Uncertain efficacy of daptomycin for prosthetic joint infections: a prospective case series

Antibiotics with antibiofilm activity - rifampicin and beyond

The management of prosthetic joint infections is a complex and multilayered process that is additionally complicated by the formation of bacterial biofilm. Foreign material provides the ideal grounds for the development of an intricate matrix that hinders treatment and creates a difficult environment for antibiotics to act. Surgical intervention is often warranted but requires appropriate adjunctive therapy. Despite available guidelines, several aspects of antibiotic therapy with antibiofilm activity lack clear definition. Given the escalating challenges posed by antimicrobial resistance, extended treatment durations, and tolerance issues, it is essential to ensure that antimicrobials with antibiofilm activity are both potent and diverse. Evidence of biofilm-active drugs is highlighted, and alternatives to classical regimens are further discussed.

Does a New Antibiotic Scheme Improve the Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus-Caused Acute Prosthetic Joint Infections (PJI) Treated with Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR)?

One of the most commonly used treatments for acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention), which comprises the debridement and the retention of the implant, followed by antibiotic treatment. The efficacy of DAIR remains unclear, as the literature has demonstrated variable success rates, ranging from 26% to 92%. The Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most closely related causative microorganisms, especially with acute and late-acute PJI; it has been identified as one of the most significant predictors of DAIR failure. The current guidelines consider the use of vancomycin as the therapy of choice, but it requires the close control of possible side effects. The aim of this study is to determine if a new combination of antibiotics (a highly bactericidal initial combination followed by an antibiofilm scheme) decreases the failure of DAIR-treated acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus. A retrospective analysis of cases of orthopedic infections during a nine-year period (2011–2019) was performed. A total of 45 acute PJI cases caused by S. aureus were diagnosed. The results of two antibiotic schemes were compared: a novel scheme comprising 5 days of daptomycin (10 mg/kg/24 h) + cloxacillin (2 g/6 h) followed by levofloxacin (500 mg/24 h) + rifampicin (600 mg/24 h), versus a traditional, less bactericidal scheme of vancomycin (1000 mg/12 h) plus rifampicin (600 mg/24 h) or levofloxacin (500 mg/24 h) plus rifampicin (600 mg/24 h). Twenty-two out of the twenty-four patients treated with the new scheme (91.6%) were free of infection after 24.8 months of mean follow-up, whereas fourteen out of twenty-one patients (66.6%) were free of infection after 46.6 months of follow-up. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.036). Demographic comparisons demonstrated homogeneous features, except the Charlson score, which was higher in the novel scheme group (p = 0.047). The combination of high-dose daptomycin and cloxacillin, followed by levofloxacin plus rifampicin, together with surgical treatment, shows better results when compared with other antibiotic schemes for treating acute PJI caused by S. aureus in which DAIR was performed.

Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Staphylococcal Infections: A Critical Reappraisal of Unmet Clinical Needs Associated with the Implementation of the Best Antibiotic Choice

Infections associated with orthopaedic implants represent a major health concern characterized by a remarkable incidence of morbidity and mortality. The wide variety of clinical scenarios encountered in the heterogeneous world of infections associated with orthopaedic implants makes the implementation of an optimal and standardized antimicrobial treatment challenging. Antibiotic bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and drug choice/dosage regimens favouring outpatient management (i.e., long-acting or oral agents) play a major role in regards to the chronic evolution of these infections. The aim of this multidisciplinary opinion article is to summarize evidence supporting the use of the different anti-staphylococcal agents in terms of microbiological and pharmacological optimization according to bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and feasibility for outpatient regimens, and to provide a useful guide for clinicians in the management of patients affected by staphylococcal infections associated with orthopaedic implants Novel long-acting lipoglycopeptides, and particularly dalbavancin, alone or in combination with rifampicin, could represent the best antibiotic choice according to real-world evidence and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. The implementation of a multidisciplinary taskforce and close cooperation between microbiologists and clinicians is crucial for providing the best care in this scenario.

Daptomycin for the Treatment of Gram-Positive Periprosthetic Hip Infections: Can Daptomycin Prevent the Implant Removal?

Introduction

Management of periprosthetic hip infections (PHIs) generally consists of implant removal and thorough debridement, accompanied by appropriate antibiotic therapy. Daptomycin (DAP) is a novel antibiotic, which allowed for implant retention in several patients after treating their infected joints. However, there is no consensus about implant retention or removal during the treatment of PHIs. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of DAP and to determine a surgical treatment strategy.

Methods

This study retrospectively evaluated 20 patients between August 2014 and December 2018, divided into implant retention (n=9) and implant removal groups (n=11). Infection control and risk of recurrent infection were evaluated. Infection control was defined as not requiring implant removal after the final treatment.

Results

Infection control rates in implant retention and implant removal groups were 67% and 90%, respectively. All late chronic infections resulted in failure cases within the implant retention group. In the implant retention group, mean preoperative risk scores for successful cases were significantly higher than those for failure cases (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Patients with low risk did not require implant removal, suggesting that DAP may be a breakthrough alternative to traditional PHI management.

Daptomycin to bone and joint infections and prosthesis joint infections: a systematic review

Backgroud

Daptomycin has been used in bone and joint infections (BJI) and prosthesis joint infections (PJI) considering spectrum of activity and biofilm penetration. However, the current experience is based on case reports, case series, cohorts, and international surveys. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate studies about daptomycin treatment efficacy in BJI/PJI compared to other antibiotic regimens.

Methods

PubMed, LILACS, Scielo and Web of Science databases were searched for articles about daptomycin and treatment of BJI and PJI from inception to March 2018. Inclusion criteria were any published researches that included patients with BJI treated with daptomycin. Diagnosis of BJI was based on clinical, laboratory and radiological findings according to IDSA guidelines.

Results

From 5107 articles, 12 articles were included. Only three studies described the outcomes of patients with BJI treated with daptomycin with comparator regimen (vancomycin, teicoplanin and oxacillin). Studies presented large heterogeneity regarding device related infections, surgical procedures, and daptomycin regimens (varied from 4 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg). A total of 299 patients have been included in all studies (184 infections associated with orthopedic disposal and 115 osteomyelitis/septic arthritis). Two hundred and thirty-three patients were treated with daptomycin. The clinical cure rates on device related and non-device related infections (i.e. osteomyelitis) were 70% and 78%, respectively. Compared to all regimens evaluated, daptomycin group outcomes were non-inferior.

Conclusion

Although a randomized clinical trial is needed, this systematic review tends to support daptomycin usage for bone and joint infections.

In vitroantibacterial activity of oxide and non-oxide bioceramics for arthroplastic devices: I.In situtime-lapse Raman spectroscopy

Raman spectroscopy proved why the antibacterial response of non-oxide Si₃N₄bioceramic is superior to those of alumina-based oxide bioceramics.

Daptomycin treatment in patients with resistant staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infection

BACKGROUND

Resistant staphylococcal organisms remain a serious problem in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Higher failure rates have been reported when vancomycin was used. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical dosage, effect, and safety of daptomycin in patients with resistant staphylococcal PJI.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled patients with hip or knee PJI who were treated with daptomycin in our institution (n = 16) from January 2013 to December 2014 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The patients received daptomycin when glycopeptide could not be used due to multiple resistance, any adverse reaction, chronic kidney disease stage 3 or worse, and previous treatment failure with glycopeptide or empirical therapy.

RESULTS

These patients received daptomycin at a median dose of 8.3 mg∕kg per day for a median duration of 14 days. The overall treatment success rate was 87.5% (14 of 16 cases) after a median follow-up period of 27 months. In the subgroups of acute and chronic PJI, the success rate was 80% and 91%, respectively. One patient developed asymptomatic transient serum aspartate transaminase (AST) elevation. No severe side effects such as myositis, acute renal failure due to rhabdomyolysis or eosinophilic pneumonia were found in our series.

CONCLUSION

Relatively high daptomycin doses combined with adequate surgical intervention were effective in treating resistant staphylococcal PJI. Daptomycin is an option worthy of consideration in PJI patients for whom glycopeptide treatment is unsuitable. Further prospective randomized comparative study is needed in the future.

A retrospective study of outcomes of device-associated osteomyelitis treated with daptomycin

Background

Daptomycin appears well tolerated and effective for osteomyelitis treatment. However, limited data exist regarding daptomycin use for treatment of device-associated osteomyelitis (DAO).

Methods

We used a retrospective, observational database (Cubicin® Outcomes Registry and Experience [CORE® 2007–2009]) that assessed patients treated with daptomycin to evaluate the characteristics of patients with DAO, outcomes after daptomycin treatment, and safety of daptomycin in this setting. Information from 54 institutions for patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and other hardware-associated osteomyelitis (OHAO) who received daptomycin from January 2007 to December 2008 with follow-up data in 2009 was collected using a standardized data collection form.

Results

Eighty-two patients receiving daptomycin were identified in CORE 2007–2009; 48 patients (59 %) had follow-up data. Sixty-seven percent of patients had received a previous antibiotic. Surgical intervention was similar between the 2 groups: PJI, 22 of 27 (82 %) and OHAO, 17 of 21 (81 %). However, device removal or replacement was more frequent in the PJI patients (17 of 27, 63 %) than in the OHAO patients (8 of 21, 38 %). Clinical success was reported in 22 of 27 (82 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 62–94 %) patients with PJI and 18 of 21 (86 %; 95 % CI, 64–97 %) patients with OHAO at follow-up (13–402 days). Adverse events occurred in 8 of 50 (16 %) patients in the safety population and did not differ by daptomycin dose.

Conclusion

Daptomycin appeared effective and well tolerated in patients with DAO, including PJI or OHAO.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections can be effectively controlled by systemic and local daptomycin

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus remains a serious problem in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Higher failure rates were reported when vancomycin was used in 2-stage exchange arthroplasty. Therefore a better therapeutic drug is needed to treat PJI caused by methicillin-resistant organisms. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of daptomycin when administered in bone cement combined with systemic use for methicillin-resistant Staphylococci PJI.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study from January 2010 to December 2012. Twenty-two patients (10 knees and 12 hips) with PJI caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species underwent 2-stage revision arthroplasty. In the first stage, 10 % daptomycin (weight daptomycin per weight bone cement) was incorporated into polymethylmethacrylate bone cement, and systemic daptomycin (6 mg/kg) was administered postoperatively for 14 days. In the second stage, 2.5 % w/w daptomycin was used in the bone cement. The minimum follow-up was 2 years or until recurrence of infection.

Results

The infecting organisms included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 10 patients, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in 8 patients and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci in 4 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 33.7 months (range, 24–51 months). The treatment success rate was 100 %. Only one patient developed asymptomatic transient elevation of the creatine phosphokinase level. No patient experienced any adverse effects related to daptomycin such as myositis, rhabdomyolysis, peripheral neuropathy, derangement of liver function, or eosinophilic pneumonia.

Conclusions

In this series, no serious adverse events occurred. Our protocol, using daptomycin-impregnated cement combined with short duration of systemic daptomycin, appears to be an effective and safe treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus PJI.

Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Prosthetic joint infection remains a devastating complication of arthroplasty associated with significant patient morbidity. The demand for arthroplasty is rapidly growing with a corresponding increase in the number of infections involving the prosthesis. The diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic joint infections presents a significant challenge to orthopaedic and infectious diseases clinicians.

RECENT FINDINGS

The underlying pathogenesis of prosthetic joint infections is due to the ability of the microorganisms to form a biofilm. The biofilm provides protection against host immune responses and antimicrobial therapy. In addition, it impedes standard laboratory diagnostic techniques. This review will examine new investigations to improve the diagnostic yield and rapidity of diagnosis of infections, including the use of sonication to disrupt the biofilm, new molecular tests to improve the detection of infecting microorganisms and new imaging techniques such as (18)F-fluoro-deoxyglucose PET.

SUMMARY

The successful treatment of prosthetic joint infections is dependent on eliminating the biofilm dwelling microorganisms whilst maintaining patient mobility and quality of life. This review will examine current understanding of management approaches for these infections, with a particular focus on antimicrobial therapy with activity against the biofilm, such as rifampicin and fluoroquinolones.

Successful Clinical Use of Daptomycin-Impregnated Bone Cement in Two-Stage Revision Hip Surgery for Prosthetic Joint Infection

OBJECTIVE

To describe the safe and successful use of daptomycin-impregnated polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement in the treatment of a case of recurrent prosthetic joint infection in a patient with multiple antibiotic allergies and past colonization with multiply antibiotic-resistant organisms.

CASE SUMMARY

A 79-year-old female had a history of chronic recurrent left prosthetic hip infection. The patient had confirmed allergies to multiple antibiotics and a past history of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. At first-stage revision surgery, the infected prosthesis was removed and samples were sent for microbiologic culture. A spacer device was fashioned, with incorporation of daptomycin and gentamicin into the PMMA bone cement at a concentration of 5% w/w for each antibiotic. Systemic daptomycin and gentamicin were administered postoperatively for 14 days. Propionibacterium acnes was isolated from deep-tissue specimens. The patient made excellent postoperative progress and was discharged after 2 weeks. Second-stage revision surgery was performed at 6 months, with no signs of persistent infection. She remained well, pain free, and mobilizing independently 2 years later.

DISCUSSION

Daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, is approved for systemic treatment of endocarditis and skin and soft tissue infections. In vitro data demonstrate acceptable drug elution from and tensile strength of daptomycin-impregnated PMMA bone cement; however, clinical data are lacking. In our patient's case, the cement formulation was well tolerated, with no adverse effects detected, and demonstrated adequate mechanical strength in vivo. Infection with P. acnes, an unusual pathogen, was successfully treated. Further clinical studies are required to assess the efficacy of daptomycin-impregnated cement in infection with more typical pathogens, such as S. aureus.

CONCLUSIONS

Daptomycin impregnation of PMMA bone cement may be an option in cases in which patient or pathogen factors preclude use of routinely incorporated agents.

Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

These guidelines are intended for use by infectious disease specialists, orthopedists, and other healthcare professionals who care for patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI). They include evidence-based and opinion-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of patients with PJI treated with debridement and retention of the prosthesis, resection arthroplasty with or without subsequent staged reimplantation, 1-stage reimplantation, and amputation.

Daptomycin therapy for osteomyelitis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Daptomycin is a rapidly bactericidal agent with broad coverage against Gram-positive organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus, the most frequent cause of osteomyelitis. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical outcome of patients with non-hardware associated osteomyelitis, and the safety profile of daptomycin in the treatment of these infections.

METHODS

All patients with osteomyelitis, excluding concurrent orthopedic foreign body infections, treated with daptomycin and identified between 2007-2008 in a retrospective, multicenter, observational registry, were included. Investigators assessed patient outcome (cured, improved, failed, non-evaluable) at the end of daptomycin therapy. Patients with a successful outcome at the end of daptomycin therapy were reassessed in 2009. All patients were included in the safety analysis; evaluable patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Data was assessed using descriptive statistics. A Kaplan Meier analysis was used to assess time to clinical failure.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and nine osteomyelitis patients successfully completed daptomycin therapy in 2007-2008, 71 of which (34%) had a follow-up visit in 2009 and had an evaluable clinical outcome. The median (min, max) daptomycin dose and duration were 6 mg/kg (4, 10) and 42 days (1, 88), respectively. Of the 52 patients with a documented pathogen, S. aureus was the most common (42%); primarily methicillin-resistant S. aureus. All patients were included in the safety analysis; evaluable patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Clinical resolution was reported in 94% (CI - 86.2%, 98.44%) of patients. A Kaplan Meier analysis of time to clinical failure showed that approximately 85% (CI - 64%, 95%) of patients had a continued successful outcome at the time of re-evaluation. Eighteen patients (25%) in the safety population experienced an adverse event; 13 patients (18%) had an adverse event that was possibly-related to daptomycin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Daptomycin appears to be an effective therapeutic choice with an acceptable safety profile in the management of osteomyelitis that does not involve hardware.

Daptomycin resistance in prosthetic joint infections

Antimicrobial resistance has been problematic since the advent of antibiotics. Patients with prosthetic joint infections often require prolonged courses of antibiotic therapy, with resistance commonly being the consequence. The rapid evolution of resistance poses a serious challenge in the treatment of infections and creates a need for new agents with novel mechanisms of bactericidal activity. Daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide naturally produced by Streptomyces roseosporus, is a newer agent approved for use in complicated skin, soft tissue, and prosthetic joint infections. To our knowledge, this article describes the first case of daptomycin-resistant heterogenous vancomycin intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) in an 82-year-old man undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty in Queensland, Australia, with a subsequent deep prosthetic joint infection.A literature review is presented, and the increasing number of multi-resistant organisms and their implications for orthopedics are discussed. Worldwide reports of hVISA are reviewed. To our knowledge, this is the first article to describe daptomycin resistance in prosthetic joint infections. The role of newer antimicrobial agents, such as daptomycin, and strategies to minimize antibiotic resistance are examined.

Characterization of daptomycin-loaded antibiotic cement

Antibiotics are commonly mixed with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement to suppress severe periprosthetic infections associated with total joint arthroplasty. The relationship between antibiotic concentration and the resulting elution kinetics remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to characterize the release of daptomycin from PMMA cement and the subsequent effects on mechanical properties.Varying concentrations of daptomycin and tobramycin were vacuum mixed in commercially available PMMA and subjected to an in vitro elution period. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to quantify the concentration of the amount of daptomycin eluted at predetermined time points. Samples were subjected to compressive loading to analyze the effect of antibiotic concentration on cement mechanical properties. Daptomycin elution increased when initial tobramycin concentration was increased. Furthermore, the addition of antibiotics increased the compressive strength of the cement in the postelution period. The binary addition of tobramycin with daptomycin antibiotics modifies the elution and mechanical properties of PMMA bone cement. Based on the findings of our study, 2 g of daptomycin and 3.6 g of tobramycin per 40-g packet of cement should be used to promote daptomycin elution without sacrificing PMMA mechanical properties.

Treatment of gram-positive deep sternal wound infections in cardiac surgery--experiences with daptomycin

The reported incidence of deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after cardiac surgery is 0.4-5% with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common pathogen isolated from infected wound sternotomies and bacteraemic blood cultures. This infection is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality than other known aetiologies. Little is reported about the optimal antibiotic management. The aim of the study is to quantify the application of daptomycin treatment of DSWI due to gram-positive organisms post cardiac surgery. We performed an observational analysis in 23 cases of post sternotomy DSWI with gram-positive organisms February 2009 and September 2010. When the wound appeared viable and the microbiological cultures were negative, the technique of chest closure was individualised to the patient. The incidence of DSWI was 1.46%. The mean dose of daptomycin application was 4.4 ± 0.9 mg/kg/d and the average duration of the daptomycin application was 14.47 ± 7.33 days. In 89% of the patients VAC therapy was used. The duration from daptomycin application to sternal closure was 18 ± 13.9 days. The parameters of infection including, fibrinogen (p = 0.03), white blood cell count (p = 0.001) and C-reactive protein (p = 0.0001) were significantly reduced after daptomycin application. We had no mortality and wound healing was successfully achieved in all patients. Treatment of DSWI due to gram-positive organisms with a daptomycin-containing antibiotic regimen is safe, effective and promotes immediate improvement of local wound conditions.Based on these observations, daptomycin may offer a new treatment option for expediting surgical management of DSWI after cardiac surgery.

Successful salvage of peritoneal catheter in unresolved methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus peritonitis by combination treatment with daptomycin and rifampin

Peritoneal dialysis patients are at an increased risk of Gram-positive organism infections because of disrupted skin barrier function, presence of a peritoneal catheter, and a deficient immunological system. In particular, the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is clinically challenging. Herein, we present a case of MRSA peritonitis that showed no response to a 14-day treatment with intraperitoneal vancomycin. To overcome unresponsiveness to vancomycin, we shifted the regimen to intraperitoneal daptomycin (given every 6 h through manual peritoneal dialysate exchanges) and oral rifampin (300 mg twice daily). The peritonitis resolved without sequelae or relapse. We suggest daptomycin and rifampin as an alternative combination therapy for MRSA infections that may otherwise remain unresolved.

Consensus document on controversial issues in the diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic joint infections

BACKGROUND

Joint replacement surgery has been on the increase in recent decades and prosthesis infection remains the most critical complication. Many aspects of the primary prevention and clinical management of such prosthesis infections still need to be clarified.

CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES

The aim of this GISIG (Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulle Infezioni Gravi) working group - a panel of multidisciplinary experts - was to define recommendations for the following controversial issues: (1) Is a conservative surgical approach for the management of prosthetic joint infections effective? (2) Is the one-stage or the two-stage revision for the management of prosthetic joint infections more effective? (3) What is the most effective treatment for the management of prosthetic joint infections due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci? Results are presented and discussed in detail.

METHODS

A systematic literature search using the MEDLINE database for the period 1988 to 2008 of randomized controlled trials and/or non-randomized studies was performed. A matrix was created to extract evidence from original studies using the CONSORT method to evaluate randomized clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for case-control studies, longitudinal cohorts, and retrospective studies. The GRADE method for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation was applied.

Daptomycin: a novel lipopeptide antibiotic against Gram-positive pathogens

The aim of this review is to summarize the historical background of drug resistance of Gram-positive pathogens as well as to describe in detail the novel lipopeptide antibiotic daptomycin. Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic aspects are reviewed and the current clinical use of daptomycin is presented. Daptomycin seems to be a reliable drug in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections, infective right-sided endocarditis, and bacteremia caused by Gram-positive agents. Its unique mechanism of action and its low resistance profile, together with its rapid bactericidal action make it a favorable alternative to vancomycin in multi-drug resistant cocci. The role of daptomycin in the treatment of prosthetic material infections, osteomyelitis, and urogenital infections needs to be evaluated in randomized clinical trials.

Daptomycin in bone and joint infections: a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of daptomycin, a novel antibiotic for the treatment of bone and joint infections, a literature search of relevant articles was conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed/MEDLINE search (1990-April 2008) to identify relevant English-language literature was conducted. Search terms included bone and joint infection, osteomyelitis, daptomycin, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Additional articles were identified by reviewing the bibliographies of articles cited. Programs and abstracts from infectious disease meetings were searched, and prescribing information of antibiotics indicated for bone and joint infections consulted. All articles identified from data sources published in English were evaluated.

RESULTS

Caused primarily by Gram-positive pathogens such as S. aureus and, to a lesser extent, Enterococcus faecalis, bone and joint infections are difficult to treat successfully. Surgical intervention and prolonged courses of antibiotics are frequently required, and failure of first-line antibiotic therapy is common. The emergence of S. aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, the longstanding gold standard for bone and joint infections, has complicated the clinical scenario. Few randomized trials comparing the efficacy of different antibiotics for bone and joint infections exist. Daptomycin, a novel intravenous lipopeptide antibiotic, has shown potent in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive bacteria, including many resistant pathogens commonly associated with bone and joint infections such as MRSA and vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis. Early clinical investigation of daptomycin in bone and joint infections unresponsive to antibiotics, such as vancomycin, has found a cure rate of approximately 80%, with a low incidence of adverse events and drug resistance.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are warranted to determine if limited clinical evidence, described in individual case reports and a daptomycin-specific retrospective registry, suggests daptomycin is a promising option for patients with bone and joint infections such as MRSA osteomyelitis.

Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, recognition and management

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important cause of infection, particularly in hospitalized patients and those with significant healthcare exposure. In recent years, epidemic community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections occurring in patients without healthcare risk factors have become more frequent. The most common manifestation of CA-MRSA infection is skin and soft tissue infection, although necrotizing pneumonia, sepsis and osteoarticular infections can occur. CA-MRSA strains have become endemic in many communities and are genetically distinct from previously identified MRSA strains. CA-MRSA may be more capable colonizers of humans and more virulent than other S. aureus strains. Specific mechanisms of pathogenicity have not been elucidated, but several factors have been proposed as responsible for the virulence of CA-MRSA, including the Panton-Valentine leukocidin, phenol-soluble modulins and type I arginine catabolic mobile element. The movement of CA-MRSA strains into the nosocomial setting limits the utility of using clinical risk factors alone to designate community- or healthcare-associated status. Identification of unique genetic characteristics and genotyping are valuable tools for MRSA epidemiological studies. Although the optimum pharmacological therapy for CA-MRSA infections has not been determined, many CA-MRSA strains remain broadly susceptible to several non-beta-lactam antibacterial agents. Empirical antibacterial therapy should include an MRSA-active agent, particularly in areas where CA-MRSA is endemic.

Efficacy of clarithromycin plus vancomycin in mice with implant-related infection caused by biofilm-forming Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcal biofilms pose an important problem, especially after orthopedic surgery using foreign implants. Clarithromycin (CAM) eliminates the biofilms formed by a wide variety of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. In a previous in vitro study, we showed that treatment with CAM and vancomycin (VCM) eradicated staphylococcal biofilms from surgical implants. To investigate the efficacy of this eradication therapy, we assessed its effects against Staphylococcus aureus on titanium plates implanted in mice.

METHODS

A titanium washer covered with S. aureus biofilms was implanted in the muscular tissue around the femoral bone. Mice were given intravenous injections of CAM and intraperitoneal injections of VCM twice daily beginning 72 h after implantation. To confirm eradication of biofilms and S. aureus strains, the resected washer was examined by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Dense colonization and biofilms were seen on the washer implanted in the control mice that received saline, saline plus CAM, or saline plus VCM. Treatment with CAM plus VCM eliminated the biofilms, indicating an S. aureus eradication effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Staphylococcal biofilms have demonstrated resistance to most antibiotics, including VCM. Our in vivo data support the hypothesis that combined treatment using CAM plus VCM may effectively eradicate staphylococcal biofilms in patients with implant-related infection.

Treatment recommendations and strategies for the management of bone and joint infections

Bone and joint infections are a cause of rising concern, mainly owing to the increasing number of traumatic accidents, the appearance of new groups of patients at risk, the widespread use of prosthetic devices and the emergence of new patterns of antimicrobial resistance. Treatment guidelines and particular strategies for the management of such infections are reviewed. Decisions regarding the best therapeutic modality can be challenging and take into account the factors involved in infection staging, along with a better knowledge of the bacterial biofilm status. Surgery and antibiotic therapy are the keystones of the management, but overall the timing and length of treatment and follow-up should be posed to obtain the best quality of life for the patient. These infections are characteristically intriguing and sometimes need multiple surgical interventions and several courses of therapy. A multi-disciplinary approach is worthwhile in each institution. The collaboration of a specialized team composed by surgeons, pathologists, microbiologists and clinicians will permit diagnostic and therapeutic protocol-guided decisions.

Long-term use of daptomycin for MRSA osteomyelitis and joint infection

This case describes almost continual daptomycin use for approximately 18 months in a patient with osteomyelitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The case is notable for only a brief episode of myalgia-associated creatine kinase elevations, which quickly resolved. Daptomycin demonstrated efficacy against this strain, which was tolerant to other antibiotics.

Clinical experience with daptomycin for the treatment of patients with osteomyelitis

Data from a registry were analyzed to describe the clinical experience with daptomycin (Cubicin; Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, MA) for the treatment of patients with osteomyelitis. The Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience (CORE) 2004 database was used to identify patients treated for osteomyelitis. Posttherapy follow-up outcome assessments were collected for a subset of these patients. A total of 67 patients with osteomyelitis were clinically evaluable for outcome at the end of daptomycin therapy and had outcome assessed at a posttherapy visit. The median follow-up interval after the last dose of daptomycin was 76 days (range, 1 to 547 days). The median initial dose was 5.6 mg/kg (range, 3.2 to 7.5 mg/kg), and the median duration of therapy was 35 days (range, 3 to 546 days). Daptomycin was given concurrently with other antibiotics in 48% of cases. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (45%). Clinical outcomes at follow-up were cure, 42 (63%); improved, 13 (19%); failure, 7 (10%); and nonevaluable, 5 (7%). A total of 82% of patients with an orthopedic device (n = 17) were successfully treated, as were 88% of patients with concurrent bacteremia (n = 16). Failures were more likely if surgical debridement was not performed (24% vs. 5%; P = 0.045). The clinical success rate for patients treated with an initial daptomycin dose >4 mg/kg was significantly higher than for patients treated with an initial dose < or =4 mg/kg (88% vs. 65%; P = 0.013, chi2 test). Daptomycin had a 94% success rate when used alone with no follow-up antibiotics. The results indicate that daptomycin is being used in clinical practice to treat patients with osteomyelitis caused by gram-positive pathogens including MRSA. Prospective, controlled clinical trials of daptomycin are warranted that include rigorous data collection and long-term follow-up analysis.

Clinical experience with daptomycin treatment of foot or ankle osteomyelitis: a preliminary study

We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients with foot or ankle osteomyelitis reported to a registry who were treated with daptomycin. The patients' clinical experience was analyzed and described at a median dose of 6 mg/kg (range, 4-6.2 mg/kg) and a median duration of 38 days (range, 6-59 days). Twenty-three patients received daptomycin as secondary or tertiary therapy, primarily for not responding to their prior antibiotic therapy (n = 15). Concomitant antibiotics were given to 11 patients, mostly for Gram-negative and/or anaerobic coverage. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen overall (15 of 25 patients). The median followup interval was 9 weeks (range, 0.5-77 weeks). Outcomes at the end of therapy were 16 patients' symptoms resolved, eight patients improved, and one patient did not respond to therapy; at followup, 19 patients' symptoms resolved, three patients improved, and three patients did not respond to therapy. Ongoing antibiotics were given to 52% of patients for a minimum of 8 days (median, 30 days; range, 8-232 days). Four patients with an implant (all removed) were successfully treated. Daptomycin appears promising for foot and ankle osteomyelitis caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Prospective, controlled clinical trials of daptomycin for osteomyelitis are warranted.

Daptomycin for treatment of patients with bone and joint infections: a systematic review of the clinical evidence

The treatment of bone and joint infections, mainly caused by Gram-positive pathogens, can be difficult and quite challenging since it frequently involves prolonged administration of antibiotics as well as appropriate surgical procedures. First-line drugs have failed in some cases to cure the underlying infection. We performed a systematic review of the available evidence to clarify further the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin in the treatment of bone and joint infections. Cure of infection was achieved in 43/53 cases (81.1%). The results of the reviewed articles are promising with regard to the effectiveness and safety profile of this new antibiotic for bone and joint infections that are not responsive to other traditionally used antimicrobial agents. Although these reports are encouraging, the relatively frequent emergence of antimicrobial resistance associated with prolonged administration of daptomycin should be considered seriously.

Treatment ofStaphylococcus aureusinfections: new issues, emerging therapies and future directions

Infections due to Staphylococcus aureus are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Antimicrobial resistance in strains of S. aureus is a continually evolving problem, including widespread methicillin resistance in hospitals, increasing methicillin resistance in community strains, and the recent acquisition of glycopeptide resistance. New antimicrobials with activity against S. aureus have recently entered the market or are in the late stages of development. In addition, there has been significant interest in the development of novel and immune-based strategies for prevention or treatment of S. aureus infections. This review describes established and emerging therapies for S. aureus infections, and considers the safety profiles and likely impact on present treatment standards of novel agents either undergoing clinical development or emerging onto the market.