1
|
Gu T, Li K, Zhang X, Xiao R, Yin N, Wang Q, Teng L. The Impact of Centrifugal Force on Isolation of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Using Density Gradient Centrifugation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48:1855-1866. [PMID: 38388797 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-03892-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) have great potential in bone regenerative therapy. The main method used today to obtain BMMNCs is Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. However, the centrifugal force for this isolation method is still suboptimal. OBJECTIVES To determine the optimal centrifugal force in Ficoll density gradient centrifugation of bone marrow (BM) to achieve high stem/progenitor cell content BMMNCs for regenerative therapy. METHODS BM was aspirated from nine minipigs and divided into three groups according to different centrifugal forces (200 g, 300 g and 400 g). Immediately after BMMNCs were obtained from each group by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation, residual red blood cell (RBC) level, nucleated cell counting, viability and flow cytometric analyses of apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation were measured. The phenotypic CD90 and colony formation analyses of BMMNCs of each group were performed as well. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were harvested at passage 2, then morphology, cell phenotype, proliferation, adipogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic lineage differentiation potential of BMSCs from each group were compared. RESULTS The 300 g centrifugal force was able to isolate BMMNCs from BM with the same efficiency as 400 g and provided significantly higher yields of CD90+ BMSCs and fibroblastic colony-forming units of BMSC (CFU-f(BMSC)), which is more crucial for the regenerative efficacy of BMMNCs. Meanwhile, 200 g hosted the most RBC contamination and minimum CFU-f (BMSC) yield, which will be disadvantageous for BMMNC-based cell therapy. As for in vitro cultured BMSCs which were isolated from BMMNCs by different centrifugal forces, no significant differences were found on morphology, cell proliferation rate, phenotypic marker, adipogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential. CONCLUSIONS 300 g may be the optimal centrifugal force when using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation to isolate BMMNCs for bone regenerative therapy. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyi Gu
- The Second Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China
| | - Kongying Li
- Cleft Lip and Palate Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhang
- Department of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China
| | - Ran Xiao
- Research Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China
- Key Laboratory of External Tissue and Organ Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ningbei Yin
- Cleft Lip and Palate Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Research Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China.
- Key Laboratory of External Tissue and Organ Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
| | - Li Teng
- The Second Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xin H, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Al Maruf DSA, Cheng K, Wykes J, Manzie TGH, Wise SG, Crook JM, Clark JR. From Free Tissue Transfer to Hydrogels: A Brief Review of the Application of the Periosteum in Bone Regeneration. Gels 2023; 9:768. [PMID: 37754449 PMCID: PMC10530949 DOI: 10.3390/gels9090768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The periosteum is a thin layer of connective tissue covering bone. It is an essential component for bone development and fracture healing. There has been considerable research exploring the application of the periosteum in bone regeneration since the 19th century. An increasing number of studies are focusing on periosteal progenitor cells found within the periosteum and the use of hydrogels as scaffold materials for periosteum engineering and guided bone development. Here, we provide an overview of the research investigating the use of the periosteum for bone repair, with consideration given to the anatomy and function of the periosteum, the importance of the cambium layer, the culture of periosteal progenitor cells, periosteum-induced ossification, periosteal perfusion, periosteum engineering, scaffold vascularization, and hydrogel-based synthetic periostea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai Xin
- Integrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (D.S.A.A.M.); (K.C.); (J.W.); (T.G.H.M.); (J.R.C.)
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Eva Tomaskovic-Crook
- Arto Hardy Family Biomedical Innovation Hub, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (E.T.-C.); (J.M.C.)
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia;
- Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, AIIM Facility, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, North Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
| | - D S Abdullah Al Maruf
- Integrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (D.S.A.A.M.); (K.C.); (J.W.); (T.G.H.M.); (J.R.C.)
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Kai Cheng
- Integrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (D.S.A.A.M.); (K.C.); (J.W.); (T.G.H.M.); (J.R.C.)
- Royal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - James Wykes
- Integrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (D.S.A.A.M.); (K.C.); (J.W.); (T.G.H.M.); (J.R.C.)
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Timothy G. H. Manzie
- Integrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (D.S.A.A.M.); (K.C.); (J.W.); (T.G.H.M.); (J.R.C.)
| | - Steven G. Wise
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Jeremy M. Crook
- Arto Hardy Family Biomedical Innovation Hub, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (E.T.-C.); (J.M.C.)
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia;
- Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, AIIM Facility, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, North Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
| | - Jonathan R. Clark
- Integrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (D.S.A.A.M.); (K.C.); (J.W.); (T.G.H.M.); (J.R.C.)
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
An Overview of Collagen-Based Composite Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2023:10.1007/s12010-023-04318-y. [PMID: 36652090 DOI: 10.1007/s12010-023-04318-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Bone regeneration or restoration is a series of well-ordered physiological activities that occur throughout a person's life, they are continuously being repaired and remodeled. A conventional bone repair procedure, such as autograft and allograft bone transplant, has failed to address bone reconstruction disputes and complexity. On the other hand, Tissue Engineering is a potential therapy option for repairing rather than replacing the damaged tissue. Biomaterials in bone tissue engineering (BTE) help pave the way for damaged tissues as an artificial extracellular matrix, facilitating new tissue growth. Collagen-based biomaterials for repair and replacement have inspired much interest in the hunt for versatile biomaterials compatible with human tissue. It is a major organic component of extracellular matrix in bone and has been employed as scaffolding material in BTE for decades. In this review, we documented the role of collagen in BTE, focusing on collagen type I, its crosslinking capability, collagen-based biomaterials, and fabrication methods. It also considers osteoblast citration a critical process in bone formation, a unique perspective for an old relationship.
Collapse
|
4
|
Golubovsky JL, Ejikeme T, Winkelman R, Steinmetz MP. Osteobiologics. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21:S2-S9. [PMID: 34128067 DOI: 10.1093/ons/opaa383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteobiologics are engineered materials that facilitate bone healing and have been increasingly used in spine surgery. Autologous iliac crest bone grafts have been used historically, but morbidity associated with graft harvesting has led surgeons to seek alternative solutions. Allograft bone, biomaterial scaffolds, growth factors, and stem cells have been explored as bone graft substitutes and supplements. OBJECTIVE To review current and emerging osteobiologic technologies. METHODS A literature review of English-language studies was performed in PubMed. Search terms included combinations of "spine," "fusion," "osteobiologics," "autologous," "allogen(e)ic," "graft," "scaffold," "bone morphogenic protein," and "stem cells." RESULTS Evidence supports allograft bone as an autologous bone supplement or replacement in scenarios where minimal autologous bone is available. There are promising data on ceramics and P-15; however, comparative human trials remain scarce. Growth factors, including recombinant human bone morphogenic proteins (rhBMPs) 2 and 7, have been explored in humans after successful animal trials. Evidence continues to support the use of rhBMP-2 in lumbar fusion in patient populations with poor bone quality or revision surgery, while there is limited evidence for rhBMP-7. Stem cells have been incredibly promising in promoting fusion in animal models, but human trials to this point have only involved products with questionable stem cell content, thereby limiting possible conclusions. CONCLUSION Engineered stem cells that overexpress osteoinductive factors are likely the future of spine fusion, but issues with applying viral vector-transduced stem cells in humans have limited progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua L Golubovsky
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Education Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Tiffany Ejikeme
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert Winkelman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael P Steinmetz
- Center for Spine Health, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hsieh PC, Chung AS, Brodke D, Park JB, Skelly AC, Brodt ED, Chang K, Buser Z, Meisel HJ, Yoon ST, Wang JC. Autologous Stem Cells in Cervical Spine Fusion. Global Spine J 2021; 11:950-965. [PMID: 32964752 PMCID: PMC8258818 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220948479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVES To systematically review, critically appraise and synthesize evidence on use of stem cells from autologous stem cells from bone marrow aspirate, adipose, or any other autologous sources for fusion in the cervical spine compared with other graft materials. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE was conducted for literature published through October 31, 2018 and through February 20, 2020 for EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov comparing autologous cell sources for cervical spine fusion to other graft options. RESULTS From 36 potentially relevant citations identified, 10 studies on cervical fusion met the inclusion criteria set a priori. Two retrospective cohort studies, one comparing cancellous bone marrow (CBM) versus hydroxyapatite (HA) and the other bone marrow aspirate (BMA) combined with autograft and HA versus autograft and HA alone, were identified. No statistical differences were seen between groups in either study for improvement in function, symptoms, or fusion; however, in the study evaluating BMA, the authors reported a statistically greater fusion rate and probability of fusion over time in the BMA versus the non-BMA group. Across case series evaluating BMA, authors reported improved function and pain and fusion ranged from 84% to 100% across the studies. In general, complications were poorly reported. CONCLUSIONS The overall quality (strength) of evidence of effectiveness and safety of autologous BMA for cervical arthrodesis in the current available literature was very low. Based on currently available data, firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness or safety of BMA in cervical fusions cannot be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick C. Hsieh
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Patrick C. Hsieh, Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1200 North State Street, Suite 3300, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
| | | | | | - Jong-Beom Park
- Uijongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Uijongbu, Korea
| | | | | | - Ki Chang
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Zorica Buser
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li C, Mills Z, Zheng Z. Novel cell sources for bone regeneration. MedComm (Beijing) 2021; 2:145-174. [PMID: 34766140 PMCID: PMC8491221 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
A plethora of both acute and chronic conditions, including traumatic, degenerative, malignant, or congenital disorders, commonly induce bone disorders often associated with severe persisting pain and limited mobility. Over 1 million surgical procedures involving bone excision, bone grafting, and fracture repair are performed each year in the U.S. alone, resulting in immense levels of public health challenges and corresponding financial burdens. Unfortunately, the innate self-healing capacity of bone is often inadequate for larger defects over a critical size. Moreover, as direct transplantation of committed osteoblasts is hindered by deficient cell availability, limited cell spreading, and poor survivability, an urgent need for novel cell sources for bone regeneration is concurrent. Thanks to the development in stem cell biology and cell reprogramming technology, many multipotent and pluripotent cells that manifest promising osteogenic potential are considered the regenerative remedy for bone defects. Considering these cells' investigation is still in its relative infancy, each of them offers their own particular challenges that must be conquered before the large-scale clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenshuang Li
- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Zane Mills
- College of DentistryUniversity of OklahomaOklahoma CityOklahomaUSA
| | - Zhong Zheng
- Division of Growth and Development, School of DentistryUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cole BJ, Gilat R, DiFiori J, Rodeo SA, Bedi A. The 2020 NBA Orthobiologics Consensus Statement. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211002296. [PMID: 34017878 PMCID: PMC8114275 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211002296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
This 2020 NBA Orthobiologics Consensus Statement provides a concise summary of available literature and practical clinical guidelines for team physicians and players. We recognize that orthobiologic injections are a generally safe treatment modality with a significant potential to reduce pain and expedite early return to play in specific musculoskeletal injuries. The use of orthobiologics in sports medicine to safely reduce time loss and reinjury is of considerable interest, especially as it relates to the potential effect on a professional athlete. While these novel substances have potential to enhance healing and regeneration of injured tissues, there is a lack of robust data to support their regular use at this time. There are no absolutes when considering the implementation of orthobiologics, and unbiased clinical judgment with an emphasis on player safety should always prevail. Current best evidence supports the following: Key Points There is support for the use of leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. There is support for consideration of using leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma for patellar tendinopathy. The efficacy of using mesenchymal stromal cell injections in the management of joint and soft tissue injuries remains unproven at this time. There are very few data to suggest that current cell therapy treatments lead to any true functional tissue regeneration. Meticulous and sterile preparation guidelines must be followed to minimize the risk for infection and adverse events if these treatments are pursued.Given the high variability in orthobiologic formulations, team physicians must stay up-to-date with the most recent peer-reviewed literature and orthobiologic preparation protocols for specific injuries.Evidence-based treatment algorithms are necessary to identify the optimal orthobiologic formulations for specific tissues and injuries in athletes.Changes in the regulatory environment and improved standardization are required given the exponential increase in utilization as novel techniques and substances are introduced into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Cole
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ron Gilat
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - John DiFiori
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Scott A Rodeo
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Asheesh Bedi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This manuscript is a review of the literature investigating the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) being applied in the setting of spinal fusion surgery. We mention the rates of pseudarthrosis, discuss current bone grafting options, and examine the preclinical and clinical outcomes of utilizing MSCs to assist in successfully fusing the spine. METHODS A thorough literature review was conducted to look at current and previous preclinical and clinical studies using stem cells for spinal fusion augmentation. Searches for PubMed/MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov through January 2021 were conducted for literature mentioning stem cells and spinal fusion. RESULTS All preclinical and clinical studies investigating MSC use in spinal fusion were examined. We found 19 preclinical and 17 clinical studies. The majority of studies, both preclinical and clinical, were heterogeneous in design due to different osteoconductive scaffolds, cells, and techniques used. Preclinical studies showed promising outcomes in animal models when using appropriate osteoconductive scaffolds and factors for osteogenic differentiation. Similarly, clinical studies have promising outcomes but differ in their methodologies, surgical techniques, and materials used, making it difficult to adequately compare between the studies. CONCLUSION MSCs may be a promising option to use to augment grafting for spinal fusion surgery. MSCs must be used with appropriate osteoconductive scaffolds. Cell-based allografts and the optimization of their use have yet to be fully elucidated. Further studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of MSCs with different osteoconductive scaffolds and growth/osteogenic differentiation factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R Stephan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Linda E Kanim
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hyun W Bae
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Collagen Type I Biomaterials as Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers (Basel) 2021; 13:polym13040599. [PMID: 33671329 PMCID: PMC7923188 DOI: 10.3390/polym13040599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Collagen type I is the main organic constituent of the bone extracellular matrix and has been used for decades as scaffolding material in bone tissue engineering approaches when autografts are not feasible. Polymeric collagen can be easily isolated from various animal sources and can be processed in a great number of ways to manufacture biomaterials in the form of sponges, particles, or hydrogels, among others, for different applications. Despite its great biocompatibility and osteoconductivity, collagen type I also has some drawbacks, such as its high biodegradability, low mechanical strength, and lack of osteoinductive activity. Therefore, many attempts have been made to improve the collagen type I-based implants for bone tissue engineering. This review aims to summarize the current status of collagen type I as a biomaterial for bone tissue engineering, as well as to highlight some of the main efforts that have been made recently towards designing and producing collagen implants to improve bone regeneration.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Spinal fusion surgery is performed all over the world to help patients with cervical and thoracolumbar pathology. As outcomes continue to improve in patients with spine-related pathology, it is important to understand how we got to modern day spinal fusion surgery. Scientific innovations have ranged from the first spinal fusions performed with basic instrumentation in the late nineteenth century to contemporary tools such as pedicle screws, bone grafts, and interbody devices. This article tracks this technological growth so that surgeons may better serve their patients in treating spine-related pain and disability.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang H, Zhou Y, Li CQ, Chu TW, Wang J, Huang B. Tissue-engineered bone used in a rabbit model of lumbar intertransverse process fusion: A comparison of osteogenic capacity between two different stem cells. Exp Ther Med 2020; 19:2570-2578. [PMID: 32256736 PMCID: PMC7086144 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal fusion serves an important role in the reconstruction of spinal stability via restoration of the normal spinal sequence and relief of pain. Studies have demonstrated that the fusion rate is mainly associated with the osteogenic capacity of the implanted graft. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been successfully isolated from human degenerated cartilage endplate (CEP) and designated as CEP-derived stem cells (CESCs). Previous studies have suggested that CESCs possesses in vitro and in vivo chondrogenic potential superior to that of bone marrow (BM)-MSCs. In addition, CESCs have shown a stronger in vitro osteogenic ability. The present study aimed to further determine the in vivo three-dimensional osteogenesis efficacy of CESCs for spinal fusion. Tissue-engineered bone grafts were transplanted into a rabbit model of posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process fusion using CESCs and BM-MSCs as seed cells composited with porous hydroxyapatite (PHA). The results of manual palpation and computed tomography (CT) scan reconstruction indicated that the CESCs/PHA group had a higher fusion rate than the BM-MSCs/PHA group, although the difference was not observed to be statistically significant. In addition, RT-qPCR results revealed that the in vitro CESCs/PHA composite expressed significantly higher levels of osteogenic-specific mRNA compared with the BM-MSCs/PHA composite. Finally, micro-CT and semi-quantitative histological analysis further demonstrated that the newly formed bone quality of the CESCs/PHA group was significantly higher than that of the BM-MSCs/PHA group in the intertransverse process fusion model. Therefore, the study indicated that CESCs possess superior in vivo osteogenesis capacity compared with BM-MSCs, and might serve as an important alternative seed cell source for bone tissue engineering. These results may provide the foundation for a biological solution to spinal fusion or other bone defect issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xingsha Branch, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan 410000, P.R. China.,Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, P.R. China.,Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan 410000, P.R. China.,Faculty of Life Science, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650093, P.R. China
| | - Yue Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, P.R. China
| | - Chang-Qing Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, P.R. China
| | - Tong-Wei Chu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, P.R. China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, P.R. China
| | - Bo Huang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wu C, Wang G, Yan Q, Wang JC, Yang H, Zou J. Silk Fibroin Regulates Osteoconduction of Hydroxyapatite in Rat Spine Fusion Model. J HARD TISSUE BIOL 2019. [DOI: 10.2485/jhtb.28.341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cenhao Wu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
| | - Genlin Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
| | - Qi Yan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
| | - Jeffrey C Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
| | - Huilin Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
| | - Jun Zou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Review of literature. OBJECTIVES This review of literature investigates the application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in spinal fusion, highlights potential uses in the development of bone grafts, and discusses limitations based on both preclinical and clinical models. METHODS A review of literature was conducted looking at current studies using stem cells for augmentation of spinal fusion in both animal and human models. RESULTS Eleven preclinical studies were found that used various animal models. Average fusion rates across studies were 59.8% for autograft and 73.7% for stem cell-based grafts. Outcomes included manual palpation and stressing of the fusion, radiography, micro-computed tomography (μCT), and histological analysis. Fifteen clinical studies, 7 prospective and 8 retrospective, were found. Fusion rates ranged from 60% to 100%, averaging 87.1% in experimental groups and 87.2% in autograft control groups. CONCLUSIONS It appears that there is minimal clinical difference between commercially available stem cells and bone marrow aspirates indicating that MSCs may be a good choice in a patient with poor marrow quality. Overcoming morbidity and limitations of autograft for spinal fusion, remains a significant problem for spinal surgeons and further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of stem cells in augmenting spinal fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A. Robbins
- University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA,Michael A. Robbins, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mail Code MP240, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | | | - Adam M. Wegner
- University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hsu WK, Goldstein CL, Shamji MF, Cho SK, Arnold PM, Fehlings MG, Mroz TE. Novel Osteobiologics and Biomaterials in the Treatment of Spinal Disorders. Neurosurgery 2017; 80:S100-S107. [PMID: 28350951 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal osteobiologics have evolved substantially in this century after the development of many product categories such as growth factors, allograft, and stem cells. The indications for the use of novel biologics within spine surgery are rapidly expanding as the mechanism of each is elucidated. While the knowledge base of bone morphogenetic protein increases with each subsequent year, the application of new nanotechnology and cell-based strategies are being reported. This review will discuss the most recent data in novel osteobiologics, and where we could use future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wellington K Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Mohammed F Shamji
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sam K Cho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Paul M Arnold
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tom E Mroz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nandoe Tewarie RDS, Nandoe RDS, Hurtado A, Levi ADO, Grotenhuis JA, Grotenhuis A, Oudega M. Bone Marrow Stromal Cells for Repair of the Spinal Cord: Towards Clinical Application. Cell Transplant 2017; 15:563-77. [PMID: 17176609 DOI: 10.3727/000000006783981602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Stem cells have been recognized and intensively studied for their potential use in restorative approaches for degenerative diseases and traumatic injuries. In the central nervous system (CNS), stem cell-based strategies have been proposed to replace lost neurons in degenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's disease), or to replace lost oligodendrocytes in demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Stem cells have also been implicated in repair of the adult spinal cord. An impact to the spinal cord results in immediate damage to tissue including blood vessels, causing loss of neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. In time, more tissue nearby or away from the injury site is lost due to secondary injury. In case of relatively minor damage to the cord some return of function can be observed, but in most cases the neurological loss is permanent. This review will focus on in vitro and in vivo studies on the use of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), a heterogeneous cell population that includes mesenchymal stem cells, for repair of the spinal cord in experimental injury models and their potential for human application. To optimally benefit from BMSCs for repair of the spinal cord it is imperative to develop in vitro techniques that will generate the desired cell type and/or a large enough number for in vivo transplantation approaches. We will also assess the potential and possible pitfalls for use of BMSCs in humans and ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi D S Nandoe Tewarie
- The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chu S, Chen N, Dang ABC, Kuo AC, Dang ABC. The Effects of Topical Vancomycin on Mesenchymal Stem Cells: More May Not Be Better. Int J Spine Surg 2017; 11:12. [PMID: 28765796 PMCID: PMC5537948 DOI: 10.14444/4012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of topical vancomycin is increasingly popular in spine surgery. Large retrospective reviews suggest that topical vancomycin provides a cost-effective decrease in post-operative infection. Currently, there is little that is known about the maximum dose that can be applied locally. When 1 gram of vancomycin is mixed into the bone graft and another 1 gram applied freely in a spine wound, the local concentration of antibiotic ranges from 260-2900 μg/mL in the immediate post-op period and 50-730 μg/mL by the second post-operative day. We hypothesized that exuberant doses of vancomycin would be toxic to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). METHODS Bone marrow was obtained from the femoral canal of patients undergoing routine elective total hip arthroplasty. Mesenchymal stem cells were isolated using plastic adhesion. Cells were exposed to a wide range of doses of vancomycin for 24 hours and then assessed for viability. Osteogenic potential was assessed with alizarin red staining. RESULTS There was dose-dependent cell death with vancomycin use. MSC death was 9.43% at 400 μg/mL (p=0.047), 13.79% at 1600 μg/mL (p=0.0047), 19.35% at 3200 μg/mL (p<0.0001), 24.82% at 6400 μg/mL (p<0.0001) and 51.83% at 12800 μg/mL of vancomycin (p<0.0001) in comparison to the control group containing no vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS Our in vitro study suggests that vancomycin has toxic effects on hMSCs, a cell population particularly important for bone formation. In the absence of any clinical evidence suggesting that "more vancomycin is better," and our data suggesting that more vancomycin is harmful in vitro, surgeons electing to use topical vancomycin in spine surgery should restrict their use to the doses currently reported in the available published studies unless specific reasons exist otherwise. This study does not establish a contraindication to the use of topical vancomycin, nor does it suggest that pseudarthroses are attributable to vancomycin use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Chu
- 1Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, West Lebanon, NH
| | - Nita Chen
- Albany Medical College, School of Medicine, Albany NY
| | - Alexis B C Dang
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alfred C Kuo
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alan B C Dang
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clough BH, McNeill EP, Palmer D, Krause U, Bartosh TJ, Chaput CD, Gregory CA. An allograft generated from adult stem cells and their secreted products efficiently fuses vertebrae in immunocompromised athymic rats and inhibits local immune responses. Spine J 2017; 17:418-430. [PMID: 27765715 PMCID: PMC5309156 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Revised: 09/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Spine pain and the disability associated with it are epidemic in the United States. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, more than 650,000 spinal fusion surgeries are performed annually in the United States, and yet there is a failure rate of 15%-40% when standard methods employing current commercial bone substitutes are used. Autologous bone graft is the gold standard in terms of fusion success, but the morbidity associated with the procedure and the limitations in the availability of sufficient material have limited its use in the majority of cases. A freely available and immunologically compatible bone mimetic with the properties of live tissue is likely to substantially improve the outcome of spine fusion procedures without the disadvantages of autologous bone graft. PURPOSE This study aimed to compare a live human bone tissue analog with autologous bone grafting in an immunocompromised rat model of posterolateral fusion. DESIGN/SETTING This is an in vitro and in vivo preclinical study of a novel human stem cell-derived construct for efficacy in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. METHODS Osteogenically enhanced human mesenchymal stem cells (OEhMSCs) were generated by exposure to conditions that activate the early stages of osteogenesis. Immunologic characteristics of OEhMSCs were evaluated in vitro. The secreted extracellular matrix from OEhMSCs was deposited on a clinical-grade gelatin sponge, resulting in bioconditioned gelatin sponge (BGS). Bioconditioned gelatin sponge was used alone, with live OEhMSCs (BGS+OEhMSCs), or with whole human bone marrow (BGS+hBM). Efficacy for spine fusion was determined by an institutionally approved animal model using 53 nude rats. RESULTS Bioconditioned gelatin sponge with live OEhMSCs did not cause cytotoxicity when incubated with immunologically mismatched lymphocytes, and OEhMSCs inhibited lymphocyte expansion in mixed lymphocyte assays. Bioconditioned gelatin sponge with live OEhMSC and BGS+hBM constructs induced profound bone growth at fusion sites in vivo, with a comparable rate of fusion with syngeneic bone graft (negative [0 of 10], BGS alone [0 of 10], bone graft [7 of 10], BGS+OEhMSC [10 of 15], and BGS+hBM [8 of 8]). CONCLUSIONS Collectively, these studies demonstrate that BGS+OEhMSC constructs possess low immunogenicity and drive vertebral fusion with efficiency matching syngeneic bone graft in rodents. We also demonstrate that BGS serves as a promising scaffold for spine fusion when combined with hBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bret H. Clough
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 206 Olsen Blvd, Room 228 MS1114, College Station, TX 77845, USA
| | - Eoin P. McNeill
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 206 Olsen Blvd, Room 228 MS1114, College Station, TX 77845, USA
| | - Daniel Palmer
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 206 Olsen Blvd, Room 228 MS1114, College Station, TX 77845, USA
| | - Ulf Krause
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Hospital, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2401 S. 31st St, Temple, TX 76508, USA,Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Immunology, University Hospital Muenster, 11 Domagkstr, Muenster 48149, Germany
| | - Thomas J. Bartosh
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 206 Olsen Blvd, Room 228 MS1114, College Station, TX 77845, USA
| | - Christopher D. Chaput
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Hospital, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2401 S. 31st St, Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Carl A. Gregory
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 206 Olsen Blvd, Room 228 MS1114, College Station, TX 77845, USA,Corresponding author. Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 206 Olsen Blvd, Room 228 MS1114, College Station, TX 77845, USA. Tel.: (979) 436-9643; fax: (979) 436-9679. (C.A. Gregory)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu Z, Zhu Y, Zhu H, He X, Liu X. Enhancement of posterolateral lumbar spine fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and mesenchymal stem cells delivered in fibrin glue. J Biomater Appl 2016; 31:477-487. [PMID: 27059496 DOI: 10.1177/0885328216643854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells have shown great potential for accelerating bone healing. In the present study, we evaluate the efficacy of fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 composite for posterolateral spinal fusion in a rabbit model. Forty adult rabbits underwent posterolateral intertransverse fusion at the L5–L6 level. The animals were randomly divided into four groups based on the implant material: fibrin glue, fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells composite, fibrin glue-recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (fibrin glue/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2) composite, and fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 composite. After six weeks, the rabbits were euthanized for manual palpation, radiographic examination, biomechanical testing, and histology. Manual palpation results showed that the fusion rate for fibrin glue, fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells, fibrin glue/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2, and fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 was 0, 0, 40%, and 70%, respectively. Moreover, fusion rate determined by radiographic examination for fibrin glue, fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells, fibrin glue/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2, and fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 was 0, 0, 40%, and 80%, respectively. Gray analysis showed that fibrin glue/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 group had higher ossification area and density than fibrin glue group; and fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 group had higher ossification area and density than fibrin glue/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 group. Formation of continuous bone masses between L5 and L6 level in mesenchymal stem cells/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/fibrin glue group was further confirmed by computed tomography scanning and three-dimensional reconstruction. Biomechanical testing demonstrated that the fusion strength (flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation) in fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 group is significantly higher than that in fibrin glue/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 group. The formation of mature bone tissues between transverse processes of the fused specimens from both fibrin glue/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2, and fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 groups was confirmed by HE staining, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction results showed the upregulation of CD31, type I collagen, osteocalcin, and osteonectin in the fibrin glue/mesenchymal stem cells/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 group. In conclusion, our findings show that mesenchymal stem cells delivered with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 using fibrin glue as carrier are more effective in enhancing spine fusion than recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 without mesenchymal stem cells in the rabbit model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zunpeng Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Fourth Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yue Zhu
- Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Haitao Zhu
- Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaoning He
- Department of Stomatology, Fourth Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xinchun Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Evaluation of Anterior Vertebral Interbody Fusion Using Osteogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplanted in Collagen Sponge. Clin Spine Surg 2016; 29:E201-7. [PMID: 22576723 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0b013e31825ca123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN The study used a rabbit model to achieve anterior vertebral interbody fusion using osteogenic mesenchymal stem cells (OMSCs) transplanted in collagen sponge. OBJECTIVE We investigated the effectiveness of graft material for anterior vertebral interbody fusion using a rabbit model by examining the OMSCs transplanted in collagen sponge. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Anterior vertebral interbody fusion is commonly performed. Although autogenous bone graft remains the gold-standard fusion material, it requires a separate surgical procedure and is associated with significant short-term and long-term morbidity. Recently, mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow have been studied in various fields, including posterolateral spinal fusion. Thus, we hypothesized that cultured OMSCs transplanted in porous collagen sponge could be used successfully even in anterior vertebral interbody fusion. METHODS Forty mature male White Zealand rabbits (weight, 3.5-4.5 kg) were randomly allocated to receive one of the following graft materials: porous collagen sponge plus cultured OMSCs (group I); porous collagen sponge alone (group II); autogenous bone graft (group III); and nothing (group IV). All animals underwent anterior vertebral interbody fusion at the L4/L5 level. The lumbar spine was harvested en bloc, and the new bone formation and spinal fusion was evaluated using radiographic analysis, microcomputed tomography, manual palpation test, and histologic examination at 8 and 12 weeks after surgery. RESULTS New bone formation and bony fusion was evident as early as 8 weeks in groups I and III. And there was no statistically significant difference between 8 and 12 weeks. At both time points, by microcomputed tomography and histologic analysis, new bone formation was observed in both groups I and III, fibrous tissue was observed and there was no new bone in both groups II and IV; by manual palpation test, bony fusion was observed in 40% (4/10) of rabbits in group I, 70% (7/10) of rabbits in group III, and 0% (0/10) of rabbits in both groups II and IV. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that mesenchymal stem cells that have been cultured with osteogenic differentiation medium and loaded with collagen sponge could induce bone formation and anterior vertebral interbody fusion. And the rabbit model we developed will be useful in evaluating the effects of graft materials for anterior vertebral interbody fusion. Further study is needed to determine the most appropriate carrier for OMSCs and the feasibility in the clinical setting.
Collapse
|
20
|
Allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells (MPCs) combined with an osteoconductive scaffold to promote lumbar interbody spine fusion in an ovine model. Spine J 2016; 16:389-99. [PMID: 26291397 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Revised: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in immunomagnetic cell sorting have enabled isolation and purification of pleuripotent stem cells from marrow aspirates and have expanded stem cell therapies to include allogeneic sources. PURPOSE This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells (MPCs) combined with an osteoconductive scaffold in lumbar interbody spinal fusion using an ovine model. STUDY DESIGN Thirty-two skeletally mature ewes underwent a single-level interbody fusion procedure using a Polyetheretherketone fusion cage supplemented with either iliac crest autograft (AG) or an osteconductive scaffold (Mastergraft Matrix, Medtronic, Memphis, TN, USA) with 2.5×10(6) MPCs, 6.25×10(6) MPCs, or 12.5×10(6) MPCs. METHODS Plain radiographs and computed tomography scans were scored for bridging bone at multiple points during healing and at necropsy. The biomechanical competency of fusion was scored by manual palpation and quantified using functional radiographs at necropsy. Postnecropsy histopathology and histomorphometric analysis assessed the local response to MPC treatment and quantified the volume and connectivity of newly formed bridging bone. Safety was assessed by serum biochemistry, hematology, and organ histopathology. RESULTS Mesenchymal precursor cell treatment caused no adverse systemic or local tissue responses. All analyses indicated MPCs combined with an osteoconductive scaffold achieved similar or better fusion success as AG treatment after 16 weeks, and increasing the MPC dose did not enhance fusion. Manual palpation of the fusion site indicated more than 75% of MPC-treated and 65% of AG-treated animals achieved rigid fusion, which was corroborated with functional radiography. Computed tomography fusion scores indicated all animals in the MPC- and AG-treatment groups were fused at 16 weeks, yet X-ray scores indicated only 67% of the AG-treated animals were fused. Histomorphometry analyses showed equivalent outcomes for fusion connectivity and bony fusion area for MPC- and AG-treated groups. Approximately 6% residual graft material remained in the MPC-treated fusion sites at 16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Adult allogeneic MPCs delivered using an osteoconductive scaffold were both safe and efficacious in this ovine spine interbody fusion model. These results support the use ofallogeneic MPCs as an alternative to AG for lumbar interbody spinal fusion procedures.
Collapse
|
21
|
Aquino-Martínez R, Rodríguez-Carballo E, Gámez B, Artigas N, Carvalho-Lobato P, Manzanares-Céspedes MC, Rosa JL, Ventura F. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Within Gelatin/CaSO4 Scaffolds Treated Ex Vivo with Low Doses of BMP-2 and Wnt3a Increase Bone Regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A 2016; 22:41-52. [DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2015.0181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rubén Aquino-Martínez
- Departament de Ciències Fisiològiques II, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Edgardo Rodríguez-Carballo
- Departament de Ciències Fisiològiques II, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Beatriz Gámez
- Departament de Ciències Fisiològiques II, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Natalia Artigas
- Departament de Ciències Fisiològiques II, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Patricia Carvalho-Lobato
- Unitat d'Anatomia i Embriologia Humana, Departament de Patologia i Terapèutica Experimental, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Maria Cristina Manzanares-Céspedes
- Unitat d'Anatomia i Embriologia Humana, Departament de Patologia i Terapèutica Experimental, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Rosa
- Departament de Ciències Fisiològiques II, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Francesc Ventura
- Departament de Ciències Fisiològiques II, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Oehme D, Goldschlager T, Rosenfeld JV, Ghosh P, Jenkin G. The role of stem cell therapies in degenerative lumbar spine disease: a review. Neurosurg Rev 2015; 38:429-45. [PMID: 25749802 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-015-0621-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Revised: 06/23/2014] [Accepted: 01/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine are extremely common. Ninety percent of people over the age of 60 years have degenerative change on imaging; however, only a small minority of people will require spine surgery (Hicks et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(12):1301-1306, 2009). This minority, however, constitutes a core element of spinal surgery practice. Whilst the patient outcomes from spinal surgeries have improved in recent years, some patients will remain with pain and disability despite technically successful surgery. Advances in regenerative medicine and stem cell therapies, particularly the use of mesenchymal stem cells and allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells, have led to numerous clinical trials utilising these cell-based therapies to treat degenerative spinal conditions. Through cartilage formation and disc regeneration, fusion enhancement or via modification of pain pathways, stem cells are well suited to enhance spinal surgery practice. This review will focus on the outcomes of lumbar spinal procedures and the role of stem cells in the treatment of degenerative lumbar conditions to enhance clinical practice. The current status of clinical trials utilising stem cell therapies will be discussed, providing clinicians with an overview of the various cell-based treatments likely to be available to patients in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Oehme
- The Ritchie Centre, MIM-PHI Institute of Medical Research, Monash University Clayton Victoria, PO Box 6178, Clayton, VIC, 3141, Australia,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Asatrian G, Pham D, Hardy WR, James AW, Peault B. Stem cell technology for bone regeneration: current status and potential applications. STEM CELLS AND CLONING-ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS 2015; 8:39-48. [PMID: 25709479 PMCID: PMC4334288 DOI: 10.2147/sccaa.s48423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Continued improvements in the understanding and application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have revolutionized tissue engineering. This is particularly true within the field of skeletal regenerative medicine. However, much remains unknown regarding the native origins of MSC, the relative advantages of different MSC populations for bone regeneration, and even the biologic safety of such unpurified, grossly characterized cells. This review will first summarize the initial discovery of MSC, as well as the current and future applications of MSC in bone tissue engineering. Next, the relative advantages and disadvantages of MSC isolated from distinct tissue origins are debated, including the MSC from adipose, bone marrow, and dental pulp, among others. The perivascular origin of MSC is next discussed. Finally, we briefly comment on pluripotent stem cell populations and their possible application in bone tissue engineering. While continually expanding, the field of MSC-based bone tissue engineering and regeneration shows potential to become a clinical reality in the not-so-distant future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Asatrian
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Dalton Pham
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Winters R Hardy
- UCLA/Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aaron W James
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA ; UCLA/Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bruno Peault
- UCLA/Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Medical Research Council Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Montoya G, Arenas J, Romo E, Zeichner-David M, Alvarez M, Narayanan AS, Velázquez U, Mercado G, Arzate H. Human recombinant cementum attachment protein (hrPTPLa/CAP) promotes hydroxyapatite crystal formation in vitro and bone healing in vivo. Bone 2014; 69:154-64. [PMID: 25263524 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2014] [Revised: 09/14/2014] [Accepted: 09/16/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Cementum extracellular matrix is similar to other mineralized tissues; however, this unique tissue contains molecules only present in cementum. A cDNA of these molecules, cementum attachment protein (hrPTPLa/CAP) was cloned and expressed in a prokaryotic system. This molecule is an alternative splicing of protein tyrosine phosphatase-like A (PTPLa). In this study, we wanted to determine the structural and functional characteristics of this protein. Our results indicate that hrPTPLa/CAP contains a 43.2% α-helix, 8.9% β-sheet, 2% β-turn and 45.9% random coil secondary structure. Dynamic light scattering shows that this molecule has a size distribution of 4.8 nm and aggregates as an estimated mass of 137 kDa species. AFM characterization and FE-SEM studies indicate that this protein self-assembles into nanospheres with sizes ranging from 7.0 to 27 nm in diameter. Functional studies demonstrate that hrPTPLa/CAP promotes hydroxyapatite crystal nucleation: EDS analysis revealed that hrPTPLa/CAP-induced crystals had a 1.59 ± 0.06 Ca/P ratio. Further confirmation with MicroRaman spectrometry and TEM confirm the presence of hydroxyapatite. In vivo studies using critical-size defects in rat cranium showed that hrPTPLa/CAP promoted 73% ± 2.19% and 87% ± 1.97% new bone formation at 4 and 8 weeks respectively. Although originally identified in cementum, PTPLa/CAP is very effective at inducing bone repair and healing and therefore this novel molecule has a great potential to be used for mineralized tissue bioengineering and tissue regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonzalo Montoya
- Laboratorio de Biología Periodontal, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México
| | - Jesús Arenas
- Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México
| | - Enrique Romo
- Laboratorio de Biología Periodontal, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México
| | | | - Marco Alvarez
- Laboratorio de Bioingeniería de Tejidos, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México
| | - A Sampath Narayanan
- School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Ulises Velázquez
- Laboratorio de Biología Periodontal, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México
| | - Gabriela Mercado
- Laboratorio de Biología Periodontal, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México
| | - Higinio Arzate
- Laboratorio de Biología Periodontal, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Skovrlj B, Guzman JZ, Al Maaieh M, Cho SK, Iatridis JC, Qureshi SA. Cellular bone matrices: viable stem cell-containing bone graft substitutes. Spine J 2014; 14:2763-72. [PMID: 24929059 PMCID: PMC4402977 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2013] [Revised: 04/03/2014] [Accepted: 05/20/2014] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Advances in the field of stem cell technology have stimulated the development and increased use of allogenic bone grafts containing live mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), also known as cellular bone matrices (CBMs). It is estimated that CBMs comprise greater than 17% of all bone grafts and bone graft substitutes used. PURPOSE To critically evaluate CBMs, specifically their technical specifications, existing published data supporting their use, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation, cost, potential pitfalls, and other aspects pertaining to their use. STUDY DESIGN Areview of literature. METHODS A series of Ovid, Medline, and Pubmed-National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) searches were performed. Only articles in English journals or published with English language translations were included. Level of evidence of the selected articles was assessed. Specific technical information on each CBM was obtained by direct communication from the companies marketing the individual products. RESULTS Five different CBMs are currently available for use in spinal fusion surgery. There is a wide variation between the products with regard to the average donor age at harvest, total cellular concentration, percentage of MSCs, shelf life, and cell viability after defrosting. Three retrospective studies evaluating CBMs and fusion have shown fusion rates ranging from 90.2% to 92.3%, and multiple industry-sponsored trials are underway. No independent studies evaluating spinal fusion rates with the use of CBMs exist. All the commercially available CBMs claim to meet the FDA criteria under Section 361, 21 CFR Part 1271, and are not undergoing FDA premarket review. The CBMs claim to provide viable MSCs and are offered at a premium cost. Numerous challenges exist in regard to MSCs' survival, function, osteoblastic potential, and cytokine production once implanted into the intended host. CONCLUSIONS Cellular bone matrices may be a promising bone augmentation technology in spinal fusion surgery. Although CBMs appear to be safe for use as bone graft substitutes, their efficacy in spinal fusion surgery remains highly inconclusive. Large, nonindustry sponsored studies evaluating the efficacy of CBMs are required. Without results from such studies, surgeons must be made aware of the potential pitfalls of CBMs in spinal fusion surgery. With the currently available data, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of CBMs as bone graft substitutes in spinal fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Branko Skovrlj
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, Box 1136, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Javier Z. Guzman
- Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th St, 9th Floor, Box 1188, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Motasem Al Maaieh
- Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th St, 9th Floor, Box 1188, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Samuel K. Cho
- Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th St, 9th Floor, Box 1188, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - James C. Iatridis
- Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th St, 9th Floor, Box 1188, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Sheeraz A. Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th St, 9th Floor, Box 1188, New York, NY 10029, USA,Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 E. 98th St, Box 1188, New York, NY 10029, USA. Tel.: (212) 241-3909; fax: (212) 534-6202.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Klíma K, Vaněček V, Kohout A, Jiroušek O, Foltán R, Štulík J, Machoň V, Pavlíková G, Jendelová P, Syková E, Šedý J. Stem cells regenerative properties on new rat spinal fusion model. Physiol Res 2014; 64:119-28. [PMID: 25194134 DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.932728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Stem cells biology is one of the most frequent topic of physiological research of today. Spinal fusion represents common bone biology challenge. It is the indicator of osteoinduction and new bone formation on ectopic model. The purpose of this study was to establish a simple model of spinal fusion based on a rat model including verification of the possible use of titanium microplates with hydroxyapatite scaffold combined with human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Spinous processes of two adjacent vertebrae were fixed in 15 Wistar rats. The space between bony vertebral arches and spinous processes was either filled with augmentation material only and covered with a resorbable collagen membrane (Group 1), or filled with augmentation material loaded with 5 × 10⁶ MSCs and covered with a resorbable collagen membrane (Group 2). The rats were sacrificed 8 weeks after the surgery. Histology, histomorphometry and micro-CT were performed. The new model of interspinous fusion was safe, easy, inexpensive, with zero mortality. We did not detect any substantial pathological changes or tumor formation after graft implantation. We observed a nonsignificant effect on the formation of new bone tissue between Group 1 and Group 2. In the group with MSCs (Group 2) we described minor inflamatory response which indicates the imunomodulational and antiinflamatory role of MSCs. In conclusion, this new model proved to be easy to use in small animals like rats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Klíma
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic, Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chung CG, James AW, Asatrian G, Chang L, Nguyen A, Le K, Bayani G, Lee R, Stoker D, Zhang X, Ting K, Péault B, Soo C. Human perivascular stem cell-based bone graft substitute induces rat spinal fusion. Stem Cells Transl Med 2014; 3:1231-41. [PMID: 25154782 DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2014-0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Adipose tissue is an attractive source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) because of its abundance and accessibility. We have previously defined a population of native MSCs termed perivascular stem cells (PSCs), purified from diverse human tissues, including adipose tissue. Human PSCs (hPSCs) are a bipartite cell population composed of pericytes (CD146+CD34-CD45-) and adventitial cells (CD146-CD34+CD45-), isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and with properties identical to those of culture identified MSCs. Our previous studies showed that hPSCs exhibit improved bone formation compared with a sample-matched unpurified population (termed stromal vascular fraction); however, it is not known whether hPSCs would be efficacious in a spinal fusion model. To investigate, we evaluated the osteogenic potential of freshly sorted hPSCs without culture expansion and differentiation in a rat model of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. We compared increasing dosages of implanted hPSCs to assess for dose-dependent efficacy. All hPSC treatment groups induced successful spinal fusion, assessed by manual palpation and microcomputed tomography. Computerized biomechanical simulation (finite element analysis) further demonstrated bone fusion with hPSC treatment. Histological analyses showed robust endochondral ossification in hPSC-treated samples. Finally, we confirmed that implanted hPSCs indeed differentiated into osteoblasts and osteocytes; however, the majority of the new bone formation was of host origin. These results suggest that implanted hPSCs positively regulate bone formation via direct and paracrine mechanisms. In summary, hPSCs are a readily available MSC population that effectively forms bone without requirements for culture or predifferentiation. Thus, hPSC-based products show promise for future efforts in clinical bone regeneration and repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Choon G Chung
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron W James
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Greg Asatrian
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Le Chang
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Nguyen
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Khoi Le
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Georgina Bayani
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Lee
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - David Stoker
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Xinli Zhang
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Kang Ting
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Bruno Péault
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Chia Soo
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, UCLA and Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Operation Mend, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, Marina del Rey, California, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Science and MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Oehme D, Goldschlager T, Ghosh P, Jenkin G, Rosenfeld JV. Concern over the use of recombinant bone morphogenetic protein in spinal fusion surgery: are stem cells an alternative? ANZ J Surg 2014; 84:302-3. [PMID: 24877230 DOI: 10.1111/ans.12538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
30
|
Wang L, Ma XY, Zhang Y, Feng YF, Li X, Hu YY, Wang Z, Ma ZS, Lei W. Repair of segmental bone defect using Totally Vitalized tissue engineered bone graft by a combined perfusion seeding and culture system. PLoS One 2014; 9:e94276. [PMID: 24728277 PMCID: PMC3984127 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2013] [Accepted: 03/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The basic strategy to construct tissue engineered bone graft (TEBG) is to combine osteoblastic cells with three dimensional (3D) scaffold. Based on this strategy, we proposed the "Totally Vitalized TEBG" (TV-TEBG) which was characterized by abundant and homogenously distributed cells with enhanced cell proliferation and differentiation and further investigated its biological performance in repairing segmental bone defect. METHODS In this study, we constructed the TV-TEBG with the combination of customized flow perfusion seeding/culture system and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffold fabricated by Rapid Prototyping (RP) technique. We systemically compared three kinds of TEBG constructed by perfusion seeding and perfusion culture (PSPC) method, static seeding and perfusion culture (SSPC) method, and static seeding and static culture (SSSC) method for their in vitro performance and bone defect healing efficacy with a rabbit model. RESULTS Our study has demonstrated that TEBG constructed by PSPC method exhibited better biological properties with higher daily D-glucose consumption, increased cell proliferation and differentiation, and better cell distribution, indicating the successful construction of TV-TEBG. After implanted into rabbit radius defects for 12 weeks, PSPC group exerted higher X-ray score close to autograft, much greater mechanical property evidenced by the biomechanical testing and significantly higher new bone formation as shown by histological analysis compared with the other two groups, and eventually obtained favorable healing efficacy of the segmental bone defect that was the closest to autograft transplantation. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the feasibility of TV-TEBG construction with combination of perfusion seeding, perfusion culture and RP technique which exerted excellent biological properties. The application of TV-TEBG may become a preferred candidate for segmental bone defect repair in orthopedic and maxillofacial fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiang-Yu Ma
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Ya-Fei Feng
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiang Li
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun-Yu Hu
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen-Sheng Ma
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Lei
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Werner BC, Li X, Shen FH. Stem cells in preclinical spine studies. Spine J 2014; 14:542-51. [PMID: 24246748 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2013] [Revised: 07/05/2013] [Accepted: 08/23/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The recent identification and characterization of mesenchymal stem cells have introduced a shift in the research focus for future technologies in spinal surgery to achieve spinal fusion and treat degenerative disc disease. Current and past techniques use allograft to replace diseased tissue or rely on host responses to recruit necessary cellular progenitors. Adult stem cells display long-term proliferation, efficient self-renewal, and multipotent differentiation. PURPOSE This review will focus on two important applications of stem cells in spinal surgery: spine fusion and the management of degenerative disc disease. STUDY DESIGN Review of the literature. METHODS Relevant preclinical literature regarding stem cell sources, growth factors, scaffolds, and animal models for both osteogenesis and chondrogenesis will be reviewed, with an emphasis on those studies that focus on spine applications of these technologies. RESULTS In both osteogenesis and chondrogenesis, adult stem cells derived from bone marrow or adipose show promise in preclinical studies. Various growth factors and scaffolds have also been shown to enhance the properties and eventual clinical potential of these cells. Although its utility in clinical applications has yet to be proven, gene therapy has also been shown to hold promise in preclinical studies. CONCLUSIONS The future of spine surgery is constantly evolving, and the recent advancements in stem cell-based technologies for both spine fusion and the treatment of degenerative disc disease is promising and indicative that stem cells will undoubtedly play a major role clinically. It is likely that these stem cells, growth factors, and scaffolds will play a critical role in the future for replacing diseased tissue in disease processes such as degenerative disc disease and in enhancing host tissue to achieve more reliable spine fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C Werner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, PO Box 800159, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0159 USA
| | - Xudong Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, PO Box 800159, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0159 USA
| | - Francis H Shen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, PO Box 800159, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0159 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Allogeneic mesenchymal progenitor cells for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in sheep. Spine J 2014; 14:435-44. [PMID: 24438940 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2011] [Revised: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Osteoconductive porous ceramic bone graft materials supplemented with mesenchymal precursor cells (MPC) derived from autologous bone marrow aspirates have been shown to stimulate successful interbody and posterolateral spine fusion in preclinical models. Recent advances in immunomagnetic cell sorting have enabled purification and isolation of pluripotent stem cells from marrow aspirates and have expanded stem cell technology to allogeneic cell sources. Allogeneic MPC technology combined with appropriate synthetic biomaterial carriers could provide both the osteogenic and osteoconductive components needed for successful posterolateral spine fusion without the need for autologous bone harvest or expensive recombinant protein technology. PURPOSE To determine the safety and efficacy of a hydroxyapatite:tricalcium phosphate graft material supplemented with allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion using an ovine model. STUDY DESIGN Skeletally mature ewes underwent single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion using either autograft (AG), hydroxyapatite:tricalcium phosphate carrier (CP), or CP supplemented with allogeneic mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs). Three doses of MPCs were evaluated: 25 × 10⁶ cells (low dose, LD), 75 × 10⁶ cells (mid dose, MD), and 225 × 10⁶ cell (high dose, HD). Animals survived for either 4 or 9 months. METHODS Plain radiographs were acquired and scored for bridging bone at regular intervals during healing to monitor fusion development. Hematology, coagulation, and serum chemistry were monitored at regular intervals throughout the study to monitor animal health. After necropsy, computed tomography, high-resolution radiography, biomechanical testing, organ pathology, bone histopathology, and bone histomorphometry were conducted to monitor the safety and ascertain the efficacy of MPC treatment. RESULTS MPC treatment in this spine fusion model resulted in no observed adverse systemic or local tissue responses. Radiographically, fusion scores for MPC-treated animals were uniformly higher compared with those treated with carrier alone (CP) after 3 months and continued the same trend throughout 9 month of healing. Quantitative computed tomography confirmed better connectivity of the fusion for MPC treatment groups compared with CP. Biomechanical analyses were not able to differentiate between treatment groups. Histomorphometry results confirmed radiographic and quantitative computed tomography results; cell-supplemented treatment groups and autograft had equivalent amounts of bone within the fusion mass and less bony fusion tissue was found within the fusion mass in specimens from the CP treatment group. No conclusive effects of cell dose of fusion efficacy were noted. CONCLUSIONS Adult allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells delivered via a hydroxyapatite:tricalcium phosphate carrier were both safe and efficacious in this ovine spine fusion model. Results from this preclinical study support that allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells produced fusion efficacy similar to that achieved using iliac crest autograft, thereby providing a safe and viable option to achieve successful posterolateral spine fusion.
Collapse
|
33
|
Lee TH, Huang YH, Chang NK, Lin WC, Chien PWC, Su TM, Hsieh DJ, Lee TC. Characterization and spinal fusion effect of rabbit mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Res Notes 2013; 6:528. [PMID: 24325928 PMCID: PMC4029367 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2013] [Accepted: 12/03/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The surface markers of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) of rabbits have been reported only sporadically. However, interest in the spinal fusion effect of MSCs has risen recently. The purpose of this research was to study the surface markers and spinal fusion effect of rabbit MSCs. Results Of our rabbit MSCs, 2% expressed CD14, CD29, and CD45, 1% expressed CD90 and 97% expressed CD44. These results implied the MSCs were negative for CD14, CD29, CD45, and CD90, but positive for CD44. The surgical results showed that satisfactory fusion occurred in 10 rabbits (83%) in the study group and unsatisfactory fusion in 2 (17%). In the control group, satisfactory fusion was found in 3 rabbits (25%) and unsatisfactory fusion in 9 (75%). Statistical analysis showed the study group had significantly better spinal fusion results than the control group. Conclusions The surface markers of human and rabbit MSCs are not exactly the same. Rabbit MSCs do not have positive reactivity for CD29 and CD90, which are invariably present on human MSCs. The allogeneic undifferentiated rabbit MSCs were able to promote spinal fusion and did not induce an adverse immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tao-Chen Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ghodasra JH, Daley EL, Hsu EL, Hsu WK. Factors influencing arthrodesis rates in a rabbit posterolateral spine model with iliac crest autograft. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2013; 23:426-34. [PMID: 24166021 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3074-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2013] [Revised: 10/12/2013] [Accepted: 10/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The rabbit posterolateral intertransverse spine arthrodesis model has been widely used to evaluate spinal biologics. However, to date, the validity and reproducibility of performance of iliac crest bone graft, the most common and critical control group, has not been firmly established. We evaluated original research publications that utilized this model, identified which experimental conditions affected fusion rates, and developed an algorithm to predict fusion rates for future study designs. METHODS A MEDLINE search was performed for publications through December, 2011 that utilized this model to evaluate fusion rates elicited by iliac crest autograft. All study parameters were recorded, and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the effects of these variables on fusion rates as determined by either manual palpation or radiographs. RESULTS Seventy studies with 959 rabbits in 102 groups met the inclusion criteria. Excluding studies that measured fusion at 4 or fewer weeks or intentionally tried to decrease the fusion rate, the overall fusion rate for autograft was 58.3 ± 16.3 % (mean ± SD) as determined by manual palpation and 66.4 ± 17.8 % by plain radiographs. Regression analysis demonstrated a difference between these outcome measures with a trend towards significance (p = 0.09). Longer time points and larger volumes of autograft resulted in significantly greater reported fusion rates (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Neither strain, age, weight, nor vertebral level significantly affected fusion rates. CONCLUSIONS Although experimental conditions varied across studies, time point evaluation and autograft volume significantly affected fusion rates. Despite some variability demonstrated across certain studies, we demonstrated that when the time point and volume of autograft were controlled for, the iliac crest control group of the rabbit posterolateral spinal arthrodesis model is both reliable and predictably affected by different experimental conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason H Ghodasra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Ave., 76-143 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the effect of 1-(4-(tert-butyl)benzyl)-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (Pyr-C) on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells. MATERIALS & METHODS MTT and BrdU incorporation assay were used to determine cell survival and proliferation. The gene expression levels of osteogenic markers were determined using real-time PCR and ALP activity was detected. Western-blot analysis was used to determine the protein expression of BSP and OPN. The long-term effect of Pyr-C on mineralization deposition was measured by Alizarin Red Staining. RESULTS Pyr-C inhibited cell proliferation and increased ALP activity. Gene expression of ALP, BSP, OCN, Runx2, and Osterix was up-regulated in Pyr-C-induced group. Pyr-C increased the protein expression of BSP at day 7, 14 and 21, and OPN at day 14, 21 and 28. Meanwhile, Pyr-C enhanced the mineral deposition. CONCLUSION Pyr-C inhibits proliferation and stimulates osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells.
Collapse
|
36
|
Lu Y, Darne CD, Tan IC, Zhu B, Hall MA, Lazard ZW, Davis AR, Simpson L, Sevick-Muraca EM, Olmsted-Davis EA. Far-red fluorescence gene reporter tomography for determination of placement and viability of cell-based gene therapies. OPTICS EXPRESS 2013; 21:24129-24138. [PMID: 24104323 PMCID: PMC3796689 DOI: 10.1364/oe.21.024129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2013] [Revised: 09/02/2013] [Accepted: 09/15/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive injectable cellular therapeutic strategies based on sustained delivery of physiological levels of BMP-2 for spinal fusion are emerging as promising alternatives, which could provide sufficient fusion without the associated surgical risks. However, these injectable therapies are dependent on bone formation occurring only at the specific target region. In this study, we developed and deployed fluorescence gene reporter tomography (FGRT) to provide information on in vivo cell localization and viability. This information is sought to confirm the ideal placement of the materials with respect to the area where early bone reaction is required, ultimately providing three dimensional data about the future fusion. However, because almost all conventional fluorescence gene reporters require visible excitation wavelengths, current in vivo imaging of fluorescent proteins is limited by high tissue absorption and confounding autofluorescence. We previously administered fibroblasts engineered to produce BMP-2, but is difficult to determine 3-D information of placement prior to bone formation. Herein we used the far-red fluorescence gene reporter, IFP1.4 to report the position and viability of fibroblasts and developed 3-D tomography to provide placement information. A custom small animal, far-red fluorescence tomography system integrated into a commercial CT scanner was used to assess IFP1.4 fluorescence and to demark 3-D placement of encapsulated fibroblasts with respect to the vertebrae and early bone formation as assessed from CT. The results from three experiments showed that the placement of the materials within the spine could be detected. This work shows that in vivo fluorescence gene reporter tomography of cell-based gene therapy is feasible and could help guide cell-based therapies in preclinical models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujie Lu
- Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas,
USA
| | - Chinmay D. Darne
- Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas,
USA
| | - I-Chih Tan
- Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas,
USA
| | - Banghe Zhu
- Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas,
USA
| | - Mary A. Hall
- Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas,
USA
| | - ZaWaunyka W. Lazard
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas,
USA
| | - Alan R. Davis
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas,
USA
| | - LaShan Simpson
- Bioengineering Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas,
USA
- Current address: Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi,
USA
| | - Eva M. Sevick-Muraca
- Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas,
USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Evans NR, Davies EM, Dare CJ, Oreffo RO. Tissue engineering strategies in spinal arthrodesis: the clinical imperative and challenges to clinical translation. Regen Med 2013; 8:49-64. [PMID: 23259805 DOI: 10.2217/rme.12.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Skeletal disorders requiring the regeneration or de novo production of bone present considerable reconstructive challenges and are one of the main driving forces for the development of skeletal tissue engineering strategies. The skeletal or mesenchymal stem cell is a fundamental requirement for osteogenesis and plays a pivotal role in the design and application of these strategies. Research activity has focused on incorporating the biological role of the mesenchymal stem cell with the developing fields of material science and gene therapy in order to create a construct that is not only capable of inducing host osteoblasts to produce bone, but is also osteogenic in its own right. This review explores the clinical need for reparative approaches in spinal arthrodesis, identifying recent tissue engineering strategies employed to promote spinal fusion, and considers the ongoing challenges to successful clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick R Evans
- Bone & Joint Research Group, Centre for Human Development, Stem Cells & Regeneration, Human Development & Health, Institute of Developmental Sciences, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dorozhkin SV. Calcium Orthophosphate-Based Bioceramics. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2013; 6:3840-3942. [PMID: 28788309 PMCID: PMC5452669 DOI: 10.3390/ma6093840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2013] [Revised: 08/07/2013] [Accepted: 08/19/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Various types of grafts have been traditionally used to restore damaged bones. In the late 1960s, a strong interest was raised in studying ceramics as potential bone grafts due to their biomechanical properties. A bit later, such synthetic biomaterials were called bioceramics. In principle, bioceramics can be prepared from diverse materials but this review is limited to calcium orthophosphate-based formulations only, which possess the specific advantages due to the chemical similarity to mammalian bones and teeth. During the past 40 years, there have been a number of important achievements in this field. Namely, after the initial development of bioceramics that was just tolerated in the physiological environment, an emphasis was shifted towards the formulations able to form direct chemical bonds with the adjacent bones. Afterwards, by the structural and compositional controls, it became possible to choose whether the calcium orthophosphate-based implants remain biologically stable once incorporated into the skeletal structure or whether they were resorbed over time. At the turn of the millennium, a new concept of regenerative bioceramics was developed and such formulations became an integrated part of the tissue engineering approach. Now calcium orthophosphate scaffolds are designed to induce bone formation and vascularization. These scaffolds are often porous and harbor different biomolecules and/or cells. Therefore, current biomedical applications of calcium orthophosphate bioceramics include bone augmentations, artificial bone grafts, maxillofacial reconstruction, spinal fusion, periodontal disease repairs and bone fillers after tumor surgery. Perspective future applications comprise drug delivery and tissue engineering purposes because calcium orthophosphates appear to be promising carriers of growth factors, bioactive peptides and various types of cells.
Collapse
|
39
|
Li X, Wei G, Wang X, Liu DH, Deng RD, Li H, Zhou JH, Li YW, Zeng HP, Chen DF. Targeting of the Sonic Hedgehog pathway by atractylenolides promotes chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biol Pharm Bull 2012; 35:1328-35. [PMID: 22863933 DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b12-00265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Molecules that enhance chondrogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were identified and isolated using an in vitro Gli reporter gene assay in MSCs incorporating a Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) target. Atractylenolide III, which promoted Gli1-mediated transcriptional activity, was isolated from an ethyl acetate extract of the Rhizoma, Atractylodis macrocephalae. After dehydration, atractylenolide III was transformed to atractylenolide I. Both atractylenolides were confirmed by MS, UV, IR, 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra. Atractylenolide III (which contains -OH at the 8-position) and atractylenolide I (which lacks -OH at the 8-position) were found to effectively promote the activity of the Gli promoter. While the hydroxyl group of atractylenolide III was not essential for the effect of atractylenolide, its effect was dependent on Shh signaling. Phenotypic cellular analysis indicated that atractylenolides induced MSCs to differentiate into chondrocytes, as shown by increased expression of specific chondrogenic markers including collagen II, aggrecan and the cartilage related transcription factor, Sox9. Atractylenolides significantly increased the expression of Shh and its target gene Gli-1, indicating that Shh signaling was activated by atractylenolides. Moreover, inhibition of Shh signaling reduced the effect of atractylenolides on the chondrogenic phenotype. The discovery that atractylenolides induce chondrocytes from MSCs is promising for bony disease therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xican Li
- School of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lubelski D, Abdullah KG, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. The Utility of Allograft Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Spine Fusion: A Literature Review. Global Spine J 2012; 2:109-14. [PMID: 27054055 PMCID: PMC4813091 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1307263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
More than 50% of patients complain of postoperative donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone graft harvest, and recent discoveries have identified adverse outcomes following bone morphogenetic protein use in spine fusion. This has led the spine community to turn toward alternative methods to promote fusion following spine surgery. The present article reviews numerous studies that have shown the osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). MSCs have been used with both in vitro and in vivo models and have involved animal studies ranging from rats to macaque monkeys to successfully induce bone regeneration in lesions of the tibia and spine. There is no fear of graft rejection, as there may be with other allograft materials, because neither undifferentiated nor differentiated MSCs elicit lymphocyte response when transplanted; they tend to alter the cytokine profile to an anti-inflammatory state. Early clinical trials are underway with various commercially available MSC formulations. Although there is much enthusiasm, it is integral that the spine surgery community carefully evaluate the use of MSCs in spine fusion through well-designed and executed studies to determine the efficacy and safety profiles in spine surgery patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lubelski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kalil G. Abdullah
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Edward C. Benzel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Thomas E. Mroz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health,
Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sauerbier S, Rickert D, Gutwald R, Nagursky H, Oshima T, Xavier SP, Christmann J, Kurz P, Menne D, Vissink A, Raghoebar G, Schmelzeisen R, Wagner W, Koch FP. Bone marrow concentrate and bovine bone mineral for sinus floor augmentation: a controlled, randomized, single-blinded clinical and histological trial--per-protocol analysis. Tissue Eng Part A 2011; 17:2187-97. [PMID: 21529247 DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this work was to evaluate the potential of substituting autogenous bone (AB) by bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC). Both AB and BMAC were tested in combination with a bovine bone mineral (BBM) for their ability of new bone formation (NBF) in a multicentric, randomized, controlled, clinical and histological noninferiority trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-five severely atrophied maxillary sinus from 26 patients were evaluated in a partial cross-over design. As test arm, 34 sinus of 25 patients were augmented with BBM and BMAC containing mesenchymal stem cells. Eleven control sinus from 11 patients were augmented with a mixture of 70% BBM and 30% AB. Biopsies were obtained after a 3-4-month healing period at time of implant placement and histomorphometrically analyzed for NBF. RESULTS NBF was 14.3%±1.8% for the control and nonsignificantly lower (12.6%±1.7%) for the test (90% confidence interval: -4.6 to 1.2). Values for BBM (31.3%±2.7%) were significantly higher for the test compared with control (19.3%±2.5%) (p<0.0001). Nonmineralized tissue was lower by 3.3% in the test compared with control (57.6%; p=0.137). CONCLUSIONS NBF after 3-4 months is equivalent in sinus, augmented with BMAC and BBM or a mixture of AB and BBM. This technique could be an alternative for using autografts to stimulate bone formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Sauerbier
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
A bioactive and bioresorbable porous cubic composite scaffold loaded with bone marrow aspirate: a potential alternative to autogenous bone grafting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:441-7. [PMID: 21124263 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181d39067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Experimental animal study. OBJECTIVE To investigate the osteogenic properties of a particulate uncalcined, unsintered hydroxyapatite/polydllactide (u-HA/PdlLA) composite scaffold loaded with bone marrow aspirate (BMA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Because of the high morbidity associated with bone graft harvesting, current research in spine surgery has largely focused on bone graft alternatives involving a combination of scaffolds and osteogenic substances. BMA is obtained by a simple and relatively noninvasive method and can easily be clinically applied as an osteogenic material. However, few studies have reported successful posterolateral spinal fusion (PLF) with BMA-loaded synthetic materials. METHODS Porous u-HA/PdlLA composites loaded with BMA were used as bone graft substitutes. In experiment 1, porous u-HA/PdlLA cylinders containing or lacking BMA were implanted in rabbit muscles. They were retrieved 4, 8, and 12 weeks after implantation, and ectopic bone formation was histologically evaluated. In experiment 2, 48 rabbits underwent PLF with 1 of 4 bone grafts: autogenous bone (group 1); single-strip u-HA/PdlLA alone (group 2); morselized u-HA/PdlLA + BMA (group 3); or single-strip u-HA/PdlLA + BMA (group 4). After 12 weeks, fusion was assessed by manual palpation, microcomputed tomography, mechanical tests, and histologic examination. RESULTS In experiment 1, ectopic bone formation was observed in BMA-loaded u-HA/PdlLA, and the new bone area increased until 12 weeks after implantation. In experiment 2, the fusion rates in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 58.3%, 16.7%, 66.7%, and 91.7%, respectively, as determined by manual palpation, and 66.7%, 16.7%, 75.0%, and 91.7%, respectively, as determined by microcomputed tomography. The mechanical strength was significantly greater in group 4 than in the other groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Conclusion. Our results indicate that BMA-loaded porous μ-HA/PdlLA is an effective alternative to autogenous bone grafts. The structure and composition of porous u-HA/PdlLA render it an effective scaffold for BMA.
Collapse
|
43
|
Biomolecular strategies of bone augmentation in spinal surgery. Trends Mol Med 2010; 17:215-22. [PMID: 21195666 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2010] [Revised: 11/27/2010] [Accepted: 12/01/2010] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Autologous bone grafts and allografts are the most accepted procedures for achieving spinal fusion. Recently, breakthroughs in understanding bone biology have led to the development of novel approaches to address the clinical problem of bone regeneration in an unfavorable environment, while bypassing the drawbacks of traditional treatments, including limited availability, donor site morbidity, risk of disease transmission and reduced osteogenicity. These approaches have also been studied for their effectiveness in reaching successful spinal fusion. This review focuses on the cellular and molecular mechanisms explaining the rationale behind these methods, including bone marrow aspirate and mesenchymal stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, bone morphogenetic proteins and gene therapy, which have opened a promising perspective in the field of bone formation in spinal surgery.
Collapse
|
44
|
Higashino K, Viggeswarapu M, Bargouti M, Liu H, Titus L, Boden SD. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 potentiates bone morphogenetic protein-2 induced bone formation. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 17:523-30. [PMID: 21043834 DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The mechanisms driving bone marrow stem cell mobilization are poorly understood. A recent murine study found that circulating bone marrow-derived osteoprogenitor cells (MOPCs) were recruited to the site of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2)-induced bone formation. Stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) and its cellular receptor CXCR4 have been shown to mediate the homing of stem cells to injured tissues. We hypothesized that chemokines, such as SDF-1, are also involved with mobilization of bone marrow cells. The CD45(-) fraction is a major source of MOPCs. In this report we determined that the addition of BMP-2 or SDF-1 to collagen implants increased the number of MOPCs in the peripheral blood. BMP-2-induced mobilization was blocked by CXCR4 antibody, confirming the role of SDF-1 in mobilization. We determined for the first time that addition of SDF-1 to implants containing BMP-2 enhances mobilization, homing of MOPCs to the implant, and ectopic bone formation induced by suboptimal BMP-2 doses. These results suggest that SDF-1 increases the number of osteoprogenitor cells that are mobilized from the bone marrow and then home to the implant. Thus, addition of SDF-1 to BMP-2 may improve the efficiency of BMPs in vivo, making their routine use for orthopaedic applications more affordable and available to more patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosaku Higashino
- Atlanta Veteran Affairs Medical Center and Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
van Gaalen SM, Dhert WJA, Kruyt MC, Yuan H, Oner FC, van Blitterswijk CA, Verbout AJ, de Bruijn JD. Goat bone tissue engineering: comparing an intramuscular with a posterolateral lumbar spine location. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16:685-93. [PMID: 19769525 DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of implant location on bone formation in goats using autologous bone marrow-derived stromal cells in porous calcium phosphate scaffolds. Intramuscular locations were compared to posterolateral spine fusion locations in eight goats. As scaffolds, we used biphasic calcium phosphate porous blocks of 5 x 5 x 5 mm. Cell-seeded implants were compared to empty controls. Bone marrow-derived stromal cells were seeded at 8 million cells per cm(3) scaffold and cultured for 1 week. The follow-up time was 12 weeks. Fluorochromes were administered intravenously at 4, 6, and 8 weeks. Ectopic implants showed 21 +/- 3.6% bone formation for the cell seeded and 2.0 +/- 3.0% for the controls (p < 0.001). Paraspinal implants, however, showed 0.10 +/- 0.13% in the cell seeded compared to 0.023 +/- 0.027% in the control group (p = 0.09). A benefit of the cells was only found in the area closest to the paraspinal muscles (p < 0.01). Bone formation in the control samples was of later onset compared to the cell-seeded implants. In conclusion, cell-based bone tissue engineering in an ectopic environment was clearly effective. Similar constructs implanted in a posterolateral spine fusion location hardly showed any effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M van Gaalen
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Giannicola G, Ferrari E, Citro G, Sacchetti B, Corsi A, Riminucci M, Cinotti G, Bianco P. Graft vascularization is a critical rate-limiting step in skeletal stem cell-mediated posterolateral spinal fusion. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2010; 4:273-83. [PMID: 20013838 DOI: 10.1002/term.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The ability of skeletal stem cells (SSCs) to direct spinal fusion (SF) upon transplantation in conjunction with osteoconductive biomaterials was investigated in a rabbit model. When tested in a mouse heterotopic transplantation assay, rabbit SSCs and Pro-Osteon 500R was osteoconductive and supported osteogenesis. When used in a SF model, the same constructs induced bone formation in periapophyseal regions (PARs). In this respect, they proved to be superior to grafts of cell-free carrier or total uncultured bone marrow-carrier constructs, used as controls. However, interapophyseal regions (IARs) remained devoid of new bone, such that true bony bridging of adjacent transverse apophyses (true SF) could not be achieved. Interestingly, this could not be predicted from high-resolution radiography. A systematic histological survey of the entire graft harvested at 6 months was essential for proper assessment of the transplantation procedure outcome. Immunohistochemical analysis of microvessel density revealed that IARs remained undervascularized, as compared to PARs, suggesting that differential vascularization could account for the absence or presence of new bone formation in the same regions. SF is an extreme model of stem cell-directed bone regeneration, requiring a combination of orthotopic (PAR) and heterotopic (IAR) bone formation. Our data show that, in this setting, graft size can be critical with respect to the necessary neovascularization, a crucial variable independent of proper osteogenic and osteoconductive competence of the cells and materials employed. Furthermore, stringent histological studies are mandatory for proper assessment of outcomes in SF studies, in which the use of mineralized materials can make radiographic assessment misleading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Giannicola
- Orthopaedic Department, University 'La Sapienza', Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ploumis A, Albert TJ, Brown Z, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE. Healos graft carrier with bone marrow aspirate instead of allograft as adjunct to local autograft for posterolateral fusion in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 13:211-5. [DOI: 10.3171/2010.3.spine09603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object
The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of Healos graft carrier with bone marrow aspirate and local autograft compared with the results of allograft in patients with lumbar degenerative scoliosis undergoing posterolateral fusion.
Methods
Twenty-eight patients with degenerative scoliosis underwent posterolateral instrumented fusion and decompression. Patients were grouped according to the graft used. Group A consisted of 12 cases in which the authors used a Healos graft carrier, bone marrow aspirate, and local autograft, and Group B consisted of 16 cases in which the authors used cancellous allograft and local autograft. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively in terms of pain (visual analog scale), function (Oswestry Disability Index), curve magnitude (Cobb angle), and fusion status (plain and dynamic radiographs). The 2 groups did not differ statistically significantly (p > 0.05) in age, sex, smoking habits, magnitude of preoperative visual analog scale score, Oswestry Disability Index score, Cobb angle, or number of levels requiring decompression and fusion.
Results
The groups had similar (p > 0.05) results in terms of pain, function, curve progression, and fusion rates at the 2-year follow-up examination. Radiographic fusion was achieved in all but 2 cases, 1 in each group, in which the patients were asymptomatic. Patients in the allograft group (Group B) showed evidence of fusion earlier than in the Healos group (p < 0.05). No toxicity from Healos graft was recorded.
Conclusions
The combination of Healos hydroxyapatite sponge and bone marrow aspirate plus local allograft had significantly slower fusion rates but equal clinical outcomes compared with cancellous allograft plus local autograft when used for posterolateral fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avraam Ploumis
- 1Orthopaedic Department, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
- 2Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Todd J. Albert
- 1Orthopaedic Department, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Zoe Brown
- 1Orthopaedic Department, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fu TS, Ueng SWN, Tsai TT, Chen LH, Lin SS, Chen WJ. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen on mesenchymal stem cells for lumbar fusion in vivo. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11:52. [PMID: 20302633 PMCID: PMC2850325 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2009] [Accepted: 03/19/2010] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy has been proved in improving bone healing, but its effects on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in vivo is not clear. The aims of this study are to clarify whether the HBO therapy has the same enhancing effect on MSCs with regard to bone formation and maturation and to ascertain whether the transplanted MSCs survive in the grafted area and contribute to new bone formation. Methods Twenty-three adult rabbits underwent posterolateral fusion at L4-L5 level. The animals were divided into three groups according to the material implanted and subsequent treatment: (1) Alginate carrier (n = 6); (2) Alginate-MSCs composite (n = 11); and (3) Alginate-MSCs composite with HBO therapy (n = 6). After 12 weeks, spine fusion was examined using radiographic examination, manual testing, and histological examination. Using a PKH fluorescence labeling system, whether the transplanted MSCs survived and contributed to new bone formation in the grafted area after HBO therapy was also examined. Results The bilateral fusion areas in each animal were evaluated independently. By radiographic examination and manual palpation, union for the Alginate, Alginate-MSCs, and Alginate-MSCs-HBO groups was 0 of 12, 10 of 22, and 6 of 12 respectively. The difference between the Alginate-MSCs and Alginate-MSCs-HBO groups was not significant (P = 0.7997). The fluorescence microscopy histological analysis indicated that the transplanted PKH67-labeled MSCs survived and partly contributed to new bone formation in the grafted area. Conclusions This study demonstrated that the preconditioned MSCs could survive and yield bone formation in the grafted area. HBO therapy did not enhance the osteogenic ability of MSCs and improve the success of spine fusion in the rabbit model. Although there was no significant effect of HBO therapy on MSCs for spine fusion, the study encourages us to research a more basic approach for determining the optimal oxygen tension and pressure that are required to maintain and enhance the osteogenic ability of preconditioned MSCs. Further controlled in vivo and in vitro studies are required for achieving a better understanding of the effect of HBO treatment on MSCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsai-Sheng Fu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cultured autologous bone marrow stem cells inhibit bony fusion in a rabbit model of posterolateral lumbar fusion with autologous bone graft. J Clin Neurosci 2010; 17:481-5. [PMID: 20171892 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2009] [Accepted: 06/26/2009] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been isolated from various tissues and expanded in culture. MSCs add osteogenic potential to ceramic scaffolds when used together. A spinal fusion rabbit model was used to evaluate whether a pellet of cultured, autologous bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs) with osteogenic differentiation could increase the fusion rate when co-grafted with an autologous bone graft compared to autograft alone. Thirty rabbits were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 received bone autograft alone and Group 2 received bone autograft plus a pellet of cultured and differentiated BMSCs. Group 2 rabbits had a bone marrow puncture, after which the BMSC were cultured and osteoblastic differentiation was induced. BMSC cultures were obtained from 12 of 15 rabbits. The 27 rabbits underwent a bilateral, L4-L5 intertransverse fusion with an autograft and in Group 2 rabbits a pellet of differentiated BMSCs was added to the autograft. In Group 1, the fusion rate was 53% (8 of 15 rabbits) and in Group 2 the fusion rate was 0% (p<0.05). Adding differentiated BMSCs in a pellet without a scaffold not only failed to increase fusion rate, but completely inhibited bony growth.
Collapse
|
50
|
Aghaloo T, Cowan CM, Zhang X, Freymiller E, Soo C, Wu B, Ting K, Zhang Z. The effect of NELL1 and bone morphogenetic protein-2 on calvarial bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:300-8. [PMID: 20116699 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2008] [Accepted: 03/23/2009] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Most craniofacial birth defects contain skeletal components that require bone grafting. Although many growth factors have shown potential for use in bone regeneration, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are the most osteoinductive. However, supraphysiologic doses, high cost, and potential adverse effects stimulate clinicians and researchers to identify complementary molecules that allow a reduction in dose of BMP-2. Because NELL1 plays a key role as a regulator of craniofacial skeletal morphogenesis, especially in committed chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation, and a previous synergistic mechanism has been identified, NELL1 is an ideal molecule for combination with BMP-2 in calvarial defect regeneration. We investigated the effect of NELL1 and BMP-2 on bone regeneration in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS BMP-2 doses of 589 and 1,178 ng were grafted into 5-mm critical-sized rat calvarial defects, as compared with 589 ng of NELL1 plus 589 ng of BMP-2 and 1,178 ng of NELL1 plus 1,178 ng of BMP-2, and bone regeneration was analyzed. RESULTS Live micro-computed tomography data showed increased bone formation throughout 4 to 8 weeks in all groups but a significant improvement when the lower doses of each molecule were combined. High-resolution micro-computed tomography and histology showed more mature and complete defect healing when the combination of NELL1 plus BMP-2 was compared with BMP-2 alone at lower doses. CONCLUSION The observed potential synergy has significant value in the future treatment of patients with craniofacial defects requiring extensive bone grafting that would normally entail extraoral autogenous bone grafts or doses of BMP-2 in milligrams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Aghaloo
- Dental and Craniofacial Research Institute and Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|