Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws

Assessing the Accuracy and Safety Thresholds of Patient-Specific Screw Guide Template System in Cervical and Thoracic Spine Surgeries Using DAST Measurements

Introduction

To analyze the reliability of the newly developed patient-specific Screw Guide Template (SGT) system as an intraoperative navigation device for spinal screw insertion.

Methods

We attempted to place 428 screws for 51 patients. The accuracy of the screw track was assessed by deviation of the screw axis from the preplanned trajectory on postoperative CT. The safety of the screw insertion was evaluated by the bone breach of the screw. The bone diameter available for screw trajectory (DAST) was measured, and the relations to the bone breach were analyzed.

Results

In the inserted screws, 98.4% were defined as accurate, and 94.6% were contained in the target bone. In the cervical spine, the screw deviation between breaching (0.57 mm) and contained screws (0.43 mm) did not significantly differ, whereas DAST for breaching screws (3.62 mm) was significantly smaller than contained screws (5.33 mm) (p<0.001). Cervical screws with ≥4.0 mm DAST showed a significantly lower incidence of bone breach (0.4%) than ≤3.9 mm DAST (28.3%) (p<0.001). In the thoracic spine, screw deviation and DAST had significant differences between breaching (1.54 mm, 4.41 mm) and contained (0.75 mm, 6.07 mm) (p<0.001). The incidence of the breach was significantly lower in thoracic screws with ≥5.0 mm (1.9%) than ≤4.9 (21.9%) DAST (p<0.001).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that our SGT system could support precise screw insertion for 98.4% accuracy and 94.6% safety. DAST was recommended to be ≥4.0 and ≥5.0 mm in the cervical and thoracic spines for safe screw insertion.

Reducing residual forces in spinal fusion using a custom-built rod bending machine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

As part of spinal fusion surgery, shaping the rod implant to align with the anatomy is a tedious, error-prone, and time-consuming manual process. Inadequately contoured rod implants introduce stress on the screw-bone interface of the pedicle screws, potentially leading to screw loosening or even pull-out.

METHODS

We propose the first fully automated solution to the rod bending problem by leveraging the advantages of augmented reality and robotics. Augmented reality not only enables the surgeons to intraoperatively digitize the screw positions but also provides a human-computer interface to the wirelessly integrated custom-built rod bending machine. Furthermore, we introduce custom-built test rigs to quantify per screw absolute tensile/compressive residual forces on the screw-bone interface. Besides residual forces, we have evaluated the required bending times and reducer engagements, and compared our method to the freehand gold standard.

RESULTS

We achieved a significant reduction of the average absolute residual forces from for the freehand gold standard to (p=0.0015) using the bending machine. Moreover, our bending machine reduced the average time to instrumentation per screw from to . Reducer engagements per rod were significantly decreased from an average of 1.00±1.14 to 0.11±0.32 (p=0.0037).

CONCLUSION

The combination of augmented reality and robotics has the potential to improve surgical outcomes while minimizing the dependency on individual surgeon skill and dexterity.

Accurate Placement and Revisions for Cervical Pedicle Screws Placed With or Without Navigation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of placement for cervical pedicle screws with and without the use of spinal navigation.

METHODS

A structured search was conducted in electronic databases without any language or date restrictions. Eligible studies reported the proportion of accurately placed cervical pedicle screws measured on intraoperative or postoperative 3D imaging, and reported whether intraoperative navigation was used during screw placement. Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were used to evaluate the methodological quality of how accuracy was assessed for cervical pedicle screws.

RESULTS

After screening and critical appraisal, 4697 cervical pedicle screws from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion for cervical pedicle screws with a breach up to 2 mm was 94% for navigated screws and did not differ from the pooled proportion for non-navigated screws (96%). The pooled proportion for cervical pedicle screws placed completely in the pedicle was 76% for navigated screws and did not differ from the pooled proportion for non-navigated screws (82%). Intraoperative screw reposition rates and screw revision rates as a result of postoperative imaging also did not differ between navigated and non-navigated screw placement.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the use of spinal navigation systems does not significantly improve the accuracy of placement of cervical pedicle screws compared to screws placed without navigation. Future studies evaluating intraoperative navigation for cervical pedicle screw placement should focus on the learning curve, postoperative complications, and the complexity of surgical cases.

Research into the anatomy of the subaxial cervical pedicle for ensuring screw insertion safety

The study aimed to determine the optimal entry points and trajectories for posterior subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation. Computed tomography (CT) and Mimics software were used to evaluate the subaxial cervical pedicle in 42 cervical spine CT scans. The width of the cervical pedicle was measured and compared at medial angulations of 30°, 35°, 40°, 45°, 50°, 55°, and 60° relative to the midline sagittal plane. Based on an observational examination of the positions of all cervical 3-dimensional models and screws, the proposed entry point for C3-7 CPS was analyzed. Although the variations in C3-6 pedicle width (PW) among 45°, 50°, and 55° were not statistically significant, they were significantly larger than the differences among 30°, 35°, 40°, and 60° angles (P < .05). The differences in C7 PW between the 30°, 35°, 40°, and 45° angles were not statistically different even though the 30°, 35°, 40°, and 45° angles were significantly bigger. (P < .05). The proposed entry point for C3-7 CPS was below the junction of the lateral and lower borders of the superior articular process joint surface. The entry point for C3-7 levels was below the junction of the lateral and lower borders of the superior articular process joint surface. The optimal medial angulation for the posterior C3-6 CPS was 45°-55° and that for the posterior C7 CPS was 30°-45°. The sagittal angle of the posterior C3-7 CPS was parallel to the corresponding upper endplate.

Modified Tap-drilling Technique for Mid-cervical Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case Series of 473 Consecutive Screws

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTION

To report our modified tap-drilling technique for mid-cervical pedicle screw placement and to evaluate its safety and accuracy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical pedicle screw fixation, which provides a strong stabilization, has been a major concern due to the potential risks to neurovascular structures despite its increasing use. Several insertion techniques have been described so far to improve the cervical pedicle screw placement accuracy.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent mid-cervical (C3-C6) pedicle screw fixation between September 2005 and September 2020. Laminectomy, laminoforaminotomy, or notch-referred anatomic landmark methods were used to adjust the entry point and the direction of the screws. After the cortical bone was removed at the entry point with a diamond burr, the cancellous bone was slowly drilled with a hand drill starting from 8 to 10 millimeters in length. Then, all of the bone walls were checked with a ball-tip probe to determine if there was any breach. The procedure was repeated several times. After completing the drilling, the screw was inserted without tapping. The breach rate of pedicle screws was analyzed on postoperative computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

A total of 473 mid-cervical pedicle screws were placed in 122 consecutive patients. No navigation or computer-assisted system was used, and the first 2 authors inserted all of the screws. All patients completed the surgery, and no evident intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative CT scans were obtained for 405 screws. Although deviation was observed for 131 pedicle screws, a critical deviation was observed for only 25 pedicle screws.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical pedicle screw insertion is a risky but applicable technique. Checking all of the bone walls with a ball-tip probe before gradually advancing the hand drill in small amounts, as presented in this article, may lead to the safe and effective placement of cervical pedicle screws.

Safety and Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Cervical Screw Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and safety of robot-assisted (RA) cervical screw placement with conventional freehand (FH) technique.

METHODS

Computer-based searches were conducted on various databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, the China Biology Medicine, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting the use of RA techniques for cervical screw placement and providing data on safety and accuracy outcomes. Primary outcome indicators focused on the accuracy of screw placement, while secondary outcome indicators included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, complication rate, and radiation dose. Data from eligible studies were extracted and synthesized using a forest plot analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients (1233 screws) from 6 studies were included, with 148 patients (47.4% with 567 screws) in the RA group. Perfect screw accuracy, as categorized by Gertzbein-Robbins grade A, was significantly superior with RA surgery compared to FH technique. RA screw implantation significantly reduced complication rates, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospitalization, and radiation dose compared to the conventional FH group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in surgery time between the RA and FH groups.

CONCLUSIONS

RA surgery significantly improves the accuracy of cervical screw insertion and offers potential advantages in terms of reduced complications and blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and decreased radiation exposure. However, the impact on operative time remains uncertain. Further high-quality studies, including large-scale randomized controlled trials, are needed to strengthen the evidence base.

Lateral Mass Screws Versus Pedicle Screws at C7: Reoperation Rates for Operative Adjacent Segment Disease and Nonunion in Posterior Cervical Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic adjacent segment disease (operative ASD) and symptomatic nonunions (operative nonunions) in posterior cervical fusions (PCFs) stopping at C7 using either lateral mass screws (LMS) or cervical pedicle screws (CPS) at C7.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Stopping PCFs at C7 has been controversial because of the risks of adjacent segment disease or nonunions. The two commonly used fixation techniques at the C7 level are LMS and CPS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis from the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry identified a cohort of patients with cervical degenerative disk disease who underwent primary PCFs stopping at C7 with either LMS or CPS at C7. Demographic and operative data were extracted from the registry, and operative ASD and operative nonunions were adjudicated through chart review. Patients were followed until validated operative ASD or nonunion, membership termination, death, or end of study (March 31, 2022). Descriptive statistics and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were calculated for operative ASDs and operative nonunions.

RESULTS

We found 481 patients with PCFs stopping at C7 with either LMS (n=347) or CPS (n=134) at C7 with an average follow-up time of 5.6 (±3.8) years, time to operative ASD of 3.0 (±2.8) years, and to operative nonunion of 1.2 (±0.7) years. There were 11 operative ASDs (LMS=8, CPS=3) and eight operative nonunions (LMS=4, CPS=4). There was no statistical difference between patients stopping at C7 with LMS versus CPS for operative ASDs (HR: 0.68, 95% CI=0.17-2.77, P =0.60) or operative nonunions (HR: 2.09, 95% CI=0.45-8.58, P =0.37).

CONCLUSION

A large cohort of patients with PCFs stopping at C7 with an average follow-up of > 5 years found no statistical difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic ASD (operative ASD) or operative nonunion using either LMS or CPS at C7.

[Spinal navigation with preoperative computed tomography]

OBJECTIVE

Safe placement of posterior cervical-sacral pedicle screws, S2-Ala-iliac screws, iliac screws, transarticular screws C1/2, translaminar screws C2 or cervical lateral mass screws under the guidance of spinal navigation.

INDICATIONS

All posterior spinal instrumentations with screws: instabilities and deformities of rheumatic, traumatic, neoplastic, infectious, iatrogenic or congenital origin; multilevel cervical spinal stenosis with degenerative instability or kyphosis of the affected spinal segment.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

There are no absolute contraindications for spinal navigation.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Cervical spine: Prone position on a gel mattress, rigid head fixation, e.g., with Mayfield tongs; if appropriate, closed reduction under lateral image intensification; thoracic + lumbar spine: prone position on a cushioned frame; midline posterior surgical approach at the level of the segments to be instrumented; if necessary, open reduction; insertion of the cervical/upper thoracic screws under the guidance of spinal navigation; if necessary, posterior decompression; instrumentation longitudinal rods; if fusion is to be obtained, decortication of the posterior bone elements with a high-speed burr and onlay of cancellous bone or bone substitutes.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

In stable instrumentations, no postoperative immobilization with orthosis is necessary, removal of drains (if used) 2-3 days postoperatively (postop), removal of the sutures 14 days postop, clinical and x‑ray controls 3 and 12 months postop or in case of clinical or neurological deterioration.

RESULTS

Numerous studies showed that the use of spinal navigation significantly reduces implant malplacement rates, complications, and revision surgery. Furthermore, intraoperative radiation exposure to the operation team can be reduced by up to 90%.

Individualized 3D printed navigation template-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screws vs. free-hand screws for the treatment of upper cervical fractures

Objective

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of freehand atlantoaxial pedicle screws against custom 3D printed navigation template screws in the treatment of upper cervical fractures.

Methods

In our institution from 2010 to 2020, a retrospective cohort analysis of 23 patients with upper cervical fractures was done. These patients were separated into two groups: group A (N = 12), which received customized 3D printed navigation template-assisted screws with virtual reality techniques, and group B (N = 11), which received freehand screws assisted by intraoperative fluoroscopy. Every patient was monitored for more than 1 year. The two groups were contrasted in terms of screw implant accuracy, cervical spine Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, surgical time, fluoroscopy times, and intraoperative blood loss.

Results

A total of 88 atlantoaxial pedicle screws in all, 46 in group A and 42 in group B, were implanted. In group A, the screw insertion accuracy rate was 95.7%, compared to 80.0% in group B (P < 0.05). When compared to group B, group A had shorter surgery times, less blood loss, fewer fluoroscopies, a higher short-term JOA score, and overt pain reduction (P < 0.05). However, there was no discernible difference between the two groups' VAS scores, long-term JOA scores, or ASIA scores (sensory and motor), at the most recent follow-up.

Conclusion

Individualized 3D printed guide leads to significant improvement in the screw safety, efficacy, and accuracy, which may be a promising strategy for the treatment of upper cervical fractures.

Navigation accuracy and assessability of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK instrumentation with multimodal intraoperative imaging in spinal oncology

Radiolucent carbon-fiber reinforced PEEK (CFRP) implants have helped improve oncological follow-up and radiation therapy. Here, we investigated the performance of 3D intraoperative imaging and navigation systems for instrumentation and precision assessment of CFRP pedicle screws across the thoraco-lumbar spine. Thirty-three patients with spinal tumors underwent navigated CFRP instrumentation with intraoperative CT (iCT), robotic cone-beam CT (rCBCT) or cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging. Two different navigation systems were used for iCT-/rCBCT- and CBCT-based navigation. Demographic, clinical and outcome data was assessed. Four blinded observers rated image quality, assessability and accuracy of CFRP pedicle screws. Inter-observer reliability was determined with Fleiss` Kappa analysis. Between 2018 and 2021, 243 CFRP screws were implanted (iCT:93, rCBCT: 99, CBCT: 51), of which 13 were non-assessable (iCT: 1, rCBCT: 9, CBCT: 3; *p = 0.0475; iCT vs. rCBCT). Navigation accuracy was highest using iCT (74%), followed by rCBCT (69%) and CBCT (49%) (*p = 0.0064; iCT vs. CBCT and rCBCT vs. CBCT). All observers rated iCT image quality higher than rCBCT/CBCT image quality (*p < 0.01) but relevant pedicle breaches were reliably identified with substantial agreement between all observers regardless of the imaging modality. Navigation accuracy for CFRP pedicle screws was considerably lower than expected from reports on titanium implants and CT may be best for reliable assessment of CFRP materials.

Minimally invasive lateral occipitocervical fixation: case series and technique description

PURPOSE

Occipitocervical junction (OCJ) instability is commonly treated with fixation via open posterior approach. The use of intraoperative navigation allows us to perform occipitocervical fixation via minimally invasive approach. We report a series of patients treated with percutaneous occipitocervical fixation, describing the surgical procedure in detail and discussing the technique.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 8 patients affected by OCJ instability secondary to trauma and rheumatoid arthritis. Traumatic patients were preoperatively evaluated with CT scan and MRI scan if needed. Rheumatoid arthritis group was evaluated with both CT and MR. Patients underwent percutaneous occipitocervical fixation with the assist of intraoperative 3D imaging and navigation. All patients were functionally and radiologically evaluated pre-, at 6 weeks, and at 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Percutaneous occipitocervical fixation was successfully performed in all of the patients. 33 screws were placed. 29 (87.88%) were placed without any pedicle breach. In 3 (9.09%) screws we observed a minor; and in 1 (3.03%) screw we observed a major pedicle breach. We did not have any postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Described method of occipitocervical fixation is a minimally invasive method that has a similar outcome to the open technique. It requires the experience in open techniques and the assist of intraoperative 3D imaging and navigation to be performed efficiently.

O-Arm Navigated Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lower Cervical Fracture-Dislocation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement with O-arm navigation in the treatment of lower cervical fracture-dislocation.

METHODS

A retrospective clinical study was performed involving 42 consecutive patients with lower cervical spine fracture-dislocation who underwent CPS fixation surgery with O-arm navigation (CPS group) or received conventional lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation surgery (LMS group) between August 2015 and August 2019. Accuracy of CPS position was evaluated by postoperative CT. The clinical parameters including preoperative and final follow-up Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, preoperative Sub-axial Injury Classification (SLIC) score, number of fixation segments, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, injury mechanism, injury location, surgical complications were also assessed between the two groups.

RESULTS

In LMS group, the preoperative SLIC score was 7.5 ± 0.9, ASIA score improvement was 0.8 ± 0.5, JOA score improvement was 3.0 ± 1.8, mean operation time was 204 ± 89 min, intraoperative blood loss was 311 ± 127 ml. In CPS group, the preoperative SLIC score was 7.3 ± 1.2, ASIA score improvement was 0.9 ± 0.5, JOA score improvement was 3.2 ± 2.4, mean operation time is 241 ± 85 min, intraoperative blood loss is about 327 ± 120 ml. There was no significant difference in terms of above clinical parameters between the two groups (P > 0.05), the fixation segments in CPS group (3.5 ± 1.1) were less than that in LMS group (4.2 ± 0.7) (P = 0.037). The accuracy of CPS insertion was evaluated based on postoperative CT. Of all the 118 CPSs, 83 (70.3%) were defined as Grade 0; 27 (22.9%) as Grade 1; eight (6.8%) as Grade 2; and none as Grade 3. CPS malposition rate in this study was 6.8%. In this study, there was no direct intraoperative or postoperative complication caused by CPS or LMS insertion. All the operations were successfully completed in two groups. One of the patients in LMS group presented cerebrospinal fluid leak caused by bone fragment broken of the dural sac, which led to delayed incision healing. CPS group and LMS group both had two patients who suffered pulmonary infection after surgery. A total of 78.6% of the patients showed evidence of neurologic recovery. Satisfactory reduction was achieved in all cases and maintained throughout the follow-up duration.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of lower cervical spine fracture-dislocation, cervical pedicle screw insertion with O-arm navigation is a safe and effective method for posterior fixation.

Morphological characteristics of subaxial cervical pedicles and surrounding critical structures in patients with vertebral artery dominance - an anatomical study based on computed tomographic imaging

Background

No study has assessed the feasibility and safety of cervical pedicle screw implantation in patients with vertebral artery dominance (VAD), a common vertebral artery (VA) variation which can increase VA injury (VAI) risk. This study was to assess morphological characteristics of the subaxial cervical pedicles and surrounding critical structures, and identify their correlations in patients with VAD.

Methods

Computed tomography arteriography scans of 152 patients were used for retrospectively measuring parameters including pedicle outer width (POW), the distance from the lateral pedicle border to the closest part of VA (DPVA), diameter of VA (DVA), area of VA (AVA), area of transverse foramen (ATF) and occupational ratio of transverse foramen (TF). Moreover, correlations among some critical parameters were assessed.

Results

One hundred eight males and 44 females, with a mean age of 55.9 years were included. POW was smaller on the dominant side than on the non-dominant side, whereas DPVA, DVA, AVA, ATF, and TF were larger on the dominant side than those on the non-dominant side. On both sides, POW < 4 mm and POW + DPVA < 5 mm were observed most frequently at C3 and C4. On both sides, POW was correlated to ATF, and ATF was correlated to DVA and AVA. DPVA was correlated to ATF on the dominant side.

Conclusion

Patients with VAD exhibited smaller POW on the dominant side, most frequently at C3 and C4. Dominant VA may indirectly affect POW. TF may be a key determinant of DPVA and POW.

Vital Role of In-House 3D Lab to Create Unprecedented Solutions for Challenges in Spinal Surgery, Practical Guidelines and Clinical Case Series

For decades, the advantages of rapid prototyping for clinical use have been recognized. However, demonstrations of potential solutions to treat spinal problems that cannot be solved otherwise are scarce. In this paper, we describe the development, regulatory process, and clinical application of two types of patient specific 3D-printed devices that were developed at an in-house 3D point-of-care facility. This 3D lab made it possible to elegantly treat patients with spinal problems that could not have been treated in a conventional manner. The first device, applied in three patients, is a printed nylon drill guide, with such accuracy that it can be used for insertion of cervical pedicle screws in very young children, which has been applied even in semi-acute settings. The other is a 3D-printed titanium spinal column prosthesis that was used to treat progressive and severe deformities due to lysis of the anterior column in three patients. The unique opportunity to control size, shape, and material characteristics allowed a relatively easy solution for these patients, who were developing paraplegia. In this paper, we discuss the pathway toward the design and final application, including technical file creation for dossier building and challenges within a point-of-care lab.

[3D printing in spinal surgery-Update]

The technique of 3D printing offers a high potential for further optimization of spinal surgery. This new technology has been published for different areas in the field of spinal surgery, e.g. in preoperative planning, intraoperative use as well as to create patient-specific implants. For example, it has been demonstrated that preoperative 3‑dimensional visualization of spinal deformities is helpful in planning procedures. Moreover, insertion of pedicle screws seems to be more accurate when using individualized templates to guide the drill compared to freehand techniques. This review summarizes the current literature dealing with 3D printing in spinal surgery with special consideration of the current applications, the limitations and the future potential.

Autonomous lumbar spine pedicle screw planning using machine learning: A validation study

Introduction:

Several techniques for pedicle screw placement have been described including freehand techniques, fluoroscopy assisted, computed tomography (CT) guidance, and robotics. Image-guided surgery offers the potential to combine the benefits of CT guidance without the added radiation. This study investigated the ability of a neural network to place lumbar pedicle screws with the correct length, diameter, and angulation autonomously within radiographs without the need for human involvement.

Materials and Methods:

The neural network was trained using a machine learning process. The method combines the previously reported autonomous spine segmentation solution with a landmark localization solution. The pedicle screw placement was evaluated using the Zdichavsky, Ravi, and Gertzbein grading systems.

Results:

In total, the program placed 208 pedicle screws between the L1 and S1 spinal levels. Of the 208 placed pedicle screws, 208 (100%) had a Zdichavsky Score 1A, 206 (99.0%) of all screws were Ravi Grade 1, and Gertzbein Grade A indicating no breech. The final two screws (1.0%) had a Ravi score of 2 (<2 mm breech) and a Gertzbein grade of B (<2 mm breech).

Conclusion:

The results of this experiment can be combined with an image-guided platform to provide an efficient and highly effective method of placing pedicle screws during spinal stabilization surgery.

Cervical Spine Pedicle Screw Accuracy in Fluoroscopic, Navigated and Template Guided Systems-A Systematic Review

Background: Pedicle screws provide excellent fixation for a wide range of indications. However, their adoption in the cervical spine has been slower than in the thoracic and lumbar spine, which is largely due to the smaller pedicle sizes and the proximity to the neurovascular structures in the neck. In recent years, technology has been developed to improve the accuracy and thereby the safety of cervical pedicle screw placement over traditional fluoroscopic techniques, including intraoperative 3D navigation, computer-assisted Systems and 3D template moulds. We have performed a systematic review into the accuracy rates of the various systems. Methods: The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible papers; 9 valid papers involving 1427 screws were found. Results: fluoroscopic methods achieved an 80.6% accuracy and navigation methods produced 91.4% and 96.7% accuracy for templates. Conclusion: Navigation methods are significantly more accurate than fluoroscopy, they reduce radiation exposure to the surgical team, and improvements in technology are speeding up operating times. Significantly superior results for templates over fluoroscopy and navigation are complemented by reduced radiation exposure to patient and surgeon; however, the technology requires a more invasive approach, prolonged pre-operative planning and the development of an infrastructure to allow for their rapid production and delivery. We affirm the superiority of navigation over other methods for providing the most accurate and the safest cervical pedicle screw instrumentation, as it is more accurate than fluoroscopy and lacks the limitations of templates.

Clinical efficiency of operating room-based sliding gantry CT as compared to mobile cone-beam CT-based navigated pedicle screw placement in 853 patients and 6733 screws

PURPOSE

Multiple solutions for navigation-guided pedicle screw placement are available. However, the efficiency with regard to clinical and resource implications has not yet been analyzed. The present study's aim was to analyze whether an operating room sliding gantry CT (ORCT)-based approach for spinal instrumentation is more efficient than a mobile cone-beam CT (CBCT)-based approach.

METHODS

This cohort study included a random sample of 853 patients who underwent spinal instrumentation using ORCT-based or CBCT-based pedicle screw placement due to tumor, degenerative, trauma, infection, or deformity disorders between November 2015 and January 2020.

RESULTS

More screws had to be revised intraoperatively in the CBCT group due to insufficient placement (ORCT: 98, 2.8% vs. CBCT: 128, 4.0%; p = 0.0081). The mean time of patients inside the OR (Interval 5 Entry-Exit) was significantly shorter for the ORCT group (ORCT: mean, [95% CI] 256.0, [247.8, 264.3] min, CBCT: 283.0, [274.4, 291.5] min; p < 0.0001) based on shorter times for Interval 2 Positioning-Incision (ORCT: 18.8, [18.1, 19.9] min, CBCT: 33.6, [32.2, 35.5] min; p < 0.0001) and Interval 4 Suture-Exit (ORCT: 24.3, [23.6, 26.1] min, CBCT: 29.3, [27.5, 30.7] min; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of imaging technology for navigated pedicle screw placement has significant impact on standard spine procedures even in a high-volume spine center with daily routine in such devices. Particularly with regard to the duration of surgeries, the shorter time needed for preparation and de-positioning in the ORCT group made the main difference, while the accuracy was even higher for the ORCT.

Navigation for surgical treatment of disorders of the cervical spine - A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) is a well-established tool in spinal instrumentation surgery. Different techniques - each with specific advantages and disadvantages - are used in the cervical spine.

METHODS

A structured summary of different spinal navigation techniques and a review of the literature were done to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of specific navigation tools in the cervical spine.

RESULTS

In cervical spine surgery, CAN increases the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, reduces screw mispositioning and leads to fewer revision surgeries. Due to the mobility of the cervical spine, preoperative CT followed by region matching or intraoperative CT are recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

CAN increases pedicle screw placement accuracy and should be used in spinal instrumentation for the cervical spine whenever possible.

Prevalence of spine surgery navigation techniques and availability in Africa: A cross-sectional study

Background

Africa has a large burden of spine pathology but has limited and insufficient infrastructure to manage these spine disorders. Therefore, we conducted this e-survey to assess the prevalence and identify the determinants of the availability of spine surgery navigation techniques in Africa.

Materials and methods

A two-part questionnaire was disseminated amongst African neurological and orthopedic surgery consultants and trainees from January 24 to February 23, 2021. The Chi-Square, Fisher Exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to evaluate bivariable relationships, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We had 113 respondents from all regions of Africa. Most (86.7 %) participants who practiced or trained in public centers and centers had an annual median spine case surgery volume of 200 (IQR = 190) interventions. Fluoroscopy was the most prevalent spine surgery navigation technique (96.5 %), followed by freehand (55.8 %), stereotactic without intraoperative CT scan (31.9 %), robotic with intraoperative CT scan (29.2 %), stereotactic with intraoperative CT scan (8.8 %), and robotic without intraoperative CT scan (6.2 %). Cost of equipment (94.7 %), lack of trained staff to service (63.7 %), or run the equipment (60.2 %) were the most common barriers to the availability of spine instrumentation navigation. In addition, there were significant regional differences in access to trained staff to run and service the equipment (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

There is a need to increase access to more advanced navigation techniques, and we identified the determinants of availability.

•

African spine surgery has regional disparities in navigation techniques.

•

Fluoroscopy is the most prevalent navigation technique.

•

Cost and lack of trained personnel are the most significant barriers.

Free-Hand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement by Using Para-articular Minilaminotomy: Its Feasibility and Novice Neurosurgeons' Experience

STUDY DESIGN.

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE.

Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement is technically demanding because of the great variation in pedicle size, dimension, and angulations between cervical levels and patients and the lack of anatomical landmarks. This retrospective study was conducted to analyze novice neurosurgeons' experience of CPS placement by using the technique with direct exposure of pedicle via para-articular minilaminotomy.

METHODS.

We retrospectively reviewed 78 CPSs in 22 consecutive patients performed by 2 surgeons. All pedicle screws were inserted under the direct visualization of the pedicle by using para-articular minilaminotomy without any fluoroscopic guidance. We analyzed the direction and grade of pedicle perforation on the postoperative computed tomography scan. The degree of perforation was classified as grade 0 to 3. Grades 0 and 1 were classified as the correct position and the others, as the incorrect position.

RESULTS.

In total, the correct position (grade 0 and 1) was found in 72 (92.3%) screws and the incorrect position (grade 2 and 3) in 6 (7.7%). Among the 16 pedicle perforations (grade 1, 2, and 3 perforations), the directions were lateral in 15 (93.8%) and superior in 1 (6.2%). There were no neurovascular complications related to CPS insertion.

CONCLUSION.

Free-hand CPS placement by using para-articular minilaminotomy seems to be feasible and reproducible.

Use of Intraoperative CT Improves Accuracy of Spinal Navigation During Screw Fixation in Cervico-thoracic Region

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of a single-center consecutive series of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that using a mobile intraoperative computed tomography in combination with spinal navigation would result in better accuracy of lateral mass and pedicle screws between C3 and T5 levels, compared to cone-beam computed tomography and traditional 2D fluoroscopy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Use of spinal navigation associated with 3D imaging has been shown to improve accuracy of screw positioning in the cervico-thoracic region. However, use of iCT imaging compared to a cone-beam CT has not been fully investigated in these types of surgical interventions.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a series of patients who underwent posterior cervico-thoracic fixations using different intraoperative imaging systems in a single hospital. We identified three different groups of patients: Group A, operated under 2D-fluoroscopic guidance without navigation; Group B: O-arm guidance with navigation; Group C: iCT AIRO guidance with navigation. Primary outcome was the rate of accurately placed screws, measured on intra or postoperative CT scan with Neo et al. classification for cervical pedicles screws and Gertzbein et al. for thoracic pedicle screws. Screws in cervical lateral masses were evaluated according to a new classification created by the authors.

RESULTS

Data on 67 patients and 495 screws were available. Overall screw accuracy was 92.8% (95.6% for lateral mass screws, 81.6% for cervical pedicle screws, and 90% for thoracic pedicle screws). Patients operated with iCT AIRO navigation had significantly fewer misplaced screws (2.4%) compared to 2D-fluoroscopic guidance (9.1%) and O-arm navigation (9.7%) (P = 0.0152). Accuracy rate of iCT navigation versus O-arm navigation was significantly higher (P = 0.0042), and there was no statistically significant difference in surgical time between the three Groups (P = 0.5390).

CONCLUSION

Use of high-quality CT associated with spinal navigation significantly improved accuracy of screw positioning in the cervico-thoracic region.Level of Evidence: 3.

Comparison of Morphometric Measurements of Traditional Posterior Cervical Screw and Paravertebral Foramen Screw in Chinese Population

STUDY DESIGN

A morphometric measurement study.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the length and angle parameters of the screw paths of pedicle screws (PS), lateral mass screws (LMS), and paravertebral foramen screws (PVFS) of subaxial cervical spine in Chinese population.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Aramomi proposed a novel internal fixation technology, named PVFS, as an alternative to LMS and PS for subaxial cervical vertebrae (C3-C7).

METHODS

This study measured the length and medial angles of screw paths on the three-dimensional reconstruction model of cervical computerized tomography data of 50 patients (25 men and 25 women) in our hospital from January 2018 to June 2018.

RESULTS

In general, the optimum length and medial angle of the PVFS in Chinese population were 10.65 mm and 21.12° at C3; 10.12 mm, 22.62° at C4; 9.82 mm, 23.66° at C5; 9.19 mm, 24.13° at C6; and 9.10 mm, 27.54° at C7. The optimum axial length and medial angle of PS in Chinese population were 30.94 mm, 33.92° at C3; 30.50 mm, 34.95° at C4; 31.92 mm, 33.42° at C5; 30.50 mm, 31.94° at C6; and 29.87 mm, 31.01° at C7. The optimum lengths of LMS paths in Chinese population were C3, 14.84 mm; C4, 15.33 mm; C5, 15.44 mm; C6, 14.74 mm; and C7, 14.06 mm.

CONCLUSION

Although the length of PVFS is limited, it still can be used as an effective substitute for LMS and PS. The PVFS does not have the risk of directly injuring the vertebral artery, its safety angle of insertion is larger than that in PS, and it has higher surgical safety.Level of Evidence: 3.

Pedicle screw placement with use of a navigated surgical drill at subaxial cervical spine

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement with use of a navigated surgical drill (ND) and to compare it with navigated manual probe (MP) at C3-C6.

METHODS

47 consecutive patients (27 males and 20 females, 67.2 [33-91] years) underwent a posterior cervical fixation using CPSs under an intraoperative 3D - - CT based navigation system (total 207 CPSs). For initial probing, ND with 2.2-mm steel burr was used since Apr. 2017 (Group ND; 33 patients, 152 CPSs). MP was used earlier (Group MP; 14 patients, 55 CPSs). There were no other different procedures between the two groups. The accuracy of CPS placement was graded with postoperative CT and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the total perforation rates both in axial and sagittal planes between Groups ND and MP (axial; 7.2% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.25, sagittal; 10.5% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.46). However, the lateral and rostral perforation rates were significantly reduced in Group ND compared to Group MP (lateral: 36.4% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.04; rostral: 6.3% vs. 100%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although ND did not decrease the total perforation rate significantly, it reduced the incidence of lateral and rostral perforation. ND is likely to make initial probing easier without a forcible manipulation which might cause vertebral rotation.

Assessing the Clinical Safety Profile of Computer-Assisted Navigation for Posterior Cervical Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 30-Day Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) has been shown to improve accuracy of screw placement in procedures involving the posterior cervical spine, but whether the addition of CAN affects complication rates, neurologic or otherwise, is presently unknown. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of spinal CAN on short-term clinical outcomes following posterior cervical fusion.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2011 to 2018. Patients receiving posterior cervical fusion were identified and separated into CAN and non-CAN cohorts on the basis of a propensity score matching algorithm to select similar patients for comparison. Rates of 30-day unplanned readmission, reoperation, and other complications were evaluated. A separate matching algorithm was used to generate a subgroup of patients undergoing C1-C2 or occiput-C2 fusion for comparison of the same outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 12,578 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 689 received CAN and 11,889 did not. After adjusting for baseline differences, patients receiving CAN experienced longer operations and had higher total relative value units associated with care. There were no significant differences in 30-day complication, readmission, or revision rates. At the occipitocervical junction, there were more hardware revisions in the non-CAN group, but this effect did not reach statistical significance (2 vs. 0; P = 0.155).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons should embrace navigation in the cervical spine at their own discretion, as use of CAN does not appear to be associated with increased rates of surgical complications or readmissions despite longer operative time.

Significance of Preoperative Prone Position Computed Tomography in Free Hand Subaxial Cervical Pedicular Screwing

OBJECTIVE

The subaxial cervical pedicle screwing technique shows powerful biomechanical properties for posterior cervical fusion. When applying a pedicle screw using the freehand technique, it is essential to analyse cervical computed tomography and plan the surgery accordingly. Normal cervical computed tomography is usually performed in the supine position, whereas during surgery, the patient lies in a prone position. This fact leads us to suppose that radiological evaluations may yield misleading results. Our study aimed to investigate whether there is any superiority between preoperative preparation on computed tomography performed in the prone position and that performed in the supine position.

METHODS

This study included 17 patients (132 pedicle screws) who were recently operated on with cervical vertebral computed tomography in the prone position and 17 patients (136 pedicle screws) who were operated on by conventional cervical vertebral computed tomography as the control group. The patients in both groups were compared in terms of age, gender, pathological diagnosis, screw malposition and complications. A screw malposition evaluation was made according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding age, gender and pathological diagnosis. The screw malposition rate (from 11.1% to 6.9%, p<0.05), mean malposition distance (from 2.18 mm to 1.86 mm, p <0.05), and complications statistically significantly decreased in the prone position computed tomography group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative surgical planning by performing cervical vertebral computed tomography in the prone position reduces screw malposition and complications. Our surgical success increased with a simple modification that can be applied by all clinicians without creating additional radiation exposure or additional costs.

Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Assisted Spinal Navigation in Dorsal Cervical Instrumentation: A Prospective Study on Accuracy Regarding Different Pathologies and Screw Types

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) navigated dorsal instrumentation has been successfully introduced as a new clinical standard. The proximity of vital anatomic structures makes cervical spine instrumentation an especially delicate task. Therefore, navigated approaches might prove to be beneficial. In this study, the accuracy of conventional instrumentation was compared with iCT navigated dorsal cervical spine instrumentation with focus on cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) versus lateral mass screws (LMSs) and pathologies.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective consecutive series of patients undergoing cervical dorsal instrumentation with iCT and spinal navigation and retrospectively analyzed a cohort that received conventional cervical instrumentation with C-arm fluoroscopy (control group). Accuracy was assessed with a modified Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Underlying pathologies were taken into account regarding accuracy in different entities.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were treated using iCT (357 screws: 238 CPSs, 119 LMSs), and 98 patients underwent conventional instrumentation (632 screws: 69 CPSs, 563 LMSs). We achieved an initial accuracy of 93.28% (n = 220 screws) in the iCT group and 80.9% (n = 511 screws) in the control group (P < 0.001). Significant differences were found regarding the accuracy of CPS placement in cases of degenerative disorders (iCT vs. control; 94% vs. 63%; P < 0.001) and trauma (iCT vs. control; 88% vs. 72%; P < 0.05). iCT yielded favorable precision rates in regard to LMS placement (iCT vs. control; 94.2% vs. 82%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy of iCT navigated instrumentation was significantly higher than conventional instrumentation. An overall tendency toward the use of CPSs with iCT navigation is evident, increasing the mechanical properties of the construct. iCT appears to be especially beneficial in elective surgery cases of degenerative spinal disorders.

Pedicle Screw Instrumentation of the Cervicothoracic Junction in the Sitting Position using CT-guided Navigation: Application and Technical Aspects

BACKGROUND

 We evaluate the feasibility and potential advantages of spinal CT navigation in the placement of pedicle screws at the cervicothoracic junction in the sitting position to counteract the anatomy-related limitations of 2D fluoroscopy.

METHODS

 We retrospectively analyze the data from 15 patients who underwent CT-based navigation-guided placement of a total of 36 pedicle screws at the cervicothoracic junction in the sitting position.

RESULTS

 CT-based spinal navigation is a useful method in increasing accuracy of pedicle screw instrumentation in the sitting position, successfully counteracting the anatomy-related limitations of 2D fluoroscopy at the cervicothoracic junction.

CONCLUSION

 CT-based navigation-guided placement of pedicle screws at the cervicothoracic junction in the sitting position proved to be an accurate, safe, and user-friendly method.

Current state of navigation in spine surgery

The use of navigation has become more prevalent in spine surgery. The multitude of available platforms, as well as increased availability of navigation systems, have led to increased use worldwide. Specific subsets of spine surgeons have incorporated this new technology in their practices, including minimally invasive spine (MIS) spine surgeons, neurosurgeons, and high-volume surgeons. Improved accuracy with the use of navigation has been demonstrated and its use has proven to be a safe alternative to fluoroscopic guided procedures. Navigation use allows the limitation of radiation exposure to the surgeon during common spine procedures, which over the course of a surgeon's lifetime may offer significant health benefits. Navigation has also been beneficial in tumor resection and MIS surgery, where traditional anatomic landmarks are missing or in the case of MIS not visible. As cost effectiveness improves, the use of navigation is likely to continue to expand. Navigation will also continue to expand with further innovation such as coupling the use of navigation with robotics and improving tools to enhance the end user experience.

Intraoperative image guidance for cervical spine surgery

Intraoperative image-guidance in spinal surgery has been influenced by various technological developments in imaging science since the early 1990s. The technology has evolved from simple fluoroscopic-based guidance to state-of-art intraoperative computed tomography (iCT)-based navigation systems. Although the intraoperative navigation is more commonly used in thoracolumbar spine surgery, this newer imaging platform has rapidly gained popularity in cervical approaches. The purpose of this manuscript is to address the applications of advanced image-guidance in cervical spine surgery and to describe the use of intraoperative neuro-navigation in surgical planning and execution. In this review, we aim to cover the following surgical techniques: anterior cervical approaches, atlanto-axial fixation, subaxial instrumentation, percutaneous interfacet cage implantation as well as minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. The currently available data suggested that the use of 3D navigation significantly reduces the screw malposition, operative time, mean blood loss, radiation exposure, and complication rates in comparison to the conventional fluoroscopic-guidance. With the advancements in technology and surgical techniques, 3D navigation has potential to replace conventional fluoroscopy completely.

Accurate and Minimally Invasive Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion Procedure Using the Bone Biopsy Needle as Drill Guide

Introduction

Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation provides the strongest mechanical stability. It needs, however, wide soft tissue detachment to expose the entry point and carries the potential risk of iatrogenic damage to neurovascular structures. Malposition of the CPS cannot be completely avoided even using the navigation system.

Technical Note

Using the bone biopsy needle as drill guide, we developed a novel accurate CPS insertion technique. (1) The entry point of CPS was exposed using Southwick's technique for anterior fixation or Tokioka's technique for posterior fixation. (2) A 13G bone biopsy needle was inserted from the entry point established by the fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle axis view technique described by Yukawa et al. to within a few millimeters of the pedicle. (3) The external sleeve of the bone biopsy needle was left in place as a drill guide, and the 1.25 mm guidewire for a 4.0 mm cannulated screw was then inserted into the pedicle cavity. (4) The external sleeve of the bone biopsy needle was removed, and the screw trajectory was created by a 2.7 mm cannulated drill bit over the guidewire. (5) Tapping was conducted prior to CPS insertion.

Using this method, 29 CPSs in nine patients were inserted. Postoperative computed tomography scans revealed that all the CPSs were placed accurately.

Conclusions

Utilizing the bone biopsy needle as drill guide, our procedure enables accurate positioning of CPS without expensive instruments.

HoloYolo: A proof-of-concept study for marker-less surgical navigation of spinal rod implants with augmented reality and on-device machine learning

BACKGROUND

Existing surgical navigation approaches of the rod bending procedure in spinal fusion rely on optical tracking systems that determine the location of placed pedicle screws using a hand-held marker.

METHODS

We propose a novel, marker-less surgical navigation proof-of-concept to bending rod implants. Our method combines augmented reality with on-device machine learning to generate and display a virtual template of the optimal rod shape without touching the instrumented anatomy. Performance was evaluated on lumbosacral spine phantoms against a pointer-based navigation benchmark approach and ground truth data obtained from computed tomography.

RESULTS

Our method achieved a mean error of 1.83 ± 1.10 mm compared to 1.87 ± 1.31 mm measured in the marker-based approach, while only requiring 21.33 ± 8.80 s as opposed to 36.65 ± 7.49 s attained by the pointer-based method.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggests that the combination of augmented reality and machine learning has the potential to replace conventional pointer-based navigation in the future.

Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and accuracy of the C2 pedicle versus C2 pars screws placement and free-hand technique versus navigation for upper cervical fusion patients.

Methods

Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify all papers published up to April 2020 that have evaluated C2 pedicle/pars screws placement accuracy. Two authors individually screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The accuracy rates associated with C2 pedicle/pars were extracted. The pooled accuracy rate estimated was performed by the CMA software. A funnel plot based on accuracy rate estimate was used to evaluate publication bias.

Results

From 1123 potentially relevant studies, 142 full-text publications were screened. We analyzed data from 79 studies involving 4431 patients with 6026 C2 pedicle or pars screw placement. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of studies included in this review. Overall, funnel plot and Begg’s test did not indicate obvious publication bias. The pooled analysis reveals that the accuracy rates were 93.8% for C2 pedicle screw free-hand, 93.7% for pars screw free-hand, 92.2% for navigated C2 pedicle screw, and 86.2% for navigated C2 pars screw (all, P value < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the accuracy of placement C2 pedicle versus C2 pars screws with the free-hand technique and the free-hand C2 pedicle group versus the navigated C2 pedicle group (all, P value > 0.05).

Conclusion

Overall, there was no difference in the safety and accuracy between the free-hand and navigated techniques. Further well-conducted studies with detailed stratification are needed to complement our findings.

[Assessment of the safety and accuracy of implantation of screws into the C2 vertebra using individual 3D-navigation matrices]

Introduction

Individual 3D-navigation matrices are valuable to increase the safety of screw implantation into the axis.

Objective

To analyze safety and accuracy of screw deployment into the axis using individual 3D-navigation matrices compared to free hand technique.

Material and methods

A retrospective analysis included 23 patients (group 1) who underwent implantation of 44 screws into the axis using the «free hand» technique. The screws were installed along the transpedicular or pars trajectory. A prospective analysis enrolled 17 patients (group 2) who underwent installation of 34 screws using individual navigation matrices. 3D-printing technology was applied for manufacturing these matrices. Implantation results were evaluated considering postoperative CT data and SGT (Screw Guide Template) system.

Results

In the 1st group («free hand»), grade 0 and 1 (no malposition or less than 50% of screw diameter) were recorded for 29 (65.91%) screws, grade 2 - for 13 (29.55%) screws, grade 3 - for 2 (4.45%) screws. Intraoperative injury of the vertebral artery without postoperative neurological deficit occurred in 4 (8.89%) patients. In the 2nd group, 97% of screws were implanted in accordance with grades 1 and 2. Deviation grade 2 was registered in 11 cases (32.35%). Mean deviation was 1.8 ± 1.0 mm. In the 2nd group, 28 (82.35%) out of 34 screws were completely within the bone structures (grade 0), 4 (11.76%) screws perforated pedicles for less than 50% of their diameter (grade 1). There were 2 cases of malposition grade 2 and 3 without vertebral artery injury.

Conclusion

Individual 3D navigation matrix is an effective method for screw installation into the axis. This approach exceeds fluoroscopy-assisted "free hand" technique in terms of safety of implantation.

Techniques of cervical pedicle screw insertion in lower cervical spine - A review

Cervical pedicle screws (CPS) have been used for stabilization of lower cervical spine since its first description by Abumi et al., in 1994^, but the usage has been limited due to the feared complications. Cadaveric studies have discouraged use of CPS in lower cervical spine due to high misplacement rates. On the contrary, clinical studies have shown limited complications due to screw misplacements and have highlighted the benefits of CPS with its superior biomechanical strength. Therefore surgeons have always tried to find a reliable, reproducible and safe CPS insertion technique to expand the usage of CPS with minimal complications. As of today Abumi et al. technique is the most popular free-hand technique used by surgeons, though many modifications have evolved to make the CPS insertions more safe and reproducible. The free hand technique should be considered as the cornerstone technique for CPS insertion and the navigation tools are essential to improve the safety of CPS in complex surgeries with altered cervical anatomy. The present review brings together the literature on the various aspects of cervical pedicle anatomy, the free-hand screw insertion techniques with their modifications, the screw misplacement rates and complications.

Precision and safety of Multilevel Cervical Transpedicular Screw Fixation with 3D Patient-Specific Guides; A Cadaveric Study

The aim is to design a patient-specific instrument (PSI) for multilevel cervical pedicle screw placement from C2 to C7, as well as verifying reliability and reproducibility. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained from 7 cadaveric cervical spines. Using Mimics software, semiautomatic segmentation was performed for each cervical spine, designing a 3D cervical spine bone model in order to plan transpedicular screw fixation. A PSI was designed according to the previously cited with two cannulated chimneys to guide the drill. The guides were 3D printed and surgeries performed at the laboratory. Postoperative scans were obtained to study screw placement. Sixty-eight transpedicular screws were available for study. 61.8% of all screws were within the pedicle or partially breached <4 mm. No differences were observed between cervical levels. None of these screws had neurovascular injury. Of the 27 screws with a grade 3 (screw outside the pedicle; 39.7%), only 2 had perforation of the transverse foramen and none of them would have caused a neural injury. In conclusion, multilevel PSI for cervical pedicle screw is a promising technology that despite showing improvements regarding free-hand technique requires further studies to improve the positioning of the PSI and their accuracy.

Feasibility of mixed reality-based intraoperative three-dimensional image-guided navigation for atlanto-axial pedicle screw placement

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and accuracy of mixed reality-based intraoperative three-dimensional navigated pedicle screws in three-dimensional printed model of fractured upper cervical spine. A total of 27 cervical model from patients of upper cervical spine fractures formed the study group. All the C1 and C2 pedicle screws were inserted under mixed reality-based intraoperative three-dimensional image-guided navigation system. The accuracy and safety of the pedicle screw placement were evaluated on the basis of postoperative computerized tomography scans. A total of 108 pedicle screws were properly inserted into the cervical three-dimensional models under mixed reality-based navigation, including 54 C1 pedicle screws and 54 C2 pedicle screws. Analysis of the dimensional parameters of each pedicle at C1/C2 level showed no statistically significant differences in the ideal and the actual entry points, inclined angles, and tailed angles. No screw was misplaced outside the pedicle of the three-dimensional printed model, and no ionizing X-ray radiation was used during screw placement under navigation. It is easy and safe to place C1/C2 pedicle screws under MR surgical navigation. Mixed reality-based navigation is feasible within upper cervical spinal fractures with improved safety and accuracy of C1/C2 pedicle screw insertion.

[Relevance of spinal navigation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine]

BACKGROUND

Spinal navigation has made significant advances in the last two decades. After initial experiences with pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine, technological improvements have resulted in their increased application in the cervical spine. Instrumentation techniques like cervical pedicle screws, lateral mass screws in C1 and transarticular screws C1/C2 have become standard due to the application of image guidance.

TECHNIQUE

Different navigation techniques can be distinguished based on the type of imaging. In the cervical spine, the preoperative computer tomography (CT) scan that requires intraoperative matching is still the standard of care due to the high image quality. 3D fluoroscopy navigation techniques are currently widely used in the lumbar spine, but the reduced image quality obviates the application in the more sophisticated cervical anatomy or the cervicothoracic region. The future availability of intraoperative CT scans (iCT) combines the advantages of high image quality with those of intraoperative image acquisition. This will lead to a wider use of image guidance in the cervical spine and will enable the surgeon to apply minimally invasive techniques with higher accuracy.

APPLICATION

The successful application of spinal navigation is based on the technical knowledge of navigation systems and its exercise in daily routine. Only the sufficient experience of the clinical staff makes it possible to standardize operational procedures to increase patient safety, reduce radiation dose and shorten operation time.

Application of patient-specific 3D navigation templates for pedicle screw fixation of subaxial and upper thoracic vertebrae

Objective. To analyze the safety and accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the subaxial cervical and upper thoracic spine using patient-specific 3D navigation templates.

Material and Methods. The study included 16 patients who underwent transpedicular implantation of screws in the subaxial cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae using patient-specific 3D navigation templates. A total of 88 screws were installed. All patients underwent preoperative CT angiography to assess visualization of the vertebral artery. Customized vertebral models and navigation templates were created using 3D printing technology. Models and templates were sterilized and used during surgery. The results of screw implantation, as well as the safety and accuracy of the placement, were assessed by postoperative CT.

Results. The average deviation from the planned trajectory was 1.8 ± 0.9 mm. Deviation was estimated as class 1 (<2 mm) for 57 (64.77 %) screws, class 2 (2–4 mm) for 29 (32.95 %), and class 3 for two (2.27 %). The safety of screw implantation of grade 0 (the screw is completely inside the bone structure) was in 79 (89.77 %) cases, of grade 1 (<50 % of the screw diameter perforates the bone) – in 5 (5.68 %), and of grade 3 – in 2 (2.27 %).

Conclusion. Using 3D navigation templates is an affordable and safe method of installing pedicle screws in the cervical and upper thoracic spine. The method can be used as an alternative to intraoperative CT navigation.

[Spinal navigation for posterior cervical and cervicothoracic instrumentation]

OBJECTIVE

Safe placement of posterior cervical or high-thoracic pedicle screws, transarticular screws C1/2, translaminar screws C2 or cervical lateral mass screws under the guidance of spinal navigation.

INDICATIONS

All posterior cervical and cervicothoracic instrumentation with screws: instabilities and deformities of rheumatoid, traumatic, neoplastic, infectious, iatrogenic or congenital origin; multilevel cervical spinal stenosis with degenerative instability or kyphosis of the affected spinal segment.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

There are no absolute contraindications.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Prone position on a gel mattress, rigid head fixation, e.g., with Mayfield tongs; if appropriate, closed reduction under lateral image intensification; midline posterior surgical approach at the level of the segments to be instrumented; if necessary, open reduction; insertion of the cervical/upper thoracic screws under the guidance of spinal navigation; if necessary, posterior decompression; instrumentation longitudinal rods; if a fusion is to be obtained, decortication of the posterior bone elements with a high-speed burr and onlay of cancellous bone or bone substitutes.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

In stable instrumentation, no postoperative immobilization with cervical collar is necessary. Drain removal on postoperative day 2-3, suture removal on postoperative day 14, clinical and x‑ray control 3 and 12 months after surgery or in case of clinical or neurological deterioration.

RESULTS

Numerous studies showed that the use of spinal navigation reduces implant malplacement rates significantly. Furthermore, it allows a reduction of the radiation dose for the operation team up to 90%.

Design and application of subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement guide device

In the present study, a novel subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement guide device was designed and developed. In cervical specimens (C3-C7), a pedicle screw was inserted into the left pedicle using the guide device with a keyhole partial laminectomy and tapping technique, and the right pedicle by drilling using the Abumi technique. After removing the pedicle screws, the channel wall of each pedicle screw was probed with a pedicle probe. The vertebral body was then dissociated for direct observation of the screw channel. Among the 10 specimens, 2 of the 50 pedicles (4%) in the guide device group were perforated. Screw placement failed in 8 of 50 pedicles (16%) in the Abumi technique group. Significant differences were observed in the outcomes for the guide device and Abumi technique groups. The subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement guide device developed in the present study decreased the failure rate of pedicle screw placement.

Navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery

Minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery is associated with limited dissection as compared to open surgical procedures and this can result in decreased visualization. The use of computer-assisted navigation technology, however, allows surgeons greater visualization of bony and soft tissue anatomy through limited MIS incisions. This article outlines the potential benefits of intraoperative navigation during minimally invasive spinal surgery procedures to reduce intra-operative radiation exposure and enhance surgical accuracy. We also offer the senior author's surgical setup and technique related to a skin-based navigation system. Future research is required into the use of augmented reality for surgeons during a navigated MIS surgery.

A Review of the Historical Evolution, Biomechanical Advantage, Clinical Applications, and Safe Insertion Techniques of Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation

Cervical spine instrumentation is evolving with an aim of stabilizing traumatic and non-traumatic cases of the cervical spine with a beneficial reduction, better biomechanical strength, and a strong construct with minimal intraoperative, as well as immediate and late postoperative complications. The evolution from interspinous wiring till cervical pedicle screws has changed the outlook in treating the cervical spine pathologies with maximum 3D stability, decreasing the duration of postoperative immobilization and hospital stay. Some complications associated with the use of cervical pedicle screw can be catastrophic. This review article discusses the morphometry of cervical pedicle; indications, biomechanical superiority, tricks, and pitfalls of cervical pedicle screw; complications and technical advancements in targeting safe surgery; and future directions of cervical pedicle screw instrumentation.

Pedicle screw navigation using surface digitization on the Microsoft HoloLens

PURPOSE

In spinal fusion surgery, imprecise placement of pedicle screws can result in poor surgical outcome or may seriously harm a patient. Patient-specific instruments and optical systems have been proposed for improving precision through surgical navigation compared to freehand insertion. However, existing solutions are expensive and cannot provide in situ visualizations. Recent technological advancement enabled the production of more powerful and precise optical see-through head-mounted displays for the mass market. The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate whether such a device is sufficiently precise for the navigation of lumbar pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

A novel navigation method, tailored to run on the Microsoft HoloLens, was developed. It comprises capturing of the intraoperatively reachable surface of vertebrae to achieve registration and tool tracking with real-time visualizations without the need of intraoperative imaging. For both surface sampling and navigation, 3D printable parts, equipped with fiducial markers, were employed. Accuracy was evaluated within a self-built setup based on two phantoms of the lumbar spine. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the phantoms were acquired to carry out preoperative planning of screw trajectories in 3D. A surgeon placed the guiding wire for the pedicle screw bilaterally on ten vertebrae guided by the navigation method. Postoperative CT scans were acquired to compare trajectory orientation (3D angle) and screw insertion points (3D distance) with respect to the planning.

RESULTS

The mean errors between planned and executed screw insertion were [Formula: see text] for the screw trajectory orientation and 2.77±1.46 mm for the insertion points. The mean time required for surface digitization was 125±27 s.

CONCLUSIONS

First promising results under laboratory conditions indicate that precise lumbar pedicle screw insertion can be achieved by combining HoloLens with our proposed navigation method. As a next step, cadaver experiments need to be performed to confirm the precision on real patient anatomy.

Prospective Multicenter Study of a Multistep Screw Insertion Technique Using Patient-Specific Screw Guide Templates for the Cervical and Thoracic Spine

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective clinical study of a multistep screw insertion method using a patient-specific screw guide template system (SGTS) for the cervical and thoracic spine.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of SGTS for inserting screws into the cervical and thoracic spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior screw fixation is a standard procedure for spinal instrumentation; however, screw insertion carries the risk of injury to neuronal and vascular structures.

METHODS

Preoperative bone images of the computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed using 3D/multiplanar imaging software, and the screw trajectories were planned. Plastic templates with screw-guiding structures were created for each lamina using 3D design and printing technology. Three types of templates were made for precise multistep guidance, and all the templates were specially designed to fit and lock onto the lamina during the procedure. In addition, plastic vertebra models were generated, and preoperative screw insertion simulation was performed. This patient-specific SGTS was used to perform the surgery, and CT scanning was used to postoperatively evaluate screw placement.

RESULTS

Enrolled to verify this procedure were 103 patients with cervical, thoracic, or cervicothoracic pathologies. The SGTS were used to place 813 screws. Preoperatively, each template was found to fit exactly and to lock onto the lamina of the vertebra models. In addition, intraoperatively, the templates fit and locked onto the patient lamina, and the screws were inserted successfully. Postoperative CT scans confirmed that 801 screws (98.5%) were accurately placed without cortical violation. There were no injuries to the vessels or nerves.

CONCLUSION

The multistep, patient-specific SGTS is useful for intraoperative pedicle screw (PS) navigation in the cervical and thoracic spine. This method improves the accuracy of PS insertion and reduces the operating time and radiation exposure during spinal fixation surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.