The radiographic results and neurologic complications of instrumented reduction and fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis without decompression of the neural elements: a retrospective review of 44 patients

Stand-Alone Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Lumbar Fixation to Indirectly Decompress the Neural Elements in Spinal Stenosis: A Radiographic Assessment Case Series

BACKGROUND

 The ideal surgical treatment of lumbar canal stenosis remains controversial. Although decompressive open surgery has been widely used with good clinical outcome, minimally invasive indirect decompression techniques have been developed to avoid the complications associated with open approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiologic outcome and safety of the indirect decompression achieved with stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative pathologies.

METHODS

 Twenty-eight patients presenting with spinal degenerative diseases including concomitant central and/or lateral stenosis were treated with stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Radiographic measurements were made on axial and sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) images, performed before surgery and after a mean follow-up period of 25.2 months. Measurements included spinal canal and foraminal areas, and anteroposterior canal diameter.

RESULTS

 Percutaneous screw fixation was performed in 35 spinal levels. Measurements on the follow-up MR images showed statistically significant increase in the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal and the neural foramen, from a mean of 88.22 and 61.05 mm2 preoperatively to 141.52 and 92.18 mm2 at final follow-up, respectively. The sagittal central canal diameter increased from a mean of 4.9 to 9.1 mm at final follow-up. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) both improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

 Stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a safe and effective technique for indirect decompression of the spinal canal and neural foramina in lumbar degenerative diseases. This minimally invasive technique may provide the necessary decompression in cases of common degenerative lumbar disorders with ligamentous stenosis.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Reducing Adult Lytic High-Grade Spondylolisthesis Using a Hybrid Technique: Combination of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws with Midline Microscopic Transforaminal Decompression

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PURPOSE

To analyze the results and effectiveness of percutaneous screws (PS) with midline microscopic transforaminal decompression (MTFD) technique in reducing adult stiff lytic high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGSL) and compare it with the conventional technique.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Pedicle screw cannulation and segmental kyphosis negotiation are surgical challenges in HGSL. Open reduction is the preferred approach. PS have the advantage of optimized trajectory and minimized soft tissue exposure. The role of minimally invasive surgery in HGSL remains unknown. We propose a hybrid technique combining PS with MTFD for lytic HGSL.

METHODS

This study included 25 patients with adult lytic HGSL (Meyerding grade III and IV) operated using a hybrid technique from 2012 to 2015. Data were compared with retrospective data on conventional open reduction (n=23) operated from 2000 to 2015. The minimum follow-up was 5 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and modified Oswestry Disability Index (m-ODI). The spinopelvic and perioperative parameters were recorded. The inter-body fusion and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) were assessed on radiographs at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

The average age in the MTFD and open groups was 45.84±12.70 years (nine males and 16 females) and 49.26±13.33 years (eight males and 15 females), respectively. Further, 22 and three patients in the MTFD group and 19 and four in the open group had grade III and IV listhesis, respectively. The MTFD group demonstrated less operative time, blood loss, and hospital stays than the open group. Significant improvements were observed in VAS and m-ODI in subsequent follow-ups in both groups. The MTFD group fared better at 3 months but outcomes were comparable at the final follow-up. Both techniques were equally effective in restoring spinopelvic parameters. The incidence of ASD is comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique was proven effective in reducing HGSL. The long-term clinical and radiological outcomes were favorable and comparable with the conventional approach.

Surgical management of high-grade paediatric spondylolisthesis: meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

There is currently no consensus on the management of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) in paediatric populations. The objective of this analysis is to compare the outcomes of reduction followed by fusion (RFF) or in situ fusion (ISF) in paediatric patients.

METHODS

Using major databases, a systematic literature search was performed. Primary studies comparing ISF with RFF in paediatric and adolescent patients were identified. Study data including patient-reported outcomes, complications, and spinopelvic parameters were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included, comprising 97 ISF and 131 RFF. Average patient age was 14.4 ± 2.1 years and follow up was 8.2 ± 5.1 years. Patients undergoing RFF compared to patients undergoing ISF alone were less likely to develop pseudarthrosis (RR 0.51, 95% CI, [0.26, 0.99], p = 0.05). On average, RFF led to 11.97º more reduction in slip angle and 34.8% more reduction in sagittal translation (p < 0.00001) compared to ISF. There was no significant difference between patient satisfaction and pain at follow up. Neurologic complications and reoperation rates were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Both RFF and ISF are effective techniques for managing HGS. Performing a reduction followed by fusion reduces the likelihood of pseudarthrosis in paediatric patients. The difference between risk of neurologic complications, need for reoperation, patient satisfaction, and pain outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Correlation with patient-reported outcomes still needs to be further explored. LEVEL 3 EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies.

Efficacy of Reverse and Modified Bohlman Technique for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

High grade lumbar spondylolisthesis (HGLS) remains a challenging surgical entity, and there is no current consensus regarding optimal surgical approach. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature for studies utilizing the Reverse or Modified Bohlman technique for the treatment of HGLS to assess its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

The authors perform a literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE electronic databases from their inception according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies were included. The studies comprised a total of 43 patients, with mean age of 41.4 ± 19.8 (9-83) years. The mean follow-up was 38.2 ± 41.7 (3-137) months. Most patients (81.4%) were classified as having grade III or higher spondylolisthesis. The most common presenting symptom was back pain (93%), followed by radiculopathy in roughly half of patients (41.9%). Majority of patients (93%) experienced complete resolution of symptoms as well as successful fusion (90.7%) on follow-up. Complications included cage/graft failure (7%), nerve injury (7%), wound infection (7%), pseudoarthrosis (2.3%), epidural hematoma (2.3%), and deep vein thrombosis (2.3%). Revision surgery was required in 4 (9.3%) patients. Slip percentage (60.2% versus 43.2%, p<0.0001) and slip angle (17.1° versus 6.4°, p<0.001) both decreased significantly following surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate Reverse and Modified Bohlman techniques appear to be effective in both improving slip angle/percentage and relieving symptoms with low risk of complications. These findings are limited by the small sample size of patients. The authors recommend larger series before formal recommendations can be made.

L5 Radiculopathy After Formal Reduction of High-Grade SDSG Type 5 and 6 L5-S1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis with 2-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the main treatment for patients with high-grade L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis, which can result in neurologic complications, but little is known about its clinical course. The present study evaluated the presence of L5 radiculopathy in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis in adults in pre- and postoperative periods and after a 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A series of 16 patients who underwent reduction and instrumented fusion for high-grade 5 and 6 spondylolisthesis between 2018 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated in the pre- and postoperative periods as well as after 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Clinical and surgical data on possible neurological complications of L5 radiculopathy were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

The age was 20.1 ± 12.0 years, and preoperative L5-S1 slip was 89.0%. Five patients presented motor deficit in the preoperative period. In the immediate postoperative period, 9 patients (56%) experienced motor deficits or worsening of the preoperative condition. At the 6-week follow-up, only 1 patient showed resolution of the motor deficit. Three patients presented healed motor deficits after 3 months, and 1 patient demonstrated a healed L5 motor radiculopathy after 6 months. At the 1-year follow-up, only 1 patient exhibited an L5 radiculopathy motor deficit, and at the 2-year follow-up, none of the patients exhibited an L5 radiculopathy motor deficit.

CONCLUSION

L5 radiculopathy was frequent in the preoperative period and increased after reduction and instrumented fusion of high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis in the postoperative period and in the 6-week follow-up. Three and 6 months after the surgery, there were consecutive motor improvements. After 2 years of follow-up, no patients showed neurological deficit of L5 radiculopathy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This is the first study reporting a reduction in complications of L5 neurological motor deficit over a 2-year follow-up in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis in young adults.

High-Grade Spondylolisthesis in Adults: Current Concepts in Evaluation and Management

Background

Information regarding the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) in adults has been previously described; however, previous descriptions of the evaluation and surgical management of HGS do not represent more recent and now established approaches. The purpose of the current review is to discuss current concepts in the evaluation and management of patients with HGS.

Methods

Literature review.

Results

HGS is diagnosed in up to 11.3% of adults with spondylolisthesis and typically presents as nonspecific lower back pain. Regarding evaluation, a thorough history and physical examination should be performed, which may help predict the presence of HGS. Diagnostic imaging, and specifically the use of spino-pelvic parameters, are now commonly implicated in guiding treatment course and prognosis. When surgical intervention is indicated, surgical approaches include in situ fusion variations, reduction and partial reduction with fusion, and vertebrectomy. Although the majority of studies suggest improvements with these approaches, the literature is limited by a low level of evidence with regards to the superiority of one technique when compared with others.

Conclusions

HGS is a unique cause of low back pain in adults that carries considerable morbidity, but rarely presents with neurologic symptoms. Although the definitions, classifications, and methods of diagnosis of this spinal deformity have been established and accepted, the ideal surgical management of this deformity remains highly debated. Fusion in situ techniques are often technically easier to perform and provide lower risk of neurologic complications, whereas reduction and fusion techniques offer greater restoration of global spino-pelvic balance. Preoperative spino-pelvic parameters may have utility in assisting in procedural selection; however, future, higher-quality and longer-term studies are warranted to determine the optimal surgical intervention among the widely available techniques currently used, and to better define the indications for these interventions.

Reduction versus In Situ Fusion for Adult High-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis is controversial. Both reduction and in situ fusion are available options, but it remains unclear which approach provides better outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting outcomes following reduction or in situ fusion for adult high-grade spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were last searched on June 24, 2019. We identified 1236 studies after excluding duplicates. After screening, 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Random-effects models were used to pool effect estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients were analyzed. Compared with reduction, in situ fusion had a higher mean estimated blood loss (584 mL vs. 451 mL) and a clinically higher incidence of neurologic (48% vs. 15%), pseudarthrosis (13% vs. 8%), and infectious (20% vs. 10%) complications; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Reduction was associated with a clinically higher incidence of overall complications (32% vs. 25%) and dural tears (22% vs. 7%). Reduction provided better pain relief (mean difference [MD] = 5.24 vs. 4.77) and greater change in pelvic tilt (MD = 5.33 vs. 2.60); however, these differences were not statistically significant. Patients who underwent reduction had significantly greater decline in Oswestry Disability Index scores (MD = 55.7 vs. 11.5; P_interaction < 0.01) and greater change in slip angle (MD = 25.0 vs. 11.4; P_interaction = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In management of adult high-grade spondylolisthesis, both approaches appeared to be safe and effective. Reduction appeared to offer better disability relief and spinopelvic parameter correction than in situ fusion.

Reverse Bohlman technique for treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis in an adult population

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Surgical techniques for treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remain controversial. This study aims to evaluate both radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with HGS treated with the "modified Bohlman" and Reverse Bohlman technique.

METHODS

Review of consecutive HGS patients undergoing modified Bohlman and Reverse Bohlman at a single center from 2006 to 2018. Clinical, surgical, and radiographic data were collected.

RESULTS

Six patients identified in the modified Bohlman treatment arm: and eight patients in the Reverse Bohlman group. Twelve (12) patients presented with high grade congenital spondylolisthesis at L5-S1; one patient presented with dissolution of the L5 vertebral body secondary to uncontrolled osteomyelitis that developed after a previous failed fusion; and one patient presented with iatrogenic L5-S1 spondylolisthesis after a previous L3-S1 fusion. One patient had medially placement pedicle screw and associated radiculopathy. All follow-up post = operative scans demonstrated solid fusion. Postoperatively, anterolisthesis improved from 18.3% to 10.1% (p = .0586) and the slip angle improved from 60.43° of kyphosis to 48.71° (p = .0139). No spondylolisthesis translational reduction maneuvers were attempted intraoperatively except for positioning on a sacral cushion to increase lordotic angle. Lumbar lordosis improved from 65.29 to 63.86 postoperatively. Four of our fourteen patients had long-term median follow-up of 28 months (range = 19-48 months) slip angle, percentage, and lumbar lordosis all improved from the patient's pre-operative measurements. The improvement in slip angle was nearly statistically significant with a p-value of 0.065.

CONCLUSIONS

Reverse Bohlman technique for high grade spondylolisthesis is a viable option when seeking to address adjacent level instability or slip.

Grade II Spondylolisthesis: Reverse Bohlman Procedure with Transdiscal S1-L5 and S2 Alar Iliac Screws Placed with Robotic Guidance

BACKGROUND

Grade II spondylolisthesis remains a complex surgical pathology for which there is no consensus regarding optimal surgical strategies. Surgical strategies vary regarding extent of reduction, use of instrumentation/interbody support, and anterior versus posterior approaches with or without decompression. Here we provide the first report on the efficacy of robotic spinal surgery systems in support of the treatment of grade II spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Using 2 illustrative cases, we provide a technical report describing how robotic spinal surgery platform can be used to treatment grade II spondylolisthesis with a novel instrumentation strategy.

RESULTS

We describe how the "reverse Bohlman" technique to achieve a large anterior fusion construct spanning the pathological level and buttressed by the adjacent level above, coupled with a novel, high-fidelity posterior fixation scheme with transdiscal S1-L5 and S2 alar iliac (S2AI) screws placed in a minimally invasive fashion with robot guidance allows for the best chance of fusion in situ.

CONCLUSIONS

The reverse Bohlman technique coupled with transdiscal S1-L5 and S2AI screw fixation accomplishes the surgical goals of creating a solid fusion construct, avoiding neurologic injury with aggressive reduction, and halting the progression of anterolisthesis. The use of robot guidance allows for efficient placement of these difficult screw trajectories in a minimally invasive fashion.

Surgical Treatment of Developmental Spondylolisthesis: Contemporary Series With a Two-Surgeon Team

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVES

To report operative outcomes of contemporary surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis in the pediatric population.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical treatment of developmental spondylolisthesis is controversial, with limited data on complication and reoperation rates.

METHODS

A retrospective study followed pediatric patients with either L5-S1 high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) or L5-S1 symptomatic low-grade spondylolisthesis (LGS) for a minimum of two years. All patients underwent a contemporary, single-stage decompression, partial reduction, and posterior instrumented fusion (DRPF) or in situ stabilization by a combined orthopedic and neurosurgeon team at a single institution during 2005-2015. Clinical examination and radiographic data were collected preoperatively and at discharge, 1 year, 2 years, and terminal visit (defined as the last follow-up at >2 years).

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (79% HGS), mean (±standard deviation) age at surgery 13.5 (±3.3) years, were followed for 4.8 (±2.3) years. The patients who underwent DRPF (n = 26) had mean lumbosacral angle increase from 79.8° (±20.8) to 92.5° (±16.1) (p < .001) and mean listhesis reduce from 63.2% (±21.9) to 26.0% (±20.1) (p < .001). Preoperatively, 18 (53%) had neurologic symptoms. At one- and two-year follow-up, new or residual neurologic symptoms were present in four patients (12%) (p < .001). Postoperative symptoms were not significantly related to amount of reduction. Sixteen (47%) underwent reoperation at an average of 24.8 months, 10 for planned prominent instrumentation removal, and 6 for true complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical reduction and decompression of spondylolisthesis in the pediatric population restores spinopelvic alignment. We found no evidence that a greater amount of reduction was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications. However, patients should be advised that prominent instrumentation may require future removal. Although previous reports suggest complication rates and permanent neurologic sequelae in up to 20% after operative treatment of spondylolisthesis, our results suggest that a contemporary approach with a two-surgeon team may provide improved results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

The reliability of motor evoked potentials to predict dorsiflexion injuries during lumbosacral deformity surgery: importance of multiple myotomal monitoring

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control analysis of transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) responses and clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of MEPs to predict isolated nerve root injury causing dorsiflexion weakness in selected patients having complex lumbar spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The surgical correction of distal lumbar spine deformity involves significant risk for damage to neural structures that control muscles of ankle and toe dorsiflexion. Procedures often include vertebral translation, interbody fusion, and posterior-based osteotomies. The benefit of using MEP monitoring to predict dorsiflexion weakness has not been well-established. The purpose of this paper is to describe the relationship between neural complications from lumbar surgery and intraoperative MEP changes.

METHODS

Included were 542 neurologically intact patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for the correction of distal lumbar deformity. Two myotomes, including tibialis anterior (TA) and extensor hallucis longus (EHL), were monitored. MEP and free-running electromyography data were assessed in each patient. Cases of new dorsiflexion weakness noted postoperatively were identified. Data in case and control patients were compared. There was no direct funding for this work. The Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care provides salary support for authors one and six. Authors two and three report employment in the field of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring as a study-specific conflict of interest.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (cases) developed dorsiflexion weakness. MEP amplitude decreased in the injured myotomes by an average of 65 ± 21% (TA) and 60±26% (EHL), which was significantly greater than the contralateral uninjured side or for control subjects. (p < .01) Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves showed high sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for changes in MEP amplitude using either the TA or EHL. Analysis of MEP changes to either TA or EHL yielded a superior ROC curve. Net reclassification improvement analysis showed assessing MEP changes to both TA and EHL improved the predictability of injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MEP amplitude change is highly sensitive and specific to predict a new postoperative dorsiflexion injury. Monitoring two myotomes (both TA and EHL) is superior to relying on MEP changes from a single myotome. Electromyography activity was less accurate but compliments MEP use. Additional studies are needed to define optimal intraoperative MEP warning thresholds.

Analysis of Spinopelvic Parameters with L5 as the New Sacrum after Fusion in High-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A Possible Explanation for Satisfactory Results with In-Situ Fusion

Study Design

Retrospective case series.

Purpose

To correlate functional outcomes with spinopelvic parameters in patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) treated with instrumented in-situ surgery or reduction and fusion.

Overview of Literature

Satisfactory functional outcomes are reported with reduction and in-situ fusion strategies in HGS. However, reasons for this are unclear. We hypothesize that following lumbosacral fusion, the L5 becomes part of the sacrum, which improves spinopelvic parameters, resulting in equivalent functional outcomes in both surgical methods.

Methods

Twenty-six patients undergoing HGS (reduction group A, 13; in-situ group B, 13) were clinically evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), short form-12 (SF-12), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores. Spinopelvic parameters, including pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), lumbosacral kyphosis (LSK) angle, and sacrofemoral distance (SFD) were measured preoperatively from S1 and postoperatively from L5 as the new sacrum at 1 year follow-up. Sagittal alignment was assessed using the sagittal vertical axis.

Results

Both groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, severity of slip, and preoperative spinopelvic parameters (p>0.05). Postoperative VAS, SF-12, and ODI scores significantly improved in both groups (p<0.05). Compared with preoperative values, the mean postoperative PT, SFD, and LSK significantly changed in both groups. In reduction group, PT changed from 26.98° to 10.78°, SFD from 61.24 to 33.56 mm, and LSK from 74.76° to 109.61° (p<0.05). In in-situ fusion group PT changed from 26.78° to 11.08°, SFD from 62.9 to 36.99 mm, and LSK from 67.23° to 113.38° (p<0.05 for all). In both groups, SS and LL did not change significantly (p>0.05).

Conclusions

After fusion, the L5 becomes the new sacrum and influences spinopelvic parameters to change favorably. This possibly explains why reduction and in-situ fusion achieve equivalent functional outcomes in HGS.

A Multicenter Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following High-grade Spondylolisthesis Reduction and Fusion

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective review of the clinical and radiographic outcomes from a multicenter study of surgical treatment for high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) in adults. The objective was to assess the safety of surgical reduction, its ability to correct regional deformity, and its clinical effectiveness.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicenter review of adults (age above 18 y) with lumbosacral HGS (Meyerding grade 3-5) treated surgically with open decompression, attempted reduction, posterior instrumentation, and interbody fusion. Preoperative and postoperative assessment of the Meyerding grade, slip angle, and sacral inclination were performed based on standing radiographs. Preoperative visual analog scale scores were compared with those at the mean follow-up period. Prolo and Oswestry Disability Index scores at most recent follow-up were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients, aged 19-72 years, met inclusion criteria. Seventeen interbody cages were placed, including 15 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions, 1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and 1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Five patients required sacral dome osteotomies. The average follow-up was 21.3 months.At most recent follow-up there was a statistically significant improvement in both the Meyerding grade and the slip angle (P<0.05). There was 1 intraoperative complication resulting in a neurological deficit (4%) and 1 intraoperative vertebral body fracture (4%). No additional surgery was required for any of these patients. There were no cases of nonunion or device failure except for 1 patient who suffered an unrelated traumatic injury 1 year after surgery. The mean Oswestry Disability Index and Prolo scores at mean follow-up of 21.3 months were 20% (minimum disability) and 8.2 (grade 1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that reduction, when accomplished in conjunction with wide neural element decompression and instrumented arthrodesis, is safe, effective, and durable with low rates of neurological injury, favorable clinical results, and high-fusion rates.

Outcome of L5 radiculopathy after reduction and instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of high-grade L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis and the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and course of iatrogenic L5 radiculopathy after reduction and instrumented fusion of high-grade L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis and the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM).

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated for high-grade spondylolisthesis with IONM from 2005 to 2013 were screened for eligibility. Prospectively collected clinical and surgical data as well as radiographic outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) before and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included, with a mean age of 26.3 (±9.5) years. Mean preoperative L5-S1 slip was 72% (±21%) and was reduced to 19% (±13%) postoperatively. Mean loss of reduction at last follow-up [mean 19 months (±14, range 3-48 months)] was 3% (±4.3%). Rate of new L5 radiculopathy with motor deficit (L5MD) after surgery was 29% (five patients). Four patients fully recovered after 3 months, one patient was lost to neurologic follow-up. IONM sensitivity and specificity for postoperative L5MD was 20 and 100%, respectively. COMI, back pain and leg pain scores showed significant (p < 0.001) improvements at 3 months postoperatively, which were retained up to 24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Transient L5 radiculopathy after reduction and instrumented fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis is frequent. With IONM the risk of irreversible L5 radiculopathy is minimal. If IONM signal changes recover, full clinical recovery is expected within 3 months. Overall, patient-reported outcome of reduction and instrumented fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis showed clinically important improvement.

"Knee-up test" for easy detection of postoperative motor deficits following spinal surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Neurologic motor deficit is a serious complication of spinal surgery. Early diagnosis of complications by neurologic examination immediately after spinal surgery is mandatory. However, patients cannot always cooperate with the physician in the very early stages of recovery.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study is to prospectively investigate the usefulness of the "knee-up test" for easy detection of postoperative motor deficits.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective clinical study was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with spinal disorder operated upon at a single institute were administered the knee-up test after an anesthesiologist had judged that endotracheal extubation was possible.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative Manual Muscle Testing.

METHODS

A simple yet reliable method known as the "knee-up test" was developed to easily assess postoperative deficits before endotracheal extubation. When the patient's knee is passively lifted up and the patient is able to maintain this position in both legs, the result is negative, whereas when the patient is unable to maintain the knee in an upright position for one or both legs, the result is positive. The presently accepted criterion for a new-onset postoperative neurologic motor deficit is motor weakness leading to a decrease in function of at least two grades in more than one muscle function within 12 hours of spinal surgery, as evaluated by the Manual Muscle Testing. The association between the presence of new-onset motor deficits and the results of the knee-up test was prospectively investigated.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients exhibited positive results when evaluated using the knee-up test, whereas 521 patients exhibited negative results. Sixteen of the patients with positive results were determined to have new-onset motor deficits, whereas no new-onset motor deficits were observed in the remaining patient. Of the 521 patients with negative knee-up test results, only 2 were determined to have new-onset motor deficits, whereas no new-onset motor deficits were observed in the remaining 519 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 88.9, 99.8, 94.1, and 99.6, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The knee-up test may allow for early and easy detection of postoperative motor deficits with high probability in very early stages.

Interbody Fusion in Low Grade Lumbar Spondylolsithesis: Clinical Outcome Does Not Correalte with Slip Reduction and Neural Foraminal Dimension

Study Design

Prospective nonrandomized study.

Purpose

To find a possible correlation between clinical outcome and extent of lumbar spondylolisthesis reduction.

Overview of Literature

There is no consensus in the literature concerning whether a beneficial effect of reduction on outcome can be expected following reduction and surgical fusion for low grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Methods

Forty six patients with a mean age of 37.5 years (age, 17–48 years) with isthmic spondylolisthesis underwent interbody fusion with cages with posterior instrumentation (TLIF). Clinical outcome was measured using visual analogue score (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Foraminal dimensions and disc heights were measured in standard digital radiographs. These were analyzed at baseline and 1 year after surgery and changes were compared. Radiographic fusion was judged with computed tomography scans at 1 year.

Results

Ninety percent of the patients had good or very good clinical results with fusion and instrumentation. Baseline and one-year postoperative mean VAS score was 6.33 (range, 5–8) and 0.76 (range, 0–3), respectively (p=0.004). Baseline and one-year postoperative, mean ODI score was 48 (range, 32–62) and 10 (range, 6–16), respectively (p<0.001). A mean spondylolisthesis slip of 32.1% was reduced to 6.7% at 1 year. Average anterior disc height, posterior disc height, vertical foraminal dimension), and foraminal) diameter improved from 9.8 to 11.7 mm (p=0.005), 4.5 to 5.8 mm (p=0.004), 11.3 to 12.6 mm (p=0.002), and 18.6 to 20.0 mm (p<0.001), respectively. The fusion rate was 75% with TLIF. There is no significant correlation between the improvements of ODI scores and the extent of slip reduction.

Conclusions

Neural decompression and interbody fusion can significantly improve pain and disability but the clinical outcome does not correlate with radiological improvement in the neural foraminal dimension.

Reduction and fusion in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis by a single posterior approach. Results in 50 patients

INTRODUCTION

Treatment strategies in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis are controversial. Reduction of slippage, correction of lumbosacral kyphosis and the necessity of a complementary anterior approach are debated in the literature. The present study reports clinical and radiological outcome for reduction and instrumented fusion on a single posterior approach.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective study included all consecutive adolescent and young adult patients operated on by a single surgeon (D.C.) for high-grade (Meyerding 3-4-5) L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. The technique consisted in reduction of lumbosacral kyphosis and posterolateral fusion on a single posterior approach without resection of the sacral dome or complementary anterior approach. Only cases of adult ptosis required impacted tibial interbody graft. Clinical complications, radiologic lumbopelvic results and sagittal balance were analyzed at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty patients, with a mean age at surgery of 21±11 years, were followed up for a mean 5.5±4.6 years. Mean lumbosacral angle was reduced by 25° (from 76° to 101°; P<0.05), and mean listhesis grade by >50% (from 75% to 23%; P<0.0001), without correction loss at last follow-up. C7 sagittal offset was corrected (from 8° to 4°; P<0.05), with harmonization of lumbar (from 57° to 64°; P<0.001) and thoracic curvature (from 37° to 44°; P=0.1). Seventeen patients (34%) showed postoperative radicular deficit, without sequelae at last follow-up. There were no cauda equina lesions. Bone fusion was achieved in 42 patients (84%), in the same surgical step. After revision by complementary interbody graft, there was no residual non-union.

CONCLUSION

Surgery on a single posterior approach gave reliable results in high-grade spondylolisthesis in adolescents and young adults. The technique is not however, free of risk (transient neurologic deficit and non-union), and patients should be forewarned. Complementary interbody graft can be reserved to adult ptosis with incomplete reduction of lumbosacral kyphosis and to revision surgery for non-union.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Patient-Based Surgical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Patient Satisfaction Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate: (1) patient-based surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF); (2) correlations between patient-based surgical outcomes and surgeon-based surgical outcomes; (3) factors associated with patient satisfaction.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There have been no reports of patient-based surgical outcomes of PLIF for lumbar spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PLIF for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2006 and 2009 were reviewed (n = 121). Surgical outcomes were assessed 5 years after primary surgery using a questionnaire, a numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score), and the recovery rate. The original questionnaire consisted of 5 categories, with scoring out of 100 points for surgery, satisfaction, improvement, recommendation to others, and willingness to undergo repeat surgery. Patient-based outcomes were divided into 3 groups according to the questionnaire responses as positive, intermediate, and negative and were compared with the JOA scores.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients responded, for a response rate of 85%. The average patient-evaluated score for surgery was 82 points. The positive response rate in each category was 78% for satisfaction, 88% for improvement, 74% for recommendation, and 71% for repeat. The average pre- and postoperative JOA scores were 11.2 and 23.2, respectively. The average recovery rate was 68.5%. There were significant correlations between patient-based surgical outcomes and the JOA score. Furthermore, there were significant correlations between patient-based surgical outcomes and the NRS and physical component scores of the SF-36. Postoperative permanent motor loss was a major factor related to a negative response.

CONCLUSION

The patient-evaluated score for surgery was 82 points. More than 70% of patients gave positive responses in all sections of the questionnaire. There were significant correlations between patient-based and surgeon-based surgical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

"Reverse Bohlman" technique for the treatment of high grade spondylolisthesis in an adult population

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Surgical techniques for effective high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remain controversial. This study aims to evaluate radiographic/clinical outcomes in HGS patients treated using modified "Reverse Bohlman" (RB) technique.

METHODS

Review of consecutive HGS patients undergoing RB at a single university-center from 2006 to 2013. Clinical, surgical, radiographic parameters collected.

RESULTS

Six patients identified: five with L5-S1 HGS with L4-L5 instability and one had an L4-5 isthmic spondylolisthesis and grade 1 L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Two interbody graft failures and one L5-S1 pseudoarthrosis. Postoperative improvement of anterolisthesis (62.3% vs. 49.6%, p = 0.003), slip angle (10 vs. 5°, p = 0.005), and lumbar lordosis (49 vs. 57.5°, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

RB technique for HGS recommended when addressing adjacent level instability/slip.

One-stage posterior spinal shortening by L5 partial spondylectomy for spondyloptosis or L5-S1 high-grade spondylolisthesis management

STUDY DESIGN

A case series of seven consecutive patients with L5-S1 spondyloptosis (SPP) and Meyerding IV spondylolisthesis (HGSPL) treated consecutively by a new surgical technique with partial reduction and fixation after spinal shortening.

OBJECTIVE

To report clinical and radiological outcomes of a spinal shortening procedure by a single posterior approach in seven patients with HGSPL and SPP.

BACKGROUND DATA

The surgical treatment of L5-S1 SPP and HGSPL remains challenging, and numbers of surgical treatment options have been described with several principles. We reported a new surgical technique achieving partial reduction and fixation of L5-S1 SPP and HGSPL and highlighted its clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS

Seven patients with Meyerding Grade IV (2), and Grade V (5) were operated consecutively between 2004 and 2011 for HGSPL and SPP. Surgery time, blood loss and complications were collected for all patients. The slip angle or Dubousset lumbo-sacral Angle (Dub-LSA), L5 slip percentage (%slip), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK) and C7-tilt were measured pre and postoperatively. All patients underwent posterior one-stage decompression with sacral dome osteotomy, L5 vertebrectomy with L5-S1 discectomy, and partial reduction and instrumented fusion in a single posterior approach.

RESULTS

The mean age and follow-up were, respectively, 20 years and 65 months. The mean preoperative %slip was 115 %, which improved to 63 % postoperatively. The mean preoperative Dub-LSA, PT, LL, TK, and C7-tilt were 37°, 31°, -74°, 30°, and 6°, respectively, which improved to 94°, 25°, -44°, 42° and -0.14° postoperatively. No implant failure or pseudarthrosis were reported at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This novel and efficient one-stage shortening technique offers the possibility to manage lumbosacral kyphosis and spinal local malalignment in L5-S1 SPP.

Radiologic and clinical outcomes of surgery in high grade spondylolisthesis treated with temporary distraction rod

Background

Surgical techniques used in the treatment of patients with high grade lumbar spondylolisthesis (> 50% slippage) are usually associated with a great deal of controversies. We aim to evaluate the surgical outcomes of high grade spondylolisthesis treated with an intraoperative temporary distraction rod.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 21 patients (14 females and 7 males), aged 50.4 ± 9.2 years, who had high grade lumbar spondylolisthesis that was treated with intraoperative temporary distraction rods, neural decompression, pedicular screw fixation, and posterolateral fusion involving one more intact upper vertebra. The mean follow-up period was 39.2 months. Radiologic and clinical outcomes were measured by slip angle, slip percentage, correction rate, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), patient's satisfaction rate in the pre- and postoperative period. Data were analyzed by SPSS ver. 11.5.

Results

Analysis of the preoperative visits and final follow-up visits indicated that surgery could improve ODI, lumbar VAS, and leg VAS from 60.5% to 8.2%, from 6.7 to 2.2, and from 6.9 to 1.3, respectively. Slip angle and slip percentage were also changed from -8° to -15° and from 59.2% to 21.4%, respectively. Mean correction rate at the final follow-up visit was 64.1%. Loss of correction was insignificant and a neurologic complication occurred in one patient due to misplacement of one screw. Excellent and good levels of satisfaction were observed in 90.5% of the patients.

Conclusions

In the surgical treatment of refractory high grade spondylolisthesis, the use of a temporary distraction rod to reduce the slipped vertebra in combination with neural decompression, posterolateral fusion, and longer instrumentation is associated with satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes.

Instrumented reduction and monosegmental fusion for Meyerding Grade IV developmental spondylolisthesis: a report of 3 cases

There are numerous reports of treatment methods for spondylolisthesis with a Meyerding Grade of more than III. In high dysplastic spondylosthesis, surgical treatment was selected because there is considered to be a high possibility of low back pain and lower limb neurological symptoms worsening if slippage progresses. Monosegmental lumbar interbody fusion (L5-S1) with a pedicle screw system (PPS) was used to treat three cases of Meyerding Grade IV developmental spondylolisthesis. Patients gave written informed consent. The spondylolisthesis was reduced to Meyerding Grade I and sagittal balance improved in all three cases. In two cases with severe spinal instability, there were no postoperative neurological complications and the course was favorable. However, in one case with little spinal mobility due to vertebral body dysplasia, despite performing sufficient decompression of the nerve root at L5 and slow reduction to avoid placing excessive tension on the nerve root, a transient neurological disorder was observed. A PPS was used to increase the reduction strength and favorable reduction was possible. However, in the case with a long clinical course and the case with poor spinal mobility, since the mobility and plasticity of the nerve root itself may have been reduced, it was considered that reduction should be performed carefully using intraoperative neurological monitoring.

[Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents]

Low back pain is a common cause of lost playing time in young athletes, and spondylolysis is its most common identifiable cause. Despite technological advances in radiology, which can lead to an early diagnosis with better prognosis, progression to spondylolisthesis is sometimes asymptomatic and may not be detected until late stages. There are wide variations, suggesting lack of consensus as regards the objective of treatment, which consists of clinical, radiological, biomechanical or functional improvement. There is also a lack of agreement regarding the ideal conservative treatment, surgical indications and need of slip reduction, and most of the established recommendations are not evidence based. We present a review of literature, which summarizes the current knowledge of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents.

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy for low-dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis: effects of slip reduction on surgical outcomes

Object

The management of isthmic spondylolisthesis remains controversial, especially with respect to reduction. There have been no reports regarding appropriate slip reduction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the following issues: 1) surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with total facetectomy for low-dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis, including postoperative complications; 2) effects of slip reduction on surgical outcomes; and 3) appropriate slip reduction.

Methods

A total of 106 patients who underwent PLIF with total facetectomy for low-dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis and who were followed for at least 2 years were reviewed. The average follow-up period was 8 years. Surgical outcomes, including the scores assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system, the recovery rate, and postoperative complications were investigated. As for radiographic evaluations, pre- and postoperative slip and disc height, instrumentation failure, and fusion status were also examined.

Results

The pre- and postoperative average Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were 14 (range 3–25) and 25 (range 11–29) points, respectively. The average recovery rate was 73% (range 0%–100%). The average pre- and postoperative slip was 24% and 10%, respectively. A significant correlation between postoperative slip and clinical outcomes was found; clinical outcomes were better in proportion to slip reduction. Although no statistical difference was detected in clinical outcomes between postoperative slip of less than 10% and from 10% to 20%, patients with postoperative slip of more than 20% showed significantly worse clinical outcomes. Postoperative complications included neurological deficits in 7 patients (transient motor loss in 6 and permanent motor loss in 1), instrumentation failures in 7, adjacent-segment degeneration in 5, and nonunion in 4. Instrumentation failures occurred significantly more often in patients with more slip reduction, although slip reduction did not affect the other postoperative complications. All patients with instrumentation failure showed postoperative slip reduction within 10%.

Conclusions

The use of PLIF with total facetectomy for low-dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis appears to produce satisfactory clinical outcomes, with an average of 73% recovery rate and few postoperative complications. Although clinical outcomes were better in proportion to slip reduction, excessive reduction caused instrumentation failure, and patients with less reduction demonstrated worse clinical outcomes. Appropriate reduction resulted in a postoperative slip ranging from 10% to 20%.

High-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis reduction and fusion in children using transsacral rod fixation

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on how to treat surgically high-dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Although reducing spinal deformity seems mandatory, the issue of surgical reduction versus in situ fusion remains controversial.

METHODS

The files of 12 consecutive patients surgically treated for a grade 3 or 4 spondylolisthesis were reviewed. The treatment consisted in L4 to sacrum reduction and fusion by posterior approach. The reduction of lumbopelvic imbalance was made intraoperatively using a trans-sacral rod fixation technique.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative L5 anterior slippage was 72.3 % (60 to 95 %). The mean preoperative lumbosacral tilt angle was 70.5° (43 to 92°). Mean final lumbosacral tilt angle was 102° (91 to 114°). Mean final L5 anterior slippage was 19 % (7 to 63 %). Neurological complications (radicular L5 or S1 deficits) were noted in five patients. At final follow-up L4 to S1 fusion was achieved in all patients. No patient had persistent deficit or radicular pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The fusion rate in our series proved to be optimal. Thanks to the trans-sacral rod fixation, lumbosacral kyphosis correction was very good. The intrasacral positioning of the screws reduces the risk of implant prominence especially in such pediatric patients. We stress the importance to avoid complete slip reduction in such patients to minimize stretching on L5 and S1 roots. No additional immobilization is needed due to solid posterior instrumentation. Doing such procedure only by posterior approach avoids anterior approach-related complications.

High-grade spondylolisthesis treated using a modified Bohlman technique: results among multiple surgeons

OBJECT

The ideal surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis remains unclear. Concerns regarding the original Bohlman transsacral interbody fusion technique with stand-alone autologous fibular strut include late graft fracture and incomplete reduction of lumbosacral kyphosis. The authors' goal was to evaluate the radiographic and surgical outcomes of patients treated for high-grade spondylolisthesis with either transsacral S-1 screws or standard pedicle screw fixation augmenting the Bohlman posterior transsacral interbody fusion technique.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent fusion for high-grade spondylolisthesis in which a Bohlman oblique posterior interbody fusion augmented with either transsacral or standard pedicle screw fixation was performed by 4 spine surgeons was completed. Estimated blood loss, operating time, perioperative complications, and need for revision surgery were evaluated. Upright pre- and postsurgical lumbar spine radiographs were compared for slip percent and slip angle.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (12 female and 4 male) with an average age of 29 years (range 9-66 years) were evaluated. The average clinical follow-up was 78 months (range 5-137 months) and the average radiographic follow-up was 48 months (range 5-108 months). Ten L4-S1 and 6 L5-S1 fusions were performed. Five fibular struts and 11 titanium mesh cages were used for interbody fusion. Six patients had isolated transsacral screws placed, with 2 (33%) of the 6 requiring revision surgery for nonunion. No nonunions were observed in patients undergoing spanning pedicle screw fixation augmenting the interbody graft. Six patients experienced perioperative complications including 3 iliac crest site infections, 1 L-5 radiculopathy without motor involvement, 1 deep vein thrombosis, and 1 epidural hematoma requiring irrigation and debridement. The average estimated blood loss and operating times were 763 ml and 360 minutes, respectively. Slip percent improved from an average of 62% to 37% (n = 16; p < 0.01) and slip angle improved from an average of 18° to 8° (n = 16; p < 0.01). No patient experienced L-5 or other motor deficit postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Bohlman technique for treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis has reproducible outcomes among multiple surgeons and results in significant improvements in slip percent and slip angle. Fusion rates were high (14 of 16; 88%), especially with spanning instrumentation augmenting the oblique interbody fusion. Rates of L-5 motor deficit were low in comparison with techniques involving reduction of the anterolisthesis.

No correlation between slip reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis or change in neuroforaminal morphology and clinical outcome

Background

In instrumented posterolateral fusion reduction of a spondylolisthesis is appealing on theoretical grounds since this may lead to indirect decompression of the entrapped nerve roots. However, there is no consensus in the literature whether a beneficial effect of reduction on outcome can be expected. The objective of the current study was to evaluate whether a correlation between the extent of listhesis reduction and clinical improvement could be established.

Methods

From two ongoing prospective studies 72 patients with a single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion for low-grade spondylolisthesis (isthmic/degenerative 51/21) were evaluated. Radiographs and clinical outcome scores were available at baseline, 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery. Changes in neuroforaminal morphology were measured on calibrated radiographs. These changes in radiographic parameters were correlated to clinical outcome (Visual Analogue Score (VAS) leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)). Fusion status was assessed on Computed Tomography-scan at one year.

Results

A mean spondylolisthesis of 25 percent was reduced to 15 percent at 6 weeks with some loss of reduction to 17 percent at one year. The VAS and ODI significantly improved at both time intervals after surgery (p < 0.001). No significant correlations could be established between the extent of slip reduction and improvement in VAS or ODI (Pearson’s correlation −0.2 and 0.07 respectively at one year); this also accounted for the other radiographic parameters. A fusion rate of 64 percent was seen on CT-scan.

Conclusions

Clinical outcome was not related to the obtained radiographic reduction of the slipped vertebra in patients with a lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis. Loss of reduction or non-union on CT-scans had no effect on the clinical outcome. Reduction of a low-grade spondylolisthesis in spinal fusion is appealing, however, there is no evidence that it positively affects clinical outcome on the short term.

Trial registration

ISRCTN43648350

Management of high-grade spondylolisthesis

Management of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remains challenging and is associated with significant controversies. The best surgical procedure remains debatable. Although the need for instrumentation is generally agreed upon, significant controversies still surround the role of reduction and anterior column support in the surgical management of HGS. Complications with operative management of HGS can be significant and often dictate the selection of surgical approach. This review highlights the pathophysiology, classification, clinical presentation, and management controversies of HGS, in light of recent advances in our understanding of the importance of sagittal spinopelvic alignment and technologic advancements.

Clinical significance of lumbosacral kyphosis in adolescent spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study of 96 patients with lumbosacral adolescent spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether lumbosacral kyphosis (LSK) is associated with the quality of life of patients with spondylolisthesis and to identify reference values of LSK associated with significant impairments in quality of life.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LSK is considered an important aspect of deformity in adolescent spondylolisthesis, but its clinical impact is not known.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with low-grade and 29 with high-grade adolescent lumbosacral spondylolisthesis were evaluated. Three radiological parameters of LSK were measured: slip angle (SA), Dubousset lumbosacral angle (Dub-LSA), and lumbosacral joint angle (LSJA). All patients completed the Short Form Health Survey-12v2 questionnaire. Pearson correlations were calculated between each radiological parameter and the questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

Correlations of the 3 LSK parameters with the physical component summary of the Short Form Health Survey-12v2 were significant (r = -0.55 for SA, 0.52 for Dub-LSA, and -0.55 for LSJA). Correlations were even stronger when calculated for high-grade patients only (r = -0.62 for SA, 0.56 for Dub-LSA, and -0.63 for LSJA). Correlations also remained significant when controlling for slip percentage. Values of 30°, 80°, and 30° for SA, Dub-LSA, and LSJA were associated with an increased proportion of subjects with poor physical component scores.

CONCLUSION

LSK is significantly correlated to the physical aspect of the quality of life of adolescents with spondylolisthesis. The implication of abnormal LSK is particularly evident in patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis. All evaluated LSK parameters seem equivalent to measure this effect. LSK should be routinely measured in adolescents with spondylolisthesis to fully appreciate the severity of the deformity and its clinical association with the quality of life of the patient.