Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries

Evaluating the Status and Promising Potential of Robotic Spinal Surgery Systems

The increasing frequency of cervical and lumbar spine disorders, driven by aging and evolving lifestyles, has led to a rise in spinal surgeries using pedicle screws. Robotic spinal surgery systems have emerged as a promising innovation, offering enhanced accuracy in screw placement and improved surgical outcomes. We focused on literature of this field from the past 5 years, and a comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Robotic spinal surgery systems have significantly impacted spinal procedures by improving pedicle screw placement accuracy and supporting various techniques. These systems facilitate personalized, minimally invasive, and low-radiation interventions, leading to greater precision, reduced patient risk, and decreased radiation exposure. Despite advantages, challenges such as high costs and a steep learning curve remain. Ongoing advancements are expected to further enhance these systems' role in spinal surgery.

Robotic spine systems: overcoming surgeon experience in pedicle screw accuracy: a prospective study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective single-center study.

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of pedicle screws placed by freehand and under fluoroscopy and robotic assistance with intraoperative image acquisition.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Pedicle screws are the most commonly used spinal anchors owing to their ability to stabilize all three spinal columns. Various techniques such as freehand, fluoroscopy-assisted, and navigation-assisted pedicle screw placements have been used with varying degrees of accuracy. Most studies on robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement have utilized preoperatively acquired computed tomography scans. To our knowledge, this is the only study in the literature that compared freehand with fluoroscopy-guided and robotic-assisted pedicle screw insertion with freehand and fluoroscopy.

METHODS

In this prospective study, a total of 1,120 pedicle screws were placed in the freehand group (n=175), 1,250 in the fluoroscopyassisted group (n=172), and 1,225 in the robotic-assisted group (n=180). Surgical parameters and screw accuracy were analyzed between the three groups. The preoperative plan overlapped with the postoperative O-arm scan to determine if the screws were executed as planned.

RESULTS

The frequency of clinically acceptable screw placement (Gertzbein-Robbins grades A and B) in the freehand, fluoroscopy-assisted, and robotic-assisted groups were 97.7%, 98.6%, and 99.34%, respectively. With robotic assistance, an experience-neutralizing effect implied that surgeons with varying levels of experience achieved comparable pedicle screw accuracy, blood loss, O-arm time, robot time, and time per screw. No significant difference in these parameters was found between surgeries commencing before and after 2 PM. No significant differences were noted between the planned and executed screw trajectories in the robotic-assisted group irrespective of surgical experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The third-generation robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement system used in conjunction with intraoperative threedimensional O-arm imaging consistently demonstrates safe and accurate screw placement with an experience-neutralizing effect.

What is the Marginal Cost of Using Robot Assistance or Navigation for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Our primary objective was to compare the marginal intraoperative cost of 3 different methods for pedicle screw placement as part of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs). Specifically, we used time-driven activity-based costing to compare costs between robot-assisted TLIF (RA-TLIF), TLIF with intraoperative navigation (ION-TLIF), and freehand (non-navigated, nonrobotic) TLIF.

METHODS

Total cost was divided into direct and indirect costs. We identified all instances of RA-TLIF (n = 20), ION-TLIF (n = 59), and freehand TLIF (n = 233) from 2020 to 2022 at our institution. Software was developed to automate the extraction of all intraoperatively used personnel and material resources from the electronic medical record. Total costs were determined through a combination of direct observation, electronic medical record extraction, and interdepartmental collaboration (business operations, sterile processing, pharmacy, and plant operation departments). Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to compare costs between TLIF modalities, accounting for patient-specific factors as well as number of levels fused, surgeon, and hospital site.

RESULTS

The average total intraoperative cost per case for the RA-TLIF, ION-TLIF, and freehand TLIF cohorts was $24 838 ± $10 748, $15 991 ± $6254, and $14 498 ± $6580, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that RA-TLIF had significantly higher intraoperative cost compared with both ION-TLIF (β-coefficient: $7383 ± $1575, P < .001) and freehand TLIF (β-coefficient: $8182 ± $1523, P < .001). These cost differences were primarily driven by supply cost. However, there were no significant differences in intraoperative cost between ION-TLIF and freehand TLIF ( P = .32).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate a novel use of time-driven activity-based costing methodology to compare different modalities for executing the same type of lumbar fusion procedure. RA-TLIF entails significantly higher supply cost when compared with other modalities, which explains its association with higher total intraoperative cost. The use of ION, however, does not add extra expense compared with freehand TLIF when accounting for confounders. This might have implications as surgeons and hospitals move toward bundled payments.

Computer Assisted Navigation Does Not Improve Outcomes in Posterior Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of CT-based computer assisted navigation (CAN) to conventional pedicle screw placement for patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study drew data from the National Readmissions Database, years 2016-2019. Patients undergoing posterior fusion for AIS, either via CAN or fluoroscopic-guided procedures, were identified via ICD-10 codes. Multivariate regression was performed to compare outcomes between operative techniques. Negative binomial regression was used to asses discharge disposition, while Gamma regression was performed to assess length of stay (LOS) and total charges. Patient demographics and comorbidities, measured via the Elixhauser comorbidity index, were both controlled for in our regression analysis.

RESULTS

28,868 patients, 2095 (7.3%) undergoing a CAN procedure, were included in our analysis. Patients undergoing CAN procedures had increased surgical complications (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.23; P < 0.001), namely, blood transfusions (OR 2.47; P < 0.001). Discharge disposition and LOS were similar, as were reoperation and readmission rates; however, total charges were significantly greater in the CAN group (OR 1.37; P < 0.001). Mean charges were 191,489.42 (119,302.30) USD for conventional surgery vs 268 589.86 (105,636.78) USD for the CAN cohort.

CONCLUSION

CAN in posterior fusion for AIS does not appear to decrease postoperative complications and is associated with an increased need for blood transfusions. Given the much higher total cost of care that was also seen with CAN, this study calls into question whether the use of CAN is justified in this setting.

The Impact of Navigation in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Study of Historical Aspects, Current Techniques and Future Directions

Background/Objectives: We sought to improve accuracy while minimizing radiation hazards, improving surgical outcomes, and preventing potential complications. Despite the increasing popularity of these systems, a limited number of papers have been published addressing the historical evolution, detailing the areas of use, and discussing the advantages and disadvantages, of this increasingly popular system in lumbar spine surgery. Our objective was to offer readers a concise overview of navigation system history in lumbar spine surgeries, the techniques involved, the advantages and disadvantages, and suggestions for future enhancements to the system. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, focusing on the development and implementation of navigation systems in lumbar spine surgeries. Our sources include PubMed-indexed peer-reviewed journals, clinical trial data, and case studies involving technologies such as computer-assisted surgery (CAS), image-guided surgery (IGS), and robotic-assisted systems. Results: To develop more practical, effective, and accurate navigation techniques for spine surgery, consistent advancements have been made over the past four decades. This technological progress began in the late 20th century and has since encompassed image-guided surgery, intraoperative imaging, advanced navigation combined with robotic assistance, and artificial intelligence. These technological advancements have significantly improved the accuracy of implant placement, reducing the risk of misplacement and related complications. Navigation has also been found to be particularly useful in tumor resection and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), where conventional anatomic landmarks are lacking or, in the case of MIS, not visible. Additionally, these innovations have led to shorter operative times, decreased radiation exposure for patients and surgical teams, and lower rates of reoperation. As navigation technology continues to evolve, future innovations are anticipated to further enhance the capabilities and accessibility of these systems, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes in lumbar spine surgery. Conclusions: The initial limited utilization of navigation system in spine surgery has further expanded to encompass almost all fields of lumbar spine surgeries. As the cost-effectiveness and number of trained surgeons improve, a wider use of the system will be ensured so that the navigation system will be an indispensable tool in lumbar spine surgery. However, continued research and development, along with training programs for surgeons, are essential to fully realize the potential of these technologies in clinical practice.

Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intraoperative Image-Guided Navigation in Spine Surgery

Navigation technologies have become essential in spine surgery over the last decade, offering precise procedures and minimizing risks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first bibliometric analysis on this topic, providing insights and trends on topics, authors, and journals. The study identifies and analyzes the 100 most cited articles related to navigation in spine surgery. A systematic search was performed in Scopus and Google Scholar to identify all articles related to navigation in spine surgery (38,057 articles). The 100 most cited were analyzed for citations, titles, abstracts, authors, affiliations, keywords, country and institute of origin, year of publication, and level of evidence. The search was conducted in October 2023. The 100 most cited articles were published between 1995 and 2019, with 2010 to 2019 being the most prolific decade (46%). The most cited article had 733 citations, and the paper with the most citations per year averaged 59.27 citations/year. The Spine Journal had the most articles (34%). The United States contributed the most articles (39%). Most publications were clinical research and reviews (94%), with an overall evidence grade of IV-V (63%). A positive trend was noted in the last decade for incorporating augmented reality. This bibliometric analysis offers valuable insights and trends in spine surgery navigation literature. The findings indicate that technological advancements have led to more articles with higher levels of evidence. These pivotal articles shape evidence-based medicine, future surgeons, and industry improvements in navigated spine surgery.

Navigation-Guided C-arm-Free Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study of Cage Orientation and Screw Insertion Accuracy Against the Conventional C-arm-Assisted Technique

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a widely utilized technique in spine surgery. This study compares the efficacy and safety of MIS-TLIF performed with traditional C-arm fluoroscopy and C-arm-free O-arm navigation. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to compare cage positioning between C-arm-free and C-arm techniques for MIS- TLIF.

METHODS

A retrospective, comparative analysis was conducted on 43 patients undergoing MIS-TLIF. The group was divided based on the utilization of C-arm fluoroscopy or C-arm-free O-arm navigation. Key parameters analyzed included cage orientation, screw insertion accuracy, operative efficiency, and postoperative recovery. Radiographic measurements were used to assess surgical precision and perioperative complications were documented.

RESULTS

The study encompassed 43 patients, with no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups. Surgical time and blood loss were comparable between C-arm-free and C-arm groups. O-arm navigation significantly reduced pedicle screw misplacement (p=0.024). Cage positioning differed between groups (p=0.0063): O-arm cages were mostly mid-center, while C-arm cages were more anterior-center. Such differences in the cage location did not cause any impact on clinical outcome. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications (screw loosenings, dural tears, surgical site infections) between groups. The Oswestry Disability Index scores at the final follow-up showed no significant difference between the O-arm and C-arm groups, indicating similar levels of postoperative disability.

CONCLUSION

Despite the clinically insignificant difference in cage placement between C-arm-free and C-arm dependent, C-arm-free MIS-TLIF significantly improves screw placement accuracy and reduces radiation exposure to operating stuff. This suggests its potential as a valuable tool for safer and more precise spinal fusion surgery.

Unprecedented journey to 650 transpedicular screws using freehand technique and intraoperative C-arm imaging with technical nuances

Introduction

Pedicle screw placement plays a crucial role in treating various cases such as fractures, scoliosis, degenerative spine issues, and kyphosis, reinforcing all three spinal columns simultaneously. While three-dimensional navigation-assisted pedicle screw placement is considered superior, the freehand technique relies on anatomical landmarks and tactile feedback, with observed low complication rates.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective single-center study conducted over a period of 3 years. It included all patients of dorsal, lumbar, and sacral spinal instability of myriad etiology. Previously operated patients and sick obtunded patients were excluded from the study.

Results

In our study, we included 102 patients including 62 (60.7%) males and 40 (39.2%) females. More than half of patients were young in the age group of 20-50 years. Our study population had a varied etiology with 43.1% of patients having vertebral column instability due to trauma. The other etiologies were spondylolisthesis and lumbar canal stenosis (39.2%), Pott's spine (11.7%), tumors (2.9%), and osteoporotic fractures (2.9%). Majority of patients (44.1%) presented with lower backache with radiculopathy. All the transpedicular screws inserted were evaluated by C-arm to assess for screw fixation. In the first year of our study, an average of 4 anteroposterior (AP) and 4 lateral C-arm X-ray shots were taken per screw placement. In the next year, an average of 3 AP and 3 lateral shots and finally in the last year of our study only 2 AP and 2 lateral C-arm X-ray shots were taken per screw placement. Out of 650 screws placed, 4 screws were identified to cause breach with maximum breaches in the lumbar spine fixation. In dorsal spine fixation, there was 1 lateral breach at D10. In lumbar spine fixation, there were 3 breaches: two medial one each at L4 and L5 and one anterior at L2 level. The various complications include wound infection, temporary and permanent neurological deficit, screw breakage, screw misplacement, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, nonunion, and spinal epidural hematoma.

Conclusions

Our study has provided strong encouragement to persist with the freehand technique in transpedicular fixation surgeries after a certain number of cases given the minimal breaches and complications observed. There are subtle technical nuances as we increase the number of cases with less exposure of anatomical landmarks and X-rays. Success hinges on experience, adherence to technique, and thorough preoperative planning. Further research and extended follow-up periods are necessary to firmly establish this technique as the gold standard.

Accuracy and postoperative assessment of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws during scoliosis surgery compared with conventional freehand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

The complexity of human anatomical structures and the variability of vertebral body structures in patients with scoliosis pose challenges in pedicle screw placement during spinal deformity correction surgery. Through technological advancements, robots have been introduced in spinal surgery to assist with pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and CNKI databases and comparative studies assessing the accuracy and postoperative efficacy of pedicle screw placement using robotic assistance or freehand techniques in patients with scoliosis were included. The analysis evaluated the accuracy of screw placement, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay, and complications.

RESULTS

Seven studies comprising 584 patients were included in the meta-analysis, with 282 patients (48.3%) in the robot-assisted group and 320 (51.7%) in the freehand group. Robot-assisted placement showed significantly better clinically acceptable screw placement results compared with freehand placement (odds ratio [OR]: 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.75-3.91, P < 0.0001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in achieving "perfect" screw placement between the two groups (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.95-2.46, P = 0.08). The robot-assisted group had longer operation durations (mean deviation [MD]: 43.64, 95% CI: 22.25-64.74, P < 0.0001) but shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD: - 1.12, 95% CI: - 2.15 to - 0.08, P = 0.03) than the freehand group. There were no significant differences in overall complication rates or intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. There was no significant difference in Cobb Angle between the two groups before and after operation.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement offers higher accuracy and shorter hospital stay than freehand placement in scoliosis surgery; although the robotics approach is associated with longer operative durations, similar complication rates and intraoperative blood loss.

Low Radiation Protocol for Intraoperative Robotic C-Arm Can Enhance Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Deformity Correction Accuracy and Safety

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-series study.

OBJECTIVES

To assess (1) low cone beam CT (CBCT) mediated intraoperative navigation to limit radiation exposure without compromising surgical accuracy, and (2) the potential of intraoperative C-arm CBCT navigation to augment pedicle screw (PS) placement accuracy in AIS surgery compared to pre-surgery CT-based planning.

METHODS

The first part involved a prospective phantom study, comparing radiation doses for conventional CT, and standard (6sDCT) and a low dose (5sDCT) Artis Zeego®-imaging. Next, 5sDCT- and 6sDCT-navigation were compared on PS accuracy and radiation exposure during AIS correction. The final part compared surgical AIS deformity correction through intraoperative 5sDCT navigation to a matched cohort treated using conventional pre-surgery CT-scans for navigation. Outcome parameters included operation time, skin dose (SD), dose area product (DAP), intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and PS deviation rates.

RESULTS

The phantom study demonstrated a reduction in radiation for the 5sDCT protocol. Moreover, 5sDCT-imaged patients (n = 15) showed a significantly lower SD (-27.41%) and DAP (-30.92%), without compromising PS accuracy compared with 6sDCT-settings (n = 15). Finally, AIS correction through intraoperative CBCT C-arm navigation (n = 27) significantly reduced screw deviation rates (6.83% versus 10.75%, P = .016) without increasing operation times, compared with conventional CT (n = 37).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative navigation using a CBCT C-arm system improved the accuracy of PS insertion and reduced surgery time. Moreover, it reduced radiation exposure compared with conventional CT, which was further curtailed by adapting the low-dose 5sDCT protocol. In short, our study highlights the benefits of intraoperative CBCT navigation for PS placement in AIS surgery.

Consistent anatomical relationships of pedicle, lamina, and superior articulating process in severe idiopathic scoliosis allow for safe freehand pedicle screw placement: A proof-of-concept technical study

Introduction

Transpedicular screw placement has superior pullout strength compared to alternative forms of spinal fusion and is often performed in deformity correction surgery with navigation for optimal accuracy and reliability. Freehand technique for pedicle screws minimizes operation time and radiation exposure without fluoroscopy but is not widely adopted given the challenge of difficult anatomical corridors and accurate placement, especially in idiopathic scoliosis and advanced deformity. We used a computer-generated model to assess a proof-of-concept and anatomical feasibility of a freehand screw technique in severe scoliosis.

Methods

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of vertebra from a sample of two male patients with severe idiopathic scoliosis deformity (1 thoracic and 1 lumbar) with Cobb angles of 100° were used for planned placement of 17 levels of thoracolumbar (6.5 mm × 45 mm) pedicle screws. 3D reconstruction of each vertebra was created and measurements of screw entries and trajectories were reproduced with a 3D slicer software image computing platform.

Results

Accurate transpedicular screw placement is possible with anatomical landmarks based on the 3D reconstructed vertebral levels. A series of 5 figures were assembled to demonstrate sagittal, coronal, and axial planes and key anatomical landmarks and trajectories of thoracic and lumbar freehand pedicle screws in severe idiopathic scoliosis.

Conclusions

Anatomical landmarks for freehand transpedicular screw placement (between pedicle, lamina, and superior articulating process) are constant and reliable in severe idiopathic scoliosis as evidenced by 3D computer modeling. Preoperative computed tomography modeling may assist appropriate screw entry and trajectory based on anatomical landmarks for spine surgeons, and guide freehand technique for screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Image-Guided Navigation in Spine Surgery: From Historical Developments to Future Perspectives

Intraoperative navigation is critical during spine surgery to ensure accurate instrumentation placement. From the early era of fluoroscopy to the current advancement in robotics, spinal navigation has continued to evolve. By understanding the variations in system protocols and their respective usage in the operating room, the surgeon can use and maximize the potential of various image guidance options more effectively. At the same time, maintaining navigation accuracy throughout the procedure is of the utmost importance, which can be confirmed intraoperatively by using an internal fiducial marker, as demonstrated herein. This technology can reduce the need for revision surgeries, minimize postoperative complications, and enhance the overall efficiency of operating rooms.

Analysis of duration of different stages of surgery in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients: comparison between severe versus non-severe AIS

PURPOSE

Prolonged surgical duration in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients is associated with increased blood loss and perioperative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the duration of each stage of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in severe AIS (Cobb angle ≥ 90°) with non-severe AIS patients. This analysis will identify the most time-consuming stage of PSF and help surgeons formulate strategies to shorten operative time.

METHODS

Retrospective study whereby 90 AIS patients (Lenke type 2, 3, 4, and 6) who underwent PSF from 2019 to 2023 were recruited. Twenty-five severe AIS patients were categorized in Gp1 and 65 non-severe AIS patients in Gp2. Propensity score matching (PSM) with one-to-one with nearest neighbor matching (match tolerance 0.05) was performed. Outcomes measured via operation duration of each stage of surgery, blood loss, number of screws, fusion levels and screw density.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients from each group were matched. Total operative time was significantly higher in Gp1 (168.2 ± 30.8 vs. 133.3 ± 24.0 min, p < 0.001). The lengthiest stage was screw insertion which took 58.5 ± 13.4 min in Gp1 and 44.7 ± 13.7 min in Gp2 (p = 0.001). Screw insertion contributed 39.5% of the overall increased surgical duration in Gp1. Intraoperative blood loss (1022.2 ± 412.5 vs. 714.2 ± 206.7 mL, p = 0.002), number of screws (17.1 ± 1.5 vs. 15.5 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and fusion level (13.1 ± 0.9 vs. 12.5 ± 1.0, p = 0.026) were significantly higher in Gp1.

CONCLUSION

Screw insertion was the most time-consuming stage of PSF and was significantly longer in severe AIS. Adjunct technologies such as CT-guided navigation and robotic-assisted navigation should be considered to reduce screw insertion time in severe AIS.

Radiation exposure in navigated techniques for AIS: is there a difference between pre-operative CT and intraoperative CT?

PURPOSE

Utilization of navigation improves pedicle screw accuracy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Our center switched from intraoperative CT (ICT) to an optical navigation system that utilizes pre-operative CT (PCT). We aim to evaluate the radiation dose and operative time for low-dose ICT compared to standard and low-dose PCT used for optical navigation in AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

METHODS

A single-center matched-control cohort study of 38 patients was conducted. Nineteen patients underwent ICT navigation (O-arm) and were matched by sex, age, and weight to 19 patients who underwent PCT for use with an optical-guided navigation (7D, Seaspine). A total of 418 levels were instrumented and reviewed. PCT was either a standard dose (N = 7) or a low dose (N = 12). The mean volume CT dose index, dose-length product, overall effective dose (ED), ED per level instrumented, and operative time per level were compared.

RESULTS

ED per level instrumented was 0.061 ± 0.029 mSv in low-dose PCT and 0.14 ± 0.05 mSv in low-dose ICT (p < 0.0001). ED per level instrumented was significantly higher in standard PCT (1.46 ± 0.39 vs. 0.14 ± 0.03 mSv; p < 0.0001). Mean operative time per level was 31 ± 7 min for ICT and 33 ± 3 min for PCT (p = 0.628).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose PCT resulted in 0.70 mSv exposure per case and 31 min per level, standard-dose was 16.95 mSv, while ICT resulted in 1.34-1.62 mSv and a similar operative time. Use of a standard-dose PCT involves radiation exposure about 9 times higher than ICT and 23 times higher than low-dose PCT per level instrumented.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Comparison of 3D-navigation and fluoroscopic guidance in percutaneous pedicle screw placement for traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction

Introduction

Fractures of the thoracolumbar junction are the most common vertebral fractures and can require surgical treatment. Several studies have shown that the accuracy of pedicle screw placement can be improved by the use of 3D-navigation. Still only few studies have focused on the use of navigation in traumatic spine injuries.

Research question

The aim of this study was to compare the screw placement accuracy and radiation exposure for 3D-navigated and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement in traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction.

Materials and methods

In this single-center study 25 patients undergoing 3D-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw placement for traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) were compared to a control group of 25 patients using fluoroscopy. Screw accuracy was determined in postoperative CT-scans using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification system. Additionally, duration of surgery, dose area product, fluoroscopy time and intraoperative complications were compared between the groups.

Results

The accuracy of 3D-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw placement was 92.66 % while an accuracy of 88.08 % was achieved using standard fluoroscopy (p = 0.19). The fluoroscopy time was significantly less in the navigation group compared to the control group (p = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in radiation exposure, duration of surgery or intraoperative complications between the groups.

Discussion and conclusion

The results suggest that 3D-navigation facilitates higher accuracy in percutaneous pedicle screw placement of traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction, although limitations should be considered. In this study 3D-navigation did not increase fluoroscopy time, while radiation exposure and surgery time were comparable.

Surgical Management of Primary Thoracic Epidural Melanoma

In this study, we reported one of the first cases where a rare robotic-assisted platform with neuronavigation technology and carbon-fiber-polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) screws is employed to surgically treat multilevel thoracic primary spinal epidural melanoma. A 67-year-old male presented with left upper thoracic pain. His magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the thoracic spine revealed a dumbbell-shaped left epidural mass at the T2-3 level. Partial resection was performed due to tumor growth into the vertebral bodies and patient discretion for minimal surgery. The patient's neurological conditions improved postoperatively, with reduced reported symptoms of pain and numbness. Postoperative imaging showed evidence of appropriate spinal stabilization. Patient underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and no adverse events were reported. This case reflects one of the first examples of treating thoracic epidural melanoma with the use of robotic-assisted navigation. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy of robot-assisted navigation for patients with primary spinal malignant melanoma which may open the possibility of surgery to once presumed non-operative patients.

Use of navigation for anterior and posterior instrumentation in the surgical management of pediatric pathologic lumbosacral deformity

We report the use of computerized tomography (CT)-guided navigation for complex spinal deformity correction (anterior and posterior) in an 8-year-old patient with neurofibromatosis complicated by dystrophic pedicles, dural ectasia, and extensive vertebral scalloping. A retrospective review was conducted of the patient's medical records for the past 3 years, including the patient's office visit notes, operative reports, pre- and 2-year postoperative imaging studies. The patient successfully underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion from L3-S1 using CT-guided navigation to negotiate the challenges posed by dural ectasia and vertebral body scalloping. One week after the anterior procedure, she underwent navigation-guided T10-to-pelvis posterior instrumented fusion. There were no perioperative or postoperative complications at 2 years. In patients with complex deformities of the spine, including dural ectasia, scalloped vertebral bodies, and decreased pedicle integrity, the use of intraoperative CT-guided navigation can benefit surgeons by facilitating the safe placement of interbody spacers and pedicle screws.

Anterior cervical osteotomy of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis lesions with computer-assisted navigation surgery: A case report

Key Clinical Message

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) involves spine ligament ossification. Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) effectively aids complex surgeries, such as anterior cervical osteotomy, to alleviate progressive DISH-related dysphagia.

Abstract

We describe a 68-year-old man with sudden onset dysphagia to both solids and liquids. Radiographic Imaging revealed DISH lesions from C2 down to the thoracic spine. The patient was successfully treated with CAN anterior osteotomy and resection of DISH lesions from C3-C6 and had complete symptom relief within 2 weeks post-operatively.

Accuracy of imaging grading in comparison to open laminectomy to evaluate pedicle screws positioning

Study design

Prospective experimental study.

Objective

To compare the accuracy of O-Arm-acquired radiographic and computed tomography (CT) evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement with open laminectomy in a simulation laboratory.

Summary of background data

Improving surgical safety and procedural efficiency during thoracic posterior spine instrumentation is essential for decreasing complication rates and possible related risks. The most common way of verifying the position of pedicle screws during the surgical procedure and immediately postoperatively is to acquire intraoperative fluoroscopic images and plain radiographs of the spine, respectively. Laboratory simulated surgery is a valuable tool to evaluate the accuracy of those exams.

Methods

Twenty simulation models of scoliosis from T3 to T7 were instrumented by five spine fellows (total of 200 pedicle screws), followed by radiographic and CT images acquired with the assistance of the O-Arm which were evaluated by three independent raters. A fellowship-trained spine neurosurgeon performed laminectomies on the instrumented levels and assessed pedicle integrity (gold standard).

Results

Forty-eight breaches were identified in the axial direct view after laminectomy. Of those, eighteen breaches were classified as unacceptable. Regarding the sagittal direct view, four breaches were observed, three of which were classified as unacceptable. Overall, both O-arm radiographic and CT evaluations had a significantly high negative predicted value but a low positive predicted value to identify unacceptable breaches, especially in the sagittal plane. The frequency of missed breaches by all three examiners was high, particularly in the sagittal plane.

Conclusion

Postoperative evaluation of pedicle screws using O-arm-acquired radiographic or CT images may underdiagnose the presence of breaches. In our study, sagittal breaches were more difficult to diagnose than axial breaches. Although most breaches do not have clinical repercussions, this study suggests that this modality of postoperative radiographic assessment may be inaccurate.

Level of evidence

4.

MakoTM robotic-arm-assisted total hip and total knee arthroplasty outcomes in an orthopedic oncology setting: A case series

Background

The MAKO Robotic-Arm system is a cutting-edge technology which combines both computed tomography (CT) scanning and three-dimensional planning to determine the ideal size and orientation of implants prior to bone resection. It is typically utilized within a general orthopedic setting for joint replacement procedures, such as total joint arthroplasties. However, its use within orthopedic oncology, which contains a much more compromised patient population and more complex surgical treatment, is not well documented within the literature.

Question/purposes

To determine the patient outcomes of those who underwent a total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at Morristown Medical Center using the MAKO Robotic-Arm System. Particularly, we aspired to delve into the use of the MAKO in an orthopedic oncology setting for patients with a degenerative hip or knee and a history of cancer or other orthopedic tumor, impending pathological fracture, PVNS, chondromatosis, radiation therapy, or other oncological related conditions.

Patients and methods

Our institution monitored twenty-five individuals with unique orthopedic oncology conditions that underwent MAKO robotic-assisted total hip and knee arthroplasty. This was performed between 2020 and 2022 at Morristown Medical Center in New Jersey. During this time period, 52% (13/25) of the operations were performed on knees and 48% (12/25) were performed on hips. Data regarding patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), medications, hemoglobin, hematocrit, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class, operative data, the length of stay (LOS), readmission rates due to infection or periprosthetic fractures, and complications were collected retrospectively. All confidence intervals were calculated at the 95% confidence level.

Results

Postoperatively, the average LOS was 3.2 days, and there were no complications after any of the MAKO-assisted joint arthroplasty procedures. Additionally, there were no readmissions at any of our recorded intervals - 1-30, 1-60, 1-90, and 1 year - however one patient presented to the emergency department after falling 4 days post-operatively. X-ray imaging ultimately revealed no periprosthetic fracture or malalignment of the prosthesis.

Conclusions

The utilization of the MAKO Robotic-Arm System for joint arthroplasty procedures (THAs and TKAs) on orthopedic oncology patients yielded exceptional outcomes, with no complications or readmissions directly attributed to the use of this innovative robotic technology. Thus, this newly emerging surgical system holds great promise, potentially revolutionizing the approach for selected orthopedic oncology patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty compared to the traditional manual techniques. It further demonstrates that its use in an orthopedic oncology setting - where the cohort of patients are often compromised, leading to more intricate surgeries with heightened risks - elicits safety and provides optimal outcomes for patients. Nevertheless, its role within the field is evolving, and in the coming years, as it gains further popularity and sees broader application by orthopedic oncology surgeons, its potential will become clearer. To solidify its position, future clinical investigations and prospective research should be conducted to support the preference of the MAKO system over traditional manual techniques. This will help provide the necessary evidence to advocate for its widespread adoption and continued advancements in orthopedic oncology procedures.

Ten-step minimally invasive slalom unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (sULBD) with navigation

BACKGROUND

Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) is a MIS surgical technique that offers safe and effective decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with a long-term resolution of symptoms. Advantages over conventional open laminectomy include reduced expected blood loss, muscle damage, mechanical instability, and less postoperative pain. The slalom technique combined with navigation is used in multi-segmental LSS to improve the workflow and effectiveness of the procedure.

METHODS

We outline ten technical steps to achieve a slalom unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (sULBD) with navigation. In a retrospective case series, we included patients with multi-segmental LSS operated in our institution using the sULBD between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was a reduction in pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

RESULTS

In our case series (N = 7), all patients reported resolution of initial symptoms on an average follow-up of 20.71 ± 9 months. The average operative time and length of hospital stay were 196.14 min and 1.67 days, respectively. On average, VAS (back pain) was 4.71 pre-operatively and 1.50 on long-term follow-up of an average of 19.05 months. VAS (leg pain) decreased from 4.33 to 1.21. ODI was reported as 33% pre-operatively and 12% on long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The sULBD with navigation is a safe and effective MIS surgical procedure and achieves the resolution of symptoms in patients presenting with multi-segmental LSS. Herein, we demonstrate the ten key steps required to perform the sULBD technique. Compared to the standard sULBD technique, the incorporation of navigation provides anatomic localization without exposure to radiation to staff for a higher safety profile along with a fast and efficient workflow.

Robotics and navigation in spine surgery: A narrative review

Introduction

In recent decades, there has been a rising trend of spinal surgical interventional techniques, especially Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MIS), to improve the quality of life in an effective and safe manner. However, MIS techniques tend to be difficult to adapt and are associated with an increased risk of radiation exposure. This led to the development of 'computer-assisted surgery' in 1983, which integrated CT images into spinal procedures evolving into the present day robotic-assisted spine surgery. The authors aim to review the development of spine surgeries and provide an overview of the benefits offered. It includes all the comparative studies available to date.

Methods

The manuscript has been prepared as per "SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles". The authors searched Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus using the terms "(((((Robotics) OR (Navigation)) OR (computer assisted)) OR (3D navigation)) OR (Freehand)) OR (O-Arm)) AND (spine surgery)" and 68 articles were included for analysis excluding review articles, meta-analyses, or systematic literature.

Results

The authors noted that 49 out of 68 studies showed increased precision of pedicle screw insertion, 10 out of 19 studies show decreased radiation exposure, 13 studies noted decreased operative time, 4 out of 8 studies showed reduced hospital stay and significant reduction in rates of infections, neurological deficits, the need for revision surgeries, and rates of radiological ASD, with computer-assisted techniques.

Conclusion

Computer-assisted surgeries have better accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, decreased blood loss and operative time, reduced radiation exposure, improved functional outcomes, and lesser complications.

Robotic-Assisted Surgery and Navigation in Deformity Surgery

Deformity surgery is advancing quickly with the use of three-dimensional navigation and robotics. In spinal fusion, the use of robotics improves screw placement accuracy and reduces radiation, complications, blood loss, and recovery time. Currently, there is limited evidence showing that robotics is better than traditional freehand techniques. Most studies favoring robotics are small and retrospective due to the novelty of the technology in deformity surgery. Using these systems can also be expensive and time-consuming. Surgeons should use these advancements as tools, but not rely on them to replace surgical experience, anatomy knowledge, and good judgment.

Patient-specific guide systems decrease the major perforation rate of pedicle screw placement in comparison to the freehand technique for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw (PS) placement between a low-profile three-dimensional (3D) printed patient-specific guide system and freehand technique for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery.

METHODS

Patients with AIS who underwent surgery between 2018 and 2023 at our hospital were included in the study. The 3D-printed patient-specific guide was used since 2021 (guide group). PS perforation was classified using Rao and Neo's classification (grade 0, no violation; grade 1, < 2 mm; grade 2, 2-4 mm; grade 3, > 4 mm). Major perforations were defined as grades 2 or 3. The major perforation rate of PS, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and correction rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 576 PSs were inserted in 32 patients (20 patients in the freehand (FH) group and 12 patients in the guide group). The major perforation rate was significantly lower in the guide group than in the FH group (2.1% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001). Significantly fewer major perforations were observed in the guide group than in the FH group in the upper thoracic (T2-4) region (3.2% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) and lower thoracic (T10-12) region (0% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.001). The operative time, EBL, and correction rate were equivalent between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The 3D-printed patient-specific guide notably reduced the major perforation rate of PS without increasing EBL and operative time. Our findings indicate that this guide system is reliable and effective for AIS surgery.

Computer-assisted Navigation in Lumbar Spine Instrumented Fusions: Comparison of In-hospital and 30-Day Postoperative Complications With Nonnavigated Fusions in a National Database

OBJECTIVE

To compare in-hospital and 30-day postoperative complications for lumbar spine operations with and without use of computer-assisted navigation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent 1-level to 3-level lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusions 2011 to 2014 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Emergent procedures and patients aged younger than 18 years were excluded. Patients whose surgery involved the use of computer-assisted navigation were propensity score matched 1:4 based on preoperative demographics and comorbidities to operations without the use of navigation. Multivariate analysis was done to compare postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In total, 8,500 patients (average age: 60.7 ± 12.9, male 3,866, female 4,634) were analyzed (1,700 navigation, 6,800 Non-Navigated). Operations with navigation had significantly fewer overall complications (24% vs. 27%, P = 0.008; odds ratio [OR] = 0.83; CI = 0.73 to 0.95), fewer minor complications (20% vs. 24%, P = 0.002; OR = 0.80; CI = 0.70 to 0.91), fewer blood transfusions (17% v. 20%, P = 0.013; OR = 0.82; CI = 0.71 to 0.95), more wound dehiscences (0.4% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.022; OR = 2.16; CI = 1.12,4.19), and shorter average lengths of hospital stays (4.8 ± 4.8 vs. 5.1 ± 5.8 days, P = 0.01). Operations with computer navigation had significantly longer average surgical times (247 ± 129 vs 221 ± 115 minutes, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in 30-day revision rates, readmissions, and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Although use of computer-assisted navigation in short-segment lumbar spine fusions (1 to 3 levels) did not decrease revision rates for screw misplacement within 30 days postoperatively, it independently reduced the frequency of blood transfusions and minor complications and decreased hospital lengths of stay compared with operations without navigation. These benefits came at the expense of increased surgical times and wound dehiscences within 30 days postoperatively. Given the inherent limitations of large national databases, these results warrant confirmation through prospective, multicenter investigations.

Accuracy and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement for Treating Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Narrative Review Comparing Available Techniques

Posterior spinal fusion and segmental spinal instrumentation using pedicle screws (PS) is the most used procedure to correct adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Computed navigation, robotic navigation, and patient-specific drill templates are available, besides the first described free-hand technique. None of these techniques are recognized as the gold standard. This review compares the PS placement accuracy and misplacement-related complication rates achieved with the techniques mentioned above. It further reports PS accuracy classifications and anatomic PS misplacement risk factors. The literature suggests a higher PS placement accuracy for robotic relative to computed navigation and for the latter relative to the free-hand technique (misplacement rates: 0.4-7.2% versus 1.9-11% versus 1.5-50.7%) using variable accuracy classifications. The reported PS-misplacement-related complication rates are, however, uniformly low (0-1.4%) for every technique, while robotic and computed navigation induce a roughly fourfold increase in the patient's intraoperative radiation exposure relative to the free-hand technique with fluoroscopic implant positioning control. The authors, therefore, recommend dedicating robotic and computed navigation for complex deformities or revisions with altered landmarks, underline the need for a generally accepted PS accuracy classification, and advise against PS placement in grade 4 pedicles yielding higher misplacement rates (22.2-31.5%).

Facet joint violation after open and percutaneous posterior instrumentation: a comparative study

PURPOSE

Posterior instrumentation is the state-of-the-art surgical treatment for fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Options for pedicle screw placement comprise open or minimally invasive techniques. Open instrumentation causes large approach related muscle detachment, which minimally invasive techniques aim to reduce. However, concerns of accurate pedicle screw placement are still a matter of debate. Beside neurological complications due to pedicle screw malplacement, also affection of the facet joints and thus motion dependent pain is known as a complication. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy of pedicle screw placement concerning facet joint violation (FJV) after open- and minimally invasive posterior instrumentation.

METHODS

A retrospective data analysis of postoperative computer tomographic scans of 219 patients (1124 pedicle screws) was conducted. A total of 116 patients underwent open screw insertion (634 screws) and 103 patients underwent minimally invasive, percutaneous screw insertion (490 screws).

RESULTS

In the lumbar spine (segments L3, L4, L5), there were significantly more and higher grade (open = 0.55 vs. percutaneous = 1.2; p = 0.001) FJV's after percutaneously compared to openly inserted screws. In the thoracic spine, no significant difference concerning rate and grade of FJV was found (p > 0.56).

CONCLUSION

FJV is more likely to occur in percutaneously placed pedicle screws. Additionally, higher grade FJV's occur after percutaneous instrumentation. However, in the thoracic spine we didn't find a significant difference between open and percutaneous technique. Our results suggest a precise consideration concerning surgical technique according to the fractured vertebrae in the light of the individual anatomic structures in the preop CT.

O-Arm Accuracy and Radiation Exposure in Adult Deformity Surgery

OBJECTIVE

In long thoracolumbar deformity surgery, accurate screw positioning is critical for spinal stability. We assessed pedicle and pelvic screw accuracy and radiation exposure in patients undergoing long thoracolumbar deformity fusion surgery (≥4 levels) involving 3-dimensional fluoroscopy (O-Arm/Stealth) navigation.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center cohort study, all patients aged >18 years who underwent fusion in 2016-2018 were reviewed. O-Arm images were assessed for screw accuracy. Effective radiation doses were calculated. The primary outcome was pedicle screw accuracy (Heary grade). Secondary outcomes were pelvic fixation screw accuracy, radiation exposure, and screw-related perioperative and postoperative complications or revision surgery within 3 years.

RESULTS

Of 1477 pedicle screws placed in 91 patients (mean 16.41 ± 5.6 screws/patient), 1208 pedicle screws (81.8%) could be evaluated by 3-dimensional imaging after placement. Heary Grade I placement was achieved in 1150 screws (95.2%), Grade II in 47 (3.9%), Grade III in 10 (0.82%), Grade IV in 1 (0.08%), and Grade V in 0; Grade III-V were replaced intraoperatively. One of 60 (1.6%) sacroiliac screws placed showed medial cortical breach and was replaced. The average O-Arm-related effective dose was 29.54 ± 14.29 mSv and effective dose/spin was 8.25 ± 2.65 mSv. No postoperative neurological worsening, vascular injuries, or revision surgeries for screw misplacement were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

With effective radiation doses similar to those in interventional neuroendovascular procedures, the use of O-Arm in multilevel complex deformity surgery resulted in high screw accuracy, no need for surgical revision because of screw malposition, less additional imaging, and no radiation exposure for the surgical team.

A Surgical Robotic System for Osteoporotic Hip Augmentation: System Development and Experimental Evaluation

Minimally-invasive Osteoporotic Hip Augmentation (OHA) by injecting bone cement is a potential treatment option to reduce the risk of hip fracture. This treatment can significantly benefit from computer-assisted planning and execution system to optimize the pattern of cement injection. We present a novel robotic system for the execution of OHA that consists of a 6-DOF robotic arm and integrated drilling and injection component. The minimally-invasive procedure is performed by registering the robot and preoperative images to the surgical scene using multiview image-based 2D/3D registration with no external fiducial attached to the body. The performance of the system is evaluated through experimental sawbone studies as well as cadaveric experiments with intact soft tissues. In the cadaver experiments, distance errors of 3.28mm and 2.64mm for entry and target points and orientation error of 2.30° are calculated. Moreover, the mean surface distance error of 2.13mm with translational error of 4.47mm is reported between injected and planned cement profiles. The experimental results demonstrate the first application of the proposed Robot-Assisted combined Drilling and Injection System (RADIS), incorporating biomechanical planning and intraoperative fiducial-less 2D/3D registration on human cadavers with intact soft tissues.

Robotic and navigated pedicle screws are safer and more accurate than fluoroscopic freehand screws: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Navigated and robotic pedicle screw placement systems have been developed to improve the accuracy of screw placement. However, the literature comparing the safety and accuracy of robotic and navigated screw placement with fluoroscopic freehand screw placement in thoracolumbar spine surgery has been limited.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials that compared the accuracy and safety profiles of robotic and navigated pedicle screws with fluoroscopic freehand pedicle screws.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review and meta-analysis PATIENT SAMPLE: Only randomized controlled trials comparing robotic-assisted or navigated pedicle screws placement with freehand pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds ratio (OR) estimates for screw accuracy according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale and relative risk (RR) for various surgical complications.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE for English-language studies from inception through April 7, 2022, including references of eligible articles. The search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers conducted a full abstraction of all data, and one reviewer verified accuracy. Information was extracted on study design, quality, bias, participants, and risk estimates. Data and estimates were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 papers encompassing 12 randomized controlled trials were identified (n=892 patients, 4,046 screws). The pooled analysis demonstrated that robotic and navigated pedicle screw placement techniques were associated with higher odds of screw accuracy (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.24-5.72, p=.01). Robotic and navigated screw placement was associated with a lower risk of facet joint violations (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, p<.01) and major complications (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.84, p=.02). There were no observed differences between groups in nerve root injury (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.11-2.30, p=.37), or return to operating room for screw revision (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07-1.13, p=.07).

CONCLUSIONS

These estimates suggest that robotic and navigated screw placement techniques are associated with higher odds of screw accuracy and superior safety profile compared with fluoroscopic freehand techniques. Additional randomized controlled trials will be needed to further validate these findings.

Cervical spine involvement in pediatric mucopolysaccharidosis patients: Clinical features, early diagnosis, and surgical management

Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) is a progressive genetic disease that causes a deficiency in lysosomal enzymes, which play an important role in the degradation pathway of glycosaminoglycans. As a result of enzyme defects, mucopolysaccharides cannot be metabolized and thus accumulate. The cervical spine is one of the most commonly involved sites; thus, prompt surgical management before the onset of severe neurological deterioration is critical. However, because of the rarity of the disease, there is no standard treatment. In this review, we characterize the cervical spinal involvement in pediatric patients with MPS, describe the useful imaging technologies for diagnosis, and provide screening procedure for children with MPS. Surgical managements, including indications, surgical methods, possible difficulties, and solutions, are reviewed in detail.

Pedicle Screw Placement Aided by C-Arm Fluoroscopy: A "Nevermore without" Technology to Pursue Optimal Spine Fixation

The surgical technique and the intraoperative technology that support spinal pedicle screw placement have consistently evolved over the past decades to decrease the misplacement rate of pedicle screws. We retrospectively evaluated our case series by analyzing the period 2016-2020. Patients undergoing pedicle screw fixation for cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine degenerative diseases have been included. Surgery was carried out with the aid of intraoperative 3D C-arm fluoroscopy to assess and optimize screw placement and/or correct possible mispositioning. Each patient underwent a postoperative CT scan. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and accuracy of pedicle screw placement and estimate the variation in mispositioning rates. We carried out 329 surgical procedures, as follows: 70 cervical, 78 thoracic spine, and 181 lumbar spine surgeries. An excellent overall pedicle screw positioning was obtained, with slight differences between the cervical (98.6%), thoracic (100%), and lumbar (98.9%) tracts. Accordingly, only three patients required a revision surgery owing to mispositioning (0.91%). In particular, intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy significatively improved the accuracy of thoracic screw positioning, as shown by postoperative CT scans. Our experience proves the crucial role of intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy in pursuing optimal technical results and improving patient outcomes at follow-up.

Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients using the entry point identified by new landmarks: a computed tomography study

Background

Although thoracic pedicle (TP) screw has gained increasingly popularity in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients, questions remain about the accurate selection of entry point for TP screw placement in these patient. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of TP screw placement in AIS patients using the entry point identified by new landmarks.

Methods

Thirty-four thoracic AIS patients treated with posterior TP screw instrumentation were included. All these TP screws were inserted through the entry point identified by new landmarks with free-hand technique. Postoperative CT scans were obtained to evaluate the screw position. The perforations of the pedicle were classified as grade 0 (no perforation), grade 1 (≤ 2 mm), grade 2 (2.1–4 mm), grade 3 (4.1–6 mm) and grade 4 (6.1–8.0 mm). Screws in grade 0, displaced either medially or anteriorly in grade 1 and displaced laterally in grades 1 to 2 were considered acceptable.

Results

Of the 495 TP screws inserted, 34 (6.9%) screws were displaced with 7 screws (1.4%) displaced medially, 20 screws (4.1%) displaced laterally and 7 screws (1.4%) displaced anteriorly (P < 0.05). Among the 34 displaced screws, 11 screws (32.4%) were considered as grade 1, 14 screws (38.2%) as grade 2 and 9 screws (29.4%) as grade 3 (P < 0.05). The overall rate of acceptable screws was 97.8%. No screw-related complication was noted.

Conclusion

Our new method for selecting the entry point of TP screw in AIS patients is convenient and can achieve high accuracy of screw placement, which is worthy of being widely popularized.

[Does navigation still have a value in trauma surgery?]

BACKGROUND

Navigation systems are supposed to increase precision and support surgeons while they perform certain interventions. 2D, or nowadays 3D, systems are used in image-based approaches. Image-free navigation uses 3D printing.

INDICATIONS

There are several studies on navigation procedures in trauma surgery. In contrast to limb surgery, the use of 3D navigation in pelvic and spine surgery is already well established. Navigation is especially regularly used to treat fractures of the posterior pelvic ring and for posterior stabilization of the cervical spine.

REQUIREMENTS

To be able to utilize navigation systems optimally, the learning curve should be completed, and the technique should be used regularly. In addition, the surgeon should know the surgical technique without navigation in order to recognize potential errors of the navigation.

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

Advantages include increased patient safety, reduction in radiation exposure and less invasive surgical procedures. However, among other disadvantages, initial costs are high.

Evaluation of the implantation of transpedicular screws in spinal instrumentation with free-hand technique and navigation-assisted with intraoperative computed tomography: An analytical-positional study

BACKGROUND

Spinal instrumentation using transpedicular screws has been used for decades to stabilize the spine. In October 2018, an intraoperative CT system was acquired in the Neurosurgery service of the University Hospital Complex of Vigo, this being the first model of these characteristics in the Spanish Public Health System, so we began a study from January 2015 to December 2019 to assess the precision of the transpedicular screws implanted with this system compared with a control group performed with the classical technique and final fluoroscopic control.

METHODS

The study was carried out in patients who required transpedicular instrumentation surgery, in total 655 screws were placed, 339 using the free-hand technique (Group A) and 316 assisted with intraoperative CT navigation (Group B) (p>0.05). Demographic characteristics, related to surgery and the screw implantation grades were assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification.

RESULTS

92 patients were evaluated, between 12 and 86 years (average: 57.1 years). 161 thoracic screws (24.6%) and 494 lumbo-sacral screws (75.4%) were implanted. Of the thoracic screws, 33 produced a pedicle rupture. For the lumbo-sacral screws, 71 have had pedicle violation. The overall correct positioning rate for the free-hand group was 72.6% and for the CT group it was 96.5% (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy rate is higher in thoracic-lumbar instrumentation in the navigation group versus free-hand group with fluoroscopic control.

Propensity-Matched Comparison of 90-Day Complications in Robotic-Assisted Versus Non-Robotic Assisted Lumbar Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective single center propensity-matched observational cohort study that included patients who underwent 1- to 3-level lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 90-day complication rates between robotic-assisted and non-robotic-assisted lumbar spinal fusions in propensity-matched cohorts.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A recent administrative database (PearlDiver) study reported increased 30-day complications with the utilization of robotic-assisted enabling technology.

METHODS

Of 146 robotic-assisted cases that met inclusion criteria, 114 were successfully propensity matched to 114 patients from 214 cases who had 1 to 3 level lumbar fusion without robotic assistance based on age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologist grade, number of surgical levels, primary versus revision, and surgical approach (posterior-only or anterior-posterior). We excluded tumor, trauma, infection, or deformity cases. Outcomes included surgical and medical (major/minor) complications at intraoperative, immediately postoperative, 30- and 90-day postoperative intervals, including reoperations, and readmissions within 90 days.

RESULTS

All cause intraoperative complication rates were similar between non-robotic-assisted (5.3%) and robotic-assisted groups (10.5%, P = 0.366). Immediate postoperative medical complication rate was also similar between non-robotic-assisted (6.1%) and robotic-assisted groups (1.8%, P = 0.089). Thirty-day complication rates, 90-day complication rates, reoperation rates, and readmission rates showed no difference between non-robotic-assisted and robotic-assisted groups. There was no difference between return to OR for infection between the cohorts (non-robotic-assisted: 6 [5%] vs. robotic-assisted: 1 [0.8%], P = 0.119). There was however improved length of stay (LOS) in the robotic-assisted group compared with non-robotic-assisted group (2.5 vs. 3.17 days, P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

In propensity-matched cohorts, patients undergoing 1- to 3-level robotic-assisted posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions did not have increased 90-day complication rate, and had a shorter length of stay compared with non-robotic-assisted patients. There findings differ from a prior administrative database study as the robotic-assisted group in the current study had 0% return to OR for malpositioned screws and 0.8% return to OR for infection.Level of Evidence: 2.

Evolution of Complex Spine Surgery in Neurosurgery: From Big to Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Spinal Deformity

Spinal instrumentation for adult spinal deformity dates back to the surgical correction of secondary complications from infectious processes, such as Pott's disease and poliomyelitis [1]. With the population aging at a longer life expectancy today, advanced degenerative spinal diseases and idiopathic scoliosis supersede as the most common causes of adult spinal deformity. Correction of the thoracolumbar malignment, specifically, has rapidly evolved with the burgeoning success of spinal instrumentation. The objective of this chapter is to review the metamorphosis of operative principles for adult thoracolumbar deformity, from aggressive osteotomies in the posterior bony elements to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) at the intervertebral disc space.

State of the art review of new technologies in spine deformity surgery-robotics and navigation

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS

Review article.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this article is to review the available evidence for computerized navigation and robotics as an accuracy improvement tool for spinal deformity surgery, as well as to consider potential complications, impact on clinical outcomes, radiation exposure, and costs. Pedicle screw and rod construct are widely utilized for posterior spinal fixation in spinal deformity correction. Freehand placement of pedicle screws has long been utilized, although there is variable potential for inaccuracy depending on surgeon skill and experience. Malpositioned pedicle screws may have significant clinical implications ranging from nerve root irritation, inadequate fixation, CSF leak, perforation of the great vessels, or spinal cord damage. Computer-based navigation and robotics systems were developed to improve pedicle screw insertion accuracy and consistency, and decrease the risk of malpositioned pedicle fixation. The available evidence suggests that computer-based navigation and robotic-assisted guidance systems for pedicle cannulation are at least equivalent, and in several reports superior, to freehand techniques in terms of accuracy. CT and robotic navigation systems do appear to decrease radiation exposure to the operative team in some reports. Published reports do indicate longer operative times with use of robotic navigation compared with traditional freehand techniques for pedicle screw placement. To date, there is no conclusive evidence that use of CT or robotic navigation has any measurable impact on patient outcomes or overall complication reduction. There are theoretical advantages with robotic and CT navigation in terms of both speed and accuracy for severe spinal deformity or complex revision cases, however, there is a need for studies to investigate this technology in these specific cases. There is no evidence to date demonstrating the cost effectiveness of CT or robotic navigation as compared with traditional pedicle cannulation techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The review of available evidence suggests that computer-based navigation and robotic-assisted guidance systems for pedicle cannulation are at least equivalent, and in several reports superior, to freehand techniques in terms of radiographic accuracy. There is no current clinical evidence that the use of navigation or robotic techniques leads to improved patient outcomes or decreased overall complications or reoperation rates, and the use of these systems may substantially increase surgical costs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Review

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have advanced the treatment of metastatic diseases to the spine. The objective of this review is to describe clinical outcomes, benefits, and complications of these techniques.

METHODS

All relevant clinical studies describing the role of MIS, computer-assisted navigation (CAN), robot-assisted (RA) procedures, and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in the treatment of metastatic spine diseases were identified from PubMed, MEDLINE, and relevant article bibliographies.

RESULTS

For MIS articles, we filtered 1480 results and identified 26 studies. For CAN, we searched 464 articles to identify 18 articles for review. For RA, we searched 321 results to identify 7 studies for review. For LITT, we identified 21 articles for review.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS for the treatment of spine metastasis has significant potential benefits in reducing surgical site infections, hospital stay, and blood loss without compromising instrument accuracy or overall outcomes. Overall, MIS and its adjuncts have the potential to reduce the risks involved in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease to the spinal column without compromising the benefits of decompression and stabilization of the spine.

The Clinical Impact of Image Guidance and Robotics in Spinal Surgery: A Review of Safety, Accuracy, Efficiency, and Complication Reduction

Image guidance (IG) and robotic-assisted (RA) surgery are modern technological advancements that have provided novel ways to perform precise and accurate spinal surgery. These innovations supply real-time, three-dimensional imaging information to aid in instrumentation, decompression, and implant placement. Although nothing can replace the knowledge and expertise of an experienced spine surgeon, these platforms do have the potential to supplement the individual surgeon's capabilities. Specific advantages include more precise pedicle screw placement, minimally invasive surgery with less reliance on intraoperative fluoroscopy, and lower radiation exposure to the surgeon and staff. As these technologies have become more widely adopted over the years, novel uses such as tumor resection have been explored. Disadvantages include the cost of implementing IG and robotics platforms, the initial learning curve for both the surgeon and the staff, and increased patient radiation exposure in scoliosis surgery. Also, given the relatively recent transition of many procedures from inpatient settings to ambulatory surgery centers, access to current devices may be cost prohibitive and not as readily available at some centers. Regarding patient-related outcomes, much further research is warranted. The short-term benefits of minimally invasive surgery often bolster the perioperative and early postoperative outcomes in many retrospective studies on IG and RA surgery. Randomized controlled trials limiting such confounding factors are warranted to definitively show potential independent improvements in patient-related outcomes specifically attributable to IG and RA alone. Nonetheless, irrespective of these current unknowns, it is clear that these technologies have changed the field and the practice of spine surgery. Surgeons should be familiar with the potential benefits and tradeoffs of these platforms when considering adopting IG and robotics in their practices.

Less Invasive Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: The Case for Robotic-Assisted Placement of Pedicle Screws

Introduction: Pediatric spinal deformity involves a complex 3-dimensional (3D) deformity that increases the risk of pedicle screw placement due to the close proximity of neurovascular structures. To increase screw accuracy, improve patient safety, and minimize surgical complications, the placement of pedicle screws is evolving from freehand techniques to computer-assisted navigation and to the introduction of robotic-assisted placement. Purpose: The aim of this review was to review the current literature on the use of robotic navigation in pediatric spinal deformity surgery to provide both an error analysis of these techniques and to provide recommendations to ensure its safe application. Methods: A narrative review was conducted in April 2021 using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed retrospective or prospective studies, included pediatric patients, included a primary diagnosis of pediatric spine deformity, utilized robotic-assisted spinal surgery techniques, and reported thoracic or lumbar pedicle screw breach rates or pedicle screw malpositioning. Results: In the few studies published on the use of robotic techniques in pediatric spinal deformity surgery, several found associations between the technology and increased rates of screw placement accuracy, reduced rates of breach, and minimal complications. All were retrospective studies. Conclusions: Current literature is of a low level of evidence; nonetheless, the findings suggest the accuracy and safety of robotic-assisted spinal surgery in pediatric pedicle screw placement. The introduction of robotics may drive further advances in less invasive pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Further study is warranted.

The Use of Skin Staples as Fiducial Markers to Confirm Intraoperative Spinal Navigation Registration and Accuracy

BACKGROUND

With the advent of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) for image guidance, numerous examples of accurate navigation being applied to cranial and spinal pathology have come to light. For spinal disorders, the utilization of image guidance for the placement of percutaneous spinal instrumentation, complex osteotomies, and minimally invasive approaches are frequently utilized in trauma, degenerative, and oncological pathologies. The use of intraoperative CT for navigation, however, requires a low target registration error that must be verified throughout the procedure to confirm the accuracy of image guidance.

OBJECTIVE

To present the use of skin staples as a sterile, economical fiducial marker for minimally invasive spinal procedures requiring intraoperative CT navigation.

METHODS

Staples are applied to the skin prior to obtaining the registration CT scan and maintained throughout the remainder of the surgery to facilitate confirmation of image guidance accuracy.

RESULTS

This low-cost, simple, sterile approach provides surface landmarks that allow reliable verification of navigation accuracy during percutaneous spinal procedures using intraoperative CT scan image guidance.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of staples as a fiducial marker represents an economical and easily adaptable technique for ensuring accuracy of image guidance with intraoperative CT navigation.

Radiotherapy and Surgical Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Spine Tumors: A Narrative Review

Spine tumors encompass a wide range of diseases with a commensurately broad spectrum of available treatments, ranging from radiation for spinal metastases to highly invasive en bloc resection for primary vertebral column malignancies. This high variability in treatment approaches stems both from variability in the goals of surgery (e.g., oncologic cure vs. symptom palliation) and from the significant advancements in surgical technologies that have been made over the past 2 decades. Among these advancements are improvements in surgical technique, namely minimally invasive approaches, increased availability of focused radiation modalities (e.g., proton therapy and linear accelerator devices), and new surgical technologies, such as carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone rods. In addition, several groups have described nonsurgical interventions, such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for spinal instability secondary to pathologic fracture, and lesion ablation with spinal laser interstitial thermoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or cryoablation. We provide an overview of the latest technological advancements in spinal oncology and their potential usefulness for modern spinal oncologists.

[Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technique combined with thoracic pedicle screw track detector in thoracic pedicle screw placement]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical application of three-dimensional (3D) printing technique combined with a new type of thoracic pedicle screw track detector in thoracic pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

According to the characteristics of thoracic pedicle and common clinical screw placement methods, a new type of thoracic pedicle screw track detector was independently developed and designed. The clinical data of 30 patients with thoracic vertebrae related diseases who underwent posterior thoracic pedicle screw fixation between March 2017 and January 2020 were retrospectively analysed. Among them, there were 18 males and 12 females with an average age of 56.3 years (range, 32-76 years). There was 1 case of thoracic disc herniation, 4 cases of thoracic canal stenosis, 2 cases of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of thoracic vertebra, 16 cases of thoracic trauma, 2 cases of thoracic infection, and 5 cases of thoracic canal occupation. Three-dimensional CT of the thoracic vertebra was routinely performed preoperatively, and the model of the patient's thoracic vertebra was reconstructed and printed out. With the assistance of the model, preoperative simulation was performed with the combination of the new type thoracic pedicle screw track detector, and detected no nails after critical cortical damage. During operation, one side was randomly selected to use traditional hand screws placement (control group), and the other side was selected to use 3D printing technique combined with new type thoracic pedicle screw track detector to assist thoracic pedicle screws placement (observation group). The single screw placement time, adjustment times of single screw, and blood loss during screw placement were compared between the two groups. The accuracy of screw placement in the two groups was evaluated according to postoperative CT imaging data.

RESULTS

The single screw placement time, adjustment times of single screw, and blood loss during screw placement in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group ( P<0.05). Postoperative CT examination showed that the observation group had 87 screws of grade 1, 3 screws of grade 2, and the acceptable screw placement rate was 100% (90/90); the control group had 76 screws of grade 1, 2 screws of grade 2, 11 screws of grade 3, and 1 screw of grade 4, and the acceptable screw placement rate was 86.7% (78/90); showing significant difference in screw placement between the two groups ( χ 2=12.875, P=0.001). All patients were followed up 6-18 months, with an average of 11.3 months. There was no complication of vascular, nerve, spinal cord, or visceral injury, and screws or rods broken, and no patient was revised.

CONCLUSION

The 3D printing technique combined with the new type of thoracic pedicle screw track detector assisted thoracic pedicle screw placement is convenient, and significantly improves the accuracy and safety of intraoperative screw placement, and overall success rate of the surgery.

Robotics in spine surgery: A systematic review

Robotic systems to assist with pedicle screw placement have recently emerged in the field of spine surgery. Here, the authors systematically reviewed the literature for evidence of these robotic systems and their utility. Thirty-four studies that reported the use of spinal instrumentation with robotic assistance and met inclusion criteria were identified. The outcome measures gathered included: pedicle screw accuracy, indications for surgery, rates of conversion to an alternative surgical method, radiation exposure, and learning curve. In our search there were five different robotic systems identified. All studies reported accuracy and the most commonly used accuracy grading scale was the Gertzbein Robbins scale (GRS). Accuracy of clinically acceptable pedicle screws, defined as < 2 mm cortical breech, ranged from 80% to 100%. Many studies categorized indications for robotic surgery with the most common being degenerative entities. Some studies reported rates of conversion from robotic assistance to manual instrumentation due to many reasons, with robotic failure as the most common. Radiation exposure data revealed a majority of studies reported less radiation using robotic systems. Studies looking at a learning curve effect with surgeon use of robotic assistance were not consistent across the literature. Robotic systems for assistance in spine surgery have continued to improve and the accuracy of pedicle screw placement remains superior when compared to free-hand technique, however rates of manual conversion are significant. Currently, these systems are successfully employed in various pathological entities where trained spine surgeons can be safe and accurate regardless of robotic training.

Assessment of pedicle screw malposition in uniplanar versus multiplanar spinal deformities in children

Background

Spinal deformities can either be uniplanar or multiplanar. The current study aims to compare mal-positioned pedicle screw assessment on radiographs versus CT in children <12 years with multiplanar and uniplanar spinal deformities.

Methods

A cohort of 15 children, mean age 10.1 years, who underwent posterior spinal fusion using free-hand pedicle screw insertion for multiplanar (M) or uniplanar (U) deformities with post-operative radiograph and CT evaluation of 154 screws. The outcome measures included the assessment of malpositions detected on plain radiographs versus CT scans in U and M deformities. The overall breaches in post-operative plain radiographs and CT in each group were compared and analyzed by two independent observers.

The mal-positioned screws were graded on extent of cortical breach on CT. Inter and intra-observer variability was calculated with Kappa(k) method. Sensitivity, Specificity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were calculated by comparing breaches on radiographs versus CT considered the gold standard.

Results

In total,154 pedicle screws were analyzed, 65 in U group and 89 in M group. There were 23 (14.9%) malpositioned screws identified on plain radiographs and 43 (27.9%) on CT (p = 0.008). There were 17/154 (11.03%) Grade 1 breaches, 16/154 (10.38%) Grade 2 breaches and 10/154(6.49%) Grade III breaches.

Among the 43 CT breaches, 12/65 (18.46%) were in U group, 31/89 (34.83%) were in M group (p = 0.013).The overall Sensitivity, Specificity and PPV of plain radiographs compared to CT in detecting malpositions were 32.56%, 91.89% and 60.87% respectively.

Conclusions

There was a significant discrepancy in identification of pedicle screw malposition based on plain radiographic versus CT based assessment, more so in multiplanar deformities. The ability to detect a breach on plain radiographs is lesser in multiplanar versus uniplanar deformities.

Evaluation of the implantation of transpedicular screws in spinal instrumentation with free-hand technique and navigation-assisted with intraoperative computed tomography: An analytical-positional study

BACKGROUND

Spinal instrumentation using transpedicular screws has been used for decades to stabilize the spine. In October 2018, an intraoperative CT system was acquired in the Neurosurgery service of the University Hospital Complex of Vigo, this being the first model of these characteristics in the Spanish Public Health System, so we began a study from January 2015 to December 2019 to assess the precision of the transpedicular screws implanted with this system compared with a control group performed with the classical technique and final fluoroscopic control.

METHODS

The study was carried out in patients who required transpedicular instrumentation surgery, in total 655 screws were placed, 339 using the free-hand technique (Group A) and 316 assisted with intraoperative CT navigation (Group B) (p>0.05). Demographic characteristics, related to surgery and the screw implantation grades were assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification.

RESULTS

92 patients were evaluated, between 12 and 86 years (average: 57.1 years). 161 thoracic screws (24.6%) and 494 lumbo-sacral screws (75.4%) were implanted. Of the thoracic screws, 33 produced a pedicle rupture. For the lumbo-sacral screws, 71 have had pedicle violation. The overall correct positioning rate for the free-hand group was 72.6% and for the CT group it was 96.5% (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy rate is higher in thoracic-lumbar instrumentation in the navigation group versus free-hand group with fluoroscopic control.

Fragility Analysis of Statistically Significant Outcomes of Randomized Control Trials in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the robustness of statistically significant outcomes from randomized control trials (RCTs) in spine surgery using Fragility Index (FI) which is a novel metric measuring the number of events upon which statistical significance of the outcome depends.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many trials in Spine surgery were characterized by fewer outcome events along with small sample size. FI helps us identify the robustness of the results from such studies with statistically significant dichotomous outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted independent and in duplicate, a systematic review of published RCTs in spine surgery from PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane Database. RCTs with 1:1 prospective study design and reporting statistically significant dichotomous primary or secondary outcomes were included. FI was calculated for each RCT and its correlation with various factors was analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy trials met inclusion criteria with a median sample size of 133 (interquartile range [IQR]: 80-218) and median reported events per trial was 38 (IQR: 13-94). The median FI score was 2 (IQR: 0-5), which means if we switch two patients from nonevent to event, the statistical significance of the outcome is lost. The FI score was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up in 28 of 70 trials. The FI score was found to positively correlated with sample size (r = 0.431, P = 0.001), total number of outcome events (r = 0.305, P = 0.01) while negatively correlated with P value (r = -0.392, P = 0.001). Funding, journal impact-factor, risk of bias domains, and year of publication did not have a significant correlation.

CONCLUSION

Statistically significant dichotomous outcomes reported in spine surgery RCTs are more often fragile and outcomes of the patients lost to follow-up could have changed the significance of results and hence it needs caution before transcending their results into clinical application. The addition of FI in routine reporting of RCTs would guide readers on the robustness of the statistical significance of outcomes. RCTs with FI ≥5 without any patient lost to follow-up can be considered to have clinically robust results.Level of Evidence: 1.

Current state of navigation in spine surgery

The use of navigation has become more prevalent in spine surgery. The multitude of available platforms, as well as increased availability of navigation systems, have led to increased use worldwide. Specific subsets of spine surgeons have incorporated this new technology in their practices, including minimally invasive spine (MIS) spine surgeons, neurosurgeons, and high-volume surgeons. Improved accuracy with the use of navigation has been demonstrated and its use has proven to be a safe alternative to fluoroscopic guided procedures. Navigation use allows the limitation of radiation exposure to the surgeon during common spine procedures, which over the course of a surgeon's lifetime may offer significant health benefits. Navigation has also been beneficial in tumor resection and MIS surgery, where traditional anatomic landmarks are missing or in the case of MIS not visible. As cost effectiveness improves, the use of navigation is likely to continue to expand. Navigation will also continue to expand with further innovation such as coupling the use of navigation with robotics and improving tools to enhance the end user experience.

Intraoperative image guidance for the surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity

Operative management of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has been increasing in recent years secondary to an aging society. The advance of intraoperative image guidance, such as the development of navigation and robotics systems has contributed to the growth and safety of ASD surgery. Currently, intraoperative image guidance is mainly used for pedicle screw placement and the evaluation of alignment correction in ASD surgery. Though it is expected that the use of navigation and robotics would result in increasing pedicle screw accuracy as reported in other spine surgeries, there are no well-powered studies specifically focusing on ASD surgery. Currently, deformity correction relies heavily on preoperative planning, however, a few studies have shown the possibility that intraoperative image modalities may accurately predict postoperative spinopelvic parameters. Future developments of intraoperative image guidance are needed to overcome the remaining challenges in ASD surgery such as radiation exposure to patient and surgeon. More novel imaging modalities may result in evolution in ASD surgery. Overall there is a paucity of literature focusing on intraoperative image guidance in ASD surgery, therefore, further studies are warranted to assess the efficacy of intraoperative image guidance in ASD surgery. This narrative review sought to provide the current role and future perspectives of intraoperative image guidance focusing on ASD surgery.