Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients

Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS) Evidence Review of Surgical Treatments for Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Disease: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Interventional treatment options for the lumbar degenerative spine have undergone a significant amount of innovation over the last decade. As new technologies emerge, along with the surgical specialty expansion, there is no manuscript that utilizes a review of surgical treatments with evidence rankings from multiple specialties, namely, the interventional pain and spine communities. Through the Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS), the purpose of this manuscript is to provide a balanced evidence review of available surgical treatments.

METHODS

The PSPS Research Committee created a working group that performed a comprehensive literature search on available surgical technologies for the treatment of the degenerative spine, utilizing the ranking assessment based on USPSTF (United States Preventative Services Taskforce) and NASS (North American Spine Society) criteria.

RESULTS

The surgical treatments were separated based on disease process, including treatments for degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is emerging and significant evidence to support multiple approaches to treat the symptomatic lumbar degenerative spine. As new technologies become available, training, education, credentialing, and peer review are essential for optimizing patient safety and successful outcomes.

Biomedical Applications of Titanium Alloys: A Comprehensive Review

Titanium alloys have emerged as the most successful metallic material to ever be applied in the field of biomedical engineering. This comprehensive review covers the history of titanium in medicine, the properties of titanium and its alloys, the production technologies used to produce biomedical implants, and the most common uses for titanium and its alloys, ranging from orthopedic implants to dental prosthetics and cardiovascular devices. At the core of this success lies the combination of machinability, mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and corrosion resistance. This unique combination of useful traits has positioned titanium alloys as an indispensable material for biomedical engineering applications, enabling safer, more durable, and more efficient treatments for patients affected by various kinds of pathologies. This review takes an in-depth journey into the inherent properties that define titanium alloys and which of them are advantageous for biomedical use. It explores their production techniques and the fabrication methodologies that are utilized to machine them into their final shape. The biomedical applications of titanium alloys are then categorized and described in detail, focusing on which specific advantages titanium alloys are present when compared to other materials. This review not only captures the current state of the art, but also explores the future possibilities and limitations of titanium alloys applied in the biomedical field.

Biomechanical and clinical studies on lumbar spine fusion surgery: a review

Low back pain is associated with degenerative disc diseases of the spine. Surgical treatment includes fusion and non-fusion types. The gold standard is fusion surgery, wherein the affected vertebral segment is fused. The common complication of fusion surgery is adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). The ASD often leads to revision surgery, calling for a further fusion of adjacent segments. The existing designs of nonfusion type implants are associated with clinical problems such as subsidence, difficulty in implantation, and the requirement of revision surgeries. Various surgical approaches have been adopted by the surgeons to insert the spinal implants into the affected segment. Over the years, extensive biomechanical investigations have been reported on various surgical approaches and prostheses to predict the outcomes of lumbar spine implantations. Computer models have been proven to be very effective in identifying the best prosthesis and surgical procedure. The objective of the study was to review the literature on biomechanical studies for the treatment of lumbar spinal degenerative diseases. A critical review of the clinical and biomechanical studies on fusion spine surgeries was undertaken. The important modeling parameters, challenges, and limitations of the current studies were identified, showing the future research directions.

The influence of total disc arthroplasty with Mobidisc prosthesis on lumbar spine and pelvic parameters: a prospective in vivo biomechanical study with a minimum 3 year of follow-up

Background

This study examined the impact of Mobidisc implant on spinopelvic parameters, with particular focus on the preservation of the lumbar lordosis (LL) and on the segmental lordosis (SL) of the treated and adjacent segments.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted on 63 consecutive patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease who underwent Mobidisc implantation at the Clinic for Spinal Diseases in Strasbourg, France. Based on the profile images of the whole, the following static spinopelvic parameters were measured and analysed: lumbar lordosis L1-S1 (LL), SL for L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1, sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic incidence. In the lumbar spine images, the anterior (ADH) and posterior disc height (PDH) were measured prior to surgery and at the different follow-up appointments. The preoperative and postoperative values were compared and statistically analysed at different time intervals.

Results

Sixty-three patients were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 41.4 years (range 27–59 years). The mean follow-up was 44 months (range 36–71 months). Overall, total disc replacement (TDR) led to an increase in LL which increased TED over time. The preoperative LL measured 48.9° ± 10.1° and 53.4° ± 9.9° at 3 years follow-up (p < 0.0001). In the cohort of patients who underwent TDR at L4-5, the LL increased from 51.6° ± 10° to 56.2° ± 9.2° at the last FU (p = 0.006). All other spinopelvic parameters remained stable between the preoperative values and the last follow-up. In the patients who underwent L5-S1 TDR, a significant increase in LL was also observed between preoperative data and at the last FU (from 47.8° ± 10.1° to 53.3° ± 10.1°, p < 0.0001). Following L5-S1 TDR, the SS increased from 32.9° ± 8.3° to 35.6° ± 7.4° (p = 0.05) and the PT decreased from 15.4° ± 6.2° to 11.6° ± 5.7° between preoperative values and the last follow-up. Considering the entire cohort, the SL L5-S1 increased significantly from 5.9° ± 4.2° preoperatively to 8.1° ± 4.4° (p < 0.01) at the last FU, while at the L4-L5 level, the SL remained stable from 9.9 ± 4.5° to 10.7° ± 3.8° (p = 0.3). After L4-5 TDR, an increase in ADH and PDH at the treated level was observed, while these parameters progressively decreased in the adjacent segment. In patients who underwent L5-S1 TDR, a significant increase in L5-S1 ADH and PDH was observed from 18.8 ± 9.1 to 28.4 ± 11.1 and from 9.5 ± 3.8 to 17.6 ± 9.5 pixels, respectively. ADH and PDH at the proximal adjacent levels L3-4 and L4-5 were reduced. We did not observe any case of implant failure or damage to the bone/implant interface.

Conclusion

TDR with Mobidisc allows for an improvement of LL and SL at the treated level. An increase in both anterior and posterior disc height was observed at the treated level. While disc height decreased at the adjacent level, further studies are required to investigate whether these changes are clinically relevant.

Impact of heterotopic ossification following lumbar total disk replacement: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) is an alternative to lumbar fusion in the treatment of lower back pain and reduces the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Heterotopic ossification (HO) has been identified as a common complication following lumbar TDR.

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to determine the prevalence, risk factors and clinical and radiological impact of HO following lumbar TDR.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane Central were searched for articles that referred to lumbar TDR and HO. The hits were assessed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from each included study was extracted and analysed with respect to the study aims.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included in this review and the pooled prevalence of HO was estimated to be between 13.2% (participants) and 15.3% (vertebral levels). TDR clinical outcomes were not found to be reduced by HO and there was insufficient data to identify a given impact upon radiological outcomes. Age and follow up time were identified as potential risk factors for HO.

CONCLUSIONS

This review was hampered by inconsistencies in the reporting of HO across the studies. We therefore recommend that a set of guidelines should be produced to aid future researchers and reduce the risk of bias.

The biomechanical effect of the relevant segments after facet-disectomy in different diameters under posterior lumbar percutaneous endoscopes: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biomechanical influence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar facetectomy in different diameters on segmental range of motion (ROM) and intradiscal pressure (IDP) of the relevant segments by establishing three dimensional finite element (FE) model.

METHODS

An intact L3-5 model was successfully constructed from the CT of a healthy volunteer as Model A (MA). The Model B (MB), Model C (MC) and Model D (MD) were obtained through facetectomy on L4 inferior facet in diameters 7.5 mm, 10 mm and 15 mm on MA for simulation. The ROM and IDP of L3/4 and L4/5 of four models were all compared in forward flexion, backward extension, left and right bending, left and right rotation.

RESULTS

Compared with MA, the ROM of L4/5 of MB, MC and MD all increased. MD changed more significantly than MB and MC in backward extension, right bending and right rotation. But that of MB and MC on L3/4 had no prominent change, while MD had a slight increase in backward extension. The IDP of MB and MC on L4/5 in six states was similar to MA, yet MD increased obviously in backward extension, right bending, left and right rotation. The IDP on L3/4 of MB and MC was resemble to MA in six conditions, nevertheless MD increased slightly only in backward extension.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the facetectomy in diameters 7.5 mm and 10 mm, the mechanical effect brought by facetectomy in diameter 15 mm on the operating segment changed more significantly, and had a corresponding effect on the adjacent segments.

Long-Term Residual-Mobility and Adjacent Segment Disease After Total Lumbar Disc Replacement

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Total disc replacement (TDR) has been introduced in order to preserve segmental motion and thus reduce adjacent segment disease (ASD) as seen after spinal fusion. However, it is uncertain whether these presumed beneficial effects remain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term incidence of ASD and residual-mobility in relation to clinical outcome.

METHODS

A total of 210 patients treated with lumbar TDR for degenerative disc disease were invited for follow-up. ASD was reported in case of severe degeneration in an adjacent disc at latest follow-up, or if an increase in disc degeneration was observed in these adjacent segments as compared to direct postoperative radiographs. Residual-mobility of the TDR was defined as a minimal rotation of 4.6° on flexion-extension radiographs. Patient-reported outcome measures were obtained.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (27.1%) were lost to follow-up. In 32 patients (15.3%) a revision by spinal fusion had been performed. In 20 patients this revision had occurred ≥5 years after TDR and were included. Consequently, 141 patients were available for analysis (mean follow-up of 16.7 years). Residual-mobility was noted in 38.0%. No significant associations were observed between residual-mobility and the occurrence of ASD, or with clinical outcome. In addition, ASD and clinical outcome were not related either.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that long-term preservation of motion after TDR is met for only a third of patients. However, residual-mobility is not associated with the occurrence of ASD, and both residual-mobility and ASD do not appear to be related to long-term clinical outcome.

Analytical and finite element analysis of shape memory polymer for use in lumbar total disc replacement

One-piece bearing is the latest type of total disc replacement (TDR) design that is used for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). Due to the unique properties of the shape memory polymers (SMPs), such as self-healing, shape-memory, adhesion control, and self-deployable ability, they may be a good candidate for the core of such a design. The purpose of the present study is to use an analytical method combined with a numerical analysis (finite element analysis (FEA)) to determine the mechanical responses of an SMP intervertebral disc (IVD) model, under pure torsion (axial rotation) and pure compression, two loading conditions to which natural intervertebral discs (IVDs) are subjected in vivo. We considered the SMP IVD model to be positioned at L4-L5 because most cases of lumbar DDD are reported at this segment. For the analytical method, an appropriate constitutive equation for an SMP was determined and, then, an analytical solution for the torsional response of a circular SMP IVD model, in a full cycle of stress-free strain recovery, was derived. The developed equations were implemented in finite element modeling to determine responses of the IVD disc model under pure torsion. Additionally, responses of the SMC IVD model, under a compressive load, and different conditions were determined. The analytical and FEA results were compared to experimental results give in the literature for intact lumbar spine segments as the core in a one-piece lumbar TDR. Based on this study, we suggest that SMPs can be used for TDR, as they are strong enough to bear the torsional and compressive loads that IVD is subjected through its life.

Revision Surgery of Total Lumbar Disk Replacement: Review of 48 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective clinical review.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze failure mechanisms after total lumbar disk replacement (TDR) and surgical revision strategies in patients with recurrent low back pain (LBP).

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA

Several reports indicate that TDR revision surgery carries a major risk and that it should not be recommended. The clinical results of posterior instrumented fusion using the prosthesis like an interbody cage have not been well analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2003 to 2018, 48 patients with recurrent LBP after TDR underwent revision surgery. The average age was 39 years (24-61 y). The mean follow-up was 100.4 months (24.6-207.7 mo). Clinical data, self-assessment of patient satisfaction, and Oswestry Disability Index collected at each clinical control or by phone call for the older files and radiologic assessments were reviewed. The surgical revision strategy included posterior fusion in 41 patients (group A) and TDR removal and anterior fusion in 7 patients (group B), of which 6 patients had an additional posterior fixation.

RESULTS

Facet joint osteoarthritis was associated with TDR failure in 85%. In 68% the position of the prosthesis was suboptimal. Range of motion was preserved in 25%, limited in extension in 65%, and limited in flexion in 40%. Limited range of motion and facet joint osteoarthritis were significantly related (P=0.0008). The complication rate in group B was 43% including iliac vein laceration. Preoperative and 2-year follow-up Oswestry Disability Index were 25.5 and 22.0, respectively, in group A versus 27.9 and 21.3 in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior osteoarthritis was the principal cause of recurrent LBP in failed TDR. The anterior approach for revision carried a major vascular risk, whereas a simple posterior instrumented fusion leads to the same clinical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Clinical-Instrumental Results and Analysis of Functional Activity Restoration in Professional Athletes After Lumbar Total Disk Replacement

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical and biomechanical outcome of professional athletes after lumbar total disk replacement, with a focus on restoration of the functional activity.

METHODS

This nonrandomized retrospective single-center study included 11 professional athletes who underwent lumbar disc replacement surgery using the prosthesis M6-L (Spinal Kinetics, Schaffhausen, Switzerland). The average postoperative follow-up was 3.18 ± 1.14 years. The following outcomes were evaluated: intensity of pain in the lumbar spine and lower limbs, Oswestry Disability Index, Short-Form 36, complications, time of return to previous sports activity, range of movement, degree of lumbar lordosis, degenerative changes of the adjacent levels, and degree of heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS

The operated patients reported significant decrease of pain on visual analog scale (P < 0.001) as well as significant improvement of Oswestry Disability Index (P = 0.001) and Short-Form 36 (P < 0.001). For the duration of follow-up, the patients maintained segmental range of motion at L4-L5 (P = 0.04) and L5-S1 (P = 0.03) levels. There was also some statistically insignificant increase of global lumbar lordosis (P = 0.84). We did not identify any significant degeneration of the adjacent intervertebral disks (P > 0.05) or progression of the facet joint degenerative changes at the implantation level and in the adjacent segments (P > 0.05). One patient (9.1%) developed grade I heterotopic ossification 5 years after surgery and in 1 patient (9.1%), a lesion of superior hypogastric plexus was recorded. The average time of return to previous sports activity was 9.72 ± 3.03 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Total lumbar disc replacement using M6-L prosthesis in professional athletes made it possible to achieve statistically significant reduction of pain and facilitated early return to normal sports activities. In our opinion, preservation of movement of the operated lumbar segment can help to reduce the mechanical stress with beneficial impact on the rate of degeneration of the adjacent level.

Long-term clinical outcome of the Charité III total lumbar disc replacement

Purpose

To compare the long-term clinical results and complications of two revision strategies for patients with failed total disc replacements (TDRs).

Methods

In 19 patients, the TDR was removed and the intervertebral defect was filled with a femoral head bone strut graft. In addition, instrumented posterolateral fusion was performed (removal group). In 36 patients, only a posterolateral instrumented fusion was performed (fusion group). Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were completed pre- and post-revision surgery. Intra- and post-operative complications of both revision strategies were assessed.

Results

The median follow-up was 12.3 years (range 5.3–24.3). In both the removal and fusion group, a similar (p = 0.515 and p = 0419, respectively) but significant decrease in VAS- (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively) and ODI-score (p = 0.033 and p = 0.013, respectively) at post-revision surgery compared to pre-revision surgery was seen. A clinically relevant improvement in VAS- and ODI-score was found in 62.5% and 43.8% in the removal group and in 43.5% and 39.1% in the fusion group (p = 0.242 and p = 0.773, respectively). Removal of the TDR was associated with substantial intra-operative complications such as major vessel bleeding and ureter lesion. The percentage of late reoperations for complications such as pseudarthrosis was comparable for both revision strategies.

Conclusions

Revision of a failed TDR is clinically beneficial in about half of the patients. No clear benefits for additional TDR removal as compared to posterolateral instrumented fusion alone could be identified. Particularly, when considering the substantial risks and complications, great caution is warranted with removal of the TDR.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Multilevel Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Disc Disease

STUDY DESIGN

Case series OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to assess the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient satisfaction of multilevel lumbar total disc arthroplasty (TDA) for symptomatic multilevel degenerative disc disease (MLDDD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

TDA has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic single level degenerative disc disease. There is minimal PROMs data on the mid- to long-term outcomes of multilevel TDA constructs.

METHODS

Prospectively collected PROMs were analyzed from patients receiving multilevel TDA for symptomatic MLDDD. Data were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months, then yearly. PROMs included patient satisfaction, Visual Analog Score back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients (77 men, 45 women) who had preoperative and at least 24-month follow-up data were included. The average age was 42 ± 8.2 years (range 21-61) and mean follow-up 7.8 years (range 2-10). The majority received two-level TDA, except two patients (1.6%) who received three-level TDA. The two- to three-level TDA's were at the levels L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1, whereas most two levels (n = 110, 90.2%) were at L4-5 and L5-S1; the remainder (n = 10, 8.2%) being at L3-4 and L4-5. Implants used were Charité (DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA) in 119 patients (240 levels) and InMotion (DePuy Spine) in 3 patients (6 levels). Improvement in pain and disability scores were both clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.001), and this improvement was sustained in those patients over the course of their follow-up. Ninety-two percent of patients reported good or excellent satisfaction with treatment at final review.

CONCLUSION

Multilevel TDA constructs for MLDDD demonstrate favorable and sustained clinical outcomes at mid- to long-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Lumbar Arthroplasty: Past, Present, and Future

Lumbar degenerative disc disease is a pathologic process that affects a large portion of our aging population. In the recent past, surgical treatment has involved fusion procedures. However, lumbar disc arthroplasty and replacement provides an alternative for carefully selected patients. It provides the major advantage of motion preservation and thus keeps adjacent segments from significantly progressive degeneration. The history of lumbar disc replacement has roots that start in the 1960s with the implantation of stainless-steel balls. Decades later, multiple implants with different material design and biomechanical properties were introduced to the market. New third-generation implants have made great strides in improved biomechanics and clinical outcomes. Although there is room for further advancement and studies are warranted to assess the long-term durability and sustainability of lumbar disc arthroplasty, it has certainly proven to be a very acceptable alternative within the surgical armamentarium that should be offered to patients who meet indications. In this review we present an overview of lumbar disc arthroplasty including its history, indications, biomechanics, challenges, and future directions.

Modularized Implant Assembly for Spinal Fusion-Means for Managing Adjacent Level Disease: Technical Report

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of adjacent-level disease in spinal fusion is a complex and contentious issue. Through the years, surgeons have developed various approaches to address this problem. While some have avoided fusion altogether, others have advocated for large, multilevel fusion constructs. With the advent of minimally invasive spine surgery, there are now novel approaches to the spine which allow for less onerous and morbid revision surgeries. In this paper, we present the case of a woman who previously underwent a posterior cervical fusion and presented with adjacent-level disease.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 63-year-old female who had previously undergone a cervical 5 to thoracic 1 posterior instrumented fusion presented with axial neck pain, hand numbness, and imbalance. Imaging demonstrated adjacent-level disease with anterolisthesis of cervical 4 on cervical 5. Rather than exposing her entire fusion construct, we used a new technique to link her old hardware to new instrumentation.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that our case is demonstrative of a new, modularized approach to spinal fusion and suggest a way forward in the treatment of adjacent-level disease.

Mid- to long-term results of total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review

Background

Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) has shown satisfactory clinical outcomes with few complications and reoperations at short-term follow-up, but the mid- to long-term results are not clear.

Purpose

The objective of this study was to evaluate the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes of artificial TDR for lumbar degenerative disc diseases.

Patients and methods

A systematic search was conducted using the PubMed database to identify studies of TDR surgery that included at least 3 years of follow-up. The search keywords were as follows: lumbar, total disc replacement, and arthroplasty. The following data were extracted: patient demographics, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, satisfactory rate, clinical success rate, complications, and reoperations.

Results

Thirteen studies, including eight prospective studies and five retrospective studies, met the criteria. A total of 946 patients were identified who reported at least 3 years of follow-up results. The artificial prostheses in these studies were ProDisc-L, Charité, AcroFlex, Maverick, and XL TDR. Patients with lumbar TDR demonstrated significant improvements in VAS scores of 51.1 to 70.5% and of − 15.6 to − 44.4 for Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores at the last follow-up. Patient satisfaction rates were reported in eight studies and ranged from 75.5 to 93.3%. Complication rates were reported in 11 studies, ranging from 0 to 34.4%. The overall reoperation rate was 12.1% (119/986), ranging from 0 to 39.3%, with eight of the 13 studies reporting a reoperation rate of less than 10%.

Conclusions

This review shows that lumbar TDR effectively results in pain relief and an improvement in quality of life at mid- to long-term follow-up. Complication and reoperation rates were acceptable. However, this study did not provide sufficient evidence to show that lumbar TDR is superior to fusion surgery. To answer that question, a greater number of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed.

Middle-Column Gap Balancing and Middle-Column Mismatch in Spinal Reconstructive Surgery

Background

Middle-column gap balancing (MCGB) is a reference measurement of the path of the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL), which is reconstructed under tension and balanced by the combined height of the posterior one-third of the vertebral bodies and the posterior one-third of the disks, including any intervening load-sharing spacers. This measurement allows for a comparison of the ligamentous component of the middle column (PLL) with the load-sharing components (posterior one-third vertebral body + disk ). This difference gives rise to a "middle-column mismatch," which provides a linear measurement of the redundancy of the ligaments and neural elements, which relates to the correct cage, spacer, or load-bearing height, which is optimized.

Methods

For phase 1 measurement testing, 24 consecutive patients underwent reliable flexion, extension, and neutral lateral radiographic studies with a calibrated marker. The anterior, middle, and posterior columns were measured using a custom software program capable of measuring the length of curved lines specifically written for this purpose. For phase 2 measurement testing, 21 consecutive patients undergoing surgery with multilevel deformities for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar procedures had MCGB height pre- and postoperatively measured by 3 blinded observers. The preoperative and postoperative measurements were compared using a linear regression analysis and Pearson product-moment correlation.

Results

In phase 1 measurement testing the flexion, extension, and neutral bending radiographs of spinal segments not containing deformities showed that the middle column had the most reliable measurements of spinal axial height both in the actual measurements of change from flexion to extension (mm) and in percentage of change. In phase 2 measurement testing, a Pearson product-moment correlation was run between each individual's pre- and postoperative middle-column measurements. There was a strong positive correlation between preoperative and postoperative measurements, which was statistically significant (r = 0.983, n = 21, P < .01).

Conclusions

This consecutive series of 21 deformity patients demonstrated the utility of measuring the preoperative middle-column length in predicting the optimal height of the spacers and intervertebral disks, and posterior vertebral body height, simultaneously restoring sagittal and coronal plane alignment. Key points of this study include the following: (1) Spinal balance requires optimizing spinal height, which is a curved line in order to accommodate cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis. (2) Software programs can allow measurement of the preoperative curved circuitous course of the PLL and vertebral body misalignment; this curved length is predictive of the optimal postoperative middle-column height after spinal osteotomies and intervertebral spacer insertion. (3) All 3 dimensions are important to optimize in deformity correction: sagittal plane, coronal plane, and axial spinal height.

National Trends for Primary and Revision Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty Throughout the United States

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study.

OBJECTIVES

Analysis of economic and demographic data concerning lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) throughout the United States to improve value-based care and health care utilization.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients who underwent primary or revision LDA between 2005 and 2013. Demographic and economic data included total surgeries, costs, length of stay, and frequency of routine discharge. The National Inpatient Sample database represents a 20% sample of discharges from US hospitals weighted to provide national estimates.

RESULTS

Primary LDA decreased 86% from 3059 to 420 from 2005 to 2013. The mean total cost of LDA increased 33% from $17 747 to $23 804. The mean length of stay decreased from 2.8 to 2.4 days. The mean routine discharge (home discharge without visiting nursing care) remained constant at 91%. Revision procedures (removal, supplemental fixation, or reoperation at the treated level) declined 30% from 194 to 135 cases over the study period. The mean revision burden, defined as the ratio of revision procedures to the sum of primary and revision procedures, was 12% (range 6% to 24%). The mean total cost of revisions ranged from $12 752 to $22 282.

CONCLUSIONS

From 2005 to 2013, primary LDA significantly declined in the United States by 86% despite several studies pointing to improved efficacy and cost-efficiency. This disparity may be related to a lack of surgeon reimbursement from insurance companies. Congruently, the number of revision LDA cases has declined 30%, while revision burden has risen from 6% to 24%.

Are Controversial Issues in Cervical Total Disc Replacement Resolved or Unresolved?: A Review of Literature and Recent Updates

Since the launch of cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) in the early 2000s, many clinical studies have reported better outcomes of CTDR compared to those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. However, CTDR is still a new and innovative procedure with limited indications for clinical application in spinal surgery, particularly, for young patients presenting with soft disc herniation with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. In addition, some controversial issues related to the assessment of clinical outcomes of CTDR remain unresolved. These issues, including surgical outcomes, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), heterotopic ossification (HO), wear debris and tissue reaction, and multilevel total disc replacement (TDR) and hybrid surgeries are a common concern of spine surgeons and need to be resolved. Among them, the effect of CTDR on patient outcomes and ASD is theoretically and clinically important; however, this issue remains disputable. Additionally, HO, wear debris, multilevel TDR, and hybrid surgery tend to favor CTDR in terms of their effects on outcomes, but the potential of these factors for jeopardizing patients' safety postoperatively and/or to exert harmful effects on surgical outcomes in longer-term follow-up cannot be ignored. Consequently, it is too early to determine the therapeutic efficacy and cost-effectiveness of CTDR and will require considerable time and studies to provide appropriate answers regarding the same. For these reasons, CTDR requires longer-term follow-up data.

Clinical and Radiological Mid-Term Outcomes of Lumbar Single-Level Total Disc Replacement

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective single-center case cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes of a consecutive 122-patient cohort with discogenic back pain, at 2- to 10-year follow-up periods, treated by a single surgeon, with CHARITÉ Artificial Disc (DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Minimum 2-year clinical and radiographic level 1 data for the first lumbar artificial disc, the CHARITÉ Artificial Disc (DePuy Spine), have recently been published, demonstrating sustained clinical benefit of the device for the treatment of degenerative disc disease.

METHODS

Patients were assessed preoperatively using clinical outcome measures, including visual analog scale (VAS) score back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Roland-Morris Questionnaires (RMDQ), and further assessed postoperatively, 3-, 6-, 12-months, and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

Average follow-up was 44.9 ± 23.3 months (n = 122). The median age at surgery was 43.0 ± 9.0 years. Preoperative diagnosis included degenerative disc disease in 118 (96.7%) and internal disc disruption in 4 (3.3%). Surgery was performed at L5-S1 in 96 (77.9%) patients and at L4-L5 in 27 (22.1%). Statistically significant clinical improvements from baseline were observed on VAS (back and leg), ODI, SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS, and RMDQ 3 months onward. Back VAS scores decreased from 78.2 ± 21.3 preoperatively to 21.9 ± 27.8 by final follow-up. ODI scores decreased from 51.1 ± 17.3 to 16.2 ± 17.9 at last follow-up. The RMDQ scores also decreased from 16.7 ± 4.7 to 4.2 ± 5.8. SF-36 PCS and MCS increased from 25.7 ± 11.0 to 46.4 ± 10.3 for PCS and from 35.5 ± 17.4 to 51.6 ± 10.8 for MCS. Patient satisfaction surveys indicated that 90.56% patients rated their satisfaction with the surgery as "excellent" or "good" at 2 years. Range of motion averaged 8.6 ± 3.5 (median = 8.0°) at the last follow-up time point.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes verify the clinical efficacy of total disc replacement for treatment of discogenic back pain with or without radiculopathy. The outcomes instruments demonstrated statistically significant improvements 3 months onward.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Defining the Ideal Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Patient and Standard of Care

: Lumbar total disc replacement, now in use since 2004, was determined by the panel to be a standard of care for the treatment of symptomatic single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease in the active patient subpopulation as outlined by the investigational device exemption study criteria. The large body of evidence supporting this statement, including surgeons' experiences, was presented and discussed. Consensus statements focusing on decision-making criteria reflected that efficacy, long-term safety, clinical outcomes with validated measures, and cost-effectiveness should form the basis of decision-making by payers. Diagnostic challenges with lumbar degenerative disc disease patients were discussed among the panel, and it was concluded that although variably used among surgeons, reliable tools exist to appropriately diagnose discogenic back pain.

Challenges and Solutions for Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Implantation

: Long-term data are now available to support the safety and efficacy of lumbar total disc replacement (TDR). Five-year randomized and controlled trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies support a similar or lower risk of complications with lumbar TDR compared with fusion. The panel concluded that published data on commercially available lumbar TDR devices demonstrate minimal concerns with late-onset complications, and that the risk of adjacent segment degeneration and reoperations can be reduced with lumbar TDR versus fusion. Survey results of surgeon practice experiences supported the evidence, revealing a low rate of complications with TDR. Panelists acknowledged the importance of adhering to selection criteria to help minimize patient complications.

Patient-reported Outcomes and Revision Rates at a Mean Follow-up of 10 Years After Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the long-term clinical results and prosthesis survival in patients treated with lumbar total disc replacement (TDR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Fusion has become the current standard surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disease. TDR is an alternative treatment that seeks to avoid fusion-related adverse events, specifically adjacent segment disease.

METHODS

Sixty-eight consecutive patients treated with TDR from 2003 to 2008 were invited to follow-up and complete a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ), and the Short Form-36. These surveys were also administered to the subjects before their index TDRs. Data on reoperation were collected from the patients' medical records.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven (84%) patients were available for follow-up at a mean 10.6 years post-operatively (range 8.1-12.6 years). There was a significant improvement from preop to latest follow-up in VAS (6.8 vs. 3.2, P < 0.000) and DPQ (63.2 vs. 45.6, P = 0.000) in the entire cohort. Nineteen patients (33%) had a revision fusion surgery after their index TDR. Patients who had revision surgery had statistically significant worse outcome scores at last follow-up than patients who had no revision. Thirty patients (52.6%) would choose the same treatment again if they were faced with the same problem.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated significant improvement in long-term clinical outcomes, similar to previously published studies, and two-thirds of the discus prostheses were still functioning at follow-up. However, there is still a lack of well-designed long-term studies, thus requiring further investigation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Spinal motion preservation surgery: indications and applications

Fusion is one of the most commonly performed spinal procedures, indicated for a wide range of spinal problems. Elimination of motion though results in accelerated degeneration of the adjacent level, known as adjacent level disease. Motion preservation surgical methods were developed in order to overcome this complication. These methods include total disc replacement, laminoplasty, interspinous implants and dynamic posterior stabilization systems. The initial enthusiasm about these methods was followed by certain concerns about their clinical usefulness and their results. The main indications for total disc replacement are degenerative disc disease, but the numerous contraindications for this method make it difficult to find the right candidate. Application of interspinous implants has shown good results in patients with spinal stenosis, but a more precise definition is needed regarding the severity of spinal stenosis up to which these implants can be used. Laminoplasty has several advantages and less complications compared to fusion and laminectomy in patients with cervical myelopathy/radiculopathy. Dynamic posterior stabilization could replace conventional fusion in certain cases, but also in this case the results are successful only in mild to moderate cases.

Lumbar total disc arthroplasty: outdated surgery or here to stay procedure? A systematic review of current literature

Background

The purpose of this study was to summarize the available evidence about total lumbar disc replacement (TDR), focusing our attention on four main topics: clinical and functional outcomes, comparison with fusion surgery results, rate of complications and influence on sagittal balance.

Materials and methods

We systematically searched Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Medscape, Google Scholar and Cochrane library databases in order to answer our four main research questions. Effective data were extracted after the assessment of methodological quality of the trials.

Results

Fifty-nine pertinent papers were included. Clinical and functional scores show statistically significant improvements, and they last at all time points compared to baseline. The majority of the articles show there is no significant difference between TDR groups and fusion groups. The literature shows similar rates of complications between the two surgical procedures.

Conclusions

TDR showed significant safety and efficacy, comparable to lumbar fusion. The major advantages of a lumbar TDR over fusion include maintenance of segmental motion and the restoration of the disc height, allowing patients to find their own spinal balance. Disc arthroplasty could be a reliable option in the treatment of degenerative disc disease in years to come.

Level of evidence

II.

Why Lumbar Artificial Disk Replacements (LADRs) Fail

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To determine why artificial disk replacements (ADRs) fail by examining results of 91 patients in FDA studies performed at a single investigational device exemption (IDE) site with minimum 2-year follow-up.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients following lumbar ADR generally achieve their 24-month follow-up results at 3 months postoperatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Every patient undergoing ADR at 1 IDE site by 2 surgeons was evaluated for clinical success. Failure was defined as <50% improvement in ODI and VAS or any additional surgery at index or adjacent spine motion segment. Three ADRs were evaluated: Maverick, 25 patients; Charité, 31 patients; and Kineflex, 35 patients. All procedures were 1-level operations performed at L4-L5 or L5-S1. Demographics and inclusion/exclusion criteria were similar and will be discussed.

RESULTS

Overall clinical failure occurred in 26% (24 of 91 patients) at 2-year follow-up. Clinical failure occurred in: 28% (Maverick) (7 of 25 patients), 39% (Charité) (12 of 31 patients), and 14% (Kineflex) (5 of 35 patients). Causes of failure included facet pathology, 50% of failure patients (12 of 24). Implant complications occurred in 5% of total patients and 21% of failure patients (5 of 24). Only 5 patients went from a success to failure after 3 months. Only 1 patient went from a failure to success after a facet rhizotomy 1 year after ADR.

CONCLUSIONS

Seventy-four percent of patients after ADR met strict clinical success after 2-year follow-up. The clinical success versus failure rate did not change from their 3-month follow-up in 85 of the 91 patients (93%). Overall clinical success may be improved most by patient selection and implant type.

Lumbar disc replacement surgery-successes and obstacles to widespread adoption

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lumbar disc replacement has been a surgical alternative to fusion surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) for many years. Despite enthusiasm after the approval of the first devices, implantation rates have remained low, especially in the USA. The goal of this review is to provide a general overview of lumbar disc replacement in order to comprehend the successes and obstacles to widespread adoption.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although a large amount of evidence-based data including satisfactory long-term results is available, implantation rates in the USA have not increased in the last decade. Possible explanations for this include strict indications for use, challenging surgical techniques, lack of device selection, fear of late complications or revision surgeries, and reimbursement issues. Recent publications can address some of the past concerns, but there still remain obstacles to widespread adoption. Upcoming data on long-term outcome, implant durability and possible very late complications will determine the future of lumbar disc replacement surgery.

Maverick total disc arthroplasty performs well at 10 years follow-up: a prospective study with HRQL and balance analysis

PURPOSE

The treatment of low back pain associated to Disc Degenerative Disease (DDD) is still controversial. Segmental Fusion is the gold standard, but many studies have reported that motion-preserving devices bring substantial clinical benefits to patients. Concerns on the associated complications and on the long-term clinical effectiveness of such instrumentations are still present and have led recently to a decrease of the number of Lumbar Total Disk Replacements (TDR). The objective of this prospective study is to present the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Maverick Lumbar disk prostheses (Medtronic, TE, Memphis, USA) at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Prospective, single center study of clinical outcome of the treatment with Maverick lumbar Prosthesis of patients with low back pain from DDD resistant to conservative treatment. Patients were examined preoperatively and at 3 months, 2 and 10 years post-operatively. Patients were examined preoperatively and at 3 months, 2 and 10 years post-operatively. Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire were assessed to study clinical outcomes. Radiographic studies allowed measurements of range of motion, adjacent segment disease and pelvic and lumbar parameters.

RESULTS

From an initial cohort of 87 patients who underwent TDR between 2003 and 2007 with the Maverick prosthesis, 61 were available at Final follow-up (70%). The clinical outcomes measured by VAS and ODI showed a significant improvement in all the postoperative stages of the follow-up (FU). At 10 years-FU, ODI experienced a mean decrease of 21.1 points, VAS for back pain decreased up to 3.85 and substantial clinical benefit was reached for 55.6% of the patients. Although Mobility of the prosthesis was preserved in 76.8% of the cases, TDR was not clearly protective against ALD.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant, clinically relevant, and lasting reduction of back pain has been achieved in patients who underwent a total disk arthroplasty or a Hybrid construct with Maverik prosthesis. TDR is a safe and effective technique to decrease pain in patients with one or two levels of DDD.

Analysis of Segmental Mobility Following a Novel Posterior Apical Short-Segment Correction for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of motion present at instrumented but unfused segments and at motion segments adjacent to the instrumentation following application of a new posterior apical short-segment correction technique for correcting adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

High-density pedicle screw instrumentation and posterior arthrodesis of all instrumented levels is the most common surgical treatment for AIS stabilization. The consequence of long fusion is an abnormal load on adjacent levels with an increased risk of future adjacent segment degeneration.

METHODS

This new system applied translational and derotational forces over a short apical segment. The short apical region was prepared for fusion while maintaining motion of unfused vertebral segments. Radiographic data were collected pre-operatively, at surgery, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-one female patients, mean age of 14.2 years (10.6-16.9 years) with Lenke 1A/1B curves, were enrolled. The range of motion in the unfused instrumented segment was significantly higher than the apical fused segment (11 vs. 0.9, P < 0.001). The range of motion of unfused vertebral levels distal to the construct at one year did not differ significantly from their respective pre-op values. When the analysis was extended to understand the impact of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) on motion of unfused segments distal to the construct, it appeared that (1) the change in motion from pre-op to 12 months post-op as a function of LIV is not statistically significant; and (2) The motion of the unfused distal vertebral segments at 12 months does not statistically increase with a lower LIV.

CONCLUSION

Through one year, this novel technique achieved and maintained similar AIS correction to current posterior fusion techniques while maintaining the mobility of unfused motion segments with less implant density.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

Lumbar degenerative disc disease is extremely common. Current evidence supports surgery in carefully selected patients who have failed non-operative treatment and do not exhibit any substantial psychosocial overlay. Fusion surgery employing the correct grafting and stabilization techniques has long-term results demonstrating successful clinical outcomes. However, the best approach for fusion remains debatable. There is some evidence supporting the more complex, technically demanding and higher risk interbody fusion techniques for the younger, active patients or patients with a higher risk of non-union. Lumbar disc arthroplasty and hybrid techniques are still relatively novel procedures despite promising short-term and mid-term outcomes. Long-term studies demonstrating superiority over fusion are required before these techniques may be recommended to replace fusion as the gold standard. Novel stem cell approaches combined with tissue engineering therapies continue to be developed in expectation of improving clinical outcomes. Results with appropriate follow-up are not yet available to indicate if such techniques are safe, cost-effective and reliable in the long-term.

Influence of the Type of Sagittal Profile on Clinical Results of Lumbar Total Disk Replacement After a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiologic data of a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To research the clinical differences after lumbar total disk replacement (TDR) with respect to the preoperative global and the adaptation at the local sagittal profile (SP) of the spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

It was suggested that facet loads and degeneration are dependent on epidemiologically defined types of SP. Moreover, the success of TDR was related to segmental facet joint loads. The influences of the preoperative SP or of the changes of the local SP after TDR on the clinical outcome after TDR remain unclear.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients included in a prospective cohort study regarding lumbar single-level TDR L4/5 (n=22) or L5/S1 (n=30) because of degenerative disk disease (Modic ≤2 degrees) were clinically (visual analog scale for back, leg, and overall pain; Oswestry Disability Index) and radiologically (extension-flexion radiographs, plain-spine, and whole-spine lateral radiographs in upright standing position) reevaluated after a minimum follow-up of 24 (24-69) months. On the basis of preoperative plain radiographs in upright standing position, patients were retrospectively assigned to 4 groups according to the individual sagittal profile type (SPT). In patients with persistent back pain, a facet infiltration at the index level was performed.

RESULTS

For all patients, an SPT could be defined. Global SP did not change compared with the preoperative state. All groups improved clinically over follow-up. At the last follow-up, types 1 and 4 demonstrated significantly inferior scores for pain and function. TDR-induced changes at the superior adjacent segment and the posterior disk height at the index level were also correlated to inferior clinical results. Infiltration test was positive in type 1-4: 67%, 40%, 33%, and 75%, respectively, of the symptomatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest SPTs 1 and 4 to represent a contraindication for lumbar TDR of levels L4/5 or L5/S1. Local adaptation in the adjacent segment to TDR may influence the clinical outcome as well.

Long-Term Outcomes Following Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Using ProDisc-II: Average 10-Year Follow-Up at a Single Institute

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and to investigate who achieved the successful outcomes after lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) using ProDisc II.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are few evidences regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of TDR. Furthermore, it has not been addressed which patients achieved good outcomes in long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Data at 1-, 2-, 5-, 7-year, and last follow-up were used for the analysis. According to the presence of combined pathologies, patients were categorized as groups A and B (presumed good and bad candidates, respectively). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, clinical success rate, and subjective satisfaction (four-point scale). Radiographic results included segmental range of motion.

RESULTS

Total study population was 54 patients with 69 segments with the average follow-up duration of 120.0 months. There were 39 patients in group A and 15 in group B. Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were improved significantly at all follow-up periods, reaching maximal improvement at the postoperative 2 years. Clinical success rate and satisfaction rate were significantly higher in group A (76.9% and 87.2%, respectively) than those in group B (40.0% and 60.0%, respectively) at the last follow-up. Five patients (9.3%) required revision fusion surgeries, and they are all in group B. The final segmental range of motion was well maintained in monosegmental TDR, but not in bisegmental TDR.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar TDR using Prodisc II showed the successful outcomes with the clinical success rate of 76.9% and the satisfaction rate of 87.2% when the patients were presumed as good candidate for TDR. However, the patients who had the combined pathologies showed suboptimal results with high risk of the revision surgeries. Thus, the strict patient selection process is mandatory for the successful outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

The activL(®) Artificial Disc: a next-generation motion-preserving implant for chronic lumbar discogenic pain

Degeneration of the lumbar intervertebral discs is a leading cause of chronic low back pain in adults. Treatment options for patients with chronic lumbar discogenic pain unresponsive to conservative management include total disc replacement (TDR) or lumbar fusion. Until recently, only two lumbar TDRs had been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration - the Charité Artificial Disc in 2004 and the ProDisc-L Total Disc Replacement in 2006. In June 2015, a next-generation lumbar TDR received Food and Drug Administration approval - the activL(®) Artificial Disc (Aesculap Implant Systems). Compared to previous-generation lumbar TDRs, the activL(®) Artificial Disc incorporates specific design enhancements that result in a more precise anatomical match and allow a range of motion that better mimics the healthy spine. The results of mechanical and clinical studies demonstrate that the activL(®) Artificial Disc results in improved mechanical and clinical outcomes versus earlier-generation artificial discs and compares favorably to lumbar fusion. The purpose of this report is to describe the activL(®) Artificial Disc including implant characteristics, intended use, surgical technique, postoperative care, mechanical testing, and clinical experience to date.

Five-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Lumbar Total Disc Replacements

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of two lumbar total disc replacements (TDRs) at 5-year follow-up and report results of serum ion level analysis in a subgroup of patients receiving a metal-on-metal implant.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Lumbar TDR has been compared with fusion in several randomized studies, finding TDR noninferior to fusion and superior on some measures. Receiving less attention has been comparing TDR devices. Additionally, there is concern about metal-on-metal implants, with little data available for spine devices.

METHODS

The study included 204 patients receiving Kineflex-L (investigational) and 190 receiving CHARITÉ (control). Outcome measure included Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog pain scales (VAS), patient satisfaction, neurological status, complications, reoperations, and a composite success score. Radiographic assessment included range of motion, subsidence, and heterotrophic ossification. In 32 investigational patients, serum ion analysis was performed for cobalt and chromium. These values were compared with Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency values to merit monitoring total hip replacement patients for potential wear problems.

RESULTS

Mean Oswestry and VAS scores in both groups improved significantly by 6 weeks and remained improved during 5-year follow-up (Oswestry Disability Index, scores in both groups were approximately 60 preoperatively vs. 20 at 2- and 5-year follow-up; P < 0.01; VAS scores improved >50% by 6 weeks and remained significantly improved; P < 0.05). Approximately 11% of both groups underwent reoperation. Radiographic analysis found segmental range of motion decreased at 3 month, then increased through 24 months, and was maintained thereafter. Serum ion level analysis found the greatest mean value at any follow-up point was less than 20% of Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency recommended minimum value to merit monitoring hip replacement patients.

CONCLUSION

This prospective, randomized study comparing two TDRs found no significant differences in outcomes during 5-year follow-up. Both provided statistically significant improvements by 6 weeks that were maintained. This results support other studies. Serum ion levels in TDR patients were well below the recommended threshold levels to merit monitoring.

Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar artificial disc replacement compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to examine the clinical outcome of single-level lumbar artificial disc replacement (ADR) compared to that of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD) in an Asian population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 74 patients who had surgery performed for discogenic lower backs that involved only the L4/5 and L5/S1 levels. All the patients had lumbar DDD without radiculopathy or spondylolithesis, and concordant pain with discogram at the pathological level. The patients were divided into two groups--those who underwent ADR and those who underwent TLIF.

RESULTS

A trend suggesting that the ADR group had better perioperative outcomes (less blood loss, shorter operating time, shorter hospital stay and shorter time to ambulation) than the TLIF group was observed. However, a trend indicating that surgical-approach-related complications occurred more frequently in the ADR group than the TLIF group was also observed. The rate of revision surgery was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that for the treatment of discogenic lower back pain, lumbar ADR has better perioperative outcomes and a similar revision rate when compared with TLIF. However, the use of ADR was associated with a higher incidence of surgical-approach-related complications. More studies with bigger cohort sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of ADR in lumbar DDD.

Adjacent Segment Pathology after Lumbar Spinal Fusion

One of the major clinical issues encountered after lumbar spinal fusion is the development of adjacent segment pathology (ASP) caused by increased mechanical stress at adjacent segments, and resulting in various radiographic changes and clinical symptoms. This condition may require surgical intervention. The incidence of ASP varies with both the definition and methodology adopted in individual studies; various risk factors for this condition have been identified, although a significant controversy still exists regarding their significance. Motion-preserving devices have been developed, and some studies have shown their efficacy of preventing ASP. Surgeons should be aware of the risk factors of ASP when planning a surgery, and accordingly counsel their patients preoperatively.

Rotation effect and anatomic landmark accuracy for midline placement of lumbar artificial disc under fluoroscopy

PURPOSE

Total disc arthroplasty can be a viable alternative to fusion for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. The correct placement of the prosthesis within 3 mm from midline is critical for optimal function. Intra-operative radiographic error could lead to malposition of the prosthesis. The objective of this study was first to measure the effect of fluoroscopy angle on the placement of prosthesis under fluoroscopy. Secondly, determine the visual accuracy of the placement of artificial discs using different anatomical landmarks (pedicle, waist, endplate, spinous process) under fluoroscopy.

METHODS

Artificial discs were implanted into three cadaver specimens at L2-3, L3-4, and L4-L5. Fluoroscopic images were obtained at 0°, 2.5°, 5°, 7.5°, 10°, and 15° from the mid axis. Computerized tomography (CT) scans were obtained after the procedure. Distances were measured from each of the anatomic landmarks to the center of the implant on both fluoroscopy and CT. The difference between fluoroscopy and CT scans was compared to evaluate the position of prosthesis to each anatomic landmark at different angles.

RESULTS

The differences between the fluoroscopy to CT measurements from the implant to pedicle was 1.31 mm, p < 0.01; implant to waist was 1.72 mm, p < 0.01; implant to endplate was 1.99 mm, p < 0.01; implant to spinous process was 3.14 mm, p < 0.01. When the fluoroscopy angle was greater than 7.5°, the difference between fluoroscopy and CT measurements was greater than 3 mm for all landmarks.

CONCLUSIONS

A fluoroscopy angle of 7.5° or more can lead to implant malposition greater than 3 mm. The pedicle is the most accurate of the anatomic landmarks studied for placement of total artificial discs in the lumbar spine.

An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease

PURPOSE

To report our 11-year minimum clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as complications of the Charite III total disc replacement (TDR).

METHODS

A total of 35 patients indicated for total disc replacement were implanted with the Charite III prosthesis. Clinical evaluation included visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). Radiological parameters of intervertebral disc height (IDH), range of motion (ROM), lumbar lordosis, lumbar scoliosis and prosthesis position were evaluated. Complications and reoperation rates were also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients had a minimum 11-year follow-up, and 33 prostheses were implanted. The mean follow-up time was 11.8 years, ranging from 11.3 to 13.8 years. Twenty-eight patients (87.5 %) had a successful outcome, as defined by the FDA. Reoperation was performed in 2 patients for adjacent segment degeneration and pedicle fracture (1 case each). Both VAS and ODI scores showed significant improvement compared to baseline. At the final follow-up, the ROM of both the index- and adjacent-level showed an obvious decrease. The IDH of the index level showed a tendency to decrease, but the difference was not significant. The IDH of adjacent levels were not significantly affected by the surgery. Mean lumbar lordosis was increased at the final follow-up, and lumbar scoliosis over 3° was observed in 12 patients (37.5%), with a mean angle of 5.6° (range 3°-12°). Of all 35 prostheses, 15 were left-shifted, 3 were right-shifted and 14 were just in the middle. In the coronal plane, 25 were rated as ideally placed, 5 were discretely shifted, 4 were slightly shifted and 1 was markedly shifted. In the sagittal plane, only 12 prostheses were rated as ideally placed, 14 were discretely shifted and 9 were suboptimally placed. Prosthesis subsidence was noted in 3 (9.4%) patients (the subsidence distances were 3.1, 4.2 and 2.8 mm, respectively). Heterotopic ossification was detected in 25 segments (71.4%), consisting of Class-I heterotopic ossification in 7 segments (20.0%), Class-II in 9 segments (25.7%), and Class-III in 9 segments (25.7%). Class-IV heterotopic ossification was not observed.

CONCLUSION

The cumulative survival was 100% at a mean follow-up of 11.8 years. Clinical and radiological results were satisfactory and long-term clinical results were maintained for a mean follow-up of 11.8 years. Reoperation and complication rates are acceptable, and our study does not substantiate the fear of reoperation or late complications. The results of our long-term follow-up indicate that, with strict indication, TDR is a safe and effective procedure as an alternative to lumbar fusion.

Retrospective study on effectiveness of activ L total disc replacement: clinical and radiographical results of 1- to 3-year follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of activ L total disc replacement (TDR) on degenerative disc diseases with the clinical and radiographical results.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are few reports on activ L TDR. This is the first one from China.

METHODS

From March 2009 to March 2012, 32 patients with degenerative disc diseases underwent mono- or bisegmental lumbar TDR. Mean age was 45.1 years (32-58 yr). Clinical outcomes were measured by Oswestry Disability Index and Visual analogue scale pre- and postoperatively (1, 2, and 3 yr). Radiographical parameters as range of motion and intervertebral disc height of the index- and adjacent segments were also measured. Prosthesis subsidence and heterotopic ossification were observed during the follow-up period. Work status was also tracked.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were available for a mean follow-up of 28.8 months and had complete radiographical data. At the final follow-up, the success rate was 86.7%. Visual analogue scale score for low back pain and leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved after surgery. Average intervertebral disc heights of patients with more than 3 years' follow-up at the index segment and upper and lower adjacent segments were 12.87 mm, 12.61 mm, and 11.62 mm, respectively, showing no significant difference compared with preoperative scores. The range of motion of the index and upper adjacent segments showed a significant increase for patients with more than 3 years' follow-up. Changes of range of motion at lower adjacent segment were not significant. We observed tears of the iliac vein in 2 patients, prosthesis subsidence in 3 patients, and heterotopic ossification in 1 patient. At the final follow-up, 18 patients went back to their original work, 8 patients changed jobs, and 4 patients stopped working.

CONCLUSION

The 1- to 3-year follow-up of this cohort of patients showed satisfactory clinical outcomes. The long-term results of activ L TDR need more investigation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc

PURPOSE

The primary goal of this Policy Statement is to educate patients, physicians, medical providers, reviewers, adjustors, case managers, insurers, and all others involved or affected by insurance coverage decisions regarding lumbar disc replacement surgery.

PROCEDURES

This Policy Statement was developed by a panel of physicians selected by the Board of Directors of ISASS for their expertise and experience with lumbar TDR. The panel's recommendation was entirely based on the best evidence-based scientific research available regarding the safety and effectiveness of lumbar TDR.

ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized trial.

PURPOSE

The treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with two-level fusion has been associated with a reasonable rate of complications. The aim of the present study was to compare (Hybrid) stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5/S1 with total disc replacement at L4/5 (TDR) as an alternative surgical strategy to (Fusion) 2-level circumferential fusion employing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with transpedicular stabilization at L4-S1.

METHODS

A total of 62 patients with symptomatic DDD of segments L5/S1 (Modic ≥2°) and L4/5 (Modic ≤2°; positive discography) were enrolled; 31 were treated with Hybrid and 31 with Fusion. Preoperatively, at 0, 12, and a mean follow-up of 37 months, clinical (ODI, VAS) and radiological evaluations (plain/extension-flexion radiographs evaluated for implant failure, fusion, global and segmental lordosis, and ROM) were performed.

RESULTS

In 26 of 31 Hybrid and 24 of 31 Fusion patients available at the final follow-up, we found a significant clinical improvement compared to preoperatively. Hybrid patients had significantly lower VAS scores immediately postoperatively and at follow-up compared to Fusion patients. The complication rates were low and similar between the groups. Lumbar lordosis increased in both groups. The increase was mainly located at L4-S1 in the Hybrid group and at L1-L4 in the Fusion group. Hybrid patients presented with increased ROM at L4/5 and L3/4, and Fusion patients presented with increased ROM at L3/4, with significantly greater ROM at L3/4 compared to Hybrid patients at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid surgery is a viable surgical alternative for the presented indication. Approach-related inferior trauma and the balanced restoration of lumbar lordosis resulted in superior clinical outcomes compared to two-level circumferential fusion with TLIF.

Intraoperative determination of lumbar prosthesis endplate lordotic angulation to improve motion

The aim of total disc replacement (TDR) is to restore and maintain closer-to-physiology motion. Therefore, the factors that influence postoperative intervertebral motion have to be controlled. Factors such as disc height (DH), postoperative segmental lordosis (SL), implant design and positioning are still recognized to be influent. Otherwise, range of motion (ROM) distribution, between flexion and extension, appear to be influenced by obtaining parallel bearing surfaces, which depends on prosthesis endplate lordotic angulation. To assess in vivo the correlation between an intraoperative parameter (intraoperative segmental lordosis: ISL) and a postoperative parameter (postoperative segmental lordosis: PSL). To determine the advantage of ISL measurement on the improvement of the prosthetic endplate lordotic angulation choice. Radiological comparison between intraoperative and postoperative segmental parameters. Fifty-seven patients who received a TDR at one level, L4-L5 or L5-S1, with different prosthetic endplate lordotic angulations (0°, 5°, and 10°). Twenty-one consecutive patients underwent intraoperative measurement (ISL) on a lateral view, with a spacer at the mid-vertebral bony endplates (Group 1). ISL was correlated using a linear correlation test with PSL. Group 1 postoperative prosthesis endplate lordosis (PEL: angle between the bearing surfaces) were compared to those of 46 patients without intraoperative measurement (Group 2). The mean ISL and PSL angles were 12.2° (7-21°) and 13.9° (8-23°), respectively. We observed a strong linear correlation between ISL and PSL (r=0.78, P <0.006). In Group 1, PEL varied between -1° and 11°, and between -3.7° and 17.8° in Group 2. For 80% of the patients in Group 1, the PEL was less than 5°, versus 33% of the patients in Group 2. Only prostheses with PEL less than 5° had a preserved extension curve in ROM distribution (+3°). Intraoperative measurement of ISL has emerged as a key factor in predicting PSL in TDR. The percentage of parallel bearing surfaces was increased by a prosthesis endplate lordotic angulation choice guided by ISL measurement. This study confirmed the advantage of choosing the adequate lordotic angulation of the prosthesis endplate to restore a physiological motion distribution between flexion and extension.

Indications for lumbar total disc replacement: selecting the right patient with the right indication for the right total disc

Summary of Background Data

As with any surgery, care should be taken to determine patient selection criteria for lumbar TDR based on safety and optimizing outcome. These goals may initially be addressed by analyzing biomechanical implant function and early clinical experience, ongoing evaluation is needed to refine indications.

Objective

The purpose of this work was to synthesize information published on general indications for lumbar TDR. A secondary objective was to determine if indications vary for different TDR designs.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify lumbar TDR articles. Articles were reviewed and patient selection criteria and indications were synthesized.

Results

With respect to safety, there was good agreement in the literature to exclude patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis or fracture. Risk of injury to vascular structures due to the anterior approach was often addressed by excluding patients with previous abdominal surgery in the area of disc pathology or increased age. The literature was very consistent on the primary indication for TDR being painful disc degeneration unresponsive to at least 6 months of nonoperative care. Literature investigating the impact of previous spine surgery was mixed; however, prior surgery was not necessarily a contra-indication, provided the patient otherwise met selection criteria. The literature was mixed on setting a minimum preoperative disc height as a selection criterion. There were no publications investigating whether some patients are better/worse candidates for specific TDR designs. Based on the literature a proposal for patient selection criteria is offered.

Conclusions

Several TDR indications and contra-indications are widely accepted. No literature addresses particular TDR design being preferable for some patients. As with any spine surgery, ongoing evaluation of TDR outcomes will likely lead to more detailed general and device design specific indications.

Clinical outcomes, radiologic kinematics, and effects on sagittal balance of the 6 df LP-ESP lumbar disc prosthesis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease remains a controversial subject. Lumbar fusion has been associated with a potential risk of segmental junctional disease and sagittal balance misalignment. Motion preservation devices have been developed as an alternative to fusion. The LP-ESP disc is a one-piece deformable device achieving 6 df, including shock absorption and elastic return. This is the first clinical report on its use.

PURPOSE

To assess clinical outcomes and radiologic kinematics in the first 2 years after implantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort of patients with LP-ESP total disc replacement (TDR) at the lumbar spine.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Forty-six consecutive patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the GHQ28 (General Health Questionnaire) psychological score. Radiologic data were the range of motion (ROM), sagittal balance parameters, and mean center of rotation (MCR).

METHODS

Patients had single-level TDR at L4-L5 or L5-S1. Outcomes were prospectively recorded for 2 years (before and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery). The SpineView software was used for computed analysis of the radiographic data. Paired t tests were used for statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complication occurred. All clinical scores improved significantly at 24 months: the back pain VAS scores by a mean of 4.1 points and the ODI by 33 points. The average ROM of the instrumented level was 5.4°±4.8° at 2 years and more than 2° for 76% of prostheses. The MCR was in a physiological area in 73% of cases. The sagittal balance (pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and segmental lordosis) did not change significantly at any point of the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from the 2-year follow-up indicate that LP-ESP prosthesis recreates lumbar spine function similar to that of the healthy disc in terms of ROM, quality of movement, effect on sagittal balance, and absence of modification in the kinematics of the upper adjacent level.

Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The role of fusion of lumbar motion segments for the treatment of intractable low back pain (LBP) from degenerative disc disease (DDD) without deformities or instabilities remains controversially debated. Total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) has been used as an alternative in a highly selected patient cohort. However, the amount of long-term follow-up (FU) data on TDR is limited. In the United States, insurers have refused to reimburse surgeons for TDRs for fear of delayed complications, revisions, and unknown secondary costs, leading to a drastic decline in TDR numbers.

PURPOSE

To assess the mid- and long-term clinical efficacy as well as patient safety of TDR in terms of perioperative complication and reoperation rates.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Prospective, single-center clinical investigation of TDR with ProDisc II (Synthes, Paoli, PA, USA) for the treatment of LBP from lumbar DDD that has proven unresponsive to conservative therapy.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with a minimum of 5-year FU after TDR, performed for the treatment of intractable and predominant (≥80%) axial LBP resulting from DDD without any deformities or instabilities.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and patient satisfaction rates (three-scale outcome rating); complication and reoperation rates as well as elapsed time until revision surgery; patient's professional activity/employment status.

METHODS

Clinical outcome scores were acquired within the framework of an ongoing prospective clinical trial. Patients were examined preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, annually from then onward. The data acquisition was performed by members of the clinic's spine unit including medical staff, research assistants, and research nurses who were not involved in the process of pre- or postoperative decision-making.

RESULTS

The initial cohort consisted of 201 patients; 181 patients were available for final FU, resembling a 90.0% FU rate after a mean FU of 7.4 years (range 5.0-10.8 years). The overall results revealed a highly significant improvement from baseline VAS and ODI levels at all postoperative FU stages (p<.0001). VAS scores demonstrated a slight (from VAS 2.6 to 3.3) but statistically significant deterioration from 48 months onward (p<.05). Patient satisfaction rates remained stable throughout the entire postoperative course, with 63.6% of patients reporting a highly satisfactory or a satisfactory (22.7%) outcome, whereas 13.7% of patients were not satisfied. The overall complication rate was 14.4% (N=26/181). The incidence of revision surgeries for general and/or device-related complications was 7.2% (N=13/181). Two-level TDRs demonstrated a significant improvement of VAS and ODI scores in comparison to baseline levels (p<.05). Nevertheless, the results were significantly inferior in comparison to one-level cases and were associated with higher complication (11.9% vs. 27.6%; p=.03) and inferior satisfaction rates (p<.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that the current data comprises the early experiences and learning curve associated with a new surgical technique, the results demonstrate satisfactory and maintained mid- to long-term clinical results after a mean FU of 7.4 years. Patient safety was proven with acceptable complication and reoperation rates. Fear of excessive late complications or reoperations following the primary TDR procedure cannot be substantiated with the present data. In carefully selected cases, TDR can be considered a viable treatment alternative to lumbar fusion for which spine communities around the world seem to have accepted mediocre clinical results as well as obvious and significant drawbacks.

Five-year results of lumbar disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry

PURPOSE

The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health demanded a nationwide HTA registry for lumbar total disc arthroplasty (TDA), to decide about its reimbursement. The goal of the SWISS spine registry is to generate evidence about the safety and efficiency of lumbar TDA.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-eight cases treated between 3-2005 and 6-2006, who were eligible for the 5-year follow-up were included in the study. Follow-up rates for 3-6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years were 85.9, 77.0, 44.0 and 51.2 %, respectively. Outcome measures were back and leg pain, medication consumption, quality of life, intraoperative and postoperative complication and revision rates. Additionally, segmental mobility, ossification, adjacent and distant segment degeneration were analysed at the 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

There was a significant, clinically relevant and lasting reduction of back (preop/postop 73/29 VAS points) and leg pain (preop/postop VAS 55/22) and a consequently decreased analgesics consumption and quality of life improvement (preop/postop 0.30/0.76 EQ-5D score points) until 5 years after surgery. The rates for intraoperative and early postoperative complications were 4.4 and 3.2 %, respectively. The overall complication rate during five postoperative years was 23.4 %, and the adjacent segment degeneration rate was 10.7 %. In 4.4 % of patients, a revision surgery was performed. Cumulative survivorship probability for a revision/re-intervention-free 5-year postoperative course was 90.4 %. At the 5-year follow-up, the average range of motion of the mobile segments (86.8 %) was 9.7°. In 43.9 % of patients, osteophytes at least potentially affecting the range of motion were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar TDA appeared as efficient in long-term pain alleviation, consequent reduction of pain medication consumption and improvement of quality of life. The procedure also appeared sufficiently safe, but surgeons have to be aware of a list of potential adverse events. The outcome is stable over the 5-year postoperative period. The vast majority of treated segments remained mobile after 5 years, although almost half of patients showed osteophytes.

Comparison of 2 lumbar total disc replacements: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration trial with 24-month follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study with 24-month follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy in a Food and Drug Administration Investigation Device Exemption of a new lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) by comparing it to an earlier TDR approved for sale.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Randomized trials have reported TDR to produce results similar or superior to lumbar fusion. Results for various TDRs seem to be similar, but differences in study design and outcome measures pose challenges in definitively comparing devices. The purpose of this study was to perform a direct comparison of 2 lumbar TDRs in a prospective, randomized trial.

METHODS

TDR was performed in 457 patients from 21 sites (261 patients in the investigational group (Kineflex-L Disc; metal-on-metal design anchored with keels, 204 randomized and 57 nonrandomized training cases), and 196 in the control group (CHARITE artificial disc; metal with polyethylene core with teeth for anchoring; 190 randomized and 6 nonrandomized training cases). All patients were treated nonoperatively for single-level symptomatic disc degeneration for at least 6 months prior to surgery. Perioperative data were collected. Clinical outcome data were collected prospectively, as approved by the Food and Drug Administration, through 24-month follow-up. Primary outcome measures used were the Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scales assessing pain, patient satisfaction, and reoperations. Success was defined to be at least 15-point improvements in Oswestry Disability Index scores, no reoperation, and no major adverse events. Radiographical measures included range of motion, disc space height, and assessment for device migration, subsidence, and fusion at the TDR level.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups when comparing operative time, blood loss, or length of hospital stay. Both groups improved significantly on Oswestry Disability Index and visual analogue scale scores (P < 0.01) with no differences between the groups. Success rates were similar (68.1% investigational vs. 67.4% control). At 24-month follow-up, 94.1% of the investigational group and 91.9% of controls were satisfied with outcome. Reoperation was performed in 10.3% of the investigational group and 8.4% of the control group.

CONCLUSION

This prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing 2 TDRs, the first to the authors' knowledge, found the devices produced very similar clinical outcomes. Both groups improved significantly by 6 weeks postoperatively and remained improved throughout follow-up with a high patient satisfaction rate.

Long-term Outcomes of 2-Level Total Disc Replacement Using ProDisc-L: Nine- to 10-Year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective clinical data analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term clinical success of 2-level total disc replacement (TDR) in patients with degenerative disc disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Early successful clinical results of 2-level TDR have been reported. Few studies exist that have described this procedure's durability in the long term.

METHODS

Fifteen patients underwent 2-level lumbar TDR with the ProDisc-L as part of a randomized trial, 13 of whom were available for follow-up. The patients were assessed preoperatively and at 2 years, 5 years, and more than 9 years postoperatively using visual Oswestry Disability Index. At the last follow-up visit, 2 additional questions were asked: satisfaction with surgery and willingness to undergo the same treatment. Finally, clinical success was assessed using a previously described definition.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 9.6 years (range, 9.2-10.3 yr). Postoperatively there was a significant improvement in Oswestry Disability Index score from baseline (70.0 vs. 15.7 at 2 yr, P = 0.002) that remained unchanged during the period of follow-up (19.8 at 5 yr, P = 0.003 and 12.9 at 9-10 yr, P = 0.002). Ninety-two percent of patients were "satisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" with treatment and the same number would undergo treatment again. Eighty-five percent of patients achieved clinical success.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study demonstrates the durable clinical success of 2-level lumbar TDR as assessed at more than 9 years postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.