Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brain Metastases

Clinical factors associated with mortality within three months after radiosurgery of asymptomatic brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Routine brain MRI surveillance frequently diagnoses small, asymptomatic brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that are effectively treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A subset of patients, however, may die prior to the onset of symptoms. This study identifies clinical features that distinguish neurologically-asymptomatic NSCLC brain metastases patients that die prior to routine 3 month follow-up after SRS.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review from 2007 to 2017 identified 18 patients with neurologically-asymptomatic NSCLC brain metastases who died < 3 months after SRS. Twenty-eight additional patients meeting criteria and surviving > 6 months after SRS were identified. Clinical factors were examined to determine characteristics correlated with survival using cox proportional hazards and nominal logistic regression models. Logistic regression models using salient factors were trained with 10-fold cross-validation and compared to the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) and score index of radiosurgery (SIR) using the AUC from receiver operant characteristic curves.

RESULTS

The median survival following SRS was 1.4 and 9.2 months for the < 3 months and > 6 months groups, respectively. Age, number of brain metastases, and Karnofsky performance status were associated with overall survival while gender and interval between primary cancer and first brain metastasis diagnoses were associated with < 3 months and > 6 months survival, respectively. Models using GPA and SIR performed poorly compared to preliminary metrics generated in this study for prognosis of both < 3 months and > 6 months survival.

CONCLUSION

Physicians require data to provide high-value, cost-conscious health care. Clinical metrics can screen patients with asymptomatic NSCLC brain metastases likely to die prior to the standard screening interval and observation could be considered.

Brain Metastases from Endometrial Carcinoma: Report of Three Cases and Review of the Literature

Aims and background

Endometrial carcinoma is a rare cause of brain metastases, accounting for less than 1% of all metastatic lesions to the brain. This report aims to review our experience in the treatment of patients with brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma in order to establish the characteristics of these patients and evaluate the results and efficacy of whole-brain radiation therapy as a palliative measure.

Methods

Three cases of brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma treated with radiotherapy were identified in the files of the Division of Radiotherapy at the A. Businco Regional Oncological Hospital of Cagliari between 1999 and 2005.

Results

All patients had brain metastases as the only sign of systemic disease (a single lesion in 2 patients and 2 lesions in 1 patient). Two patients were classified as RTOG RPA class I and 1 patient as class III. Radiotherapy to the brain was delivered after surgical resection in the first 2 patients and as the only method of palliation in the third patient. The delivered radiation dose was 3000 cGy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks in the postoperative setting and 2000 cGy in 5 fractions over 1 week to the patient treated with irradiation alone. The 2 surgically treated patients are alive and well after 16 and 64 months, respectively. The patient treated with palliative intent died 2 months after irradiation.

Conclusions

The combination of surgery and postoperative whole-brain irradiation in selected patients with solitary brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma is an effective method of palliation.

Erlotinib intercalating pemetrexed/cisplatin versus erlotinib alone in Chinese patients with brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma: a prospective, non-randomised, concurrent controlled trial (NCT01578668)

Objective

Erlotinib has a synergistic effect with pemetrexed for treating non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. We investigated the efficacy and safety of erlotinib (E) in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin (E-P) in Chinese patients with lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastases.

Design

Patients who were erlotinib-naïve or pemetrexed-naïve were assigned in parallel to receive either E or E-P. The primary endpoint was the intracranial overall response rate (ORRi).

Results

Sixty-nine patients with lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastases received E (n=35) or E-P (n=34) from January 2012 to November 2014. Demographics and patient characteristics were well balanced between the two groups, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status, sex, age, smoking status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, brain metastases and number of prior treatments. ORRi in the E-P arm was superior to that in the E arm (79% vs 48%, p=0.008). Compared with E as the first-line treatment, E-P was associated with better intracranial progression-free survival (PFSi, median: 9 vs 2 months, p=0.027) and systemic PFS (median: 8 vs 2 months, p=0.006). The most frequent E-related adverse events were higher in the combination arm. No new safety signals were detected. The side effects were tolerable, and there were no drug-related deaths.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the E-P combination may be effective in Chinese patients with lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastases, with improved PFS in treatment-naïve patients. Toxicities are tolerable, and there are more E-related side effects.

Intensity-Modulated Radiosurgery for Patients with Brain Metastases: A Mature Outcomes Analysis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with brain metastases treated by tomotherapeutic Intensity-modulated Radiosurgery (IMRS). Using retrospective chart review, we analyzed the outcomes of 78 patients (age 33–83 years, median 57 years) who underwent 111 sessions of IMRS (1 to 7 sessions per patient, median 1) for brain metastases (1 to 4 targets per IMRS session, median 1) treated between 2000 and 2005 using a serial tomotherapeutic intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment (IMRT) planning and delivery system (Peacock, Nomos Corp., Cranberry Township, PA). Treatment planning was performed using an inverse treatment planning optimization algorithm that was optimized for IMRS. A median prescription dose of 15 Gy in combination with WBI, and median 20 Gy for IMRS alone was delivered using 2–4 couch angles over 4–24 rotational arcs. Overall survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. To determine the effects of prognostic variables on survival, univariate and multivariate analyses using proportional hazards were performed to assess the effects of age, tumor size, the combination with whole brain irradiation, presence of multiple brain metastases, and presence of extracranial disease. The median overall survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.5–7.9). One- and two-year survival rates were 24% and 10%. In multivariate analyses, age greater than 60 years was the only statistically significant variable that affected survival (hazard rate 1.29, p=0.049). We conclude that tomotherapeutic IMRS is safe and effective to treat patients with brain metastases.

Quick regression of brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: A case report and literature review

Brain metastasis (BM) commonly occurs in patients with advanced lung cancer, and is associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options, particularly for end-stage patients who are in poor physical and mental state. We herein present a case of lung adenocarcinoma with BM, as revealed by tumor marker and imaging studies. The patient was a 74-year-old woman who was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma with several metastatic lesions in the mediastinal lymph nodes, bone and brain. The patient underwent two cycles of chemotherapy, but the cancer recurred with enlarged BM, resulting in confusion and body dysfunction. The patient then received epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy with icotinib. After approximately 12 h of treatment the symptoms disappeared, and the metastatic lesions in the brain largely regressed in the following months. Our case indicates that the EGFR-TKI icotinib may provide a rapid and safe approach for emergency situations with BM from lung adenocarcinoma.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for intraventricular brain metastases

Object

The authors' institution previously reported a 69% rate of crude local control for surgical management of lateral ventricle metastases at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. For comparison, the authors here report their institutional experience with use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to treat intraventricular metastases.

Methods

To identify patients with intraventricular metastases for this retrospective review, the authors queried an institutional SRS database containing the medical records of 1962 patients with 5800 brain metastases who consecutively underwent SRS from June 2009 through October 2013. End points assessed were local control (crude and locoregional), distant failure–free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

Results

Of the 1962 records examined, those for 25 (1.3%) patients with 30 (0.52%) intraventricular metastases were identified. Median patient age at SRS was 55.8 years. The most common primary malignancy was renal cell carcinoma (n = 13), followed by melanoma (n = 7) and breast adenocarcinoma (n = 5). Median tumor volume was 0.75 cm3 (range 0.01–5.6 cm3). Most lesions were located in the lateral ventricles (n = 25, 83.3%) and were treated to a median dose of 20 Gy (range 14–20 Gy). A total of 12 (48%) patients received whole-brain radiation therapy, most (n = 10) before SRS. With a median follow-up of 11.4 months (range 1.6–39.2 months), the rate of crude local control was 93.3%, and the rates of 6-month and 1-year actuarial locoregional control were 85.2% and 56.2%, respectively. The median overall survival time after SRS was 11.6 months (range 1.3–38.9 months), and the 6-month and 1-year actuarial rates were 87.1% and 46.7%, respectively. Disease dissemination developed in 7 (28%) patients as a second intraventricular metastatic lesion (n = 3, 12%), leptomeningeal disease (n = 3, 12%), or both (n = 1, 4%). Radiographic changes developed in 5 (20%) patients and included necrosis (n = 2, 8%) and hemorrhage (n = 3, 12%). A primary diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma was associated with an improved rate of distant failure–free survival (p = 0.05) and progression-free survival (p = 0.08).

Conclusions

SRS provides excellent local control for intraventricular metastases, with acceptable treatment-related toxicity, thereby supporting nonsurgical treatment for these lesions. The propensity for intraventricular dissemination among intraventricular metastases seems to be histologically dependent.

Sensitive detection of EGFR mutations in cerebrospinal fluid from lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) might be useful predictive markers for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment of intracranial metastatic tumors. In this retrospective study, amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR assays were used to investigate the EGFR gene status in 30 lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases. A total of 16 patients tested positive for EGFR-activating mutations in CSF or tumor tissues. These included L858R mutation in exon 21 in six CSF samples and exon 19 deletions in seven CSF samples. EGFR mutations were detected between CSF and primary tumor samples with a 75% positive predictive value (95% CI, 0.45-1.00), 75% negative predictive value (95% CI, 0.51-0.99), 67% sensitivity (95% CI, 0.36-0.97), and 82% specificity (95% CI, 0.59-1.00). Most of the patients who had EGFR mutations in CSF achieved good responses with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. In conclusion, ARMS-PCR could be a sensitive method of detecting EGFR mutations in the CSF of patients with lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastases. As such, ARMS-PCR could play an important role in guiding EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments of intracranial tumors and for diagnosing brain metastases in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Erlotinib with pemetrexed/cisplatin for patients with EGFR wild-type lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastases

Erlotinib and pemetrexed have been approved for the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Recent reports indicated that erlotinib and pemetrexed exerted synergistic effects against lung adenocarcinoma. The available treatment options for lung cancer with brain metastases (BM) are currently limited. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of the combined administration of erlotinib and pemetrexed in 9 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type lung adenocarcinoma with BM. Pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) and cisplatin (20 mg/m²) were administered on day 1 and days 1-3, respectively. Erlotinib (150 mg) was administered daily on days 4-20. The 9 patients harbored EGFR wild-type mutation in the primary tumor tissues. With regard to the BM, no patients achieved complete remission, 7 patients exhibited a partial response (PR), 1 had stable disease (SD) and 1 had progressive disease (PD). As regards the extracranial tumors, 3 patients exhibited a PR, 2 had SD, 3 had PD and 1 was not applicable. The performance status and the symptoms improved in 3 patients following treatment. The median progression-free survival for intracranial and extracranial disease control was 179 and 146.5 days, respectively. The median overall survival was 197.4 days. Therefore, erlotinib combined with pemetrexed/cisplatin, was found to be effective in the treatment of patients with EGFR wild-type lung adenocarcinoma.

A review of the clinical outcomes for patients diagnosed with brainstem metastasis and treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

Only 3%-5% of all brain metastases are located in the brainstem. We present a comprehensive review of the clinical outcomes from modern studies that treated patients with brainstem metastasis using either a Gamma Knife or a linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery. The median survival time of patients was compared to better understand what clinical or treatment factors are predictive of improved survival. This information can then be utilized to optimize patient care. The data suggests that higher prescribed marginal dose and the associated greater local control of brainstem lesions are associated with longer patient survival. Further research is necessary to better describe the most effective dose for individual brainstem lesions and to tailor optimum therapy to specific patient subgroups.

Combined primary tumor and extracranial metastasis status as constituent factor of prognostic indices for predicting the overall survival in patients with brain metastases

We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic factors on overall survival (OS) in patients with brain metastasis (BM) and evaluated the role of combined primary tumor and extracranial metastasis (ECM) status as a constituent factor for prognostic index. This study involved 897 patients with BMs who underwent radiotherapy between April 2003 and December 2009. Among the clinical parameters, multivariate analysis showed that age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), combined primary tumor and ECM status, number of BMs, and treatment group were significant prognostic factors for OS (P < 0.05). To compare the discriminatory ability of 5 prognostic indices, i.e., recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), basic score for BMs (BSBM), score index for radiosurgery (SIR), graded prognostic assessment (GPA), and modified GPA including the combined primary tumor and ECM status (mGPA), the Akaike information criteria (AIC) were calculated. The mGPA showed the lowest AIC value, followed by RPA, GPA, SIR, and BSBM, in that order. It is implicated that modified score of pre-existing factors (i.e., age and KPS) and addition of the combined primary tumor and ECM status to the prognostic index can improve its discriminatory ability and the combined primary tumor and ECM status may be useful as one of constituent factors for prognostic index.

Long-Term Survival of a Patient with Brainstem and Recurrent Brain Metastasis from Stage IV Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Multiple Gamma Knife Radiosurgeries and Craniotomies: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

The prognosis of patients diagnosed with stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer that have brain and brainstem metastasis is very poor, with less than a third surviving a year past their initial date of diagnosis. We present the rare case of a 57-year-old man who is a long-term survivor of brainstem and recurrent brain metastasis, after aggressive treatment. He is now five and a half years out from diagnosis and continues to live a highly functional life without evidence of disease. Four separate Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgeries in conjunction with two craniotomies were utilized since his initial diagnosis to treat recurrent brain metastasis while chemoradiation therapy and thoracic surgery were used to treat his primary disease in the right upper lung. In his situation, Gamma Knife radiosurgery proved to be a valuable, safe, and effective tool for the treatment of multiply recurrent brain metastases within critical normal structures.

Image guidance for brain metastases resection

The primary goal in removing a metastatic brain tumor is to maximize surgical resection while minimizing the risk of neurological injury. Intraoperative image guidance is frequently used in the resection of both primary and metastatic brain tumors. Stereotactic volumetric techniques allow for smaller craniotomies, facilitate lesion localization, and help neurosurgeons avoid eloquent structures. In turn, this leads to decreased patient morbidity and shorter hospitalizations. Image guidance is not without shortcomings, however, perhaps the most significant of which is inaccuracy of tumor resection associated with intraoperative brain shifts. The goal of this review is to expound on the uses of image guidance and discuss avoidance of technical pitfalls in the resection of cerebral metastatic lesions.

Clinical outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of patients with metastatic brain tumors

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a form of radiation therapy that delivers a focused, highly conformal dose of radiation to a single volume, while minimizing damage to the adjacent nervous tissue. The efficacy of SRS has been examined in the treatment of patients diagnosed with brain metastases due to the fact that it is capable of targeting any region in the brain and can irradiate multiple tumors in the same treatment setting in a noninvasive fashion.

METHODS

Modern literature was reviewed for studies on SRS in the treatment of patients with brain metastases.

RESULTS

After assessing patient age, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), control of primary cancer, presence of extracranial metastases, number of brain metastases, location of brain metastases, and size of brain metastases, SRS offers suitable patients a viable, less invasive treatment option. In patients with 1 to 4 brain metastases who have a KPS ≥70, the addition of SRS to whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) produces increased levels of survival and local tumor control when compared with patients treated with WBRT alone. The available evidence suggests that specific patients treated with SRS alone exhibit superior levels of survival and tumor control when compared with patients treated with WBRT alone. Further evidence in the form of a randomized trial is needed to confirm this observation. Questions remain regarding survival and tumor control in patient groups treated with SRS with or without WBRT. Recently published randomized evidence reported a survival advantage in patients treated with SRS alone. These data differ from other previously published randomized evidence, as well as several prospective and retrospective studies, which reported nonsignificant survival differences. Contrasting evidence also exists pertaining to local and distant tumor control, which warrants further investigation into this matter. The available evidence suggests that in patients with 1 to 2 brain metastases, both SRS alone and SRS with WBRT offer equivalent levels of survival when compared with patients treated with surgery with WBRT. Research has been conducted that reports a survival advantage in patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases that were treated with SRS with WBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS can be an advantageous course of treatment in specific patient groups when utilized alone, after surgery, with WBRT, or in combination with either or both of the treatment modalities. Although treatment approaches have been refined, many questions remain unanswered and further clinical evidence is needed to guide physicians in their future treatment decisions regarding treating patients in specific clinical scenarios.

Multimodality treatment of brain metastases: an institutional survival analysis of 275 patients

Background

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and combinations of the three modalities are used in the management of patients with metastatic brain tumors. We present the previously unreported survival outcomes of 275 patients treated for newly diagnosed brain metastases at Cancer Care Northwest and Gamma Knife of Spokane between 1998 and 2008.

Methods

The effects treatment regimen, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS), primary tumor histology, number of brain metastases, and total volume of brain metastases have on patient overall survival were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Andersen 95% confidence intervals, approximate confidence intervals for log hazard-ratios, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

The median clinical follow up time was 7.2 months. On multivariate analysis, survival statistically favored patients treated with SRS alone when compared to patients treated with WBRT alone (p < 0.001), patients treated with resection with SRS when compared to patients treated with SRS alone (p = 0.020), patients in ECOG-PS class 0 when compared to patients in ECOG-PS classes 2 (p = 0.04), 3 (p < 0.001), and 4 (p < 0.001), patients in the non-small-cell lung cancer group when compared to patients in the combined melanoma and renal-cell carcinoma group (p < 0.001), and patients with breast cancer when compared to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In our analysis, patients benefited from a combined modality treatment approach and physicians must consider patient age, performance status, and primary tumor histology when recommending specific treatments regimens.

Stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole brain radiotherapy for patients with a single radioresistant brain metastasis

PURPOSE

To examine the outcomes of patients with a single brain metastasis from radioresistant histologies (renal cell carcinoma and melanoma) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed the medical records of 27 patients treated at our institution between 2000 and 2007 with a single radioresistant brain metastasis. Patients were treated with Gamma Knife based SRS. Tumor histologies included renal cell carcinoma and melanoma.

RESULTS

Patients were treated to a median marginal dose was 20 Gy (range, 15-22 Gy). At follow-up intervals ranging from 1.8 to 23.2 months, the radiographic responses were as follows: progression in 7 patients; stable in 5 patients; and shrinkage in 15 patients. Fifteen patients (56%) developed distant brain failure. Seven of the 27 patients were alive at last follow-up. The 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, and 18-months after SRS local control rates were 82.8%, 77.9%, 69.3%, 69.3%, and 55.4%, respectively. None of the 5 patients who received WBRT developed distant brain failure although the follow-up intervals were short (range, 3.5-13.7 months; median, 5.1 months). WBRT did not appear to affect local control, progression free survival, and overall survival (P = 0.32, 0.87, 0.69). One patient developed worsening of symptoms attributable to SRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma Knife SRS is a safe and feasible strategy for treatment of patients with a single radioresistant brain metastasis. Radiosurgery alone is a reasonable treatment option, but may carry a greater likelihood of distant brain recurrence.

Early brain tumor metastasis reduction following Gamma Knife surgery

OBJECT

Unlike whole-brain radiation therapy, Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) is delivered in a single session for the treatment of brain metastases. The extent to which GKS can facilitate early tumor control was the focus of this study.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 134 metastatic lesions in 82 patients treated with GKS at the University of Virginia who underwent follow-up MR imaging within 30 days or less of GKS. For accurate volumetry only tumors measuring 0.5 cm3 or greater in volume were included. Radiological review as well as tumor volumetry was performed to assess the tumor's response to GKS. Tumors were characterized as either enlarged (> 15% volume increase), stable (follow-up volume +/- 15% of the initial volume), or decreased (> 15% volume decrease). A multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors related to each volume outcome group.

RESULTS

Within the first month following GKS, a decrease was observed in 47.8% of the tumors. Tumor reduction varied according to carcinoma histopathological subtype, with 46.4% of non-small cell lung carcinomas, 70% of breast carcinomas, and 22.6% of melanomas showing volume reduction within 30 days after GKS. The mean volume decrease was 41.7%. For the remaining tumors, 41% were stable and 11.2% increased in volume. The overall analysis showed that there was a significant difference in percentage tumor change according to histopathological type (p < 0.001). There was a trend toward increased tumor reduction in those carcinoma types that are traditionally viewed as radiation sensitive (breast and non-small cell lung carcinomas).

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma Knife surgery can offer patients early substantial volume reduction in many brain metastases. In instances in which early volume reduction of limited intracranial disease is desired, GKS may be used alone or before whole brain radiation therapy.

Outcomes and cost-effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery and whole brain radiotherapy for multiple metastatic brain tumors

We aimed to analyze the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for multiple metastatic brain tumors. Over a period of 5 years, 156 patients with multiple metastatic brain tumors were enrolled and freely assigned by the referring doctors to either gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS, Group A, n=56), or to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT, Group B, n=100). The follow-up time was set at 1200 days (3.3 years) post-treatment. The number of tumors, patient age, extent of systemic disease and Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score, were recorded and recursive partitioning analysis used. The outcomes analyzed were: mortality, survival time, neurological complications, post-treatment KPS score, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and cost-effectiveness. A paired t-test was used for statistical analysis. Mortality rates for patients receiving GKRS and WBRT were 81.1% and 93.0%, respectively (p=0.05). The mortality rate was lower for GKRS (74.4%) than for WBRT (97.1%) in patients with initial KPS70 (p=0.02). The mortality rate was also significantly lower for GKRS (78.9%) than WBRT (95.5%) in patients with 2-5 tumors (p<0.05). Post-treatment KPS score (mean+/-standard deviation [s.d.] was higher for patients receiving GKRS (73.8+/-13.2) than for those receiving WBRT (45.5+/-26.0), p<0.01. The median survival time for GKRS and WBRT was 9.5 months and 8.3 months, respectively, p=0.72. The mean (+/- s.d.) QALY was 0.76+/-0.23 for GKRS and 0.59+/-0.18 for WBRT, respectively (p<0.05). The cost-effectiveness per unit of QALY was better for the GKRS treatment (US$10,381/QALY) than in the WBRT treatment (US$17,622/QALY), p<0.05. The cost-effectiveness per KPS score was also higher for the GKRS treatment (US$139/KPS score) than for WBRT (US$229/KPS score), p<0.01. Thus, the mortality rate for multiple metastatic brain tumors treated by GKRS is significantly better with a good initial KPS score and when the tumor number is 2-5. GKRS results in a better post-treatment KPS score, QALY, and higher cost-effectiveness than WBRT for treating multiple metastatic brain tumors.

Oncologic emergencies: diagnosis and treatment

Patients with malignancies are subject to developing a unique set of complications that require emergent evaluation and treatment. With the increasing incidence of cancer in the general population and improved survival, these emergencies will be more frequently encountered. Physicians must be able to recognize these conditions and institute appropriate therapy after a focused initial evaluation. The approach to definitive therapy is commonly multidisciplinary, involving surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and other medical specialists. Prompt interventions can be lifesaving and may spare patients considerable morbidity and pain. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis of and initial therapy for common emergencies in hematology and oncology.