1
|
Cohen L, Danhauer SC, Garcia MK, Dressler EV, Rosenthal DI, Chambers MS, Cusimano A, Brown WM, Ochoa JM, Yang P, Chiang JS, Gordon O, Crutcher R, Kim JK, Russin MP, Lukenbill J, Porosnicu M, Yost KJ, Weaver KE, Lesser GJ. Acupuncture for Chronic Radiation-Induced Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2410421. [PMID: 38739392 PMCID: PMC11091764 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Patients with head and neck cancer who undergo radiotherapy can develop chronic radiation-induced xerostomia. Prior acupuncture studies were single center and rated as having high risk of bias, making it difficult to know the benefits of acupuncture for treating radiation-induced xerostomia. Objective To compare true acupuncture (TA), sham acupuncture (SA), and standard oral hygiene (SOH) for treating radiation-induced xerostomia. Design, Setting, and Participants A randomized, blinded, 3-arm, placebo-controlled trial was conducted between July 29, 2013, and June 9, 2021. Data analysis was performed from March 9, 2022, through May 17, 2023. Patients reporting grade 2 or 3 radiation-induced xerostomia 12 months or more postradiotherapy for head and neck cancer were recruited from community-based cancer centers across the US that were part of the Wake Forest National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base. Participants had received bilateral radiotherapy with no history of xerostomia. Interventions Participants received SOH and were randomized to TA, SA, or SOH only. Participants in the TA and SA cohorts were treated 2 times per week for 4 weeks. Those experiencing a minor response received another 4 weeks of treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures Patient-reported outcomes for xerostomia (Xerostomia Questionnaire, primary outcome) and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) were collected at baseline, 4 (primary time point), 8, 12, and 26 weeks. All analyses were intention to treat. Results A total of 258 patients (201 men [77.9%]; mean [SD] age, 65.0 [9.16] years), participated from 33 sites across 13 states. Overall, 86 patients were assigned to each study arm. Mean (SD) years from diagnosis was 4.21 (3.74) years, 67.1% (n = 173) had stage IV disease. At week 4, Xerostomia Questionnaire scores revealed significant between-group differences, with lower Xerostomia Questionnaire scores with TA vs SOH (TA: 50.6; SOH: 57.3; difference, -6.67; 95% CI, -11.08 to -2.27; P = .003), and differences between TA and SA (TA: 50.6; SA: 55.0; difference, -4.41; 95% CI, -8.62 to -0.19; P = .04) yet did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons. There was no significant difference between SA and SOH. Group differences in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores revealed statistically significant group differences at week 4, with higher scores with TA vs SOH (TA: 101.6; SOH: 97.7; difference, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.43-6.38; P = .002) and at week 12, with higher scores with TA vs SA (TA: 102.1; SA: 98.4; difference, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.10-6.18; P = .005) and TA vs SOH (TA: 102.1; SOH: 97.4; difference, 4.61; 95% CI, 1.99-7.23; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this trial suggest that TA was more effective in treating chronic radiation-induced xerostomia 1 or more years after the end of radiotherapy than SA or SOH. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02589938.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Suzanne C. Danhauer
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - M. Kay Garcia
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Emily V. Dressler
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Mark S. Chambers
- Department of Dental Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Andrew Cusimano
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - W. Mark Brown
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Jewel M. Ochoa
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Peiying Yang
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Joseph S. Chiang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ora Gordon
- Disney Family Cancer Center, Department of Integrative Medicine, Providence St Joseph Medical Center, Burbank, California
| | - Rhonda Crutcher
- Disney Family Cancer Center, Department of Integrative Medicine, Providence St Joseph Medical Center, Burbank, California
| | - Jung K. Kim
- Disney Family Cancer Center, Department of Integrative Medicine, Providence St Joseph Medical Center, Burbank, California
| | - Michael P. Russin
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Kaiser Permanente Diablo Service Area, Martinez, California
| | | | - Mercedes Porosnicu
- Section on Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Kathleen J. Yost
- Cancer Research Consortium of West Michigan NCORP, Spectrum Health at Butterworth Campus, Grand Rapids
| | - Kathryn E. Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Glenn J. Lesser
- Section on Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, Beswick DM, London NR, Su SY, Wang MB, Abuzeid WM, Alexiev B, Alt JA, Antognoni P, Alonso-Basanta M, Batra PS, Bhayani M, Bell D, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Betz CS, Blay JY, Bleier BS, Bonilla-Velez J, Callejas C, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Chandra RK, Chatzinakis V, Chen SB, Chiu AG, Choby G, Chowdhury NI, Citardi MJ, Cohen MA, Dagan R, Dalfino G, Dallan I, Dassi CS, de Almeida J, Dei Tos AP, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Eloy JA, Evans JJ, Fang CH, Farrell NF, Ferrari M, Fischbein N, Folbe A, Fokkens WJ, Fox MG, Lund VJ, Gallia GL, Gardner PA, Geltzeiler M, Georgalas C, Getz AE, Govindaraj S, Gray ST, Grayson JW, Gross BA, Grube JG, Guo R, Ha PK, Halderman AA, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hernandez SC, Holtzman AL, Hopkins C, Huang Z, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Hwang PH, Iloreta AM, Ishii M, Ivan ME, Jafari A, Kennedy DW, Khan M, Kimple AJ, Kingdom TT, Knisely A, Kuo YJ, Lal D, Lamarre ED, Lan MY, Le H, Lechner M, Lee NY, Lee JK, Lee VH, Levine CG, Lin JC, Lin DT, Lobo BC, Locke T, Luong AU, Magliocca KR, Markovic SN, Matnjani G, McKean EL, Meço C, Mendenhall WM, Michel L, Na'ara S, Nicolai P, Nuss DW, Nyquist GG, Oakley GM, Omura K, Orlandi RR, Otori N, Papagiannopoulos P, Patel ZM, Pfister DG, Phan J, Psaltis AJ, Rabinowitz MR, Ramanathan M, Rimmer R, Rosen MR, Sanusi O, Sargi ZB, Schafhausen P, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Shrivastava R, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Smith KA, Snyderman CH, Solares CA, Sreenath SB, Stamm A, Stölzel K, Sumer B, Surda P, Tajudeen BA, Thompson LDR, Thorp BD, Tong CCL, Tsang RK, Turner JH, Turri-Zanoni M, Udager AM, van Zele T, VanKoevering K, Welch KC, Wise SK, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Wong SN, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Yao WC, Yeh CF, Zhou B, Palmer JN. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:149-608. [PMID: 37658764 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nyall R London
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program, Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Waleed M Abuzeid
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borislav Alexiev
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Paolo Antognoni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mihir Bhayani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian S Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin S Bleier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juliana Bonilla-Velez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudio Callejas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roy R Casiano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Rakesh K Chandra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Simon B Chen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexander G Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin J Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Iacopo Dallan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina H Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nyssa F Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam Folbe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meha G Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gary L Gallia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christos Georgalas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica W Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradley A Gross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ashleigh A Halderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen C Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiao Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ian M Humphreys
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alfred M Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aria Jafari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd T Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anna Knisely
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Ju Kuo
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jivianne K Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victor H Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Corinna G Levine
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tran Locke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amber U Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gesa Matnjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cem Meço
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shorook Na'ara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel W Nuss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gurston G Nyquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gretchen M Oakley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Omura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard R Orlandi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nobuyoshi Otori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mindy R Rabinowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc R Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zoukaa B Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raj Shrivastava
- Department of Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satyan B Sreenath
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Aldo Stamm
- São Paulo ENT Center (COF), Edmundo Vasconcelos Complex, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pavol Surda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond K Tsang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin H Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Aaron M Udager
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thibaut van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kyle VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian J Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephanie N Wong
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William C Yao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Yeh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Levyn H, Yang F, Lee NY. Radiation oncology for the rhinologist. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 32:5-13. [PMID: 38116957 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This comprehensive review explores evolving treatment strategies for sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancies. It analyzes the role of adjuvant radiotherapy, the potential of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and the relevance of de-escalation strategies nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Additionally, it discusses hyperfractionation in re-irradiation in NPC. RECENT FINDINGS Adjuvant radiotherapy remains pivotal for sinonasal tumors, improving locoregional control and survival, notably in squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, and adenoid cystic carcinomas. IMPT promises enhanced outcomes by sparing healthy tissues, potentially improving patients' quality of life. For select stage II/T3N0 NPC, radiotherapy alone offers comparable outcomes to concurrent chemoradiotherapy, with fewer adverse events and improved quality of life. Selective neck irradiation in NPC patients with uninvolved necks maintains oncologic outcomes while reducing late toxicity. Hyperfractionation in re-irradiation shows promise in lowering late toxicities and improving overall survival, particularly in undifferentiated sinonasal carcinomas. SUMMARY This review underscores the significance of adjuvant radiotherapy and the potential of advanced radiation techniques in optimizing sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancy outcomes. It emphasizes evolving de-escalation methods and individualized, evidence-based approaches. Future research will further refine strategies for these challenging malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dörfler J, Freuding M, Zaiser C, Büntzel J, Keinki C, Käsmann L, Hübner J. Umbrella review: Summary of findings for acupuncture as treatment for radiation-induced xerostomia. Head Neck 2023; 45:1026-1044. [PMID: 36779370 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Acupuncture is a common part of complementary medicine. However, traditional Chinese acupuncture has been built on concepts which are not in accordance with science-based medicine. Our aim was to critically assess the evidence presented in systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) about the effectiveness of acupuncture on radiotherapy induced xerostomia. A systematic search was conducted in February 2022. We evaluated all SRs/MAs using the AMSTAR-2 instrument. Eight SRs, with 12 controlled studies were included. All SRs summarize that the methodological drawbacks do not allow to give a clear statement about the effectiveness of acupuncture. While objective assessments in most SRs/MAs reported no difference between real and sham acupuncture, some favorable effects on subjective xerostomia symptoms are found. No clinical meaningful effectiveness of acupuncture on xerostomia has been proven so far, but positive subjective findings need to be explored more. While most SRs recommend further studies, studies involving patients with a serious cancer diagnosis are ethically questionable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Dörfler
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Maren Freuding
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Christopher Zaiser
- Abteilung für Medizinische Statistik, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Jens Büntzel
- Klinik für HNO-Erkrankungen, Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie, Südharz Klinikum Nordhausen, Nordhausen, Germany
| | - Christian Keinki
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Abteilung für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum, LMU München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jutta Hübner
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wiriyakijja P, Niklander S, Santos-Silva AR, Shorrer MK, Simms ML, Villa A, Sankar V, Kerr AR, Riordain RN, Jensen SB, Delli K. World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: Development of a Core Outcome Set for Dry Mouth: A Systematic Review of Outcome Domains for Xerostomia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2023:S2212-4403(23)00068-8. [PMID: 37198047 DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2023.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify all outcome domains used in clinical studies of xerostomia, that is, subjective sensation of dry mouth. This study is part of the extended project "World Workshop on Oral Medicine Outcomes Initiative for the Direction of Research" to develop a core outcome set for dry mouth. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. All clinical and observational studies that assessed xerostomia in human participants from 2001 to 2021 were included. Information on outcome domains was extracted and mapped to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy. Corresponding outcome measures were summarized. RESULTS From a total of 34,922 records retrieved, 688 articles involving 122,151 persons with xerostomia were included. There were 16 unique outcome domains and 166 outcome measures extracted. None of these domains or measures were consistently used across all the studies. The severity of xerostomia and physical functioning were the 2 most frequently assessed domains. CONCLUSION There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome domains and measures reported in clinical studies of xerostomia. This highlights the need for harmonization of dry mouth assessment to enhance comparability across studies and facilitate the synthesis of robust evidence for managing patients with xerostomia.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gulati A, Kidane J, Chang JL. Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Salivary Function: A Systematic Review. Laryngoscope 2023. [PMID: 36606658 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A number of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assess quality of life and symptom severity in patients with salivary gland dysfunction, but many vary in the extent of validation and domain types addressed. We identified PROMs validated to measure salivary gland function and analyzed key properties. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Validated instruments with >1 item to assess salivary gland-related symptoms were included. PROMs were evaluated for developmental methodology, structure, validity, and reliability using Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria. RESULTS A total of 2059 abstracts were retrieved, and 133 full-text articles were reviewed. Sixteen PROMs assessing xerostomia (n = 7), sialadenitis (n = 4), Sjogren's syndrome (n = 2), Parkinson's-associated sialorrhea (n = 2), and oral systemic sclerosis (n = 1) were identified. Most (n = 15) were developed de novo, one was adapted from a pre-existing questionnaire. Eleven PROMs demonstrated "very good" analysis of internal consistency per COSMIN criteria, and 10 included test-retest data. Regarding content validity, four PROMs were developed with both patient and physician input, but none were rated as "adequate." All included comparisons against other questionnaires (n = 7), salivary flow rate (n = 9), and/or healthy controls (n = 3). The most rigorously developed PROM, the Xerostomia Inventory, was rated adequate in 6 out of 7 domains. CONCLUSIONS Several PROMs evaluate salivary function. The abilties of these PROMs to meet design and validation standards were variable, with notable limitations in content validity for all tools. New and updated PROMs assessing obstructive and inflammatory salivary symptoms should utilize patient and provider input. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A Laryngoscope, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arushi Gulati
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joseph Kidane
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jolie L Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.,Surgery Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang SQ, Chen HB, Liu J, Dai WJ, Lu QQ, Li JC. Research status and prospects of acupuncture for prevention and treatment of chemo- and radiotherapy-induced salivary gland dysfunction in head and neck cancer. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2021; 304:2381-2396. [PMID: 34626452 DOI: 10.1002/ar.24784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Salivary gland dysfunction (SGD) induced by chemo- and radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) has always been a difficult problem in modern medicine. The quality of life of a large number of HNC patients is severely impaired by SGD such as xerostomia and dysphagia. In recent years, several studies have found that acupuncture can improve patients' salivary secretion, but it has not yet been approved as an alternative therapy for SGD. For this reason, we collected the clinical study reports on acupuncture in the treatment of SGD induced by chemo- and radiotherapy in HNC patients in the past 20 years, and analyzed and discussed the advantages and disadvantages of these studies with respect to tumor types, group setting, intervention modality, acupoints selection, outcome evaluation, and safety. We believed that acupuncture is beneficial for SGD, but the existing objective evidence is insufficient to support its effectiveness. Therefore, improving the Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture, selecting the optimal combination of acupoints through scientific and rigorous study design, and exploring the potential mechanism of acupuncture in the treatment of diseases combined with the meridian theory may be effective ways to promote the acceptance of acupuncture as an alternative therapy for SGD in future. The significance of this review is to provide a reference for researchers to carry out high-quality clinical trials of acupuncture in the treatment of SGD in future from the perspective of the combination of modern medicine and traditional Chinese medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan-Qiang Zhang
- Medical Research Center, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
| | - Hai-Bin Chen
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Medical Research Center, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
| | - Wen-Jie Dai
- Medical Research Center, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
| | - Qi-Qi Lu
- Medical Research Center, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
| | - Ji-Cheng Li
- Medical Research Center, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
- Department of Anatomy and Embryology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brodie KD, Zebolsky AL, Ochoa E, Ha PK, Heaton CM, El‐Sayed IH, Ryan WR. A prospective study of patient-reported xerostomia-related outcomes after parotidectomy. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2021; 6:683-689. [PMID: 34401492 PMCID: PMC8356866 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a paucity of data on patient-reported outcome measures regarding xerostomia after parotidectomy surgery. Although salivary flow rates after parotidectomy have been previously studied, they do not correlate with subjective xerostomia. This study was designed to evaluate if unilateral parotidectomy increases patient-reported xerostomia. METHODS A prospective cohort of patients undergoing unilateral partial, superficial, or total parotidectomy for benign or low-grade malignant pathology without postoperative radiation at a tertiary care academic center was studied. We analyzed patient-reported outcome measures of xerostomia using the Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ) preoperatively and postoperatively. We compared pre- and postoperative cumulative and individual XQ scores using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. We stratified patients by the weight in grams (g) of the parotid tissue excised, pathology, smoking status, and xerostomia-related medication use. RESULTS Twenty-two adults with benign or low grade malignant unilateral parotid tumors were included. Postoperative questionnaires were completed at a median of 10.2 months (interquartile range [IQR] 8.6-11.9) after unilateral parotidectomy. Mean preoperative and postoperative cumulative XQ scores, on a 100-point scale, with higher scores representing worse symptoms, were 10.33 (95% CI: 4.46-16.20) and 10.54 (95% CI: 5.10-15.98), respectively, with a mean change of +0.21 (p = 0.472). There were no statistically significant changes in individual XQ symptom scores. Neither type of parotidectomy, resection specimens weighing over 10 g, smoking habits, xerostomia-related medication use, nor malignant pathology were associated with worse symptom scores. CONCLUSION Based on these data, unilateral parotidectomy does not appear to definitely, or at least consistently, increase xerostomia per patient reporting. More extensive parotid resections are not associated with worse symptom scores. These data can help guide preoperative counseling and postoperative expectations for parotidectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2b.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara D. Brodie
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of California – San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Aaron L. Zebolsky
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of California – San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Edgar Ochoa
- University of California – San Francisco School of MedicineSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Patrick K. Ha
- Division of Head and Neck Oncologic and Endocrine Surgery, University of California – San Francisco, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer CenterUCSF Mission Bay Medical CenterSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Chase M. Heaton
- Division of Head and Neck Oncologic and Endocrine Surgery, University of California – San Francisco, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer CenterUCSF Mission Bay Medical CenterSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ivan H. El‐Sayed
- Division of Head and Neck Oncologic and Endocrine Surgery, University of California – San Francisco, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer CenterUCSF Mission Bay Medical CenterSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - William R. Ryan
- Division of Head and Neck Oncologic and Endocrine Surgery, University of California – San Francisco, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer CenterUCSF Mission Bay Medical CenterSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer reduces rates of late xerostomia. Radiother Oncol 2021; 160:32-39. [PMID: 33839202 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To determine rates of xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and identify dosimetric factors associated with xerostomia risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with OPC who received IMRT (n = 429) or IMPT (n = 103) from January 2011 through June 2015 at a single institution were studied retrospectively. Every 3 months after treatment, each patient completed an eight-item self-reported xerostomia-specific questionnaire (XQ; summary XQ score, 0-100). An XQ score of 50 was selected as the demarcation value for moderate-severe (XQs ≥ 50) and no-mild (XQs < 50) xerostomia. The mean doses and percent volumes of organs at risk receiving various doses (V5-V70) were extracted from the initial treatment plans. The dosimetric variables and xerostomia risk were compared using an independent-sample t-test or chi-square test. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 36.2 months. The proportions of patients with moderate-severe xerostomia were similar in the two treatment groups up to 18 months after treatment. However, moderate-severe xerostomia was less common in the IMPT group than in the IMRT group at 18-24 months (6% vs. 20%; p = 0.025) and 24-36 months (6% vs. 20%; p = 0.01). During the late xerostomia period (24-36 months), high dose/volume exposures (V25-V70) in the oral cavity were associated with high proportions of patients with moderate-severe xerostomia (all p < 0.05), but dosimetric variables regarding the salivary glands were not associated with late xerostomia. CONCLUSION IMPT was associated with less late xerostomia than was IMRT in OPC patients. Oral cavity dosimetric variables were related to the occurrence of late xerostomia.
Collapse
|
10
|
Teng F, Fan W, Luo Y, Xu S, Gong H, Ge R, Zhang X, Wang X, Ma L. A Risk Prediction Model by LASSO for Radiation-Induced Xerostomia in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Comprehensive Salivary Gland-Sparing Helical Tomotherapy Technique. Front Oncol 2021; 11:633556. [PMID: 33718219 PMCID: PMC7953987 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.633556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to develop a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-based multivariable normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model to predict radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with comprehensive salivary gland–sparing helical tomotherapy technique. Methods and Materials LASSO with the extended bootstrapping technique was used to build multivariable NTCP models to predict factors of patient-reported xerostomia relieved by 50% and 80% compared with the level at the end of radiation therapy within 1 year and 2 years, R50-1year and R80-2years, in 203 patients with NPC. The model assessment was based on 10-fold cross-validation and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results The prediction model by LASSO with 10-fold cross-validation showed that radiation-induced xerostomia recovery could be predicted by prognostic factors of R50-1year (age, gender, T stage, UICC/AJCC stage, parotid Dmean, oral cavity Dmean, and treatment options) and R80-2years (age, gender, T stage, UICC/AJCC stage, oral cavity Dmean, N stage, and treatment options). These prediction models also demonstrated a good performance by the AUC. Conclusion The prediction models of R50-1year and R80-2years by LASSO with 10-fold cross-validation were recommended to validate the NTCP model before comprehensive salivary gland–sparing radiation therapy in patients with NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Teng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
| | - Wenjun Fan
- Affiliated Foshan Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Armed Police Corps Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yanrong Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shouping Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hanshun Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ruigang Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xinxin Zhang
- Departmant of Otorhinolaryngology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoning Wang
- School of Data Science and Media Intelligence, Communication University of China, Beijing, China.,State Key Laboratory of Media Convergence and Communication, Communication University of China, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lowther NJ, Marsh SH, Louwe RJ. Dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 14:53-60. [PMID: 33458315 PMCID: PMC7807697 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Literature has reported reduced treatment toxicity in head-and-neck radiotherapy (HNRT) when reducing the planning target volume (PTV) margin from 5 to 3 mm but loco-regional control was not always preserved. This study used deformable image registration (DIR)-facilitated dose accumulation to assess clinical target volume (CTV) coverage in the presence of anatomical changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS VMAT plans for 12 patients were optimized using 3 or 5 mm PTV and planning risk volume (PRV) margins. The planning computed tomography (pCT) scan was registered to each daily cone beam CT (CBCT) using DIR. The inverse registration was used to reconstruct and accumulate dose (D acc ). CTV coverage was assessed using the dose-volume histogram (DVH) metric D 99 % acc and by individual voxel analysis. Both approaches included an uncertainty estimate using the 95% level of confidence. RESULTS D 99 % acc was less than 95% of the prescribed doseD presc for three cases including only one case where this was at the 95% level of confidence. However for many patients, the accumulated dose included a substantial volume of voxels receiving less than 95%D presc independent of margin expansion, which predominantly occurred in the subdermal region. Loss in target coverage was very patient specific but tightness of target volume coverage at planning was a common factor leading to underdosage. CONCLUSION This study agrees with previous literature that PTV/PRV margin reduction did not significantly reduce CTV coverage during treatment, but also highlighted that tight coverage of target volumes at planning increases the risk of clinically unacceptable dose delivery. Patient-specific verification of dose delivery to assess the dose delivered to each voxel is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J. Lowther
- Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellington, New Zealand
- University of Canterbury, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Steven H. Marsh
- University of Canterbury, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Robert J.W. Louwe
- Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lowther NJ, Marsh SH, Louwe RJW. Quantifying the dose accumulation uncertainty after deformable image registration in head-and-neck radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2020; 143:117-125. [PMID: 32063377 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Deformable image registration (DIR) facilitated dose reconstruction and accumulation can be applied to assess delivered dose and verify the validity of the treatment plan during treatment. This retrospective study used in silico deformations based on clinically observed anatomical changes as ground truth to investigate the uncertainty of reconstructed and accumulated dose in head-and-neck radiotherapy (HNRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS A planning CT (pCT), cone beam CT (CBCT) from week one of treatment and three later CBCTs were selected for 12 HNRT patients. These images were used to generate in silico reference CBCTs and deformation vector fields (DVFs) as ground truth with B-spline DIR. Inverse consistency (IC) of voxels was assessed by determining their net displacement after successive application of the forward and backward DVF. The reconstructed dose based on demons DIR was compared to the ground truth to assess the structure-specific uncertainties of this DIR algorithm for inverse consistent and inverse inconsistent voxels. RESULTS Overall, 98.5% of voxels were inverse consistent with the 95% level of confidence range for dose reconstruction of a single fraction equal to [-2.3%; +2.1%], [-10.2%; +15.2%] and [-9.5%; +12.5%] relative to their planned dose for target structures, critical organs at risk (OARs) and non-critical OARs, respectively. Inverse inconsistent voxels generally showed a higher level of uncertainty. CONCLUSION The uncertainty in accumulated dose using DIR can be accurately quantified and incorporated in dose-volume histograms (DVHs). This method can be used to prospectively assess the adequacy of target coverage during treatment in an objective manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Lowther
- Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellington, New Zealand; University of Canterbury, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Steven H Marsh
- University of Canterbury, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Robert J W Louwe
- Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellington, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Garcia MK, Meng Z, Rosenthal DI, Shen Y, Chambers M, Yang P, Wei Q, Hu C, Wu C, Bei W, Prinsloo S, Chiang J, Lopez G, Cohen L. Effect of True and Sham Acupuncture on Radiation-Induced Xerostomia Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1916910. [PMID: 31808921 PMCID: PMC6902763 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Radiation-induced xerostomia (RIX) is a common, often debilitating, adverse effect of radiation therapy among patients with head and neck cancer. Quality of life can be severely affected, and current treatments have limited benefit. OBJECTIVE To determine if acupuncture can prevent RIX in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This 2-center, phase 3, randomized clinical trial compared a standard care control (SCC) with true acupuncture (TA) and sham acupuncture (SA) among patients with oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were undergoing radiation therapy in comprehensive cancer centers in the United States and China. Patients were enrolled between December 16, 2011, and July 7, 2015. Final follow-up was August 15, 2016. Analyses were conducted February 1 through 28, 2019. INTERVENTION Either TA or SA using a validated acupuncture placebo device was performed 3 times per week during a 6- to 7-week course of radiation therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was RIX, as determined by the Xerostomia Questionnaire in which a higher score indicates worse RIX, for combined institutions 1 year after radiation therapy ended. Secondary outcomes included incidence of clinically significant xerostomia (score >30), salivary flow, quality of life, salivary constituents, and role of baseline expectancy related to acupuncture on outcomes. RESULTS Of 399 patients randomized, 339 were included in the final analysis (mean [SD] age, 51.3 [11.7] years; age range, 21-79 years; 258 [77.6%] men), including 112 patients in the TA group, 115 patients in the SA group, and 112 patients in the SCC group. For the primary aim, the adjusted least square mean (SD) xerostomia score in the TA group (26.6 [17.7]) was significantly lower than in the SCC group (34.8 [18.7]) (P = .001; effect size = -0.44) and marginally lower but not statistically significant different from the SA group (31.3 [18.6]) (P = .06; effect size = -0.26). Incidence of clinically significant xerostomia 1 year after radiation therapy ended followed a similar pattern, with 38 patients in the TA group (34.6%), 54 patients in the SA group (47.8%), and 60 patients in the SCC group (55.1%) experiencing clinically significant xerostomia (P = .009). Post hoc comparisons revealed a significant difference between the TA and SCC groups at both institutions, but TA was significantly different from SA only at Fudan University Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (estimated difference [SE]: TA vs SCC, -9.9 [2.5]; P < .001; SA vs SCC, -1.7 [2.5]; P = .50; TA vs SA, -8.2 [2.5]; P = .001), and SA was significantly different from SCC only at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (estimated difference [SE]: TA vs SCC, -8.1 [3.4]; P = .016; SA vs SCC, -10.5 [3.3]; P = .002; TA vs SA, 2.4 [3.2]; P = .45). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This randomized clinical trial found that TA resulted in significantly fewer and less severe RIX symptoms 1 year after treatment vs SCC. However, further studies are needed to confirm clinical relevance and generalizability of this finding and to evaluate inconsistencies in response to sham acupuncture between patients in the United States and China. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01266044.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Kay Garcia
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Zhiqiang Meng
- Department of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Yehua Shen
- Department of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Mark Chambers
- Department of Dental Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Peiying Yang
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Qi Wei
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Radiation, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Caijun Wu
- Department of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenying Bei
- Department of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Sarah Prinsloo
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Joseph Chiang
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Gabriel Lopez
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Palazzi M, Orlandi E, Pignoli E, Lualdi M, Zonca G, Sangalli C, Stucchi C, Olmi P. Target Coverage in Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: A Comparison between Conventional and Conformal Techniques. TUMORI JOURNAL 2019; 92:503-10. [PMID: 17260491 DOI: 10.1177/030089160609200607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Aims and background We designed a comparative planning study aimed at quantifying the advantages of intensity-modu-lated radiotherapy (IMRT) over the conventional 3-field technique (3FT) and a 5-field conformal technique (5FCT) for head and neck (HN) cancer. Methods We selected 9 patients treated at our institution with curative radiotherapy for a HN cancer. For all cases 4 plans were generated: 2 plans using the “standard” techniques (3FT and 5FCT), a third plan using IMRT, and a fourth “mixed” plan using IMRT followed by a conventional boost. Results Our study confirmed literature data on the ability of IMRT to significantly decrease the dose received by organs at risk, compared with previous techniques. Target coverage was systematically better with 5FCT and IMRT than with 3FT. However, the increase in coverage of both PTV2 and PTV1 was only about 3-5% and this was achieved at the price of a similar increase in maximum dose (D1%). Volumetric parameters (V100%, V95%) were much more sensitive in detecting the improvement with IMRT. Conclusions The improvement of target coverage attained by IMRT, as compared with conventional and conformal techniques, might be overestimated by data currently available in the medical literature. If treatment with conventional techniques is planned using all tools provided by currently available fully 3-D planning systems, excellent target coverage can be obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Palazzi
- Unit of Radiotherapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Reducing Xerostomia by Comprehensive Protection of Salivary Glands in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with Helical Tomotherapy Technique for Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2019; 2019:2401743. [PMID: 31380414 PMCID: PMC6662416 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2401743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to analyze the effects of comprehensive protection of bilateral parotid glands (PG-T), contralateral submandibular gland (cSMG), and accessory salivary glands in the oral cavity (OC) by helical tomotherapy for head-and-neck cancer patients. Methods Totally 175 patients with histologically confirmed head-and-neck cancer treated with helical tomotherapy were recruited. The doses delivered to PG-T, cSMG, and OC were constrained to be as low as possible in treatment planning. The saliva flow rates and xerostomia questionnaire were evaluated. Correlation between xerostomia and other clinical factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate models. The impact of salivary gland dose on locoregional (LR) recurrence was assessed by Cox analysis. ROC curve was used to determine the threshold of mean dose for each gland. Results The median follow-up was 25 (19-36) months. The OC mean dose, PG-T mean dose, cSMG mean dose, age, clinical stage (II and III versus IV), and both unstimulated and stimulated saliva flow rates were significantly correlated with xerostomia. The OC mean dose, cSMG mean dose, age, and clinical stage were predictors of xerostomia after adjusting PG-T mean dose, and unstimulated and stimulated saliva flow rates. Xerostomia was significantly decreased when the mean doses of PG-T, cSMG, and OC were kept below 29.12Gy, 29.29Gy, and 31.44Gy, respectively. At 18 months after radiation therapy, early LR recurrence rate was only 4%. Conclusion Comprehensive protection of salivary glands minimized xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients treated by helical tomotherapy, without increasing early LR recurrence risk.
Collapse
|
16
|
Andreano A, Ansarin M, Alterio D, Bruschini R, Valsecchi MG, Russo AG. Cancer of the head and neck: a set of indicators based on register and administrative data. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA 2019; 38:13-23. [PMID: 29756612 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-1934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2017] [Accepted: 12/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY Head and neck (H&N) tumours are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with 5-year relative survival ranging from about 25% for the hypopharynx to 60% for the larynx in Europe. To improve survival rates, along with therapeutic improvements, it is important to standardise and optimise care received by patients with H&N tumours across different healthcare providers. To reach this goal, it is necessary to evaluate adherence to standards of received care at a population level. Published guidelines can serve as the basis to develop indicators, which can be computed from administrative health databases, measuring the adherence to specific recommendations at the individual level in unselected H&N cancer patients, identified from a population cancer register. We developed a set of indicators and calculated them in a cohort of 2007-2012 incident cases of H&N tumours in the cancer register of the Milan province (n = 1441 cases). The study cohort was mainly composed of men (77%) and patients older than 50 years (89%). Surgery was the most frequently employed treatment (66%). Ten percent of patients had no recorded treatment. Timing between cyto-histological assessment and first therapy for those having a recorded microscopic verification procedure was ≤ 60 days for 90.4% of patients undergoing surgery, 86.3% of those undergoing radiotherapy, and 90.7% of patients receiving chemotherapy. Eighty-three percent of patients underwent cyto-histological assessment in the 180 days before the first treatment. Evaluation by a pain therapist, opioid therapy or hospitalisation for palliative therapy in the 90 days before death was performed in 51% of patients who eventually died of cancer. This is the first Italian study defining and calculating quality indicators to monitor adherence to standards of care received by H&N cancer patients at a population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Andreano
- Center of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Biococca, Monza, Italy; Epidemiology Unit, Agency for Health Protection of Milan, Italy
| | - M Ansarin
- Division of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - D Alterio
- Division of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - R Bruschini
- Division of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - M G Valsecchi
- Center of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Biococca, Monza, Italy
| | - A G Russo
- Epidemiology Unit, Agency for Health Protection of Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ma SJ, Rivers CI, Serra LM, Singh AK. Long-term outcomes of interventions for radiation-induced xerostomia: A review. World J Clin Oncol 2019; 10:1-13. [PMID: 30627521 PMCID: PMC6318483 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Xerostomia, or dry mouth, is a significant problem affecting quality of life in patients treated with radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Strategies for reduction of xerostomia burden vary widely, with options including: sialagogue medications, saliva substitutes, acupuncture, vitamins, hyperbaric oxygen, submandibular gland transfer, and acupuncture or associated treatments. In this review, we sought to evaluate long-term outcomes of patients treated with various interventions for radiation-induced xerostomia. A literature search was performed using the terms "xerostomia" and "radiation" or "radiotherapy"; all prospective clinical trials were evaluated, and only studies that reported 1 year follow up were included. The search results yielded 2193 studies, 1977 of which were in English. Of those, 304 were clinical trials or clinical studies. After abstract review, 23 trials were included in the review evaluating the following treatment modalities: pilocarpine (three); cevimeline (one); amifostine (eleven); submandibular gland transfer (five); acupuncture like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) (one); hyperbaric oxygen (one); and acupuncture (one). Pilocarpine, cevimeline, and amifostine have been shown in some studies to improve xerostomia outcomes, at the cost of toxicity. ALTENS has similar efficacy with fewer side effects. Submandibular gland transfer is effective but requires an elective surgery, and thus may not always be appropriate or practical. The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, in addition to dose de-escalation in select patients, may result in fewer patients with late xerostomia, reducing the need for additional interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Jun Ma
- University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States
| | - Charlotte I Rivers
- University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States
| | - Lucas M Serra
- University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States
| | - Anurag K Singh
- University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pham TAV, Le DD. Dental condition and salivary characteristics in Vietnamese patients with chronic kidney disease. Int J Dent Hyg 2018; 17:253-260. [PMID: 30582881 DOI: 10.1111/idh.12380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Revised: 11/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the dental status and salivary characteristics and to analyse the correlation between creatinine clearance with DMFT index and salivary flow rate in Vietnamese patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS This study was conducted on 111 CKD and 109 non-CKD patients. The socio-demographic characteristics associated with dental habits and xerostomia status were recorded from a self-administered questionnaire. Dental status (DT, MT, FT) and salivary characteristics (flow rate; pH; buffering capacity; urea and creatinine concentrations) were examined. The multivariate regression models were used to assess the correlation of creatinine clearance with DMFT index and salivary flow rate with adjustment for confounders. RESULTS Patients with CKD made MT and DMFT indices significantly higher than non-CKD subjects. Chronic kidney disease patients had reduced salivary flow rate; but higher xerostomia level, salivary pH and buffering capacity than those in non-CKD subjects. Results of multivariate regression models showed that with lower creatinine clearance 1 mL/min, DMF index was higher 0.02 teeth, and salivary flow rate lower 0.003 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS There were no differences in dental status between patients with CKD and those without CKD, except that poor renal function is directly related with a higher DMFT index and lower salivary flow rate. Dental professionals should pay greater attention to oral problems during the progression of CKD to prevent deterioration of oral health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy A V Pham
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Dinh D Le
- Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, Northern Mountainous Region General Hospital, Quang Nam Province, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lowther NJ, Hamilton DA, Kim H, Evans JM, Marsh SH, Louwe RJ. Monitoring anatomical changes of individual patients using statistical process control during head-and-neck radiotherapy. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2018; 9:21-27. [PMID: 33458422 PMCID: PMC7807752 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
EWMA trends from DIR data enabled timely detection of anatomical changes. The majority of the systematic trends occurred before the 4th week of treatment. Using SPC control limits, only 24% of patient positioning trends could be confirmed. Using a 2 mm threshold, 82% of patient positioning trends could be confirmed. Using SPC control limits, 90% of the soft tissue changes could be confirmed.
Background and purpose Reduced toxicity while maintaining loco-regional control rates have been reported after reducing planning target volume (PTV) margins for head-and-neck radiotherapy (HNRT). In this context, quantifying anatomical changes to monitor patient treatment is preferred. This retrospective feasibility study investigated the application of deformable image registration (DIR) and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts for this purpose. Materials and methods DIR between the computed tomography for treatment planning (pCT) images of twelve patients and their daily on-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images quantified anatomical changes during treatment. EWMA charts investigated corresponding trends. Uncertainty analysis provided 90% confidence limits which were used to confirm whether a trend previously breached a threshold. Results Trends in patient positioning reproducibility occurred before the end of treatment week four in 54% of cases. Using SPC process limits, only 24% of these were confirmed at a 90% confidence level before the end of treatment. Using an a priori clinical limit of 2 mm, absolute changes in patient pose were detected in 39% of cases, of which 82% were confirmed. Soft tissue trends outside SPC process limits occurring before the end of treatment week four were confirmed in 90% of cases. Conclusion Structure specific action thresholds enabled detection of systematic anatomical changes during the first four weeks of treatment. Investigation of the dosimetric impact of the observed deviations is needed to show the efficacy of SPC to timely indicate required treatment adaptation and provide a safety net for PTV margin reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J. Lowther
- Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellington, New Zealand
- University of Canterbury, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - David A. Hamilton
- Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Han Kim
- Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jamie M. Evans
- Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Steven H. Marsh
- University of Canterbury, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Robert J.W. Louwe
- Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellington, New Zealand
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Memtsa PT, Tolia M, Tzitzikas I, Bizakis J, Pistevou-Gombaki K, Charalambidou M, Iliopoulou C, Kyrgias G. Assessment of xerostomia and its impact on quality of life in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. Mol Clin Oncol 2017; 6:789-793. [PMID: 28529753 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Xerostomia in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients significantly affects their quality of life (QoL). The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations among QoL, xerostomia and quantity of saliva in a sample of H&N cancer patients who had received conventional radiotherapy (RT). A total of 60 H&N adult patients were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), the Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck Module (QLQ-H&N35) and the Greek version of the XQ questionnaire at 4 timepoints: At the beginning of RT, at the end of RT, 6 months after RT completion and 1 year after RT completion. Patients with distant metastases or serious comorbidities were excluded from the study. Salivary pH, and stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow rate were assessed. All functional scales and symptom scales, apart from cognitive functioning in QLQ-C30 and feeding tube in H&N35 exhibited an abrupt deterioration at timepoint 3 and were then gradually restored over time. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). XQ scores at different timepoints exhibited a statistically significant negative correlation with salivary flow rates. Salivary flow rate and XQ scores almost parallelled one another. Flow rates recovered at a mean level of 20% below baseline values at the end of the follow-up period. The subjective symptom of xerostomia parallelled salivary flow and QoL. Despite receiving conventional RT, the participants exhibited a considerable preservation of salivary gland function after 12 months, allowing some optimism regarding the course of xerostomia in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pinelopi-Theopisti Memtsa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 546 21 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Maria Tolia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Larissa, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Ioannis Tzitzikas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 546 21 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - John Bizakis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Kyriaki Pistevou-Gombaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 546 21 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Martha Charalambidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Theagenio Cancer Hospital of Thessaloniki, 546 39 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Chrysoula Iliopoulou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Theagenio Cancer Hospital of Thessaloniki, 546 39 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - George Kyrgias
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Larissa, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pigorsch SU, Wilkens JJ, Kampfer S, Kehl V, Hapfelmeier A, Schläger C, Bier H, Schwaiger M, Combs SE. Do selective radiation dose escalation and tumour hypoxia status impact the loco-regional tumour control after radio-chemotherapy of head & neck tumours? The ESCALOX protocol. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:45. [PMID: 28249612 PMCID: PMC5333380 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0776-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Standard of care primary treatment of carcinoma of locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LAHNSCC) consists of platinum-based concomitant chemo-irradiation. Despite progress in the treatment of LAHNSCC using modern radiotherapy techniques the outcome remains still poor. Using IMRT with SIB the escalation of total dose to the GTV is possible with the aim to improve clinical outcome. This study tests the hypothesis if radiation dose escalation to the GTV improves 2-year-LRC and -OS after concomitant chemo-irradiation. Methods The ESCALOX trial is a prospective randomized phase III study using cisplatin chemo-irradiation and the SIB-IMRT concept in patients with LAHNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx or hypopharynx to escalate the total dose to the GTV up to 80.5 Gy. Chemotherapy is planned either in the 1st and 5th week (cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d d 1–5 and d 29–33) or weekly (cisplatin 40 mg/m2/d) during RT. RT is delivered as SIB with total doses of 80.5 Gy/70.0 Gy/56.0 Gy with 2.3 Gy/2.0 Gy and 1.6 Gy in the experimental arm and in the control arm with 70.0 Gy/56.0 Gy with 2.0 Gy and 1.6 Gy. A pre-study with dose escalation up to 77.0 Gy/70.0 Gy/56.0 Gy with 2.2 Gy/2.0 Gy and 1.6 Gy is demanded by the German federal office of radiation protection (BfS). In the translational part of the trial 100 of the randomised patients will be investigated by 18-F-FMiso-PET-CT for the presence and behaviour of tumor hypoxia twice in the week before treatment start. Discussion The primary endpoint of the pre-study is acute radiation induced toxicity. Primary endpoint of the main trial is 2-year-LRC. By using the dose escalation up to 80.5 Gy to the GTV of the primary tumor and lymph nodes > 2 cm a LRC benefit of 15% at 2 years should be expected. The ESCALOX trial is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG); Grant No.: MO-363/4-1. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT 01212354, EudraCT-No.: 2010-021139-15
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffi U Pigorsch
- Department of Radiaton Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiaton Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Severin Kampfer
- Department of Radiaton Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Victoria Kehl
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology (IMSE), Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Hapfelmeier
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology (IMSE), Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schläger
- Münchner Studienzentrum (MSZ Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials), Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Henning Bier
- Department of Ear, Neck and Throat (ENT), Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Schwaiger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiaton Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the xerostomia questionnaire in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2016; 25:847-853. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3471-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
23
|
Oral toxicity management in head and neck cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation: Xerostomia and trismus (Part 2). Literature review and consensus statement. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 102:47-54. [PMID: 27061883 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2015] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or surgery is a well-known radical treatment for head and neck cancer patients. Nevertheless acute side effects (such as moist desquamation, skin erythema, loss of taste, mucositis etc.) and in particular late toxicities (osteoradionecrosis, xerostomia, trismus, radiation caries etc.) are often debilitating and underestimated. A multidisciplinary group of head and neck cancer specialists from Italy met in Milan with the aim of reaching a consensus on a clinical definition and management of these toxicities. The Delphi Appropriateness method was used for this consensus and external experts evaluated the conclusions. The paper contains 20 clusters of statements about the clinical definition and management of stomatological issues that reached consensus, and offers a review of the literature about these topics. The review was split into two parts: the first part dealt with dental pathologies and osteo-radionecrosis (10 clusters of statements), whereas this second part deals with trismus and xerostomia (10 clusters of statements).
Collapse
|
24
|
Organ sparing and clinical outcome with step-and-shoot IMRT for head and neck cancer: a mono-institutional experience. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2015; 120:753-8. [PMID: 25663551 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0512-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2014] [Accepted: 05/12/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensity-modulated radiotherapy has been suggested as the technique of choice for locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. In the last decade, most radiotherapy departments have focused their efforts in programs to implement this technique. We report our experience for parotid gland and constrictor muscle sparing with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer using a step-and-shoot technique. METHODS Thirty-four consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx, oropharynx and larynx treated between June 2008 and June 2011 were retrospectively evaluated. A simultaneous integrated boost was adopted to treat different volumes in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Priority as organs at risk was given to the parotid glands as well as the constrictor muscle of the pharynx in 53 % (n = 18). Dysphagia and xerostomia were evaluated according to RTOG/EORTC scale at 6, 12 and 24 months. Outcomes were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS The median follow-up was 43 months. The 5-year overall survival was 70 %, and local control was 94 %. Grade 2 dysphagia and xerostomia at 6, 12 and 24 months were as follows: 26 % (n = 9), 23 % (n = 8), 23 % (n = 8) and 21 % (n = 7), 12 % (n = 4), 12 % (n = 4), respectively. No grade 3 or 4 toxicity was found. Ordinal logistic regression analysis demonstrated that hyposalivation was the main predictive factor for late dysphagia. CONCLUSION Excellent loco-regional results were achieved with acceptable acute and late toxicities. The low rate of late dysphagia was related to parotid gland sparing; we did not observe a correlation between late dysphagia and dose to pharyngeal constrictors.
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Xerostomia is one of the most debilitating late effects of head and neck radiotherapy (RT) and significantly impacts quality of life. The submandibular gland (SMG) provides approximately 70% of the unstimulated saliva that accounts for about 95% of the salivary flow during a 24-hour period. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) has been used in recent years to lower the RT dose to the parotid gland(s) to reduce long-term xerostomia. There is little experience with SMG-sparing IMRT. Mean RT doses to the SMG exceeding 39 Gy cause permanent ablation of both stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow. Limited data suggest that SMG-sparing IMRT in selected patients results in reduced long-term xerostomia without increasing the risk of a local-regional recurrence.
Collapse
|
26
|
Pellegrino F, Groff E, Bastiani L, Fattori B, Sotti G. Assessment of radiation-induced xerostomia: validation of the Italian version of the xerostomia questionnaire in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2014; 23:925-32. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2438-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
27
|
Ramos M, Benavente S, Giralt J. Management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: updated European treatment recommendations. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 10:339-44. [DOI: 10.1586/era.10.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
28
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of cancer survivors in the general population is increasing. Oral and dental status affects patients' quality of life and oral function, which, in turn, may affect nutritional intake and general health. The authors review the importance of oral health and the role of the oral health care provider in supporting dietary intake and providing nutritional guidance. METHODS The authors provide a brief review of oral complications of therapy and nutritional guidelines for patients with head and neck cancer. RESULTS Oral adverse effects of head and neck cancer treatment include salivary gland dysfunction, taste change, orofacial pain and mucosal sensitivity, oral infection, tissue defects and necrosis, trismus and fibrosis, progressive dental and periodontal disease, and problems with prosthesis function. CONCLUSIONS Managing oral adverse effects of treatment may have an impact on dietary and nutritional intake, as well as on quality of life. Dietary modifications may be needed because of the patient's oral function and may include modification of food texture and flavor, as well as the use of dietary supplements. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS As part of the patient's health care team, dental care professionals should be aware of the oral adverse effects of cancer therapy, as well as their role in recognizing and treating the resulting oral conditions. In addition, they should provide guidance to patients to support their oral dietary and nutritional intake.
Collapse
|
29
|
Loo SW, Martin WMC, Smith P, Cherian S, Roques TW. Interobserver variation in parotid gland delineation: a study of its impact on intensity-modulated radiotherapy solutions with a systematic review of the literature. Br J Radiol 2012; 85:1070-7. [PMID: 22815411 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/32038456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study evaluates the interobserver variation in parotid gland delineation and its impact on intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) solutions. METHODS The CT volumetric data sets of 10 patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma who had been treated with parotid-sparing IMRT were used. Four radiation oncologists and three radiologists delineated the parotid gland that had been spared using IMRT. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) for each study contour was calculated using the IMRT plan actually delivered for that patient. This was compared with the original DVH obtained when the plan was used clinically. RESULTS 70 study contours were analysed. The mean parotid dose achieved during the actual treatment was within 10% of 24 Gy for all cases. Using the study contours, the mean parotid dose obtained was within 10% of 24 Gy for only 53% of volumes by radiation oncologists and 55% of volumes by radiologists. The parotid DVHs of 46% of the study contours were sufficiently different from those used clinically, such that a different IMRT plan would have been produced. CONCLUSION Interobserver variation in parotid gland delineation is significant. Further studies are required to determine ways of improving the interobserver consistency in parotid gland definition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S W Loo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lu SH, Cheng JCH, Kuo SH, Lee JJS, Chen LH, Wu JK, Chen YH, Chen WY, Wen SY, Chong FC, Wu CJ, Wang CW. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-and-shoot IMRT. Radiother Oncol 2012; 104:324-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2011] [Revised: 11/14/2011] [Accepted: 11/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
31
|
Lu W, Wayne PM, Davis RB, Buring JE, Li H, Goguen LA, Rosenthal DS, Tishler RB, Posner MR, Haddad RI. Acupuncture for dysphagia after chemoradiation in head and neck cancer: rationale and design of a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2012; 33:700-11. [PMID: 22406102 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2011] [Revised: 02/21/2012] [Accepted: 02/22/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dysphagia is a common side effect following chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Current dysphagia management includes swallowing therapy and dilation procedures, but these treatments have limitations. While acupuncture has been reported to positively impact swallowing function and quality of life (QOL) in patients with dysphagia, current evidence is inconclusive. MATERIAL AND METHODS In an ongoing trial, 42 squamous cell carcinoma HNC patients, who are receiving platinum-based CRT with curative intent, are being recruited from a comprehensive cancer center. They are randomized to 12 sessions of either active acupuncture or to sham acupuncture during and following CRT over a 24-week period. Blinded research staff assesses outcomes at baseline, 20 weeks post-CRT (end of acupuncture), and 12 months after baseline (6-month follow-up). The primary outcome is change in M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory score from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes include QOL measures pertaining to HNC patients. In addition, a subset of study patients are tested for salivary flow rates and cytokines, including plasma transforming growth factor-β1 and interleukin 6 (n=10 per arm), to preliminarily explore the biological mechanisms of acupuncture for dysphagia. DISCUSSION This paper addresses unique challenges related to study design in nonpharmacological, sham-controlled acupuncture trials including development of evidence-based credible verum and sham treatment protocols, blinding, and assuring fidelity of treatment. Results of this study will inform the feasibility of conducting a large scale trial and will provide preliminary evidence regarding the value of acupuncture for dysphagia in HNC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weidong Lu
- Leonard P. Zakim Center for Integrative Therapies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Meng Z, Kay Garcia M, Hu C, Chiang J, Chambers M, Rosenthal DI, Peng H, Wu C, Zhao Q, Zhao G, Liu L, Spelman A, Lynn Palmer J, Wei Q, Cohen L. Sham-controlled, randomised, feasibility trial of acupuncture for prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2012; 48:1692-9. [PMID: 22285177 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2011] [Revised: 12/08/2011] [Accepted: 12/26/2011] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Xerostomia (dry mouth) after head/neck radiation is a common problem among cancer patients. Quality of life (QOL) is impaired, and available treatments are of little benefit. This trial determined the feasibility of conducting a sham-controlled trial of acupuncture and whether acupuncture could prevent xerostomia among head/neck patients undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS A sham controlled, feasibility trial was conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy. To determine feasibility of a sham procedure, 23 patients were randomised to real acupuncture (N=11) or to sham acupuncture (N=12). Patients were treated three times/week during the course of radiotherapy. Subjective measures were the Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN). Objective measures were unstimulated whole salivary flow rates (UWSFR) and stimulated salivary flow rates (SSFR). Patients were followed for 1 month after radiotherapy. RESULTS XQ scores for acupuncture were significantly lower than sham controls starting in week 3 and lasted through the 1-month follow-up (all P's <0.001 except for week 3, which was 0.006), with clinically significant differences as follows: week 6 - RR 0.28 [95% confidence interval, 0.10, 0.79]; week 11 - RR 0.17 [95%CI, 0.03, 1.07]. Similar findings were seen for MDASI-HN scores and MDASI-Intrusion scores. Group differences for UWSFR and SSFR were not found. CONCLUSIONS In this small pilot study, true acupuncture given concurrently with radiotherapy significantly reduced xerostomia symptoms and improved QOL when compared with sham acupuncture. Large-scale, multi-centre, randomised and placebo-controlled trials are now needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiqiang Meng
- Department of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nabil S, Samman N. Risk factors for osteoradionecrosis after head and neck radiation: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 113:54-69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.07.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2010] [Revised: 07/14/2011] [Accepted: 07/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
34
|
Meng Z, Garcia MK, Hu C, Chiang J, Chambers M, Rosenthal DI, Peng H, Zhang Y, Zhao Q, Zhao G, Liu L, Spelman A, Palmer JL, Wei Q, Cohen L. Randomized controlled trial of acupuncture for prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 2011; 118:3337-44. [PMID: 22072272 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2011] [Revised: 07/19/2011] [Accepted: 07/25/2011] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Xerostomia (dry mouth) after head/neck radiation is a common problem among cancer patients, and available treatments are of little benefit. The objective of this trial was to determine whether acupuncture can prevent xerostomia among head/neck patients undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS A randomized, controlled trial among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma was conducted comparing acupuncture to standard care. Participants were treated at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. Forty patients were randomized to acupuncture treatment and 46 to standard care. Patients were treated 3×/wk on the same days they received radiotherapy. Subjective measures included the Xerostomia Questionnaire and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck (MDASI-HN). Objective measures were unstimulated and stimulated whole salivary flow rates. Patients were followed for 6 months after the end of radiotherapy. RESULTS Xerostomia Questionnaire scores for acupuncture were statistically significantly lower than for controls starting in week 3 through the 6 months (P = .003 at week 3, all other P < .0001), with clinically significant differences as follows: week 11, relative risk (RR) 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.87); 6 months, RR 0.38 (95% CI, 0.19-0.76). Similar findings were seen for MDASI-HN scores. Group differences emerged as early as 3 weeks into treatment for saliva (unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, P = .0004), with greater saliva flow in the acupuncture group at week 7 (unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, P < .0001; stimulated whole salivary flow rate, P = .002) and 11 (unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, P < .02; stimulated whole salivary flow rate, P < .03) and at 6 months (stimulated whole salivary flow rate, P < .003). CONCLUSIONS Acupuncture given concurrently with radiotherapy significantly reduced xerostomia and improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiqiang Meng
- Department of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Clavel S, Nguyen DHA, Fortin B, Després P, Khaouam N, Donath D, Soulières D, Guertin L, Nguyen-Tan PF. Simultaneous integrated boost using intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared with conventional radiotherapy in patients treated with concurrent carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 82:582-9. [PMID: 21277695 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2010] [Revised: 10/03/2010] [Accepted: 10/13/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare, in a retrospective study, the toxicity and efficacy of simultaneous integrated boost using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) vs. conventional radiotherapy (CRT) in patients treated with concomitant carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 2000 and December 2007, 249 patients were treated with definitive chemoradiation. One hundred patients had 70 Gy in 33 fractions using IMRT, and 149 received CRT at 70 Gy in 35 fractions. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Median follow-up was 42 months. Three-year actuarial rates for locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 95.1% vs. 84.4% (p = 0.005), 85.3% vs. 69.3% (p = 0.001), and 92.1% vs. 75.2% (p < 0.001) for IMRT and CRT, respectively. The benefit of the radiotherapy regimen on outcomes was also observed with a Cox multivariate analysis. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was associated with less acute dermatitis and less xerostomia at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that simultaneous integrated boost using IMRT is associated with favorable locoregional control and survival rates with less xerostomia and acute dermatitis than CRT when both are given concurrently with chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Clavel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Quantitative estimation of doses to salivary glands from using brachytherapy in head and neck cancers. Brachytherapy 2011; 10:81-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2010.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2009] [Revised: 03/11/2010] [Accepted: 03/24/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
37
|
Zhang X, Penagaricano J, Moros EG, Corry PM, Yan Y, Ratanatharathorn V. Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Linac-IMRT Treatment Plans for Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Med Dosim 2010; 35:264-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2009.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2009] [Revised: 07/30/2009] [Accepted: 08/11/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
38
|
Stock M, Dörr W, Stromberger C, Mock U, Koizar S, Pötter R, Georg D. Investigations on parotid gland recovery after IMRT in head and neck tumor patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2010; 186:665-71. [PMID: 21136030 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-010-2157-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2010] [Accepted: 09/16/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE in recent years, the role of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck irradiation has increased. The main motivation is sparing the parotid gland and reduction of xerostomia. Generally, relative parotid volumes have been evaluated for treatment outcome and planning constraints, neglecting that absolute parotid volumes can vary significantly. The aim of the present study was to investigate changes in parotid gland function and set this in relation to absolute volumes. MATERIAL AND METHODS 46 head and neck patients were treated by sparing at least the contralateral parotid gland. The mean dose to the contralateral gland was limited to 26 Gy. Parotid function was measured with scintigraphy before and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after radiotherapy. Gland recovery was correlated with absolute parotid gland volumes and mean dose. Finally the dose-effect relationship was investigated. RESULTS the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the ipsi- and contralateral glands were significantly different. A correlation between absolute volumes receiving certain doses and the function loss after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months was found. The most significant correlation was found for the absolute volume that received at least 40 Gy (aV40). ED50 values of 23-38 Gy were observed for more than 50% function loss and and 52-68 Gy afor more than 75% function loss. CONCLUSION the mean dose, aV40 or aV26, revealed similar correlations with the excretion rate and with recovery. Hence, also absolute volumes can be used for treatment planning. Longer recovery times show higher ED50 values indicating partial regeneration of gland functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Stock
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Morris CG, Kirwan JM, Li JG. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma1. Laryngoscope 2010; 120:2218-22. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.21144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
40
|
A review of the clinical evidence for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2010; 22:643-57. [PMID: 20673708 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2009] [Revised: 03/03/2010] [Accepted: 06/23/2010] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a development of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy that offers improvements in dosimetry in many clinical scenarios. Here we review the clinical evidence for IMRT and present ongoing or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS We identified randomised and non-randomised comparative studies of IMRT and conventional radiotherapy using MEDLINE, hand-searching Radiotherapy and Oncology and the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics and the proceedings of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology annual meetings. The metaRegister of Controlled Trials was searched to identify completed-unpublished, ongoing and planned RCTs. RESULTS Sixty-one studies comparing IMRT and conventional radiotherapy were identified. These included three RCTs in head and neck cancer (205 patients) and three in breast cancer (664 patients) that had reported clinical outcomes; these were all powered for toxicity-related end points, which were significantly better with IMRT in each trial. There were 27 additional non-randomised studies in head and neck (1119 patients), 26 in prostate cancer (>5000 patients), four in breast cancer (875 patients) and nine in other tumour sites. The results of these studies supported those of the RCTs with benefits reported in acute and late toxicity, health-related quality of life and tumour control end points. Twenty-eight completed-unpublished, ongoing or planned RCTs incorporating IMRT were identified, including at least 12,310 patients, of which 15 compared conventional radiotherapy within IMRT as a randomisation or pre-planned stratification. DISCUSSION Inverse-planned IMRT maintains parotid saliva production and reduces acute and late xerostomia during radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer, reduces late rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients allowing safe dose escalation and seems to reduce toxicity in several other tumour sites. Forward-planned IMRT reduces acute toxicity and improves late clinician-assessed cosmesis compared with conventional tangential breast radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
41
|
Jensen SB, Pedersen AML, Vissink A, Andersen E, Brown CG, Davies AN, Dutilh J, Fulton JS, Jankovic L, Lopes NNF, Mello ALS, Muniz LV, Murdoch-Kinch CA, Nair RG, Napeñas JJ, Nogueira-Rodrigues A, Saunders D, Stirling B, von Bültzingslöwen I, Weikel DS, Elting LS, Spijkervet FKL, Brennan MT. A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: management strategies and economic impact. Support Care Cancer 2010; 18:1061-79. [PMID: 20333412 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0837-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2009] [Accepted: 02/08/2010] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review aimed to assess the literature for management strategies and economic impact of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies and to determine the quality of evidence-based management recommendations. METHODS The electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE were searched for articles published in English since the 1989 NIH Development Consensus Conference on the Oral Complications of Cancer Therapies until 2008 inclusive. For each article, two independent reviewers extracted information regarding study design, study population, interventions, outcome measures, results, and conclusions. RESULTS Seventy-two interventional studies met the inclusion criteria. In addition, 49 intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) studies were included as a management strategy aiming for less salivary gland damage. Management guideline recommendations were drawn up for IMRT, amifostine, muscarinic agonist stimulation, oral mucosal lubricants, acupuncture, and submandibular gland transfer. CONCLUSIONS There is evidence that salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies can be prevented or symptoms be minimized to some degree, depending on the type of cancer treatment. Management guideline recommendations are provided for IMRT, amifostine, muscarinic agonist stimulation, oral mucosal lubricants, acupuncture, and submandibular gland transfer. Fields of sparse literature identified included effects of gustatory and masticatory stimulation, specific oral mucosal lubricant formulas, submandibular gland transfer, acupuncture, hyperbaric oxygen treatment, management strategies in pediatric cancer populations, and the economic consequences of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S B Jensen
- Department of Oral Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jensen SB, Pedersen AML, Vissink A, Andersen E, Brown CG, Davies AN, Dutilh J, Fulton JS, Jankovic L, Lopes NNF, Mello ALS, Muniz LV, Murdoch-Kinch CA, Nair RG, Napeñas JJ, Nogueira-Rodrigues A, Saunders D, Stirling B, von Bültzingslöwen I, Weikel DS, Elting LS, Spijkervet FKL, Brennan MT. A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life. Support Care Cancer 2010; 18:1039-60. [PMID: 20237805 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0827-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 257] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2009] [Accepted: 01/26/2010] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review aimed to assess the literature for prevalence, severity, and impact on quality of life of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies. METHODS The electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE were searched for articles published in English since the 1989 NIH Development Consensus Conference on the Oral Complications of Cancer Therapies until 2008 inclusive. Two independent reviewers extracted information regarding study design, study population, interventions, outcome measures, results and conclusions for each article. RESULTS The inclusion criteria were met by 184 articles covering salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by conventional, 3D conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients, cancer chemotherapy, total body irradiation/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, radioactive iodine treatment, and immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia are induced by radiotherapy in the head and neck region depending on the cumulative radiation dose to the gland tissue. Treatment focus should be on optimized/new approaches to further reduce the dose to the parotids, and particularly submandibular and minor salivary glands, as these glands are major contributors to moistening of oral tissues. Other cancer treatments also induce salivary gland hypofunction, although to a lesser severity, and in the case of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, the adverse effect is temporary. Fields of sparse literature included pediatric cancer populations, cancer chemotherapy, radioactive iodine treatment, total body irradiation/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S B Jensen
- Department of Oral Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gokhale A, McLaughlin B, Flickinger J, Beriwal S, Heron D, Ferris R, Johnson J, Gibson M, Argiris A, Smith R. Clinical and dosimetric factors associated with a prolonged feeding tube requirement in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for head and neck cancers. Ann Oncol 2010; 21:145-51. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
44
|
Delineation guidelines for organs at risk involved in radiation-induced salivary dysfunction and xerostomia. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93:545-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2008] [Revised: 09/04/2009] [Accepted: 09/17/2009] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
45
|
Nakamura T, Kodaira T, Tachibana H, Tomita N, Yokouchi JI, Fuwa N. Clinical outcome of oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Oral Oncol 2009; 45:830-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2009] [Revised: 01/21/2009] [Accepted: 01/22/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
46
|
Daly ME, Le QT, Maxim PG, Loo BW, Kaplan MJ, Fischbein NJ, Pinto H, Chang DT. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: clinical outcomes and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 76:1339-46. [PMID: 19540068 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2008] [Revised: 03/27/2009] [Accepted: 04/03/2009] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report outcomes, failures, and toxicities in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between Aug 2001 and Oct 2007, 107 patients were treated with IMRT with curative intent at Stanford University. Twenty-two patients were treated postoperatively, and 85 were treated definitively. Concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy was administered to 86 patients (80%) and cetuximab to 8 patients (7%). The prescribed dose was 66 Gy at 2.2 Gy/fraction for definitively treated cases and 60 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction for postoperative cases. Median follow-up was 29 months among surviving patients (range, 4-105 months). RESULTS Eight patients had persistent disease or local-regional failure at a median of 6.5 months (range, 0-9.9 months). Six local failures occurred entirely within the high-risk clinical target volume (CTV) (one with simultaneous distant metastasis). One patient relapsed within the high- and intermediate-risk CTV. One patient had a recurrence at the junction between the IMRT and low-neck fields. Seven patients developed distant metastasis as the first site of failure. The 3-year local-regional control (LRC), freedom from distant metastasis, overall survival, and disease-free survival rates were 92%, 92%, 83%, and 81%, respectively. T stage (T4 vs. T1-T3) was predictive of poorer LRC (p = 0.001), overall survival (p = 0.001), and disease-free survival (p < 0.001) rates. Acute toxicity consisted of 58% grade 3 mucosal and 5% grade 3 skin reactions. Six patients (6%) developed grade >or=3 late complications. CONCLUSIONS IMRT provides excellent LRC for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Distant metastases are a major failure pattern. No marginal failures were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Daly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Xerostomia in Long-term Survivors of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of Waldeyer's Ring. Am J Clin Oncol 2009; 32:145-9. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e3181841f42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
48
|
|
49
|
Gomez-Millan J. Radiation therapy in the elderly: more side effects and complications? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2009; 71:70-8. [PMID: 19144538 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2008] [Revised: 09/16/2008] [Accepted: 11/20/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aging is associated with physiological changes and comorbid illnesses, which may affect an individual's tolerance to radiation. There is the belief that a relationship exists between age and radiation toxicity and therefore non-curative schemes are offered to older patients. Preclinical studies show that normal tissue radiation-induced toxicity differs little with age. In the clinical setting, retrospective and some prospective studies have reported that elderly patients treated with radical radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy, who do not have comorbidities and retain a good performance status, show a benefit in treatment outcomes. However, an increase in acute effects or a lowered functional tolerance has also been reported. To select candidates for radical treatments, a specific geriatric assessment should be used to stratify elderly patients as a function of the physiological status. Only specifically designed prospective studies can define the role of radiation treatment in elderly patients with different physiological status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Gomez-Millan
- Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Radiation Oncology Department, Ronda Norte SN. 21005 Huelva, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
The effect of amifostine or IMRT to preserve the parotid function after radiotherapy of the head and neck region measured by quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy. Radiother Oncol 2008; 89:71-80. [PMID: 18707782 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2008] [Revised: 06/22/2008] [Accepted: 07/16/2008] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this retrospective study, two approaches to preserve the parotid function after radiotherapy (RT) were compared: application of the radioprotective agent amifostine during RT and parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were qualified for this analysis if (1) both parotid glands received a radiation dose of >or=50Gy using conventional radiotherapy techniques (cRT) or if they received a parotid-sparing IMRT as alternative, if (2) salivary gland scintigraphies before and after RT were performed, and if (3) a normal parotid function was present before RT. Quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy was used to assess the parotid gland function. RESULTS Altogether 275 salivary gland scintigraphies of 100 patients were analyzed. The mean relative tracer uptake (DeltaU) of patients treated with cRT, cRT with amifostine and IMRT 1-12 months after RT was 0.59 (95%CI 0.54-0.65), 0.67 (95%CI 0.59-0.76), and 0.93 (95%CI 0.78-1.07), respectively. The mean relative DeltaU 13-47 months after RT was 0.40 (95%CI 0.32-0.49), 0.60 (95%CI 0.48-0.71), and 0.92 (95%CI 0.56-1.28). At 1-12 months after RT, ANOVA testing with post-hoc comparison using the Bonferroni correction showed a significant difference between IMRT and cRT (p<0.001) or IMRT and amifostine (p<0.01). The difference between amifostine and cRT was not significant during the first year. At 13-47 months after RT, the difference between cRT and amifostine was significant (p=0.02). CONCLUSION Our data suggest that both amifostine and IMRT are able to partially preserve the parotid function after radiotherapy. The effect of IMRT appeared to be much greater.
Collapse
|