Effect of candesartan on coronary flow reserve in patients with systemic hypertension

Factors Contributing to Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), characterised by a reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR) or an increased index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), has received considerable attention as a cause of chest pain in recent years. However, the risks and causes of CMD remain unclear; therefore, effective treatment strategies have not yet been established. Heart failure or coronary artery disease (CAD) is a risk factor for CMD, with a higher prevalence among women. However, the other contributing factors remain unclear. In this study, we assessed the risk in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), excluding those with heart failure or organic stenosis of the coronary arteries. Furthermore, we analysed whether the risk of CMD differed according to component factors and sex.

METHODS

This study included 84 patients with ANOCA (36 men and 48 women; mean age, 63 years) who underwent coronary angiography and functional testing (CFT). The CFT included a spasm provocation test (SPT), followed by a coronary microvascular function test (CMVF). In the SPT, patients were mainly provoked by acetylcholine (ACh), and coronary spasm was defined as >90% transient coronary artery constriction on coronary angiography, accompanied by chest pain or ischaemic changes on electrocardiography. In 15 patients (18%) with negative ACh provocation, ergonovine maleate (EM) was administered as an additional provocative drug. In the CMVF, a pressure wire was inserted into the left anterior descending coronary artery using intravenous adenosine triphosphate, and the CFR and IMR were measured using previously described methods. A CFR < 2.0 or IMR ≥ 25 was indicative of CMD. The correlations between various laboratory indices and CMD and its components were investigated, and logistic regression analysis was performed, focusing on factors where p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients, a CFR < 2.0 was found in 22 (26%) and an IMR ≥ 25 in 40 (48%) patients, with CMD identified in 46 (55%) patients. CMD was correlated with smoking (p = 0.020) and the use of EM (p = 0.020). The factors that correlated with a CFR < 2.0 included the echocardiograph index E/e' (p = 0.013), which showed a weak but positive correlation with the CFR (r = 0.268, p = 0.013). Conversely, the factors correlated with an IMR ≥ 25 included RAS inhibitor usage (p = 0.018) and smoking (p = 0.042). Assessment of the risk of CMD according to sex revealed that smoking (p = 0.036) was the only factor associated with CMD in men, whereas the left ventricular mass index (p = 0.010) and low glycated haemoglobin levels (p = 0.012) were associated with CMD in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that smoking status and EM use were associated with CMD. The risk of CMD differed between the two CMD components and sex. Although these factors should be considered when treating CMD, smoking cessation remains important. In addition, CMD assessment should be performed carefully when EM is used after ACh provocation. Further validation of our findings using prospective studies and large registries is warranted.

Effects of Oral Drugs on Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients Without Significant Stenosis of Epicardial Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Coronary Flow Reserve

Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of cardiovascular medications on the coronary flow reserve (CFR) in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to 15 November 2019. Studies were included if they reported CFR from baseline to follow-up after oral drug therapy of patients without obstructive CAD. Data was pooled using random-effects modeling. The primary outcome was change in CFR from baseline to follow-up after oral drug therapy.

Results: A total of 46 studies including 845 subjects were included in this study. Relative to baseline, the CFR was improved by angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACEIs), aldosterone receptor antagonists (ARBs) [standard mean difference (SMD): 1.12; 95% CI: 0.77–1.47], and statins treatments (SMD: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.36–0.85). Six to 12 months of calcium channel blocker (CCB) treatments improved CFR (SMD: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.51–1.58). Beta-blocker (SMD: 0.24; 95% CI: −0.39–0.88) and ranolazine treatment (SMD: 0.31; 95% CI: −0.39–1.01) were not associated with improved CFR.

Conclusions: Therapy with ACEIs, ARBs, and statins was associated with improved CFR in patients with confirmed or suspicious CMD. CCBs also improved CFR among patients followed for 6–12 months. Beta-blocker and ranolazine had no impact on CFR.

Treatment strategies in coronary microvascular dysfunction: A systematic review of interventional studies

CMD has been associated with a wide spectrum of diseases and conditions, and it has proven to be a strong prognostic marker of morbidity and mortality. Despite increased attention, guideline-based treatment recommendations are lacking. We performed a systematic review of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to improve coronary perfusion, assessed by IC Doppler, TTDE, PET, CMRI, transthoracic contrast perfusion echocardiography, and dilution techniques. No restrictions were made regarding the study design (randomized, placebo-controlled/randomized with active comparators/nonrandomized with or without a control group), the cardiac condition studied, or the coronary microvascular function at baseline. An electronic database search yielded 4485 records of which 80 studies met our inclusion criteria. Included studies were sorted according to intervention and study design. Studies were small and heterogeneous in methodology, and only few were placebo-controlled. Although some treatments looked promising, we found that no specific treatment was sufficiently well documented to be recommended in any patient groups. There is a need for larger well-designed clinical trials, and we suggest that future studies stratify study populations according to pathogenic mechanisms, thereby investigating whether an individualized treatment approach would be more successful.

Wave intensity analysis and its application to the coronary circulation

Wave intensity analysis (WIA) is a technique developed from the field of gas dynamics that is now being applied to assess cardiovascular physiology. It allows quantification of the forces acting to alter flow and pressure within a fluid system, and as such it is highly insightful in ascribing cause to dynamic blood pressure or velocity changes. When co-incident waves arrive at the same spatial location they exert either counteracting or summative effects on flow and pressure. WIA however allows waves of different origins to be measured uninfluenced by other simultaneously arriving waves. It therefore has found particular applicability within the coronary circulation where both proximal (aortic) and distal (myocardial) ends of the coronary artery can markedly influence blood flow. Using these concepts, a repeating pattern of 6 waves has been consistently identified within the coronary arteries, 3 originating proximally and 3 distally. Each has been associated with a particular part of the cardiac cycle. The most clinically relevant wave to date is the backward decompression wave, which causes the marked increase in coronary flow velocity observed at the start of the diastole. It has been proposed that this wave is generated by the elastic re-expansion of the intra-myocardial blood vessels that are compressed during systolic contraction. Particularly by quantifying this wave, WIA has been used to provide mechanistic and prognostic insight into a number of conditions including aortic stenosis, left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary artery disease and heart failure. It has proven itself to be highly sensitive and as such a number of novel research directions are encouraged where further insights would be beneficial.

Coronary flow reserve in patients with resistant hypertension

Resistant hypertension is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is impaired in patients with hypertension and an independent predictor of cardiac mortality. However, there are no published data on CFR in the subset of treatment-resistant hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess CFR in patients with resistant hypertension. Twenty-five consecutive patients with primary resistant hypertension, scheduled for renal denervation, 25 matched patients with controlled hypertension, and 25 healthy controls underwent transthoracic colour Doppler echocardiography at rest and during adenosine infusion. Patients with hypertension were pair-matched with regard to age, sex, ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, and body-mass index. Healthy controls were selected according to age and sex. Mean flow velocity was measured in the left coronary anterior descending artery. Baseline mean flow velocities were similar in patients with controlled and resistant hypertension. CFR was significantly lower in patients with resistant hypertension as compared to individuals with non-resistant hypertension (2.7 ± 0.6 vs. 3.1 ± 0.8; p = 0.03). Systolic office blood pressure was significantly higher in patients with resistant hypertension (169 ± 20 vs. 144 ± 21 mm Hg; p < 0.01). Heart rate, ventricular mass, and ejection fraction were similar in the two groups. Healthy controls showed significantly lower baseline velocity, higher CFR, and lower blood pressure as compared to hypertensives. Resistant hypertension was associated with impaired CFR as compared to individuals with non-resistant hypertension indicating impaired cardiac microvascular function which may contribute to the increased risk of adverse outcome in patients with resistant hypertension.

Pleiotropic effects of the acute and chronic inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system in hypertensives

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition may exert beneficiary pleiotropic effects on heart hemodynamics in hypertensive patients. We aimed to assess these effects on coronary flow reserve (CFR) and left ventricular (LV) filling pressure after acute and long-term treatment. Thirty-nine patients (48.4±6.8 years) with newly diagnosed, never-treated essential arterial hypertension were consecutively recruited from an outpatient hypertension clinic. CFR in the left anterior descending artery and the ratio of mitral inflow E wave to the averaged mitral annulus tissue velocity of the E waves (E/e' ratio), as an estimate of LV filling pressure, were assessed by Doppler echocardiography. In the acute phase of the study, consecutive eligible patients were assigned to receive po Quinapril (Q) 20 mg (n=15) or Losartan (L) 100 mg (n=14) or no treatment (n=10) and were reexamined 2 h post treatment. In the chronic phase of the study, the patients were reevaluated after 1 month on the assigned treatment. During the acute phase, CFR (P=0.005) was significantly improved in the RAS inhibition as compared with the control group, independently of blood pressure (BP) changes. The E/e' ratio was also marginally improved (P=0.053), but this effect was more pronounced in patients with E/e' ratio>8 (P=0.005). CFR and E/e' ratio were also improved after 1 month of treatment, particularly in responders after the acute phase. In hypertensive patients, RAS inhibition acutely improved CFR and E/e' ratio independently of BP changes. An acute positive response in these parameters was closely related to sustained improvement after 1 month of single-drug treatment.

Optimal antihypertensive level for improvement of coronary microvascular dysfunction: the lower, the better?

Recently, coronary microvascular function was documented to be impaired even in patients with prehypertension. However, the impact of antihypertensive level on improvement of coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertensive patients remains to be established. We investigated the optimal blood pressure achieved with treatment of antihypertensive agents for improvement of coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertensive patients. We prospectively studied 108 untreated hypertensive patients. All patients were treated with antihypertensive agents for approximately 12 months. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was measured before and after treatment. The patients were divided into hypertensive, prehypertensive, and normal groups based on their average blood pressure during the treatment period. Pretreatment CFR was similar among all groups. CFR increased significantly in the normal group during the treatment period, but decreased significantly in the prehypertensive and hypertensive groups. This decrease was significantly greater in the hypertensive group than in the prehypertensive group. Multivariate analysis showed lowering blood pressure to normal level to be an independent determinant of improvement in CFR. The normal group was divided into normal-higher and normal-lower subgroups based on their average diastolic blood pressure during the treatment period. Increase in CFR was significantly greater in the normal-higher group than in the normal-lower group. These findings indicate that lowering blood pressure to a normal level is necessary to improve coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertensive patients. Furthermore, raising diastolic blood pressure to a higher level within normal range has the most beneficial effect. However, as this study is based on observational design, it may have several limitations.

Vascular and metabolic effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in patients with hypertension, heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Several large clinical trials have demonstrated that these agents are effective in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. These benefits are partly independent of the degree of blood pressure reduction and most likely related to ARBs' anti-inflammatory, metabolic and vascular effects. Clinical studies showed that the anti-inflammatory effect of ARBs could be related to the dosage and/or the length of the treatment. In large clinical trials, ARBs have inconsistently reduced the risk of new-onset T2DM. Among ARBs, only losartan significantly reduced serum uric acid levels. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that ARBs improve endothelial dysfunction in patients with hypertension and/or coronary artery disease (CAD), while all but one of the studies proved that these agents could usually, after 6-12 months of therapy, induce regression of vascular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. These positive effects could be relevant to vascular protection and, together with the blood pressure reduction, constitute the background of the improved outcome observed in clinical studies on mortality and/or morbidity in hypertensive, high-risk and CAD patients. The clinical significance of the different potency of ARBs needs to be investigated further in specific and adequately powered trials.

Beta-blockers and coronary flow reserve: the importance of a vasodilatory action

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is the maximal increase in coronary blood flow (CBF) above its resting level for a given perfusion pressure when coronary vasculature is maximally dilated. Normally, hyperaemic CBF reaches values at least 2- to 3-fold greater than resting CBF. Reduction of CFR is mainly due to epicardial coronary artery stenosis or to coronary microvascular dysfunction. CFR can be determined by several techniques that measure CBF itself (e.g. positron emission tomography) or CBF velocities (Doppler methods) from which coronary flow velocity reserve is calculated. Hyperaemic coronary vasodilation can be obtained by pharmacological agents (e.g. adenosine and dipyridamole), but also by the cold pressure test. Long-term antihypertensive treatment induces significant improvement of CFR, which is parallel to the regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. First- and second-generation beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (beta-blockers) have shown contradictory influences on CFR. This can be explained by the interaction of the effects on CBF at rest, generally reduced by these drugs, and after hyperaemia, when minimal coronary resistance appears to be either increased or reduced. Third-generation beta-blockers (e.g. carvedilol and nebivolol), which have vasodilating capacity, improve hyperaemic CBF. This occurs as a result of a reduction in minimal resistance, which can be attributed to alpha-adrenergic blockade and/or to a nitric oxide-mediated effect. This improvement is clearly beneficial in patients with coronary artery disease and indicates an improved coronary microvascular function. Changes of CFR due to vasodilating beta-blockers improve microvascular angina pectoris or silent ischaemia in patients without epicardial artery stenosis, and are also helpful in predicting the response or the further improvement of LV function to treatment.

Candesartan: from left ventricular hypertrophy to heart failure, a global approach

Cardiovascular disease is a continuum, starting with risk factors resulting from physiological changes and extending to vascular pathology associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The overactivation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has been related to the development and worsening of risk factors associated with cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension and heart failure. Treatment at each stage along the continuum may prevent, or at least delay, the next one, and so it is crucial to initiate therapy as early as possible in such patients so as to provide optimal care. Candesartan, a long-acting angiotensin receptor antagonist, has been shown to be an effective, and well-tolerated therapy, in both the early and late phases of cardiovascular disease (prehypertension, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure). This article reviews the data supporting the use of candesartan in cardiovascular medicine, with a focus on left ventricular hypertrophy and ultimately heart failure. Particular emphasis is given to the Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program, which has shown a positive impact of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure in terms of reducing the incidence of cardiovascular deaths and chronic heart failure hospitalizations.