Design of a comprehensive chest pain initiative in an academic urban hospital

Updating a Healthcare System-wide Clinical Pathway for Managing Chest Pain and Acute Coronary Syndromes

Clinical pathways are useful tools for conveying and reinforcing best practices to standardize care and optimize patient outcomes across myriad conditions. The NewYork-Presbyterian Healthcare System has utilized a clinical chest pain pathway for more than 20 years to facilitate the timely recognition and management of patients presenting with chest pain syndromes and acute coronary syndromes. This chest pain pathway is regularly updated by an expanding group of key stakeholders, which has extended from the Columbia University Irving Medical Center to encompass the entire regional healthcare system, which includes 8 hospitals. In this 2023 update of the NewYork-Presbyterian clinical chest pain pathway, we present the key changes to the healthcare system-wide clinical chest pain pathway.

Twenty Years of an Institutional Chest Pain Pathway: What's Come and What's Yet to Come

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the United States and around the world. Because of the acute nature of ACS presentations, timely identification, risk stratification, and intervention are of the utmost importance. Twenty years ago, we published the first iteration of our institutional chest pain clinical pathway in this journal, which separated patients presenting with chest pain into one of the 4 levels of decreasing acuity, with associated actions and interventions for providers based on the level. This chest pain clinical pathway has undergone regular review and updates under a collaborative team of cardiologists, emergency department physicians, cardiac nurse practitioners, and other associated stakeholders in the treatment of patients presenting with chest pain. This review will discuss the key changes that our institutional chest pain algorithm has undergone over the last 2 decades and what the future holds for chest pain algorithms.

Hospital variation in the use of noninvasive cardiac imaging and its association with downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes

IMPORTANCE Current guidelines allow substantial discretion in use of noninvasive cardiac imaging for patients without acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who are being evaluated for ischemia. Imaging use may affect downstream testing and outcomes. OBJECTIVE To characterize hospital variation in use of noninvasive cardiac imaging and the association of imaging use with downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional study of hospitals using 2010 administrative data from Premier, Inc, including patients with suspected ischemia on initial evaluation who were seen in the emergency department, observation unit, or inpatient ward; received at least 1 cardiac biomarker test on day 0 or 1; and had a principal discharge diagnosis for a common cause of chest discomfort, a sign or symptom of cardiac ischemia, and/or a comorbidity associated with coronary disease. We excluded patients with AMI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES At each hospital, the proportion of patients who received noninvasive imaging to identify cardiac ischemia and the subsequent rates of admission, coronary angiography, and revascularization procedures. RESULTS We identified 549,078 patients at 224 hospitals. The median (interquartile range) hospital noninvasive imaging rate was 19.8% (10.9%-27.7%); range, 0.2% to 55.7%. Median hospital imaging rates by quartile were Q1, 6.0%; Q2, 15.9%; Q3, 23.5%; Q4, 34.8%. Compared with Q1, Q4 hospitals had higher rates of admission (Q1, 32.1% vs Q4, 40.0%), downstream coronary angiogram (Q1, 1.2% vs Q4, 4.9%), and revascularization procedures (Q1, 0.5% vs Q4, 1.9%). Hospitals in Q4 had a lower yield of revascularization for noninvasive imaging (Q1, 7.6% vs Q4, 5.4%) and for angiograms (Q1, 41.2% vs Q4, 38.8%). P <.001 for all comparisons. Readmission rates to the same hospital for AMI within 2 months were not different by quartiles (P = .51). Approximately 23% of variation in imaging use was attributable to the behavior of individual hospitals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Hospitals vary in their use of noninvasive cardiac imaging in patients with suspected ischemia who do not have AMI. Hospitals with higher imaging rates did not have substantially different rates of therapeutic interventions or lower readmission rates for AMI but were more likely to admit patients and perform angiography.

Positive impact of an interdisciplinary chest pain initiative on traditionally underserved populations

BACKGROUND

We assessed the clinical impact of an interdisciplinary, cardiac nurse practitioner-facilitated chest pain (CP) initiative that stresses an early invasive approach for patients with CP with acute coronary syndromes in traditionally underserved patient populations, including females, blacks, Hispanics, and patients older than 60 years.

METHODS

Two groups of patients were identified: Pre-CP initiative (December 1999-February 2000) and post-CP initiative (December 2000-February 2001).

RESULTS

Analysis of 714 patients revealed significantly more cardiac diagnoses post-CP initiative (61% pre-CP initiative vs. 73% post-CP initiative, P = 0.002), including in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who were older than 60 years, females, and Hispanics. There was a significant increase in rates of cardiac catheterizations within 1 week of admission (10.5% vs. 20.4%, P <0.001), including in Hispanics. For rates of coronary artery stenting and/or bypass grafting (CABG), there was also a significant increase post-CP initiative (2.5% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.0005), as well as for Hispanics. Length of stay was significantly reduced for patients older than 60 years (8.3 vs. 5.8 days, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Establishment of an interdisciplinary, cardiac nurse practitioner-facilitated CP initiative is associated with improvement in several clinical processes and outcomes: increased cardiac disease diagnosis in females, Hispanics, and patients older than 60 years; increased rates of cardiac catheterizations in Hispanic patients, increased rates of coronary artery stenting and/or CABG, particularly in Hispanic patients; and decreased length of stay in patients older than 60 years. These data support a targeted interdisciplinary CP initiative as a strategy to systematically enhance access to cardiovascular diagnosis in underserved patient populations.

A rapid-response alphanumeric paging design decreases door-to-balloon times in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION

In acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), rapid reperfusion of the infarcted artery improves cardiovascular outcomes; however, many hospitals have difficulty achieving recommended times. We hypothesized that a Rapid-Response Alphanumeric Paging Design (RAPiD) would reduce door-to-balloon time for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI.

METHODS

A chest pain algorithm and interdisciplinary team was established in December 2000. In August 2002, RAPiD was instituted to transmit the diagnosis and location of a STEMI to the chest pain team through a speed-dial button. All patients presenting to our emergency department from February 2002 through July 2003 with STEMI were included. Exclusion criteria included lack of chest pain, cardiopulmonary arrest before PCI, and catheterization or PCI not performed. Outside-referral STEMI, in-patient STEMI, and failed thrombolysis patients were excluded. Data was obtained from medical records. Log transform of door-to-balloon (DTB) times was performed.

RESULTS

Forty-seven events satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria with 32 occurring after RAPiD (post-RAPiD). Fifteen events occurred during on-hours (8 am to 7 pm on weekdays). Mean untransformed DTB times pre- and post-RAPiD were 162 +/- 137 (standard deviation) minutes and 112 +/- 41 minutes. The main effects analysis of variance model showed a significant reduction in post-RAPiD DTB time (P = 0.03) with a mean reduction of 26% during off-hours and 20% during on-hours. The post-RAPiD estimate of mean DTB time, derived from the antilog of the log transform, was 96.7 minutes (95% confidence interval, 83.7-111.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The institution of RAPiD in a hospital with a preexisting chest pain algorithm significantly decreases DTB times so as to satisfy current ACC/AHA guidelines.