Significant dose effect of carbamazepine on reduction of steady-state plasma concentration of haloperidol in schizophrenic patients

Drug-drug interactions between antiseizure medications and antipsychotic medications: a narrative review and expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) and antipsychotic drugs are frequently coadministered with the potential for drug-drug interactions. Interactions may either be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic, resulting in a decrease or increase in efficacy and/or an increase or decrease in adverse effects.

AREAS COVERED

The clinical evidence for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics is reviewed based on the results of a literature search in MEDLINE conducted in April 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

There is now extensive published evidence for the clinical importance of interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics. Enzyme-inducing ASMs can decrease blood concentrations of many of the antipsychotics. There is also evidence that enzyme-inhibiting ASMs can increase antipsychotic blood concentrations. Similarly, there is limited evidence showing that antipsychotic drugs may affect the blood concentrations of ASMs through pharmacokinetic interactions. There is less available evidence for pharmacodynamic interactions, but these can also be important, as can displacement from protein binding. The lack of published evidence for an interaction should not be interpreted as meaning that the given interaction does not occur; the evidence is building continually. There is no substitute for careful patient monitoring and sound clinical judgment.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with oral haloperidol in adults: dose correction factors from a combined weighted analysis

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of oral haloperidol, a first-generation antipsychotic, are systematically reviewed.

AREAS COVERED

After exclusions, the search for DDIs with oral haloperidol provided 47 articles as victim and 7 as perpetrator. Changes in mean haloperidol concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratios after weighting each study's size were used to calculate the effects of other drugs (inhibitors/inducers) on haloperidol. These changes of haloperidol C/D ratio were used to estimate dose-correction factors (<1 for inhibitors and >1 for inducers).

EXPERT OPINION

A box summarizes our recommendations for clinicians regarding our current knowledge of haloperidol PK DDIs, which will need to be updated as new information becomes available. Moderate to strong inducers (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, or rifampin) should be avoided since they required dose-correction factors of 2-5. Smoking appeared to be a weak inducer (dose-correction factor 1.2). Fluvoxamine, promethazine, and combinations of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 inhibitors should be avoided. There are no long-term studies on fluoxetine to provide a dose correction factor. Limited information suggests that valproate may be an inhibitor (dose-correction factor 0.6). In most patients, haloperidol may not have clinically relevant effects as a perpetrator, but in vitro and clinical studies suggest it is a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor.

Lack of correlation between the steady-state plasma concentrations of aripiprazole and haloperidol in Japanese patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Both aripiprazole and haloperidol have been used in the treatment of schizophrenia, and are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and CYP3A4. The authors studied the correlations between the steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of aripiprazole and its active metabolite, dehydroaripiprazole, and those of haloperidol in 19 Japanese patients with schizophrenia, together with the effects of CYP2D6 genotypes on the steady-state kinetics of these compounds.

METHODS

All the patients received first 24 mg/d of aripiprazole for 3 weeks and later received 6 mg/d of haloperidol for 2 weeks. Blood samplings were performed at least 2 weeks after the initiation of each treatment. The Css values of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole were measured using liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection, and those of haloperidol were measured by using an enzyme immunoassay. CYP2D6 genotypes were determined by using polymerase chain reaction analysis.

RESULTS

None of the correlations between the Css of aripiprazole (r = 0.286) or the sum of aripiprazole plus dehydroaripiprazole (r = 0.344) and those of haloperidol were significant. The mean Css of aripiprazole was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the subjects with 1 *10 allele of CYP2D6 (n = 6) than in those with no mutated alleles (n = 13), whereas there were no significant differences in those of haloperidol between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the Css of aripiprazole and that of aripiprazole plus dehydroaripiprazole do not correlate with that of haloperidol in the same individual, because of the greater involvement of CYP2D6 in the metabolism of aripiprazole than in that of haloperidol.

The effects of antiepileptic inducers in neuropsychopharmacology, a neglected issue. Part I: A summary of the current state for clinicians

The literature on inducers in epilepsy and bipolar disorder is seriously contaminated by false negative findings. This is part i of a comprehensive review on antiepileptic drug (AED) inducers using both mechanistic pharmacological and evidence-based medicine to provide practical recommendations to neurologists and psychiatrists concerning how to control for them. Carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin, are clinically relevant AED inducers; correction factors were calculated for studied induced drugs. These correction factors are rough simplifications for orienting clinicians, since there is great variability in the population regarding inductive effects. As new information is published, the correction factors may need to be modified. Some of the correction factors are so high that the drugs (e.g., bupropion, quetiapine or lurasidone) should not co-prescribed with potent inducers. Clobazam, eslicarbazepine, felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, rufinamide, topiramate, vigabatrin and valproic acid are grouped as mild inducers which may (i)be inducers only in high doses; (ii)frequently combine with inhibitory properties; and (iii)take months to reach maximum effects or de-induction, definitively longer than the potent inducers. Potent inducers, definitively, and mild inducers, possibly, have relevant effects in the endogenous metabolism of (i)sexual hormones, (ii) vitamin D, (iii)thyroid hormones, (iv)lipid metabolism, and (v)folic acid.

Interaction between paliperidone and carbamazepine

BACKGROUND

This aim of this study was to determine the impact of carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of paliperidone.

METHODS

Six schizophrenic patients initially received a 6-12 mg/d dose of paliperidone alone. Subsequently, a 200 mg/d dose of carbamazepine was administered, and the carbamazepine dose was increased to 400 mg/d and then 600 mg/d. Plasma concentrations of paliperidone before and after carbamazepine coadministration were quantified using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

RESULTS

Carbamazepine significantly reduced the plasma concentration of paliperidone. The plasma concentration of paliperidone at baseline and with coadministration of 200, 400, and 600 mg/d were 45.8 ± 11.7, 26.9 ± 13.7, 17.1 ± 8.2, and 15.9 ± 7.6 ng/mL, respectively. The concentration of paliperidone with carbamazepine coadministration at doses of 200, 400, and 600 mg/d were 55.7% ± 20.7%, 36.1% ± 12.2%, and 33.6% ± 10.4%, respectively, of baseline. This effect occurred even at the carbamazepine dose of 200 mg/d and reached a plateau at doses higher than 400 mg/d. However, carbamazepine coadministration exacerbated the psychotic symptoms in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest that adjunctive treatment with carbamazepine reduces the concentration of paliperidone in a dose-dependent manner, most likely because of the induction of several drug-metabolizing enzymes and several drug transporters.

Psychotropic drug-drug interactions involving P-glycoprotein

Multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein (P-gp; also known as MDR1 and ABCB1) is expressed in the luminal membrane of the small intestine and blood-brain barrier, and the apical membranes of excretory cells such as hepatocytes and kidney proximal tubule epithelia. P-gp regulates the absorption and elimination of a wide range of compounds, such as digoxin, paclitaxel, HIV protease inhibitors and psychotropic drugs. Its substrate specificity is as broad as that of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, which encompasses up to 50 % of the currently marketed drugs. There has been considerable interest in variations in the ABCB1 gene as predictors of the pharmacokinetics and/or treatment outcomes of several drug classes, including antidepressants and antipsychotics. Moreover, P-gp-mediated transport activity is saturable, and is subject to modulation by inhibition and induction, which can affect the pharmacokinetics, efficacy or safety of P-gp substrates. In addition, many of the P-gp substrates overlap with CYP3A4 substrates, and several psychotropic drugs that are P-gp substrates are also CYP3A4 substrates. Therefore, psychotropic drugs that are P-gp substrates may cause a drug interaction when P-gp inhibitors and inducers are coadministered, or when psychotropic drugs or other medicines that are P-gp substrates are added to a prescription. Hence, it is clinically important to accumulate data about drug interactions through studies on P-gp, in addition to CYP3A4, to assist in the selection of appropriate psychotropic medications and in avoiding inappropriate combinations of therapeutic agents. There is currently insufficient information available on the psychotropic drug interactions related to P-gp, and therefore we summarize the recent clinical data in this review.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between carbamazepine and aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between carbamazepine and aripiprazole were studied in 18 inpatients with schizophrenia being treated with aripiprazole. The daily dose of aripiprazole was 24 mg in 15 cases and 12 mg in 3 cases. Carbamazepine 400 mg/d was coadministered for 1 week, and blood samples were taken twice before the start of carbamazepine coadministration and then 1 week after completion. In addition, on these days, the severity of illness and side effects were evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser side effects rating scale, respectively. Plasma concentrations of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole were measured using liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. Carbamazepine significantly decreased both plasma concentrations of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole by 64% and 68%, respectively (P < 0.001). Despite these decreases in plasma concentrations, the total and negative scores in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, together with the neurological score in Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser, decreased slightly but significantly (P < 0.05) after carbamazepine coadministration. The present study implies that carbamazepine augmentation may be effective for patients with schizophrenia treated with aripiprazole, although carbamazepine dramatically decreases plasma concentrations of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole, by inducing the metabolism of these compounds.

Modeling, prediction, and in vitro in vivo correlation of CYP3A4 induction

CYP3A4 induction is not generally considered to be a concern for safety; however, serious therapeutic failures can occur with drugs whose exposure is lower as a result of more rapid metabolic clearance due to induction. Despite the potential therapeutic consequences of induction, little progress has been made in quantitative predictions of CYP3A4 induction-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) from in vitro data. In the present study, predictive models have been developed to facilitate extrapolation of CYP3A4 induction measured in vitro to human clinical DDIs. The following parameters were incorporated into the DDI predictions: 1) EC(50) and E(max) of CYP3A4 induction in primary hepatocytes; 2) fractions unbound of the inducers in human plasma (f(u, p)) and hepatocytes (f(u, hept)); 3) relevant clinical in vivo concentrations of the inducers ([Ind](max, ss)); and 4) fractions of the victim drugs cleared by CYP3A4 (f(m, CYP3A4)). The values for [Ind](max, ss) and f(m, CYP3A4) were obtained from clinical reports of CYP3A4 induction and inhibition, respectively. Exposure differences of the affected drugs in the presence and absence of the six individual inducers (bosentan, carbamazepine, dexamethasone, efavirenz, phenobarbital, and rifampicin) were predicted from the in vitro data and then correlated with those reported clinically (n = 103). The best correlation was observed (R(2) = 0.624 and 0.578 from two hepatocyte donors) when f(u, p) and f(u, hept) were included in the predictions. Factors that could cause over- or underpredictions (potential outliers) of the DDIs were also analyzed. Collectively, these predictive models could add value to the assessment of risks associated with CYP3A4 induction-based DDIs by enabling their determination in the early stages of drug development.

Sensitive determination of 4-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-hydroxypiperidine, a metabolite of haloperidol, in a rat biological sample by HPLC with fluorescence detection after pre-column derivatization using 4-fluoro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole

4-(4-Chlorophenyl)-4-hydroxypiperidine (CPHP), one of the metabolites of haloperidol, is considered to exhibit brain toxicity. CPHP concentrations in plasma and tissue homogenates (each 200 microL) from rats were analyzed by HPLC fluorescence detection after pre-column derivatization with 4-fluoro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-F). After basic extraction of the samples with benzene, the derivatization with NBD-F was conducted in borate buffer (pH 8.0) at 60 degrees C for 3 min. Mexiletine was carried through the procedure as an internal standard. The regression equation for CPHP showed a good linearity in the range of 0.03-1 microg/mL with a detection limit of 0.008 microg/mL. The coefficient of variation was less than 11.6%. Plasma concentration-time courses of CPHP after intraperitoneal or per oral administration of CPHP, haloperidol or reduced haloperidol were examined, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. Additionally, CPHP levels in various tissues at 8 h after intraperitoneal administration of these compounds were compared. The method was simple and sensitive, useful for determination of CPHP in rat biological samples using as little as 200 microL of sample volume and could be applied for pharmacokinetic study.

Interactions between Antiepileptic and Antipsychotic Drugs

Antiepileptic and antipsychotic drugs are often prescribed together. Interactions between the drugs may affect both efficacy and toxicity. This is a review of human clinical data on the interactions between the antiepileptic drugs carbamazepine, valproic acid (sodium valproate), vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, pregabalin, felbamate, zonisamide, phenobarbital and phenytoin with the antipsychotic drugs risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, clozapine, amisulpride, sulpiride, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, haloperidol and chlorpromazine; the limited information on interactions between antiepileptic drugs and zuclopenthixol, periciazine, fluphenazine, flupenthixol and pimozide is also presented. Many of the interactions depend on the induction or inhibition of the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, but other important mechanisms involve the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoenzymes and protein binding. There is some evidence for the following effects. Carbamazepine decreases the plasma concentrations of both risperidone and its active metabolite. It also decreases concentrations of olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, haloperidol, zuclopenthixol, flupenthixol and probably chlorpromazine and fluphenazine. Quetiapine increases the ratio of carbamazepine epoxide to carbamazepine and this may lead to toxicity. The data on valproic acid are conflicting; it may either increase or decrease clozapine concentrations, and it appears to decrease aripiprazole concentrations. Chlorpromazine possibly increases valproic acid concentrations. Lamotrigine possibly increases clozapine concentrations. Phenobarbital decreases clozapine, haloperidol and chlorpromazine concentrations. Phenytoin decreases quetiapine, clozapine, haloperidol and possibly chlorpromazine concentrations. There are major gaps in the data. In many cases there are no published clinical data on interactions that would be predicted on theoretical grounds.

An overview of psychotropic drug-drug interactions

The psychotropic drug-drug interactions most likely to be relevant to psychiatrists' practices are examined. The metabolism and the enzymatic and P-glycoprotein inhibition/induction profiles of all antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers are described; all clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions between agents in these psychotropic classes, as well as with frequently encountered nonpsychotropic agents, are detailed; and information on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic results, mechanisms, and clinical consequences of these interactions is presented. Although the range of drug-drug interactions involving psychotropic agents is large, it is a finite and manageable subset of the much larger domain of all possible drug-drug interactions. Sophisticated computer programs will ultimately provide the best means of avoiding drug-drug interactions. Until these programs are developed, the best defense against drug-drug interactions is awareness and focused attention to this issue.

Efficacy of carbamazepine against neuroleptic-induced akathisia in treatment with perospirone: case series

Neuroleptic-induced akathisia is a distressing side effect of antipsychotics, and it is unmanageable in some cases. The authors report three cases of schizophrenia whose neuroleptic-induced akathisia did not respond to representative anti-akathisia drugs such as beta-adrenergic antagonists, anticholinergic agents, benzodiazepines and antihistaminergics, and they showed a marked improvement of it without worsening of psychotic symptoms during a combination treatment with carbamazepine and perospirone, a serotonin-dopamine antagonist developed in Japan. As the mechanism of current observation, we assumed that carbamazepine affected the pharmacokinetics of perospirone, and change in the proportion of perospirone and its major active metabolite (ID-15036). Further investigations including the monitoring pharmacokinetics of perospirone and ID-15036 under concomitant use of carbamazepine should be carried out to explain the mechanism of the current experience.