Rechallenge of late-onset neutropenia with clozapine

Second to none: rationale, timing, and clinical management of clozapine use in schizophrenia

Despite its enduring relevance as the single most effective and important evidence-based treatment for schizophrenia, underutilization of clozapine remains considerable. To a substantial degree, this is attributable to a reluctance of psychiatrists to offer clozapine due to its relatively large side-effect burden and the complexity of its use. This underscores the necessity for continued education regarding both the vital nature and the intricacies of clozapine treatment. This narrative review summarizes all clinically relevant areas of evidence, which support clozapine's wide-ranging superior efficacy - for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and beyond - and make its safe use eminently feasible. Converging evidence indicates that TRS constitutes a distinct albeit heterogeneous subgroup of schizophrenias primarily responsive to clozapine. Most importantly, the predominantly early onset of treatment resistance and the considerable decline in response rates associated with its delayed initiation make clozapine an essential treatment option throughout the course of illness, beginning with the first psychotic episode. To maximize patients' benefits, systematic early recognition efforts based on stringent use of TRS criteria, a timely offer of clozapine, thorough side-effect screening and management as well as consistent use of therapeutic drug monitoring and established augmentation strategies for suboptimal responders are crucial. To minimize permanent all-cause discontinuation, re-challenges after neutropenia or myocarditis should be considered. Owing to clozapine's unique efficacy, comorbid conditions including substance use and most somatic disorders should not dissuade but rather encourage clinicians to consider clozapine. Moreover, treatment decisions need to be informed by the late onset of clozapine's full effects, which for reduced suicidality and mortality rates may not even be readily apparent. Overall, the singular extent of its efficacy combined with the high level of patient satisfaction continues to distinguish clozapine from all other available antipsychotics.

Clozapine Rechallenge After Major Adverse Effects: Clinical Guidelines Based on 259 Cases

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is widely prescribed for treatment-refractory schizophrenia, but its use is limited by many potentially life-threatening adverse effects. The risk of rechallenge after these complications has never been comprehensively assessed in controlled studies. Thus, clinical guidelines must rely on the published case reports. The number of such reports is likely to increase over time, and updated analyses of larger samples are needed, as they may lead to changes in clinical guidelines.

STUDY QUESTIONS

How safe is the clozapine rechallenge after life-threatening adverse effects?

STUDY DESIGN

The published case reports of clozapine rechallenge were identified in a MEDLINE search. We added 121 cases reported from 2012 through 2017 to the 138 cases reported from 1972 through 2011 analyzed by us in a previous publication. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the successful rechallenge rate were calculated for each adverse effect with at least 5 published case reports. The rechallenge was considered a valid clinical option when the lower end of the CI range was at least 50%.

RESULTS

A successful outcome was documented in 128/203 patients rechallenged after neutropenia (63.0%, CI, 56.0%-69.6%), 3/17 after agranulocytosis (17.7%, CI, 4.7%-44.2%), 11/17 after myocarditis (64.7%, CI, 38.6%-84.7%), and 7/7 after neuroleptic malignant syndrome (100%, CI, 56.1%-100%). Among the 15 patients with other clozapine-induced adverse effects, the rechallenge was successful in those with eosinophilia, cardiac complications other than myocarditis (QTc prolongation, pericarditis, cardiomyopathy, and atrial flutter), and gastrointestinal hypomotility. The rechallenge failed in patients who had developed pancreatitis or renal insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine rechallenge is a reasonable clinical option after return to baseline for patients who had developed neutropenia and neuroleptic malignant syndrome, but not after agranulocytosis or myocarditis. Data are insufficient to formulate rechallenge guidelines for any other clozapine-related adverse effects.

Re-titration rates after clozapine-induced neutropenia or agranulocytosis: A case report and literature review

Clozapine-induced neutropenia occurs in 3-5% of individuals treated with clozapine. Current US guidelines require interruption of clozapine when the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) drops below 1000 cells/mm3. There is minimal available guidance for what dosing schedule to use when restarting clozapine after an episode of neutropenia. Here, we present a case of a 50-year-old Caucasian female with a history of schizoaffective disorder who was successfully rechallenged on clozapine one month after developing clozapine-induced neutropenia (ANC 600 cells/mm3). To understand published re-titration rates of clozapine after neutropenia, we conducted a literature review using a using the PubMed database and found only seven case reports that unambiguously reported a clozapine dosing schedule during re-challenge. All were successful except one, a case of clozapine rechallenge after agranulocytosis. Including this case presentation, six out of eight cases restarted clozapine more cautiously than recommended by the US guidelines for a new clozapine initiation. We cannot comment what role a slower or more rapid titration plays in a successful rechallenge after neutropenia with the available evidence. We encourage researchers to publish their dosing schedule in detail after an episode of neutropenia or agranulocytosis.

Late Onset Agranulocytosis with Clozapine Associated with HLA DR4 Responding to Treatment with Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Agranulocytosis as a side effect of clozapine has been reported to be associated with initial phases of treatment, i.e., first six months. Agranulocytosis with clozapine during the initial phases of treatment has been linked to genetic vulnerability in the form of variations in the human leukocyte-antigen haplotypes. However, there is limited literature on late onset agranulocytosis with clozapine and this has very rarely been linked to human leukocyte-antigen haplotypes vulnerability. In this report we review the existing data on late onset agranulocytosis with clozapine and describe the case of a young man, who developed agranulocytosis with clozapine after 35 months of treatment and was found to have genetic vulnerability in form of being positive for HLA DR4. This case highlights underlying autoimmune immune mechanism in clozapine-induced agranulocytosis and the need for frequent blood count monitoring on clozapine even after the initial 6 months of starting treatment especially in patients with genetic vulnerability to develop this condition.

[Clozapine rechallenge after neutropenia in resistant schizophrenia: A review]

INTRODUCTION

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic known for its efficacy in refractory schizophrenia. One of the adverse effects is neutropenia. This dysplasia is a rare but major side effect which leads to a discontinuation and constitutes further contraindication. Thereafter, therapeutic options decrease dramatically. Mechanisms involved are not well known at this time and can be combined. A toxic hypothesis may be more likely than an immune-allergic one.

METHODS

We have reviewed publications on Medline describing procedures that allowed clozapine rechallenge after blood dyscrasia in refractory schizophrenia. Three different procedures were found: simple rechallenge, rechallenge with lithium and rechallenge with Granulocyte - colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Rechallenge could be simple or multiple.

RESULTS

These past years, clozapine have been rechallenged successfully after neutropenia thanks to different procedures, the different options being simple rechallenge, rechallenge with lithium and/or rechallenge with G-CSF. Lithium as G-CSF are used to increase neutrophil blood rate and prevent neutropenia recurrence after clozapine rechallenge. G-CSF was first used within the context of chemotherapy and extends now to clozapine-induced neutropenia. Both for lithium and G-CSF, numerous procedures are reviewed and cannot be compared.

DISCUSSION

Publications are limited but increasing, and they point out that a careful rechallenge can be successful. However, interesting data can be extracted. First, clozapine is more likely to be incriminated in neutropenia when patients receive many drugs, but a careful study could prevent some discontinuation. Indeed, other drugs or a hematologic disease could be involved. Moreover, several contributing factors have been found such as HLA group and drug interaction. Ethnic origin also affects neutrophil rate. That is why, in Great Britain, a subgroup of patients "benign ethnic neutropenia" has been introduced to enlarge threshold and allow these patients to access clozapine despite lower blood counts. Then, rechallenge choice has to be done on a case-by-case basis and only after considering the benefits and risks of such a treatment. Most of the time, clinical advice of rechallenge arises from the inefficiency of other antipsychotics and even sismotherapy failure. Patients and sometimes families have to be informed and give their consent. Preventive measures have been found such as taking a hematologic recommendation and doing twice-a-week blood sample monitoring. With regards lithium and G-CSF, some efficient doses are assumed (lithium: 0,4-1,1 mEq/L and G-CSF>0,3 mg/week). Lithium as G-CSF may have other adverse effects which need to be considered. There is no successful rechallenge reported after agranulocytosis. Some publications highlight that if neutropenia occurs on rechallenge, it will do so more quickly and more severe than at the time of initial trial of clozapine.

CONCLUSION

There is emerging evidence of successful clozapine rechallenging. However, further investigations are required as randomized controlled trials to reassess guidelines and establish the safety and effectiveness of the different procedures. Because of the practical and ethical difficulties of designing such studies, referral hospitals could be elected, and common background writing proposed in order to ease data comparison.

Clozapine: key discussion points for prescribers

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic medication for treatment-refractory schizophrenia and is also approved for suicidality in schizophrenia patients. However, it can cause significant medical morbidity and requires intensive medical monitoring once prescribed. Perhaps due to lack of familiarity with its use, it is underused in clinical practice and its initiation often delayed. This article reviews the literature on clozapine in order to measure its potential effectiveness against its adverse effects and ultimately aims to serve as a useful summary for clinicians in their everyday prescribing.

Successful rechallenge with clozapine following 'red alert'

A case is presented of a 23-year-old lady with treatment-resistant schizoaffective disorder who had responded well to treatment with clozapine. Fifteen months after satisfactory use of clozapine she had 'red alerts' from routine haematological monitoring indicating neutropenia. Clozapine was discontinued and she was admitted to the psychiatric hospital to manage the aftermath of discontinuing clozapine and start alternative treatment with other antipsychotics. Her mental health rapidly deteriorated. Adequate trials with amisulpride, haloperidol, olanzapine and flupenthixol decanoate yielded little improvement in her clinical state. After 9 months of non-response to other antipsychotic medications, she was rechallenged with clozapine, followed by improvement in her mental state. She was eventually discharged home after 14 months of hospitalisation in a stable mental state. She remained mentally stable in the community on clozapine for 18 months after rechallenge, with no further red alerts.

When can patients with potentially life-threatening adverse effects be rechallenged with clozapine? A systematic review of the published literature

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is widely prescribed for treatment refractory patients with schizophrenia, but its use is limited by potentially life threatening adverse effects. Rechallenge after these complications has been occasionally attempted in patients with severe psychotic symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To review the outcome of clozapine rechallenge after potentially life threatening adverse effects.

METHODS

Electronic, all-language, literature search (1972-2011) followed by demographic and clinical data extraction. The outcome of rechallenge was considered favorable when the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the proportion of patients who could continue clozapine was >50%.

RESULTS

Altogether, 138 patients (mean age: 36.3years, 65.7% male, 57.6% Caucasian, virtually all with schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis) underwent clozapine rechallenge after developing neutropenia (n=112), agranulocytosis (n=15), neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) (n=5), myocarditis (n=4), pericarditis (n=1) and lupus erythematosus (n=1). Rechallenge strategies were heterogeneous and not systematically evaluated. Clozapine rechallenge was successful in 78/112 patients (69.6%, CI: 60.6-77.4) after neutropenia, 3/15 (20%, CI: 7.1-45.2) after agranulocytosis, 5/5 (100%, CI: 56-100) after NMS, 3/4 (75%, CI: 30-95) after myocarditis, 1/1 after pericarditis, and 0/1 after clozapine-induced lupus. Successfully rechallenged patients were followed for 16-96weeks. None of the rechallenged patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

Although controlled studies are clearly needed, using a priori, confidence interval-based criteria, case reports/series suggest that in refractory patients who benefited from clozapine, careful rechallenge can be considered after neutropenia and NMS, but not after agranulocytosis and myocarditis.

Clozapine-induced late leukopenia

A patient with a 28-year history of schizophrenia was treated with a wide range of antipsychotic medications since diagnosis. She had experienced no clinically significant symptomatic relief until she commenced treatment on clozapine. Her psychotic symptoms, self care, and general sense of well-being improved significantly. After 6 years of successful treatment, she developed leukopenia and clozapine was discontinued. The following issues will be discussed in the article: rechallenge with clozapine following leukopenia during previous therapy and the choice of and haematological monitoring needs with other antipsychotic medications after clozapine-induced blood dyscrasia.

Children with schizophrenia: clinical picture and pharmacological treatment

Awareness of childhood-onset schizophrenia is rapidly increasing, with a more precise definition now available of the clinical picture and early signs, the outcome and the treatment strategies. Premorbid developmental impairments, including language, motor and social deficits, are more frequent and more pronounced in earlier- than in later-onset forms of schizophrenia. This 'pan-dysmaturation' is reported from the first months of life in more than half of the children who will develop childhood-onset schizophrenia, and it suggests a more severe and early disruption of brain development compared with the adolescent- and adult-onset disorder. The insidious onset in at least 75% of children, the high rates of premorbid problems and the hesitancy on the part of clinicians to make a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a child usually delay the recognition of the syndrome. Elementary auditory hallucinations are the most frequent positive symptom, while visual and tactile hallucinations are rarer. Delusions are less complex than in adolescents and are usually related to childhood themes. Negative symptoms are largely predominant, namely flat or inappropriate affect. A marked deterioration from the previous level of functioning is present in all these children, and an impaired outcome is reported in approximately 50-60% of them. The main diagnostic challenges are with differentiating childhood-onset schizophrenia from affective disorders (both depression and bipolar disorder) with psychotic symptoms, pervasive developmental disorders and severe personality disorders. Post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder without insight may also be misdiagnosed as schizophrenia. Furthermore, approximately 10% of children from the community report nonpsychotic hallucinations or delusions. Finally, children with atypical psychotic features that do not strictly fit diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia have been described, and new labels have been proposed to categorise these clinical patterns, such as multidimensionally impaired disorder and multiple complex developmental disorder. In the context of a multimodal approach, including behavioral, social, scholastic and familial interventions, a pharmacological treatment is usually the core treatment. Available experience from the few controlled studies, open studies and case reports on pharmacotherapy in children with schizophrenia aged <12 years is critically analysed in this review, with particular reference to the use of atypical antipsychotics in clinical practice. To date, the major evidence supports the efficacy of risperidone and olanzapine, while clozapine seems an effective option in treatment-refractory cases. Published experience with newer atypical antipsychotics (quetiapine, ziprasidone, aripiprazole) is still lacking in this age range. Safety data (namely extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, hyperprolactinaemia, haematological adverse effects, seizures, hepatotoxicity, metabolic effects, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and cardiovascular effects) are reviewed and discussed, along with strategies for management.

Recent Publications on Medications and Pharmacy

Hospital Pharmacy presents a new feature to keep pharmacists abreast of new publications in the medical/pharmacy literature. Articles of interest will be abstracted monthly regarding a broad scope of topics.