Second primary cancers in men with prostate cancer: an increased risk of male breast cancer

Risk of Subsequent Primary Cancers Among Adult-Onset 5-Year Cancer Survivors in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The number of cancer survivors who develop subsequent primary cancers (SPCs) is expected to increase.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the overall and cancer type-specific risks of SPCs among adult-onset cancer survivors by first primary cancer (FPC) types considering sex and age.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database of South Korea including 5-year cancer survivors diagnosed with an FPC in 2009 to 2010 and followed them until December 31, 2019. We measured the SPC incidence per 10,000 person-years and the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) compared with the incidence expected in the general population.

RESULTS

Among 266,241 survivors (mean age at FPC: 55.7 years; 149,352/266,241, 56.1% women), 7348 SPCs occurred during 1,003,008 person-years of follow-up (median 4.3 years), representing a 26% lower risk of developing SPCs (SIR 0.74, 95% CI 0.72-0.76). Overall, men with 14 of the 20 FPC types had a significantly lower risk of developing any SPCs; women with 7 of the 21 FPC types had a significantly lower risk of developing any SPCs. The risk of developing any SPC type differed by age; the risk was 28% higher in young (<40 years) cancer survivors (SIR 1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.42; incidence: 30 per 10,000 person-years) and 27% lower in middle-aged and older (≥40 years) cancer survivors (SIR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71-0.74; incidence: 80 per 10,000 person-years) compared with the age-corresponding general population. The most common types of FPCs were mainly observed as SPCs in cancer survivors, with lung (21.6%) and prostate (15.2%) cancers in men and breast (18.9%) and lung (12.2%) cancers in women. The risks of brain cancer in colorectal cancer survivors, lung cancer in laryngeal cancer survivors, and both kidney cancer and leukemia in thyroid cancer survivors were significantly higher for both sexes. Other high-risk SPCs varied by FPC type and sex. Strong positive associations among smoking-related cancers, such as laryngeal, head and neck, lung, and esophageal cancers, were observed. Substantial variation existed in the associations between specific types of FPC and specific types of SPC risk, which may be linked to hereditary cancer syndrome: for women, the risks of ovarian cancer for breast cancer survivors and uterus cancers for colorectal cancer survivors, and for men, the risk of pancreas cancer for kidney cancer survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

The varying risk for SPCs by age, sex, and FPC types in cancer survivors implies the necessity for tailored prevention and screening programs targeting cancer survivors. Lifestyle modifications, such as smoking cessation, are essential to reduce the risk of SPCs in cancer survivors. In addition, genetic testing, along with proactive cancer screening and prevention strategies, should be implemented for young cancer survivors because of their elevated risk of developing SPCs.

Evaluating SunSmart: a brief educational intervention promoting sun protection in young adult cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Young adult cancer survivors (YACS) are at risk for secondary skin cancers but relevant interventions have not been validated in this population. To address this, we designed and tested SunSmart, a set of two educational videos designed to promote sun protection (SP). One provides SP education (Information) and the second combines SP education with content on negative appearance consequences of sun exposure (Information + Appearance).

METHODS

One hundred ninety-three YACS (aged 18-35) were randomized to one of three groups: (1) Information, (2) Information + Appearance, or (3) control (sleep hygiene video). Participants completed measures on SP behaviors at baseline and follow-up. One-way ANCOVAs examined the intervention effect on follow-up SP behaviors controlling for baseline behaviors.

RESULTS

The intervention did not significantly affect SP behaviors. However, secondary analyses limited to participants with the lowest baseline SP adherence found that the Information + Appearance group had significantly lower intentional sun exposure than the control group (p = 0.02) at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to hypotheses, the SunSmart intervention did not significantly improve sun protection in YACS, even when it presented information on negative appearance consequences of sun exposure. However, secondary analyses suggest SunSmart may be more effective in YACS with the lowest SP adherence. Future research is required to improve intervention efficacy with YACS (e.g., increased focus on secondary cancer risks).

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Despite their increased risk of secondary skin cancer, YACS in the current study reported significant sun exposure and inadequate SP. The need for development and validation of effective interventions to address these concerns remains.

Safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis with a history of malignancy: 5-year results from the VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 trials

The VOYAGE 1 and 2 studies of guselkumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis are among the first studies of biologics to include patients with a history of malignancy. In these studies, 18 guselkumab-treated patients had a history of malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) &gt; 5 years prior to enrolment. These 18 patients were exposed to guselkumab for up to 5 years; during this time, one patient had a recurrence of bronchial carcinoma, and three patients developed new malignancies (breast cancer, melanoma and sebaceous carcinoma). All patients with new or recurrent malignancies had underlying risk factors for malignancy. Overall, the results of this analysis in a small population of patients with a history of malignancy support the favourable long-term safety profile of guselkumab.

Prevalence of men's health history in male breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Male breast carcinoma (MBC) is an uncommon disease, accounting for less than 0.5% of cancer diagnoses in men. Data on the prevalence thereof in Argentina are unknown.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of a men's health history associated with MBC as well as the anthropometric and clinical characteristics of the study population.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included all men according to original biological sex over 18 years of age with a history of breast cancer who sought care at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires [Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires] between January 2010 and December 2018.

RESULTS

We included 57 men with breast cancer. Their median age was 71 years. Of them, 53.06% had obesity and 24.53% had diabetes. With respect to men's health history, 5.56% (2/36) had infertility, 29.17% (14/48) had gynaecomastia and 60.71% (17/28) had sexual dysfunction. Some 63% (7/11) had androgen deficiency based on laboratory diagnosis; of them, 45.45% (5/11) had high gonadotropins.

CONCLUSION

We identified similarities with the literature as to the prevalence of obesity, diabetes and infertility in patients with MBC. The prevalence of testosterone deficiency was higher than reported for men of the same age. Many of these factors support the need to examine the role of endogenous hormones. Further research is required to help physicians care for and counsel men at higher risk of this disease.

An introduction to male breast cancer for urologists: epidemiology, diagnosis, principles of treatment, and special situations

Breast cancer (BC) is mainly considered a disease in women, but male BC (MaBC) accounts for approximately 1.0% of BC diagnoses and 0.5% of malignant neoplasms in the western population. The stigmatization of MaBC, the fact that men are less likely to undergo regular health screenings, and the limited knowledge of health professionals about MaBC contribute to men being diagnosed at more advanced stages. The aim of this article is to increase the visibility of MaBC among urologists, who have more contact with male patients. This review highlights key points about the disease, the risk factors associated with MaBC, and the options for treatment. Obesity and increased population longevity are among the important risk factors for MaBC, but published studies have identified family history as extremely relevant in these patients and associated with a high penetrance at any age. There is currently no screening for MaBC in the general population, but the possibility of screening in men at high risk for developing BC can be considered. The treatment of MaBC is multidisciplinary, and, because of its rarity, there are no robust clinical studies evaluating the role of systemic therapies in the management of both localized and metastatic disease. Therefore, in current clinical practice, treatment strategies for men with breast cancer are extrapolated from information arising from studies in female patients.

A Synchronous Diagnosis of Metastatic Male Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer

In this article, we present a patient diagnosed synchronously with metastatic male breast cancer and prostate cancer. This is a 63-year-old male and recent immigrant from Nigeria, who sought medical attention for progressively worsening of shortness of breath and acute progression of a chronic right breast mass. An invasive breast carcinoma was diagnosed by the core biopsy of the right breast mass. Within 2 months of his breast cancer diagnosis, the patient also was diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma after being worked up for urinary retention. By presenting this patient with a synchronous diagnosis with metastatic male breast cancer and prostate cancer, history of chronic right breast mass, and gynecomastia, we speculate on possible cancer etiologies and risk factors.

Breast Metastasis From Castrate-Resistant Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Mimicking as a Second Primary: A Case Report

The occurrence of breast metastasis from prostate carcinoma and primary breast carcinoma in men may cause a diagnostic dilemma. This report aims to present a patient diagnosed with metastatic castrate-resistant prostatic adenocarcinoma who developed breast metastasis mimicking as a second primary. A 57-year-old male patient presented with a breast mass while undergoing hormonal therapy for prostatic adenocarcinoma. The initial histopathologic diagnosis of the breast specimen was an infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma. The breast mass enlarged after four cycles of docetaxel. Immunostaining with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) was done on the breast specimen revealing a negative PSA and a moderately staining PSAP. These stains confirmed the diagnosis of a breast metastasis from prostatic adenocarcinoma. The differentiation between primary breast carcinoma and breast metastasis from prostate carcinoma is crucial. Hence, immunohistochemistry staining should be utilized for diagnosis and appropriate management.

Impact of a Changing Population Structure and Clustering of Cancer in Prostate Cancer Patients Depending on a First-Degree Family History

INTRODUCTION

In the last century, there have been major changes within the population structure in Germany. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a changing population structure on identification of familial prostate cancer (PCa), and to investigate how many and which types of other cancers have occurred in patients and their first-degree relatives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 19,540 patients were evaluated in a prospectively collected PCa family database and divided into four birth cohorts: 1925-1934 (cohort A), 1935-1944 (cohort B), 1945-1954 (cohort C), and 1955-1964 (cohort D). Other primary cancers and cancers of first-degree relatives were evaluated.

RESULTS

The percentage of PCa patients with ≥2 sons declined (A: 28.9% to D: 21.6%). The percentage of patients whose fathers lived for ≥65 years increased (B: 64.2% to D: 73.0%). Malignancies of the skin, the urinary tract, and the lymphoid/hematopoietic tissue were more common in patients with a positive first-degree PCa family history and their first-degree relatives. Additionally, first-degree relatives reported more often neoplasms of respiratory/intrathoracic organs and the female breast.

CONCLUSIONS

A small family size, an early deceased father, and a high number of sporadic cases complicate the identification of familial PCa patients. Thus, a detailed family history should also include unaffected first-degree relatives to avoid any misclassification. Findings of other primary cancers in patients and their relatives warrant further investigation.

Metachronous Malignancies in Men with Previous Prostate Cancer in Umbria, Italy, 1994–2003

Data about second primary tumors after prostate carcinoma are controversial. Some authors emphasize an increased incidence of some cancer sites, others an overall diminution. With the aim to provide further information to define the issue, we have analyzed the frequency of second metachronous primary malignancies in patients with diagnosed prostate cancer in the Umbria region of Italy. A total of 410 metachronous cancers among 4528 prostate cancer patients were abstracted from incident cases of the RTUP, over the period 1994–2003. This cohort was compared with all cases (except prostate cancers) recorded in the RTUP archive. The expected number of cases was obtained from indirect standardization with regional incidence rates of several sites. The significance of the observed/expected ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were based on the Poisson distribution. A significant standardized incidence ratio was found for all sites but prostate, with 410/351 observed/expected cases. The significance disappears considering all sites except prostate and skin non-melanomas. Among several sites, significant standardized incidence ratios were found for skin non-melanomas, for bladder, for rectum, but not for colon cancers. Kidney, ureter and urethra showed a nonsignificant standardized incidence ratio. Nasopharynx showed a significant standardized incidence ratio, but the result was based on a very small number of cases. In our data, the increase in urinary bladder and rectal cancers, after prostate cancer diagnosis, seems to be real: it is plausible that the number of second cancers may be due to increased urologist surveillance, which, in our Region, does not seem to be reduced in elderly men.

Risk of Second Cancer in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors and Influence of Family History

Purpose Although advances in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treatment have led to improved disease-free survival, this has been accompanied by an increased risk of second cancers. We sought to quantify the second cancer risks and to investigate the impact of family history. Patients and Methods Using the Swedish Family-Cancer Project Database, we identified 9,522 individuals with primary HL diagnosed between 1965 and 2012. We calculated standardized incidence ratios and cumulative incidence of second cancer in HL survivors and compared the standardized incidence ratios of lung, breast, colorectal, and all second cancers in HL survivors with and without a site-specific family history of cancer. Interactions between family history of cancer and HL treatment were evaluated under additive and multiplicative models. Results Overall, the risk of a second cancer in HL survivors was increased 2.39-fold (95% CI, 2.29 to 2.53). The 30-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer in women diagnosed with HL at younger than 35 years of age was 13.8%. We observed no significant difference in cancer risk over successive time periods. The risk of all second cancers was 1.3-fold higher for HL survivors with a first-degree relative with cancer ( P < .001), with 3.3-fold, 2.1-fold, and 1.8-fold differences shown for lung, colorectal, and breast cancers, respectively. Moreover, a greater than additive interaction between family history of lung cancer and HL treatment was shown ( P = .03). Conclusion HL survivorship is associated with a substantive risk of a second cancer. Notably, the risk is higher in individuals with a family history of cancer. This information should be used to inform risk-adapted therapy and to assist in screening to reduce long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with HL.

Special considerations in the evaluation and management of breast cancer in men

Breast cancer in men is relatively uncommon but its incidence has been rising. Traditionally, the management of breast cancer in men is based on extrapolation from clinical trials of breast cancer in women, due to the much more extensive data available in women with this disease. There are, however, unique characteristics that distinguish breast cancer in men and these should be taken into consideration when managing this patient population. Breast cancer in men is more frequently estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) positive, and less frequently HER2 amplified. Lobular carcinoma, which accounts for 10-15% of breast cancers in women, is exceptionally rare in men. Genetic risk factors, particularly BRCA2 mutations, are increasingly recognized as a key risk factor for breast cancer in men and genetic testing is now routinely recommended for all men diagnosed with breast cancer. Tamoxifen remains the gold standard endocrine therapy for breast cancer in men, but other endocrine agents such as the aromatase inhibitors (AI) and fulvestrant are increasingly being used. While superior to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women, the use of AIs for adjuvant therapy in men with breast cancer may not be optimal since the physiology of hormonal regulation in men resembles that of premenopausal rather than postmenopausal women. Emerging areas of investigation include the role of genomic risk stratification to gain further insight into the biology of breast cancer in men, the study of the androgen receptor (AR) as a therapeutic target, and the role of gonadal suppression in the management of the disease. There is clearly a more consorted effort to study breast cancer in men as a unique disease in order to have a better understanding of its biology and we are likely to witness further advances that will help us better manage this unique disease situation.

Male Breast Cancer

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancer diagnoses worldwide. Although breast carcinomas share certain characteristics in both genders, there are notable differences. Most studies on men with breast cancer are very small. Thus, most data on male breast cancer are derived from studies on females. However, when a number of these small studies are grouped together, we can learn more from them. This review emphasizes the incidence, etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, pathology, survival, and prognostic factors related to MBC.

Optimal delivery of male breast cancer follow-up care: improving outcomes

Male breast cancer is a rare disease. There are limited data to inform optimal treatment and follow-up strategies in this population. Currently, most follow-up guidelines are drawn from the vast literature on female breast cancer, despite the fact that male breast cancer has unique biological characteristics. In this review, we discuss clinical characteristics of male breast cancer as well as current best practices for long-term care with a focus on surveillance, screening, and treatment-related symptom management in male breast cancer survivors.

Molecular profiling of male breast cancer - lost in translation?

Breast cancer is the most common cancer form in women and it has been extensively studied on the molecular level. Male breast cancer (MBC), on the other hand, is rare and has not been thoroughly investigated in terms of transcriptional profiles or genomic aberrations. Most of our understanding of MBC has therefore been extrapolated from knowledge of female breast cancer. Although differences in addition to similarities with female breast cancer have been reported, the same prognostic and predictive markers are used to determine optimal management strategies for both men and women diagnosed with breast cancer. This review is focused on prognosis for MBC patients, prognostic and predictive factors and molecular subgrouping; comparisons are made with female breast cancer. Information was collected from relevant literature on both male and female breast cancer from the MEDLINE database between 1992 and 2014. MBC is a heterogeneous disease, and on the molecular level many differences compared to female breast cancer have recently been revealed. Two distinct subgroups of MBC, luminal M1 and luminal M2, have been identified which differ from the well-established intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer in women. These novel subgroups of breast cancer therefore appear unique to MBC. Furthermore, several studies report inferior survival for men diagnosed with breast cancer compared to women. New promising prognostic biomarkers for MBC (e.g. NAT1) deserving further attention are reviewed. Further prospective studies aimed at validating the novel subgroups and recently proposed biomarkers for MBC are warranted to provide the basis for optimal patient management in this era of personalized medicine. This article is part of a Directed Issue entitled: Rare Cancers.

Second primary cancer risk - the impact of applying different definitions of multiple primaries: results from a retrospective population-based cancer registry study

Background

There is evidence that cancer survivors are at increased risk of second primary cancers. Changes in the prevalence of risk factors and diagnostic techniques may have affected more recent risks.

Methods

We examined the incidence of second primary cancer among adults in the West of Scotland, UK, diagnosed with cancer between 2000 and 2004 (n = 57,393). We used National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results and International Agency for Research on Cancer definitions of multiple primary cancers and estimated indirectly standardised incidence ratios (SIR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

There was a high incidence of cancer during the first 60 days following diagnosis (SIR = 2.36, 95% CI = 2.12 to 2.63). When this period was excluded the risk was not raised, but it was high for some patient groups; in particular women aged <50 years with breast cancer (SIR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.58 to 2.78), patients with bladder (SIR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.67) and head & neck (SIR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.67 to 2.21) cancer. Head & neck cancer patients had increased risks of lung cancer (SIR = 3.75, 95% CI = 3.01 to 4.62), oesophageal (SIR = 4.62, 95% CI = 2.73 to 7.29) and other head & neck tumours (SIR = 6.10, 95% CI = 4.17 to 8.61). Patients with bladder cancer had raised risks of lung (SIR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.62 to 2.88) and prostate (SIR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.72 to 3.30) cancer.

Conclusions

Relative risks of second primary cancers may be smaller than previously reported. Premenopausal women with breast cancer and patients with malignant melanomas, bladder and head & neck cancers may benefit from increased surveillance and advice to avoid known risk factors.

The risk of developing a second primary cancer in melanoma patients: a comprehensive review of the literature and meta-analysis

The number of cutaneous melanoma survivors has been increasing for years due to improvements in early diagnosis and subsequent prolonged survival. These patients are at increased risk of developing a second melanoma and a second primary malignancy (SPM) at other sites as well. We performed a review of scientific literature and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of developing a SPM (other than melanoma) among melanoma patients. Twenty-three independent papers and over 350,000 melanoma patients were included. Risk of cancer among melanoma survivors was increased overall (1.57, 95% CI 1.29-1.90) and at several sites: bone (2.09, 95% CI 1.08-4.05), non-melanoma skin cancer (4.01, 95% CI 1.81-8.87), soft tissue (6.80, 95% CI 1.29-35.98), colon-rectum (1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.25), female breast (1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.22), kidney (1.34, 95% CI 1.23-1.45), prostate (1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.37) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1.37, 95% CI 1.22-1.54). The overall risk of SPM showed a tendency to decrease as the time from melanoma diagnosis lengthened. Most of our findings may be explained by the tendency of some exposures, which are risk factors for different tumors, to occur simultaneously in the same individuals. These results suggest primary and secondary cancer prevention counselling for melanoma survivors.

[The issue of low doses in radiation therapy and impact on radiation-induced secondary malignancies]

Several studies have well documented that the risk of secondary neoplasms is increasing among patients having received radiation therapy as part of their primary anticancer treatment. Most frequently, radiation-induced neoplasms occur in volume exposed to high doses. However, the impact of "low" doses (<5 Gy) in radiation-induced carcinogenesis should be clinically considered because modern techniques of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic irradiation significantly increase tissue volumes receiving low doses. The risk inherent to these technologies remains uncertain and estimates closely depend on the chosen risk model. According to the (debated) linear no-threshold model, the risk of secondary neoplasms could be twice higher with IMRT, as compared to conformal radiation therapy. It seems that only proton therapy could decrease both high and low doses delivered to non-target volumes. Except for pediatric tumors, for which the unequivocal risk of second malignancies (much higher than in adults) should be taken into account, epidemiological data suggest that the risk of secondary cancer related to low doses could be very low, even negligible in some cases. However, clinical follow-up remains insufficient and a marginal increase in secondary tumors could counterbalance the benefit of a highly sophisticated irradiation technique. It therefore remains necessary to integrate the potential risk of new irradiation modalities in a risk-adapted strategy taking into account therapeutic objectives but also associated risk factors, such as age (essentially), chemotherapy, or life style.

Male breast cancer: risk factors, biology, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship

BACKGROUND

The causes, optimal treatments, and medical/psychosocial sequelae of breast cancer in men are poorly understood.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the English language literature was conducted to identify studies relevant to male breast cancer between 1987 and 2012 and including at least 20 patients. Searches were carried out on PubMed using the title terms 'male breast cancer' or 'male breast carcinoma'.

RESULTS

Relevant published data regarding risk factors, biological characteristics, presentation and prognosis, appropriate evaluation and treatment, and survivorship issues in male breast cancer patients are presented. BRCA2 mutations, age, conditions that alter the estrogen/androgen ratio, and radiation are proven risk factors. Disease biology is distinct in men, but diagnostic approaches and treatments for men are generally extrapolated from those in women due to inadequate research in men. Survivorship issues in men may include sexual and hormonal side-effects of endocrine therapies as well as unique psychosocial impacts of the disease.

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to address gaps in knowledge pertaining to care of male breast cancer patients and survivors.

Histology and outcomes of newly detected lung lesions in melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Melanoma frequently metastasizes to the lung. Improved radiologic techniques may decrease the need for biopsy of such lesions. The aim of this study was to examine factors predictive of a positive biopsy of melanoma.

METHODS

Using the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center melanoma database, all patients with melanoma who had undergone biopsy of a suspicious new lung lesion from 1996 to 2009 were identified. Age, date of diagnosis, histology, and stage were obtained. Chart review was carried out to obtain medical history, smoking status, radiological appearance, and histology of lung lesions biopsied.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-nine patients were identified; median age was 63 years; 48% were never smokers; 27% had a prior nonmelanoma cancer; 88% of lung nodules were malignant: 69% melanoma, 19% other cancers. Among 113 patients undergoing positron emission tomography (PET), proportions of benign, melanoma, and nonmelanoma 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-avid nodules did not differ (P = 0.53). On multivariable analysis, >stage I melanoma, negative smoking history, multiple lung nodules, and no prior nonmelanoma cancer were significantly associated with a melanoma biopsy result rather than other cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, 31% of lung lesions were not melanoma. In the subset undergoing PET, this did not differentiate between benign and malignant lesions. Biopsy is mandated in melanoma patients with new lung nodules.

Prostate cancer risk alleles and their associations with other malignancies

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether certain risk alleles are responsible for the relationship between prostate cancer (CaP) and other malignancies. CaP has been associated with other common malignancies. Recently, numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with CaP susceptibility.

METHODS

We genotyped 1121 patients with CaP for 36 risk alleles known to be significantly associated with CaP susceptibility and determined their relationships to other malignancies in CaP probands and their first-degree relatives.

RESULTS

The most common other malignancies in the CaP probands were nonmelanoma skin cancer (13.6%), leukemia (7.3%), melanoma (3.9%), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (0.7%), colorectal cancer (0.6%), and multiple myeloma (0.3%). Among the probands, a significantly increased frequency of leukemia was found in the carriers of SNP rs2736098 (5p15, P = .03) and melanoma in the carriers of either SNP rs1512268 (8p21, P = .006) or SNP rs5759167 (22q13, P = .02). Multiple myeloma was more common in carriers of SNP rs9364554 (6q25, P = .02). The probands who were carriers of SNP rs16901979 (8q24) were significantly more likely to report a family history of melanoma (P = .03), and the probands with a family history of multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's disease were significantly more likely to be carriers of SNP rs12621278 (2q31, P = .04) and rs6465657 (7q21, P = .02), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Certain alleles associated with CaP susceptibility might be associated with an increased or a decreased risk of other malignancies in CaP probands and their first-degree relatives. Additional studies are warranted to examine the underlying mechanisms of these SNPs in CaP and other malignancies.

Male breast cancer

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease. However, as global populace ages, there is a trend to MBC increasing. Although aetiology is still unclear, constitutional, environmental, hormonal (abnormalities in estrogen/androgen balance) and genetic (positive family history, Klinefelter syndrome, mutations in BRCA1 and specially BRCA2) risk factors are already known. Clinic manifestation is painless hard and fixed nodule in the subareolar region in 75% of cases, with nipple commitment earlier than in women. Breast cancer has similar prognostic factors in males and females, among which axillary adenopathy (present in 40-55% cases) is the most important one. Although mammography, ultrasonography and scintigraphy can be useful tools in diagnosis; clinical assessment, along with a confirmatory biopsy, remains the main step in the evaluation of men with breast lesions. Infiltrating ductal carcinoma is the most frequent histological type. The established standard of care is modified radical mastectomy followed by tamoxifen for endocrine-responsive positive disease, although other options are being explored. While similarities between breast cancer in males and females exist, it is not appropriate to extrapolate data from female disease to the treatment of male. There is a need for specific multi-institutional trials to better understanding of clinicopathologic features and establishment of optimal therapy for this disease.

Male breast cancer: a survey at the Helsinki University Central Hospital during 1981-2006

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to analyze the behavior of male breast cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-eight male breast cancer patients were treated at the HUCH during 1981-2006. Data on risk factors, tumor characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment and survival were obtained by chart review.

RESULTS

Presentation occurred at a median age of 63 years, most often due to a self-detected lump. The median size of the primary tumor was 1.8 cm and 14% were T4 tumors. Forty-seven percent had lymph node metastases and 4% distant metastases at diagnosis. Ductal carcinoma was the most common tumor type. All tumors with known receptor status were positive for estrogen receptor (ER) and 79% for progesterone receptor (PgR). Her-2 overexpression was found in 2/19 patients (11%). A family history of breast cancer, obesity, high alcohol intake and liver cirrhosis were the most often seen risk factors. Nineteen percent had one or two other malignancies, the most common second malignancy being prostate cancer in 7%. Ninety-seven percent were operated by mastectomy and 90% by axillary evacuation while sentinel node biopsy alone was done only in 7%. Sixty percent of the patients received radiotherapy, 64% adjuvant hormonal treatment, 20% adjuvant chemotherapy, and 2% adjuvant trastuzumab. Fourteen patients (25%) experienced a relapse of which 60% were distant, bone being the most common site. During follow-up 21 patients (37%) died, of whom nine of breast cancer and 12 due to other causes. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Male breast cancer behaves and is today treated in many respects like postmenopausal breast cancer. However, due to rudimentary breast tissue the symptoms, diagnosis and especially a higher amount of T4 tumors differ from that of females. Also the risk factor profile and histologic subgroups seem different. The 5-year OS of 75% is clearly higher than 44% reported at our institution in 1982.

Etiologic factors for male breast cancer in the U.S. Veterans Affairs medical care system database

The etiology of male breast cancer is largely unknown, reflecting its relative rarity. Although a number of previous studies have suggested relationships with a variety of medical conditions, the results have largely derived from case-control studies and may reflect recall biases. Within the large U.S. Veterans Affairs computerized medical care system database, we had the opportunity to access 26 million hospital discharge records over the period 1969-1996 and to relate various documented medical conditions to the risk of subsequent male breast cancer. This allowed us to calculate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for male breast cancer associated with conditions occurring one or more years after initial hospitalization, adjusted for age, race, calendar year, duration of follow-up, and number of hospital visits. Among 4,501,578 men aged 18-100 years, a total of 642 cases of primary male breast cancer were identified (523 among whites, 119 among blacks). Medical conditions that were significantly related to risk were diabetes (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.60), obesity (1.98, 1.55-2.54), orchitis/epididymitis (1.84, 1.10-3.08), Klinefelter syndrome (29.64, 12.26-71.68), and gynecomastia (5.86, 3.74-9.17). Additionally, among black patients, cholelithiasis emerged as a significant risk predictor (3.45, 1.59-7.47). Diseases that have previously been related to male breast cancer risk that were not supported by our study results included thyroid diseases, smoking-related conditions, liver cirrhosis, prostatic hyperplasia, and fractures. After adjustment for obesity, the association with diabetes disappeared, but that with gynecomastia persisted. In multivariate models that simultaneously considered all important medical predictors of risk, significant risks were seen for Klinefelter syndrome (16.83, 6.81-41.62), gynecomastia (5.08, 3.21-8.03), obesity (1.91, 1.50-2.44), and orchitis/epididymitis (1.80, 1.08-3.01). These results support previous speculations that male breast cancer is influenced not only by tissue at risk, but also by hormonal and inflammatory factors.

Incidence of prostate cancer in male breast cancer patients: a risk factor for prostate cancer screening

Synchronous or metachronous occurrences of both prostate cancer and male breast cancer are rarely reported, but provide insight into their hormonal and genetic biology. We sought to determine the incidence of prostate cancer in male breast cancer patients at our institution, and to examine estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER-2/neu receptor (HR) status in these patients. A retrospective review was conducted of male breast cancer patients from 1990 to 2006. Histopathologic characteristics and hormone receptor expression was obtained. In 69 patients with male breast cancer, 12 (17%) also had a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Nine had ER-positive status and three were unreported. PR status was positive in 5, whereas 3 had PR-negative status. HR status was positive in 1, whereas 5 had HR-negative status. Male breast cancer patients in this cohort have an incidence of prostate cancer higher than would be predicted in the general population; this risk factor has implications for careful prostate cancer screening.

Higher than expected association of clinical prostate and bladder cancers

PURPOSE

In this study we evaluated the risk of a second malignancy of the bladder or prostate in patients with a previous diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) or urothelial cancer (TCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all cases of PCa and TCC diagnosed between January 1996 and June 2003. Only PCa diagnosed due to abnormal digital rectal examination or increased prostate specific antigen were included. All patients with TCC presented with hematuria or irritative voiding symptoms and the diagnoses were confirmed with a tissue diagnosis. The incidence of lung, colon and renal cancers was also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 816 men were diagnosed with PCa and/or TCC. Of 673 men initially diagnosed with PCa 21 had TCC. Of 149 men initially diagnosed with TCC 18 had PCa. Average age at PCa and TCC diagnosis +/- SD was 68.2 +/- 7.9 and 68.2 +/- 10.4 years, respectively. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of TCC in patients with PCa (SIR 4.31, 95% CI 2.411 to 7.110) and of PCa in patients with TCC (SIR 3.83, 95% CI 1.911 to 6.858) was significantly increased. There was no statistical significant difference in SIR for TCC in men with or without radiotherapy. SIR for lung, renal or colon cancer was not significantly different from what was expected.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PCa have higher incidence of bladder cancer and those with bladder cancer have a higher incidence of PCa. This study has clinical implications in the care of these patients and it may stimulate research interest that may identify common pathways of carcinogenesis.

Second cancers in patients with male breast cancer: a literature review

PURPOSE

The risk of second malignancies among female breast cancer patients has been studied for decades. In contrast, very little is known about second primary tumors in men. Risk factors for breast cancer in men, including genetic, hormonal and environmental factors, provide parallels to the etiology of breast cancer in women. This review considers the literature related to the risk of developing a second cancer in patients with male breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature between 1966 and 2007 was conducted and acceptable articles used for analysis. All retrieved articles were screened to identify any papers that had been missed. Studies were included if they discussed the risk of subsequent malignancy in patients with male breast cancer.

RESULTS

Patients with history of male breast cancer have an increased risk of a second ipsilateral, or contralateral breast cancer (standardized incidence ratio 30-110). The risk of subsequent contralateral breast cancer was highest in men under 50 years of age at the time of the diagnosis of the initial cancer. The data on non-breast second primary cancers is diverse. One study has suggested an increased incidence of cancers of the small intestine, prostate, rectum and pancreas, and of non-melanoma skin cancer and myeloid leukaemia. Other investigators did not find an increase in the overall risk of subsequent cancer development in men diagnosed initially with primary breast cancer. Although sarcoma, lung and esophageal cancers are well recognized complications of radiation therapy for female breast cancer, there is no evidence for the association of these cancers following radiation therapy in male breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the incidence of second primary cancer in patients with primary male breast cancer requires further study, male breast cancer survivors should probably undergo periodic screening for the early detection of second breast cancers and other adverse health effects.

Family history of cancer as a risk factor for second malignancies after Hodgkin's lymphoma

This study estimated the risk of second primary malignancies after Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in relation to family history of cancer, age at diagnosis and latency, among 6946 patients treated for HL in Sweden in 1965-1995 identified through the Swedish Cancer Register (SCR). First-degree relatives (FDRs) to the HL patients and their malignancies were then ascertained together with their malignancies through the Multi-Generation Registry and SCR. The HL patient cohort was stratified on the number of FDRs with cancer, and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) of developing SM were analysed. In the HL cohort, 781 SM were observed 1 year or longer after HL diagnosis. The risk for developing SM increased with the number of FDRs with cancer, SIRs being 2.26, 3.01, and 3.45 with 0, 1, or >or=2 FDRs with cancer, respectively. Hodgkin's lymphoma long-term survivors treated at a young age with a family history of cancer carry an increased risk for developing SM and may represent a subgroup where standardised screening for the most common cancer sites could be offered in a stringent surveillance programme.

Risk of second primary malignancies and causes of death in patients with adenocarcinoma and carcinoid of the small intestine

We studied risk of second malignancies and causes of death in 1829 cases of adenocarcinoma and 3055 cases of carcinoid tumours in the small bowel reported to the Swedish Cancer Registry from 1960 through to 2000. Data on causes of death were analysed as from 1966 whereas data on second tumours was available during the whole registry-period. Follow-up was available until 2001. Standard mortality ratio (SMR) and standard incidence ratio (SIR) were calculated. Female patients with adenocarcinoma had increased risk of acquiring cancer in the female genital organs (SIR 3.2; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.9-5.0) and breasts (SIR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-5.4). Both sexes combined had increased risk of second tumours in the gastrointestinal tract (SIR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.1) and skin (SIR 4.6; 95% CI 1.2-12). Men with carcinoid tumour had increased risk of prostate cancer (SIR 2.8; 95% CI 1.6-4.6). Increased risk was seen for both sexes with carcinoid for malignant melanoma (SIR 6.3; 95% CI 2.7-12), malignant skin tumours (SIR 3.6; 95% CI 1.7-6.7) and malignancies of endocrine organs (SIR 2.3 95% CI 1.3-3.8). Patients with adenocarcinoma had increased risk of dying from malignant diseases other than the primary cancer (SMR 9.5; 95% CI 8.6-10) and gastrointestinal disease (SMR 2.6 95% CI 1.6-4.2). The cohort with carcinoid had higher than expected risk of dying from malignant disease (SMR 4.3; 95% CI 4.0-4.6), gastrointestinal disease (SMR 2.8; 95% CI 2.1-3.6) and cardiovascular disease (SMR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.3). The increased risk of second malignant tumours is an indication of common aetiology, or possibly, a general vulnerability to malignant disease for these patients. A detailed analysis of causes of death in a population-based cohort of small intestinal malignancies has not been presented before in the literature.

What makes a man a man? The lived experience of male breast cancer

Male breast cancer is a rare condition with scant research into its psychosocial impact. This phenomenologic study sought to elicit its lived experience. Following analysis of interview data, 4 key themes emerged: Living with male breast cancer, concealment as a strategy for managing the diagnosis, a contested masculinity, interacting with health services. Male breast cancer constitutes a unique lived experience for men that is unparalleled in other disease profiles. The idea of living with a feminized illness was very distressing and stigmatizing for some men. Furthermore, treatment resulted in a profound change to the concept of their embodied selves and constituted a significant change to body image and sexuality. This was reinforced in participants who experienced erectile dysfunction related to tamoxifen therapy. Sadly, some health professionals were unable to offer specific psychosocial support, and participants felt marginalized from the potential benefits of the treatment environment. However, participants adapted to the illness by reasserting and renegotiating masculinity and finding ways to accommodate life with a stigmatizing condition and an altered body image.

Synchronous male breast cancer and carcinoma of prostate in 90-year-old male, presented with spinal cord compression and multiple spine lytic lesions

Male breast cancer and prostate cancer are similar in many ways, including the potential role of steroid hormones in their pathogenesis. We describe a 90-year-old male patient, who came with synchronous male breast cancer and carcinoma of the prostate. The first presentation was spinal cord compression with multiple lytic lesions in the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae on computed tomography. Serum tumor marker tests revealed an elevated serum PSA level of 104 ng/dL (normal <4 ng/dL) and a low free PSA of 11.6%. A histological examination of a specimen from a lytic lesion of the spine was consistent with metastatic breast cancer and a needle biopsy of the prostate showed adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 4.

Bladder cancer incidence and risk factors in men with prostate cancer: results from Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor

PURPOSE

We evaluated a large disease registry to determine the incidence of bladder cancer in patients with prostate cancer and investigate whether the type of treatment for prostate cancer increased the risk of bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the CaPSURE disease registry for men diagnosed with prostate cancer plus bladder cancer between 1989 and 2003. Demographics, comorbidities and prostate cancer treatment modalities were compared in patients with and without bladder cancer. A backward stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to predict bladder cancer onset after treatment for prostate cancer in patients who had bladder cancer 30 days or greater after prostate cancer treatment.

RESULTS

Of 9,780 patients from CaPSURE 143 (1.46%) also had bladder cancer. Patients with bladder cancer and prostate cancer were older (p<0.01) and more likely to be white (p=0.03), and they had lower levels of income (p<0.01) and education (p=0.04) than patients with prostate cancer only. Comorbidities did not differ between patients with and without bladder cancer. Patients treated with radical prostatectomy were approximately half as likely to have posttreatment bladder cancer as patients who underwent radiation therapy (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.89). Patients who smoked had an independent increase in the risk of bladder cancer (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.09-3.97), while smokers treated with radiation therapy were at almost 4-fold risk for bladder cancer (HR 3.65, 95% CI 1.45-9.16).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of bladder cancer in patients with prostate cancer was 1.5%. Radiation therapy and smoking increased the risk of bladder cancer.

Risk of Cancer of the Prostate and of the Kidney Parenchyma following Bladder Cancer

Aims and Background

A registry-based cohort study of male patients with bladder cancer was conducted to determine the relative risk of second primary cancer of the prostate and kidney, the uni-/multivariate differences in relative risk according to patient characteristics, the cumulative risk by duration of the follow-up, and the prevalence:incidence ratio of prostate and kidney cancer cases detected in the first 6 months after the diagnosis of bladder cancer.

Methods

The complete case records of all male patients (n = 2025) diagnosed with bladder cancer between 1986 and 2002 were extracted from the database of the Romagna Cancer Registry: 1539 patients were eligible for analysis of the incidence of following prostate and kidney cancers, of the relative risk and the standardized incidence ratio specific for the time interval of follow-up.

Results

A total of 108 prostate cancer cases and 23 kidney cancer cases were observed during the follow-up. The relative risk of second primary cancer of the prostate and kidney was respectively 3.52 (95% CI, 2.89-4.25) and 3.90 (95% CI, 2.475.85). The absolute excess risk was 11.8 × 1000 for prostate cancer and 2.5 × 1000 for kidney cancer. The number of prevalent cases of prostate and kidney cancer detected was approximately 10 times greater than the expected number based on incidence rates from the general population. During the follow-up, incidence of prostate cancer stabilized at a level that was 3- to 4-fold greater than that expected. Despite fluctuations, a decrease was also observed for incidence of kidney cancer.

Conclusions

In summary, our study showed the relatively constant high incidence of prostate and kidney cancers in bladder cancer patients over time. The possibility of subsequent cancer implies that an appropriate long surveillance is required. The pertinence depends on the duration of the follow- up as well as the degree of surveillance.

Genomic scan of 12 hereditary prostate cancer families having an occurrence of pancreas cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is a genetically heterogeneous disease. Using the occurrence of other cancers in hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) families is a promising strategy for developing genetically homogeneous data sets that can enhance the ability to identify susceptibility loci using linkage analysis.

METHODS

Twelve HPC families with the co-occurrence of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were selected from the Prostate Cancer Genetic Research Study (PROGRESS). Non-parametric linkage analysis for a prostate/pancreas cancer susceptibility phenotype was performed using 441 genome-wide microsatellite markers.

RESULTS

No statistically significant linkage signal was detected in this analysis. The strongest linkage signals, as measured by Kong and Cox LOD score (KC LOD), were observed on chromosomes 2q37.2-q37.3 (KC LOD = 1.01; P = 0.02) and 16q23.2 (KC LOC = 1.05; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of statistically significant findings, four chromosomal regions, three of which (2q, 16q, 17q) were previously noted as harboring potential susceptibility loci, showed suggestive linkage results in this scan.

Rectosigmoid cancer after radiotherapy for prostate cancer can be detected early and successfully treated

The clinical features and outcomes of rectosigmoid cancers (RSCs) occurring after radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer were reviewed to determine whether they are significantly different to RSC occurring without those precedents, whether the subsequent RSC could be either predicted or detected early, and whether they can be effectively treated. Eight patients who had been treated by RT for prostate cancer subsequently developed lower gastrointestinal tract symptoms consistent with proctopathy, however, investigation by endoscopy indicated RSC. These cases were reviewed in detail. The most common presenting symptom was mild bleeding. All eight RSCs were detected before the development of metastatic disease and successfully treated. Only one required an anteroposterior resection. Otherwise, there were no unusual features about any of the cases that would have predicted the occurrence of RSC or enabled earlier detection. No complications occurred that could be attributed to prior RT. Six recommendations for clinicians are offered on the basis of these cases and the relevant published work. In particular, when symptoms of proctopathy occur after RT for prostate cancer the conclusion that radiation proctopathy is the cause should not be drawn until confirmed by endoscopy. Prior RT did not increase the risks involved in colorectal surgery in this setting.

Secondary cancers after a lung carcinoid primary: A population-based analysis

Carcinoid tumors of the lung were first described in 1937, yet little is known about their etiology. The aim of the present investigation was to determine if there was excess risk of secondary cancers in a population-based sample after a lung carcinoid tumor diagnosis which may provide insight to the etiology. Subjects were 1882 cases diagnosed with carcinoid tumors of the lung between 1988 and 2000 whose information was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program database. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated by dividing the observed number of second primary cancers by the expected number of cancers. Excess risk of breast cancer was seen following diagnosis of a carcinoid tumor (SIR=1.80 95% CI 1.22-2.55). When stratified by time after diagnosis, excess risk of breast cancers in women was seen in the first 5 years after carcinoid diagnosis (SIR=1.68 95% CI 1.08-2.50) but fewer than expected breast cancers were diagnosed greater than 5 years after carcinoid diagnosis (SIR=0.29 95% CI 0.09-0.68). Prostate cancers also occurred 2.8 times more often than expected (95% CI 1.66-4.43), with risk being elevated only in the first 5 years post-carcinoid diagnosis. Development of lung carcinoids may be the result of genetic predisposition or environmental exposures, particularly those that are hormonally related. The role of genetics and sex hormones in lung carcinoid development, as well as the identification of other risk factors, should be explored.

Comparative epidemiology of breast cancer among men and women in the US, 1996 to 2000

OBJECTIVE

Few investigations of breast cancer among men have been conducted because of the relative rarity of this malignancy. The objective of this analysis was to compare the demographic, pathological, and clinical features of breast cancer among men and women.

METHODS

Breast cancer among 6379 men and 744,275 women was identified through 34 US population-based registries in the US during the period 1996 to 2000. These registries were estimated to represent 69% of the US population. Age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIR) were calculated per million population using counts derived from the 2000 US census.

RESULTS

The AAIR of breast cancer among men (16.6) was substantially lower than the incidence among women (1557.7). Rates of breast cancer among black men were higher than among white and Asian-Pacific Island men, in contrast to women among whom rates in whites exceeded those among other ethnic groups. Similar to women, breast cancer rates among non-Hispanic men were 50% greater than among Hispanic men. Ductal cancer was the most common histologic type diagnosed in both sexes. The incidence of lobular cancer was rare in men, but Paget's disease and papillary carcinoma occurred with lower relative frequency in women than in men. Lobular breast cancers were less common among black men and women than among other ethnic groups. In situ breast cancer was diagnosed in 10.8% of men and 16.2% of women. Localized breast cancer was the most common stage at diagnosis in both sexes and all ethnic groups, although women were more likely than men to be diagnosed at a localized stage. Cancer was 10% more likely to be diagnosed in the left breast than the right breast among men compared to 4% in women.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the rare incidence of breast cancer in men, the descriptive epidemiology of this malignancy is surprisingly similar to that in women. An explanation for the greater relative incidence of breast cancer in black men is a research challenge.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in men: a review

Breast carcinoma in men is rare and comprises approximately 1% of all breast cancer cases. In contrast to the increase in the detection rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in women resulting from the wide use of screening mammography programs, the rate of male DCIS is still small and represents approximately 5% of all male breast cancers. Considerable debate exists concerning the nature of this entity, including the clinical course, pathologic findings, treatment, and prognosis. In this review, the relevant literature dealing with male DCIS is summarized in an attempt to more precisely define the features of this disease.