1
|
Anderson RT, Eton DT, Camacho FT, Kennedy EM, Brenin CM, DeGuzman PB, Carter KF, Guterbock T, Ruddy KJ, Cohn WF. Impact of comorbidities and treatment burden on general well-being among women's cancer survivors. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:2. [PMID: 33411204 PMCID: PMC7790943 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00264-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gains in cancer detection and treatment have meant that more patients are now living with both cancer and other chronic health conditions, which may become burdensome. We used the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-Management (PETS) framework to study challenges in self-management and its impact on health among survivors of women's cancers who are caring for other chronic health conditions. METHODS Applicability of the PETS domains among survivors of women's cancers with comorbidities was assessed in focus groups to create the study survey. Women surviving primary breast, cervical, ovarian, or endometrial/uterine cancer treated between 6 months and 3 years prior at two large healthcare systems in Virginia were mailed study invitation letters to complete a telephone-based survey. The survey included questions on cancer treatment history, comorbid conditions prior to cancer, treatment and self-management experiences, health literacy, financial security, and items on self-management activities, self-management difficulties and self-management impact (i.e., role/social activity limitations and physical/mental exhaustion). Additionally, general health was assessed with items from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Hierarchical regression models and path analysis were used to examine correlates of self-management impact on general physical health (GPH) and mental health (GMH). RESULTS Of 1448 patients contacted by mail, 274 (26%) returned an interest form providing their consent to be contacted. Of these, 183 completed the survey. Reasons for non-completion included ineligibility (42), unable to be reached (33) and refusal (6). The majority were survivors of breast (58%) or endometrial/uterine cancer (28%), and 45% resided in non-urban locations. After adjusting for age, race, and cancer type, survivors with higher self-management difficulty reported higher self-management impact, which was associated with lower perceived general health. Reports of higher self-management impact was associated with being single or unmarried, white race, fulltime employed, higher financial insecurity, lower health literacy and more comorbidities. In path analysis, self-management impact was a significant mediator in the association of comorbidity and financial insecurity on GPH and GMH. CONCLUSIONS Among survivors of women's cancer, pre-diagnosis comorbidity, health literacy, and financial security are associated with psychosocial impact of self-management and general physical and mental health in the 6 month to 3-year period after cancer treatment has ended. The impact of self-management on psychosocial functioning is an important factor among cancer survivors caring for multiple chronic health conditions. This study provides evidence on the importance of assessing cancer survivors' self-management difficulties such as in future interventions to promote health and wellness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R T Anderson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, PO Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
| | - D T Eton
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - F T Camacho
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, PO Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - E M Kennedy
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, PO Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - C M Brenin
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - P B DeGuzman
- School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - T Guterbock
- Center for Survey Research, Department of Public Health Sciences and Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - K J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - W F Cohn
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, PO Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Loprinzi CL, Lustberg MB, Hershman DL, Ruddy KJ. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: ice, compression, both, or neither? Ann Oncol 2020; 31:5-6. [PMID: 31912795 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C L Loprinzi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
| | - M B Lustberg
- Internal Medicine/Division of Hematology-Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - D L Hershman
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University; New York City, USA
| | - K J Ruddy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cardoso F, Bartlett JMS, Slaets L, van Deurzen CHM, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Porter P, Linderholm B, Hedenfalk I, Schröder C, Martens J, Bayani J, van Asperen C, Murray M, Hudis C, Middleton L, Vermeij J, Punie K, Fraser J, Nowaczyk M, Rubio IT, Aebi S, Kelly C, Ruddy KJ, Winer E, Nilsson C, Lago LD, Korde L, Benstead K, Bogler O, Goulioti T, Peric A, Litière S, Aalders KC, Poncet C, Tryfonidis K, Giordano SH. Characterization of male breast cancer: results of the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NABCG International Male Breast Cancer Program. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:405-417. [PMID: 29092024 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Male breast cancer (BC) is rare, managed by extrapolation from female BC. The International Male BC Program aims to better characterize and manage this disease. We report the results of part I, a retrospective joint analysis of cases diagnosed during a 20-year period. Methods Patients with follow-up and tumor samples, treated between 1990 and 2010, in 93 centers/9 countries. Samples were centrally analyzed in three laboratories (the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and the United States). Results Of 1822 patients enrolled, 1483 were analyzed; 63.5% were diagnosed between 2001 and 2010, 57 (5.1%) had metastatic disease (M1). Median age at diagnosis: 68.4 years. Of 1054 M0 cases, 56.2% were node-negative (N0) and 48.5% had T1 tumors; 4% had breast conserving surgery (BCS), 18% sentinel lymph-node biopsy; half received adjuvant radiotherapy; 29.8% (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and 76.8% adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), mostly tamoxifen (88.4%). Per central pathology, for M0 tumors: 84.8% ductal invasive carcinomas, 51.5% grade 2; 99.3% estrogen receptor (ER)-positive; 81.9% progesterone receptor (PR)-positive; 96.9% androgen receptor (AR)-positive [ER, PR or AR Allred score ≥3]; 61.1% Ki67 expression low (<14% positive cells); using immunohistochemistry (IHC) surrogates, 41.9% were Luminal-A-like, 48.6% Luminal-B-like/HER-2-negative, 8.7% HER-2-positive, 0.3% triple negative. Median follow-up: 8.2 years (0.0-23.8) for all, 7.2 years (0.0-23.2), for M0, 2.6 years (0.0-12.7) for M1 patients. A significant improvement over time was observed in age-corrected BC mortality. BC-specific-mortality was higher for men younger than 50 years. Better overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were observed for highly ER+ (P = 0.001), highly PR+ (P = 0.002), highly AR+ disease (P = 0.019). There was no association between OS/RFS and HER-2 status, Ki67, IHC subtypes nor grade. Conclusions Male BC is usually ER, PR and AR-positive, Luminal B-like/HER2-negative. Of note, 56% patients had T1 tumors but only 4% had BCS. ER was highly positive in >90% of cases but only 77% received adjuvant ET. ER, PR and AR were associated with OS and RFS, whereas grade, Ki67 and IHC surrogates were not. Significant improvement in survival over time was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Breast Cancer Group, Toronto, Canada.
| | - J M S Bartlett
- Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - L Slaets
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C H M van Deurzen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), The Netherlands
| | | | - P Porter
- Divisions of Human Biology and Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - B Linderholm
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - I Hedenfalk
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - C Schröder
- Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Martens
- Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), The Netherlands; Breast Cancer Genomics and Proteomics Lab, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Bayani
- Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - C van Asperen
- Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M Murray
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - C Hudis
- Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
| | - L Middleton
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - J Vermeij
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Network Antwerp (ZNA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - K Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Fraser
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Nowaczyk
- Specialist Hospital, St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland
| | - I T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Unit, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Aebi
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Switzerland
| | - C Kelly
- All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Ireland
| | - K J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - E Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - C Nilsson
- Department of Oncology, Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Sweden
| | - L Dal Lago
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | - L Korde
- University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - K Benstead
- Department of Oncology, Cheltenham General Hospital, UK
| | - O Bogler
- Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - T Goulioti
- Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Peric
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Litière
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K C Aalders
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Poncet
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Tryfonidis
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S H Giordano
- Departments of Health Services Research and Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yadav S, Leon-Ferre RA, Jimenez RE, Hawse JR, Hieken TJ, Couch FJ, Boughey JC, Ruddy KJ. Abstract P6-19-05: Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with male breast cancer: The Mayo Clinic experience. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-19-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, and usually managed by extrapolation from female breast cancer. We report on the characteristics and survival outcomes of MBC patients from Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR).
Methods:
Medical records of MBC patients treated at MCR during a 25-year period (1990-2015) were reviewed. Demographic variables, tumor characteristics, recurrences, and overall survival (OS) were collected. Progression free survival (PFS) and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression was used to identify predictors of OS.
Results:
One hundred sixty-seven patients were included in the final analysis, with a median follow-up of 58 months after diagnosis. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Eighty percent of patients with ER-positive tumors received endocrine therapy. Among men with stage I-III disease, approximately 90% underwent mastectomy, and 44% received adjuvant chemotherapy.
The 5-year locoregional and distant recurrence rates for patients with stage I-III disease were 4.4% and 21.5%, respectively. The 5-year PFS and OS for patients with stage I-III disease were 65.5% and 80.1%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis assessing predictors of OS in patients with stage I-III disease, older age (HR 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02 – 1.09), stage II (HR 11.06; 95% CI: 3.84 – 31.85) or stage III disease (HR 14.74; 95% CI (3.99 – 54.45), and omission of surgery (HR 45.33; 95% CI: 3.97 – 517.32) were associated with poorer OS, while endocrine therapy (HR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.09 – 0.51) was associated with better OS. ER, PR, HER2 and grade were not independently prognostic.
The median OS for stage IV patients was 10 months, though this 11-man cohort was too small to allow assessment of prognostic factors in advanced male breast cancer.
Conclusions:
MBC remains an understudied condition. Prognostic factors in this stage I-III disease are consistent with those identified in other MBC retrospective cohorts. Prospective studies are needed to better understand the unique clinical features of MBC, and to improve outcomes, particularly for advanced disease.
Table 1:Baseline characteristics N=167 Median age at diagnosis (Years)64.4 Ethnicity/Race: Caucasian131 (78.4%)African American4 (2.4%)Other or unknown32 (19.2%) Overall AJCC 7th edition stage: Stage I39 (23.4%)Stage II80 (47.9%)Stage III32 (19.2%)Stage IV11 (6.6%)Unknown5 (3.0%) Grade: 18 (4.8%)247 (28.1%)3101 (60.5%)Unknown12 (7.1%) ER status: Negative8 (4.8%)Positive153 (91.6%)Unknown6 (3.6%) PR status: Negative17 (10.2%)Positive141 (84.4%)Unknown9 (5.4%) HER-2 status: Negative70 (41.9%)Positive12 (7.2%)Unknown85 (50.9%)
Citation Format: Yadav S, Leon-Ferre RA, Jimenez RE, Hawse JR, Hieken TJ, Couch FJ, Boughey JC, Ruddy KJ. Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with male breast cancer: The Mayo Clinic experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-19-05.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ruddy KJ, Sangaralingham LR, Freedman RA, Jemal A, Mougalian SS, Keegan T, Loprinzi CL, Gross CP, Henk HJ, Shah N. Abstract PD6-07: Trends in the cost of care for breast cancer among women with commercial insurance. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-pd6-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer care imposes a significant financial burden to U.S. healthcare systems and has become a key focus in the health care debate. Therapies for breast cancer are expensive, and the economic burden of these therapies may be rising due to the rapid introduction of pricey new drugs and techniques. There are limited data on the health care costs of individuals with breast cancer after initial diagnosis and how these costs have changed over time.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of commercially insured adult women with newly diagnosed non-metastatic breast cancer (identified via previously published claims-based algorithms) using 2007-2016 data from a large US health plan available in OptumLabs® Data Warehouse. We included patients with continuous health plan coverage for at least 2 years after initial diagnosis 2007-2014 and assessed how total health care spending and out-of-pocket costs (paid amounts) changed over this time. Costs were adjusted to 2016 US dollars using the general Consumer Price Index. Inpatient, outpatient, and outpatient pharmacy costs were evaluated. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine predictors of above average cost (cost > mean for that year of diagnosis).
Results: A total of 12,446 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were identified (mean age, 51.6 years). Forty percent had undergone mastectomy, 38% chemotherapy, and 63% radiation. After adjustment for inflation, total healthcare costs increased 29.7% from 2007 to 2014 (Table 1), with increases primarily observed during the first year after diagnosis. Out-of-pocket costs remained relatively stable, and accounted for 5.3% of the total spending. Approximately 80% of the total costs were related to care received in the outpatient setting. Factors independently associated with above average spending included treatment with mastectomy [OR 1.78 (95% CI 1.5-2.1)], reconstruction [OR 3.0 (95% CI 2.6-3.5)], radiation [OR 4.0 (95% CI 3.4-4.7)] and chemotherapy [OR 18.4 (95% CI 16.6-20.3].
Table 1.Average healthcare spending over time Mean cost during first year after diagnosisMean cost during second year after diagnosisYear of diagnosistotalout-of-pockettotalout-of-pocket2007$80,296.17$4,271.25$16,559.21$1,907.012008$84,126.70$4,445.78$16,785.43$2,205.982009$88,331.45$4,728.42$17,005.68$2,214.932010$91,502.58$5,067.78$17,243.91$2,126.192011$93,826.40$5,089.45$16,862.45$2,027.962012$96,690.06$5,449.91$17,814.09$2,179.262013$104,064.93$5,678.19$17,087.47$2,115.972014$104,169.74$5,620.51$16,714.12$1,590.67
Conclusions: Breast cancer care is increasingly expensive during the first year after diagnosis, and costs are greatest for the recipients of more aggressive treatments. Costs during the second year after diagnosis have remained relatively stable.
Citation Format: Ruddy KJ, Sangaralingham LR, Freedman RA, Jemal A, Mougalian SS, Keegan T, Loprinzi CL, Gross CP, Henk HJ, Shah N. Trends in the cost of care for breast cancer among women with commercial insurance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KJ Ruddy
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA; Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN
| | - LR Sangaralingham
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA; Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN
| | - RA Freedman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA; Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN
| | - A Jemal
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA; Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN
| | - SS Mougalian
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA; Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN
| | - T Keegan
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA; Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN
| | - CL Loprinzi
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA; Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN
| | - CP Gross
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA; Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN
| | - HJ Henk
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA; Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN
| | - N Shah
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA; Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Optum Labs, Eden Prairie, MN
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bayani J, Poncet C, Yao CQ, Crozier C, Anouk N, Piper T, Cunningham C, Sobol M, Aebi S, Benstead K, Bogler O, Dal Lago L, Fraser J, Hilbers FH, Hedenfalk I, Korde L, Linderholm B, Martens J, Middleton L, Murray M, Kelly C, Nilsson C, Nowaczyk M, Peeters S, Peric A, Porter P, Schröder C, Rubio IT, Ruddy KJ, van Asperen C, Van Den Weyngaert D, van Deurzen C, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Vermeij J, Winer E, Boutros PC, Giordano SH, Cardoso F, Bartlett JM. Abstract P6-19-01: Evaluation of multiple transcriptomic gene risk signatures in male breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-19-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers (BC) and 1% of all cancers in males. The clinical management is largely extrapolated from female BC. Several multigene assays are increasingly used to guide clinical treatment decisions in female BC, however there is little data on the utility of these tests in MBC.
Methods: Here we present the gene expression results of 380 M0, ER+ve, HER2-ve MBCs enrolled in the Part 1 (retrospective joint analysis) International Male Breast Cancer Program of 1483 patients diagnosed between 1990-2010 (Cardoso et al. Annals of Oncology, 2018). Using a custom Nanostring™ panel comprised of the genes from the commercial risk tests Prosigna®, OncotypeDx® and Mammaprint®, risk scores and intrinsic subtyping data were generated to recapitulate the commercial tests as described by Bayani and Yao et al (npjBreast Cancer, 2017). Survival outcomes by risk classification were analyzed using Cox models with time-dependent covariates when the proportional hazard assumption was not met and adjusted for clinical and treatment variables.
Results: Prosigna-like risk scores identified 99 (26.1%) as low-risk, 159 (41.8%) as intermediate-risk, and 122 (32.1%) as high-risk. Using the TAILORx cut-off (25) for OncotypeDx-like risk of recurrence scoring, 158 (41.6%) were identified as low-risk, while 222 (58.4%) were identified as high-risk. MammaPrint-like results identified 175 (46.1%) as low-risk and 205 (53.9%) as high-risk. Overall, patients classified as high-risk had higher grade, more nodal involvement, larger tumors, and more frequently treated with chemotherapy than low-risk patients. Survival analyses demonstrated clear clinical utility for each test, showing patients at high-risk with poor relapse-free survival (RFS) as compared to patients classified as low-risk: Prosigna-like RFS at 3-years (HR=2.20, 95% CI, 1.28-3.80); Oncotype-like RFS at 3-years (HR=1.92, 95% CI, 1.17-3.17); MammaPrint-like RFS (HR=1.51, 95% CI, 1.00-2.27); with similar findings for distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS). Across outcomes and all gene signatures, patients with concordant Low/Low risk classification had better prognosis than those with concordant High/High risk classification. PAM50 intrinsic subtyping identified 147 (38.7%) as Luminal A, 57 (15.0%) as Luminal B, 80 (21.1%) as Her2-enriched and 96 (25.3%) as Basal-like; showing overall 34.5% concordance to clinic-pathological subtyping by central pathology (95% CI, 29.7%-39.5%). Comparison between the tests in the MBC cohort and a comparable cohort of female BC from the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial processed in the same way will be presented.
Conclusion: Common transcriptomic assays designed to assess residual risk, validated in female BC, provide similar information in male BC patients. Not surprisingly, disagreement between test results at the individual patient level was observed. To our knowledge, this is the largest study of MBC assayed to generate risk scores of the current commercial BC tests to demonstrate their clinical utility and their differences and similarity to female BC.
This work has been funded by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF).
Citation Format: Bayani J, Poncet C, Yao CQ, Crozier C, Anouk N, Piper T, Cunningham C, Sobol M, Aebi S, Benstead K, Bogler O, Dal Lago L, Fraser J, Hilbers FH, Hedenfalk I, Korde L, Linderholm B, Martens J, Middleton L, Murray M, Kelly C, Nilsson C, Nowaczyk M, Peeters S, Peric A, Porter P, Schröder C, Rubio IT, Ruddy KJ, van Asperen C, Van Den Weyngaert D, van Deurzen C, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Vermeij J, Winer E, Boutros PC, Giordano SH, Cardoso F, Bartlett JM. Evaluation of multiple transcriptomic gene risk signatures in male breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-19-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Bayani
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - C Poncet
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - CQ Yao
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - C Crozier
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - N Anouk
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - T Piper
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - C Cunningham
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - M Sobol
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - S Aebi
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - K Benstead
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - O Bogler
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - L Dal Lago
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - J Fraser
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - FH Hilbers
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - I Hedenfalk
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - L Korde
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - B Linderholm
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - J Martens
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - L Middleton
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - M Murray
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - C Kelly
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - C Nilsson
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - M Nowaczyk
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - S Peeters
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - A Peric
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - P Porter
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - C Schröder
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - IT Rubio
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - C van Asperen
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - D Van Den Weyngaert
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - C van Deurzen
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - E van Leeuwen-Stok
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - J Vermeij
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - E Winer
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - PC Boutros
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - SH Giordano
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - F Cardoso
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| | - JM Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom; Global Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium; Lund University, Lund, Sweden; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, United Kingdom; Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden; Speci
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pak LM, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Snow C, Collins L, King TA, Partridge AH. Abstract P6-22-03: Tumor phenotype and concordance in synchronous bilateral breast cancer in young women. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-22-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Synchronous bilateral breast cancer is rare, with reported incidence from 0.3-12%; the incidence and pattern of bilateral breast cancer among younger women is unknown. Here we report the incidence and phenotypes of bilateral breast cancer in women ≤40 years of age enrolled in the Young Women's Study (YWS) cohort.
Methods: The YWS is a multi-center, prospective cohort study that enrolled women with newly diagnosed breast cancer at age ≤40 years from 2006-2016. Those with synchronous bilateral breast cancer (in-situ and/or invasive) formed our study cohort. Disease characteristics and treatment were obtained by medical record review. Central pathology review was performed to capture histologic features and categorize the tumor phenotype as either luminal A (hormone receptor (HR)+, HER2-, grade 1 or 2), luminal B (HR+, HER2+, or HER2- and grade 3), HER2-type (HR-, HER2+), or triple negative (TNC; HR/HER2-). Tumor phenotypes of bilateral breast cancers were compared and evaluated for concordance.
Results: Among 1302 patients enrolled in the YWS, 20 (1.5%) patients presented with bilateral disease, with median age of diagnosis of 38 years (range 18-40). The majority of patients (13 (65%)) presented with unilateral symptoms and contralateral disease was identified on subsequent imaging. 12 (60%) reported a positive family history of breast cancer and 17 (85%) underwent genetic testing; resulting in the identification of 6 mutation carriers (2 BRCA1, 3 BRCA2, 1 TP53). The majority of patients (15 (75%)) underwent bilateral mastectomy, 1 underwent unilateral mastectomy with contralateral lumpectomy, and 4 underwent bilateral lumpectomy. On pathology, 2 patients had bilateral in-situ disease, 5 had unilateral invasive and contralateral in-situ disease, and 13 had bilateral invasive disease. Of those with bilateral invasive disease, all had concordant tumor histology (92% ductal, 8% ductal and lobular), 10 (77%) patients had bilateral luminal tumors and when fully characterized 6 were of the same luminal type. Only one patient had bilateral basal-like breast cancer.
Patient ID ERPRHer2 amplifiedGradePhenotype1Left++-2Luminal A Right++-3Luminal B3Left++-3Luminal B Right++-3Luminal B6Left++-3Luminal B Right++-3Luminal B9Left++-2Luminal A Right++-2Luminal A10Left+++3Luminal B Right++-2Luminal A12Left+--3Luminal B Right+--2Luminal A13Left---NABasal-like Right++-NALuminal A or B14Left+++2Luminal B Right++-3Luminal B15Left++-3Luminal B Right+++3Luminal B16Left+++3Luminal B Right--+NAHEr2-type17Left---3Basal-like Right---3Basal-like19Left++-2Luminal A Right++-3Luminal B20Left++-1Luminal A Right++-2Luminal A
Conclusions: Among a large cohort of young women, only 20 (1.5%) had bilateral disease, and the majority of the invasive tumors were of the luminal phenotype, yet frequently differed by grade or HER2 status; supporting the need for thorough pathologic evaluation of bilateral disease to determine risk and tailor treatment. Overall the low incidence of bilateral disease and preponderance of the luminal phenotype in this population is reassuring.
Citation Format: Pak LM, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Snow C, Collins L, King TA, Partridge AH. Tumor phenotype and concordance in synchronous bilateral breast cancer in young women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-22-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LM Pak
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - SM Rosenberg
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - RM Tamimi
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Peppercorn
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - L Schapira
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - VF Borges
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - SE Come
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - E Warner
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - C Snow
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - L Collins
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - TA King
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - AH Partridge
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Stanford University, Palo Alto; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ruddy KJ, Roeland EJ, LeBlanc TW, Binder G, Sebastiani S, Potluri R, Schmerold LM, Papademetriou E, Navari RM. Abstract P4-16-05: Avoidable acute care use associated with nausea and emesis among patients receiving AC, carboplatin, or cisplatin for breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-16-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In order to improve care and reduce costs of cancer treatment, attention has focused on reducing inpatient (IP) and emergency room (ED) utilization. The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently implemented an oncology outcome measure (OP-35) to assess the quality of care and determine outpatient hospital payment. It assesses 30-day post-chemotherapy rates of IP or ED events deemed “potentially avoidable” by CMS due to association with any of 10 CMS-defined toxicities: anemia, dehydration, diarrhea, fever, nausea, emesis, neutropenia, pain, pneumonia, or sepsis. Although CMS found that 20% of chemotherapy treatment resulted in such events, event rates with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) are understudied, particularly for breast cancer (bCA) patients treated with anthracycline + cyclophosphamide (AC), carboplatin, or cisplatin.
Methods: In a large electronic health record database focused on US integrated delivery networks, HEC courses of therapy were identified from 4Q 2012 to 3Q 2017. IP/ED events within 30 days of chemotherapy administration were considered related to the OP-35 measure if they included a diagnosis code of any of the ten OP-35 toxicities, per CMS' definitions. HEC chemotherapy use, IP/ED events, bCA diagnosis, and toxicities were identified by ICD-9, ICD-10, and procedural codes. Subgroups were evaluated for 3 common HECs: AC, carboplatin (>14 days apart, as a proxy for AUC ≥4), and cisplatin.
Results: 4128 courses of HEC in bCA were identified. Of these, 2304 involved AC (median 4 cycles), 1721 involved carboplatin (median 6 cycles), and 103 involved cisplatin (median 4 cycles), with median ages of 55, 59, and 64, respectively. 30-day IP/ED events were seen in 25% of these HEC bCA courses (22%, 30% and 23% for AC, carboplatin, and cisplatin, respectively). The 10 CMS-defined toxicities were associated with an IP/ED event for 73%, 72%, and 76% of events for these AC, carboplatin, and cisplatin courses respectively, confirming that these are principal contributors to 30-day IP/ED use for patients receiving HEC in bCA. The top five that were most commonly associated with IP/ED for bCA for patients receiving AC, carboplatin, or cisplatin were pain 53%/49%/63%, anemia 51%/51%/38%, fever 48%/31%/38%, neutropenia 46%/27%/31%, and nausea/emesis 30%/40%/25%; patients may have had ≥1 toxicity associated with each IP/ED event. The IP/ED rate may be understated because some events, particularly ED, may occur out of the network the EHR data covers.
Conclusion: One quarter of patients receiving AC, carboplatin, or cisplatin for bCA visit the ED or are hospitalized within 30 days of at least one of their chemotherapy administrations. Most events involved ≥1 of 10 toxicities deemed avoidable causes of hospitalization by CMS and now tracked as an oncology outcome measure. Relative to patients receiving AC, acute care rates for patients receiving carboplatin were lower for fever and neutropenia and higher for nausea/emesis, perhaps because the study period largely precedes the 2017 addition of carboplatin AUC ≥4 to national guidelines as HEC requiring triplet antiemetic prophylaxis. Toxicity prevention and symptom monitoring are crucial to reduce acute care needs.
Citation Format: Ruddy KJ, Roeland EJ, LeBlanc TW, Binder G, Sebastiani S, Potluri R, Schmerold LM, Papademetriou E, Navari RM. Avoidable acute care use associated with nausea and emesis among patients receiving AC, carboplatin, or cisplatin for breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-16-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KJ Ruddy
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Duke University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Helsinn Therapeutics US, Iselin, NJ; Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland; SmartAnalyst, New York, NY; University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - EJ Roeland
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Duke University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Helsinn Therapeutics US, Iselin, NJ; Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland; SmartAnalyst, New York, NY; University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - TW LeBlanc
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Duke University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Helsinn Therapeutics US, Iselin, NJ; Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland; SmartAnalyst, New York, NY; University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - G Binder
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Duke University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Helsinn Therapeutics US, Iselin, NJ; Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland; SmartAnalyst, New York, NY; University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - S Sebastiani
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Duke University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Helsinn Therapeutics US, Iselin, NJ; Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland; SmartAnalyst, New York, NY; University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - R Potluri
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Duke University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Helsinn Therapeutics US, Iselin, NJ; Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland; SmartAnalyst, New York, NY; University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - LM Schmerold
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Duke University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Helsinn Therapeutics US, Iselin, NJ; Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland; SmartAnalyst, New York, NY; University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - E Papademetriou
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Duke University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Helsinn Therapeutics US, Iselin, NJ; Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland; SmartAnalyst, New York, NY; University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - RM Navari
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Duke University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Helsinn Therapeutics US, Iselin, NJ; Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland; SmartAnalyst, New York, NY; University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rosenberg SM, Hu J, Dominici LS, Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Come S, Peppercorn JM, Borges VF, Partridge AH. Abstract P2-14-03: Longitudinal changes in psychosocial health in young women following breast cancer surgery: Results from a multi-center cohort study. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p2-14-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Young women with breast cancer (BC) are increasingly choosing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), yet little is known about the impact of surgical choices on quality of life (QOL) and psychological health. Using a large, prospective cohort of young women with BC, we sought to evaluate psychosocial outcomes following surgery.
Methods: Among participants of the Young Women's BC Study, a multi-center cohort of women dx'd with BC at age ≤40, we identified women with Stage 0-3 unilateral BC who had surgery and completed surveys that included measures of QOL (CARES) and psychological health (HADS). Linear mixed-effects models were fit to assess changes from 1 to 3 years (yrs) post-dx in anxiety, depression, psychosocial, body image, and sexual scores. Adjusted (stage, hormone receptor status, chemotherapy, age) means were estimated and differences compared (Bonferroni adjusted p-values) between CPM vs breast conserving surgery (BCS) and unilateral mastectomy (UM) at 1, 2, and 3 yrs.
Results: Of 863 women, 30% had BCS, 24% UM, 46% CPM. Median age at dx was 37 (range: 22-40). Of women who had UM/CPM, 84% had reconstruction. Among women who had CPM, mean body image (p=.02), psychosocial (p<.0001), sexual (p<.0001), and depression p=.0007) scores decreased, indicating improvement, from yr 1 to 2 but remained stable from yr 2 to 3 (Table). Anxiety decreased from yr 1 to 2 for women who had BCS (p=.0007) and M (p=.03), and from yr 2 to 3 for women who had CPM (p=.003). Body image scores did not change significantly between any time points among women who had M or BCS. Overall change trajectories for sexual (p=.03) and anxiety scores (p=.008) differed by surgery. Compared to BCS and UM, psychosocial scores were higher in women who had CPM at 1 yr (p<.05) and remained higher compared to BCS at 2 yrs (p=.04). Anxiety was higher among women who had CPM vs UM at 1 and 2 yrs (p<.01), vs BCS at 2 yrs (p=.004). Depression was higher among women who had CPM vs UM in yr 1 (p=.05). By yr 3, there were no significant differences in anxiety, depression, and overall psychosocial scores between groups. Compared to BCS, women who had CPM had higher sexual and body image scores (p<.01), indicating worse QOL, at all timepoints. Compared to UM, women who had CPM had higher sexual scores at 1 and 3 yrs (p<.05) and body image scores at 3 yrs (p=.02).
Conclusions: While psychosocial health improves over time, differences by surgery persist, with women who have CPM experiencing more sexual and body image issues compared to women who undergo BCS or M in the years following surgery. Given that surgical choices may be affected by distress experienced before or at dx, ensuring young women receive adequate support when making surgical decisions as well as after surgery is warranted.
Mean CARES and HADS scores Year 123Psychosocial*CPM.89.78.76 UM.75.69.66 BCS.72.65.66 Sexual*CPM1.641.371.40 UM1.411.291.08 BCS1.181.071.04 Body image*CPM1.331.221.30 UM1.161.131.04 BCS.64.57.56 Anxiety**CPM7.657.406.79 UM6.505.916.39 BCS7.036.226.50 Depression**CPM3.723.213.25 UM3.022.802.70 BCS3.332.823.13**CARES range: 0-4;higher scores=worse QOL **HADS range 0-21;higher scores=more anxiety/depression
Citation Format: Rosenberg SM, Hu J, Dominici LS, Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Come S, Peppercorn JM, Borges VF, Partridge AH. Longitudinal changes in psychosocial health in young women following breast cancer surgery: Results from a multi-center cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SM Rosenberg
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - J Hu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - LS Dominici
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - PD Poorvu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - RM Tamimi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - L Schapira
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - S Come
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - JM Peppercorn
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - VF Borges
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - AH Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gast KC, Cathcart-Rake EJ, Norman A, Eshragi L, Obidegwu N, Yost K, Nichols HB, Rosenberg S, Su HI, Stewart E, Couch F, Vachon C, Ruddy KJ. Abstract P1-12-10: Regimen-specific rates of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-12-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy can damage the ovaries and cause amenorrhea, a surrogate for infertility. Young women often wish to understand and minimize their risk of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA). However, the incidence of CRA with regimens that do not include either an anthracycline or cyclophosphamide is poorly studied. For patients with HER-2 positive disease, these anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-sparing regimens (e.g., docetaxel-carboplatin) are common (in combination with Her-2 directed therapy) in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.
Methods: Women diagnosed with breast cancer under age 50 and within the past 10 years were recruited through a Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation Army of Women e-mail blast. Those who provided their contact information were mailed a consent form and medical record authorization form. Participants then received a web-based survey that inquired about receipt of and type of chemotherapy (including date of last dose) and date of last menstrual period (LMP). Patient-reported LMP was compared to date of final chemotherapy dose to determine if the LMP occurred before (defined as “CRA”) or after the last chemotherapy dose. When available, medical record data was used in place of survey data regarding type of chemotherapy used. Exclusion criteria included: LMP prior to diagnosis date, receipt of multiple chemotherapy regimens or no chemotherapy regimens, receipt of ovarian suppression medications (which interfere with interpretation of menstrual data), surgical menopause prior to or at the same time as diagnosis, a cancer diagnosis more than 10 years prior, incomplete menstrual data on the survey, report of an unknown chemotherapy regimen, and no date available for the last chemotherapy dose without an LMP within a month prior to survey completion. Fisher Exact test was used to compare CRA rates between regimens. Rates after two anthracycline-sparing regimens (taxane/cyclophosphamide; taxane/carboplatin) were compared to rates after anthracycline/cyclophosphamide/taxane.
Results: 273 women consented to participate in this study, 258 of whom filled out the web survey. 151 of them were eligible for this analysis with a median age at diagnosis of 41 (range 24-49) and a median time from last chemotherapy dose to survey of 62.5 months (range 2-138). CRA occurred in 51.2% of the 86 participants who received an anthracycline, cyclophosphamide, and a taxane, in 41.9% of the 43 participants who received only a taxane and cyclophosphamide (p=0.35), and in 13.3% of the 15 participants who received carboplatin with a taxane (p=0.01). When the 11 patients who were <12 months since last chemotherapy were excluded, CRA rates changed minimally. Age did not differ by regimen, but median time since chemotherapy was shorter in the taxane/carboplatin group (35 months vs. 68 months). Trastuzumab with or without pertuzumab was administered in 100% of patients who received carboplatin/taxane, in 23.3% of patients who received taxane and cyclophosphamide, and in 22.1% of patients who received anthracycline/cyclophosphamide/taxane.
Conclusions: This study suggests that carboplatin/taxane may be substantially less gonadotoxic than cyclophosphamide-based (neo)adjuvant regimens. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings.
Citation Format: Gast KC, Cathcart-Rake EJ, Norman A, Eshragi L, Obidegwu N, Yost K, Nichols HB, Rosenberg S, Su HI, Stewart E, Couch F, Vachon C, Ruddy KJ. Regimen-specific rates of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea in breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KC Gast
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - EJ Cathcart-Rake
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - A Norman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - L Eshragi
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - N Obidegwu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - K Yost
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - HB Nichols
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - S Rosenberg
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - HI Su
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - E Stewart
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - F Couch
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - C Vachon
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, Encino, CA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dominici LS, Hu J, King TA, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM. Abstract GS6-06: Local therapy and quality of life outcomes in young women with breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-gs6-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Increasing rates of mastectomy, primarily bilateral mastectomy (BMx), have been most dramatic in young women with breast cancer (BC). Impact on long-term quality of life (QOL) is largely unknown.
Methods: Between 10/2016-11/2017, we administered the BREAST-Q, a validated patient-reported outcomes measure, to women dx with BC at age ≤40 in a large prospective cohort study. Demographic and treatment information was obtained by surveys and chart review. Mean BREAST-Q scores for each domain (breast satisfaction, physical, psychosocial, and sexual) were compared by surgery types; higher BREAST-Q scores (range: 0-100) indicate better QOL. Linear regression was used to identify predictors of BREAST-Q domain scores.
Results: 581 women with stage 0-3 BC completed the BREAST-Q a median of 5.8 years from dx. Median age at dx was 37 (range: 26-40) years; 86% had stage 0, 1 or 2 disease; 28% had breast-conserving surgery (BCS); 72% had mastectomy (Mx), among whom 72% underwent BMx and 89% had reconstruction. Mean BREAST-Q scores (unadjusted) for breast satisfaction, psychosocial, and sexual well-being were lower for patients having unilateral mastectomy (UMx) or BMx compared to BCS; physical function was similar among groups. In multivariate analysis, lower BREAST-Q psychosocial scores were associated with radiation and Mx (UMx or BMx). Lower sexual well-being scores were also associated with Mx. Lower satisfaction with breast scores following radiation were of a clinically significant magnitude (β -8.1 95% CI -11.9- -4.3, p-value 0.03). Lower scores for physical well-being were seen for patients reporting lymphedema and higher for those who had undergone surgery more than 5 years prior. Lower scores across all 4 domains were associated with reported financial distress.
BREAST-Q domain mean scores (SD) BMxUMxBCSp-valueBreast satisfaction60.3 (18.9)59.5 (21.3)65.9 (20.7)0.008Physical well-being78.6 (14.9)79.7 (15.1)78.9 (15.5)0.8Psychosocial well-being68.1 (20.8)70.5 (21.2)76.1 (20.5)<0.001Sexual well-being48.6 (21.3)53.2 (21.7)57.5 (18.7)<0.001SD Standard deviation
Conclusion: Local therapy in young breast cancer survivors may have a persistent impact on their breast satisfaction, psychosocial, and sexual outcomes, with particular effects from UMx or BMx. Socio-economic stressors also appear to play a role. When counseling young women about their surgical decisions, knowledge of potential long-term QOL impact is of critical importance.
Citation Format: Dominici LS, Hu J, King TA, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM. Local therapy and quality of life outcomes in young women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LS Dominici
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J Hu
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - TA King
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - RM Tamimi
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J Peppercorn
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Schapira
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - VF Borges
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - SE Come
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Warner
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - AH Partridge
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - SM Rosenberg
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Poorvu PD, Gelber SI, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Collins LC, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Jakubowski DM, Russell C, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Abstract P2-08-07: Prognostic impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay among young women with node-negative and node-positive ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p2-08-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay is prognostic among women with early-stage estrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer (BC) and is used to select patients for chemotherapy (CT). Young women (age <40) have represented a minority in studies evaluating gene expression assays, including TAILORx, and additional data in young women are needed.
Methods: In the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with BC at age <40 enrolling between 2006-2016 (N=1302), we identified those with stage I-III ER+/HER2- BC. Disease and treatment information were obtained through serial surveys and medical record review. The RS was performed on banked specimens for those not tested clinically. Distant recurrence free interval (DRFI), defined as distant recurrence or BC specific death, by risk group was assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Outcomes by receipt of CT were explored in the RS 11-25 group, and due to small number of events, reported descriptively.
Results: Among eligible women (N=577), 189 (33%) had undergone RS testing and 320 (56%) had banked specimens sufficient for testing. Median follow-up was 6 years. Median age at diagnosis was 37, most had N0 BC (300/509, 59%), and the majority had RS 11-25 (306/509, 60%). RS result was significantly associated with DRFI in N0 BC, with hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) of 0.29 (0.07,1.30) and 0.21 (0.09,0.50) for RS<11 and RS 11-25, respectively, relative to RS>26 (and trended towards significance in N1 BC). Results were similar using conventional RS groups. Among women with N0 BC and RS 11-25, 44% received CT, with two events in the 86 receiving CT (2.3%) and 6 events in the 109 without CT (5.5%); 5/8 (63%) occurred in those with RS 20-25.
Table 1 N0N1Total Cohort N%N%N% 3005916332509100Median Age37.137.537.2Tumor Stage T120869694229358T28227784817635T3103159357T4001151Grade I4716855711II16555794926652III8829754618536Not assessed 1 1 PR status by IHC Negative (<1%)2071710398Positive (>=1%)280931469047092Chemotherapy No1414712715430Yes159531519335570Ovarian Suppression No263881499145289Yes37121495711TAILORx RS Groups RS <1133111495411RS 11-2519565885430660RS >=267224613714929Conventional RS Groups RS <1812742543319939RS 18-3012542694221142RS >=31481640259919
Table 2 6-year freedom from distant recurrence or breast cancer deathDRFI HR (95% CI) N0N1N0N1TAILORx RS Groups RS <1194.4%92.3%0.29 (0.07,1.30)0.21 (0.03,1.61)RS 11-2596.9%85.2%0.21 (0.09, 0.50)0.55 (0.27,1.12)RS >=2685.1%71.3%RefRefConventional RS Groups RS <1897.5%85.9%0.19 (0.06,0.59)0.31 (0.13,0.74)RS 18-3093.1%87.3%0.39 (0.16,1.00)0.32 (0.14,0.73)RS >=3186.4%62.8%RefRef
Conclusions: The RS is prognostic among young women with node-negative and node-positive BC, and is a valuable tool for risk stratification. Disease outcomes among young women with N0 disease and RS 11-25, a minority of whom received CT, are very good. Evaluation of the effect of ovarian suppression/CT-induced amenorrhea by RS/treatment strata is ongoing.
Citation Format: Poorvu PD, Gelber SI, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Collins LC, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Jakubowski DM, Russell C, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Prognostic impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay among young women with node-negative and node-positive ER+/HER2- breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PD Poorvu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - SI Gelber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - SM Rosenberg
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - RM Tamimi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - LC Collins
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - J Peppercorn
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - L Schapira
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - VF Borges
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - SE Come
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - E Warner
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - DM Jakubowski
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - C Russell
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - EP Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | - AH Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Leon-Ferre RA, Novotny PJ, Faubion SS, Ruddy KJ, Flora D, Dakhil C, Rowland KM, Graham ML, Le-Lindqwister N, Loprinzi CL. Abstract GS6-02: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oxybutynin (Oxy) for hot flashes (HF): ACCRU study SC-1603. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-gs6-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: HF occur in about 75% of midlife women and are associated with quality of life disruption and premature endocrine therapy discontinuation among breast cancer survivors. Estrogen therapy, effective for HF, is contraindicated in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). Previous studies have suggested that Oxy could be effective in managing HF.
Methods: This randomized, placebo (P)-controlled trial enrolled women who had experienced HF ≥28 times per week over >30 days and of sufficient severity to seek treatment. Patients (pts) were randomized to receive oral Oxy at two doses: 2.5mg BID for 6 weeks (Oxy2.5), 2.5mg BID for a week with subsequent increase to 5mg BID (Oxy5), or matching P, in equal ratios. Baseline and monthly questionnaires were administered including a HF diary, the HF related daily interference scale (HFRDIS) and a symptom experience questionnaire. The primary endpoint was intra-patient change in weekly HF score and frequency from baseline to end of study compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Results: 150 pts were accrued between 2/23/2017-3/5/2018. 4 pts cancelled before starting treatment and were excluded from analyses. This interim report includes the first 104 pts for which at least one post-baseline evaluation was available. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the arms. Sixty-two percent were on tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor for the duration of the study. Pts on both Oxy doses had a significantly greater reduction in HF score and frequency compared to P. Pts on Oxy2.5 had a mean change in HF score of -10 (SD 7.4) vs -5.1 (SD 9.7) with P, p=0.003; and a mean change in average weekly number of HF of -4.6 (SD 3.1) vs -2.3 (SD 3.9), p=0.002. Pts on Oxy5 had a mean change in HF score of -16.2 (SD 5.1) vs -5.1 (SD 9.7) with P, p<0.001; and a mean change in average weekly number of HF of -7.0 (SD 4.0) vs -2.3 (SD 3.9), p<0.001. Repeated measures mixed models confirmed that, after adjusting for baseline values, both Oxy arms had significantly lower HF scores and frequency compared to P (p<0.001). HFRDIS revealed that pts in both Oxy arms experienced improvement in the following HF interference measures: work, social activities, leisure activities, sleep, relations, life enjoyment, and overall quality of life. Pts on Oxy5 also had improvement in HF interference with mood. Pts on Oxy2.5 experienced more stomach pain (p=0.031), diarrhea (p=0.007), nausea (p=0.04), headaches (0.032), episodes of confusion (0.012), dry mouth (p=0.003) and dry eyes (0.027) compared to P. Pts on Oxy5 experienced more constipation (0.004), dry mouth (0.001) and difficulty urinating (0.004) compared to P. There were no differences in study discontinuation due to adverse effects between either Oxy arm and P (Oxy2.5 vs P, p=0.653; Oxy5 vs P, p=0.483).
Conclusions: Oxy is superior to P for management of HF. Oxy2.5 and 5 were both associated with significant improvements in HF scores and frequency as well as improvement in HF interference with several quality of life measures. While pts on Oxy experienced more side effects than pts on P, rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were low.
This study was supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.
Citation Format: Leon-Ferre RA, Novotny PJ, Faubion SS, Ruddy KJ, Flora D, Dakhil C, Rowland KM, Graham ML, Le-Lindqwister N, Loprinzi CL. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oxybutynin (Oxy) for hot flashes (HF): ACCRU study SC-1603 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- RA Leon-Ferre
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Elizabeth Physicians, Ft. Thomas, KY; Camcer Cemter of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Urbana, IL; Waverly Hematology Oncology, Cary, NC; Illinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL
| | - PJ Novotny
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Elizabeth Physicians, Ft. Thomas, KY; Camcer Cemter of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Urbana, IL; Waverly Hematology Oncology, Cary, NC; Illinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL
| | - SS Faubion
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Elizabeth Physicians, Ft. Thomas, KY; Camcer Cemter of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Urbana, IL; Waverly Hematology Oncology, Cary, NC; Illinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Elizabeth Physicians, Ft. Thomas, KY; Camcer Cemter of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Urbana, IL; Waverly Hematology Oncology, Cary, NC; Illinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL
| | - D Flora
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Elizabeth Physicians, Ft. Thomas, KY; Camcer Cemter of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Urbana, IL; Waverly Hematology Oncology, Cary, NC; Illinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL
| | - C Dakhil
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Elizabeth Physicians, Ft. Thomas, KY; Camcer Cemter of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Urbana, IL; Waverly Hematology Oncology, Cary, NC; Illinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL
| | - KM Rowland
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Elizabeth Physicians, Ft. Thomas, KY; Camcer Cemter of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Urbana, IL; Waverly Hematology Oncology, Cary, NC; Illinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL
| | - ML Graham
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Elizabeth Physicians, Ft. Thomas, KY; Camcer Cemter of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Urbana, IL; Waverly Hematology Oncology, Cary, NC; Illinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL
| | - N Le-Lindqwister
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Elizabeth Physicians, Ft. Thomas, KY; Camcer Cemter of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Urbana, IL; Waverly Hematology Oncology, Cary, NC; Illinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL
| | - CL Loprinzi
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Elizabeth Physicians, Ft. Thomas, KY; Camcer Cemter of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Urbana, IL; Waverly Hematology Oncology, Cary, NC; Illinois Cancer Care, Peoria, IL
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu MC, Peng KW, Federspiel MJ, Russell SJ, Brunton BA, Zhou Y, Packiriswamy N, Hubbard JM, Loprinzi CL, Peethambaram PP, Ruddy KJ, Allred JB, Galanis E, Okuno SH. Abstract P6-21-03: Phase I trial of intratumoral (IT) administration of a NIS-expressing derivative manufactured from a genetically engineered strain of measles virus (MV). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-21-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The live attenuated non-pathogenic Edmonston MV vaccine strain has advantages as an oncolytic platform given its tumor specificity, potent bystander effect, and ability to be engineered and retargeted. MV-NIS expresses the human thyroidal sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) and is selectively oncolytic, entering tumor cells through CD46 (overexpressed on many cancers, including breast cancer of all subtypes) and Nectin-4. NIS expression in MV-NIS infected cells permits noninvasive monitoring of virus spread by SPECT-CT imaging of Tc-99m pertechnetate or I-123 uptake.
Methods: NCT01846091 is a standard 3+3 phase I trial of a single IT administration of MV-NIS in pts with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Primary objectives are (a) safety and tolerability and (b) maximally tolerated single dose. The secondary clinical objective is to preliminarily assess antitumor efficacy at and away from the MV injection site. Key eligibility criteria were: absence of standard therapy with life prolonging intent; at least one lesion >1 cm amenable to percutaneous injection; and no impending visceral crisis. MV-NIS was administered on D1 with mandatory SPECT-CT at baseline (BL) and on D3&D8; repeat SPECT-CT on D15&D21 if the prior result was positive; mandatory tumor biopsies on D3&D21; optional tumor biopsies on D8&D15; assessments for viremia and viral shedding at BL and on D3,D8,D15,D21; and standard imaging for restaging at BL,D21,W6,W12.
Results: Accrual completed with 12 evaluable pts (6 SCCHN and 6 MBC) at 3 dose levels (108, 3x108, 109 TCID50). The MBC group included 5 HR+/HER2- pts and 1 pt with mixed HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+ disease. 5 pts had evidence of disease progression prior to study participation. No dose limiting toxicities were observed among the MBC pts; AEs possibly related to MV-NIS in this group were gr2 fatigue, gr1 flu-like illness, gr2 lymphopenia (all n=1). No SCCHN responses were observed. Best response for the MBC pts was: stable disease (SD) >6 wks, n=4; clinical response, n=1; progression, n=1. One MBC pt with SD for 12 wks had positive SPECT/CT imaging at and away from the injection site on D3&D8 and was the only pt seronegative for measles IgG antibodies prior to MV-NIS exposure. The MBC pt who responded after initial MV-NIS exposure was the only pt with low viral RNA in blood (D3); she received additional doses at W9&W13 without toxicity through an expanded access protocol exemption and had disease progression by W19. No viral shedding was detected from mouth rinse or urine in any pt. MV was detected in tumor samples from all pts treated at the highest dose level. Additional blood and tissue analyses are in progress.
Conclusion: These results demonstrate the safety of IT MV-NIS administration, provide early evidence of biologic activity in MBC, and support the possibility of viral replication in tumors remote from the IT injection site. A MV strain encoding the immunomodulatory neutrophil activating protein transgene has been constructed (MV-s-NAP) with preclinical evidence of improved antitumor activity and immunogenicity. The phase I MV-s-NAP trial will start recruitment in Fall 2018.
Citation Format: Liu MC, Peng K-W, Federspiel MJ, Russell SJ, Brunton BA, Zhou Y, Packiriswamy N, Hubbard JM, Loprinzi CL, Peethambaram PP, Ruddy KJ, Allred JB, Galanis E, Okuno SH. Phase I trial of intratumoral (IT) administration of a NIS-expressing derivative manufactured from a genetically engineered strain of measles virus (MV) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-21-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MC Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | - Y Zhou
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Melisko M, Chien AJ, Poage GM, Salganik M, Schnabel CA, Ruddy KJ, Blackwell K. Abstract P6-09-03: Gene expression patterns in younger versus older HR+ breast cancer patients: An age-related analysis of HoxB13/IL17BR (H/I), proliferation status, and quantitative hormone receptor expression. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p6-09-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: HR+ breast cancer in younger vs older patients may have distinct biological features. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a gene expression-based assay that includes two component biomarkers: the HoxB13/IL17BR (H/I ratio), an endocrine response biomarker; and the molecular grade index (MGI), a set of proliferation-related genes. The objective of this study was to assess age-related associations with endocrine sensitivity (H/I), proliferative status (MGI), and quantitative expression of ER and PR.
Methods: Data were extracted from the BCI Clinical Database for Correlative Studies, an IRB-approved de-identified database containing clinicopathologic and molecular variables from clinical cases submitted for BCI testing. Molecular results from H/I, MGI, and quantitative (qPCR–based) ER and PR were analyzed across age groups. Chi-squared tests and ANOVA were used to compare the results between age groups (<40y, 40-49y, 50-59y, 60-69y, and ≥70y).
Results: Analyses included 19,126 patients (median age at diagnosis 58.6y; 4.5% <40y, 20.6% 40-49y, 28.9% 50-59y, 32.5% 60-69y, and 13.6% ≥70y). Proliferation status (MGI) was significantly higher in patients <40y and 40-49y compared to older groups (P<.0001).H/I analysis indicated a similar distribution of high versus low endocrine responsiveness across all groups (P=.94), except the 40-49y group, in which fewer patients had high H/I (44.2% in <40y, 39.4% in 40-49y, 43.7% in 50-59y, 43.7% in 60-69y, and 43.1% in ≥70y; P=.0001). Median qER increased with age (P<0.0001), while qPR was similar across all age groups except for the 40-49y group (P=.57), in which expression was higher (P<.0001).
Conclusion: Results from >19,000 patients with early-stage HR+ breast cancer and BCI testing showed a broad distribution in all variables. Tumors from the youngest patients (<40y) had the highest expression of proliferative genes and the lowest quantitative ER expression. However, endocrine response, according to the H/I biomarker, does not appear to be strongly linked to age.
Citation Format: Melisko M, Chien AJ, Poage GM, Salganik M, Schnabel CA, Ruddy KJ, Blackwell K. Gene expression patterns in younger versus older HR+ breast cancer patients: An age-related analysis of HoxB13/IL17BR (H/I), proliferation status, and quantitative hormone receptor expression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Melisko
- University of California San Francisco; Biotheranostics, Inc.; Mayo Clinic; Duke University
| | - AJ Chien
- University of California San Francisco; Biotheranostics, Inc.; Mayo Clinic; Duke University
| | - GM Poage
- University of California San Francisco; Biotheranostics, Inc.; Mayo Clinic; Duke University
| | - M Salganik
- University of California San Francisco; Biotheranostics, Inc.; Mayo Clinic; Duke University
| | - CA Schnabel
- University of California San Francisco; Biotheranostics, Inc.; Mayo Clinic; Duke University
| | - KJ Ruddy
- University of California San Francisco; Biotheranostics, Inc.; Mayo Clinic; Duke University
| | - K Blackwell
- University of California San Francisco; Biotheranostics, Inc.; Mayo Clinic; Duke University
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schroder C, Cardoso F, Dijkstra N, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Linderholm B, Morgenstern D, Van Poznak C, Wolff AC, Poncet C, Gomez HL, Aalders K, Bjelic-Radisic V, Werutsky G, Tryfonidis K, Coens C, Giordano SH, Ruddy KJ. Abstract P5-23-02: Quality of life (QoL) in male breast cancer (BC): Prospective study of the EORTC10085/TBCRC029/BIG2-07/NABCG International male BC program. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p5-23-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Male BC is a rare disease (dx) for which management is extrapolated from trials in female BC. Comprehensive prospective data about QoL in men with BC could inform treatment. The international Male BC Consortium conducted a prospective registry of male BC patients of all stages who newly presented to a participating center between October 2013 and February 2017. A QoL substudy was conducted as part of this registry at most participating sites.
Methods: Informed consent for participation in the QoL substudy was requested from new enrollees. Those who consented were asked to complete a survey including the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 (breast cancer specific module), adapted by replacing female-specific items with male-specific sexual activity/function items from the prostate module (PR25). Outcomes were scored according to standard EORTC QLQ procedures on a 0-100 scale (with higher scores on QoL/functioning scales representing better QoL and functioning, and higher scores on symptom scales representing worse symptoms). Forms were analyzed centrally by EORTC. In order to compare to female BC, we used reference data from 2782 mixed age (62% under age 60) women with BC (of whom 1,147 had recurrent or metastatic dx, and 464 had stage 1-2 dx) reported in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values manual (2008).
Results: A total of 557 men were enrolled in EORTC10085, 445 at sites participating in the QoL substudy. Consent forms were received from 422/445 (95%) for the substudy. Baseline survey (required to be completed within 30 days of enrollment) compliance was 85% (359/422). Median age at diagnosis was 67 years. There were 111 men (45%) with node-positive M0/MX dx and 27 men (8%) with M1 dx. Their median global health status score at baseline was 75 (IQR 67-83), higher than that documented historically in female BC (67, with IQR 50-83, in both the 2782 women with mixed stage and the subgroup of 464 with stage 1-2 tumors). The participating men's median social functioning score was 100 (IQR 67-100), also higher than the 83.3 (IQR 67-100) reported in mixed stage female BC patients, though no different than the 100 (IQR 67-100) found in women with stage 1-2 dx. Men's most commonly reported symptoms included fatigue (median score 13.9, IQR 0-33), insomnia (median score 0, IQR 0-33), and pain (median score 0, IQR 0-33), for which women's median scores were 33 (IQR 11-44), 33 (IQR 0-33), and 17 (IQR 0-50) with mixed stage dx, and 22 (IQR 0-33), 33 (IQR 0-33), and 17 (IQR 0-33) with stage 1-2 dx. Men's median sexual activity score was 33.3 (IQR 0-50), with less sexual activity reported by older patients and men with M1 dx. In those who were sexually active, median sexual function score was 83 (IQR 75-92), with no difference by age or stage.
Conclusions: QoL and symptom burden in male BC patients appears no worse (and possibly better) than that in female patients. Future analyses of 1- and 5-year surveys from this study will assess the impact of specific treatments on changes in symptoms and QoL over time. These data will be useful in future efforts to tailor treatments and target interventions for male BC.
Funding: Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Dutch Pink Ribbon Foundation, Swedish BRO, and EBCC Council.
Citation Format: Schroder C, Cardoso F, Dijkstra N, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Linderholm B, Morgenstern D, Van Poznak C, Wolff AC, Poncet C, Gomez HL, Aalders K, Bjelic-Radisic V, Werutsky G, Tryfonidis K, Coens C, Giordano SH, Ruddy KJ. Quality of life (QoL) in male breast cancer (BC): Prospective study of the EORTC10085/TBCRC029/BIG2-07/NABCG International male BC program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-23-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schroder
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - F Cardoso
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - N Dijkstra
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - E van Leeuwen-Stok
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - B Linderholm
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D Morgenstern
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - C Van Poznak
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - AC Wolff
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - C Poncet
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - HL Gomez
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - K Aalders
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - V Bjelic-Radisic
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - G Werutsky
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - K Tryfonidis
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - C Coens
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - SH Giordano
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - KJ Ruddy
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
O'Sullivan CC, Van Houten HK, Sangaralingham L, Leal AD, Shinde S, Liu H, Ettinger D, Loprinzi CL, Ruddy KJ. Abstract P6-11-18: Ten year trends in antiemetic prescribing in cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p6-11-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is essential to preserve quality of life in cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) such as doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) or cisplatin. Recently, new drugs (e.g. fosaprepitant and newer neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists [NK1RAs], rolapitant and netupitant) and updated guidelines for antiemetic use (e.g. adding olanzapine) have emerged. However, trends in real world antiemetic use are understudied.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study using the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW), which includes administrative claims for privately insured and Medicare Advantage enrollees in the U.S. We identified 34,236 patients age 18 years or older treated with either AC or cisplatin between January 2006 and June 2016. Data collected included baseline demographics (age, gender, census region and race), chemotherapy administered, and presence/absence of a central intravenous access device. Trends of anti-emetic use were presented overall and separately for 5-HT receptor antagonists (5HT3RAs) and NK1RAs.
Results: 23,030 patients (67.3%) received an anthracycline-based regimen (AC with or without docetaxel or paclitaxel), and 11,206 (32.7%) patients received cisplatin. Approximately two thirds of patients were female (n= 23,392). Dexamethasone use was stable over the decade (used by 85-90% in all years). Use of 5HT3RAs, primarily palonosetron and ondansetron, occurred in at least 95% of patients in all study years, consistent with guideline recommendations. NK1RAs were underutilized early on compared with guideline recommendations, but use increased to approximately 80% in the most recently evaluated year. Fosaprepitant use rose precipitously starting in 2009, preceding a sharp fall in aprepitant use beginning in 2011. The use of olanzapine, rolapitant and netupitant was minimal throughout the study period.
Conclusions: Dexamethasone and 5-HT3RAs were used in the vast majority of patients receiving HEC, in accordance with guideline recommendations. Less compliance with guidelines was seen with NK1RA use.
Citation Format: O'Sullivan CC, Van Houten HK, Sangaralingham L, Leal AD, Shinde S, Liu H, Ettinger D, Loprinzi CL, Ruddy KJ. Ten year trends in antiemetic prescribing in cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CC O'Sullivan
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - HK Van Houten
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - L Sangaralingham
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - AD Leal
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - S Shinde
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - H Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - D Ettinger
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - CL Loprinzi
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ, Gelber SI, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM. Abstract P3-12-06: Fertility concerns and their impact on hormonal therapy decisions in young breast cancer survivors. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p3-12-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Fertility is a critical issue for young breast cancer (BC) survivors and can be diminished by adjuvant chemotherapy or by age-related decline in ovarian reserve over time. Little is known about how fertility concerns affect decision-making and persistence with endocrine therapy (ET) given the standard 5-10 year duration of therapy during which pregnancy is contraindicated.
Methods: As part of a multi-center, prospective cohort study enrolling women with newly diagnosed (dx) BC at age ≤40 years between 2006-2016, we identified participants with HR+, Stage I-III BC, without documented recurrence and with at least 3 years of follow-up. Participants completed serial surveys that include questions about socio-demographics, fertility issues and outcomes, treatment, and decision-making. ET use and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated up to 5 years post-dx (mean follow-up: 4.4 years). We used t-tests and chi-square tests to evaluate differences between women who indicated at least once in the first 2 years following diagnosis that fertility concerns affected their ET decisions and those who did not, and multi-variable logistic regression to identify factors independently associated (p≤0.05) with indicating ET decisions were affected by fertility concerns.
Results: Among 479 women included in this analysis, 33% (156/479) indicated that fertility concerns affected their decision regarding hormonal therapy – by choosing to defer treatment, stop early, or indicating that they may stop early or interrupt at a future time. Among these women, 44% (67/156) did not initiate or stopped ET (at least temporarily) vs. 21% (68/323) among women who did not indicate that fertility concerns affected their decision (p<0.0001). Among the 67 women with fertility concerns who did not initiate/discontinued ET, 29 (43%) subsequently reported a pregnancy within 5 years of dx. Women who were younger at dx, not partnered, nulliparous, and those who had a pre-treatment discussion about fertility with a provider were more likely to indicate that fertility concerns affected their ET decision (Table). In multi-variable analyses, only no or low parity remained significant: no children at diagnosis vs. ≥2 OR 9.86, 95% CI: 5.19-18.75, 1 child at diagnosis vs. ≥2: OR 6.28, 95% CI: 3.18-12.39.
Conclusion: Concern about fertility is a contributor to ET decisions among a significant number of young women with HR+ BC. Ongoing research, including the POSITIVE trial (NCT 02308085), an international study that is exploring the safety and feasibility of interrupting ET for pregnancy after HR+ BC, will provide much needed evidence that will help inform and guide both patients and providers as they make fertility and treatment decisions.
Table Fertility concerns affected decisionFertility concerns did not affect decisionpAge at dx - mean (SD)34.0 (3.8)36.3 (3.8)<0.0001Stage 0.17172 (46)128 (40) 269 (44)146 (45) 315 (10)49 (15) Chemo 0.41Yes112 (73)247 (77) No41 (27)75 (23) Radiation 0.96Yes98 (64)205 (64) No56 (36)116 (36) Partnered <0.0001Yes106 (69)272 (84) No48 (31)50 (16) Children pre-diagnosis <0.0001094 (64)73 (23) 131 (21)43 (14) > 2 children22 (15)197 (63) Pre-treatment fertility discussion 0.0003Yes127 (88)225 (73) No17 (12)84 (27)
Citation Format: Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ, Gelber SI, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM. Fertility concerns and their impact on hormonal therapy decisions in young breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PD Poorvu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United Arab Emirates; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United Arab Emirates; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - SI Gelber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United Arab Emirates; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - RM Tamimi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United Arab Emirates; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - J Peppercorn
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United Arab Emirates; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - L Schapira
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United Arab Emirates; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - VF Borges
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United Arab Emirates; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - SE Come
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United Arab Emirates; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - AH Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United Arab Emirates; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - SM Rosenberg
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United Arab Emirates; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Poorvu PD, Gelber SI, Ruddy KJ, Seiger K, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM. Abstract P6-12-08: Fertility interest, management and outcomes in young BRCA+ breast cancer survivors. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p6-12-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Young women with BRCA mutations may face fertility issues given the standard recommendation for risk-reducing oophorectomy after childbearing has been completed or before age 40. Potential transmission of the affected gene to future progeny may also be a concern. Little is known regarding the perspectives, management, and outcomes of young breast cancer survivors with BRCA mutations, who also face risks of recurrent disease and treatment effects on fertility.
Methods: As part of a multi-center, prospective cohort study of newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC) at age ≤40 years enrolling between 2006-2016, we identified women with stage I-III BC who had self-reported results of genetic testing. Participants are surveyed at baseline then annually regarding their breast cancer treatment, genetic testing, fertility interest, pregnancy attempts, and pregnancies. Chi-square tests were used to compare proportions of carriers vs non-carriers who were interested in future biologic children, took steps to preserve fertility, underwent bilateral oophorectomy, attempted pregnancy, and became pregnant in the 5 years following diagnosis.
Results: Carriers (n=104) and non-carriers (n=662) were similar in age and stage, but greater proportions of carriers had ER negative disease and received chemotherapy (Table 1). The proportion of carriers and non-carriers interested in future biologic children was similar prior to diagnosis (51% vs 38%; p=0.18), 1 year following diagnosis (30% vs 27%; p=0.44), and 5 years following diagnosis (14% vs 15%; p=0.26). Similar proportions of carriers (12%) and non-carriers (14%) took steps to prevent infertility prior to treatment. Greater proportions of carriers indicated that concern about having a child at higher risk of breast cancer affected their interest in future biologic children (15% vs 4%, p=0.02) and underwent bilateral oophorectomy (61% vs 9%, p<0.0001), but there was no difference in rates of pregnancy attempts (15% vs 11%, p=0.62), or pregnancies (12% vs 8%, p=0.36) in the five years following diagnosis.
Conclusion: Young breast cancer survivors with known BRCA mutations have similar interest in future fertility and both attempt and become pregnant at similar rates to non-carriers in the five years following diagnosis. Impact of specific BRCA mutation (1 or 2), ER status of tumor, and timing of pregnancy attempts will be explored in future analyses.
Table 1: BRCA mutation carriers, n (%)Non-carriers, n (%)X2 p-valueAge 0.47<3018 (17)86 (13) 31-3529 (28)201 (30) 36-4057 (55)375 (57) Stage 0.73I40 (39)260 (39) II46 (44)307 (46) III18 (17)95 (14) Partnered 0.44Yes77 (74)509 (77) No27 (26)148 (22) Missing0 (0)5 (1) Children pre-diagnosis 0.33Yes62 (60)427 (64) No42 (40)235 (36) Phenotype <0.0001ER and/or PR+48 (46)490 (74) ER and PR-56 (54)171 (26) Missing0 (0)1 (0) Adjuvant hormones <0.0001Yes44 (42)488 (74) No60 (58)174 (26) Chemotherapy 0.003Yes96 (92)529 (80) No8 (8)132 (2) Missing0 (0)1 (0)
Citation Format: Poorvu PD, Gelber SI, Ruddy KJ, Seiger K, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM. Fertility interest, management and outcomes in young BRCA+ breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PD Poorvu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - SI Gelber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - K Seiger
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - RM Tamimi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - J Peppercorn
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - L Schapira
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - VF Borges
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - SE Come
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - AH Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - SM Rosenberg
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Giordano SH, Schröder CP, Poncet C, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Linderholm B, Abreu MH, Rubio I, Van Poznak C, Morganstern D, Cameron D, Vleugel MM, Smilde TJ, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, Korde L, Russell NS, den Hoed IDM, Honkoop AH, van der Velden AWG, van 't Riet M, Dijkstra N, Bogler O, Goulioti T, Hilsenbeck S, Ruddy KJ, Wolff A, van Deurzen CHM, Martens J, Bartlett JMS, Aalders K, Tryfonidis K, Cardoso F. Abstract P5-23-01: Clinical and biological characterization of male breast cancer (BC) EORTC 10085/TBCRC 029/BOOG 2013-02/BIG 2-07: Baseline results from the prospective registry. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p5-23-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Through the International Male Breast Cancer Program, a prospective registry for male BC was created with the goals of evaluating 1) the clinical and biological features of this disease and 2) assessing feasibility of a prospective therapeutic clinical trial.
METHODS: All men, with any stage histologically proven invasive breast cancer, age 3 18 years, and newly presenting at the participating institutions (within 3 months prior) were eligible. Patients were enrolled for 30 months after activation of the first center, through February 2017. Per the study design, if <100 men enrolled, the study would be considered a failure and therapeutic trials would not be pursued through this network. Epidemiologic data, staging, pathologic features, and BRCA status were collected. Treatment and outcome data collection is ongoing. Optional collection of FFPE tumor samples, blood, and QOL were performed in the US, the Netherlands, and Latin America. Clinical database lock for this report was May 30, 2017. We currently report patient and disease characteristics and will update with patterns of treatment for the presentation. Outcomes and biological samples will be analyzed in the future.
RESULTS: 557 patients were enrolled: 75% in Europe, 20% in United States, 5% in other countries. 6.3% of patients had missing forms. Median age was 67 years (range 26-92). 93% were diagnosed 2010-2017. Among patients with complete data, 79% presented with a breast mass. 88% were M0 and 12% M1. Among M0 patients: 47%, 39%, 2%, and 11% had T1, T2, T3, and T4 disease respectively; 52% were N0. Overall, 98% had ER+ disease and 11% had HER2+ cancer. 14% had grade 1, 56% had grade 2, and 30% had grade 3 tumors. Among 112 men who underwent BRCA1 testing, 1 was positive. Among 118 men who had BRCA2 testing, 18 (15%) were positive. 21% of men had prior or concurrent malignancies, with the following most common sites: prostate, non-melanoma skin, colorectal, and melanoma. The prevalence of previously identified possible risk factors for male breast cancer were: overweight/obesity (72%), former/current smoker (51%), current alcohol 31 drink daily (41%), family history of breast cancer (35%), gynecomastia (16%), history radiation exposure (8%), use of anti-androgens (1%), and use of estrogens (1%).
CONCLUSION: Through an international collaborative effort, we were able to prospectively accrue 557 patients to a male breast cancer registry. These results demonstrate feasibility of pursuing a therapeutic clinical trial in men with breast cancer. In addition, this study shows the relatively low uptake of BRCA testing, high rates of concurrent/prior malignancy, and the rates of potentially modifiable risk factors in this patient population.
Funding from Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Susan G. Komen, Dutch Pink Ribbon Foundation, Swedish Breast Cancer Association (BRO) and EBCC Council.
Citation Format: Giordano SH, Schröder CP, Poncet C, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Linderholm B, Abreu MH, Rubio I, Van Poznak C, Morganstern D, Cameron D, Vleugel MM, Smilde TJ, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, Korde L, Russell NS, den Hoed IDM, Honkoop AH, van der Velden AWG, van 't Riet M, Dijkstra N, Bogler O, Goulioti T, Hilsenbeck S, Ruddy KJ, Wolff A, van Deurzen CHM, Martens J, Bartlett JMS, Aalders K, Tryfonidis K, Cardoso F. Clinical and biological characterization of male breast cancer (BC) EORTC 10085/TBCRC 029/BOOG 2013-02/BIG 2-07: Baseline results from the prospective registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-23-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SH Giordano
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - CP Schröder
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - C Poncet
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - E van Leeuwen-Stok
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - B Linderholm
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - MH Abreu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - I Rubio
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - C Van Poznak
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - D Morganstern
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - D Cameron
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - MM Vleugel
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - TJ Smilde
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - I Bozovic-Spasojevic
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - L Korde
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - NS Russell
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - IDM den Hoed
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - AH Honkoop
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - AWG van der Velden
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - M van 't Riet
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - N Dijkstra
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - O Bogler
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - T Goulioti
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - S Hilsenbeck
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - KJ Ruddy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - A Wolff
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - CHM van Deurzen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - J Martens
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - JMS Bartlett
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - K Aalders
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - K Tryfonidis
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| | - F Cardoso
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; EORTC HQ, Brussel, Belgium; BOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Hosital General Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Esperanz - loc. Waterland, Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands; Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, National Cancer Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia; Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle; The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands; Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands; Martini Hospita
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM, Rajagopal PS, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Come S, Borges V, Gelber S. Abstract P4-10-04: Employment trends in young women following a breast cancer diagnosis. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p4-10-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Workplace concerns are particularly salient for young women with breast cancer (BC), and a cancer diagnosis (dx) and treatment may affect their careers. We sought to evaluate the perceived impact of dx on employment, describe job changes, and identify factors associated with transition out of the workforce after dx of BC at a young age.
Methods: As part of an ongoing, multi-center cohort of young women diagnosed with BC at age ≤ 40, we surveyed women with early-stage BC about their pre- and post-dx employment status. Additional items assessed socio-demographic and treatment information; tumor characteristics were ascertained via pathology and medical record review. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of transitioning from pre-dx employment to unemployment at 1 year after dx. Among women employed 1 year after dx, we evaluated job satisfaction, perceived impact of dx on job performance, accommodations made by employers, and perceived likelihood of employment in the future.
Results: 76% of women (555/730) were employed both before dx and at 1 year; 13% were not employed at either time point; 7% were employed pre-dx but unemployed at 1 year; 4% were not employed prior to dx but reported employment at 1 year. Among women employed 1 year after dx, 74% (427/581) were somewhat or completely satisfied with their job. Only 6% said cancer or treatment limited their ability to perform their job quite a bit or very much; 38% said their ability was affected a little bit. Most (63%) said their employers had made accommodations for them, and almost all women (93%) said it was very likely they would be working in 1 year. In multivariable analyses (Table 1), women with stage 3 disease (vs. stage 1), were more likely to transition out of the workforce following dx, while women with a college or graduate degree (vs. no college degree) were less likely to transition out.
Conclusion: Most young women with early stage BC remain employed and report a willingness by their employer to make accommodations following a breast cancer dx. While few women reported that their dx or treatment limited their job performance, the finding that women with more advanced disease were more likely to transition out of the workforce suggests an impact of dx/treatment burden on employment. Women without a college degree were also at risk for unemployment post-dx, suggesting that job type, socioeconomic status, and environment affect employment outcomes. Attention to these subgroups of women is warranted to ensure that they are sufficiently supported given the potential adverse psychosocial and financial impacts of unemployment on patients, families, communities, and society.
Table 1. Multivariable analysis of factors associated with transition out of workforce 1year post-dx (N=634) OR (95% CI)Stage (ref=1) 04.52 (0.60-33.85)21.11 (0.48-2.58)34.05 (1.53-10.72)*White non-Hispanic (ref=non-WNH)1.47 (0.56-3.81)College graduate (ref=no college degree)0.44 (0.22-0.90)*Married/Living as married (ref=unmarried)0.95 (0.43-2.08)Parous (ref=nulliparous)1.75 (0.83-3.69)Age at diagnosis (years)0.98 (0.90-1.06)Mastectomy (ref=lumpectomy)1.74 (0.75-4.05)Endocrine therapy (ref=none)0.75 (0.41-1.39)Chemotherapy (ref=none)5.20 (0.93-29.22)Radiation (ref=none)1.38 (0.64-2.96)*p<0.05
Citation Format: Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM, Rajagopal PS, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Come S, Borges V, Gelber S. Employment trends in young women following a breast cancer diagnosis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AH Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Mayo Clinic; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Massachusetts General Hospital; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; University of Colorado Cancer Center
| | - SM Rosenberg
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Mayo Clinic; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Massachusetts General Hospital; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; University of Colorado Cancer Center
| | - PS Rajagopal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Mayo Clinic; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Massachusetts General Hospital; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; University of Colorado Cancer Center
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Mayo Clinic; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Massachusetts General Hospital; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; University of Colorado Cancer Center
| | - RM Tamimi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Mayo Clinic; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Massachusetts General Hospital; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; University of Colorado Cancer Center
| | - L Schapira
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Mayo Clinic; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Massachusetts General Hospital; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; University of Colorado Cancer Center
| | - S Come
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Mayo Clinic; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Massachusetts General Hospital; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; University of Colorado Cancer Center
| | - V Borges
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Mayo Clinic; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Massachusetts General Hospital; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; University of Colorado Cancer Center
| | - S Gelber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Mayo Clinic; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Massachusetts General Hospital; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; University of Colorado Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ruddy KJ, Rack B, Schwitulla J, Lambrechts D, Haeberle L, Schramm A, Trapp E, Scholz C, Beutler AS, Ginsburg E, Couch F, Partridge AH, Wang L, Weinshilboum RM, Janni W, Vachon C, Fasching P. Abstract P4-10-07: Genetic predictors of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p4-10-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA) impacts quality of life and reproductive options, and may play a role in treatment decision-making for young breast cancer patients. Although age, increasing doses of alkylating agents, and tamoxifen are known to increase the risk of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA), it is difficult to predict which women will develop CRA in order to inform fertility preservation and treatment decisions. We sought to investigate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that have been associated with a younger age at natural menopause and ovarian reserve in non-oncologic populations were predictive of CRA in two large German clinical trials that administered gonadotoxic chemotherapy.
Methods: A total of 1322 premenopausal participants under age 50 who enrolled in SUCCESS B (a phase 3 trial of FEC-docetaxel-trastuzumab +/- gemcitabine for high risk early stage breast cancer) or SUCCESS C (a phase 3 trial of FEC-docetaxel-cyclophosphamide vs. docetaxel-cyclophosphamide that also tested the efficacy of a weight loss intervention in early stage breast cancer patients) were eligible for this study. We excluded patients who were receiving ovarian suppression. On these trials, menstrual status was self-reported as amenorrheic or not every three months after chemotherapy. Bloods were stored and patients provided consent for DNA analysis. We genotyped nine candidate SNPs in six genes (rs2002555 and rs11170547 in AMHR2, rs6166 in FSHR, rs10852344 <60kb from TNFRSF17/RUNDC2A/ GSPT1, rs12461110 in NLRP11, rs1801133 in MTHFR, rs2066470 in MTHRF, rs3810682 in BMP15, and rs615942 in COASY), and examined their association with CRA at 12-month and 24-month time points using logistic regression adjusted for age, BMI, and tamoxifen.
Results: Of the 554 eligible women with SNP data and menstrual data at 12 months, 70% reported CRA; of the 458 eligible women with SNP data and menstrual data at 24 months, 69% reported CRA. The two SNPs in AMHR2 showed suggestive associations with CRA at 12 and 24 months. [Final results pending].
Conclusions: Genetic variation in AMHR2 may be associated with CRA. Additional research will be needed to validate these findings in other breast cancer survivors and to identify additional SNPs that may be associated with CRA. Together with other clinical factors, genetic variation may improve our ability to predict who will experience CRA, and may inform reproductive and treatment decision-making in cancer patients.
Citation Format: Ruddy KJ, Rack B, Schwitulla J, Lambrechts D, Haeberle L, Schramm A, Trapp E, Scholz C, Beutler AS, Ginsburg E, Couch F, Partridge AH, Wang L, Weinshilboum RM, Janni W, Vachon C, Fasching P. Genetic predictors of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KJ Ruddy
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - B Rack
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - J Schwitulla
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - D Lambrechts
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - L Haeberle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - A Schramm
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - E Trapp
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - C Scholz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - AS Beutler
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - E Ginsburg
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - F Couch
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - AH Partridge
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - L Wang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - RM Weinshilboum
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - W Janni
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - C Vachon
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - P Fasching
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; University of Erlangen, Ernlagen, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rosenberg SM, Dutton CR, Ligibel J, Barry W, Ruddy KJ, Sprunck-Harrild K, Emmons KM, Partridge AH. Abstract P1-10-18: Contraception use in young women with breast cancer. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p1-10-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Young women with breast cancer need highly effective contraception given the potential implications of unplanned pregnancy for optimal treatment, and the teratogenic risks. We sought to determine the contraceptive methods used by young women after diagnosis (dx) of breast cancer and factors associated with use of less effective methods or no contraceptive method, which confers a 6-90% annual risk of pregnancy in sexually active women in contrast to highly effective methods (risk <1%).
Methods: As part of a randomized trial conducted in 54 sites to test an education and support intervention for young women with breast cancer and their oncologists, we surveyed women about their pre-dx, current, and planned contraceptive use, and about communication with their providers regarding contraception. Women enrolled within 3 months of dx; contraception items were included on 3- and 12-month post-enrollment surveys. Intrauterine device (IUD) use, tubal sterilization, hysterectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (hyst/BSO) after dx, or male partner vasectomy were classified as highly effective methods; all other methods and non-use were categorized as less effective. We excluded women not at risk of pregnancy: hyst/BSO prior to dx, or no indication for contraception. We used logistic regression to explore factors associated with use of less effective methods.
Results: Of 424 women who completed the 3-month post-enrollment survey, median age at dx was 39 (range 22-45). 312 women at risk of pregnancy were included in this analysis, including 291 reporting sexual activity with a male partner within the last 6 months, and 21 reporting no recent sexual activity but reporting use of birth control. 123 women (39%) used highly effective contraceptive methods prior to dx; after dx, 161 (52%) reported current use of or a plan to use a highly effective method. 19 women (6%) reported use of a hormonal birth control method since dx; 7 (2%) reported withdrawal as their only contraceptive method; 25 (8%) reported no contraception. 30% of women did not recall a discussion of avoiding pregnancy or need for contraception during treatment with their providers. In multivariable analyses (N=310), desire for additional biologic children (OR 7.54, 95% CI 3.88-14.66) and provider discussion of contraception and pregnancy (OR 2.13 95% CI 1.20-3.78) were associated with use of less effective contraception. Age, race/ethnicity, disease stage, and partner status were not significantly associated with use of less effective methods.
Conclusion: About half of women who are at risk of pregnancy reported use or planned use of less effective contraceptive methods or no method of contraception following dx of breast cancer. Women with breast cancer and their providers may benefit from targeted education on contraceptive options and method effectiveness.
Citation Format: Rosenberg SM, Dutton CR, Ligibel J, Barry W, Ruddy KJ, Sprunck-Harrild K, Emmons KM, Partridge AH. Contraception use in young women with breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SM Rosenberg
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA
| | - CR Dutton
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA
| | - J Ligibel
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA
| | - W Barry
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA
| | - K Sprunck-Harrild
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA
| | - KM Emmons
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA
| | - AH Partridge
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Partridge AH, Ruddy KJ, Barry WT, Greaney M, Sprunck-Harrild K, Meyer ME, Baker EL, Ligibel J, Emmons KM. Abstract OT2-4-02: Young and strong: A randomized trial to evaluate a program for young women with breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-ot2-4-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer face substantial challenges including higher risk of disease recurrence and likelihood of harboring a genetic mutation compared with older women. Many young women are also very concerned about their future fertility and this population often feels isolated from other breast cancer survivors due to their age and life stage. Some worry that their doctors are unsure of how to treat them. To address these issues, we developed a comprehensive program at our institution to coordinate and enhance the care, support, and education for young women with breast cancer. The Young and Strong study is a randomized clinical trial (RCT) to evaluate a virtual, exportable, scalable version of this program designed to improve the quality of care and the psychosocial well-being of this vulnerable population.
The specific aims of this program are:
1) To develop, pilot, and refine an exportable and sustainable educational and support intervention for young women with breast cancer and their oncology providers (Young Women's Intervention; YWI).
2) To determine the effect of the YWI compared to a contact-time control intervention focused on promoting physical activity (Physical Activity Intervention; PAI) on attention to fertility issues in a RCT: “Young and Strong”.
We initially conducted 4 focus groups (n = 36) and 20 key informant interviews, and developed, piloted, and refined the YWI as well as the PAI. Based on this successful work, we launched the Young and Strong study in June 2012 as a cluster-randomized trial at a total of 54 sites (40 community and 14 academic sites across the United States). Randomization is 1:1 between sites, and stratified by practice type (community vs. academic). Each community site will enroll 5-10 participants, each academic site 15 participants. Total recruitment will be 410-610 pts. The primary objective is to evaluate whether YWI, as compared to PAI, is associated with greater attention to fertility issues, assessed via medical record review. In addition, participants will complete assessments at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months that assess satisfaction with care, psychosocial well-being, physical activity and anthropomorphic changes.
Young and Strong activated in June 2012 and all sites have been identified. As of 6/11/2013 the study has been initiated at 53 out of 54 sites, and total of 282 women have enrolled on the study.
Eligibility Criteria:
1. Women age 18-45 years at diagnosis
2. Stage I-III invasive breast cancer without known recurrence or metastatic disease
3. Newly-diagnosed (within 3 months of initial diagnosis)
4. Have 1st appt. with a medical oncologist at participating site after the site opens to enrollment
5. Able to read and write in English
For further information, contact Ann Partridge, MD, MPH at 888-814-3324.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT2-4-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AH Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - WT Barry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - M Greaney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - K Sprunck-Harrild
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - ME Meyer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - EL Baker
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - J Ligibel
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - KM Emmons
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rosenberg SM, Sepucha K, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Gelber S, Meyer ME, Schapira L, Come SE, Borges VF, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Abstract P2-18-02: Factors associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in young women with breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p2-18-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: While younger age at diagnosis has consistently been identified as a predictor of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), little is known about how clinical, decisional, and psychosocial factors are related to the decision to undergo CPM in young women with breast cancer.
Methods: As part of an ongoing, multi-center cohort study of young women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger, we identified 428 women with unilateral Stage I-III disease. Participants were asked to complete surveys by mail that included questions about decision-making and treatments. Tumor characteristics were ascertained via medical record review. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors of: 1) CPM vs. unilateral mastectomy (UM); 2) CPM vs. breast conserving surgery (BCS). Independent variables with a p-value ≤ 0.15 in bi-variate analyses were included in the final multivariable model.
Results: 41% of women had CPM, 29% had UM and 31% had BCS. Median age at diagnosis was 37 (range: 17-40). Most women had stage I or II disease (87%), and estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors (69%); approximately 14% were carriers of a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation. In the multivariable analysis (Table 1), having a cancer-predisposing mutation, having at least one child, anxiety as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and patient-driven decision making were all associated with a greater likelihood of undergoing CPM, while women who reported their physician made the final decision about surgery were less likely to undergo CPM, compared to both UM and BCS. Additional factors significantly associated with undergoing CPM vs. BCS included nodal involvement, Her2 positivity, and lower BMI. Race/ethnicity, marital status, tumor size, tumor grade, depression (as measured by the HADS), fear of recurrence, and having a first-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer were not associated with undergoing CPM.
Conclusion: Many young women with early stage breast cancer are choosing to undergo CPM. Our findings point to the need for improved communication with patients regarding surgical choices as well as better management of anxiety surrounding diagnosis. Interventions aimed at enhancing risk communication and encouraging shared patient-physician decision-making might be beneficial in this setting.
Table 1. Factors associated with: 1) CPM vs. UM; 2) CPM vs. BCS CPM vs. UMCPM vs. BCS OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)Age at diagnosis0.92 (0.86-1.00)0.97 (0.90-1.04)Mutation positive3.83 (1.60-9.15)14.51 (5.02-41.92)Any nodal involvement0.79 (0.45-1.38)1.93 (1.05-3.55)Her2 positivity0.71 (0.40-1.26)2.24 (1.18-4.25)Having ≥ 1 child2.08 (1.04-4.14)3.25 (1.63-6.48)BMI0.98 (0.92-1.03)0.92 (0.87-0.97)Anxiety1.93 (1.05-3.56)2.31 (1.22-4.35)Decisional involvement (ref = shared) Mainly patient's decision3.47 (1.99-6.06)3.71 (2.09-6.58)Mainly doctor's decision0.14 (0.03-0.63)0.16 (0.03-0.77)
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-18-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SM Rosenberg
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| | - K Sepucha
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| | - RM Tamimi
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| | - S Gelber
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| | - ME Meyer
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| | - L Schapira
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| | - SE Come
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| | - VF Borges
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| | - EP Winer
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| | - AH Partridge
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ruddy KJ, Baker EL, Guo H, Goldstein MJ, Winer EP, Shulman LN, Partridge AH. Abstract OT2-5-02: Randomized trial evaluating a coordinated survivorship care program for early stage breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-ot2-5-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Prior studies suggest that many breast cancer survivors use substantial medical resources but still do not receive all guideline-recommended care. Poorly coordinated care may result in unnecessary visits and testing, and may drive up medical costs without improving outcomes. Data are mixed regarding the ability of survivorship care plans to improve the quality of cancer survivorship care.
Trial Design: Randomized (1:1) 2-arm study of a coordinated survivorship care program (including a breast cancer treatment summary and survivorship care plan shared with the patient and mailed to her providers, as well as phone calls from a patient navigator to the patient every three months for one year) compared with standard follow-up care. Participants are asked to complete a survey at baseline and one year later, and medical record review is performed at the end of a year to collect data on medical care received during the first year of survivorship care. Cost data will be acquired via institutional billing systems.
Specific Aims: To assess the effects of the coordinated survivorship care program compared to standard follow-up care on patients’ receipt of redundant care, receipt of guideline-directed care, and cost of care.
The primary endpoint for the study is:
-The proportion of patients in each group who have 2+ office visits that include breast or chest wall exams (not including by plastic surgeons) within 30 days of each other in the absence of a new breast/chest wall complaint during the year of follow-up.
The secondary endpoints for the study include:
-The proportion of age-appropriate health services (mammograms, gynecologic exams, bone density tests, colon cancer screening, cardiovascular screening) performed for each patient
-The number and cost of imaging, lab, and other tests
-The number of MD/NP visits
-Changes between baseline and 1-year in survey data: Lasry Fear of Recurrence score, anxiety/depression (GHQ-12), quality of life (SF-12), satisfaction with care (PSQ-18), satisfaction with study participation, and understanding of follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria: English-speaking, women age 18 or older with recently diagnosed stage 0-3A breast cancer who are planning to receive follow-up medical oncology care through Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), with a primary care provider who uses the same electronic medical record. Patients are excluded if more than 30 days have elapsed since the end of active treatment (EATD, defined as the final breast surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, or visit to decide about one of these, whichever was last, excluding reconstructive surgeries and visits).
Statistical Methods: Descriptive statistics will assess the primary and secondary endpoints. For the primary endpoint, the proportion (95% CI) of patients in each arm who receive 2+ breast/chest wall exams within 30 days during the year following the EATD will be determined. With a sample size of 50 per arm, the maximum width of the 95% CI will be 29%.
Target accrual (met between 1/14/11-4/25/13): 100
Contact information: katieruddy@gmail.com.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT2-5-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - EL Baker
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - H Guo
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - MJ Goldstein
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - EP Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - LN Shulman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - AH Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Baselga J, Morales SM, Awada A, Blum JL, Tan AR, Ewertz M, Cortes J, Moy B, Ruddy KJ, Haddad T, Ciruelos EM, Vuylsteke P, Ebbinghaus S, Im E, Eaton L, Prathiraja K, Gause C, Mauro D, Rugo HS. Abstract P2-16-04: A phase 2 study of ridaforolimus (RIDA) and dalotuzumab (DALO) in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p2-16-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Preclinical studies indicate that the dual inhibition of IGFR and mTOR may be additive or synergistic and abrogates the feedback activation of AKT due to rapamycin analog mTOR inhibitors. A phase 1 study of the mTOR inhibitor RIDA and the anti-IGFR antibody DALO demonstrated that the combination was feasible and well-tolerated at doses that were nearly those used for the two single agents. The dose limiting toxicity was stomatitis, similar to RIDA monotherapy. Preliminary signals of anti-tumor activity, including partial responses and prolonged progression free survival (PFS), were observed in ER+ advanced breast cancer (ABC), especially in high proliferation tumors (Ki67 ≥15%). Methods: The trial was a multi-center, international randomized study with PFS as the primary endpoint. Key eligibility included ABC with prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. The original phase 2 study design was a two-part, adaptive design intended to first test the combination of RIDA (30 mg by mouth daily for 5 out of every 7 days), -DALO (10 mg/kg IV weekly) against a standard agent, exemestane in Part A. Patients were stratified into high and low proliferation strata based on baseline Ki67. Following a demonstration of PFS benefit of the combination in Part A, Part B was intended to show the PFS benefit of the combination over each single agents by comparing RIDA-DALO to RIDA and DALO. Results: The study was initiated in October 2011. Accrual was suspended after the first 66 patients were randomized due to a higher than expected rate of stomatitis in the RIDA-DALO arm. Preliminary data indicated an overall incidence of any grade stomatitis was 68% (22/33 pts), and of grade 3 stomatitis was 35% (11/33 pts). In an effort to identify a more tolerable regimen, the study was amended to eliminate Part B and to evaluate two sequential reduced dose RIDA-DALO cohorts in a non-randomized design: 20mg and 10mg for 5 out of every 7 days. The dose of DALO was unchanged. Preliminary safety results of overall and grade 3 stomatitis in the 20 mg were 81.5% (22/27 pts) and 37% (10/27 pts), respectively. Although the incidence of overall stomatitis in the 10 mg cohort remained high, 88% (22/25 pts), grade 3 stomatitis was dramatically reduced to 8% (2/25 pts). Conclusion: Preliminary evaluation of safety from this phase 2 study demonstrates that the previously recommended phase 2 dose of RIDA-DALO was not tolerable. However lower doses of RIDA (10 mg) in combination with DALO appeared to be tolerable with markedly reduced rates of grade 3 stomatitis. Final results of efficacy, safety and RNA profiling analysis from the two RIDA-DALO dose cohorts as well as from the randomized portion of the study will be available at the time of the meeting.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-16-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Baselga
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - SM Morales
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - A Awada
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - JL Blum
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - AR Tan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - M Ewertz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - J Cortes
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - B Moy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - T Haddad
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - EM Ciruelos
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - P Vuylsteke
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - S Ebbinghaus
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - E Im
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - L Eaton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - K Prathiraja
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - C Gause
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - D Mauro
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - HS Rugo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; H. de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lerida, Spain; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Minnesota Masonic Clinical Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN; Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Clinique Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The causes, optimal treatments, and medical/psychosocial sequelae of breast cancer in men are poorly understood. DESIGN A systematic review of the English language literature was conducted to identify studies relevant to male breast cancer between 1987 and 2012 and including at least 20 patients. Searches were carried out on PubMed using the title terms 'male breast cancer' or 'male breast carcinoma'. RESULTS Relevant published data regarding risk factors, biological characteristics, presentation and prognosis, appropriate evaluation and treatment, and survivorship issues in male breast cancer patients are presented. BRCA2 mutations, age, conditions that alter the estrogen/androgen ratio, and radiation are proven risk factors. Disease biology is distinct in men, but diagnostic approaches and treatments for men are generally extrapolated from those in women due to inadequate research in men. Survivorship issues in men may include sexual and hormonal side-effects of endocrine therapies as well as unique psychosocial impacts of the disease. CONCLUSION Further research is needed to address gaps in knowledge pertaining to care of male breast cancer patients and survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Ruddy
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dowton AA, Meyer ME, Ruddy KJ, Yeh ED, Partridge AH. Abstract P4-01-09: Screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in early-stage breast cancer survivors. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p4-01-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Limited evidence is available regarding the value of screening breast MRI in female early stage breast cancer survivors. We sought to evaluate outcomes of index screening breast MRI in breast cancer survivors in the modern era of breast cancer treatment and imaging.
Methods: Using a large prospective institutional database, we identified all women who underwent breast MRI between 7/2006 and 6/2008, were ≥ 1 year and ≤ 3 years after diagnosis of stage I-IIIa breast cancer, had remaining breast tissue after treatment, and had consented to a record review protocol at our center (95% uptake rate). Sociodemographic, disease, staging and treatment information (see table 1), indications and outcomes for breast MRI, as well as disease status at 2 years after the index MRI were ascertained.
Results: 643 patients were identified as having undergone at least 1 MRI of the breast(s); 248 (38.5%) were diagnostic MRIs (had identified clinical indication or imaging abnormality); 12 (2%) were missing clinical data; 383 (59.5%) were screening MRIs. 338/383 (88%) patients who had screening MRI had stage I-IIIa invasive breast cancer. 220/338 (65%) MRIs performed were index MRIs (index MRI defined as first MRI >1 year post diagnosis). For this preliminary analysis, we include only the 155 patients (70%) who were within 1–3 years of diagnosis at the time of index MRI (see table 1 for patient and disease characteristics).
24/155 (15.5%) screening MRIs were considered not normal. Five women (21%) underwent biopsy based on abnormal MRI finding; 1 resulted in the detection of a local recurrence (4.2%, 95% CI=0.1%–21.1%). 3/131 patients who had a normal index MRI were found to have local/regional recurrence or contralateral breast cancer diagnosed within 2 years of the MRI (2.3%, 95% CI=0.5%–6.6%). A statistically significant difference in the proportions was not observed based on Fisher's test (p = 0.50). 6/155 patients (3.9 %) had a systemic recurrence in the 2 years following index MRI.
Conclusion: The vast majority of first screening breast MRIs obtained 1–3 years following treatment in early stage breast cancer survivors are normal, and very few detect cancer. Planned further analysis in this dataset will evaluate frequency of cancer detection in longer-term survivors. Additional research is necessary to determine the risks and benefits of screening breast MRIs being performed in this population.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AA Dowton
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - ME Meyer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - ED Yeh
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - AH Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ruddy KJ, Pitcher BN, Archer LE, Cohen HJ, Winer EP, Hudis CA, Muss HB, Partridge AH. Persistence, adherence, and toxicity with oral CMF in older women with early-stage breast cancer (Adherence Companion Study 60104 for CALGB 49907). Ann Oncol 2012; 23:3075-3081. [PMID: 22767584 PMCID: PMC3501229 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2011] [Revised: 03/19/2012] [Accepted: 04/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF) is often selected as adjuvant chemotherapy for older patients with early-stage breast cancer due to perceived superior tolerability. We sought to measure persistence with CMF, adherence to oral cyclophosphamide, and the association of these with toxic effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS CALGB 49907 was a randomized trial comparing standard chemotherapy (CMF or AC, provider/patient choice) with capecitabine in patients aged ≥65 with stage I-IIIB breast cancer. Those randomized to standard therapy and choosing CMF were prescribed oral cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m(2) for 14 consecutive days in six 28-day cycles. Persistence was defined as being prescribed six cycles of at least one of the three CMF drugs. Adherence was the number of cyclophosphamide doses that women reported they had taken divided by the number prescribed. Persistence and adherence were based on case report forms and medication calendars. RESULTS Of 317 randomized to standard chemotherapy, 133 received CMF. Median age was 73 (range 65-88). Seventy-one percent submitted at least one medication calendar; 65% persisted with CMF. Non-persistence was associated with node negativity (P = 0.019), febrile neutropenia (P = 0.002), and fatigue (P = 0.044). Average adherence was 97% during prescribed cycles. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported adherence to cyclophosphamide was high, but persistence was lower, which may be attributable to toxic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Ruddy
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
| | - B N Pitcher
- CALGB Statistical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
| | - L E Archer
- CALGB Statistical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
| | - H J Cohen
- CALGB Statistical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
| | - E P Winer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - C A Hudis
- Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - H B Muss
- Medical Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - A H Partridge
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ruddy KJ, Giobbie-Hurder A, Giordano SH, Goldfarb S, Kereakoglow S, Winer EP, Partridge AH. P4-19-03: Physical and Psychological Sequelae of Breast Cancer in Men. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p4-19-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Little is known about the physical and emotional health of men with breast cancer. Information is also lacking regarding whether their informational and supportive care needs are being met regarding fertility and genetic concerns.
Methods: In an online pilot study recruiting participants through three websites focused on male breast cancer, www.outoftheshadowofpink.com, www.malebreastcancer.org, and www.malebreastcancer.ca, we surveyed men with breast cancer about their attitudes, symptoms, experiences, and health perceptions. We measured anxiety and depression using the Hospitalized Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), health-related quality of life (QOL) using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), and hormonal and sexual symptoms using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal and Sexual Scales. We assessed select toxicities from therapy and history of genetic and fertility counseling.
Results: Forty-two men responded to this online survey at least in part.
Conclusions: Men with breast cancer experience substantial symptoms in follow-up. Sexual functioning, in particular, may be impaired (in men without cancer, mean EPIC Sexual Score is 61.4 with SD 23.6). Hormonal symptoms are also prevalent (in men without cancer, mean EPIC Hormonal Score is 91.7 with SD 9.7). We plan to use data from this pilot study to inform a larger study and develop targeted interventions to improve sexual functioning and reduce symptoms in male breast cancer survivors.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-19-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KJ Ruddy
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - A Giobbie-Hurder
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - SH Giordano
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - S Goldfarb
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - S Kereakoglow
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - EP Winer
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - AH Partridge
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Collins LC, Gelber S, Marotti JD, Cole K, Kereakoglow S, Ruddy KJ, Brachtel EF, Schapira L, Come SE, Borges VF, Schedin PJ, Warner E, Winer E, Partridge A. P4-11-12: Molecular Phenotype of Breast Cancers in a Large Cohort of Young Women According to Time Interval Since Pregnancy. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p4-11-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The increase in breast cancer risk during pregnancy and post partum is well recognized. The cross-over to protective effect does not occur until many years later and varies with age at first birth. Recently, a genomic signature specific to the pregnant compared with the non-pregnant breast has been identified; this signature remains present in the postmenopausal parous breast. Given this, we investigated whether time interval since pregnancy affects the phenotype of breast cancers arising in young women compared with nulliparous women. Methods: We examined molecular phenotype, according to histologic grade and biomarker status, in relation to time since pregnancy in an ongoing prospective cohort study (n=355) of young women (≤40yrs) with breast cancer. Medical records were reviewed for tumor stage and receptor status. Parity was ascertained from questionnaires completed within 9 months of diagnosis. Tumor grade was determined by central pathology review. Using tumor grade and biomarker expression, cancers were categorized as luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2−, histologic grade 1 or 2); luminal B ( ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+, or ER and/or PR+, HER2− and grade 3); HER2 type (ER-, PR-, HER2+); and triple negative (ER-, PR-, HER2−).
Results: The median age of the study population is 37 years (range 17–40). Overall, 80% of women had stage 1 or 2 disease; 67% of cancers were ER positive and 32% showed HER2 overexpression. The distribution of breast cancer molecular phenotypes by time interval since last pregnancy is shown in the table.
Distribution of molecular phenotype by interval between last pregnancy and diagnosis
In our large cohort of parous young women, we found no differences in the distribution of molecular phenotype according to time interval since pregnancy. However, nulliparous young women were more likely to develop luminal A cancers compared to parous women (40% vs. 29%; unadjusted chi square p-value=0.03) and appeared less likely to develop HER2−type and triple negative cancers (7% vs. 13%, p-value=0.09 and 17% vs. 23%, p-value=0.22 respectively). There were no differences in the distribution of luminal B cancers. Conclusions: The distribution of molecular phenotypes is similar among parous young women regardless of the time interval since parturition. Nulliparous young women appear more likely to develop luminal A cancers compared to parous women. Whether the difference in molecular phenotypes of pregnancy-associated breast cancers vs. cancers arising in nulliparous women is due to the effects of genomic alteration remains to be investigated. Effects of a prior pregnancy appear consistent across a 5-year period, in keeping with the concept of genomic alterations identified in the normal pregnant breast and thereafter.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LC Collins
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Gelber
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - JD Marotti
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - K Cole
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Kereakoglow
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - KJ Ruddy
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - EF Brachtel
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Schapira
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - SE Come
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - VF Borges
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - PJ Schedin
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Warner
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Winer
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Partridge
- 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Hanover, NH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Colorado Cancer Center, CO; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ruddy KJ, Gelber S, Tamimi RM, Ginsburg ES, Schapira L, Come SE, Meyer ME, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Fertility concerns in young women with breast cancer: Results from a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.6025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
34
|
Ruddy KJ, Archer LE, Cohen HJ, Winer EP, Hudis CA, Muss HB, Partridge AH. Abstract P5-10-12: Adherence, Persistence and Toxicity with Oral CMF in Older Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer in CALGB 49907 (Adherence Companion Study 60104). Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs10-p5-10-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil (CMF) is often selected as adjuvant chemotherapy for older patients with early stage breast cancer due to perceived better tolerability compared to other standard regimens such as doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC). We sought to measure adherence and persistence with oral cyclophosphamide and the relationship with toxicity among women who were prescribed CMF in CALGB49907.
Patients and Methods: CALGB49907 (NEJM 2009) was a randomized trial that compared standard chemotherapy (CMF or AC) versus capecitabine in patients age ≥65 with stage 1-3 breast cancer. Those randomized to standard chemotherapy were treated with either AC or CMF. For those given CMF, cyclophosphamide was prescribed at 100 mg/m2 daily for 14 consecutive days of each of six 28 day cycles. Persistence was defined as completing all six cycles. Adherence was measured using patient self-report medication calendars, and was calculated as the number of doses that women reported they had taken divided by the doses they were prescribed, taking into account toxicity-related dosing changes.
Results: Of the 317 patients randomized to standard chemotherapy, 133 elected to receive CMF. CMF patients were older (p=0.009) and less likely to be Hispanic (P<0.001) than patients who received AC. Median age of CMF patients was 73 (range 65 to 88); only 86 patients (65%) persisted with CMF to completion of planned protocol therapy. In a multivariable logistic regression model, non-persistence was associated with the report of a non-hematologic adverse event (p <0.001), but not with a hematologic adverse event (p = 0.578). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 21% of the non-persistent patients, but only in 1 % of the persistent patients (P<0.001). Fatigue also occurred in 21% of the non-persistent patients, but only in 6% of the persistent patients (p=0.009). Other non-significant covariates included age, race, performance status at enrollment, type of surgery, nodal status, ER status, and PgR status. Ninety-four of 133 (71%) CMF-treated patients submitted medication calendars documenting their use of cyclophosphamide. The only characteristic that was found to differ between women who submitted medication calendars and those who did not was that the former were less likely to be ER-positive (p=0.010). Average adherence across all cycles with available data was 97%, and adherence did not vary by cycle (p=0.46). Five percent of participants reported taking fewer than 80% of expected doses and were deemed non-adherent. In a logistic regression model, there were no significant variables predicting non-adherence.
Conclusions: In this substudy of a large clinical trial of older women with early stage breast cancer, self-reported adherence to oral cyclophosphamide as part of standard CMF chemotherapy was high. However, only 65% of older women were persistent with CMF, lower than the 92% observed among patients who elected to receive AC in the trial. Further research is needed to study how non-persistence impacts outcomes in this population and whether persistence can be increased by improving management of toxicities in older women.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-10-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - LE Archer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - HJ Cohen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - EP Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - CA Hudis
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - HB Muss
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - AH. Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ruddy KJ, Meyer ME, Giobbie-Hurder A, Emmons KM, Weeks JC, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Abstract P2-15-01: Long-Term Risk Perceptions and Quality of Life of Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs10-p2-15-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Research has demonstrated that many women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) overestimate their risk of future breast cancer events. However, no prior studies have evaluated risk perceptions in long-term follow-up.
Methods: As part of a multicenter longitudinal cohort study, we mailed long-term follow-up surveys to 315 of 392 women who had previously responded to a survey 18 months after they were diagnosed with DCIS (33 of the 392 were excluded because they were receiving follow-up care at outside centers, and 44 because of recurrence/death). We evaluated psychosocial distress by Hospitalized Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Revised Impact of Events Scale (RIES), quality of life (QOL) by Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and risk perceptions with items used previously in the cohort.
Results: One hundred ninety-three women (61%) responded. They were a median age of 53 yrs (range 31-89) and a median of 5.8 yrs from diagnosis (range 4.3-7.0). Twelve were excluded due to report of recurrence. Of the 181 remaining, 32% perceived at least a moderate risk of developing DCIS again within 5 yrs; 43% perceived at least a moderate lifetime risk of developing DCIS again; 27% perceived at least a moderate risk of developing invasive breast cancer within 5 yrs; 38% perceived at least a moderate lifetime risk of developing invasive breast cancer; 24% perceived at least a moderate risk of DCIS spreading to other parts of their bodies. For qualitative responses of ≥ moderate perceived risk, median quantitative risk perception was 10% regarding 5-yr risk of DCIS or invasive cancer, 20% regarding lifetime risk, and 50% pertaining to risk of DCIS spreading. The proportion of women reporting ≥ moderate perceived risk of DCIS spreading remained stable over time (25% at baseline; 26% at 18 mos), but this proportion decreased for other perceptions of risk (e.g., at baseline and 18 mos, 51% and 50% of these same women perceived ≥ moderate risk of developing DCIS again within 5 yrs). In a multivariable model, worse financial status (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.3) and higher perceived risk on earlier surveys (OR 24.4, 95% CI 12.7-47.2) were the only predictors of ≥ moderate perception of risk of DCIS spreading to other parts of the body in long-term follow-up. Non-significant covariates included age, race, education, grade of DCIS, comedonecrosis, mastectomy, radiation, marital status, employment status, comorbidity, and HADS and RIES scores. This contrasted with earlier survey data, which demonstrated an association between higher risk perceptions and anxiety by HADS and RIES. In long-term follow-up, only 7% were found to be anxious (HADS Anxiety ≥11) and 0.6% were depressed (HADS Depression ≥11). Median SF-36 scores were 48.9 (range 15.7-58.2) and 47.1 (range 23.6-60.3) for the physical and mental components, respectively, consistent with overall good QOL.
Conclusions: Women with a history of DCIS continue to harbor inaccurate perceptions of risk of future breast cancer events even at 6 yrs follow-up. Future research should evaluate how these excessive risk perceptions impact health behaviors. Interventions to improve risk perceptions are warranted.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-15-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KJ Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - ME Meyer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - KM Emmons
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - JC Weeks
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - EP Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ruddy KJ, Gelber S, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Come SE, Meyer ME, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Coping strategies in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.9159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
37
|
Abstract
6608 Background: Current guidelines for early detection of breast cancer do not adequately address diagnosis in young women. Furthermore, a lower suspicion for malignancy in this population may cause diagnostic delays. It is unknown how much the lack of routine screening and potential diagnostic delays contribute to the poorer outcomes of younger women. Methods: We surveyed women age <40 with recently diagnosed breast cancer in a prospective multicenter cohort study started in late 2006. We evaluated initial sign/symptom of cancer, time to first seeking medical attention, time from seeking medical attention to diagnosis, and patient factors associated with delays of >30 days in either timeframe. Chi square and Fisher's Exact tests were used to compare those with and without delays. Results: The first 222 women enrolled in the cohort are included in this analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 36 years (range 17–40). 79% of women initially identified their cancers through breast self exam. Only 6% were initially identified by clinical breast exam, 14% by breast imaging, 1% by systemic symptoms. While the median time between initial sign and seeking medical attention was 10 days (range 0–3,600), 54 women had >30 days between initial sign and medical attention (median 102, range 44–3,600). Similarly, median time from seeking medical attention to diagnosis was 21 days (range 0–2,970), yet 59 women had >30 days from attention to diagnosis (median 70, range 33–2,970). Preliminary comparison of women with and without delays did not reveal significant differences in age, race, education, marital status, or gravidity. Analyses will be updated and psychosocial factors, tumor subtype, and stage at diagnosis will be evaluated. Conclusions: In this large modern cohort of young women with breast cancer, nearly 80% presented with a self-detected breast abnormality, and most were diagnosed soon after they developed a sign/symptom. However, nearly 25% delayed seeking medical attention and 25% experienced a delay in diagnosis after seeking medical attention. Further research is warranted to compare delays between younger and older women, to evaluate delays in more diverse populations, to explore predictors of delays, and to assess for prognostic implications of delays in order to improve outcomes in young women. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. J. Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - S. Gelber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - R. Tamimi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - L. Schapira
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - S. Come
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - S. Kereakoglow
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - N. U. Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - E. P. Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - A. H. Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- K J Ruddy
- Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ruddy KJ, Partridge AH, Gelber S, Schapira L, Abusief M, Meyer M, Winer EP, Ginsburg ES. Ovarian reserve in women who remain premenopausal after chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.9571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|