Prostate specific antigen based biennial screening is sufficient to detect almost all prostate cancers while still curable

Prostate Cancer Foundation Screening Guidelines for Black Men in the United States

BACKGROUND

In the United States, Black men are at highest risk for being diagnosed with and dying from prostate cancer. Given this disparity, we examined relevant data to establish clinical prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines for Black men in the United States.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search identified 1848 unique publications for screening. Of those screened, 287 studies were selected for full-text review, and 264 were considered relevant and form the basis for these guidelines. The numbers were reported according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials provided Level 1 evidence that regular PSA screening of men 50 to 74 years of age of average risk reduced metastasis and prostate cancer death at 16 to 22 years of follow-up. The best available evidence specifically for Black men comes from observational and modeling studies that consider age to obtain a baseline PSA, frequency of testing, and age when screening should end. Cohort studies suggest that discussions about baseline PSA testing between Black men and their clinicians should begin in the early 40s, and data from modeling studies indicate prostate cancer develops 3 to 9 years earlier in Black men compared with non-Black men. Lowering the age for baseline PSA testing to 40 to 45 years of age from 50 to 55 years of age, followed by regular screening until 70 years of age (informed by PSA values and health factors), could reduce prostate cancer mortality in Black men (approximately 30% relative risk reduction) without substantially increasing overdiagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines recommend that Black men should obtain information about PSA screening for prostate cancer. Among Black men who elect screening, baseline PSA testing should occur between ages 40 and 45. Depending on PSA value and health status, annual screening should be strongly considered. (Supported by the Prostate Cancer Foundation.).

Economic evaluation of the introduction of the Prostate Health Index as a rule-out test to avoid unnecessary biopsies in men with prostate specific antigen levels of 4-10 in Hong Kong

A recent study showed that the Prostate Health Index may avoid unnecessary biopsies in men with prostate specific antigen 4-10ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in Hong Kong. This study aimed to conduct an economic evaluation of the impact of adopting this commercially-available test in the Hong Kong public health service to determine whether further research is justified. A cost-consequence analysis was undertaken comparing the current diagnostic pathway with a proposed diagnostic pathway using the Prostate Health Index. Data for the model was taken from a prospective cohort study recruited at a single-institution and micro-costing studies. Using a cut off PHI score of 35 to avoid biopsy would cost HK$3,000 and save HK$7,988 per patient in biopsy costs and HK$511 from a reduction in biopsy-related adverse events. The net cost impact of the change was estimated to be HK$5,500 under base case assumptions. At the base case sensitivity and specificity for all grades of cancer (61.3% and 77.5% respectively) all grade cancer could be missed in 4.22% of the population and high grade cancer in 0.53%. The introduction of the prostate health index into the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer in Hong Kong has the potential to reduce biopsies, biopsy costs and biopsy-related adverse events. Policy makers should consider the clinical and economic impact of this proposal.

Early detection of prostate cancer: European Association of Urology recommendation

BACKGROUND

The recommendations and the updated EAU guidelines consider early detection of PCa with the purpose of reducing PCa-related mortality and the development of advanced or metastatic disease.

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents the recommendations of the European Association of Urology (EAU) for early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in men without evidence of PCa-related symptoms.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The working panel conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective clinical studies on baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and early detection of PCa and on PCa screening published between 1990 and 2013 using Cochrane Reviews, Embase, and Medline search strategies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The level of evidence and grade of recommendation were analysed according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. The current strategy of the EAU recommends that (1) early detection of PCa reduces PCa-related mortality; (2) early detection of PCa reduces the risk of being diagnosed and developing advanced and metastatic PCa; (3) a baseline serum PSA level should be obtained at 40-45 yr of age; (4) intervals for early detection of PCa should be adapted to the baseline PSA serum concentration; (5) early detection should be offered to men with a life expectancy ≥ 10 yr; and (6) in the future, multivariable clinical risk-prediction tools need to be integrated into the decision-making process.

CONCLUSIONS

A baseline serum PSA should be offered to all men 40-45 yr of age to initiate a risk-adapted follow-up approach with the purpose of reducing PCa mortality and the incidence of advanced and metastatic PCa. In the future, the development and application of multivariable risk-prediction tools will be necessary to prevent over diagnosis and over treatment.

A longitudinal study of PSA and its influential factors in a cohort of Chinese men with initial PSA levels less than 4 ng ml(-1)

To evaluate the longitudinal change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the influence of initial PSA on the PSA change. We retrospectively analysed health examination data collected at Beijing Hospital from March 2007 to November 2011. Men with an initial PSA levels less than 4 ng ml(-1) and an annual PSA test for 5 years were enrolled into the study. The men were separated into four groups by the initial PSA level (0-0.99, 1-1.99, 2-2.99 and 3-3.99 ng ml(-1)), and the difference in PSA change among the four groups was analysed. A total of 1330 men were enrolled into the study. The mean age, initial PSA and PSA velocity (PSAV) were 58.17 ± 14.63 (range 24-91) years, 1.18 ± 0.79 (range 0-4) ng ml(-1) and 0.04 ± 0.25 (range -1.34-2.02) ng ml(-1) year(-1). Pearson's correlation analysis showed no correlation between initial PSA and PSAV (r=-0.036, P=0.189). The PSAV of the 0-0.99, 1-1.99, 2-2.99 and 3-3.99 ng ml(-1) initial PSA groups was 0.03 ± 0.11, 0.07 ± 0.32, 0.03 ± 0.34 and -0.01 ± 0.43 ng ml(-1) year(-1), respectively (P=0.06). As the initial PSA increased, the percentage of having a PSAV over 0.75 ng ml(-1) year(-1) and a negative PSAV both significantly increased. Males with a baseline PSA of 0-0.99, 1-1.99, 2-2.99 and 3-3.99 ng ml(-1) had a 1.88%, 6.16%, 16.30% and 57.81% chance, respectively, that their PSA would increase above 4.0 ng ml(-1) over the following 4 years (P<0.0001). The PSAV has no correlation with the initial PSA level. However, as the initial PSA increases, the chance that males will have an abnormal PSA or PSAV in the future increases.

Risk of suicide in men with low-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Risk of suicide is increased among men with prostate cancer. We investigated this association among men with low-risk cancer, usually detected by prostate specific antigen (PSA)-testing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Relative risk (RR) of suicide was calculated by use of Poisson regression analysis within the Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) 2.0, a nation-wide, population-based database, comparing 105,736 men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1997-2009 to 528,658 matched prostate cancer-free men.

RESULTS

During the first 6 months after diagnosis, there were 38 suicides among men with prostate cancer; incidence rate 0.73 per 1000 person-years (PY) and 30 suicides in the comparison cohort; 0.11 per 1000 PY, corresponding to a RR of suicide of 6.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0-10). Risk was highest among men with distant metastases, incidence rate 1.25 per 1000 PY, RR 10 (95% CI 5.1-21) but risk was also increased for men with low-risk tumours, incidence rate difference 0.45 per 1000 PY and RR 5.2 (95% CI 2.3-12) and across categories of socioeconomic status and comorbidity. Eighteen months after diagnosis, risk of suicide had decreased to 0.27 per 1000 PY, RR 1.0 (95% CI 0.68-1.5) for low-risk prostate cancer but remained increased among men with metastases, 0.57 per 1000 PY, RR 1.8 (95% CI 1.1-2.9).

CONCLUSION

Although the increase in absolute risk of suicide was modest, our findings reflect the severe psychological stress that prostate cancer patients may experience after diagnosis. The increased risk of suicide observed in men with prostate cancer, including low-risk, calls for increased awareness.

Optimal prostate-specific antigen screening interval for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

To identify the optimal interval for repeat prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing to screen for prostate cancer in healthy adults.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 7332 healthy males without prostate cancer at baseline from 2005 to 2008. Participants underwent annual health checkups including PSA testing at the Center for Preventive Medicine in Japan. Participants with high PSA (≥ 4.0 ng/ml) underwent further examination for prostate cancer. A subgroup analysis was conducted age group (<50 years, ≥ 50 years).

RESULTS

Mean age was 50 years. Mean PSA at baseline was 1.2 ng/ml. In over 50-year group, for those with initial PSA of <1.0, 1.0-1.9, 2.0-2.9, and 3.0-3.9 ng/ml at baseline, the 3-year cumulative incidence of prostate cancer was 0%, 0.1%, 0.3%, and 5.7%, respectively. No prostate cancer was identified in those <50 years, regardless of PSA level.

CONCLUSIONS

If PSA screening is recommended, males >50 years with PSA of 3.0-3.9 ng/ml at baseline should undergo rescreening at 2 years. For men with PSA <3.0 ng/ml, PSA rescreening at intervals of ≥ 3 years is appropriate. PSA screening may not be indicated in males of <50 years of age.

[Referral criteria for benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care]

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a high prevalence condition in men over 50 years that requires continued assistance between primary care and urology. Therefore, consensus around common referral criteria was needed to guide and support both levels. Medical history, symptom assessment with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement are diagnostic tests available for general practitioners that allow setting a correct BPH diagnose. Patients with an IPSS<8 should be monitored by evaluating them annually. Treatment with alpha-blockers and an evaluation at the first and third month is recommended in patients with an IPSS 8-20 and if the prostate is small, if the prostate size is large treatment with alpha-blockers or 5alpha-reductase inhibitors and evaluation at the third and six month is recommended, and in patients with a large prostate and a PSA >1.5 ng/ml combined treatment and evaluation at the first and sixth month is recommended. Some clear criteria for referral to urology are established in this document, which help in the management of these patients. Those patients with BPH who do not show any improvement at the third month of treatment with alpha-blockers, or the sixth month with 5alpha-reductase inhibitors, will be referred to urology. Patients will also be referred to urology if they have lower urinary tract symptoms, a pathological finding during rectal examination, IPSS>20, PSA>10 ng/ml or PSA>4 ng/ml and free PSA<20% or if they are <50 years with suspected BHP, or if they have any urological complication.

Interval cancers in prostate cancer screening: comparing 2- and 4-year screening intervals in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Gothenburg and Rotterdam

BACKGROUND

The incidence of prostate cancer has increased substantially since it became common practice to screen asymptomatic men for the disease. The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) was initiated in 1993 to determine how prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening affects prostate cancer mortality. Variations in the screening algorithm, such as the interval between screening rounds, likely influence the morbidity, mortality, and quality of life of the screened population.

METHODS

We compared the number and characteristics of interval cancers, defined as those diagnosed during the screening interval but not detected by screening, in men in the screening arm of the ERSPC who were aged 55-65 years at the time of the first screening and were participating through two centers of the ERSPC: Gothenburg (2-year screening interval, n = 4202) and Rotterdam (4-year screening interval, n = 13301). All participants who were diagnosed with prostate cancer through December 31, 2005, but at most 10 years after the initial screening were ascertained by linkage with the national cancer registries. A potentially life-threatening (aggressive) interval cancer was defined as one with at least one of the following characteristics at diagnosis: stage M1 or N1, plasma PSA concentration greater than 20.0 ng/mL, or Gleason score greater than 7. We used Mantel Cox regression to assess differences between rates of interval cancers and aggressive interval cancers at the two centers. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

The 10-year cumulative incidence of all prostate cancers in Rotterdam versus Gothenburg was 1118 (8.41%) versus 552 (13.14%) (P<.001), the cumulative incidence of interval cancer was 57 (0.43%) versus 31 (0.74%) (P = .51), and the cumulative incidence of aggressive interval cancer was 15 (0.11%) versus 5 (0.12%) (P = .72).

CONCLUSION

The rate of interval cancer, especially aggressive interval cancer, was low in this study. The 2-year screening interval had higher detection rates than the 4-year interval but did not lead to lower rates of interval and aggressive interval prostate cancers.

Anxiety associated with prostate cancer screening with special reference to men with a positive screening test (elevated PSA) - Results from a prospective, population-based, randomised study

Levels of anxiety were assessed through questionnaires completed by 1781 screen-positive (PSA > or = 3 ng/mL) men attending the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer in Gothenburg, Sweden. During the first visit (clinical examination, including biopsies), no anxiety whilst awaiting the PSA test results was reported by 66% and 2% reported high levels of anxiety. A multinomial logistics model for repeated measurements, adjusted for age, PSA level, heredity, biopsy finding and urinary symptoms, revealed that anxiety awaiting the PSA was only influenced (increased) by the existence of previously elevated PSA tests (p<.0001). No anxiety associated with biopsy was reported by 45%, while 6% experienced high levels of anxiety. Levels of anxiety decreased significantly with subsequent rounds of examinations (p<0.0001) and with increasing age (p=0.0016). Anxiety associated with prostate cancer screening in general is low to moderate, even in men with elevated PSA, and severe anxiety affects a smaller group of susceptible men.

Tumor characteristics and prognostic factors in two subsequent screening rounds with four-year interval within prostate cancer screening trial, ERSPC Rotterdam

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the tumor characteristics and prognostic factors in screen-detected prostate cancers in two successive screening rounds with a 4-year screening interval in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam.

METHODS

From 1993 to 2000, 42,376 men (21,210 in the screening arm and 21,166 in the control arm) were randomized and screened. Prostate-specific antigen testing, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and sextant biopsies were offered to the participants in the screening arm. A total of 1218 men with a biopsy indication at the first screening received an additional screening after 1 year (early recall). By 2004, all men had received their second screening. Interval carcinomas were defined as cancers detected during the screening interval and were identified by linkage with the Cancer Registry.

RESULTS

In the first round, 1014 prostate cancers were detected--24 in the men noncompliant to screening, 63 at the early recall screening, and 433 in the second round of screening. Also, 62 interval carcinomas were diagnosed. In the second screening round, the mean prostate-specific antigen value was lower (5.6 versus 11.1 ng/mL), advanced clinical stage T3-T4 was 7.1-fold less common, and 76.4% versus 61.5% of the biopsy Gleason scores were less than 7. In the first screening round, 13 regional and 9 distant metastases were detected; in the second round, 2 cases with distant metastasis were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, a shift toward more favorable tumor characteristics was seen for the second round of screening. These results support the screening methods used and the interscreening interval of 4 years.

Prostate specific antigen changes as related to the initial prostate specific antigen: data from the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial

PURPOSE

Annual screening with PSA, although of unproven benefit, is currently used for prostate cancer early detection. A large fraction of screened men have low (less than 2 ng/ml) initial PSA. The yield over time of positive PSA screens (ie more than 4 ng/ml) in these men has not been well characterized in large cohorts in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men in the screening arm of the PLCO received baseline PSA and annual tests for 5 years. 30,495 of these men had baseline PSA 4 ng/ml or less. We estimated the cumulative probability of converting to PSA greater than 4 at years 1 through 5 as a function of baseline PSA.

RESULTS

Among men with baseline PSA less than 1 ng/ml, 1.5% converted by year 5 (95% CI 1.2-1.7). Among men with baseline PSA of 1.0 to 1.99 ng/ml, 1.2% (95% CI 0.9-1.3) and 7.4% (95% CI 6.8-8.1) converted by year 1 and 5, respectively. A total of 33.5% and 79% of men with initial PSA of 2.0 to 2.99 and 3.0 to 4.0, respectively, converted by year 5. Of men with baseline PSA less than 1 ng/ml converting to PSA more than 4 ng/ml, 8% were diagnosed with cancer within 2 years of conversion. About 10% of men with baseline PSA less than 1 ng/ml and negative baseline DRE had a positive DRE within 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

For men choosing PSA screening, screening every 5 years for baseline PSA less than 1 ng/ml and every 2 years for PSA 1 to 2 ng/ml could result in a 50% reduction in PSA tests and in less than 1.5% of men missing earlier positive screens, but with an unknown effect on prostate cancer mortality.

Impact of race and baseline PSA on longitudinal PSA

There is an increasing debate regarding the frequency of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and the current primary screening modality used to detect prostate cancer. The purpose of this study is to determine whether PSA screening intervals should be based on initial PSA. Our study explores longitudinal changes of PSA levels in black and white males separately. Study participants were 768 white and 450 black males attending an annual prostate cancer screening. We fit a longitudinal repeated measures model separately for blacks and whites and estimated the probability of PSA converting to greater than 4.0 ng/ml at a follow-up year given baseline PSA range among males without an abnormal DRE. Black and white males with a baseline PSA between 0 and 1.0 ng/ml, with a healthy or enlarged prostate, have a less than 1% chance that their PSA will increase above 4.0 ng/ml over the following 5 years. Black and white males with a PSA between 1.0 and 1.9 ng/ml have a less than 1% chance of PSA conversion to greater than 4.0 ng/ml over the next year. Our findings further support that annual screening for prostate cancer may not be necessary, specifically males with a baseline PSA less than 2.0 may not need to undergo annual screening. Our results suggest that race does not affect the longitudinal trend of PSA enough to warrant setting screening intervals based on race.

Differential exoprotease activities confer tumor-specific serum peptidome patterns

Recent studies have established distinctive serum polypeptide patterns through mass spectrometry (MS) that reportedly correlate with clinically relevant outcomes. Wider acceptance of these signatures as valid biomarkers for disease may follow sequence characterization of the components and elucidation of the mechanisms by which they are generated. Using a highly optimized peptide extraction and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS-based approach, we now show that a limited subset of serum peptides (a signature) provides accurate class discrimination between patients with 3 types of solid tumors and controls without cancer. Targeted sequence identification of 61 signature peptides revealed that they fall into several tight clusters and that most are generated by exopeptidase activities that confer cancer type-specific differences superimposed on the proteolytic events of the ex vivo coagulation and complement degradation pathways. This small but robust set of marker peptides then enabled highly accurate class prediction for an external validation set of prostate cancer samples. In sum, this study provides a direct link between peptide marker profiles of disease and differential protease activity, and the patterns we describe may have clinical utility as surrogate markers for detection and classification of cancer. Our findings also have important implications for future peptide biomarker discovery efforts.

Relationship Among Initial Serum Prostate Specific Antigen, Prostate Specific Antigen Progression and Prostate Cancer Detection at Repeat Screening Visits

PURPOSE

We evaluated the probability of positive serum PSA (3 ng/ml or greater) and CaP detection at annual followup visits in men with negative initial PSA (less than 3 ng/ml) to optimize the re-screening schedule.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 5,387 men 45 to 80 years old with negative PSA and no CaP diagnosis at the first screening visit were obtained from the Laval University Prostate Cancer Screening Program database. Accelerated failure time regressions were fitted to time from baseline to positive PSA and to time from positive PSA to CaP detection. The models were combined to estimate the cumulative probability of positive PSA followed by CaP detection at re-screening.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative probability of detecting CaP at annual visits in men with baseline PSA up to 1.5 ng/ml remained below 0.8%, while it was 1.3%, 4.8% and 8.3% in men with PSA 1.5 to less than 2, 2 to less than 2.5 and 2.5 to less than 3 ng/ml, respectively. Time to positive PSA significantly decreased with increasing baseline PSA and age, while the time between positive PSA and CaP detection depended only on age. Men with PSA below 1.0 ng/ml could wait for 4 to 5 years before being re-tested, while men with PSA between 1.0 and 1.5 ng/ml should be screened every second year and men with PSA 1.5 ng/ml or greater should be screened every year.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed retesting schedule using current PSA and age decreases the number of visits by 38.1%, while delaying the detection of only 2.4% of CaPs that would have been detected using annual PSA testing.

Is additional testing necessary in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 1.0 ng/mL or less in a population-based screening setting? (ERSPC, section Rotterdam)

OBJECTIVES

Currently, several prostate cancer rescreening intervals are in use in different countries worldwide, varying from 1 to 4 years. Recently, it has been proposed to determine the rescreening interval relative to the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and possibly to extend the rescreening interval up to 5 years.

METHODS

We evaluated the screening results of two subsequent screening visits (4-year interval) of 1703 men aged 55 to 65 years with an initial PSA level of 1.0 ng/mL or less within a randomized screening trial. We assessed the PSA values, numbers of men biopsied (biopsy indication: PSA level of 3.0 ng/mL or greater), and numbers of cancers detected at the second and third screening visits.

RESULTS

A total of 1327 men (79.3%) attended the second screening visit. Of these men, 13 (0.98%) had a PSA level of 3.0 ng/mL or greater, and three cancers were detected (cancer detection rate 0.23%). At the third screening visit, 1017 men (76.8%) attended, 34 men (3.3%) had a PSA level of 3.0 ng/mL or greater, and five cancers were detected (cancer detection rate 0.49%). The 2344 subsequent PSA determinations in an 8-year period after the initial screening resulted in eight cancers detected, for an overall cancer detection rate of 0.47%. Through linkage of all men with the cancer registry, no additional cancers were found.

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy of PSA screening every 8 years for men with a PSA level of 1.0 ng/mL or less will lead to a considerable decrease in the number of screening visits (with the associated costs and stress), with a minimal risk of missing aggressive cancer at a curable stage.

4-YEAR PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN PROGRESSION AND DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE EUROPEAN RANDOMIZED STUDY OF SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER, SECTION ROTTERDAM

PURPOSE

The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer investigates the impact of screening on prostate cancer mortality and contributes to a better understanding of available screening tests. The present study evaluates the predictive value of a prostate specific antigen (PSA) increase to PSA 3.0 ng/ml or greater in a 4-year period in men who present with low PSA values (less than 3.0 ng/ml) at first screen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 42,376 men were randomized to screening vs control in Rotterdam. Of 6,467 men 5,771 had PSA values of less than 3.0 ng/ml, did not undergo biopsy at baseline and were rescreened after 4 years with PSA 3.0 ng/ml or greater as biopsy indication. PSA progression in a 4-year interscreening interval is evaluated by determining the positive predictive values, detection rates and parameters of aggressiveness of round 2 cancers.

RESULTS

PSA progression to more than 3.0 ng/ml occurred in 0.9%, 9.3% and 48.6% of men who presented with PSA values less than 1.0, 1 to 1.9 and 2 to 2.9 ng/ml, respectively, in round 1. Their respective positive predictive values amounted to 19.0%, 23.8% and 27.9%. Cancer detection rates increased with increasing PSA values in round 1. The distribution of low, moderate and high risk cancers depends on round 2 but not on round 1 PSA ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

PSA progression to the (arbitrary) cutoff value of 3.0 ng/ml and the diagnosis of prostate cancer in round 2 screening with a 4-year interval depends strongly on PSA values at the time of the 1st screen. These observations will be helpful to design future screening procedures. With levels less than 2.0 ng/ml PSA progression to levels of 3.0 ng/ml or greater is rare as it was seen only in 4.8% of all men.

Second Round Results of the Finnish Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial

PURPOSE

Large randomized trials provide the only valid means of quantifying the benefits and drawbacks of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, but the follow-up of ongoing studies is still too short to allow evaluation of mortality. We report here the intermediate indicators of screening efficacy from the second round of the Finnish trial.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The Finnish trial, with approximately 80,000 men in the target population, is the largest component in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. The first round was completed in 1996-1999. Each year 8,000 men 55-67 years of age were randomly assigned to the screening arm, and the rest formed the control arm. Men randomized to the screening arm in 1996 were reinvited 4 years later, in 2000, and PSA was determined.

RESULTS

Of the eligible 6415 men, 4407 (69%) eventually participated in the second round of screening. Of the first-round participants, up to 84% (3833 of 4556) attended rescreening. A total of 461 screenees (10.5%) had PSA levels of > or = 4 microg/liter. Altogether, 97 cancers were found, yielding an overall detection rate of 2.2% (97 of 4407). Seventy-nine cases were found among the 3833 second-time screenees (detection rate 2.1%) and 18 in those 574 men (3.1%) who had not participated previously. A PSA of > or = 4 microg/liter, but negative biopsy in the first screening round was associated with an up to 9-fold risk of cancer in rescreening relative to those with lower PSA levels at baseline. Ninety-one (94%) of all of the detected cancers were clinically localized.

CONCLUSIONS

As surrogate measures of an effective screening program, both compliance as well as the overall and advanced prostate cancer detection rates remained acceptable. Men defined as screen-positive but with a negative confirmation of cancer at prevalence screen formed a high-risk group at rescreening.

De la biologie à la clinique : le décès dû au cancer de la prostate peut-il maintenant être une exception ?

The most significant discovery of the second half of the XXth century in the field of prostate cancer therapy is probably the observation that the human prostate, as well as many other peripheral human tissues, synthesize locally an important amount of androgens from the inactive steroid precursors dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfate DHEA-S. In parallel with these observations, two important discoveries also made by our group are applied in the clinic worldwide, namely the use of LHRH (luteininizing hormone-releasing hormone) agonists to completely block testicular androgens, while, simultaneously, the androgens made locally in the prostate from DHEA are blocked in their access to the androgen receptor by a pure antiandrogen of the class of flutamide. This treatment, called combined androgen blockade, has been the first treatment demonstrated to prolong life in prostate cancer. While the first studies were performed in patients with advanced and metastatic disease, our recent data indicate a remarkable level of efficacy of the same treatment applied to localized prostate cancer, namely a 90% possibility of cure. However, in order to be able to treat localized prostate cancer, early diagnosis must be achieved. In the first large-scale randomized study of prostate cancer screening, we have demonstrated that 99% of prostate cancers can be diagnosed at the localized or potentially curable stage, using simple annual measurement of PSA (prostatic specific antigen). Today's data show that with the simple application of the available diagnostic and therapeutic tools, death from prostate cancer should be an exception.