Innovations in shock wave lithotripsy technology: updates in experimental studies

A new model for bubble cluster dynamics in a viscoelastic media

Bubble cluster dynamics in viscoelastic media is instructive for ultrasound diagnosis and therapy. In this paper, we propose a statistical model for bubble cluster dynamics in viscoelastic media considering the radius distribution of bubble nuclei. By investigating and comparing the response for a bubble in three conditions: single bubble; multi-bubble with the same radius; multi-bubble with different radius, the following rules are found: The promotion or suppression of the bubble cluster on the bubble vibration is not monotonous with the increase of the number of bubbles. The promotion or suppression of the bubble cluster on the bubble vibration varies alternately with the frequency. The effect of bubble cluster on bubble vibration is mostly suppressed when the driving acoustic pressure amplitude pa is high (5000 kPa). Usually, the bubble cluster promotes the vibration of the large bubbles (R0 = 10 μm) more, or suppresses it less.

Impact of Pulse Mode on Dusting Effect for Holmium Laser Lithotripsy: In Vitro Evaluation With Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate Stones

OBJECTIVE

To assess the distribution of stone fragments (<0.25->2 mm) after in vitro dusting laser lithotripsy with varying pulse modes using canine calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones. Recent work demonstrates that fragments <0.25 mm are ideal for dusting, and we hypothesized advanced pulse modes might improve this outcome.

METHODS

A 3D-printed bulb was used as a calyceal model containing a single COM stone. A 230-core fiber (Lumenis) was passed through a ureteroscope (LithoVue, Boston Scientific). Contact laser lithotripsy by a single operator was performed with dusting settings (0.5J x 30Hz; Moses Pulse120H) to deliver 1kJ of energy for each trial. Short pulse (SP), long pulse (LP), Moses Distance (MD) and Moses Contact (MC) modes were tested with 5 trials for each parameter. Primary outcome was mass of fragments <0.25, <0.5, <1, and <2 mm. Laser fiber tip degradation was measured using a digital caliper.

RESULTS

Mass of stone fragments <0.25 mm varied from 34.6%-43.0% depending on the pulse mode, with no statistically significant differences between modes. MC (98.5%) produced a greater mass of fragments <2 mm compared to LP (86.1%; P = .046) but not SP (92.0%). Significantly less fiber tip burnback occurred with MC (0.29 mm) and MD (0.28 mm), compared to SP (0.83 mm; P < .0005).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of pulse mode, greater than one-third of the mass of COM stone was reduced to fragments <0.25 mm following contact laser lithotripsy. MC produced a greater mass of fragments <2 mm compared to LP and demonstrated less fiber tip burnback compared to SP.

Kriging model to study the dynamics of a bubble subjected to tandem shock waves as used in biomedical applications

The purpose of this work was to develop a metamodel (Kriging model) to identify the most important input parameters of shock wave pressure profiles as used in biomedical applications without solving a large number of differential equations. Shock wave-induced cavitation is involved in several biological effects. During bubble collapse, secondary shock waves and microjets are formed. For some applications, it is desirable to enhance this phenomenon by applying a second shock wave before bubble collapse; however, the delay between the leading shock wave and the second pressure pulse has yet to be optimized. This optimization can be done using numerical analysis. A metamodel that predicts the most convenient ranges for the input variables and provides information on the joint effects between the input variables was tested. Because the metamodel is an analytical expression, running it fifty thousand times and analyzing variables, such as the pressure amplitude, delay between pulses, and pressure rise time, was fast and easy. Furthermore, this method can be a helpful tool to study the joint effect between the input variables and reduce the computation time. The metamodel can also be adapted to analyze simulations based on equations different from the Gilmore-Akulichev formulation, which was used in this study.

Shock wave-induced permeabilization of mammalian cells

Controlled permeabilization of mammalian cell membranes is fundamental to develop gene and cell therapies based on macromolecular cargo delivery, a process that emerged against an increasing number of health afflictions, including genetic disorders, cancer and infections. Viral vectors have been successfully used for macromolecular delivery; however, they may have unpredictable side effects and have been limited to life-threatening cases. Thus, several chemical and physical methods have been explored to introduce drugs, vaccines, and nucleic acids into cells. One of the most appealing physical methods to deliver genes into cells is shock wave-induced poration. High-speed microjets of fluid, emitted due to the collapse of microbubbles after shock wave passage, represent the most significant mechanism that contributes to cell membrane poration by this technique. Herein, progress in shock wave-induced permeabilization of mammalian cells is presented. After covering the main concepts related to molecular strategies whose applications depend on safer drug delivery methods, the physics behind shock wave phenomena is described. Insights into the use of shock waves for cell membrane permeation are discussed, along with an overview of the two major biomedical applications thereof-i.e., genetic modification and anti-cancer shock wave-assisted chemotherapy. The aim of this review is to summarize 30 years of data showing underwater shock waves as a safe, noninvasive method for macromolecular delivery into mammalian cells, encouraging the development of further research, which is still required before the introduction of this promising tool into clinical practice.

Enhanced High-Rate Shockwave Lithotripsy Stone Comminution in an In Vivo Porcine Model Using Acoustic Bubble Coalescence

Cavitation plays a significant role in the efficacy of stone comminution during shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Although cavitation on the surface of urinary stones helps to improve fragmentation, cavitation bubbles along the propagation path may shield or block subsequent shockwaves (SWs) and potentially induce collateral tissue damage. Previous in vitro work has shown that applying low-amplitude acoustic waves after each SW can force bubbles to consolidate and enhance SWL efficacy. In this study, the feasibility of applying acoustic bubble coalescence (ABC) in vivo was tested. Model stones were percutaneously implanted and treated with 2500 lithotripsy SWs at 120 SW/minute with or without ABC. Comparing the results of stone comminution, a significant improvement was observed in the stone fragmentation process when ABC was used. Without ABC, only 25% of the mass of the stone was fragmented to particles <2 mm in size. With ABC, 75% of the mass was fragmented to particles <2 mm in size. These results suggest that ABC can reduce the shielding effect of residual bubble nuclei, resulting in a more efficient SWL treatment.

Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update

INTRODUCTION

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is a well - established treatment option for urolithiasis. The technology of SWL has undergone significant changes in an attempt to better optimize the results while reducing failure rates. There are some important limitations that restrict the use of SWL. In this review, we aim to place these advantages and limitations in perspective, assess the current role of SWL, and discuss recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted to identify studies reporting outcomes on ESWL. We searched for literature (PubMed, Embase, Medline) that focused on the physics of shock waves, theories of stone disintegration, and studies on optimising shock wave application. Relevant articles in English published since 1980 were selected for inclusion.

RESULTS

Efficacy has been shown to vary between lithotripters. To maximize stone fragmentation and reduce failure rates, many factors can be optimized. Factors to consider in proper patient selection include skin - to - stone distance and stone size. Careful attention to the rate of shock wave administration, proper coupling of the treatment head to the patient have important influences on the success of lithotripsy.

CONCLUSION

Proper selection of patients who are expected to respond well to SWL, as well as attention to the technical aspects of the procedure are the keys to SWL success. Studies aiming to determine the mechanisms of shock wave action in stone breakage have begun to suggest new treatment strategies to improve success rates and safety.

Effect of hydrodynamic cavitation in the tissue erosion by pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound (pHIFU)

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is emerging as an effective therapeutic modality in clinics. Besides the thermal ablation, tissue disintegration is also possible because of the interaction between the distorted HIFU bursts and either bubble cloud or boiling bubble. Hydrodynamic cavitation is another type of cavitation and has been employed widely in industry, but its role in mechanical erosion to tissue is not clearly known. In this study, the bubble dynamics immediately after the termination of HIFU exposure in the transparent gel phantom was captured by high-speed photography, from which the bubble displacement towards the transducer and the changes of bubble size was quantitatively determined. The characteristics of hydrodynamic cavitation due to the release of the acoustic radiation force and relaxation of compressed surrounding medium were found to associate with the number of pulses delivered and HIFU parameters (i.e. pulse duration and pulse repetition frequency). Because of the initial big bubble (~1 mm), large bubble expansion (up to 1.76 folds), and quick bubble motion (up to ~1 m s^-1) hydrodynamic cavitation is significant after HIFU exposure and may lead to mechanical erosion. The shielding effect of residual tiny bubbles would reduce the acoustic energy delivered to the pre-existing bubble at the focus and, subsequently, the hydrodynamic cavitation effect. Tadpole shape of mechanical erosion in ex vivo porcine kidney samples was similar to the contour of bubble dynamics in the gel. Liquefied tissue was observed to emit towards the transducer through the punctured tissue after HIFU exposure in the sonography. In summary, the release of HIFU exposure-induced hydrodynamic cavitation produces significant bubble expansion and motion, which may be another important mechanism of tissue erosion. Understanding its mechanism and optimizing the outcome would broaden and enhance HIFU applications.

Combined short and long-delay tandem shock waves to improve shock wave lithotripsy according to the Gilmore-Akulichev theory

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a common non-invasive treatment for urinary stones whose fragmentation is achieved mainly by acoustic cavitation and mechanical stress. A few years ago, in vitro and in vivo experimentation demonstrated that such fragmentation can be improved, without increasing tissue damage, by sending a second shock wave hundreds of microseconds after the previous wave. Later, numerical simulations revealed that if the second pulse had a longer full width at half maximum than a standard shock wave, cavitation could be enhanced significantly. On the other side, a theoretical study showed that stress inside the stone can be increased if two lithotripter shock waves hit the stone with a delay of only 20 μs. We used the Gilmore-Akulichev formulation to show that, in principle, both effects can be combined, that is, stress and cavitation could be increased using a pressure pulse with long full width at half maximum, which reaches the stone within hundreds of microseconds after two 20 μs-delayed initial shock waves. Implementing the suggested pressure profile into clinical devices could be feasible, especially with piezoelectric shock wave sources.

Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?

INTRODUCTION

Following its introduction in 1980, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) rapidly emerged as the first-line treatment for the majority of patients with urolithiasis. Millions of SWL therapies have since been performed worldwide, and nowadays, SWL still remains to be the least invasive therapy modality for urinary stones. During the last three decades, SWL technology has advanced in terms of shock wave generation, focusing, patient coupling and stone localization. The implementation of multifunctional lithotripters has made SWL available to urology departments worldwide. Indications for SWL have evolved as well. Although endoscopic treatment techniques have improved significantly and seem to take the lead in stone therapy in the western countries due to high stone-free rates, SWL continues to be considered as the first-line therapy for the treatment of most intra-renal stones and many ureteral stones.

METHODS

This paper reviews the fundamentals of SWL physics to facilitate a better understanding about how a lithotripter works and should be best utilized.

RESULTS

Advances in lithotripsy technology such as shock wave generation and focusing, advances in stone localization (imaging), different energy source concepts and coupling modalities are presented. Furthermore adjuncts to improve the efficacy of SWL including different treatment strategies are reviewed.

CONCLUSION

If urologists make use of a more comprehensive understanding of the pathophysiology and physics of shock waves, much better results could be achieved in the future. This may lead to a renaissance and encourage SWL as first-line therapy for urolithiasis in times of rapid progress in endoscopic treatment modalities.

Shock wave Lithotripsy in the Elderly: Our Experience Related to Literature Review

Background

The more and more common use of abdominal ultrasonography and of other imaging techniques, the increase of the life expectancy and therapies for calcium metabolism, has led to a higher diagnosis rate of renal stones in the elderly. At the moment, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is considered the first-line therapy in the majority of reno-ureteral stones.

Objectives

To prove the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy also in the elderly population.

Materials and Methods

We proceeded to a retrospective study on patients aged over 70 years, who underwent SWL at our division from January 1996 to April 2005, with Storz Modulith SLX electromagnetic lithotripter. We defined as 'stone-free those patients who did not show any stone fragment in the following ultrasonography and abdomen X-ray control. In addition, we performed a medium/long-term follow-up. We adopted as “control group” 115 patients aged less than 60 years, who underwent lithotripsy with the same lithotripter from June 2007 to January 2008.

Results

In the short-term follow-up, at the end of the single treatment or of the course of treatments (1-3 months after treatment), we observed: 72.1% (83/115) stone-free subjects, 20% (23/115) of cases with stone fragments that could be eliminated (<4 mm), 3.5% (4/115) with stone fragments >4 mm, 4.3% (5/115) unchanged cases; 2 of these (1.7%) underwent endoscopic lithotripsy and one percutaneous lithotripsy (0.9%). Concerning the medium/long-term follow-up (mean 59.2 months, range 7 mo-108 mo), we observed: 59.8% (67/112) stone-free cases, 25.9% (29/112) recurring stones, 11.6% (13/112) re-growth, 2,7% (3/112) unchanged cases. In the short-term follow-up, comparing the study group with the control one we observed: – No statistically significant difference regarding the treatment side effects in the two groups; – A lower stone-free percentage in caliceal stones in the elderly than in the younger patients (SFR = 62.5% vs 70.3%) – A stone-free percentage for non-caliceal stones similar in the older and the young patients (SFR = 79.1% vs 80.4%).

Conclusions

Shock wave lithotripsy proves to be effective in the first-line treatment of renal stones in the elderly, yielding good results with no increase of side effects.

Modified shock waves for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a simulation based on the Gilmore formulation

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is a reliable therapy for the treatment of urolithiasis. Nevertheless, improvements to enhance stone fragmentation and reduce tissue damage are still needed. During SWL, cavitation is one of the most important stone fragmentation mechanisms. Bubbles with a diameter between about 7 and 55μm have been reported to expand and collapse after shock wave passage, forming liquid microjets at velocities of up to 400m/s that contribute to the pulverization of renal calculi. Several authors have reported that the fragmentation efficiency may be improved by using tandem shock waves. Tandem SWL is based on the fact that the collapse of a bubble can be intensified if a second shock wave arrives tenths or even a few hundredths of microseconds before its collapse. The object of this study is to determine if tandem pulses consisting of a conventional shock wave (estimated rise time between 1 and 20ns), followed by a slower second pressure profile (0.8μs rise time), have advantages over conventional tandem SWL. The Gilmore equation was used to simulate the influence of the modified pressure field on the dynamics of a single bubble immersed in water and compare the results with the behavior of the same bubble subjected to tandem shock waves. The influence of the delay between pulses on the dynamics of the collapsing bubble was also studied for both conventional and modified tandem waves. For a bubble of 0.07mm, our results indicate that the modified pressure profile enhances cavitation compared to conventional tandem waves at a wide range of delays (10-280μs). According to this, the proposed pressure profile could be more efficient for SWL than conventional tandem shock waves. Similar results were obtained for a ten times smaller bubble.

Novel instrumentation in urologic surgery: Shock wave lithotripsy

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) was first introduced in 1980 and it rapidly revolutionized the treatment of stone disease. SWL is a non-invasive, outpatient procedure that now accounts for the majority of stone removal procedures. Since the introduction of first generation lithotripter, the Dornier HM3 machine, SWL devices have undergone many modifications secondary to limitations, in efforts to create a more effective and efficient way to treat stones and decrease possible morbidities. Herein, we review the evolution of the technology and advances in the instrumentation over the last three decades.

Shock wave technology and application: an update

CONTEXT

The introduction of new lithotripters has increased problems associated with shock wave application. Recent studies concerning mechanisms of stone disintegration, shock wave focusing, coupling, and application have appeared that may address some of these problems.

OBJECTIVE

To present a consensus with respect to the physics and techniques used by urologists, physicists, and representatives of European lithotripter companies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We reviewed recent literature (PubMed, Embase, Medline) that focused on the physics of shock waves, theories of stone disintegration, and studies on optimising shock wave application. In addition, we used relevant information from a consensus meeting of the German Society of Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Besides established mechanisms describing initial fragmentation (tear and shear forces, spallation, cavitation, quasi-static squeezing), the model of dynamic squeezing offers new insight in stone comminution. Manufacturers have modified sources to either enlarge the focal zone or offer different focal sizes. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) can be increased by lowering the pulse rate to 60-80 shock waves/min and by ramping the shock wave energy. With the water cushion, the quality of coupling has become a critical factor that depends on the amount, viscosity, and temperature of the gel. Fluoroscopy time can be reduced by automated localisation or the use of optical and acoustic tracking systems. There is a trend towards larger focal zones and lower shock wave pressures.

CONCLUSIONS

New theories for stone disintegration favour the use of shock wave sources with larger focal zones. Use of slower pulse rates, ramping strategies, and adequate coupling of the shock wave head can significantly increase the efficacy and safety of ESWL.

Acoustically driven cavitation cluster collapse in planar geometry

We demonstrate the dynamics of arrays of transient cavitation bubbles exposed to a sound field in a planar geometry. Single, double, and complex configurations of cavitation bubbles are obtained by shaping a pulsed laser beam with a digital hologram and focusing it into a thin gap of liquid. The liquid is driven with an oscillating pressure field of variable phase and amplitude. We compare the dynamics of a single bubble recorded with high-speed photography with a two-dimensional Rayleigh model. For multibubble configurations we observe bubble-bubble interaction and coalescence which depends on the phase of the acoustic field. Larger clusters demonstrate drastically enhanced collapse for high-amplitude driving, enabling the study of artificial cavitation clusters under strong driving.

Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy

Using a reflector insert, the original HM-3 lithotripter field at 20 kV was altered significantly with the peak positive pressure (p(+)) in the focal plane increased from 49 to 87 MPa while the -6 dB focal width decreased concomitantly from 11 to 4 mm. Using the original reflector, p(+) of 33 MPa with a -6 dB focal width of 18 mm were measured in a pre-focal plane 15-mm proximal to the lithotripter focus. However, the acoustic pulse energy delivered to a 28-mm diameter area around the lithotripter axis was comparable ( approximately 120 mJ). For all three exposure conditions, similar stone comminution ( approximately 70%) was produced in a mesh holder of 15 mm after 250 shocks. In contrast, stone comminution produced by the modified reflector either in a 15-mm finger cot (45%) or in a 30-mm membrane holder (14%) was significantly reduced from the corresponding values (56% and 26%) produced by the original reflector (no statistically significant differences were observed between the focal and pre-focal planes). These observations suggest that a low-pressure/broad focal width lithotripter field will produce better stone comminution than its counterpart with high-pressure/narrow focal width under clinically relevant in vitro comminution conditions.

Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is the only noninvasive method for stone removal. Once considered as a primary option for the treatment of virtually all stones, SWL is now recognized to have important limitations that restrict its use. In particular, the effectiveness of SWL is severely limited by stone burden, and treatment with shock waves carries the risk of acute injury with the potential for long-term adverse effects. Research aiming to characterize the renal response to shock waves and to determine the mechanisms of shock wave action in stone breakage and renal injury has begun to suggest new treatment strategies to improve success rates and safety. Urologists can achieve better outcomes by treating at slower shock wave rate using a step-wise protocol. The aim is to achieve stone comminution using as few shock waves and at as low a power level as possible. Important challenges remain, including the need to improve acoustic coupling, enhance stone targeting, better determine when stone breakage is complete, and minimize the occurrence of residual stone fragments. New technologies have begun to address many of these issues, and hold considerable promise for the future.

[The future of ESWL]

With the introduction of the Dornier HM3 lithotripter, the successful history of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for noninvasive treatment of urinary stones began about 25 years ago. The development of newer lithotripters has not been able to improve clinical efficacy because the shock wave parameters specifically responsible for stone disintegration or tissue trauma and pain induction have not yet been identified. Actual research in lithotripter technology deals with modification of the focal point. The evolution of endoscopic procedures, ureterorenoscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy took longer but was more successful in terms of clinical efficacy. Nowadays, ESWL or an endoscopic procedure is offered as a reasonable option for most urinary stone cases. Therefore, economic aspects and the surgeon's expertise will become greater factors when a procedure is chosen. ESWL, with or without anaesthesia, will be an inherent part of future treatment modalities for urinary stones.

New concepts in shock wave lithotripsy

This monograph reviews the basic principles of shock wave lithotripsy. The focus is on new research on stone fragmentation and tissue injury and how this improved understanding of shock-wave technology is leading to modifications in lithotripsy that will allow this therapy to be a safer, more effective treatment for nephrolithiasis.

Optimizing Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the 21st Century

OBJECTIVE

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has radically changed treatment of stone disease and appears to be the first option for the majority of patients. This review of current literature focused on suggestions for optimising technique, patient selection, results, and lithotriptor comparison for SWL.

METHODS

Literature search for SWL was performed for recently published papers in English language. Topics of interest were treatment protocols; patient evaluation; pre-SWL prediction of outcome; lithotriptor technology; efficacy; and methods to assess the effects, decrease complications, and compare lithotriptors. Earlier classic papers on SWL and guidelines for stone disease were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Recent literature contained important recommendations about SWL concerning (1) methods to predict stone fragmentation; (2) identification of factors contributing to treatment failure for lower pole and ureteric calculi; (3) guidelines from urological associations; (4) manoeuvres and changes in SWL delivery (slower rate, twin-pulse technique) to increase efficacy and decrease complications; (5) clarification of the role of medical treatment (antibiotics, alpha-blockers); (6) role of SWL in calyceal stones, CIRF, and abnormal kidneys; (7) obesity and SWL; and (8) methods to evaluate and compare lithotriptors.

CONCLUSIONS

SWL delivered in an outpatient setting as an anaesthesia-free treatment is still considered the first option for the majority of stones with a minimal number of complications. Better understanding of the physics of shockwave delivery is required, together with treatment optimisation by limiting renal damage and better selection of patients because this approach will offer maximum benefit to patients and physicians, as well as more cost-effective treatment.

Enhanced kidney stone fragmentation by short delay tandem conventional and modified lithotriptor shock waves: a numerical analysis

PURPOSE

We evaluated the effectiveness of modified lithotriptor shock waves using computer models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Finite element models were used to simulate the propagation of lithotriptor shock waves in human renal calculi in vivo. Kidney stones were assumed to be spherical, homogeneous, isotropic and linearly elastic, and immersed in a continuum fluid. Single and tandem shock wave pulses modified to intensify the collapse of cavitation bubbles near the stone surface to increase fragmentation efficiency and suppress the expansion of intraluminal bubbles for decreased vascular injury were analyzed. The effectiveness of the modified shock waves was assessed by comparing the states of loading in the renal calculi induced by these shock waves to those produced by conventional shock waves.

RESULTS

Our numerical simulations revealed that modified shock waves produced marginally lower stresses in spherical renal calculi than those produced by conventional shock waves. Tandem pulses of conventional or modified shock waves produced peak stresses in the front and back halves of the renal calculi. However, the single shock wave pulses generated significant peak stresses in only the back halves of the renal calculi.

CONCLUSIONS

Our numerical simulations suggest that for direct stress wave induced fragmentation modified shock waves should be as effective as conventional shock waves for fragmenting kidney stones. Also, with a small interval of 20 microseconds between the pulses tandem pulse lithotripsy using modified or conventional shock waves could be considerably more effective than single pulse lithotripsy for fragmenting kidney stones.

A new electromagnetic shock-wave generator “SLX-F2” with user-selectable dual focus size: ex vivo evaluation of renal injury

Storz Medical AG (Kreutzlingen/Switzerland) has developed a new electromagnetic shockwave (SW) generator, the "SLX-F2", which allows the user to choose between a small-focus, high-pressure treatment regime or a wide-focus, low-pressure option. The aim of this study was to investigate, under standardized conditions, the impact of these two different treatment regimes on SW-induced renal injury. SW-induced renal injury was investigated by using the standardized model of the perfused ex vivo kidney. SWs were applied under ultrasound control in the parenchyma of a kidney pole. Different SW numbers (20, 50, 125, 250, 500, 1,000) were applied in three groups: group A was treated with a wider focus (80 MPa), groups B (60 MPa) and C (120 MPa) with a smaller focus (each parameter setting was repeated ten-fold). Disintegration capacity (measured by crater volume in cubes of plaster of Paris) was the same in groups A and C. After SW exposure, barium sulphate suspension was perfused through the renal artery. The maximum diameter (mm) of the extravasation in the cortex, representing the extent of vascular injury, was measured on X-ray mammography films. H&E staining was performed. In all three groups (A, B, C) a higher number of SWs caused the diameter of the extravasate to increase, with statistical significance appearing at 1,000 shots versus 20 shots (p < 0.05). Vascular injury was not influenced by the focal size and positive peak pressure at identical SW numbers applied. Histology of the focal area showed gap-like defects. Our ex vivo data show that renal vascular injury is independent of the focal diameter of the SW generator at the same peak positive pressure and disintegration power. This confirms the in vivo findings that show renal injury caused by SW as being related to the number of SWs administered. Clinical studies are needed to investigate whether there is any advantage to offering both treatment regimes in one SW machine-for example, by using the "wide-focus, low-pressure" option for kidney stones and the "small-focus, high-pressure" regimen for stones in the ureter. The renal injury caused by either regime remains comparable.

Assessment of shock wave lithotripters via cavitation potential

A method to characterize shock wave lithotripters by examining the potential for cavitation associated with the lithotripter shock wave (LSW) has been developed. The method uses the maximum radius achieved by a bubble subjected to a LSW as a representation of the cavitation potential for that region in the lithotripter. It is found that the maximum radius is determined by the work done on a bubble by the LSW. The method is used to characterize two reflectors: an ellipsoidal reflector and an ellipsoidal reflector with an insert. The results show that the use of an insert reduced the -6 dB volume (with respect to peak positive pressure) from 1.6 to 0.4 cm(3), the -6 dB volume (with respect to peak negative pressure) from 14.5 to 8.3 cm(3), and reduced the volume characterized by high cavitation potential (i.e., regions characterized by bubbles with radii larger than 429 µm) from 103 to 26 cm(3). Thus, the insert is an effective way to localize the potentially damaging effects of shock wave lithotripsy, and suggests an approach to optimize the shape of the reflector.

Interaction of lithotripter shockwaves with single inertial cavitation bubbles

The dynamic interaction of a shockwave (modelled as a pressure pulse) with an initially spherically oscillating bubble is investigated. Upon the shockwave impact, the bubble deforms non-spherically and the flow field surrounding the bubble is determined with potential flow theory using the boundary-element method (BEM). The primary advantage of this method is its computational efficiency. The simulation process is repeated until the two opposite sides of the bubble surface collide with each other (i.e. the formation of a jet along the shockwave propagation direction). The collapse time of the bubble, its shape and the velocity of the jet are calculated. Moreover, the impact pressure is estimated based on water-hammer pressure theory. The Kelvin impulse, kinetic energy and bubble displacement (all at the moment of jet impact) are also determined. Overall, the simulated results compare favourably with experimental observations of lithotripter shockwave interaction with single bubbles (using laser-induced bubbles at various oscillation stages). The simulations confirm the experimental observation that the most intense collapse, with the highest jet velocity and impact pressure, occurs for bubbles with intermediate size during the contraction phase when the collapse time of the bubble is approximately equal to the compressive pulse duration of the shock wave. Under this condition, the maximum amount of energy of the incident shockwave is transferred to the collapsing bubble. Further, the effect of the bubble contents (ideal gas with different initial pressures) and the initial conditions of the bubble (initially oscillating vs. non-oscillating) on the dynamics of the shockwave-bubble interaction are discussed.

Oscillatory interaction between bubbles and confining microvessels and its implications on clinical vascular injuries of shock-wave lithotripsy

This paper presents a detailed study of the oscillation characteristics of a bubble confined inside a deformable microvessel, whose size is comparable with the bubble size. The vessel's compliance is characterized by a nonlinear relation between the intraluminal pressure and the expansion ratio of the vessel radius, which represents the variation of the vessel stiffness with the pressure of the filling liquid. In this analysis, an initially spherical bubble evolves into an ellipsoid, and the asymmetric oscillation appears immediately after the driving pressure is applied and magnifies with oscillation cycles. Compared with the symmetric oscillation in an unconstrained environment, the vessel constraint makes the bubble contract significantly more and subsequently expand in a more violent rebound, inducing substantially larger peaks of the intraluminal pressure exerted on the vessel wall. A larger initial bubble/vessel radius ratio leads to not only a larger peak but also a higher oscillation frequency of the intraluminal pressure, which are the two most dominating parameters in determining the vessel's failure under cyclic loading. The numerical results have further shown that an increase of the vessel wall stiffness strengthens the asymmetric effect, i.e., a larger peak of the intraluminal pressure with a higher oscillation frequency, and so does a larger pre-existing pressure in the liquid filling the vessel. These findings imply that the asymmetric effect is one of the primary mechanisms for clinical injuries of capillary and small blood vessels and for the higher risk of pediatric and hypertension patients in shock wave lithotripsy.

Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the analgesic effect and utility of prilocaine infiltration alone for minimal morbidity during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

METHODS

A total of 114 patients with kidney stones, aged 18 to 69 years, were randomly separated into two groups. The 58 patients in group 1 received intramuscular diclophenac 30 minutes before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and the 56 patients in group 2 received prilocaine infiltration into the 30 cm2 area below the 12th rib right before the session. A visual analog scale (0 to 100 mm) was used to evaluate pain.

RESULTS

The visual analog scale scores for group 2 were statistically lower at 1, 10, and 20 minutes compared with the scores for group 1 (P = 0.006, P = 0.005, and P = 0.006, respectively). However, no difference was detected at the end of the procedure. The requirement for additional analgesic was less in group 2 (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Prilocaine infiltration alone can be used for analgesic purposes efficiently and safely during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with minimal morbidity.

The effect of reflector geometry on the acoustic field and bubble dynamics produced by an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter

A theoretical model for the propagation of shock wave from an axisymmetric reflector was developed by modifying the initial conditions for the conventional solution of a nonlinear parabolic wave equation (i.e., the Khokhlov-Zabolotskaya-Kuznestsov equation). The ellipsoidal reflector of an HM-3 lithotripter is modeled equivalently as a self-focusing spherically distributed pressure source. The pressure wave form generated by the spark discharge of the HM-3 electrode was measured by a fiber optic probe hydrophone and used as source conditions in the numerical calculation. The simulated pressure wave forms, accounting for the effects of diffraction, nonlinearity, and thermoviscous absorption in wave propagation and focusing, were compared with the measured results and a reasonably good agreement was found. Furthermore, the primary characteristics in the pressure wave forms produced by different reflector geometries, such as that produced by a reflector insert, can also be predicted by this model. It is interesting to note that when the interpulse delay time calculated by linear geometric model is less than about 1.5 micros, two pulses from the reflector insert and the uncovered bottom of the original HM-3 reflector will merge together. Coupling the simulated pressure wave form with the Gilmore model was carried out to evaluate the effect of reflector geometry on resultant bubble dynamics in a lithotripter field. Altogether, the equivalent reflector model was found to provide a useful tool for the prediction of pressure wave form generated in a lithotripter field. This model may be used to guide the design optimization of reflector geometries for improving the performance and safety of clinical lithotripters.

Effect of modification of shock-wave delivery on stone fragmentation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Shock-wave lithotripsy has been the mainstay of urinary-stone treatment over the past 20 years, with three generations of lithotripters now in the market place. Little improvement, however, has been made in the overall efficiency, since the original Dornier HM3 lithotripter. Over the past 5 years much progress has been made in the basic research of shock-wave lithotripsy, with better understanding of the mechanisms involved in stone fragmentation. This progress has led to new modifications in the way shock-wave pulse is generated and delivered.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical studies, reflecting improved understanding of basic mechanisms of stone comminution, are being published. Two recent prospective clinical trials have shown the higher efficiency of slow-rate compared with fast-rate shock-wave lithotripsy. A very practical solution requiring no hardware upgrade albeit at longer procedure times. Other promising developments include the use of twin-head technology, with either simultaneous or sequential shock waves. In addition, chemolytic pretreatment and dose-escalation techniques have shown early encouraging results. This review provides an update of the latest shock-wave technology and delivery strategies.

SUMMARY

Long-term studies, to document anticipated improved safety with slow shock-wave rate, are needed. Future in-vivo and clinical studies of twin-head technology and dose-escalation strategy of shock-wave lithotripsy may initiate new lithotripter designs that will lead to improved stone-free rates, while simultaneously reducing associated renal trauma.

Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the optimal frequency of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urolithiasis, in terms of efficacy and duration, by comparing three different shock wave frequencies.

METHODS

A total of 170 patients between the ages of 18 and 69 years with radiopaque kidney stones were included in the study. The patients were randomly separated into three groups. Group 1 (56 patients) received 120 shock waves per minute, group 2 (57 patients) received 90 shock waves per minute, and group 3 (57 patients) received 60 shock waves per minute. The duration, analgesic or sedative requirement, and complications were recorded for each treatment. All patients were evaluated in terms of successful treatment by radiography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder and abdominal ultrasonography 10 days after the single-session therapy.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed in patients according to age, sex, stone size, side, composition, location in the kidney, total energy level, or number of shocks. The successful therapy rate in groups 2 and 3 was prominently greater compared with that for group 1, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.032 between groups 1 and 2 and P = 0.015 between groups 1 and 3). The analgesic or sedative requirement in groups 2 and 3 was lower than that in group 1, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003 between groups 1 and 2 and P = 0.001 between groups 1 and 3). The duration was longer in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000 between groups 1 and 3 and P = 0.009 between groups 2 and 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study have shown that the optimal frequency during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is 90 shock waves per minute in terms of duration, efficacy, and analgesic and sedative requirement at the same total energy level.

[Extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) procedure in urology]

Since 1980, extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has become the first line treatment for most stones in adults and children. The indications are based on criteria depending on localization, chemical composition and size of the renal and ureteral calculi. Since the DORNIER HM 3 which remains the gold standard of first generation lithotripters, many devices of second and third generation have been built (electro hydrolic, piezo electric and electromagnetic) with fluoroscopic and ultrasound localization systems. SWL may now be performed on an out-patient basis without anaesthesia or under neuroleptic analgesia. Indications and evaluation criteria on 3 months plain abdominal X-ray are better defined since 1996. Nevertheless, comparison of reported results remains difficult due to the multiplicity of lithotripter types and the lack of consensus on efficacy criteria. Today, the third generation of mobile electromagnetic lithotripters give an average of 80% stone free rate of patients with kidney and ureteral calculi whatever the localization and size.

DUAL PULSE SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY: IN VITRO AND IN VIVO STUDY

PURPOSE

We evaluated the performance of a novel dual pulse lithotriptor for extracorporeal lithotripsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A piezoelectric lithotriptor was modified to produce pairs of successive (tandem) shock waves. Four kidney stone models were exposed in vitro to 500 single shock waves with a standard lithotriptor. Another set of stones was exposed 1 at a time to 250 pairs of shock waves with the tandem lithotriptor. The time delay between the first and second shock waves was increased in steps of 50 microseconds between 100 and 600 microseconds. Four stones were used per delay, ie 44 phantoms were fractured with the tandem system. Rabbits were used in vivo to demonstrate that the novel device does not produce more tissue trauma. Five rabbits were exposed to shock waves generated by the new device, 5 were treated with the standard system and 5 served as the sham treated group. Renal damage caused by the 2 systems was compared 1 week after shock wave application.

RESULTS

Enhanced fragmentation efficiency was achieved at a delay of 250 microseconds. In vivo results indicate that the dual pulse shock wave generator does not produce more kidney tissue damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Tandem lithotriptors may improve the quality and rate of stone comminution without increasing tissue damage. The device enhances cavitation induced damage to kidney stones. Extensive in vivo experiments will be important to evaluate the new design.