1
|
Martins FE, Lumen N, Holm HV. Management of the Devastated Bladder Outlet after Prostate CANCER Treatment. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:149-162. [PMID: 38750347 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01206-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Devastating complications of the bladder outlet resulting from prostate cancer treatments are relatively uncommon. However, the combination of the high incidence of prostate cancer and patient longevity after treatment have raised awareness of adverse outcomes deteriorating patients' quality of life. This narrative review discusses the diagnostic work-up and management options for bladder outlet obstruction resulting from prostate cancer treatments, including those that require urinary diversion. RECENT FINDINGS The devastated bladder outlet can be a consequence of the treatment of benign conditions, but more frequently from complications of pelvic cancer treatments. Regardless of etiology, the initial treatment ladder involves endoluminal options such as dilation and direct vision internal urethrotomy, with or without intralesional injection of anti-fibrotic agents. If these conservative strategies fail, surgical reconstruction should be considered. Although surgical reconstruction provides the best prospect of durable success, reconstructive procedures are also associated with serious complications. In the worst circumstances, such as prior radiotherapy, failed reconstruction, devastated bladder outlet with end-stage bladders, or patient's severe comorbidities, reconstruction may neither be realistic nor justified. Urinary diversion with or without cystectomy may be the best option for these patients. Thorough patient counseling before treatment selection is of utmost importance. Outcomes and repercussions on quality of life vary extensively with management options. Meticulous preoperative diagnostic evaluation is paramount in selecting the right treatment strategy for each individual patient. The risk of bladder outlet obstruction, and its severest form, devastated bladder outlet, after treatment of prostate cancer is not negligible, especially following radiation. Management includes endoluminal treatment, open or robot-assisted laparoscopic reconstruction, and urinary diversion in the worst circumstances, with varying success rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco E Martins
- Department of Urology, University of Lisbon, School of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário, Lisboa Norte (CHULN), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Preisser F, Incesu RB, Rajwa P, Chlosta M, Nohe F, Ahmed M, Abreu AL, Cacciamani G, Ribeiro L, Kretschmer A, Westhofen T, Smith JA, Steuber T, Calleris G, Raskin Y, Gontero P, Joniau S, Sanchez-Salas R, Shariat SF, Gill I, Karnes RJ, Cathcart P, Van Der Poel H, Marra G, Tilki D. Impact of persistent PSA after salvage radical prostatectomy: a multicenter study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023:10.1038/s41391-023-00728-5. [PMID: 37803241 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00728-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Persistent prostatic specific antigen (PSA) represents a poor prognostic factor for recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, the impact of persistent PSA on oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing salvage RP is unknown. To investigate the impact of persistent PSA after salvage RP on long-term oncologic outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients who underwent salvage RP for recurrent prostate cancer between 2000 and 2021 were identified from twelve high-volume centers. Only patients with available PSA after salvage RP were included. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regression models were used to test the effect of persistent PSA on biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastasis and any death after salvage RP. Persistent PSA was defined as a PSA-value ≥ 0.1 ng/ml, at first PSA-measurement after salvage RP. RESULTS Overall, 580 patients were identified. Of those, 42% (n = 242) harbored persistent PSA. Median follow-up after salvage RP was 38 months, median time to salvage RP was 64 months and median time to first PSA after salvage RP was 2.2 months. At 84 months after salvage RP, BCR-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival was 6.6 vs. 59%, 71 vs. 88% and 77 vs. 94% for patients with persistent vs. undetectable PSA after salvage RP (all p < 0.01). In multivariable Cox models persistent PSA was an independent predictor for BCR (HR: 5.47, p < 0.001) and death (HR: 3.07, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Persistent PSA is common after salvage RP and represents an independent predictor for worse oncologic outcomes. Patients undergoing salvage RP should be closely monitored after surgery to identify those with persistent PSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Preisser
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Marcin Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Florian Nohe
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mohamed Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andre Luis Abreu
- Keck Medical Center of USC, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- Keck Medical Center of USC, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Thilo Westhofen
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joseph A Smith
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Yannic Raskin
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Inderbir Gill
- Keck Medical Center of USC, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Henk Van Der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Drobner J, Kaldany A, Shah MS, Ghodoussipour S. The Role of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Radiation-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3734. [PMID: 37509395 PMCID: PMC10378204 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
There are multiple treatment strategies for patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma. In intermediate- and high-risk patients, external beam radiation therapy demonstrates effective long-term cancer control rates comparable to radical prostatectomy. In patients who opt for initial radiotherapy but have a local recurrence of their cancer, there is no unanimity on the optimal salvage approach. The lack of randomized trials comparing surgery to other local salvage therapy or observation makes it difficult to ascertain the ideal management. A narrative review of existing prospective and retrospective data related to salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy was undertaken. Based on retrospective and prospective data, post-radiation salvage radical prostatectomy confers oncologic benefits, with overall survival ranging from 84 to 95% at 5 years and from 52 to 77% at 10 years. Functional morbidity after salvage prostatectomy remains high, with rates of post-surgical incontinence and erectile dysfunction ranging from 21 to 93% and 28 to 100%, respectively. Factors associated with poor outcomes after post-radiation salvage prostatectomy include preoperative PSA, the Gleason score, post-prostatectomy staging, and nodal involvement. Salvage radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment option for patients with biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy, although careful patient selection is important to optimize oncologic and functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Drobner
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Alain Kaldany
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Mihir S Shah
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Romito I, Giannarini G, Rossanese M, Mucciardi G, Simonato A, Ficarra V. Incidence of Rectal Injury After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 52:85-99. [PMID: 37213241 PMCID: PMC10192923 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Rectal injury (RI) is a dreaded complication after radical prostatectomy (RP), increasing the risk of early postoperative complications, such as bleeding and severe infection/sepsis, and late sequelae, such as a rectourethral fistula (RUF). Considering its traditionally low incidence, uncertainty remains as to predisposing risk factors and management. Objective To examine the incidence of RI after RP in contemporary series and to propose a pragmatic algorithm for its management. Evidence acquisition A systematic literature search was performed using the Medline and Scopus databases. Studies reporting data on RI incidence were selected. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the differential incidence by age, surgical approach, salvage RP after radiation therapy, and previous benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery. Evidence synthesis Eighty-eight, mostly retrospective noncomparative, studies were selected. The meta-analysis obtained a pooled RI incidence of 0.58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.73) in contemporary series with significant across-study heterogeneity (I2 = 100%, p < 0.00001). The highest RI incidence was found in patients undergoing open RP (1.25%; 95% CI 0.66-2.38) and laparoscopic RP (1.25%; 95% CI 0.75-2.08) followed by perineal RP (0.19%; 95% CI 0-276.95) and robotic RP (0.08%; 95% CI 0.02-0.31). Age ≥60 yr (0.56%; 95% CI 0.37-06) and salvage RP after radiation therapy (6.01%; 95% CI 3.99-9.05), but not previous BPH-related surgery (4.08%, 95% CI 0.92-18.20), were also associated with an increased RI incidence. Intraoperative versus postoperative RI detection was associated with a significantly decreased risk of severe postoperative complications (such as sepsis and bleeding) and subsequent formation of a RUF. Conclusions RI is a rare, but potentially devastating, complication following RP. RI incidence was higher in patients ≥60 yr of age, and in those who underwent open/laparoscopic approach or salvage RP after radiation therapy. Intraoperative RI detection and repair apparently constitute the single most critical step to significantly decrease the risk of major postoperative complications and subsequent RUF formation. Conversely, intraoperatively undetected RI can lead more often to severe infective complications and RUF, the management of which remains poorly standardised and requires complex procedures. Patient summary Accidental rectum tear is a rare, but potentially devastating, complication in men undergoing prostate removal for cancer. It occurs more often in patients aged 60 yr or older as well as in those who underwent prostate removal via an open/laparoscopic approach and/or prostate removal after radiation therapy for recurrent disease. Prompt identification and repair of this condition during the initial operation are the key to reduce further complications such as the formation of an abnormal opening between the rectum and the urinary tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Romito
- Gaetano Barresi Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology, Urology Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Urology Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Marta Rossanese
- Gaetano Barresi Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology, Urology Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Mucciardi
- Gaetano Barresi Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology, Urology Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Urology Section, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ficarra
- Gaetano Barresi Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology, Urology Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
- Corresponding author. Gaetano Barresi Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology, Urologic Section, University of Messina, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico “Gaetano Martino”, Via Consolare Valeria 1, IT-98125 Messina, Italy. Tel. +390902217027.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nabavizadeh R, Karnes RJ. Salvage radical prostatectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:163-167. [PMID: 36591993 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) is underutilized because of fear of historical high rates of peri-operative morbidities. However, there has been significant improvements in complication rates as well as oncologic outcomes in the recent years. RECENT FINDINGS Complication rates have significantly declined for both open and robotic approach in the past decade. Rectal injury is now reported around 2%, which is down from 30% in the historic series. Similarly, the current risk of major vascular injury is low. About 75% of patients report social continence (up to one pad per day). However, erectile function recovery remains poor and patients should be counselled accordingly. Long-term durable oncologic response is achievable with 10-year recurrence-free survival reported in about 40-50% of well selected patients. SUMMARY Recent improvements in oncologic and peri-operative outcomes make sRP a desirable option for local control. sRP treats the whole gland as opposed to focal therapies and allows for pelvic lymph node dissection and removal of seminal vesicles, which can be sanctuary site of disease. In experienced hands, regardless of the surgical approach, sRP can achieve a durable response resulting in delaying or avoiding androgen deprivation therapy and its associated morbidities.
Collapse
|
6
|
Salvage Retzius-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Review of Complications, Functional Outcomes, and Oncologic Outcomes. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:9733-9743. [PMID: 36547178 PMCID: PMC9777071 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29120764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
(Background) Radiation failure for localized prostate cancer is seen in 20-60% of patients who do not undergo extirpative surgery. Though potentially curative, salvage prostatectomy (SS) has not been frequently performed historically due to high rates of complications and postoperative incontinence. With the advent of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, these rates appear to be improved. Retzius-sparing approaches have additionally been shown to improve continence outcomes in the index setting, and may further improve continence outcomes in salvage cases while maintaining oncologic integrity. (Methods) We performed a literature review and qualitative analysis of published papers on salvage Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SRS). Three studies met criteria and were included in analysis. (Results) There were more patients with Gleason Grade Group 1 disease after initial treatment in the SRS group vs. SS (22% vs. 8%). Patients most frequently underwent external beam radiation therapy in both groups (52% vs. 49%). 30-day complication rates were 10% and 26% for SRS and SS, respectively. Continence outcomes were significantly improved in SRS with 59% of continence (based on study criteria) compared to 38% in SS. Time to continence was similarly improved for SRS. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence were not significantly different between SRS and SS in any study. (Conclusions) SRS is a safe and feasible option for salvage treatment of localized prostate cancer and may improve postoperative continence outcomes. Positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence rates are similar to those reported in SS.
Collapse
|
7
|
High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
8
|
Martins FE, Holm HV, Lumen N. Devastated Bladder Outlet in Pelvic Cancer Survivors: Issues on Surgical Reconstruction and Quality of Life. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4920. [PMID: 34768438 PMCID: PMC8584541 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Bladder outlet obstruction following treatment of pelvic cancer, predominantly prostate cancer, occurs in 1-8% of patients. The high incidence of prostate cancer combined with the long-life expectancy after treatment has increased concerns with cancer survivorship care. However, despite increased oncological cure rates, these adverse events do occur, compromising patients' quality of life. Non-traumatic obstruction of the posterior urethra and bladder neck include membranous and prostatic urethral stenosis and bladder neck stenosis (also known as contracture). The devastated bladder outlet can result from benign conditions, such as neurogenic dysfunction, trauma, iatrogenic causes, or more frequently from complications of oncologic treatment, such as prostate, bladder and rectum. Most posterior urethral stenoses may respond to endoluminal treatments such as dilatation, direct vision internal urethrotomy, and occasionally urethral stents. Although surgical reconstruction offers the best chance of durable success, these reconstructive options are fraught with severe complications and, therefore, are far from being ideal. In patients with prior RT, failed reconstruction, densely fibrotic and/or necrotic and calcified posterior urethra, refractory incontinence or severe comorbidities, reconstruction may not be either feasible or recommended. In these cases, urinary diversion with or without cystectomy is usually required. This review aims to discuss the diagnostic evaluation and treatment options for patients with bladder outlet obstruction with a special emphasis on patients unsuitable for reconstruction of the posterior urethra and requiring urinary diversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco E. Martins
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Hospital Santa Maria/CHULN, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bearrick EN, Findlay BL, Boswell TC, Hebert KJ, Viers BR. New perspectives on the surgical treatment of posterior urethral obstruction. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:521-530. [PMID: 34175873 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Posterior urethral obstruction (PUO) from prostate surgery for benign and malignant conditions poses a significant reconstructive challenge. Endoscopic management demonstrates only modest success and often definitive reconstructive solutions are necessary to limit morbidity and firmly establish posterior urethral continuity. This often demands a combined abdominoperineal approach, pubic bone resection, and even sacrifice of the external urinary sphincter and anterior urethral blood supply. Recently, a robotic-assisted approach has been described. Enhanced instrument dexterity, magnified visualization, and adjunctive measures to assess tissue quality may enable the reconstructive surgeon to engage posterior strictures deep within the confines of the narrow male pelvis and optimize functional outcomes. The purpose of this review is to review the literature regarding endoscopic, open, and robotic management outcomes for the treatment of PUO, and provide an updated treatment algorithm based upon location and complexity of the stricture. RECENT FINDINGS Contingent upon etiology, small case series suggest that robotic bladder neck reconstruction has durable reconstructive outcomes with acceptable rates of incontinence in carefully selected patients. SUMMARY Initial reports suggest that robotic bladder neck reconstruction for recalcitrant PUO may offer novel reconstructive solutions and durable function outcomes in select patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lewin R, Amit U, Laufer M, Berger R, Dotan Z, Domachevsky L, Davidson T, Portnoy O, Tsvang L, Ben-Ayun M, Weiss I, Symon Z. Salvage re-irradiation using stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer: the impact of castration sensitivity on treatment outcomes. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:114. [PMID: 34162398 PMCID: PMC8220691 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01839-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in imaging, biomaterials and precision radiotherapy provide new opportunities to salvage locally recurrent prostate cancer (PC). This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We hypothesized that patients with castrate-resistant PC (CRPC) would benefit less from local salvage. Methods A prospective clinical database was reviewed to extract 30 consecutive patients treated with prostate re-irradiation. Gallium prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography was performed following prostate-specific antigen failure in all patients and biopsy was obtained in 18 patients (60%). Re-irradiation was either focal (n = 13) or whole-gland (n = 17). Endo-rectal balloons were used in twenty-two patients and hydrogel spacers in eight patients. The median prescription dose was 5 fractions of 6.5 (range: 6–8) Gray (Gy). Results Median follow-up was 28 months. Failure occurred in 10 (out of 11) CRPC patients versus 6 (out of 19) castrate-sensitive patients (91% vs. 32%, p = 0.008) after a median of 13 and 23 months, respectively. Metastases occurred in 64% (n = 7) of CRPC patients versus 16% (n = 3) of castrate-sensitive patients (p = 0.007). Two patients experienced local in-field recurrence, thus local control was 93%. The 2 and 3-year recurrence-free survival were 84% and 79% for castrate-sensitive patients versus 18% and 9% for CRPC patients (p < 0.001), and 3-year metastasis-free survival was 90% versus 27% (p < 0.01) for castrate-sensitive and CRPC patients, respectively. Acute grade II and III genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurred in 27% and 3%, and late GU toxicity in 30% and 3%, respectively. No ≥ grade II acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred, and only one patient (3%) developed late grade II toxicity. Conclusions Early delivery of salvage SBRT for local recurrence is associated with excellent 3-year disease control and acceptable toxicity in the castrate-sensitive phenotype. PSMA imaging for detection of local recurrence and the use of precision radiotherapy with rectal protective devices should be further investigated as a novel salvage strategy for radio-recurrent PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Lewin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
| | - Uri Amit
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Menachem Laufer
- Institute of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Raanan Berger
- Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Zohar Dotan
- Institute of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Liran Domachevsky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Tima Davidson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Orith Portnoy
- Department of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Lev Tsvang
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Maoz Ben-Ayun
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Ilana Weiss
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Zvi Symon
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Graefen M, Kluth LA, Mandel P, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. The effect of lymph node dissection on cancer-specific survival in salvage radical prostatectomy patients. Prostate 2021; 81:339-346. [PMID: 33666271 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We hypothesized that lymph node dissection (LND) at salvage radical prostatectomy may be associated with lower cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and we tested this hypothesis. METHODS We relied on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (2004-2016) to identify all salvage radical prostatectomy patients. Categorical, as well as univariate and multivariate Cox regression models tested the effect of LND (LND performed vs. not), as well as at its extent (log-transformed lymph node count) on CSM. RESULTS Of 427 salvage radical prostatectomy patients, 120 (28.1%) underwent LND with a median lymph node count of 6 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-11). According to LND status, no significant or clinically meaningful differences were recorded in PSA at diagnosis, stage and biopsy Gleason score at diagnosis, except for age at prostate cancer diagnosis (LND performed 63 vs. 68 years LND not performed, p < .001). LND status (performed) was an independent predictor of lower CSM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47; p = .03). Similarly, lymph node count (log transformed) also independently predicted lower CSM (HR: 0.60; p = .01). After the 7th removed lymph node, the effect of CSM became marginal. The effect of N-stage on CSM could not be tested due to insufficient number of observations. CONCLUSIONS Salvage radical prostatectomy is rarely performed and LND at salvage radical prostatectomy is performed in a minority of patients. However, LND at salvage radical prostatectomy is associated with lower CSM. Moreover, LND extent also exerts a protective effect on CSM. These observations should be considered in salvage radical prostatectomy candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Graefen M, Becker A, Kluth LA, Mandel P, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Salvage Radical Prostatectomy: Baseline Prostate Cancer Characteristics and Survival Across SEER Registries. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:e255-e263. [PMID: 33849813 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test for baseline prostate cancer characteristics and survival differences after salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) across 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries from 2004 to 2016. METHODS We tabulated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), cT stage, age, and SRP rates across individual SEER registries. Kaplan-Meier and competing risks regression methodologies depicted cancer-specific mortality and other cause mortality. Finally, overall mortality was compared with predicted life expectancy. RESULTS Overall, 428 SRP patients (2004-2016) were identified in the SEER database. Median follow-up duration was 74 months (interquartile range [IQR], 31-114). The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (IQR, 61-73 years) with a median PSA at diagnosis of 8.8 ng/mL (IQR, 5.4-18.6 ng/mL) and 10% cT3-4 stage (0%-23.8%). Variability existed across individual SEER registries regarding age, PSA, cT stage, and annual number of SRPs (0-17), as well as cumulative numbers of SRPs (7-73) between 2004 and 2016. At 10 years, cancer-specific mortality was 23.2% vs. other cause mortality 19.3%. Finally, SRP patients exhibited higher 10-year overall mortality (43.3%) than predicted by life tables (31.8%). CONCLUSION SRP is rarely performed. In most SEER registries, SRP use is very occasional. More than 2 average annual SRPs were reported in only 5 of all registries. Nonetheless, across all registries, SRP patients showed marginal to moderate differences in PSA, cT stage, and age at diagnosis. However, at 10 years of follow-up, 1 of 5 SRP patients died of other causes and observed overall mortality was higher than expected (36%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tx; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abufaraj M, Siyam A, Ali MR, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Yang L, Foerster B, Shariat SF. Functional Outcomes after Local Salvage Therapies for Radiation-Recurrent Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020244. [PMID: 33440752 PMCID: PMC7826752 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the rate and severity of functional outcomes after salvage therapy for radiation recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS This systematic review of the MEDLINE/PubMed database yielded 35 studies, evaluating salvage radical prostatectomy (RP), brachytherapy (BT), high-intensity focal ultrasound (HIFU) and cryotherapy (CT) after failure of primary radiation therapy. Data on pre- and post-salvage rates and severity of functional outcomes (urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and lower urinary tract symptoms) were collected from each study. RESULTS The rates of severe urinary incontinence ranged from 28-88%, 4.5-42%, 0-6.5%, 2.4-8% post salvage RP, HIFU, CT and BT, respectively. The rates of erectile dysfunction were relatively high reaching as much as 90%, 94.6%, 100%, 62% following RP, HIFU, CT and BT, respectively. Nonetheless, the high pre-salvage rates of ED preclude accurate estimation of the effect of salvage therapy. There was an increase in the median IPSS following salvage HIFU, BT and CT ranging from 2.5-3.4, 3.5-12, and 2, respectively. Extended follow-up showed a return-to-baseline IPSS in a salvage BT study. The reported data suffer from selection, reporting, publication and period of study biases, making inter-study comparisons inappropriate. CONCLUSIONS local salvage therapies for radiation recurrent PCa affect continence, lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual functions. The use of local salvage therapies may be warranted in the setting of local disease control, but each individual decision must be made with the informed patient in a shared decision working process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1080 Vienna, Austria;
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, 11942 Amman, Jordan; (A.S.); (M.R.A.)
| | - Abdelmuez Siyam
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, 11942 Amman, Jordan; (A.S.); (M.R.A.)
| | - Mustafa Rami Ali
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, 11942 Amman, Jordan; (A.S.); (M.R.A.)
| | - Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg—Medical Centre, 79098 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Lin Yang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada;
- Departments of Oncology and Community Health Sciences, Cumming school of medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Beat Foerster
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland;
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1080 Vienna, Austria;
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, 11942 Amman, Jordan; (A.S.); (M.R.A.)
- Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USA
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-140-4002-6150; Fax: +43-140-4002-3320
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rosenbaum CM, Fisch M, Vetterlein MW. Contemporary Management of Vesico-Urethral Anastomotic Stenosis After Radical Prostatectomy. Front Surg 2020; 7:587271. [PMID: 33324673 PMCID: PMC7725760 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.587271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Vesico-urethral anastomotic stenosis is a well-known sequela after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and has significant impact on quality of life. This review aims to summarize contemporary therapeutical approaches and to give an overview of the available evidence regarding endoscopic interventions and open reconstruction. Initial treatment may include dilation, incision or transurethral resection. In treatment-refractory stenoses, open reconstruction via an abdominal (retropubic), transperineal or combined abdominoperineal approach is a viable option with high success rates. All of the open surgical procedures are generally accompanied by a high risk of developing de novo incontinence and patients may need further interventions. In such cases, subsequent artificial urinary sphincter implantation is the most common treatment option with the best available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Malte W Vetterlein
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Surcel C, Mirvald C, Tsaur I, Borgmann H, Heidegger I, Labanaris AP, Sinescu I, Tilki D, Ploussard G, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Mathieu R, Valerio M, Jinga V, Badescu D, Radavoi D, van den Bergh RCN, Gandaglia G, Kretschmer A. Contemporary role of palliative cystoprostatectomy or pelvic exenteration in advanced symptomatic prostate cancer. World J Urol 2020; 39:2483-2490. [PMID: 33135127 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03493-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To access the feasibility of palliative cystoprostatectomy/pelvic exenteration in patients with bladder/rectal invasion due to prostate cancer (PC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-five men with cT4 PC were retrospectively identified in the institutional databases of six tertiary referral centers in the last decade. Local invasion was documented by CT or MRI scans and was confirmed by urethrocystoscopy. Oncological therapies, local symptoms, previous local treatments, time from diagnosis to intervention and type of surgical procedure were recorded. Patients were divided into groups: ADT group (12 pts) and 13 pts without any history of previous local/systemic treatments for PCa (nonADT groups). Perioperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery to death from any cause. A Cox regression analysis, stratified for ISUP score and previous hormonal treatment (ADT) was also performed for survival analysis. RESULTS Ileal conduit was the main urinary diversion in both cohorts. For the entire cohort, complication rate was 44%. No significant differences regarding perioperative complications and complication severity between both subgroups were observed (p = 0.2). Median follow-up was 15 months (range 3-41) for the entire cohort with a median survival of 15 months (95% CI 10.1-19.9). In Cox regression analysis stratified for ISUP score, no statistically significant differences in OS in patients with and without previous ADT before cystectomy or exenteration were observed (HR 3.26, 95% CI 0.62-17.23, p = 0.164). CONCLUSION Palliative cystoprostatectomy and pelvic exenteration represent viable treatment options associated with acceptable morbidity and good short-term survival outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Surcel
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Urology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - C Mirvald
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania. .,Department of Urology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
| | - I Tsaur
- Department of Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - H Borgmann
- Department of Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - A P Labanaris
- Department of Urology, Interbalkan Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - I Sinescu
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Urology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - G Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - F Montorsi
- Department of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - R Mathieu
- Department of Urology, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - M Valerio
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - V Jinga
- Urology Department, 'Prof. Dr. Th. Burghele' Clinical Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania
| | - D Badescu
- Urology Department, 'Prof. Dr. Th. Burghele' Clinical Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania
| | - D Radavoi
- Urology Department, 'Prof. Dr. Th. Burghele' Clinical Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania
| | - R C N van den Bergh
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - G Gandaglia
- Department of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - A Kretschmer
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tashiro K, Urabe F, Ito D, Atsuta M, Sasaki H, Egawa S. Salvage surgery for residual disease following unsuccessful laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urol Case Rep 2020; 34:101435. [PMID: 33083234 PMCID: PMC7554359 DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) has been one of the common procedures for the patients with a failure after primary treatment. We present a case of SRP with rare surgical history. To our knowledge, this is the first report of salvage surgery for residual prostate gland including prostate cancer after unsuccessful radical prostatectomy. We indicated new possibility for salvage radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kojiro Tashiro
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ito
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mahito Atsuta
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Sasaki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Song X, Wang H, Wu J, Sun Y. Long Noncoding RNA SOX2-OT Knockdown Inhibits Proliferation and Metastasis of Prostate Cancer Cells Through Modulating the miR-452-5p/HMGB3 Axis and Inactivating Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2020; 35:682-695. [PMID: 32407168 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2019.3479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Recent studies have proven that abnormal expression of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) often contributes to growth and invasion of cancer cells. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biological function and regulatory mechanism of lncRNA SOX2 overlapping transcript (SOX2-OT) in prostate cancer (PCa) progression. Materials and Methods: The expression of SOX2-OT, microRNA-452-5p (miR-452-5p), and high mobility group box 3 (HMGB3) was detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Flow cytometry was performed to determine the cell cycle distribution. Western blot assay was conducted to measure the protein levels of cyclin D1, p21, p27, E-cadherin, vimentin, and N-cadherin. The interaction between miR-452-5p and SOX2-OT or HMGB3 was predicted by bioinformatics analysis and verified by dual-luciferase reporter assay and RNA immunoprecipitation assay. The mice xenograft model was established to investigate the role of SOX2-OT in vivo. Results: SOX2-OT and HMGB3 were upregulated, whereas miR-452-5p was downregulated in PCa tissues and cells. Knockdown of SOX2-OT inhibited PCa cell growth and metastasis. MiR-452-5p could directly bind to SOX2-OT and its knockdown reversed the inhibitory effects of SOX2-OT interference on growth and metastasis of PCa cells. HMGB3 was a direct target of miR-452-5p and its knockdown weakened the promotive effects of miR-452-5p silence on growth and metastasis of PCa cells. Moreover, HMGB3 expression was inversely regulated by miR-452-5p and positively modulated by SOX2-OT. Furthermore, SOX2-OT activated the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway through increasing HMGB3 expression. Finally, SOX2-OT knockdown hindered tumor growth in vivo by regulating miR-452-5p/HMGB3 axis. Conclusions: SOX2-OT downregulation limited PCa cell growth and metastasis by regulating miR-452-5p/HMGB3 axis and inactivating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which might offer lncRNA-directed diagnosis and therapy for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofei Song
- Department of Urology, Fudan University, Minhang Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Hang Wang
- Department of Urology, Fudan University, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiawen Wu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University, Minhang Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Sun
- Department of Urology, Fudan University, Minhang Hospital, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Boswell TC, Hebert KJ, Tollefson MK, Viers BR. Robotic urethral reconstruction: redefining the paradigm of posterior urethroplasty. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:121-131. [PMID: 32055476 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Outlet procedures for benign prostatic hypertrophy, prostate cancer therapy, and trauma can result in stenosis of the posterior urethra, a complex reconstructive problem that often fails conservative endoscopic management, necessitating more aggressive and definitive reconstructive solutions. This is typically done with an open technique which may require a combined abdominoperineal approach, pubectomy, and/or flap interposition. Implementation of a robot-assisted platform affords several potential advantages including smaller incisions, magnified field of vision, near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging to characterize tissue integrity, enhanced dexterity within the deep and narrow confines of the male pelvis, sparing of the perineal planes, and shorter convalescence. Herein, we describe important surgical considerations for robotic posterior urethral reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Boyd R Viers
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yuan P, Wang S, Liu X, Wang X, Ye Z, Chen Z. The role of cystoprostatectomy in management of locally advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:14. [PMID: 31959170 PMCID: PMC6971978 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-1791-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of cystoprostatectomy for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) was evaluated by a comprehensive review of contemporary literatures. Methods A systematic search of English language literatures using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library, from 1990 to 2018, was performed. Two independent authors reviewed abstracts as well as full-text articles and extracted data from the selected manuscripts. Results After the literature research, seven articles with a total of 211 patients were identified. Both 120 cases who received cystoprostatectomy for the primary treatment of LAPC and 91 cases for the salvage surgery after local recurrence were finally included. Overall incidence of positive surgical margins ranged from 25 to 78%. The incidence of major complications caused by the surgery during the follow-up time was limited. It had been reported that among LAPC patients who received cystoprostatectomy combined with adjuvant therapies, 5-year cancer-specific survival rate and 5-year biochemical progression-free survival was up to 87.1% and 62.2%. Moreover, symptoms such as hematuria and other urination dysfunctions, as well as patients’ quality of life were significantly improved after cystoprostatectomy in LAPC patients with the bladder invasion. Conclusions Cystoprostatectomy can serve as an alternative to the surgical step of multimodal therapy for highly selected LAPC patients with the bladder invasion, which may improve patients’ symptoms and related quality of life. Therefore, cystoprostatectomy as an option for the treatment of LAPC with the bladder invasion may be feasible and safe with considerable survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Yuan
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shen Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiao Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xinguang Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Management of intractable bladder neck strictures following radical prostatectomy using the Memokath ®045 stent. J Robot Surg 2019; 14:621-625. [PMID: 31617064 PMCID: PMC7347512 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01035-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) post radical prostatectomy varies from 1 to 26%. Current treatment can be challenging and includes a variety of different procedures. These range from endoscopic dilations to bladder neck reconstruction to urinary diversion. We investigated a 2-stage endoscopic treatment, using the thermo-expandable Memokath®045 bladder neck stent to manage patients with VUAS post radical prostatectomy. We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients, between 2013 and 2017, who underwent a Memokath®045 stent insertion following failed primary treatment (dilation and clean intermittent catheterisation) for VUAS. The mean interval time between prostatectomy and Memokath®045 stent insertion was 13 months. The mean follow-up time was 3.6 years with all patients having a minimum of 12-month follow-up. All patients had two previous attempts at endoscopic dilatation with or without incision and a trial of clean intermittent catheterisation. During stage 1, the anastomotic stricture is dilated/incised to diameter of 30 Fr, the stricture length is measured, and a catheter is left in situ. One to 2 weeks later, post haemostasis and healing, an appropriately sized Memokath®045 stent is inserted. The stent is then removed 1-year post-op. Our series of patients had a median age of 62 (54–72). Most patients (26) had a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or salvage procedure. Results showed improvement in IPSS scores, IPSS quality of life scores, Qmax and PVR after the Memokath®045 stent was removed compared to pre-operation. With a minimum of 12 months post stent removal, 93% of patients were fully continent, whilst 7% of patients were socially continent. 2 (7%) patients had their stents removed and not replaced due to re-stricturing and stone formation. However, no urinary tract infections, stricture recurrence or urinary retention was observed in the rest of the cohort (93%). Overall, the Memokath®045 stent was successful in treating 93% of our patients with VUAS. Our series had minimal complications that were managed with conservative measures and in three patients’ re-operation was needed. In conclusion, the Memokath®045 stent is a minimally invasive technique with faster recovery time compared to other techniques such as bladder neck reconstruction or urinary diversion. Additionally, it provides superior patency results compared to other techniques such as bladder neck incision and injection of Mitomycin C. Therefore, this management option should be considered in the management of VUAS.
Collapse
|
21
|
Hostiou T, Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Rouvière O, Mège-Lechevalier F, Lafon C, Tonoli-Catez H, Badet L, Crouzet S. Salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound for locally recurrent prostate cancer after low-dose-rate brachytherapy: oncological and functional outcomes. BJU Int 2019; 124:746-757. [PMID: 31148367 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (S-HIFU) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical phase II studies (2003-2015) included 50 consecutive patients with post-brachytherapy local recurrence treated by S-HIFU. S-HIFU was performed with post-external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) parameters and, since 2008, with specific post-brachytherapy parameters. Treatments were whole-gland ablation and, since 2009, hemi-ablation in cases of unilateral prostate cancer. The primary objective was to assess oncological outcomes: treatment failure-free survival, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates. The secondary objective was to evaluate adverse events, continence, and erectile function. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated oncological outcomes. RESULTS In all, 13 patients were treated with post-EBRT parameters, 37 with post-brachytherapy parameters, 35 with whole-gland treatment, and 15 with hemi-ablation. The median follow-up was 4.6 years. After S-HIFU, the median prostate-specific antigen level was 0.3 ng/mL. At 6 years, treatment failure-free survival, PFS, OS, CSS, and MFS rates were 41%, 45%, 93%, 98%, and 80%, respectively. Post-brachytherapy compared with post-EBRT parameters reduced Grade 2-3 incontinence (34% vs 62%, P = 0.015). Incontinence, bladder outlet obstruction and Grade ≥III complications were significantly reduced with hemi-ablation compared with whole-gland treatment (14% vs 54%, P < 0.001; 13% vs 46%, P = 0.03; 13% vs 63%, P = 0.001; respectively). Before S-HIFU, 25 patients had a five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function score of ≥17, which was maintained in 48% at 12 months. CONCLUSION S-HIFU for locally recurrent prostate cancer after LDR brachytherapy is associated with favourable survival rates at a price of significant morbidity. Dedicated post-brachytherapy parameters and hemi-ablation improve the safety of the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hostiou
- Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.,Department of Urology, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,INSERM Unit 1032, LabTau, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Albert Gelet
- Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.,Department of Urology, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,INSERM Unit 1032, LabTau, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Olivier Rouvière
- Department of Urology, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,INSERM Unit 1032, LabTau, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Department of Radiology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | | | - Cyril Lafon
- INSERM Unit 1032, LabTau, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Hélène Tonoli-Catez
- Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Lionel Badet
- Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.,Department of Urology, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Sébastien Crouzet
- Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.,Department of Urology, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,INSERM Unit 1032, LabTau, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Steele EM, Holmes JA. A review of salvage treatment options for disease progression after radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:582-598. [PMID: 31133370 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Recurrence of prostate cancer after initial treatment with radiation therapy (RT) is highly dependent on pretreatment risk group and unfortunately, a proportion of patients fail primary treatment. The treatment of recurrence after primary radiation is rapidly changing with advances in imaging and it is important to distinguish those with a local failure from those with distant failure. If disease remains locally confined, salvage treatment with a variety of techniques can still provide a potential cure. Patients with distant failure are often treated with androgen deprivation, or in those with a shorter life expectancy, conservative management. In patients with a higher burden of metastatic disease, there is emerging evidence that chemotherapy and advanced androgen therapy can improve survival. We review the relevant literature on available salvage treatment options and appropriate patient selection for patients with recurrent prostate cancer after RT. We report on the efficacy and adverse effects of the currently available local salvage modalities including salvage radical prostatectomy, high dose rate and low dose rate brachytherapy, cryotherapy, high intensity focused ultrasound, and stereotactic body RT. We additionally discuss diagnosis of oligometastatic disease on imaging and current approaches to treatment with either radiation or surgery. While a full review of chemotherapy and advanced androgen therapies is beyond the scope of this article we briefly discuss their use in the treatment of newly diagnosed recurrence after radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan M Steele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Jordan A Holmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mohler JL, Halabi S, Ryan ST, Al-Daghmin A, Sokoloff MH, Steinberg GD, Sanford BL, Eastham JA, Walther PJ, Morris MJ, Small EJ. Management of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: long-term results from CALGB 9687 (Alliance), a prospective multi-institutional salvage prostatectomy series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2018; 22:309-316. [PMID: 30385835 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-018-0106-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 09/09/2018] [Accepted: 09/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate efficacy and morbidity prospectively in a contemporary multi-institutional salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) series. METHODS Forty-one men were enrolled between 1997 and 2006, who suffered biopsy-proven recurrent prostate cancer (CaP) after receiving ≥ 60c Gy radiation as primary treatment for cT1-2NXM0 disease. Surgical morbidity, quality of life, biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS Twenty-four men had undergone external beam radiotherapy, 11 brachytherapy, and six both. Median time between radiation and SRP was 64 months. Median age at SRP was 64 years. Pathologic staging revealed 44% pT2, 54% pT3, and 3% pT4. Surgical margins were positive in 17 and 88% were pN0. Twenty-two percent required intraoperative blood transfusion. Three rectal and one obturator nerve injuries occurred. Seventeen of 38 evaluable patients (45%) had urinary incontinence ( ≥ 3 pads/day) prior to SRP; 88% reported urinary incontinence at 6 months, 85% at 12 months, 63% at 24 months after SRP. Furthermore, 37% of men reported impotence prior to SRP; 78% reported impotence at 6 months, 82% at 12 months, and 44% at 24 months after SRP. The 2-, 5- and 10-year BPFS rates were 51, 39, and 33% respectively; the 2-, 5- and 10-year OS rates were 100, 89, and 52%, respectively, at median follow-up 91 months. CONCLUSIONS Modern surgical techniques continue to be associated with significant peri-operative complication rates. Nevertheless, SRP may benefit carefully selected patients through durable oncologic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Mohler
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, CA59518, United States.
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, CA33601, United States
| | - Stephen T Ryan
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Ali Al-Daghmin
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, CA59518, United States
| | | | | | - Ben L Sanford
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, CA33601, United States
| | - James A Eastham
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, CA77651, United States
| | - Philip J Walther
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, CA47577, United States
| | - Michael J Morris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, CA77651, United States
| | - Eric J Small
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, CA60138, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lieng H, Hayden AJ, Christie DRH, Davis BJ, Eade TN, Emmett L, Holt T, Hruby G, Pryor D, Shakespeare TP, Sidhom M, Skala M, Wiltshire K, Yaxley J, Kneebone A. Radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer: 2018 Recommendations of the Australian and New Zealand Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary group. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:377-386. [PMID: 30037499 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The management of patients with biochemical, local, nodal, or oligometastatic relapsed prostate cancer has become more challenging and controversial. Novel imaging modalities designed to detect recurrence are increasingly used, particularly PSMA-PET scans in Australia, New Zealand and some European countries. Imaging techniques such as MRI and PET scans using other prostate cancer-specific tracers are also being utilised across the world. The optimal timing for commencing salvage treatment, and the role of local and/or systemic therapies remains controversial. Through surveys of the membership, the Australian and New Zealand Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Group (FROGG) identified wide variation in the management of recurrent prostate cancer. Following a workshop conducted in April 2017, the FROGG management committee reviewed the literature and developed a set of recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinion, for the appropriate investigation and management of recurrent prostate cancer. These recommendations cover the role and timing of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy, the management of regional nodal metastases and oligometastases, as well as the management of local prostate recurrence after definitive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hester Lieng
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Australia.
| | - Amy J Hayden
- Sydney West Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Australia
| | - David R H Christie
- Genesis Cancer Care, Australia; Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Thomas N Eade
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Australia; Genesis Cancer Care, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia; University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tanya Holt
- University of Queensland, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - George Hruby
- Genesis Cancer Care, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia; University of Sydney, Australia
| | - David Pryor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Thomas P Shakespeare
- North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, Australia; University of New South Wales Rural Clinical School, Australia
| | - Mark Sidhom
- Liverpool Hospital Cancer Therapy Centre, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - John Yaxley
- University of Queensland, Australia; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Wesley Urology Clinic, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Australia; Genesis Cancer Care, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia; University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tisseverasinghe SA, Crook JM. The role of salvage brachytherapy for local relapse after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:414-435. [PMID: 30050801 PMCID: PMC6043745 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.05.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer amongst men. For localized disease, there currently exist several reliable treatment modalities including surgery, radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Our growing understanding of this disease indicates that local control plays a very important role in prevention of subsequent dissemination. Many improvements to external beam radiotherapy over recent years have decreased toxicity and improved outcomes, but nonetheless, local relapse remains common. Many salvage options exist for locally recurrent prostate cancer, but are rarely offered, partly because of the fear of toxicity. Many men with isolated local recurrence therefore do not receive potentially curative second line treatment and are instead treated with palliative androgen suppression. Selection plays an important role in determining which individuals are likely to benefit from salvage. Those at high risk of pre-existing micro-metastatic disease despite negative staging scans are unlikely to benefit. Prostate brachytherapy has evolved over the more than 3 decades of experience. Modern techniques allow more precise tumor localization and dose delivery. Better understanding of dosimetric parameters can distinguish optimal from suboptimal implants. Salvage brachytherapy can be an effective treatment for locally recurrent prostate cancer after prior external beam radiotherapy. We review the literature pertaining to both low dose rate (LDR) and high dose rate (HDR) salvage brachytherapy and discuss patient selection, optimal dose, treatment volume and toxicity avoidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Tisseverasinghe
- BC Cancer Agency Centre for the Southern Interior, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Juanita M Crook
- BC Cancer Agency Centre for the Southern Interior, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Browne BM, Vanni AJ. Management of Urethral Stricture and Bladder Neck Contracture Following Primary and Salvage Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2018; 18:76. [PMID: 28776126 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0729-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article discusses the incidence, evaluation, and treatment of bladder outlet obstruction from urethral stricture, vesicourethral anastomotic stricture, and bladder neck contracture following primary and salvage treatment of prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Rates of stenosis after prostate cancer treatment appear similar across all primary treatment modalities including radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, cryoablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound in contemporary series. Urethral dilation and urethrotomy continue to report moderate patency rates. Urethroplasty achieves high patency rates even for long strictures, but more extensive reconstruction increases the risk of postoperative urinary incontinence. Recent AUA guidelines on urethral strictures provide new recommendations for management of these patients. All treatment options for prostate cancer carry a risk for bladder outlet obstruction, and intervention is often necessary to relieve long-lasting morbidity. Careful preoperative evaluation should be completed to assess location and extent of the stricture in order to choose optimal therapy. Endoscopic treatments, open reconstruction, and urinary diversion all play a role in relief of stenosis depending on stricture length, location, characteristics, and patient comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Michael Browne
- Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA
| | - Alex J Vanni
- Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Leroy T, Lacornerie T, Bogart E, Nickers P, Lartigau E, Pasquier D. Salvage robotic SBRT for local prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy: preliminary results of the Oscar Lambret Center. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:95. [PMID: 28599663 PMCID: PMC5466739 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0833-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2016] [Accepted: 06/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, there is no standard option for local salvage treatment for local prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy. Our objective was to investigate the feasibility and efficiency of Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in this clinical setting. METHODS/MATERIALS We retrospectively reviewed patients who were treated at our institution with SBRT for local prostate cancer recurrence after External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy. Multidisciplinary staff approved the treatment, and recurrence was biopsy-proven when feasible. A dose of 36 Gy was prescribed in six fractions. Treatment was delivered every other day. RESULTS Between August 2011 and February 2014, 23 patients were treated with SBRT for intra-prostate cancer recurrence with a median follow up of 22 months (6 to 40). Twenty patients had biopsy-proven recurrence. For 19 patients, EBRT was the initial treatment and in four patients, brachytherapy was the initial treatment; the median relapse-time from initial treatment was 65 months (28 to 150). At relapse, 10 patients had an extra-capsular extension. Fourteen patients were treated with androgen deprivation that could be stopped after a median of 1 month after SBRT (range 0-24). A PSA decrease occurred in 82.6% of the patients after SBRT. The 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 54 and 100%, respectively. Disease progression was observed for nine patients (39.1%) (five local, three metastatic and one nodal progression) after a median of 20 months (7-40 months). The median nadir PSA was 0.35 ng/ml and was achieved after a median of 8 months (1 to 30) after treatment. We observed no grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Two patients presented with grade 3 toxicities (two Cystitis and one neuralgia). Other toxicities included urinary toxicities (five grade 2 and nine grade 1) and rectal toxicities (two grade 2 and two grade 1). CONCLUSION SBRT for local prostate cancer recurrence seems feasible and well tolerated with a short follow up. Prospective evaluation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Leroy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020 Lille cedex, France
| | - Thomas Lacornerie
- Department of Radiation Physics, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020 Lille cedex, France
| | - Emilie Bogart
- Department of Statistic, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020 Lille cedex, France
| | - Philippe Nickers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020 Lille cedex, France
| | - Eric Lartigau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020 Lille cedex, France
- Université de Lille-CRIStAL UMR 9189, 59650 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020 Lille cedex, France
- Université de Lille-CRIStAL UMR 9189, 59650 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Crouzet S, Blana A, Murat FJ, Pasticier G, Brown SCW, Conti GN, Ganzer R, Chapet O, Gelet A, Chaussy CG, Robertson CN, Thuroff S, Ward JF. Salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after failed radiation therapy: Multi-institutional analysis of 418 patients. BJU Int 2017; 119:896-904. [PMID: 28063191 DOI: 10.1111/bju.13766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the oncological outcome of salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (S-HIFU) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) from a multicentre database. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study comprises patients from nine centres with local recurrent disease after EBRT treated with S-HIFU from 1995 to 2009. The biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) rate was based on the 'Phoenix' definition (PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL). Secondary endpoints included progression to metastasis and cancer-specific death. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed examining overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Adverse events and quality of life status are reported. RESULTS In all, 418 patients with a mean (SD) follow-up of 3.5 (2.5) years were included. The mean (SD) age was 68.6 (5.8) years and the PSA level before S-HIFU was 6.8 (7.8) ng/mL. The median PSA nadir after S-HIFU was 0.19 ng/mL. The OS, CSS and MFS rates at 7 years were 72%, 82% and 81%, respectively. At 5 years the bFFS rate was 58%, 51% and 36% for pre-EBRT low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. The 5-year bFFS rate was 67%, 42% and 22% for pre-S-HIFU PSA level ≤4, 4-10 and ≥10 ng/mL, respectively. Complication rates decreased after the introduction of specific post-RT parameters: incontinence (grade II or III) from 32% to 19% (P = 0.002); bladder outlet obstruction or stenosis from 30% to 15% (P = 0.003); recto-urethral fistula decreased from 9% to 0.6% (P < 0.001). Study limitations include being a retrospective analysis from a registry with no control group. CONCLUSION S-HIFU for locally recurrent prostate cancer after failed EBRT is associated with 7-year CSS and MFS rates of >80% at a price of significant morbidity. S-HIFU should be initiated early following EBRT failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andreas Blana
- Department of Urology, Fuerth Hospital, Fürth, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Roman Ganzer
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lyon Sud Hospital, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Albert Gelet
- Department of Urology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Stefan Thuroff
- Department of Urology, Harlaching Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - John F Ward
- Department of Urology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tetreault-Laflamme A, Crook J. Options for Salvage of Radiation Failures for Prostate Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2017; 27:67-78. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2016.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
30
|
Jiang P, van der Horst C, Kimmig B, Zinsser F, Poppe B, Luetzen U, Juenemann KP, Dunst J, Siebert FA. Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy as salvage treatment for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiation therapy: Toxicity and 5-year outcome. Brachytherapy 2016; 16:186-192. [PMID: 28341011 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2016] [Revised: 09/18/2016] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report our results with interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as a salvage therapy option after external beam therapy with or without BT. Emphasis was put on toxicity and 5-year outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 2003 to 2011, 29 patients with local failure after previous radiotherapy for prostate cancer were treated with salvage interstitial HDR-BT. The diagnosis of local recurrence was made on the basis of choline positron emission tomography. Salvage HDR-BT was given in three fractions with a single dose of 10 Gy per fraction and weekly. The target volume covered the peripheral zone of the prostate and the positron emission tomography-positive area. Acute and late toxicities were documented according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v 4.0). RESULTS Twenty-two patients with minimum followup of 60 months were analyzed. The 5-year overall survival was 95.5% with a disease-specific survival of 100%. The 5-year biochemical control was 45%. Late grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in two patients (9%). No grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal late toxicities were observed. Urinary incontinence found in 2 patients (9%) and grade 2 obstruction of urinary tract occurred in one patient (4%). CONCLUSIONS Interstitial HDR-BT was feasible and effective in the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy. The long-term toxicity was low and acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| | | | - Bernhard Kimmig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Fabian Zinsser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Bjoern Poppe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius-Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Ulf Luetzen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Klaus-Peter Juenemann
- Department of Urology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Juergen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Frank-André Siebert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Editorial Comment. Urology 2016; 98:175. [PMID: 27633974 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
32
|
Zdrojowy R, Dembowski J, Małkiewicz B, Tupikowski K, Krajewski W. Salvage local therapy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer - where are we? Cent European J Urol 2016; 69:264-270. [PMID: 27729992 PMCID: PMC5057051 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2016.832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Revised: 05/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer among males in Europe and a leading cause of cancer deaths, with similar proportion in other developed countries. For more than twenty years, external-beam radiation therapy, alongside with radical prostatectomy, has been used as a primary radical therapeutic approach for localized prostate cancer. Yet, EBRT failures relate to 22-69% following curative radiotherapy (± androgen deprivation therapy). Additionally, a proportion of these men will have a biopsy-proven local recurrence. MATERIAL AND METHODS The Medline and Web of Science databases were searched without a time limit during March 2016 using the terms 'prostate cancer' in conjunction with 'radiotherapy', 'recurrence', 'biochemical', 'salvage', 'brachytherapy', 'prostatectomy', 'HIFU', 'cryotherapy' and 'focal'. The search was limited to the English, Polish, German and Spanish literature. RESULTS Currently, salvage treatment after failed radiotherapy includes radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy and ablative whole-gland therapies, such as cryotherapy and high intensity focused ultrasound. New approaches, so called focal salvage therapy, involve ablation of only the zone of recurrence in order to decrease tissue injury and therefore to diminish morbidity. CONCLUSIONS At present no authoritative recommendations can be concluded because of the absence of randomized data with standardized definitions and protocols. Nevertheless, we believe that local salvage treatment should be at least considered in patients after biochemical relapse following radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romuald Zdrojowy
- Urology and Oncologic Urology Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Janusz Dembowski
- Urology and Oncologic Urology Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Urology and Oncologic Urology Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Tupikowski
- Urology and Oncologic Urology Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Urology and Oncologic Urology Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wojcieszek P, Szlag M, Głowacki G, Cholewka A, Gawkowska-Suwińska M, Kellas-Ślęczka S, Białas B, Fijałkowski M. Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy failure. Radiother Oncol 2016; 119:405-10. [PMID: 27165612 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2015] [Revised: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) as a salvage modality for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-three prostate cancer patients, who locally relapsed after radiotherapy, were treated with salvage HDR BT. The schedule was three implantations, every two weeks, with 10Gy per implant, to a total dose of 30Gy. Acute and late toxicity rates were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and biochemical control were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Median follow-up after salvage HDR was 41months. The 3-year and 5-year OS were 93% and 86%, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) were 76% and 67%, respectively. The single factor associated with biochemical control was time to achieve salvage PSA nadir (p-.006). OS was linked significantly with primary nadir level (p-.001) while primary biochemical relapse interval was of borderline significance (p-.07). CONCLUSIONS Salvage HDR BT is a promising treatment option for patients with localized relapse of previously irradiated prostate cancer. Lower PSA nadir after primary radiotherapy and longer primary disease-free interval influence the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Wojcieszek
- Brachytherapy Department, MSC Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Ul. Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
| | - Marta Szlag
- Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy Treatment Planning Department, MSC Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Ul. Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Głowacki
- Radiotherapy Department, MSC Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Ul. Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Cholewka
- Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy Treatment Planning Department, MSC Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Ul. Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Marzena Gawkowska-Suwińska
- III Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, MSC Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Ul. Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Sylwia Kellas-Ślęczka
- Brachytherapy Department, MSC Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Ul. Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Brygida Białas
- Brachytherapy Department, MSC Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Ul. Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Marek Fijałkowski
- Brachytherapy Department, MSC Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Ul. Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Focal salvage therapy for local prostate cancer recurrences after primary radiotherapy: a comprehensive review. World J Urol 2016; 34:1521-1531. [PMID: 27012712 PMCID: PMC5063906 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1811-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2015] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aim Patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy can be eligible for salvage treatment. Whole-gland salvage techniques carry a high risk of toxicity. A focal salvage approach might reduce the risk of adverse events while maintaining cancer control in carefully selected patients. The aim of this review was to evaluate current literature to assess whether focal salvage leads to a comparable or favourable recurrence rate and less toxicity compared to whole-gland salvage. Methods A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. A total of 3015 articles were screened and assessed for quality. Eight papers [on focal cryoablation (n = 3), brachytherapy (n = 3) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (n = 2)] were used to report outcomes. Results One-, 2-, 3- and 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) ranges for focal salvage are, respectively, 69–100, 49–100, 50–91 and 46.5–54.5 %. Severe genitourinary, gastrointestinal and sexual function toxicity rates are 0–33.3 %. One study directly compares focal to whole-gland salvage cryotherapy, showing 5-year BDFS of, respectively, 54.4 and 86.5 % with lower toxicity rates for focal salvage patients. Conclusion Provisional data suggest that BDFS rates of focal salvage are in line with those of whole-gland approaches. There is evidence that focal salvage could decrease severe toxicity and preserve erectile function. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00345-016-1811-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
35
|
Salvage Brachytherapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer following Primary Brachytherapy. Prostate Cancer 2016; 2016:9561494. [PMID: 27092279 PMCID: PMC4820628 DOI: 10.1155/2016/9561494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2015] [Revised: 01/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose. In this study, we evaluated our experience with salvage brachytherapy after discovery of biochemical recurrence after a prior brachytherapy procedure. Methods and Materials. From 2001 through 2012 twenty-one patients treated by brachytherapy within University of Kentucky or from outside centers developed biochemical failure and had no evidence of metastases. Computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated; patients who had an underseeded portion of their prostate were considered for reimplantation. Results. The majority of the patients in this study (61.9%) were low risk and median presalvage PSA was 3.49 (range 17.41-1.68). Mean follow-up was 61 months. At last follow-up after reseeding, 11/21 (52.4%) were free of biochemical recurrence. There was a trend towards decreased freedom from biochemical recurrence in low risk patients (p = 0.12). International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) increased at 3-month follow-up visits but decreased and were equivalent to baseline scores at 18 months. Conclusions. Salvage brachytherapy after primary brachytherapy is possible; however, in our experience the side-effect profile after the second brachytherapy procedure was higher than after the first brachytherapy procedure. In this cohort of patients we demonstrate that approximately 50% oncologic control, low risk patients appear to have better outcomes than others.
Collapse
|
36
|
Thiruthaneeswaran N, Hoskin PJ. High dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Standard of care and future direction. Cancer Radiother 2016; 20:66-72. [PMID: 26811209 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2015] [Revised: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 12/16/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
High dose rate brachytherapy is a highly conformal method of radiation dose escalation for prostate cancer and one of several treatment options for men with localised disease. The large doses per fraction exploit the low alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer cells so that biological radiation dose delivered is substantially greater than that achieved with conventional external beam delivery. This review article presents contemporary data on the rationale for high dose rate brachytherapy including treatment technique and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Thiruthaneeswaran
- Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, HA6 2RN, United Kingdom
| | - P J Hoskin
- Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, HA6 2RN, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Salvage Therapy for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer After External Beam Radiation Therapy. Prostate Cancer 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800077-9.00050-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
38
|
Al-Shraideh Y, Sejpal SV, Meeks JJ. Radiation-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Salvage Prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800077-9.00031-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
39
|
Vora A, Agarwal V, Singh P, Patel R, Rivas R, Nething J, Muruve N. Single-institution comparative study on the outcomes of salvage cryotherapy versus salvage robotic prostatectomy for radio-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Int 2015; 4:7-10. [PMID: 27014657 PMCID: PMC4789332 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2015.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Revised: 11/14/2015] [Accepted: 11/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although primary treatment of localized prostate cancer provides excellent oncologic control, some men who chose radiotherapy experience a recurrence of disease. There is no consensus on the most appropriate management of these patients after radiotherapy failure. In this single-institution review, we compare our oncologic outcome and toxicity between salvage prostatectomy and cryotherapy treatments. METHODS From January 2004 to June 2013, a total of 23 salvage procedures were performed. Six of those patients underwent salvage prostatectomy while 17 underwent salvage cryotherapy by two high-volume fellowship-trained urologists. Patients being considered for salvage therapy had localized disease at presentation, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/mL at recurrence, life expectancy > 10 years at recurrence, and a negative metastatic workup. Patients were followed to observe cancer progression and toxicity of treatment. RESULTS Patients who underwent salvage cryotherapy were statistically older with a higher incidence of hypertension than our salvage prostatectomy cohort. With a mean follow up of 14.1 months and 7.2 months, the incidence of disease progression was 23.5% and 16.7% after salvage cryotherapy and prostatectomy, respectively. The overall complication rate was also 23.5% versus 16.7%, with the most frequent complication after salvage cryotherapy being urethral stricture and after salvage prostatectomy being severe urinary incontinence. There were no rectal injuries with salvage prostatectomy and one rectourethral fistula in the cohort after salvage cryotherapy. CONCLUSION While recurrences from primary radiotherapy for prostate cancer do occur, there is no consensus on its management. In our experience, salvage procedures were generally safe and effective. Both salvage cryotherapy and salvage prostatectomy allow for adequate cancer control with minimal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anup Vora
- Chesapeake Urology Associates, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Vidhi Agarwal
- Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Urology, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Prabhjot Singh
- Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Urology, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Rupen Patel
- Eastern Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Rodolfo Rivas
- Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Urology, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Josh Nething
- Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Urology, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Nic Muruve
- Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Urology, Weston, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015; 13:291-304. [PMID: 26598944 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Chromosome instability (CIN) is gaining increasing interest as a central process in cancer. CIN, either past or present, is indicated whenever tumour cells harbour an abnormal quantity of DNA, termed 'aneuploidy'. At present, the most widely used approach to detecting aneuploidy is DNA cytometry - a well-known research assay that involves staining of DNA in the nuclei of cells from a tissue sample, followed by analysis using quantitative flow cytometry or microscopic imaging. Aneuploidy in cancer tissue has been implicated as a predictor of a poor prognosis. In this Review, we have explored this hypothesis by surveying the current landscape of peer-reviewed research in which DNA cytometry has been applied in studies with disease-appropriate clinical follow up. This area of research is broad, however, and we restricted our survey to results published since 2000 relating to seven common epithelial cancers (those of the breast; endometrium, ovary, and uterine cervix; oesophagus; colon and rectum; lung; prostate; and bladder). We placed particular emphasis on results from multivariate analyses to pinpoint situations in which the prognostic value of aneuploidy as a biomarker is strong compared with that of existing indicators, such as clinical stage, histological grade, and specific molecular markers. We summarize the implications of our findings for the prognostic use of ploidy analysis in the clinic and for the theoretical understanding of the role of CIN in carcinogenesis.
Collapse
|
41
|
Salomon L, Ploussard G, Hennequin C, Richaud P, Soulié M. Traitements complémentaires de la chirurgie du cancer de la prostate et chirurgie de la récidive. Prog Urol 2015; 25:1086-107. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
42
|
Boyd KA, Jones RJ, Paul J, Birrell F, Briggs AH, Leung HY. Decision analytic cost-effectiveness model to compare prostate cryotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy for treatment of radiation recurrent prostate cancer. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e007925. [PMID: 26482768 PMCID: PMC4611206 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the cost-effectiveness of salvage cryotherapy (SC) in men with radiation recurrent prostate cancer (RRPC). DESIGN Cost-utility analysis using decision analytic modelling by a Markov model. SETTING AND METHODS Compared SC and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in a cohort of patients with RRPC (biopsy proven local recurrence, no evidence of metastatic disease). A literature review captured published data to inform the decision model, and resource use data were from the Scottish Prostate Cryotherapy Service. The model was run in monthly cycles for RRPC men, mean age of 70 years. The model was run over the patient lifetime, to assess changes in patient health states and the associated quality of life, survival and cost impacts. Results are reported in terms of the discounted incremental costs and discounted incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained between the 2 alternative interventions. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis used a 10,000 iteration Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS SC has a high upfront treatment cost, but delays the ongoing monthly cost of ADT. SC is the dominant strategy over the patient lifetime; it is more effective with an incremental 0.56 QALY gain (95% CI 0.28 to 0.87), and less costly with a reduced lifetime cost of £29,719 (€37,619) (95% CI -51,985 to -9243). For a ceiling ratio of £30,000, SC has a 100% probability to be cost-effective. The cost neutral point was at 3.5 years, when the upfront cost of SC (plus any subsequent cumulative cost of side effects and ADT) equates the cumulative cost in the ADT arm. Limitations of our model may arise from its insensitivity to parameter or structural uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS The platform for SC versus ADT cost-effective analysis can be employed to evaluate other treatment modalities or strategies in RRPC. SC is the dominant strategy, costing less over a patient's lifetime with improvements in QALYs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This economic analysis was undertaken as part of the CROP RCT study ISRCTN 72677390; it was a pre-trial economic model developed and analysed during the pre-results stage of the RCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen A Boyd
- Health Economics & Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rob J Jones
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jim Paul
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Fiona Birrell
- Department of Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew H Briggs
- Health Economics & Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Hing Y Leung
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Glasgow, UK
- Department of Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
- Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Bearsden, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Philippou Y, Parker RA, Volanis D, Gnanapragasam VJ. Comparative Oncologic and Toxicity Outcomes of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy Versus Nonsurgical Therapies for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Regression Analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2015; 2:158-171. [PMID: 28723532 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2015.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Revised: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT In the absence of randomised controlled trials comparing the oncologic, toxicity, and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP), salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (SHIFU), salvage brachytherapy (SBT), and salvage cryotherapy (SCT), controversy exists as to the optimal salvage modality in radiorecurrent prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE We carried out a meta-regression analysis to determine whether there is a difference in oncologic, toxicity, and functional outcomes using data from original publications of salvage modalities in the postradiation setting. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic review of PubMed/Medline citations according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. We included 63 articles in the analysis (25 on SRP, 8 on SHIFU, 16 on SCT, 14 on SBT). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Median values of the following variables were extracted from each study: patient age, length of follow-up, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) before radiotherapy (RT), PSA before salvage therapy, Gleason score before RT, and time interval between RT and salvage therapy. Functional, toxicity, and oncologic outcomes were measured according to rates of impotence, incontinence, fistula formation, urethral strictures, and biochemical recurrence. Meta-regression adjusting for confounders found no significant difference in oncologic outcomes between SRP and nonsurgical salvage modalities. SBT, SCT, and SHIFU appeared to have better continence outcomes than SRP. No significant difference in toxicity outcomes between modalities was found, although limitations such as reporting, selection, and publication bias and between-study heterogeneity must also be considered with these conclusions. CONCLUSIONS Oncologic outcomes are comparable for SRP and all three nonsurgical salvage modalities. We found no significant differences in toxicity outcomes among modalities; however, SRP appears to be associated with worse rates of urinary incontinence than SBT, SCT, and SHIFU. PATIENT SUMMARY We performed a meta-regression analysis to compare oncologic, functional, and toxicity outcomes between salvage radical prostatectomy and nonsurgical salvage modalities. Oncologic and toxicity outcomes appear to be similar; however, all nonsurgical salvage modalities may be associated with better continence outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiannis Philippou
- Department of Surgery, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital, Essex, UK
| | - Richard A Parker
- Health Services Research Unit University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vincent J Gnanapragasam
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's University Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Academic Urology Group, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Salvage low-dose-rate permanent seed brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer: Association between dose and late toxicity. Brachytherapy 2015; 14:342-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2014] [Revised: 01/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
45
|
Matei DV, Ferro M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Renne G, Crisan N, Bottero D, Mazzarella C, Terracciano D, Autorino R, De Cobelli O. Salvage radical prostatectomy after external beam radiation therapy: a systematic review of current approaches. Urol Int 2015; 94:373-82. [PMID: 25765848 DOI: 10.1159/000371893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a standard treatment for prostate cancer patients. Despite this, the rate of intraprostatic relapses after primary EBRT is still not negligible. There is no consensus on the most appropriate management of these patients after EBRT failure. For these patients, local salvage therapy such as radical prostatectomy, cryotherapy, and brachytherapy may be indicated. OBJECTIVE The objectives of this review were to analyze the eligibility criteria for careful selection of appropriate patients and to evaluate the oncological results and complications for each method. METHODS A review of the literature was performed to identify studies of local salvage therapy for patients who had failed primary EBRT for localized prostate cancer. RESULTS Most studies demonstrated that local salvage therapy after EBRT may provide long-term local control in appropriately selected patients, although toxicity is often significant. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that for localized prostate cancer recurrence after EBRT, the selection of a local treatment modality should be made on a patient-by-patient basis. An improvement in selection criteria and an integrated definition of biochemical failure for all salvage methods are required to determine which provides the best oncological outcome and least comorbidity.
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Failure of non-surgical primary treatment for localized prostate cancer is a common occurrence, with rates of disease recurrence ranging from 20% to 60%. In a large proportion of patients, disease recurrence is clinically localized and therefore potentially curable. Unfortunately, due to the complex and potentially morbid nature of salvage treatment, radical salvage surgery is uncommonly performed. In an attempt to decrease the morbidity of salvage therapy without sacrificing oncologic efficacy, a number of experienced centers have utilized robotic assistance to perform minimally invasive salvage radical prostatectomy. Herein, we critically evaluate the existing literature on salvage robotic radical prostatectomy with a focus on patient selection, perioperative complications and functional and early oncologic outcomes. These results are compared with contemporary and historical open salvage radical prostatectomy series and supplemented with insights we have gained from our experience with salvage robotic radical prostatectomy. The body of evidence by which conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of robotic salvage radical prostatectomy can be drawn comprises fewer than 200 patients with limited follow-up. Preliminary results are promising and some outcomes have been favorable when compared with contemporary open salvage prostatectomy series. Advantages of the robotic platform in the performance of salvage radical prostatectomy include decreased blood loss, short length of stay and improved visualization. Greater experience is required to confirm the long-term oncologic efficacy and functional outcomes as well as the generalizability of results achieved at experienced centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel D Kaffenberger
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, A1302 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37215, United States
| | - Joseph A Smith
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, A1302 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37215, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Radiotherapy before and after radical prostatectomy for high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2014; 33:226-34. [PMID: 25454485 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2014] [Revised: 09/26/2014] [Accepted: 09/29/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Men with localized high-risk prostate cancer carry significant risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality. The best treatment approach to minimize this risk is unclear. In this review, we evaluate the role of radiation before and after radical prostatectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS A critical review of the literature was performed regarding the application of external radiation therapy (RT) in combination with prostatectomy for high-risk localized prostate cancer. RESULTS Up to 70% of men with high-risk localized disease may require adjuvant therapy because of adverse pathologic features or biochemical recurrence in the absence of systemic disease. The utility of adjuvant RT among men with adverse pathologic features are well established at least regarding minimizing biochemical recurrence risk. The optimal timing of salvage radiation is the subject of ongoing studies. Neoadjuvant RT requires further study but is a potentially attractive method because of decreased radiation field sizes and potential radiobiologic benefits of delivering RT before surgery. Salvage prostatectomy is effective at treating local recurrence after radiation but is associated with significant surgical morbidity. CONCLUSIONS Combining local therapies including radical prostatectomy and RT can be a reasonable approach. Care should be taken at the initial presentation of high-risk localized prostate cancer to consider and plan for the likelihood of multimodality care.
Collapse
|
48
|
Soulié M, Salomon L. Traitements de rattrapage après irradiation prostatique : place de l’urologue. Cancer Radiother 2014; 18:535-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2014] [Revised: 06/26/2014] [Accepted: 06/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
49
|
Salvage low-dose-rate (125)I partial prostate brachytherapy after dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2014; 6:304-10. [PMID: 25337135 PMCID: PMC4200181 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2014.45134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2014] [Revised: 07/17/2014] [Accepted: 09/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report outcomes on 5 patients treated with salvage partial low-dose-rate (LDR) 125-iodine (125I) permanent prostate seed brachytherapy (BT) for biopsy-proven locally persistent prostate cancer, following failure of dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Material and methods A retrospective review of the Fox Chase Cancer Center prostate cancer database identified five patients treated with salvage partial LDR 125I seed implant for locally persistent disease following dose-escalated EBRT to 76-84 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction equivalent. All patients had post-EBRT biopsies confirming unilateral locally persistent prostate cancer. Pre-treatment, EBRT and BT details, as well as post-treatment characteristics were documented and assessed. Results The median follow-up post-implant was 41 months. All five patients exhibited low acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities. Increased erectile dysfunction was noted in three patients. There were no biochemical failures following salvage LDR 125I seed BT to date, with a median post-salvage PSA of 0.4 ng/mL. Conclusions In carefully selected patients with local persistence of disease, partial LDR 125I permanent prostate seed implant appears to be a feasible option for salvage local therapy with an acceptable toxicity profile. Further study is needed to determine long-term results of this approach.
Collapse
|
50
|
Retreatment for prostate cancer with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): Feasible or foolhardy? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2014; 20:425-9. [PMID: 26696782 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2014] [Revised: 06/26/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The most popular therapeutic option in the management of radio-recurrent prostatic carcinoma is represented by the androgen deprivation therapy, that however should be considered only palliative and hampered by potential adverse effects of testosterone suppression. Local therapies such as surgery, cryoablation or brachytherapy might be curative choices for patients in good conditions and with a long-life expectancy, but at cost of significant risk of failure and severe toxicity. The administration of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in this setting have come about because of tremendous technologic advances in image guidance and treatment delivery techniques that enable the delivery of large doses to tumor with reduced margins and high gradients outside the target, thereby reducing the volume of rectum which already received significant doses from primary radiotherapy. So far, very modest data are available to support its employment. Rationale, clinical experience, and challenges are herein reviewed and discussed.
Collapse
|