Follow-up care after a diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in an Asian immigrant cohort

Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease: A retrospective analysis of post-treatment testing practices

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Guidelines recommend that patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-associated peptic ulcer disease (PUD) receive H. pylori eradication therapy followed by post-treatment testing to prove eradication; however, post-treatment testing rates are suboptimal and barriers to testing are poorly understood. Our aim was to identify factors that predicted receipt of post-treatment testing.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 152 patients with H. pylori-associated PUD diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 at a large tertiary medical center in the United States, who received standard eradication therapy and ambulatory follow-up within one year. The primary outcome of interest was receipt of post-treatment testing. Logistic regression models compared post-treatment testing rates in those diagnosed while outpatient vs inpatient, patients with vs without repeat endoscopy, and patients with vs without gastroenterology (GI) clinic follow-up. Propensity scores controlled for age, sex, race, ulcer location, and symptom persistence.

RESULTS

Among 152 patients, 67 (44%) patients received post-treatment testing. There were significant differences in post-treatment testing rates in those diagnosed as outpatients vs inpatients (57% vs 33%; OR 3.87, P = 0.001) and in patients with vs without GI follow-up (62% vs 11%; OR 9.85, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of testing for eradication after treatment in patients with H. pylori- associated PUD was low. However, this was significantly improved in patients who have GI follow-up and whose diagnosis was made in the outpatient setting. Our study demonstrates a clear opportunity for quality improvement initiatives.

How well is Helicobacter pylori treated in usual practice?

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori is a WHO class I carcinogen also associated with nonmalignant gastrointestinal diseases. Effective treatment exists, and all persons infected with H pylori should receive treatment. However, data regarding the rates of treatment prescription in clinical practice are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rates of H pylori treatment in usual practice.

METHODS

Patients with histological evidence of H pylori infection between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2007, at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Toronto, Ontario) were identified. Charts were reviewed to determine the rates of H pylori treatment and confirmation of eradication, when indicated. Questionnaires were subsequently sent to endoscopists of patients identified as not having received treatment to determine the reasons for lack of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were H pylori positive and were appropriate candidates for treatment, of whom 58 (57%) were male and 78 (76%) were outpatients, with 92 (90%) receiving eradication therapy. When indicated, 15 of 22 (68%) patients received confirmation of eradication, 13 of 18 (72%) patients underwent repeat endoscopy and 86% received complete therapy. Outpatients were more likely to receive eradication therapy (OR 10.3 [95% CI 2.6 to 40.4]; P=0.001) and complete therapy (OR 13.2 [95% CI 3.8 to 45.7]; P=0.0001) compared with inpatients. Having a follow-up appointment resulted in higher treatment rates (OR 12.0 [95% CI 3.0 to 47.5]; P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

During the time period studied, adequate rates of H pylori treatment were achieved in outpatients and patients who had formal follow-up at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. However, some aspects of care remain suboptimal including treatment of inpatients and care following treatment. Additional studies are required to identify strategies to improve the care of patients infected with H pylori.

Acceptance of repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy to detect gastric cancer in a Chinese immigrant cohort

GOAL

To study the feasibility of using repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) to screen for Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer in an Asian immigrant cohort.

BACKGROUND

Immigrants in the United States (US) from countries with high per capita rates of gastric cancer remain at higher risk for gastric cancer. The existence of the possibly modifiable risk factor of H. pylori infection and the poor outcomes associated with late-stage disease make screening higher-risk groups with EGD an appealing possibility. It is unknown whether Asian immigrants in the US would accept an EGD-based strategy for gastric cancer screening.

STUDY

Cross-sectional study of adult Chinese immigrants in New York City with dyspepsia who underwent EGD in an earlier gastric cancer detection study, who were offered a second EGD four years later. Our main outcome measure was acceptance or refusal of repeat EGD.

RESULTS

Seventy-three of the 115 Chinese participants in the earlier study were successfully contacted for this current study. Twenty-three of 73 (32%) underwent repeat EGD. Leading reasons given for declining were lack of symptoms and lack of time. Significantly associated with acceptance of repeat EGD was the belief that EGD will find stomach cancer "nearly always" in someone who has it (P=0.0054; odds ratio=14.0, 2.1 to 94.2 95% confidence interval).

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptance of repeat EGD for gastric cancer detection in a cohort of Chinese immigrants was relatively low despite the mitigation of cost and language factors, 2 major barriers to healthcare access. Relocation seemed to be a factor as well. In this population, perceptions of the benefits of EGD may influence acceptance of testing for cancer detection purposes.