Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in medical patients

Incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism according to primary treatment type in women with endometrial cancer: a population-based study

Background

Current prophylaxes and treatments for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women with gynecologic cancer are mainly guided by studies on solid cancers because studies in gynecologic cancer did not provide sufficient data. Large-scale studies evaluating the incidence and risk of VTE according to therapeutic modality may guide prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in gynecologic cancer. This study was performed to determine the incidence and risk of VTE according to primary treatment type in Korean women with endometrial cancer.

Methods

We selected 26,256 women newly diagnosed with endometrial cancer between 2009 and 2018 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. During the total follow-up period and first six months after primary treatments initiation, the incidence and risk of VTE were evaluated according to primary treatment type, that is, no treatment, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or hormone therapy.

Results

VTE occurred in 136 per 10,000 women during the total follow-up period and in 54 per 10,000 women during the first six months with the highest frequency in women that underwent chemotherapy. During the first year, the monthly incidence of VTE decreased with time among women that underwent no treatment, surgery, or hormone therapy and remained unchanged in those that received radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Compared with women that received no treatment, VTE risk, especially of PE significantly increased in women that underwent chemotherapy (VTE: hazard ratio (HR), 2.334; 95% CI, 1.38–3.949; P = 0.002) (PE: HR, 2.742; 95% CI, 1.424–5.278; P = 0.003) or hormone therapy (VTE: HR, 2.073; 95% CI, 1.356–3.17; P = 0.001) (PE: HR, 2.086; 95% CI, 1.19–3.657; P = 0.01) during the total follow-up period and women that underwent only chemotherapy during the first six months (VTE: HR, 2.532; 95% CI, 1.291–4.966; P = 0.007) (PE: HR, 3.366; 95% CI, 1.496–7.576; P = 0.003).

Conclusions

In this cohort study, the incidence and risk of VTE were highest in women with endometrial cancer that underwent chemotherapy as a primary treatment. Notably, the incidence of VTE decreased over time in women that received no treatment, surgery, or hormone therapy. This study can help guide therapies for prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in women with endometrial cancer.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08853-x.

Optional Vena Cava Filters: What, Why, and When

Optional vena cava filters can used to provide either short-term or permanent protection from pulmonary embolism. These devices have recently become available for clinical use in the United States. However, there remains a paucity of data about these devices and their outcomes. This article reviews current and future devices, the rationale behind non-permanent caval filtration, and the generally accepted guidelines for their clinical application.

Permanent versus Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Rethinking the "One-Filter-for-All" Approach to Mechanical Thromboembolic Prophylaxis

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filtration for thromboembolic protection is not without risks, and there are important differences among commercially available IVC filters. While retrievable filters are approved for permanent implantation, they may be associated with higher device-related complications in the long term when compared with permanent filters. Prospective patient selection in determining which patients might be better served by permanent or retrievable filter devices is central to resource optimization, in addition to improved clinical follow-up and a concerted effort to retrieve filters when no longer needed. This article highlights the differences between permanent and retrievable devices, describes the interplay between these differences and the clinical indications for IVC filtration, advises against a "one-filter-for-all" approach to mechanical thromboembolic prophylaxis, and discusses strategies for optimizing personalized device selection.

Pattern of Venous Thromboembolism Occurrence in Gynecologic Malignancy: Incidence, Timing, and Distribution a 10-Year Retrospective Single-institutional Study

The aim of this single-institutional 10-year retrospective study was to investigate the clinical pattern (incidence, type, timing, and location) of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Chinese patients with gynecologic cancer. Cases were identified by searching institutional Electronic Discharge Database. A comprehensive review of medical documentation was then performed to collect relevant data. The detection of VTE was symptom-triggered. A total of 155 VTE events were identified out of 7562 cases over the past 10-year period in our hospital. The incidence of clinically significant VTE was 2.0% in gynecologic malignancy, with vulvar cancer (3.7%) and ovarian cancer (2.5%) being the high-risk types (P = 0.01, Chi-square test). Perioperative period (35.1%) and preoperation (29.1%) were the 2 incidence peaks. Seventeen cases of pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred prior to surgery. Ovarian cancer patients were more likely to present preoperative PE compared to other site of cancer (76.4%; P = 0.01, Chi-square test). More preoperative VTE cases were complicated by PE than those in the perioperative period (39.5% vs 17.3%, P = 0.02, Chi-square test). Bilateral lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) accounted for 32.6% and there existed a preponderance of left-sided DVT (47.5% vs 17.0%, ratio 2.79:1). Femoral vein (36.6%) was the most common location for DVT. About 2.0% of the Chinese patients with gynecologic carcinoma developed clinical VTE, mostly during perioperative period and the time of diagnosis. The true incidence might have been under-estimated due to several reasons. The need for increased patient education and awareness of VTE is of importance.

Validation of a venous thromboembolism risk assessment model in gynecologic oncology

OBJECTIVES

Gynecologic oncology patients undergoing surgery are at an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We attempted to validate a VTE risk assessment model in gynecologic oncology patients.

METHODS

All gynecologic oncology patients who underwent a laparotomy for the diagnosis or suspicion of gynecologic malignancy from 2004 to 2010 were included. Demographic, surgicopathologic, and complication data were collected. VTE was based on the symptomatic diagnosis. Data for the Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) was used to score and stratify patients on their risk for VTE.

RESULTS

1123 gynecologic oncology patients were included within this study. Ovarian cancer was the most common diagnosis (39%) with a median age of 56.1. All patients received SCDs with 40% receiving double prophylaxis. The overall incidence of VTE was 3.3%, with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) n=17 and pulmonary embolism (PE) n=20. Complication rates were similar in each group. Based on the Caprini scoring model 92% of patients scored in the "Highest Risk" category. The Caprini RAM accurately predicted all 37 VTEs, all of which scored in the "Highest Risk" category. The percentage of patients that received double prophylaxis increased with time from 12% in 2004 to 63% in 2010. Importantly, 25 of the 37 VTEs (68%) did not receive double prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the Caprini RAM accurately predicted patients at the highest risk of experiencing VTE. Considering accurate identification of patients allows proper administration of double prophylaxis, we recommend the use of this scoring model preoperatively in patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic malignancies.

Low molecular weight heparin downregulates tissue factor expression and activity by modulating growth factor receptor-mediated induction of nuclear factor-κB

Treatment of cancer patients with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) appears to have beneficial effects. In this study, the influence of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on tissue factor (TF) expression and activity in five cell lines from various tissues was analysed and explored. Incubation of cells with LMWH (0-2000μg/ml) resulted in the downregulation of TF mRNA expression which was both LMWH concentration-dependent and time-dependent. Downregulation of TF was also measured as decreased cellular TF antigen and activity. Consistently, incubation of cells with LMWH suppressed the nuclear localisation and the transcriptional activity of NFκB. Decreased TF mRNA was largely achievable by incubating the cells with an NFκB inhibitor alone whilst incubation with betulinic acid to activate NFκB reversed the inhibitory influence of LMWH. Cells were also incubated with a range of concentrations of EGF (0-10ng/ml), bFGF (0-20ng/ml) or VEGF (0-4ng/ml) in the presence or absence of LMWH (200μg/ml) for 24h and TF antigen measured. Inclusion of LMWH reduced TF expression in response to EGF, bFGF or VEGF but TF expression was partially restored by increasing concentrations of the growth factors. We conclude that LMWH downregulates TF expression in vitro through a mechanism that involves interference with the function of growth factors which in turn is mediated through the downregulation of the transcriptional activity of NFκB. This mechanism may also explain some of the beneficial influences attributed to LMWH therapy in the treatment of cancer patients.

Venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients: identifying risk and strategies for prevention

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a condition that has multiple causes but few warning signs. Consequently, the 2 manifestations of VTE-pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis-often go unpredicted. This is especially true for medical patients. Treatment guidelines indicate that most hospitalized patients should receive prophylaxis for VTE. This report discusses these guidelines, the high prevalence of VTE among medical patients, and clinical studies of thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. VTE prophylaxis continues to be underutilized in medically ill patients. These patients are at significant risk of VTE and require prophylaxis, an objective that is supported by the recent guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians. In addition, several lines of clinical evidence support the use of prophylaxis in this subgroup of patients. Improved systems are needed in medically ill patients to help improve outcomes and compliance for the use of VTE prophylaxis.

Deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients: a review of evidence-based guidelines for prevention

Deep vein thrombosis affects many hospitalized patients because of decreased activity and therapeutic equipment. This article reviews known risk factors for developing deep vein thrombosis, current prevention methods, and current evidence-based guidelines in order to raise nurses' awareness of early prevention methods in all hospitalized patients. Early prophylaxis can reduce patient risk of deep vein thrombosis and its complications.

Nursing interventions in the management of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis

OBJECTIVES

To provide oncology nurses with an overview of the clinical trial evidence and to help them apply the data to patient management to optimize care and ensure the best possible outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Primary and tertiary literature and the authors' clinical experience.

CONCLUSION

Nursing interventions for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis involve such key areas as the need for careful and continuing risk assessment, close monitoring of laboratory values, evaluation of patients as candidates for outpatient management, patient and caregiver education, and monitoring of patient compliance.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses provide critical oversight and coordination in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. These interventions are essential to reducing venous thromboembolism-associated morbidity and mortality.

[Use of low molecular weight heparin for medical prophylaxis by European geriatricians]

PURPOSE

Many hospitalised elderly patients are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to assess the rate and duration of medical utilization of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for VTE prevention by European geriatricians.

METHOD

A questionnaire was sent to 94 geriatricians of the European Academy for Medicine of Ageing (EAMA), to be filled out for each patient older than 65 years of their institutions who received LMWH during 1 day of December 2000.

RESULTS

In the 37 centers that participated (representing 11 different European countries) 2912 patients were present on the day of the study: 857 patients in acute care, 367 in rehabilitation care, 1568 in long-term care and 141 in day hospital. Prophylaxis by LMWH was given to 284 medical patients (9.75%, mean age 82.2 years). Use of LMWH was more frequent in acute and rehabilitation care (22.4% and 9.8%) than in long-term care (3.1%). The main risk factors in patients with LMWH prophylaxis were: bedridden (53%), infectious disease (18%), heart failure (17.6%), venous insufficiency (17.6%), paralysis of lower limbs (16.6%), recent stroke (15%) and malignancy (10%). The duration of the treatment for VTE prophylaxis exceeded 30 days in 51 patients (12%) and one year in 15 patients (3.3%).

CONCLUSION

In Europe, VTE prophylaxis by LMWH is widely used in elderly medical patients without specific guidelines in this population. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the appropriate duration of prophylaxis in very prolonged immobilization.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines: Use by primary care physicians

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a prevalent, costly medical condition, is one of the most common causes of death in the United States. Although risk factors for VTE are well known, thromboembolic events cannot be predicted because patients are asymptomatic and screening methods have limitations. Anticoagulant therapy (eg, low-molecular-weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, selective factor Xa inhibitors) has proved effective for preventing thromboembolism, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. While quality care for VTE entails prophylaxis for all relevant patients, many high-risk patients are undertreated or treated incorrectly. Both primary and secondary prevention of VTE remain inadequate for several reasons, including lack of awareness of the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, of the seriousness of VTE, of the benefits of prophylaxis, and of the relatively low risk of bleeding complications. To provide appropriate treatment, physicians must assess the numbers and types of risk factors for each patient, the underlying illness or surgical procedure, and the benefits and risks of possible therapies. The problem of VTE will grow as the US population ages, as surgery is performed on increasingly sick patients, and as the length of hospital stays continues to decrease.