Advanced bionics thin lateral and Helix II electrodes: a temporal bone study

Cochlear implant electrode design for safe and effective treatment

The optimal placement of a cochlear implant (CI) electrode inside the scala tympani compartment to create an effective electrode-neural interface is the base for a successful CI treatment. The characteristics of an effective electrode design include (a) electrode matching every possible variation in the inner ear size, shape, and anatomy, (b) electrically covering most of the neuronal elements, and (c) preserving intra-cochlear structures, even in non-hearing preservation surgeries. Flexible electrode arrays of various lengths are required to reach an angular insertion depth of 680° to which neuronal cell bodies are angularly distributed and to minimize the rate of electrode scalar deviation. At the time of writing this article, the current scientific evidence indicates that straight lateral wall electrode outperforms perimodiolar electrode by preventing electrode tip fold-over and scalar deviation. Most of the available literature on electrode insertion depth and hearing outcomes supports the practice of physically placing an electrode to cover both the basal and middle turns of the cochlea. This is only achievable with longer straight lateral wall electrodes as single-sized and pre-shaped perimodiolar electrodes have limitations in reaching beyond the basal turn of the cochlea and in offering consistent modiolar hugging placement in every cochlea. For malformed inner ear anatomies that lack a central modiolar trunk, the perimodiolar electrode is not an effective electrode choice. Most of the literature has failed to demonstrate superiority in hearing outcomes when comparing perimodiolar electrodes with straight lateral wall electrodes from single CI manufacturers. In summary, flexible and straight lateral wall electrode type is reported to be gentle to intra-cochlear structures and has the potential to electrically stimulate most of the neuronal elements, which are necessary in bringing full benefit of the CI device to recipients.

Development and Clinical Introduction of the Nurotron Cochlear Implant Electrode Array

As the only medical device used in the treatment for deafness, the cochlear implant has benefited to more than half a million individuals worldwide. However, the device has limited penetration due to its high cost, especially in low- and middle-income countries. China alone has 27.8 million deaf people, but less than 100,000 of them have received a cochlear implant. The Nurotron Venus device was developed to address the need for an affordable yet safe and effective cochlear implant. The present study describes the design, development, and evaluation of the Nurotron intracochlear electrode array. The standard array is 22 mm in length from the round window marker to the apical tip of the carrier and has 24 electrodes, with a surface area of 0.32 mm2 and center-to-center spacing of 0.85 mm. The Nurotron array has been tested to meet the mechanical, chemical, and electrical requirements specified by the ISO Standard 14708-07. Human temporal bone and clinical trial results showed that the Nurotron array is easy to insert (7.8/10 rating with 10 indicating the highest ease of use) and has a low complication rate (12.5%) of severe insertion trauma while achieving high device stability and reliability (6 array failures in 43,000 patient years of experience). As a critical component, the Nurotron array has contributed to the high level of Nurotron implant speech performance, equivalent to that produced by other existing devices. The Nurotron device has benefited 10,000 deaf people and helped reduce the unit cost from US$25,000 in 2011 to US$4,620 in 2017 through the Chinese Government Tender Program. New, slim, and micromachined electrodes are being developed to further improve performance and accessibility.

Radiological evaluation of inner ear trauma after cochlear implant surgery by cone beam CT(CBCT)

PURPOSE

Cochlear implantation (CI) has been extended to involve younger age group with higher incidence of residual hearing which increases the need of minimizing surgical inner ear trauma. Radiological evaluation for electrode position has been studied yet without assessment of inner ear trauma, our objective is radiological evaluation of post cochlear implantation inner ear trauma MATERIAL AND METHODS: 20 patients with CI for pre lingual SNHL were included in this study. Cone beam CT (CBCT) was used for evaluation of electrode position and assessment of inner ear trauma. A Neuroradiologist and an implant surgeon analyzed the relation of inserted electrode to the intra-cochlear structures, with introduction of novel radiological grading for inner ear trauma.

RESULTS

The mean major cochlear diameter was 8.9 mm, the mean angular depth of insertion was 406.9944 (SD = 165.0559). Ten patients were with no cochlear trauma (grade 0), three patients were grade 1, two patients were grade 2 and five patients were grade 3 inner ear trauma.

CONCLUSION

Radiological evaluation for electrode position should extend to involve assessment of inner ear trauma using relation of the implant to cochlear internal structures which could be performed by CBCT with high resolution and least metallic artifacts.

Electrode Designs for Protection of the Delicate Cochlear Structures

The most recent electrode introductions from Advanced Bionics, the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala and the HiFocus SlimJ arrays, have common design goals intended to provide sufficient access to the necessary frequency range while avoiding intracochlear trauma. The electrode choice, either a pre-curved (mid-scala) array or straight (lateral) array, can be made by the surgeon based on anatomical considerations and/or their preferred surgical approach. Both arrays offer ease of handling, suitability for a round window and cochleostomy based insertion and control of the insertion speed.

HiFocus Helix™ electrode insertion: surgical approach

Background

Cochlear implants have been used for almost 30 years as a device for the rehabilitation of individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss. One of the important aspects of cochlear implantation is the type of electrode selected and proper insertion of the electrode array in scala tympani to minimize cochlear damage. The HiFocus Helix™ electrode is a precurved design aimed at placing the electrode contacts close to the spiral ganglion cells in the modiolus. The prescribed insertion techniques are intended to minimize the likelihood of damage to the basilar membrane or lateral wall of the cochlea.

Case presentation

To describe the first insertion of a HiFocus Helix™ electrode in Brazil exposing surgical particularities and device details in a patient with profound hearing loss, due to Mondini’s dysplasia.

Conclusion

No problems were encountered during the surgical procedure. The patient experienced improvement in hearing thresholds and speech perception. The HiFocus Helix™ electrode proved easy to insert and provided expected hearing benefits for the patient. This manuscript indicates that the HiResolution™ Bionic Ear System with HiFocus Helix™ electrode comprise a cochlear implant system that is practical and beneficial for the treatment of severe-to-profound hearing loss.

Effects of a dexamethasone-releasing implant on cochleae: A functional, morphological and pharmacokinetic study

AIM

This study evaluated the impact of a dexamethasone-releasing silicone implant on hearing function preservation, cochlear morphology and perilymph pharmacokinetics after cochlear implantation.

METHODS

Guinea pigs were implanted unilaterally with silicone rods containing either 2% dexamethasone (DEXA group, n = 18) or no dexamethasone (control group, n = 17). Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured preoperatively and over 6 months postoperatively. Cochlear histology using standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha staining was performed 1 month postoperatively. Twenty-two guinea pigs were involved in the pharmacokinetic study, and real-time drug concentrations in perilymph were investigated using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The Mann-Whitney U test (1-tailed) was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

ABR and DPOAE testing demonstrated decreased hearing function immediately postoperatively followed by a progressive hearing loss within the first day postoperatively. There was almost no observable hearing improvement in the control group from 1 week to 6 months postoperatively, but hearing levels in the DEXA group improved gradually from 1 week to 12 weeks. Hearing loss in the DEXA and control group was 5.0 ± 3.4 dB and 21.7 ± 5.3 dB, respectively at a 16-kHz stimulus frequency 6 months postoperatively. The difference in threshold shifts was present throughout all measured frequencies, and it was significant at 4-24 kHz. The morphological study revealed new fibrosis formation in the scala tympani, which encapsulated the implanted electrode. TNF-alpha positive staining in the cochleae of the DEXA group was less evident than the control group. The pharmacokinetic study revealed a peak perilymph concentration 30 min postoperatively and sustained dexamethasone release at least 1 week postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implants that incorporate dexamethasone can release drug chronically in the inner ear and induce significant long-term recovery and preservation of auditory function after implantation.

Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE

To describe the relationship between implantation-associated trauma and postoperative speech perception scores among adult and pediatric patients undergoing cochlear implantation using conventional length electrodes and minimally traumatic surgical techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review (2002-2010).

SETTING

Tertiary academic referral center.

PATIENTS

All subjects with significant preoperative low-frequency hearing (≤70 dB HL at 250 Hz) who underwent cochlear implantation with a newer generation implant electrode (Nucleus Contour Advance, Advanced Bionics HR90K [1J and Helix], and Med El Sonata standard H array) were reviewed.

INTERVENTION(S)

Preimplant and postimplant audiometric thresholds and speech recognition scores were recorded using the electronic medical record.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Postimplantation pure tone threshold shifts were used as a surrogate measure for extent of intracochlear injury and correlated with postoperative speech perception scores.

RESULTS

: Between 2002 and 2010, 703 cochlear implant (CI) operations were performed. Data from 126 implants were included in the analysis. The mean preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average was 55.4 dB HL. Hearing preservation was observed in 55% of patients. Patients with hearing preservation were found to have significantly higher postoperative speech perception performance in the CI-only condition than those who lost all residual hearing.

CONCLUSION

Conservation of acoustic hearing after conventional length cochlear implantation is unpredictable but remains a realistic goal. The combination of improved technology and refined surgical technique may allow for conservation of some residual hearing in more than 50% of patients. Germane to the conventional length CI recipient with substantial hearing loss, minimizing trauma allows for improved speech perception in the electric condition. These findings support the use of minimally traumatic techniques in all CI recipients, even those destined for electric-only stimulation.

The effect of pulling out cochlear implant electrodes on inner ear microstructures: a temporal bone study

The exchange of an cochlear implant or the re-positioning of an electrode have become more frequently required than a decade ago. The consequences of such procedures at a microstructural level within the cochlea are not known. It was the aim of the present study to further investigate the effects of an CI electrode pull-out. Therefore 10 freshly harvested temporal bones (TB) were histologically evaluated after a cochlear implant electrode pull-out of a perimodiolar electrode. In additional 9 TB the intrascalar movements of the CI electrode while being pulled-out were digitally analysed by video- capturing. Histologically, a disruption of the modiolar wall or the spiral osseous lamina were not observed. In one TB, a basilar membrane lifting up was found, but it could not be undoubtedly attributed to the pull-out of the electrode. When analyzing the temporal sequence of the electrode movement during the pull-out, the electrode turned in one case so that the tip elevates the basilar membrane. The pull- out of perimodiolarly placed CI electrodes does not damage the modiolar wall at a microstructural level and should be guided (e.g., forceps) to prevent a 90 o turning of the electrode tip into the direction of the basilar membrane.

Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach

Recent advances in cochlear implant technology have focused renewed attention on the preservation of residual hearing. The focus on preservation of residual hearing is driven by the concept of electroacoustic stimulation. This option depends on the insertion of a short cochlear implant electrode into the basal region of the cochlea while preserving native function in the apical region. The desire to preserve residual hearing has led to the development of the soft-surgery cochlear implantation technique. Here, the authors evaluate its various components. Avoiding entry of blood into the cochlea and the use of hyaluronate seem to be reasonably supported, whereas the use of topical steroids is unlikely to be beneficial. The site of entry into the cochlea, the use of contoured or straight devices, and the depth of insertion are also evaluated. The authors highlight the importance of systematic recording of outcomes and surgical events.

Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation

As the most successful neural prosthesis, cochlear implants have provided partial hearing to more than 120000 persons worldwide; half of which being pediatric users who are able to develop nearly normal language. Biomedical engineers have played a central role in the design, integration and evaluation of the cochlear implant system, but the overall success is a result of collaborative work with physiologists, psychologists, physicians, educators, and entrepreneurs. This review presents broad yet in-depth academic and industrial perspectives on the underlying research and ongoing development of cochlear implants. The introduction accounts for major events and advances in cochlear implants, including dynamic interplays among engineers, scientists, physicians, and policy makers. The review takes a system approach to address critical issues in cochlear implant research and development. First, the cochlear implant system design and specifications are laid out. Second, the design goals, principles, and methods of the subsystem components are identified from the external speech processor and radio frequency transmission link to the internal receiver, stimulator and electrode arrays. Third, system integration and functional evaluation are presented with respect to safety, reliability, and challenges facing the present and future cochlear implant designers and users. Finally, issues beyond cochlear implants are discussed to address treatment options for the entire spectrum of hearing impairment as well as to use the cochlear implant as a model to design and evaluate other similar neural prostheses such as vestibular and retinal implants.

Prevention of cochlear implant electrode damage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the current trend in cochlear implantation is to prescribe cochlear implants for patients with residual hearing and to use electroacoustic stimulation, cochlear implant damage must be prevented. This article summarizes current research endeavors to prevent electrode insertion trauma and resulting hearing loss.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alteration in surgical technique is necessary with each new electrode design. Nontraumatic surgical technique also requires minimizing acoustic trauma due to drilling the cochleostomy, mechanical damage from electrode insertion, potential infection, and fibrosis of the cochlea. The pattern of hearing loss following electrode insertion trauma is an immediate loss that results from direct trauma to the macroscopic elements of the cochlea and a delayed loss that may reflect the activation of inflammatory and cell death pathways. Therapies under investigation include glucocorticoids, inhibitors of cell death pathways, and hypothermia.

SUMMARY

Electrode insertion trauma-induced hearing loss involves multiple mechanisms ranging from mechanical insertion trauma to activation of inflammatory and cell death pathways. The macroscopic mechanical damage to the cochlea may be prevented by improvement of electrode design and surgical technique. The molecular damage needs further studies to assess the efficacy of novel therapeutic strategies in preserving functional residual hearing.