Systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids in children

The impact of glucocorticoids on bone health and growth: endocrine and non-endocrine effects in children and young patients

Glucocorticoids have numerous applications in short and/or long-term therapy both in pediatric and young adults, based on their significant anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Different routes of administration can be provided including topical, inhalatory and oral. Topical treatments are the first choice for many dermatologic conditions. The inhalatory form is widely used in asthma management while systemic pathologies often require oral administration. The risks for adverse effects are related to the dose and duration of therapy as well as the specific agent used. Therefore, long-term treatment has a negative impact on different metabolic systems and can lead to hypertension, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance. In particular, many studies emphasize the direct and indirect effects of glucocorticoids on bone health. Glucocorticoids are the most common iatrogenic cause of osteoporosis and can alter bone development in young adults. These side effects are due to an early and transient increase in bone resorption and a decrease in bone formation. Glucocorticoid-induced changes can act on the bone multicellular unit, bone cells and intracellular signaling pathways. Chronic use can also modify bone mass though indirect endocrine and non-endocrine effects by reducing the anabolic function of sex steroids and GH/IGF-1 axis, interfere with calcium metabolism, as well as muscle atrophy and central fat accumulation. The aim of our review was to revise the available evidence on the impact of glucocorticoid treatment on bone health related to endocrine and non-endocrine effects in Young patients.

A Quality Improvement Intervention to Improve Inpatient Pediatric Asthma Controller Accuracy

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to investigate if a rigorous quality improvement (QI) intervention could increase accuracy of pediatric asthma controller medications on discharge from an inpatient hospitalization.

METHODS

Our interprofessional QI team developed interventions such as improving documentation and creating standardized language to ensure patients were discharged on an appropriate asthma controller medication and improve assessment of asthma symptom control. Each week of 2015-2016, the first 5 patients discharged with status asthmaticus from the pediatric wards were reviewed for documentation of the 6 asthma control questions and accuracy of the discharge controller therapy. Correct discharge medication was defined as being prescribed the age-appropriate medication and dose on the basis of baseline controller therapy, compliance with baseline medication, and responses to asthma control assessment. The weekly proportion of control questions that were accessed and correct controller medications that were prescribed were analyzed by using Nelson rules and interrupted time series.

RESULTS

A total of 240 preintervention and 252 postintervention charts were reviewed. The primary outcome of the median proportion of patients discharged on appropriate controller therapy improved from 60% in preintervention data to 80% in the postintervention period. The process measure of proportion of asthma control questions that were assessed improved from 43% in the preintervention period to 98% by the final months of the intervention period. Both of these changes were statistically significant as per Nelson's rules and interrupted time series analyses (P = .02 and P < .001, respectively, for postintervention break).

CONCLUSIONS

An interdisciplinary QI team successfully improved the accuracy of asthma controller therapy on discharge and the inpatient assessment of asthma control questions.

Salivary cortisol levels in prepubertal children using inhaled corticosteroids with or without concurrent intranasal corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and intranasal steroids (INS) are frequently co-administered in children with asthma and rhinitis. In contrast to monotherapy with ICS or INS, little is known about the safety of concurrent use of topical steroids on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function in prepubertal children.

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of morning salivary cortisol levels in prepubertal children using maintenance treatment with ICS with and without concurrent use of INS to steroid naïve control groups (healthy children, and children with constipation who are under pediatric care).

METHODS

Cross-sectional observational study in prepubertal children (6-12 years) using ICS alone (n = 41) or in combination with INS (n = 22), compared to different control groups with no steroid treatment (18 healthy children, and 28 children with constipation). Morning salivary cortisol levels were determined from saliva samples collected at home.

RESULTS

The morning salivary cortisol levels of the healthy children (8.7 nmol/L; 95% CI 5.9-18.8), and the children with constipation (8.9 nmol/L; 8.0-11.3) were comparable. The salivary cortisol levels of prepubertal children using ICS (median 4.7 nmol/L; 95% CI 4.6-6.9) or a combination of ICS and INS (5.1 nmol/L; 4.2-7.6) were comparable, but significantly reduced compared to both control groups. There was no correlation between salivary cortisol level and age, duration of disease, or cumulative daily dose of topical steroids.

CONCLUSION

Salivary cortisol levels in prepubertal children using ICS, with or without concurrent use of INS, were comparable. However, salivary cortisol levels were significantly reduced compared to steroid naïve controls, irrespective of the cumulative daily dose of topical steroids. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2011; 46:1055-1061. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The effect of an inhaled corticosteroid on glucose control in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy on glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coexisting asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

DESIGN

A prospective randomized, double-blind, double-dummy placebo-controlled, crossover investigation of inhaled steroids and oral leukotriene blockers.

SETTING

A United States Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System outpatient setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with type 2 diabetes and asthma or COPD.

METHODS

Subjects (n=12) were randomized to receive either inhaled fluticasone propionate (440 microg twice daily) and oral placebo, or inhaled placebo and oral montelukast (10 mg/day). After 6 weeks, subjects were switched to the opposite therapy for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change in the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (%HbA1c) at 6 weeks relative to the baseline value.

RESULTS

Ten patients completed the study. The difference between the mean within-subject changes in %HbA1c associated with 6-week periods of fluticasone and the mean changes associated with montelukast therapy was small but statistically significant (mean difference=0.25; P<0.025). Neither fluticasone nor oral montelukast therapy for 6 weeks led to a significantly different mean % HbA1c compared with the relevant baseline (mean differences=0.11 and -0.14, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The absence of a clinically significant within-subject difference in the changes in %HbA1c associated with fluticasone versus oral montelukast therapy, or between either therapy or baseline does not warrant recommending changes in therapy for asthma or diabetes in patients with these co-morbid conditions. However, we suggest that clinicians carefully monitor blood glucose control when diabetic patients initiate ICS, especially with higher dosages.

Cross-sectional study on bone density-related sonographic parameters in children with asthma: correlation to therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and disease severity

The aim of this study was to screen asthmatic children for bone density-related sonographic parameters on the calcaneal bone. Findings were correlated to therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as well as with asthma severity (AS), concomitance and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD), and rhinitis (AR). We enrolled 173 children with AS1-3 consecutively; 44% (AS1) had not received any ICS medication; 56% (AS2 and -3) received ICS therapy for > or =6 months (medium daily dose, 286 microg fluticasone-proprionate-equivalent/maximum 500 microg); and in addition 38% (n = 65) presented with AD and 66% (n = 115) with AR. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) results were compared to regional normative values of 3299 children obtained with the identical system. ICS-treated children showed a tendency toward reduced age-, weight-, and height-adjusted standard deviation scores (SDS) for SOS compared to children without ICS treatment, which tendency did not reach statistical significance and was not as consistent for BUA (mean of ICS-treated children compared to our controls: SOS-SDS, -0.29/-0.31/-0.30; BUA-SDS, -0.23/-0.17/-0.05). For ICS-treated children, the proportion of patients with BUA and SOS values below -1 SDS was statistically significant higher for age-adjusted BUA and SOS than for children without ICS medication (BUA 15.00% vs. 5.41%; SOS 32.98% vs. 17.56%). However, we cannot differentiate possible negative effects of ICS from influences of the underlying inflammatory disease because higher asthma severity was associated with greater use of ICS medication. Additionally, the higher physical activity of children with less severe asthma can have influenced quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters positively, compared to patients with a higher degree of exercise-induced symptoms. For differentiation of possible negative effect of ICS on ultrasonic bone quality and for evaluation of the potentials of the method, further longitudinal QUS assessment of asthmatics receiving a new ICS treatment is needed.

Do airway clearance mechanisms influence the local and systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids?

The role of airway clearance in inhaled drug therapy is complex. Disease-induced bronchoconstriction results in a central drug-deposition pattern where mucociliary clearance is most efficient. When drug-induced bronchodilation is achieved, deposition and uptake becomes more peripheral, and because there is less mucociliary clearance in the periphery, this will lead to an unintentional increase in lung exposure and enhance the risk of systemic side effects. In addition, mucociliary clearance is pathologically reduced in both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Among inhaled corticosteroids, rate of dissolution and lung uptake differs considerably. For the slowly dissolving, lipophilic steroids, the contribution of mucociliary clearance to these findings appears significant, and variability in lung and systemic exposure resulting from variable mucociliary function appears to be amplified. In addition, dose optimisation of non-stable asthma becomes more complex. The present review highlights the impact of mucociliary clearance on inhaled corticosteroid disposition and identifies critical areas where more research is needed.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide 160 microg once daily vs. budesonide 400 microg once daily in children with asthma

Ciclesonide is an onsite-activated inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for the treatment of asthma. This study compared the efficacy, safety and effect on quality of life (QOL) of ciclesonide 160 microg (ex-actuator; nominal dose 200 microg) vs. budesonide 400 microg (nominal dose) in children with asthma. Six hundred and twenty-one children (aged 6-11 yr) with asthma were randomized to receive ciclesonide 160 microg (ex-actuator) once daily (via hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler and AeroChamber Plus spacer) or budesonide 400 microg once daily (via Turbohaler) both given in the evening for 12 wk. The primary efficacy end-point was change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Additional measurements included change in daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), change in asthma symptom score sum, change in use of rescue medication, paediatric and caregiver asthma QOL questionnaire [PAQLQ(S) and PACQLQ, respectively] scores, change in body height assessed by stadiometry, change in 24-h urinary cortisol adjusted for creatinine and adverse events. Both ciclesonide and budesonide increased FEV1, morning PEF and PAQLQ(S) and PACQLQ scores, and improved asthma symptom score sums and the need for rescue medication after 12 wk vs. baseline. The non-inferiority of ciclesonide vs. budesonide was demonstrated for the change in FEV1 (95% confidence interval: -75, 10 ml, p = 0.0009, one-sided non-inferiority, per-protocol). In addition, ciclesonide and budesonide showed similar efficacy in improving asthma symptoms, morning PEF, use of rescue medication and QOL. Ciclesonide was superior to budesonide with regard to increases in body height (p = 0.003, two-sided). The effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis was significantly different in favor of ciclesonide treatment (p < 0.001, one-sided). Both ciclesonide and budesonide were well tolerated. Ciclesonide 160 microg once daily and budesonide 400 microg once daily were effective in children with asthma. In addition, in children treated with ciclesonide there was significantly less reduction in body height and suppression of 24-h urinary cortisol excretion compared with children treated with budesonide after 12 wk.

Clinical safety of inhaled corticosteroids for asthma in children: an update of long-term trials

Inhaled corticosteroids are established as the mainstay of maintenance therapy for chronic asthma. However, there remains some debate regarding the safety of long-term use of these agents, particularly in children. This concern mainly stems from the findings of short-term studies assessing the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on lower leg growth rate or the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. However, the clinical relevance of these findings to long-term treatment is unknown and significant uncertainty exists regarding the predictive value of changes in cortisol levels and clinically relevant changes in growth or bone mineral density. To assess the safety of long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma, a systematic review of the literature was performed focusing on randomised, controlled studies of >or=12 months' duration, to obtain data with maximum relevance to clinical practice. Specific searches were conducted to identify studies examining each of the following three areas: growth, bone mineral density and cortisol levels. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria for statural growth, four for bone mineral density, and ten for cortisol levels. There was some evidence of a small decrease in statural growth during the initial period of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. This effect was more marked at daily doses of >200 microg and did not apply to all treatment regimens. Studies examining final attained adult height found no difference between patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids and those receiving nonsteroidal therapy. None of the studies investigating effects on bone mineral density found any adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Finally, recommended doses of inhaled corticosteroids generally had little or no effect on plasma- or urinary-cortisol levels versus nonsteroidal therapy. In conclusion, this literature review supports the theory that recommended doses of inhaled corticosteroids can be administered to children for the long-term management of asthma with minimal risk of clinically relevant adverse effects on growth, bone density or cortisol levels.

The systemic safety of inhaled corticosteroid therapy: a focus on ciclesonide

OBJECTIVE

To review the potential systemic activity of ciclesonide and its active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide, by evaluation of the effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE and MEDLINE searches using the keyword ciclesonide, without date restrictions, were conducted to identify published articles that related to clinical trials that included ciclesonide.

STUDY SELECTION

The primary articles that reported systemic safety data for ciclesonide were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ciclesonide (320-1,280 microg/d) demonstrated no detectable, clinically relevant effect on HPA axis function as evaluated by basal cortisol excretion measurements and dynamic stimulation tests. Furthermore, ciclesonide had no effect on the normal diurnal rhythm of endogenous cortisol secretion while simultaneously improving pulmonary function and reducing bronchial hyperresponsiveness. These results suggest that ciclesonide has a low systemic activity that may be attributable to unique pharmacologic properties, including a high degree of serum protein binding, a low oral bioavailability, and rapid systemic elimination, that reduce the level of systemically available pharmacologically active drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Even at the higher doses used to treat more severe cases of asthma, ciclesonide was observed to have no effect on HPA axis function. These data, in conjunction with the observed clinical efficacy, suggest that ciclesonide may have an improved therapeutic margin compared with some other currently available inhaled corticosteroid treatments and, therefore, the potential to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Concerns about intranasal corticosteroids for over-the-counter use: position statement of the Joint Task Force for the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

The Joint Task Force for the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology was charged with formulating a position paper regarding the potential release of intranasal corticosteroids for over-the-counter use. We took the position that safety issues regarding this proposal would be our sole concern. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the frequency and severity of potential adverse events related to the administration of intranasal corticosteroids. We limited this review to 5 areas: (1) effects on growth, (2) ocular effects, (3) effects on bone, (4) effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and (5) local adverse effects. After review of the available data, we concluded that intranasal corticosteroids should remain prescription-only drugs. Patients receiving an intranasal corticosteroid should be instructed in its use and that use should be monitored by a physician or an appropriately trained medical provider (eg, nurse practitioner or physician assistant) under the direct supervision of a physician. This conclusion was reached based on the evidence that corticosteroids administered by any route, including the intranasal route, have the potential to cause adverse effects in all the areas noted herein. Our conclusion was strengthened by the fact that these adverse effects can be insidious and therefore not evident for many years; there is the potential for overuse; patients could also have access to other forms of topically administered corticosteroids, thus increasing their total dose; and individuals vary in their susceptibility to corticosteroid-induced adverse effects. We were also influenced to take this position knowing that generally reassuring data regarding the use of respiratory tract-administered corticosteroids are based on mean data and that all such studies have shown outliers in whom adverse effects were evident. Thus, as stated, we recommend that intranasal corticosteroids remain prescription-only drugs.

Childhood asthma: breakthroughs and challenges

As we move forward, our goal is to control and eliminate asthma and other allergic disorders. This may come through broadly applied manipulation of environmental, dietary, and infectious risk factors, possibly during the perinatal period. Or we may learn to identify genetically susceptible children and to intervene with individualized genotype-specific treatment before the onset of disease. Maybe we'll learn how to block the mechanisms that give rise to chronic inflammation, or how to subdue Th2 activation. However, as the Swedish proverb says--Don't throw away the old bucket until you know whether the new one holds water. To continue using the old bucket, we have to fix the leaks. One approach to reducing asthma disparities is through traditional disease prevention stages. Primary prevention targets asthma incidence; secondary prevention mitigates established disease and involves disease detection, management, and control; and tertiary prevention is the reduction of complications caused by severe disease. Once causative factors at each level of disease prevention are understood, this knowledge can be translated into clinical practice and public health policy. We need reliable diagnostic criteria to provide correct treatment for infants and toddlers. This will require longitudinal cohort studies supported by assessment of pulmonary function and inflammatory markers. We must find ways to convince more physicians to embrace controller therapy for more severe disease, and to identify the patients with less severe disease who also require ongoing controller therapy. We need to close the gap between what we know and what we do in practice. We need to link basic research to healthcare delivery, and to gain acceptance and support from the intended recipients of new interventions. We need better strategies for improving adherence. We need accountability, foresight, and imagination.

Safety of inhaled corticosteroids: room for improvement

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the standard of care in asthma and are widely used in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. High-dose regimens and long-term use of ICS in predisposed individuals may be associated with a variety of side effects, similar to those observed with systemic corticosteroid therapy. Side effects associated with long-term ICS use include reduction in growth velocity, cataracts, glaucoma, osteoporosis, and fractures. Fear of unwanted complications may be of concern in all patients using ICS, particularly in age- and gender-specific populations that are more prone to develop side effects or to reduce treatment adherence because of physical, behavioral, or psychological problems. In addition to concerns about ICS safety, dosing regimens that are difficult to follow may further reduce a patient's ability to comply with treatment. Ciclesonide, a new-generation ICS with unique pharmacokinetic properties, was developed to provide effective anti-inflammatory control for asthma with once-daily administration to improve patient adherence and a high safety profile to reduce the occurrence of local and systemic side effects.

High lung deposition of 99mTc-labeled ciclesonide administered via HFA-MDI to patients with asthma

OBJECTIVE

To examine the deposition and pharmacokinetics of ciclesonide administered via hydrofluoroalkane-metered dose inhaler (HFA-MDI) in patients with asthma.

METHODS

Twelve patients with mild asthma (FEV1, 95% predicted) inhaled a single dose of 99mtechnetium (Tc)-ciclesonide 320 microg ex-actuator (400 microg ex-valve). Deposition of ciclesonide in the lung and oropharynx was quantified using two-dimensional (2D)-gamma scintigraphy. Three-dimensional single photon emission computed tomography (3D SPECT) was used to assess the regional distribution of ciclesonide in the lung. The pharmacokinetics of ciclesonide and its active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC), were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Ciclesonide and des-CIC concentrations were determined in mouth-rinsing solutions.

RESULTS

2D-gamma scintigraphy indicated that ciclesonide deposition was higher in the whole lung (52%) than in the oropharynx (32.9%). Furthermore, 3D SPECT revealed that ciclesonide deposition within the lungs was highest in the peripheral regions that contain the small airways and alveoli. The pharmacokinetic profile of Tc-labeled ciclesonide and des-CIC was similar to that obtained after inhalation of non-labeled formulations in previous studies. Des-CIC accounted for 14.9% of the total molar concentration of ciclesonide/des-CIC in mouth-rinsing solutions obtained between 7 and 12min after inhalation.

CONCLUSION

Inhalation of ciclesonide via HFA-MDI results in high pulmonary deposition, especially in the peripheral regions of the lung. High pulmonary deposition contributes to ciclesonide's ability to maintain lung function and control symptoms in patients with asthma. Deposition and activation of ciclesonide in the oropharynx is low, consistent with previous reports of low oropharyngeal deposition and a reduced incidence of local side effects in patients receiving ciclesonide therapy.