The Effect of Monocularly and Binocularly Induced Astigmatic Blur on Depth Discrimination Is Orientation Dependent

Functional visual tests to evaluate the effect of small astigmatism correction with toric contact lenses

The prescription of daily contact lenses does not often include a full astigmatic correction. We question here whether this full astigmatic correction (for low to moderate astigmatism) provides a substantial improvement in the overall visual performance compared to a more conservative approach based only on the prescription of spherical contact lenses. The visual performance of 56 contact lens neophytes divided in two contact lens fitting groups (toric versus spherical lens fit) was assessed using standard visual acuity and contrast sensitivity tests. A new set of functional tests simulating everyday tasks was also used. Results showed that subjects with toric lenses had significantly better visual acuity and contrast sensitivity than those with spherical lenses. Functional tests did not render significant differences between groups, which was explained by several factors like i) the visual demand of the functional tests, ii) the dynamic blur due to misalignments and iii) small misfits between the available and measured axis of the astigmatic contact lens.

Surgeon effects on cataract refractive outcomes are minimal compared with patient comorbidity and gender: an analysis of 490 987 cases

AIM

To investigate effect of patient age, gender, comorbidities and surgeon on refractive outcomes following cataract surgery.

METHODS

Study population: patients on UK national ophthalmic cataract database on cataract operations undertaken between 1 April 2010 and 31 August 2018. Variables examined included gender, age, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, high myopia, inherited retinal disease, optic nerve disease, uveitis, pseudoexfoliation, vitreous opacities, retinal pathology, cataract type, previous surgery and posterior capsular rupture. A multivariate normal cross-classified model was fitted to the refractive outcome using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods with diffuse priors to approximate maximum likelihood estimation. A MCMC chain was generated with a burn-in of 5000 iterations and a monitoring chain of 50 000 iterations.

RESULTS

490 987 cataract operations were performed on 351 864 patients by 2567 surgeons. Myopic and astigmatic errors were associated with posterior capsule rupture (-0.38/+0.04×72), glaucoma (-0.10/+0.05×95), previous vitrectomy (-0.049/+0.03×66) and high myopia (-0.07/+0.03×57). Hyperopic and astigmatic errors were associated with diabetic retinopathy (+0.08/+0.03×104), pseudoexfoliation (+0.07/+0.01×158), male gender (+0.12/+0.05×91) and age (-0.01/+0.06×97 per increasing decade). Inherited retinal disease, optic nerve disease, previous trabeculectomy, uveitis, brunescent/white cataract had no significant impact on the error of the refractive outcome. The effect of patient gender and comorbidity was additive. Surgeons only accounted for 4% of the unexplained variance in refractive outcome.

CONCLUSION

Patient comorbidities and gender account for small but statistically significant differences in refractive outcome, which are additive. Surgeon effects are very small.

The influence of refractive state and heterophorias on visual acuity and stereoacuity in healthy young adults

PURPOSE

To evaluate associations of refractive error and heterophoria with best-corrected visual acuity and stereoacuity in a population of healthy young adults.

METHODS

Data extracted from the Israeli Defense Forces Air Force candidates database was analyzed retrospectively. Myopia and hyperopia were defined as spherical equivalent of ≤ -0.50 D and ≥ +0.50 D. Cylinder of ≥0.75 D was considered astigmatism. Oblique astigmatism was defined as axis between 30°-60° and 120°-150°. Heterophoria of ≥8^Δ for near was considered exo- or esophoria.

RESULTS

The study population included 5,491 subjects (75.8% male), with a mean age of 17.6 ± 0.9 years: 2,355 (42.9%) had myopia, 640 (11.6%) had hyperopia, and the rest were emmetropic. Astigmatism was present in 2,006 participants (36.5%), and of those, 619 (30.9%) had oblique astigmatism. Emmetropia was correlated with better best-corrected visual acuity; astigmatism and high hyperopia, with poorer best-corrected visual acuity. A total of 331 subjects (6%) had heterophoria of ≥8^Δ; of those, 300 (90.6%) had exophoria and 31 (9.4%) had esophoria. The prevalence of exophoria was higher in the myopic group, and exophoria was not associated with stereoacuity. Esophoria and anisometropia were associated with worse stereoacuity. The best stereopsis was achieved by emmetropic subjects with no astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS

Emmetropia is associated with better best-corrected visual acuity and stereoacuity. Astigmatism and high hyperopia are correlated with poorer best-corrected visual acuity. Exophoria does not interfere with stereopsis, but both esophoria and anisometropia do.

Type of residual astigmatism and uncorrected visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes

It is difficult to assess the pure impact of the type of residual astigmatism (with-the-rule; WTR, against-the-rule; ATR, and oblique astigmatism) on uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in pseudophakic eyes due to different age distribution of patients between those subgroups. We conducted the current study to investigate the association between astigmatism type and UDVA in eyes after cataract surgery with consideration for various confounding factors such as age. Data were retrospectively collected from 1535 pseudophakic eyes with corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/20 or better, and spherical equivalent between − 0.125 D and 0.0 D. They were classified based on the pattern of residual refractive astigmatism into four groups; minimum astigmatism (< 0.5 D), WTR, ATR, and oblique astigmatism groups. The stepwise multivariate regression analysis showed that the magnitude of residual refractive astigmatism (standardized partial regression coefficient β = 0.559, p < 0.001), CDVA (β = 0.381, p < 0.001), minimum astigmatism group (β = − 0.188, p < 0.001), and WTR astigmatism group (β = − 0.058, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with UDVA (r² = 0.795). Variables excluded from the multivariate regression model include age, preoperative corneal astigmatism, axial length, anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens power, and postoperative spherical equivalent. These results indicate that UDVA is significantly better in eyes with minimum and WTR astigmatism than in those with ATR and oblique astigmatism, after adjustment for confounding parameters. In pseudophakic eyes, oblique and ATR astigmatism exerts a greater impact on UDVA than WTR astigmatism does, even after controlling for age.

Comparison of corneal irregular astigmatism by the type of corneal regular astigmatism

We investigated the relation between corneal regular and irregular astigmatism in normal human eyes. In 951 eyes of 951 patients, corneal irregular astigmatism, such as asymmetry and higher-order irregularity components, was calculated using the Fourier harmonic analysis of corneal topography data within the central 3-mm zone of the anterior corneal surface. The eyes were classified by the type of corneal regular astigmatism into four groups; minimum (< 0.75 diopters), with-the-rule (WTR), against-the-rule (ATR), and oblique astigmatism. The mean age was significantly different among the four groups (P < 0.001); patients with WTR astigmatism were the youngest, followed by those with minimum, oblique, and ATR astigmatism. Significant inter-group differences were found among the four groups in asymmetry (P = 0.005) and higher-order irregularity components (P < 0.001); the largest was in eyes with oblique astigmatism, followed by ATR, WTR, and minimum astigmatism. The stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that corneal regular astigmatism pattern significantly influenced the amount of corneal irregular astigmatism after controlling for confounding factors (P < 0.001). Corneal irregular astigmatism, such as asymmetry and higher order irregularity components, was the largest in eyes with oblique astigmatism, followed by those with ATR, WTR, and minimum astigmatism, even after adjustment for age of subjects.

Comparison of blur and magnification effects on stereopsis: overall and meridional, monocularly- and binocularly-induced

PURPOSE

To determine whether monocularly- and binocularly-induced spherical and meridional blur and aniseikonia had similar effects on stereopsis thresholds.

METHODS

Twelve participants with normal binocular vision viewed McGill modified random dot stereograms to determine stereoacuities in a four-alternative forced-choice procedure. Astigmatism was induced by placing trial lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty-three conditions were used, consisting of zero (no lens), +1 D and +2 D spheres and cylinders at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye, and the following binocular combinations of both lens powers: R × 180/L × 180, R × 45/L × 45, R × 90/L × 90, R sphere/L sphere, R × 180/L × 90, R × 45/L × 135, R × 90/L × 180. Aniseikonia was induced by placing magnifying lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty-three conditions were used, consisting of zero, 6% and 12% overall magnification and both magnifications at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye only, and the following binocular combinations using 3% and 6% lenses: R × 90/L × 90, R × 45/L × 45, R × 180/L × 180, R overall/L overall, R × 90/L × 180, R × 45/L × 135, and R × 180/L × 90.

RESULTS

Stereopsis losses for binocular blur effects with parallel axes (non-anisometropic) were the same as for monocular blur effects of the same axes, and these were strongly dependent on axis (spherical blur and ×90 had the greatest effects). Binocular blur effects with orthogonal axes had greater effects than with parallel axes, with the axis combination of the former having no effect (e.g. R × 90/L × 180 was similar to R × 45/L × 135). For induced aniseikonia, splitting the magnifications between the eyes improved stereopsis slightly, and the effects were not dependent on axis.

CONCLUSION

Binocular blur affects stereopsis similarly to monocular meridional blur if axes in the two eyes are parallel, whereas the effect is greater if the axes are orthogonal. In meridional aniseikonia, splitting magnification between the right and left lenses produces a small improvement in stereopsis that is independent of axis direction and right/left combination.

A comparative study of stereoacuity in patients with various grades of cataract and bilateral pseudophakia

Purpose

To compare the stereopsis in patients with various grades of cataract and bilateral pseudophakia.

Methods

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in South India from December 2016 to September 2018, wherein the stereoacuity of patients having bilateral senile cataract or bilateral pseudophakia, was measured using the Titmus Fly chart. Those with any form of squint, glaucoma or retinal pathology were excluded. The patients were divided into three groups based on the severity of cataract, determined by the Lens Opacification Classification System (LOCS)-III. Group 4 included those with bilateral pseudophakia. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test with post hoc analysis using the Bonferroni test, to study the difference of stereoacuity between the groups.

Results

A total of 200 patients were evaluated. The mean stereoacuity was 65.2 ± 18.2, 114.8 ± 83.42, 402.4 ± 223.7 and 107.2 ± 71.68 arc seconds in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in LogMAR units was 0.19 ± 0.15, 0.37 ± 0.24, 0.82 ± 0.26 and 0.14 ± 0.13 in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (P = 0.01). On comparison between four groups, there was a generalised decrease in BCVA and stereoacuity with increasing grades of cataract except for group 4 which included the bilateral pseudophakics. On post hoc analysis to analyse intergroup variation a statistically significant difference in stereo acuity was noticed when group 3 was compared to other groups.

Conclusion

Stereoacuity decreases with increasing grades of cataract. Better stereoacuity is seen in patients with bilateral pseudophakia when compared with high grades of cataract.

Effects of simulated anisometropia and aniseikonia on stereopsis

PURPOSE

Stereopsis depends on horizontally disparate retinal images but otherwise concordance between eyes. Here we investigate the effect of spherical and meridional simulated anisometropia and aniseikonia on stereopsis thresholds. The aims were to determine effects of meridian, magnitude and the relative effects of the two conditions.

METHODS

Ten participants with normal binocular vision viewed McGill modified random dot stereograms through synchronised shutter glasses. Stereoacuities were determined using a four-alternative forced-choice procedure. To induce anisometropia, trial lenses of varying power and axes were placed in front of right eyes. Seventeen combinations were used: zero (no lens) and both positive and negative, 1 and 2 D powers, at 45, 90 and 180 axes; spherical lenses were also tested. To induce aniseikonia 17 magnification power and axis combinations were used. This included zero (no lens), and 3%, 6%, 9% and 12% at axes 45, 90 and 180; overall magnifications were also tested.

RESULTS

For induced anisometropia, stereopsis loss increased as cylindrical axis rotated from 180° to 90°, at which the loss was similar to that for spherical blur. For example, for 2 D meridional anisometropia threshold increased from 1.53 log sec arc (i.e. 34 sec arc) for x 180 to 1.89 log sec arc (78 sec arc) for x 90. Anisometropia induced with either positive or negative lenses had similar detrimental effects on stereopsis. Unlike anisometropia, the stereopsis loss with induced meridional aniseikonia was not affected by axis and was about 64% of that for overall aniseikonia of the same amount. Approximately, each 1 D of induced anisometropia had the same effect on threshold as did each 6% of induced aniseikonia.

CONCLUSION

The axes of meridional anisometropia but not aniseikonia affected stereopsis. This suggests differences in the way that monocular blur (anisometropia) and interocular shape differences (aniseikonia) are processed during the production of stereopsis.

The relationship between clinical measures of aniseikonia and stereoacuity before and after LASIK

PURPOSE

To determine the significance of changes and and inter-relationships between three markers of binocular function (aniseikonia, distance and near stereoacuity) following unremarkable LASIK at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

METHODS

All patients underwent LASIK using the Schwind Amaris 750S and the flaps were created using Intralase 150 kHz. Patients were I, monocular myopes II, binocular myopes III, binocular hyperopes IV, binocular astigmats V, anisometropes and VI, matched age and gender control (n = 20 in each group except III where n = 18). Aniseikonia (Awaya test), distance and near stereoacuity (Randot tests) were measured before surgery, and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. At all times data were collected under constant conditions and analyzed using appropriate non-parametric statistical tests.

RESULTS

The following statistically significant changes were found after applying the Bonferroni correction (p ≤ 0.001); aniseikonia reduced (groups I, III, IV, V), stereoacuity improved at distance (groups I, III-V) and near (groups I, V). Inter-group differences in aniseikonia distance and near stereoacuity were significant preoperatively, but not postoperatively. In groups I, IV and V, the changes in aniseikonia and stereoacuity (near and distance) were significantly correlated with the preoperative value. Aniseikonia was significantly correlated with distance and near stereoacuity preoperatively but not postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Binocular function improved in all groups after LASIK except in binocular myopes. In general, binocular function was still low compared with the control group at six months postoperatively. It is unclear why binocular function improved in the binocular astigmats.

Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus

Stereoacuity losses are induced by increased magnitudes and interocular differences in high-order aberrations (HOAs). This study used keratoconus as a model to investigate the impact of HOAs on disparity processing and stereoacuity. HOAs and stereoacuity were quantified in subjects with keratoconus (n = 21) with HOAs uncorrected (wearing spectacles) or minimized (wearing rigid gas-permeable contact lenses) and in control subjects without keratoconus (n = 5) for 6-mm pupil diameters. Disparity signal quality was estimated using metrics derived from binocular cross-correlation functions of stereo pairs convolved with point-spread functions from these HOAs. Metrics computed for all subjects were compared with stereoacuities. The effects of contrast losses and phase shifts on disparity signal quality were studied independently by manipulating the amplitude and phase components of optical transfer functions. The magnitudes, orientations, interocular relationships in magnitude, and shape of the point-spread function affected the cross-correlation metrics that determine disparity signal quality. Stereoacuity covaries strongly with cross-correlation metrics and moderately with image-quality metrics. Both phase distortions and contrast losses due to HOAs significantly influence computations of binocular disparity. HOA-induced stereoacuity reductions are attributable to disparity blur and noise from image properties that reduce the height and kurtosis of the peak stimulus disparity match of the cross-correlation. Phase distortions and contrast losses due to HOAs are both partly responsible for the greater stereoacuity losses seen with spectacles compared to rigid gas-permeable contact lenses in keratoconus.

The effects of experimentally induced graded monocular and binocular astigmatism on near stereoacuity

Purpose

To determine the effects of experimentally induced graded monocular and binocular astigmatism on near Stereoacuity in healthy adults.

Method

This prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 60 healthy adults ranging between 19 and 33 years of age recruited from College of Applied Medical Sciences. All subjects were emmetropic with normal binocular single vision, and stereoacuity of 40 sec of arc. Enrolled subjects were divided into four groups, each with 15 participants. Myopic astigmatism was induced in two groups, either monocularly or binocularly using +1.00 DC and +2.00 DC at different axes 45, 90 and 180. The remaining two groups were subjected to induced hypermetropic astigmatism using −1.00 DC and −2.00 DC at different axes 45, 90 and 180. The Titmus Fly Stereo Test was used to measure near stereoacuity both before and after induction of astigmatism.

Results

There was a reduction in stereoacuity with an increase in dioptric power of astigmatism (p < 0.05). In all groups, oblique astigmatism had the most significant effect followed by against the rule astigmatism and then with the rule astigmatism. Binocular induced hypermetropic astigmatism caused more reduction in stereoacuity than binocular induced myopic astigmatism, but statistically not significant. A similar impact was noted between monocular myopic astigmatism and monocular hyperopic astigmatism (p = 0.037), (p = 0.049) and (p = 0.044) with 2.00 D cylinder at 180, 90 and 45 axes, respectively.

Conclusion

The results indicate that the small amount of monocular or binocular astigmatism will affect on Stereoacuity, and the amount of reduction varies according to the axis of orientation.

Evaluating Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To compare methods for evaluating refractive outcomes after cataract surgery to detect outliers.

DESIGN

Case series database study of the evaluation of diagnostic technology.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients who had uneventful cataract operations over a 5-year period.

METHODS

The intended and postoperative refractive outcome and differences between these were analyzed as a spherical equivalent, cylinder, and spherocylinder. The average keratometry and differences between steep and flat keratometric meridians were used to calculate the intended refractive error.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outliers were defined as patients for whom the difference between the intended and postoperative refractive errors was more than 3 standard deviations (SDs) away from the mean.

RESULTS

A total of 9000 patients were included. Twelve patients had missing data and were excluded. The mean intended refractive outcome was -0.12+0.12×2 (95% lower confidence limit [LCL], -1.94+1.06×44; 95% upper confidence limit [UCL], +0.77+1.05×140). The actual postoperative refractive error was -0.30+0.47×6 (95% LCL, -2.36+1.31×36; 95% UCL, +1.00+1.18×148) with a difference from the intended of -0.18+0.35×7 (95% LCL, -1.91+1.22×38; 95% UCL, +0.75+1.09×145). Treating the components of the refractive error independently, outliers were observed in 82 eyes (0.91%) based on the sphere, 46 eyes (0.51%) based on the spherical equivalent, 115 eyes (1.28%) based on treating the cylinder as a scalar, and 76 eyes (0.85%) based on treating the cylinder as a vector. When the differences between the intended and postoperative refractive errors were calculated as a compound spherocylinder, outliers were observed for 233 eyes (2.59%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treating the intended refractive outcome as a spherocylinder improves the precision for detecting clinically significant refractive outliers.

Influence of severity and types of astigmatism on visual acuity in school-aged children in southern China

AIM

To investigate the influence of astigmatism on visual acuity in school-aged children, and to define a cutoff for clinically significant astigmatism.

METHODS

This is a population-based, cross-sectional study. Among 5053 enumerated children aged 5-15y in Guangzhou, 3729 (73.8%) children aged 7-15 with successful cycloplegic auto-refraction (1% cyclopentolate) and a reliable visual acuity measurement were included. Ocular measurement included external eye, anterior segment, media and fundus and cycloplegic auto-refraction. Primary outcome measures included the relationship between severity and subtypes of astigmatism and the prevalence of visual impairment. Three criteria for visual impairment were adopted: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤0.7, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) ≤0.5 or <0.7 in the right eye.

RESULTS

Increases of cylinder power was significantly associated with worse visual acuity (UCVA: β=0.051, P<0.01; BCVA: β=0.025, P<0.001). A substantial increase in UCVI and BCVI was seen with astigmatism of 1.00 diopter (D) or more. Astigmatism ≥1.00 D had a greater BCVI prevalence than cylinder power less than 1.00 D (OR=4.20, 95%CI: 3.08-5.74), and this was also true for hyperopic, emmetropic and myopic refraction categories. Oblique astigmatism was associated with a higher risk of BCVI relative to with the rule astigmatism in myopic refractive category (OR=12.87, 95%CI: 2.20-75.38).

CONCLUSION

Both magnitude and subtypes of astigmatism influence the prevalence of visual impairment in school children. Cylinder ≥1.00 D may be useful as a cutoff for clinically significant astigmatism.

Effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity

Purpose

To determine the effects of astigmatism on contrast sensitivity (CS).

Methods

Eighteen normal volunteers (30.5 ± 6.0 [mean ± SD] years) were recruited. After correcting each refractive error by spectacles, against-the-rule (ATR) or with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism of +1.00, +2.00 and +3.00 D was intentionally produced in both eyes, and then binocular CS was measured. The cylindrical addition of different powers (+1.00–+3.00 D) was compensated with spherical lenses so that the spherical equivalent refraction became zero in each eye. Subsequently, the above cylindrical addition was monocularly induced, and binocular CS was measured again. The relation between CS and astigmatic power, axis, and monocular or binocular astigmatism was investigated.

Results

With binocular ATR and WTR astigmatism, increases in astigmatic power significantly correlated with decreases in the area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). With monocular astigmatic defocus, astigmatic power addition did not affect AULCSF. With binocular astigmatic defocus of high-power (+2.00 and +3.00 D), ATR astigmatism deteriorated AULCSF more than WTR astigmatism. In a comparison between binocular and monocular astigmatic defocus, CS was significantly worse with binocular astigmatic defocus than with monocular astigmatic defocus at higher spatial frequencies regardless of astigmatic power.

Conclusions

Binocular astigmatic defocus deteriorates CS depending on the amount of astigmatic power. ATR astigmatism reduces CS more than WTR astigmatism dose. In addition, binocular astigmatic defocus affects CS more severely than monocular astigmatic defocus especially at high spatial frequencies.

Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests

PURPOSE

Although vanishing optotype preferential-looking tasks are commonly used to measure visual acuity (VA), the relative sensitivity of these tests to refractive error is not well understood. To address this issue, we determined the effect of spherical and astigmatic simulated refractive errors on adult VA measures obtained using vanishing optotypes, picture optotypes and Sloan letters.

METHODS

VA was determined uniocularly for adults under conditions of spherical (0.0-3.0 DS; n = 23) and astigmatic (0.0-3.0 DC at 90° and 180°; n = 20) defocus using the Cardiff Acuity Test (vanishing optotypes), crowded linear Lea Symbols (picture-optotype recognition task) and the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter chart.

RESULTS

The Cardiff Acuity Test over-estimated VA compared with the Lea Symbols and ETDRS charts in both focused and defocused conditions. The mean difference between the Cardiff Acuity Test and the ETDRS chart was 0.31 logMAR (95% limits of agreement (LOA) 0.10-0.52 logMAR) in focused conditions and 0.64 logMAR (95% LOA 0.25-1.05 logMAR) with 3D of spherical defocus. Defocus degraded VA on all charts, however there was a significant chart-by-defocus interaction whereby the Cardiff Acuity Test was more resistant to the effects of both spherical (P < 0.0001) and cylindrical (P < 0.001) optical defocus than the recognition acuity tasks at all defocus levels.

CONCLUSION

Although the Cardiff Acuity Test provides an easy method for VA measurement in infants and toddlers, there is a considerable overestimation of VA compared with recognition acuity tasks particularly in the presence of defocus. A simple correction factor (of for example three lines overestimate) cannot be applied to Cardiff acuity measures as there is increasing over-estimation of VA with increasing defocus. Infants with significant refractive error may fall within normal visual acuity ranges for the Cardiff Acuity Test.

Influence of different types of astigmatism on visual acuity

PURPOSE

To investigate the change in visual acuity (VA) produced by different types of astigmatism (on the basis of the refractive power and position of the principal meridians) on normal accommodating eyes.

METHODS

The lens induced method was employed to simulate a set of 28 astigmatic blur conditions on different healthy emmetropic eyes. Additionally, 24 values of spherical defocus were also simulated on the same eyes for comparison. VA was measured in each case and the results, expressed in logMAR units, were represented against of the modulus of the dioptric power vector (blur strength).

RESULTS

LogMAR VA varies in a linear fashion with increasing astigmatic blur, being the slope of the line dependent on the accommodative demand in each type of astigmatism. However, in each case, we found no statistically significant differences between the three axes investigated (0°, 45°, 90°). Non-statistically significant differences were found either for the VA achieved with spherical myopic defocus (MD) and mixed astigmatism (MA). VA with simple hyperopic astigmatism (SHA) was higher than with simple myopic astigmatism (SMA), however, in this case non conclusive results were obtained in terms of statistical significance. The VA achieved with imposed compound hyperopic astigmatism (CHA) was highly influenced by the eye's accommodative response.

CONCLUSIONS

VA is correlated with the blur strength in a different way for each type of astigmatism, depending on the accommodative demand. VA is better when one of the focal lines lie on the retina irrespective of the axis orientation; accommodation favors this situation.

Monocular blur alters the tuning characteristics of stereopsis for spatial frequency and size

Our sense of depth perception is mediated by spatial filters at different scales in the visual brain; low spatial frequency channels provide the basis for coarse stereopsis, whereas high spatial frequency channels provide for fine stereopsis. It is well established that monocular blurring of vision results in decreased stereoacuity. However, previous studies have used tests that are broadband in their spatial frequency content. It is not yet entirely clear how the processing of stereopsis in different spatial frequency channels is altered in response to binocular input imbalance. Here, we applied a new stereoacuity test based on narrow-band Gabor stimuli. By manipulating the carrier spatial frequency, we were able to reveal the spatial frequency tuning of stereopsis, spanning from coarse to fine, under blurred conditions. Our findings show that increasing monocular blur elevates stereoacuity thresholds 'selectively' at high spatial frequencies, gradually shifting the optimum frequency to lower spatial frequencies. Surprisingly, stereopsis for low frequency targets was only mildly affected even with an acuity difference of eight lines on a standard letter chart. Furthermore, we examined the effect of monocular blur on the size tuning function of stereopsis. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Correlation Between Stereoacuity and Experimentally Induced Graded Monocular and Binocular Astigmatism

INTRODUCTION

Stereopsis, the highest grade of binocular single vision, is affected by various factors, such as mis-alignment of visual axes, refractive errors especially anisometropia and astigmatism, both of which may result in amblyopia. There are very few studies in literature regarding the relationship between stereoacuity and refractive errors, especially astigmatism.

AIM

The present study was conducted to determine the correlation between stereoacuity and experimentally induced graded astigmatism in emmetropes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized study was conducted on 2000 individuals of either gender, between the ages of 8-35 years, at tertiary care centre attached to a medical college during the period of August 2012 to August 2014, All subjects were emmetropic with normal binocular single vision. Participants were randomly divided into four groups of 500 individuals each. Two groups were subjected to induced myopic astigmatism, either uni-ocularly or binocularly, using + 1.0 D and + 2.0 D cylinders at varying axes i.e., 45(0), 90(0) and 180(0). Similarily, the remaining two groups were subjected to induced hypermetropic astigmatism, using - 1.0 D and - 2.0D cylinders at varying axes i.e. 45(0), 90(0) and 180(0). Near stereoacuity was determined by the Titmus Fly Stereo Test, both before and after induction of astigmatism. Statistical analysis was done using paired t-test and ANOVA.

RESULTS

The mean stereoacuity in emmetropes was 28.81±4.97 seconds of arc. There was a decrease in stereoacuity with increase in dioptric power of astigmatism (p<0.001). Oblique astigmatism reduced the stereoacuity maximally, while stereoacuity was least affected at 180(o) axis. Hypermetropic astigmatism caused more deterioration in stereoacuity than myopic astigmatism. A gross reduction in stereoacuity was noted in induced monocular astigmatism as against binocular astigmatism.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that stereoacuity is significantly affected by even minor degrees of monocular or binocular astigmatism.

Corneal Transplantation in Disease Affecting Only One Eye: Does It Make a Difference to Habitual Binocular Viewing?

BACKGROUND

Clarity of the transplanted tissue and restoration of visual acuity are the two primary metrics for evaluating the success of corneal transplantation. Participation of the transplanted eye in habitual binocular viewing is seldom evaluated post-operatively. In unilateral corneal disease, the transplanted eye may remain functionally inactive during binocular viewing due to its suboptimal visual acuity and poor image quality, vis-à-vis the healthy fellow eye.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This study prospectively quantified the contribution of the transplanted eye towards habitual binocular viewing in 25 cases with unilateral transplants [40 yrs (IQR: 32-42 yrs) and 25 age-matched controls [30 yrs (25-37 yrs)]. Binocular functions including visual field extent, high-contrast logMAR acuity, suppression threshold and stereoacuity were assessed using standard psychophysical paradigms. Optical quality of all eyes was determined from wavefront aberrometry measurements. Binocular visual field expanded by a median 21% (IQR: 18-29%) compared to the monocular field of cases and controls (p = 0.63). Binocular logMAR acuity [0.0 (0.0-0.0)] almost always followed the fellow eye's acuity [0.00 (0.00 --0.02)] (r = 0.82), independent of the transplanted eye's acuity [0.34 (0.2-0.5)] (r = 0.04). Suppression threshold and stereoacuity were poorer in cases [30.1% (13.5-44.3%); 620.8 arc sec (370.3-988.2 arc sec)] than in controls [79% (63.5-100%); 16.3 arc sec (10.6-25.5 arc sec)] (p<0.001). Higher-order wavefront aberrations of the transplanted eye [0.34 μ (0.21-0.51 μ)] were higher than the fellow eye [0.07 μ (0.05-0.11 μ)] (p<0.001) and their reduction with RGP contact lenses [0.09 μ (0.08-0.12 μ)] significantly improved the suppression threshold [65% (50-72%)] and stereoacuity [56.6 arc sec (47.7-181.6 arc sec)] (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In unilateral corneal disease, the transplanted eye does participate in gross binocular viewing but offers limited support to fine levels of binocularity. Improvement in the transplanted eye's optics enhances its participation in binocular viewing. Current metrics of this treatment success can expand to include measures of binocularity to assess the functional benefit of the transplantation process in unilateral corneal disease.

Distance and near visual performance in pseudophakic eyes with simulated spherical and astigmatic blur

PURPOSE

Increased depth-of-focus after cataract surgery is dependent on various ocular characteristics, including refractive astigmatism. This work studied the influence of meridional blur produced by astigmatism, and spherical blur, on distance and near visual performance in pseudophakic eyes.

METHODS

Visual performance was assessed monocularly in 59 pseudophakes (mean ± standard deviation, 66.9 ± 7.53 years) at distance (3.0 m) and near (0.33 m) using high- (HC: 94%) and low-contrast (LC: 10%) visual acuity (VA) charts. Reading performance (maximum reading speed [MRS], threshold print size [TPS] and reading acuity [RA]) was evaluated at near using a reading chart. Four refractive conditions at distance and near were monocularly simulated using the following trial lenses: distance (in-focus: ± 0.00 DS, with-the-rule [WTR] astigmatism: +2.00 × 180; against-the-rule [ATR] astigmatism: +2.00 × 90; spherical defocus: +1.00 DS) and near (in-focus: +3.00 DS, WTR astigmatism: +2.00 × 180; ATR astigmatism: +2.00 × 90, spherical blur: ±0.00 DS).

RESULTS

Distance high- and low-contrast VA were degraded by spherical and astigmatic blur in comparison to the distance in-focus condition (p < 0.001 for all), with astigmatism in either of the forms being more harmful than spherical blur (p < 0.001 for all). At near, best HC- and LCVA were attained with full near correction (p < 0.001 for all) followed by the ATR and WTR astigmatism. For all conditions, the VA measured was independent of whether the astigmatism was WTR or ATR. However, MRS was higher with +3.00 DS and ATR astigmatism compared to the other conditions. RA and TPS significantly strengthened the weak pattern seen with HCVA at near, with ATR astigmatism allowing significantly better RA and TPS than WTR astigmatism (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Simple myopic astigmatism improved near visual performance in pseudophakic eyes at the expense of some deterioration in distance performance. ATR astigmatism degraded VA at distance marginally more than WTR astigmatism and provided a marginally better VA at near. However, the benefit at near was more explicit when measured by reading performance, confirming the role of blur orientation on visual performance.

Can the red-green duochrome test be used prior to correcting the refractive cylinder component?

Purpose

A primary task of the eye care professional is determining the refraction, or optical correction, of a patient. The duochrome red-green test is a standard tool for verification of the final refraction. Traditionally, it is recommended for use both prior to and subsequent to determining the cylindrical or astigmatic component of the refraction. In order for it to be effective when used before correcting the cylinder it is necessary that the COLC (Circle of Least Confusion) be on the retina. This study examined whether it is necessarily true that the duochrome response in uncorrected astigmatism will be as trust-worthy as it is with corrected cylinders.

Methods

The red-green examination was performed monocularly under the following three conditions: a. fully corrected refraction for the subgroup of eyes that had spherical refractions and for the subgroup of eyes with sphero-cylindrical refractions. b. best sphere-only correction without cylinder correction in sphero-cylindrical eyes c. an induced cylinder error in spherical eyes. The interval between the last “red” response and the first “green” response for the right eyes as a group and separately for the physiological cylinder and induced cylinder correction sub-groups was calculated and compared using a paired, two-tailed t-test.

Results

The intervals between “red” and “green” responses were not significantly different in the population as a whole and in the uncorrected physiological cylinder and induced cylinder subgroups examined.

Conclusion

Based on the finding that the interval of red-green equality with fully corrected cylinder and without the cylindrical correction are not significantly different, the red-green duochrome test can indeed be used both before and after cylindrical correction.

Impact of cylinder axis on the treatment for astigmatic amblyopia

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of oblique astigmatism on refractive amblyopia in children aged 3-7 years with those having orthogonal astigmatism.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of medical records.

METHODS

The medical records of patients attending Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan from January 2003 to December 2010 were reviewed and summarized. Seventy-two children with oblique astigmatism-related refractive amblyopia (Group 1) and 82 children with orthogonal astigmatism (Group 2) were chosen. Characteristics such as baseline visual acuity (VA), the time course of VA improvement, refractive error, and family history were assessed.

RESULTS

Group 1 showed a worse baseline mean VA (±SD) of 0.61 (0.13) vs 0.52 (0.16) logMAR (P = .01), a slower rate of amblyopia improvement, and higher prevalence of parental oblique astigmatism (29% vs 5.5%; P < .01) than did Group 2. The cylinder power of astigmatism (in D) causing amblyopia in Group 1 of 2.48 (0.82) was lower than that in Group 2: 2.93 (0.71) (P = .006). However, Group 1 achieved a noninferior resolution of amblyopia (mean final VA 0.18 vs 0.16 logMAR) after longer treatment of 6.45 (2.44) vs 5.86 (2.92) months (P = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

A smaller degree of initial oblique astigmatism caused amblyopia than did orthogonal astigmatism. Although the children with oblique astigmatism achieved equal resolution rates after treatment, this took longer. Therefore, we should pay more attention to children with mild oblique astigmatism, as they are more likely to develop oblique astigmatism-related amblyopia. Moreover, early diagnosis and prompt treatment might help visual improvement.

Prevalence of high astigmatism in children aged 3 to 6 years in Guangxi, China

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence and type of high astigmatism among children aged 3 to 6 years in Guangxi, a relatively undeveloped province in western China, and to examine the correlation between astigmatism and visual acuity.

METHODS

Children aged 3 to 6 years in Nanning, the capital of Guangxi Province, participated in a population-based survey using a cluster random sampling technique. Eye examinations included autorefraction, visual acuity measurements, and assessments of the external eye, anterior segment, media, and fundus. Data for the right eyes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 2304 children examined, the overall prevalence of high astigmatism (≥1.25 diopters by noncycloplegic SureSight autorefraction) was 12.7% (95% confidence interval, 11.3 to 14.0%). The age-specific prevalences of high astigmatism in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old children were 13.8, 13.2, 12.9, and 8.1%, respectively. The prevalence of high astigmatism did not vary with age or gender (p > 0.05). The majority of cases of high astigmatism were with-the-rule astigmatism (82.9%), followed by against-the-rule (12.6%) and oblique (4.5%) astigmatism. A linear correlation was found between astigmatism magnitude and visual acuity (logMAR acuity = 0.068 + 0.055 × astigmatism) in all participants. Multiple linear regression analysis further showed that the correlation of astigmatism with visual acuity was magnitude dependent (β = 0.240). When with-the-rule astigmatism was used as a reference group, against-the-rule astigmatism (β = 0.137) and oblique astigmatism (β = 0.154) were closely correlated with visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

High astigmatism was moderately prevalent among children aged 3 to 6 years in Guangxi Province. With-the-rule astigmatism was the dominant form of astigmatism. Magnitude- and orientation-dependent correlations of astigmatism with visual acuity were confirmed.

The visual and functional impacts of astigmatism and its clinical management

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive overview of research examining the impact of astigmatism on clinical and functional measures of vision, the short and longer term adaptations to astigmatism that occur in the visual system, and the currently available clinical options for the management of patients with astigmatism.

RECENT FINDINGS

The presence of astigmatism can lead to substantial reductions in visual performance in a variety of clinical vision measures and functional visual tasks. Recent evidence demonstrates that astigmatic blur results in short-term adaptations in the visual system that appear to reduce the perceived impact of astigmatism on vision. In the longer term, uncorrected astigmatism in childhood can also significantly impact on visual development, resulting in amblyopia. Astigmatism is also associated with the development of spherical refractive errors. Although the clinical correction of small magnitudes of astigmatism is relatively straightforward, the precise, reliable correction of astigmatism (particularly high astigmatism) can be challenging. A wide variety of refractive corrections are now available for the patient with astigmatism, including spectacle, contact lens and surgical options.

CONCLUSION

Astigmatism is one of the most common refractive errors managed in clinical ophthalmic practice. The significant visual and functional impacts of astigmatism emphasise the importance of its reliable clinical management. With continued improvements in ocular measurement techniques and developments in a range of different refractive correction technologies, the future promises the potential for more precise and comprehensive correction options for astigmatic patients.

D(max) for stereoscopic depth perception with simulated monovision correction

PURPOSE

Persons who wear monovision correction typically receive a clear image in one eye and a blurred image in the other eye. Although monovision is known to elevate the minimum stereoscopic threshold (Dmin), it is uncertain how it influences the largest binocular disparity for which the direction of depth can reliably be perceived (Dmax). In this study, we compared Dmax for stereo when one eye's image is blurred to Dmax when both eyes' images are either clear or blurred.

METHODS

The stimulus was a pair of vertically oriented, random-line patterns. To simulate monovision correction with +1.5 or +2.5 D defocus, the images of the line patterns presented to one eye were spatially low-pass filtered while the patterns presented to the other eye remained unfiltered.

RESULTS

Compared to binocular viewing without blur, Dmin is elevated substantially more in the presence of monocular than binocular simulated blur. Dmax is reduced in the presence of simulated monocular blur by between 13 and 44%, compared to when the images in both eyes are clear. In contrast, when the targets presented to both eyes are blurred equally, Dmax either is unchanged or increases slightly, compared to the values measured with no blur.

CONCLUSION

In conjunction with the elevation of Dmin, the reduction of Dmax with monocular blur indicates that the range of useful stereoscopic depth perception is likely to be compressed in patients who wear monovision corrections.

Correlation between myopic ametropia and stereoacuity in school-aged children in Taiwan

PURPOSE

To investigate the correlation between stereoacuity, as analyzed by the Titmus stereotest, and the severity of myopia, astigmatism and anisometropia in a school-aged population in Taiwan.

METHODS

Cycloplegic autorefraction, best corrected monocular visual acuity and stereoacuity were measured in 6- to 18-year-old school children. Children with amblyopia (best corrected visual acuity of <20/25) or strabismus were excluded from this study. The correlation between stereoacuity and the severity of myopia, astigmatism and anisometropia was analyzed by the Titmus stereotest.

RESULTS

A total of 166 children (95 boys, 71 girls; mean age 10.75 years, range 6-18 years) with myopia or astigmatism were enrolled in the study. The mean spherical error was -2.22 ± 1.70 diopters (D) (range -0.25 to -9.50 D), and the mean astigmatism was -0.72 ± 0.89 (range 0 to -4.50) D. An anisometropia of >1.00 D and spherical anisometropia of >1.00 D were strongly associated with decreased stereoacuity on the Titmus stereotest (P < 0.001). Astigmatism was also correlated with the performance of stereopsis (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Anisometropia (>1.00 D), spherical anisometropia (>1.00 D), and astigmatism were associated with reduced stereoacuity in school-aged children.

Development and treatment of astigmatism-related amblyopia

Blur induced by uncorrected astigmatism during early development can result in amblyopia, as evidenced by reduced best-corrected vision relative to normal, in measures of grating acuity, vernier acuity, contrast sensitivity across a range of spatial frequencies, recognition acuity, and stereoacuity. In addition, uncorrected astigmatism during early development can result in meridional amblyopia, or best-corrected visual deficits that are greater for, or are present only for, specific stimulus orientations. Astigmatism-related amblyopia can be successfully treated with optical correction in children as old as school age, but the amblyopia may not be completely eliminated with optical treatment alone, and the age at which optical treatment is most effective has yet to be determined. Future research on determining the period of susceptibility of the visual system to negative effects of uncorrected astigmatism and exploration of alternative or complimentary treatment methods, in addition to optical correction, are warranted.

Contribution of a real depth distance stereoacuity test to clinical management

Measurement of Stereopsis forms an important part of the clinical assessment of patients with disorders of ocular motility. The introduction of a real depth distance stereoacuity test (FD2) was evaluated in clinical practice and to what extent the introduction affected clinical management. Seventy-three patients under evaluation before and following the introduction of the test were included. Combined thresholds were measured at near using the Frisby and TNO test and at distance using the FD2. Fifty healthy controls were included. Forty-five patients demonstrated Stereopsis using the FD2 and 23 of these had a change in their management based in part on their responses using the FD2. Patients with evidence of Stereopsis using the FD2 were significantly more likely to have change in their management than expected from the whole sample (P = .02). The introduction of a real depth distance stereoacuity test into clinical practice contributed to a change in management when used in conjunction with other tests. The usefulness of the FD2 is limited by its range at 6 m. Use at closer distances necessitates the calculation of binocular threshold from the combined and monocular threshold.

Amblyopia in astigmatic children: patterns of deficits

Neural changes that result from disruption of normal visual experience during development are termed amblyopia. To characterize visual deficits specific to astigmatism-related amblyopia, we compared best-corrected visual performance in 330 astigmatic and 475 non-astigmatic kindergarten through 6th grade children. Astigmatism was associated with deficits in letter, grating and vernier acuity, high and middle spatial frequency contrast sensitivity, and stereoacuity. Although grating acuity, vernier acuity, and contrast sensitivity were reduced across stimulus orientation, astigmats demonstrated orientation-dependent deficits (meridional amblyopia) only for grating acuity. Astigmatic children are at risk for deficits across a range of visual functions.

Pooling signals from vertically and non-vertically orientation-tuned disparity mechanisms in human stereopsis

To understand the role that orientation-tuned disparity-sensitive mechanisms play in the perception of stereoscopic depth, we measured stereothresholds using two sets of random-dot stimuli that produce identical stimulation of disparity mechanisms tuned to vertical orientation but dissimilar stimulation of disparity mechanisms tuned to non-vertical orientations. Either 1 or 1.5D of astigmatic blur was simulated in the random-dot images presented to both eyes, using two axis configurations. In the parallel-axis conditions, the axis of simulated astigmatic blur was same in the two eyes (0, 45 or 135 o[rientation]deg). In the orthogonal-axis conditions, the axes of astigmatic blur were orthogonal in the two eyes (LE: 180, RE: 90; LE: 90, RE: 180; LE: 45, RE: 135; and LE: 135, RE: 45). Whereas the stimulation of disparity mechanisms tuned to near-vertical orientations should be similar in the oblique parallel- and orthogonal-axis conditions, the stimulation of non-vertically tuned disparity mechanisms should be dissimilar. Measured stereothresholds were higher in the orthogonal compared to the parallel-axis condition by factors of approximately 2 and 5, for 1 and 1.5D of simulated oblique astigmatic blur, respectively. Further, for comparable magnitudes of simulated astigmatic blur, stereothresholds in the (LE: 180, RE: 90 and LE: 90, RE: 180) conditions were similar to those in the (LE: 45, RE: 135 and LE: 135, RE: 45) conditions. These results suggest that the computation of horizontal disparity includes substantial contributions from disparity mechanisms tuned to non-vertical orientations. Simulations using a modified version of a disparity-energy model [Qian, N., & Zhu, Y. (1997). Physiological computation of binocular disparity. Vision Research, 37, 1811-1827], show (1) that pooling across disparity mechanisms tuned to vertical and non-vertical orientations is required to account for our data and (2) that this pooling can provide the spatial resolution needed to encode spatially changing horizontal disparities.