Effects of burn wound excision on bacterial colonization and invasion

Bacterial fluorescence imaging as a predictor of skin graft integration in burn wounds

BACKGROUND

Split-thickness skin graft (STSG)1 integration rates are susceptible to improvement. Infection and/or biofilm should be appropriately addressed prior to grafting to improve the likelihood of graft-take. Incorporating technological aids such as fluorescence (FL)2 imaging (MolecuLight®), which accurately locates areas of bacterial loads above 104 CFU/gr, for graft site assessment and preparation could yield better outcomes.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective observational study included adult burn patients with previously infected wounds that had been deemed clinically and microbiologically clean and were therefore candidates for grafting. Prior to grafting, a FL imaging assessment (blinded to the surgical team) localized areas positive for moderate-high bacterial loads (>104 CFU/gr). Intra-operatively, a standard swab sample from the recipient site was collected by the surgical team. Postoperatively, areas positive/negative for FL and areas of graft take and failure were overlapped and measured (cm2) over a 2D schematic. The performance and accuracy of FL imaging and swab sampling in relation to graft outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

38 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean total body surface area (TBSA)3 involvement was 14.5 ± 12.4 % [range 0.8 - 40.2 %]. 25/38 of the subjects enrolled had complete graft take while 13 had partial graft losses. There were no total losses. FL-imaging was positive in 100 % of losses versus 31 % (4/13) of the swab microbiology. FL-imaging was found to have a sensitivity of 86 %, specificity of 98 %, PPV of 72 %, NPV of 99 %, and an accuracy of 94 % for predicting any type or range of graft loss in the entire cohort. Meanwhile, the sensitivity of microbiology from swab samples was 30 %, with a specificity of 76 %.

CONCLUSIONS

FL imaging is an accurate method for assessing recipient sites and predicting the outcome of a skin graft among burn patients. These findings suggest that FL imaging can inform better decision-making surrounding grafts that may lead to better outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IIA, Therapeutic study.

Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: The Silent Plight of Burn Patients

The global increasing spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is threatening the control of various infections in vulnerable populations and patient groups. One of the most affected groups is patients with burns, who are prone to hyperinfection as they suffer from a hypermetabolic state and weaken immune barriers. Those patients also share the infection risk of patients hospitalized for a long time, including ventilator-associated pneumonia and urinary tract infections. While some preventative and therapeutic management styles are still controversial, we discuss consensuses here. In this review, we aim to present the current knowledge on multidrug resistance with a special focus on patients with burns, discuss various causative organisms and their treatment options, and highlight the importance of antibiotic stewardship and teamwork in responding to an outbreak of MDROs.

Assessing Pediatric Burn Wound Infection Using a Point-of-Care Fluorescence Imaging Device

Wound infection is the most common complication among pediatric burn patients. When not treated promptly, burn wound infection may lead to delayed healing, failure of skin grafts, or death. Standard burn wound assessment includes inspection for visual signs and symptoms of infection (VSSI) and microbial sampling. To aid in the assessment of burn wound infection, the MolecuLight, a point-of-care autofluorescence imaging device, was introduced at our pediatric burn program in 2020. The MolecuLight uses violet light to illuminate the wound bed, causing clinically relevant quantities of 29 different species of bacteria (>104 CFU/g) to fluoresce in real time. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the role of the MolecuLight in the management of pediatric burn wounds and determine if the findings from the MolecuLight corresponded to VSSI and/or microbial sampling. A retrospective review of patients 0-18 years who had burn wounds assessed with the MolecuLight between November 1, 2020 and June 8, 2023 was conducted. Data were extracted from the medical records of 178 eligible patients with 218 wounds imaged with the device. Fluorescence corresponded with VSSI in 81% of wounds and microbial findings in 82% of wounds. MolecuLight fluorescence, in combination with VSSI, improved sensitivity for detecting wound infections by 39% and decreased specificity by 19% compared to visual signs and symptoms in isolation. Incorporation of the MolecuLight in standard burn wound assessments can improve the detection of infections, which may promote improved wound healing outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship.

Delayed admission to hospital with proper prehospital treatments prevents severely burned patients from sepsis in China: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in burn patients. However, the optimal timing of admission which can minimize the probability of sepsis is still unclear. This study aims to determine the optimal time period of admission for severely burned patients and find out the possible reasons for it.

METHOD

185 victims to the Kunshan factory aluminum dust explosion accident, which happened on August 2nd, 2014, were studied. The optimal cutpoint for continuous variables in survival models was determined by means of the maximally selected rank statistic. Univariate and multivariate analyses were further conducted to verify that admission time was not a risk factor for sepsis. Subgroup analyses were performed to find out possible contributing factors for the result.

RESULT

The cutoff point for admission time was determined as seven hours, which was supported by the survival curve (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that, in our study population, delayed admission time was not a risk factor for sepsis (HR = 0.610, 95 %CI = 0.415 - 0.896, p = 0.012). Subgroup analyses showed that "Tracheotomy before admission" (p = 0.002), "Whole blood transfusion" (p < 0.001), "Hemodynamic instability before admission" (p = 0.02), "Has a burn department in the hospital" (p = 0.009), "Has a burn ICU in the hospital" (p < 0.001), "Acute heart failure (AHF)" (p = 0.05), "acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)" (p = 0.05) and "GI bleeding" (p = 0.04) were all statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In our study population, we found that delayed admission time was not a risk factor associated with a reduced incidence of sepsis among severely burned patients. This might be attributed to variations in prehospital treatments (whole blood transfusion and tracheotomy), whether the hospital had a burn department/ICU, and certain complications (AHF, ARDS and GI bleeding). It can be inferred that early prehospital care plays a crucial role in reducing sepsis risk among severe burn patients.

Enzymatic Debridement (Nexobrid) on Burned Hands: Retrospective Review from a Burn Referral Center in Spain

Background

In deep burns, the gold standard of treatment is surgical debridement and coverage, but in hands, this may lead to poor aesthetic and functional results due to the complexity of this anatomical area. Enzymatic debridement (Nexobrid) allows for the preservation of the dermal remnant and reduces the number of skin grafts when compared with surgical excision. The study aimed to analyze the patients with intermediate second-degree or deeper burns in hands who required surgical treatment after Nexobrid and those who avoided it.

Methods

A descriptive retrospective study of all patients who underwent Nexobrid following hand burns between May 2015 and April 2020 treated in Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital was conducted. After the enzymatic debridement, the burn unit team determined if the burn required conservative treatment or surgery, based on the characteristics of the wound bed.

Results

A total of 202 hands were collected. Most hands included in this study had deep second-degree burns (122; 60.4%). Almost half of the hands underwent surgery (99; 49%), and most had deep second-degree burns (61; 61.62%). During follow-up, 24 hands required surgery for sequelae (11.88%) and 62 did not undergo follow-up (30.69%). In the group that needed sequelae surgery, 21 needed surgery after Nexobrid and three of them were healed with conservative treatment after Nexobrid (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Nexobrid decreases the number of surgical procedures in deep burns of the hand because more conservative attitudes are adopted. Also, it seems to reduce the need of surgery due to burn sequelae.

Multi-resistant organisms in burn patients: an end or a new beginning

Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in burn patients, and the rise of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) has made it more challenging to manage and prevent infections. This review examines the available treatment options for MDROs in burn patients and anticipates the future challenges posed by their increasing prevalence. The review covers new antibiotics, such as Eravacycline and Plazomicin, as well as non-antibiotic therapies, such as bacteriophages and nanoparticles. Future research should focus on examining the long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and in vivo efficacy of different treatment modalities. The potential of alternative therapies, such as probiotics and low-frequency magnetic fields, should also be explored. Accurate and rapid diagnostic and monitoring tools for detecting MDROs in burn patients should be developed. The emergence of MDROs in burn care is a challenge and a new beginning in infection innovation and novel treatments.

The impact of infection on length of stay in adult burns: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The disruption to the immune system and profound metabolic response to burn injury gives rise to a unique susceptibility to infection. Indeed, infection is one of the most frequently encountered post-burns complications placing significant burden on patients and healthcare system. Advancements in burn care have led to marked improvements in burn-related mortality and morbidity; however, scarce hospital resources hamper adequate burn-related care, and patient length of stay (LOS) in hospital is an important drain on such resources. The aim of this review was to assess and evaluate the existing literature relating to the impact of infections on LOS in hospitalised, adult burn patients.

METHODS

Electronic searches were performed in Medline and Embase. Eligible studies were those reporting on LOS and infection in adult burn populations. Articles published before 2000 were excluded to ensure that the analysis was focused on contemporary literature that reflects current, clinical management of burn patients.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies (54,397 burn patients) were included in the review. All studies were retrospective, with the majority undertaken in North America (14 studies). The mean age range was 38-67 years and the majority of patients were male. Inhalation injury was recorded in eleven studies. The most common types of infection included pneumonia, blood stream infections (BSI) and burn wound infections. Overall, there was a trend towards a positive association between infection and LOS.

CONCLUSION

The results of this scoping review provide an overview of the existing literature on the relationship between infection and LOS in adult burn populations. However, significant gaps remain in knowledge which call for further high-quality research. Standardised definitions for the collection of infection data and the use of burns specific infection control guidelines are also critical to understanding and improving patient outcomes.

Prevalence and antimicrobial-resistant patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa among burn patients attending Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Burns are one of the most common forms of trauma globally. P. aeruginosa plays a prominent role as an etiological agent among burn patients. There is a paucity of information about the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of P. aeruginosa among burn patients in Ethiopia. Hence, this study was designed to assess the prevalence and antimicrobial-resistant patterns of P. aeruginosa among burn patients attending Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

METHODS

Hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College among burn patients from November 2020 to April 2021. Identification of P. aeruginosa was performed using Culture, Biochemical tests, and, Gram staining. Antimicrobial resistance testing was done using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Logistic regression was computed to determine associated factors.

RESULTS

From 210 burn wound cultures, 27 (12.86%) were found positive for P. aeruginosa. All the isolates showed greater than 70% susceptibility to the tested antibiotics except Gentamycin, Ceftazidime, and, Ciprofloxacin. In addition, 33.33% of P. aeruginosa isolates were multidrug-resistant. Admission type, Hospital stay time and Total body surface area (TBSA) had a statistically significant association (all with P-value <0.05) with the acquisition of P. aeruginosa infection.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the prevalence of P. aeruginosa isolates among burn patients is almost 13%. Most P. aeruginosa isolates were sensitive to Imipenem, while they were most resistant to Gentamycin. One-third of P. aeruginosa were multidrug-resistant. This suggests the need to monitor the treatment of infection with the pathogen to limit the possibility of the emergence of multidrug-resistant isolates in burn centers.

[Surgical management of burn injury patients : Comments on the guidelines on treatment of thermal injuries in adults]

The treatment of burn injury patients is a unique challenge for clinicians. The extent of thermal injuries ranges from very small burns to life-threatening burn injuries. Insufficient treatment can result in a substantial impairment in the quality of life. In order to avoid such sequelae a targeted treatment must be carried out. A precise diagnosis determines the necessary treatment. Superficial second-degree burns (2a) not involving the face, hand or joints with a total body surface area smaller than 10% can usually be treated with modern wound dressings in an outpatient setting. Deep second-degree burns (2b) are an indication for debridement. In addition to the classical surgical procedures with tangential excision, enzymatic debridement can also be employed. Similarly, indeterminate burns (2a/2b) are also considered to be an indication for enzymatic debridement. Third-degree burns are treated with early debridement and skin grafting. These patients can also benefit from special dermal replacement procedures for an improvement of the functional and esthetic results. Due to the long-term visible sequelae of burns, aftercare of these patients is indicated.

Amphetamine Positivity Prior to Burn Surgery Does not Adversely Affect Intraoperative Outcomes

The treatment of burn patients using amphetamines is challenging due hemodynamic liabilty and altered physiology. Wide variation exists in the operative timing for this patient population. We hypothesize that burn excision in patients admitted with amphetamine positivity is safe regardless of timing. Data from two verified burn centers between 2017 and 2022 with differing practice patterns in operative timing for amphetamine-positive patients. Center A obtains toxicology only on admission and proceeds with surgery based on hemodynamic status and operative urgency, whereas Center B sends daily toxicology until a negative test results. The primary outcome was the use of vasoactive agents during the index operation, modeled using logistic regression adjusting for burn severity and hospital days to index operation. Secondary outcomes included death and inpatient complications. A total of 270 patients were included, and there were no significant differences in demographics or burn characteristics between centers. Center A screened once and Center B obtained a median of four screens prior to the surgery. The adjusted OR of requiring vasoactive support intraoperatively was not associated with negative toxicology result (P = .821). Having a body surface area burned >20% conferred a significantly higher risk of vasoactive support (adj. OR 13.42 [3.90-46.23], P < .001). Mortality, number of operations, stroke, and hospital length of stay were similar between cohorts. Comparison between two verified burn centers indicates that waiting until a negative amphetamine toxicology result does not impact intraoperative management or subsequent burn outcomes. Serial toxicology tests are unnecessary to guide operative timing of burn patients with amphetamine use.

Ten-Year Analysis of Bacterial Colonisation and Outcomes of Major Burn Patients with a Focus on Pseudomonas aeruginosa

A retrospective descriptive study included patients admitted with severe burns over the course of 10 years (2008-2018). Across all patients, there were 39 different species of bacteria, with 23 species being Gram-negative and 16 being Gram-positive bacteria, with also five different species of fungi cultured. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most commonly isolated organism, with 57.45% of patients having a positive culture. There was a significant difference in the number of P. aeruginosa isolated from patients that acquired their burns at work, in a garden, inside a vehicle, in a garage or in a public place. In patients that were positive for P. aeruginosa, the number of operations was higher (2.4) and the length of stay was significantly increased (80.1 days). Patients that suffered from substance abuse demonstrated significantly higher numbers of isolated P. aeruginosa (14.8%). Patients that suffered from both mental health illness and substance abuse demonstrated significantly higher numbers of P. aeruginosa isolated (18.5%). In the P. aeruginosa-negative group, there were significantly fewer patients that had been involved in a clothing fire. Furthermore, in the P. aeruginosa-negative patient cohort, the mortality rate was significantly higher (p = 0.002). Since the incidence of P. aeruginosa was also associated with a decreased mortality rate, it may be that patients admitted to hospital for shorter periods of time were less likely to be colonised with P. aeruginosa. This study demonstrates novel factors that may increase the incidence of P. aeruginosa isolated from burn patients.

[Surgical management of burn injury patients : Comments on the guidelines on treatment of thermal injuries in adults]

The treatment of burn injury patients is a unique challenge for clinicians. The extent of thermal injuries ranges from very small burns to life-threatening burn injuries. Insufficient treatment can result in a substantial impairment in the quality of life. In order to avoid such sequelae a targeted treatment must be carried out. A precise diagnosis determines the necessary treatment. Superficial second-degree burns (2a) not involving the face, hand or joints with a total body surface area smaller than 10% can usually be treated with modern wound dressings in an outpatient setting. Deep second-degree burns (2b) are an indication for debridement. In addition to the classical surgical procedures with tangential excision, enzymatic debridement can also be employed. Similarly, indeterminate burns (2a/2b) are also considered to be an indication for enzymatic debridement. Third-degree burns are treated with early debridement and skin grafting. These patients can also benefit from special dermal replacement procedures for an improvement of the functional and esthetic results. Due to the long-term visible sequelae of burns, aftercare of these patients is indicated.

Hypertrophic Scar

Hypertrophic scars frequently develop post-burn, and are characterized by their pruritic, painful, raised, erythematous, dyschromic, and contractile qualities. This article aims to synthesize knowledge on the clinical and molecular development, evolution, management, and measurement of hypertrophic burn scar for both patient and clinician knowledge.

Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens in Burn Wound, Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Approaches (Conventional Antimicrobials and Nanoparticles)

Multidrug-resistant pathogens are one of the common causes of death in burn patients and have a high risk of nosocomial infections, especially pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and cellulitis. The role of prolonged hospitalization and empirical antibiotics administration in developing multidrug-resistant pathogens is undeniable. In the early days of admitting burn patients, Gram-positive bacteria were the dominant isolates with a more sensitive antibiotic pattern. However, the emergence of Gram-negative bacteria that are more resistant later occurs. Trustworthy guideline administration in burn wards is one of the strategies to prevent multidrug-resistant pathogens. Also, a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach is an effective way to avoid antibiotic resistance that involves infectious disease specialists, pharmacists, and burn surgeons. However, the emerging resistance to conventional antimicrobial approaches (such as systemic antibiotic exposure, traditional wound dressing, and topical antibiotic ointments) among burn patients has challenged the treatment of multidrug-resistant infections, and using nanoparticles is a suitable alternative. In this review article, we will discuss different aspects of multidrug-resistant pathogens in burn wounds, emphasizing the full role of these pathogens in burn wounds and discussing the application of nanotechnology in dealing with them. Also, some advances in various types of nanomaterials, including metallic nanoparticles, liposomes, hydrogels, carbon quantum dots, and solid lipid nanoparticles in burn wound healing, will be explained.

The Burn Wound

Skin serves as a protective barrier against infection, prevents excessive fluid and electrolyte losses, performs crucial thermoregulation, and provides tactile feedback of surroundings. The skin also plays an essential role in human perception of body image, personal appearance, and self-confidence. With these many diverse functions, understanding normal anatomic composition of skin is pivotal to evaluating the extent of its disruption from burn injury. This article discusses the pathophysiology, initial evaluation, subsequent progression, and healing of burn wounds. By delineating the various microcellular and macrocellular alterations of burn injury, this review also augments providers' capacity to deliver patient-centered, evidence-based burn care.

Introduction: The Multidisciplinary Team Approach to Burn Care

Since the first burn units were established following World War II, great advances in understanding and treating burn shock, smoke inhalation injury, pneumonia, and invasive burn wound infections, and in achieving early burn-wound closure, have greatly decreased postburn morbidity and mortality. These advances were the result of closely integrated multidisciplinary teams of clinicians and researchers. The team approach to burns is a model for success in the care of any challenging clinical problem.

Can Cold Atmospheric Plasma Be Used for Infection Control in Burns? A Preclinical Evaluation

Wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication and is responsible for higher rates of mortality in burn patients. Because of the resistance of PA to many antibiotics and antiseptics, an effective treatment is difficult. As a possible alternative, cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) can be considered for treatment, as antibacterial effects are known from some types of CAP. Hence, we preclinically tested the CAP device PlasmaOne and found that CAP was effective against PA in various test systems. CAP induced an accumulation of nitrite, nitrate, and hydrogen peroxide, combined with a decrease in pH in agar and solutions, which could be responsible for the antibacterial effects. In an ex vivo contamination wound model using human skin, a reduction in microbial load of about 1 log₁₀ level was observed after 5 min of CAP treatment as well as an inhibition of biofilm formation. However, the efficacy of CAP was significantly lower when compared with commonly used antibacterial wound irrigation solutions. Nevertheless, a clinical use of CAP in the treatment of burn wounds is conceivable on account of the potential resistance of PA to common wound irrigation solutions and the possible wound healing-promoting effects of CAP.

Changes in Burn Wound Microbiology Profile Over 14 Years of an Adult Tertiary Burn Center

Burn wound colonization can progress to invasive infection. During 14 years of this study, the burn center was relocated to a center with improved infrastructure. This study investigates the association that infrastructure, geography, and time may have on colonization. Data were collected from October 2004 to August 2018, and relocation took place in June 2010, defining the two study periods. Admission swabs were within 48 hours. Unique isolates and resistance data were analyzed and compared statistically between the two study periods. In total, 2001 patients with 24,226 wound swabs were included. Median age was 45.4 (IQR 30.2-61.6), length of stay was 11 days (IQR 6-21), and %TBSA was 5.5 (IQR 2.5-11). Staph. aureus (33.7/100 patients) and Pseudomonas spp. (13.1/100 patients) were the most prevalent bacterial growths. After admission, the prevalence of methicillin resistant Staph. aureus, Coliform spp., and Aci. baumanni was greater in the first site, and Candida spp. colonization was higher in the second study period site. The prevalence of patients affected by multi-drug-resistant organisms was lower in the second study site (13.5/100 patients vs 16.6/100 patients; P < .05). There are differences in burn wound colonization across time, within the same region. Candida spp. growth has been shown to be increased over time and represents an added challenge. Awareness facilitates effective empirical antimicrobial therapies and protocols locally.

A PREVENTIVE TOOL FOR PREDICTING BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN WITH BURNS

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Despite significant advances in pediatric burn care, bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain a compelling challenge during recovery. A personalized medicine approach for accurate prediction of BSIs before they occur would contribute to prevention efforts and improve patient outcomes. Methods: We analyzed the blood transcriptome of severely burned (total burn surface area [TBSA] ≥20%) patients in the multicenter Inflammation and Host Response to Injury ("Glue Grant") cohort. Our study included 82 pediatric (aged <16 years) patients, with blood samples at least 3 days before the observed BSI episode. We applied the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) machine-learning algorithm to select a panel of biomarkers predictive of BSI outcome. Results: We developed a panel of 10 probe sets corresponding to six annotated genes ( ARG2 [ arginase 2 ], CPT1A [ carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A ], FYB [ FYN binding protein ], ITCH [ itchy E3 ubiquitin protein ligase ], MACF1 [ microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 ], and SSH2 [ slingshot protein phosphatase 2 ]), two uncharacterized ( LOC101928635 , LOC101929599 ), and two unannotated regions. Our multibiomarker panel model yielded highly accurate prediction (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.938; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.881-0.981) compared with models with TBSA (0.708; 95% CI, 0.588-0.824) or TBSA and inhalation injury status (0.792; 95% CI, 0.676-0.892). A model combining the multibiomarker panel with TBSA and inhalation injury status further improved prediction (0.978; 95% CI, 0.941-1.000). Conclusions: The multibiomarker panel model yielded a highly accurate prediction of BSIs before their onset. Knowing patients' risk profile early will guide clinicians to take rapid preventive measures for limiting infections, promote antibiotic stewardship that may aid in alleviating the current antibiotic resistance crisis, shorten hospital length of stay and burden on health care resources, reduce health care costs, and significantly improve patients' outcomes. In addition, the biomarkers' identity and molecular functions may contribute to developing novel preventive interventions.

Surgical Repair of the Acute Burn Wound: Who, When, What Techniques? What Is the Future?

Modern burns surgery is multidisciplinary, multimodal and includes a dermal preservation approach. The management of the surgical wound starts in the pre-hospital environment with stabilization and assessment of the burn injured patient according to protocols of trauma resuscitation with special emphasis in the assessment of the burn depth and surface area. A large burn requires fluid resuscitation and physiological support, including counterbalancing hyper metabolism, fighting infection and starting a long burns intensive care journey. A deep burn may impose the need for surgical debridement and cover through a staged approach of excision of devitalized tissue depending on its extension and patient circumstances. These methodologies warrant patients survivability and require professionals integrated in a multidisciplinary team sharing decisions and directing management. Burns Multimodality involves multiple techniques used according to patient's needs, wound environment, operators experience and available resources. Traditional practices used together with new techniques may reduce morbidity and operative time but also challenge stablished practice. The concept of using the best teams with the best techniques combines with the need for selective and judicious surgery that preserves tissue architecture and spares as much as possible dermal component, therefore reducing the possibility of functional impairment and cosmetic embarrassment caused by pathological scars. Who is best placed to perform these tasks, the appropriate or best timing of surgery and the different practices used to achieve best results will be discussed, together with a reflection on what the future holds for these fundamental steps in the management of the burn injured patient turning into a functional burn survivor.

Preliminary Single-Center Experience of Bromelain-Based Eschar Removal in Children with Mixed Deep Dermal and Full Thickness Burns

Introduction: Early eschar removal is the standard management of burns. The goal is to remove all of the necrotic tissue and render the wound suitable for healing or skin grafting. The enzymatic debridement of burn wounds allows for minimally invasive removal of burn eschar. The aim of the study was to describe and compare the demographic characteristics, surgical treatment and outcomes of patients treated with Nexobrid® with patients who had standard surgical excision. Material and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on children who underwent enzymatic debridement. The study group was compared with children treated with the standard of care (SoC). Results: Twelve children (mean age 8 years, range 3 to 15 years) with mixed deep dermal and full thickness burn wounds were treated with Nexobrid®. The mean size of the burns was 29% TBSA. The median percentage TBSA debrided using Nexobrid® was 15% (range 2–27%). In a clinical assessment, enzymatic debridement was effective in removing dead tissue in a single application. No adverse reaction to Nexobrid® and serious complications after enzymatic procedure were recorded in the study group. The estimated relative risk of the need for reconstructive procedures decreases 3.5 times for the study group (RR 3.5, 95%CI 0.9–13.5, p = 0.089). Conclusion: The bromelain-based enzymatic method offers a good and safe debridement option to improve the treatment and life quality of children with severe burns. The main outcome of interest was the number of reconstructive procedures due to scar contractures, which was reduced in the group treated enzymatically compared to the SoC-treated children.

THE IMPORTANCE OF BIOMECHANICS AND THE KINETIC CHAINS OF HUMAN MOVEMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND TREATMENT OF BURN SCARS – A NARRATIVE REVIEW WITH ILLUSTRATIVE CASES

BACKGROUND

Burn scars are a major clinical sequelae of severe burn wound healing. To effectively establish a successful treatment plan and achieve durable results, understanding the pathophysiology of scar development is of utmost importance.

METHODS

A narrative review of the principles of the kinematic chain of movement and the hypothesised effect on burn scar development based on properties of burn scars was performed. An examination of the literature supporting these concepts is presented in conjunction with illustrative cases, with a particular focus on the effect of combination treatments that include ablative fractional resurfacing with surgical contracture releases.

DISCUSSION

Ablative fractional resurfacing combined with the surgical release of contractures are an effective treatment modality for burn scar reconstruction. This treatment approach seems particularly effective because it is one of the only approaches where the principles of functional kinematics can be addressed when tailoring a reconstructive approach to an individual burn patient. The presented cases illustrate the importance of recognising and including the principles of functional kinematic chains in any reconstructive treatment approach for burn scars. Further, epifascial contracture bands are cord like structures which can be found underneath the subcutaneous fat of scar contractures which follow the principles of functional kinematics. Contractures can be more efficiently released if these structures are divided as well.

CONCLUSION

Ablative fractional resurfacing combined with local tissue re-arrangements is a promising approach to address the underlying forces leading to hypertrophic burn scarring. To achieve an optimal outcome, it is essential to recognise and address the origin of the pathology when treating burn scars. Ablative fractional laser resurfacing allows a different scar approach as it is not limited to one surgical site and thus enables for effective treatment at the cause of the pathology.

Enzymatic debridement in critically injured burn patients - Our experience in the intensive care setting and during burn resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Much of the recent literature on bromelain based enzymatic debridement of burn injury has focused on its use in smaller burn injury and specialist areas such as the hands or genitals (Krieger et al., 2012; Schulz et al., 2017a,b,c,d). This is despite the original papers describing its use in larger burn injury (Rosenberg et al., 2004, 2014). The current EMA license for Nexobrid™ advises that it should not be used for burn injuries of more than 15% TBSA and should be used with caution in patients with pulmonary burn trauma and suspected pulmonary burn trauma. The original safety and efficacy trial of NexoBrid™ limited its use to 15% TBSA aliquots with concern regarding the effect of bromelain on coagulation. In a European consensus paper of experienced burns clinicians, now on its second iteration, 100% of respondents agreed that "up to 30% BSA can be treated by enzymatic debridement based on individual decision" (Hirche et al., 2017). Hofmaenner et al.'s recent study on the safety of enzymatic debridement in extensive burns larger than 15% provides some further evidence that "bromelain based enzymatic debridement can be carried out safely in large-area burns" (Hofmaenner et al., 2020) but the literature is scant in these larger debridement areas. In our centre we have been using enzymatic debridement for resuscitation level burn injury since 2016. We have gained significant learning in this time; this article aims to describe our current protocol for enzymatic debridement in this patient population and highlight specific learning points that might aid other centres in using enzymatic debridement for larger burn injury.

METHOD

We performed a search of the IBID database to identify all adult patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria of resuscitation level burn injury (defined as total burn surface area (TBSA) ≥15% in patients aged >16 years), or level 3 admission following burn injury and who underwent Enzymatic Debridement. A case note review was completed, and details comprising patient demographics, TBSA, mechanism of burn, presence of inhalation injury, sequencing of debridement, length of ICU and hospital stay, blood product utilisation and the need for autografting were recorded. No ethical approval has been sought for this retrospective review.

RESULTS

We identified 29 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria (Table 1). Between June 2016 and June 2020 the average total burn size of patients who had at least some of their burn treated by enzymatic debridement increased from 21.4% in 2016/17 to 34.7% in 2019/20. In these patients the actual area treated by enzymatic debridement also increased from 11.9% TBSA to 20.3% TBSA. 19 patients (66%) had enzymatic debridement performed within 24 h of injury, a further 2 patients (7%) within 48 h after injury. Patients were more likely to have enzymatic debridement commenced in the first 24 h after injury if they had circumferential limb injury (39% vs 9%) or were planned for enzyme only debridement (78% vs 28%). Those who were planned for combination enzyme and surgical debridement were more likely to have enzymatic debridement commenced after the first 48 h (75%). We have performed enzymatic debridement overnight on one occasion, for a patient who presented with circumferential limb injury and was determined to undergo urgent debridement.

CONCLUSION

Much of the literature has described the use of enzymatic debridement in smaller burns, and specialist areas. However, it is our opinion that the advantages of enzymatic debridement appear to be greater in larger burns with a facility for whole burn excision on the day of admission in the ICU cubicle. We have demonstrated significantly reduced blood loss, improved dermal preservation, reduced need for autografting, and a reduction in the number of trips to theatre. We would advocate that both the team and the patient need to be as prepared as they would be for a traditional surgical excision. The early part of our learning curve for enzymatic debridement in resuscitation level injuries was steep, and we were able to build on experience from managing smaller injuries. We recommend any team wishing to using enzymatic debridement gain experience in the same way and develop robust local pathways prior to attempting use in larger burn injuries.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in Australian burns patients

Background: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is perceived to reduce intraoperative bacteraemia and prevent surgical site infections, however, the evidence for its use in burns surgery is limited. Excessive use of perioperative antibiotics has become a growing concern. The authors aimed to audit the prescribing practices of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis at the Victorian Adult Burns Service and determine whether the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis influenced the risk of postoperative wound infection, bacte-raemia and antibiotic resistance. Methods: This retrospective chart review included all acute adult burns patients who had an operation between November 2018 and November 2019. Basic demographic data, burn specific data and data on perioperative antibiotic use were collected. The outcome measures were wound infection, bacteraemia, other infections and presence of resistant organisms. Results: Results demonstrated that almost all patients (98.6%) received perioperative antibiotic prophylax-is. In comparison, there was no significant difference between the rate of postoperative wound infection, bacteraemia or antibiotic resistance between patients receiving a short or long course of antibiotics. Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrate variable use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with-in one burns unit. There were many cases of unsubstantiated use of long courses of antibiotics without apparent benefit for clinical outcomes of wound infection or bacteraemia. With the growing concern over antibiotic overuse and development of resistance, there is an increasing need for development of clear guidelines for antibiotic use in burns surgery.

Carbon-Based Nanomaterials: Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene and Fullerenes in Control of Burns Infections and Wound Healing

Burn injuries are extremely debilitating, resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates around the world. The risk of infection escalates in correlation with impairment of skin integrity, creating a barrier to healing and possibly leading to sepsis. With its numerous advantages over traditional treatment methods, nanomaterial-based wound healing has immense capability for treating and preventing wound infections. Carbon-based nanomaterials (CNMs) owing to their distinctive physicochemical and biological properties have emerged as promising platform for biomedical applications. Carbon nanotubes, graphene, fullerenes, and their nanocomposites have demonstrated broad antimicrobial activity against invasive bacteria, fungi, and viruses causing burn wound infection. The specific mechanisms that govern the antimicrobial activity of CNMs must be understood in order to ensure the safe and effective incorporation of these structures into biomaterials. However, it is challenging to decouple individual and synergistic contributions of physical, chemical, and electrical effects of CNMs on cells. This review reported on significant advances in the application of CNMs in burn wound infection and wound healing, with brief discussion on the interaction between different families of CNMs and microorganisms to assess antimicrobial performance.

Prevention and treatment of burn wound infections: the role of topical antimicrobials

INTRODUCTION

Infections related to the skin are the principal drivers of morbidity and mortality following severe burn, therefore a diverse armamentarium of topical antimicrobial agents were developed over the history of burn care. The last 30 years witnessed dramatic changes in the application of surgical intervention and utilization of topical therapies.

AREAS COVERED

We explore well-known topical antimicrobial products used in burn care. First, we investigate how fundamental changes in the practice of burn surgery influenced the choice of topical therapies used. Then, we examine antimicrobial creams and ointments commonly recognized due to their long record of use in burn care. Next, we dive into antimicrobial solutions commonly used as adjuncts to surgical intervention. Finally, we explore representative antimicrobial dressings, an ever-advancing roster of products opening the door to the next era in burn care. We also describe how these new agents relate to already established tools in present-day burn care.

EXPERT OPINION

In the current day, though the wisdom of early excision and wound closure remains valid, we continue to strive to minimize aggressive wound excision and disfiguring donor tissue collection while securing rapid wound closure. To this end, antimicrobial therapies are titrated to optimize operative outcomes and provide non-operative wound care when appropriate. Antimicrobial agents bridge the gap with the next generation of skin substitute and skin replacement therapies.

Microbial profile of burn wounds managed with enzymatic debridement using bromelain-based agent, NexoBrid®

The antimicrobial properties of bromelain have been previously studied. However, the effect of enzymatic debridement on bacterial colonisation in burn wounds was not described in literature. In this study, we examine whether bromelain-based enzymatic debridement using NexoBrid® gel alters the microbiological pattern of burn wounds. Bacterial emergences in burn wounds that were enzymatically debrided at Pinderfields Regional Burns Centre, between July 2016 and February 2019, were studied and compared to the bacterial profile of burn wounds that were managed either by surgical debridement or dressings only during the same period. Our results showed that the microbial profile of burn wounds treated with NexoBrid® is similar to what is widely reported in cases treated without enzymatic debridement, at all stages of wound healing. This particularly showed in the predominance of Gram-positive organisms in the first week and Gram-negative in the second week.

Outcomes of grafted skin on the dorsum of the foot after car-tire friction injuries

BACKGROUND

A car-tire friction injury on the dorsum of a child's foot often results in hypertrophic scarring of the wound margins. This study describes the clinical appearance of the injured areas and surgical complications that occurred during the follow-up period in a series of children with car-tire friction injuries who were treated with split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs). We describe the clinical features that we believe need to be highlighted when initially treating car-tire injuries in children.

METHODS

From May 2003 to June 2016, our retrospective study included 15 patients with car-tire injuries on the dorsum of the foot who were treated with surgical excision and STSG to cover the wound.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients with car-tire injuries were treated. The average age was 6.26 years old. The average injury grade was 3.26. Two patients were treated using delayed repair, and 13 patients received STSG for initial management. Four patients experienced no complications, while 11 patients had hypertrophic scars and/or scar contracture after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A car-tire friction injury on the dorsum of a child's foot often results in hypertrophic scar formation or scar contracture even if proper management is undertaken. Since the occurrence of these complications in childhood can lead to a secondary deformity, it is important to properly treat car-tire friction wounds, inform patients and caregivers about potential complications, and ensure regular follow-up evaluations over a 12-month period following the initial surgery.

Application of Phagotherapy in the Treatment of Burn Patients (Review)

Treatment of patients with a burn injury is a complex process involving multicomponent multidirectional intensive therapy of the majority of organs and systems damaged by thermal effects on the skin, alternating with repeated surgical interventions aimed at removing nonviable tissues with subsequent plastic closure of wound defects. After the recovery from the burn shock, local infectious complications are considered to be the leading problem that decelerates the process of recovery and is the main cause of lethal outcomes. Since the skin integrity is broken, microorganisms penetrate readily into the internal environment of the human organism resulting in a septic state with multiple organ failure. A widespread and often uncontrollable use of antibacterial drugs in medical practice has led to the emergence of multiple drug resistance (MDR) in microorganisms. Introduction of drugs made on the basis of bacteriophages into practice is presently becoming increasingly important. This is confirmed by the growing interest in this field of pharmacology, the development of special programs aimed at studying the processes of phage and bacterial cell interaction. This review presents the main types of bacteria pertaining to MDR pathogens, principles of their classification, and the risk factors for infecting patients. The mechanisms of the selective action of phage particles on a bacterial cell and the possibility of using phage therapy in the treatment of burn injury (experimental and clinical data) based on the analysis of foreign literature are demonstrated as well as new positive properties of phages related to the changes in the macroorganism immune status caused by the interaction with bacteriophage particles.

Systematic review of excision and grafting in burns: Comparing outcomes of early and late surgery in low and high-income countries

INTRODUCTION

While the benefits of early excision in burn surgery are clear, the advantages may be lost in low income countries with limited resources. It is important to identify the right timing of excision in different groups of patients, particularly those in low-income countries (LIC), as the burden of disease contributes to the highest global mortality and has the least resources. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the timing of excision in LICs and the outcomes associated with surgery: (1) mortality, (2) sepsis and (3) length of stay (LOS) compared to high income countries (HICs).

METHODOLOGY

The PRISMA guidelines and MOOSE checklist were followed for this review. Publications in English from year 1990 to 2017 that included data on the timing and type of burn surgery and outcomes were included. Searches were done using Web of Science, Cochrane collaboration and Pubmed using keywords "Burn and surgery", "Burn and excision", "Burn and excision and grafting" and "burn and skin grafting". Trial quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Outcomes compared for early and late excisions were length of stay (LOS), sepsis and mortality between LICs and HICs.

RESULTS

From 278 citations, we selected 41 for full text evaluation, and identified 16 eligible trials. LOS is shorter in early excision compared to late excision in both LICs and HICs. Mortality is lower in late excision compared to early excision in both LICs and HICs. Further subgroup analysis of elderly patients in HICs confirmed that mortality is lower in late excision and unchanged if the elderly are excluded. Early excision reduces sepsis in both LIC and HIC.

DISCUSSION

The variable definitions of age, timing of excision, variable nature of % TBSA comparison, mixed inclusion of inhalation injury, co-morbidities and unquantified access to resources make the data difficult to interpret and it is not possible to draw accurate conclusions on the role of early excision for burns in low-middle income countries. A prospective study is needed in order to answer this question.

Nexobrid Treatment for Burn Injuries in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Home Oxygen Therapy

There is an increased risk for burn injuries associated with home oxygen therapy of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease since 10 to 50 % of these patients continue to smoke. Enzymatic eschar removal of facial burns is gaining popularity but intubation of this specific patient group often leads to prolonged weaning and can require tracheostomy. This study dealt with the question if enzymatic debridement in these patients can also be performed in analgosedation. A selective review of the literature regarding burn trauma associated with home oxygen use in patients with COPD was performed, as well as a retrospective analysis of all patients with burn injuries associated with home oxygen use and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that were admitted to the study clinic. In the literature 1746 patients with burns associated with home oxygen use are described, but none of them received enzymatic debridement. In this study seventeen patients were included. All three patients in this study with facial full-thickness burn injuries received enzymatic debridement. The mortality rate in this cohort was 17.6 % (3/17). Up to date, there is limited experience performing regional anesthesia debridement in patients with COPD. This is the first manuscript describing the use of enzymatic debridement in patients with COPD and home oxygen therapy. We could confirm other studies that intubation of these patients leads to prolonged ventilation hours and increases the probability for poor prognosis. Therefore, we described the treatment of enzymatic debridement in analgosedation without intubation.

Epidemiology and outcomes of bloodstream infections in severe burn patients: a six-year retrospective study

Background

Infection is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among burn patients, and bloodstream infection (BSI) is the most serious. This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of BSI in severe burn patients.

Methods

Clinical variables of all patients admitted with severe burns (≥ 20% total body surface area, %TBSA) were analyzed retrospectively from January 2013 to December 2018 at a teaching hospital. The Kaplan–Meier method was utilized for plotting survival curves. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression model were also performed.

Results

A total of 495 patients were evaluated, of whom 136 (27.5%) had a BSI. The median time from the patients being burned to BSI was 8 days. For BSI onset in these patients, 47.8% (65/136) occurred in the first week. The most frequently isolated causative organism was A. baumannii (22.7%), followed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (18.7%) and K. pneumoniae (18.2%), in patients with BSI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that %TBSA (p = 0.023), mechanical ventilation (p = 0.019), central venous catheter (CVC) (p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (27d vs 50d, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors associated with BSI. Cox regression model showed that acute kidney injury (HR, 12.26; 95% CI 2.31–64.98; p = 0.003) and septic shock (HR, 4.36; 95% CI 1.16–16.34; p = 0.031) were identified as independent predictors of 30-day mortality of BSI in burn patients.

Conclusions

Multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria were the main pathogens of BSI in severe burn patients. Accurate evaluation of risk factors for BSI and the mortality of BSI in severe burn patients may improve early appropriate management.

Contemporary Aspects of Burn Care

The past one hundred years have seen tremendous improvements in burn care, allowing for decreased morbidity and mortality of this pathology. The more prominent advancements occurred in the period spanning 1930-1980; notably burn resuscitation, early tangential excision, and use of topical antibiotic dressings; and are well documented in burn literature. This article explores the advancements of the past 40 years and the areas of burn management that are presently topics of active discussion and research.

Therapeutic Targeting of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Improves Primary and Secondary Intention Wound Healing in Mice

Background

Neutrophils are the first responders in wound healing after injury that mediate pro- and anti-inflammatory activities i.a. through the formation of extracellular traps (NETs). However, excessive NETs presence in wound tissue can cause local hyperinflammation and -coagulation resulting in delayed wound healing. To improve wound healing, we aimed to examine the role of NETs and DNase1 on primary and secondary wound healing.

Methods

The study included 93 C57BL/6 mice, with 3 different genotypes: wildtype, Pad4-, and DNase1-Knockout (KO). Pad4-KO mice show limited NETs formation, while DNase1-KO mice cannot disintegrate them. All 3 genotypes were included in (1) a laparotomy group and (2) a thermal injury group. Animals in both groups either received DNase1 or a vehicle i.p. post wound induction and wound assessment and euthanasia were conducted. Laparotomy and burn scars were assessed using the stony brook scar evaluation scale and modified Yeong scale respectively. Tissue was analyzed histologically using H&E staining. Ly6g, Collagen I and III, SMA, and Fibrinogen were visualized and neutrophils activation (NE, MPO) and NETs (H3cit) formation assessed.

Results

All animals survived with no complications. DNase1 treatment led to a significantly improved scar appearance in both groups, which was also seen in Pad4-KO mice. In the laparotomy group DNase1 improved collagen deposition and fibrin concentration was significantly reduced by DNase1 treatment. Markers of neutrophil activation were significantly reduced in the treatment and Pad4-KO group. In the thermal injury group wound closure time was significantly reduced after DNase1 treatment and in the Pad4-KO group. Even though inflammation remained high in the thermal injury model over time, neutrophil activation and NETs formation were significantly reduced by DNase1 treatment compared to controls.

Discussion

Primary and secondary intention wound healing is improved by targeting NETs through DNase1 treatment or genetic KO, as assessed by wound closure time and scar appearances. Additionally, wound stability was not affected by DNASE treatment. The results suggest that overall wound healing is accelerated and DNase1 appears to be a promising option to reduce scar formation; which should be evaluated in humans.

The pathogenesis and diagnosis of sepsis post burn injury

Burn is an under-appreciated trauma that is associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality. Although the survival rate after devastating burn injuries has continued to increase in previous decades due to medical advances in burn wound care, nutritional and fluid resuscitation and improved infection control practices, there are still large numbers of patients at a high risk of death. One of the most common complications of burn is sepsis, which is defined as “severe organ dysfunction attributed to host's disordered response to infection” and is the primary cause of death in burn patients. Indeed, burn injuries are accompanied by a series of events that lead to sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, such as a hypovolaemic state, immune and inflammatory responses and metabolic changes. Therefore, clear diagnostic criteria and predictive biomarkers are especially important in the prevention and treatment of sepsis and septic shock. In this review, we focus on the pathogenesis of burn wound infection and the post-burn events leading to sepsis. Moreover, the clinical and promising biomarkers of burn sepsis will also be summarized.

Burn wound excision within 24 h: A 9-year review

BACKGROUND

Severe burns are accompanied by an acute and prolonged hypermetabolic response typified by elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines and acute phase proteins. When persistent, this inflammatory response can result in multi-organ dysfunction and death. Regarded as the standard of care, early removal of devitalised tissue and eschar mitigates this hypermetabolic response. Ascertaining the optimal time point for early excision, which remains controversial, has several clinical implications.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 836 adult thermal burns patients with total burned surface area ≥20% from all Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ) Hospital sites, including the Victorian Adult Burns Service (VABS), from July 1 2009 to June 30 2018. Patients were divided into two groups, "early" and "delayed", based on a 24-hour excision cut-off from when the injury occurred. Outcome measurements included mortality, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, ventilation requirements and the incidence of positive blood cultures.

RESULTS

Among all patients at BRANZ sites, excision within 24 h was associated with reduced mean length of ICU stay (6.6 ± 8.1 vs. 9.2 ± 10.6 days; p = 0.008) and lower mean mechanical ventilator hourly use (94.9 ± 160.8 vs. 159.2 ± 219.1 h; p = 0.001) in the 20-29% TBSA sub-group. Beyond this, no significant differences were observed in outcome measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

While it is physiologically important to perform early burn wound excision to mitigate the inflammatory response, delaying excision beyond 24 h for surgical planning, possibly up to 72 h after injury, may be a reasonable approach for certain patient groups.

Evidence and Trends in Burn Wound Debridement: An Evidence Map

Treatment of the burn wound is crucial in care of severely burned patients. Surgical strategies differ in technique and timing of wound excision and are considered to have an impact on morbidity and mortality of burn patients. Most techniques and strategies have been established during the last century and are still standard of care. Nonetheless, several newer techniques have been presented and evaluated recently. To summarize the evidence and trends for eschar removal by burn wound debridement currently available, an evidence map as variant of the systematic review, was prepared. For this purpose, a systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed databases until December 2016. While overall evidence in this domain is low, recent publications focus on optimal timing of wound excision, enzymatic debridement, and hydrosurgery. Several studies report the benefit of an early wound excision in terms of shorter hospital stay, lower wound infection rate, and reduction of postburn metabolic changes. Enzymatic debridement has been shown to be an effective tool for early eschar removal and in addition reduces the need for autografting of the debrided burn wound with a relatively high level of evidence (LoE 2-). Wound debridement by means of hydrosurgery is more precise compared to conventional wound excision and preserves viable dermis, but a positive effect on wound healing or scar formation could not been shown (LoE 2). Furthermore, rarely reported techniques comprise larvae therapy, debridement by laser, and other technical adjuncts, but the level of evidence is limited (LoE 4-/5).

Clinical features and mortality-related factors of extensive burns among young adults: the Kunshan disaster experience

Background

The aim of the study was to identify the clinical features and the factors associated with burn induced mortality among young adults after exposure to indoor explosion and fire.

Methods

This is an observational study which included burn patients who were admitted to eighteen ICUs after a fire disaster. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics, as well as therapy were recorded. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. The mortality-related factors were also analyzed.

Results

There were 167 burn patients enrolled in the study, the median age was 38 years, 62 (37.1%) patients died within 90 days. Seventy-one percent of patients had a burn size ≥90% TBSA, and 73.7% of patients had a full-thickness burn area above 50% TBSA. The survivors had lower Baux scores, and received earlier escharectomy and autologous skin grafts. The 50% mortality rates (LA50s) for burn size and full-thickness burn area were 95.8% and 88.6% TBSA, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that full-thickness burn area over 50% TBSA and residual burned surface area (RBSA)/TBSA at 28 days were strong predictors of mortality among burn patients (odds ratio 2.55; 95% CI, 1.01 to 6.44, P=0.047; odds ratio 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.09, P<0.001). The ROC curve-based cut-off values of RBSA/TBSA at 28 days for predicting 90-day mortality were 62.5%.

Conclusions

Burn size and full-thickness burn area were the main risk factors for poor outcome in patients with extensive burns. Earlier escharectomy and autologous skin grafts may improve outcomes.

Pediatric Burn Infection

Background: Severe burns lead to a profound hypermetabolic, hypercatabolic, hyper-inflammatory state. Pediatric burn patients are at significantly increased risk for infection and sepsis secondary to loss of the skin barrier and subsequent immunosuppression. Infection is the most common cause of morbidity and death in pediatric burn patients, and the mortality rate from sepsis remains high. Methods: Review of pertinent English-language literature pertaining to infection among pediatric burn patients. Results: Established risk factors for infection in pediatric burn patients are the depth of injury, presence of inhalation injury, indwelling devices, and total body surface area burned. Total body surface area remains one of the most important risk factors for the development of infectious complications, and mortality risks increase significantly if the burn size is >40%. The predominant colonization of burn wound starts with gram-positive organisms, which are replaced later by gram-negative organisms. Most cases of sepsis in burn patients originate from infected burn wounds. Treatment options include topical and systemic antimicrobial drugs, but surgical intervention often is the most definitive treatment. Excision of burn eschar to remove the source of potential infection is a key component of the treatment as well as prevention of infection. Conclusion: Key principles in improving outcomes for septic pediatric burn patients is early recognition, resuscitation, and adherence to management strategies such as prompt antimicrobial drug administration and source control.

Topical treatment for facial burns

BACKGROUND

Burn injuries are an important health problem. They occur frequently in the head and neck region. The face is the area central to a person's identity that provides our most expressive means of communication. Topical interventions are currently the cornerstone of treatment of burns to the face.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of topical interventions on wound healing in people with facial burns of any depth.

SEARCH METHODS

In December 2019 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of topical treatment for facial burns were eligible for inclusion in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and GRADE assessment of the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

In this first update, we included 12 RCTs, comprising 507 participants. Most trials included adults admitted to specialised burn centres after recent burn injuries. Topical agents included antimicrobial agents (silver sulphadiazine (SSD), Aquacel-Ag, cerium-sulphadiazine, gentamicin cream, mafenide acetate cream, bacitracin), non-antimicrobial agents (Moist Exposed Burn Ointment (MEBO), saline-soaked dressings, skin substitutes (including bioengineered skin substitute (TransCyte), allograft, and xenograft (porcine Xenoderm), and miscellaneous treatments (growth hormone therapy, recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor hydrogel (rhGMCS)), enzymatic debridement, and cream with Helix Aspersa extract). Almost all the evidence included in this review was assessed as low or very low-certainty, often because of high risk of bias due to unclear randomisation procedures (i.e. sequence generation and allocation concealment); lack of blinding of participants, providers and sometimes outcome assessors; and imprecision resulting from few participants, low event rates or both, often in single studies. Topical antimicrobial agents versus topical non-antimicrobial agents There is moderate-certainty evidence that there is probably little or no difference between antimicrobial agents and non-antimicrobial agents (SSD and MEBO) in time to complete wound healing (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.85, 1 study, 39 participants). Topical antimicrobial agents may make little or no difference to the proportion of wounds completely healed compared with topical non-antimicrobial agents (comparison SSD and MEBO, risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.29; 1 study, 39 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether there is a difference in wound infection (comparison topical antimicrobial agent (Aquacel-Ag) and MEBO; RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.21; 1 study, 40 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No trials reported change in wound surface area over time or partial wound healing. There is low-certainty evidence for the secondary outcomes scar quality and patient satisfaction. Two studies assessed pain but it was incompletely reported. Topical antimicrobial agents versus other topical antimicrobial agents It is uncertain whether topical antimicrobial agents make any difference in effects as the evidence is low to very low-certainty. For primary outcomes, there is low-certainty evidence for time to partial (i.e. greater than 90%) wound healing (comparison SSD versus cerium SSD: mean difference (MD) -7.10 days, 95% CI -16.43 to 2.23; 1 study, 142 participants). There is very low-certainty evidence regarding whether topical antimicrobial agents make a difference to wound infection (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.17; 1 study, 15 participants). There is low to very low-certainty evidence for the proportion of facial burns requiring surgery, pain, scar quality, adverse effects and length of hospital stay. Skin substitutes versus topical antimicrobial agents There is low-certainty evidence that a skin substitute may slightly reduce time to partial (i.e. greater than 90%) wound healing, compared with a non-specified antibacterial agent (MD -6.00 days, 95% CI -8.69 to -3.31; 1 study, 34 participants). We are uncertain whether skin substitutes in general make any other difference in effects as the evidence is very low certainty. Outcomes included wound infection, pain, scar quality, adverse effects of treatment and length of hospital stay. Single studies showed contrasting low-certainty evidence. A bioengineered skin substitute may slightly reduce procedural pain (MD -4.00, 95% CI -5.05 to -2.95; 34 participants) and background pain (MD -2.00, 95% CI -3.05 to -0.95; 34 participants) compared with an unspecified antimicrobial agent. In contrast, a biological dressing (porcine Xenoderm) might slightly increase pain in superficial burns (MD 1.20, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.75; 15 participants (30 wounds)) as well as deep partial thickness burns (MD 3.00, 95% CI 2.34 to 3.66; 10 participants (20 wounds)), compared with antimicrobial agents (Physiotulle Ag (Coloplast)). Miscellaneous treatments versus miscellaneous treatments Single studies show low to very low-certainty effects of interventions. Low-certainty evidence shows that MEBO may slightly reduce time to complete wound healing compared with saline soaked dressing (MD -1.7 days, 95% CI -3.32 to -0.08; 40 participants). In addition, a cream containing Helix Aspersa may slightly increase the proportion of wounds completely healed at 14 days compared with MEBO (RR 4.77, 95% CI 1.87 to 12.15; 43 participants). We are uncertain whether any miscellaneous treatment in the included studies makes a difference in effects for the outcomes wound infection, scar quality, pain and patient satisfaction as the evidence is low to very low-certainty.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is mainly low to very low-certainty evidence on the effects of any topical intervention on wound healing in people with facial burns. The number of RCTs in burn care is growing, but the body of evidence is still hampered due to an insufficient number of studies that follow appropriate evidence-based standards of conducting and reporting RCTs.

Innovations in Infection Prevention and Treatment

Background: Patients with large, acute burn injuries are a major challenge for clinicians. The loss of skin barrier protection against micro-organisms combined with the induced immunosuppression after burn injury makes this population especially vulnerable to infection. For burn-injured patients who survive immediate management considerations and burn resuscitation after acute injury, sepsis remains the primary cause of death. The purpose of this article is to describe current strategies and innovations in burn sepsis prevention and management. Methods: This work reviews the current understanding of the systemic inflammatory response to burn injury and burn sepsis as well as current strategies in insolation and infection prevention, newer burn unit design strategies in the context of infection prevention, and novel therapies being considered in topical antimicrobial wound care management. Results: A review of burn sepsis is key to understanding current paradigms and innovation in burn management and prevention. Key management principles begin from the time of injury and persist throughout the patient's hospital course. This includes use of personal protective equipment, burn unit design considerations, and knowledge of critical care principles such as central venous catheter management strategies. Innovations on wound dressing types, forms, and use have been key to better controlling burn wound sepsis and improving wound healing. Products incorporating nanotechnology, novel anions, oxygen, and even light have been key to introducing previously unconsidered methods to fight or prevent infection. Conclusion: Understanding the pathophysiology and source identification of sepsis from burn wounds has been a key contributor in developing innovative prevention and therapeutic strategies in burn management. The emergence of drug-resistant pathogens and the difficulty of systemic antibiotic agents to reach poorly vascularized wounds have further reinforced the need to anticipate management strategies moving forward. A proactive, multidisciplinary approach is necessary to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with infection control.

Bacterial infection profile and predictors among patients admitted to a burn care center: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Infection is the main cause of mortality and complications in burn patients. The present study was the first to examine the local profile and antecedents of bacterial infections among patients admitted to a Lebanese burn care center.

METHODS

The present study was a retrospective analysis of the occurrence and recurrence of infection, its characteristics as well as antimicrobial susceptibility among 475 patients admitted to the Burn Centre at the Lebanese Geitaoui Hospital between January 2014 and December 2018.

RESULTS

55% of patients contracted at least one infection during their hospitalization. Length of stay (LOS), sepsis, wound dressing under anesthesia, blood transfusion and female sex independently and positively predicted infection in burn patients. Infection was predominately caused by Staphylococcus aureus (48.7%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.6%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (15.7%). Bacterial isolates were predominately multi-drug or extensively drug resistant and showed variable antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Recurrent infections occurred in 44.1% of infected burn patients, and were independently predicted by LOS (p = 0.004), sepsis (p = 0.001), surgery (p = 0.003), burn excision and skin grafting (p = 0.019), and central line insertion (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Existing burn management and infection control measures must be revised in order to reduce the incidence and improve the treatment of infections in burn patients.

Burn Infection and Burn Sepsis

Background: Infection is the most common complication and cause of death in patients suffering burn injuries. These patients are susceptible to infection and burn wound sepsis secondary to the alterations in their physiology. Diagnosis and management of infections rely on physical examination, cultures, and the pathology of the burn wound. Method: We performed an electronic search for articles in the Google Scholar and PubMed databases using the search terms "burn sepsis," "burn infection," and "burn critical care." Results: Multiple factors increase burn patients' risk of invasive infection and sepsis, including underlying factors and co-morbidities, the percent total body surface area of the burn, delays in burn wound excision, and microbial virulence/bacterial count. Organisms causing burn wound infection differ, depending on the time since injury and its location; and diagnosis is multi-factorial. The most common pathogens remain Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas spp. Conclusion: Overall, the recognition of burn sepsis is based on clinical findings. Treatment consists of a combination of local dressings, early burn excision, and systemic antimicrobial therapy. The mortality rate has decreased significantly over the past 10 years, but continued efforts at timely management and infection prevention are essential.

Infections in Pediatric Burn Patients: An Analysis of One Hundred Eighty-One Patients

Background: Infectious complications are one of the most life-threatening complications and result in substantial mortality and morbidity in children who have been burned. The goal of the study is to assess the risk factors for sepsis in pediatric burn patients in a referral hospital. Methods: This study was performed at the Pediatric Burn Unit of Ankara Child Health and Diseases Hematology Oncology Training and Research Hospital during the period between January 2014 and June 2017. The patients were evaluated for age, sex, burn etiology, burned body surface area (BSA), the presence of inhalation injury, sepsis, positive cultures, the micro-organisms cultured samples, and septic focus. Results: A total of 181 patients were included in the study. The most common cause of burns was scalds in 120 patients (66.3%). Forty-one patients (22.7%) developed health-care-associated infection and sepsis. Gram-negative micro-organisms were isolated in 40 (97.6%) patients (Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia) with sepsis. Carbapenem resistance was detected in 31 (93.8%) of 40 patients. Mortality was observed in 11 patients (6.1%) in the group with sepsis. Burn surface area, burn depth, C-reactive protein (CRP) values, mortality, Garcés index, and Baux index were higher in the group with sepsis (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that mechanism of injury (flame), burned BSA ≥25%, C-reactive protein ≥6 mg/dL (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.76 p < 0.001 and AUC: 0.90, p < 0.001, respectively) at admission were independent parameters for development of sepsis in pediatric burn patients. Conclusion: Multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii were important agents of blood stream infection in burned children. Burned BSA ≥25% and CRP ≥6 mg/dL were risk factors for developing sepsis in pediatric burn patients.

Perioperative in Intensive Medicine of reconstructive surgery and burned patients

Burned patients may need prolonged admissions in the Intensive Care Service, both for initial care and for the pre and postoperative treatment of the multiple surgeries they require. The initial resuscitation of critically burned patients requires adequate monitoring to calculate the fluid therapy necessary to replenish the losses and ensure tissue perfusion, but without excesses that increase interstitial edema. In addition, monitoring can evaluate the systemic inflammatory response that can lead to shock and organic dysfunctions. After this initial phase we will find a critical patient who requires multiple reinterventions in non-optimal situations, so he will need special care over a long period of time. In addition, the Intensive Care Service offers specific postoperative care for reconstructive surgery and the transplantation of composite tissues (upper limb and face) in which its success depends on a rigorous control through adequate monitoring and treatment.

Management and prevention of drug resistant infections in burn patients

Introduction: Despite modern advances, the primary cause of death after burns remains infection and sepsis. A key factor in determining outcomes is colonization with multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms. Infections secondary to MDR organisms are challenging due to lack of adequate antibiotic treatment, subsequently prolonging hospital stay and increasing risk of adverse outcomes. Areas covered: This review highlights the most frequent organisms colonizing burn wounds as well as the most common MDR bacterial infections. Additionally, we discuss different treatment modalities and MDR infection prevention strategies as their appropriate management would minimize morbidity and mortality in this population. We conducted a search for articles on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus and UpToDate with applied search strategies including a combination of: "burns, 'thermal injury,' 'infections,' 'sepsis,' 'drug resistance,' and 'antimicrobials.' Expert opinion: Management and prevention of MDR infections in burns is an ongoing challenge. We highlight the importance of preventative over therapeutic strategies, which are easy to implement and cost-effective. Additionally, targeted, limited use of antimicrobials can be beneficial in burn patients. A promising future area of investigation within this field is post-trauma microbiome profiling. Currently, the best treatment strategy for MDR in burn patients is prevention.