Aesthetic considerations in nasal reconstruction and the role of modified nasal subunits

Nasal Dorsum Rotation-Transposition Flap Associated with Guitar-String Sutures: One-Stage Reconstruction of Large Defects on the Nose

(1) Background: The preferred reconstructive option for closing small- or medium-sized defects of the distal half of the nose is the use of local flaps. The dorsal nasal (Rieger) flap is suitable for closing medium-sized defects at this location, especially when they are medially located, and are wider rather than tall. We describe a rotation-transposition dorsal nasal flap reconstruction for large nasal defects. The novelty of this design includes the addition of a small transposition lobe to the rotation flap, enabling the acquisition of tissue from either the lateral sidewall or the nasolabial sulcus, facilitating closure with guitar-string sutures. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all the patients with large defects (>20 mm) of the nose who underwent nasal dorsum rotation-transposition flap repair between January 2019 and November 2022 at a single academic center. (3) Results: Fourteen patients (eight males, six females; ages 47-83, mean age 60 years) with defects (range: 20.00-35.00 mm) on the dorsum and nasal tip were recruited. Follow-up duration ranged from 12 months to 3 years, with all cases showing good or excellent oncologic and cosmetic results. (4) Conclusions: The rotation-transposition dorsal nasal flap was demonstrated to be a reproducible one-stage technique for large defects of the dorsum and nasal tip, with minimal risk of aesthetic or functional complications. Guitar-string sutures allowed the reduction of the defect size, facilitating a smaller flap design.

Handheld Doppler Detection and Light Illumination for Vascular Mapping in Nasal Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The application of the expanded forehead flap in nasal reconstruction has the advantage of being able to provide a sufficient amount of flap and can provide good aesthetic results. For an expanded forehead flap to survive, there must be adequate arterial supply and venous return. Despite this, limited studies have been conducted on preoperative vascular mapping and the design of the expanded forehead flap for nasal reconstruction. In this article, the authors present a technique of hand-held Doppler detection with light illumination for vascular mapping.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included patients who underwent total nasal reconstruction with expanded forehead flaps between May 2016 and April 2021. The design of the flap was based on the result of preoperative vascular detection by hand-held Doppler detection assisted by light illumination.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients underwent total nasal reconstruction with an expanded forehead flap. The distal part of the flap became necrotic 1 week after the surgery in 2 patients. Following dressing changes and the administration of antibiotics, the distal flap in these patients survived well. No complications were reported in the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand-held Doppler detection combined with light illumination is a convenient and effective preoperative design method for nasal reconstruction with an expanded forehead flap. All flaps survived well in the long term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

[Cosmetic outcome of nasal tip reconstruction with the frontonasal flap and other locoregional flaps - Cosmetic Outcome of Nasal Tip Reconstruction]

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the results of nasal tip reconstruction with the frontonasal flap compared with other locoregional flaps.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All nasal tip reconstructions with locoregional flaps performed during a 10-year period were included. Defect size, flap type, risk factors, comorbidities, complications, revisions, and secondary operations were retrospectively assessed. Clinical follow-up examinations were performed after 12 months. Digital photographs were taken in standard projections preoperatively and at the time of the last follow-up examination, and the aesthetic results were assessed by three independent examiners, with nasal contour, symmetry, scarring, and match of skin colour between flap and nasal skin rated on a 4-point scale. Finally, patient satisfaction was obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 112 nasal tip reconstructions were performed in 68 women and 44 men with a mean age of 71,4±10,2 years. Taking into account defect size, individual factors and patient preference, reconstruction was performed with 58 frontonasal flaps, 23 Rintala flaps, 20 paramedian forehead flaps and 11 bilobed flaps. Mean age and comorbidities of patients were comparable between flap types, except for a higher incidence of arterial hypertension and a lower incidence of diabetes mellitus in patients treated with frontonasal flaps. Defect size was the same in reconstructions with frontonasal flaps and Rintala flaps, smaller in bilobed flaps, and more extensive in paramedian forehead flaps. There were no differences in complication rates between the different flap techniques. Taking into account the planned second interventions (flap pedicle separations) in the paramedian forehead flaps, the frequency of unplanned corrections was comparable for all flap techniques. Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction were rated as very good or good in more than 90% with all techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the paramedian forehead flap, the frontonasal flap avoids a planned secondary procedure and an extensive donor defect. It allows for the coverage of defects at least the size of the Rintala flap and larger defects than the bilobed flap.

State of the Evidence for Facial Skin Cancer Reconstruction

This review provides a comprehensive presentation of the evidence available in facial reconstruction post-Mohs micrographic surgery. Given the large diversity in post-Mohs reconstruction, there are limited guidelines in the management of defects. The aim of the present work is to provide a review of the best evidence as it pertains to several considerations in facial reconstruction. Data suggests that Mohs micrographic surgery and many reconstructive procedures can be performed as outpatient procedures under local anesthesia, with narcotic pain medication only given in certain patient populations following a minority of reconstructive procedures. Perioperative and topical antibiotics are generally not indicated. Aspirin and warfarin can generally be continued for most reconstructive procedures, but clopidogrel and novel anticoagulants may predispose to increased bleeding complications. Delayed reconstruction appears to be safe, although data are discordant on this topic. No specific wound closure technique or suture choice appears to be consistently superior. Given the lack of robust comparative studies, consistent methodology, and variable defect sizes/locations, no robust evidence-based guidelines can be generated for reconstruction techniques of facial subsites.

Nasal reconstruction with the expanded forehead flap: Long-term follow-up of esthetic outcome and 12-year experience

BACKGROUND

The expanded forehead flap has its unique advantage in nasal reconstruction. The authors present their 12-year experience with nasal reconstruction with an expanded forehead flap. The esthetic and functional outcomes were assessed with long-term subjective and objective evaluations.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent nasal reconstruction with the expanded forehead flap from 2009 to 2021 performed by the senior author (F.F.). Data were collected and analyzed regarding defect characteristics, processes of treatment, and complications. Subjective esthetic and functional outcomes were assessed through questionnaires FACE-Q (Face Questionnaire) and NOSE (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation). The objective esthetic outcome was assessed by a senior resident through the viewing of clinical photographs.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-five patients underwent nasal reconstruction with an expanded forehead flap. The average expansion period was 174 days, and the injection volume was 685.7 ml. There were 15 complications. One hundred and eight patients (69.6%) were satisfied, and 19 patients (12.2%) were very satisfied with the outcome. The differences between postoperative and preoperative scores of FACE-Q were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Sixty-nine percent of patients complained of bilateral eyebrow asymmetry, 27.1% of patients reported partial recovery of frontal deformity with dissatisfaction, and 2.6% of patients considered not recovered at all. The results of 78 patients (50.3%) were considered "satisfied," and 41 patients (26.5%) were considered "very satisfied" by objective evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Nasal reconstruction with an expanded forehead flap was a safe technique with good esthetic outcomes. Although problems with the asymmetry of the eyebrows and frontal deformation were presented, the influence was minimal and well-accepted by most patients.

Patient-Reported Nasal Function and Appearance After Interpolation Flap Repair Following Skin Cancer Resection: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Objective: Among patients undergoing two-stage interpolated flap repair of nasal defects, nasal function, and appearance before surgery and at 16 weeks after flap takedown were compared using the Nasal Appearance and Function Evaluation Questionnaire (NAFEQ). Design: Multicenter prospective cohort study. Methods: Adult patients with a nasal skin cancer anticipated to require two-stage interpolation flap repair completed the NAFEQ before surgery, at 1 week after flap placement, 4 weeks after flap takedown, and 16 weeks after flap takedown. Results: One hundred sixty-nine patients were enrolled, with 138 patients completing both presurgical and 16-week post-takedown NAFEQs. Overall NAFEQ score increased by 1.09 points (1.91% improvement, confidence interval [95% CI -0.34 to 2.53]). NAFEQ functional subscale increased by 0.72 points (2.58% increase; 95% CI [0.10-1.35]) and appearance subscale increased by 0.37 points (1.28% improvement, 95% CI [-0.65 to 1.39]). Conclusion: At 16 weeks after flap takedown, patients' perceptions of their nasal function and appearance are similar to or slightly improved when compared with their presurgical assessments.

Aesthetic Principles in Nasal Reconstruction after Squamous Cell Carcinoma Resection

"A successful nose reconstruction is represented by a normal look and nasal breathing preservation. The choice of method is based on the site, size, depth of the defect, donor availability, and surgeon experience. There are multiple methods of restoring nasal cover, from primary repair to healing by secondary intention, from primary suture, skin graft to locoregional flaps, but all of them should be integrated into a personalized approach, keeping the nasal functions, a good aesthetic outcome and without any tumor infiltration. This paper consisting of a retrospective study of 9 patients diagnosticated with squamous cell carcinoma revealed the importance of skin properties and skin changes during aging. Despite all aesthetic principles, skin is the most important resource in facial reconstruction. "

Surgical Treatment and Reconstruction of Nasal Defects According to the Aesthetic Subunits Principles

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of nasal skin cancer, its location by facial aesthetic subunits and the type of reconstructive procedures performed for each nasal subunit after excision for nasal skin tumors. Observational cross-sectional study of all consecutive patients with the diagnosis of skin tumor located in the nasal unit, treated from 2018 to 2019 by the department of head and neck surgery of a general hospital. 60 patients were treated with nasal skin tumors excisions. A total of 52 patients (86,6%) had basal cell skin cancer, 7 (11,6%) had squamous cell skin cancer and 1 (1,6%) had melanoma. Fifty-nine patients (98.33%) presented a primary tumor and just 1 case (1,66%) recived a previous surgical treatment. Regardless of the type of tumor, the tip subunit was the most often involved with 29 (48,33%) cases in total. Despite of the nasal aesthetic subunit affected, the most frequent type of procedure used for reconstruction was the rotation or advancement flap, based on aesthetic nasal subunits, which was performed in 39 cases (65%). Nasal reconstruction after skin cancer can be very complex, especially since all patients have high expectations about the results. In order to achieve good results, there is a necessity for careful analysis of the defect, correct planning and excellent technical execution of the procedures Frequently, staged procedures will be needed to achieve an optimal result.

Current strategies for aesthetic soft tissue refinement in nasal reconstruction

The challenges of successful nasal reconstruction, which are related to the anatomical complexity of the region, have been extensively studied. Revisional operations are often required to achieve proper nasal reconstruction, with results resembling the premorbid nasal status. This is necessary to ensure the quality of life of skin cancer patients. Fundamental nasal reconstruction requires both proper soft tissue coverage and proper function. However, earlier studies in the field primarily focused on the functional aspect of nose reconstruction, although the cosmetic aspect is also an important factor to consider. In response to this need, many recent studies on nose reconstruction have proposed various refinement strategies to improve aesthetic satisfaction. Most plastic surgeons accept the nasal aesthetic subunit principle as a standard for nasal reconstruction. This review outlines the commonly used surgical refinement options and management strategies for postoperative complications based on the subunit principle. In patients with nasal defects, a proper technical strategy might help minimize revision operations and optimize the long-term results.

Upper Margin of the Forehead Flap and Its Correlation With Aesthetic Results in Nasal Reconstruction in Fitzpatrick Skin Type III and IV Chinese

BACKGROUND

The forehead flap is one of the most commonly used methods for nose reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the ideal upper margin of the flap in nasal reconstruction and its correlation with aesthetic results.

METHODS

From April 2013 to September 2017, 40 patients underwent nasal reconstruction involving the dorsum with a forehead flap. The authors hypothesized 5fdifferent levels as the position to place the upper margin of the forehead flap: (1) glabella, (2) level of the upper eyelid, (3) intercanthal line, (4) horizontal line between the keystone and intercanthal line, and (5) the keystone. Then they photoshopped the upper margins of the forehead flap at 5 different levels and designed a questionnaire. Nasal reconstructive plastic surgeons, medical practitioners, and people without medical backgrounds chose the most aesthetically pleasing photograph for every patient.

RESULTS

The questionnaire showed that the most aesthetically pleasing positions were located at glabella (n = 0), level of upper eyelid (n = 9), intercanthal line (n = 24), the line between keystone and intercanthal line (n = 6), and keystone (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

The authors suggest placing the upper margin of the forehead flap at the level of the intercanthal line in nasal reconstruction involving the dorsum to achieve the best aesthetic results.

Reconstruction of Congenital Alar Rim Defects (Tessier Number 1 Cleft) Using Laterally Based Alar Subunit Rotation Advancement Flap

BACKGROUND

Alar rim defects develop in most cases as a result of burns, trauma, or tumor excision. Congenital alar rim defects are rare, with an incidence of 1 in 20,000 to 40,000 live births. Tessier classification is the most commonly used classification system for craniofacial defects. Facial clefts involving the nose are categorized as types 0, 1, 2, and 3, whereas cranial clefts with nose lesions are categorized as types 11, 12, 13, and 14. The patterns of nasal clefts are extremely variable, ranging from a simple notch of alar margin to complex craniofacial cleft involving the lip, nose, eyelid, brow, forehead, and underlying bone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at Fayoum University Hospital on 8 male patients who present with congenital alar rim defects (Tessier number 1 cleft). Surgeries were performed under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. A full-thickness incision was created along the whole alar subunit, keeping the ala attached only laterally (laterally based alar full-thickness flap). The alar flap was advanced and rotated medially and inferiorly and sutured to the anatomical place in 2 layers, skin and mucosa. Follow-up was done at least 1.5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The study was conducted on 8 male patients presenting with congenital alar rim defects (Tessier number 1 cleft). The mean age of patients was 14.2 years, and the cleft was unilateral in 4 patients (50%) and bilateral in 4 patients (50%). The patients were assessed both aesthetically and functionally and followed at 1.5 years postoperatively. The aesthetic outcome was assessed according to both patients' and author's evaluations of the scar appearance, alar symmetry, nostril symmetry, and general satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Laterally based alar subunit rotation advancement flap is a reliable option for reconstruction of congenital alar rim defects (Tessier number 1 cleft) with the advantages of being an easy single-stage procedure with good tissue matching and nostril symmetry and only limitation of extremely wide defects with deficient tissues between the ala and tip.

Complex nasal reconstruction for skin cancer and posttraumatic deformity using a modified frontonasal flap - Case report

Introduction and importance

Reconstruction of the nasal tip is challenging, especially when large defects are associated with compromised nasal soft tissues and framework. The frontonasal flap is an axial-pattern myocutaneous flap from the glabella and nasal dorsum that allows for various modifications in flap design to cover medium sized defects of the nasal tip.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old male patient presented with a large and ulcerated squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal tip that was associated with substantial posttraumatic damage of the nasal soft tissue envelope and cartilaginous vault of the dorsum. Considering patient comorbidity, risk factors, and specific nasal condition, a single-stage tumor resection and reconstruction using a modified frontonasal flap was intended. While tumor excision resulting in a tip defect of 1.5 × 1.5 cm and flap coverage were initially achieved in a single stage, histologically incomplete tumor resection and individual patient requests mandated further surgery, including re-excision, cartilage grafting, and soft tissue contouring.

Clinical discussion

The frontonasal flap allows for single-stage reconstruction of moderate size tip defects. Even in the case of prior soft tissue damage and scarring, the flap may be used safely pending individual adjustments in flap design. However, additional measures may be employed as needed to optimize the functional and aesthetic outcome in cases of complex nasal pathology.

Conclusion

In a case with a combined tumor and posttraumatic nasal deformity, an individualized surgical concept incorporating a modified frontonasal flap with adjunct cartilage grafting and soft tissue contouring achieved an excellent functional and cosmetic outcome.

•

Nasal tip reconstruction can be performed with various grafts and flaps.

•

The frontonasal flap allows single-staged reconstruction of tip defects.

•

Previous nasal trauma can impair frontonasal flap reconstruction.

•

A modified frontonasal flap with adjunct procedures is presented.

•

The modified frontonasal flap obtained an excellent functional and aesthetic result.

Total nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap: Focusing on the facial aesthetic subunit principle

The nasal aesthetic subunit principle has been widely accepted as the standard for nasal reconstruction with forehead flaps. However, in our experience, one's impression of a reconstructed face can easily be represented by the nose's entire appearance rather than a single nasal component. Accordingly, we hypothesized that total nasal reconstruction focusing more on the facial aesthetic subunit principle would be superior to focal nasal subunit partial reconstruction. Here, we investigated the indication range of total nasal reconstruction and analyzed its effectiveness. Between July 2006 and December 2017, 32 patients who underwent total or subtotal nasal reconstruction were recruited. The total nasal reconstruction group (n = 20) was treated according to our modified facial aesthetic unit concept, while the subtotal reconstruction group (n = 16) was treated according to the nasal aesthetic subunit principle. Using retrospective reviews, we compared surgical details and aesthetic, and functional outcomes with visual analog scale scores. In aesthetic evaluation, nose contour (p = 0.009), nasal symmetry (p = 0.001), and nostril shape (p = 0.041) were superior in the total nasal reconstruction group. Satisfaction regarding the nose (p = 0.036) was significantly higher than that regarding the forehead and labial folds in the total group. Regarding function, there were no significant intergroup differences in nasal airflow, snoring, or olfaction. We suggest that total nasal reconstruction is not a strategy to avoid because of its aggressive nature. For selected suitable patients, the use of the total nose reconstruction focusing on our one nose concept can be a successful surgical option, and the reconstructed nose can be visualized as a real part of the face.

Medial femoral condyle free flap in combination with paramedian forehead flap for total/subtotal nasal reconstruction: Level of evidence: IV (therapeutic studies): Level of evidence: IV (therapeutic studies)

BACKGROUND

The nose is a functionally complex organ with also a critical role in aesthetics. For reconstruction of full thickness nasal defects, multiple stages are needed and there is risk for resorption resulting in residual deformity. The aim of this report was to develop and evaluate a new method for full thickness total/subtotal nose reconstruction using the medial femoral condyle free flap (MFCFF) in combination with a paramedian forehead flap.

METHODS

Between November 2015 and January 2018, eight patients (four males, four females) mean age 52 years (range 40-73 years) undergoing a total/subtotal nasal excision and subsequential reconstruction with MFCFF plus paramedian forehead flap were enrolled. Six cases were squamous cell carcinomas while two were basal cell carcinomas. The MFCFF was stabilized, with the periosteum as inner layer, with plates and a paramedian forehead flap was used as external skin coverage. All patients were evaluated for with postoperative nasal endoscopy and CT scan. A postoperative questionnaire was given 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean MFCFF size was 2-3.8 cm × 2.25-2.5 cm with a mean pedicle length of 6.3 cm (range 4.1-9.4 cm). The postoperative period was uneventful. The mean follow-up was 16 months, no bone displacement or resorption was observed at the CT scan, no evidence of nasal stenosis occurred. All patients had a satisfying aesthetic evaluation and a good subjective nasal function.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, the MFCFF in combination with the paramedian forehead flap appeared to provide a valid subtotal nose reconstruction, allowing for the recreation of all the three nasal layers and maintaining the nose projection and airway patency in the long term.

A new flap combination for reconstruction of lower nasal dorsum and supra-tip skin defects

Repairing surgical defects of the nose is still challenging due to its tridimensional shape and its aesthetic concern. Difficulty in reconstructing nasal subunits lies in their contour, skin texture and limited availability of adjacent skin. For lower nasal dorsum and supra-tip regions, we design a new combined local flap as existing local flaps may give disappointing results. This combination flap was performed on two patients for reconstruction of the lower nasal dorsum area after basal cell carcinoma excision. Size of the excision ranged from 20 to 25 mm diameter and safe margins were obtained. The defects were reconstructed with a local flap that combined a rotation nasal flank flap and a V-Y advancement nasolabial flap. Excision and reconstruction were performed in a one-stage surgery under intravenous sedation and local anesthesia. There were no postoperative complications and no flap loss occurred. Aesthetic and functional results after 6 months postoperatively were satisfying without modification of nasal shape. This flap is reliable and offers interesting functional and aesthetic outcomes. It can be considered as a new reconstruction alternative for supra-tip and lower nasal dorsum skin defects performed in a one-stage procedure under local anesthesia.

An original procedure for orbitonasal cutaneous infiltrative tumor repair, using combined forehead and melolabial propeller flaps

INTRODUCTION

Resections of cutaneous tumors in the medial orbitonasal region can be transfixing. Repairs using a single local flap run the risk of failure and that of secondary sinonasal fistula, especially in cases of surgery on a radiated field. We propose an original and reliable repair procedure using two pedicled regional flaps vascularized by two distinct arterial systems clinched together to reconstruct the mucosal and cutaneous planes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A first melolabial propeller flap (MPF) with a superior perforating pedicle was elevated and the cutaneous side was sutured to the deep plane of the loss of substance (mucosal lining). A second homolateral or contralateral paramedian forehead flap (PFF) was then lifted and sutured over the first flap (superficial plane). The forehead pedicle flap was divided at 1 month.

RESULTS

No trophic complication or failure was recorded on two patients. The 7-year carcinologic, aesthetic, and functional results were satisfying.

CONCLUSION

This technique involving the superimposition of two local flaps, vascularized by two different arterial systems, appears to offer a simple and reliable repair technique for transfixing cutaneous losses of substance in the medial orbitonasal region. It could be used in the first-line treatment, particularly if an additional radiotherapy is to be performed.

Usefulness of the subunit principle in nasal reconstruction

The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction proposed the concept of reconstructing the specific topographic subunits that were identified as dorsum, tip, columella, the paired alae, sidewalls, and soft triangles. In patients with more than 50% of subunit loss, removing the remaining portion of the subunit and reconstructing the entire subunit may yield better results. The placement of incisions along the borders of the subunits minimizes scar lines. Furthermore, as trapdoor contraction occurs, the entire restored subunit bulges in a way that mimics the normal contour of a nasal tip, dorsum or ala. Two cases of nasal reconstruction that followed this important principle are described.

Surgical Treatment with Locoregional Flap for the Nose

Nonmelanotic skin cancers (NMSCs) are the most frequent of all neoplasms and nasal pyramid represents the most common site for the presentation of such cutaneous malignancies, particularly in sun-exposed areas: ala, dorsum, and tip. Multiple options exist to restore functional and aesthetic integrity after skin loss for oncological reasons; nevertheless, the management of nasal defects can be often challenging and the best "reconstruction" is still to be found. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed a total of 310 patients who presented to our Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery for postoncological nasal reconstruction between January 2011 and January 2016. Nasal region was classified into 3 groups according to the anatomical zones affected by the lesion: proximal, middle, and distal third. We included an additional fourth group for complex defects involving more than one subunit. Reconstruction with loco regional flaps was performed in all cases. Radical tumor control and a satisfactory aesthetic and functional result are the primary goals for the reconstructive surgeon. Despite tremendous technical enhancements in nasal reconstruction techniques, optimal results are usually obtained when "like is used to repair like." Accurate evaluation of the patients clinical condition and local defect should be always considered in order to select the best surgical option.

Aesthetic Refinements in Forehead Flap Reconstruction of the Asian Nose

BACKGROUND

Traditional paramedian forehead flap reconstruction exploits the aesthetic subunit principle. Refinements and outcomes of forehead flap nasal reconstruction largely reflect Western experience. Differences in ethnic Asian anatomy and wound healing may foster suboptimal outcomes. We modified methods to address Asian features by extending subunit and flap boundaries, minimizing flap thinning, and overbuilding the nasal framework to combat contraction and suboptimal scarring.

METHODS

Between November 2010 and September 2015, 40 Asians were treated for nasal reconstruction with a modified forehead flap technique. Average age of 26 men and 14 women was 50.2 years (range: 10-87 years). Oncologic, traumatic, congenital, and infectious defects involving 1 (37%) or more (63%) subunits were reconstructed. Modifications to the classic forehead flap were extension of involved subunits and flap, conservative flap thinning, and framework overbuilding.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for 20 months (range: 16 months to 4 years 8 months). Nasal lining was reconstructed with hinge-over lining flaps, forehead flaps, free flaps, or regional flaps. Cartilage was reconstructed in 44 (88%) patients with autologous septum or ear in 33 (75%) cases. Costal cartilage was needed in 11 (25%) cases. In 48 (96%) cases, the ipsilateral forehead was used. There were 5 (10%) wound infections, 2 (4%) dehisced wounds, and 2 (4%) occurrences of distal flap necrosis. Nasal aesthetic results were 72.6% good, 23.3% fair, and 4% poor. Donor site aesthetic results were 74% good and 26% fair. Three case reports are included.

CONCLUSION

We report favourable results of forehead flap nasal reconstruction using refinements tailored to ethnic Asians.

Variations in Frontonasal Flap Design for Single-Stage Reconstruction of the Nasal Tip

BACKGROUND

Single-stage reconstruction of the nasal tip using frontonasal flaps yields variable results. Variations in flap design were used to optimize outcome.

METHODS

Consecutive nasal tip reconstructions using frontonasal flaps performed by the author during a 6-year period were studied retrospectively. Patients were followed up clinically and charts were reviewed for defect size, vertical orientation (tip versus supratip), and horizontal orientation (central versus lateral). Surgical reports and digital photographs were evaluated for flap design that was adapted to the defect, individual anatomy, and the nasal subunit concept. Flaps were classified by size (standard versus extended), proximal scar configuration (angular versus curved), and distal scar configuration (straight versus stairstep). Surgical complications and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine frontonasal flaps were performed in 16 female and 13 male patients with a mean age of 73 years. The average defect diameter was 2 cm. The average surface area was 4 cm. Primary defects were located at the tip in 22 cases and the supratip in seven cases, with 19 being lateral and 10 being central. Standard flaps were chosen in 13 patients and extended flaps in 16 patients. Proximal scar configuration was angular in 20 cases and curved in nine cases. Distals scar configuration was straight in 21 patients and stairstep in eight cases. Minor flap complications occurred in eight patients. Outcome was rated good to excellent in 97 percent of patients.

CONCLUSION

Aesthetically pleasing single-stage reconstruction of the nasal tip is attainable using an anatomically based approach to frontonasal flap design.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Should we consider the hemi-tip as a proper aesthetic subunit in a nasal reconstruction?

BACKGROUND

Defects involving several aesthetic subunits (ASUs) or lying at the junction of an ASU are challenging and require a complex reconstruction. This study aimed to describe the hemi-tip as a new ASU.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study including patients who underwent a nasal reconstruction for lower nasal pyramid defects according to our modified ASU principle. Patients who suffered from a subtotal alar defect, which also involved <50% of the tip, were reconstructed after excising the remaining tissue of the hemi-tip subunit. An aesthetic evaluation was performed using a patient satisfaction scale and by independent raters.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2014, 21 patients underwent a lower hemi-nose reconstruction. All patients had a full-thickness defect and underwent a reconstruction of the three layers of the nose. Sixty-four percent of our patients were very satisfied, 26% were satisfied, and only 10% were unsatisfied with their nasal tip appearance, with a mean score of 4.4/5. The nasal tip was also rated by independent raters with a mean score of 4.1/5.

DISCUSSION

Our results and experience showed that a midline scar between the two hemi-tips is inconspicuous. The majority of the defects involving only one side of the tip would benefit from the hemi-tip ASU reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

We have modified the number of ASUs by considering the hemi-tip as a proper subunit.

Aesthetic and Functional Evaluation of Total Nasal Reconstructions

The loss of a portion or the totality of the nose has great relevance on the perception of the beauty of a face and can result in a catastrophic quality of life impairment. Several surgical techniques are currently available for the reconstruction of the nasal pyramid. However, there are very few nasal reconstruction quality evaluation protocols that allow the surgeon to choose objectively the best technique for each kind of defects. Six total nasal reconstruction performed in University of Sassari Maxillofacial Unit were evaluated with a protocol that investigate objectively and subjectively the surgical aesthetic and functional outcome. Sensitivity recovery on the reconstructive flaps was also assessed. Patients reported a satisfactory nasal reconstruction both functionally and aesthetically. Sensitivity recovery on the forehead flap was always present even after pedicle resection or in case of traumatic section of the infraorbital nerve. The use of a three layer reconstruction has proved a viable technique both aesthetically and functionally. In particular the use of the forehead flap to reconstruct the outer layer of the nose allows to carry a tissue with very similar characteristics to the original with a recovery of the sensitivity almost complete.

Nasolabial Perforator Flap for One-stage Reconstruction of Nasal Defects

Background:

The excellent freedom of movement and range of this flap when based on a the nasolabial perforator flap have not been sufficiently explored. In this study, along with demonstrating the other key advantages of this flap over its traditional counterpart, we will endeavour to fill these lacunae in the available literature.

Materials and Methods:

From February 2009 to February 2012, twenty patients with nasal defects were repaired with a nasolabial perforator flap in the Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi. Of these, two patients (10%) underwent the procedure bilaterally. Thus, a total of 22 nasolabial perforator flap procedures were carried out. Prospectively, collected clinical records and data of each patient were retrospectively retrieved and reviewed to study the nasal defect and surgery done.

Results:

All the twenty (100%) patients had good functional and aesthetic outcome. All patients who had nasal stenosis preoperatively had very good improvement in the patency of the nasal passages, breathing and nasal blockage with complete recovery of symptoms. The patients were entirely satisfied with the functional recovery.

Conclusions:

The reliability and versatility of the nasolabial perforator flap exceed its recognised application in reconstruction of nasal defects and it must form a part of every plastic surgeon's armamentarium.

Nasolabial and forehead flap reconstruction of contiguous alar-upper lip defects

BACKGROUND

Defects of the nasal ala and upper lip aesthetic subunits can be challenging to reconstruct when they occur in isolation. When defects incorporate both the subunits, the challenge is compounded as subunit boundaries also require reconstruction, and local soft tissue reservoirs alone may provide inadequate coverage. In such cases, we used nasolabial flaps for upper lip reconstruction and a forehead flap for alar reconstruction.

METHODS

Three men and three women aged 21-79 years (average, 55 years) were treated for defects of the nasal ala and upper lip that resulted from cancer (n = 4) and trauma (n = 2). Unaffected contralateral subunits dictated the flap design. The upper lip subunit was excised and replaced with a nasolabial flap. The flap, depending on the contralateral reference, determined accurate alar base position. A forehead flap resurfaced or replaced the nasal ala. Autologous cartilage was used in every case to fortify the forehead flap reconstruction.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for 25.6 months (range, 1-4 years). All the flaps survived, and there were no complications. Satisfactory aesthetic results were achieved in every case. With the exception of a small vertical cheek scar and a vertical forehead scar, all incisions were concealed within the subunit borders.

CONCLUSION

From preliminary experience, we advocate combining nasolabial flap reconstruction of the upper lip with a forehead flap reconstruction of the ala to preserve normal facial appearance. This combination addresses an important void in the algorithmic approach to central facial reconstruction.

[Reconstruction of superficial defects from the crossroad of nasal subunits, tip, alar lobule and lateral side wall: Study of 36 patients]

PURPOSE

Conventionally, articles dealing with nasal defects plan reconstructions regarding the aesthetic subunits, imposing their systematic respect. We propose to study the reconstruction of a crossroad region of three subunits, tip, alar lobule and lateral sidewall, where that full compliance is not possible, in our experience of 36 patients.

METHODS

Our retrospective study from January 2011 to December 2012 focused on patients with a defect in this crossroad region that was repaired by skin graft or flap. We described the population of the study, histological type of the lesions, surgical procedures and complications. We evaluated the reconstructions performed with a photographic review 1 year post-surgery according to the criteria of symmetry, discoloration, thickness, shrinkage, and rating on the Vancouver Scar Scale, which helped create an overall aesthetic score for the reconstruction.

RESULTS

Of 144 patients with a nasal defect, 36 of them (25%) were included, presenting a defect in our study area. The reconstruction was made by eight hatchet flaps, eight frontal flaps, seven bilobed flaps, five advanced-rotated lateronasal flaps, four nasolabial flaps, two Rybka flaps and two total skin grafts. The advanced-rotated flap, hatchet flap and bilobed flap had the highest results and scores, according to the criteria assessed. Rybka flap and total skin grafts had the lowest results.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of a defect in the crossroads seems common. In this indication, specific local flaps had a favourable outcome, including review of the overall esthetic score which was created to standardize the assessment of reconstructions.

Surgical Treatment and Recurrence of Cutaneous Nasal Malignancies: A 26-Year Retrospective Review of 1795 Patients

Frequent localization of facial malignancies in the nasal area and their required complete surgical extirpation pose a significant challenge to the plastic surgeon, who is called to perform a suitable delicate reconstruction of produced nasal skin defects. The present study was aimed to examine the role of tumor characteristics in the prognosis of patients with nasal skin cancer undergoing surgical management.A retrospective review of 1795 patients operated on for nasal cutaneous neoplasms during a 26-year period is presented in our study. Descriptive statistics were appropriately calculated; multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed regarding the possible risk factors for recurrence. Only those with a complete follow-up were included in the study. The mean age of our study population was 66.7 years with a male majority (52.4%). Basal cell carcinoma appeared as the most common histological type (87.7%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (7.9%); the latter correlated with poor prognosis.The nasal sidewalls were the most frequent lesion location (29.8%), followed by the alae (27.8%), dorsum (21.7%), and tip (19.3%). The columella was very rarely affected (0.5%) but was associated with increased recurrence [hazard ratio, 4.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-20.00; P = 0.034]. Most patients were treated with elliptical excision and direct closure (58.7%). Local flaps (31.0%) and skin grafting (9.0%) proved very reliable surgical options, especially for larger, high-risk lesions. Recurrence transpired in 46 patients (2.6%) and 4 skin cancer-related deaths occurred.Surgical modality of choice should be individualized and carefully adjusted to patients' needs. Moreover, more elective techniques, such as Mohs micrographic surgery or cumulative therapeutic approaches, like irradiation, should be examined as a beneficial aid to confront high-risk malignancies.

A Retrospective Review of Reconstructive Options and Outcomes of 202 Cases Large Facial Mohs Micrographic Surgical Defects, Based on the Aesthetic Unit Involved

BACKGROUND

For optimal treatment of facial defects following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), the aesthetic unit principles should be applied. Often multiple staged procedures and revisions are necessary.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the reconstructive options and outcomes for complex facial defects per aesthetic unit.

METHODS

Data of 202 patients, who underwent a facial reconstruction at the department of plastic and reconstructive surgery following MMS, were collected.

RESULTS

The central facial units were affected in more than 70%, with over 20% of the defects involving more than 1 unit. Nasal defects required the longest reconstruction time (3-staged forehead flap) and periocular defects the most revisional procedures. In more than 50%, additional operations (range, 1-5) were needed. In 12%, postoperative complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

An overview for the reconstructive options of extensive facial skin cancer is presented. Proper treatment requires a structured multidisciplinary approach in order to achieve excellent tumour control and a satisfactory aesthetic and functional end result.

Reconstruction algorithm for nasal basal cell carcinoma with skin involvement only: analysis of 221 cases repaired by minor surgery

BACKGROUND

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) often occurs on the nose. Reconstruction of the nose should yield excellent aesthetic and functional outcomes.

AIM

We propose a technical algorithm for the reconstruction of surgical defects, based on our analysis of 221 cases of nasal BCC with skin involvement only, which could be repaired by minor surgery.

METHODS

The aesthetic and functional outcomes for various reconstruction techniques were analysed according to defect location and size. A reconstruction algorithm was proposed with the aim of obtaining the best surgical results.

RESULTS

Defect location and size were key considerations. Primary closure was the first option for small defects (< 10 mm), with scores of 3.4 for objective aesthetic outcome (OAO), 3.2 for subjective aesthetic outcome (SAO) and 3.3 for subjective functional outcome (SFO). The first option for medium defects (1-20 mm) was the island pedicle flap, with scores of 3.5 for OAO, 3.2 for SAO and 3.7 for SFO. The first option for large defects (> 20 mm) was the transposition flap for the upper nose (scores of 2.0 for OAO and SAO and 3.0 for SFO) and the interpolation flap for the lower nose (2.8 for OAO and 2.9 for SAO and SFO).

CONCLUSIONS

We have proposed an algorithm to select the optimal technique for repairing nasal BCC surgical defects according to their size and location.

The reconstruction of the nasal ala with interpolated flaps from the cheek and forehead: design and execution modifications to improve surgical outcomes

The nasal ala, critically important in the function and appearance of the central face, has significant reconstructive demands given the lack of suitable adjacent donor tissue that can be used to repair all but the smallest surgical defects in this area. Interpolated flaps from the forehead and cheek have long been ideal reconstructive alternatives for the repair of larger or more difficult alar wounds, and with the design and execution modifications described here, the dermatological surgeon can offer more appropriate restoration of this critically important aesthetic unit.

Nasal Reconstruction: A Simplified Approach Based on 419 Operated Cases

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this review is to examine a single surgeon's 10-year experience with nose defects and offer a simplified approach for nasal reconstruction to close most nasal defects following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing repair of MMS defects of the nose over a 10-year period. Data collected included patients' age and sex, anatomic location of the defect, type of reconstruction, and number of operations required.

RESULTS

A total of 419 patients were included in this study. The most common location for nasal reconstruction was the nasal dorsum and sidewalls (66.35 %). Complications mainly related to reconstruction of defects of the tip ± ala (n = 31), followed by the ala (n = 15) and the dorsum and sidewalls (n = 13). Bulkiness of the flap used (n = 32) and hypertrophic scar (n = 13) were the most common complications. The bilobed flap was the most commonly used flap (n = 145), followed by nasolabial flap (n = 69), FTSGs (n = 63), forehead flap (n = 62), and dorsal glabellar flap (n = 44).

CONCLUSIONS

In this article, a simplified approach for nasal defects reconstruction is presented, which is based on commonly performed local flaps and skin grafting. This algorithm can be useful for the novice plastic surgeons in planning a reconstructive strategy that will be efficient, easy to perform, and produces an acceptable esthetic and functional outcome.

Use of aesthetic rhinoplasty procedures in reconstructive nasal surgery

Resection of cancer often involves the excision of underlying hard tissue, and some procedures in aesthetic rhinoplasty can be used in reconstructive nasal surgery to increase the margin of safety while still achieving an acceptable aesthetic and functional outcome. We have used techniques from aesthetic rhinoplasty to shape the nasal framework. Osteotomy and formation of the tip were used in 17 patients with defects (ranging from 1 to 3.5 cm in size) from the nasal root to the tip of the nose. After the underlying bony or cartilaginous framework, or both, had been removed, the resulting open roof deformity had to be corrected by osteotomy of the bony nasal wall and the tip shaped by excision and suturing, including insertion of the tip graft and columellar strut graft. After this, and narrowing of the nose, the defect was smaller and could be closed with local tissue without tension. There were no deformities in the contour, and patency of the airway was maintained. Patients were satisfied with both the aesthetic and functional results. Although the margin of safety was increased, shaping the nasal framework reduced the size of the defect, which allowed tension-free closure with a local flap. The operation requires a thorough knowledge of procedures used in aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Reconstruction of full-thickness nasal alar defects using cartilage-supported nonfolded nasolabial flaps

The difficulties faced in the reconstruction of the nasal alar defects are still continuing because of their unique anatomy, free margin, and triple-layered complex structure. In this study, we would like to present the results of the cartilage-supported nonfolded nasolabial flap reconstruction method that we applied to full-thickness alar defects involving the alar rim. Between March 2009 and October 2011, 5 patients with full-thickness alar defects underwent cartilage graft-supported nasolabial flap reconstructions. Three of the patients were men, whereas 2 patients were women. Their median age was 54.2 years (range, 43-62 y). The defects were caused by either tumor excision or trauma. According to the method we applied, cartilage grafts were placed into the pouches formed between the skin and the adipose tissue to provide cartilaginous support to the nasolabial flaps to be adapted to the defect areas. The deep surfaces that were going to form the nasal mucosa were grafted using postauricular full-thickness skin grafts. Patients were followed up for a median period of 7.3 months (range, 3-21 mo). In all patients, the flaps fully fitted the defect areas and provided enough coverage over the defects. Although minimal graft contractions were observed in the later phase because of the cartilage support placed within the pouches formed in the flaps, no nasal airway constrictions were observed.The technique we applied is a simple and reliable method providing adequate framework support, full color and texture harmony, an open nasal passage, and a single-session reconstruction in most cases.

Acquired defects of the nose and naso-orbitoethmoid (NOE) region

Nasal injuries coupled with midface fractures of the orbit and ethmoids constitute a nasoorbitoethmoid (NOE) fracture pattern, which is typically the most challenging facial fracture to repair. Hard and soft tissue defects of this region may require advanced reconstruction techniques, including local rotational flaps, free tissue transfer, and even prosthetics. The restoration of form and function dictates treatment, and the success of primary repair is paramount, because secondary correction is challenging in this area of the midface. Because of the complex nature of this region, this discussion is divided into hard tissue defects, with a focus on trauma, and soft tissue defects, with a focus on oncology.

Isolated cleft of alar rim

Alar rim defects are most commonly acquired as a result of trauma, burns, tumor excision or sometimes accompanying craniofacial clefts. However, isolated congenital alar defects are extremely rare occurring in about 1 in 20,000 to 40,000 live births. We are presenting a case report of an isolated congenital cleft of the alar rim. The defect was closed by the use of a rotation advancement full-thickness flap. With this technique, both symmetry and desired thickness of the nostrils were achieved. The skin color and texture of the alar rim were good with minimal scars.

Reconstruction of the nose with a new double flap technique: microvascular osteocutaneous femur and microvascular chondrocutaneous ear flap--first clinical results

This study describes a new microvascular flap combination from the medial femur and ear to reconstruct the nose after subtotal resection and presents the first clinical results. In four patients a squamous cell carcinoma of the nose was registered. In three patients this was diagnosed for the first time while in the fourth patient it was the second relapse after two resections and local flap surgery. In every case, tumour resection ended up in an extended defect of the nose, cheek and upper lip region. For skeletal reconstruction and the inner lining of the nose, a microvascular osteocutaneous femur flap was used. After reconstructing the nasal skeleton, the remaining defect was covered by a microvascular composite flap from the left ear and preauricular region. Both flap pedicles were anastomosed to the facial vein and artery. In every case, the flaps healed without complications. There was no tumour relapse. 12 months after reconstruction, minor surgical corrections were made. The patients showed a satisfying functional and aesthetic result. The combination of a microvascular osteocutaneous femur flap and a microvascular ear flap can be used successfully for reconstructing the nose after subtotal resection.

Reconstruction of alar defects

With its complex symmetric contours and central facial location, the nose plays a key role in characterizing the face. Among the cosmetic subunits of the nose, the delicate nasal ala has a particularly marked influence on breathing and cosmetic appearance. Therefore, reconstruction of defects of the nasal ala requires careful attention to preserve and restore function and cosmesis. Reconstructive surgeons have a wide variety of options and techniques to repair specific defects of the nasal ala. Attention to detail, knowledge of the nasal anatomy, and precise surgical techniques allows for the optimum results with the lowest risk of complications.

Transposition flaps in nasal reconstruction

The aim of reconstructive nasal surgery is not only to rebuild all or part of the nose but also to blend and tailor the new and old tissues in such a way as to create the best possible result. Although a variety of reconstructive options exist, local or regional skin flaps are one of the most powerful reconstructive tools for the reconstruction of cutaneous nasal defects. This article discusses the fundamentals of nasal reconstruction and describes the local and regional transposition flaps for the reconstruction of nasal defects.

The midline forehead flap in nasal reconstruction

An ancient Indian medical document, the Sushruta Samhita, describes a technique of using a flap from the forehead for nasal reconstruction. The forehead flap remains the workhorse for major nasal resurfacing today. Contemporary nasal reconstruction with forehead flaps uses the well-established concept of facial and nasal subunits, restoring the three-dimensional morphology by replacing missing tissue with like tissue. This article covers the history of forehead flap surgery, current concepts in flap design, surgical steps, potential complications, defect analysis, lining, framework, and cover as a means of restoring the three-dimensional nasal morphology.

Anatomy, physiology, and general concepts in nasal reconstruction

Nasal reconstruction provides a challenging task for any facial plastic surgeon. In performing reconstructive surgery on the nose, one must balance both the functional aspects of the nasal airway with the aesthetic responsibilities of being the central fixture of the face. Before performing surgery, the surgeon must grasp the importance of the anatomic nasal relationships and subunits, the physiology of the skin, the flaps or grafts used to reconstruct these areas, and the basic steps in wound healing. Accurate preoperative planning and analysis of the nasal defect are also vital to producing both an aesthetic and functional nose.

Reconstruction of nasal tip and columella

Reconstruction of nasal tip and columella defects is demanding area with a range of reconstructive options, varying in complexity depending on requirements from simple skin grafting to multiple stage reconstruction with regional flaps. A framework is suggested to aid the reader in choice of reconstruction by classifying the defect based on size and the requirements of one to three layer (full thickness) reconstruction.

Lemmo's flap for nasal dorsum reconstruction

PURPOSE

Reconstruction of nasal defects is an antique challenge for surgeons. The first reported technique is dated 600 B.C. Since then a number of reconstructive options have been proposed in the literature. Some principles, first stated by Buget and Menick must be always taken into account when planning such reconstructions. In detail, every reconstruction should respect the subunit principle and the scars should always be well hidden in the passage between adjacent subunits. The flap proposed in the present paper adheres to the cited principles and leads to optimal nasal dorsum reconstruction in selected cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2008 to March 2009, 5 patients were reconstructed with Lemmo's flap after local excision of 3 basal cell carcinomas and 2 squamous cell carcinomas affecting the the skin of the nasal dorsum in its caudal portion.

RESULTS

In all cases a pleasing aesthetic result was obtained, no postoperative deformity was observed and all the scars were unnoticeable.

CONCLUSIONS

The Lemmo's flap described in the present paper can be considered a valid choice for nasal dorsum skin reconstruction and is preferable over other techniques for reconstruction of small to medium sized defects of the skin of the caudal dorsum.

Soft tissue assessment in midface advancement: the use of regional flaps to enhance facial projection

Classically, soft tissue repair when indicated is done before or after the skeletal mobilization especially in those cases that present midface deficiency with severe midline soft tissue restriction by scars or congenital affectation. The distraction osteogenesis method has contributed to improve substantially this problem elongating bones, muscles, and ligaments, but some situations need specific and more precise reconstruction of the subunits to gain in aesthetics. The labial-columella junction, the tip of the nose, and the more projecting point of the cheeks are one of these exigent anatomic areas, where only sophisticated reconstruction by flaps can improve facial proportions and projections.

Clinical outcome of cutaneous flaps versus full-thickness skin grafts after Mohs surgery on the nose

BACKGROUND

A large proportion of facial skin cancers occur on the nose, and defects after Mohs surgery in this location often present a reconstructive challenge. For intermediate-sized defects, the choice of reconstruction is usually between skin flap and full-thickness skin graft. Ongoing debate exists, and limited data are available to determine which of these methods is more satisfactory.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the clinical appearance of wound healing after surgical repair with a skin graft versus a skin flap for Mohs defects on the nose.

METHOD

In this study, 43 flaps and 24 grafts were evaluated using a modified Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale and a visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

The mean visual analogue scale score was significantly better for flap repairs than for graft repairs. In addition, 100% of flaps had an acceptable overall cosmetic appearance on the basis of the Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale, compared with only 75% of skin grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

For defects on the nose where flap and graft repair may both be technically possible, a flap may be more likely to result in superior cosmetic outcome.

Review of nasal reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Nasal reconstruction after tumor extirpation is a necessity. The aim of the current study was to present the Greek experience in this field for a long period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Charts of patients who underwent nasal reconstruction, from 1985 to 2006, were reviewed retrospectively. They were analyzed in relation to their age, sex, location of the defect, histologic diagnosis of the lesion, type of reconstruction, recurrence of the tumor, and final outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 1585 patients underwent nasal reconstruction by the senior author (O.P.) during a period of 21 years in our department. A clear male preponderance was shown (845 or 53.3% vs 740 or 46.7%). Their age ranged from 13 to 97 years with a mean of 65.9 years. One thousand five hundred ninety-three different tumors had been resected during the studied period (some patients had >1 lesion). Basal cell carcinoma was the most common type, affecting 1399 patients (87.8%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma, which was identified in 109 patients (6.8%). Cutaneous melanoma was not a frequent diagnosis. Excision and primary closure represented the most frequent type of reconstruction, followed by flap reconstruction and any type of graft. Sidewalls were the usual location in the whole population. Recurrence rate was 3.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal reconstruction remains a challenge for every plastic surgeon. Efficient diagnosis and appropriate reconstruction are prerequisites for the final desired outcome.