Prolongation of Skin Allograft Survival after Neonatal Injection of Donor Bone Marrow and Epidermal Cells

The abdominal wall transplant as a sentinel skin graft

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Abdominal wall transplantation is a technique used to achieve abdominal closure after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. This review focuses on whether there are additional benefits for the skin component as an immune-monitoring tool.

RECENT FINDINGS

The largest series of abdominal wall transplants has recently been published. Alongside the physiological advantage gained in abdominal closure, the authors describe the immunological insight that the skin component can provide and how this contributes to the management of patients. The skin appears to develop a rash with early rejection, which facilitates early systemic treatment before significant visceral rejection occurs. It can also help in cases in which there is diagnostic doubt regarding the cause of bowel dysfunction such as in instances of intestinal infection. Despite the additional immunological burden of donor tissue, there appears to be no requirement for increased immunosuppressive therapy.

SUMMARY

The technical and immunological feasibility of abdominal wall transplantation has now been demonstrated by several centres. Skin transplanted as part of the abdominal wall or as a separate vascularized sentinel skin flap may aid in the diagnosis of rejection. This has the potential to improve graft survival and reduce immunosuppressive morbidity.

Vascularized composite allograft-specific characteristics of immune responses

Vascularized composite allograft (VCA) transplantation, or reconstructive transplantation, has revolutionized the treatment of complex tissue and functional defects. Despite arriving during an age in which the immunology of solid organ transplant rejection has been investigated in much detail, these transplants have offered new perspectives from which to explore the immunobiology of transplantation. VCAs have a number of unique molecular, cellular, and architectural features which alter the character and intensity of the rejection response. While much is yet to be clarified, an understanding of these distinct mechanisms affords new possibilities for the control of immune responses in an effort to improve outcomes after VCA transplantation.

Contribution of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells and the secretome to the skin allograft survival in mice

BACKGROUND

Despite considerable evidence showing the immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in vitro, such properties have not been fully demonstrated in vivo. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MSCs and/or MSC secretome in inducing tolerance in a mouse skin transplantation model.

METHODS

After receiving full-thickness skin allotransplantation on the back of the mouse, the recipient mice were infused with phosphate-buffered saline, adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs), conditioned media (CM), and control media. Specifically, ASCs (1.0 × 10(6)/0.1 mL) were transplanted to ASC-infused mice and 25-fold concentrated CM, which had been obtained from ASC culture were infused to CM-infused mice. Graft survival rates and the parameters reflecting immunologic consequences were assessed.

RESULTS

The serum level of proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 6 decreased in mice treated with ASCs or CM compared with the control groups after infusion (P < 0.05). Interferon gamma, interleukin 10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha messenger RNA levels in the skin graft seemed to be decreased in the ASC-infused mice and CM-infused mice. Hyporesponsiveness was identified in mixed lymphocyte reaction assay at 30-d posttransplantation in ASC- or CM-infused mice. And, administering ASCs and CM markedly increased skin allograft survival compared with control animals (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that ASCs and their secretome have the potential to induce immunologic tolerance. Moreover, our results demonstrate that the immunosuppressive properties of ASCs are mediated by the ASC secretome. Our approach could provide insights into a promising strategy to avoid toxicities of chemical immunosuppressive regimen in solid organ transplantation.

Translating tolerogenic therapies to the clinic - where do we stand?

Manipulation of the immune system to prevent the development of a specific immune response is an ideal strategy to improve outcomes after transplantation. A number of experimental techniques exploiting central and peripheral tolerance mechanisms have demonstrated success, leading to the first early phase clinical trials for tolerance induction. The first major strategy centers on the facilitation of donor-cell mixed chimerism in the transplant recipient with the use of bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The second strategy, utilizing peripheral regulatory mechanisms, focuses on cellular therapy with regulatory T cells. This review examines the key studies and novel research directions in the field of immunological tolerance.

Immunodepletive anti-alpha/beta-TCR antibody in transplantation of composite tissue allografts: Cleveland Clinic research experience

The immunologic characteristics of composite tissue allografts (CTA), which contain skin, lymphoid elements and bone with bone marrow, raise new challenges for transplant immunologists. Owing to the heterogeneity of transplanted tissues in limb or face transplant models, researchers are focusing on the new tolerance-inducing strategies facilitating CTA acceptance. A number of immunosuppressive protocols have been designed to develop tolerance in experimental models; however, only a few protocols have been introduced to clinical transplantation. In this review, based on own experiences, we discuss the major strategies for tolerance induction in limb and face allograft models in experimental studies. This review is focused on tolerance induction strategies by establishment of donor-specific chimerism using different immunomodulatory protocols, including nonselective T-cell depletion with polyclonal antibody antilymphocyte serum and selective inhibition of alphabeta-T-cell receptors on the alloreactive T cells.

Hand transplantation and vascularized composite tissue allografts in orthopaedics and traumatology

Composite tissue allograft (CTA) is defined as heterologous transplantation of a complex comprising skin and subcutaneous, neurovascular and mesenchymal tissue. Such techniques allow complex reconstruction using matched tissue, without donor site morbidity. The potential indications in orthopaedics-traumatology could in the future be more frequent than the present indications of heart, lung, liver, kidney and pancreas transplantation. International clinical experience clearly demonstrates the feasibility of CTA, both surgically and immunologically. However, immunosuppression remains indispensable, exposing the patient to risks that are not acceptable for purely functional surgery, except in very particular indications. The main hope for the future lies in induction of graft-specific tolerance.

Use of donor bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of skin allograft rejection in a preclinical rat model

Recent studies indicate that mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) exhibit a degree of immune privilege due to their ability to suppress T cell mediated responses causing tissue rejection; however, the impact of allogeneic MSC in the setting of organ transplantation has been poorly investigated so far. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of intravenous donor MSC infusion for clinical tolerance induction in allogeneic skin graft transplantations in rats. MSC were isolated from Wistar rats and administered in Sprague-Dawley rats receiving Wistar skin graft with or without cyclosporine A (CsA). Graft biopsies were performed at day 10 post transplantation in all experimental groups for histological and gene expression studies. Intravenous infusion with donor MSC in CsA-treated transplanted rats resulted in prolongation of skin allograft survival compared to control animals. Unexpectedly, donor MSC infusion in immunocompetent rats resulted in a faster rejection as compared to control group. Cytokine expression analysis at the site of skin graft showed that CsA treatment significantly decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-gamma and IL-2 and reduced TNF-alpha gene expression; however, the level of TNF-alpha is high in MSC-treated and not immunosuppressed rats. Results of our study in a rat tissue transplantation model demonstrated a possible immunogenic role for donor (allogeneic) MSC, confirming the need of adequate preclinical experimentation before clinical use.

Allogreffe de main chez le nouveau-né agénésique: étude de faisabilité

Would a newborn with a single hand benefit from hand allograft? Transantebrachial aplasia is the chosen clinical form of agenesia in our interrogation. The feasibility study presents several aspects: 1) ethical and psychological aspects. Is this a desired surgery for agenesic population? Which are the functional, psychological and social situations of agenesic patient? Is the hand transplantation in newborn ethically acceptable? What is the parents' attitude toward agenesia? Can we envisage organ donation in neonatal period? 2) immunological aspects. The non-vital character of this condition and its' good functional tolerance cannot make accepting the risk of adverse effects of hand allotransplantation. Hence, one may consider this surgery only without immunosuppression. Can the peculiarities of the neonate "immature" immune system represent an opportunity of easier tolerance obtaining, avoiding immunosuppression? 3) anatomical and technical aspects. The proximal tissues at the level of amputation are all hypoplastic in agenesic patients. Can we efficaciously suture those structures with donor eutrophic tissues? 4) cognitive aspects. Is a neonate born with only one hand is able to use two? A feasibility study on such a subject needs to take into account all these aspects. This research is useful because, even if hand allograft in agenesic newborn will never be done, the provided information will allow to progress in the vaster domain of composite tissue allotransplantation in perinatology.

Skin tolerance: in search of the Holy Grail

In 1943, Gibson and Medawar opened the modern era of transplantation research with a paper on the problem of skin allograft rejection. Ten years later Billingham, Brent and Medawar demonstrated that it was possible to induce selective immune acceptance of skin grafts in mice, a state of tolerance. After over six decades, however, the precise mechanism of skin allograft rejection remains still ill-defined. Furthermore, it has not been possible to achieve reliably clinical tolerance allowing the widespread application of skin allotransplantation techniques. The first successful applications of skin allotransplantation have included the hand and face. However, complications from the chronic immunosuppression regimens limit the application of these techniques. Induction of tolerance to skin (and the other tissues in the allograft) would be the most effective way to overcome all these difficulties, but this is yet to be achieved reliably, stimulating some to look for other ways to surmount the current limitations. This paper summarizes alternatives to enlarge the scope of skin allotransplantation techniques, current understanding of mechanisms of skin rejection, and the utility and limitations of animal models used to study skin rejection and tolerance induction. Finally, manipulation strategies to achieve skin tolerance are outlined.

[Experimental and clinical experience of composite tissues allotransplantation in reconstructive surgery]

Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is a new concept in reconstructive surgery to improve major physical defects with no current solution. Although not a life-saving procedure, tissue replacement by CTA offers great potential for improving quality of life but relies on lifelong immunotherapy. This new practice has become achievable with the refinement of microsurgical techniques, with experience gained from limb and scalp replantations, with the development of organ transplantation and the release of new immunosuppressive drugs. Experimental and clinical research made it possible. The first human cases of CTA proved the reality and the feasibility of the concept. While the early functional results of these allografts are encouraging, they will need to be assessed in the long-term, and development of less toxic - more efficient immonu-suppressive drugs will be a permanent requisite to the broadening of CTA. Although long-term outcome and potential adverse effects of chronic immunosuppression remain uncertain, as for organ transplantation, CTA is already a potential solution for some highly selected patients carrying physical disabilities such as large facial defects and bilateral hand amputation.

Research and Events Leading to Facial Transplantation

Facial transplantation has long captured the interest and imagination of scientists, the media, and the lay public. Facial transplantation could provide an excellent alternative to current treatments for facial disfigurement caused by burns, trauma, cancer extirpation, or congenital birth defects. This article discusses the major technical, immunologic, psychosocial and ethical hurdles that have been overcome to bring facial transplantation from an idea to a clinical reality by providing the reader with a chronologic overview of the research and events that have led this exciting new treatment into the clinical arena.

Hand transplantation: the state-of-the-art

The feasibility of hand transplantation has been demonstrated, both surgically and immunologically. Levels of immunosuppression comparable to regimens used in solid organ transplantation are proving sufficient to prevent graft loss. Many patients have achieved discriminative sensibility and recovery of intrinsic muscle function. In addition to restoration of function, hand transplantation offers considerable psychological benefits. The recipient's pre-operative psychological status, his motivation and his compliance with the intense rehabilitation programme are key issues. While the induction of graft specific tolerance represents a hope for the future, immunosuppression currently remains necessary and carries significant risks. Hand transplantation should, therefore, only be considered a therapeutic option for a carefully selected group of patients.