Quality of Life and Affective Distress in Women Seeking Immediate versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

Immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Long-term follow-up on health-related quality of life and satisfaction with breasts

INTRODUCTION

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) can be improved by breast reconstruction following mastectomy. The optimal timing of the reconstruction remains unclear.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study on 338 women who had undergone immediate or delayed breast reconstruction between 08/2017 and 07/2019 was performed. The postoperative HRQL was assessed using the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module and the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Regression analysis was performed for group-wise comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 146 (43%) patients participated. Seventy-seven patients (53%) had undergone immediate, and 69 patients (47%) had delayed reconstruction. The median age was 55 years (interquartile ratio [IQR] 50-62) for the Immeda group te, and 60 years (IQR 54-65) for the delayed reconstruction group. The median follow-up time was 2.3 years (IQR 1.8-2.9). No difference between the groups was detected in satisfaction with breasts (median 61, IQR 53-71 vs. 62, IQR 46-71, p = 0.62), physical well-being of the chest (median 100, IQR 80-100 vs. 100, IQR 80-100, p = 0.95) or psychosocial well-being (median 69, IQR 54-83 vs. 62, IQR 54-74, p = 0.19). No difference was detected in the SF-36 domains either.

CONCLUSIONS

The timing of the breast reconstruction does not affect the postoperative HRQL. Patients with both immediate and delayed breast reconstruction reported high satisfaction with the breast and psychosocial well-being.

Outcome Analysis of Combined Surgical Approaches in Advanced-stage Upper Extremity Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema

Background

This study aimed to discuss several surgical approaches for advanced-stage breast cancer-related lymphedema and compared their treatment outcomes.

Methods

The patients who underwent surgery with International Society of Lymphology stage III lymphedema were included in this study. The three surgical methods used here were (1) suction-assisted lipectomy with lymphovenous anastomosis, (2) autologous breast reconstruction with muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap combined with inguinal lymph node transfer, and (3) vascularized lymph node transfer with free omental flap. Analysis of the postoperative outcomes in the patients was based on the difference in volume between patients pre- and postoperatively, LYMPH-Q questionnaire, and bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Results

Eighty-seven patients with stage IIb or higher disease underwent surgery. 38 patients underwent suction-assisted lipectomy + lymphovenous anastomosis, 23 underwent autologous breast reconstruction with vascularized lymph node transfer + lymphovenous anastomosis, and 26 underwent right gastroepiploic omental vascularized lymph node transfer with lymphovenous anastomosis. The LYMPH-Q questionnaire, which evaluates patients' subjective satisfaction, showed that the autologous breast reconstruction group showed the greatest improvement, whereas in bioimpedance analysis, the omental flap group demonstrated the greatest postoperative improvement compared with preoperative values. However, suction-assisted lipectomy was considered the most effective surgical method for reducing limb volume in patients with high-stage lymphedema accompanied by fibrosis and volume increase.

Conclusions

We observed slightly different clinical effects for each surgical method; however, all surgical methods demonstrated a reduction in the degree of edema and an increase in patient satisfaction.

Silicone prosthetics and anti-thyroid autoimmunity

INTRODUCTION

In esthetic surgery, the use of silicone implants is a topic of hot discussion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An analysis of 119 esthetic surgical interventions on the mammary gland was performed. A study of the immune and endocrine parameters after mammoplasty was carried out.

RESULTS

The phenomenon of an increase in the levels of autoantibodies to the TSH receptor was revealed. The phenomenon of pre-operative growth of prolactin and TSH levels has been confirmed. An increase in thyroid autoimmunity after silicone mammoplasty is interpreted as a result of a silicone adjuvant action. An increase in the incidence of ASIA syndrome in patients who underwent breast surgery was registered. However, it was observed in both patients with silicone and non-silicone breast surgeries and therefore could not be solely explained by the use of silicone. Within 12 months following silicone mammoplasty, the patients with an increase of anti-TSH receptor autoimmunity nevertheless did not show any clinical and laboratory signs of overt thyroid disease, thus staying in a pre-nosological state. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on these results, we recommend the following for esthetic surgery: (a) all patients planned for silicone implant surgery should be examined for autoantibodies to the TSH receptor and (b) patients who have undergone breast endoprosthesis, starting 6 months after the operation, need long-term follow-up for thyroid status with mandatory testing for the level of these autoantibodies.

Patient Perspectives and Quality of Life after Breast Reconstruction and the Impact of Subsequent Revisions

There is limited research on the impact of revisional surgery after breast reconstruction on patient experience and postoperative quality of life (QoL).

Methods

Patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate implant-based or autologous free-flap breast reconstruction from 2008 to 2020 were reviewed. These patients were categorized by revisions (0-1, 2-3, and 4+) and surveyed on QoL metrics using BREAST-Q and Was It Worth It? (WIWI) questionnaires. BREAST-Q QoL, satisfaction, and WIWI metrics between revision groups were evaluated.

Results

Among 252 patients, a total of 150 patients (60%) underwent zero to one revisions, 72 patients (28%) underwent two to three revisions, and 30 patients (12%) underwent four or more revisions. Median follow-up was 6 years (range, 1-11 years). BREAST-Q satisfaction among patients with four or more revisions was significantly lower (P = 0.03), while core QoL domains (chest physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being) did not significantly differ. Analysis of unplanned reoperations due to complications and breast satisfaction showed no significant difference in QoL scores between groups (P = 0.08). Regarding WIWI QoL metrics, four or more revisions were associated with a higher rate of worse QoL (P = 0.035) and worse overall experience (P = 0.001). Most patients in all revision groups felt it was worthwhile to undergo breast reconstruction (86%), would choose breast reconstruction again (83%), and would recommend breast reconstruction to others (79%).

Conclusions

Overall, a majority of patients undergoing revisions after breast reconstruction still have a worthwhile experience. Although reoperations after breast reconstruction do not significantly impact long-term BREAST-Q QoL domains, patients undergoing four or more revisions have significantly lower breast satisfaction, worse QoL, and a postoperative experience worse than expected.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncoplastic Surgery Prevents Delays to Adjuvant Therapy

Breast reductions, including oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS), have high postoperative wound healing complication (WHC) rates, ranging from 17% to 63%, thus posing a potential delay in the onset of adjuvant therapy. Incision management with closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) effectively reduces postoperative complications in other indications. This retrospective analysis compares postoperative outcomes and delays in adjuvant therapy in patients who received ciNPT on the cancer breast versus standard of care (SOC) after oncoplastic breast reduction and mastopexy post lumpectomy.

Methods

Patient demographics, ciNPT use, postoperative complication rates, and time to adjuvant therapy were analyzed from the records of 150 patients (ciNPT = 29, SOC = 121). Propensity score matching was used to match patients based on age, body mass index, diabetes, tobacco use, and prior breast surgery.

Results

In the matched cohort, the overall complication rate of ciNPT-treated cancerous breasts was 10.3% (3/29) compared with 31% (9/29) in SOC-treated cancerous breasts (P = 0.096). Compared with the SOC-treated cancerous breasts, the ciNPT breasts had lower skin necrosis rates [1/29 (3.4%) versus 6/29 (20.7%); P = 0.091] and dehiscence rates [0/29 (0%) versus 8/29 (27.6%); P = 0.004]. In the unmatched cohort, the total number of ciNPT patients who had a delay in adjuvant therapy was lower compared to the SOC group (0% versus 22.5%, respectively; P = 0.007).

Conclusion

Use of ciNPT following oncoplastic breast reduction effectively lowered postoperative wound healing complication rates and, most importantly, decreased delays to adjuvant therapy.

Prospective Longitudinal Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Effects of Reconstruction Timing

BACKGROUND

Without reconstruction, mastectomy alone can produce significant detrimental effects on health-related quality of life. The magnitude of quality-of-life benefits following breast reconstruction may be unique based on timing of reconstruction. Facilitated by the BREAST-Q questionnaire, characterization of how reconstruction timing differentially affects patient-reported quality of life is essential for improved evidence-based clinical practice.

METHODS

Consecutive DIEP flap breast reconstruction patients prospectively completed BREAST-Q questionnaires preoperatively and at two different time intervals postoperatively. The first (postoperative time point A) and second (postoperative time point B) postoperative questionnaires were completed 1 month postoperatively and following breast revision/symmetry procedures, respectively. Postoperative flap and donor-site complications were recorded prospectively. Stratified by timing (immediate versus delayed) of reconstruction, preoperative clinical data, operative morbidity, and BREAST-Q scores were compared at all time points.

RESULTS

Between July of 2012 and August of 2016, 73 patients underwent 130 DIEP flap breast reconstructions. Collectively, breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being scores significantly (p < 0.001) increased postoperatively versus baseline. Chest and abdominal physical well-being scores returned to baseline levels by postoperative time point B. Preoperatively, patients undergoing delayed breast reconstruction reported significantly (p < 0.05) lower breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being scores compared to immediate reconstruction patients. Postoperatively, delayed and immediate reconstruction patients reported similar quality-of-life scores. Outcome satisfaction and flap and donor-site morbidity were similar between groups irrespective of timing of reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study, patient-reported outcomes demonstrate significant improvements in breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being among patients following DIEP flap reconstruction. Moreover, preoperative differences in quality-of-life scores among delayed/immediate reconstruction patients were eliminated postoperatively.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Oncological safety and complication risks of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: A Bayesian analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy (MA) have three surgical options: MA only and reconstruction at the time of MA ("immediate," IBR) or at a later time ("delayed," DBR). To assess the oncological safety and complication risks associated with different surgical choices, a systematic review with Bayesian network analysis was conducted.

METHODS

Cochrane library, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure were systematically searched in November 2019. The odds ratios [OR] were estimated for oncological safety (including disease-free survival, overall survival, local recurrence, and distant metastases) and complication risks (including overall complications, surgical site infection, and lymphedema) among MA, IBR, and DBR groups.

RESULTS

In the included 51 studies (265,522 patients), reconstruction after MA for IBR or DBR was associated with increased overall survival compared to simple MA (DBR vs. MA: OR 4.12, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.80-10.01; IBR vs. MA: OR 1.75, 95% CrI 1.32-2.32). Additionally, IBR was associated with a decreased distant metastasis rate compared to MA (IBR vs. MA: OR 0.67, 95% CrI 0.51-0.90). However, the risk of overall complications and surgical site infection was higher in the IBR group than in the other two groups (complications, IBR vs. DBR: OR 1.40, 95% CrI 1.01-1.93; surgical site infection, IBR vs. MA: OR 1.77, 95% CrI 1.03-3.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggested that breast reconstruction, whether IBR or DBR, does not adversely affect oncological safety in the setting of breast cancer. IBR is associated with an increased risk of overall complications and surgical site infection, but technical advances in this surgical procedure have cumulated over time.

Higher Distress in Patients with Breast Cancer Is Associated with Declining Breast Reconstruction

Background:

Distress among newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer is common and may have an impact on their surgical decision-making. The revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) is a validated instrument that provides an estimate of patients’ total distress, and no previous study has related preoperative scores to the choice to have breast reconstruction.

Methods:

Women with breast cancer treated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in 2014 were reviewed, and patient and tumor characteristics were collected from local databases. Breast reconstruction status was obtained from patients’ electronic medical records until April 2017. A multivariable logistic regression model assessed for an independent association between preoperative ESAS-r total distress scores and patients’ decision to have breast reconstruction.

Results:

A total of 312 patients were analyzed. ESAS-r values had an overall median score of 10.0 and ranged from 0 to 69 (interquartile range, 17). Of these patients, 82 chose to undergo breast reconstruction surgery (26.8%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that higher ESAS-r scores were associated with patients forgoing breast reconstruction surgery (lumpectomy-alone group: odds ratio estimate, 1.034 [1.004–1.064], P = 0.025; mastectomy-alone group: odds ratio estimate, 1.031 [1.004–1.059], P = 0.023).

Conclusions:

This study of patients with breast cancer found that higher distress scores as measured by the ESAS-r were associated with reduced breast reconstruction. Distress in patients with breast cancer is important to address, as it is often treatable, and its resolution may unmask a desire for breast reconstruction, which has known benefits psychosocially.

Immediate Breast Reconstruction in The Netherlands and the United States: A Proof-of-Concept to Internationally Compare Quality of Care Using Cancer Registry Data

BACKGROUND

Studies based on large-volume databases have made significant contributions to research on breast cancer surgery. To date, no comparison between large-volume databases has been made internationally. This is the first proof-of-concept study exploring the feasibility of combining two existing operational databases of The Netherlands and the United States, focusing on breast cancer care and immediate breast reconstruction specifically.313/291 METHODS:: The National Breast Cancer Organization The Netherlands Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA) (2011 to 2015) and the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010 to 2013) were compared on structure and content. Data variables were grouped into general, treatment-specific, cancer-specific, and follow-up variables and were matched. As proof-of-concept, mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction rates in patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ were analyzed.

RESULTS

The NBCA included 115 variables and SEER included 112. The NBCA included significantly more treatment-specific variables (n = 46 versus 6), whereas the SEER database included more cancer-specific variables (n = 74 versus 26). In patients diagnosed with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ, immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 19.3 percent and 24.0 percent of the breast cancer cohort and 44.0 percent and 35.3 percent of the ductal carcinoma in situ cohort in the NBCA and SEER, respectively. Immediate breast reconstruction rates increased significantly over time in both data sets.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a first overview of available registry data on breast cancer care in The Netherlands and the United States, and revealed limited data on treatment in the United States. Comparison of treatment patterns of immediate breast reconstruction showed interesting differences. The authors advocate the urgency for an international database with alignment of (treatment) variables to improve quality of breast cancer care for patients across the globe.

Optimizing DIEP Flap Insetting for Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study of Patient-Reported Aesthetic Outcomes

BACKGROUND

To improve the aesthetic outcome of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, flaps should be tailored to the patient's characteristics. A single method of DIEP flap insetting will not suffice for all women seeking breast reconstruction. The authors share the outcomes of a prospective longitudinal study on DIEP flap insetting and present an algorithm for reconstruction.

METHODS

Over 4 years, 70 consecutive immediate unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions were prospectively evaluated. DIEP insetting was based on the characteristics of the donor site and contralateral breast, according to the authors' algorithm. Baseline and outcome data were collected. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated by a panel of three independent assessors, and patient-reported outcomes were quantified using the BREAST-Q at 1 year after reconstruction.

RESULTS

Seventy women underwent reconstruction. There were no total or partial flap failures, four cases of fat necrosis, and 14 revision operations. Women reported a mean overall BREAST-Q score of 82 of 100, representing excellent satisfaction but poor satisfaction with sexual well-being. BREAST-Q scores were not associated with age or body mass index. Fat necrosis reduced satisfaction with the chest (absolute mean reduction, 13; 95 percent CI, 8 to 18; p = 0.002). Independent assessors scored the outcomes favorably, but there was no agreement between surgeons, nurses, and lay assessors.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' algorithm can support surgeons in selecting individually tailored DIEP flap insetting to achieve excellent aesthetic outcomes. Further research is needed as to the relevance of scores from BREAST-Q in relation to interventions.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

With advancements in and the evolution of the medical field, several methods and surgical techniques have been developed for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Generally, we can categorize these strategies into two broad groups: autologous reconstruction and implant-based reconstruction. This study aimed to analyze the satisfaction rate between these groups, considering age, timing of breast reconstruction, body mass index (BMI), major complications, and the need for radiotherapy or chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the patients who underwent a mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction surgery at our institution between August 1, 2013, and August 31, 2017, were invited to complete a BREAST-Q questionnaire. To compare the quality of life and complication rate between the autologous and implant-based reconstruction groups, data were collected from specific patients. All participants completed the Arabic version of the postoperative reconstruction module.

RESULTS

Among 61 patients, 43 (70.5%) completed the two domains of the BREAST-Q questionnaire, about the satisfaction with the implanted breast and satisfaction with the surgical outcome. These patients were divided into two groups: autologous (n = 21) and implant-based (n = 22) groups. The mean score of satisfaction with the implanted breast was 43.5 for the autologous group and 39.6 for the implant-based group. For the surgical outcome, the scores for the autologous and implant-based groups were 45.4 and 56.0, respectively. However, there was neither a statistical significance in the satisfaction with the implanted breast nor the surgical outcome between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although there are many different surgical techniques to reconstruct a breast after mastectomy, there is still no specific surgical method that is perfect or well-suited for all patients undergoing breast reconstruction surgery. In our study, we found that there was no significant difference in satisfaction between the ABR and IBR group.

Capsular fibrosis in aesthetic and reconstructive-cancer patients: A retrospective analysis of 319 cases

BACKGROUND

Implant-based breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed operations in plastic surgery worldwide, for aesthetic and reconstructive reasons. Capsular fibrosis is the most common long-term foreign body response after breast implant augmentation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the occurrence of capsular contracture in aesthetic and reconstructive-cancer patients, including those patients who received radiotherapy prior to breast reconstruction with implants.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 319 patients who underwent breast implant revision between Jan 2000 and Oct 2016. The patient group was comprised of 175 reconstructive-cancer patients and 144 patients who underwent operation for aesthetic reasons. The occurrence of capsular fibrosis, other complications and the time-period between implantation of breast implants and revision surgery (TP) was analyzed.

RESULTS

For all 319 patients the mean TP was 7.9 years (7.86±0.45). The most common complication in all revisions was capsular fibrosis (65.1% of all revisions). In aesthetic patients with capsular fibrosis the mean TP was 11.9 years (11.89±0.95, p < 0.001). This mean TP was significantly higher than the mean TP of 6.1 years (6.13±0.56, p < 0.001) in breast cancer patients with capsular fibrosis. Preoperatively irradiated cancer patients had a mean TP of 6.2 years (6.17±0.95), compared to a mean TP of 5.1 years (5.07±0.19, p = 0.051) in non-irradiated cancer patients, which was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that aesthetic patients exhibit a significantly higher mean TP compared to breast cancer patients, suggesting that reconstructive-cancer patients in general develop capsular fibrosis earlier. Despite the literature, we did not find a significant influence of preoperative radiotherapy on the occurrence of capsular fibrosis in reconstructive-cancer patients. Further clinical studies need to be conducted to identify methods to decrease the risk of developing capsular fibrosis.

The Relationship Between Patients' Personality Traits and Breast Reconstruction Process

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy is a part of breast cancer treatment. There is a lack of data regarding the impact of reconstruction over psychological traits and quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate personality changes in patients who underwent reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

Thirty-seven women underwent breast reconstruction. These women took the Crown-Crisp Experiential Index before and after the different procedures. The questionnaire analyzes: (a) the satisfaction level with personal relationships before and after surgery, and the level of satisfaction with surgical results and (b) personality index. Comparisons of preoperative and postoperative personality traits were made by using the Crown-Crisp test and analyzed by Chi-square test. Correlations between preoperative concerns and CCEI traits and correlations between physical aspects and Crown-Crisp, both preoperatively and postoperatively, were performed using the Spearman test.

RESULTS

We found statistically significant differences in the following traits: anxiety anticipating possible technique failures (p = 0.01); cancer recurrence (p = 0.04); dissatisfaction with results (p = 0.02); phobic anxiety for possible technique failure (p = 0.03); obsessionality with possible technique failure (p = 0.01); preoccupations around cancer recurrence (p = 0.01) and dissatisfaction with results (p = 0.03); somatic of technique failure (p = 0.05); and finally, depression and hysteria traits in response to surgical procedures except anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study suggests that personality traits define perceptions of body image, which has an influence over quality of life and satisfaction with results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Objective assessment of flap volume changes and aesthetic results after adjuvant radiation therapy in patients undergoing immediate autologous breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The use of immediate breast reconstruction and adjuvant radiation therapy is increasing in breast cancer patients. This study aimed to analyze the aesthetic outcome and changes in flap volume in patients with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy of the surgical site after immediate autologous tissue reconstruction.

METHODS

Immediate abdominal free flap breast reconstruction following unilateral mastectomy was performed in 42 patients; 21 patients received adjuvant radiation (study group) and 21 patients did not (control group). To compare flap volume, three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) was performed before and after radiation. Also, aesthetic analysis was performed in both groups to evaluate shape changes.

RESULTS

There was a 12.3% flap volume reduction after the completion of radiation in the experimental group that was significantly greater than the 2.6% volume reduction observed in the non-radiation group (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the short- and long-term aesthetic results between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When performing immediate autologous breast reconstruction, 14% volume overcorrection is recommended for patients in whom adjuvant radiation therapy is anticipated to improve aesthetic outcomes.

Perceived Stress and Surgical Wound Cytokine Patterns

This was a pilot study to examine pre- and postoperative stress experienced by women who were undergoing autologous breast reconstruction and how stress might impact wound healing, specifically examining cytokines and other chemical mediators in the wound environment. A nonexperimental descriptive design over time was utilized. Participants were women who were undergoing autologous abdominal breast reconstruction for breast cancer (N = 20). Data were collected preoperatively and at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hr postsurgery. Complications were monitored intraoperatively and up to 30 days postsurgery. Psychological stress was measured with the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R), and a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Cytokines were assayed using the 27-plex kit with a Bio-Plex Plus. Although breast cancer is considered a stressor, in this sample of women, scores of the PSS, IES-R, and VAS showed that in fact these participants experienced low levels of psychological stress. All measured biochemical mediators in serum and wound fluid were detected and trends were identified. IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-8, G-CSF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1β, RANTES, and VEGF were present in the highest concentrations. Significant changes in levels of cytokines in wound fluid were observed in IL-1β, IL-2, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-17, FGF-basic, G-CSF, MIP-1α, PDGF-bb, MIP-1β, RANTES, and TNF-α. The remaining cytokine concentrations stayed stable over time. These findings suggest that although these women were not experiencing high levels of stress, meaningful cytokine patterns were detected.

Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Results of a multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest that immediate reconstruction following mastectomy produces superior results over delayed procedures. However, for medical or oncological reasons, some patients may be poor candidates for immediate reconstruction. We compared complications and patient-reported outcomes between immediate and delayed breast reconstructions in a prospective, multicenter study.

METHODS

1957 patients (1806 immediate, 151 delayed) met eligibility criteria. Demographic data, major complications, infections, and reconstructive failure rates were evaluated. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed with BREAST-Q, PROMIS, and EORTC QLQ-BR23 surveys, pre- and two years post-operatively. Subscale scores were compared across cohorts using mixed-effects regression models, controlling for patient characteristics and hospitals.

FINDINGS

Complete data were available in 1639 immediate and 147 delayed reconstruction patients. There were significant baseline differences between immediate and delayed cohorts in age, BMI, prevalence of diabetes, lymph node management, use of radiation, and chemotherapy. Controlling for clinical covariates, the delayed group had lower odds of any (OR 0.38, p < 0.001) and major (OR 0.52, p = 0.016) complications, compared with immediate patients. Furthermore, delayed reconstruction was associated with a significantly lower failure rates (6% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.032). However, multivariate analyses found no significant differences in patient satisfaction or in psychosocial, sexual, or physical well-being at two years.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with immediate techniques, delayed reconstruction following mastectomy was associated with lower rates of overall and major complication, while providing equivalent patient satisfaction and quality of life benefits. Although immediate reconstruction is still the preferred choice of most patients and surgeons, delaying reconstruction does not appear to compromise clinical or patient-reported outcomes.

Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy with or without Prior Postmastectomy Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction with initial insertion of a tissue expander followed by an implant after a period of inflation is a well-established breast reconstruction option. Most of the current literature concentrates on the immediate setting, and there are only a few reports into delayed cases, especially after postmastectomy radiotherapy (RT). We performed a retrospective review of our experience over a 12.5-year period.

METHODS

Between June 1998 and December 2010, a total of 671 patients received prosthetic-only breast reconstruction. Of these, 170 (25.3%) underwent delayed 2-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Patients were divided into group A, no postmastectomy RT (n = 150), and group B, postmastectomy RT (n = 20). The primary factor examined was the failure of the reconstruction from loss of prosthesis with or without smoking. Other complications, as well as rates of revisional surgery were also recorded.

RESULTS

Expander or implant loss occurred in 3 of 150 patients in group A (2.0%) and 3 of 20 patients in group B (15%; P = 0.02). For nonsmokers, implant loss was 1.6% and 5.6%, respectively (P = NS). Smoking was associated with 1 of the 3 losses in group A and 2 of the 3 in group B (smokers, n = 2; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in other complications such as seromas or minor wound infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed 2-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction has a low failure rate. It can also be successfully completed in selected patients after postmastectomy RT, but care must be taken with patients who smoke.

Immediate Breast Reconstruction

This article represents findings of a qualitative analysis of interviews with women age 30 to 64 years ( n = 14) who had undergone immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following mastectomy. The purpose of the study was to explore women’s experiences for electing IBR. According to our analysis, women experienced mastectomy as a disability, and their expectations of IBR to restore their sense of normalcy were not fulfilled. Most women perceived the reconstructed breast mainly as a visual replacement. Women’s experience formed a continuous narrative from the moment of diagnosis, through mastectomy until the completion of the reconstruction.

Unilateral breast reconstruction after mastectomy - patient satisfaction, aesthetic outcome and quality of life

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of women undergo a breast reconstruction (BR) after treatment for breast cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate patient-reported esthetic satisfaction, quality of life (QoL), and the association between these, following different types of BR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All women who underwent unilateral BR in Central Denmark Region between January 2005 and July 2011 were included. Participants were sent a questionnaire package, which included the Body Image Scale, The Beck Depression Inventory, the Impact of Event Scale, and a study-specific patient-reported esthetic satisfaction scale. Additionally, patients were asked if they experienced a change in QoL owing to the BR. Based on reconstructive method and timing, participants were divided into four groups, three delayed: an abdominal flap group, a latissimus dorsi flap group, an implant ± thoracodorsal flap group; and one immediate BR group.

RESULTS

Of 166 eligible participants, a total of 144 women (87%) completed the questionnaire. The mean follow-up was 3.8 years. Esthetic satisfaction differed significantly between groups [F(3,139) = 8.55; p < 0.001], with abdominal flap recipients reporting the highest levels of esthetic satisfaction. No between-group differences were observed for the remaining psychosocial measures. Higher satisfaction with esthetic outcome was associated with reporting higher QoL owing to the BR (odds ratio 1.10, p<0.001; 95% CI 1.06-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal flap recipients expressed higher satisfaction with their esthetic outcome, compared to the remaining BR types. Higher esthetic satisfaction was strongly associated with reporting an experience of higher QoL.

Factors Associated with Acute Postoperative Pain Following Breast Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction has become an increasingly important component of breast cancer treatment. Unfortunately, some patients experience severe postoperative pain, placing them at risk for increased clinical morbidity and the development of disabling chronic pain. In an attempt to identify at-risk patients, we prospectively evaluated patient characteristics and medical/surgical variables associated with more severe acute post-reconstruction pain.

METHODS

Women (N = 2207; one-week 82.8% response rate) undergoing breast reconstruction were assessed for pain experience, anxiety, depression, and sociodemographic characteristics prior to surgery. Pain assessments were made preoperatively and postoperative at 1-week using validated survey instruments including the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (MPQ-SF), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and BREAST-Q Chest and Upper Body scale. Depressive symptoms and anxiety severity were assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorders Scale, respectively. Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to examine the relationships between patient characteristics and medical/surgical factors and 1-week postoperative pain.

RESULTS

Younger age, bilateral reconstruction, and severity of preoperative pain, anxiety and depression were all associated with more severe acute postoperative pain on all the pain measures and BREAST-Q. Comparison of surgical procedure type indicated less severe postoperative pain for PTRAM, DIEP and SIEA reconstructive surgery compared to tissue expander/implant reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified patients at risk for greater acute postoperative pain following breast reconstruction. These findings will allow plastic surgeons to better tailor postoperative care to improve patient comfort, reduce clinical morbidity, and further enhance patient satisfaction with their surgical outcome.

Techniques to refine the upper outer breast aesthetic subunit in alloplastic breast reconstruction: The lateral capsular flap

BACKGROUND

Lateral displacement of breast implants and axillary fullness are common causes of patient dissatisfaction and reoperation following prosthetic breast reconstruction. Suture plication of the capsule and acellular dermal matrix slings have been described to address lateral implant malposition, but with unacceptably high rates of recurrence and additional cost, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel technique using a lateral capsular flap to provide durable correction of implant malposition and, at the same time, redefinition of the lateral breast border, thereby restoring balance to the breast aesthetic subunits.

METHODS

Sixteen patients presented with lateral malposition of tissue expanders or breast implants during staged implant-based breast reconstruction, four of whom had additional unwanted axillary soft tissue fullness. An anteriorly based lateral capsular flap was performed for each breast to reconstruct the lateral border of the breast, return the implant to its appropriate position and address axillary fullness when indicated.

RESULTS

Lateral capsular flaps were performed for 16 patients (20 breasts) resulting in durable medial repositioning of the implant for a minimum of six months follow-up (range six to 60 months). Eight patients presented after implant placement with subsequent malposition while the remainder presented after tissue expander placement alone. For the eight patients with axillary fullness, elevation of the capsular flap allowed access to axillary contents for excision (four cases) or incorporation of axillary fat into the flap to prevent lateral implant palpability. No major complications, infectious complications or wound healing complications were reported. All patients showed satisfactory results, and reported high cosmetic and functional satisfaction with the appearance of their reconstructed breasts and axillary comfort.

CONCLUSIONS

In the authors' experience, the lateral capsular flap represents a simple, safe and reliable technique to correct breast implant lateral malposition, reconstruct the lateral breast border, and address unwanted axillary fullness in primary or revision implant-based breast reconstruction with improved cosmetic appearance and balance of the breast.

Techniques to refine the upper outer breast aesthetic subunit in alloplastic breast reconstruction: The lateral capsular flap

Background

Lateral displacement of breast implants and axillary fullness are common causes of patient dissatisfaction and reoperation following prosthetic breast reconstruction. Suture plication of the capsule and acellular dermal matrix slings have been described to address lateral implant malposition, but with unacceptably high rates of recurrence and additional cost, respectively.

Objective

To describe a novel technique using a lateral capsular flap to provide durable correction of implant malposition and, at the same time, redefinition of the lateral breast border, thereby restoring balance to the breast aesthetic subunits.

Methods

Sixteen patients presented with lateral malposition of tissue expanders or breast implants during staged implant-based breast reconstruction, four of whom had additional unwanted axillary soft tissue fullness. An anteriorly based lateral capsular flap was performed for each breast to reconstruct the lateral border of the breast, return the implant to its appropriate position and address axillary fullness when indicated.

Results

Lateral capsular flaps were performed for 16 patients (20 breasts) resulting in durable medial repositioning of the implant for a minimum of six months follow-up (range six to 60 months). Eight patients presented after implant placement with subsequent malposition while the remainder presented after tissue expander placement alone. For the eight patients with axillary fullness, elevation of the capsular flap allowed access to axillary contents for excision (four cases) or incorporation of axillary fat into the flap to prevent lateral implant palpability. No major complications, infectious complications or wound healing complications were reported. All patients showed satisfactory results, and reported high cosmetic and functional satisfaction with the appearance of their reconstructed breasts and axillary comfort.

Conclusions

In the authors' experience, the lateral capsular flap represents a simple, safe and reliable technique to correct breast implant lateral malposition, reconstruct the lateral breast border, and address unwanted axillary fullness in primary or revision implant-based breast reconstruction with improved cosmetic appearance and balance of the breast.

Predictors for Reconstruction and Mood Disorder Associated With Reconstruction in Patients With Breast Cancer and Mastectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

This study used Taiwan's National Health Insurance medical claims to investigate the predictors for operative modes chosen by early-stage breast cancer patients; as well as to assess whether operative modes are associated with risk of mood disorder. We included 36,377 patients with breast cancer who received surgery between 2000 and 2008, and were followed to the end of 2010; they were further classified into 3 groups: mastectomy alone (n = 34,900), along with early reconstruction (n = 1080), and along with delayed reconstruction (n = 397). The results showed that age, insurance premium, urbanization level, and postsurgery chemotherapy and radiotherapy were all significant predictors for the selection of operative modes. Breast cancer patients with mastectomy alone, early reconstruction, and delayed reconstruction showed a cumulative incidence rate of mood disorder of 36.90%, 41.56%, and 33.89%, respectively. The multiple cox proportional model further revealed that early (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.93-1.21) and delayed (HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.96-1.42) reconstruction were associated with a slightly higher but insignificant risk of mood disorder, as compared to the patients received no reconstruction.

Body image and quality of life of breast cancer patients: influence of timing and stage of breast reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The process of cancer-related breast reconstruction is typically multi-staged and can take months to years to complete, yet few studies have examined patient psychosocial well-being during the reconstruction process. We investigated the effects of reconstruction timing and reconstruction stage on body image and quality of life at specific time points during the breast reconstruction process.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 216 patients were grouped into four reconstructive stages: pre-reconstruction, completed stage 1, completed stage 2, and final stages. Multiple regression analyses examined the roles of reconstruction timing (immediate vs delayed reconstruction) and reconstruction stage as well as their interaction in predicting body image and quality of life, controlling for patient age, BMI, type of reconstruction, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and major complication(s).

RESULTS

A difference in pattern of body image was observed across the reconstructive stages, with those receiving delayed reconstruction showing significant decrease in body image dissatisfaction compared with those with immediate reconstruction. At pre-reconstruction, patients awaiting delayed reconstruction reported significantly lower social well-being compared with those awaiting immediate reconstruction. Reconstruction stage predicted emotional well-being, with higher emotional well-being observed in those who had commenced reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Timing and stage of reconstruction are important to consider when examining psychosocial outcomes of breast cancer patients undergoing reconstruction. Those waiting to initiate delayed reconstruction appear at particular risk for body image, emotional, and social distress. Our findings have implications for delivery of psychosocial treatment to maximize body image and quality of life of patients undergoing cancer-related breast reconstruction.Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Quality of life and anxiety of patients affected by the PIP/Rofil Medical breast implant recall: results from a prospective monocentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

The PIP/Rofil Medical breast implant recall affected around 40,000 women worldwide. An impact on quality of life (QoL) has been suspected but not yet reported.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify QoL and anxiety in affected women with respect to implant indication and their removal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women who attended consultation and opted for implant removal between December 2011 and 2012 were eligible for study. Quality of life and anxiety were measured using validated questionnaires pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients completed at least one questionnaire, of which 32 had received implants for breast cancer, 15 for aesthetic augmentation, and 8 for primary breast malformations. Removal of the implants improved QoL in every group, especially those who had malformations. The QoL of breast cancer patients was generally better compared to the patients with implant for other reasons.

CONCLUSION

The recall of PIP/Rofil Medical breast implants had a measurable impact on QoL in affected women and no pathological worry was measurable among those women.

Qualidade de vida de mulheres tratadas de câncer de mama em uma cidade do nordeste do Brasil

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a qualidade de vida de mulheres tratadas cirurgicamente de câncer de mama no Hospital de Referência Estadual em Oncologia de São Luís (MA). A qualidade de vida foi avaliada pelo Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B). As variáveis foram expressas em média e desvio padrão; e a análise estatística constou da Anova ou Kruskal Wallis e Teste t de Student ou Mann-Whitney. O nível de significância foi α < 5%. Na estatística foram usados o Stata 9.0 e o BioEstat 5.0. Participaram 197 mulheres com idade média de 53,0 ± 11,7 anos. Os valores médios do FACT-B demonstraram tendência para boa qualidade de vida, sendo o domínio Emocional o mais comprometido e a Subescala Câncer a mais favorável. O tipo de cirurgia influenciou os domínios Social, Emocional e Subescala câncer do questionário. A cirurgia não conservadora apresentou piores níveis de qualidade de vida. Viu-se relação estatística significante entre o tempo de cirurgia e os domínios Físico, Emocional e Funcional, bem como entre tempo de cirurgia e os escores do FACT-B. O tratamento adjuvante influenciou todos os domínios do FACT-B. A qualidade de vida encontrada foi relativamente boa, mas influenciada negativamente pela cirurgia não conservadora, pelo menor tempo desde a cirurgia e pelas terapias adjuvantes.

Impact of a bilingual education intervention on the quality of life of Latina breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To test the effectiveness of a bilingual education intervention to improve the quality of life (QOL) of Latina breast cancer survivors (BCSs) after completing primary treatment for breast cancer.

DESIGN

A two-group prospective, longitudinal, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

An ambulatory-care setting of a designated comprehensive cancer center in southern California.

SAMPLE

52 English- and Spanish-speaking Latina BCSs.

METHODS

Women were randomly assigned to the experimental or attention control group and completed measures of QOL, uncertainty, distress, and acculturation at baseline, and at three and six months postintervention.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

QOL, uncertainty, and distress.

FINDINGS

After controlling for acculturation, the four dimensions of QOL increased slightly in the groups or remained unchanged without significant group-by-time interaction. The social and psychological well-being subscales had the lowest scores, followed by physical and spiritual well-being. Although the group-by-time interaction was not statistically significant, the post-hoc difference for total QOL between time 2 and time 3 in the experimental group approached significance, with a slight increase in total QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

Latina BCSs have multiple survivorship and QOL concerns that might put them at risk for poor QOL.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

More culturally congruent intervention studies are needed to address the paucity of intervention research with Latina BCS.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION

Core values must be incorporated in the development of health education programs. Those programs also should be linguistically appropriate and available to non-English-speaking Latinas. In this way, the informational and supportive needs of all BCSs can be met.

Quality of life before reconstructive breast surgery: A preoperative comparison of patients with immediate, delayed, and major revision reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Women undergo breast reconstruction at different time-points in their cancer care; knowing patients' preoperative quality of life (QoL) is critical in the overall care of the patient with breast cancer. Our objective was to describe presurgical QoL among women undergoing immediate, delayed, or major revision breast reconstructive surgery at our institution.

METHODS

From March 2008 to February 2009, we administered preoperative BREAST-Q questionnaires to women who presented to our institution for breast reconstruction. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare patient cohorts across multiple QoL domains including body image, physical well-being, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being.

RESULTS

Of the 231 patients who presented for preoperative consultation, 176 returned the questionnaire (response rate 76%; 117 from the immediate, 21 from the delayed, and 32 from the major revision reconstruction groups, plus 6 mixed or unknown). The three groups differed significantly (P < 0.05) across four of the six domains: body image (satisfaction with breasts), psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, and physical well-being of the chest and upper body. The immediate reconstruction group had higher (better) scores than the delayed reconstruction group, which had higher (better) scores than the major revision group.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that women presenting for breast reconstruction at different stages of reconstruction have different baseline QoL. Such data may help us better understand patient selection, education, and expectations, and may lead to improved patient-surgeon communication.

The effect of breast reconstruction surgery on body image among women after mastectomy: a meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to analyze the available evidence concerning the effects of breast reconstruction (BR) on body image of women with breast cancer. BR is a potential intervention to improve the body image of women with breast cancer. Conflicting research findings about the effects of breast reconstructive surgery on body image compared to breast conservative surgery (BCS) or mastectomy exist. A meta-analysis of studies found in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, PubMed as well as PQDT (dissertation and theses), and other unpublished literature resources from 1970 to 2010 were searched. Comparable studies that examined the difference of body image between breast cancer women receiving mastectomy plus BR and those with BCS were included. A clear definition about the domains of body image including body stigma, body concern, and transparency were identified. Mean effect sizes were calculated. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. Women with BR and BCS were no different on the body concern domain of body image. However, women with BR had a significantly worse score on body stigma domain of body image than women receiving BCS. Women with BR had a better body image score than women with mastectomy. Women who are satisfied with their body shape may still perceive deficiencies because of the stigma of mastectomy and affect on body image. Consistent application of valid and reliable measures of body image specific to breast cancer women is needed.

Delayed two-stage breast reconstruction with implants: The authors' recent experience

BACKGROUND

Presently, breast cancer detection is delayed in Poland and, thus, the only other option for patients is amputation and breast reconstruction (immediate or delayed). Reconstructive methods are based on using the patient's own tissue (pedicled or free myocutaneous flaps) or implants (a tissue expander, which is later exchanged for a prosthesis or an expandable implant).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the aesthetic results of a delayed two-stage breast reconstruction with the use of implants (expander and prosthesis) in patients who have previously undergone cancer-related mastectomy.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2009, 54 patients (34 to 65 years of age) underwent reconstruction at least one year after their mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy; three women also received x-ray therapy. All women underwent a two-stage treatment with a tissue expander, which was later exchanged for a prosthesis.

RESULTS

Outcomes of the surgery (evaluated by the physician and the patient at least six months after all stages of reconstruction) were found to be very good in 42 patients and good in 12 patients. After amputation and x-ray therapy in two cases, a fistula developed, which necessitated implant removal.

CONCLUSIONS

After amputation, breast reconstruction with implants (expander and prosthesis) provides good aesthetic results. The method is mildly burdening to the patient and does not cause severe scarring. Symmetrization of the second breast is often recommended; however, the cost is not covered by the national health system. In principle, earlier x-ray therapy disqualifies the application of implants. Dividing reconstruction into two stages (expander and prosthesis) allows for possible correction of prosthesis placement.

An exploration of patient decision-making for autologous breast reconstructive surgery following a mastectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine patients' experiences of the decision to undergo breast reconstructive surgery following mastectomy.

METHOD

21 Women, who had undergone reconstruction, took part in a semi-structured qualitative interview, which examined the participants' experience of the decision-making process. The recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using "framework analysis".

RESULTS

Women who underwent immediate reconstruction spoke of the convenience of undergoing only one operation with regards to juggling work and childcare arrangements. For women who underwent delayed reconstructive surgery the reasons centre on dissatisfaction with wearing prosthesis. Others spoke of no choice, as immediate reconstruction was not offered as an option. However both groups did report similar influential factors and received and used similar informational content and informational sources in order to make their decision.

CONCLUSION

The study outlines the different motivations for undergoing immediate or delayed breast reconstruction and highlights that there is not always a choice offered to patients.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Future patients who are considering breast reconstruction should be provided with the relevant information to make a well informed decision and may benefit from different methods of information delivery that could include decision aids such as informational booklets, photographs, and videos.

Receipt of delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy: do women revisit the decision?

BACKGROUND

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction is an important component of breast cancer care, but few receive it at the time of the mastectomy. Virtually nothing is known about receipt of reconstruction after initial cancer therapy and why treatment might be delayed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 5-year follow-up survey was mailed to a population-based cohort of mastectomy-treated breast cancer patients who were initially surveyed at time of diagnosis in 2002 and reported to the Los Angeles and Detroit SEER registries (N = 645, response rate 60%). Outcomes were receipt of reconstruction (immediate [IR], delayed [DR], or none) and patient appraisal of their treatment decisions.

RESULTS

About one-third (35.9%) had IR, 11.5% had DR, and 52.6% had no reconstruction. One-third delayed reconstruction because they focused more on other cancer interventions, and nearly half were concerned about surgical complications and interference with cancer surveillance. Two-thirds of those with no reconstruction said that the procedure was not important to them. A large proportion of all patients were satisfied with their reconstruction decision-making (89.4% IR, 78.4% DR, 80.4% no reconstruction, P = NS). However, only 59.3% of those with no reconstruction felt that they were adequately informed about their reconstructive options (vs 82.7% IR and 78.4% DR, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

There was modest uptake of breast reconstruction after initial cancer treatment. Factors associated with delayed reconstruction were primarily related to uncertainty about the procedure, concern about cancer surveillance, and low priority. Those without reconstruction demonstrated significant informational needs, which should be addressed with future research efforts.

Sensation Following Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Implants

Sensation is a neglected aspect of the outcome of breast reconstructions with implants. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the cutaneous somatosensory status in breasts following mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with permanent adjustable prostheses and to analyze the patients' subjective experience of the sensation. Twenty-four consecutive patients diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast carcinoma were examined preoperatively and 2 years after mastectomy and reconstruction, for assessment of perception thresholds for touch, cold, warmth, and heat pain above and below the areola. Von Frey filaments and a Peltier element-based thermode were used. The patients completed a questionnaire concerning their experienced sensation in the reconstructed breast. Using quantitative somato-sensory testing, the sensation to all the examined modalities was significantly impaired compared to preoperatively. Most affected was the area above the areola. Patients given postoperative radiotherapy (n = 9) did not differ from those without radiotherapy (n = 15) regarding any of the modalities. All patients reported reduced sensation in the reconstructed breast compared to that preoperatively. Twenty-three patients stated that the reconstructed breast felt different from the other breast; nevertheless 16 reported that the reconstructed breast felt like a real breast. The study revealed sensation impairment following mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants. Patients should be informed about this effect preoperatively to allow adequate expectations regarding the sensation outcome. However, two-thirds of the study patients considered that the reconstructed breast felt like a real breast, which must be one of the main purposes of a breast reconstruction.

Sexual abuse in childhood and postoperative depression in women with breast cancer who opt for immediate reconstruction after mastectomy

INTRODUCTION

Breast reconstruction is routinely offered to women who undergo mastectomy for breast cancer. However, patient-reported outcomes are mixed. Child abuse has enduring effects on adults' well-being and body image. As part of a study into damaging effects of abuse on adjustment to breast cancer, we examined: (i) whether women with history of abuse would be more likely than other women to opt for reconstruction; and (ii) whether mood problems in women opting for reconstruction can be explained by greater prevalence of abuse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited 355 women within 2-4 days after surgery for primary breast cancer; 104 had mastectomy alone and 29 opted for reconstruction. Using standardised questionnaires, women self-reported emotional distress and recollections of childhood sexual abuse. Self-report of distress was repeated 12 months later.

RESULTS

Women who had reconstruction were younger than those who did not. Controlling for this, they reported greater prevalence of abuse and more distress than those having mastectomy alone. They were also more depressed postoperatively, and this effect remained significant after controlling for abuse.

CONCLUSIONS

One interpretation of these findings is that history of abuse influences women's decisions about responding to the threat of mastectomy, but it is premature to draw inferences for practice until the findings are replicated. If they are replicated, it will be important to recognise increased vulnerability of some patients who choose reconstruction. Studying the characteristics and needs of women who opt for immediate reconstruction and examining the implications for women's adjustment should be a priority for research.

[Experiences of mastectomised women. A phenomenological study]

OBJECTIVE

To understand the life experience of women with mastectomy in relation to their disease, analysing what leads some women to have breast reconstruction and others not to do so. Identify the situation of mastectomised women with lymphoedemas, alopecia and other problems.

METHOD

Phenomenological qualitative research. Twenty-nine in-depth interviews were conducted on the women through specific informants in the oncology services of the Hospital Vall d'Hebron; and the gynaecology unit at the Salud La Mina Primary Care Centre in Barcelona. The age range was between 20 and 69 years.

RESULTS

Through the analysis of the interviews it was possible to reveal the phenomenon in research. The following subjects were those of most relevance: there women with reconstructed and non-reconstructed breasts, and a mutilated body image through the loss of one or both breasts. Participation of women in social occasions, use of clothing and lifestyle. The cancer is visualised: lymphoedemas, loss of hair with an affect on the public image.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger women, graduates and middle class ladies and those over 40 with a primary education are those that have a breast reconstruction. Middle-high and high class graduates do not have a breast reconstruction. They negotiate their relationship with their partner in other ways.

Body Image Perception and Quality of Life in Patients who Underwent Breast Surgery

Quality of Life (QoL) has become a standard measure in assessing the effectiveness of medical interventions. We compared the differences between QoL and body image scale (BIS) in a group of patients who underwent breast surgery, including lumpectomy or conservative surgery, modified radical mastectomy and radical mastectomy with breast reconstruction. We included patients who underwent breast surgery between August of 2005 and June of 2006 in two tertiary referral centers in Mexico City. Two self-administered questionnaires assessing body image perception, BIS and quality of life (SF-36), were assigned and a physician-conducted interview was done. We stratified patients by age, marital status, and scholar grade. The sample comprised 202 patients. The BIS results yielded: the group with a benign lesion demonstrated favorable body image perception when compared with the malignant lesion group. A confirmed diagnosis of malignancy hinders QoL in older and younger age groups. Conservative surgery and breast reconstruction improves QoL in younger patients without significance in the older group. The most significant variable that hinders the BIS and QoL is the cancer diagnosis. Impact of conservative surgery and breast reconstruction in body image perception and quality of life is influenced by patient age and educational level.

Clinical evaluation of the flotrac/Vigileo system for continuous cardiac output monitoring in patients undergoing regional anesthesia for elective cesarean section: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery may cause severe maternal hypotension and a decrease in cardiac output. Compared to assessment of cardiac output via a pulmonary artery catheter, the FloTrac/Vigileo system may offer a less invasive technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiac output and other hemodynamic measurements made using the FloTrac/Vigileo system in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section.

METHODS

A prospective study enrolling 10 healthy pregnant women was performed. Hemodynamic parameters were continuously obtained at 15 main points: admission to surgery (two baseline measurements), after preload, after spinal anesthesia administration and 4 time points thereafter (4, 6, 8 and 10 min after anesthesia), at skin and uterine incision, newborn and placental delivery, oxytocin administration, end of surgery, and recovery from anesthesia. Hemodynamic therapy was guided by mean arterial pressure, and vasopressors were used as appropriate to maintain baseline values. A repeated measures ANOVA was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in heart rate and a decrease of stroke volume and stroke volume index up to 10 min after spinal anesthesia (P < 0.01). Importantly, stroke volume variation increased immediately after newborn delivery (P < 0.001) and returned to basal values at the end of surgery. Further hemodynamic parameters showed no significant changes over time.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

No significant hemodynamic effects, except for heart rate and stroke volume changes, were observed in pregnant women managed with preload and vasopressors when undergoing elective cesarean section and spinal anesthesia.

A review of the surgical management of breast cancer: plastic reconstructive techniques and timing implications

The oncologic management of breast cancer has evolved over the past several decades from radical mastectomy to modern-day preservation of chest and breast structures. The increased rate of mastectomies over recent years made breast reconstruction an integral part of the breast cancer management. Plastic surgery now offers patients a wide variety of reconstruction options from primary closure of the skin flaps to performance of microvascular and autologous tissue transplantation. Well-coordinated partnerships between surgical oncologists, plastic surgeons, and patients address concerns of tumor control, cosmesis, and patients' wishes. The gamut of breast reconstruction options is reviewed, particularly noting state-of-the-art techniques, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of various timing modalities.

Preferences in choosing between breast reconstruction options: a survey of female plastic surgeons

BACKGROUND

Female plastic surgeons are well suited to make a personal choice regarding breast reconstruction options, based on their knowledge of the actual procedures and first-hand experience with results. The authors surveyed this group to elicit their personal views on various modalities of breast reconstruction and to ascertain which types of reconstruction they would choose if faced with such a decision.

METHODS

All board-certified female plastic surgeons in the United States and Canada were surveyed by means of e-mail. This survey included questions regarding basic demographic and practice data. Respondents were requested to rank desired methods of reconstruction for themselves and to cite reasons for these choices.

RESULTS

A total of 435 surveys were sent: 350 were delivered (85 had invalid e-mail addresses), and 143 were returned (response rate, 41 percent). Overall, 66 percent of respondents chose implant-based reconstruction, 25 percent chose autologous reconstruction, and 9 percent chose no reconstruction. Respondents selecting autologous reconstruction cited cosmetic outcome as the most important factor considered in 47 percent of cases, compared with 14 percent of those choosing implant-based breast reconstruction (p = 0.0001). Invasiveness of the procedure/recovery time was cited as the most important factor by 83 percent of those surgeons opting for no breast reconstruction and by 51 percent of those choosing implant-based breast reconstruction (p = 0.0175).

CONCLUSIONS

Board-certified female plastic surgeons exhibit a strong desire to pursue implant-based breast reconstruction over autologous reconstruction. When it was chosen, autologous reconstruction was felt to offer improved aesthetic outcomes. When making such a decision, patients can use female plastic surgeons as a resource for information, thus helping them to make an informed decision.