Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: initial experience in a single institution

Clinical Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Microsphere Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with First-Line Chemotherapy as the Initial Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the combination of drug-eluting microsphere (DEM) transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with those of chemotherapy in treating unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy patients diagnosed with unresectable ICC between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. Of these, 39 patients received DEM-TACE and first-line chemotherapy (TACE+Chemo group) and 31 received chemotherapy alone (Chemo group). Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias between the TACE+Chemo and the Chemo groups. Differences in tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

The patients in the TACE+Chemo group had better median OS (18.6 vs 11.9 months; P = .018), median PFS (11.9 vs 6.9 months, P = .033), and objective response rates (56.8% vs 13.3%; P < .001) than those in the Chemo group. TRAEs showed a higher incidence of transient elevation of transaminase and abdominal pain in the TACE+Chemo group than in the Chemo group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with chemotherapy alone, DEM-TACE combined with first-line chemotherapy may be a viable and safe treatment option for unresectable ICC.

The Recent Trends of Systemic Treatments and Locoregional Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a hepatic malignancy that has a rapidly increasing incidence. CCA is anatomically classified into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA), which is further divided into perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) subtypes, with higher incidence rates in Asia. Despite its rarity, CCA has a low 5-year survival rate and remains the leading cause of primary liver tumor-related death over the past 10-20 years. The systemic therapy section discusses gemcitabine-based regimens as primary treatments, along with oxaliplatin-based options. Second-line therapy is limited but may include short-term infusional fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The adjuvant therapy section discusses approaches to improve overall survival (OS) post-surgery. However, only a minority of CCA patients qualify for surgical resection. In comparison to adjuvant therapies, neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable cases shows promise. Gemcitabine and cisplatin indicate potential benefits for patients awaiting liver transplantation. The addition of immunotherapies to chemotherapy in combination is discussed. Nivolumab and innovative approaches like CAR-T cells, TRBAs, and oncolytic viruses are explored. We aim in this review to provide a comprehensive report on the systemic and locoregional therapies for CCA.

Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Secondary Hepatic Malignancies

Management of hepatic malignancies is a multidisciplinary task with the involvement of hepatologists, medical/surgical/radiation oncologists, transplant surgeons, and interventional radiologists. Patients should be selected for a specific targeted therapy after multidisciplinary consensus. Interventional oncology, with image-guided locoregional cancer therapies, can decrease systemic toxicity without compromising tumoricidal effect.

Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that originates at any point along the biliary tree. CC is an uncommon malignancy as it represents approximately 3% of all gastrointestinal malignancies, though its global incidence is rising. CC can often be asymptomatic in its early stages and as a result, it is frequently diagnosed in later stages, leading to challenges in clinical management.

Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Embolization in Heavily Treated Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Analysis of Clinicopathological and Radiographic Parameters Associated with Better Overall Survival

The safety and efficacy of hepatic artery embolization (HAE) in treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) was evaluated. Initial treatment response, local tumor progression-free survival (L-PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in 34 IHC patients treated with HAE. A univariate survival analysis and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis to identify independent factors were carried out. Objective response (OR) at 1-month was 79.4%. Median OS and L-PFS from the time of HAE was 13 (CI = 95%, 7.4-18.5) and 4 months (CI = 95%, 2.09-5.9), respectively. Tumor burden < 25% and increased tumor vascularity on preprocedure imaging and surgical resection prior to embolization were associated with longer OS (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that tumor burden < 25% and hypervascular tumors were independent risk factors. Mean post-HAE hospital stay was 4 days. Grade 3 complication rate was 8.5%. In heavily treated patients with IHC, after exhausting all chemotherapy and other locoregional options, HAE as a rescue treatment option appeared to be safe with a mean OS of 13 months. Tumor burden < 25%, increased target tumor vascularity on pre-procedure imaging, and OR on 1 month follow-up images were associated with better OS. Further studies with a control group are required to confirm the effectiveness of HAE in IHC.

A Paradigm Shift in Primary Liver Cancer Therapy Utilizing Genomics, Molecular Biomarkers, and Artificial Intelligence

Primary liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Conventional therapies offer limited survival benefit despite improvements in locoregional liver-directed therapies, which highlights the underlying complexity of liver cancers. This review explores the latest research in primary liver cancer therapies, focusing on developments in genomics, molecular biomarkers, and artificial intelligence. Attention is also given to ongoing research and future directions of immunotherapy and locoregional therapies of primary liver cancers.

Locoregional Approaches in Cholangiocarcinoma Treatment

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare hepatic malignant tumor with poor prognosis due to late detection and anatomic factors limiting the applicability of surgical resection. Without surgical resection, palliation is the most common approach. In non-surgical cases contained within the liver, locoregional therapies provide the best chance for increased survival and disease control. The most common methods, transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radioembolization, target tumors by embolizing their blood supply and limiting the tumor's ability to metabolize. Other treatments induce direct damage via thermal ablation to tumor tissue to mediate their anti-tumor efficacy. Recent studies have begun to explore roles for these therapies outside their previous role of palliation. This review will outline the mechanisms of each of these treatments, along with their effects on overall survival, while comparing these to non-locoregional therapies.

Successful control of a large intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated by transarterial chemo-embolization; a single case report

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is hardly diagnosed in early stages as the symptoms are non-specific. Due to an advanced stages at the time of first diagnosis, the therapeutic options for patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma are mostly limited to systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy, but good local control or preferable prognostic effects are hardly obtained. The transarterial chemoembolization had not been a standard of care because of hepatic functional damages caused by lipiodol and gelatin sponge. A newly developed spherical embolic material causes limited hepatic damages might be an option for these patients. It makes it possible to repeat the procedure in a short period. Eventually, better prognosis can be expected using a spherical embolic material. We report a case of a 15 cm locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated by chemoembolization using a drug-eluting spherical embolic material and achieved good local tumor control without liver damage. The patient survived longer than 4 years without additional or concomitant treatments.

Outcome and Safety after 103 Radioembolizations with Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres in 73 Patients with Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-An Evaluation of Predictors

Simple Summary

TARE with yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres is emerging in many countries as a treatment option for ICC. Identification of patients that will benefit from TARE is a clinically relevant problem with individual but also economical relevance. The aim of this study was to detect outcome predictors for patients with ICC after TARE with 90Y resin microspheres. We found TARE with 90Y resin microspheres to be a safe treatment option for unresectable ICC. Predictive factors for TARE in ICC are CA-19-9 response, tumor burden, and cholinesterase. Multiple TARE sessions might further improve overall survival.

Abstract

Trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) is increasingly evaluated for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Not all ICC patients benefit equally well from TARE. Therefore, we sought to evaluate variables predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with non-resectable ICC underwent TARE and were treated with 90Y resin microspheres. Baseline characteristics, biochemical/clinical toxicities, and response were examined for impact on PFS and OS. A total of 103 treatments were administered to 73 patients without major complications or toxicity. Mean OS was 18.9 months (95% confidence intervals (CI); 13.9–23.9 months). Mean and median PFS were 10.1 months (95% CI; 7.9–12.2) and 6.4 months (95% CI; 5.20–7.61), respectively. Median OS and PFS were significantly prolonged in patients with baseline cholinesterase (CHE) ≥ 4.62 kU/L (OS: 14.0 vs. 5.5 months; PFS: 6.9 vs. 3.2 months; p < 0.001). Patients with a tumor burden ≤ 25% had a significantly longer OS (15.2 vs. 6.6 months; p = 0.036). Median PFS was significantly longer for patients with multiple TARE cycles (24.4 vs. 5.8 months; p = 0.04). TARE is a considerable and safe option for unresectable ICC. CA-19-9, CHE, and tumor burden have predictive value for survival in patients treated with TARE. Multiple TARE treatments might further improve survival; this has to be confirmed by further studies.

Current State of Multidisciplinary Treatment in Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive malignancy, and its incidence seems to be increasing over the last years. Given the high rate of irresectability at the time of initial diagnosis, new treatment approaches are important to achieve better patient outcomes. Our review provides an overview of current multimodal therapy options across different specialties of gastroenterology/oncology, surgery, and interventional radiology.

SUMMARY

CCA is subdivided into clinically and molecularly distinct phenotypes. Surgical treatment currently is the only potentially curative therapy, but unfortunately, the majority of all patients are not eligible for resection at the time of initial diagnosis due to anatomic location, inadequate hepatic reserve, metastatic disease, or limiting comorbidities. However, multimodal treatment options are available to prolong survival, relieve symptoms, and maintain life quality.

KEY MESSAGES

The treatment of CCA is complex and requires close interdisciplinary collaboration and individualized treatment planning to ensure optimal patient care at specialized centers. Molecular profiling of patients and inclusion into clinical trials is highly recommended.

Interventional Treatment for Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common type of primary liver malignancy. The latest classification includes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, with the latter one further categorized into perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Although surgical resection is the preferred treatment for CCA, less than half of the patients are actually eligible for radical surgical resection. Interventional treatment, such as intra-arterial therapies, ablation, and brachytherapy (iodine-125 seed implantation), has become an acceptable palliative treatment for patients with unresectable CCA. For these patients, interventional treatment is helpful for locoregional control, symptom relief, and improving quality of life. Herein, in a timely and topical manner, we will review these advances and highlight future directions of research in this article.

Combined with interventional therapy, immunotherapy can create a new outlook for tumor treatment

Recent progress in immunotherapy provides hope of a complete cure to cancer patients. However, recent studies have reported that only a limited number of cancer patients with a specific immune status, known as "cold tumor", can benefit from a single immune agent. Although the combination of immune agents with different mechanisms can partially increase the low response rate and improve efficacy, it can also result in more side effects. Therefore, discovering therapies that can improve tumors' response rate to immunotherapy without increasing toxicity for patients is urgently needed. Tumor interventional therapy is promising. It mainly includes transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, ablation, radioactive particle internal irradiation, and photodynamic interventional therapy based on a luminal stent. Interventional therapy can directly kill tumor cells by targeted drug delivery in situ, thus reducing drug dosage and systemic toxicity like cytokine release syndrome. More importantly, interventional therapy can regulate the immune system through numerous mechanisms, making it a suitable choice for immunotherapy to combine with. In this review, we provide a brief description of immunotherapies (and their side effects) on tumors of different immune types and preliminarily elaborate on interventional therapy mechanisms to improve immune efficacy. We also discuss the progress and challenges of the combination of interventional therapy and immunotherapy.

An Assessment of Combination of the Camrelizumab With Chemotherapy in Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancers

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies that target the PD-1 receptor are emerging as promising therapeutic candidates for the treatment of biliary tract cancers (BTCs). The purpose of the current study was to assess the combination of the camrelizumab with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for metastatic BTCs.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective single-arm pilot study of PD-1 antibody (camrelizumab 3 mg/kg d1, Q2 W or Q3 W) combined with different chemotherapy regimens as first-line treatment for BTCs. Efficacy endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with histologically confirmed BTCs were evaluated. The ORR was 14.3% (95% CI: 1.8 to 42.8) and the DCR was 64.3% (95%CI: 41.7 to 86.9). The median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 3.8 to 9.2), and the 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 61.6% and 12.3%, respectively. The median OS was 9.9 months (95% CI: 7.6 to 12.2), and the 6-and 12-month OS rates were 74.5% and 26.6%, respectively. All patients displayed at least 1 TRAE., and Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs occurred in 6 (42.86%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic BTCs demonstrated acceptable safety and efficacy in our pilot study. These findings warrant prospective controlled clinical trials comparing combinations of camrelizumab and chemotherapy to standard regimens.

Neoadjuvant therapy for cholangiocarcinoma: A comprehensive literature review

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) comprise a heterogenous group of aggressive and rare malignancies arising in the bile duct outside or within the liver. BTCs include cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), gallbladder cancer (GBC) and ampulla of Vater cancer (AVC); according to the "historical" anatomical classification, CCAs are further subdivided into extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (eCCAs) - including distal (dCCA) and perihilar (pCCA) - and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCA). Notably enough, these subtypes reflect distinct features in terms of biology, epidemiology, prognosis and therapeutic strategies. Although surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment option for CCA patients, radical surgery is possible for only a small proportion of cases. Moreover, it has been observed that up to 50% of patients deemed resectable at diagnosis are found to be unresectable during exploratory laparotomy. Additionally, even following radical surgery, recurrence rates are high. Neoadjuvant therapy represents an appealing approach in this setting, where this therapeutic strategy has the potential to improve local and distant control, to achieve R0 resection and to prevent distant metastasis. However, few data are currently available supporting neoadjuvant therapy in CCA and several questions remains unanswered, including the activity of systemic therapy in early stages of the disease, the optimal start time of treatment, patient selection and the length of neoadjuvant therapy. In this review, we will discuss available data on neoadjuvant systemic therapy in CCA, highlighting future directions in this setting, with a particular focus on recently published data and ongoing and recruiting trials.

The technical aspects of ex vivo hepatectomy with autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Ex vivo hepatectomy is the incorporation of liver transplant techniques in the non-transplant setting, providing opportunity for locally advanced tumors found conventionally unresectable. Because the procedure is rare and reports in the literature are limited, we sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating technical variations of ex vivo hepatectomies.

METHODS

In the literature, there is a split in those performing the procedure between venovenous bypass (VVB) and temporary portacaval shunts (PCS). Of the 253 articles identified on the topic of ex vivo resection, 37 had sufficient data to be included in our review.

RESULTS

The majority of these procedures were performed for hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (69%) followed by primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. In 18 series, VVB was used, and in 18, a temporary PCS was performed. Comparing these two groups, intraoperative variables and morbidity were not statistically different, with a cumulative trend in favor of PCS. Ninety-day mortality was significantly lower in the PCS group compared to the VVB group (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

In order to better elucidate these differences between technical approaches, a registry and consensus statement are needed.

Surgical Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Emerging Principles

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare, aggressive cancer of the biliary tract. It often presents with locally advanced or metastatic disease, but for patients with early-stage disease, surgical resection with negative margins and portahepatis lymphadenectomy is the standard of care. Recent advancements in ICC include refinement of staging, improvement in liver-directed therapies, clarification of the role of adjuvant therapy based on new randomized controlled trials, and advances in minimally invasive liver surgery. In addition, improvements in neoadjuvant strategies and surgical techniques have enabled expanded surgical indications and reduced surgical morbidity and mortality. However, recurrence rates remain high and more effective systemic therapies are still necessary to improve recurrence-free and overall survival. In this review, we focus on current and emerging surgical principals for the management of ICC including preoperative evaluation, current indications for surgery, strategies for future liver remnant augmentation, technical principles, and the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies.

Combination of intraoperative radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: feasibility and long-term survival

PURPOSE Most patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are not eligible for surgical resection due to advanced stage. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, local tumor control, and long-term survival of intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (IORFA) with surgical resection to treat unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS From 2009 to 2016, 20 consecutive patients (12 primary ICC, 8 recurrent ICC) underwent curative IORFA with hepatic resection for surgically unresectable ICC. Patients were not qualified to undergo surgical resection due to multiple lesions causing postoperative hepatic insufficiency and undesirable tumor locations for surgical resection or percutaneous RFA. Of the 51 treated tumors (mean, 2.6±0.9 tumors/patient), 24 were treated by IORFA and 27 were surgically removed. The technical success and effectiveness, overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and complications were assessed retrospectively. The overall survival and PFS rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The technical success and effectiveness of IORFA were 100%. The overall survival rates at 6 months, 1, 3, and 5 years were 95%, 79%, 27%, and 14%, respectively. The median overall survival time was 22.0±3.45 months. The PFS rates at 6 months, 1, 3, and 5 years were 70%, 33%, 13%, and 13%, respectively. The median PFS was 9.0±1.68 months. The prognosis was significantly worse for patients with recurrent ICC than for patients with primary ICC. One patient (5%) had major complications due to IORFA such as liver abscess and biliary stricture. CONCLUSION IORFA with surgical resection can be a feasible option for ICC cases that are not amenable to treatment with surgical resection alone. This strategy provides acceptable local tumor control and overall survival.

Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver malignancy and is increasing in incidence. Long-term outcomes are optimized when patients undergo margin-negative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Unfortunately, a significant proportion of patients present with locally advanced, unresectable disease. Furthermore, recurrence rates are high even among patients who undergo surgical resection. The delivery of systemic and/or liver-directed therapies prior to surgery may increase the proportion of patients who are eligible for surgery and reduce recurrence rates by prioritizing early systemic therapy for this aggressive cancer. Nevertheless, the available evidence for neoadjuvant therapy in ICC is currently limited yet recent advances in liver directed therapies, chemotherapy regimens, and targeted therapies have generated increasing interest its role. In this article, we review the rationale for, current evidence for, and ongoing research efforts in the use of neoadjuvant therapy for ICC.

Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) includes a cluster of highly heterogeneous biliary malignant tumours that can arise at any point of the biliary tree. Their incidence is increasing globally, currently accounting for ~15% of all primary liver cancers and ~3% of gastrointestinal malignancies. The silent presentation of these tumours combined with their highly aggressive nature and refractoriness to chemotherapy contribute to their alarming mortality, representing ~2% of all cancer-related deaths worldwide yearly. The current diagnosis of CCA by non-invasive approaches is not accurate enough, and histological confirmation is necessary. Furthermore, the high heterogeneity of CCAs at the genomic, epigenetic and molecular levels severely compromises the efficacy of the available therapies. In the past decade, increasing efforts have been made to understand the complexity of these tumours and to develop new diagnostic tools and therapies that might help to improve patient outcomes. In this expert Consensus Statement, which is endorsed by the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma, we aim to summarize and critically discuss the latest advances in CCA, mostly focusing on classification, cells of origin, genetic and epigenetic abnormalities, molecular alterations, biomarker discovery and treatments. Furthermore, the horizon of CCA for the next decade from 2020 onwards is highlighted.

Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Post Hoc Analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is increasing. The aim of the study was to provide reference survival data for patients with advanced iCCA treated with first-line cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy (current standard of care).

METHODS

Individual data from patients with iCCA recruited into the prospective, random assignment Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC)-01, -02, and -03 studies were retrieved. The prevalence and survival of liver-only iCCA was also assessed. Survival analysis was performed using univariate and multivariable Cox regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Of 534 patients recruited into the ABC-01, -02, and -03 studies, 109 (20.4%) had iCCA. Most patients (n = 86, 78.9%) had metastatic disease at the time of recruitment; 52 patients (47.7%) had liver-only disease. Following random assignment, 66 (60.6%) iCCA patients received cisplatin and gemcitabine. The median progression-free and overall survival (OS) were 8.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.9 to 8.9 months) and 15.4 months (95% CI = 11.1 to 17.9 months), respectively. Of these 66 patients, 34 patients (51.5%) had liver-only disease. Following chemotherapy, 30 (45.5%) and 21 (31.8%) were progression-free at 3 and 6 months from chemotherapy commencement, respectively. The median OS for patients with liver-only iCCA at diagnosis and after 3 and 6 months of chemotherapy was 16.7 months (95% CI = 8.7 to 20.2 months), 17.9 months (95% CI = 11.7 to 20.9 months), and 18.9 months (95% CI = 16.7 to 25.9 months), respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed that iCCA had a longer OS compared with other non-iCCA biliary tract cancers (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.95, P value = .03); liver-only iCCA patients also showed longer OS even though findings did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.19, P value = .16).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients diagnosed with advanced iCCA have a better OS compared with other biliary tract cancers; a similar trend was identified for patients diagnosed with liver-only iCCA. These findings are to be considered for future clinical trial design.

Molecular targeted therapies: Ready for "prime time" in biliary tract cancer

The prognosis for patients with biliary tract cancers (cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer) is poor, while the incidence of these cancers is increasing. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease when treatment options are limited to palliative approaches, mainly focused on chemotherapy. In recent years, novel treatment targets of relevance to biliary tract cancers, mainly present in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, have been identified and are rapidly changing the field. These include fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) fusions and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-1 and -2 mutations which are each present in around 10-20% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In addition, inhibition of other pathways/molecules is currently being explored, including human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family members, the Wnt pathway, neurotropic tyrosine kinase receptor (NTRK) fusions and BRAF mutations. The IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib has already been tested in a phase III clinical trial in pretreated cholangiocarcinoma and showed benefit in terms of progression-free survival. Multiple FGFR inhibitors have consistently shown high response rates in phase II/III trials, especially for patients harbouring FGFR2 fusions. Herein, we provide an overview of the status of targeted therapies in biliary tract cancers, discussing the current clinical development of IDH and FGFR inhibitors in detail, as well as reviewing current caveats and future steps.

Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancer, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) are rare tumours with a rising incidence. Prognosis is poor, since most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Only ~20% of patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease, suitable for curative surgery. Despite surgery performed with potentially-curative intent, relapse rates are high, with around 60-70% of patients expected to have disease recurrence. Most relapses occur in the form of distant metastases, with a predominance of liver spread. In view of high tumour recurrence, adjuvant strategies have been explored for many years, in the form of radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Historically, few randomised trials were available, which included a variety of additional tumours (e.g. pancreatic and ampullary tumours); most evidence relied on phase II and retrospective studies, with no high-quality evidence available to define the real benefit derived from adjuvant strategies. Since 2017, three randomised phase III clinical trials have been reported; all recruited patients with resected biliary tract cancer (CCA and GBC) who were randomised to observation alone, or chemotherapy in the form of gemcitabine (BCAT study; included patients diagnosed with extrahepatic CCA only), gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC) or capecitabine (BILCAP; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC). While gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failed to show an impact on patient outcome (relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS)), the BILCAP study showed a benefit from adjuvant capecitabine in terms of OS (pre-planned sensitivity analysis in the intention-to-treat population and in the per-protocol analysis), with confirmed benefit in terms of RFS. Based on the BILCAP trial, international guidelines recommend adjuvant capecitabine for a period of six months following potentially curative resection of CCA as the current standard of care for resected CCA and GBC. However, BILCAP failed to show OS benefit in the intention-to-treat (non-sensitivity analysis) population (primary end-point), and this finding, as well as some inconsistencies between studies has been criticised and has led to confusion in the biliary tract cancer medical community. This review summarises the adjuvant field in biliary tract cancer, with evidence before and after 2017, and comparison between the latest randomised phase III studies. Potential explanations are presented for differential findings, and future steps are explored.

Regional Chemotherapy for Biliary Tract Tumors and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are associated with a grim prognosis. The development of highly effective systemic therapies for these tumors has been challenging; however, numerous locoregional treatment alternatives have emerged, including transarterial hepatic embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAI), radioembolization, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Although there is potential for long-term disease control for these therapies, the evidence to guide adequate patient selection and choose among different treatment alternatives is still limited. This review focuses on the rationale and data supporting TAE, TACE, DEB-TACE, and HAI in hepatobiliary cancers.

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To define the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) by performing a meta-analysis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Oncological benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable ICC remains controversial, high-level evidence in such context is lacking.

METHOD

A comprehensive search using Pubmed, EMbase, and Web of Science was performed from inception to October 2018. Studies compared the survival of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone were included. Data were analyzed using random effect model. Quality of each study and presence of publication bias were assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa score (NOS) and funnel plot with Egger test respectively.

RESULTS

The present meta-analysis included 15 studies (all were retrospective series) and 5060 patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered either intravenously or intra-arterially in the form of trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE). The average NOS for the included studies was 6.5. Pooled analysis of the included studies demonstrated significant advantage in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (HR 0.66, 0.55-079, P <.001, I-square [I] = 20.8%). After 2 studies were removed for heterogeneity, advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy remained (HR 0.72, 0.62-0.84, P <.001, I = 0%). Funnel plot suggested no significant publication bias (Egger test, 2-tailed P = .203). Subgroup analyses suggested that intravenous route of chemotherapy injection (P <.001) and use of gemcitabine base regimen (P = .004) are associated with improved overall survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve disease-free survival in subgroup analysis (P = .94).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival and should be considered in patients with ICC following curative resection and in particular to patients with advance disease.

Deoxypodophyllotoxin induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human cholangiocarcinoma cells

Deoxypodophyllotoxin (DPT), a naturally occurring flavolignan, has a broad range of biological effects, including anti-inflammatory, anti-viral and anticancer properties. The present study investigated the anti-proliferative effect of DPT on human cholangiocarcinoma QBC939 and RBE cell lines and its underlying mechanisms of inducing cytotoxicity. MTT assays demonstrated that DPT inhibited the viability of the QBC939 and RBE cells in a dose and time-dependent manner. In addition, DPT treatment resulted in G2/M phase cell cycle arrest associated with the downregulation of Cyclin B and cyclin dependent kinase 1 and caused an increase in apoptosis that was confirmed by characteristic morphological changes. Apoptosis was accompanied by increasing B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2)/Bcl-2 associated X protein ratios and activated expression of caspase-3, -8 and -9. These findings suggested that DPT may be a novel anticancer agent against human cholangiocarcinoma.

Liver-Directed Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) are primary liver cancers where all or most of the tumor burden is usually confined to the liver. Therefore, locoregional liver-directed therapies can provide an opportunity to control intrahepatic disease with minimal systemic side effects. The English medical literature and clinical trials were reviewed to provide a synopsis on the available liver-directed percutaneous therapies for HCC and IHC. Locoregional liver-directed therapies provide survival benefit for patients with HCC and IHC compared to best medical treatment and have lower comorbid risks compared to surgical resection. These treatment options should be considered, especially in patients with unresectable disease.

Liver transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Although hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become a common indication for liver transplantation (LT), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) are historically contraindicated due to their aggressive behavior. On the basis of recent experiences, some groups have proposed a clinical trial investigating the role of LT for patients with early cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), defined as a single lesion ≤ 2 cm. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinicopathologic features and outcomes following LT for patients who were initially diagnosed with HCC and subsequently found to have either ICC or cHCC-CCA on explant. Patients with the diagnosis of primary liver cancer (PLC) after LT from a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes for patients with early CCA were compared with patients with HCC within Milan criteria (MC). Out of 618 patients transplanted with PLC, 44 patients were found to have CCA on explant. On the basis of preoperative imaging, 12 patients met criteria for early CCA and were compared with 319 patients who had HCC within MC. The 1- and 5-year overall survival for early CCA versus HCC was 63.6% versus 90.0% and 63.6% versus 70.3% (log-rank, P = 0.25), respectively. Overall recurrence was 33.3% for early CCA versus 11% for HCC. On explant the patients with CCA were more likely understaged with higher tumor grade and vascular invasion. In conclusion, patients with CCA present a diagnostic challenge, which often leads to the finding of more aggressive lesions on explant after LT, higher recurrence rates, and worse post-LT survival. Careful consideration of this diagnostic conundrum needs to be made before a clinical trial is undertaken. Liver Transplantation 24 634-644 2018 AASLD.

Update on Treatment Options for Advanced Bile Duct Tumours: Radioembolisation for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare form of gastrointestinal cancer with a poor prognosis. Patients often present with biliary obstruction or non-specific abdominal pain, and a high proportion of patients have advanced disease at initial diagnosis. The goal of this review is to discuss treatment options for patients with advanced bile duct tumours focusing on radioembolisation (RE) and its impact on overall survival. RE provides a therapeutic option for patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. However, although systemic chemotherapy has demonstrated a survival benefit in randomised controlled trials, there is limited supporting evidence for the use of RE in this setting. Studies are mostly limited to single-centre, small cohorts with variable outcome measures. Additionally, patients included in these studies received a variety of previous therapies including chemotherapy, surgery or alternative intra-arterial therapy; therefore, a true assessment of overall survival benefit is difficult.

Diagnosis and Management of Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinomas (CC) are rare tumors which usually present late and are often difficult to diagnose and treat. CCs are categorized as intrahepatic, hilar, or extrahepatic. Epidemiologic studies suggest that the incidence of intrahepatic CCs may be increasing worldwide. In this chapter, we review the risk factors, clinical presentation, and management of cholangiocarcinoma.

Effectiveness and safety of sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable and advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a pilot study

Patients with unresectable and advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) usually have short survival due to a lack of effective treatment. This multicenter, single arm, open labeled, prospective study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sorafenib combined with best supportive care (BSC) in these patients. We enrolled 44 patients with unresectable and advanced ICC who were treated with sorafenib (400 mg, twice daily) and BSC. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) at week 12, and the secondary endpoints included time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of therapy (DOT), and adverse events (AEs). Our results showed that the DCR was 15.9%, the median TTP was 5.6 months, and the median PFS and OS were 3.2 and 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-4.1 months; 3.7-8.5 months), respectively. The median DOT was 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.9-3.9 months). AEs of grades 1 and 2 events occurred in 75% of patients, and AE of grade 4 (severe) was observed in 1 patient. Therefore, sorafenib in combination with BSC had an acceptable DCR and safety profile in patients with unresectable and advanced ICC.

Chemoembolization versus radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a single institution image-based efficacy and comparative toxicity

Aim

Compare radioembolization (Y90) and chemoembolization (CE) for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (UICC).

Materials & methods

Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective search was performed. Forty patients with UICC were treated with either Y90 (n = 25, 39 treatments) or CE (n = 15, 35 treatments). Comparative analysis was performed using Student's t and fisher-exact tests. Multivariable-logistic regression was also performed.

Results

Median ages were 60 and 64 years for CE and Y90 groups, respectively (p = 0.798). Patient variables including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor burden, extra-hepatic disease, prior chemotherapy and prior surgery were similar between groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups (CE 20%, Y90 26%; p > 0.9). Overall response rate (CE 6%, Y90 4%; p > 0.9) and disease control rate (CE 46%, Y90 48%; p > 0.9) were statistically similar. Multilogistic regression did not identify any variables that correlated with disease control rate, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and tumor burden.

Conclusion

Our observation shows that CE and Y90 display similar toxicity and disease control in the treatment of UICC.

Decision Making: Intra-arterial Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma-TACE and TARE

The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has been increasing in recent years and now represents the second most common primary hepatic cancer in the United States. The prognosis is dismal without surgical resection. In patients ineligible to receive curative treatments, locoregional therapies represent a diverse array of techniques that can stabilize or reverse tumor progression to improve overall survival and reduce tumor-related symptoms. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) have been demonstrated to be efficacious methods for this patient population. Deciding between these two options is challenging. This article reviews the differences in patient selection, preprocedural evaluation, financial considerations and availability, quality of life, and rates of complications and overall survival.

Other non-surgical treatments for liver cancer

Interventional radiology plays a major role in the modern management of liver cancers, in primary hepatic malignancies or metastases and in palliative or curative situations. Radiological treatments are divided in two categories based on their approach: endovascular treatment and direct transcapsular access. Endovascular treatments include mainly three applications: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and portal vein embolization (PVE). TACE and TARE share an endovascular arterial approach, consisting of a selective catheterization of the hepatic artery or its branches. Subsequently, either a chemotherapy (TACE) or radioembolic (TARE) agent is injected in the target vessel to act on the tumor. PVE raises the volume of the future liver remnant in extended hepatectomy by embolizing a portal vein territory which results in hepatic regeneration. Direct transcapsular access treatments involve mainly three techniques: radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA), microwave thermal ablation (MWA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI). RFA and MWA procedures are almost identical, their clinical applications are similar. A probe is deployed directly into the tumor to generate heat and coagulation necrosis. PEI has known implications based on the chemical toxicity of intra-tumoral injection with highly concentrated alcohol by a thin needle.

Management of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: how do we decide among the various liver-directed treatments?

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma often causes death due to obstruction of the biliary system or interruption of the vascular supply of the liver. This fact emphasizes the critical need for local tumor control in this disease. Successful local tumor control has traditionally been achievable through surgical resection for the small proportion of patients with operable tumors. Technological advances in radiation oncology and in interventional radiology have enabled the delivery of ablative radiation doses or other cytotoxic therapies for tumors in the liver. In some cases, this has translated into substantial prolongation of life for patients with this disease, but the indications for these different treatment options are still the subject of ongoing debate. Here, we review the technological advances and clinical studies that are changing the way intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is managed, and discuss ways to achieve individualized treatment of patients.

Intra-arterial embolotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: update and future prospects

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare disease and carries a poor prognosis with surgery remaining the only curative treatment option. However, due to the late presentation of symptoms and close proximity of the tumors to central hepatic structures, only about 30% of patients are classified eligible to resection. As for palliative approaches, ICC constitutes a possible indication for loco-regional therapies (LRT). As such, intra-arterial therapies (IAT) are reported to be feasible, safe and effective in inducing tumor response in unresectable ICC. The paradigm of IAT is premised on the selective delivery of embolic, chemotherapeutic agents to the tumor via its feeding arteries, thus allowing dose escalation within the carcinoma and reduction of systemic toxicity. Conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) so far remains the most commonly used IAT modality. However, drug-eluting beads (DEB)-TACE was initiated with the idea of more selective targeting of the tumor owing to the combined embolizing as well as drug-eluting properties of the microspheres used in this setting. Moreover, radioembolization is performed by intra-arterial administration of very small spheres containing β-emitting yttrium-90 (Y90-RE) to the site of the tumor. Clinical evidence exists in support of survival benefits for IAT in the palliative treatment of ICC compared to surgery and systemic chemotherapy. As for combination regimens, cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90-RE are reported to achieve conversion of patients to surgery in a sequential treatment planning and simultaneous IAT combinations may provide a therapeutic option for treatment escalation. Regarding the current status of literature, controlled randomized prospective trials to compare different IAT techniques and combination therapies as well as treatment recommendations for different IAT modalities are needed.

The role of interventional radiology in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma. Complete surgical resection remains the only potentially curative option for patients with ICC. However, until now, early diagnosis with potential surgical intervention has been the exception rather than the rule with only 30% of patients qualifying for attempted surgical cure. Many patients are unresectable because of disease stage, anatomic conditions, medical comorbidities, and small future remnant liver. Interventional radiology procedures are available for these types of patients with intra-arterial therapies and/or ablative treatments both for curative and for palliative treatment. The goals of interventional therapy are to control local tumor growth, to relieve symptoms, and to improve and preserve quality of life. The choice of treatment depends largely on tumor extent and patient performance. No randomized studies exist to compare treatments. The present review describes the current evidence of the interventional treatments in the management of the ICC. Moreover, interventional procedures available to increase the future liver reserve before surgery were analyzed.

Locoregional Therapies of Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is the second most primary liver malignancy with increasing incidence in Western countries. Currently, surgical R0 resection is regarded as the only potentially curative treatment. The results of systemic chemotherapy and best supportive care (BSC) in patients with metastatic disease are often disappointing in regard to toxicity, oncologic efficacy, and overall survival. In current practice, the use of different locoregional therapies is increasingly more accepted.

METHODS

A review of the literature on locoregional therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) was undertaken.

RESULTS

There are no prospective randomized controlled trials. For localized ICC, either primary or recurrent, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is by far the most commonly used thermal ablation modality. Thereby, a systematic review and meta-analysis reports major complication in 3.8% as well as 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of 82, 47, and 24%, respectively. In selected patients (e.g. with a tumor diameter of ≤3 cm), oncologic efficacy and survival after RFA are comparable with surgical resection. For diffuse ICC, different transarterial therapies, either chemotherapy-based (hepatic artery infusion (HAI), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)) or radiotherapy-based (transarterial radioembolization (TARE)), show extremely promising results. With regard to controlled trials (transarterial therapy versus systemic chemotherapy, BSC or no treatment), tumor control is virtually always better for transarterial therapies and very often accompanied by a dramatic survival benefit and improvement of quality of life. Of note, the latter is the case not only for patients without extrahepatic metastatic disease but also for those with liver-dominant extrahepatic metastatic disease. There are other locoregional therapies such as microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation, and chemosaturation; however, the current data support their use only in controlled trials or as last-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

Dedicated locoregional therapies are commonly used for primary and recurrent ICC as well as liver-only and liver-dominant extrahepatic metastatic disease. Currently, the best evidence and most promising results are available for RFA, HAI, TACE, and TARE. In cohort studies, the overall survival rates are similar to those obtained with surgery or systemic therapies. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare safety and efficacy between different surgical, interventional, and systemic therapies, as well as their combinations.

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Although intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma, there are limited data available on PET/CT imaging in ICC. This retrospective study analyzed the role of PET/CT imaging in the evaluation of ICC.

METHODS

FDG PET/CT findings were reviewed in 65 patients with histologically confirmed ICC. PET/CT was evaluated based on visual interpretation and the semiquantitative index of SUVmax and tumor-to-normal liver tissue ratio (TNR), which were consequently further analyzed and correlated with tumor localization, differentiation, size, and serum levels of tumor markers. Forty-five cases also underwent abdominal MRI examinations.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients had hilar ICC, whereas 46 patients had peripheral ICC. Sixty cases of ICC showed elevated FDG uptake with an average SUVmax of 8.3 ± 4.7 and TNR of 3.1 ± 1.7. Five cases located in the hilum were false negative on PET/CT imaging. Compared with hilar ICC, SUVmax and TNR of peripheral ICC were significantly higher (P < 0.05). FDG accumulation correlated with the degree of ICC differentiation. SUVmax and TNR correlated with tumor size, whereas there was no correlation observed with serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of regional lymph node metastases were 70.0% versus 50%, 91.7% versus 83.3%, and 81.8% versus 68.2%, respectively. PET/CT upstaged 12.3% and downstaged 3.1% of cases and had no impact on patient management in the remaining 84.6% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of FDG PET/CT and abdominal MRI might improve the diagnostic accuracy for ICC.

Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Secondary Hepatic Malignancies

Management of hepatic malignancies is a multidisciplinary task with the involvement of hepatologists, medical/surgical oncologists, transplant surgeons, and interventional radiologists. The patients should be selected for a specific targeted therapy after multidisciplinary consensus. Interventional oncology has established its role in the management of hepatic malignancies. Image-guided locoregional therapies decrease the rate of systemic toxicity without compromising tumoricidal effect.

Trans-arterial embolisation therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) portends a poor prognosis despite standard systemic treatments which confer minimal survival benefits and significant adverse effects. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes, complications and prognostic factors of TAE therapies using chemotherapeutic agents or radiation.

METHODS

A literature search and article acquisition was conducted on PubMed (MEDLINE), OVID (MEDLINE) and EBSCOhost (EMBASE). Original articles published after January 2000 on trans-arterial therapies for unresectable ICC were selected using strict eligibility criteria. Radiological response, overall survival, progression-free survival, safety profile, and prognostic factors for overall survival were assessed. Quality appraisal and data tabulation were performed using pre-determined forms. Results were synthesized by narrative review and quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included (n=929 patients). Thirty three percent of patients presented with extrahepatic metastases. After treatment, the average rate of complete and partial radiological response was 10% and 22.2%, respectively. Overall median survival time was 12.4 months with a median 30-day mortality and 1-year survival rate of 0.6% and 53%, respectively. Acute treatment toxicity (within 30 days) was reported in 34.9% of patients, of which 64.3% were mild to moderate in severity. The most common clinical toxicities were abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, and fatigue. Multiplicity, localization and vascularity of the tumor may predict worse overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Trans-arterial therapies are safe and effective treatment options which should be considered routinely for unresectable ICC. Consistent and standardized methodology and data collection is required to facilitate a meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials will be valuable in the future.

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy that arises from epithelial cells of the biliary system. Its desmoplastic histology and the heterogeneity of its presentation have contributed to its poor prognosis, with limited therapeutic options previously available. However, recent advances using locoregional therapy may expand the treatment arsenal used to manage this resistant malignancy. Although surgical resection has previously been reserved for relatively few patients because of inadequate hepatic reserve, portal vein embolization can induce contralateral hepatic lobe hypertrophy to increase the number of patients eligible for resection. For unresectable cases, both transarterial chemoembolization and yttrium-90 radioembolization have shown effectiveness in controlling tumor growth and prolonging survival.

Multidisciplinary Care of Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Updates in Management

Cholangiocarcinoma is a highly fatal primary cancer of the bile ducts which arises from malignant transformation of bile duct epithelium. While being an uncommon malignancy with an annual incidence in the United States of 5000 new cases, the incidence has been increasing over the past 30 years and comprises 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers. Cholangiocarcinoma can be classified into intrahepatic (ICC) and extrahepatic (including hilar and distal bile duct) according to its anatomic location within the biliary tree with respect to the liver. This paper reviews the management of ICC, focusing on the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and surgical and nonsurgical management.

Integration of chemoembolization and radioembolization into multimodal treatment of cholangiocarcinoma

Over the last decade radioembolization and transarterial chemoembolization have been shown to be effective in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Unfortunately, up to now the evidence is not high with most of the conclusions drawn from single center retrospective analyses with small sample sizes treated in the salvage situation. However, the results are promising and suggest a survival benefit in the treatment of unresectable cholangiocellular carcinoma, even in an advanced stage with extrahepatic disease. In the following, available results of the treatment of unresectable cholangiocellular carcinoma by radioembolization and transarterial chemoembolization will be summarized. Special attention will be given to prognostic factors and efficacy as measured by response criteria. The potential integration of these therapies into multimodal treatment concepts will be discussed with focus on the intensification of therapy and a staged concept of therapy.

Transcatheter embolization therapy in liver cancer: an update of clinical evidences

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a form of intra-arterial catheter-based chemotherapy that selectively delivers high doses of cytotoxic drug to the tumor bed combining with the effect of ischemic necrosis induced by arterial embolization. Chemoembolization and radioembolization are at the core of the treatment of liver hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who cannot receive potentially curative therapies such as transplantation, resection or percutaneous ablation. TACE for liver cancer has been proven to be useful in local tumor control, to prevent tumor progression, prolong patients' life and control patient symptoms. Recent evidence showed in patients with single-nodule HCC of 3 cm or smaller without vascular invasion, the 5-year overall survival (OS) with TACE was similar to that with hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation. Although being used for decades, Lipiodol(®) (Lipiodol(®) Ultra Fluid(®), Guerbet, France) remains important as a tumor-seeking and radio-opaque drug delivery vector in interventional oncology. There have been efforts to improve the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors. Drug-eluting bead (DEB) is a relatively novel drug delivery embolization system which allows for fixed dosing and the ability to release the anticancer agents in a sustained manner. Three DEBs are available, i.e., Tandem(®) (CeloNova Biosciences Inc., USA), DC-Beads(®) (BTG, UK) and HepaSphere(®) (BioSphere Medical, Inc., USA). Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) technique has been developed, and proven to be efficient and safe in advanced liver cancers and those with vascular complications. Two types of radioembolization microspheres are available i.e., SIR-Spheres(®) (Sirtex Medical Limited, Australia) and TheraSphere(®) (BTG, UK). This review describes the basic procedure of TACE, properties and efficacy of some chemoembolization systems and radioembolization agents which are commercially available and/or currently under clinical evaluation. The key clinical trials of transcatheter arterial therapy for liver cancer are summarized.