TERLIPRESSIN AS RESCUE THERAPY FOR INTRACTABLE HYPOTENSION DUE TO SEPTIC SHOCK IN CHILDREN

A simple nomogram for predicting the mortality of PICU patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

As one of the serious complications of sepsis in children, sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is associated with significantly poor prognosis and increased mortality. However, predictors of outcomes for pediatric SAE patients have yet to be identified. The aim of this study was to develop nomograms to predict the 14-day and 90-day mortality of children with SAE, providing early warning to take effective measures to improve prognosis and reduce mortality.

Methods

In this multicenter, retrospective study, we screened 291 patients with SAE admitted to the PICU between January 2017 and September 2022 in Shandong Province. A least absolute shrinkage and selector operation (LASSO) method was used to identify the optimal prognostic factors predicting the outcomes in pediatric patients with SAE. Then, multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed based on these variables, and two nomograms were built for visualization. We used the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves and decision curves to test the accuracy and discrimination of the nomograms in predicting outcomes.

Results

There were 129 patients with SAE in the training cohort, and there were 103 and 59 patients in the two independent validation cohorts, respectively. Vasopressor use, procalcitonin (PCT), lactate and pediatric critical illness score (PCIS) were independent predictive factors for 14-day mortality, and vasopressor use, PCT, lactate, PCIS and albumin were independent predictive factors for 90-day mortality. Based on the variables, we generated two nomograms for the early identification of 14-day mortality (AUC 0.853, 95% CI 0.787-0.919, sensitivity 72.4%, specificity 84.5%) and 90-day mortality (AUC 0.857, 95% CI 0.792-0.923, sensitivity 72.3%, specificity 90.6%), respectively. The calibration plots for nomograms showed excellent agreement of mortality probabilities between the observed and predicted values in both training and validation cohorts. Decision curve analyses (DCA) indicated that nomograms conferred high clinical net benefit.

Conclusion

The nomograms in this study revealed optimal prognostic factors for the mortality of pediatric patients with SAE, and individualized quantitative risk evaluation by the models would be practical for treatment management.

Vasopressin in newborns with refractory acute pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Acute pulmonary hypertension (aPH) in newborns can be life threatening and challenging to manage. In newborns with refractory aPH, there is currently limited therapeutic agents.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center cohort study in newborns less than one month old who were treated with vasopressin for a minimum of one hour in the context of refractory aPH in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units of a tertiary university center between 2016 and 2022. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vasopressin in newborns as an adjuvant treatment for refractory aPH.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. In patients who received vasopressin, oxygenation index improved from 28.4 to 14.4 (p = 0.004) after twelve hours of continuous infusion. Oxygen requirements (FiO2) decreased from 0.91 to 0.50 (p = 0.004) and mean arterial pressure increased from 41 to 51 mmHg (p = 0.001). In our cohort, 68% of patients presented an episode of hyponatremia (serum sodium <130 mmol/L).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of vasopressin may be associated with improvement in oxygenation and hemodynamic status of neonatal patients with aPH refractory to initial therapy. Further prospective studies are needed to establish the safety profile of vasopressin in newborns, particularly in preterm infants.

IMPACT

Vasopressin may be an effective cardiotropic agent to improve oxygenation and hemodynamic status in newborns with acute pulmonary hypertension. Careful monitoring of serum sodium levels are warranted in newborns who are receiving vasopressin infusion. This provides additional evidence for the consideration of vasopressin in newborns with acute pulmonary hypertension refractory to inhaled nitric oxide.

Terlipressin for the Prevention and Treatment of Renal Decline in Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Drug Profile

Hepatorenal syndrome stands as one of several potential triggers of acute kidney injury in individuals grappling with either acute or persistent liver ailments. The nature of the decline in kidney function has led to the identification of two variants of hepatorenal syndrome. In cases where terlipressin therapy is accessible, the initial approach involves administering terlipressin alongside albumin. Terlipressin, a synthetic analog of vasopressin, boasts double the preference for vasopressin V1 receptors compared to V2 receptors. The FDA granted approval to terlipressin in September 2022, demonstrating its intrinsic activity, although a significant portion of its function arises from its transformation into lysine vasopressin. This article provides a comprehensive examination of terlipressin's various pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic facets, as well as its clinical utility, aiming to keep the scientific community well informed about its safe and efficient utilization.

Using terlipressin in a pediatric patient with septic shock resistant to catecholamines

Sepsis and septic shock are important causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. The goal of treatment is to ensure adequate mean arterial pressure to maintain organ perfusion. The growing number of instances of peripheral vascular hyporeactivity to catecholamines has necessitated the search for alternative vasopressors. A 14-year-old boy had septic shock, with a high cardiac index and low systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) measurements according to pulse contour analysis, despite treatment with dopamine, dobutamine, adrenaline, and noradrenaline infusions. A terlipressin (TP) 10 μg/kg intravenous bolus was administered, followed by a 1 μg/kg/minute continuous infusion. The response to TP treatment was assessed using pulse contour analysis. The mean arterial pressure and SVRI increased, and the cardiac index and heart rate decreased within 10 minutes after bolus administration of TP. Noradrenaline infusion could be reduced to 0.7 μg/kg/minute within 5 hours. The goal in presenting this case was to evaluate the vasoconstrictor effects of TP, a long-acting vasopressin analogue, in septic shock.

American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock

OBJECTIVES

The American College of Critical Care Medicine provided 2002 and 2007 guidelines for hemodynamic support of newborn and pediatric septic shock. Provide the 2014 update of the 2007 American College of Critical Care Medicine "Clinical Guidelines for Hemodynamic Support of Neonates and Children with Septic Shock."

DESIGN

Society of Critical Care Medicine members were identified from general solicitation at Society of Critical Care Medicine Educational and Scientific Symposia (2006-2014). The PubMed/Medline/Embase literature (2006-14) was searched by the Society of Critical Care Medicine librarian using the keywords: sepsis, septicemia, septic shock, endotoxemia, persistent pulmonary hypertension, nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and American College of Critical Care Medicine guidelines in the newborn and pediatric age groups.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The 2002 and 2007 guidelines were widely disseminated, translated into Spanish and Portuguese, and incorporated into Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Heart Association/Pediatric Advanced Life Support sanctioned recommendations. The review of new literature highlights two tertiary pediatric centers that implemented quality improvement initiatives to improve early septic shock recognition and first-hour compliance to these guidelines. Improved compliance reduced hospital mortality from 4% to 2%. Analysis of Global Sepsis Initiative data in resource rich developed and developing nations further showed improved hospital mortality with compliance to first-hour and stabilization guideline recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

The major new recommendation in the 2014 update is consideration of institution-specific use of 1) a "recognition bundle" containing a trigger tool for rapid identification of patients with septic shock, 2) a "resuscitation and stabilization bundle" to help adherence to best practice principles, and 3) a "performance bundle" to identify and overcome perceived barriers to the pursuit of best practice principles.

Safety and Efficacy of Terlipressin in Pediatric Distributive Shock: A Retrospective Analysis in 20 Children

INTRODUCTION

Data are still lacking about the use of terlipressin or vasopressin in the treatment of pediatric patients who are in a state of therapy-refractory shock.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of terlipressin on hemodynamics in children with distributive shock and to describe any severe side effects.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 20) with catecholamine-resistant distributive shock who were treated with terlipressin were retrospectively enrolled in this study. We analyzed response in terms of mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), urinary output, and serum lactate.

RESULTS

The hemodynamics of 12 children significantly improved within 6 h of commencing terlipressin (mean blood pressure increase of ≥20 % without VIS increase, or mean blood pressure increase of ≥10 % with VIS decrease of ≥10 %). The hemodynamics of eight patients did not improve, regardless of treatment dosage or duration. More children died in the responders group (n = 7 [58.3 %]) than in the non-responders group (n = 2 [25.0 %]), but this was not statistically significant. Two patients (one in each group) who received high dosages of terlipressin developed rhabdomyolysis. One case of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy was observed, which could be related to terlipressin.

CONCLUSIONS

Although treatment with terlipressin resulted in rapid positive hemodynamic responses in some children, it did not seem to have a positive effect in other pediatric patients. Therefore, the possible benefits of terlipressin should be always weighed against potential severe adverse effects.

Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Background

Vasopressin (AVP) and terlipressin (TP) have been used as last-line therapy in refractory shock in children. However, the efficacy and safety profiles of AVP and TP have not been determined in pediatric refractory shock of different origins. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the addition of AVP/TP therapy in pediatric refractory shock of all causes compared to conventional therapy with fluid resuscitation and vasopressor and inotropic therapy.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) comparing AVP and TP to conventional therapy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to February 2016. The systematic review included all reports of AVP/TP use in the pediatric population. Reports of clinical trials were pooled using random-effects models and TSA. Main outcomes were mortality and tissue ischemia.

Results

Three randomized controlled trials and five “before-and-after clinical” trials (without comparator) met the inclusion criteria. Among 224 neonates and children (aged 0 to 18 years) with refractory shock, 152 received therapy with AVP or TP. Pooled analyses showed no association between AVP/TP treatment and mortality (relative risk (RR),1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71–2.00), length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (mean difference (MD), –3.58 days; 95% CI, –9.05 to 1.83), and tissue ischemia (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.47–4.62). In TSA, no significant effect on mortality and risk for developing tissue ischemia was observed with AVP/TP therapy.

Conclusion

Our results emphasize the lack of observed benefit for AVP/TP in terms of mortality and length of stay in the PICU, and suggest an increased risk for ischemic events. Our TSA suggests that further large studies are necessary to demonstrate and establish benefits of AVP/TP in children.

PROSPERO registry: CRD42016035872

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1589-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Role of Terlipressin in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Review of the Literature and Personal Experience

Vasopressin and its synthetic analog terlipressin are potent vasopressors that could be useful in vasodilatory septic shock. In septic adults, vasopressin/terlipressin have been shown to increase mean arterial pressure and to decrease the necessity for catecholamines. Moreover, low doses of vasopressin (or terlipressin) increase urine output and ameliorate oxygenation. Although pediatric septic shock is more often hypodynamic, both vasopressin and terlipressin have proved to be effective in restoring blood pressure or increasing the diuresis in this setting. The purpose of this review is to summarize the physiology of vasopressin and to report the available evidence for the use of vasopressin or terlipressin in pediatric septic shock in order to make best use in this population. We also report our experience with the continuous infusion of terlipressin in two pediatric patients who developed catecholamine refractory septic shock.

Blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy: a systematic review

Physicians often prescribe vasopressors to correct pathological vasodilation and improve tissue perfusion in patients with septic shock, but the evidence to inform practice on vasopressor dosing is weak. We undertook a systematic review of clinical studies evaluating different blood pressure targets for the dosing of vasopressors in septic shock. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL (to November 2013), reference lists from included articles, and trial registries for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational and crossover intervention studies comparing different blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in septic shock. Two reviewers independently selected eligible studies and extracted data on standardized forms. We identified 2 RCTs and 10 crossover trials but no observational studies meeting our criteria. Only one RCT measured clinical outcomes after comparing mean arterial pressure targets of 80 to 85 mmHg versus 65 to 70 mmHg. There was no effect on 28-day mortality, but confidence intervals were wide (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.84 - 1.38). In contrast, this intervention was associated with a greater risk of atrial fibrillation (relative risk, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.18 - 4.72) and a lower risk of renal replacement therapy in hypertensive patients (relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 - 1.0). Crossover trials suggest that achieving higher blood pressure targets by increasing vasopressor doses increases heart rate and cardiac index with no effect on serum lactate. Our findings underscore the paucity of clinical evidence to guide the administration of vasopressors in critically ill patients with septic shock. Further rigorous research is needed to establish an evidence base for vasopressor administration in this population.

Recognition and Management of Sepsis in Children: Practice Patterns in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Pediatric sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Understanding current practice patterns and challenges is essential to inform future research and education strategies.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to describe the practice patterns of pediatric emergency physicians (PEPs) in the recognition and management of sepsis in children and to identify perceived priorities for future research and education.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey of members of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Emergency Medicine and Pediatric Emergency Research Canada. The survey was internally derived, externally validated, and distributed using a modified Dillman methodology. Rank scores (RS) were calculated for responses using Likert-assigned frequency values.

RESULTS

Tachycardia, mental-status changes, and abnormal temperature (RS = 83.7, 80.6, and 79.6) were the highest ranked clinical measures for diagnosing sepsis; white blood cell count, lactate, and band count (RS = 73.5, 70.9, and 69.1) were the highest ranked laboratory investigations. The resuscitation fluid of choice (85.5%) was normal saline. Dopamine was the first-line vasoactive medication (VAM) for cold (57.1%) and warm (42.2%) shock with epinephrine (18.5%) and norepinephrine (25.1%) as second-line VAMs (cold and warm, respectively). Steroid administration increased with complexity of presentation (all-comers 3.8%, VAM-resistant shock 54.5%, chronic steroid users 72.0%). Local ED-specific clinical pathways, national emergency department (ED)-specific guidelines, and identification of clinical biomarkers were described as future priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

While practice variability exists among clinicians, PEPs continue to rely heavily on clinical metrics for recognizing sepsis. Improved recognition through clinical biomarkers and standardization of care were perceived as priorities. Our results provide a strong framework to guide future research and education strategies in pediatric sepsis.

Vasopressin and its analogues for the treatment of refractory hypotension in neonates

BACKGROUND

Neonatal hypotension that is refractory to volume expansion, catecholamines, or corticosteroids has a mortality of about 50%. Optimization of blood pressure and tissue perfusion in refractory hypotension may be crucial to improve clinical outcomes. Vasopressin, a neuropeptide hormone, or its analogue terlipressin has been used to treat refractory hypotension in neonates and may be effective.

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vasopressin and its synthetic analogues (e.g. terlipressin) in decreasing mortality and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, and improving survival in neonates with refractory hypotension. Our secondary objectives were to determine the effects of vasopressin and its analogues (terlipressin) on improvement in blood pressure, increase in urine output, decrease in inotrope score, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), periventricular leukomalacia, intraventricular hemorrhage, chronic lung disease, and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in neonates with refractory hypotension.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the literature in January 2012, using the search strategy recommended by the Cochrane Neonatal Group. We searched electronic databases (CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE), abstracts of the Pediatric Academic Societies, web sites for registered trials at www.clinicaltrials.gov and www.controlled-trials.com and in the reference list of identified articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized or quasi-randomized trials evaluating vasopressin or its analogues, at any dosage or duration used as an adjunct to standard therapy (any combination of volume expansion, inotropic agents and corticosteroids) to treat refractory hypotension in neonates.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed the standard methods of The Cochrane Collaboration for conducting a systematic review. Two review authors (BS and MP) independently assessed the titles and abstracts of studies identified by the search strategy for eligibility for inclusion. We obtained the full text version if eligibility could not be done reliably by title and abstract. We resolved any differences by mutual discussion. We designed electronic forms for trial inclusion/exclusion, data extraction, and for requesting additional published information from authors of the original reports.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search did not identify any completed or ongoing trials that met our inclusion criteria. Three studies that did not include neonates and one study where the objective was not to treat neonates with refractory hypotension were excluded.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to recommend or refute the use of vasopressin or its analogues in the treatment of refractory hypotension in neonates. Well-designed, adequately powered, randomized controlled studies are necessary to address efficacy, optimal dosing, safety and long-term neurodevelopmental and pulmonary outcomes. 

Terlipressin decreases vascular endothelial growth factor expression and improves oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and shock

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical data suggest that treatment with terlipressin (TP) may be more advantageous for septic shock than catecholamines. However, it is unknown whether TP would be effective for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients with shock.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the impact of TP vs. dopamine on hemodynamic variables and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in ARDS patients with shock.

METHODS

We studied 32 ARDS patients with shock despite fluid loading, who were randomized to receive TP (16 patients) or dopamine (16 patients). TP was administered as a continuous intravenous dose of 1.3 μg/kg/h and dopamine was administered in doses up to 20 μg/kg/min to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 70 ± 5 mm Hg for 48 h. Hemodynamic changes, ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO(2)/FiO(2)), and VEGF were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between the plasma VEGF level and the lung injury score at baseline (r = 0.387, p < 0.01). VEGF concentrations significantly decreased from baseline levels in the TP group (p < 0.05) at 48 h; there was no difference in the dopamine group (p > 0.05) at 48 h vs. baseline. There was no significant difference in the tumor necrosis factor-α concentration between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TP treatment has the potential to inhibit VEGF and improve oxygenation in patients with shock in the early stage of ARDS.

Therapeutic applications of vasopressin in pediatric patients

CONTEXT

Reports of successful use of vasopressin in various shock states and cardiac arrest has lead to the emergence of vasopressin therapy as a potentially major advancement in the management of critically ill children.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of physiology of vasopressin, rationale of its use and dose schedule in different disease states with special focus on recent advances in the therapeutic applications of vasopressin.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE search (1966-September 2011) using terms vasopressin, terlipressin, arginine-vasopressin, shock, septic shock, vasodilatory shock, cardiac arrest, and resuscitation for reports on vasopressin/terlipressin use in children and manual review of article bibliographies. Search was restricted to human studies. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, evaluation studies, case series, and case reports on vasopressin/terlipressin use in children (preterm neonates to 21 years of age) were included. Outcome measures were analysed using following clinical questions: indication, dose and duration of vasopressin/terlipressin use, main effects especially on systemic blood pressure, catecholamine requirement, urine output, serum lactate, adverse effects, and mortality.

RESULTS

51 reports on vasopressin (30 reports) and terlipressin (21 reports) use in pediatric population were identified. A total of 602 patients received vasopressin/terlipressin as vasopressors in various catecholamine-resistant states (septic - 176, post-cardiotomy - 136, other vasodilatory/mixed shock - 199, and cardiac arrest - 101). Commonly reported responses include rapid improvement in systemic blood pressure, decline in concurrent catecholamine requirement, and increase in urine output; despite these effects, the mortality rates remained high.

CONCLUSION

In view of the limited clinical experience, and paucity of randomized controlled trials evaluating these drugs in pediatric population, currently no definitive recommendations on vasopressin/terlipressin use can be laid down. Nevertheless, available clinical data supports the use of vasopressin in critically ill children as a rescue therapy in refractory shock and cardiac arrest.

Rescue treatment with terlipressin in different scenarios of refractory hypotension in newborns and infants

OBJECTIVE

Terlipressin has been successfully used as rescue treatment in hypotensive adults and children with septic shock, but only exceptionally in neonates. The aim of this study is to describe original clinical scenarios in which terlipressin, in newborns and infants, resolved the catecholamine-refractory hypotension.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Neonatal intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

All newborns with hypotension unresponsive to volume replacement and catecholamines, and treated with terlipressin, from January 2008 to December 2009. In this study, also an infant (11 months old) born extremely preterm was included.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Four hypotensive patients received as rescue therapy terlipressin, which produced a dramatic increase in mean arterial pressure, diuresis, and reduction of lactate levels. In three newborns, hypotension, associated with pulmonary hypertension, was resolved with terlipressin. Two of them (one with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, the other with congenital diaphragmatic hernia) died in the following days for causes unrelated to hypotension; the third (on mild hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy) recovered. We report furthermore an infant with septic shock and on treatment with β-blockers in whom terlipressin normalized blood pressure. In two patients, cranial Doppler ultrasonography showed the recovery of diastolic cerebral flow in the anterior cerebral artery and the normalization of resistance index within 30 mins from the first dose of terlipressin. In two infants, hyponatremia was detected.

CONCLUSION

Although the number of reported infants is little, terlipressin appears to be an effective rescue treatment in different scenarios of refractory neonatal hypotension. Further controlled studies are required to confirm its efficacy and safety.

Beneficial effects of terlipressin in pediatric cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

: Vasopressin and its analog, terlipressin (TP), are potent vasopressors that may be useful therapeutic agents in the treatment of cardiac arrest (CA), septic and catecholamine-resistant shock, and esophageal variceal hemorrhage. The American Heart Association 2000 guidelines recommend its use for adult ventricular fibrillation arrest, and the American Heart Association 2005 guidelines note that it may replace the first or second epinephrine dose. There is little reported experience with TP in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of children. The purpose of this retrospective case series was to report successful return of spontaneous circulation after the rescue administration of vasopressin after prolonged CA and failure of conventional CPR, advanced life support, and epinephrine therapy in children.

METHODS

: Nine pediatric patients with asystole, aged 11 months to 14 years, who experienced 12 episodes of refractory CA and did not respond to conventional therapy. Terlipressin was administered as intravenous bolus doses of 20 mcg/kg to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

RESULTS

: Return of spontaneous circulation was monitored and achieved in 6 of the 12 episodes. The mean duration of CPR was 24.8 minutes in these 12 episodes of CA with TP administration, with a range of 10 to 50 minutes (median, 23 minutes). Five survivors were discharged home without sequelae and with good neurologic status (score 1 by the pediatric cerebral performance category).

CONCLUSIONS

: The combination of TP to epinephrine during CPR may have a beneficial effect in children with CA. However, the recommendations for its use in the pediatric literature are based on limited clinical data.

Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

Note From the Writing Group: Throughout this article, the reader will notice combinations of superscripted letters and numbers (eg, “Family Presence During ResuscitationPeds-003”). These callouts are hyperlinked to evidence-based worksheets, which were used in the development of this article. An appendix of worksheets, applicable to this article, is located at the end of the text. The worksheets are available in PDF format and are open access.

Continuous Terlipressin Infusion as Rescue Treatment in a Case Series of Children with Refractory Septic Shock

Background:

Despite intensive therapy, refractory pediatric septic shock has a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Additional treatments are needed to improve outcomes in such cases.

Objective:

To report the clinical effects of continuous terlipressin infusion as rescue treatment for children with septic shock refractory to high catecholamine doses.

Methods:

Sixteen episodes of catecholamine-resistant septic shock were recorded in 15 children (aged from newborn to 15 years) who received compassionate rescue treatment with terlipressin at 6 pediatric intensive care units. Terlipressin treatment consisted of a loading dose (20 μg/kg) followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 4–20 μg/kg/h. Terlipressin was titrated at increases of 1 μg/kg/h to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) in normal range for age and to reduce catecholamine dosage. The main outcome was survival of the episode. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic effects, ischemia, and terlipressin-related adverse events.

Results:

Terlipressin increased median MAP from 48 (range 42–63) to 68 (45–115) mm Hg 30 minutes after terlipressin administration (p < 0.01). MAP was subsequently sustained, which allowed for the reduction of norepinephrine infusion from 2 μg/kg/min (1–4) at baseline to 1.5 μg/kg/min (0.4–4) at 1 hour, 1.3 μg/kg/min (0–8) at 4 hours, 1 μg/kg/min (0–2) at 12 hours, 0.45 μg/kg/min (0–1.4) at 24 hours, and 0 μg/kg/min (0–0.6) at 48 hours (p < 0.05 vs baseline in all cases). In 8 (50%) of the 16 septic shock episodes the patients survived, 7 (44%) without sequelae. One patient survived with sequelae (minor amputation and mild cutaneous ischemia). Eight patients had signs of ischemia at admission; terlipressin induced reversible ischemia in another 4 patients. Meningococcal infection, prior ischemia, and MAP were risk factors for mortality.

Conclusions:

Continuous terlipressin infusion may improve hemodynamics and survival in some children with refractory septic shock. Terlipressin could contribute to tissue ischemia.

Low-dose vasopressin infusion therapy for refractory hypotension in ELBW infants

BACKGROUND

Severe hypotension in infants, especially in preterm infants, is associated with poor neurological outcome and high mortality. In adults, low-dose vasopressin (arginine vasopressin: AVP) infusion therapy has been effective for treating hypotension that is refractory to vasopressors and inotropes.

METHODS

The effects of AVP infusion therapy for refractory hypotension were retrospectively evaluated in extremely low-birthweight infants. Between January 2002 and November 2005, 22 infants with refractory hypotension treated with low-dose AVP infusion were reviewed. The average birthweight was 658 g (+/-142 g), and the average gestational age was 24.9 weeks (+/-1.4). The changes in blood pressure, urinary output, and other parameters in response to AVP therapy were analyzed in all the infants.

RESULTS

After AVP infusion, systolic blood pressure increased from 30 mmHg to 43 mmHg (P < 0.0001), and the diastolic pressure increased from 15 mmHg to 24 mmHg (P < 0.0001). The urine output dramatically increased from 1.5 mL/kg per h to 4.0 mL/kg per h (P < 0.0001). AVP infusion, however, was not effective in four of the 22 patients (18%). The sodium concentration in the serum decreased mildly after administration. In six patients the serum sodium concentration decreased below 130 mEq/L. Severe mitral regurgitation was observed in two patients. Three infants showed a transient decrease in the platelet count during AVP infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose AVP therapy should be considered as rescue therapy when high-dose catecholamine therapy and/or steroid administration do not produce sufficient increase in the blood pressure. Further investigations are required to prove the efficacy and safety of AVP infusion therapy in preterm infants.

Pediatric cardiac arrest refractory to advanced life support: is there a role for terlipressin?

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric cardiac arrest unresponsive to advanced life support and several adrenaline doses has a very poor prognosis. Alternative vasopressors could improve the results of resuscitation in such cases. We report our experience with the compassionate administration of terlipressin in children who suffered in-pediatric intensive care unit cardiac arrest and did not respond to immediate advanced life support and at least three epinephrine doses.

DESIGN

Prospective multicenter registry.

SETTING

Three pediatric intensive care units at university-affiliated tertiary care children's hospitals.

PATIENTS

Five pediatric patients, aged 5 mos to 12 yrs, with in-pediatric intensive care unit cardiac arrest unresponsive to advanced life support that included at least three epinephrine doses.

INTERVENTIONS

Addition of terlipressin (10-20 microg/kg intravenous, up to two doses) to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Sustained return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in four cases, two of them were declared dead 6 and 12 hrs later, and the remaining two survived without cardiopulmonary procedures-related sequelae and with good neurologic condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Terlipressin might contribute to obtain sustained return of spontaneous circulation in children with refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest. A randomized controlled clinical trial should be conducted to investigate the optimal drug treatment in pediatric cardiac arrest.

Terlipressin for Children with Extremely Low Cardiac Output After Open Heart Surgery

Background:

Terlipressin, a long-acting analog of vasopressin, has been used successfully in patients with extremely low cardiac output, but its application in children following open heart surgery is limited.

Objective:

To describe our experience using terlipressin in children with extremely low cardiac output after open heart surgery.

Methods:

Records were reviewed of all pediatric patients between January 2003 and December 2005 who had undergone open heart surgery, experienced extremely low cardiac output, and were treated with terlipressin as rescue therapy. Mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, urine output, and lactate and oxygenation index values were retrieved and analyzed when available.

Results:

Twenty-nine children who were considered gravely ill despite conventional vasoactive agents received terlipressin as rescue therapy, which rapidly yielded significant improvements in all measured hemodynamic and respiratory indices. Mean ± SD arterial blood pressure increased significantly, from 49 ± 17 to 57 ± 16 mm Hg after 10 minutes (p = 0.004) and to 64 ± 15 mm Hg 24 hours after treatment onset (p = 0.001). Twenty-four hours following terlipressin administration, urine output increased from 1.5 ± 2.1 to 3.0 ± 2.3 mL/kg/h (p = 0.001), the oxygenation index decreased from 16.5 ± 27.9 to 9.5 ± 16.7 in the survivors (p = 0.023), and the inotropic score decreased from 41.9 ± 19.9 to 32.6 ± 18.8 (p = 0.009).

Conclusions:

Terlipressin caused significant improvement in hemodynamic, respiratory, and renal indices in children with extremely low cardiac output after open heart surgery. Further controlled studies are needed to confirm the drug's safety and efficacy in this population.

Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine

BACKGROUND

The Institute of Medicine calls for the use of clinical guidelines and practice parameters to promote "best practices" and to improve patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

2007 update of the 2002 American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Guidelines for Hemodynamic Support of Neonates and Children with Septic Shock.

PARTICIPANTS

Society of Critical Care Medicine members with special interest in neonatal and pediatric septic shock were identified from general solicitation at the Society of Critical Care Medicine Educational and Scientific Symposia (2001-2006).

METHODS

The Pubmed/MEDLINE literature database (1966-2006) was searched using the keywords and phrases: sepsis, septicemia, septic shock, endotoxemia, persistent pulmonary hypertension, nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and American College of Critical Care Medicine guidelines. Best practice centers that reported best outcomes were identified and their practices examined as models of care. Using a modified Delphi method, 30 experts graded new literature. Over 30 additional experts then reviewed the updated recommendations. The document was subsequently modified until there was greater than 90% expert consensus.

RESULTS

The 2002 guidelines were widely disseminated, translated into Spanish and Portuguese, and incorporated into Society of Critical Care Medicine and AHA sanctioned recommendations. Centers that implemented the 2002 guidelines reported best practice outcomes (hospital mortality 1%-3% in previously healthy, and 7%-10% in chronically ill children). Early use of 2002 guidelines was associated with improved outcome in the community hospital emergency department (number needed to treat = 3.3) and tertiary pediatric intensive care setting (number needed to treat = 3.6); every hour that went by without guideline adherence was associated with a 1.4-fold increased mortality risk. The updated 2007 guidelines continue to recognize an increased likelihood that children with septic shock, compared with adults, require 1) proportionally larger quantities of fluid, 2) inotrope and vasodilator therapies, 3) hydrocortisone for absolute adrenal insufficiency, and 4) ECMO for refractory shock. The major new recommendation in the 2007 update is earlier use of inotrope support through peripheral access until central access is attained.

CONCLUSION

The 2007 update continues to emphasize early use of age-specific therapies to attain time-sensitive goals, specifically recommending 1) first hour fluid resuscitation and inotrope therapy directed to goals of threshold heart rates, normal blood pressure, and capillary refill 70% and cardiac index 3.3-6.0 L/min/m.

Recent advances in sepsis and septic shock

Sepsis remains a common problem in all age groups. Recently surviving sepsis campaign has taken up a worldwide initiative by publishing international guidelines 2008 with a hope to disseminate information regarding management of sepsis for all age groups. This article presents a review of recent advances as they apply to pediatric age group supported by the available evidence with reference to standard definitions of pediatric sepsis and septic shock and management in the emergency room and pediatric intensive care unit.

Vasopressin in pediatric shock and cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

To review the physiology and the published literature on the role of vasopressin in shock in children.

DATA SOURCE

We searched MEDLINE (1966-2007), EMBASE (1980-2007), and the Cochrane Library, using the terms vasopressin, terlipressin, and shock and synonyms or related terms for relevant studies in pediatrics. We searched the online ISRCTN-Current Controlled Trials registry for ongoing trials. We reviewed the reference lists of all identified studies and reviews as well as personal files to identify other published studies.

RESULTS

Beneficial effects have been reported in vasodilatory shock and asystolic cardiac arrest in adults. Solid evidence for vasopressin use in children is scant. Observational studies have reported an improvement in blood pressure and rapid weaning off catecholamines during administration of low-dose vasopressin. Dosing in children is extrapolated from adult studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasopressin offers promise in shock and cardiac arrest in children. However, in view of the limited experience with vasopressin, it should be used with caution. Results of a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in children with vasodilatory shock will be available soon.

Terlipressin as rescue treatment of refractory shock in a neonate

Patients with septic shock may develop refractory hypotension despite maximal inotropic support with impairment of clinical outcome. Terlipressin, a long-acting vasopressin analogue, is reported to be effective as rescue treatment of refractory septic shock in adult and paediatric patients, while clinical experience in neonates is definitely scarce. We report a neonate with systemic inflammatory response syndrome after surgery for abdominal neuroblastoma who received terlipressin as rescue treatment after failure of volume load and catecholamines. Terlipressin promptly reversed hypotension and improved tissue perfusion without adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Terlipressin appears an effective rescue treatment in patients with refractory vasodilatory septic shock. Further studies are required to assess its efficacy and safety in neonatal population.

Year in review 2006: Critical Care--Paediatrics

In 2006, paediatric intensive care-related subjects were discussed in a number of papers published in various journals, including Critical Care. Because they focused on the cardiovascular system and its support, we summarize them here. In particular, these papers highlighted the management of refractory septic shock, extracorporeal support, outcome markers in sepsis, and outcome after cardiac arrest.

Pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety of terlipressin in esophageal varices bleeding, septic shock and hepatorenal syndrome

Terlipressin, a vasopressin agonist, is a commonly used drug with different indications, particularly in patients with end-stage liver disease. As a V(1) receptor agonist, it increases systemic vascular resistance, particularly in the splanchnic area, resulting in a decrease of portal pressure. Besides the approved use for variceal bleeding, terlipressin also has beneficial effects in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome and norepinephrine-resistant septic shock. In patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding, the use of terlipressin reduces the portal vein pressure and decreases the pressure in esophageal varices. This can save lives when skilled endoscopists are not immediately available. Hepatorenal syndrome is associated with vasodilation in the mesenteric circulation with arterial underfilling and consecutive renal vasoconstriction. Restoration of an effective arterial blood volume can be achieved by the combination of terlipressin and volume expansion. In some cases, a success rate of up to 75% is reported. The early use of terlipressin in catecholamine-resistant shock can improve organ perfusion.

Comparison of terlipressin and noradrenalin on cerebral perfusion, intracranial pressure and cerebral extracellular concentrations of lactate and pyruvate in patients with acute liver failure in need of inotropic support

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Volume expansion and inotropic support with catecholamines are sometimes insufficient to ensure adequate blood pressure and cerebral perfusion in acute liver failure (ALF). The aim of this study was to determine if terlipressin increases cerebral perfusion, cerebral concentration of lactate and intracranial pressure (ICP), and to compare the effect with that of noradrenalin (NA).

METHODS

Ten patients (median age 42.5 yr; range 15-66; 5 women) who needed inotropic support and had an ICP and a cerebral microdialysis catheter placed had concomitant recording of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), cerebral perfusion (using transcranial Doppler sonography (V(mean))) and ICP. Also cerebral extracellular concentration of lactate ([lactate]ec) and pyruvate ([pyruvate]ec) was collected before and after an increase in the NA infusion rate and/or i.v.-injection of 1mg terlipressin.

RESULTS

Both NA and terlipressin increased CPP and V(mean) (p<0.01). Also ICP increased during NA infusion (p<0.01) but not after terlipressin. The cerebral [lactate]ec decreased after terlipressin injection from 2.34 (1.52-8.38) to 1.99 (0.03-4.83)mmol/l (p=0.027) but not during NA infusion (2.83 (1.53-7.11)mmol/l). The [lactate]ec to [pyruvate]ec ratio remained unchanged in both the NA group (20.7 (13.2-40.0)) and terlipressin group (22.2 (10.5-30.0)).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that terlipressin increases CPP and cerebral perfusion with little influence upon ICP and cerebral [lactate]ec in ALF patients. These findings indicate that terlipressin may be valuable, as an additive treatment to NA infusion to secure brain viability.

Methylprednisolone reverses vasopressin hyporesponsiveness in ovine endotoxemia

Tachyphylaxis against catecholamines often complicates hemodynamic support in patients with septic shock. Recent experimental and clinical research suggests that the hemodynamic response to exogenous arginine vasopressin (AVP) infusion may also be blunted. The purpose of the present study was therefore to clarify whether the efficacy of a continuous AVP infusion (0.04 U x min(-1)) decreases over time in ovine endotoxemia. An additional objective was to determine whether the anticipated hyporesponsiveness can be counteracted by corticosteroids. Fourteen adult ewes (37 +/- 1 kg) were instrumented for chronic hemodynamic monitoring. All ewes received a continuous endotoxin infusion that contributed to a hypotensive-hyperdynamic circulation. After 16 h of endotoxemia, the sheep were randomized to receive either AVP (0.04 U x min(-1)) or the vehicle (normal saline; n = 7 each). After 6 h of AVP or placebo infusion, respectively, methylprednisolone (30 mg x kg(-1)) was injected. Arginine vasopressin infusion increased mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance index at the expense of a reduced cardiac index (P < 0.05 each). Supraphysiologic AVP plasma levels in the treatment group (298 +/- 15 pg x mL(-1)) were associated with increased surrogate parameters of liver, mesenterial, and myocardial dysfunction. After 6 h of continuous AVP infusion, the vasopressor effect was significantly reduced. Interestingly, a bolus infusion of methylprednisolone (30 mg x kg(-1)) reestablished mean arterial pressure by increasing both cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance index. The present study demonstrates that in endotoxemia, (a) the vasopressor effect of AVP infusion may be reduced, (b) corticosteroids may potentially be useful to increase the efficacy of AVP infusion, and (c) even moderate AVP doses may potentially impair myocardial and hepatic function.

Beneficial effects of terlipressin in prolonged pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a case series

OBJECTIVE

Arginine vasopressin was found in experimental and clinical studies to have a beneficial effect in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The American Heart Association 2000 guidelines recommended its use for adult ventricular fibrillation arrest, and the American Heart Association 2005 guidelines noted that it may replace the first or second epinephrine dose. There is little reported experience with arginine vasopressin in cardiopulmonary resuscitation of children. Terlipressin, a long-acting analog of arginine vasopressin, has recently emerged as a treatment for vasodilatory shock in both adults and in children, but evidence of its effectiveness in the pediatric setting is sparse. The objective of this retrospective study is to describe our experience in adding terlipressin to the conventional protocol in children with cardiac arrest.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series study.

SETTING

An 18-bed pediatric critical care department at a university-affiliated tertiary care children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Seven pediatric patients with asystole, aged 2 months to 5 yrs, who experienced eight episodes of refractory cardiac arrest and did not respond to conventional therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

Addition of terlipressin to epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of children.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Return of spontaneous circulation was monitored and achieved in six out of eight episodes of cardiac arrest. One patient died 12 hrs after return of spontaneous circulation, and four patients survived to discharge with no neurologic sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of terlipressin to epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may have a beneficial effect in children with cardiac arrest. More studies on this drug's safety and efficacy in this setting are mandated.

Diagnosis and management of meningococcal disease: the need for centralized care

Meningococcal infection remains a significant health problem in children, with a significant mortality and morbidity. Prompt recognition and aggressive early treatment are the only effective measures against invasive disease. This requires immediate administration of antibiotic therapy, and the recognition and treatment of patients who may have complications of meningococcal infection such as shock, raised intracranial pressure (ICP) or both. Encouragingly, its mortality has fallen in recent years. This is the result of several factors such as the centralization of care of seriously ill children in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), the establishment of specialized mobile intensive care teams, the development of protocols for the treatment of meningococcal infection, and the dissemination by national bodies and charities of guidance about early recognition and management. We will review the pathophysiology and management of the different presentations of meningococcal disease and examine the possible role of adjunctive therapies.

Rescue therapy in septic shock--is terlipressin the last frontier?

Use of terlipressin, an analogue of vasopressin, can be considered in septic shock patients with intractable hypotension and high cardiac output in whom fluid resuscitation and high-dose conventional catecholamines have failed. The effects of this agent on organ function are poorly evaluated in humans. The limited number of patients evaluated precludes any analysis of adverse outcomes and prognosis.

Vasopressin in catecholamine-resistant septic and cardiogenic shock in very-low-birthweight infants

AIM

To evaluate vasopressin as a rescue therapy in catecholamine-refractory septic and cardiogenic shock in very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants.

METHODS

Prospective assessment of vasopressin therapy in three VLBW infants with catecholamine-refractory septic shock (24 + 6 wk, 600 g) and cardiogenic shock (26 + 1 wk, 890 g; 26 + 1 wk, 880 g) at a university hospital.

RESULTS

Adequate systemic arterial blood pressure could only be restored after vasopressin administration as a continuous infusion over a 36-h period in the preterm suffering from septic shock; in the two neonates with cardiogenic shock, only a transient stabilization in mean arterial pressure was observed, which did not impact on the poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Although vasopressin appears to be a suitable rescue therapy in catecholamine-resistant septic shock in VLBW infants, further evaluation in controlled clinical trials is warranted.

Arginine-vasopressin in catecholamine-refractory septic versus non-septic shock in extremely low birth weight infants with acute renal injury

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) as a rescue therapy in catecholamine-refractory septic and non-septic shock in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants with acute renal injury.

Methods

Prospective assessment of AVP therapy in three ELBW infants with catecholamine-refractory septic shock and acute renal injury (mean birth weight 600 ± 30 g) and three ELBW infants with non-septic shock and acute renal injury (mean birth weight 770 ± 110 g) at a University hospital. The main outcome measures were restoration of blood pressure with adequate organ perfusion and survival at discharge.

Results

In all three ELBW infants with catecholamine-resistant septic shock, systemic arterial blood pressure increased substantively with restoration of urine output after AVP administration (dosage, 0.035 to 0.36 U/kg/h; length, 70 ± 21 hours). In the three ELBW infants with non-septic shock, only a transient stabilization in mean arterial pressure with restoration of urine output was observed after AVP therapy (dosage, 0.01 to 0.36 U/kg/h; length, 30 ± 16 hours). The mortality rate was 1/3 in the sepsis group versus 3/3 in the non-septic group.

Conclusion

AVP may be a promising rescue therapy in catecholamine-resistant shock in ELBW infants with acute renal injury. Larger prospective clinical trials are warranted to assess the efficacy and safety of AVP as a pressor adjunct in septic versus non-septic shock in ELBW infants.

Serial circulating vasopressin levels in children with septic shock

BACKGROUND

Septic shock is an important cause of death in pediatric intensive care units. Initial evaluations have shown that vasopressin may have a role in catecholamine refractory shock in adults. It is important to determine whether children with septic shock have deficiency of vasopressin. This will help in defining the role of vasopressin in septic shock.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in north India.

PATIENTS

Patients were children with septic shock, and controls were children with sepsis but no shock.

STUDY DESIGN

Vasopressin levels in plasma were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for children with septic shock at diagnosis (baseline) and thereafter at 24, 48, and 96 hrs to determine the time trends. The baseline vasopressin values for children with septic shock were compared with those for children without shock.

RESULTS

The median (95% confidence interval) vasopressin level at baseline in children with septic shock was 116 (63.3-130.7) pg/mL, and in children with sepsis but no shock it was 106 (61.7-131.77) pg/mL. The median value for survivors was 76 (44.6-130.9) pg/mL, and for nonsurvivors, 118 (81.7-259) pg/mL (p = .16). The serial values also did not show any significant changes; the values at 24 hrs (n = 17), 48 hrs (n = 16), and 96 hrs (n = 15) were 105 (76.1-125.9), 105 (41.4-155.5), and 109.5 (54.9-154.8) pg/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study suggest that vasopressin levels are elevated in children with septic shock and that serial values up to 96 hrs do not show any decline.

Rescue treatment with terlipressin in children with refractory septic shock: a clinical study

INTRODUCTION

Refractory septic shock has dismal prognosis despite aggressive therapy. The purpose of the present study is to report the effects of terlipressin (TP) as a rescue treatment in children with catecholamine refractory hypotensive septic shock.

METHODS

We prospectively registered the children with severe septic shock and hypotension resistant to standard intensive care, including a high dose of catecholamines, who received compassionate therapy with TP in nine pediatric intensive care units in Spain, over a 12-month period. The TP dose was 0.02 mg/kg every four hours.

RESULTS

Sixteen children (age range, 1 month-13 years) were included. The cause of sepsis was meningococcal in eight cases, Staphylococcus aureus in two cases, and unknown in six cases. At inclusion the median (range) Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score was 23.5 (12-52) and the median (range) Pediatric Risk of Mortality score was 24.5 (16-43). All children had been treated with a combination of at least two catecholamines at high dose rates. TP treatment induced a rapid and sustained improvement in the mean arterial blood pressure that allowed reduction of the catecholamine infusion rate after one hour in 14 out of 16 patients. The mean (range) arterial blood pressure 30 minutes after TP administration increased from 50.5 (37-93) to 77 (42-100) mmHg (P < 0.05). The noradrenaline infusion rate 24 hours after TP treatment decreased from 2 (1-4) to 1 (0-2.5) microg/kg/min (P < 0.05). Seven patients survived to the sepsis episode. The causes of death were refractory shock in three cases, withdrawal of therapy in two cases, refractory arrhythmia in three cases, and multiorgan failure in one case. Four of the survivors had sequelae: major amputations (lower limbs and hands) in one case, minor amputations (finger) in two cases, and minor neurological deficit in one case.

CONCLUSION

TP is an effective vasopressor agent that could be an alternative or complementary therapy in children with refractory vasodilatory septic shock. The addition of TP to high doses of catecholamines, however, can induce excessive vasoconstriction. Additional studies are needed to define the safety profile and the clinical effectiveness of TP in children with septic shock.

Vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Vasoactive drugs are the mainstay of hemodynamic management of vasodilatory shock when fluids fail to restore tissue perfusion. In this review, studies published during the past year that increase our understanding of the use of vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

In septic shock, there is no benefit in increasing mean arterial pressure from 65 to 85 mmHg. Norepinephrine did not worsen renal function. Epinephrine induced visceral hypoperfusion and hyperlactatemia, and worsened organ function and survival compared with norepinephrine and vasopressin. There are a number of reports of the safety and efficacy of vasopressin but it is not currently recommended as first line therapy, and if used, should be given as a continuous low dose infusion. Terlipressin is showing promise but decreases cardiac output. Metaraminol is being investigated as an alternative to norepinephrine. Dopamine may improve splanchnic flow mainly by increasing cardiac output. Dobutamine improves oxygen delivery and may improve mesenteric blood flow.

SUMMARY

Over the last 40 years, there have been few controlled clinical trials to guide clinicians on the use of vasoactive drugs of treating shock states. It is not known whether the currently favored combination of norepinephrine and dobutamine is superior to traditional therapy with dopamine. Epinephrine is not recommended as the first-line therapy. The role of vasopressin and terlipressin remains unknown. Three large ongoing clinical trials will be completed soon and the results should clarify the role of these various agents.