1
|
Dimou FM, Velanovich V. Dynamics of hiatal hernia recurrence: how important is a composite crural repair? Hernia 2024; 28:1571-1576. [PMID: 39207551 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03136-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hiatal hernia recurrence rates vary widely. The true causes of recurrences are not fully understood but likely multifactorial. Surgical approaches and techniques have evolved over time to try and reduce recurrence rates after hiatal hernia repair. Our objective is to provide a current review on the physiology of hiatal hernias and the importance of a composite crural repair on hiatal hernia recurrence rates; more specifically, for this review, a composite repair is defined as a repair requiring more than primary closure of the crura. METHODS A recent review of the literature was conducted to identify studies reporting on hiatal hernia pathophysiology, stress, and tension, as well as the role of composite repair. RESULTS There is a paucity of studies focusing on the pathophysiology of hiatal hernias and recurrence rates. Articles that report on the pathophysiology of the hiatus were found to have alterations of the extracellular matrix, collagen composition, changes in metalloproteinases (MMPs), and differences in genetic composition. The role of composite repair on reducing recurrence rates is not well studied. CONCLUSIONS Hiatal hernias remain a complex problem with no ideal surgical technique. It is likely that the pathophysiology of hiatal hernias is multifactorial, and more studies need to be done to better understand the potential underlying mechanisms for hiatal hernias so this may also further identify the ideal surgical repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca M Dimou
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 5 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.
| | - Vic Velanovich
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 5 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palenzuela D, Paudel M, Petrusa E, Maltby A, Andrus S, Paranjape C. Patients report significant improvement in quality of life following hiatal hernia repair-despite recurrence. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:6001-6007. [PMID: 39085667 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11106-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hiatal hernia (HH) repairs have been associated with high recurrence rates. This study aimed to investigate if changes in patient's self-reported GERD health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores over time are associated with long-term surgical outcomes. METHODS Retrospective chart reviews were conducted on all patients who had laparoscopic or robotic HH repairs between 2018 and 2022 at a tertiary care center. Information was collected regarding initial BMI, endoscopic HH measurement, surgery, and pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Repeat imaging at least a year following surgical repair was then evaluated for any evidence of recurrence. Paired t tests were used to compare pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Wilcoxon ranked-sum tests were used to compare the HRQL scores between the recurrence cohort and non-recurrence cohorts at different time points. RESULTS A total of 126 patients underwent HH repairs and had pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Mesh was used in 23 repairs (18.25%). 42 patients had recorded HH recurrences (33.3%), 35 had no evidence of recurrence (27.7%), and 49 patients (38.9%) had no follow-up imaging. The average pre-operative QOL score was 24.99 (SD ± 14.95) and significantly improved to 5.63 (SD ± 8.51) at 2-week post-op (p < 0.0001). That improvement was sustained at 1-year post-op (mean 7.86, SD ± 8.26, p < 0.0001). The average time between the initial operation and recurrence was 2.1 years (SD ± 1.10). Recurrence was significantly less likely with mesh repairs (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in QOL scores at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, or 1 year postoperatively between the cohorts (p = NS). CONCLUSION Patients had significant long-term improvement in their HRQL scores after surgical HH repair despite recurrences. The need to re-intervene in patients with HH recurrence should be based on their QOL scores and not necessarily based on established recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna Palenzuela
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- , 22 Trenton St. Apt 1, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
| | - Manasvi Paudel
- Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Charudutt Paranjape
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salehi N, Marshall T, Christianson B, Al Asadi H, Najah H, Lee-Saxton YJ, Tumati A, Safe P, Gavlin A, Chatterji M, Finnerty BM, Fahey TJ, Zarnegar R. Comparative anatomic and symptomatic recurrence outcomes of diaphragmatic suture cruroplasty versus biosynthetic mesh reinforcement in robotic hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-11257-0. [PMID: 39271508 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11257-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hiatal and paraesophageal hernia (HH/PEH) recurrence is the most common cause of failure after gastroesophageal anti-reflux surgery. Crural reinforcement with mesh has been suggested to address this issue, but its efficacy remains debated. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of biosynthetic mesh reinforcement compared to suture cruroplasty on anatomic and symptomatic hernia recurrence. METHOD Data of patients who underwent robotic HH/PEH repair with suture cruroplasty with or without biosynthetic mesh reinforcement between January 2012 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and anatomic hernia recurrence were assessed at short-term (3 months to 1 year) and longer-term (≥ 1 year) follow-up. Symptomatic hernia recurrence was defined as having both anatomic recurrence and symptoms. RESULTS Out of the 503 patients in the study, 308 had undergone biosynthetic mesh repair, while 195 had suture-only repair. After the surgery, both groups demonstrated comparable improvements in symptoms. Short-term anatomic hernia recurrence rates were 11.8% and 15.6% for mesh and suture groups, respectively (p = 0.609), while longer-term rates were 24.7% and 44.9% (p = 0.015). The rates of symptomatic hernia recurrence in the same group were 8.8% and 14.6% in the short-term (p = 0.256), and 17.2% and 42.2% in longer-term follow-ups (p = 0.003). In the repair of medium and large-size hernias, mesh reinforcement resulted in a 50.0% relative risk reduction in anatomic hernia recurrences and a 59.2% reduction in symptomatic hernia recurrences at ≥ 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION After more than a year of follow-up, it has been found that using biosynthetic mesh for medium and large hiatal or paraesophageal hernia repair significantly reduces the likelihood of both anatomic and symptomatic recurrence compared to using only suture cruroplasty. These findings strongly support the use of biosynthetic mesh to manage larger hernias. However, further long-term multicenter randomized studies are needed to provide more conclusive evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niloufar Salehi
- Division of Endocrine & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Teagan Marshall
- Division of Endocrine & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Blake Christianson
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hala Al Asadi
- Division of Endocrine & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haythem Najah
- Division of Endocrine & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yeon Joo Lee-Saxton
- Division of Endocrine & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Abhinay Tumati
- Division of Endocrine & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parima Safe
- Division of Endocrine & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Gavlin
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Manjil Chatterji
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brendan M Finnerty
- Division of Endocrine & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas J Fahey
- Division of Endocrine & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rasa Zarnegar
- Division of Endocrine & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Daly S, Kumar SS, Collings AT, Hanna NM, Pandya YK, Kurtz J, Kooragayala K, Barber MW, Paranyak M, Kurian M, Chiu J, Ansari MT, Slater BJ, Kohn GP. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:4765-4775. [PMID: 39080063 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11092-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hiatal hernia (HH) is a common condition. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions regarding the treatment of HH. METHODS Systematic reviews were conducted for four key questions regarding the treatment of HH in adults: surgical treatment of asymptomatic HH versus surveillance; use of mesh versus no mesh; performing a fundoplication versus no fundoplication; and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus redo fundoplication for recurrent HH. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology by subject experts. When the evidence was insufficient to base recommendations on, expert opinion was utilized instead. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS The panel provided one conditional recommendation and two expert opinions for adults with HH. The panel suggested routinely performing a fundoplication in the repair of HH, though this was based on low certainty evidence. There was insufficient evidence to make evidence-based recommendations regarding surgical repair of asymptomatic HH or conversion to RYGB in recurrent HH, and therefore, only expert opinions were offered. The panel suggested that select asymptomatic patients may be offered surgical repair, with criteria outlined. Similarly, it suggested that conversion to RYGB for management of recurrent HH may be appropriate in certain patients and again described criteria. The evidence for the routine use of mesh in HH repair was equivocal and the panel deferred making a recommendation. CONCLUSIONS These recommendations should provide guidance regarding surgical decision-making in the treatment of HH and highlight the importance of shared decision-making and consideration of patient values to optimize outcomes. Pursuing the identified research needs will improve the evidence base and may allow for stronger recommendations in future evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of HH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Daly
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
| | - Sunjay S Kumar
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amelia T Collings
- Department of Surgery, Hiram C. Polk, Jr., University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Nader M Hanna
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Yagnik K Pandya
- Department of Surgery, MetroWest Medical Center, Framingham, MA, USA
| | - James Kurtz
- Department of Surgery, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Meghan W Barber
- Department of Surgery, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Mykola Paranyak
- Department of General Surgery, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv Oblast, Ukraine
| | - Marina Kurian
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Chiu
- Department of Surgery, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Mohammed T Ansari
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Geoffrey P Kohn
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yokouchi T, Nakajima K, Takahashi T, Yamashita K, Saito T, Tanaka K, Yamamoto K, Makino T, Kurokawa Y, Eguchi H, Doki Y. The role of anterior gastropexy in elderly Japanese hiatal hernia patients. Surg Today 2024; 54:1051-1057. [PMID: 38514475 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02809-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE As Japanese society ages, the number of surgeries performed in elderly patients with hiatal hernia (HH) is increasing. In this study, we examined the feasibility, safety, and potential effectiveness of the addition of anterior gastropexy to hiatoplasty with or without mesh repair and/or fundoplication in elderly Japanese HH patients. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 39 patients who underwent laparoscopic HH repair between 2010 and 2021. We divided them into 2 groups according to age: the "younger" group (< 75 years old, n = 21), and the "older" group (≥ 75 years old, n = 18). The patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative results were collected. RESULTS The median ages were 68 and 82 years old in the younger and older groups, respectively, and the female ratio was similar between the groups (younger vs. older: 67% vs. 78%, p = 0.44). The older group had more type III/IV HH cases than the younger group (19% vs. 83%, p < 0.001). The operation time was longer in the older group than in the younger group, but there was no significant difference in blood loss, perioperative complications, or postoperative length of stay between the groups. The older group had significantly more cases of anterior gastropexy (0% vs. 78%, p < 0.001) and less fundoplication (100% vs. 67%, p = 0.004) than the younger group. There was no significant difference in HH recurrence between the groups (5% vs. 11%, p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS The addition of anterior gastropexy to other procedures is feasible, safe, and potentially effective in elderly Japanese patients with HH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Yokouchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Next Generation Endoscopic Intervention (Project ENGINE), Center of Medical Innovation and Translational Research, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyokazu Nakajima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
- Department of Next Generation Endoscopic Intervention (Project ENGINE), Center of Medical Innovation and Translational Research, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Tsuyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kotaro Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuro Saito
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuyoshi Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoki Makino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hanna NM, Kumar SS, Collings AT, Pandya YK, Kurtz J, Kooragayala K, Barber MW, Paranyak M, Kurian M, Chiu J, Abou-Setta A, Ansari MT, Slater BJ, Kohn GP, Daly S. Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2917-2938. [PMID: 38630179 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10816-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical management of hiatal hernia remains controversial. We aimed to compare outcomes of mesh versus no mesh and fundoplication versus no fundoplication in symptomatic patients; surgery versus observation in asymptomatic patients; and redo hernia repair versus conversion to Roux-en-Y reconstruction in recurrent hiatal hernia. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases between 2000 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and case series (asymptomatic and recurrent hernias). Screening was performed by two trained independent reviewers. Pooled analyses were performed on comparative data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively. RESULTS We included 45 studies from 5152 retrieved records. Only six RCTs had low risk of bias. Mesh was associated with a lower recurrence risk (RR = 0.50, 95%CI 0.28, 0.88; I2 = 57%) in observational studies but not RCTs (RR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.47, 2.02; I2 = 34%), and higher total early dysphagia based on five observational studies (RR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.10, 1.89; I2 = 40%) but was not statistically significant in RCTs (RR = 3.00, 95%CI 0.64, 14.16). There was no difference in complications, reintervention, heartburn, reflux, or quality of life. There were no appropriate studies comparing surgery to observation in asymptomatic patients. Fundoplication resulted in higher early dysphagia in both observational studies and RCTs ([RR = 2.08, 95%CI 1.16, 3.76] and [RR = 20.58, 95%CI 1.34, 316.69]) but lower reflux in RCTs (RR = 0.31, 95%CI 0.17, 0.56, I2 = 0%). Conversion to Roux-en-Y was associated with a lower reintervention risk after 30 days compared to redo surgery. CONCLUSIONS The evidence for optimal management of symptomatic and recurrent hiatal hernia remains controversial, underpinned by studies with a high risk of bias. Shared decision making between surgeon and patient is essential for optimal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nader M Hanna
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada.
| | - Sunjay S Kumar
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amelia T Collings
- Hiram C. Polk, Jr Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Yagnik K Pandya
- Department of Surgery, MetroWest Medical Center, Framingham, MA, USA
| | - James Kurtz
- Department of Surgery, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Meghan W Barber
- Department of Surgery, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Mykola Paranyak
- Department of General Surgery, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Marina Kurian
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Ahmed Abou-Setta
- Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | | | - Geoffrey P Kohn
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne Upper GI Surgical Group, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shaun Daly
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Latorre-Rodríguez AR, Rajan A, Mittal SK. Cruroplasty with or without mesh? A systematic literature review with a novel time-organized proportion meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1685-1708. [PMID: 38351425 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10683-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved outcomes with the use of non-absorbable mesh (NAM) for inguinal hernia repairs led to its rapid adoption for hiatal hernia (HH) repairs; however, feared complications occurred, and the trend shifted toward using absorbable mesh (AM). We aimed to analyze the literature assessing objective HH recurrence rates after primary laparoscopic cruroplasty with or without the use of different mesh types. METHODS A systematic literature review with both pairwise and time-organized proportion meta-analyses of articles published between January 1993 and September 2022 was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Taylor & Francis databases to identify relevant studies comparing groups undergoing cruroplasty with suture repair (SR) alone, AM, NAM, or partially absorbable mesh (PAM). Studies documenting an objective follow-up ≥ 6 months were included. The primary outcome was the HH recurrence rate confirmed by barium esophagram or upper GI endoscopy. RESULTS A total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 6 randomized clinical trials, 25 retrospectives studies, and 3 prospective cohort studies. A total of 2170 subjects underwent laparoscopic HH repair and completed an objective follow-up ≥ 6 months after surgery; the objective recurrence rate was 20.8% (99/477) at a mean follow-up of 25.8 ± 16.4 months for the SR group, 20.6% (244/1187) at 28.1 ± 13.8 months for the AM group, 13.7% (65/475) at 30.8 ± 15.3 months for the NAM group, and 0% (0/31) at 32.5 ± 13.5 months for the PAM group. However, the pairwise meta-analysis revealed that overall mesh use was not superior to SR in preventing long-term HH recurrence. CONCLUSION The use of AM does not appear to reduce HH recurrence compared to SR alone. Although the data favors NAM to decrease objective HH recurrence in the mid-term, the long-term (≥ 48 months) recurrence rate was similar with or without any type of mesh.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés R Latorre-Rodríguez
- Norton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 500 W Thomas Road, Suite 500, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA
- Universidad del Rosario. Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Grupo de Investigación Clínica, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | - Ajay Rajan
- School of Medicine School, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sumeet K Mittal
- Norton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 500 W Thomas Road, Suite 500, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
- School of Medicine School, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fair L, Ward M, Adhikari P, Tran D, Pina E, Ramakrishnan S, Ogola G, Aladegbami B, Leeds S. Coated poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Phasix ST™) mesh is safe and effective for hiatal hernia repair: our institutional experience and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:830-836. [PMID: 38082013 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10604-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) is a bioabsorbable mesh with a non-adhesive coating on one side that is being used to reinforce the hiatus during hiatal hernia repair; however, there is limited data regarding its use. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes after hiatal hernia repair using this mesh at our institution and through a review of the literature. METHODS An institutional review board-approved prospective database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair from April 2018 to December 2022. A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate outcomes using P4HB coated mesh. RESULTS In our institutional cohort, there were 230 patients (59 males; 171 females) with a mean follow-up of 20 ± 14.6 months. No mesh-related complications occurred. Hernia recurrence was diagnosed in 11 patients (4.8%) with a median time to recurrence of 16 months. In the systematic review, 4 studies with 221 patients (76 males; 145 females) were included. Median follow-up ranged from 12 to 27 months. Recurrence rate in these studies was reported from 0 to 8.8%, with a total of 12 recurrences identified. Like our institutional cohort, no mesh-related complications were reported. After our recurrences were combined with those from the systematic review, a total of 23 recurrences were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed a low recurrence rate following hiatal hernia repair with P4HB coated mesh (incidence rate per 100 person-years, 2.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.60, 4.04). CONCLUSION P4HB coated mesh is safe and effective for hiatal hernia repairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Fair
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA
- Research Institute, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Marc Ward
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA
- Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA
| | | | - Daniel Tran
- Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA
| | - Emerald Pina
- Research Institute, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Sudha Ramakrishnan
- Baylor Health Sciences Library, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Gerald Ogola
- Research Institute, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Bola Aladegbami
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA
- Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA
| | - Steven Leeds
- Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA.
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, 3417 Gaston Avenue, Suite 965, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Analatos A, Håkanson BS, Ansorge C, Lindblad M, Lundell L, Thorell A. Hiatal Hernia Repair With Tension-Free Mesh or Crural Sutures Alone in Antireflux Surgery: A 13-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:11-18. [PMID: 37819652 PMCID: PMC10568445 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Importance Antireflux surgery is an effective treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but the durability of concomitant hiatal hernia repair remains challenging. Previous research reported that the use of a mesh-reinforced, tension-free technique was associated with more dysphagia for solid foods after 3 years without reducing hiatal hernia recurrence rates compared with crural sutures alone, but the long-term effects of this technique have not been assessed. Objective To assess the long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of using a mesh for hiatal hernia repair in patients with GERD. Design, Setting, and Participants A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed at a single center (Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden) from January 11, 2006, to December 1, 2010. A total of 159 patients were recruited and randomly assigned. Data for the current analysis were collected from September 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. All analyses were conducted with the intention-to-treat population. Interventions Closure of the diaphragmatic hiatus with crural sutures alone vs a tension-free technique using a nonabsorbable polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (Bard CruraSoft). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was radiologically verified recurrent hiatal hernia after more than 10 years. Secondary outcomes were dysphagia scores (ranging from 1 to 4, with 1 indicating no episodes of dysphagia and 4 indicating more than 3 episodes of dysphagia per day) for solid and liquid foods, generic 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and disease-specific Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale symptom assessment scores, proton pump inhibitor consumption, and reoperation rates. Intergroup comparisons of parametric data were performed using t tests; for nonparametric data, Mann-Whitney U, χ2, or Fisher exact tests were used. For intragroup comparisons vs the baseline at follow-up times, the Friedman test was used, and post hoc analysis was performed using Wilcoxon matched pairs. Results Of 145 available patients, follow-up data were obtained from 103 (response rate 71%; mean [SD] age at follow-up, 65 [11.3] years; 55 [53%] female), with 53 initially randomly assigned to mesh reinforcement, and 50 to crural suture alone. The mean (SD) follow-up time was 13 (1.1) years. The verified radiologic hiatal hernia recurrence rates were 11 of 29 (38%) in the mesh group vs 11 of 35 (31%) in the suture group (P = .61). However, 13 years postoperatively, mean (SD) dysphagia scores for solids remained significantly higher in the mesh group (mean [SD], 1.9 [0.7] vs 1.6 [0.9]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance Findings from this long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial suggest that tension-free crural repair with nonabsorbable mesh does not reduce the incidence of hiatal hernia recurrence 13 years postoperatively. This finding combined with maintained higher dysphagia scores does not support the routine use of tension-free polytetrafluoroethylene mesh closure in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair for treatment of GERD. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05069493.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolos Analatos
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Nyköping Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden
- Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Bengt S. Håkanson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christoph Ansorge
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Nyköping Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden
| | - Mats Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Thorell
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Markar SR, Menon N, Guidozzi N, Kontouli KM, Mavridis D, Andreou A, Berlth F, Bonavina L, Cushieri A, Fourie L, Gossage J, Gronnier C, Hazebroek EJ, Krishnadath S, Low DE, McCord M, Pouw RE, Watson DI, Carrano FM, Ortenzi M, Antoniou SA. EAES Multidisciplinary Rapid Guideline: systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed recommendations on the surgical management of paraesophageal hernias. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9013-9029. [PMID: 37910246 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10511-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New evidence has emerged since latest guidelines on the management of paraesophageal hernia, and guideline development methodology has evolved. Members of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery have prioritized the management of paraesophageal hernia to be addressed by pertinent recommendations. OBJECTIVE To develop evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations on paraesophageal hernias, through evidence synthesis and a structured evidence-to-decision framework by an interdisciplinary panel of stakeholders. METHODS We performed three systematic reviews, and we summarized and appraised the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE methodology. A panel of general and upper gastrointestinal surgeons, gastroenterologists and a patient advocate discussed the evidence in the context of benefits and harms, the certainty of the evidence, acceptability, feasibility, equity, cost and use of resources, moderated by a Guidelines International Network-certified master guideline developer and chair. We developed the recommendations in a consensus meeting, followed by a modified Delphi survey. RESULTS The panel suggests surgery over conservative management for asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernias (conditional recommendation), and recommends conservative management over surgery for asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernias in frail patients (strong recommendation). Further, the panel suggests mesh over sutures for hiatal closure in paraesophageal hernia repair, fundoplication over gastropexy in elective paraesophageal hernia repair, and gastropexy over fundoplication in patients who have cardiopulmonary instability and require emergency paraesophageal hernia repair (conditional recommendation). A strong recommendation means that the proposed course of action is appropriate for the vast majority of patients. A conditional recommendation means that most patients would opt for the proposed course of action, and joint decision-making of the surgeon and the patient is required. Accompanying evidence summaries and evidence-to-decision frameworks should be read when using the recommendations. This guideline applies to adult patients with moderate to large paraesophageal hernias type II to IV with at least 50% of the stomach herniated to the thoracic cavity. The full guideline with user-friendly decision aids is available in https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/j7q7Gn . CONCLUSION An interdisciplinary panel provides recommendations on key topics on the management of paraesophageal hernias using highest methodological standards and following a transparent process. GUIDELINE REGISTRATION NUMBER PREPARE-2023CN018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz R Markar
- Department of General Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nainika Menon
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nadia Guidozzi
- Department of General Surgery, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Katerina-Maria Kontouli
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Mavridis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Alexandros Andreou
- Department of Surgery, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Felix Berlth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfred Cushieri
- Institute for Medical Science and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Lana Fourie
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - James Gossage
- Department of General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline Gronnier
- Esophagogastric Surgery Unit, Haut Lévêque Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Eric J Hazebroek
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Sheila Krishnadath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Donald E Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle, Seattle, USA
| | | | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David I Watson
- Flinders Medical Centre, Oesophagogastric Surgery Unit, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Francesco Maria Carrano
- Department of General Surgery, Busto Arsizio Circolo Hospital ASST-Valle Olona, Busto Arsizio, Italy
| | - Monica Ortenzi
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Stavros A Antoniou
- Department of Surgery, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloníki, Greece.
- EAES Guidelines Subcommittee, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
El-Magd ESA, Elgeidie A, Elmahdy Y, El Sorogy M, Elyamany MA, Abulazm IL, Abbas A. Impact of laparoscopic repair on type III/IV giant paraesophageal hernias: a single-center experience. Hernia 2023; 27:1555-1570. [PMID: 37642773 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02851-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Giant paraesophageal hernia (GPEH) is a challenging problem for surgeons because of its high recurrence rate. This study was conducted to compare the outcomes in type IV vs. type III GPEHs after laparoscopic repair. Other outcomes included peri-operative morbidity and long-term quality of life. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 130 GPEH patients in a period between 2010 and 2019 underwent a tailored laparoscopic repair in our tertiary center with a minimum follow-up of 48 months. Operative steps included hernial sac excision, crural repair, relaxing incisions, and mesh cruroplasty with special indications. RESULTS The study enrolled 90 patients with type III and 40 patients with type IV GPEH. Type IV GPEH patients were older, more fragile, and scored worse on ASA classification, aside from having a more challenging surgical technique (wider crura, weaker muscles, increased need for release incisions, and mesh cruroplasty).Type IV GPEHs had a prolonged operative durations, and a higher conversion rate. Additionally, the same group showed increased morbidity, mortality, and re-operation rates. With a mean follow-up of 65 months (range 48-150 months), the incidence of recurrence was 20.7%, with an increased incidence in type IV GPEH (37.5% vs. 13.33% in type III GPEH). Type IV GPEH, low pre-operative albumin, larger crural defect, and low surgeon experience were significant risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of GPEH. CONCLUSION Type IV GPEH has a higher peri-operative morbidity and recurrence rate; so, a more tailored laparoscopic repair with a high surgeon experience is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E-S A El-Magd
- Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Surgical Center GISC, Mansoura University, Gehan Street, Mansoura, 35511, Al Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt.
| | - A Elgeidie
- Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Y Elmahdy
- Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - M El Sorogy
- Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - M A Elyamany
- Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - I L Abulazm
- Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - A Abbas
- Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsoposidis A, Thorell A, Axelsson H, Reuterwall Hansson M, Lundell L, Wallenius V, Kostic S, Håkanson B. The value of "diaphragmatic relaxing incision" for the durability of the crural repair in patients with paraesophageal hernia: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Front Surg 2023; 10:1265370. [PMID: 38026477 PMCID: PMC10667682 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1265370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical repair of paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) is burdened with high recurrence rates, and hitherto various techniques explored to enforce the traditional crural repair have not been successful. The hiatal reconstruction in PEH is exposed to significant tension, which may be minimized by adding a diaphragmatic relaxing incision to enhance the durability of the crural repair. Patients and methods All individuals undergoing elective laparoscopic repair of a large PEH, irrespective of age, were considered eligible. PEHs were classified into types II-IV. The preoperative work-up program included multidetector computed tomography and symptom assessment questionnaires, which will be repeated during the postoperative follow-up. Patients were randomly divided into a control group with crural repair alone and an intervention group with the addition of a left-sided diaphragmatic relaxing incision at the edge of the upper pole of the spleen. The diaphragmatic defect was then covered by a synthetic mesh. Results The primary endpoint of this trial was the rate of anatomical PEH recurrence at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease, dysphagia, odynophagia, gas bloat, regurgitation, chest pain, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, postprandial pain, cardiovascular and pulmonary symptoms, and patient satisfaction in the immediate postoperative course (3 months) and at 1 year. Postoperative complications, morbidity, and disease burden were recorded for each patient. This was a double-blind study, meaning that the operation report was filed in a locked archive to keep the patient, staff, and clinical assessors blinded to the study group allocation. Blinding must not be broken during the follow-up unless required by any emergencies in the clinical management of the patient. Likewise, the patients must not be informed about the details of the operation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identification number NCT04179578.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Tsoposidis
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - A. Thorell
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H. Axelsson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M. Reuterwall Hansson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L. Lundell
- Division of Surgery and Oncology CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - V. Wallenius
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - S. Kostic
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - B. Håkanson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lima DL, de Figueiredo SMP, Pereira X, Murillo FR, Sreeramoju P, Malcher F, Damani T. Hiatal hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement: a qualitative systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7425-7436. [PMID: 37721592 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10379-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reinforcement of crural closure with synthetic resorbable mesh has been proposed to decrease recurrence rates after hiatal hernia repair, but continues to be controversial. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and intermediate-term results of using biosynthetic mesh to augment the hiatus. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed throughout this systematic review. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions and Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials tools were used to perform qualitative assessment of all studies included in this review. Recommendations were then summarized for the following pre-defined key items: protocol, research question, search strategy, study eligibility, data extraction, study design, risk of bias, publication bias, and statistical analysis. RESULTS The systematic literature search found 520 articles, 101 of which were duplicates and 355 articles were determined to be unrelated to our study and excluded. The full text of the remaining 64 articles was thoroughly assessed. A total of 18 articles (1846 patients) were ultimately included for this review, describing hiatal hernia repair using three different biosynthetic meshes-BIO-A, Phasix ST, and polyglactin mesh. Mean operative time varied from 127 to 223 min. Mean follow up varied from 12 to 54 months. There were no mesh erosions or explants. One mesh-related complication of stenosis requiring reoperation was reported with BIO-A. Studies showed significant improvement in symptom and quality-of-life scores, as well as satisfaction with surgery. Recurrence was reported as radiologic or clinical recurrence. Overall, recurrence rate varied from 0.9 to 25%. CONCLUSION The use of biosynthetic mesh is safe and effective for hiatal hernia repair with low complications rates and high symptom resolution. The reported recurrence rates are highly variable due to significant heterogeneity in defining and evaluating recurrences. Further randomized controlled trials with larger samples and long-term follow-up should be performed to better analyze outcomes and recurrence rates.
Collapse
|
14
|
Aili A, Maimaitiming M, Li Y, Maisiyiti A, Wang Z, Tusuntuoheti Y, Abudureyimu K. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair for treating patients with massive hiatal hernia and iron-deficiency anaemia. BMC Surg 2023; 23:293. [PMID: 37752453 PMCID: PMC10521551 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02184-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Massive hiatal hernias may result in extraoesophageal symptoms, including iron-deficiency anaemia. However, the role played by hiatal hernias in iron-deficiency anaemia is not clearly understood. We examined the prevalence of anaemia in patients with massive hiatal hernias and the frequency of anaemia resolution after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair at long term follow-up. METHODS Patients who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair from June 2008 to June 2019 were enrolled in this study. We collected the patients' demographic and clinical data from their medical records, and compared the pre-surgical and post-surgical findings (at 1 week and 3 months post-surgery). All patients with adequate documentation underwent post-surgical follow-up to evaluate improvements in clinical symptoms and signs. RESULTS A total of 126 patients with massive hiatal hernias underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. Of these, 35 (27.8%) had iron-deficiency anaemia. Anaemia was resolution in all the patients and they had significantly reduced GERD-Q scores at 3 months postoperatively (P<0.01) .The mean follow-up period was 60 months. Iron-deficiency anaemia resolution after hiatal hernia repair was achieved in 93.9% of the patients. CONCLUSION Anaemia is common in patients with massive hiatal hernias, and most of our patients were symptomatic because of their anaemia. Moreover, in patients with massive hiatal hernias, iron-deficiency anaemia resolution is likely after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aikebaier Aili
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
- Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
- Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
| | - Maimaitiaili Maimaitiming
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
- Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
- Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
| | - Yiliang Li
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
- Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
- Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
| | - Alimujiang Maisiyiti
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
- Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
- Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
| | - Zhi Wang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
- Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
- Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
| | - Yusujiang Tusuntuoheti
- The graduate student institute of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
| | - Kelimu Abudureyimu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
- Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
- Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kayastha A, Wasselle J, Wilensky A, Sujka JA, Mhaskar R, DuCoin CG. Feasibility of Anti-reflux Gastric Bypass for Massive Paraesophageal Hernia in Obese Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Cureus 2023; 15:e45616. [PMID: 37868460 PMCID: PMC10588764 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The objective of this study is to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of anti-reflux gastric bypass (ARGB) as a treatment for symptomatic massive paraesophageal hernias (PEH) in the obese population. Both gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and PEH are particularly prevalent in the obese patient population, and obesity adversely affects the long-term outcomes of all anti-reflux procedures. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective review of 17 obese adults who underwent ARGB for the treatment of massive PEH between September 2019 and December 2021. Massive PEH was defined as >5 cm in a singular direction, and obesity as BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Patients without preoperative diagnostic testing were excluded. We reviewed and analyzed patient demographic data, postoperative symptom resolution, weight loss, and complications using descriptive statistics, change from baseline, and comparison of proportions. Results Sixteen of the 17 subjects were female. The median age was 48, and the median BMI was 39.10 kg/m2 (30.0-49.3 kg/m2). The average PEH size on imaging was 6.48 (H) x 6.25 (W) cm. The resolution of heartburn was 93.8% (p<0.001), and the resolution of nausea and vomiting was 80.0%. The mean postoperative length of follow-up was 9.12 months. Median excess body weight loss percentages at one, three, six, and 12 months were 16.43% (p<0.001), 35.92% (p<0.001), 40.64% (p=0.001), and 58.58% (p<0.01), respectively. Five patients experienced adverse events requiring additional intervention or hospitalization. There were no symptomatic hernia recurrences or mortality. Conclusion This study demonstrates that ARGB is feasible and potentially effective in treating symptomatic massive paraesophageal hernias in the obese patient population. Further investigation is needed to determine efficacy and long-term outcomes compared to standard surgical repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahan Kayastha
- Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Joseph Wasselle
- Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Adam Wilensky
- Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Joseph A Sujka
- Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Rahul Mhaskar
- Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kanagasegar N, Alvarado CE, Lyons JL, Rivero MJ, Vekstein C, Levine I, Towe CW, Worrell SG, Marks JM. Risk factors for adverse outcomes following paraesophageal hernia repair among obese patients. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:6791-6797. [PMID: 37253871 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10115-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although obesity is an established risk factor for adverse outcomes after paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR), many obese patients nonetheless receive PEHR. The purpose of this study was to explore risk factors for adverse outcomes of PEHR among this high-risk cohort. We hypothesized that obese patients may have other risk factors for adverse outcomes following PEHR. METHODS A retrospective study of adult obese patients who underwent minimally invasive PEHR from 2017 to 2019 was performed. Patients were excluded for BMI < 30 or if they had concomitant bariatric surgery at time of PEHR. The primary outcome of interest was a composite adverse outcome (CAO) defined as having any of the four following outcomes after PEHR: persistent GERD > 30 d, persistent dysphagia > 30 d, recurrence, or reoperation. Chi-square and t-test analysis was used to compare demographic and clinical characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate independent predictors of CAO. RESULTS In total, 139 patients met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 19.7 months (IQR 8.8-81). Among them, 51/139 (36.7%) patients had a CAO: 31/139 (22.4%) had persistent GERD, 20/139 (14.4%) had persistent dysphagia, 24/139 (17.3%) had recurrence, and 6/139 (4.3%) required reoperation. On unadjusted analysis, patients with a CAO were more likely to have a history of prior abdominal surgery (86.3% vs 70.5%, p = 0.04) and were less likely to have undergone a preoperative CT scan (27.5% vs 45.5%, p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, previous abdominal surgery was independently associated with an increased likelihood of CAO whereas age and preoperative CT scan had a decreased likelihood of CAO. CONCLUSIONS Although there were adverse outcomes among obese patients, minimally invasive PEHR may be feasible in a subset of patients at specialized centers. These findings may help guide the appropriate selection of obese patients for PEHR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nithya Kanagasegar
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Christine E Alvarado
- Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Joshua L Lyons
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Marco-Jose Rivero
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Carolyn Vekstein
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Iris Levine
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Christopher W Towe
- Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Stephanie G Worrell
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Marks
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Khoma O, Wong NLJ, Mugino M, Khoma MJ, Van der Wall H, Falk GL. Dyspnoea improves following composite repair of giant paraoesophageal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2023; 105:523-527. [PMID: 36374275 PMCID: PMC10313459 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Paraoesophageal hernias (PEH) are often symptomatic and can lead to life-threatening complications such as volvulus and ischaemia. Dyspnoea is one of the most prevalent symptoms of giant hiatus herniae. The primary outcome of this study is resolution of dyspnoea following composite repair of giant paraoesophageal hernia. Secondary outcomes include complications of surgery, hernia recurrence rates and effect of recurrence on dyspnoea. METHODS Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained single-surgeon database containing records of all patients undergoing composite repair of paraoesophageal hernia. Patients presenting with dyspnoea who underwent composite laparoscopic repair of giant (>30% of stomach above diaphragm) paraoesophageal hernia between March 2009 and December 2015 were included. RESULTS Inclusion criteria were met by 154 patients. The mean age at time of surgery was 71.2 years (range 49-93, SD 9.66) with an average BMI of 28 (range 19-38kg/m2, SD 4.1). On average hernia contained 64% of stomach (range 30-100%, SD 20.2). One procedure was converted to laparotomy. Surgery resulted in near complete resolution of dyspnoea (2.6% postoperatively, p<0.001). Recurrence rate was 24% and was not associated with persistent dyspnoea. There was one death and two significant complications. CONCLUSION Dyspnoea resolves following laparoscopic repair of giant paraoesophageal hernia. The presence of dyspnoea in patients with known large paraoesophageal hernia should be regarded as an indication for referral to a surgical service with expertise in hiatal hernia management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Khoma
- University of Notre Dame, Chippendale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - NLJ Wong
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Mugino
- University of Notre Dame, Chippendale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - MJ Khoma
- Sydney Heartburn Clinic, Australia
| | - H Van der Wall
- University of Notre Dame, Chippendale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - GL Falk
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ukegjini K, Vetter D, Dirr V, Gutschow CA. Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:5295-5302. [PMID: 36976420 PMCID: PMC10322952 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10005-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mesh augmentation is a highly controversial adjunct of hiatus hernia (HH) surgery. The current scientific evidence remains unclear and even experts disagree on indications and surgical techniques. With an aim to avoid the downsides of both non-resorbable synthetic and biological materials, biosynthetic long-term resorbable meshes (BSM) have recently been developed and are becoming increasingly popular. In this context, we aimed at assessing outcomes after HH repair with this new generation of mesh at our institution. METHODS From a prospective database, we identified all consecutive patients that underwent HH repair with BSM augmentation. Data was extracted from electronic patient charts of our hospital information system. Endpoints of this analysis included perioperative morbidity, functional results and recurrence rates at follow-up. RESULTS Between December 2017 and July 2022, 97 patients (elective primary cases n = 76, redo cases n = 13, emergency cases n = 8) underwent HH with BSM augmentation. Indications in elective and emergency cases were paraesophageal (Type II-IV) HH in 83%, and large Type I HH in 4%. There was no perioperative mortality, and overall (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 2) and severe (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) postoperative morbidity was 15% and 3%, respectively. An outcome without postoperative complications was achieved in 85% of cases (elective primary surgery 88%, redo cases 100%, emergencies cases 25%). After a median (IQR) postoperative follow-up of 12 months, 69 patients (74%) were asymptomatic, 15 (16%) reported improvement, and 9 (10%) had clinical failure, of which 2 patients (2%) required revisional surgery. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that HH repair with BSM augmentation is feasible and safe with low perioperative morbidity and acceptable postoperative failure rates at early to mid-term follow-up. BSM may be a useful alternative to non-resorbable materials in HH surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristjan Ukegjini
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Diana Vetter
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Valerian Dirr
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian A Gutschow
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rajkomar K, Wong CS, Gall L, MacKay C, Macdonald A, Forshaw M, Craig C. Laparoscopic large hiatus hernia repair with mesh reinforcement versus suture cruroplasty alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 2023:10.1007/s10029-023-02783-2. [PMID: 37010656 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02783-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the difference in outcomes in laparoscopic large hiatus hernia (LHH) repair using suture-based and mesh-based repair techniques. METHODS A systematic search of articles was conducted in PubMed, Medline and Embase using the PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing recurrences and reoperations in those patients with large hiatal hernia repair (> 30% stomach in the chest, > 5 cm hiatal defect, hiatal surface area > 10 cm2) who had mesh vs no mesh were assessed quantitatively. The impact of mesh on significant intraoperative/postoperative surgical complications was qualitatively assessed. RESULTS Pooled data included six randomized controlled trials and thirteen observational studies with 1670 patients (824 with no mesh, 846 with mesh). There was a significant reduction in the total recurrence rate with mesh (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.80, p = 0.007). Mesh use did not cause significant reduction in recurrences > 2 cm (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.52-1.67, p = 0.83) or in reoperation rates (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39-1.07, p = 0.09). None of the specific meshes assessed were found to be superior in the reduction of recurrence or reoperation rates. Cases of mesh erosion with eventual foregut resection were noted and were associated with synthetic meshes only. CONCLUSION Mesh reinforcement seemed protective against total recurrence in LHH although this has to be interpreted with caution given the level of heterogeneity introduced by the inclusion of observational studies in the analysis. There was no significant reduction in large recurrences (> 2 cm) or reoperation rate. If the synthetic mesh is to be used patients need to be informed of the risk of mesh erosion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Rajkomar
- Upper GI Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G40SF,, UK.
| | - C S Wong
- Upper GI Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G40SF,, UK
| | - L Gall
- Upper GI Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G40SF,, UK
| | - C MacKay
- Upper GI Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G40SF,, UK
| | - A Macdonald
- Upper GI Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G40SF,, UK
| | - M Forshaw
- Upper GI Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G40SF,, UK
| | - C Craig
- Upper GI Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G40SF,, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Does bioabsorbable mesh reduce hiatal hernia recurrence rates? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:2295-2303. [PMID: 35951120 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09514-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of bioabsorbable mesh at the hiatus is controversial. Long-term data are scant. We evaluated the world literature and performed a meta-analysis to determine if these meshes were effective in reducing recurrence. METHODS A literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and ClinicalKey. We evaluated articles reporting on both Bio-A™ (polyglycolic acid:trimethylene carbonate-PGA:TMC) and Phasix™ (poly-4-hydroxybutyrate-P4HB) used at the hiatus. The DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used to estimate the overall pooled treatment effect along with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Similar analysis was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes, i.e., recurrence rate, mean surgical time, mean hospital stays and mean follow-up duration between non-Mesh and Mesh group. The I2 statistic was computed to assess the heterogeneity in effect sizes across the studies. RESULTS A total of 21 studies (12 mesh studies with 963 subjects and 9 non-mesh studies with 617 subjects) were included to conduct the meta-analysis. There was one article reporting outcomes on P4HB mesh (73 subjects) and 11 on PGA:TMC mesh (890 subjects). The bioabsorbable mesh group had a significantly lower recurrence rate compared to the non-mesh group (8% vs. 18%; 95%CI 0.08-0.17), pooled p-value < 0.0001. Surgery time was shorter in the mesh group compared to the non-mesh group (136.4 min vs. 150 min) but not statistically significant (p = 0.54). There tended to be a more extended follow-up period after surgery in the non-mesh group compared to the mesh group (27 vs. 25.8 months, range 10.8-54 months); but not statistically significant (ES: 27.4; 95%CI 21.6-33.3; p = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS Hiatal hernia repair with bioabsorbable mesh is more effective at reducing hernia recurrence rate in the mid-term than simple suture cruroplasty. Further studies investigating the long-term outcomes and P4HB mesh are needed.
Collapse
|
21
|
Carrera Ceron RE, Oelschlager BK. Management of Recurrent Paraesophageal Hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2022; 32:1148-1155. [PMID: 36161967 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Recurrent paraesophageal hernias (rPEH) represent a clinical and surgical challenge. Even with a relatively high incidence, most of them are minimally symptomatic, and the need for reoperation is low. For those patients who are candidates for surgery, laparoscopic revision is a feasible and safe technique although there are other treatment options available. Methods: This article provides an overview of the definition, mechanisms of recurrence, epidemiology, clinical presentation, and indications for treatment of rPEH, as well as an overview of the surgical management options and a description of the technical principles of the repair and/or resection. Results: Surgeons should consider multiple factors when deciding the appropriate treatment of patients with rPEH, and all of them require a complete and comprehensive evaluation. The surgical options need to be individualized and include a redo PEH repair and revisional fundoplication, a partial or total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction, or an esophagectomy. There are key steps during the surgical repair that contribute to a successful operation and also auxiliary techniques that can improve postoperative outcomes. After laparoscopic redo most patients have improvement of their symptoms and an acceptable rate of perioperative complications when they are performed by experienced foregut surgeons. In obese patients with rPEH, bariatric surgery can be the best treatment option. Conclusions: Laparoscopic reoperative management should be considered in symptomatic patients who are not controlled with maximal nonoperative therapy, after a thorough work-up and appropriate counseling. In cases with multiple hernia repairs, it is important to consider alternative operations.
Collapse
|
22
|
Ehlers AP, Bonham AJ, Ghaferi AA, Finks JF, Carlin AM, Varban OA. Impact of hiatal hernia repair technique on patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux symptoms following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6815-6821. [PMID: 35854122 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08970-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Repairing a hiatal hernia at the time of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) can reduce or even prevent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms in the post-operative period. Several different hiatal hernia repair techniques have been described but their impact on GERD symptoms after SG is unclear. METHODS Surgeons (n = 74) participating in a statewide quality collaborative were surveyed on their typical technique for repair of hiatal hernias during SG. Options included posterior repair with mesh (PRM), posterior repair (PR), and anterior repair (AR). Patients who underwent SG with concurrent hiatal hernia repair (n = 7883) were compared according to their surgeon's reported technique. Patient characteristics, baseline and 1-year GERD health-related quality of life surveys, weight loss and 30-day risk-adjusted complications were analyzed. RESULTS The most common technique reported by surgeons for hiatal hernia repair was PR (n = 64, 85.3%), followed by PRM (n = 7, 9.3%) and AR (n = 4, 5.3%). Patients who underwent SG by surgeons who perform AR had lower rates of baseline GERD diagnosis (AR 55.3%, PR 59.5%, PRM 64.8%, p < 0.01), but were more likely to experience worsening GERD symptoms at 1 year (AR 29.8%, PR 28.7%, PRM 28.2%, p < 0.0001), despite similar weight loss (AR 29.8%, PR 28.7%, PRM 28.2%, p = 0.08). Satisfaction with GERD symptoms at 1 year was high (AR 73.2%, PR 76.3%, PRM 75.7%, p = 0.43), and risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes were similar among all groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing SG with concurrent hiatal hernia repair by surgeons who typically perform an AR were more likely to report worsening GERD at 1 year despite excellent weight loss. Surgeons who typically performed an AR had nearly one-half of their patients report increased GERD severity after surgery despite similar weight loss. While GERD symptom control may be multifactorial, technical approach to hiatal hernia repair at the time of SG may play a role and a posterior repair is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne P Ehlers
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, 2210 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Aaron J Bonham
- Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amir A Ghaferi
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, 2210 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jonathan F Finks
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, 2210 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Arthur M Carlin
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Oliver A Varban
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, 2210 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sillcox R, Jackson HT. Mesh Versus No Mesh for Cruroplasty. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2022; 32:1144-1147. [PMID: 35980377 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This review describes the evolution of hiatal hernia repair for the past several decades: From the use of a primary tissue repair only, the subsequent inclusion of synthetic mesh and its complications, to current day indications for mesh use. We will highlight the recent research in biologic and composite meshes as well as the ongoing limitations in studying their efficacy. Finally, we will describe our institutional indications and surgical technique practices in the utilization of biologic mesh.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Sillcox
- Department of Surgery, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Hope T Jackson
- Department of Surgery, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Blake KE, Zolin SJ, Tu C, Baier KF, Beffa LR, Alaedeen D, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Rosen MJ, Petro CC. Comparing anterior gastropexy to no anterior gastropexy for paraesophageal hernia repair: a study protocol for a randomized control trial. Trials 2022; 23:616. [PMID: 35907909 PMCID: PMC9338471 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06571-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than half of patients undergoing paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) will have radiographic hernia recurrence at 5 years after surgery. Gastropexy is a relatively low-risk intervention that may decrease recurrence rates, but it has not been studied in a prospective manner. Our study aims to evaluate the effect of anterior gastropexy on recurrence rates after PEHR, compared to no anterior gastropexy. METHODS This is a two-armed, single-blinded, registry-based, randomized controlled trial comparing anterior gastropexy to no anterior gastropexy in PEHR. Adult patients (≥18 years) with a symptomatic paraesophageal hernia measuring at least 5 cm in height on computed tomography, upper gastrointestinal series, or endoscopy undergoing elective minimally invasive repair are eligible for recruitment. Patients will be blinded to their arm of the trial. All patients will undergo laparoscopic or robotic PEHR, where some operative techniques (crural closure techniques and fundoplication use or avoidance) are left to the discretion of the operating surgeon. During the operation, after closure of the diaphragmatic crura, participants are randomized to receive either no anterior gastropexy (control arm) or anterior gastropexy (treatment arm). Two hundred forty participants will be recruited and followed for 1 year after surgery. The primary outcome is radiographic PEH recurrence at 1 year. Secondary outcomes are symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, dysphagia, odynophagia, gas bloat, regurgitation, chest pain, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, postprandial pain, cardiovascular, and pulmonary symptoms as well as patient satisfaction in the immediate postoperative period and at 1-year follow-up. Outcome assessors will be blinded to the patients' intervention. DISCUSSION This randomized controlled trial will examine the effect of anterior gastropexy on radiographic PEH recurrence and patient-reported outcomes. Anterior gastropexy has a theoretical benefit of decreasing PEH recurrence; however, this has not been proven beyond a suggestion of effectiveness in retrospective series. If anterior gastropexy reduces recurrence rates, it would likely become a routine component of surgical PEH management. If it does not reduce PEH recurrence, it will likely be abandoned. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04007952 . Registered on July 5, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K E Blake
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A10-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| | - S J Zolin
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A10-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - C Tu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - K F Baier
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A10-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - L R Beffa
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A10-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - D Alaedeen
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A10-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - D M Krpata
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A10-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - A S Prabhu
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A10-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - M J Rosen
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A10-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - C C Petro
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A10-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Piening LM, Lillyman DJ, Lee FS, Lozano AM, Miles JR, Wachs RA. Injectable decellularized nucleus pulposus tissue exhibits neuroinhibitory properties. JOR Spine 2022; 5:e1187. [PMID: 35386760 PMCID: PMC8966883 DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability, but treatments for LBP are limited. Degeneration of the intervertebral disc due to loss of neuroinhibitory sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAGs) allows nerves from dorsal root ganglia to grow into the core of the disc. Treatment with a decellularized tissue hydrogel that contains sGAGs may inhibit nerve growth and prevent disc-associated LBP. Methods A protocol to decellularize porcine nucleus pulposus (NP) was adapted from previous methods. DNA, sGAG, α-gal antigen, and collagen content were analyzed before and after decellularization. The decellularized tissue was then enzymatically modified to be injectable and form a gel at 37°C. Following this, the mechanical properties, microstructure, cytotoxicity, and neuroinhibitory properties were analyzed. Results The decellularization process removed 99% of DNA and maintained 74% of sGAGs and 154% of collagen compared to the controls NPs. Rheology demonstrated that regelled NP exhibited properties similar to but slightly lower than collagen-matched controls. Culture of NP cells in the regelled NP demonstrated an increase in metabolic activity and DNA content over 7 days. The collagen content of the regelled NP stayed relatively constant over 7 days. Analysis of the neuroinhibitory properties demonstrated regelled NP significantly inhibited neuronal growth compared to collagen controls. Conclusions The decellularization process developed here for porcine NP tissue was able to remove the antigenic material while maintaining the sGAG and collagen. This decellularized tissue was then able to be modified into a thermally forming gel that maintained the viability of cells and demonstrated robust neuroinhibitory properties in vitro. This biomaterial holds promise as an NP supplement to prevent nerve growth into the native disc and NP in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan M. Piening
- Biological Systems Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Nebraska‐LincolnLincolnNebraskaUSA
| | - David J. Lillyman
- Biological Systems Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Nebraska‐LincolnLincolnNebraskaUSA
| | - Fei San Lee
- Biological Systems Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Nebraska‐LincolnLincolnNebraskaUSA
| | - Alvaro Moreno Lozano
- Biological Systems Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Nebraska‐LincolnLincolnNebraskaUSA
| | - Jeremy R. Miles
- USDA, ARS, US Meat Animal Research CenterClay CenterNebraskaUSA
| | - Rebecca A. Wachs
- Biological Systems Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Nebraska‐LincolnLincolnNebraskaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Sozzi A, Lombardo F, Lanzaro A, Panizzo V, Bonitta G, Mendogni P, Bruni PG, Campanelli G, Bona D. Medium-term safety and efficacy profile of paraesophageal hernia repair with Phasix-ST ® mesh: a single-institution experience. Hernia 2022; 26:279-286. [PMID: 34716832 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02528-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hernia recurrence after laparoscopic repair is a perplexing problem. In an effort to reduce anatomical and clinical recurrences, different type of meshes have been used to bolster the esophageal hiatus. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess safety, medium-term efficacy, and quality of life improvement after laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia reinforced with a biosynthetic absorbable mesh (Phasix-ST®). METHODS Observational single-center retrospective single-arm cohort study (November 2015-February 2021). We included all adult patients (> 18 years old) who underwent laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with Phasix-ST® mesh and Toupet fundoplication. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients were included. The median postoperative stay was 3.2 days (range 2-9) and the postoperative complication rate was 11.7%. The median follow-up time was 27 months (range 1-53). No mesh-related complications were detected. Hernia recurrence was diagnosed in six patients (8.8%). The recurrence-free probability at 34 months was 0.89 (95% CI 0.807-0.988) while at 60 months was 0.86 (95% CI 0.76-0.97). Hernia recurrences were mostly observed between 21 and 36 months after the operation. None of the patients required surgical revision and all were managed with PPI. Postoperative dysphagia requiring endoscopic balloon dilatation occurred in 2.9% of patients. Compared to baseline, both the GERD-HRQL (15.2 ± 6.2 vs. 3.2 ± 3.1; p = 0.026) and all SF-36 items were significantly improved (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic crura augmentation with Phasix-ST® mesh combined with a Toupet fundoplication is safe and seems effective in the medium-term follow-up. Phasix-ST® crural reinforcement resulted in low hernia recurrence rate with a sustained symptoms and quality of life improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Aiolfi
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.
| | - M Cavalli
- Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - A Sozzi
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - F Lombardo
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - A Lanzaro
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - V Panizzo
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - G Bonitta
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - P Mendogni
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - P G Bruni
- Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - G Campanelli
- Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - D Bona
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rogers MP, Velanovich V, DuCoin C. Narrative review of management controversies for paraesophageal hernia. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:4476-4483. [PMID: 34422374 PMCID: PMC8339754 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective To review management controversies in paraesophageal hernia and options for surgical repair. Background Paraesophageal hernia is an increasingly common problem. There are controversies over whether and when paraesophageal hernias should be surgically repaired. In addition, if these hernias are to be repaired, the method of repair, need for mesh reinforcement, need for fundoplication, and need for gastropexy are not uniformly accepted. Methods Recent literature was reviewed on need for repair, approach (open, laparoscopic or robotic surgery), method of repair (primary suture, use of relaxing incisions, use of mesh reinforcement), materials and configuration of mesh reinforcement, need and type of fundoplication, and need for gastropexy, with emphasis on surgical outcomes. Conclusions The extant literature suggests that paraesophageal hernia should be approached in a patient-centered, precision medicine manner. In general, hernia reduction, sac excision and primary suture approximation of the hiatal crura are mandatory. Use of mesh should be based on individual risk factors; if mesh is used, biological meshes appear to have a more favorable safety profile, with the “reverse C” or keyhole configuration allowing for increase in crural tensile strength at it most vulnerable areas. Use and choice of fundoplication or magnetic sphincter augmentation should be based on individual considerations. Finally, gastropexy is generally ineffective and should be used only in extreme circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Rogers
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, the University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Vic Velanovich
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, the University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Christopher DuCoin
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, the University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing paraesophageal hernia repair with selective use of biologic mesh. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:1627-1632. [PMID: 34076763 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08399-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of biologic mesh in paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) has been associated with decreased short-term recurrence but no statistically significant difference in long-term recurrence. Because of this, we transitioned from routine to selective use of mesh for PEHR. The aim of this study was to examine our indications for selective mesh use and to evaluate patient outcomes in this population. METHODS We queried a prospectively maintained database for patients who underwent laparoscopic PEHR with biologic mesh from October 2015 to October 2018, then performed a retrospective chart review. The decision to use mesh was made intraoperatively by the surgeon. Recurrence was defined as the presence of > 2 cm intrathoracic stomach on postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series. RESULTS Mesh was used in 61/169 (36%) of first-time PEHRs, and in 47/82 (57%) of redo PEHRs. Among first-time PEHRs, the indications for mesh included hiatal tension (85%), poor crural tissue quality (11%), or both (5%). Radiographic recurrence occurred in 15% of first-time patients (symptomatic N = 2, asymptomatic N = 3). There were no reoperations for recurrence. Among redo PEHRs, the indication for mesh was most commonly the redo nature of the repair itself (55%), but also hiatal tension (51%), poor crural tissue quality (13%), or both (4%). Radiographic recurrence occurred in 21% of patients (symptomatic N = 4, asymptomatic N = 1). There was 1 reoperation for recurrence in the redo-repair group. CONCLUSIONS We selectively use biologic mesh in a third of our first-time repair patients and in over half of our redo-repair patients when there is a perceived high risk of recurrence based on hiatal tension, poor tissue quality, or prior recurrence. Despite the high risk for radiologic recurrence, there was only 1 reoperation for recurrence in the entire cohort.
Collapse
|
29
|
Nie Y, Xiong Y, Guan L, Yuan X, Chen F, Chen J, Yang H. Laparoscopic fixation of biological mesh at hiatus with glue and suture during hiatal hernia repair. BMC Surg 2021; 21:158. [PMID: 33752652 PMCID: PMC7983393 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01151-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair is associated with higher recurrence rate. Mesh is used to reduce the recurrence rate. This retrospective study is to review our experience of biological mesh fixed with suture and medical glue in hiatal hernias repairs. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted for a consecutive series of patients undergoing laparoscopic hiatal herniorrhaphy between January 2018 and January 2019. After hiatus closure, a piece of biological prosthesis was fixed with medical glue and suture for reinforcement of the crural closure. Clinical outcomes were reviewed, and data were collected regarding operative details, complications, symptoms, and follow-up imaging. Radiological evidence of any size of hiatal hernia was considered to indicate a recurrence. RESULTS Thirty-six patients underwent surgery uneventfully without any serious complication. There was no mortality. The follow-up was, on average, 18.4 months, and there was no symptomatic recurrence. There was one anatomical recurrence without any related presentation. The method of mesh fixation with medical glue and suture took 12 min on average, and the handling was fairly easy. CONCLUSIONS Biological mesh fixed with suture and medical glue was safe and effective for repairing large hiatal hernias. Of course, a longer follow-up is still needed for determining long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusheng Nie
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, The Capital Medical University Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Jingyuan Road No.5, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100043, China
| | - Yao Xiong
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, The Capital Medical University Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Jingyuan Road No.5, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100043, China
| | - Lei Guan
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, The Capital Medical University Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Jingyuan Road No.5, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100043, China
| | - Xin Yuan
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, The Capital Medical University Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Jingyuan Road No.5, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100043, China
| | - Fuqiang Chen
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, The Capital Medical University Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Jingyuan Road No.5, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100043, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, The Capital Medical University Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Jingyuan Road No.5, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100043, China
| | - Huiqi Yang
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, The Capital Medical University Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Jingyuan Road No.5, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100043, China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Trans-hiatal herniation following esophagectomy or gastrectomy: retrospective single-center experiences with a potential surgical emergency. Hernia 2021; 26:259-278. [PMID: 33713205 PMCID: PMC8881432 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02380-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Trans-hiatal herniation after esophago-gastric surgery is a potentially severe complication due to the risk of bowel incarceration and cardiac or respiratory complaints. However, measures for prevention and treatment options are based on a single surgeon´s experiences and small case series in the literature. METHODS Retrospective single-center analysis on patients who underwent surgical repair of trans-hiatal hernia following gastrectomy or esophagectomy from 01/2003 to 07/2020 regarding clinical symptoms, hernia characteristics, pre-operative imaging, hernia repair technique and perioperative outcome. RESULTS Trans-hiatal hernia repair was performed in 9 patients following abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy (40.9%), in 8 patients following trans-hiatal esophagectomy (36.4%) and in 5 patients following conventional gastrectomy (22.7%). Gastrointestinal symptoms with bowel obstruction and pain were mostly prevalent (63.6 and 59.1%, respectively), two patients were asymptomatic. Transverse colon (54.5%) and small intestine (77.3%) most frequently prolapsed into the left chest after esophagectomy (88.2%) and into the dorsal mediastinum after gastrectomy (60.0%). Half of the patients had signs of incarceration in pre-operative imaging, 10 patients underwent emergency surgery. However, bowel resection was only necessary in one patient. Hernia repair was performed by suture cruroplasty without (n = 12) or with mesh reinforcement (n = 5) or tension-free mesh interposition (n = 5). Postoperative pleural complications were most frequently observed, especially in patients who underwent any kind of mesh repair. Three patients developed recurrency, of whom two underwent again surgical repair. CONCLUSION Trans-hiatal herniation after esophago-gastric surgery is rare but relevant. The role of surgical repair in asymptomatic patients is disputed. However, early hernia repair prevents patients from severe complications. Measures for prevention and adequate closure techniques are not yet defined.
Collapse
|
31
|
Chen SW, Brody F, Lee KB, Walters J, Randall JA. Outcomes of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Analysis of the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:593-602. [PMID: 32500419 PMCID: PMC7272139 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04650-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While there have been many outcome studies on paraesophageal hernia repair in the civilian population, there is sparse recent data on the veteran population. This study analyzes the mortality and morbidities of veterans who underwent paraesophageal hernia repair in the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. METHODS Veterans who underwent paraesophageal hernia repair from 2010 to 2017 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Multivariable analysis was used to compare laparoscopic and open, including abdominal and thoracic approaches, groups. The outcomes were postoperative complications and mortality. RESULTS There were 1607 patients in the laparoscopic group and 366 in the open group, with 84.1% men and mean age of 61 years. Gender and body mass index did not influence the type of surgical approach. The mortality rates at 30 and 180 days were 0.5% and 0.7%, respectively. Postoperative complications, including reintubation (2.2%), pneumonia (2.0%), intubation > 48 h (2.0%), and sepsis (2.0%) were higher in the open group (15.9% versus 7.2%, p < 0.001). The laparoscopic group had a significantly shorter length of stay (4.3 versus 9.6 days, p < 0.001) and a lower percentage of return to surgery within 30 days (3.9% versus 8.2%, p < 0.001) than the open group. The ratio of open versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs varied significantly by different Veterans Integrated Services Network regions. CONCLUSIONS Veterans undergoing laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair experience similar outcomes as patients in the private sector. Veterans who underwent laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair had significantly less complications compared to an open approach even after adjusting for patient comorbidities and demographics. The difference in open versus laparoscopic practices between various regions requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheena W Chen
- Department of Surgery, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 50 Irving St NW, 2B-100, Washington, DC, 20422, USA
| | - Fred Brody
- Department of Surgery, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 50 Irving St NW, 2B-100, Washington, DC, 20422, USA.
| | - K Benjamin Lee
- Department of Surgery, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 50 Irving St NW, 2B-100, Washington, DC, 20422, USA
| | - Jarvis Walters
- Department of Surgery, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 50 Irving St NW, 2B-100, Washington, DC, 20422, USA
| | - James Alex Randall
- Department of Surgery, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 50 Irving St NW, 2B-100, Washington, DC, 20422, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bhargava A, Andrade R. Giant paraesophageal hernia: What do we really know? JTCVS Tech 2020; 3:367-372. [PMID: 34317934 PMCID: PMC8305721 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Bhargava
- Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
| | - Rafael Andrade
- Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ellis R, Garwood G, Khanna A, Harmouch M, Miller CC, Banki F. Patient-related risk factors associated with symptomatic recurrence requiring reoperation in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. Surg Open Sci 2020; 1:105-110. [PMID: 32754702 PMCID: PMC7391889 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recurrent hiatal hernia remains a challenge. Methods For initial repairs at our center: patients with 1 repair were compared to those who required reoperation for symptomatic recurrence. Subsequently, patients who had 1 repair at our center were compared to all patients who required reoperation (including initial repair at another center). Results There were 401 repairs: 308 primary repairs at our center and 93 reoperations, 287/308 (93%) required 1 repair and 21/308 (7%) required reoperation. Comparing 1 repair versus 21 reoperations, risk factors were abdominoplasty odds ratio = 32.0 (4.1-250.6), P < .001, postoperative lifting/vomiting odds ratio = 11.6 (3.2-42.1), P < .0002, tubal ligation odds ratio = 4.9 (1.1-22.6), P < .04 and height < 160 cm odds ratio = 3.9 (1.1-13.3) P < 0.03. Comparing 287 with 1 repair versus all 93 reoperations, risk factors were post-operative vomiting odds ratio = 22.7 (2.3-218.0), P < .007, abdominoplasty odds ratio = 5.6 (1.0-31.4), P < .0495, post-operative lifting odds ratio = 5.4 (2.2-12.9), P < .0002, age < 52 odds ratio = 3.6 (1.8-7.3), P < .0003, tubal ligation odds ratio = 3.2 (1.2-8.7), P < 0.019 and height < 160 cm odds ratio = 3.0 (1.5-6.1), P < 0.003. Conclusions Younger age, shorter stature, heavy lifting or vomiting after surgery, abdominoplasty and tubal ligation are risk factors associated with symptomatic recurrence requiring reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Ellis
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth)
| | - Grant Garwood
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth)
| | - Anshu Khanna
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth)
| | - Maamoun Harmouch
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth)
| | - Charles C Miller
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth)
| | - Farzaneh Banki
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth).,Memorial Hermann Southeast Esophageal Disease Center
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Surgical and clinical outcomes comparison of mesh usage in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:2724-2730. [PMID: 32556757 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07703-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Use of absorbable mesh in hiatal hernia (HH) repair has been shown to decrease recurrence rates. Our aim was to compare the efficiency of three meshes in relation to the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing HH repair. METHODS A single-institution retrospective review was done for adult patients who underwent HH repair with mesh between 2004 and 2016. Demographics, intra-operative, and cost data were collected. Esophageal symptoms and medication use were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Surgical outcomes were evaluated at 6-, 12-months, and long-term follow-up. Three groups were created based on type of mesh: human tissue matrix (HTM), biosynthetic mesh (BIOS), or porcine tissue matrix (PTM). Comparisons were performed between groups using SPSS v.26.0 and PC SAS v9.4, α = 0.05. RESULTS 292 patients were included (HTM:N = 162, BIOS:N = 83, PTM:N = 47). Majority were male (60.4%), Caucasian (93.2%), median age, and BMI of 59 years [25-90 years] and 29.19 kg/m2 [18.9-58.0 kg/m2], respectively. 69% had a large HH. Median follow-up time was 27 months [1-166 months]. Overall recurrence rate was 39%, being significantly lower in BIOS at long-term (HTM: 31%, BIOS: 17%, PTM: 19%, p = 0.038). All groups had a significant postoperative improvement of esophageal symptoms, all p < 0.001. 65-70% of the cost difference between the groups was incurred by the cost of mesh alone (HTM: $1072, BIOS: $548, PTM: $1295), with the remainder attributable to the surgery itself. CONCLUSION While outcomes of the three mesh groups were similar in our data, there was a significant difference in mesh cost. Surgeon and hospital preference still play a role in choosing the type of mesh used; however, knowledge of the individual mesh cost will help surgeons make better informed decisions.
Collapse
|
35
|
Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F, Molena D. Management of paraesophageal hernia review of clinical studies: timing to surgery, mesh use, fundoplication, gastropexy and other controversies. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33:5848914. [PMID: 32476002 PMCID: PMC8344298 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Despite paraesophageal hernias (PEH) being a common disorder, several aspects of their management remain elusive. Elective surgery in asymptomatic patients, management of acute presentation, and other technical aspects such as utilization of mesh, fundoplication or gastropexy are some of the debated issues. The aim of this study was to review the available evidence in an attempt to clarify current controversial topics. PEH repair in an asymptomatic patient may be reasonable in selected patients to avoid potential morbidity of an emergent operation. In acute presentation, gastric decompression and resuscitation could allow to improve the patient's condition and refer the repair to a more experienced surgical team. When surgical repair is decided, laparoscopy is the optimal approach in most of the cases. Mesh should be used in selected patients such as those with large PEH or redo operations. While a fundoplication is recommended in the majority of patients to prevent postoperative reflux, a gastropexy can be used in selected cases to facilitate postoperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolás H Dreifuss
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina,Address correspondence to: Francisco Schlottmann, MD MPH, Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Av. Pueyrredon 1640, C1118AAT Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Daniela Molena
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ceccarelli G, Pasculli A, Bugiantella W, De Rosa M, Catena F, Rondelli F, Costa G, Rocca A, Longaroni M, Testini M. Minimally invasive laparoscopic and robot-assisted emergency treatment of strangulated giant hiatal hernias: report of five cases and literature review. World J Emerg Surg 2020; 15:37. [PMID: 32487136 PMCID: PMC7268602 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00316-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Giant hiatal hernia (GHH) is a condition where one-third of the stomach migrates into the thorax. Nowadays, laparoscopic treatment gives excellent postoperative outcomes. Strangulated GHH is rare, and its emergent repair is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. We report a series of five cases of strangulated GHH treated by a minimally invasive laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach, together with a systematic review of the literature. Methods During 10 years (December 2009–December 2019), 31 patients affected by GHH were treated by robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgical approach. Among them, five cases were treated in an emergency setting. We performed a PubMed MEDLINE search about the minimally invasive emergent treatment of GHH, selecting 18 articles for review. Results The five cases were male patients with a mean age of 70 ± 18 years. All patients referred to the emergency service complaining of severe abdominal and thoracic pain, nausea and vomiting. CT scan and endoscopy were the main diagnostic tools. All patients showed stable hemodynamic conditions so that they could undergo a minimally invasive attempt. The surgical approach was robotic-assisted in three patients (60%) and laparoscopic in two (40%). Patients reported no complications or recurrences. Conclusion Reviewing current literature, no general recommendations are available about the emergent treatment of strangulated hiatal hernia. Acute mechanical outlet obstruction, ischemia of gastric wall or perforation and severe bleeding are the reasons for an emergent surgical indication. In stable conditions, a minimally invasive approach is often feasible. Moreover, the robot-assisted approach, allowing a stable 3D view and using articulated instruments, represents a reasonable option in challenging situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pasculli
- Unit of General Surgery "V. Bonomo", Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "A. Moro", Polyclinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Viale Antonio Gramsci 11, 43126, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Via Francesco de Sanctis 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Mattia Longaroni
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Mario Testini
- Unit of General Surgery "V. Bonomo", Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "A. Moro", Polyclinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sowards KJ, Holton NF, Elliott EG, Hall J, Bajwa KS, Snyder BE, Wilson TD, Mehta SS, Walker PA, Chandwani KD, Klein CL, Rivera AR, Wilson EB, Shah SK, Felinski MM. Safety of robotic assisted laparoscopic recurrent paraesophageal hernia repair: insights from a large single institution experience. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:2560-2566. [PMID: 31811451 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07291-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic repair of recurrent as opposed to primary paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) are historically associated with increased peri-operative complication rates, worsened outcomes, and increased conversion rates. The robotic platform may aid surgeons in these complex revision procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic (RAL) repair of recurrent as opposed to primary PEHs. METHODS Patients undergoing RAL primary and recurrent PEH repairs from 2009 to 2017 at a single institution were reviewed. Demographics, use of mesh, estimated blood loss, intra-operative complications, conversion rates, operative time, rates of esophageal/gastric injury, hospital length of stay, re-admission/re-operation rates, recurrence, dysphagia, gas bloat, and pre- and post-operative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use were analyzed. Analysis was accomplished using Chi-square test/Fischer's exact test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. RESULTS There were 298 patients who underwent RAL PEH repairs (247 primary, 51 recurrent). They were followed for a median (interquartile range) of 120 (44, 470) days. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between groups. Patients in the recurrent PEH group had longer operative times, increased use of mesh, and increased length of hospital stay. They were also less likely to undergo fundoplication. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, incidence of intra-operative complications, re-admission rates, incidence of post-operative dysphagia and gas bloat, and incidence of post-operative PPI use. There were no conversions to open operative intervention or gastric/esophageal injury/leaks. CONCLUSIONS Although repair of recurrent PEHs are historically associated with worse outcomes, in this series, RAL recurrent PEH repairs have similar peri-operative and post-operative outcomes as compared to primary PEH repairs. Whether this is secondary to the potential advantages afforded by the robotic platform deserves further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendell J Sowards
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Nicholas F Holton
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ekatarina G Elliott
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - John Hall
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Kulvinder S Bajwa
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Brad E Snyder
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Todd D Wilson
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | | | | | - Kavita D Chandwani
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Connie L Klein
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Angielyn R Rivera
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Erik B Wilson
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shinil K Shah
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Michael E. DeBakey Institute for Comparative Cardiovascular Science and Biomedical Devices, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
| | - Melissa M Felinski
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Shea B, Boyan W, Decker J, Almagno V, Binenbaum S, Matharoo G, Squillaro A, Borao F. Emergent Repair of Paraesophageal Hernias and the Argument for Elective Repair. JSLS 2019; 23:JSLS.2019.00015. [PMID: 31285652 PMCID: PMC6600053 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2019.00015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: A feared complication of large paraesophageal hernias is incarceration necessitating emergent repair. According to previous studies, patients who require an emergent operation are subject to increased morbidity compared with patients undergoing elective operations. In this study, we detail patients who underwent hernia repair emergently and compare their outcomes with elective patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of the paraesophageal hernia repair operations between 2010 and 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with hernias that were repaired electively and patients with hernias that were repaired emergently. Perioperative complications and follow-up data regarding morbidity, mortality, and recurrence were also recorded. A propensity analysis was used to compare emergent and elective groups. Results: Thirty patients had hernias repaired emergently, and 199 patients underwent elective procedures. Patients undergoing emergent repair were more likely to have a type IV hernia, have a partial gastrectomy or gastrostomy tube insertion as part of their procedure, have a postoperative complication, and have a longer hospital stay. However, propensity analysis was used to demonstrate that when characteristics of the emergent and elective groups were matched, differences in these factors were no longer significant. Having an emergent operation did not increase a patient's risk for recurrence. Conclusion: Patients who had their hernias repaired emergently experienced complications at similar rates as those of elective patients with advanced age or comorbid conditions as demonstrated by the propensity analysis. The authors therefore recommend evaluation of all paraesophageal hernias for elective repair, especially in younger patients who are otherwise good operative candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Shea
- Monmouth Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Long Branch, New Jersey
| | - William Boyan
- Monmouth Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Long Branch, New Jersey
| | - Jonathan Decker
- Monmouth Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Long Branch, New Jersey
| | - Vincent Almagno
- Monmouth Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Long Branch, New Jersey
| | - Steven Binenbaum
- Monmouth Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Long Branch, New Jersey
| | - Gurdeep Matharoo
- Monmouth Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Long Branch, New Jersey
| | - Anthony Squillaro
- Monmouth Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Long Branch, New Jersey
| | - Frank Borao
- Monmouth Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Long Branch, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yun JS, Na KJ, Song SY, Kim S, Kim E, Jeong IS, Oh SG. Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:3903-3908. [PMID: 31656664 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.08.94] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair is a complex surgery typically performed by general abdominal surgeons because it typically involves an abdominal approach. Here, we report our experiences on laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia as thoracic surgeons. Methods Based on our experience of minimally invasive esophageal surgery (MIES) for esophageal cancer, we began performing laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia in 2009. We analyzed the surgery-related data and postoperative outcomes of 18 consecutive patients we operated on from 2009 to 2017. Results There were 1 male and 17 female patients with a median age of 73 years (range, 37-81 years). Ten of 14 symptomatic patients experienced reflux symptoms, such as heartburn. Four patients had a history of prior abdominal surgery. Hiatal hernia types I, II, III, and IV were observed in 3, 9, 5, and 1 patients, respectively. Two (11.1%) laparoscopic procedures required conversion. Modified Collis gastroplasty was used as an esophageal lengthening procedure in 5 patients (27.8%). Mean operation time was 213.8±70.1 minutes and mean hospital stay was 6.2±1.5 days. There were no postoperative complications. At the last follow-up, 15 patients (83.3%) were asymptomatic; however, 3 (16.7%) complained of reflux or dysphagia. Recurrent hiatal hernia was detected on an esophagogram in only 1 patient at 3.5 years after laparoscopic surgery. Conclusions Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia is a feasible technique with a satisfactory surgical outcome. Importantly, it can be performed by thoracic surgeons who are experienced in the laparoscopic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju Sik Yun
- Lung and Esophageal Cancer Clinic, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Jeollanam-do, South Korea
| | - Kook Joo Na
- Lung and Esophageal Cancer Clinic, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Jeollanam-do, South Korea
| | - Sang Yun Song
- Lung and Esophageal Cancer Clinic, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Jeollanam-do, South Korea
| | - Seok Kim
- Lung and Esophageal Cancer Clinic, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Jeollanam-do, South Korea
| | - Eunchong Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwang-ju, South Korea
| | - In Seok Jeong
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwang-ju, South Korea
| | - Sang Gi Oh
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwang-ju, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Khaled I, Priego P, Faisal M, Cuadrado M, García-Moreno F, Ballestero A, Galindo J, Lobo E. Assessment of short-term outcome with TiO 2 mesh in laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias. BMC Surg 2019; 19:156. [PMID: 31660930 PMCID: PMC6816156 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0607-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic large para-oesophageal hiatal hernia (LPHH) repair using mesh reinforcement significantly reduces postoperative recurrence rates compared to conventional suture repair, especially within short follow-up times. However, the ideal strategy for repairing LPHH remains disputable because no clear guidelines are given regarding indications, mesh type, shape or position. The aim of this study was to survey our short-term results of LPHH management with a biosynthetic monofilament polypropylene mesh coated with titanium dioxide to enhance biocompatibility (TiO2Mesh™). Methods A retrospective study was performed at Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Spain from December 2014 to October 2018. Data were collected on 27 consecutive patients with extensive hiatal hernia defects greater than 5 cm for which a laparoscopic repair was performed by primary suture and additional reinforcement with a TiO2Mesh™. Study outcomes were investigated, including clinical and radiological recurrences, dysphagia and mesh-related drawbacks. Results Twenty-seven patients were included in our analysis; 10 patients were male, and 17 were female. The mean age was 73 years (range, 63–79 years). All operations were performed laparoscopically. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days. After a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 8-29 months), only 3 patients developed clinical recurrence of reflux symptoms (11%), and 2 had radiological recurrences (7%). No mesh-related complications occurred. Conclusions TiO2Mesh™ was found to be safe for laparoscopic repair of LPHH with a fairly low recurrence rate in this short-term study. Long-term studies conducted over a period of years with large sample sizes will be essential for confirming whether this mesh is suitable as a standard method of care with few drawbacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Islam Khaled
- Department of Surgery, Suez Canal University Hospitals and Medical School, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Pablo Priego
- Division of Esophagogastric, Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Crta. Colmenar Viejo Km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Mohammed Faisal
- Department of Surgery, Suez Canal University Hospitals and Medical School, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Marta Cuadrado
- Division of Esophagogastric, Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Crta. Colmenar Viejo Km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisca García-Moreno
- Division of Esophagogastric, Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Crta. Colmenar Viejo Km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - Araceli Ballestero
- Division of Esophagogastric, Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Crta. Colmenar Viejo Km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio Galindo
- Division of Esophagogastric, Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Crta. Colmenar Viejo Km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduardo Lobo
- Division of Esophagogastric, Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Crta. Colmenar Viejo Km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Omura N, Tsuboi K, Yano F. Minimally invasive surgery for large hiatal hernia. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2019; 3:487-495. [PMID: 31549008 PMCID: PMC6749952 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of large hiatal hernias are paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PEH). Once prolapse of the stomach to the chest cavity reaches a high degree, it is called an intrathoracic stomach. More than 25 years have elapsed since laparoscopic surgery was carried out as minimally invasive surgery for PEH. The feasibility and safety thereof has nearly been established. PEH may cause serious complications such as strangulation and perforation. The outcome of elective repair of PEH is better than emergent repair, so we should carry out elective repair as much as possible. Although not a major clinical problem, following PEH repair the rate of anatomical recurrence increases with age. In order to reduce the recurrence rate, mesh reinforcement by crural repair has been widely performed. Although this improves the short-term outcomes, the long-term outcomes are unclear. For PEH repair, fundoplication and gastropexy are believed desirable. We should select the procedure associated with a lower incidence of dysphagia and so on following surgery. While relaxing incision is useful for primary tension-free closure, it has not contributed to improvement in the recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuo Omura
- Department of SurgeryNational Hospital Organization Nishisaitama‐Chuo National HospitalTokyoJapan
- Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Kazuto Tsuboi
- Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Fumiaki Yano
- Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kao AM, Ross SW, Otero J, Maloney SR, Prasad T, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT, Colavita PD. Use of computed tomography volumetric measurements to predict operative techniques in paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:1785-1794. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06930-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
43
|
Quilici PJ, Tovar A, Li J, Herrera T. Laparoscopic anti-reflux procedures with hepatic shoulder technique in the surgical management of large hiatal hernias and paraesophageal hernias: a follow-up study. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:2460-2464. [PMID: 31363892 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07040-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous techniques have been historically proposed in the management of gastroesophageal reflux and paraesophageal hernias (PEH). A follow-up study (Quilici et al. in Surg Endosc 23(11):2620-2623, 2009) to a novel laparoscopic approach introduced in 2009 and performed in 49 patients is presented. METHODS All procedures were performed via laparoscopy. Thirty-two patients underwent a Nissen Fundoplication, eleven a reduction of the PEH with a Nissen fundoplication, two without a fundoplication, and four with a Collis-Nissen fundoplication. In all patients, the left hepatic lobe was freed, repositioned, and anchored under and inferior to the gastroesophageal junction, propping the gastroesophageal junction anteriorly. This maneuver entirely covers and closes the diaphragmatic defect. RESULTS At the time of laparoscopy, several patients were found not to be suitable candidates for this procedure (morphology of the left hepatic lobe). Forty-nine procedures were completed. One patient was re-explored on POD 2 for a tight hiatus post-Collis fundoplication. Post-operatively, all other patients did well without notable, unusual complaints. The average length of stay was 2.2 days. Although not statistically significant, 43 patients had no recurrence of symptoms with the longest follow-up at 10 years, two patients were lost to follow-up, one patient had a recurrence of the PEH and three patients stated they were experiencing some form of gastroesophageal reflux requiring medical management. CONCLUSION In selected patients, patients with an "at-risk" crural closure during a laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure or PEH can safely be managed via a laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure with the hepatic shoulder technique. This technique has shown good early post-operative results and could be used as an alternative to a laparoscopic mesh-reinforced fundoplication in difficult crural closures or in the management of large paraesophageal hernias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe J Quilici
- Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgical Services, Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center, PSJHS, Burbank, CA, USA.
| | - Alexander Tovar
- Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgical Services, Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center, PSJHS, Burbank, CA, USA
| | - Jung Li
- Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgical Services, Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center, PSJHS, Burbank, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany Herrera
- Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgical Services, Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center, PSJHS, Burbank, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sasse KC, Gevorkian J, Lambin R, Afshar R, Gardner A, Mehta A, Lambin JH, Shinagawa A. Large Hiatal Hernia Repair with Urinary Bladder Matrix Graft Reinforcement and Concomitant Sleeve Gastrectomy. JSLS 2019; 23:JSLS.2018.00106. [PMID: 30880900 PMCID: PMC6408943 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2018.00106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There is no current consensus on the management of large hiatal hernias concomitant with performance of a sleeve gastrectomy procedure. Proposed solutions have included performing a modified Nissen fundoplication, performing cruroplasty alone, utilizing the Linx device, performing cruroplasty with reinforcement material, and avoiding the sleeve procedure altogether in favor of a bypass procedure in order to minimize gastroesophageal reflux. Urinary bladder matrix (UBM) represents a biologically derived material for use in hiatal hernia repair reinforcement with the potential to improve durability of repair without incurring the risks of other reinforcement materials. Methods: This study reports the results of a retrospective chart review of 32 cases of large hiatal hernia repair utilizing both primary crural repair and UBM reinforcement concomitant with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy by a single surgeon. Hernia diameter averaged 6 cm (range 4–9 cm). After an average of 1 year followup, 30 patients were assessed for subjective symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score. Twenty patients were evaluated with either upper gastrointestinal (GI) series, endoscopy, or both. Results: Each repair was successful and completed laparoscopically concomitant with sleeve gastrectomy. Anterior and posterior cruroplasty was performed using interrupted 0-Ethibond suture using the Endostitch device. The UBM graft exhibited favorable handling characteristics placed as a keyhole geometry sutured to the crura with absorbable suture. A careful chart review was undertaken to assess for complications. There have been no reoperations. After a median of 12 months (range, 4–27 months) of followup, an assessment of recurrences or long-term complications was completed. Median GERD-HRQL score was 6, with a range of 0 to 64 (of possible 75), indicating very low-level reflux symptomatology. Follow-up upper GI radiographs or endoscopy were obtained in 20 cases and show intact repairs. Conclusion: In this series of 32 cases, laparoscopic cruroplasty with UBM graft reinforcement has been effective and durable at 12 months of followup. This technique may offer one satisfactory solution for large hiatal hernia repair concomitant with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy that may achieve a durable repair with low GERD symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rami Afshar
- K Sasse Surgical Associates, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - Amy Gardner
- K Sasse Surgical Associates, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - Aradhana Mehta
- Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | | | - Austin Shinagawa
- Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Çalıkoğlu İ, Özgen G, Toydemir T, Yerdel MA. Iatrogenic cardiac tamponade as a mortal complication of peri-hiatal surgery. Analysis of 30 published cases. Heliyon 2019; 5:e01537. [PMID: 31183416 PMCID: PMC6495070 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Iatrogenic cardiac tamponade (ICT) is a dreadful complication of peri-hiatal surgery and vast majority occur during a hernia repair. Strikingly, against all warnings, the incidents and related deaths seem to be increasing. The aim of this review is to provide insight on how to prevent and challenge ICT. PubMed search identified 30 distinct ICTs with 10 deaths (33.3%) due to peri-hiatal procedures. Twenty-nine operations were mechanical repairs and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery was the primary cause (n:18). Graft fixation (n:23) and helical tacks (n:13) were the main offenders. Initial symptom was hypotension affecting 92%. Seven ICTs were only identified at autopsy. All treated patients except one underwent a drainage. Almost all ICTs were caused by injury to the diaphragmatic dome, anterior to hiatus. In conclusion, peri-hiatal surgery-related ICT is extremely fatal. ICT mainly occurs during the repair of a hernia, a benign condition and therefore must be prevented. Graft fixation, around the ante-hiatal diaphragmatic dome must be abandoned. If mesh-augmentation is absolutely necessary, meticulous stitching must be preferred instead of fixators. Persistent hypotension during or following a peri-hiatal operation is an alarming sign of ICT. Increased awareness is mandatory for prevention and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- İsmail Çalıkoğlu
- İstanbul Bariatrics and Advanced Laparoscopy Center, Hakkı Yeten Cad., Polat Tower, No: 12, 34343 Fulya-İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Görkem Özgen
- İstanbul Bariatrics and Advanced Laparoscopy Center, Hakkı Yeten Cad., Polat Tower, No: 12, 34343 Fulya-İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Toygar Toydemir
- İstanbul Bariatrics and Advanced Laparoscopy Center, Hakkı Yeten Cad., Polat Tower, No: 12, 34343 Fulya-İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Yerdel
- İstanbul Bariatrics and Advanced Laparoscopy Center, Hakkı Yeten Cad., Polat Tower, No: 12, 34343 Fulya-İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
A hiatus hernia is defined as a transdiaphragmatic protrusion/migration of the intrabdominal contents through the esophageal hiatus of the diaphragm. The classification of hiatus hernias is based on anatomical morphological differentiation (types I-IV). The leading symptoms and psychological stress vary with respect to the symptoms, e. g. reflux and compression symptoms. Gastroscopy and multichannel intraluminal impedance pH measurement are obligatory preoperative functional diagnostics. A distinction is made between frequent type I hernia (antireflux surgery), symptomatic paraesophageal, thoracic and mixed hernia types (II-IV). Surgical indications exist in symptomatic type II-IV hernias. Hiatal mesh augmentation reduces recurrences. The complication potential of synthetic meshes must be taken into account. Biological implants show no advantages.
Collapse
|
47
|
The first year is the hardest: a comparison of early versus late experience after the introduction of robotic hiatal hernia repair. J Robot Surg 2019; 14:205-210. [PMID: 31025244 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00967-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
While the majority of the literature written concerning minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair involves laparoscopy, little has been written concerning the transition to a robotic technique. We present our experience, with a transparent analysis of data, with regard to the introduction of robotic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. We reviewed our first 30 consecutive patients who underwent robotic PEH over a 2-year period after the introduction of robotic surgery at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups: the early experience group (procedures performed within the first year of introduction of robotic technique, n = 13) and a late experience group (procedures performed in the second year, n = 17). All procedures were performed by a single experienced foregut surgeon. The mean operative time for the early group was significantly greater than for the late group, 184 min versus 142 min, respectively (p < 0.01). Four patients in the early group required conversion to open, while zero patients in the late group required conversion (p = 0.03). Patient demographics and complications did not differ significantly between the two patient populations. The early robotic hiatal hernia repair experience can be more difficult than expected, even in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic team. We identify several areas of improvement including patient positioning, operating room team training, and technical experience. This data can help other surgeons prepare for the transition to robotic foregut surgery.
Collapse
|
48
|
Predictors of Hiatal Hernia Recurrence After Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery with Hiatal Hernia Repair: a Prospective Database Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:696-701. [PMID: 30617774 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-04073-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to identify factors that can predict hiatal hernia recurrence (HHR) in patients after anti-reflux surgery with hiatal hernia (HH) repair. METHODS A single-institution, prospectively collected database was reviewed (January 2002-October 2015) with inclusion criteria of GERD and laparoscopic anti-reflux (AR) surgery with HH repair. Demographics, esophageal symptom scores, and pre- and post-upper gastrointestinal imaging (UGI) were collected. Mesh usage, HH type (sliding, paraesophageal (HH) or type IV), and size were evaluated, and patients who had HHR versus those who did not (NHHR) were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v.23.0.0, with α = 0.05. RESULTS Three hundred twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 56.9 ± 14.8 years (60.9% female), and mean follow-up was 19.9 ± 23.8 months. 88.2% underwent total fundoplication and 11.8% underwent partial fundoplication. HHR rate was 15.5%. HHR patients had larger HH than the NHHR group. There was no significant difference between groups for age, gender, BMI, race, and mesh usage. Only 3 patients (10.3%) with HHR reported mild-to-moderate heartburn, regurgitation, and solid or liquid dysphagia at 12-month follow-up. Overall reoperation rate was 1% in this population. CONCLUSIONS HHR is correlated with large hernia size. Mesh use and patient BMI were not predictors, and no correlation was identified between HHR and presence of GERD symptoms. Recurrence after repair is not uncommon, but is asymptomatic in most cases. Reoperation is rare and mesh is not routinely needed. Large asymptomatic HHs in the elderly often do not require intervention.
Collapse
|
49
|
Sorial RK, Ali M, Kaneva P, Fiore JF, Vassiliou M, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Ferri LE, Lee L, Mueller CL. Modern era surgical outcomes of elective and emergency giant paraesophageal hernia repair at a high-volume referral center. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:284-289. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06764-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
50
|
Zanotti D, Fiorani C, Botha A. Beyond Belsey: complex laparoscopic hiatus and diaphragmatic hernia repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2019; 101:162-167. [PMID: 30322286 PMCID: PMC6400907 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diaphragmatic and hiatus hernias can cause mild chronic symptoms or have an acute presentation with gastric volvulus and obstruction. Elective or emergency surgery is indicated in symptomatic patients and nowadays is generally performed laparoscopically. METHODS We report four different types of hernias: a giant hiatus hernia following a gastric pull-up for recurrent congenital diaphragmatic hernia; a Bochdalek hernia in a pregnant young woman; concomitant hiatus and Morgagni hernias; and a giant hiatus hernia occupying the right chest. All were approached laparoscopically, either electively or as an emergency. RESULTS Surgery led to a resolution of symptoms in all the cases. We had no any intraoperative complications. Two patients developed minor postoperative complications (chest infection). No recurrences were found during a mean follow-up of 18 months. CONCLUSIONS Transabdominal laparoscopic approach is a safe and feasible approach to all cases of symptomatic hiatus and diaphragmatic hernia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Zanotti
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, London, UK
| | - C Fiorani
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, London, UK
| | - A Botha
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|