Advanced Trauma Life Support Study: Quality of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures

Design and Development of an Objective Evaluation System for a Web-Based Simulator for Trauma Management

BACKGROUND

Trauma injuries are one of the main leading causes of death in the world. Training with guidelines and protocols is adequate to provide a fast and efficient treatment to patients that suffer a trauma injury.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate deviations from a set protocol, a new set of metrics has been proposed and tested in a pilot study.

METHODS

The participants were final-year students from the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and first-year medical residents from the Hospital Universitario La Paz. They were asked to train four trauma scenarios with a web-based simulator for 2 weeks. A test was performed pre-training and another one post-training to evaluate the evolution of the treatment to those four trauma scenarios considering a predefined trauma protocol and based on the new set of metrics. The scenarios were pelvic and lower limb traumas in a hospital and in a prehospital setting, which allow them to learn and assess different trauma protocols.

RESULTS

The results show that, in general, there is an improvement of the new metrics after training with the simulator.

CONCLUSION

These new metrics provide comprehensive information for both trainers and trainees. For trainers, the evaluation of the simulation is automated and contains all relevant information to assess the performance of the trainee. And for trainees, it provides valuable real-time information that could support the trauma management learning process.

Development of trauma team cognition can be explained by "split vision": A grounded theory study

The aim of this study was to explore interaction of interprofessional hospital trauma teams. A theory about how team cognition is developed through a dynamical process was established using grounded theory methodology. Video recordings of in-real-life resuscitations performed in the emergency ward of a Scandinavian mid-size urban hospital were collected and eligible for inclusion using theoretical sampling. By analyzing interactions during seven trauma resuscitations, the theory that trauma teams perform patient assessment and resuscitation by alternating between two process modes, the two main categories "team positioning" and "sensitivity to the patient," was generated. The core category "working with split vision" explicates how the teams interplay between the two modes to coordinate team focus with an emergent mental model of the specific situation. Split vision ensures that deeper aspects of the team, such as culture, knowledge, empathy, and patient needs are absorbed to continuously adapt team positioning and create precision in care for the specific patient.

Increasing the use of continuing professional development courses to strengthen trauma care in Ghana

Injury is a major cause of death and disability in Ghana. Strengthening care of the injured is essential to reduce this burden. Trauma continuing professional development (CPD) courses are an important component of strengthening trauma care. In many countries, including Ghana, their use needs to be more uniformly promoted. We propose lowcost strategies to increase the utilization of trauma CPD in Ghana, especially in district hospitals and higher need areas. These strategies include developing plans by regional health directorates and teaching hospitals for the regions for which they are responsible. Lists could be kept and monitored of which hospitals have doctors with which type of training. Those hospitals that need to have at least one doctor trained could be flagged for notice of upcoming courses in the area and especially encouraged to have the needed doctors attend. The targets should include at least one surgeon or one emergency physician at all regional or large district hospitals who have taken the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) (or locally-developed alternative) in the past 4 years, and each district hospital should have at least one doctor who has taken the Primary Trauma Care (PTC) or Trauma Evaluation and Management (TEAM) (or locally-developed alternatives) in the past 4 years. Parallel measures would increase enrollment in the courses during training, such as promoting TEAM for all medical students and ATLS for all surgery residents. It is important to develop and utilize more "home grown" alternatives to increase the long-term sustainability of these efforts.

Funding

None.

Does ATLS Training Work? 10-Year Follow-Up of ATLS India Program

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating the efficacy of ATLS in low- and middle-income countries are limited. We followed up ATLS providers certified by the ATLS India program over a decade (2009 to 2019), aiming to measure the benefits in knowledge, skills, attitude and their attrition over time.

METHODS

The survey instrument was developed taking a cue from published literature on ATLS and improvised using the Delphi method. Randomly selected ATLS providers were sent the survey instrument via email as a Google form, along with a statement of purpose. Results are presented descriptively.

RESULTS

ATLS India trained 7,847 providers over the study period. 2500 providers were selected for the survery using computer-generated random number table. One thousand and thirty doctors (41.2%) responded. Improvement in knowledge (n = 1,013 [98.3%]), psychomotor skills (n = 986 [95.7%]), organizational skills (n = 998 [96.9%]), overall trauma management (n = 1,013 [98.7%]) and self-confidence (n = 939 [91%]) were reported. Majority (904 [87.8%]) started ATLS promulgation at workplace in personal capacity. These benefits lasted beyond 2 years in majority (>60%) of respondents. More than 40% reported cognitive (n = 492 [47.8%]), psychomotor (n = 433 [42%]), and organizational benefits (n = 499 [48.4%]) lasting beyond 3 years. Improvement in self-confidence, ATLS promulgation at the workplace, and retention of organizational skills were more pronounced in ATLS faculties than providers. All other benefits were found to be comparable in both sub-groups. Lack of trained staff (n = 660 [64.1%]) and attitude issues (n = 495 [48.1%]) were the major impediments in implementing ATLS at the workplace. More than a third of respondents (n = 373 [36.2%]) could enumerate one or more incidents where ATLS principles were life- or limb- saving.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive, psychomotor, organizational, and affective impact of ATLS is overwhelmingly positive in the Indian scenario. Until formal trauma systems are established, ATLS remains the best hope for critically injured patients in resource-contrained settings.

Evaluation of ISS, RTS, CASS and TRISS scoring systems for predicting outcomes of blunt trauma abdomen

PURPOSE

Trauma is the leading cause of mortality in people below the age of 45 years. Abdominal trauma constitutes one-fourth of the trauma burden. Scoring systems in trauma are necessary for grading the severity of the injury and prior mobilization of resources in anticipation. The aim of this study was to evaluate RTS, ISS, CASS and TRISS scoring systems in blunt trauma abdomen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective single-center study was conducted on 43 patients of blunt trauma abdomen. Revised trauma score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Clinical Abdominal Scoring System (CASS) and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) were calculated and compared with the outcomes such as need for surgical intervention, post-operative complications and mortality.

RESULTS

The majority of the study subjects were males (83.7%). The most common etiology for blunt trauma abdomen as per this study was road traffic accident (72.1%). Spleen was the most commonly injured organ as per the study. CASS and TRISS were significant in predicting the need for operative intervention. Only ISS significantly predicted post-operative complications. All scores except CASS significantly predicted mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the scoring systems studied CASS and TRISS predicted the need for operative intervention with good accuracy. For the prediction of post-operative complications, only the ISS score showed statistical significance. ISS, RTS and TRISS predicted mortality with good accuracy but the superiority of one score over the other couldn't be proved.

Global changes in mortality rates in polytrauma patients admitted to the ICU-a systematic review

Background

Many factors of trauma care have changed in the last decades. This review investigated the effect of these changes on global all-cause and cause-specific mortality in polytrauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Moreover, changes in trauma mechanism over time and differences between continents were analyzed.

Main body

A systematic review of literature on all-cause mortality in polytrauma patients admitted to ICU was conducted. All-cause and cause-specific mortality rates were extracted as well as trauma mechanism of each patient. Poisson regression analysis was used to model time trends in all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

Thirty studies, which reported mortality rates for 82,272 patients, were included and showed a decrease of 1.8% (95% CI 1.6–2.0%) in all-cause mortality per year since 1966. The relative contribution of brain injury-related death has increased over the years, whereas the relative contribution of death due to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), acute respiratory distress syndrome, and sepsis decreased. MODS was the most common cause of death in North America, and brain-related death was the most common in Asia, South America, and Europe. Penetrating trauma was most often reported in North America and Asia.

Conclusions

All-cause mortality in polytrauma patients admitted to the ICU has decreased over the last decades. A shift from MODS to brain-related death was observed. Geographical differences in cause-specific mortality were present, which may provide region-specific learning possibilities resulting in improvement of global trauma care.

Preventable Deaths in Multiple Trauma Patients: The Importance of Auditing and Continuous Quality Improvement

BACKGROUND

Management errors during pre-hospital care, triage process and resuscitation have been widely reported as the major source of preventable and potentially preventable deaths in multiple trauma patients. Common tools for defining whether it is a preventable, potentially preventable or non-preventable death include the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®) clinical guideline, the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS). Therefore, these surrogated scores were utilized in reviewing the study's trauma services.

METHODS

Trauma data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. All cases of trauma death were discussed and audited by the Hospital Trauma Committee on a regular basis. Standardized form was used to document the patient's management flow and details in every case during the meeting, and the final verdict (whether death was preventable or not) was agreed and signed by every member of the team. The reasons for the death of the patients were further classified into severe injuries, inappropriate/delayed examination, inappropriate/delayed treatment, wrong decision, insufficient supervision/guidance or lack of appropriate guidance.

RESULTS

A total of 1913 trauma patients were admitted during the study period, 82 of whom were identified as major trauma (either ISS > 15 or trauma team was activated). Among the 82 patients with major trauma, eight were trauma-related deaths, one of which was considered a preventable death and the other 7 were considered unpreventable. The decision from the hospital's performance improvement and patient safety program indicates that for every trauma patient, basic life support principles must be followed in the course of primary investigations for bedside trauma series X-ray (chest and pelvis) and FAST scan in the resuscitation room by a person who meets the criteria for trauma team activation recommended by ATLS®.

CONCLUSION

Mechanisms to rectify errors in the management of multiple trauma patients are essential for improving the quality of trauma care. Regular auditing in the trauma service is one of the most important parts of performance improvement and patient safety program, and it should be well established by every major trauma center in Mainland China. It can enhance the trauma management processes, decision-making skills and practical skills, thereby continuously improving quality and reducing mortality of this group of patients.

The role of simulation in burns education

Burns are devastating injuries which represent a significant global health burden. In the UK alone, it is estimated that 175 000 people suffer from burns injuries requiring hospital attention every year. The global treatment of burns can be improved through a more systematic team-based approach, which can be achieved through simulation training. Simulation has an increasingly important role in medical education, not only allowing practitioners to apply their knowledge in a controlled and safe environment, but also allowing them to gain technical and non-technical skills. This article explores the role of simulation as an important and effective tool for burns education worldwide.

Surgical management of spine injuries in severe polytrauma patients: a retrospective study

Background: Optimal surgical management of spinal injuries as part of life-threatening multiple traumas remains challenging. We provide insights into the surgical management of spinal injuries in polytrauma patients. Methods: All patients from our polytrauma care network who both met at least one positive Vittel criteria and an injury severity score (ISS) >15 at admission and who underwent surgery for a spinal injury were included retrospectively. Demographic data, clinical data demonstrating the severity of the trauma and imaging defining the spinal and extraspinal number and types of injuries were collected.Results: Between January 2012 and December 2016, 302 (22.2%) patients suffered from spinal injury (143 total injuries) and 83 (6.1%) met the inclusion criteria. Mean ISS was 36.2 (16-75). Only 48 (33.6%) injuries led to neurological impairment involving the thoracic (n = 23, 16.1%) and lower cervical (n = 15, 10.5%) spine. The most frequent association of injuries involved the thoracic spine (n = 42). 106 spinal surgeries were performed. The 3-month mortality rate was 2.4%.Conclusions: We present data collected on admission and in the early postoperative period referring to injury severity, the priority of injuries, and development of multi-organ failure. We revealed trends to guide the surgical support of spinal lesions in polytrauma patients.

Are Pre-hospital Trauma Deaths Preventable? A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The first and largest peak of trauma mortality is encountered on the trauma site. The aim of this study was to determine whether these trauma-related deaths are preventable. We performed a systematic literature review with a focus on pre-hospital preventable deaths in severely injured patients and their causes.

METHODS

Studies published in a peer-reviewed journal between January 1, 1990 and January 10, 2018 were included. Parameters of interest: country of publication, number of patients included, preventable death rate (PP = potentially preventable and DP = definitely preventable), inclusion criteria within studies (pre-hospital only, pre-hospital and hospital deaths), definition of preventability used in each study, type of trauma (blunt versus penetrating), study design (prospective versus retrospective) and causes for preventability mentioned within the study.

RESULTS

After a systematic literature search, 19 papers (total 7235 death) were included in this literature review. The majority (63.1%) of studies used autopsies combined with an expert panel to assess the preventability of death in the patients. Pre-hospital death rates range from 14.6 to 47.6%, in which 4.9-11.3% were definitely preventable and 25.8-42.7% were potentially preventable. The most common (27-58%) reason was a delayed treatment of the trauma victims, followed by management (40-60%) and treatment errors (50-76.6%).

CONCLUSION

According to our systematic review, a relevant amount of the observed mortality was described as preventable due to delays in treatment and management/treatment errors. Standards in the pre-hospital trauma system and management should be discussed in order to find strategies to reduce mortality.

Trauma teams and time to early management during in situ trauma team training

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between the time taken to make a decision to go to surgery and gender, ethnicity, years in profession, experience of trauma team training, experience of structured trauma courses and trauma in the trauma team, as well as use of closed-loop communication and leadership styles during trauma team training.

DESIGN

In situ trauma team training. The patient simulator was preprogrammed to represent a severely injured patient (injury severity score: 25) suffering from hypovolemia due to external trauma.

SETTING

An emergency room in an urban Scandinavian level one trauma centre.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 96 participants were divided into 16 trauma teams. Each team consisted of six team members: one surgeon/emergency physician (designated team leader), one anaesthesiologist, one registered nurse anaesthetist, one registered nurse from the emergency department, one enrolled nurse from the emergency department and one enrolled nurse from the operating theatre.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

HRs with CIs (95% CI) for the time taken to make a decision to go to surgery was computed from a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Three variables remained significant in the final model. Closed-loop communication initiated by the team leader increased the chance of a decision to go to surgery (HR: 3.88; CI 1.02 to 14.69). Only 8 of the 16 teams made the decision to go to surgery within the timeframe of the trauma team training. Conversely, call-outs and closed-loop communication initiated by the team members significantly decreased the chance of a decision to go to surgery, (HR: 0.82; CI 0.71 to 0.96, and HR: 0.23; CI 0.08 to 0.71, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Closed-loop communication initiated by the leader appears to be beneficial for teamwork. In contrast, a high number of call-outs and closed-loop communication initiated by team members might lead to a communication overload.

Observation for assessment of clinician performance: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Video recorded and in-person observations are methods of quality assessment and monitoring that have been employed in high risk industries. In the medical field, observations have been used to evaluate the quality and safety of various clinical processes. This review summarises studies utilising video recorded or in-person observations for assessing clinician performance in medicine and surgery.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE (PubMed) was conducted using a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. Articles were included if they described the use of in-person or video recorded observations to assess clinician practices in three categories: (1) teamwork and communication between clinicians; (2) errors and weaknesses in practice; and (3) compliance and adherence to interventions or guidelines.

RESULTS

The initial search criteria returned 3215 studies, 223 of which were identified for full text review. A total of 69 studies were included in the final set of literature. Observations were most commonly used in data dense and high risk environments, such as the emergency department or operating room. The most common use was for assessing teamwork and communication factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Observations are useful for the improvement of healthcare delivery through the identification of clinician lapses and weaknesses that affect quality and safety. Limitations of observations include the Hawthorne effect and the necessity of trained observers to capture and analyse the notes or videos. The comprehensive, subtle and sensitive information observations provided can supplement traditional quality assessment methods and inform targeted interventions to improve patient safety and the quality of care.

Improving trauma care in low- and middle-income countries by implementing a standardized trauma protocol

BACKGROUND

Standardized trauma protocols (STPs) have reduced morbidity and mortality in mature trauma systems. Most hospitals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have not yet implemented such protocols, often due to financial and logistic limitations. We report preliminary findings from a trauma quality improvement (QI) initiative, using and evaluating the impact of a low-cost STP in an LMIC university hospital.

METHODS

We developed an STP based on generally accepted best practices and damage control resuscitation. It was designed for the resources available at the test institution. The Neiva University Hospital (NUH) is a tertiary care hospital and level I trauma center in Neiva, Colombia. As in most LMIC hospitals, there was no trauma information data system at NUH. Therefore, we adapted an administrative electronic database to capture clinically relevant information of adult patients who were hospitalized or died in the emergency department (ED) between August 2010 and June 2012 with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) diagnoses indicating trauma (S00-Y98). Interventions that were recommended in the STP were compared in these two groups. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and mortality were also examined.

RESULTS

A total of 4,324 patients were included, of whom, 2,457 patients were in the pre-protocol period and 1,867 were in the post-protocol period. The use of several interventions increased: blood product transfusions in the ED (1.0 vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001), use of hypertonic fluids in hypotensive patients (3.2 vs. 8.9 %; p < 0.001), placement of Foley catheters (11.1 vs. 13.8%; p = 0.007), arterial blood gas draws (16.6 vs. 26.4%; p < 0.001), tetanus vaccinations (19.3 vs. 26.0%; p < 0.001), placement of multiple large bore peripheral catheters (29.5 vs. 34.7%; p < 0.001), prophylactic antibiotics (34.9 vs. 38.0%; p = 0.035), and the use of analgesics (64.5 vs. 68.0%; p = 0.016). Other interventions also trended upwards. Length of stay (LOS) decreased for both surgical and non-surgical patients (surgical 13.4 vs. 11.8 days; p = 0.017; non-surgical 4.4 vs. 3.8 days; p = 0.059). All-cause mortality of trauma patients decreased (3.9 vs. 2.9%; p = 0.088).

CONCLUSIONS

The institution of an STP at a university hospital in an LMIC has increased the use of vital interventions while decreasing overall LOS for all-cause trauma patients.

Impact of ATLS training on preventable and potentially preventable deaths

BACKGROUND

Multiple trauma continues to have a high incidence worldwide. Trauma is the leading cause of death among people between the ages of 10 and 40. The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) is the most widely accepted method for the initial control and treatment of multiple trauma patients. It is based on the following hypothesis: The application of the ATLS program may reduce preventable or potentially preventable deaths in trauma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present article reports a retrospective study based on the records of prospectively evaluated trauma patients between January 2007 and December 2012. Trauma patients over the age of 18 admitted to the critical care unit or patients who died before hospital admission were included. A multidisciplinary committee looked for errors in the management of each patient and classified deaths into preventable, potentially preventable, or nonpreventable. We recorded the number of specialists at our center who had received training in the ATLS program.

RESULTS

A total of 898 trauma patients were registered. The mean injury severity score was 21 (SD 15), and the mortality rate was 10.7 % (96 cases). There were 14 cases (14.6 %) of preventable or potentially preventable death. The main errors were delay in initiating suitable treatment and performing a computed tomography scan in cases of hemodynamic instability, followed by initiation of incorrect treatment or omission of an essential procedure. As the number of ATLS-trained professionals increases, the rates of potentially preventable or preventable death fall.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-founded protocols such as the ATLS can help provide the preparation health professionals need. In our hospital environment, ATLS training has helped to reduce preventable or potentially preventable mortality among trauma patients.

Educational and clinical impact of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

We aimed to systematically review the literature on the educational impact of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses and their effects on death rates of multiple trauma patients.

METHODS

All Medline, Pubmed, and the Cochrane Library English articles on the educational impact of ATLS courses and their effects on trauma mortality for the period 1966-2012 were studied. All original articles written in English were included. Surveys, reviews, editorials/letters, and other trauma courses or models different from the ATLS course were excluded. Articles were critically evaluated regarding study research design, statistical analysis, outcome, and quality and level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 384 articles were found in the search. Of these, 104 relevant articles were read; 23 met the selection criteria and were critically analyzed. Ten original articles reported studies on the impact of ATLS on cognitive and clinical skills, six articles addressed the attrition of skills gained through ATLS training, and seven articles addressed the effects of ATLS on trauma mortality. There is level I evidence that ATLS significantly improves the knowledge of participants managing multiple trauma patients, their clinical skills, and their organization and priority approaches. There is level II-1 evidence that knowledge and skills gained through ATLS participation decline after 6 months, with a maximum decline after 2 years. Organization and priority skills, however, are kept for up to 8 years following ATLS. Strong evidence showing that ATLS training reduces morbidity and mortality in trauma patients is still lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

It is highly recommended that ATLS courses should be taught for all doctors who are involved in the management of multiple trauma patients. Future studies are required to properly evaluate the impact of ATLS training on trauma death rates and disability.

A standardized trauma care protocol decreased in-hospital mortality of patients with severe traumatic brain injury at a teaching hospital in a middle-income country

INTRODUCTION

Standardized trauma protocols (STP) have reduced morbidity and in-hospital mortality in mature trauma systems. Most hospitals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have not implemented STPs, often because of financial and logistic limitations. We report the impact of an STP designed for the care of trauma patients in the emergency department (ED) at an LMIC hospital on patients with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI).

METHODS

We developed an STP based on generally accepted best practices and damage control resuscitation for a level I trauma centre in Colombia. Without a pre-existing trauma registry, we adapted an administrative electronic database to capture clinical information of adult patients with TBI, a head abbreviated injury score (AIS) ≥3, and who presented ≤12h from injury. Demographics, mechanisms of injury, and injury severity were compared. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), length of hospital and ICU stay, and prevalence of ED interventions recommended in the STP. Logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The pre-STP group was hospitalized between August 2010 and August 2011, the post-STP group between September 2011 and June 2012. There were 108 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 68 pre-STP implementation and 40 post-STP. The pre- and post-STP groups were similar in age (mean 37.1 vs. 38.6, p=0.644), head AIS (median 4.5 vs. 4.0, p=0.857), Injury Severity Scale (median 25 vs. 25, p=0.757), and initial GCS (median 7 vs. 7, p=0.384). Post-STP in-hospital mortality decreased (38% vs. 18%, p=0.024), and discharge GCS increased (median 10 vs. 14, p=0.034). After controlling for potential confounders, odds of in-hospital mortality post-STP compared to pre-STP were 0.248 (95%CI: 0.074-0.838, p=0.025). Hospital and ICU stay did not significantly change. The use of many ED interventions increased post-STP, including bladder catheterization (49% vs. 73%, p=0.015), hypertonic saline (38% vs. 63%, p=0.014), arterial blood gas draws (25% vs. 43%, p=0.059), and blood transfusions (3% vs. 18%, p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

An STP in an LMIC decreased in-hospital mortality, increased discharge GCS, and increased use of vital ED interventions for patients with STBI. An STP in an LMIC can be implemented and measured without a pre-existing trauma registry.

Compliance to advanced trauma life support protocols in adult trauma patients in the acute setting

INTRODUCTION

Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols provide a common approach for trauma resuscitations. This was a quality review assessing compliance with ATLS protocols at a Level I trauma center; specifically whether the presence or absence of a trauma team leader (TTL) influenced adherence.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on adult major trauma patients with acute injuries over a one-year period in a Level I Canadian trauma center. Data were collected from the Alberta Trauma Registry, and adherence to ATLS protocols was determined by chart review.

RESULTS

The study identified 508 patients with a mean Injury Severity Score of 24.5 (SD 10.7), mean age 39.7 (SD 17.6), 73.8% were male and 91.9% were involved in blunt trauma. The overall compliance rate was 81.8% for primary survey and 75% for secondary survey. The TTL group compared to non-TTL group was more likely to complete the primary survey (90.9% vs. 81.8%, p = 0.003), and the secondary survey (100% vs. 75%, p = 0.004). The TTL group was more likely than the non-TTL group to complete the following tasks: insertion of two large bore IVs (68.2% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.014), digital rectal exam (64.6% vs. 54.7%, p = 0.023), and head to toe exam (77% vs. 67.1%, p = 0.013). Mean times from emergency department arrival to diagnostic imaging were also significantly shorter in the TTL group compared to the non-TTL group, including times to pelvis xray (mean 68min vs. 107min, p = 0.007), CT chest (mean 133min vs. 172min, p = 0.005), and CT abdomen and pelvis (mean 136min vs. 173min, p = 0.013). Readmission rates were not significantly different between the TTL and non-TTL groups (3.5% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.642).

CONCLUSIONS

While many studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of trauma systems on outcomes, few have explored the direct influence of the TTL on ATLS compliance. This study demonstrated that TTL involvement during resuscitations was associated with improved adherence to ATLS protocols, and increased efficiency (compared to non TTL involvement) to diagnostic imaging. Findings from this study will guide future quality improvement and education for early trauma management.

Evolution and development of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol: a historical perspective

The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol is a successful course offered by the American College of Surgeons. Once based on didactic lectures and seminars taught by experts in the field, trauma training has evolved to become a set of standardized assessment and treatment protocols based on evidence rather than expert opinion. As the ATLS expands, indices to predict outcome, morbidity, and mortality have evolved to guide management and treatment based on retrospective data. This historical, perspective article attempts to tell the story of ATLS from its inception to its evolution as an international standard for the initial assessment and management of trauma patients.

The role of early multislice computed tomography in major trauma

Whole-body multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) has become a very important dignostic tool in the management of patients with multiple injuries. Many reports exist which demonstrate the feasibility and the benefit when using whole-body MSCT in the early phase of in-hospital management of trauma patients. Even in hemodynamically instable patients (except cardiac arrest), whole-body MSCT can be used and is a safe diagnostic procedure. While the diagnostic superiority of multislice computed tomography is proven for different organ regions (e.g. head/brain, chest, abdomen, pelvis and spine), its use as a single whole-body scan is still part of an ongoing discussion. Especially concerns about radiation exposure are the reason for uncertainty about when using whole-body trauma scan. Predefined scan protocols and individual positioning of patients may help to keep radiation dose as minimal as possible. To justify higher radiation dose, the indication must be chosen appropriately. Therefore, the use of a sensitive and specific triage scheme seems to be reasonable. Overscanning patients with minor trauma needs to be avoided, while the benefit for patients with severe multiple injuries is obvious.

[TEAM®-G (Trauma Evaluation and Management Germany). Serves as a basis for an interdisciplinary training in the emergency room]

BACKGROUND

The implementation of ATLS® in the daily routine of trauma management in the emergency department is a challenge. This goal cannot be reached by educating ATLS® to a few team members only. In order to enforce the implementation of ATLS® in a level I trauma centre, a generic in-house training was introduced in 2009 with inter-professional integration of all specialists of the trauma team.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The TEAM® course (trauma evaluation and management concept of the American College of Surgeons) was the theoretical basis of the training. This educational program was developed for medical students and multidisciplinary team members. Prior training, a questionnaire for self-assessment was completed by n=84 team members to assess their knowledge about ATLS® principles. The hands-on training time was 90 min. N=10 members of the trauma team worked out three scenarios of multiple injured patients. These were provided as near-reality manikin simulations by a specialist trainer. After the training participants re-evaluated and analysed improvement by the training. Duration of trauma management and the number of missed injuries were analysed one year prior and one year after the training and served as a marker of the process and outcome quality of trauma care.

RESULTS

Prior the training, 57% of trainees specified their knowledge related to the ATLS® can be improved. Their expectations were generally satisfied by the training. The mean time of trauma management in the ED could not be reduced one year after the training (36±16 min) compared to one year prior the training (39±18 min), however, the detection of missed injuries (5.6% vs. 3.2%, p<0.05) was significantly diminished after the training.

CONCLUSION

Apart form education of ATLS® providers the inauguration of an interdisciplinary and interprofessionel team training may enhance implementation of ATLS- algorithms into daily routine.

Increase in early mechanical ventilation of burn patients: an effect of current emergency trauma management?

BACKGROUND

Data relating to patients admitted with extensive burn injuries in the Netherlands have revealed a marked increase in patients whose initial care included mechanical ventilation (MV). The increase was abrupt, dating from 1997, and has been sustained since. The aim of this study is to quantify this observation and to discuss possible causes.

METHODS

The study included 258 consecutive patients with burns >30% total body surface area admitted to the Beverwijk burns center. Patients were divided into two groups based on admission date: group 1 from 1987 to 1996 (n=135) and group 2 from 1997 to 2006 (n=123). Data were analyzed using χ or analysis of variance.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups in demographics, facial burns, inhalation injury, and % total body surface area. However, the number of patients subjected to MV at admission increased from 38% to 76% (group 1 vs. 2; p<0.001). In 57% of patients who were intubated based on the suspicion of inhalation injury, this condition could not be confirmed (p<0.05 vs. 9% [1987-1996]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has confirmed that a higher proportion of patients were treated with MV since 1997, whereas the severity of burn injury remained unchanged throughout the study period. In the absence of a clinical explanation, we surmise that there has been a change within Dutch casualty departments in the initial management of major burn injury. The change coincides with the implementation of the Advanced Life Trauma Support training course as the accepted standard of trauma care in Dutch hospitals.

Effect of training in the Emergency Management of Severe Burns on the knowledge and performance of emergency care workers as measured by an online simulated burn incident

OBJECTIVE

To determine the value of training for the Emergency Management of Severe Burns (EMSB) for medical and nursing staff working in emergency care as measured by their performance in a simulated burn incident online program.

METHODS

An Internet-based questionnaire, which included a simulated burn incident, was developed. All of the medical and nursing staff in hospital emergency departments and ambulance services in the Netherlands were invited to complete this questionnaire. The effect of EMSB training on the individual's knowledge of and performance in the emergency management of a burn victim was evaluated because some of the respondents had participated in EMSB training, whereas others had not.

RESULTS

Of the 280 responses received, 198 questionnaires were included in the analysis. The analyzed questionnaires were submitted by nurses (43%), ambulance workers (33%), and physicians (23%). Only 14% of the people in the study had participated in EMSB training, whereas 78% had received other or additional life support training and 22% of respondents had no additional life support training. Medical and nursing staff who had participated in EMSB training performed better in the following subjects: mentioning hypothermia as a focus of attention (70% versus 53%, p=0.085), correct use of hand size (70% versus 36%, p=0.001) and use of the correct hand percentage in the estimation of total body surface area (TBSA, 82% versus 57%, p=0.015), suspicion of no airway obstruction in an outdoor trauma (93% versus 63%, p = 0.002) and referral of functional area burns to a burn center (22% versus 8%, p = 0.04). However, both groups overestimated the TBSA (34% of the total group overestimated ≥ 20%) and did not know the correct formula for fluid resuscitation (87% of the total group).

CONCLUSION

There is some evidence that medical staff members who have participated in EMSB training have a better knowledge of emergency management and are more effective in the management of a simulated burn case. However, both individuals who had participated in EMSB as well as those who had not participated in EMSB needed additional training in EMSB.

Improving trauma care in India: a recommendation for the implementation of ATLS training for emergency department medical officers

BACKGROUND

Trauma is major cause of morbidity and mortality in India. The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) programme teaches a standardised method for the initial assessment and management of trauma patients, and has been adopted by more than 50 countries worldwide.

AIM

We sought to assess the theoretical knowledge of ATLS principles among emergency department (ED) medical officers (MOs) in Salem, Tamil Nadu, India, and from the Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia.

METHODS

All MOs answered a trauma management quiz based on ATLS-type questions. Quiz scores were compared between senior and junior MO groups for each country, and within each professional group between countries. Categorical data were analysed using chi(2). An alpha value less than 0.05 was deemed to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

We discovered significant differences in the theoretical knowledge of ED MOs from Salem compared with colleagues in Adelaide. Our results demonstrated the positive influence of completion of an ATLS programme upon obtaining a passing grade on the trauma quiz. We failed to determine a link between self-rated experience in trauma management and the ability to pass the quiz.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated the positive influence of completion of an ATLS-type programme on the score obtained on the trauma management quiz. Although previous work has demonstrated mixed results concerning improvement in the care of trauma patients following completion of an ATLS programme, we recommend that such programmes be integrated into the training of Indian ED MOs and suggest that ATLS should be viewed as an integral part of medical training.

Video registration of trauma team performance in the emergency department: the results of a 2-year analysis in a Level 1 trauma center

BACKGROUND

Trauma teams responsible for the first response to patients with multiple injuries upon arrival in a hospital consist of medical specialists or resident physicians. We hypothesized that 24-hour video registration in the trauma room would allow for precise evaluation of team functioning and deviations from Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols.

METHODS

We analyzed all video registrations of trauma patients who visited the emergency room of a Level I trauma center in the Netherlands between September 1, 2000, and September 1, 2002. Analysis was performed with a score list based on ATLS protocols.

RESULTS

From a total of 1,256 trauma room presentations, we found a total of 387 video registrations suitable for analysis. The majority of patients had an injury severity score lower than 17 (264 patients), whereas 123 patients were classified as multiple injuries (injury severity score >or=17). Errors in team organization (omission of prehospital report, no evident leadership, unorganized resuscitation, not working according to protocol, and no continued supervision of the patient) lead to significantly more deviations in the treatment than when team organization was uncomplicated.

CONCLUSIONS

Video registration of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures by a multidisciplinary trauma team facilitates an accurate analysis of possible deviations from protocol. In addition to identifying technical errors, the role of the team leader can clearly be analyzed and related to team actions. Registration strongly depends on availability of video tapes, timely started registration, and hardware functioning. The results from this study were used to develop a training program for trauma teams in our hospital that specifically focuses on the team leader's functioning.

[Polytrauma management in a period of change: time analysis of new strategies for emergency room treatment]

BACKGROUND

Quality management and the early implementation of whole-body multi-slice spiral computed tomography (whole-body MSCT) are becoming increasingly important in the management of patients with multiple trauma. The aim of this study was to evaluate both components with respect to the time factor for treatment.

METHODS

The investigation involved a retrospective data analysis of the time needed in the emergency room for the initial stabilization (phase A), completing the diagnosis (phase B) and the emergency room treatment (phase C). The investigation included three groups: trauma patients imaged in the emergency room with conventional imaging procedures (group I), with whole-body MSCT alone (group II) and those who were imaged with whole-body MSCT after the introduction of a quality management system with standard operating procedures (group III).

RESULTS

The times for resuscitation (phase A), for diagnostic evaluation (phase B) and for total treatment (phase C) were analyzed. The times for phase A were for group I (n=79) 10 min (interquartile range, IQR 8-12 min), group II (n=82) 13 min (IQR 10-17 min) and group III (n=79) 10 min (IQR 8-15 min; p<0.001). The times for phase B were 70 min (IQR 56-85 min) for group I, 23 min (IQR 17-33 min) for group II and 17 min (IQR 13-21 min; p<0.001) for group III. For phase C the times were 82 min (IQR 66-110 min) for group I, 47 min (IQR 37-59 min) for group II and 42 min (IQR 34-52 min; p<0.05) for group III.

CONCLUSION

Quality management and the early implementation of whole-body MSCT can accelerate the treatment work flow. A rapid initial diagnosis represents an important component in the high quality of treatment of polytrauma patients.

Patterns of mortality and causes of death in polytrauma patients--has anything changed?

INTRODUCTION

Numerous articles have examined the pattern of traumatic deaths. Most of these studies have aimed to improve trauma care and raise awareness of avoidable complications. The aim of the present review is to evaluate whether the distribution of complications and mortality has changed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the published literature to identify studies examining patterns and causes of death following trauma treated in level 1 hospitals published between 1980 and 2008. PubMed was searched using the following terms: Trauma Epidemiology, Injury Pattern, Trauma Deaths, and Causes of Death. Three time periods were differentiated: (n=6, 1980-1989), (n=6, 1990-1999), and (n=10, 2000-2008). The results were limited to the English and/or German language. Manuscripts were analysed to identify the age, injury severity score (ISS), patterns and causes of death mentioned in studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-two publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the review. A decrease of haemorrhage-induced deaths (25-15%) has occurred within the last decade. No considerable changes in the incidence and pattern of death were found. The predominant cause of death after trauma continues to be central nervous system (CNS) injury (21.6-71.5%), followed by exsanguination (12.5-26.6%), while sepsis (3.1-17%) and multi-organ failure (MOF) (1.6-9%) continue to be predominant causes of late death.

DISCUSSION

Comparing manuscripts from the last three decades revealed a reduction in the mortality rate from exsanguination. Rates of the other causes of death appear to be unchanged. These improvements might be explained by developments in the availability of multislice CT, implementation of ATLS concepts and logistics of emergency rescue.

Three decades (1978-2008) of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) practice revised and evidence revisited

The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Program was developed to teach doctors one safe, reliable method to assess and initially manage the trauma patient. The ATLS principles represents an organized approach for evaluation and management of seriously injured patients and offers a foundation of common knowledge for all members of the trauma team. After 3 decades of teaching (1978-2008) of ATLS worldwide one should intuitively perceive that the evidence for the effect of ATLS teaching on the improved management of the injured patient be well established. This editorial addresses aspects of trauma education with needs for further development of better evidence of best practice.

Distribution of Spinal and Associated Injuries in Multiple Trauma Patients

Injury to the spinal column and cord are often part of life-threatening multiple trauma. Epidemiological data could help to establish an evidence-based assessment and therapy of these patients. We present a retrospective chart analysis of 590 multiple traumatized patients admitted within a 4-year-period. Patients suffering from injuries of the spinal column were analysed regarding mechanism and distribution of their injuries to all body regions. Thirty-one percent (n = 183) of polytraumatized patients displayed a spine injury. Distribution analysis showed peaks in the cervical spine and the thoraco-lumbar junction. The risk of relevant associated injuries is mainly influenced from anatomical vicinity to the injured spinal segment. Injuries to the spinal column are frequent in the multiple trauma patients population. Diagnosed injuries to distinct body regions should make the trauma team suspicious of injury to the nearby spinal column. Appropriate treatment includes thorough assessment of all injuries to clarify the damage and carry on special protection of these spinal regions preventing from deterioration.

[Current concepts of polytrauma management: from ATLS to "damage control"]

In recent years, the implementation of standardized protocols for polytrauma management has led to a significant improvement in trauma care as well as to a decrease in post-traumatic morbidity and mortality. As such, the "Advanced Trauma Life Support" (ATLS) protocol of the American College of Surgeons for the acute management of severely injured patients has been established as a gold standard in most European countries since the 1990s. Continuative concepts to the ATLS program include the "Definitive Surgical Trauma Care" (DSTC) algorithm and the concept of "damage control" surgery for polytraumatized patients with immediate life-threatening injuries. These phase-oriented therapeutic strategies appraise the injured patient of the whole extent of the sustained injuries and are in sharp contrast to previous modalities of "early total care" which advocate immediate definitive surgical intervention. The approach of "damage control" surgery takes into account the influence of systemic post-traumatic inflammatory and metabolic reactions of the organism and is aimed at reducing both the primary and the secondary, delayed, mortality in severely injured patients. The present paper provides an overview of the current state of management algorithms for polytrauma patients, with a focus on the standard concepts of ATLS and "damage control".