1
|
Gaither JB, Spaite DW, Bobrow BJ, Barnhart B, Chikani V, Denninghoff KR, Bradley GH, Rice AD, Howard JT, Keim SM, Hu C. EMS Treatment Guidelines in Major Traumatic Brain Injury With Positive Pressure Ventilation. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:363-372. [PMID: 38265782 PMCID: PMC10809136 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Importance The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) study demonstrated improved survival in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) following implementation of the prehospital treatment guidelines. The impact of implementing these guidelines in the subgroup of patients who received positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is unknown. Objective To evaluate the association of implementation of prehospital TBI evidence-based guidelines with survival among patients with prehospital PPV. Design, Setting, and Participants The EPIC study was a multisystem, intention-to-treat study using a before/after controlled design. Evidence-based guidelines were implemented by emergency medical service agencies across Arizona. This subanalysis was planned a priori and included participants who received prehospital PPV. Outcomes were compared between the preimplementation and postimplementation cohorts using logistic regression, stratified by predetermined TBI severity categories (moderate, severe, or critical). Data were collected from January 2007 to June 2017, and data were analyzed from January to February 2023. Exposure Implementation of the evidence-based guidelines for the prehospital care of patient with TBI. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge, and the secondary outcome was survival to admission. Results Among the 21 852 participants in the main study, 5022 received prehospital PPV (preimplementation, 3531 participants; postimplementation, 1491 participants). Of 5022 included participants, 3720 (74.1%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 36 (22-54) years. Across all severities combined, survival to admission improved (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.28-1.97), while survival to discharge did not (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.13). Within the cohort with severe TBI but not in the moderate or critical subgroups, survival to hospital admission increased (aOR, 6.44; 95% CI, 2.39-22.00), as did survival to discharge (aOR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.96-6.34). Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with severe TBI who received active airway interventions in the field, guideline implementation was independently associated with improved survival to hospital admission and discharge. This was true whether they received basic airway interventions or advanced airways. These findings support the current guideline recommendations for aggressive prevention/correction of hypoxia and hyperventilation in patients with severe TBI, regardless of which airway type is used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua B. Gaither
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine—Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Daniel W. Spaite
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine—Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Bentley J. Bobrow
- Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, Texas
| | - Bruce Barnhart
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine—Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
| | - Vatsal Chikani
- Department of Public Health, University of Texas at San Antonio
| | - Kurt R. Denninghoff
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine—Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Gail H. Bradley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
- Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS, Phoenix
| | - Amber D. Rice
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine—Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | | | - Samuel M. Keim
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine—Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Chengcheng Hu
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine—Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jarvis JL, Panchal AR, Lyng JW, Bosson N, Donofrio-Odmann JJ, Braude DA, Browne LR, Arinder M, Bolleter S, Gross T, Levy M, Lindbeck G, Maloney LM, Mattera CJ, Wang CT, Crowe RP, Gage CB, Lang ES, Sholl JM. Evidence-Based Guideline for Prehospital Airway Management. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2023; 28:545-557. [PMID: 38133523 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2281363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Airway management is a cornerstone of emergency medical care. This project aimed to create evidence-based guidelines based on the systematic review recently conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). A technical expert panel was assembled to review the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The panel made specific recommendations on the different PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) questions reviewed in the AHRQ review and created good practice statements that summarize and operationalize these recommendations. The recommendations address the use of ventilation with bag-valve mask ventilation alone vs. supraglottic airways vs. endotracheal intubation for adults and children with cardiac arrest, medical emergencies, and trauma. Additional recommendations address the use of video laryngoscopy and drug-assisted airway management. These recommendations, and the associated good practice statements, offer EMS agencies and clinicians an opportunity to review the available evidence and incorporate it into their airway management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Jarvis
- Office of the Medical Director, Metropolitan Area EMS Authority, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Ashish R Panchal
- National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians, Columbus, Ohio
| | - John W Lyng
- Emergency Medicine, North Memorial Health Hospital Level 1 trauma center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Nichole Bosson
- EMS, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Darren A Braude
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Lorin R Browne
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Michael Arinder
- EMS, Global Medical Response Inc., Greenwood Village, Colorado
| | - Scott Bolleter
- EMS, Healthcare Innovation & Sciences Centre, Spring Branch, Texas
| | - Toni Gross
- Department of Emergency Medicine, LCMC Health, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - George Lindbeck
- National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Lauren M Maloney
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York
| | | | - Cheng-Teng Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | | | - Christopher B Gage
- Research, National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Eddy S Lang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
| | - J Matthew Sholl
- National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jarvis JL, Lyng JW, Miller BL, Perlmutter MC, Abraham H, Sahni R. Prehospital Drug Assisted Airway Management: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2022; 26:42-53. [PMID: 35001829 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1990447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Airway management is a critical intervention for patients with airway compromise, respiratory failure, and cardiac arrest. Many EMS agencies use drug-assisted airway management (DAAM) - the administration of sedatives alone or in combination with neuromuscular blockers - to facilitate advanced airway placement in patients with airway compromise or impending respiratory failure who also have altered mental status, agitation, or intact protective airway reflexes. While DAAM provides several benefits including improving laryngoscopy and making insertion of endotracheal tubes and supraglottic airways easier, DAAM also carries important risks. NAEMSP recommends:DAAM is an appropriate tool for EMS clinicians in systems with clear guidelines, sufficient training, and close EMS physician oversight. DAAM should not be used in settings without adequate resources.EMS physicians should develop clinical guidelines informed by evidence and oversee the training and credentialing for safe and effective DAAM.DAAM programs should include best practices of airway management including patient selection, assessmenct and positioning, preoxygenation strategies including apneic oxygenation, monitoring and management of physiologic abnormalities, selection of medications, post-intubation analgesia and sedation, equipment selection, airway confirmation and monitoring, and rescue airway techniques.Post-DAAM airway placement must be confirmed and continually monitored with waveform capnography.EMS clinicians must have the necessary equipment and training to manage patients with failed DAAM, including bag mask ventilation, supraglottic airway devices and surgical airway approaches.Continuous quality improvement for DAAM must include assessment of individual and aggregate performance metrics. Where available for review, continuous physiologic recordings (vital signs, pulse oximetry, and capnography), audio and video recordings, and assessment of patient outcomes should be part of DAAM continuous quality improvement.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaither JB, Spaite DW, Bobrow BJ, Keim SM, Barnhart BJ, Chikani V, Sherrill D, Denninghoff KR, Mullins T, Adelson PD, Rice AD, Viscusi C, Hu C. Effect of Implementing the Out-of-Hospital Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment Guidelines: The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care for Children Study (EPIC4Kids). Ann Emerg Med 2021; 77:139-153. [PMID: 33187749 PMCID: PMC7855946 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.09.435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE We evaluate the effect of implementing the out-of-hospital pediatric traumatic brain injury guidelines on outcomes in children with major traumatic brain injury. METHODS The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care for Children study is the preplanned secondary analysis of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care study, a multisystem, intention-to-treat study using a before-after controlled design. This subanalysis included children younger than 18 years who were transported to Level I trauma centers by participating out-of-hospital agencies between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2015, throughout Arizona. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge or admission for children with major traumatic brain injury and in 3 subgroups, defined a priori as those with moderate, severe, and critical traumatic brain injury. Outcomes in the preimplementation and postimplementation cohorts were compared with logistic regression, adjusting for risk factors and confounders. RESULTS There were 2,801 subjects, 2,041 in preimplementation and 760 in postimplementation. The primary analysis (postimplementation versus preimplementation) yielded an adjusted odds ratio of 1.16 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.92) for survival to hospital discharge and 2.41 (95% confidence interval 1.17 to 5.21) for survival to hospital admission. In the severe traumatic brain injury cohort (Regional Severity Score-Head 3 or 4), but not the moderate or critical subgroups, survival to discharge significantly improved after guideline implementation (adjusted odds ratio = 8.42; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 100+). The improvement in survival to discharge among patients with severe traumatic brain injury who received positive-pressure ventilation did not reach significance (adjusted odds ratio = 9.13; 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 100+). CONCLUSION Implementation of the pediatric out-of-hospital traumatic brain injury guidelines was not associated with improved survival when the entire spectrum of severity was analyzed as a whole (moderate, severe, and critical). However, both adjusted survival to hospital admission and discharge improved in children with severe traumatic brain injury, indicating a potential severity-based interventional opportunity for guideline effectiveness. These findings support the widespread implementation of the out-of-hospital pediatric traumatic brain injury guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua B Gaither
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
| | - Daniel W Spaite
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Bentley J Bobrow
- Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX
| | - Samuel M Keim
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Bruce J Barnhart
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Vatsal Chikani
- Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Duane Sherrill
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Kurt R Denninghoff
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Terry Mullins
- Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS, Phoenix, AZ
| | - P David Adelson
- Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital and Department of Child Health/Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Amber D Rice
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Chad Viscusi
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Chengcheng Hu
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sumann G, Moens D, Brink B, Brodmann Maeder M, Greene M, Jacob M, Koirala P, Zafren K, Ayala M, Musi M, Oshiro K, Sheets A, Strapazzon G, Macias D, Paal P. Multiple trauma management in mountain environments - a scoping review : Evidence based guidelines of the International Commission for Mountain Emergency Medicine (ICAR MedCom). Intended for physicians and other advanced life support personnel. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020; 28:117. [PMID: 33317595 PMCID: PMC7737289 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00790-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple trauma in mountain environments may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared to urban environments. Objective To provide evidence based guidance to assist rescuers in multiple trauma management in mountain environments. Eligibility criteria All articles published on or before September 30th 2019, in all languages, were included. Articles were searched with predefined search terms. Sources of evidence PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and hand searching of relevant studies from the reference list of included articles. Charting methods Evidence was searched according to clinically relevant topics and PICO questions. Results Two-hundred forty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were developed and graded according to the evidence-grading system of the American College of Chest Physicians. The manuscript was initially written and discussed by the coauthors. Then it was presented to ICAR MedCom in draft and again in final form for discussion and internal peer review. Finally, in a face-to-face discussion within ICAR MedCom consensus was reached on October 11th 2019, at the ICAR fall meeting in Zakopane, Poland. Conclusions Multiple trauma management in mountain environments can be demanding. Safety of the rescuers and the victim has priority. A crABCDE approach, with haemorrhage control first, is central, followed by basic first aid, splinting, immobilisation, analgesia, and insulation. Time for on-site medical treatment must be balanced against the need for rapid transfer to a trauma centre and should be as short as possible. Reduced on-scene times may be achieved with helicopter rescue. Advanced diagnostics (e.g. ultrasound) may be used and treatment continued during transport.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Sumann
- Austrian Society of Mountain and High Altitude Medicine, Emergency physician, Austrian Mountain and Helicopter Rescue, Altach, Austria
| | - D Moens
- Emergency Department Liège University Hospital, CMH HEMS Lead physician and medical director, Senior Lecturer at the University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - B Brink
- Mountain Emergency Paramedic, AHEMS, Canadian Society of Mountain Medicine, Whistler Blackcomb Ski Patrol, Whistler, Canada
| | - M Brodmann Maeder
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland and Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
| | - M Greene
- Medical Officer Mountain Rescue England and Wales, Wales, UK
| | - M Jacob
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Hospitallers Brothers Saint-Elisabeth-Hospital Straubing, Bavarian Mountain Rescue Service, Straubing, Germany
| | - P Koirala
- Adjunct Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Mountain Medicine Society of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - K Zafren
- ICAR MedCom, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.,Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - M Ayala
- University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - M Musi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - K Oshiro
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Director of Mountain Medicine, Research, and Survey Division, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - A Sheets
- Emergency Department, Boulder Community Health, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - G Strapazzon
- Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.,The Corpo Nazionale Soccorso Alpino e Speleologico, National Medical School (CNSAS SNaMed), Milan, Italy
| | - D Macias
- Department of Emergency Medicine, International Mountain Medicine Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - P Paal
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. John of God Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spaite DW, Bobrow BJ, Keim SM, Barnhart B, Chikani V, Gaither JB, Sherrill D, Denninghoff KR, Mullins T, Adelson PD, Rice AD, Viscusi C, Hu C. Association of Statewide Implementation of the Prehospital Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment Guidelines With Patient Survival Following Traumatic Brain Injury: The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) Study. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:e191152. [PMID: 31066879 PMCID: PMC6506902 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Importance Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a massive public health problem. While evidence-based guidelines directing the prehospital treatment of TBI have been promulgated, to our knowledge, no studies have assessed their association with survival. Objective To evaluate the association of implementing the nationally vetted, evidence-based, prehospital treatment guidelines with outcomes in moderate, severe, and critical TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) Study included more than 130 emergency medical services systems/agencies throughout Arizona. This was a statewide, multisystem, intention-to-treat study using a before/after controlled design with patients with moderate to critically severe TBI (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Barell Matrix-Type 1 and/or Abbreviated Injury Scale Head region severity ≥3) transported to trauma centers between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2015. Data were analyzed between October 25, 2017, and February 22, 2019. Interventions Implementation of the prehospital TBI guidelines emphasizing avoidance/treatment of hypoxia, prevention/correction of hyperventilation, and avoidance/treatment of hypotension. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary: survival to hospital discharge; secondary: survival to hospital admission. Results Of the included patients, the median age was 45 years, 14 666 (67.1%) were men, 7181 (32.9%) were women; 16 408 (75.1% ) were white, 1400 (6.4%) were Native American, 743 (3.4% ) were Black, 237 (1.1%) were Asian, and 2791 (12.8%) were other race/ethnicity. Of the included patients, 21 852 met inclusion criteria for analysis (preimplementation phase [P1]: 15 228; postimplementation [P3]: 6624). The primary analysis (P3 vs P1) revealed an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.06 (95% CI, 0.93-1.21; P = .40) for survival to hospital discharge. The aOR was 1.70 (95% CI, 1.38-2.09; P < .001) for survival to hospital admission. Among the severe injury cohorts (but not moderate or critical), guideline implementation was significantly associated with survival to discharge (Regional Severity Score-Head 3-4: aOR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.52-2.72; P < .001; Injury Severity Score 16-24: aOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07-2.48; P = .02). This was also true for survival to discharge among the severe, intubated subgroups (Regional Severity Score-Head 3-4: aOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.65-5.98; P < .001; Injury Severity Score 16-24: aOR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.19-11.34; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Statewide implementation of the prehospital TBI guidelines was not associated with significant improvement in overall survival to hospital discharge (across the entire, combined moderate to critical injury spectrum). However, adjusted survival doubled among patients with severe TBI and tripled in the severe, intubated cohort. Furthermore, guideline implementation was significantly associated with survival to hospital admission. These findings support the widespread implementation of the prehospital TBI treatment guidelines. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01339702.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel W. Spaite
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Bentley J. Bobrow
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
- Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Samuel M. Keim
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Bruce Barnhart
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
| | - Vatsal Chikani
- Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Joshua B. Gaither
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Duane Sherrill
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Kurt R. Denninghoff
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Terry Mullins
- Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - P. David Adelson
- Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Department of Child Health/Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
| | - Amber D. Rice
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Chad Viscusi
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Chengcheng Hu
- Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bendinelli C, Ku D, Nebauer S, King KL, Howard T, Gruen R, Evans T, Fitzgerald M, Balogh ZJ. A tale of two cities: prehospital intubation with or without paralysing agents for traumatic brain injury. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88:455-459. [PMID: 29573111 DOI: 10.1111/ans.14479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2017] [Revised: 02/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of prehospital endotracheal intubation (PETI) for traumatic brain injury is unclear. In Victoria, paramedics use rapid sequence induction (RSI) drugs to facilitate PETI, while in New South Wales (NSW) they do not have access to paralysing agents. We hypothesized that RSI would both increase PETI rates and improve mortality. METHODS Retrospective comparison of adult primary admissions (Glasgow Coma Scale <9 and abbreviated injury scale head and neck >2) to either Victorian or NSW trauma centre, which were compared with univariate and logistic regression analysis to estimate odds ratio for mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. RESULTS One hundred and ninety-two Victorian and 91 NSW patients did not differ in: demographics (males: 77% versus 79%; P = 0.7 and age: 34 (18-88) versus 33 (18-85); P = 0.7), Glasgow Coma Scale (3 (3-8) versus 5 (3-8); P = 0.07), and injury severity score (38 (26-75) versus 35 (18-75); P = 0.09), prehospital hypotension (15.4% versus 11.7%; P = 0.5) and desaturation (14.6% versus 17.5%; P = 0.5). Victorians had higher abbreviated injury scale head and neck (5 (4-5) versus 5 (3-6); P = 0.04) and more often successful PETI (85% versus 22%; P < 0.05). On logistic regression analysis, mortality did not differ among groups (31.7% versus 26.3%; P = 0.34; OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.38-1.86; P = 0.67). Among survivors, Victorians had longer stay in ICU (364 (231-486) versus 144 (60-336) h), a difference that persisted on gamma regression (effect = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.30-1.92; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Paramedics using RSI to obtain PETI in patients with traumatic brain injury had a higher success rate. This increase in successful PETI rate was not associated with an improvement in either mortality rate or ICU length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cino Bendinelli
- John Hunter Hospital, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dominic Ku
- John Hunter Hospital, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shane Nebauer
- John Hunter Hospital, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate L King
- John Hunter Hospital, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Teresa Howard
- The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Russel Gruen
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Tiffany Evans
- Clinical Research Design, Information Technology and Statistical Support, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Fitzgerald
- The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zsolt J Balogh
- John Hunter Hospital, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Robert T, Algalarrondo V, Mesnard L. Hyperkaliémie sévère ou menaçante : le diable est dans les détails. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s13546-015-1125-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
9
|
Gaither JB, Galson S, Curry M, Mhayamaguru M, Williams C, Keim SM, Bobrow BJ, Spaite DW. Environmental Hyperthermia in Prehospital Patients with Major Traumatic Brain Injury. J Emerg Med 2015; 49:375-81. [PMID: 26159904 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2014] [Revised: 12/30/2014] [Accepted: 01/05/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in an estimated 1.7 million emergency department visits each year in the United States. These injuries frequently occur outside, leaving injured individuals exposed to environmental temperature extremes before they are transported to a hospital. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the existing literature for evidence that exposure to high temperatures immediately after TBI could result in elevated body temperatures (EBTs), and whether or not EBTs affect patient outcomes. DISCUSSION It has been clear since the early 1980s that after brain injury, exposure to environmental temperatures can cause hypothermia, and that this represents a significant contributor to increased morbidity and mortality. Less is known about elevated body temperature. Early evidence from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars indicated that exposure to elevated environmental temperatures in the prehospital setting may result in significant EBTs, however, it is unclear what impact these EBTs might have on outcomes in TBI patients. In the hospital, EBT, or neurogenic fever, is thought to be due to the acute-phase reaction that follows critical injury, and these high body temperatures are associated with poor outcomes after TBI. CONCLUSION Hospital data suggest that EBTs are associated with poor outcomes, and some preliminary reports suggest that early EBTs are common after TBI in the prehospital setting. However, it remains unclear whether patients with TBI have an increased risk of EBTs after exposure to high environmental temperatures, or if this very early "hyperthermia" might cause secondary injury after TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua B Gaither
- The Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Sophie Galson
- The Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Merlin Curry
- The Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Moses Mhayamaguru
- The Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Christopher Williams
- The Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Samuel M Keim
- The Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Bentley J Bobrow
- The Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Maricopa Integrated Health System, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Daniel W Spaite
- The Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
PAKKANEN T, VIRKKUNEN I, SILFVAST T, RANDELL T, HUHTALA H, YLI-HANKALA A. One-year outcome after prehospital intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015; 59:524-30. [PMID: 25790242 DOI: 10.1111/aas.12483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of physician staffed emergency medical services (EMS) is to supplement other EMS units in the care of prehospital patients. The need for advanced airway management in critical prehospital patients can be considered as one indicator of the severity of the patient's condition. Our primary aim was to study the long-term outcome of critically ill patients (excluding cardiac arrest) who were intubated by EMS physicians in the prehospital setting. METHODS Data of 845 patients, whose airways were secured by the EMS physicians during a 5-year (2007-2011) period, were retrospectively evaluated. After exclusions, the outcome of 483 patients (8.9% of all patients treated by EMS) was studied. Evaluation was based on hospital patient records 1 year after the incident. For assessment of neurological outcome, a modified Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was used. Time and cause of death were recorded. RESULTS 55.3% of the study patients had a good neurological recovery (GOS 4-5) with independent life 1 year after the event. The overall 1-year mortality (GOS 1) was 35.0%. Poor neurological outcome (GOS 2-3) was found in 9.7% of the patients. Patients with intoxication or convulsions survived best, while those with suspected intracranial pathology had the worst prognosis. Of all survivors, 85% recovered well. CONCLUSION The majority of the study patients had a favourable neurological recovery with independent life at 1 year after the incident. More than 80% of all deaths occurred within 30 days of the incident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. PAKKANEN
- Department of Anaesthesia; Tampere University Hospital; Tampere Finland
- Tays Emergency Medical Service; Tampere University Hospital; Tampere Finland
| | - I. VIRKKUNEN
- Tays Emergency Medical Service; Tampere University Hospital; Tampere Finland
| | - T. SILFVAST
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care; Helsinki University Hospital; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| | - T. RANDELL
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care; Helsinki University Hospital; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| | - H. HUHTALA
- School of Health Sciences; University of Tampere; Tampere Finland
| | - A. YLI-HANKALA
- Department of Anaesthesia; Tampere University Hospital; Tampere Finland
- Medical School; University of Tampere; Tampere Finland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nagpal N, Chowdhary S, Bhattacharyya R, Banerjee D. A color-reaction-based rapid screening for null activity of butyrylcholinesterase: A step toward point-of-care screening for succinylcholine apnea. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2015; 62:154-63. [DOI: 10.1002/bab.1252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2014] [Accepted: 05/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nitish Nagpal
- Department of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research; Chandigarh India
| | - Sheemona Chowdhary
- Department of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research; Chandigarh India
| | - Rajasri Bhattacharyya
- Department of Biotechnology; Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana; Ambala Haryana India
| | - Dibyajyoti Banerjee
- Department of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research; Chandigarh India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goldberg SA, Rojanasarntikul D, Jagoda A. The prehospital management of traumatic brain injury. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2015; 127:367-78. [PMID: 25702228 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-52892-6.00023-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important cause of death and disability, particularly in younger populations. The prehospital evaluation and management of TBI is a vital link between insult and definitive care and can have dramatic implications for subsequent morbidity. Following a TBI the brain is at high risk for further ischemic injury, with prehospital interventions targeted at reducing this secondary injury while optimizing cerebral physiology. In the following chapter we discuss the prehospital assessment and management of the brain-injured patient. The initial evaluation and physical examination are discussed with a focus on interpretation of specific physical examination findings and interpretation of vital signs. We evaluate patient management strategies including indications for advanced airway management, oxygenation, ventilation, and fluid resuscitation, as well as prehospital strategies for the management of suspected or impending cerebral herniation including hyperventilation and brain-directed hyperosmolar therapy. Transport decisions including the role of triage models and trauma centers are discussed. Finally, future directions in the prehospital management of traumatic brain injury are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott A Goldberg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dhanadol Rojanasarntikul
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Andrew Jagoda
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Brain Trauma Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kou K, Hou XY, Sun JD, Chu K. Current pre-hospital traumatic brain injury management in China. World J Emerg Med 2014; 5:245-54. [PMID: 25548596 DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2014.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2014] [Accepted: 10/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with most trauma-related deaths. Secondary brain injury is the leading cause of in-hospital deaths after traumatic brain injury. By early prevention and slowing of the initial pathophysiological mechanism of secondary brain injury, pre-hospital service can significantly reduce case-fatality rates of TBI. In China, the incidence of TBI is increasing and the proportion of severe TBI is much higher than that in other countries. The objective of this paper is to review the pre-hospital management of TBI in China. DATA SOURCES A literature search was conducted in January 2014 using the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Articles on the assessment and treatment of TBI in pre-hospital settings practiced by Chinese doctors were identified. The information on the assessment and treatment of hypoxemia, hypotension, and brain herniation was extracted from the identified articles. RESULTS Of the 471 articles identified, 65 met the selection criteria. The existing literature indicated that current practices of pre-hospital TBI management in China were sub-optimal and varied considerably across different regions. CONCLUSION Since pre-hospital care is the weakest part of Chinese emergency care, appropriate training programs on pre-hospital TBI management are urgently needed in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kou Kou
- School of Public Health and Social Work & Institute Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
| | - Xiang-Yu Hou
- School of Public Health and Social Work & Institute Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
| | - Jian-Dong Sun
- School of Public Health and Social Work & Institute Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
| | - Kevin Chu
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Butterfield Street Herston QLD 4029, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Spaite DW, Bobrow BJ, Stolz U, Sherrill D, Chikani V, Barnhart B, Sotelo M, Gaither JB, Viscusi C, Adelson PD, Denninghoff KR. Evaluation of the impact of implementing the emergency medical services traumatic brain injury guidelines in Arizona: the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) study methodology. Acad Emerg Med 2014; 21:818-30. [PMID: 25112451 PMCID: PMC4134700 DOI: 10.1111/acem.12411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2013] [Revised: 02/18/2014] [Accepted: 02/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) exacts a great toll on society. Fortunately, there is growing evidence that the management of TBI in the early minutes after injury may significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. In response, evidence-based prehospital and in-hospital TBI treatment guidelines have been established by authoritative bodies. However, no large studies have yet evaluated the effectiveness of implementing these guidelines in the prehospital setting. This article describes the background, design, implementation, emergency medical services (EMS) treatment protocols, and statistical analysis of a prospective, controlled (before/after), statewide study designed to evaluate the effect of implementing the EMS TBI guidelines-the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) study (NIH/NINDS R01NS071049, "EPIC"; and 3R01NS071049-S1, "EPIC4Kids"). The specific aim of the study is to test the hypothesis that statewide implementation of the international adult and pediatric EMS TBI guidelines will significantly reduce mortality and improve nonmortality outcomes in patients with moderate or severe TBI. Furthermore, it will specifically evaluate the effect of guideline implementation on outcomes in the subgroup of patients who are intubated in the field. Over the course of the entire study (~9 years), it is estimated that approximately 25,000 patients will be enrolled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel W Spaite
- The Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; The Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sundstrøm T, Asbjørnsen H, Habiba S, Sunde GA, Wester K. Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review. J Neurotrauma 2014; 31:531-40. [PMID: 23962031 PMCID: PMC3949434 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The cervical collar has been routinely used for trauma patients for more than 30 years and is a hallmark of state-of-the-art prehospital trauma care. However, the existing evidence for this practice is limited: Randomized, controlled trials are largely missing, and there are uncertain effects on mortality, neurological injury, and spinal stability. Even more concerning, there is a growing body of evidence and opinion against the use of collars. It has been argued that collars cause more harm than good, and that we should simply stop using them. In this critical review, we discuss the pros and cons of collar use in trauma patients and reflect on how we can move our clinical practice forward. Conclusively, we propose a safe, effective strategy for prehospital spinal immobilization that does not include routine use of collars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terje Sundstrøm
- 1 Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ben Hamouda N, Oddo M. Prise en charge du traumatisme crânien cérébral grave. MEDECINE INTENSIVE REANIMATION 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s13546-012-0620-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
17
|
Balancing the Potential Risks and Benefits of Out-of-Hospital Intubation in Traumatic Brain Injury: The Intubation/Hyperventilation Effect. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60:732-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2011] [Revised: 06/11/2012] [Accepted: 06/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
18
|
Yeh DD, Velmahos GC. Prehospital intubation for traumatic brain injury: do it correctly, or not at all. ANZ J Surg 2012; 82:484-5. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06130.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
19
|
[Sedation and analgesia in emergency structure. Which sedation and/or analgesia for tracheal intubation?]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 31:313-21. [PMID: 22440814 DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
20
|
Evans HL, Warner K, Bulger EM, Sharar SR, Maier RV, Cuschieri J. Pre-hospital intubation factors and pneumonia in trauma patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2011; 12:339-44. [PMID: 21933010 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2010.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We reported similar rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) previously in trauma patients intubated either in a pre-hospital (PH) venue or the emergency department. A subset of PH intubations with continuous quality assessment was re-examined to identify the intubation factors associated with VAP. METHODS The subgroup was derived from an existing data set of consecutive adult trauma patients intubated prior to Level I trauma center admission July 2007-July 2008. Intubation details recorded included bag-valve mask ventilation (BVM) and the presence of material in the airway. The diagnosis of VAP was made preferentially by quantitative bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures (≥ 10⁴ colony-forming units indicating infection). Baseline data, injury characteristics, and circumstances of intubation of patients with and without VAP were compared by univariable analysis. RESULTS Detailed data were available for 197 patients; 32 (16.2%) developed VAP, on average 6.0±0.7 days after admission. Baseline characteristics were similar in the groups, but diabetes mellitus was more common in the VAP group (4 [12.5%] vs. 5 [3.0%]; p=0.02). There was a higher rate of blunt injury in the VAP patients (28 [87.5%] vs. 106 [64.2%]; p=0.01) and higher injury severity scores (33.1±2.8 vs. 23.0±1.0; p=0.0002) and chest Abbreviated Injury Scores (2.6±0.3 vs. 1.5±0.1; p=0.002). Lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (7.9±0.9 vs. 9.9±0.4; p=0.04) and greater use of BVM (18 [56.3%] vs. 56 [34.0%]; p=0.02) were observed in patients who developed VAP. Among aspirations, 10 (31.3%) of patients with emesis developed VAP compared with only 4 (12.5%) with blood in the airway (p=0.003). CONCLUSION Aspiration, along with depressed consciousness and greater injury severity, may predispose trauma patients to VAP. Prospective studies should focus on the quality and timing of aspiration relative to intubation to determine if novel interventions can prevent aspiration or decrease the risk of VAP after aspiration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather L Evans
- Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Holmberg TJ, Bowman SM, Warner KJ, Vavilala MS, Bulger EM, Copass MK, Sharar SR. The Association Between Obesity and Difficult Prehospital Tracheal Intubation. Anesth Analg 2011; 112:1132-8. [DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31820effcc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
22
|
Davis DP, Koprowicz KM, Newgard CD, Daya M, Bulger EM, Stiell I, Nichol G, Stephens S, Dreyer J, Minei J, Kerby JD. The relationship between out-of-hospital airway management and outcome among trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale Scores of 8 or less. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2011; 15:184-92. [PMID: 21309705 PMCID: PMC4091894 DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2010.545473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Airway management remains a fundamental component of optimal care of the severely injured patient, with endotracheal intubation representing the definitive strategy for airway control. However, multiple studies document an association between out-of-hospital intubation and increased mortality for severe traumatic brain injury. OBJECTIVES To explore the relationship between out-of-hospital intubation attempts and outcome among trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores ≤ 8 across sites participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC). METHODS The ROC Epistry-Trauma, an epidemiologic database of prehospital encounters with critically injured trauma victims, was used to identify emergency medical services (EMS)-treated patients with GCS scores ≤ 8. Multiple logistic regression was used to explore the association between intubation attempts and vital status at discharge, adjusting for the following covariates: age, gender, GCS score, hypotension, mechanism of injury, and ROC site. Sites were then stratified by frequency of intubation attempts and chi-square test for trend was used to associate the frequency of intubation attempts with outcome. RESULTS A total of 1,555 patients were included in this analysis; intubation was attempted in 758 of these. Patients in whom intubation was attempted had higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13-3.98, p < 0.01). However, sites with higher rates of attempted intubation had lower mortality across all trauma victims with GCS scores ≤ 8 (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.15-1.72, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Patients in whom intubation is attempted have higher adjusted mortality. However, sites with a higher rate of attempted intubation have lower adjusted mortality across the entire cohort of trauma patients with GCS scores ≤ 8. Coma Scale score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P Davis
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UCSD Center for Resuscitation Science, San Diego, California 92103-8676, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Should trauma patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 be intubated prior to hospital arrival? Prehosp Disaster Med 2011; 25:541-6. [PMID: 21181689 DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00008736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous studies of heterogeneous populations (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores<9) suggest that endotracheal intubation of trauma patients prior to hospital arrival (i.e., prehospital intubated) is associated with an increased mortality compared to those patients not intubated in the prehospital setting. Deeply comatose patients (GCS=3) represent a unique population of severely traumatized patients and may benefit from intubation in the prehospital setting. The objective of this study was to compare mortality rates of severely comatose patients (scene GCS=3) with prehospital endotracheal intubation to those intubated at the hospital. METHODS Using the National Trauma Data Bank (V. 6.2), the following variables were analyzed retrospectively: (1) age; (2) injury type (blunt or penetrating); (3) Injury Severity Score (ISS); (4) scene GCS=3 (scored prior to intubation/without sedation); (5) emergency department GCS score; (6) arrival emergency department intubation status; (7) first systolic blood pressure in the emergency department (>0); (8) discharge status (alive or dead); (9) Abbreviated Injury Scale Score (AIS); and (10) AIS body region. RESULTS Of the 10,948 patients analyzed, 23% (2,491/10,948) were endotracheally intubated in a prehospital setting. Mortality rate for those hospital intubated was 35% vs. 62% for those with prehospital intubation (p<0.0001); mean ISS scores 24.2±16.0 vs. 31.6±16.2, respectively (p<0.0001). Using logistic regression, controlling for first systolic blood pressure, ISS, emergency department GCS, age, and type of trauma, those with prehospital intubation were more likely to die (OR=1.9, 95% CI=1.7-2.2). For patients with only head AIS scores (no other body region injury, n=1,504), logistic regression (controlling for all other variables) indicated that those with prehospital intubation were still more likely to die (OR=2.0. 95% CI=1.4-2.9). CONCLUSIONS Prehospital endotracheal intubation is associated with an increased mortality in completely comatose trauma patients (GCS = 3). Although the exact reasons for this remain unclear, these results support other studies and suggest the need for future research and re-appraisal of current policies for prehospital intubation in these severely traumatized patients.
Collapse
|
24
|
Russo SG, Zink W, Herff H, Wiese CHR. [Death due to (no) airway. Adverse events by out-of-hospital airway management?]. Anaesthesist 2011; 59:929-39. [PMID: 20827450 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-010-1782-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Securing the airway is a rarely performed procedure in the out-of-hospital setting. In recent years evidence has been accumulated indicating that out-of-hospital airway management is more challenging as compared to elective situations even for experienced health care providers. Furthermore, several authors have questioned the benefit of out-of-hospital tracheal intubation. This review argues the problems regarding out-of-hospital airway management studies and discusses potential solutions which may improve out-of-hospital health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Russo
- Zentrum Anaesthesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lossius HM, Sollid SJM, Rehn M, Lockey DJ. Revisiting the value of pre-hospital tracheal intubation: an all time systematic literature review extracting the Utstein airway core variables. CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2011; 15:R26. [PMID: 21244667 PMCID: PMC3222062 DOI: 10.1186/cc9973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2010] [Revised: 12/13/2010] [Accepted: 01/18/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Although tracheal intubation (TI) in the pre-hospital setting is regularly carried out by emergency medical service (EMS) providers throughout the world, its value is widely debated. Heterogeneity in procedures, providers, patients, systems and stated outcomes, and inconsistency in data reporting make scientific reports difficult to interpret and compare, and the majority are of limited quality. To hunt down what is really known about the value of pre-hospital TI, we determined the rate of reported Utstein airway variables (28 core variables and 12 fixed-system variables) found in current scientific publications on pre-hospital TI. Methods We performed an all time systematic search according to the PRISMA guidelines of Medline and EMBASE to identify original research pertaining to pre-hospital TI in adult patients. Results From 1,076 identified records, 73 original papers were selected. Information was extracted according to an Utstein template for data reporting from in-the-field advanced airway management. Fifty-nine studies were from North American EMS systems. Of these, 46 (78%) described services in which non-physicians conducted TI. In 12 of the 13 non-North American EMS systems, physicians performed the pre-hospital TI. Overall, two were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and 65 were observational studies. None of the studies presented the complete set of recommended Utstein airway variables. The median number of core variables reported was 10 (max 21, min 2, IQR 8-12), and the median number of fixed system variables was 5 (max 11, min 0, IQR 4-8). Among the most frequently reported variables were "patient category" and "service mission type", reported in 86% and 71% of the studies, respectively. Among the least-reported variables were "co-morbidity" and "type of available ventilator", both reported in 2% and 1% of the studies, respectively. Conclusions Core data required for proper interpretation of results were frequently not recorded and reported in studies investigating TI in adults. This makes it difficult to compare scientific reports, assess their validity, and extrapolate to other EMS systems. Pre-hospital TI is a complex intervention, and terminology and study design must be improved to substantiate future evidence based clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Morten Lossius
- Department of Research, The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Holterveien 24, PO Box 94, N-1441 Drøbak, Norway.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
|
28
|
Cudnik MT, Newgard CD, Daya M, Jui J. The Impact of Rapid Sequence Intubation on Trauma Patient Mortality in Attempted Prehospital Intubation. J Emerg Med 2010; 38:175-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2007] [Revised: 12/10/2007] [Accepted: 01/27/2008] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
29
|
Warner KJ, Carlbom D, Cooke CR, Bulger EM, Copass MK, Sharar SR. Paramedic Training for Proficient Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2009; 14:103-8. [DOI: 10.3109/10903120903144858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
30
|
Strote J, Roth R, Cone DC, Wang HE. Prehospital endotracheal intubation: the controversy continues. Am J Emerg Med 2009; 27:1142-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2008] [Revised: 08/07/2008] [Accepted: 08/09/2008] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
31
|
von Elm E, Schoettker P, Henzi I, Osterwalder J, Walder B. Pre-hospital tracheal intubation in patients with traumatic brain injury: systematic review of current evidence. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:371-86. [PMID: 19648153 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aep202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We reviewed the current evidence on the benefit and harm of pre-hospital tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search up to December 2007 without language restriction to identify interventional and observational studies comparing pre-hospital intubation with other airway management (e.g. bag-valve-mask or oxygen administration) in patients with TBI. Information on study design, population, interventions, and outcomes was abstracted by two investigators and cross-checked by two others. Seventeen studies were included with data for 15,335 patients collected from 1985 to 2004. There were 12 retrospective analyses of trauma registries or hospital databases, three cohort studies, one case-control study, and one controlled trial. Using Brain Trauma Foundation classification of evidence, there were 14 class 3 studies, three class 2 studies, and no class 1 study. Six studies were of adults, five of children, and three of both; age groups were unclear in three studies. Maximum follow-up was up to 6 months or hospital discharge. RESULTS In 13 studies, the unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) for an effect of pre-hospital intubation on in-hospital mortality ranged from 0.17 (favouring control interventions) to 2.43 (favouring pre-hospital intubation); adjusted ORs ranged from 0.24 to 1.42. Estimates for functional outcomes after TBI were equivocal. Three studies indicated higher risk of pneumonia associated with pre-hospital (when compared with in-hospital) intubation. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the available evidence did not support any benefit from pre-hospital intubation and mechanical ventilation after TBI. Additional arguments need to be taken into account, including medical and procedural aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E von Elm
- German Cochrane Centre, Department of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Strasse 26, Freiburg D-79104, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wang HE, Davis DP, O'Connor RE, Domeier RM. Drug-Assisted Intubation in the Prehospital Setting (Resource Document to NAEMSP Position Statement). PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2009; 10:261-71. [PMID: 16531387 DOI: 10.1080/10903120500541506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henry E Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Davis DP, Fakhry SM, Wang HE, Bulger EM, Domeier RM, Trask AL, Bochicchio GV, Hauda WE, Robinson L. Paramedic Rapid Sequence Intubation for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Perspectives from an Expert Panel. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2009; 11:1-8. [PMID: 17169868 DOI: 10.1080/10903120601021093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Although early intubation has become standard practice in the prehospital management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), many patients cannot be intubated without neuromuscular blockade. Several emergency medical services (EMS) systems have implemented paramedic rapid sequence intubation (RSI) protocols, with published reports documenting apparently conflicting outcomes effects. In response, the Brain Trauma Foundation assembled a panel of experts to interpret the existing literature regarding paramedic RSI for severe TBI and offer guidance for EMS systems considering adding this skill to the paramedic scope of practice. The interpretation of this panel can be summarized as follows: (1) the existing literature regarding paramedic RSI is inconclusive, and apparent differences in outcome can be explained by use of different methodologies and variability in comparison groups; (2) the use of Glasgow Coma Scale score alone to identify TBI patients requiring RSI is limited, with additional research needed to refine our screening criteria; (3) suboptimal RSI technique as well as subsequent hyperventilation may account for some of the mortality increase reported with the procedure; (4) initial and ongoing training as well as experience with RSI appear to affect performance; and (5) the success of a paramedic RSI program is dependent on particular EMS and trauma system characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P Davis
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California 92103-8676, and Trauma Services, Inova Regional Trauma Center, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Myers JB, Slovis CM, Eckstein M, Goodloe JM, Isaacs SM, Loflin JR, Mechem CC, Richmond NJ, Pepe PE. Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Emergency Medical Services Systems: A Model for Expanded EMS Benchmarking. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2009; 12:141-51. [DOI: 10.1080/10903120801903793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
35
|
James DN, Voskresensky IV, Jack M, Cotton BA. Emergency airway management in critically injured patients: a survey of U.S. aero-medical transport programs. Resuscitation 2009; 80:650-7. [PMID: 19375211 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2008] [Revised: 02/18/2009] [Accepted: 02/25/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pre-hospital airway management represents the intervention most likely to impact outcomes in critically injured patients. As such, airway management issues dominate quality improvement (QI) reviews of aero-medical programs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current practice patterns of airway management in trauma among U.S. aero-medical service (AMS) programs. METHODS The Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) Resource Guide from 2005 to 2006 was utilized to identify the e-mail addresses of all directors of U.S. aero-medical transport programs. Program directors from 182 U.S. aero-medical programs were asked to participate in an anonymous, web-based survey of emergency airway management protocols and practices. Non-responders to the initial request were contacted a second time by e-mail. RESULTS 89 programs responded. 98.9% have rapid sequence intubation (RSI) protocols. 90% use succinylcholine, 70% use long-acting neuromuscular blockers (NMB) within their RSI protocol. 77% have protocols for mandatory in-flight sedation but only 13% have similar protocols for maintenance paralytics. 60% administer long-acting NMB immediately after RSI, 13% after confirmation of neurological activity. Given clinical scenarios, however, 97% administer long-acting NMB to patients with scene and in-flight Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 3, even for brief transport times. CONCLUSIONS The majority of AMS programs have well defined RSI and in-flight sedation protocols, while protocols for in-flight NMB are uncommon. Despite this, nearly all programs administer long-acting NMB following RSI, irrespective of GCS or flight time. Given the impact of in-flight NMB on initial assessment, early intervention, and injury severity scoring, a critical appraisal of current AMS airway management practices appears warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorsha N James
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Warner KJ, Sharar SR, Copass MK, Bulger EM. Prehospital Management of the Difficult Airway: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Emerg Med 2009; 36:257-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2006] [Revised: 05/09/2007] [Accepted: 10/30/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
37
|
Cudnik MT, Newgard CD, Wang H, Bangs C, Herrington R. Distance impacts mortality in trauma patients with an intubation attempt. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2009; 12:459-66. [PMID: 18924009 DOI: 10.1080/10903120802290745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation (OOH-ETI) has been associated with adverse outcomes; whether transport distance changes this relationship is unclear. We sought to determine whether patients injured farther from the hospital benefit more from OOH-ETI than those injured closer. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of trauma patients > 14 years old transported to two Level 1 trauma centers and surviving to admission from 2000 to 2003. We used probabilistically linked geographic data to calculate transport distance. To adjust for the nonrandom selection of patients for OOH-ETI, we used a propensity score based on clinical variables: prehospital physiology, demographics, transport mode, mechanism, comorbidities, Abbreviated Injury Scale head injury score >or= 3, Injury Severity Score, blood transfusion, and major surgery. Propensity-adjusted multivariable logistic regression with mode of transport was used to test the interaction between distance and OOH-ETI. RESULTS 8,786 patients were included, 534 with OOH-ETI. Patients with OOH-ETI had higher adjusted mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.18), and there was a significant interaction between distance and OOH-ETI (p = 0.02). Patients with shortest distances had the highest mortality (OR 3.98, 95% CI 2.08-7.60). Probability of mortality was higher with OOH-ETI across all distances and increased for patients closest to the hospital. Helicopter transport was associated with improved survival. CONCLUSIONS Prehospital intubation is associated with increased mortality among trauma patients at all distances from the hospital. Patients with the shortest transport distances had the greatest mortality associated with OOH-ETI, whereas helicopter transport was associated with improved survival. The event location and ensuing distance to the hospital are another factor to consider when instituting and modifying OOH airway protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Cudnik
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chaudhuri K, Malham GM, Rosenfeld JV. Survival of trauma patients with coma and bilateral fixed dilated pupils. Injury 2009; 40:28-32. [PMID: 19070839 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2008] [Revised: 09/04/2008] [Accepted: 09/05/2008] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival of patients with severe trauma presenting with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) 3 and bilateral fixed dilated pupils is uncertain. Pre-hospital management of these patients affects the true measurement of the GCS and other factors may affect pupillary status. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who were classified GCS 3 and had bilateral fixed dilated pupils on admission to a Level 1 Adult Trauma Centre between July 2001 and March 2005. Pre-hospital assessment, hospital interventions and outcomes were determined. RESULTS Ninety-three patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion into the study. There were 6 survivors who were all less than 28 years of age, had at least one GCS score above 3 in the pre-hospital phase and were more likely to have had an evacuable mass lesion on CT brain scan and undergo craniotomy. Of the 6 surviving patients, none had significant thoracoabdominal injuries. Four of the survivors had Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) of 4 or 5. Time to hospital, mechanism of injury and pre-hospital haemodynamic parameters had no significant effect on survival. Of the 57 patients who were GCS 3 at the scene of the accident, post-basic resuscitation and on admission, none survived. CONCLUSION Pre-hospital GCS scores, prior to the effects of intubation, sedation and paralysis should be given more attention when assessing prognosis in patients who are GCS 3 on admission. Trauma patients with GCS 3 persisting from the scene with bilaterally fixed dilated pupils have no appreciable chance of survival. Further interventions such as ICU admission and surgery may not be warranted. Physicians may need to consider stopping treatment and discussing organ donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishanu Chaudhuri
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Carr BG, Brachet T, David G, Duseja R, Branas CC. The time cost of prehospital intubation and intravenous access in trauma patients. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2008; 12:327-32. [PMID: 18584500 DOI: 10.1080/10903120802096928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The prehospital management of trauma patients remains controversial. Little is known about the time each procedure contributes to the on-scene duration, and this information would be helpful in prioritizing which procedures to perform in the prehospital setting. We sought to estimate the contribution of procedures to on-scene duration focusing on intubation and establishment of intravenous (IV) access. METHODS Data were provided by the Office of Emergency Planning and Response at the Mississippi Department of Health. Real-time prehospital patient-level data are collected by emergency medical services (EMS) providers for all 9-1-1 calls statewide. Linear regression was performed to determine the overall additional time for an average procedure and to calculate marginal increases in on-scene time associated with the establishment of IV access and with endotracheal intubation. Analyses were performed using Stata 9. RESULTS During 2001-2005, 192,055 prehospital runs were made for trauma patients. 121,495 (63%) included prehospital procedures. Average on-scene duration for those runs was 15:24 (minutes:seconds). On average, each procedure was associated with an addition of 1 minute to the on-scene duration (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58-62 seconds). A scene involving the establishment of IV access was 5:04 longer, while one involving tracheal intubation was 2:36 longer. CONCLUSIONS We estimate the marginal increase in on-scene duration associated with the performance of an average procedure, establishment of IV access, and endotracheal intubation. There are policy and planning implications for the time trade-off of prehospital procedures, especially discretionary ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan G Carr
- Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, and the Center for Outcomes Research at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Haas B, Nathens AB. Pro/con debate: is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization? CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2008; 12:224. [PMID: 18828868 PMCID: PMC2592727 DOI: 10.1186/cc6980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
You are asked to be involved in organizing a trauma service for a major urban center. You are asked to make a decision on whether the services general approach to trauma in the city (which does have a well-established trauma center) will be scoop and run (minimal resuscitation at the scene with a goal to getting the patient to a trauma center as quickly as possible) or on-the-scene resuscitation with transfer following some degree of stabilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Haas
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, St Michael's Hospital, Queen Wing, 3N-073, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5B 1W8.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P Davis
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego, Calif.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Pickett W, Munkley D, Spaite DW, Banek J, Field B, Luinstra-Toohey L, Maloney J, Dreyer J, Lyver M, Campeau T, Wells GA. The OPALS Major Trauma Study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity. CMAJ 2008; 178:1141-52. [PMID: 18427089 PMCID: PMC2292763 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, the benefit of prehospital advanced life-support programs on trauma-related mortality and morbidity has not been established METHODS The Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) Major Trauma Study was a before-after systemwide controlled clinical trial conducted in 17 cities. We enrolled adult patients who had experienced major trauma in a basic life-support phase and a subsequent advanced life-support phase (during which paramedics were able to perform endotracheal intubation and administer fluids and drugs intravenously). The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS Among the 2867 patients enrolled in the basic life-support (n = 1373) and advanced life-support (n = 1494) phases, characteristics were similar, including mean age (44.8 v. 47.5 years), frequency of blunt injury (92.0% v. 91.4%), median injury severity score (24 v. 22) and percentage of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 9 (27.2% v. 22.1%). Survival did not differ overall (81.1% among patients in the advanced life-support phase v. 81.8% among those in the basic life-support phase; p = 0.65). Among patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 9, survival was lower among those in the advanced life-support phase (50.9% v. 60.0%; p = 0.02). The adjusted odds of death for the advanced life-support v. basic life-support phases were nonsignificant (1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.9-1.7; p = 0.16). INTERPRETATION The OPALS Major Trauma Study showed that systemwide implementation of full advanced life-support programs did not decrease mortality or morbidity for major trauma patients. We also found that during the advanced life-support phase, mortality was greater among patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores less than 9. We believe that emergency medical services should carefully re-evaluate the indications for and application of prehospital advanced life-support measures for patients who have experienced major trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian G Stiell
- The Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, and the Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
Badjatia N, Carney N, Crocco TJ, Fallat ME, Hennes HMA, Jagoda AS, Jernigan S, Letarte PB, Lerner EB, Moriarty TM, Pons PT, Sasser S, Scalea T, Schleien CL, Wright DW. Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury 2nd edition. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2008; 12 Suppl 1:S1-52. [PMID: 18203044 DOI: 10.1080/10903120701732052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Neeraj Badjatia
- Columbia University Medical Center, Neurological Institute, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Warner KJ, Bulger EM. Does pre-hospital ventilation effect outcome after significant brain injury? TRAUMA-ENGLAND 2007. [DOI: 10.1177/1460408607088317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury has a devastating impact on society, utilizing many resources and disproportionately affecting the young. Recent evidence demonstrates the early care of the brain injured patient impacts patient outcomes. While prevention of systolic hypotension and hypoxia are mainstays of prehospital management of the injured patient ventilatory management performed in the prehospital environment has recently been shown to impact outcomes. Hypocapnea from hyperventilation has been shown in several trials to cause deleterious effects from cerebral vasoconstriction and ischemia. The importance of balancing the prevention of both hypocapnea and hypercapnea has led to the idea of a target ventilation range for arterial carbon dioxide tension, the ideal way to achieve this balance in the prehospital setting remains elusive. This article reviews the background, physiologic effects, impact on outcomes, and implications for prehospital care of prehospital ventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keir J Warner
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eileen M Bulger
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bulger EM, Nathens AB, Rivara FP, MacKenzie E, Sabath DR, Jurkovich GJ. National Variability in Out-of-Hospital Treatment After Traumatic Injury. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 49:293-301. [PMID: 16978737 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2005] [Revised: 05/15/2006] [Accepted: 06/26/2006] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE The optimal out-of-hospital treatment for trauma patients remains a subject of national debate. Researchers designing future studies to address these issues must understand the variability in treatment that exists across the United States. We define the variability in the out-of-hospital treatment provided to trauma patients in the United States. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for a cohort study of trauma outcomes. The study was conducted at 15 urban or suburban regions across the United States, 18 Level I trauma centers and 51 nontrauma centers. We used a weighted population sample based on data from all hospital trauma deaths and a sample of patients discharged between January 2001 and December 2002. Entry criteria included at least 1 body region with an Abbreviated Injury Score greater than 3 and age between 18 and 84 years. Exclusion criteria were patient age greater than 65 years and isolated hip fractures and patients with burns. RESULTS Complete out-of-hospital data were available for 3,357 patients, representing a weighted population sample of 9,929 patients. Out-of-hospital treatment varied substantially among the regions, including out-of-hospital intubation (5% to 48%), use of neuromuscular blocking agents or sedatives to facilitate intubation (0% to 100%), surgical airway access (0.1% to 3.5%), peripheral and central intravenous access (22% to 95%), and needle thoracentesis (0% to 5%). CONCLUSION There is considerable national variability in out-of-hospital procedures performed for trauma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen M Bulger
- Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Klemen P, Grmec S. Effect of pre-hospital advanced life support with rapid sequence intubation on outcome of severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50:1250-4. [PMID: 17067325 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01039.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of pre-hospital trauma care and the effect of pre-hospital rapid sequence intubation (RSI) on patient outcome are still not clear. This study evaluated the impact of pre-hospital trauma care by emergency physicians (EP) on mortality from severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a 180-day Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). METHODS A 48-month parallel non-controlled cohort study compared a group of 64 patients with severe TBI [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 9; Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15] who received pre-hospital advanced life support (ALS) with RSI and were transported to the hospital by EPs (EP group), with a group of 60 patients who did not receive pre-hospital ALS with RSI [emergency medical technicians (EMT) group]. RESULTS There were no significant statistical differences between the groups in age (P= 0.79), mechanism of injury (P= 0.68), gender (P= 0.82), initial GCS (P= 0.63), initial SaO(2) in the field (P= 0.63), initial systolic blood pressure in the field (P= 0.47) and on-scene time (P= 0.41). In the EP group, there was significantly better first hour survival (97% vs. 79%, P= 0.02), first day survival (90% vs. 72%, P= 0.02), better functional outcome (GOS 4-5: 53% vs. 33%, P < 0.01; GOS 2-3: 8% vs. 20%, P < 0.01) and shortened hospitalization time in intensive care unit (ICU) (P= 0.03) and other departments (P= 0.04). In total hospital mortality, we detected no differences between both groups [EP group: 40% (95% CI: 34-45%) vs. EMT group 42% (95% CI: 36-47%, P= 0.76], except in a subgroup of patients with GCS 6-8 where there was significantly lower total hospital mortality in the EP group (24% vs. 78%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION After starting the trauma care system with emergency physicians in our region, there was a decrease in the number of deaths on hospital admission, a reduction in hospital mortality in the GCS group 6-8, a change in the temporal distribution of deaths, an improvement in functional neurological outcome and shortened hospitalization time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Klemen
- Center for Emergency Medicine Maribor, University of Maribor--Medical Faculty, Maribor, Slovenia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jeevendra Martyn JA, Fukushima Y, Chon JY, Yang HS. Muscle relaxants in burns, trauma, and critical illness. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2006; 44:123-43. [PMID: 16849960 DOI: 10.1097/00004311-200604420-00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
49
|
Bernard SA. Paramedic intubation of patients with severe head injury: a review of current Australian practice and recommendations for change. Emerg Med Australas 2006; 18:221-8. [PMID: 16712531 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00850.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Secondary brain injury may occur early after severe traumatic brain injury due to hypoxia and/or hypotension. Prehospital care by ambulance paramedics has the goal of preventing and treating these complications and, thus, improving outcomes. In Australia, most ambulance services recommend paramedics attempt endotracheal intubation in patients with severe head injury. Even though most patients with severe head injury retain airway reflexes, most states do not allow the use of appropriate drugs to facilitate intubation. In contrast, recent evidence from trauma registries suggests that this approach may be associated with significantly worse outcomes compared with no intubation. Two states allow intubation facilitated by sedative (but not relaxant) drugs, but this has a low success rate and could worsen brain injury because of a decrease in cerebral perfusion pressure. For road-based paramedics, the role of rapid sequence intubation is uncertain. Given the risks of this procedure and the lack of proven benefit, this procedure should not be introduced without supportive evidence from randomised, controlled trials. In contrast, for safety reasons, comatose patients transported by helicopter should undergo rapid sequence intubation prior to flight. However, this is not authorised in most states, despite good supportive evidence that this can be safely and effectively undertaken by paramedics. Finally, there is evidence that inadvertent hyperventilation is associated with adverse outcome, yet only two ambulance services use waveform capnography in head injury patients who are intubated. Overall, current paramedic airway practice in most states of Australia is not supported by the evidence and is probably associated with worse patient outcomes after severe head injury. For road-based paramedics, rapid transport to hospital without intubation should be regarded as the current standard of care. Rapid sequence intubation should be limited to use within appropriate clinical trials, or patients transported by helicopter. For patients who are intubated, waveform capnography is essential to confirm tracheal placement and to prevent inadvertent hyperventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen A Bernard
- Metropolitan Ambulance Service, and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wang HE, Yealy DM. Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation: where are we? Ann Emerg Med 2006; 47:532-41. [PMID: 16713780 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2005] [Revised: 01/09/2006] [Accepted: 01/11/2006] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
While remaining prominent in paramedic care and beneficial to some patients, out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation has not clearly improved survival or reduced morbidity from critical illness or injury when studied more broadly. Recent studies identify equivocal or unfavorable clinical effects, adverse events and errors, interaction with other important resuscitation interventions, and challenges in providing and maintaining procedural skill. We provide an overview of current data evaluating the overall effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of paramedic out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation. These studies highlight our limited understanding of out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation and the need for new strategies to improve airway support in the out-of-hospital setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry E Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|