A Crisis in the Delivery of Care to Patients With Brain Injuries in South Texas

International Neurotrauma Training Based on North-South Collaborations: Results of an Inter-institutional Program in the Era of Global Neurosurgery

Objective: Shortage of general neurosurgery and specialized neurotrauma care in low resource settings is a critical setback in the national surgical plans of low and middle-income countries (LMIC). Neurotrauma fellowship programs typically exist in high-income countries (HIC), where surgeons who fulfill the requirements for positions regularly stay to practice. Due to this issue, neurosurgery residents and medical students from LMICs do not have regular access to this kind of specialized training and knowledge-hubs. The objective of this paper is to present the results of a recently established neurotrauma fellowship program for neurosurgeons of LMICs in the framework of global neurosurgery collaborations, including the involvement of specialized parallel education for neurosurgery residents and medical students. Methods: The Global Neurotrauma Fellowship (GNTF) program was inaugurated in 2015 by a multi-institutional collaboration between a HIC and an LMIC. The course organizers designed it to be a 12-month program based on adapted neurotrauma international competencies with the academic support of the Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital and Meditech Foundation in Colombia. Since 2018, additional support from the UK, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research in Neurotrauma Project from the University of Cambridge enhanced the infrastructure of the program, adding a research component in global neurosurgery and system science. Results: Eight fellows from Brazil, Venezuela, Cuba, Pakistan, and Colombia have been trained and certified via the fellowship program. The integration of international competencies and exposure to different systems of care in high-income and low-income environments creates a unique environment for training within a global neurosurgery framework. Additionally, 18 residents (Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Cuba, Germany, Spain, and the USA), and ten medical students (the United Kingdom, USA, Australia, and Colombia) have also participated in elective rotations of neurotrauma and critical care during the time of the fellowship program, as well as in research projects as part of an established global surgery initiative. Conclusion: We have shown that it is possible to establish a neurotrauma fellowship program in an LMIC based on the structure of HIC formal training programs. Adaptation of the international competencies focusing on neurotrauma care in low resource settings and maintaining international mentoring and academic support will allow the participants to return to practice in their home-based countries.

Successful placement of intracranial pressure monitors by trauma surgeons

BACKGROUND

The Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines advocate for the use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less and an abnormal computed tomographic scan finding. The absence of 24-hour in-house neurosurgery coverage can negatively impact timely monitor placement. We reviewed the safety profile of ICP monitor placement by trauma surgeons trained and credentialed in their insertion by neurosurgeons.

METHODS

In 2005, the in-house trauma surgeons at a Level I trauma center were trained and credentialed in the placement of ICP parenchymal monitors by the neurosurgeons. We abstracted all TBI patients who had ICP monitors placed during a 6-year period. Demographic information, Injury Severity Score (ISS), outcome, and monitor placement by neurosurgery or trauma surgery were identified. Misplacement, hemorrhage, infections, malfunctions, and dislodgement were considered complications. Comparisons were performed by χ testing and Student's t tests.

RESULTS

During the 6-year period, 410 ICP monitors were placed for TBI. The mean (SD) patient age was 40.9 (18.9) years, 73.7% were male, mean (SD) ISS was 28.3 (9.4), mean (SD) length of stay was 19 (16) days, and mortality was 36.1%. Motor vehicle collisions and falls were the most common mechanisms of injury (35.2% and 28.7%, respectively). The trauma surgeons placed 71.7 % of the ICP monitors and neurosurgeons for the remainder. The neurosurgeons placed most of their ICP monitors (71.8%) in the operating room during craniotomy. The overall complication rate was 2.4%. There was no significant difference in complications between the trauma surgeons and neurosurgeons (3% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.2951).

CONCLUSION

After appropriate training, ICP monitors can be safely placed by trauma surgeons with minimal adverse effects. With current and expected specialty shortages, acute care surgeons can successfully adopt procedures such as ICP monitor placement with minimal complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

A survey of routine treatment of patients with intracranial hypertension (ICH) in specialized trauma centers in Sao Paulo, Brazil: a 11 million metropole!

OBJECTIVE

A survey of intensive care units (ICU) in São Paulo that care for patients with TBI and ICH using the hyperventilation technique.

METHODS

A questionnaire was given to the physiotherapist coordinator at 57 hospitals in São Paulo, where 24-h neurosurgery service is provided.

RESULTS

Fifty-one (89.5%) hospitals replied. From this total, thirty-four (66.7% perform the hyperventilation technique, 30 (85%) had the objective to reach values below 35 mmHg, four (11%) levels between 35 mmHg and 40 mmHg and one (3%) values over 40 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that most hospitals in São Paulo perform hyperventilation in patients with severe brain trauma although there are not any specific Brazilian guidelines on this topic. Widespread controversy on the use of the hyperventilation technique in patients with severe brain trauma highlights the need for a specific Global policy on this topic.

Admit or transfer? The role of insurance in high-transfer-rate medical conditions in the emergency department

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We study the association of payer status with odds of transfer compared with admission from the emergency department (ED) for multiple diagnoses with a high percentage of transfers.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult ED encounters using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 2010 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. We used the Clinical Classification Software to identify disease categories with 5% or more encounters resulting in transfer (27 categories; 3.7 million encounters based on survey weights). We sorted encounters by condition into 12 groups according to expected medical or surgical specialist needs. We used logistic regression to assess the role of payer status on odds of transfer compared with admission and report adjusted odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Among high-transfer conditions in 2010, uninsured patients had double the odds of transfer compared with privately insured patients (OR 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72 to 2.62). Medicaid patients were also more likely to be transferred (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.38). Uninsured patients had higher odds of transfer in all specialist categories (significant in 9 of 12). The categories with the highest odds of transfer for the uninsured included nephrology (OR 2.44; 95% CI 1.07 to 5.55), psychiatry (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.65 to 3.25), and hematology-oncology (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.50 to 3.25); the highest for Medicaid were general surgery (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.83), hematology-oncology (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.05 to 2.30), and vascular surgery (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.28).

CONCLUSION

Insurance status appears to play a role in ED disposition (transfer versus admission) for many high-transfer conditions.

Midlevel practitioners can safely place intracranial pressure monitors

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgical coverage is a challenge for many trauma centers. Midlevel practitioners (MLPs) can extend coverage by sharing the workload. Our objective was to determine whether the complication rates for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor placement were similar between neurosurgeons and MLPs.

METHODS

After obtaining institutional review board approval, the trauma registry at a Level I trauma center was searched for all ICP monitors placed between June 2005 and March 2010. Complications were classified as major or minor. The study was designed as a noninferiority trial with a 5% absolute difference in major complications defined as acceptable, a priori. Time to monitor placement was a secondary outcome and was analyzed by Wilcoxon rank sum and multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

One hundred seven patients were identified. Fifteen patients were excluded (inserted by trauma surgeon or MLP under direct supervision, ventricular drain, or inserted at an outside facility). Of the remaining 92, 22 were inserted by neurosurgeons and 70 by MLPs. There was one major complication (cerebrospinal fluid leak) in a monitor placed by an MLP. The difference in complication rates was significantly less than 5% (1.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.0128). The minor complication rate was higher for MLPs (5.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.80). Craniotomy and placement on third shift were associated with shorter times to monitor placement. Nine monitors were inserted at the time of craniotomy, eight of them by the neurosurgeon.

CONCLUSION

ICP monitors can be safely placed by midlevel practitioners with major complication rates not different from those of neurosurgeons.

Closed Midshaft Femur Fractures: Are They Only for Trauma Centers?

Trauma centers are limited resources, particularly in rural areas, and availability of emergency care in some parts of the United States may be inadequate. The declining number of orthopedic surgeons willing to care for injured patients has limited access to fracture repair in some communities. We studied the management of closed midshaft femur fractures in both trauma centers (TCs) and nontrauma centers (NTCs) to evaluate outcome for this common orthopedic injury and determine if these issues have affected fracture care in Kentucky. All patients 16-years-old and older who suffered femur fractures in Kentucky from 2004 and 2005 were identified. There were 334 TC patients and 341 NTC patients with closed, midshaft femur fractures. The mean age of TC patients (33 ± 17 years) was significantly lower than that of NTC patients (59 ± 25 years). TC patients were more likely men (71% vs 44%), had more associated injuries (2.4 ± 2.1 vs 0.5 ± 1.2), and had longer lengths of stay (8.3 ± 9.8 vs 6.4 ± 7.1 days) (TCs vs NTCs, all P < 0.005). Although both groups ultimately underwent internal fixation (97% vs 99%, TCs vs NTCs), TC patients were more likely (2.7% vs 0.3%) to receive external fixation than the NTC patients ( P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients that received only a closed reduction. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality (0.3% vs 0.9%, TCs vs NTCs, P = 0.62). Although differences in patient populations exist between TCs and NTCs, both TCs and NTCs manage substantial numbers of patients with closed, midshaft femur fractures with low mortality in this state database.

Disparities in access to pediatric neurooncological surgery in the United States

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate whether disparities in access to high-volume centers for neurooncological care existed in the United States in 1988-2005.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1988-2005) was performed, with additional factors incorporated from the Area Resource File (2006). International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis/procedure coding was used to identify patients. High-volume centers were defined as those with > or =50 neurosurgical cases per year. Patients >18 years of age were excluded. Covariates included age, gender, race, Charlson Index score, insurance, and county-level characteristics (including median home value, proportion of foreign born residents, and county neurosurgeon density). Multivariate analysis was performed by using multiple logistic regression models. P values of <.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 4421 patients were identified; 1651 (37.34%) were admitted to high-volume centers. Overall access to high-volume centers improved slightly over the 18-year period (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04). Factors associated with greater access to high-volume centers included greater county neurosurgeon density (OR: 1.72) and greater county home value (OR: 1.66). Factors associated with worse access included Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 0.68) and each 1% increase in foreign residents per county (OR: 0.59). All reported P values were <.05.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that racial and socioeconomic disparities in access to high-volume neurooncological care exist for the pediatric population. We also identify numerous prehospital factors that potentially contribute to persistent disparities and may be amenable to change through national health policy interventions.