Early withdrawal of cyclosporine A improves 1-year kidney graft structure and function in sirolimus-treated patients

Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in adults: a systematic review and economic model

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring renal replacement therapy: kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation, followed by immunosuppressive therapy (induction and maintenance therapy) to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival.

OBJECTIVES

To review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd) and rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) (Thymoglobulin(®), Sanofi) as induction therapy, and immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) (Adoport(®), Sandoz; Capexion(®), Mylan; Modigraf(®), Astellas Pharma; Perixis(®), Accord Healthcare; Prograf(®), Astellas Pharma; Tacni(®), Teva; Vivadex(®), Dexcel Pharma), prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf(®) Astellas Pharma), belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arzip(®), Zentiva; CellCept(®), Roche Products; Myfenax(®), Teva), mycophenolate sodium (MPS) (Myfortic(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd), sirolimus (SRL) (Rapamune(®), Pfizer) and everolimus (EVL) (Certican(®), Novartis) as maintenance therapy in adult renal transplantation.

METHODS

Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science (via ISI), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and the American Economic Association's electronic bibliography (via EconLit, EBSCOhost). Included studies were selected according to predefined methods and criteria. A random-effects model was used to analyse clinical effectiveness data (odds ratios for binary data and mean differences for continuous data). Network meta-analyses were undertaken within a Bayesian framework. A new discrete time-state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed, with acute rejection, graft function (GRF) and new-onset diabetes mellitus used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of variable quality, were included. For induction therapy, no treatment appeared more effective than another in reducing graft loss or mortality. Compared with placebo/no induction, rATG and BAS appeared more effective in reducing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and BAS appeared more effective at improving GRF. For maintenance therapy, no treatment was better for all outcomes and no treatment appeared most effective at reducing graft loss. BEL + MMF appeared more effective than TAC + MMF and SRL + MMF at reducing mortality. MMF + CSA (ciclosporin), TAC + MMF, SRL + TAC, TAC + AZA (azathioprine) and EVL + CSA appeared more effective than CSA + AZA and EVL + MPS at reducing BPAR. SRL + AZA, TAC + AZA, TAC + MMF and BEL + MMF appeared to improve GRF compared with CSA + AZA and MMF + CSA. In the base-case deterministic and probabilistic analyses, BAS, MMF and TAC were predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). When comparing all regimens, only BAS + TAC + MMF was cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY.

LIMITATIONS

For included trials, there was substantial methodological heterogeneity, few trials reported follow-up beyond 1 year, and there were insufficient data to perform subgroup analysis. Treatment discontinuation and switching were not modelled.

FUTURE WORK

High-quality, better-reported, longer-term RCTs are needed. Ideally, these would be sufficiently powered for subgroup analysis and include health-related quality of life as an outcome.

CONCLUSION

Only a regimen of BAS induction followed by maintenance with TAC and MMF is likely to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013189.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal or tapering for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) can reduce acute transplant rejection and immediate graft loss but are associated with significant adverse effects such as hypertension and nephrotoxicity which may contribute to chronic rejection. CNI toxicity has led to numerous studies investigating CNI withdrawal and tapering strategies. Despite this, uncertainty remains about minimisation or withdrawal of CNI.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of CNI tapering or withdrawal in terms of graft function and loss, incidence of acute rejection episodes, treatment-related side effects (hypertension, hyperlipidaemia) and death.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 11 October 2016 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE; handsearching conference proceedings; and searching the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where drug regimens containing CNI were compared to alternative drug regimens (CNI withdrawal, tapering or low dose) in the post-transplant period were included, without age or dosage restriction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data. Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 83 studies that involved 16,156 participants. Most were open-label studies; less than 30% of studies reported randomisation method and allocation concealment. Studies were analysed as intent-to-treat in 60% and all pre-specified outcomes were reported in 54 studies. The attrition and reporting bias were unclear in the remainder of the studies as factors used to judge bias were reported inconsistently. We also noted that 50% (47 studies) of studies were funded by the pharmaceutical industry.We classified studies into four groups: CNI withdrawal or avoidance with or without substitution with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR-I); and low dose CNI with or without mTOR-I. The withdrawal groups were further stratified as avoidance and withdrawal subgroups for major outcomes.CNI withdrawal may lead to rejection (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.56 to 4.12; moderate certainty evidence), may make little or no difference to death (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.24; moderate certainty), and probably slightly reduces graft loss (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.98; low quality evidence). Hypertension was probably reduced in the CNI withdrawal group (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.95; low certainty), while CNI withdrawal may make little or no difference to malignancy (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.30; low certainty), and probably makes little or no difference to cytomegalovirus (CMV) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.45; low certainty)CNI avoidance may result in increased acute rejection (RR 2.16, 95% CI 0.85 to 5.49; low certainty) but little or no difference in graft loss (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.16; low certainty). Late CNI withdrawal increased acute rejection (RR 3.21, 95% CI 1.59 to 6.48; moderate certainty) but probably reduced graft loss (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97, low certainty).Results were similar when CNI avoidance or withdrawal was combined with the introduction of mTOR-I; acute rejection was probably increased (RR 1.43; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.78; moderate certainty) and there was probably little or no difference in death (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.36, moderate certainty). mTOR-I substitution may make little or no difference to graft loss (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.19; low certainty), probably makes little of no difference to hypertension (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.15; moderate), and probably reduced the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.82; moderate certainty) and malignancy (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.00; low certainty). Lymphoceles were increased with mTOR-I substitution (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.21; low certainty).Low dose CNI combined with mTOR-I probably increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (MD 6.24 mL/min, 95% CI 3.28 to 9.119; moderate certainty), reduced graft loss (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.02; moderate certainty), and made little or no difference to acute rejection (RR 1.13 ; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.40; moderate certainty). Hypertension was decreased (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.20; low certainty) as was CMV (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.06; low certainty). Low dose CNI plus mTOR-I makes probably makes little of no difference to malignancy (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.42 to 3.53; low certainty) and may make little of no difference to death (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.90; moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CNI avoidance increased acute rejection and CNI withdrawal increases acute rejection but reduced graft loss at least over the short-term. Low dose CNI with induction regimens reduced acute rejection and graft loss with no major adverse events, also in the short-term. The use of mTOR-I reduced CMV infections but increased the risk of acute rejection. These conclusions must be tempered by the lack of long-term data in most of the studies, particularly with regards to chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and the suboptimal methodological quality of the included studies.

Kidney Fibrosis: Origins and Interventions

All causes of renal allograft injury, when severe and/or sustained, can result in chronic histological damage of which interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are dominant features. Unless a specific disease process can be identified, what drives interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy progression in individual patients is often unclear. In general, clinicopathological factors known to predict and drive allograft fibrosis include graft quality, inflammation (whether "nonspecific" or related to a specific diagnosis), infections, such as polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), and genetic factors. The incidence and severity of chronic histological damage have decreased substantially over the last 3 decades, but it is difficult to disentangle what effects individual innovations (eg, better matching and preservation techniques, lower CNI dosing, BK viremia screening) may have had. There is little evidence that CNI-sparing/minimization strategies, steroid minimization or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade result in better preservation of intermediate-term histology. Treatment of subclinical rejections has only proven beneficial to histological and functional outcome in studies in which the rate of subclinical rejection in the first 3 months was greater than 10% to 15%. Potential novel antifibrotic strategies include antagonists of transforming growth factor-β, connective tissue growth factor, several tyrosine kinase ligands (epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor), endothelin and inhibitors of chemotaxis. Although many of these drugs are mainly being developed and marketed for oncological indications and diseases, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a number may hold promise in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, which could eventually lead to applications in renal transplantation.

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization, Conversion, Withdrawal, and Avoidance Strategies in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite their clinical efficacy, concerns about calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity make alternative regimens that reduce CNI exposure attractive for renal transplant recipients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed four CNI immunosuppression strategies (minimization, conversion, withdrawal, and avoidance) designed to reduce CNI exposure and assessed the impact of each on patient and allograft survival, acute rejection and renal function. We evaluated 92 comparisons from 88 randomized controlled trials and found moderate- to high-strength evidence suggesting that minimization strategies result in better clinical outcomes compared with standard-dose regimens; moderate-strength evidence indicating that conversion to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or belatacept was associated with improved renal function but increased rejection risk; and moderate- to high-strength evidence suggesting planned CNI withdrawal could result in improved renal function despite an association with increased rejection risk. The evidence base for avoidance studies was insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions. The applicability of the review is limited by the large number of studies examining cyclosporine-based strategies and low-risk populations. Additional research is needed with tacrolimus-based regimens and higher risk populations. Moreover, research is necessary to clarify the effect of induction and adjunctive agents in alternative immunosuppression strategies and should include more comprehensive and consistent reporting of patient-centered outcomes.

Early withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor from a sirolimus-based immunosuppression stabilizes fibrosis and the transforming growth factor-β signalling pathway in kidney transplant

AIM

The focus in renal transplantation is to increase long-term allograft survival. One of the limiting factors is calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-induced fibrosis. This study attempted to examine the histological aspect of interstitial fibrosis and the modulation of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) canonical signalling pathway following early withdrawal of CNI from sirolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy.

METHODS

Forty-five kidney transplant recipients with low-medium immunologic risk were randomized and underwent protocol biopsies obtained at the time of transplantation and at 3 and 12 months thereafter. The recipients were taking tacrolimus, sirolimus and prednisone. After the 3rd month, patients were randomized into two groups: sirolimus (SRL) (removed CNI and increased sirolimus) and tacrolimus (TAC) (maintained CNI). Renal biopsies were analyzed according to Banff's 2007 criteria. The sum of Banff's ct and ci constituted the chronicity index. Fibrosis was evaluated by the histomorphometrical analysis of the total collagen and myofibroblast deposition. Immunohistochemical characterization and quantification of TGF-β, TGF-β receptor 1 (TGF-β-R1), receptor 2 (TGF-β-R2) and phospho-Smad2/3 (p-Smad2/3) were performed.

RESULTS

Maintenance of CNI was associated with the increase of the surface density of collagen and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), (P = 0.001). Furthermore, increased TGF-β (P = 0.02), TGF-β-R1 (P = 0.02), p-Smad2/3 (P = 0.03) and stabilized TGF-β-R2. On the other hand, the removal of CNI with increase in the dose of sirolimus limited the enhancement of the chronicity index at 12 m (SRL, 2.18 vs TAC, 3.12, P = 0.0007), diminished the deposition of fibrosis and promoted the stabilization of TGF-β, TGF-β-R2, p-Smad2/3 and myofibroblasts as well as the reduction of TGF-β-R1 (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The early withdrawal of CNI limited the fibrosis progression through the stabilization of chronicity index and of the canonical TGF-β signalling pathway.

Influence of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to everolimus on fibrosis, inflammation, tubular damage and vascular function in renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to mTOR inhibitors may reduce and even halt the progression of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) which is the most important cause of renal allograft loss. We aimed to investigate the effects of conversion from CNI to everolimus on parameters of fibrosis, inflammation, glomerulotubular damage and vascular functions in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Fifteen stable renal transplant recipients who were under CNI treatment (male/female 13/2, mean age 41 ± 10 years) were enrolled and switched to everolimus. Serum and urinary transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) were measured as markers of fibrosis, tubular damage and inflammation. As parameters of vascular functions, pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AIx), serum asymmetric dimethyl-arginine and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) were measured. All these measurements were repeated at the 3rd month of conversion.

RESULTS

Estimated GFR (52 ± 7-57 ± 11 ml/min/l.73 m(2), p = 0.02) (was increased after conversion to everolimus. However, serum uric acid levels were significantly decreased (6.21 ± 1.21-5.50 ± 1.39 mg/dL, p = 0.01). Serum TGF-β levels (8727 ± 2897-1943 ± 365 pg/mL, p = 0.03) and urinary NGAL levels (26 ± 10-12 ± 2 ng/mg creatinine, p = 0.05) were significantly decreased. However, urinary MCP-1, FGF-23, PWV and AIx did not change. Urinary TGF-β was associated with urinary NGAL (r = 0.62, p = 0.01), urinary MCP-1 (r = 0.68, p = 0.005) and proteinuria (r = 0.50, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Conversion from CNI to everolimus resulted in significant decreases of serum TGF-β and urinary NGAL which may represent less fibrosis and tubular damage. Association of urinary TGF-β with NGAL and MCP-1 suggests that tubular damage, fibrosis and inflammation may act together for progression of CAD.

Progression of pulse pressure in kidney recipients durably exposed to CsA is a risk factor for epithelial phenotypic changes: an ancillary study of the CONCEPT trial

In this ancillary study of the CONCEPT trial, we studied the role of CsA withdrawal at 3 months (3M) post-transplant on the intensity of epithelial phenotypic changes (EPC, an early marker for kidney fibrogenesis) on the 12 M surveillance biopsy. Although conversion from CsA to sirolimus (SRL) at 3M was reported to have improved mean graft function at 12 M, it did not reduce the score of EPC (1.73 ± 1.15 in the SRL group vs. 1.87 ± 1 in the CsA group, P = 0.61). Acute rejection, which had occurred twice more frequently in SRL-converted patients included here, was associated with 12 M EPC. Interestingly, we observed that the patients durably exposed to CsA and who developed 12 M EPC had a significant progression of blood pulse pressure (pp) from 1 to 6M post-transplantation (Δpp = +12.3 mmHg, P = 0.0035). Pulse pressure at 4, 6, and 9 M and pp progression from 1 to 6M were significantly associated with the development of EPC at 12 M in renal grafts. Logistic regression analysis revealed that a high 6M pp (≥ 60 mmHg) was an independent risk factor for 12 M EPC with an odds ratio of 2.25 per additional 10 mmHg pp (95%CI: 1.14-4.4, P = 0.02) after adjustment with recipient's and donor's age, acute rejection incidence and immunosuppressive regimen. A post hoc analysis of the data collected in the whole population CONCEPT study revealed that pp was significantly higher at 6 months in patients maintained on CsA and that at this time point pp correlated negatively with GFR at 1 year.

A prospective, multinational pharmacoepidemiological study of clinical conversion to sirolimus immunosuppression after renal transplantation

This prospective pharmacoepidemiological study examined treatment and outcomes in patients converted to sirolimus (SRL) after renal transplantation. 484 subjects in 36 centres in 7 countries were followed for up to 5 years. Principal reasons for conversion were declining graft function (146/484, 30%) and side effects of prior therapy (144/484, 30%) and the major treatment combinations after conversion were SRL ± MMF (62%), SRL + TAC (21.5%), SRL + CSA (16.5%). The cumulative probability of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) was 5% (n = 22), death-censored graft loss 12% (n = 56) and death 6% (n = 22), and there was no significant relationship to the treatment combination employed. Median calculated creatinine clearance was 48.4 (29.3, 64.5) mL/min at conversion, rising to 54.1 (41.2, 69.0) mL/min at month 1, 55.7 (39.0, 73.0) mL/min at month 12, 58.6 (39.7, 75.2) mL/min at two years and 60.9 (36.0, 77.0) mL/min at three years post-conversion. The most common adverse events were hypertension (47%), hyperlipidemia (26%), urinary tract infections (25%), anaemia (24%) and diarrhea (14%), and cardiac events, hyperlipemia and CMV infection were more common in patients converted during the first year. SRL was most frequently combined with MMF after conversion, but principal clinical outcomes were not significantly influenced by the treatment combination employed in normal practice.

Immunosuppression: does one regimen fit all?

There has been considerable interest in the individualization of immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to avoid side effects and improve long-term outcomes. Most available studies have addressed steroid and calcineurin inhibitor minimization in an attempt to prevent the development of chronic allograft dysfunction and cardiovascular mortality. Herein, we evaluate the available evidence for incorporation of these novel strategies in standard clinical care of kidney transplant recipients. Protocol biopsies, pharmacogenetics, and other assays have been developed to guide tailoring of immunosuppression; however, although promising results have been obtained, trials showing their ability to improve long-term outcome are lacking and urgently needed.

Conversion of long-term kidney transplant recipients from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to everolimus: a randomized, multicenter, 24-month study

BACKGROUND

Benefits of conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppression in long-term kidney transplant patients remain uncertain.

METHODS

ASCERTAIN was a 24-month, open-label, multicenter study. Kidney transplant patients more than 6 months posttransplant receiving CNI (baseline glomerular filtration rate [GFR] 30-70 mL/min/1.73 m) were randomized to everolimus with CNI elimination (n=127) or CNI minimization (n=144), or continued CNI unchanged (controls, n=123) to assess the effect on measured GFR at month 24 after randomization.

RESULTS

Renal function was stable in all groups to month 24. Mean measured GFR at month 24, the primary endpoint, was 48.0±22.0 mL/min/1.73 m, 46.6±21.1 mL/min/1.73 m, and 46.0±20.4 mL/min/1.73 m in the CNI elimination, CNI minimization, and control groups, respectively. Differences between CNI elimination (1.12 mL/min/1.73 m, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.51 to 5.76, P=0.63) and CNI minimization (0.59 mL/min/1.73 m, 95% CI -3.88 to 5.07, P=0.79) versus controls at month 24 were nonsignificant that is, the primary endpoint was not met. No efficacy endpoint differed significantly between groups. Post hoc analyses showed that patients with baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) more than 50 mL/min had a significantly greater increase in measured GFR after CNI elimination versus controls (difference 11.4 mL/min/1.73 m, 95% CI 2.1 to 20.8 mL/min/1.73 m, P=0.017). Adverse events resulted in discontinuation in 36 (28.3%) CNI elimination patients, 24 (16.7%) CNI minimization patients, and 5 (4.1%) controls (P<0.001 vs. CNI elimination; P=0.020 vs. CNI minimization).

CONCLUSION

Conversion to everolimus with CNI elimination or minimization a mean of 5.6 years after kidney transplantation had no overall renal benefit and was associated with more frequent adverse events and discontinuations. Patients with CrCl more than 50 mL/min may benefit from a change in therapy more than 6 months after renal transplantation.

The ORION study: comparison of two sirolimus-based regimens versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients

Safety and efficacy of two sirolimus (SRL)-based regimens were compared with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Renal transplantation recipients were randomized to Group 1 (SRL+TAC; week 13 TAC elimination [n = 152]), Group 2 (SRL + MMF [n = 152]) or Group 3 (TAC + MMF [n = 139]). Group 2, with higher-than-expected biopsy-confirmed acute rejections (BCARs), was sponsor-terminated; therefore, Group 2 two-year data were limited. At 1 and 2 years, respectively, graft (Group 1: 92.8%, 88.5%; Group 2: 90.6%, 89.9%; Group 3: 96.2%, 95.4%) and patient (Group 1: 97.3%, 94.4%; Group 2: 95.2%, 94.5%; Group 3: 97.0%, 97.0%) survival rates were similar. One- and 2-year BCAR incidence was: Group 1, 15.2%, 17.4%; Group 2, 31.3%, 32.8%; Group 3, 8.2%, 12.3% (Group 2 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Mean 1- and 2-year modified intent-to-treat glomerular filtration rates (mL/min) were similar. Primary reason for discontinuation was adverse events (Group 1, 34.2%; Group 2, 33.6%; Group 3, 22.3%; p < 0.05). In Groups 1 and 2, delayed wound healing and hyperlipidemia were more frequent. One-year post hoc analysis of new-onset diabetes posttransplantation was greater in TAC recipients (Groups 1 and 3 vs. 2, 17% vs. 6%; p = 0.004). Between-group malignancy rates were similar. The SRL-based regimens were not associated with improved outcomes for kidney transplantation patients.

Interstitial fibrosis evolution on early sequential screening renal allograft biopsies using quantitative image analysis

Screening renal biopsies (RB) may assess early changes of interstitial fibrosis (IF) after transplantation. The aim of this study was to quantify IF by automatic color image analysis on sequential RB. We analyzed RB performed at day (D) 0, month (M) 3 and M12 from 140 renal transplant recipients with a program of color segmentation imaging. The mean IF score was 19 ± 9% at D0, 27 ± 11% at M3 and 32 ± 11% at M12 with a 8% progression during the first 3 months and 5% between M3 and M12. IF at M3 was correlated with estimated glomerular rate (eGFR) at M3, 12 and 24 (p < 0.02) and IF at M12 with eGFR at M12 and 48 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, IF evolution between D0 and M3 (ΔIFM3-D0) was correlated with eGFR at M24, 36 and 48 (p < 0.03). IF at M12 was significantly associated with male donor gender and tacrolimus dose (p = 0.03). ΔIFM3-D0 was significantly associated with male donor gender, acute rejection episodes (p = 0.04) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.02). Thus, significant IF is already present before transplantation. IF evolution is more important during the first 3 months and has some predictive ability for change in GFR. Intervention to decrease IF should be applied early, i.e. before 3 months, after transplantation.

Use of kidney function end points in kidney transplant trials: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials in kidney transplantation are beginning to include markers of kidney function as end points now that traditional outcomes, such as acute rejection, become increasingly rare events. The frequency and type of kidney function end points used are unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING & POPULATION

Randomized controlled trials in adult kidney transplant recipients reported in 5 major general medical journals and 5 major subspecialty journals in nephrology and transplantation between January 2003 and November 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion of at least one kidney function end point at least 1 month posttransplant.

RESULTS

133 (79%) of 169 randomized trials identified used a kidney function end point. Of these, 37 (28%) used one or more measures of kidney function as the primary end point, and 81 (61%), as a secondary end point. For the primary end point, 21 (57%) trials used a creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 18 (49%) used serum creatinine level, and 7 (19%) used measured GFR. Overall, eGFR was an end point in 81 (61%) trials, and measured GFR, in 12 (9%) trials.

LIMITATIONS

This review is limited by the poor quality of the included trials, with many not defining either primary or secondary end points.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of kidney function are used commonly as surrogate end points in kidney transplant trials, with eGFR becoming more frequently used over time. Further data are needed to properly validate these surrogate end points and fully understand their limitations when designing and interpreting randomized trials.

Extended-release doxazosin for treatment of renal transplant recipients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

We studied living-related donor renal transplant recipients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). No prisoners were used in the study either as donors or recipients. We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of extended-release doxazosin for treatment of renal transplant recipients with BPH.

METHODS

Forty-six recipients were diagnosed with BPH. Their transplanted kidney functions were stable. They received 4 or 8 mg/d of extended-release doxazosin orally. After 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks, changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), peak urinary flow rate (Q(max)), residual urine, blood pressure, renal graft function, and trough immunosuppressant concentrations were analyzed by a prospective, self-calibrated method.

RESULTS

The effectiveness rate of extended-release doxazosin in renal transplant recipients with BPH was 63.04% (29/46). Compared with their status before they took doxazosin, IPSS and residual urine decreased significantly, whereas Q(max) and QoL increased significantly at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment (P < .01). In 15 renal transplant recipients with hypertension, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) significantly decreased at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment (P < .01); blood pressure became normal in 10 patients (66.67%). The differences in renal graft function and trough concentration of immunosuppressants before versus after treatment were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Extended-release doxazosin treatment was effective and safe in renal transplant recipients with BPH. The drug not only had no influence on renal graft function and trough concentrations of immunosuppressant, but improved hypertension in these patients.

Interstitial fibrosis quantification in renal transplant recipients randomized to continue cyclosporine or convert to sirolimus

Conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to sirolimus at week 12 after kidney transplantation is associated with a significant improvement in renal function. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the effect of this conversion on interstitial fibrosis (IF), a hallmark of chronic allograft injury, in patients taking part in the CONCEPT trial. This multicenter, prospective, trial included 193 renal recipients randomized at week 12 to switch from CsA to sirolimus or to continue CsA, with mycophenolate mofetil. Routine biopsy with automated, quantified assessment of IF by a program of color segmentation was performed at 1 year in 121 patients. At 1 year, renal function was significantly improved in the conversion group as assessed by estimated GFR (MDRD) and measured GFR. Biopsy results, however, showed no between-group difference in percentage of IF. Calculated GFR at 1 year was significantly associated with the percentage of IF (p = 0.004, R(2)= 0.07). By multivariate analysis diabetic patients had more fibrosis than non-diabetic patients. In conclusion, although kidney transplant patients converted from CsA to sirolimus showed significant improvement in renal function, we found no difference of IF on 1-year biopsies.

Review of symposium. Sirolimus in kidney transplantation

Sirolimus (SRL) is a non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive drug blocking T-cell proliferation through mTOR inhibition. SRL can be used as (1) an early drug in a calcineurin inhibitor-free protocol in the first 3 months after transplantation, (2) in the early and late conversion protocols as suggested by the multicenter randomized CONVERT trial, and (3) in recipients from marginal donors, because calcineurin inhibitors can increase the preexisting renal damage induced by age, hypertension, and diabetes that are frequent in elderly cadaveric donors. In any case, SRL should be used in patients with a cutoff of proteinuria (<or=800 mg/24 hr) or proteinuria-to-creatinine ratio less than 0.11.

Pathogenesis and management of chronic allograft nephropathy

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a common cause of late kidney transplant failure, characterized by progressive histological damage in the allograft. Although functional biomarkers such as creatinine are typically used to predict CAN, recent evidence suggests that composite, quantitative histological indices may be better predictors of long-term graft outcomes. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have been associated with major improvements in early rejection outcomes, but appear to cause both acute and chronic nephrotoxicity. The acute phase is associated with functional nephrotoxicity and is reversible with a reduction in CNI dosage, whereas the chronic phase is characterized by persistent histological lesions that are typically irreversible. Results from recent clinical trials suggest that converting from a CNI to sirolimus, withdrawing a CNI from a sirolimus-based regimen or using a CNI-free strategy may improve long-term outcomes by reducing CNI-related nephrotoxicity. However, in the de novo transplant setting, triple therapy with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids is not recommended in combination with basiliximab induction. A treatment algorithm, based on the patient's histological score obtained on an allograft biopsy taken at approximately 6-12 months post-transplant, has been developed by our group and is described here.

Late kidney allograft loss: what we know about it, and what we can do about it

Despite dramatic improvements in immunosuppression, late graft loss after kidney transplantation remains a common and difficult problem. Histologic evaluation may reveal changes related to BK polyomavirus infection, hypertension, or calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, which can help to guide therapy. The designation chronic allograft nephropathy should thus be reserved for biopsies with tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis without an apparent cause. Although the cause clearly includes both antigen-dependent and antigen-independent events, the approach remains largely to exclude immune mechanisms. Although this review discusses the potential contribution of antibody to chronic injury, it focuses on the basic elements of kidney injury, the role of parenchymal cells in promoting injury, and the proliferative and inflammatory responses that accompanying injury. Strategies to manage these recipients include close attention to accompanying hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia, as well as consideration for altering immunosuppression; however, therapies that limit epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition or directly block fibrosis pathways may reduce chronic allograft fibrosis and may prove to be useful. Understanding the basic pathogenesis sufficiently to allow early intervention may finally benefit patients who are at high risk for tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis and promote their long-term graft function.

Minimizing immunosuppression, an alternative approach to reducing side effects: objectives and interim result

Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival can be achieved with cyclosporine and tacrolimus (CNI)-based immunosuppressive protocols that incorporate antiproliferative immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. However, despite short-term success, long-term attrition of graft function and side effects of immunosuppressive agents continue to be significant problems, leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may contribute to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Metabolic, cosmetic, and neuropsychiatric complications of steroids affect quality of life after transplantation. Newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs or steroids altogether. In this report we review studies that address either CNI or steroid minimization strategies and discuss their risks versus benefits. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion the use of CNIs and steroids as part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI and steroid minimization strategies needs to be further validated in controlled clinical trials with adequate long-term follow-up.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

The introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) revolutionized kidney transplantation (KTx). Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival could be achieved with CNI-based (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) immunosuppressive protocols. However, despite short-term success, long-term graft attrition continues to be a significant problem, thus leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may be contributing to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Therefore, newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs altogether. Protocols exploring these options have gained greater attention over the last few years. Herein, we review studies addressing either CNI withdrawal or CNI avoidance strategies as well as discuss the risks versus benefits of these protocols. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion, the use of CNIs as a part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI withdrawal and avoidance strategies need to be further validated in controlled clinical trials.

Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation

Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression and has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent for use in solid organ transplant recipients. The drug was initially studied as an adjunct to ciclosporin (cyclosporine) to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Subsequent studies have shown efficacy when combined with a variety of other immunosuppressive agents. The most common adverse effects of sirolimus are hyperlipidaemia and myelosuppression. The drug has unique antiatherogenic and antineoplastic properties, and may promote immunological tolerance and reduce the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Although sirolimus is relatively non-nephrotoxic when administered as monotherapy, it pharmacodynamically enhances the toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Ironically, the drug has been used to facilitate calcineurin inhibitor-free protocols designed to preserve renal function after solid organ transplantation. Whether sirolimus can be used safely over the long term with low doses of calcineurin inhibitors requires further study. The use of sirolimus as a corticosteroid-sparing agent also remains to be proven in controlled trials. Postmarketing studies have revealed a number of unforeseen adverse effects including impaired wound healing and possibly proteinuria, oedema, pneumonitis and thrombotic microangiopathy. Overall, sirolimus is a powerful agent when used judiciously with other available immunosuppressants. As is true for all immunosuppressive drugs available for treatment of solid organ transplant recipients, the efficacy of the drug must be balanced against its considerable adverse effects.

Cost-effectiveness of sirolimus therapy with early cyclosporin withdrawal vs. long-term cyclosporin therapy in Australia

Cyclosporin (CsA) is Australia's most widely used immunosuppressant following renal transplantation. Randomized clinical trials demonstrate that sirolimus use for immunosuppression is associated with significantly lower incidence rates of nephrotoxicity and chronic graft rejection, and lower serum creatinine levels, suggesting long-term benefits if used as a replacement therapy for CsA. The cost-effectiveness of replacing CsA with sirolimus after 2-4 months (as approved by Australian regulatory authorities) was assessed relative to continued CsA plus low-dose sirolimus. A Markov model simulated outcomes over a patient's lifetime from initial transplant. Costs, measured in Australian dollars from the perspective of the Australian healthcare system, included immunosuppressants, dialysis, and inpatient and outpatient treatment. In a cohort with a mean age of 45 yr, the mean lifetime cost per patient is $39,052 greater with the study therapy. However, an average of 272 chronic graft rejections and 91 regrafts are prevented per 1000 patients. The mean predicted survival benefit is 2.086 life-years, or 0.938 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) when utility weights and discounting are incorporated. The incremental cost per QALY gained with the study therapy was $41,613. Cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to model duration and dialysis cost. Sirolimus is a cost-effective alternative to CsA for the long-term treatment of patients undergoing renal transplantation.

Differences in proteinuria and graft function in de novo sirolimus-based vs. calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression in live donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitor(CNI)-free protocols using sirolimus (SRL) in kidney transplantation have proven effective, although reports have linked SRL to proteinuria. We sought to investigate this link and its impact on graft function.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 184 live donor kidney transplant recipients who exclusively received de novo CNI-based (n = 106) or SRL-based (n = 78) regimens. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and semi-quantitative dipstick proteinuria measurements were obtained at one, six, 12, and 24 months and six and 12 months, respectively.

RESULTS

SRL-treated patients had higher frequencies of proteinuria (> or =1+) at 6 months (40.8% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.006) and 12 months (37.8% vs. 18.4%, P = 0.004) than those treated with CNI. Independent predictors of proteinuria at 12 months were GFR at one month (OR 0.62 per 10 ml/min/1.73 m, P<0.001), delayed graft function (OR 11.5, P = 0.02), and a SRL-based regimen (OR 4.18, P=0.002). By univariable analysis, SRL vs. CNI patients had higher GFR at each point. SRL-treated patients without proteinuria had higher GFR at 12 months compared to CNI-treated patients with and without proteinuria (66 vs. 50 or 56 ml/min/1.73 m, P < 0.05). No difference in GFR was seen between SRL-treated patients with proteinuria vs. CNI-treated patients without proteinuria (57 vs. 56 ml/min/1.73 m, P > 0.05). Absence of proteinuria and a SRL-based regimen remained independently associated FS with higher GFR at 12 months by multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo SRL-based immunosuppression is associated with a higher frequency of semi-quantitative proteinuria, however, estimated graft function at 1 year posttransplant remains superior to that of CNI-treated patients. Nevertheless, the long-term implications of these findings need to be determined.

Calcineurin Inhibitor Avoidance with Daclizumab, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Prednisolone in DR-Matched de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimens posttransplantation have been claimed to conserve graft function in addition to reduce the risk factors for cardiovascular and malignant disease in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

The primary aim of this prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, single-center study was to compare the effect of complete CNI-avoidance posttransplant (daclizumab + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisolone: Dac-group, n=27) with the standard CNI-based immunosuppressive protocol at our transplant unit (cyclosporine A + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisolone: CsA-group, n=27) on renal function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] determined as plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA) in a selected low immunogenic risk population (DR-matched, PRA-negative de novo cadaveric transplant recipients).

RESULTS

There were no significant difference in GFR at week 10 (P=0.61), but GFR was significantly (P=0.029) lower in the Dac-group (52+/-20 ml/min) at month 12 than in the CsA-group (69+/-29 ml/min). One-year patient and graft survival did not differ between the two groups. Overall acute rejection rate was 70.4% (19/27) in the Dac-group and 29.6% (8/27) in the CsA-group (P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The strategy to select DR-matched, PRA-negative de novo cadaveric transplant recipients for a CNI-avoidance protocol was not successful. The incidence of acute rejection was unacceptable high even though anti-CD25 antibody induction as well as initial higher mycophenolate mofetil doses (3 g/day) were applied, and renal function was significantly lower in the CNI-avoidance patients at 1 year. Other strategies need to be examined for avoidance of CNI's in the early posttransplant period.

Improved Renal Function after Conversion from Tacrolimus/Sirolimus to Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the potential nephrotoxicity of sirolimus (SRL) and tacrolimus (TAC) in combination.

METHODS

We reviewed the course of 97 kidney transplant patients treated with SRL and reduced-dose TAC. Conversion from SRL to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was prescribed in a minority (n = 19) for various nonrenal side effects. We compared outcomes of converted patients to those remaining on TAC/SRL (n = 78).

RESULTS

TAC levels were increased in converters (P = 0.009). Rejection rates were similar between groups over 18 months (21% vs. 16%, p = ns). Serum creatinine (Cr) and MDRD glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were similar between groups at nadir and six-months, but at 18 months the percent change from six-month Cr was +17% in non-converters vs. -10% in converters (P = 0.004 for the difference). The difference in GFR between groups at 18 months was also significant (P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis, only conversion to MMF was associated with a greater percent change in Cr from 6 to 18 months (P = 0.015). Conversion to MMF also correlated with higher GFR at 18 months independent of rejection, delayed graft function, and ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from TAC/SRL to TAC/MMF led to improved renal function despite increased TAC exposure after conversion.

Individualization of Immunosuppressive Therapy. II. Sirolimus as a Less Nephrotoxic Alternative to Calcineurin Inhibitors

The nephrotoxic effects of chronic administration of calcineurin inhibitors have created a demand for a potent immunosuppressive drug free of this side effect. Sirolimus (SRL) clearly displays fewer and a lesser degree of adverse effects on renal function by itself. However, in combination with calcineurin antagonists, it tends to augment the nephrotoxicity due, at least in part, to a pharmacokinetic interaction. The use of SRL for de novo immunosuppression (even with adjunctive mycophenolate mofetil) is probably not sufficient to avert alloimmune reactions. A useful combination with SRL can be achieved by reducing calcineurin inhibitor exposure by 80% for immediately functioning kidneys or by delaying its inception until renal graft recovery. SRL proffers additional benefits as an inhibitor of endothelial and smooth muscle cell proliferation, serving as the foundation of chronic immunosuppressive therapy.

Economic Evaluation of Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Regimens in Kidney Graft Recipients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was an economic evaluation of three sirolimus (SRL)-based regimens in the first 2 years after renal transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The three SRL-based immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplant patients between June 2000 and September 2002 were: (1) SRL + steroids + cyclosporine (CsA) permanently; (2) SRL + steroids + tacrolimus (Tac); and (3) SRL + steroids + CsA, with CsA discontinuation at 3 months posttransplant. Ten patients were included in each group in an intent-to-treat analysis. Cost was calculated according to the hospital price list and recast into euros (EUR) with a 5% discount rate.

RESULTS

The number of patients free of an acute rejection episode during 2 years posttransplant were 6, 8, and 5, with 2-year graft and patient survivals of 9, 10, and 9 for regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. As differences in clinical effects were not statistically significant, cost analysis was appropriate instead of cost-effectiveness analysis. The mean cost of the 2-year treatment was 15,759 EUR; 25,593 EUR; and 21,197 EUR per patient for regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Sensitivity analysis for the main variables confirmed that the results were not dependent on changes in costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Regimen 1 was the most economical immunosuppressive therapy during the 2 years after kidney transplantation. Studies on a larger group of longer observation would be more useful for clinical analysis.

Posttransplantation chronic renal damage in nonrenal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The growing problem of relentless deterioration of renal function in patients who undergo transplantation of nonrenal solid organs is bound to have an increasingly important impact as it may not only worsen patient morbidity and mortality but also increase transplantation costs.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature in order to provide a sum of the most important data on the incidence, clinical picture, renal pathology pattern, damage mechanisms, and risk factors, along with strategies for prevention and treatment of chronic renal damage following nonrenal solid organ transplantation.

RESULTS

Literature data report that 10% to 80% of transplanted patients have some degree of renal dysfunction and that they share a common clinical picture characterized by relentless asymptomatic progression, frequent hypertension, mild urinary abnormalities, and pathology features of vascular, glomerular, tubular, and interstitial involvement. These changes are very similar to those reported for chronic nephrotoxicity from calcineurin inhibitors. The occurrence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring chronic dialysis has been reported in up to 20% of nonrenal transplant recipients. Although there are some organ-specific differences, a group of common risk factors has been recognized, including the use of calcineurin inhibitors as immunosuppressive agents, age, pretransplantation renal function, intraoperative/perioperative factors, concomitant use of other nephrotoxic drugs, infections, and posttransplantation acute renal failure.

CONCLUSION

Calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity is a growing problem and, as the age of recipients of nonrenal organs is increasing, this problem is destined to increase. It would therefore be advisable for nephrologists to share their experiences in immunomodulation with other specialties, so as to favor the cautious extension of calcineurin inhibitor-sparing protocols to the area of life-saving transplants.

Immunosuppressive treatment and progression of histologic lesions in kidney allografts

Renal transplantation is the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although short-term results are excellent, long-term graft survival has not improved substantially in recent times. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) and death with a functioning graft are the most important causes of graft loss. Recent evidence shows that nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors contributes to CAN, and the introduction of non-nephrotoxic drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors may provide new immunosuppressive strategies to improve long-term results after renal transplantation. MMF decreases the risk of developing chronic allograft failure and is useful for treating established CAN, because it has a beneficial effect on allograft fibrosis. Treatment with sirolimus (SRL), a basic immunosuppressive drug given in association with MMF, may offer better renal function, decrease the prevalence of CAN, and downregulate expression of genes responsible for the progression of CAN than treatment with cyclosporine A (CsA). SRL also permits an early elimination of CsA from SRL-CsA-steroid regimens and shows better renal function and improved renal histology without risk of rejection. Notably, this approach improves graft survival at 4 years. Further multicenter studies are needed to determine whether both approaches produce similar results by comparing immunosuppression caused by SRL-based and tacrolimus (TAC)-based treatments. Because TAC is the most commonly used anticalcineurin drug, it is important to compare the effects of steroid-TAC-SRL treatment with and without elimination of TAC. Finally, although caution is needed, the use of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive treatment may change the natural history of CAN.

What we CAN do about chronic allograft nephropathy: Role of immunosuppressive modulations

Given the potency of modern immunosuppressive agents, kidney transplantation across alloantingen barriers is a routine phenomenon with excellent 1-year graft survival in most centers. However, the improvement in 1-year graft survival has not been matched by improvements in long-term graft function and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains the second commonest cause of graft attrition over time. Calcineurin inhibitors, namely cyclosporine A (CyA) and tacrolimus, have been implicated as causal agents in the development of the fibrotic processes that are the hallmarks of CAN. Many studies have, therefore, concentrated on the improvement of long term graft function through the modulation of immunosuppressive therapy. It is the purpose of this review to describe and appraise the available evidence for the prevention and management of CAN through modulation of immunosuppressive agents.

Predicting subsequent decline in kidney allograft function from early surveillance biopsies

Identifying factors that are predictive of allograft loss might be an important step toward prolonging kidney allograft survival. In this study we sought to determine the association between histologic changes on 1-year surveillance biopsies, changes in graft function and survival. This analysis included 292 adults, recipients of kidneys from living donors (69%) or deceased donors (31%), transplanted between 1998 and 2001 and followed up for 46 +/- 14 months. The primary end point was death-censored graft loss or a >50% reduction in GFR beyond 1 year. One-year biopsies were classified as: (i) Normal (N = 87, 30%), (ii) inflammation (N = 6, 2%), (iii) fibrosis (N = 131, 45%), (iv) fibrosis and inflammation (N = 53, 18%) and (v) transplant glomerulopathy (N = 15, 5%). By multivariate Cox analysis, survival related to biopsy classification (HR = 4.2, p = 0.001), graft function (HR = 0.97, p = 0.001) and HLA mismatches (HR = 1.003, p = 0.004). Using normal histology as a reference, fibrosis and inflammation (HR = 8.5, p < 0.0001) and glomerulopathy (HR = 10, p < 0.0001) related to poorer survival but mild fibrosis alone did not. Importantly, the degree of inflammation associated with fibrosis generally did not qualify for the diagnosis of borderline rejection. In conclusion, inflammation and glomerulopathy 1 year post-transplant predict loss of graft function and graft failure independently of function and other variables.

Concentration-controlled use of sirolimus associated with reduced exposure of cyclosporine in black recipients of primarily living renal allograft donors: 12-month results

AIM

This study was designed to identify optimal therapeutic sirolimus (SRL) concentrations in black kidney transplant recipients on reduced cyclosporine (CsA) exposure and prednisone.

METHODS

Seventy patients (64 living/six deceased) received CsA (8-10 mg/kg/d), prednisone, and 15 mg loading dose followed by 5-mg fixed doses of SRL till day 7 when they were randomized to maintain SRL trough concentrations (high-performance liquid chromatography) of 8-12 (GI = 34) or 15-20 (GII = 36) ng/mL.

RESULTS

Mean CsA concentrations were 109 +/- 53 vs. 89 +/- 41 ng/mL and 75 +/- 54 vs. 60 +/- 35 ng/mL (ns) at 2 and 6 months. Accordingly, mean SRL trough concentrations were 12.4 +/- 6.1 vs. 20.0 +/- 9.5 ng/mL (p < 0.001) and 10.8 +/- 5.8 vs. 18.0 +/- 6.1 ng/mL (p < 0.001). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection [13% (GI: 18% vs. GII: 8%, ns)], graft loss or death was 16% (GI: 21% vs. GII: 11%, ns]. There were no deaths and three graft losses (GI = 1; GII = 2). Creatinine clearance was higher in GI (64.5 +/- 17 vs. 54.4 +/- 14.7 mL/min, p = 0.011). The incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 13% and no CMV disease was observed.

CONCLUSION

In black recipients of primarily living renal allograft donors reduced CsA exposure and SRL concentration-controlled regimens produced low incidences of acute rejection, post-transplant diabetes mellitus and CMV disease, with no significant impairment in graft function.

2005 immunosuppressive strategies in kidney transplantation: which role for the calcineurin inhibitors?

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) cyclosporine and tacrolimus have been the cornerstones of immunosuppressive strategies in clinical transplantation. Currently, regimens that are most widely used for induction and maintenance therapy include CNIs. However, many clinical trials aiming at reducing or eliminating CNIs have been performed in recent years. Here, we review and discuss current and future immunosuppressive strategies with a special emphasis on the role of CNIs, in the light of recent studies in the field of kidney transplantation. In the current era, CNIs still play an important role.

Chronic renal allograft dysfunction

The major causes of renal transplant loss are death from vascular, malignant or infectious disease, and loss of the allograft from chronic renal dysfunction associated with the development of graft fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the histologic description of the fibrosis, vascular and glomerular damage occurring in renal allografts. Clinical programs rely on monitoring change in serum creatinine for identification of patients at risk of CAN, but this change occurs late in the course of the disease, and underestimates the severity of pathologic change. CAN has several causes: ischemia-reperfusion injury, ineffectively or untreated clinical and subclinical rejection, and superimposed calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, exacerbating pre-existing donor disease. Once established, interstitial fibrosis and arteriolar hyalinosis lead to progressive glomerulosclerosis over the subsequent years. There have been a number of approaches to treatment aimed at reducing the impact of CAN, mostly centered around avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors through their elimination in all, or just selected, patients. These immunosuppression strategies combine corticosteroids with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and/or sirolimus and everolimus. Late identification of CAN in individual patients has meant that strategies for intervening to prevent chronic renal allograft dysfunction and subsequent graft loss tend to be "too little and far too late."

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review of randomized trials

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal has been used as a strategy to improve renal allograft function, however, it also carries risk of acute rejection. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials that involved CNI withdrawal from a sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. The search strategy yielded six trials (n = 1047 patients) reported in eight publications. CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy, was associated with an increased risk of acute rejection (risk difference, 6%; 95% CI 2-10%, p = 0.002) but a higher creatinine clearance (mean difference, 7.49 mL/min; 95% CI 5.08-9.89 mL/min, p < 0.00001) at 1 year compared to continued CNI and sirolimus therapy. Graft loss (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI 0.46-1.64, p = 0.66) and death (relative risk, 0.88; CI 0.40-1.96, p = 0.76) were similar in both groups at 1 year. Hypertension was significantly reduced in the CNI withdrawal group (relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78, p = 0.0006). CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy is associated with an increased risk of acute rejection in the short term with a significant improvement in renal function and a reduction in hypertension. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if these changes will result in a significant improvement in patient and graft survival.

Reduction of postischemic immune inflammatory response: an effective strategy for attenuating chronic allograft nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Ischemia added to the allogeneic background accelerates the cellular mechanisms involved in alloresponsiveness, supporting the influence of early nonspecific inflammatory injury on chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The authors hypothesize that reinforcing initial immunosuppressive regimens may prevent immunogenicity derived from postischemic inflammatory responses, attenuating CAN.

METHODS

Lewis rats engrafted with Fischer kidneys received for 15 days overimmunosuppressive doses of rapamycin, a standard cyclosporine regimen, or both, and were followed functionally for 24 weeks. Animals were grouped according to the initial immunosuppressant or cold-ischemia period. Grafts were evaluated for acute inflammatory response at 1 week and for chronic histologic damage at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Rats under cyclosporine alone displayed the highest mortality, which was decreased in the long term by reducing cold ischemia or by strengthening immunosuppression. At 24 weeks, all rapamycin-treated groups displayed much less severe tubulointerstitial and vascular damage. The combination of both immunosuppressants offered better functional outcome and a global reduction in chronic histologic damage. After 1 week, ATN and profibrotic features appeared in all 5-hr ischemic animals, indicating that cyclosporine and rapamycin co-treatment did not induce further nephrotoxicity. Treatment with rapamycin, alone or combined with cyclosporine, greatly reduced the severe immune-inflammatory damage, including vessels, shown in cyclosporine-treated ischemic grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Strengthening initial immunosuppression attenuates the intensity and extent of the early postischemic immune-inflammatory response as well as later function and structure of renal allografts. Severe CAN may be prevented by reducing cold ischemia or strengthening immunosuppression. Because the former approach is not always possible, reinforcement of early immunosuppression constitutes an excellent alternative.

Sirolimus-Based Therapy With or Without Cyclosporine: Long-Term Follow-up in Renal Transplant Patients

This open-label, phase 3b, extension trial in renal transplant recipients (Sirolimus Study 311) assessed the long-term safety of sirolimus (SRL) administered with cyclosporine (CsA) (SRL + CsA group, n = 98) or without CsA (SRL group, n = 69). Renal transplant recipients who had either completed one of seven previous SRL studies sponsored by Wyeth Research or had participated for > or =3 months and reached a protocol-designated endpoint were eligible for enrollment. Data were available for 167 patients, all of whom initially received steroids. Mean total SRL exposure was 1526 days, including previous study participation. After enrollment in the extension study, there were significantly more acute rejections in the SRL + CsA group (6.1% vs 0%, P < .05). Differences in rates of graft loss (3.1% vs 1.4%) and death (6.1% vs 1.4%) were not significantly different between SRL + CsA and SRL groups, respectively. At 48 months after transplantation, calculated GFR (53.4 vs 70.9 mL/min) and hemoglobin (124.9 vs 136.6 g/L) were significantly better in the SRL group. Lipid values were not significantly different between groups at 48 months. The incidence of treatment-emergent increased creatinine, anemia, hypertension, headache, epistaxis, abnormal kidney function, and upper respiratory infection were significantly higher in the SRL + CsA group, whereas no adverse events were significantly higher in the SRL group. Malignancies were reported more frequently (11.2% vs 0%) with SRL + CsA. Results from this extension study indicate that SRL-based therapy without CsA is a safe alternative to combination therapy with CsA, offering long-term improvement in renal function with no increased risk of late acute rejection.

Improved Renal Function in De Novo Renal Transplant Patients on Sirolimus Maintenance Therapy Following Discontinuation of Cyclosporine

In the presirolimus era, cyclosporine withdrawal in de novo renal transplant patients was associated with increased rates of rejections; thus, no improvement in long-term graft survival was achieved. However, those patients who did not reject exhibited longer graft survival than did those on cyclosporine. In recent years sirolimus has been introduced into clinical practice and, so far, 4 randomized cyclosporine withdrawal trials in de novo patients after renal transplantation have been published, together with 3 smaller studies directly comparing cyclosporine with sirolimus. The main finding in all these studies was better renal function after cyclosporine withdrawal. In the largest trial with the longest follow-up there was even a trend toward higher rates of graft survival at 3 years and fewer histopathological findings in protocol biopsies at that time. Whether this success in renal function and graft survival will project to prolonged patient survival remains to be determined. In summary, with the introduction of sirolimus as a potent immunosuppressive but nonnephrotoxic drug, a considerable improvement in graft and patient survival might be possible.

Renal transplantation, immunosuppression and the skin: an update

Transplant medicine has seen many innovations over past decades and continues to evolve into the 21st century. Newer immunosuppressive strategies in renal transplantation are associated with better patient and graft survival rates; however, the adverse toxicities and long-term side effects associated with these agents present a number of challenges. Certain immunosuppressants are commonly used in dermatologic disorders, however, dermatologists may be less familiar with the clinical efficacy, side-effect profile, and dosage of newer immunosuppressive agents. A knowledge of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of action of these agents gives us a better understanding of how these agents contribute to the cutaneous and mucosal complications frequently seen post-transplant. With the advent of new immunosuppressive therapies and different treatment regimens, there is an increasing need for a multidisciplinary approach to balancing the risks and benefits of these medications to the individual transplant recipient. This review will highlight the different immunosuppressive agents and their effect on the skin while focusing on the evidence base to support the commonly used immunosuppressive regimes, newer protocols aimed at achieving maximum graft survival with minimal side effects, and important drug interactions with which all dermatologists should be familiar.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Sirolimus in Renal Transplantation

Sirolimus (rapamycin) is a macrocyclic lactone isolated from a strain of Streptomyces hygroscopicus that inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated signal-transduction pathways, resulting in the arrest of cell cycle of various cell types, including T- and B-lymphocytes. Sirolimus has been demonstrated to prolong graft survival in various animal models of transplantation, ranging from rodents to primates for both heterotopic, as well as orthotopic organ grafting, bone marrow transplantation and islet cell grafting. In human clinical renal transplantation, sirolimus in combination with ciclosporin (cyclosporine) efficiently reduces the incidence of acute allograft rejection. Because of the synergistic effect of sirolimus on ciclosporin-induced nephrotoxicity, a prolonged combination of the two drugs inevitably leads to progressive irreversible renal allograft damage. Early elimination of calcineurin inhibitor therapy or complete avoidance of the latter by using sirolimus therapy is the optimal strategy for this drug. Prospective randomised phase II and III clinical studies have confirmed this approach, at least for recipients with a low to moderate immunological risk. For patients with a high immunological risk or recipients exposed to delayed graft function, sirolimus might not constitute the best therapeutic choice--despite its ability to enable calcineurin inhibitor sparing in the latter situation--because of its anti-proliferative effects on recovering renal tubular cells. Whether lower doses of sirolimus or a combination with a reduced dose of tacrolimus would be advantageous in these high risk situations remains to be determined. Clinically relevant adverse effects of sirolimus that require a specific therapeutic response or can potentially influence short- and long-term patient morbidity and mortality as well as graft survival include hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, infectious and non-infectious pneumonia, anaemia, lymphocele formation and impaired wound healing. These drug-related adverse effects are important determinants in the choice of a tailor-made immunosuppressive drug regimen that complies with the individual patient risk profile. Equally important in the latter decision is the lack of severe intrinsic nephrotoxicity associated with sirolimus and its advantageous effects on arterial hypertension, post-transplantation diabetes mellitus and esthetic changes induced by calcineurin inhibitors. Mild and transient thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, gastrointestinal adverse effects and mucosal ulcerations are all minor complications of sirolimus therapy that have less impact on the decision for choosing this drug as the basis for tailor-made immunosuppressive therapy. It is clear that sirolimus has gained a proper place in the present-day immunosuppressive armament used in renal transplantation and will contribute to the development of a tailor-made immunosuppressive therapy aimed at fulfilling the requirements outlined by the individual patient profile.