High diversity of non-human leukocyte antigens in transplant-associated coronary artery disease

Heart failure therapies: new strategies for old treatments and new treatments for old strategies

Heart failure, whether acute or chronic, remains a major health care crisis affecting almost 6 million Americans and over 23 million people worldwide. Roughly half of those affected will die within 5 years, and the annual cost exceeds $30 billion in the US alone. Although medical therapy has made some modest inroads in partially stemming the heart failure tsunami, there remains a significant population for whom medication is unsuccessful or has ceased being effective; such patients can benefit from heart transplantation or mechanical circulatory support. Indeed, in the past quarter century (and as covered in Cardiovascular Pathology over those years), significant improvements in pathologic understanding and in engineering design have materially enhanced the toolkit of options for such refractory patients. Mechanical devices, whether total artificial hearts or ventricular assist devices, have been reengineered to reduce complications and basic wear and tear. Transplant survival has also been extended through a better comprehension of and improved therapies for transplant vasculopathy and antibody-mediated rejection. Here we review the ideas and treatments from the last 25 years and highlight some of the new directions in nonpharmacologic heart failure therapy.

Antibodies in transplantation: the effects of HLA and non-HLA antibody binding and mechanisms of injury

Until recently, allograft rejection was thought to be mediated primarily by alloreactive T cells. Consequently, immunosuppressive approaches focused on inhibition of T cell activation. While short-term graft survival has significantly improved and rejection rates have dropped, acute rejection has not been eliminated and chronic rejection remains the major threat to long-term graft survival. Increased attention to humoral immunity in experimental systems and in the clinic has revealed that donor specific antibodies (DSA) can mediate and promote acute and chronic rejection. Herein, we detail the effects of alloantibody, particularly HLA antibody, binding to graft vascular and other cells, and briefly summarize the experimental methods used to assess such outcomes.

Non-HLA antibodies targeting vascular receptors enhance alloimmune response and microvasculopathy after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (Abs) targeting vascular receptors are implicated in the pathogenesis of renal allograft vascular rejection and in progressive vasculopathy in patients with systemic sclerosis.

METHODS

We prospectively tested in 30 heart transplant recipients the impact of Abs directed against endothelin-1 type A (ET(A)R) and angiotensin II type 1 receptors (AT(1)R, cell-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) at time of transplantation and during the first posttransplantation year on cellular and Ab-mediated rejection (immunohistochemistry, C3d, and immunoglobulins) and microvasculopathy in endomyocardial biopsy.

RESULTS

Cellular rejection, Ab-mediated rejection, and microvasculopathy was found in 40% and 13%, 57% and 18%, and 37% and 40% of biopsies at 1 month and 1 year posttransplantation, respectively. Maximum levels of AT(1)R and ET(A)R Abs were higher in patients with cellular (16.5±2.6 vs. 9.4±1.3; P=0.021 and 16.5±2.5 vs. 9.9±1.9; P=0.041) and Ab-mediated rejection (19.0±2.6 vs. 10.0±1.3; P=0.004 and 19.4±2.7 vs. 9.0±1.7; P=0.002), as compared with patients who had no rejection. Patients with elevated AT(1)R Abs (53% [16/30]) or ETAR Abs (50% [15/30]; pretransplantation prognostic rejection cutoff >16.5 U/L) presented more often with microvasculopathy (both, 67% vs. 23%; P=0.048) than patients without.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated levels of AT(1)R and ET(A)R Abs are associated with cellular and Ab-mediated rejection and early onset of microvasculopathy and should be routinely monitored after heart transplantation.

Humoral autoimmunity and transplant vasculopathy: when allo is not enough

For several decades, allograft rejection was believed to be mediated almost exclusively by cellular immune responses, but it is now realized that humoral responses also play a major role. Although directed typically against donor human leukocyte antigen, it is becoming increasingly evident that the antibody response can also target autoantigens that are shared between donor and recipient and that this autoantibody may contribute to graft rejection. Many aspects of transplant-induced humoral autoimmunity remain poorly understood and key questions persist; not least what triggers the response and how autoantibody causes graft damage. Here, we collate results from recent clinical and experimental studies in transplantation and autoimmune diseases to propose answers to these questions.

Contemporary concepts in prevention and treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), is characterized by heterogeneous proliferative thickening of the vascular intima of the cardiac allograft vasculature. Since its presentation is commonly clinically silent, early diagnosis and preventative therapy are critical. Preventative therapy including optimization of immunosuppressive therapy and treatment of comorbidities associated with CAV progression must be initiated early since most of the intimal thickening occurs during the first year posttransplant. Long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors is associated with a high incidence of chronic renal disease and also contributes to hyperlipidemia and hypertension, all of which may exacerbate CAV. In addition, statins, antihypertensive agents and anti-CMV agents all have demonstrated benefits in reducing CAV. Once established, the limited treatment options include nonpharmacologic interventions such as retransplantation, percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary artery bypass grafting, transmyocardial laser revascularization and heparin-induced/mediated extracorporeal LDL plasmapheresis (HELP). As the use of new assessment tools increases our understanding of this disease, better preventative and treatment strategies are evolving.

Progression of alloresponse and tissue-specific immunity during graft coronary artery disease

Chronic rejection remains the major obstacle for long-term transplant survival. Both indirect alloresponse and tissue-specific autoimmunity have been implicated in its pathogenesis. The interrelationship between these two types of host anti-graft response remains poorly understood. We have developed an immunosuppression-free mouse model of graft coronary artery disease (GCAD), in which all FVB (H-2(q)) cardiac allografts placed into minor Ag (mHC)-mismatched DBA/1 (H-2(q)) hosts survived more than 112 days, and developed GCAD. We then examined the kinetics of both anti-mHC alloresponse and host autoimmunity against heart-specific antigen, cardiac myosin (CM). At 8 days post-transplantation, recipient mice showed minimal intragraft inflammation and apoptosis, and limited expansion of allo-specific T cells. In addition, we observed early production of anti-myosin IgG1 autoantibodies, which occurred in the absence of activated CM-specific T lymphocytes. By day 56, GCAD indices, the numbers of mHC- and CM-reactive T cells, and the levels of circulating allo- and CM-specific antibodies were all significantly increased. While host alloresponse was exhausted at 112 days post-transplant, T-cell reactivity against CM persisted. Our data suggest that both allo- and tissue-specific immunity might contribute to the induction of GCAD. They indicate that continual autoimmune response against graft tissue antigens may provide for GCAD sustenance.

Activation of autoimmune B cells and chronic rejection

Allotransplantation into immunosuppressed individuals results in long-term survival of grafts. However, the grafts are damaged, probably at many stages before, during and after implantation. The hypothesis to be presented is that release of antigens and autoantigens from the chronically damaged graft results in breaking tolerance to self-antigens and an autoimmune response. There is experimental evidence that autoimmune responses following allotransplantation are damaging and cause accelerated graft rejection.

Donor-Specific Antibodies in Allograft Rejection: Clinical and Experimental Data

The ability of donor-specific major histocompatibility complex alloantibodies to destroy a transplanted organ within minutes, the so-called hyperacute rejection phenomenon, has been known for a long time. It is a clear demonstration of the possible cytotoxic effect of antibodies. Apart from this particular situation, the role of antibodies in inducing acute or chronic allograft rejection remains controversial. Many clinical data have shown that transplant recipients capable of developing class I or class II anti-HLA antibodies experienced shorter survival periods than those who were not. This fact, in accordance with experimental data, only demonstrates that high antibody responders reject a transplant more easily than low responders. More interestingly, there is now increasing evidence that posttransplant appearance of donor-specific alloantibodies, and probably of alloreactive-induced autoantibodies, is strongly correlated with reduced graft survival rate, especially from chronic rejection. We demonstrated that donor-specific HLA antibodies can be found in more than 70% of transplanted kidneys with chronic allograft nephropathy, and that the intragraft presence of such antibodies is significantly correlated with high numbers of plasma cells on early biopsies and C4d deposits, a recognized marker of humoral rejection. It is likely that non-HLA antibodies also play a deleterious role in organ transplant outcome, particularly the heterogeneous group of anti-endothelial cells antibodies, anti-MIC antibodies, autoantibodies and some others with no recognized target. Convincing experimental data, especially using B cell and T cell deficient mice, strongly suggest that B cells and donor-specific antibodies are required for fully developed chronic allograft rejection. The role of antibodies in inducing the cascade of cytokines and growth factors leading to tissue lesions is of increasing interest since it is now possible to control B cell proliferation and antibody production.