1
|
Valcarcel B, Schonfeld SJ, Meyer CL, Brunson A, Cooley JJP, Abrahão R, Wun T, Auletta JJ, Gadalla SM, Engels E, Albert PS, Spellman SR, Rizzo JD, Shaw BE, Muffly L, Keegan THM, Morton LM. Comparison of Vital Status, Cause of Death, and Follow-Up after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Linked Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and California Cancer Registry Data, 1991 to 2018. Transplant Cell Ther 2024; 30:239.e1-239.e11. [PMID: 37981238 PMCID: PMC10872486 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
Assessing outcomes following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) poses challenges due to the necessity for systematic and often prolonged patient follow-up. Linking the HCT database of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) with cancer registry data may improve long-term outcome ascertainment, but the reliability of mortality data in death certificates from cancer registries among HCT recipients remains unknown. We compared the classification of vital status and primary cause of death (COD), as well as the length of follow-up between the CIBMTR and California Cancer Registry (CCR) to assess the possibility of supplementing the CIBMTR with cancer registry data. This retrospective study leveraged a linked CIBMTR-CCR dataset. We included patients who were California residents at the time of HCT and received a first allogeneic (allo) or autologous (auto) HCT for a hematologic malignancy diagnosed during 1991-2016. Follow-up was through 2018. We analyzed 18,450 patients (alloHCT, n = 8232; autoHCT, n = 10,218). The Vital status agreement was 97.7% for alloHCT and 97.2% for autoHCT. Unknown COD was higher in CIBMTR (12.9%) than in CCR (1.6%). After excluding patients with unknown COD information, the overall agreement of primary COD (cancer versus noncancer) was 53.7% for alloHCT and 83.2% for autoHCT. This agreement was lower within the first 100 days post-HCT (alloHCT, 31.0%; autoHCT, 54.6%). Compared with CIBMTR, deaths due to cancer were higher in CCR (alloHCT, 90.0%; autoHCT, 90.1% versus alloHCT, 47.3%; autoHCT, 82.5% in CIBMTR). CIBMTR reports more frequently noncancer-related deaths, including graft-versus-host disease and infections. The cumulative incidence of cancer-specific mortality at 20 years differed, particularly for alloHCT (CCR, 53.7%; CIBMTR, 27.6%). The median follow-up among alive patients was longer in CCR (alloHCT, 6.0 years; autoHCT, 4.7 years) than in CIBMTR (alloHCT, 5.0 years; autoHCT, 3.8 years). Our findings highlight the completeness of vital status data in CIBMTR but reveal substantial disagreement in primary COD. Consequently, caution is required when interpreting HCT studies that use only death certificates to estimate cause-specific mortality outcomes. Improving the accuracy of COD registration and follow-up completeness by developing communication pathways between cancer registries and hospital-based cohorts may enhance our understanding of late effects and long-term outcomes among HCT survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Valcarcel
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Sara J Schonfeld
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Christa L Meyer
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ann Brunson
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Julianne J P Cooley
- California Cancer Reporting and Epidemiologic Surveillance Program, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Renata Abrahão
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Ted Wun
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Jeffery J Auletta
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Divisions of Hematology/Oncology/BMT and Infectious Diseases, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Shahinaz M Gadalla
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Eric Engels
- Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Paul S Albert
- Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Stephen R Spellman
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - J Douglas Rizzo
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Bronwen E Shaw
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Lori Muffly
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Theresa H M Keegan
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Lindsay M Morton
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baumann U, Karam V, Adam R, Fondevila C, Dhawan A, Sokal E, Jacquemin E, Kelly DA, Grabhorn E, Pawlowska J, D'Antiga L, Jara Vega P, Debray D, Polak WG, de Ville de Goyet J, Verkade HJ. Prognosis of Children Undergoing Liver Transplantation: A 30-Year European Study. Pediatrics 2022; 150:189501. [PMID: 36111446 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-057424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The European Liver Transplant Registry has been collecting data on virtually all pediatric liver transplant (PLT) procedures in Europe since 1968. We analyzed patient outcome over time and identified parameters associated with long-term patient outcome. METHODS Participating centers and European organ-sharing organizations provided retrospective data to the European Liver Transplant Registry. To identify trends, data were grouped into consecutive time spans: era A: before 2000, era B: 2000 to 2009, and the current era, era C: since 2010. RESULTS From June 1968 until December 2017, 16 641 PLT were performed on 14 515 children by 133 centers. The children <7 years of age represented 58% in era A, and 66% in the current era (P <.01). The main indications for PLT were congenital biliary diseases (44%) and metabolic diseases (18%). Patient survival at 5 years is currently 86% overall and 97% in children who survive the first year after PLT. The survival rate has improved from 74% in era A to 83% in era B and 85% in era C (P <.0001). Low-volume centers (<5 PLT/year) represented 75% of centers but performed only 19% of PLT and were associated with a decreased survival rate. In the current era, however, survival rates has become irrespective of volume. Infection is the leading cause of death (4.1%), followed by primary nonfunction of the graft (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS PLT has become a highly successful medical treatment that should be considered for all children with end-stage liver disease. The main challenge for further improving the prognosis remains the early postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Baumann
- Hannover Medical School, Divisions of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department for Paediatric Kidney, Liver, and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover, Germany.,Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,European Liver Transplant Registry, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Research Unit "Chronotherapy, cancers and transplantation," University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association, Padova, Italy.,European Reference Network TransplantChild, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vincent Karam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Research Unit "Chronotherapy, cancers and transplantation," University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association, Padova, Italy
| | - René Adam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Research Unit "Chronotherapy, cancers and transplantation," University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association, Padova, Italy
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- European Liver Transplant Registry, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Research Unit "Chronotherapy, cancers and transplantation," University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IDIPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anil Dhawan
- King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Etienne Sokal
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Emmanuel Jacquemin
- Pediatric Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, National Reference Centre for Biliary Atresia and Genetic Cholestasis, FILFOIE, ERN RARE LIVER, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique: Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; Inserm U1193, Hepatinov, University Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Deirdre A Kelly
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Liver Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Enke Grabhorn
- European Reference Network TransplantChild, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Childreńs Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Joanna Pawlowska
- European Reference Network TransplantChild, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutritional Disorders and Pediatrics, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lorenzo D'Antiga
- European Reference Network TransplantChild, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Paediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology, and Transplantation, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paloma Jara Vega
- European Reference Network TransplantChild, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Paediatric Hepatology Service, Coordinator ERN TransplantChild, Hospital Infantil Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dominique Debray
- European Reference Network TransplantChild, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Pediatric Liver Unit and Reference Center for Biliary Atresia and Genetic Cholestasis, APHP-Hôpital Necker, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Wojciech G Polak
- European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association, Padova, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jean de Ville de Goyet
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Pediatric Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
| | - Henkjan J Verkade
- European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association, Padova, Italy.,Dept. of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, ERN RareLiver, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ivanics T, Wallace D, Abreu P, Claasen MPAW, Callaghan C, Cowling T, Walker K, Heaton N, Mehta N, Sapisochin G, van der Meulen J. Survival After Liver Transplantation: An International Comparison Between the United States and the United Kingdom in the Years 2008-2016. Transplantation 2022; 106:1390-1400. [PMID: 34753895 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared with the United States, risk-adjusted mortality in the United Kingdom has historically been worse in the first 90 d following liver transplantation (LT) and better thereafter. In the last decade, there has been considerable change in the practice of LT internationally, but no contemporary large-scale international comparison of posttransplant outcomes has been conducted. This study aimed to determine disease-specific short- and long-term mortality of LT recipients in the United States and the United Kingdom. METHODS This retrospective international multicenter cohort study analyzed adult (≥18 y) first-time LT recipients between January 2, 2008, and December 31, 2016, using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing and the UK Transplant Registry databases. Time-dependent Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs) comparing disease-specific risk-adjusted mortality in the first 90 d post-LT, between 90 d and 1 y, and between 1 and 5 y. RESULTS Forty-two thousand eight hundred seventy-four US and 4950 UK LT recipients were included. The main LT indications in the United States and the United Kingdom were hepatocellular carcinoma (25.4% and 24.9%, respectively) and alcohol-related liver disease (20.3% and 27.1%, respectively). There were no differences in mortality during the first 90 d post-LT (reference: United States; HR, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.12). However, between 90 d and 1 y (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.85) and 1 and 5 y (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.81]) the United Kingdom had lower mortality. The mortality differences between 1 and 5 y were most marked in hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.88) and alcohol-related liver disease patients (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.89). CONCLUSIONS Risk-adjusted mortality in the United States and the United Kingdom was similar in the first 90 d post-LT but better in the United Kingdom thereafter. International comparisons of LT may highlight differences in healthcare delivery and help benchmarking by identifying modifiable factors that can facilitate improved global outcomes in LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- Division of General Surgery, Multi-organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - David Wallace
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guys and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Phillipe Abreu
- Division of General Surgery, Multi-organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- Division of General Surgery, Multi-organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guys and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Cowling
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Walker
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Division of General Surgery, Multi-organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gómez-Gavara C, Lim C, Adam R, Zieniewicz K, Karam V, Mirza D, Heneghan M, Pirenne J, Cherqui D, Oniscu G, Watson C, Schneeberger S, Boudjema K, Fondevila C, Pratschke J, Salloum C, Esposito F, Esono D, Lahat E, Feray C, Azoulay D. The impact of advanced patient age in liver transplantation: a European Liver Transplant Registry propensity-score matching study. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:974-985. [PMID: 34872865 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The futility of liver transplantation in elderly recipients remains under debate in the HCV eradication era. METHODS The aim was to assess the effect of older age on outcome after liver transplantation. We used the ELTR to study the relationship between recipient age and post-transplant outcome. Young and elderly recipients were compared using a PSM method. RESULTS A total of 10,172 cases were analysed. Recipient age >65 years was identified as an independent risk factor associated with reduced patient survival (HR:1.42 95%CI:1.23-1.65,p < 0.001). After PSM, 2124 patients were matched, and the same association was found between elderly recipients and patient survival and graft survival (p < 0.001). As hepatocellular carcinoma and alcoholic cirrhosis were independent prognostic factors for patient and graft survival a propensity score-matching was performed for each. Patient and graft survival were significantly worse (p < 0.05) in the alcoholic cirrhosis elderly group. However, patient and graft survival in the hepatocellular carcinoma cohort were similar (p > 0.05) between groups. CONCLUSION Liver transplantation is an acceptable and safe curative option for elderly transplant candidates, with worse long-term outcomes compare to young candidates. The underlying liver disease for liver transplantation has a significant impact on the selection of elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Concepción Gómez-Gavara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vall D´Hebrón Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - René Adam
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Krzysztof Zieniewicz
- Department of General and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha, Poland
| | - Vincent Karam
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Darius Mirza
- HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | | | - Jacques Pirenne
- Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Transplantation Research Group, KU, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Gabriel Oniscu
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Watson
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke´s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, 2 Rue Henri le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General & Digestive Surgery, Institut Clínic de Malalties Digestives I Metabòliques, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Mitte/Campus Virchow, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chady Salloum
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Francesco Esposito
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Grand Hôpital de L'Est Francilien, Meaux, France
| | - Daniel Esono
- Department of Information and Communications Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eylon Lahat
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Cyrille Feray
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Azoulay
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Israel; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Visseren T, Erler NS, Polak WG, Adam R, Karam V, Vondran FWR, Ericzon BG, Thorburn D, IJzermans JNM, Paul A, van der Heide F, Taimr P, Nemec P, Pirenne J, Romagnoli R, Metselaar HJ, Darwish Murad S. Recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation - analysing the European Liver Transplant Registry and beyond. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1455-1467. [PMID: 34028110 PMCID: PMC8456806 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) can be complicated by recurrence of PSC (rPSC). This may compromise graft survival but the effect on patient survival is less clear. We investigated the effect of post‐transplant rPSC on graft and patient survival in a large European cohort. Registry data from the European Liver Transplant Registry regarding all first transplants for PSC between 1980 and 2015 were supplemented with detailed data on rPSC from 48 out of 138 contributing transplant centres, involving 1,549 patients. Bayesian proportional hazards models were used to investigate the impact of rPSC and other covariates on patient and graft survival. Recurrence of PSC was diagnosed in 259 patients (16.7%) after a median follow‐up of 5.0 years (quantile 2.5%‐97.5%: 0.4–18.5), with a significant negative impact on both graft (HR 6.7; 95% CI 4.9–9.1) and patient survival (HR 2.3; 95% CI 1.5–3.3). Patients with rPSC underwent significantly more re‐transplants than those without rPSC (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.7–4.8). PSC recurrence has a negative impact on both graft and patient survival, independent of transplant‐related covariates. Recurrence of PSC leads to higher number of re‐transplantations and a 33% decrease in 10‐year graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijmen Visseren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Stephanie Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wojciech Grzegorz Polak
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - René Adam
- Centre Hépatobiliaire, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincent Karam
- Centre Hépatobiliaire, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Bo-Goran Ericzon
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre and UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jan Nicolaas Maria IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Paul
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Frans van der Heide
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Pavel Taimr
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institut Klinické Experimentální Medicíny, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Nemec
- Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantations, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jacques Pirenne
- Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Renato Romagnoli
- Liver Transplantation Center, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Herold Johnny Metselaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarwa Darwish Murad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brüggenwirth IMA, Werner MJM, Adam R, Polak WG, Karam V, Heneghan MA, Mehrabi A, Klempnauer JL, Paul A, Mirza DF, Pratschke J, Salizzoni M, Cherqui D, Allison M, Soubrane O, Staffa SJ, Zurakowski D, Porte RJ, de Meijer VE. The Liver Retransplantation Risk Score: a prognostic model for survival after adult liver retransplantation. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1928-1937. [PMID: 34160850 PMCID: PMC8518385 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
High‐risk combinations of recipient and graft characteristics are poorly defined for liver retransplantation (reLT) in the current era. We aimed to develop a risk model for survival after reLT using data from the European Liver Transplantation Registry, followed by internal and external validation. From 2006 to 2016, 85 067 liver transplants were recorded, including 5581 reLTs (6.6%). The final model included seven predictors of graft survival: recipient age, model for end‐stage liver disease score, indication for reLT, recipient hospitalization, time between primary liver transplantation and reLT, donor age, and cold ischemia time. By assigning points to each variable in proportion to their hazard ratio, a simplified risk score was created ranging 0–10. Low‐risk (0–3), medium‐risk (4–5), and high‐risk (6–10) groups were identified with significantly different 5‐year survival rates ranging 56.9% (95% CI 52.8–60.7%), 46.3% (95% CI 41.1–51.4%), and 32.1% (95% CI 23.5–41.0%), respectively (P < 0.001). External validation showed that the expected survival rates were closely aligned with the observed mortality probabilities. The Retransplantation Risk Score identifies high‐risk combinations of recipient‐ and graft‐related factors prognostic for long‐term graft survival after reLT. This tool may serve as a guidance for clinical decision‐making on liver acceptance for reLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel M A Brüggenwirth
- Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen J M Werner
- Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - René Adam
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm U935, Hôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Wojciech G Polak
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent Karam
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm U935, Hôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University Heidelberg, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen L Klempnauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andreas Paul
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mauro Salizzoni
- General Surgery 2U - Liver Transplant Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hépato-Biliare, Inserm, Unit 1193, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Michael Allison
- Liver Unit, Department of Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Steven J Staffa
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Zurakowski
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert J Porte
- Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lerut J, Karam V, Cailliez V, Bismuth H, Polak WG, Gunson B, Adam R. What did the European Liver Transplant Registry bring to liver transplantation? Transpl Int 2020; 33:1369-1383. [PMID: 32767799 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Since its foundation in 1985, the European Liver Transplant Registry has evolved to become an important tool to monitor the liver transplantation activity in Europe. The vast amount of data collected on 169 473 liver transplantations performed in 153 238 recipients has also resulted in scientific publications. Without doubt, several of these have influenced the daily practice of liver transplantation. This paper gives an overview of the development, the functioning, and the scientific activity of the European Liver Transplant Registry during more than three decades. Indeed, it can be said that the registry helped to advance the practice of liver transplantation not only in Europe but also worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Lerut
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Karam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, INSERM U 935, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Valérie Cailliez
- European Liver Transplant Registry, INSERM U 935, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Henri Bismuth
- European Liver Transplant Registry, INSERM U 935, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Wojciech G Polak
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bridget Gunson
- Liver Unit and National Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rene Adam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, INSERM U 935, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Germani G, Zeni N, Zanetto A, Adam R, Karam V, Belli LS, O'Grady J, Mirza D, Klempnauer J, Cherqui D, Pratschke J, Jamieson N, Salizzoni M, Hidalgo E, Lerut J, Paul A, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Rodríguez FSJ, Villa E, Burra P. Influence of donor and recipient gender on liver transplantation outcomes in Europe. Liver Int 2020; 40:1961-1971. [PMID: 32418358 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The impact of gender and donor/recipient gender mismatch on LT outcomes is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of LT in Europe, using the ELTR database, between male and female recipients, including donor/recipient gender mismatch. METHODS Recipient, donor and transplant characteristics were compared between male and female patients. Patient survival was compared between groups, and the impact of donor/recipient gender matching as well as donor and recipient anthropometric characteristics were evaluated as potential risk factors for post-LT death/graft loss. RESULTS A total of 46,334 LT patients were evaluated (70.5% men and 29.5% women). Ten-year survival rate was significantly higher in female than in male recipients (66% vs 59%, P < .0001). At multivariate analysis, adjusted for indication to LT and type of graft, donor/recipient gender mismatch (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.2; P = .003), donor age > 60 years (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18; P = .027) and recipient age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.1-1.02; P < .0001) were significantly associated with post-LT lower survival rate in men. Conversely in female recipients, donor BMI > 30 (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.6; P = .005), donor age > 60 years (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.32; P = .027) and recipient age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.02; P < .0001) were significantly associated with lower post-LT survival rate. CONCLUSIONS Donor/recipient gender mismatch in male recipients and the use of obese donor in female recipients are associated with reduced survival after LT. Therefore, the incorporation of donor and recipient anthropometric quantities in the allocation process should be a matter of further studies, as their matching can significantly influence long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Germani
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Nicola Zeni
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Alberto Zanetto
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - René Adam
- ELTR, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Universite´Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincent Karam
- ELTR, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Universite´Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Luca S Belli
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liver Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jan Lerut
- Universitè Catholique Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Erica Villa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Policlinico of Modena University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Patrizia Burra
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haldar D, Kern B, Hodson J, Armstrong MJ, Adam R, Berlakovich G, Fritz J, Feurstein B, Popp W, Karam V, Muiesan P, O'Grady J, Jamieson N, Wigmore SJ, Pirenne J, Malek-Hosseini SA, Hidalgo E, Tokat Y, Paul A, Pratschke J, Bartels M, Trunecka P, Settmacher U, Pinzani M, Duvoux C, Newsome PN, Schneeberger S. Outcomes of liver transplantation for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A European Liver Transplant Registry study. J Hepatol 2019; 71:313-322. [PMID: 31071367 PMCID: PMC6656693 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Little is known about outcomes of liver transplantation for patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We aimed to determine the frequency and outcomes of liver transplantation for patients with NASH in Europe and identify prognostic factors. METHODS We analysed data from patients transplanted for end-stage liver disease between January 2002 and December 2016 using the European Liver Transplant Registry database. We compared data between patients with NASH versus other aetiologies. The principle endpoints were patient and overall allograft survival. RESULTS Among 68,950 adults undergoing first liver transplantation, 4.0% were transplanted for NASH - an increase from 1.2% in 2002 to 8.4% in 2016. A greater proportion of patients transplanted for NASH (39.1%) had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than non-NASH patients (28.9%, p <0.001). NASH was not significantly associated with survival of patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, p = 0.713) or grafts (HR 0.99; p = 0.815) after accounting for available recipient and donor variables. Infection (24.0%) and cardio/cerebrovascular complications (5.3%) were the commonest causes of death in patients with NASH without HCC. Increasing recipient age (61-65 years: HR 2.07, p <0.001; >65: HR 1.72, p = 0.017), elevated model for end-stage liver disease score (>23: HR 1.48, p = 0.048) and low (<18.5 kg/m2: HR 4.29, p = 0.048) or high (>40 kg/m2: HR 1.96, p = 0.012) recipient body mass index independently predicted death in patients transplanted for NASH without HCC. Data must be interpreted in the context of absent recognised confounders, such as pre-morbid metabolic risk factors. CONCLUSIONS The number and proportion of liver transplants performed for NASH in Europe has increased from 2002 through 2016. HCC was more common in patients transplanted with NASH. Survival of patients and grafts in patients with NASH is comparable to that of other disease indications. LAY SUMMARY The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease has increased dramatically in parallel with the worldwide increase in obesity and diabetes. Its progressive form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, is a growing indication for liver transplantation in Europe, with good overall outcomes reported. However, careful risk factor assessment is required to maintain favourable post-transplant outcomes in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debashis Haldar
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Centre for Liver and Gastroenterology Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Barbara Kern
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria,Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - James Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthew James Armstrong
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rene Adam
- Hepato-Biliary Center, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, University of Paris-Sud, Inserm U776, Villejuif, France
| | - Gabriela Berlakovich
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel, Vienna, Austria
| | - Josef Fritz
- Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Benedikt Feurstein
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Popp
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Vincent Karam
- Hepato-Biliary Center, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, University of Paris-Sud, Inserm U776, Villejuif, France
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Centre for Liver and Gastroenterology Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - John O'Grady
- King’s Liver Transplant Unit, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Neville Jamieson
- Cambridge Transplant Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge UK
| | - Stephen J. Wigmore
- MRC Centre for Inflammation Research and Royal Infirmary, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jacques Pirenne
- Laboratory of Abdominal Transplantation, Universitaire Zeikenhuizen Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Yaman Tokat
- Liver Transplantation Center, Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Andreas Paul
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Bartels
- Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Chirurgische Klinik Und Poliklinik Ii Visceral, Transplantations, Thorax und Gefabchirurgie, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Pavel Trunecka
- Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Transplant Center, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Universitatsklinikum Jena, Allgemeine, Viszerale und Transplantationschirurgie, Jena, Germany
| | - Massimo Pinzani
- Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Christophe Duvoux
- Service De Chirurgie Digestive, Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - Philip Noel Newsome
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Liver and Gastroenterology Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hernández D, Sánchez E, Armas-Padrón AM. Kidney transplant registries: How to optimise their utility? Nefrologia 2019; 39:581-591. [PMID: 30850219 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2018.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The scientific Registries (RE) in renal transplantation (Tx) are very useful since they allow us to identify risk factors in this population and facilitate contrasting the information with other national and international registries, contributing to establishing strategies which improve outcomes in terms of survival. They constitute an organised and planned system that uses observational methods and standardised systematic processes, including adjusted risk models, to essentially evaluate survival outcomes. The scientific RE are complemented with clinical trials providing scientific evidence, but inexcusably need adequate statistical analysis to generate reliable clinical data that contribute to optimising the prognosis of the transplant population. In addition, scientific RE provide valuable information on the performance of Tx programmes and help generate prognostic indexes, which could contribute to improving survival. Under these prerequisites, this review will assess the following aspects related to the scientific RE in the Tx: 1) the concept and importance of implementing RE in Tx; 2) the measures that are needed for the correct execution of the scientific RE; 3) the benefits, quality and limitations of RE; 4) the statistical tools for the adequate analysis of survival; and 5) utility of RE in the evaluation of performance, quality and surveillance of transplant programmes and the generation of comorbidity índices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domingo Hernández
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya, Instituto Biomédico de Investigación de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga, REDinREN (RD16/0009/0006), Málaga, España.
| | - Emilio Sánchez
- Área de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología. Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, REDinREN (RD16/0009/0021), Oviedo, Asturias, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Adam R, Karam V, Cailliez V, O Grady JG, Mirza D, Cherqui D, Klempnauer J, Salizzoni M, Pratschke J, Jamieson N, Hidalgo E, Paul A, Andujar RL, Lerut J, Fisher L, Boudjema K, Fondevila C, Soubrane O, Bachellier P, Pinna AD, Berlakovich G, Bennet W, Pinzani M, Schemmer P, Zieniewicz K, Romero CJ, De Simone P, Ericzon BG, Schneeberger S, Wigmore SJ, Prous JF, Colledan M, Porte RJ, Yilmaz S, Azoulay D, Pirenne J, Line PD, Trunecka P, Navarro F, Lopez AV, De Carlis L, Pena SR, Kochs E, Duvoux C. 2018 Annual Report of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) - 50-year evolution of liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2019; 31:1293-1317. [PMID: 30259574 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 280] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2018] [Revised: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this registry study was to provide an overview of trends and results of liver transplantation (LT) in Europe from 1968 to 2016. These data on LT were collected prospectively from 169 centers from 32 countries, in the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) beginning in 1968. This overview provides epidemiological data, as well as information on evolution of techniques, and outcomes in LT in Europe over more than five decades; something that cannot be obtained from only a single center experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Adam
- Paul Brousse Hospital, Univ Paris-Sud, Inserm U935, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincent Karam
- Paul Brousse Hospital, Univ Paris-Sud, Inserm U935, Villejuif, France
| | - Valérie Cailliez
- Paul Brousse Hospital, Univ Paris-Sud, Inserm U935, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Daniel Cherqui
- Paul Brousse Hospital, Univ Paris-Sud, Inserm U935, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jan Lerut
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lutz Fisher
- Universitatsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert J Porte
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Pavel Trunecka
- Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | - Eberhard Kochs
- Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Advancing Transplantation: New Questions, New Possibilities in Kidney and Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2018; 101 Suppl 2S:S1-S41. [PMID: 28125449 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
13
|
Belli LS, Perricone G, Adam R, Cortesi PA, Strazzabosco M, Facchetti R, Karam V, Salizzoni M, Andujar RL, Fondevila C, De Simone P, Morelli C, Fabregat-Prous J, Samuel D, Agarwaal K, Moreno Gonzales E, Charco R, Zieniewicz K, De Carlis L, Duvoux C. Impact of DAAs on liver transplantation: Major effects on the evolution of indications and results. An ELITA study based on the ELTR registry. J Hepatol 2018; 69:810-817. [PMID: 29940268 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have dramatically improved the outcome of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection including those with decompensated cirrhosis (DC). We analyzed the evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation (LT) in the past 10 years in Europe, focusing on the changes induced by the advent of DAAs. METHODS This is a cohort study based on data from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). Data of adult LTs performed between January 2007 to June 2017 for HCV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), alcohol (EtOH) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) were analyzed. The period was divided into different eras: interferon (IFN/RBV; 2007-2010), protease inhibitor (PI; 2011-2013) and second generation DAA (DAA; 2014-June 2017). RESULTS Out of a total number of 60,527 LTs, 36,382 were performed in patients with HCV, HBV, EtOH and NASH. The percentage of LTs due to HCV-related liver disease varied significantly over time (p <0.0001), decreasing from 22.8% in the IFN/RBV era to 17.4% in the DAA era, while those performed for NASH increased significantly (p <0.0001). In the DAA era, the percentage of LTs for HCV decreased significantly (p <0.0001) from 21.1% (first semester 2014) to 10.6% (first semester 2017). This decline was more evident in patients with DC (HCV-DC, -58.0%) than in those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with HCV (HCV-HCC, -41.2%). Conversely, three-year survival of LT recipients with HCV-related liver disease improved from 65.1% in the IFN/RBV era to 76.9% in the DAA era, and is now comparable to the survival of recipients with HBV infection (p = 0.3807). CONCLUSIONS In Europe, the number of LTs due to HCV infection is rapidly declining for both HCV-DC and HCV-HCC indications and post-LT survival has dramatically improved over the last three years. This is the first comprehensive study of the overall impact of DAA treatment for HCV on liver transplantation in Europe. LAY SUMMARY After the advent of direct-acting antivirals in 2014, a dramatic decline was observed in the number of liver transplants performed both in patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV), minus 60%, and in those with hepatocellular carcinoma associated with HCV, minus 41%. Furthermore, this is the first large-scale study demonstrating that the survival of liver transplant recipients with HCV-related liver disease has dramatically improved over the last three years and is now comparable to the survival of recipients with hepatitis B virus infection. The reduction in HCV-related indications for LT means that there is a greater availability of livers, at least 600 every year, which can be allocated to patients with indications other than HCV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saverio Belli
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liver Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Perricone
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liver Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Rene Adam
- Centre Hépatobiliaire, Université Paris-Sud, Hôpital Paul Brousse, F-94804 Villejuif, France
| | - Paolo A Cortesi
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Rita Facchetti
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Vincent Karam
- Centre Hépatobiliaire, Université Paris-Sud, Hôpital Paul Brousse, F-94804 Villejuif, France
| | - Mauro Salizzoni
- Centro trapianti di fegato, AO San Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy
| | - Rafael Lopez Andujar
- Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, Unidad de Chirurgia HPB y TX, Valencia, Spain
| | - Costantino Fondevila
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Dep. of Surgery, University of Barcelona Villaroel, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo De Simone
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Cristina Morelli
- Liver and Multiorgan Transplantation, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Joan Fabregat-Prous
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Unidad de Transplante Hepatico, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Didier Samuel
- Centre Hépatobiliaire, Université Paris-Sud, Hôpital Paul Brousse, F-94804 Villejuif, France
| | - Kosh Agarwaal
- Institute of Liver Diseases, King's College Hospital, Liver Unit, London, UK
| | | | - Ramon Charco
- Hospital Universitario Vall D Hebron HBP, Surgery & Transplant Department, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Krzysztof Zieniewicz
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Chirurgia generale 2 e Trapianti, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Christophe Duvoux
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, AssistancePublique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Est University, Creteil, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, Scaravelli G, Smeenk J, Vidakovic S, Goossens V, Gliozheni O, Strohmer H, Obruca, Kreuz-Kinderwunschzentrum SPG, Petrovskaya E, Tishkevich O, Wyns C, Bogaerts K, Balic D, Sibincic S, Antonova I, Vrcic H, Ljiljak D, Pelekanos M, Rezabek K, Markova J, Lemmen J, Sõritsa D, Gissler M, Tiitinen A, Royere D, Tandler—Schneider A, Kimmel M, Antsaklis AJ, Loutradis D, Urbancsek J, Kosztolanyi G, Bjorgvinsson H, Mocanu E, Scaravelli G, de Luca R, Lokshin V, Ravil V, Magomedova V, Gudleviciene Z, Belo lopes G, Petanovski Z, Calleja-Agius J, Xuereb J, Moshin V, Simic TM, Vukicevic D, Romundstad LB, Janicka A, Calhaz-Jorge C, Laranjeira AR, Rugescu I, Doroftei B, Korsak V, Radunovic N, Tabs N, Virant-Klun I, Saiz IC, Mondéjar FP, Bergh C, Weder M, De Geyter C, Smeenk JMJ, Gryshchenko M, Baranowski R. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE†. Hum Reprod 2018; 33:1586-1601. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 314] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ch De Geyter
- Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecological Endocrinology (RME), Vogesenstrasse 134, Basel, Switzerland
- ESHRE Central Office, Meerstraat 60, Grimbergen, Belgium
| | - C Calhaz-Jorge
- CNPMA, assembleia da Republica, Palacio de Sao Bento, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - M S Kupka
- Gynaekologicum Hamburg, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Altonaer Strasse 59, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C Wyns
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Av. Hippocrate, 10, Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Mocanu
- Human Assisted Reproduction Ireland Rotunda Hospital, HARI Unit, Master's House, Parnell Square, 1 Dublin, Ireland
| | - T Motrenko
- Medical Centre Cetinje, Human Reproduction Department, Vuka Micunovica 4, Cetinje, Montenegro
| | - G Scaravelli
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Registro Nazionale della Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita, CNESPS, Viale Regina Elena, 299, Roma, Italy
| | - J Smeenk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg, Hilv, The Netherlands
| | - S Vidakovic
- Institute for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center Serbia ‘GAK’, Visegradska 26, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - V Goossens
- ESHRE Central Office, Meerstraat 60, Grimbergen, Belgium
| | - Orion Gliozheni
- University Hospital for Obst&Gynecology, Departement of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Bul.B.Curri, Tirana, Albania. Tel: +355-4-222-3632; Fax: +355-4-225-7688; Mobile: +355-682029313. E-mail:
| | - Heinz Strohmer
- Lazarettgasse 16-18, 1090 Wien, Austria. Tel: +43-40-111-1400; Fax: +43-40-111-1401. E-mail:
| | - Obruca
- Lazarettgasse 16-18, 1090 Wien, Austria. Tel: +43-40-111-1400; Fax: +43-40-111-1401. E-mail:
| | | | | | - Oleg Tishkevich
- Centre For Assisted Reproduction ‘Embryo’ Belivpul, Filimonova Str. 53, 220114 Minsk, Belarus. Tel: +375-29-622-2722; Fax: +375-17-237-6404; Mobile: +375-296222722; E-mail:
| | - Christine Wyns
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Av. Hippocrate, 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. Tel. +32-27-64-6576; Fax: +32-27-64-9050; E-mail:
| | - Kris Bogaerts
- I-Biostat, Kapucijnenvoer 35 bus 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Tel: +32-016-33-6890; Fax: +32-016-33-7015. E-mail:
| | - Devleta Balic
- Zavod za humanu reprodukciju ‘Dr Balic’, Kojsino 25, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia—Herzegovina. Tel: +387-35-26-0650; Mobile: +387-61140222; E-mail:
| | - Sanja Sibincic
- Health Centre Medico-S, Jevrejska 58/A, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia—Herzegovina. Tel: +387-51-232-100; Mobile: +387-65515942; E-mail:
| | - Irena Antonova
- ESHRE certified clinical embryologist (2011), Ob/Gyn Hospital Dr Shechterev, 25-31, Hristo Blagoev Strasse, 1330 Sofia, Bulgaria. Tel: +359-88-712-7651; E-mail:
| | - Hrvoje Vrcic
- Zagreb University Medical School, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Petrova 13, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. Tel: +385-14-60-4646; Fax: +385-14-63-3512; E-mail:
| | - Dejan Ljiljak
- Clinical Hospital Centre ‘Sestre milosrd’, Department for Biology of Human Reproduction, Ob/Gyn Clinic, Vinogradska c. 29, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. Tel: +385-378-7597; Fax: +385-13-76-8272; Mobile: +385-378-7125; E-mail:
| | - Michael Pelekanos
- Fertility Centre Aceso, 1, Pavlou Nirvana str., 3021 Limassol, Cyprus. Tel: +357-99-64-5333; Fax: +357-25-82-4477; Mobile +30-6944248433; E-mail:
| | - Karel Rezabek
- Medical Faculty, University Hopsital, CAR-Assisited Reproduction Centre, Gyn/Ob departement, Apolinarska 18, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic. Tel: +420-22-496-7479; Fax: +420-22-492-2545; Mobile: +420-724685276; E-mail:
| | - Jitka Markova
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Palackeho namesti 4, 12801 Prague, Czech Republic. Tel: +420-22-497-2832; Mobile: +420-72-182-7532; E-mail:
| | - Josephine Lemmen
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Tel: +45-35-450-934; Fax: +45-35-454-945; Mobile: +45-30285712; E-mail:
| | - Deniss Sõritsa
- Tartu University Hospital and Elitre Clinic, Tartu, Estonia. Tel: +372-740-9930; Fax: +372-740-9931; E-mail:
| | - Mika Gissler
- THL National Institute for Health and Welfare, PO Box 30, 00271 Helsinki, Finland. Tel: +385-29-524-7279; E-mail:
| | - Aila Tiitinen
- Helsinki University Central Hospital, Dept. of Ob/Gyn, Haartmaninkatu, 2, PO Box 140, 00029 HUS—Helsinki, Finland. Tel: + 358-50-427-1217; E-mail:
| | - Dominique Royere
- Agence de la Biomédecine, 1 Av du stade de France, 93212 Saint-Denis La Plaine Cedex, France.Tel.: +33-15-593-6555; Fax: +33-15-593-6561; E-mail:
| | - Andreas Tandler—Schneider
- Fertility Centre Berlin; Spandauer damm 130; 14050 Berlin; Germany. Tel: +49-30-23-320-8110; Fax: +49-30-23-320-8119; E-mail:
| | - Markus Kimmel
- D.I.R. Geschäftsstelle, Torstrasse 140, D-10119 Berlin, Germany. Tel: +49-303-980-0743; E-mail:
| | - Aris J Antsaklis
- Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Athens, President Hellenic Authority of Assisted Human Reproduction. Tel: +30-694-429-9699; E-mail:
| | - Dimitris Loutradis
- Athens Medical School, 1st Department of OB/GYN, 62, Sirinon Street, 17561 P. Faliro, Athens, Greece. Tel: +30-19-83-3576; Fax: +30-19-88-3834; Mobile: +30-693-242-1747; E-mail:
| | - Janos Urbancsek
- Semmelweis University, 1st Dept. of Ob/Gyn, Baross utca 27, 1088 Budapest, Hungary. Tel: +36-12-66-0115; Fax: +36-12-66-0115; E-mail:
| | - G Kosztolanyi
- University of Pecs, Dept. of Medical Genetics and Child Development, Jozsef A.u.7., 7623 Pecs, Hungary. Tel: +36-72-53-5977; Fax: +36-72-53-5972; E-mail:
| | - Hilmar Bjorgvinsson
- Art Medica, Baejarlind 12, 201 Kopavogur, Iceland. Tel: +354-515-8100; Fax: +354-515-8103; E-mail:
| | - Edgar Mocanu
- Human Assisted Reproduction Ireland Rotunda Hospital, HARI Unit, Master’s House, Parnell Square, 1 Dublin, Ireland. Tel: +353-18-07-2732; Mobile: +353-86-81-8839; Fax: +353-18-72-7831; E-mail:
| | - Giulia Scaravelli
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Registro Nazionale della Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita, CNESPS, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Roma. Tel: +39-49-90-4050; Fax: +39-49-90-4324; E-mail:
| | - Roberto de Luca
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Registro Nazionale della Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita, CNESPS, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Roma. Tel: +39-064-990-4320; E-mail:
| | - Vyacheslav Lokshin
- The Urban Centre of Human Reproduction, Tole Be Street 99, 50012 Almaty, Kazakhstan. Tel: +7-727-234-3434; Fax: +7-727-264-6615; Mobile: +7-7017558209; E-mail:
| | - Valiyev Ravil
- The Scientific Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Dostyk street 125, 050020 Almaty, Kazakhstan. Tel: +7-727-300-4530; Fax: +7-727-300-4529; Mobile: +7-7772258189; E-mail:
| | - Valeria Magomedova
- Jusu Arsti Private Clinic, Apuzes 14, 1046 Riga, Latvia. Tel: +371-67-87-0029; E-mail:
| | - Zivile Gudleviciene
- Baltic American Clinic, IVF Laboratory, Nemencines rd 54 A, 10103 Vilnius, Lithuania. Tel: + 370-52-34-2020; Mobile: +370-68682417; E-mail:
| | - Giedre Belo lopes
- Northway Medical Centre, S. Žukausko g. 19, Vilnius 08234, Lithuania. Tel: + 370-529-8290; E-mail:
| | - Zoranco Petanovski
- Re-medika Hospital; Jane dandaniski 87/1/4, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia. Tel: +389-23-07-3335; Mobile: +389-72443114; E-mail:
| | - Jean Calleja-Agius
- University of Malta, 12, Mon Nid, Gianni Faure Street, TXN2421 Tarxien, Malta. Tel: +356-21-69-3041; Mobile: +356-99-55-3653; E-mail:
| | - Josephine Xuereb
- Mater Dei Hospital Malta, Apt 1 Hampton Place, BKR 104 B’Kara, Malta. Tel: +356-99-99-2382; E-mail:
| | - Veaceslav Moshin
- Medical Director at Repromed Moldova, Centre of Mother @ Child protection, State Medical and Pharmaceutical University ‘N.Testemitanu’, Bd. Cuza Voda 29/1, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova. Tel: +373-22-26-3855; Mobile: +373-69724433; E-mail:
| | - Tatjana Motrenko Simic
- Medical Centre Cetinje, Human Reproduction Departement, Vuka Micunovica 4, 81310 Cetinje, Montenegro. Tel: +382-41-23-2690; Fax: +382-41-23-1212; Mobile: +382-69-05-2331; E-mail:
| | - Dragana Vukicevic
- Hospital ‘Danilo I’, Humana reprodukcija, Vuka Micunovica bb, 86000 Cetinje, Montenegro. Tel: +382-67-55-1371; E-mail:
| | - Liv Bente Romundstad
- St. Olavs Hospital, Postboks 3250 Sluppen, Olav Kyrres gt.17, 7006 Trondheim, Norway. Tel: +47-73-86-8000; Fax: +47-73-86-7602; Mobile: +47-90-55-0207; E-mail: ,
| | - Anna Janicka
- VitroLive, Kasprzaka 2 A, 71-074 Szczecin, Poland. Tel: +48-69-167-6305; E-mail:
| | - Carlos Calhaz-Jorge
- CNPMA, assembleia da Republica, Palacio de Sao Bento, 1249-068 Lisboa, Portugal. Tel: +351-21-391-9303; Fax: +351-21-391-7502; E-mail:
| | - Ana Rita Laranjeira
- CNPMA, Assembleia da Republica, Palaio de Sao Bento 1249-068 Lisboa, Portugal. Tel: +351-21-391-9303; Fax: +351-21-391-7502; E-mail:
| | - Ioana Rugescu
- Gen Secretary of AER Embryologist association and Representative for Human Reproduction Romanian Society. Tel: +40-74-450-0267; E-mail:
| | - Bogdan Doroftei
- Univ. of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi; Teaching Hospital Obgyn ‘Cuza Voda’; Cuza Voda Str. 34; 700038 Iasi; Romania. Tel: + 40-23-221-3000/int. 176; Mobile: +40-744515297; E-mail: ;
| | - Vladislav Korsak
- International Centre for Reproductive Medicine, General Director, Liniya 11, Building 18B, Vasilievsky Island, 199034 St-Petersburg, Russia C.I.S. Tel: +7-812-328-2251; Fax: +7-812-327-1950; Mobile: +7-921-965-1977; E-mail:
| | - Nebosja Radunovic
- Institute for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Visegradska 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. Tel: +38-111-361-5592; Fax: +38-111-361-5603; Mobile: +381-63200204; E-mail:
| | - Nada Tabs
- Klinika za ginekologiju i akuserstvo, Klinicki centar Vojvodine, Branimira Cosica 37, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia. Mobile: +381-63508185; E-mail:
| | - Irma Virant-Klun
- University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Departement of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Slajmerjeva 3, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. Tel: +386-1-522-6013; Fax: +386-1-431-4355; Mobile:+386-31625774; E-mail:
| | - Irene Cuevas Saiz
- Hospital General de Alicante, Infertility Dept., Av Pintor Baeza, 12, 03010 Valencia, Spain;. Tel: +34-96-197-2000; Fax: +34-91-799-4407; Mobile +34-677245650; E-mail:
| | - Fernando Prados Mondéjar
- Hospital de Madrid-Montepríncipe, HM Fertility Centre Monteprincipe, C/Montepríncipe 25, 28660 Boadilla del Monte, Spain. Tel: +34-91-708-9931; Mobile +34-646737237; E-mail:
| | - Christina Bergh
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bla Straket 6, 413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Tel: +46-31-342-1000, +46-73-688-9325; Fax: +46-31-41-8717; Mobile +46-736889325; E-mail:
| | - Maya Weder
- Administration FIVNAT, Postfach 754, 3076 Worb, Switzerland. Tel: +41-031-819-7602; Fax + 41-031-819-8920; E-mail:
| | - Christian De Geyter
- University Women’s Hospital of Basel, Abteilungsleiter gyn. Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. Tel: +41-61-265-9315; Fax: + 41-61-265-9194; E-mail:
| | - Jesper M J Smeenk
- St Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg, Dept. of obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hilv, The Netherlands. Tel: +31-13-539-3108; Mobile: +31-622753853; E-mail:
| | - Mykola Gryshchenko
- IVF Clinic Implant Ltd, Academician V.I.Gryshchenko Clinic for Reproductive Medicine, 25 Karl Marx Str., 61000 Kharkiv, Ukraine. Tel: +380-57-12-4522; Fax: +380-57-70-507-0703; Mobile +380-57705070703; E-mail:
| | - Richard Baranowski
- Deputy Information Manager, Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA), Finsbury Tower, 103-105 Bunhill Row, London EC1 Y 8HF, UK. Tel: +44-020-7539-3329; Fax: +44-020-7377-1871; E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baumann U, Adam R, Duvoux C, Mikolajczyk R, Karam V, D'Antiga L, Chardot C, Coker A, Colledan M, Ericzon BG, Line PD, Hadzic N, Isoniemi H, Klempnauer JL, Reding R, McKiernan PJ, McLin V, Paul A, Salizzoni M, Furtado ESB, Schneeberger S, Karch A. Survival of children after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:246-255. [PMID: 29222922 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Revised: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in childhood differs from adult HCC because it is often associated with inherited liver disease. It is, however, unclear whether liver transplantation (LT) for HCC in childhood with or without associated inherited disease has a comparable outcome to adult HCC. On the basis of data from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR), we aimed to investigate if there are differences in patient and graft survival after LT for HCC between children and adults and between patients with underlying inherited versus noninherited liver disease, respectively. We included all 175 children who underwent LT for HCC and were enrolled in ELTR between 1985 and 2012. Of these, 38 had an associated inherited liver disease. Adult HCC patients with (n = 79) and without (n = 316, matched by age, sex, and LT date) inherited liver disease served as an adult comparison population. We used multivariable piecewise Cox regression models with shared frailty terms (for LT center) to compare patient and graft survival between the different HCC groups. Survival analyses demonstrated a superior longterm survival of children with inherited liver disease when compared with children with HCC without inherited liver disease (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10-0.90; P = 0.03) and adults with HCC with inherited liver disease (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.06-1.25; P = 0.09). There was no survival difference between adults with and without inherited disease (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.66-1.66; P = 0.84). In conclusion, the potential survival advantage of children with an HCC based on inherited disease should be acknowledged when considering transplantation and prioritization for these patients. Further prospective studies accounting for tumor size and extension at LT are necessary to fully interpret our findings. Liver Transplantation 24 246-255 2018 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Baumann
- Department for Pediatric Kidney, Liver, and Metabolic Diseases, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - René Adam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, INSERM U 935, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Christophe Duvoux
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, Paris Est University, Créteil, France
| | - Rafael Mikolajczyk
- Research Group Epidemiological and Statistical Methods, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research, Hannover-Braunschweig Site, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Vincent Karam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, INSERM U 935, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Lorenzo D'Antiga
- Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Christophe Chardot
- Hopital Necker Enfants Malades, Service de Chirurgie Pediatrique, Paris, France
| | - Ahmet Coker
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery Division, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Michele Colledan
- Papa Giovanni 23 Hospital, Chirurgia III e Centro Trapianti di Fegato, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Bo-Goran Ericzon
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Huddinge Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Pål Dag Line
- Radiumhospitalet Medical Center Liver Transplant Unit, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Helena Isoniemi
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery Clinic, U.C.Helsingfors, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jürgen L Klempnauer
- Klinik für Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Raymond Reding
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Valérie McLin
- Swiss Center for Liver Disease in Children, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Paul
- Klinik für allgemeine und Transplantationschirurgie, C.U.K. GHS Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Mauro Salizzoni
- Centro de Trapianti de Fegato, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy
| | - Emanuel San Bento Furtado
- Gabinete de Coordenacao de Colheita de Orgaos e Transplantacao, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - André Karch
- Research Group Epidemiological and Statistical Methods, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research, Hannover-Braunschweig Site, Braunschweig, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vannas MJ, Boyd S, Färkkilä MA, Arola J, Isoniemi H. Value of brush cytology for optimal timing of liver transplantation in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Liver Int 2017; 37:735-742. [PMID: 28453918 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 10/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with a high risk of cholangiocarcinoma. Here, we investigated the value of surveillance for dysplasia using brush cytology, to determine the optimal timing of liver transplantation in primary sclerosing cholangitis. We compared our preoperative findings, with the final explanted liver histopathology. METHODS 126 consecutive patients were transplanted for primary sclerosing cholangitis from 1984 to 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: symptomatic (n=91), and asymptomatic (n=35). RESULTS Brush cytology was available for 101 patients; 66 symptomatic and 35 asymptomatic. Suspicious cytological findings were found in nine patients (14%) in the symptomatic group and 17 (49%) in the asymptomatic group. DNA flow cytometry was available for 49 patients (25 symptomatic, 24 asymptomatic), with aneuploidy detected in six patients (24%) in the symptomatic group and 15 (63%) in the asymptomatic group. Explanted liver histology showed biliary dysplasia or cholangiocarcinoma in 11 symptomatic patients (12%) and 15 asymptomatic patients (43%). A combination of cytological and DNA flow cytometry findings resulted in a test sensitivity of 68%, with a specificity of 86%. Ten-year survival in the asymptomatic group was 91%. CONCLUSIONS Dysplasia surveillance using brush specimens may help to select those patients likely to benefit from early liver transplantation. It remains unclear as to whether surveillance with brush cytology improves long-term survival, but there is presently no better method with which to predict transplantation timing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko J Vannas
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sonja Boyd
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Martti A Färkkilä
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Arola
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Helena Isoniemi
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Early Predictors of Long-term Outcomes of HCV-negative Liver Transplant Recipients Having Survived the First Postoperative Year. Transplantation 2016; 100:382-90. [PMID: 26683515 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The non-improvement in >1-year post-liver transplant (LT) survival and diminishing importance of hepatitis C (HCV) with modern antivirals justify identification of early factors predictive of long-term outcome post-LT in HCV-negative recipients. METHODS This nationwide study included all 631 HCV-negative adult patients transplanted in Finland 1982-2013 with at least 1-year graft survival (6311 person-year follow-up). We tested 37 variables, including immunosuppression, for their association with >1-year combined graft loss/mortality, late rejection, cancer, or infections. RESULTS Significant multivariate predictors of graft loss/mortality were male gender (HR 2.40, P = 0.001), pretransplant hepatocellular (HR 2.92, P = 0.001) or biliary cancer (HR 12.7, P < 0.001), glomerular filtration rate (HR 0.89, P = 0.002), hypertension (HR 0.44, P < 0.001), early posttransplant infections (HR 1.52-1.67, P = 0.007-0.03), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (HR 1.05, P < 0.001). Elevated ALP at 1 year, affecting 30% of patients, predicted both graft loss and rejection, independent of immunologic stability, etiology, and immunosuppression type. Area under the curve of ALP in predicting graft loss from rejection was 0.81 (95% CI 0.71-0.90) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-0.98, P = 0.001) among patients under 50. Among immunologically stable patients who underwent transplantation after 2000, antimetabolite use at 1 year was associated with improved survival (P = 0.04), specifically in the subgroup with native-liver hepatocellular or biliary cancer (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Easily measurable, widely available, and noninvasive factors known at 1 year post-LT can help stratify patients according to their long-term risk of death or graft loss, and thus facilitate a personalization of long-term follow-up. ALP deserves routine monitoring, and the cause for an elevated ALP should be sought.
Collapse
|
19
|
Pang JXQ, Ross E, Borman MA, Zimmer S, Kaplan GG, Heitman SJ, Swain MG, Burak KW, Quan H, Myers RP. Validation of coding algorithms for the identification of patients hospitalized for alcoholic hepatitis using administrative data. BMC Gastroenterol 2015; 15:116. [PMID: 26362871 PMCID: PMC4566395 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-015-0348-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Epidemiologic studies of alcoholic hepatitis (AH) have been hindered by the lack of a validated International Classification of Disease (ICD) coding algorithm for use with administrative data. Our objective was to validate coding algorithms for AH using a hospitalization database. Methods The Hospital Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) was used to identify consecutive adults (≥18 years) hospitalized in the Calgary region with a diagnosis code for AH (ICD-10, K70.1) between 01/2008 and 08/2012. Medical records were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of AH, defined as a history of heavy alcohol consumption, elevated AST and/or ALT (<300 U/L), serum bilirubin >34 μmol/L, and elevated INR. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the diagnosis field in which the code was recorded (primary vs. secondary) and AH severity. Algorithms that incorporated ICD-10 codes for cirrhosis and its complications were also examined. Results Of 228 potential AH cases, 122 patients had confirmed AH, corresponding to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 54 % (95 % CI 47–60 %). PPV improved when AH was the primary versus a secondary diagnosis (67 % vs. 21 %; P < 0.001). Algorithms that included diagnosis codes for ascites (PPV 75 %; 95 % CI 63–86 %), cirrhosis (PPV 60 %; 47–73 %), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (PPV 62 %; 51–73 %) had improved performance, however, the prevalence of these diagnoses in confirmed AH cases was low (29–39 %). Conclusions In conclusion the low PPV of the diagnosis code for AH suggests that caution is necessary if this hospitalization database is used in large-scale epidemiologic studies of this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack X Q Pang
- Liver Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Erin Ross
- Liver Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Meredith A Borman
- Liver Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Scott Zimmer
- Medical Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Gilaad G Kaplan
- Liver Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Steven J Heitman
- Liver Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Mark G Swain
- Liver Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Kelly W Burak
- Liver Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Hude Quan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Robert P Myers
- Liver Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Adam R, Delvart V, Karam V, Ducerf C, Navarro F, Letoublon C, Belghiti J, Pezet D, Castaing D, Le Treut YP, Gugenheim J, Bachellier P, Pirenne J, Muiesan P. Compared efficacy of preservation solutions in liver transplantation: a long-term graft outcome study from the European Liver Transplant Registry. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:395-406. [PMID: 25612492 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2014] [Revised: 08/08/2014] [Accepted: 08/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Between 2003 and 2012, 42 869 first liver transplantations performed in Europe with the use of either University of Wisconsin solution (UW; N = 24 562), histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate(HTK; N = 8696), Celsior solution (CE; N = 7756) or Institute Georges Lopez preservation solution (IGL-1; N = 1855) preserved grafts. Alternative solutions to the UW were increasingly used during the last decade. Overall, 3-year graft survival was higher with UW, IGL-1 and CE (75%, 75% and 73%, respectively), compared to the HTK (69%) (p < 0.0001). The same trend was observed with a total ischemia time (TIT) >12 h or grafts used for patients with cancer (p < 0.0001). For partial grafts, 3-year graft survival was 89% for IGL-1, 67% for UW, 68% for CE and 64% for HTK (p = 0.009). Multivariate analysis identified HTK as an independent factor of graft loss, with recipient HIV (+), donor age ≥65 years, recipient HCV (+), main disease acute hepatic failure, use of a partial liver graft, recipient age ≥60 years, no identical ABO compatibility, recipient hepatitis B surface antigen (-), TIT ≥ 12 h, male recipient and main disease other than cirrhosis. HTK appears to be an independent risk factor of graft loss. Both UW and IGL-1, and CE to a lesser extent, provides similar results for full size grafts. For partial deceased donor liver grafts, IGL-1 tends to offer the best graft outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Adam
- Centre Hépatobiliaire, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Inserm U 776, Univ Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Burra P, Germani G, Adam R, Karam V, Marzano A, Lampertico P, Salizzoni M, Filipponi F, Klempnauer JL, Castaing D, Kilic M, Carlis LD, Neuhaus P, Yilmaz S, Paul A, Pinna AD, Burroughs AK, Russo FP. Liver transplantation for HBV-related cirrhosis in Europe: an ELTR study on evolution and outcomes. J Hepatol 2013; 58:287-96. [PMID: 23099188 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2012] [Revised: 09/26/2012] [Accepted: 10/10/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS HBV-related chronic liver disease is one of the most common indications for liver transplantation (LT) in Europe. The ELTR database was used to evaluate outcomes and evolution over 20 years (01/1988 and 12/2010). METHODS HBV transplanted patients were analysed according to indication for LT: decompensated cirrhosis (HBVdec) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV/HCC). These groups were compared with co-infected patients HBV/HDV (HBDV), HBV/HCV (HBCV), HBV/HDV/HCV (HBDCV); n = 16,664 and with HCV patients (n = 2452) according to LT indication. RESULTS 5912 patients were transplanted for HBV (78% HBVdec, 22% HBV/HCC), with HBV/HCC patients who increased from 15.8% in 1988-1995 to 29.6% in 2006-2010 (p < 0.001). In HBVdec patients, 1, 3, 5, and 10 year patient and graft survival was 83%, 78%, 75%, 68%, and 80%, 74%, 71%, 64%, respectively, significantly better than HBV/HCC (84%, 73%, 68%, 61%, and 81%, 70%, 65%, 58% respectively; p = 0.001 and p = 0.026). In 2006-2010 patient and graft survival significantly improved compared to 1988-1995, both for HBVdec and HBV/HCC (each p < 0.001). A better patient and graft survival was seen in HBV/HCC patients with HBV-DNA(-) compared to HBV-DNA(+) at the time of LT (p < 0.001). Disease recurrence, as cause of death/graft loss, was significantly reduced in recent years compared to the past: currently <1% for HBVdec and 3% for HBV/HCC. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of LT for HBV have improved in recent years, with disease recurrence being no longer a significant cause of death/graft loss. HBV-DNA at the time of LT seems to influence survival only in HBV/HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Burra
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V, O'Grady J, Mirza D, Klempnauer J, Castaing D, Neuhaus P, Jamieson N, Salizzoni M, Pollard S, Lerut J, Paul A, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Rodríguez FSJ, Burroughs A. Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). J Hepatol 2012; 57:675-88. [PMID: 22609307 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 599] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2011] [Revised: 04/04/2012] [Accepted: 04/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- René Adam
- Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Germani G, Theocharidou E, Adam R, Karam V, Wendon J, O'Grady J, Burra P, Senzolo M, Mirza D, Castaing D, Klempnauer J, Pollard S, Paul A, Belghiti J, Tsochatzis E, Burroughs AK. Liver transplantation for acute liver failure in Europe: outcomes over 20 years from the ELTR database. J Hepatol 2012; 57:288-96. [PMID: 22521347 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2011] [Revised: 02/01/2012] [Accepted: 03/08/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Liver transplantation for acute liver failure (ALF) still has a high early mortality. We evaluated changes during 20 years, and identified risk factors for poor outcome. METHODS Donor, graft, and recipient variables from the European Liver Transplant Registry database (January 1988-June 2009), were analysed. Aetiologies and time periods were compared. Three and 12-month survival models were generated from separate training data sets, which were validated. A sub-analysis was performed for recipient older than 50 years. RESULTS Four thousand nine hundred and three patients were evaluated. One, 5- and 10-year patient, and graft survival rates were 74%, 68%, 63%, and 63%, 57%, 50%, respectively. Survival was better in 2004-2009 compared to previous quinquennia (p<0.001), despite donors >60 years increased from 1.8% to 21%. A higher incidence of suicide or non-adherence occurred in paracetamol-related ALF (p<0.001). Death or graft loss were independently associated with male recipients (adjusted OR 1.25), recipient >50 years (1.26), incompatible ABO matching (1.93), donors >60 years (1.21), and reduced size graft (1.54). For both 3- and 12-month models, incompatible ABO matching, non-viral aetiology, reduced size graft, and non-UW preservation fluid were associated with increased mortality/graft loss, whereas male recipients and age >50 years were associated only at 12 months. Both models had reasonable discriminative ability with good calibration at 3 months. Recipients >50 years, combined with donors >60 years resulted in 57% mortality/graft loss within the first year. CONCLUSIONS Survival after liver transplantation has improved despite increases in donor/recipient age. Recipients >50 years paired with donors >60 years had a very high mortality/graft loss within the first year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Germani
- The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital and UCL, London UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mergental H, Adam R, Ericzon BG, Kalicinski P, Mühlbacher F, Höckerstedt K, Klempnauer JL, Friman S, Broelsch CE, Mantion G, Fernandez-Sellez C, van Hoek B, Fangmann J, Pirenne J, Muiesan P, Königsrainer A, Mirza DF, Lerut J, Detry O, Le Treut YP, Mazzaferro V, Löhe F, Berenguer M, Clavien PA, Rogiers X, Belghiti J, Kóbori L, Burra P, Wolf P, Schareck W, Pisarski P, Foss A, Filipponi F, Krawczyk M, Wolff M, Langrehr JM, Rolles K, Jamieson N, Hop WCJ, Porte RJ. Liver transplantation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in normal livers. J Hepatol 2012; 57:297-305. [PMID: 22521348 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2011] [Revised: 03/21/2012] [Accepted: 03/22/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The role of liver transplantation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in livers without fibrosis/cirrhosis (NC-HCC) is unclear. We aimed to determine selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with NC-HCC. METHODS Using the European Liver Transplant Registry, we identified 105 patients who underwent liver transplantation for unresectable NC-HCC. Detailed information about patient, tumor characteristics, and survival was obtained from the transplant centers. Variables associated with survival were identified using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. RESULTS Liver transplantation was primary treatment in 62 patients and rescue therapy for intrahepatic recurrences after liver resection in 43. Median number of tumors was 3 (range 1-7) and median tumor size 8 cm (range 0.5-30). One- and 5-year overall and tumor-free survival rates were 84% and 49% and 76% and 43%, respectively. Macrovascular invasion (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.34 to 4.86), lymph node involvement (HR 2.60, 95% CI 1.28 to 5.28), and time interval between liver resection and transplantation < 12 months (HR 2.12, 95% CI 0.96 to 4.67) were independently associated with survival. Five-year survival in patients without macrovascular invasion or lymph node involvement was 59% (95% CI 47-70%). Tumor size was not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest reported series of patients transplanted for NC-HCC. Selection of patients without macrovascular invasion or lymph node involvement, or patients ≥ 12months after previous liver resection, can result in 5-year survival rates of 59%. In contrast to HCC in cirrhosis, tumor size is not a predictor of post-transplant survival in NC-HCC.
Collapse
|
25
|
Knight M, Barber K, Gimson A, Collett D, Neuberger J. Implications of changing the minimal survival benefit in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2012; 18:549-57. [PMID: 22238251 DOI: 10.1002/lt.23380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The limited availability of livers donated by deceased donors for transplantation means that not everyone who might benefit from the procedure can receive a graft, so any selection and allocation system must have clearly defined goals. The United Kingdom, in common with many other countries, has adopted a minimum benefit criterion of a greater than 50% probability of survival 5 years after transplantation. We investigated the impact of changing this minimum benefit criterion on a case mix of listed patients. The analysis was based on 5330 adult elective patients who underwent transplantation with livers from donation after brain death donors between January 1994 and December 2007. We examined the impact of balancing the number of registrations on the list with the number of available donor livers while allowing a 10% mortality rate and found that this would require a survival threshold of at least 74% at 5 years. According to historical data, the application of this more stringent criterion would significantly reduce the eligibility of older and nonwhite patients and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatitis C virus infections. Thus, if such undesirable restrictions on access to liver transplantation are to be avoided, we must consider alternative strategies such as the acceptance of higher transplant list mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Knight
- Statistics and Clinical Audit, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Forrester L, Collet JC, Mitchell R, Pelude L, Henderson E, Vayalumkal J, Leduc S, Ghahreman S, Weir C, Gravel D. How reliable are national surveillance data? Findings from an audit of Canadian methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surveillance data. Am J Infect Control 2012; 40:102-7. [PMID: 21705109 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2010] [Revised: 03/04/2011] [Accepted: 03/04/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP) has conducted surveillance for incident cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in sentinel hospitals since 1995. In 2007, a reliability audit of the 2005 data was conducted. METHODS In 2005, 5,652 cases were submitted to the CNISP from 43 hospitals. A proportional sample of submitted forms (up to 25) from each site were randomly selected. Stratified random sampling was used to obtain the comparison data. The original data were compared with the reabstracted data for congruence on 7 preselected variables. RESULTS Reabstracted data were received from 30 out of 43 hospitals (70%), providing 443 of the 598 case forms requested (74%). Of these, 397 (90%) had matching case identification numbers. Overall, the percentage of discordant responses was 7.0%, ranging from 3.5% for sex and up to 23.7% for less well-defined variables (eg, where MRSA was acquired). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that, in general, the 2005 MRSA data are reliable. However to improve reliability a data quality framework with quality assurance practices, including ongoing auditing should be integrated into the CNISP's surveillance programs. Providing training to data collectors and standard definitions with practical examples may help to improve data quality, especially for those variables that require clinical judgment.
Collapse
|
27
|
Willis CD, Jolley DJ, McNeil JJ, Cameron PA, Phillips LE. Identifying and improving unreliable items in registries through data auditing. Int J Qual Health Care 2011; 23:317-23. [DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
28
|
Aberg F, Mäkisalo H, Höckerstedt K, Isoniemi H. Infectious complications more than 1 year after liver transplantation: a 3-decade nationwide experience. Am J Transplant 2011; 11:287-95. [PMID: 21219571 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03384.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Because few reports have addressed infections late (≥1 year) after liver transplantation (LT), we evaluated the incidence, risk factors and pathogens involved. Infection data were from the Finnish LT registry, with starting date, type and relevant pathogens for 501 Finnish adult LT patients surviving ≥1 year post-transplant. Follow-up end points were end of study, death or retransplantation. Logistic regression to assess risk factors was adjusted for age, gender and follow-up time. With 3923 person-years of follow-up, overall infection incidence was 66/1000 person-years; 155 (31%) suffered 259 infections, and two-thirds experienced only one infection. Cholangitis (20%), pneumonia (19%) and sepsis (14%) were most common. The most frequent bacteria were Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli, and the most frequent viruses cytomegalovirus and varicella zoster virus. Fungal infections were rare (n = 7). With 13 fatal infections, 17% of all late deaths involved infection. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and Roux-en-Y-type biliary anastomosis were associated with cholangitis; 18% of PSC patients suffered late cholangitis. Late acute rejection was associated with sepsis. Age, gender or cytomegalovirus did not significantly influence late infections. In conclusion, although infection risk under maintenance immunosuppression therapy is relatively low, particular vigilance regarding cholangitis, pneumonia and sepsis seems appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Aberg
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Schwendener A, Gratwohl M, Apperley J, Frauendorfer K, Niederwieser D. The EBMT activity survey 2008: impact of team size, team density and new trends. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 46:174-91. [DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2010.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
30
|
Burra P, Senzolo M, Adam R, Delvart V, Karam V, Germani G, Neuberger J. Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease in Europe: a study from the ELTR (European Liver Transplant Registry). Am J Transplant 2010; 10:138-48. [PMID: 19951276 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02869.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 234] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is one of the most common indications for liver transplantation (LT). Long-term outcome after LT for ALD versus other etiologies is still under debate. The aim of this study was to compare outcome after LT of patients with ALD, viral (VIR), and cryptogenic cirrhosis. Donor, graft and recipient ELTR variables were analysed in transplants for alcoholic and nonalcoholic cirrhosis (1988-2005) and were correlated with patient survival. Causes of death and/or graft failure were compared between groups. Nine thousand eight hundred eighty ALD, 10,943 VIR, 1478 ALD+VIR and 2410 cryptogenic (CRYP) liver transplants were evaluated. One, 3, 5 and 10 years graft survival rates after LT in ALD patients were 84%, 78%, 73%, 58%, significantly higher than in VIR and CRYP (p=0.04, p=0.05). By multivariate analysis, ALD+VIR (RR 1.14) and viral alone (RR 1.06) were significant risk factors for mortality. De novo tumors, cardiovascular and social causes were causes of death/graft failure in higher percentage in ALD groups versus other etiologies. LT for ALD cirrhosis has a favorable outcome, however, hepatitis C virus co-infection seems to eliminate this advantage. Screening for de novo tumors and prevention of cardiovascular complications are essential to provide better long-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Burra
- Gastroenterology, Department of Surgical and Gastroenterological Sciences, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Quantifying data quality for clinical trials using electronic data capture. PLoS One 2008; 3:e3049. [PMID: 18725958 PMCID: PMC2516178 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2008] [Accepted: 08/04/2008] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Historically, only partial assessments of data quality have been performed in clinical trials, for which the most common method of measuring database error rates has been to compare the case report form (CRF) to database entries and count discrepancies. Importantly, errors arising from medical record abstraction and transcription are rarely evaluated as part of such quality assessments. Electronic Data Capture (EDC) technology has had a further impact, as paper CRFs typically leveraged for quality measurement are not used in EDC processes. Methods and Principal Findings The National Institute on Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network has developed, implemented, and evaluated methodology for holistically assessing data quality on EDC trials. We characterize the average source-to-database error rate (14.3 errors per 10,000 fields) for the first year of use of the new evaluation method. This error rate was significantly lower than the average of published error rates for source-to-database audits, and was similar to CRF-to-database error rates reported in the published literature. We attribute this largely to an absence of medical record abstraction on the trials we examined, and to an outpatient setting characterized by less acute patient conditions. Conclusions Historically, medical record abstraction is the most significant source of error by an order of magnitude, and should be measured and managed during the course of clinical trials. Source-to-database error rates are highly dependent on the amount of structured data collection in the clinical setting and on the complexity of the medical record, dependencies that should be considered when developing data quality benchmarks.
Collapse
|
32
|
Gómez-Reino JJ, Carmona L, Angel Descalzo M. Risk of tuberculosis in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists due to incomplete prevention of reactivation of latent infection. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 57:756-61. [PMID: 17530674 DOI: 10.1002/art.22768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 264] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the causes of new cases of active tuberculosis (ATB) in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists included in the national registry BIOBADASER (Base de Datos de Productos Biológicos de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología) after the dissemination of recommendations to prevent reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). METHODS Incidence rate of ATB per 100,000 patient-years and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated in patients entering BIOBADASER after March 2002 and were stratified by compliance with recommendations (complete or incomplete). ATB rates in BIOBADASER were compared with the background rate and the rate in the rheumatoid arthritis cohort EMECAR (Estudio de la Morbilidad y Expresión Clínica de la Artritis Reumatoide) not treated with TNF antagonists. In addition, rates of ATB among patients treated with adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab were estimated and compared only for treatments started after September 2003, when all 3 drugs became fully available. RESULTS Following March 2002, a total of 5,198 patients treated with a TNF antagonist were registered in BIOBADASER. Fifteen ATB cases were noted (rate 172 per 100,000 patient-years, 95% CI 103-285). Recommendations were fully followed in 2,655 treatments. The probability of developing ATB was 7 times higher when recommendations were not followed (incidence rate ratio 7.09, 95% CI 1.60-64.69). Two-step tuberculosis skin test for LTBI was the major failure in complying with recommendations. CONCLUSION New cases of ATB still occur in patients treated with all available TNF antagonists due to lack of compliance with recommendations to prevent reactivation of LTBI. Continuous evaluation of recommendations is required to improve clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan J Gómez-Reino
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Santiago de Compostela School of Medicine, Santiago, Spain.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Trotter JF, Adam R, Lo CM, Kenison J. Documented deaths of hepatic lobe donors for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2006; 12:1485-8. [PMID: 16952175 DOI: 10.1002/lt.20875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The actual risk of death in hepatic lobe donors for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unknown because of the lack of a comprehensive database. In the absence of a definitive estimate of the risk of donor death, the medical literature has become replete with anecdotal reports of donor deaths, many of which cannot be substantiated. Because donor death is one of the most important outcomes of LDLT, we performed a comprehensive survey of the medical and lay literature to provide a referenced source of worldwide donor deaths. We reviewed all published articles from the medical literature on LDLT and searched the lay literature for donor deaths from 1989 to February 2006. We classified each death as "definitely," "possibly," or "unlikely" related to donor surgery. We identified 19 donor deaths (and one additional donor in a chronic vegetative state). Thirteen deaths and the vegetative donor were "definitely," 2 were "possibly," and 4 were "unlikely" related to donor surgery. The estimated rate of donor death "definitely" related to donor surgery is 0.15%. The rate of donor death which is "definitely" or "possibly" related to the donor surgery is 0.20%. This analysis provides a source document of all identifiable living liver donor deaths, provides a better estimate of donor death rate, and may provide an impetus for centers with unreported deaths to submit these outcomes to the liver transplantation community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James F Trotter
- University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Leandro G, Rolando N, Gallus G, Rolles K, Burroughs AK. Monitoring surgical and medical outcomes: the Bernoulli cumulative SUM chart. A novel application to assess clinical interventions. Postgrad Med J 2006; 81:647-52. [PMID: 16210461 PMCID: PMC1743380 DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.030619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monitoring clinical interventions is an increasing requirement in current clinical practice. The standard CUSUM (cumulative sum) charts are used for this purpose. However, they are difficult to use in terms of identifying the point at which outcomes begin to be outside recommended limits. OBJECTIVE To assess the Bernoulli CUSUM chart that permits not only a 100% inspection rate, but also the setting of average expected outcomes, maximum deviations from these, and false positive rates for the alarm signal to trigger. METHODS As a working example this study used 674 consecutive first liver transplant recipients. The expected one year mortality set at 24% from the European Liver Transplant Registry average. A standard CUSUM was compared with Bernoulli CUSUM: the control value mortality was therefore 24%, maximum accepted mortality 30%, and average number of observations to signal was 500-that is, likelihood of false positive alarm was 1:500. RESULTS The standard CUSUM showed an initial descending curve (nadir at patient 215) then progressively ascended indicating better performance. The Bernoulli CUSUM gave three alarm signals initially, with easily recognised breaks in the curve. There were no alarms signals after patient 143 indicating satisfactory performance within the criteria set. CONCLUSIONS The Bernoulli CUSUM is more easily interpretable graphically and is more suitable for monitoring outcomes than the standard CUSUM chart. It only requires three parameters to be set to monitor any clinical. INTERVENTION the average expected outcome, the maximum deviation from this, and the rate of false positive alarm triggers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Leandro
- Ospedale Gastroentrologico, Castellana Grotte, BA, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mutimer DJ, Gunson B, Chen J, Berenguer J, Neuhaus P, Castaing D, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Salizzoni M, Moreno GE, Mirza D. Impact of donor age and year of transplantation on graft and patient survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus. Transplantation 2006; 81:7-14. [PMID: 16421468 DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000188619.30677.84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has become the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT). Graft and patient survival are adversely affected by recurrent infection of the graft. Recent publications have described an inferior outcome for recently transplanted HCV patients and have highlighted the impact of advancing donor age on severity of recurrent HCV. The donor age at which a measurable impact on graft and patient outcome can be observed has not clearly been defined. In addition, the impact of donor age on graft and patient survival for non-HCV patients needs to be examined. METHODS We have examined a large European liver transplant database to define the impact of transplantation date and donor age on graft and patient survival for HCV patients (n = 4,736) and the impact for a comparison group of transplanted alcoholic liver disease patients (ALD, n = 5,406). RESULTS For the entire cohorts, graft and patient survival of HCV patients was inferior to ALD patients. Since 1987, there has been a steady and ongoing improvement in the outcome of transplanted ALD patients, an improvement not observed for HCV patients. Every year since 1989, there has been an increase in liver donor age. Graft and patient survival for both ALD and HCV cohorts was adversely affected by advancing donor age. Comparison of graft and patient survival for HCV and ALD cohorts was made according to donor age (donor age subgrouped <20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60 and >60 years of age). For donors younger than 40 years of age, HCV and ALD recipient graft and patient survival are not significantly different. For donors older than 40, HCV recipient graft survival is inferior to ALD graft survival, an inferiority that increases for each advancing decade of donor age. For donors older than 50 years, HCV recipient patient survival is inferior to ALD patient survival, an inferiority that increases when the donor age is greater than 60 years. CONCLUSION The results of liver transplantation for European HCV patients is inferior to a comparison group of ALD patients, and have not improved during the past 15 years. Liver donor age has increased significantly during that period. Advancing donor age has an adverse influence on graft and patient survival for ALD and HCV patients, but a significantly greater impact is observed for HCV patients when the donor is older than 40 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Mutimer
- Liver and Hepatobiliary Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Burroughs AK, Sabin CA, Rolles K, Delvart V, Karam V, Buckels J, O'Grady JG, Castaing D, Klempnauer J, Jamieson N, Neuhaus P, Lerut J, de Ville de Goyet J, Pollard S, Salizzoni M, Rogiers X, Muhlbacher F, Garcia Valdecasas JC, Broelsch C, Jaeck D, Berenguer J, Gonzalez EM, Adam R. 3-month and 12-month mortality after first liver transplant in adults in Europe: predictive models for outcome. Lancet 2006; 367:225-32. [PMID: 16427491 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68033-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 234] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortality after liver transplantation depends on heterogeneous recipient and donor factors. Our aim was to assess risk of death and to develop models to help predict mortality after liver transplantation. METHODS We analysed data from 34,664 first adult liver transplants from the European Liver Transplant Registry to identify factors associated with mortality at 3-months (n=21,605 in training dataset) and 12-months (n=18,852 in training dataset) after transplantation. We used multivariable logistic regression models to generate mortality scores for each individual, and assessed model discrimination and calibration on an independent validation dataset (n=9489 for 3-month model and n=8313 for 12-month model). FINDINGS 2540 of 21,605 (12%) individuals in the 3-month training sample had died by 3 months. Compared with those transplanted in 2000-03, those transplanted earlier had a higher risk of death. Increased mortality at 3-months post-transplantation was associated with acute liver failure (adjusted odds ratio 1.61), donor age older than 60 years (1.16), compatible (1.22) or incompatible (2.07) donor-recipient blood group, older recipient age (1.12 per 5 years), split or reduced graft (1.96), total ischaemia time of longer than 13 h (1.38), and low United Network for Organ Sharing score (score 1: 2.43; score 2: 1.67). However, cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma, alcohol cirrhosis, hepatitis C or primary biliary cirrhosis, donor age 40 years or younger, or less, hepatitis B, and larger size of transplant centre (> or = 70 transplants per year) were associated with improved early outcomes. The 3-month mortality score discriminated well between those who did and did not die in the validation sample (C statistic=0.688). We noted similar findings for 12-month mortality, although deaths were generally underestimated at this timepoint. INTERPRETATION The 3-month and 12-month mortality models can be effectively used to assess outcomes both within and between centres. Furthermore, the models provide a means of assessing the risk of post-transplantation mortality, giving clinicians important data on which to base strategic decisions about transplant policy in particular individuals or groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew K Burroughs
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Medicine, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Angelico M, Gridelli B, Strazzabosco M. Practice of adult liver transplantation in Italy. Recommendations of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (A.I.S.F.). Dig Liver Dis 2005; 37:461-7. [PMID: 15893508 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2005] [Accepted: 03/01/2005] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Liver transplantation is an efficient procedure as performed in Italy, yet major differences are present in terms of practice. In an effort to facilitate an homogeneous practice of liver transplantation in Italy, the Italian Association for the Study of Liver Disease has instituted a Commission aimed at providing recommendations on non-urgent liver transplantation in adults, based on current evidence. This nation-wide commission which included experienced hepatologists, surgeons and pathologists with major interest in liver transplantation has drafted a final document in October 2004, approved by the Italian Association for the Study of Liver Governing Board, whose key arguments and main conclusions are summarised in the present paper. The Commission has made specific recommendations on the following topics: the current needs of liver transplantation in Italy; the indications to liver transplantation and re-liver transplantation, with special reference to controversial issues and the minimal listing criteria; the use of marginal donors and the need to optimise donor/recipient matching; the use of living donor liver transplantation; the management of the waiting list and the introduction of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease to define priorities; the clinical management of liver transplantation recipients and disease recurrence; the implementation of audits and outcome monitoring; the training of transplant surgeons and hepatologists and the requirements for Centre accreditation; the pathology of liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Adam R, McMaster P, O'Grady JG, Castaing D, Klempnauer JL, Jamieson N, Neuhaus P, Lerut J, Salizzoni M, Pollard S, Muhlbacher F, Rogiers X, Garcia Valdecasas JC, Berenguer J, Jaeck D, Moreno Gonzalez E. Evolution of liver transplantation in Europe: report of the European Liver Transplant Registry. Liver Transpl 2003; 9:1231-43. [PMID: 14625822 DOI: 10.1016/j.lts.2003.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 405] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) currently allows for the analysis of 44,286 liver transplantations (LTs) performed on 39,196 patients in a 13-year period. After an exponential increase, the number of LTs is plateauing due to a lack of organs. To cope with this, alternatives to cadaveric LT, such as split LT, domino LT, or living-related LT (LRLT) are being used increasingly. They now account for 11% of all procedures. One of the most important findings in the evolution of LT is the considerable improvement of results along time with, for the mean time, a one-year survival of 83%, all indications confounded. The improvement is particularly significant for cancers. This improvement is mainly represented by hepatocellular carcinoma, with a gain of 17% for 5-year survival rate from 1990 to 2000. Increasingly, older donors are used to augment the donor pool and older recipients are transplanted due to improved results and a better selection of patients. More than two thirds of deaths and three quarters of retransplantations occurred within the first year of transplantation. Retransplantation is associated with much less optimal results than first LT. One of the prominent features of recent years is the development of LRLT. LRLT is now performed by almost half of the European centers. As with split LT or domino LT, LRLT aims to provide more patients to be transplanted. Special attention is paid to reducing the risk for the donor, which is now estimated to be 0.5% mortality and 21% postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Adam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, Villejuif, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|