1
|
Masset C, Danger R, Degauque N, Dantal J, Giral M, Brouard S. Blood Gene Signature as a Biomarker for Subclinical Kidney Allograft Rejection: Where Are We? Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00787. [PMID: 38867352 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
The observation decades ago that inflammatory injuries because of an alloimmune response might be present even in the absence of concomitant clinical impairment in allograft function conduced to the later definition of subclinical rejection. Many studies have investigated the different subclinical rejections defined according to the Banff classification (subclinical T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection), overall concluding that these episodes worsened long-term allograft function and survival. These observations led several transplant teams to perform systematic protocolar biopsies to anticipate treatment of rejection episodes and possibly prevent allograft loss. Paradoxically, the invasive characteristics and associated logistics of such procedures paved the way to investigate noninvasive biomarkers (urine and blood) of subclinical rejection. Among them, several research teams proposed a blood gene signature developed from cohort studies, most of which achieved excellent predictive values for the occurrence of subclinical rejection, mainly antibody-mediated rejection. Interestingly, although all identified genes relate to immune subsets and pathways involved in rejection pathophysiology, very few transcripts are shared among these sets of genes, highlighting the heterogenicity of such episodes and the difficult but mandatory need for external validation of such tools. Beyond this, their application and value in clinical practice remain to be definitively demonstrated in both biopsy avoidance and prevention of clinical rejection episodes. Their combination with other biomarkers, either epidemiological or biological, could contribute to a more accurate picture of a patient's risk of rejection and guide clinicians in the follow-up of kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Masset
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Richard Danger
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Nicolas Degauque
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Jacques Dantal
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Magali Giral
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Sophie Brouard
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Helanterä I, Dörje C, Ortiz F, Varberg Reisæter A, Hammarström C, Lauronen J, Räisänen-Sokolowski A, Haugen AJ, Lempinen M, Åsberg A, Mjøen G. Very Low Frequency of Pathological Findings in One-year Protocol Biopsies of Uneventful Standard Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results From the Nordic Protocol Biopsy Study. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1621. [PMID: 38617466 PMCID: PMC11013703 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical significance of kidney transplant protocol biopsies has been debated. We studied the frequency of borderline changes and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in 1-y protocol biopsies in standard risk kidney transplant recipients. Methods Consecutive non-HLA-sensitized recipients of kidney transplants between 2006 and 2017, who underwent a protocol biopsy at 1 y in 2 national transplant centers were studied retrospectively (N = 1546). Donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs), graft function (plasma creatinine), and proteinuria were measured at the time of 1-y protocol biopsy. The occurrence of subclinical acute TCMR (i2t2v0 or higher) or borderline changes suspicious of TCMR (i1t1v0 or higher) in the protocol biopsy was studied, together with frequency of findings causing changes in the composite score iBox. Results Subclinical acute TCMR was detected in 30 of 1546 (1.9%) of the protocol biopsies, and borderline or TCMR in 179 of 1546 (12%). Among patients with no history of acute rejection, and no proteinuria or DSA, TCMR was detected in only 1 of 974 (0.1%) and borderline or TCMR in only 48 of 974 (4.9%) patients at 1 y. In the absence of proteinuria (<30 mg/g, or equivalent as measured with a negative dipstick proteinuria) or DSA, or history of acute rejection, only 50 of 974 (5.1%) biopsies showed any lesions significant for the iBox score. Conclusions The likelihood of pathological findings in 1-y protocol biopsies in non-HLA-sensitized patients without previous immunological events is low. Clinical usefulness of protocol biopsies seems limited in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilkka Helanterä
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Christina Dörje
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fernanda Ortiz
- Department of Nephrology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Clara Hammarström
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski
- Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Marko Lempinen
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anders Åsberg
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Mjøen
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barrett-Chan E, Wang L, Bone J, Thachil A, Vytlingam K, Blydt-Hansen T. Optimizing the approach to monitoring allograft inflammation using serial urinary CXCL10/creatinine testing in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14718. [PMID: 38553815 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary CXCL10/creatinine (uCXCL10/Cr) is proposed as an effective biomarker of subclinical rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. This study objective was to model implementation in the clinical setting. METHODS Banked urine samples at a single center were tested for uCXCL10/Cr to validate published thresholds for rejection diagnosis (>80% specificity). The positive predictive value (PPV) for rejection diagnosis for uCXCL10/Cr-indicated biopsy was modeled with first-positive versus two-test-positive approaches, with accounting for changes associated with urinary tract infection (UTI), BK and CMV viremia, and subsequent recovery. RESULTS Seventy patients aged 10.5 ± 5.6 years at transplant (60% male) had n = 726 urine samples with n = 236 associated biopsies (no rejection = 167, borderline = 51, and Banff 1A = 18). A threshold of 12 ng/mmol was validated for Banff 1A versus no-rejection diagnosis (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.92). The first-positive test approach (n = 69) did not resolve a clinical diagnosis in 38 cases (55%), whereas the two-test approach resolved a clinical diagnosis in the majority as BK (n = 17/60, 28%), CMV (n = 4/60, 7%), UTI (n = 8/60, 13%), clinical rejection (n = 5/60, 8%), and transient elevation (n = 18, 30%). In those without a resolved clinical diagnosis, PPV from biopsy for subclinical rejection is 24% and 71% (p = .017), for first-test versus two-test models, respectively. After rejection treatment, uCXCL10/Cr level changes were all concordant with change in it-score. Sustained uCXCL10/Cr after CMV and BK viremia resolution was associated with later acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS Urinary CXCL10/Cr reliably identifies kidney allograft inflammation. These data support a two-test approach to reliably exclude other clinically identifiable sources of inflammation, for kidney biopsy indication to rule out subclinical rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Li Wang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Bone
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amy Thachil
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Vytlingam
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tom Blydt-Hansen
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harmacek D, Weidmann L, Castrezana Lopez K, Schmid N, Korach R, Bortel N, von Moos S, Rho E, Helmchen B, Gaspert A, Schachtner T. Molecular diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection: Evaluating biopsy-based transcript diagnostics in the presence of donor-specific antibodies but without microvascular inflammation, a single-center descriptive analysis. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00244-2. [PMID: 38548057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics may identify molecular antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) when microvascular inflammation (MVI) is absent. In this single-center cohort, biopsy-based transcript diagnostics were validated in 326 kidney allograft biopsies. A total of 71 histological AMR and 35 T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) cases were identified as molecular AMR and TCMR in 55% and 63%, respectively. Among 121 cases without MVI (glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis = 0), 45 (37%) donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive and 76 (63%) DSA-negative cases were analyzed. Twenty-one out of the 121 (17%) cases showed borderline changes, or TCMR, while BK nephropathy was excluded. None of the 45 DSA-positive patients showed molecular AMR. Among 76 DSA-negative patients, 2 had mixed molecular AMR/TCMR. All-AMR phenotype scores (sum of R4-R6) exhibited median values of 0.13 and 0.12 for DSA-positive and DSA-negative patients, respectively (P = .84). A total of 13% (6/45) DSA-positive and 11% (8/76) DSA-negative patients showed an all-AMR phenotype score > 0.30 (P = .77). Patients with a higher all-AMR phenotype score showed 33% more histologic TCMR (P = .005). The median all-AMR phenotype scores of glomerular basement membrane double contours = 0 and glomerular basement membrane double contours > 0 biopsies were 0.12 and 0.10, respectively (P = .35). Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics did not identify molecular AMR in cases without MVI. Follow-up biopsies and outcome data should evaluate the clinical relevance of subthreshold molecular alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dusan Harmacek
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Weidmann
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolas Schmid
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Korach
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bortel
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Seraina von Moos
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elena Rho
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Birgit Helmchen
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ariana Gaspert
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Schachtner
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Han HS, Lubetzky ML. Immune monitoring of allograft status in kidney transplant recipients. FRONTIERS IN NEPHROLOGY 2023; 3:1293907. [PMID: 38022723 PMCID: PMC10663942 DOI: 10.3389/fneph.2023.1293907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Kidney transplant patients require careful management of immunosuppression to avoid rejection while minimizing the risk of infection and malignancy for the best long-term outcome. The gold standard for monitoring allograft status and immunosuppression adequacy is a kidney biopsy, but this is invasive and costly. Conventional methods of allograft monitoring, such as serum creatinine level, are non-specific. Although they alert physicians to the need to evaluate graft dysfunction, by the time there is a clinical abnormality, allograft damage may have already occurred. The development of novel and non-invasive methods of evaluating allograft status are important to improving graft outcomes. This review summarizes the available conventional and novel methods for monitoring allograft status after kidney transplant. Novel and less invasive methods include gene expression, cell-free DNA, urinary biomarkers, and the use of artificial intelligence. The optimal method to manage patients after kidney transplant is still being investigated. The development of less invasive methods to assess allograft function has the potential to improve patient outcomes and allow for a more personalized approach to immunosuppression management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwarang S. Han
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
van den Broek DAJ, Meziyerh S, Budde K, Lefaucheur C, Cozzi E, Bertrand D, López del Moral C, Dorling A, Emonds MP, Naesens M, de Vries APJ. The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11321. [PMID: 37560072 PMCID: PMC10408721 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis A. J. van den Broek
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Soufian Meziyerh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Transplant Immunology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Covadonga López del Moral
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Inflammation Biology, Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aiko P. J. de Vries
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee O, Kim MJ, Lee JE, Kwon GY, Hwang NY, Kim K, Park JB, Lee KW. Effects of Treating Subclinical Rejection 2 Weeks After Kidney Transplantation, as Determined by Analyzing 1-Year Histologic Outcomes. Transplant Proc 2023:S0041-1345(23)00129-X. [PMID: 37062613 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
Subclinical rejection (SCR) is associated with chronic allograft nephropathy. Therefore, early detection and treatment of SCR through a protocol biopsy (PB) can reduce the incidence of pathologic changes. This study evaluates the impact of early detection and treatment of SCR using a routine PB 2 weeks after kidney transplantation (KT) by examining histologic outcomes 1 year later. We reviewed 624 KT recipients at the Samsung Medical Center between August 2012 and December 2018. Protocol biopsy was planned 2 weeks and 1 year after transplantation. We compared the histologic changes between the 2 biopsies. After a propensity score matching analysis, we divided the patients into 2 groups: the proven normal group (n = 256) and the rejection group (n = 96) at the PB taken 2 weeks post-transplant. The rejection group showed no significant difference from the normal group in the flow of graft function or the Kaplan-Meier curve for graft survival. In the histologic outcomes, the pathologic differences between the groups significantly improved between the 2 time points. Treating SCR through a PB 2 weeks after KT can contribute to the maintenance of graft function and improve histologic changes 1 year after KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Okjoo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Bucheon, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Jung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Eun Lee
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ghee Young Kwon
- Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Na Young Hwang
- Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyunga Kim
- Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Berm Park
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Kyo Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee O, Kim MJ, Lee JE, Hwang NY, Kim K, Lee KW, Park JB. The Protective Role of Protocol Biopsy for Allograft Kidney Maintenance in Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2023:S0041-1345(23)00095-7. [PMID: 36990887 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Many studies have reported that protocol biopsy (PB) may help preserve kidney function in kidney transplant recipients. Early detection and treatment of subclinical rejection may reduce the incidence of chronic antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure. However, no consensus has been reached regarding PB effectiveness, timing, and policy. This study aimed to evaluate the protective role of routine PB performed 2 weeks and 1 year after kidney transplantation. We reviewed 854 kidney transplant recipients at the Samsung Medical Center between July 2007 and August 2017, with PBs planned at 2 weeks and 1 year after transplantation. We compared the trends in graft function, chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, new-onset CKD, infection, and patient and graft survival between the 504 patients who underwent PB and 350 who did not undergo PB. The PB group was again divided into 2 groups: the single PB group (n = 207) and the double PB group (n = 297). The PB group was significantly different from the no-PB group in terms of the trends in graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that PB did not significantly improve graft or overall patient survival. However, in the multivariate Cox analysis, the double PB group had advantages in graft survival, CKD progression, and new-onset CKD. PB can play a protective role in the maintenance of kidney grafts in kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Danger R, Le Berre L, Cadoux M, Kerleau C, Papuchon E, Mai HL, Nguyen TVH, Guérif P, Morelon E, Thaunat O, Legendre C, Anglicheau D, Lefaucheur C, Couzi L, Del Bello A, Kamar N, Le Quintrec M, Goutaudier V, Renaudin K, Giral M, Brouard S. Subclinical rejection-free diagnostic after kidney transplantation using blood gene expression. Kidney Int 2023; 103:1167-1179. [PMID: 36990211 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
We previously established a six-gene-based blood score associated with operational tolerance in kidney transplantation which was decreased in patients developing anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Herein, we aimed to confirm that this score is associated with immunological events and risk of rejection. We measured this using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and NanoString methods from an independent multicenter cohort of 588 kidney transplant recipients with paired blood samples and biopsies at one year after transplantation validating its association with pre-existing and de novo DSA. From 441 patients with protocol biopsy, there was a significant decrease of the score of tolerance in 45 patients with biopsy-proven subclinical rejection (SCR), a major threat associated with pejorative allograft outcomes that prompted an SCR score refinement. This refinement used only two genes, AKR1C3 and TCL1A, and four clinical parameters (previous experience of rejection, previous transplantation, sex of recipient and tacrolimus uptake). This refined SCR score was able to identify patients unlikely to develop SCR with a C-statistic of 0.864 and a negative predictive value of 98.3%. The SCR score was validated in an external laboratory, with two methods (qPCR and NanoString), and on 447 patients from an independent and multicenter cohort. Moreover, this score allowed reclassifying patients with discrepancies between the DSA presence and the histological diagnosis of antibody mediated rejection unlike kidney function. Thus, our refined SCR score could improve detection of SCR for closer and noninvasive monitoring, allowing early treatment of SCR lesions notably for patients DSA-positive and during lowering of immunosuppressive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Danger
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France.
| | - Ludmilla Le Berre
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Marion Cadoux
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Clarisse Kerleau
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuelle Papuchon
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique en Biothérapie, Centre de Ressources Biologiques (CRB), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Hoa Le Mai
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Thi-Van-Ha Nguyen
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Pierrick Guérif
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuel Morelon
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM Unit 1111, Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM Unit 1111, Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), Lyon, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, INSERM, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, INSERM, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, INSERM UMR S970, Université Paris Cité, Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Couzi
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis, and Apheresis, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Arnaud Del Bello
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM UMR1291 - Université Toulouse III, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM UMR1291 - Université Toulouse III, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Moglie Le Quintrec
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, University Hospital of Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
| | - Valentin Goutaudier
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, INSERM, Paris University, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Karine Renaudin
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France; CHU Nantes, Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Nantes, France
| | - Magali Giral
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique en Biothérapie, Centre de Ressources Biologiques (CRB), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France; LabEx IGO "Immunotherapy, Graft, Oncology", Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - Sophie Brouard
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique en Biothérapie, Centre de Ressources Biologiques (CRB), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France; LabEx IGO "Immunotherapy, Graft, Oncology", Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moein M, Papa S, Ortiz N, Saidi R. Protocol Biopsy After Kidney Transplant: Clinical Application and Efficacy to Detect Allograft Rejection. Cureus 2023; 15:e34505. [PMID: 36874304 PMCID: PMC9983784 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney transplant rejection is a major cause of graft dysfunction and failure. In recent years, there has been increased interest in renal allograft protocol biopsies to allow earlier detection of acute or chronic graft dysfunction or rejection to improve long-term graft survival and reduce graft failure. This study aimed to determine if renal allograft protocol biopsies performed within the first 12 months after transplantation help detect subclinical graft dysfunction or rejection. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis utilizing SUNY Upstate University Hospital data from January 2016 to March 2022 to assess transplant outcomes and biopsies. The study population was divided into two subgroups: non-protocol biopsies and protocol biopsies within the 12 months post-transplant. Results A total of 332 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Patients were divided into two subgroups: 135 patients (40.6%) in the protocol biopsy group and 197 patients (59.4%) with non-protocol indication biopsies during the first year after the transplant. The overall number of rejection episodes reported was eight episodes (4.6%) in the protocol biopsy group and 56 episodes (18.3%) in the non-protocol indication biopsy group, which was significantly higher in the non-protocol biopsy group (P=0.001). Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) diagnoses were significantly higher in the non-protocol biopsy group (P=0.03 and P=0.03, respectively). We also mentioned a trend in terms of mixed antibody-mediated rejection and T-cell-mediated rejection diagnosis (P=0.07). One year after the rejection, the mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 56.78 mL/min/1.73m2 in the protocol biopsy group and 49.14 mL/min/1.73m2 in the non-protocol indication biopsy group, and there was no significant difference anymore (P=0.11). The patient survival rate was not significantly higher in the protocol biopsy group compared to the non-protocol indication biopsy group (P=0.42). Conclusion This study suggests that performing protocol biopsies does not significantly benefit rejection rates, graft survival, or renal function within the first 12 months post-transplant. Given these results and the small but non-zero risk of complications associated with protocol biopsies, they should be reserved for those patients at high risk of rejection. It may be more feasible and beneficial to utilize less invasive tests, such as DSA and dd-cfDNA testing, for early diagnosis of a rejection episode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoudreza Moein
- Transplantation Services, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Sarah Papa
- Transplantation Services, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Noelle Ortiz
- Transplantation Services, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Reza Saidi
- Transplantation Services, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thanukrishnan H, Venkataramanan R, Mehta RB, Jorgensen D, Sood P. The combination of exposure to Tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, Inosine 5'-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase activity and inhibition in the first week define early histological outcomes in renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14830. [PMID: 36177865 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring is routine for Tacrolimus, while levels are not routinely monitored for mycophenolic acid (MPA). This study investigated the effect of early post-transplant pharmacokinetics (PK) of MPA and Tacrolimus along with the pharmacodynamics (PD) of MPA on biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) after renal transplantation. A prospective PK/PD study with limited sampling (three blood samples) was conducted in renal transplant recipients on week 1, around Day 6 (n = 42) and at the 3rd-month biopsy on Day 90 (n = 23). The partial exposures (area under curve [AUC]0-3.5 h ) of both MPA and Tacrolimus obtained during the first week were more predictive of rejection (combined clinical and subclinical rejection) by Day 90 than their trough concentrations or Day 90 exposures. Patients with rejection had significantly worse renal function (eGFR) and a comparatively lower exposure to MPA during the first post-transplant week. The lower MPA exposure was also associated with sub-optimal inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) inhibition in patients with rejection, and the probability of rejection was higher in the presence of an increased pre-transplant IMPDH activity. A composite of parameters, including MPA exposure and IMPDH activity was found to predict acute rejection and may be beneficial along with tacrolimus monitoring early after renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raman Venkataramanan
- School of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rajil B Mehta
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dana Jorgensen
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Puneet Sood
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Steggerda JA, Pizzo H, Garrison J, Zhang X, Haas M, Kim IK, Jordan SC, Puliyanda DP. Use of a donor-derived cell-free DNA assay to monitor treatment response in pediatric renal transplant recipients with allograft rejection. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14258. [PMID: 35340104 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) reliably identifies allograft rejection in pediatric and adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Here, we evaluate the utility of dd-cfDNA for monitoring response to treatment among pediatric renal transplant recipients suffering graft rejection. METHODS 58 pediatric transplant recipients were enrolled between April 2018 and March 2020 and underwent initial dd-cfDNA testing to monitor for rejection. Allograft biopsy was performed for dd-cfDNA scores >1.0%. Patients with histologically proven rejection formed the study cohort and underwent appropriate treatment. Results of dd-cfDNA, serum creatinine (SCr), biopsy findings, and treatment outcomes were evaluated. Standard statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS Nineteen of 58 (31%) patients had dd-cfDNA score >1.0%, of which 18 (94.7%) had biopsy-proven rejection. Median dd-cfDNA value was 1.90% (interquartile range 1.43%-3.23%), and biopsy results showed 11 patients (61.1%) with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), 2 patients (11.1%) with T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), and 5 patients (27.7%) with mixed AMR/TCMR. SCr at time of biopsy was 1.28 ± 1.09 mg/dl. Following treatment, dd-cfDNA scores decreased for all types of rejection but still remained >1.0% in both AMR (1.50% [0.90%-3.10%]) and mixed (1.40% [0.95%-4.15%]) groups. Repeat dd-cfDNA values were <1.0% for patients with TCMR (0.20%-0.28%). SCr showed minimal change from pre-treatment levels regardless of rejection subtype. CONCLUSIONS Patients with TCMR may be reliably followed by dd-cfDNA; however, it remains unclear whether persistently elevated dd-cfDNA levels in AMR is a reflection of ongoing subclinical rejection or an inherent limitation of the assay's utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin A Steggerda
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Helen Pizzo
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Garrison
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mark Haas
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Irene K Kim
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dechu P Puliyanda
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Pediatric Nephrology, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Han S, Zhao W, Wang C, Wang Y, Song R, Haller H, Jiang H, Chen J. Preliminary Investigation of the Biomarkers of Acute Renal Transplant Rejection Using Integrated Proteomics Studies, Gene Expression Omnibus Datasets, and RNA Sequencing. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:905464. [PMID: 35646951 PMCID: PMC9133438 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.905464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A kidney transplant is often the best treatment for end-stage renal disease. Although immunosuppressive therapy sharply reduces the occurrence of acute allograft rejection (AR), it remains the main cause of allograft dysfunction. We aimed to identify effective biomarkers for AR instead of invasive kidney transplant biopsy. We integrated the results of several proteomics studies related to AR and utilized public data sources. Gene ontology (GO) and pathway analyses were used to identify important biological processes and pathways. The performance of the identified proteins was validated using several public gene expression omnibus (GEO) datasets. Samples that performed well were selected for further validation through RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with AR (n = 16) and non-rejection (n = 19) from our medical center. A total of 25 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) overlapped in proteomic studies of urine and blood samples. GO analysis showed that the DEPs were mainly involved in the immune system and blood coagulation. Pathway analysis showed that the complement and coagulation cascade pathways were well enriched. We found that immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1 (IGHA1) and immunoglobulin κ constant (IGKC) showed good performance in distinguishing AR from non-rejection groups validated with several GEO datasets. Through RNA sequencing, the combination of IGHA1, IGKC, glomerular filtration rate, and donor age showed good performance in the diagnosis of AR with ROC AUC 91.4% (95% CI: 82–100%). Our findings may contribute to the discovery of potential biomarkers for AR monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Han
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenjun Zhao
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Cuili Wang
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yucheng Wang
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Rong Song
- Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Hermann Haller
- Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Hong Jiang
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Hong Jiang,
| | - Jianghua Chen
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
- Jianghua Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sub-classification of borderline changes into diffuse or focal and its impact on long-term renal transplant outcomes. Transpl Immunol 2022; 72:101594. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
15
|
Rampersad C, Balshaw R, Gibson IW, Ho J, Shaw J, Karpinski M, Goldberg A, Birk P, Rush DN, Nickerson PW, Wiebe C. The negative impact of T cell-mediated rejection on renal allograft survival in the modern era. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:761-771. [PMID: 34717048 PMCID: PMC9299170 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence and long-term impact of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is poorly defined in the modern era of tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based maintenance therapy. This observational study evaluated 775 kidney transplant recipients with serial histology and correlated TCMR events with the risk of graft loss. After a ~30% incidence of a first Banff Borderline or greater TCMR detected on for-cause (17%) or surveillance (13%) biopsies, persistent (37.4%) or subsequent (26.3%) TCMR occurred in 64% of recipients on follow-up biopsies. Alloimmune risk categories based on the HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet molecular mismatch correlated with the number of TCMR events (p = .002) and Banff TCMR grade (p = .007). Both a first and second TCMR event correlated with death-censored and all-cause graft loss when adjusted for baseline covariates and other significant time-dependent covariates such as DGF and ABMR. Therefore, a substantial portion of kidney transplant recipients, especially those with intermediate and high HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch scores, remain under-immunosuppressed, which in turn identifies the need for novel agents that can more effectively prevent or treat TCMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert Balshaw
- George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare InnovationUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Ian W. Gibson
- Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada,Department of PathologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Julie Ho
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada,Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada,Department of ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Jamie Shaw
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Martin Karpinski
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Aviva Goldberg
- Department of Pediatrics and Child HealthUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Patricia Birk
- Department of Pediatrics and Child HealthUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - David N. Rush
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada,Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Peter W. Nickerson
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada,Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada,Department of ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada,Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada,Department of ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lezoeva E, Nilsson J, Wüthrich R, Mueller TF, Schachtner T. High PIRCHE Scores May Allow Risk Stratification of Borderline Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front Immunol 2022; 13:788818. [PMID: 35250973 PMCID: PMC8894244 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.788818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The diagnosis of borderline rejection (BLR) ranges from mild inflammation to clinically significant TCMR and is associated with an increased risk of allograft dysfunction. Currently, there is no consensus regarding its treatment due in part to a lack of biomarkers to identify cases with increased risk for immune-mediated injury. Methods We identified 60 of 924 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with isolated and untreated BLR. We analyzed the impact of predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes (PIRCHE) score on future rejection, de novo DSA development, and recovery to baseline allograft function. Additionally, we compared the outcomes of different Banff rejection phenotypes. Results Total PIRCHE scores were significantly higher in KTRs with BLR compared to the entire study population (p=0.016). Among KTRs with BLR total PIRCHE scores were significantly higher in KTRs who developed TCMR/ABMR in follow-up biopsies (p=0.029). Notably, the most significant difference was found in PIRCHE scores for the HLA-A locus (p=0.010). PIRCHE scores were not associated with the development of de novo DSA or recovery to baseline allograft function among KTRs with BLR (p>0.05). However, KTRs under cyclosporine-based immunosuppression were more likely to develop de novo DSA (p=0.033) than those with tacrolimus, whereas KTRs undergoing retransplantation were less likely to recover to baseline allograft function (p=0.003). Conclusions High PIRCHE scores put KTRs with BLR at an increased risk for future TCMR/ABMR and contribute to improved immunological risk stratification. The benefit of anti-rejection treatment, however, needs to be evaluated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Lezoeva
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Nilsson
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rudolf Wüthrich
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas F. Mueller
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Schachtner
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Thomas Schachtner, ; orcid.org/0000-0001-5549-4798
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xiang W, Han S, Wang C, Chen H, Shen L, Zhu T, Wang K, Wei W, Qin J, Shushakova N, Rong S, Haller H, Jiang H, Chen J. Pre-transplant Transcriptional Signature in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:799051. [PMID: 35071278 PMCID: PMC8777044 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.799051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute rejection (AR) is closely associated with renal allograft dysfunction. Here, we utilised RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and bioinformatic methods to characterise the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with acute renal allograft rejection. Pretransplant blood samples were collected from 32 kidney allograft donors and 42 corresponding recipients with biopsies classified as T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR, n = 18), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR, n = 5), and normal/non-specific changes (non-AR, n = 19). The patients with TCMR and ABMR were assigned to the AR group, and the patients with normal/non-specific changes (n = 19) were assigned to the non-AR group. We analysed RNA-Seq data for identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and then gene ontology (GO) analysis, Reactome, and ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), protein—protein interaction (PPI) network, and cell-type enrichment analysis were utilised for bioinformatics analysis. We identified DEGs in the PBMCs of the non-AR group when compared with the AR, ABMR, and TCMR groups. Pathway and GO analysis showed significant inflammatory responses, complement activation, interleukin-10 (IL-10) signalling pathways, classical antibody-mediated complement activation pathways, etc., which were significantly enriched in the DEGs. PPI analysis showed that IL-10, VEGFA, CXCL8, MMP9, and several histone-related genes were the hub genes with the highest degree scores. Moreover, IPA analysis showed that several proinflammatory pathways were upregulated, whereas antiinflammatory pathways were downregulated. The combination of NFSF14+TANK+ANKRD 33 B +HSPA1B was able to discriminate between AR and non-AR with an AUC of 92.3% (95% CI 82.8–100). Characterisation of PBMCs by RNA-Seq and bioinformatics analysis demonstrated gene signatures and biological pathways associated with AR. Our study may provide the foundation for the discovery of biomarkers and an in-depth understanding of acute renal allograft rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenyu Xiang
- Kidney Disease Center, College of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shuai Han
- Kidney Disease Center, College of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Cuili Wang
- Kidney Disease Center, College of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hongjun Chen
- Kidney Disease Center, College of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lingling Shen
- Kidney Disease Center, College of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tingting Zhu
- Kidney Disease Center, College of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kai Wang
- School of Pharmaceutical Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wenjie Wei
- Department of Nephropathy, School of Medicine, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Qin
- School of Pharmaceutical Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Nelli Shushakova
- Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Song Rong
- Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hermann Haller
- Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hong Jiang
- Kidney Disease Center, College of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianghua Chen
- Kidney Disease Center, College of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
New Insights from Metabolomics in Pediatric Renal Diseases. CHILDREN 2022; 9:children9010118. [PMID: 35053744 PMCID: PMC8774568 DOI: 10.3390/children9010118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Renal diseases in childhood form a spectrum of different conditions with potential long-term consequences. Given that, a great effort has been made by researchers to identify candidate biomarkers that are able to influence diagnosis and prognosis, in particular by using omics techniques (e.g., metabolomics, lipidomics, genomics, and transcriptomics). Over the past decades, metabolomics has added a promising number of ‘new’ biomarkers to the ‘old’ group through better physiopathological knowledge, paving the way for insightful perspectives on the management of different renal diseases. We aimed to summarize the most recent omics evidence in the main renal pediatric diseases (including acute renal injury, kidney transplantation, chronic kidney disease, renal dysplasia, vesicoureteral reflux, and lithiasis) in this narrative review.
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee YH, Sato Y, Saito M, Fukuma S, Saito M, Yamamoto S, Komatsuda A, Fujiyama N, Satoh S, Lee SH, Boor P, Habuchi T, Floege J, Yanagita M. Advanced Tertiary Lymphoid Tissues in Protocol Biopsies are Associated with Progressive Graft Dysfunction in Kidney Transplant Recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 33:186-200. [PMID: 34725107 PMCID: PMC8763171 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2021050715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tertiary lymphoid tissues (TLTs) are ectopic lymphoid tissues found in chronically inflamed organs. Although studies have documented TLT formation in transplanted kidneys, the clinical relevance of these TLTs remains controversial. We examined the effects of TLTs on future graft function using our histologic TLT maturity stages and the association between TLTs and Banff pathologic scores. We also analyzed the risk factors for the development of TLTs. METHODS Serial protocol biopsy samples (0 hour, 1, 6, and 12 months) without rejection were retrospectively analyzed from 214 patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation. TLTs were defined as lymphocyte aggregates with signs of proliferation and their stages were determined by the absence (stage I) or presence (stage II) of follicular dendritic cells. RESULTS Only 4% of patients exhibited TLTs at the 0-hour biopsy. Prevalence increased to almost 50% at the 1-month biopsy, and then slightly further for 12 months. The proportion of advanced stage II TLTs increased gradually, reaching 19% at the 12-month biopsy. Presence of stage II TLTs was associated with higher risk of renal function decline after transplantation compared with patients with no TLT or stage I TLTs. Stage II TLTs were associated with more severe tubulitis and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy at 12 months and predicted poorer graft function independently from the degree of interstitial inflammation. Pretransplantation rituximab treatment dramatically attenuated the development of stage II TLTs. CONCLUSIONS TLTs are commonly found in clinically stable transplanted kidneys. Advanced stage II TLTs are associated with progressive graft dysfunction, independent of interstitial inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Ho Lee
- Department of Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Yuki Sato
- Department of Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,Medical Innovation Center TMK Project, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Saito
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Shingo Fukuma
- Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaya Saito
- Department of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Shigenori Yamamoto
- Department of Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,Medical Innovation Center TMK Project, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Atsushi Komatsuda
- Department of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Fujiyama
- Center for Kidney Disease and Transplantation, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | - Shigeru Satoh
- Center for Kidney Disease and Transplantation, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | - Sang-Ho Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Peter Boor
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH University of Aachen, Germany, Aachen, Germany,Division of Nephrology, RWTH University of Aachen, Germany, Aachen, Germany,Electron Microscopy Facility, RWTH University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Jürgen Floege
- Division of Nephrology, RWTH University of Aachen, Germany, Aachen, Germany
| | - Motoko Yanagita
- Department of Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lubetzky ML, Salinas T, Schwartz JE, Suthanthiran M. Urinary Cell mRNA Profiles Predictive of Human Kidney Allograft Status. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 16:1565-1577. [PMID: 33906907 PMCID: PMC8499006 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.14010820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Immune monitoring of kidney allograft recipients and personalized therapeutics may help reach the aspirational goal of "one transplant for life." The invasive kidney biopsy procedure, the diagnostic tool of choice, has become safer and the biopsy classification more refined. Nevertheless, biopsy-associated complications, interobserver variability in biopsy specimen scoring, and costs continue to be significant concerns. The dynamics of the immune repertoire make frequent assessments of allograft status necessary, but repeat biopsies of the kidney are neither practical nor safe. To address the existing challenges, we developed urinary cell mRNA profiling and investigated the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive accuracy of absolute levels of a hypothesis-based panel of mRNAs encoding immunoregulatory proteins. Enabled by our refinements of the PCR assay and by investigating mechanistic hypotheses, our single-center studies identified urinary cell mRNAs associated with T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and BK virus nephropathy. In the multicenter National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-04, we discovered and validated a urinary cell three-gene signature of T-cell CD3 ε chain mRNA, interferon gamma inducible protein 10 (IP-10) mRNA, and 18s ribosomal RNA that is diagnostic of subclinical acute cellular rejection and acute cellular rejection and prognostic of acute cellular rejection and graft function. The trajectory of the signature score remained flat and below the diagnostic threshold for acute cellular rejection in the patients with no rejection biopsy specimens, whereas a sharp rise was observed during the weeks before the biopsy specimen that showed acute cellular rejection. Our RNA sequencing and bioinformatics identified kidney allograft biopsy specimen gene signatures of acute rejection to be enriched in urinary cells matched to acute rejection biopsy specimens. The urinary cellular landscape was more diverse and more enriched for immune cell types compared with kidney allograft biopsy specimens. Urinary cell mRNA profile-guided clinical trials are needed to evaluate their value compared with current standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L. Lubetzky
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Weill Cornell Department of Medicine, New York, New York,Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Thalia Salinas
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Weill Cornell Department of Medicine, New York, New York,Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Joseph E. Schwartz
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Weill Cornell Department of Medicine, New York, New York,Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stony Brook Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Manikkam Suthanthiran
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Weill Cornell Department of Medicine, New York, New York,Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Handschin J, Wehmeier C, Amico P, Hopfer H, Dickenmann M, Schaub S, Hirt-Minkowski P. Urinary CXCL10 Measurement in Late Renal Allograft Biopsies Predicts Outcome Even in Histologically Quiescent Patients. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:2168-2179. [PMID: 34419254 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CXCL10 is a promising early noninvasive diagnostic marker for allograft rejection and predictive for long-term outcomes. However, its value when measured later in the posttransplant course has not yet been accurately analyzed. METHODS We investigated urinary CXCL10 in 141 patients from a prospective, observational renal transplant cohort with 182 clinically indicated allograft biopsies performed >12 months posttransplant and corresponding urines. Urinary CXCL10 was retrospectively quantified on stored urines using the MSD V-Plex Chemokine Panel 1 sandwich immunoassay (Meso Scale Discovery). The primary outcome was a composite of allograft loss/renal function decline (>30% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]-decrease between index biopsy and last follow-up). RESULTS Seventy-two patients (51%) reached the primary outcome, and their urinary CXCL10 levels were significantly higher at the time of their biopsy compared with patients with stable allograft function (median 9.3 ng/mmol vs 3.3 ng/mmol, P < .0001). Time-to-endpoint analyses according to high/low urinary CXCL10 demonstrated that low urinary CXCL10 (≤7.0 ng/mmol) was associated with 73% 5-year event-free graft survival compared with 48% with high urinary CXCL10 (>7.0 ng/mmol; P = .0001). Even in histologically quiescent patients, high urinary CXCL10 was associated with inferior endpoint-free graft survival (P = .003), and it was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that urinary CXCL10 has a promising diagnostic performance for detection of late allograft rejection and is an independent predictor of long-term renal allograft outcomes, even in histologically quiescent patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joelle Handschin
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Wehmeier
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Patrizia Amico
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Helmut Hopfer
- lnstitute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Dickenmann
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; HLA-Diagnostic and lmmunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Patricia Hirt-Minkowski
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Protocol Biopsies on de novo Renal-Transplants at 3 Months after Surgery: Impact on 5-Year Transplant Survival. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163635. [PMID: 34441931 PMCID: PMC8397165 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In many centers, a protocol kidney biopsy (PKB) is performed at 3 months post-transplantation (M3), without a demonstrated benefit on death-censored graft survival (DCGS). In this study, we compared DCGS between kidney transplant recipients undergoing a PKB or without such biopsy while accounting for the obvious indication bias. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study conducted between 2007 and 2013, we compared DCGS with respect to the availability and features of a PKB. We built a propensity score (PS) to account for PKB indication likelihood and adjusted the DCGS analysis on PKB availability and the PS. Results: A total of 615 patients were included: 333 had a PKB, 282 did not. In bivariate Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, adjusting for the availability of a PKB and for the PS, a PKB was associated with a better 5-year DCGS independently of the PS (p < 0.001). Among the PKB+ patients, 87 recipients (26%) had IF/TA > 0. Patients with an IF/TA score of 3 had the worst survival. A total of 144 patients (44%) showed cv lesions. Patients with cv2 and cv3 lesions had the worst 5-year DCGS. Conclusions: A M3 PKB was associated with improved graft survival independently of potential confounders. These results could be explained by the early treatment of subclinical immunological events. It could be due to better management of the immunosuppressive regimen.
Collapse
|
23
|
Impact of Subclinical and Clinical Kidney Allograft Rejection Within 1 Year Posttransplantation Among Compatible Transplant With Steroid Withdrawal Protocol. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e706. [PMID: 34124342 PMCID: PMC8191698 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Early acute kidney rejection remains an important clinical issue. Methods The current study included 552 recipients who had 1-2 surveillance or indication biopsy within the 1 y posttransplant. We evaluated the impact of type of allograft inflammation on allograft outcome. They were divided into 5 groups: no inflammation (NI: 95), subclinical inflammation (SCI: 244), subclinical T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) (SC-TCMR: 110), clinical TCMR (C-TCMR: 83), and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR: 20). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time using linear mixed model, cumulative chronic allograft scores/interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) ≥2 at 12 mo, and survival estimates were compared between groups. Results The common types of rejections were C-TCMR (15%), SC-TCMR (19.9%), and AMR (3.6%) of patients. Eighteen of 20 patients with AMR had mixed rejection with TCMR. Key findings were as follows: (i) posttransplant renal function: eGFR was lower for patients with C-TCMR and AMR (P < 0.0001) compared with NI, SCI, and SC-TCMR groups. There was an increase in delta-creatinine from 3 to 12 mo and cumulative allograft chronicity scores at 12 mo (P < 0.001) according to the type of allograft inflammation. (ii) Allograft histology: the odds of IFTA ≥2 was higher for SC-TCMR (3.7 [1.3-10.4]; P = 0.04) but was not significant for C-TCMR (3.1 [1.0-9.4]; P = 0.26), and AMR (2.5 [0.5-12.8]; P = 0.84) compared with NI group, and (iii) graft loss: C-TCMR accounted for the largest number of graft losses and impending graft losses on long-term follow-up. Graft loss among patient with AMR was numerically higher but was not statistically significant. Conclusions The type of kidney allograft inflammation predicted posttransplant eGFR, cumulative chronic allograft score/IFTA ≥2 at 12 mo, and graft loss.
Collapse
|
24
|
Hoffmann AJ, Gibson IW, Ho J, Nickerson P, Rush D, Sharma A, Wishart D, Blydt-Hansen TD. Early surveillance biopsy utilization and management of pediatric renal allograft acute T cell-mediated rejection in Canadian centers: Observations from the PROBE multicenter cohort study. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e13870. [PMID: 33026135 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early TCMR surveillance with protocol kidney biopsy is used differentially among pediatric kidney transplant centers. Little has been reported about actual center-based differences, and this variability may influence TCMR ascertainment, treatment, and monitoring more broadly. METHODS Data from the PROBE multicenter study were used to identify patients from centers conducting ESB or LSIB. ESB was defined as >50% of patients having at least 1 surveillance biopsy in the first 9 months. Patients were compared for number of biopsies, rejection episodes, treatment, and follow-up monitoring. RESULTS A total of 261 biopsies were performed on 97 patients over 1-2 years of follow-up. A total of 228 (87%) of biopsies were performed in ESB centers. Compared to LSIB centers, ESB centers had 7-fold more episodes of TCMR diagnosed on any biopsy [0.8 ± 1.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.4; P < .001] and a 3-fold higher rate from indication biopsies [0.3 ± 0.9 vs 0.1 ± 0.3; P = .04]. The proportion of rejection treatment varied based on severity: Banff borderline i1t1 (40%);>i1t1 and < Banff 1A (86%); and ≥ Banff 1A (100%). Biopsies for follow-up were performed after treatment in 80% of cases (n = 28) of rejection almost exclusively at ESB centers, with 17 (61%) showing persistence of TCMR (≥i1t1). CONCLUSIONS Practice variation exists across Canadian pediatric renal transplant centers with ESB centers identifying more episodes of rejection. Additionally, treatment of Banff borderline is not universal and varies with severity regardless of center type. Lastly, follow-up biopsies are performed inconsistently and invariably show persistence of rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian W Gibson
- Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Julie Ho
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Shared Health Services Manitoba, Transplant/Immunology Lab, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - David Rush
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Atul Sharma
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - David Wishart
- The Metabolomics Innovation Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Landsberg A, Riazy M, Blydt-Hansen TD. Yield and utility of surveillance kidney biopsies in pediatric kidney transplant recipients at various time points post-transplant. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e13869. [PMID: 33073499 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to a lack of consensus on SB for pediatric kidney transplant recipients, we evaluated the yield and clinical utility of SB findings at various time points post-transplant. METHODS Patients transplanted at a single institution between 2014 and 2020 with at least one SB at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-transplant were included. Additional biopsies were done for indication (IB). TCMR was classified by Banff criteria (score ≥i1t1). RESULTS Forty-seven patients had 142 biopsies (SB = 113, IB = 29); 19 (40.4%) of whom experienced at least one TCMR episode in the first-year post-transplant. The greatest SB yield of any pathologic abnormality was at 6 months (57.1%; P < .001). Six months also had the highest yield for TCMR (42.9%), compared with 3.3%, 20.8%, 15.0%, and 9.1% at 1.5, 3, 12 months, and 24 months, respectively (P = .003). SB instigated intensification of immunosuppression (28.3% cases), reduction of immunosuppression (2.7% cases), and other non-immunosuppressant changes (1.8% cases). The 6-month SB led to the greatest number of changes in management (53.6%), compared with 1.5, 3, 12, and 24 months (13.3, 20.8, 25.0, and 36.4%, respectively; P = .012). There were no major biopsy-related complications. CONCLUSIONS SBs identify an important burden of subclinical rejection and other pathology leading to changes in clinical management. The greatest yield was at 6 months, whereas the least utility was at the 1.5 months. Selection of SB timing may be tailored such that the optimal yield is balanced against the procedural risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adina Landsberg
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Maziar Riazy
- Department of Pathology, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tom D Blydt-Hansen
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen G, Liu B, Chen S, Li H, Liu J, Mai Z, Chen E, Zhou C, Sun G, Guo Z, Lei L, Huang S, Zhang L, Li M, Tan N, Li H, Liao Y, Liu J, Chen J, Liu Y. Novel biomarkers for post-contrast acute kidney injury identified from long non-coding RNA expression profiles. Int J Biol Sci 2021; 17:882-896. [PMID: 33767596 PMCID: PMC7975710 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.45294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) is a severe complication of cardiac catheterization. Emerging evidence indicated that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) could serve as biomarkers for various diseases. However, the lncRNA expression profile and potential biomarkers in PC-AKI remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate novel lncRNA biomarkers for the early detection of PC-AKI. Methods: lncRNA profile in the kidney tissues of PC-AKI rats was evaluated through RNA sequencing. Potential lncRNA biomarkers were identified through human-rat homology analysis, kidney and blood filtering in rats and verified in 112 clinical samples. The expression patterns of the candidate lncRNAs were detected in HK-2 cells and rat models to evaluate their potential for early detection. Results: In total, 357 lncRNAs were found to be differentially expressed in PC-AKI. We identified lnc-HILPDA and lnc-PRND were conservative and remarkably upregulated in both kidneys and blood from rats and the blood of PC-AKI patients; these lncRNAs can precisely distinguish PC-AKI patients (area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.885 and 0.875, respectively). The combination of these two lncRNAs exhibited improved accuracy for predicting PC-AKI, with 100% sensitivity and 83.93% specificity. Time-course experiments showed that the significant difference was first noted in the blood of PC-AKI rats at 12 h for lnc-HILPDA and 24 h for lnc-PRND. Conclusion: Our study revealed that lnc-HILPDA and lnc-PRND may serve as the novel biomarkers for early detection and profoundly affect the clinical stratification and strategy guidance of PC-AKI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanzhong Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Bowen Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Shiqun Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Huanqiang Li
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Jin Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Ziling Mai
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Enzhao Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Chunyun Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Guoli Sun
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhaodong Guo
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Li Lei
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China
| | - Shanyi Huang
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Liyao Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Ning Tan
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China
| | - Hong Li
- Guangzhou Jingke Bioscience Center, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China
| | - Yulin Liao
- State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838, Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Jia Liu
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiyan Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China
| | - Yong Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sahay M, Kunthara M, Hussain H, Ismal K, Vali PS, Kavadi A, Kumar BV. Posttransplant renal allograft dysfunction – A retrospective observational study. INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_129_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
28
|
Puttarajappa CM, Mehta R, Roberts MS, Smith KJ, Hariharan S. Economic analysis of screening for subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation using protocol biopsies and noninvasive biomarkers. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:186-197. [PMID: 32558153 PMCID: PMC7744316 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Subclinical rejection (SCR) screening in kidney transplantation (KT) using protocol biopsies and noninvasive biomarkers has not been evaluated from an economic perspective. We assessed cost-effectiveness from the health sector perspective of SCR screening in the first year after KT using a Markov model that compared no screening with screening using protocol biopsy or biomarker at 3 months, 12 months, 3 and 12 months, or 3, 6, and 12 months. We used 12% subclinical cellular rejection and 3% subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (SC-ABMR) for the base-case cohort. Results favored 1-time screening at peak SCR incidence rather than repeated screening. Screening 2 or 3 times was favored only with age <35 years and with high SC-ABMR incidence. Compared to biomarkers, protocol biopsy yielded more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at lower cost. A 12-month biopsy cost $13 318/QALY for the base-case cohort. Screening for cellular rejection in the absence of SC-ABMR was less cost effective with 12-month biopsy costing $46 370/QALY. Screening was less cost effective in patients >60 years. Using biomarker twice or thrice was cost effective only if biomarker cost was <$700. In conclusion, in KT, screening for SCR more than once during the first year is not economically reasonable. Screening with protocol biopsy was favored over biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chethan M. Puttarajappa
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rajil Mehta
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mark S. Roberts
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth J. Smith
- Department of Medicine, Section of Decision Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chen CC, Lin WC, Lee CY, Yang CY, Tsai MK. Two-year protocol biopsy after kidney transplantation in clinically stable recipients - a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2020; 34:185-193. [PMID: 33152140 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and adjustment of immunosuppressants. Nevertheless, it is not adopted by most clinicians because of its low yield rate and uncertain long-term benefits. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of protocol biopsy on renal function and allograft survival. A two-year protocol biopsy was proposed for 190 stable patients; 68 of them accepted [protocol biopsy (PB) group], while 122 did not [nonprotocol biopsy (NPB) group]. The rejection diagnosis was made in 13 patients by protocol biopsy, and 11 of them had borderline rejection. In the following 5 years, graft survival was better in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0143). A total of 4 and 17 patients in the PB and NPB groups, respectively, had rejection events proven by indication biopsy. Renal function was better preserved in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0107) for patients with rejection events. Nevertheless, the survival benefit disappeared by a longer follow-up period (12-year, P = 0.2886). In conclusion, 2-year protocol biopsy detects subclinical pathological changes in rejection and preserves renal function by early intervention so as to prolong graft survival within 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien-Chia Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chou Lin
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Yuan Lee
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yao Yang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Kun Tsai
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
A Rejection Gene Expression Score in Indication and Surveillance Biopsies Is Associated with Graft Outcome. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21218237. [PMID: 33153205 PMCID: PMC7672640 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Rejection-associated gene expression has been characterized in renal allograft biopsies for cause. The aim is to evaluate rejection gene expression in subclinical rejection and in biopsies with borderline changes or interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). We included 96 biopsies. Most differentially expressed genes between normal surveillance biopsies (n = 17) and clinical rejection (n = 12) were obtained. A rejection-associated gene (RAG) score was defined as its geometric mean. The following groups were considered: (a) subclinical rejection (REJ-S, n = 6); (b) borderline changes in biopsies for cause (BL-C, n = 13); (c) borderline changes in surveillance biopsies (BL-S, n = 12); (d) IFTA in biopsies for cause (IFTA-C, n = 20); and (e) IFTA in surveillance biopsies (IFTA-S, n = 16). The outcome variable was death-censored graft loss or glomerular filtration rate decline ≥ 30 % at 2 years. A RAG score containing 109 genes derived from normal and clinical rejection (area under the curve, AUC = 1) was employed to classify the study groups. A positive RAG score was observed in 83% REJ-S, 38% BL-C, 17% BL-S, 25% IFTA-C, and 5% IFTA-S. A positive RAG score was an independent predictor of graft outcome from histological diagnosis (hazard ratio: 3.5 and 95% confidence interval: 1.1–10.9; p = 0.031). A positive RAG score predicts graft outcome in surveillance and for cause biopsies with a less severe phenotype than clinical rejection.
Collapse
|
31
|
Wiebe C, Rush DN, Gibson IW, Pochinco D, Birk PE, Goldberg A, Blydt‐Hansen T, Karpinski M, Shaw J, Ho J, Nickerson PW. Evidence for the alloimmune basis and prognostic significance of Borderline T cell-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2499-2508. [PMID: 32185878 PMCID: PMC7496654 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Prognostic biomarkers of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) have not been adequately studied in the modern era. We evaluated 803 renal transplant recipients and correlated HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch alloimmune risk categories (low, intermediate, high) with the severity, frequency, and persistence of TCMR. Allograft survival was reduced in recipients with Banff Borderline (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4, P = .003) and Banff ≥ IA TCMR (HR 4.3, P < .0001) including a subset who never developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (P = .002). HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch alloimmune risk categories were multivariate correlates of Banff Borderline and Banff ≥ IA TCMR and correlated with the severity and frequency of rejection episodes. Recipient age, HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch category, and cyclosporin vs tacrolimus immunosuppression were independent correlates of Banff Borderline and Banff ≥ IA TCMR. In the subset treated with tacrolimus (720/803) recipient age, HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch category, and tacrolimus coefficient of variation were independent correlates of TCMR. The correlation of HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch category with TCMR, including Borderline, provides evidence for their alloimmune basis. HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch may represent a precise prognostic biomarker that can be applied to tailor immunosuppression or design clinical trials based on individual patient risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Wiebe
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Department of ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - David N. Rush
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Ian W. Gibson
- Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Department of PathologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | | | - Patricia E. Birk
- Department of Pediatrics and Child HealthUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Aviva Goldberg
- Department of Pediatrics and Child HealthUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Tom Blydt‐Hansen
- Department of PediatricsUniversity of British ColumbiaWinnipegCanada
| | | | - Jamie Shaw
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Julie Ho
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Department of ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Peter W. Nickerson
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Department of ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sotomayor CG, te Velde-Keyzer CA, de Borst MH, Navis GJ, Bakker SJ. Lifestyle, Inflammation, and Vascular Calcification in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Perspectives on Long-Term Outcomes. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E1911. [PMID: 32570920 PMCID: PMC7355938 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
After decades of pioneering and improvement, kidney transplantation is now the renal replacement therapy of choice for most patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Where focus has traditionally been on surgical techniques and immunosuppressive treatment with prevention of rejection and infection in relation to short-term outcomes, nowadays, so many people are long-living with a transplanted kidney that lifestyle, including diet and exposure to toxic contaminants, also becomes of importance for the kidney transplantation field. Beyond hazards of immunological nature, a systematic assessment of potentially modifiable-yet rather overlooked-risk factors for late graft failure and excess cardiovascular risk may reveal novel targets for clinical intervention to optimize long-term health and downturn current rates of premature death of kidney transplant recipients (KTR). It should also be realized that while kidney transplantation aims to restore kidney function, it incompletely mitigates mechanisms of disease such as chronic low-grade inflammation with persistent redox imbalance and deregulated mineral and bone metabolism. While the vicious circle between inflammation and oxidative stress as common final pathway of a multitude of insults plays an established pathological role in native chronic kidney disease, its characterization post-kidney transplant remains less than satisfactory. Next to chronic inflammatory status, markedly accelerated vascular calcification persists after kidney transplantation and is likewise suggested a major independent mechanism, whose mitigation may counterbalance the excess risk of cardiovascular disease post-kidney transplant. Hereby, we first discuss modifiable dietary elements and toxic environmental contaminants that may explain increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and late graft failure in KTR. Next, we specify laboratory and clinical readouts, with a postulated role within persisting mechanisms of disease post-kidney transplantation (i.e., inflammation and redox imbalance and vascular calcification), as potential non-traditional risk factors for adverse long-term outcomes in KTR. Reflection on these current research opportunities is warranted among the research and clinical kidney transplantation community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo G. Sotomayor
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; (C.A.t.V.-K.); (M.H.d.B.); (G.J.N.); (S.J.L.B.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
The Impact of Early Clinical and Subclinical T Cell-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2020; 103:1457-1467. [PMID: 30747837 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the effect of clinical and subclinical T cell-mediated rejection (C-TCMR and SC-TCMR) on allograft histology, function, and progression. METHODS Adult kidney recipients with 2 protocol biopsies were divided into No-TCMR on biopsies (n = 104), SC-TCMR (n = 56), and C-TCMR (n = 32) in at least 1 biopsy. Chronicity (ci + ct + cg + cv) scores, renal function, and the burden of renal disease measured by area under the curve (serum creatinine, mg mo/dL) were compared. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar except for mean donor age and Kidney Donor Profile index scores. Patients with C-TCMR had higher mean serum creatinine, lower mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, and higher area under the curve with 95% confidence interval (75.2 [67.7-82.7]) as opposed to patients with SC-TCMR and No-TCMR (58.3 [53.6-62.9], 65.1 [58.8-71.5]), P = 0.0004. Chronicity scores were higher at 3 months in C-TCMR (2.30 ± 1.58) compared with SC-TCMR (2.02 ± 1.42) and No-TCMR (1.31 ± 1.18), P = 0.0001 and also at 12 months. At last follow-up, 18.8% patients with C-TCMR had ≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate from 3 months compared with 7% and 1% among No-TCMR and SC-TCMR groups (P = 0.038). Multivariate analyses revealed higher odds of Δ-creatinine ≥ 0.5 mg/dL from 3 months to last follow-up for C-TCMR (3.39 [95% confidence interval, 1.25-9.20]) versus No-TCMR (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS Kidney transplant recipients with C-/SC-TCMR have heightened early allograft chronicity and worse renal function compared with those with No-TCMR. Progressive renal dysfunction was noted among patients with C-TCMR as opposed to SC-TCMR and No-TCMR.
Collapse
|
34
|
Moreso F, Sellarès J, Soler MJ, Serón D. Transcriptome Analysis in Renal Transplant Biopsies Not Fulfilling Rejection Criteria. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21062245. [PMID: 32213927 PMCID: PMC7139324 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21062245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The clinical significance of renal transplant biopsies displaying borderline changes suspicious for T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) or interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) with interstitial inflammation has not been well defined. Molecular profiling to evaluate renal transplant biopsies using microarrays has been shown to be an objective measurement that adds precision to conventional histology. We review the contribution of transcriptomic analysis in surveillance and indication biopsies with borderline changes and IFTA associated with variable degrees of inflammation. Transcriptome analysis applied to biopsies with borderline changes allows to distinguish patients with rejection from those in whom mild inflammation mainly represents a response to injury. Biopsies with IFTA and inflammation occurring in unscarred tissue display a molecular pattern similar to TCMR while biopsies with IFTA and inflammation in scarred tissue, apart from T-cell activation, also express B cell, immunoglobulin and mast cell-related genes. Additionally, patients at risk for IFTA progression can be identified by genes mainly reflecting fibroblast dysregulation and immune activation. At present, it is not well established whether the expression of rejection gene transcripts in patients with fibrosis and inflammation is the consequence of an alloimmune response, tissue damage or a combination of both.
Collapse
|
35
|
Yang JYC, Sarwal RD, Sigdel TK, Damm I, Rosenbaum B, Liberto JM, Chan-On C, Arreola-Guerra JM, Alberu J, Vincenti F, Sarwal MM. A urine score for noninvasive accurate diagnosis and prediction of kidney transplant rejection. Sci Transl Med 2020; 12:eaba2501. [PMID: 32188722 PMCID: PMC8289390 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aba2501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Accurate and noninvasive monitoring of renal allograft posttransplant is essential for early detection of acute rejection (AR) and to affect the long-term survival of the transplant. We present the development and validation of a noninvasive, spot urine-based diagnostic assay based on measurements of six urinary DNA, protein, and metabolic biomarkers. The performance of this assay for detecting kidney injury in both native kidneys and renal allografts is presented on a cohort of 601 distinct urine samples. The urinary composite score enables diagnosis of AR, with a receiver-operator characteristic curve area under the curve of 0.99 and an accuracy of 96%. In addition, we demonstrate the clinical utility of this assay for predicting AR before a rise in the serum creatinine, enabling earlier detection of rejection than currently possible by standard of care tests. This noninvasive, sensitive, and quantitative approach is a robust and informative method for the rapid and routine monitoring of renal allografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Y C Yang
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Reuben D Sarwal
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Tara K Sigdel
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Izabella Damm
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Ben Rosenbaum
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Juliane M Liberto
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Chitranon Chan-On
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - José M Arreola-Guerra
- Department of Surgery, University of Mexico, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion, Ciudad de México, CDMX 14080, Mexico
| | - Josefina Alberu
- Department of Surgery, University of Mexico, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion, Ciudad de México, CDMX 14080, Mexico
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Ave. Morones Prieto 3000, Monterrey, N.L. 64710, Mexico
| | - Flavio Vincenti
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Minnie M Sarwal
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Impact of Subclinical Rejection on Kidney Graft Function. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:3304-3308. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
37
|
Ventura CG, Whisenant T, Gelbart T, David DS, Agena F, Salomon DR, David-Neto E, Kurian SM. Discovery and cross-validation of peripheral blood and renal biopsy gene expression signatures from ethnically diverse kidney transplant populations. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:3356-3366. [PMID: 31152474 PMCID: PMC6883121 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We determined peripheral blood (PB) and biopsy (Bx) RNA expression signatures in a Brazilian and US cohort of kidney transplant patients. Phenotypes assigned by precise histology were: acute rejection (AR), interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy/chronic rejection (CR), excellent functioning transplants (TX), and glomerulonephritis recurrence (GN). Samples were analyzed on microarrays and profiles from each cohort were cross-validated on the other cohort with similar phenotypes. We discovered signatures for each tissue: (1) AR vs TX, (2) CR vs TX, and (3) GN vs TX using the Random Forests algorithm. We validated biopsies signatures of AR vs TX (area under the curve [AUC] 0.97) and CR vs TX (AUC 0.87). We also validated both PB and Bx signatures of AR vs TX and CR vs TX with varying degrees of accuracy. Several biological pathways were shared between AR and CR, suggesting similar rejection mechanisms in these 2 clinical phenotypes. Thus, we identified gene expression signatures for AR and CR in transplant patients and validated them in independent cohorts of significantly different racial/ethnic backgrounds. These results reveal that there are strong unifying immune mechanisms driving transplant diseases and identified in the signatures discovered in each cohort, suggesting that molecular diagnostics across populations are feasible despite ethnic and environmental differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlucci Gualberto Ventura
- Renal Transplant Service, Hospital das Clinicas - University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Thomas Whisenant
- University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, La Jolla, California
| | - Terri Gelbart
- Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
| | - Daisa S.R. David
- Renal Transplant Service, Hospital das Clinicas - University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabiana Agena
- Renal Transplant Service, Hospital das Clinicas - University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel R. Salomon
- Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
| | - Elias David-Neto
- Renal Transplant Service, Hospital das Clinicas - University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sunil M. Kurian
- Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kölling M, Haddad G, Wegmann U, Kistler A, Bosakova A, Seeger H, Hübel K, Haller H, Mueller T, Wüthrich RP, Lorenzen JM. Circular RNAs in Urine of Kidney Transplant Patients with Acute T Cell-Mediated Allograft Rejection. Clin Chem 2019; 65:1287-1294. [PMID: 31371281 DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.305854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have recently been described as novel noncoding regulators of gene expression. They are detectable in the blood of patients with acute kidney injury. We tested whether circRNAs were present in urine and could serve as new predictors of outcome in renal transplant patients with acute rejection. METHODS A global circRNA expression analysis using RNA from urine of patients with acute T cell-mediated renal allograft rejection and control transplant patients was performed. Dysregulated circRNAs were confirmed in a cohort of 62 patients with acute rejection, 10 patients after successful antirejection therapy, 18 control transplant patients without rejection, and 13 stable transplant patients with urinary tract infection. RESULTS A global screen revealed several circRNAs to be altered in urine of patients with acute rejection. Concentrations of 2 circRNAs including hsa_circ_0001334 and hsa_circ_0071475 were significantly increased. These were validated in the whole cohort of patients. hsa_circ_0001334 was upregulated in patients with acute rejection compared with controls. Concentrations of hsa_circ_0001334 normalized in patients with acute rejection following successful antirejection therapy. hsa_circ_0001334 was associated with higher decline in glomerular filtration rate 1 year after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS CircRNA concentrations are significantly dysregulated in patients with acute rejection at subclinical time points. Urinary hsa_circ_0001334 is a novel biomarker of acute kidney rejection, identifying patients with acute rejection and predicting loss of kidney function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malte Kölling
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland;
| | - George Haddad
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Urs Wegmann
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Andrea Bosakova
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Harald Seeger
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Kerstin Hübel
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Hermann Haller
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Thomas Mueller
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Rudolf P Wüthrich
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Johan M Lorenzen
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland;
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Grosser T, Naji A, FitzGerald GA. Urinary Prostaglandin Metabolites: An Incomplete Reckoning and a Flush to Judgment. Circ Res 2019; 122:537-539. [PMID: 29449357 DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.118.312616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tilo Grosser
- From the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics (T.G., G.A.F.) and Department of Surgery (A.N.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ali Naji
- From the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics (T.G., G.A.F.) and Department of Surgery (A.N.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Garret A FitzGerald
- From the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics (T.G., G.A.F.) and Department of Surgery (A.N.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zhang W, Yi Z, Keung KL, Shang H, Wei C, Cravedi P, Sun Z, Xi C, Woytovich C, Farouk S, Huang W, Banu K, Gallon L, Magee CN, Najafian N, Samaniego M, Djamali A, Alexander SI, Rosales IA, Smith RN, Xiang J, Lerut E, Kuypers D, Naesens M, O'Connell PJ, Colvin R, Menon MC, Murphy B. A Peripheral Blood Gene Expression Signature to Diagnose Subclinical Acute Rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:1481-1494. [PMID: 31278196 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2018111098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In kidney transplant recipients, surveillance biopsies can reveal, despite stable graft function, histologic features of acute rejection and borderline changes that are associated with undesirable graft outcomes. Noninvasive biomarkers of subclinical acute rejection are needed to avoid the risks and costs associated with repeated biopsies. METHODS We examined subclinical histologic and functional changes in kidney transplant recipients from the prospective Genomics of Chronic Allograft Rejection (GoCAR) study who underwent surveillance biopsies over 2 years, identifying those with subclinical or borderline acute cellular rejection (ACR) at 3 months (ACR-3) post-transplant. We performed RNA sequencing on whole blood collected from 88 individuals at the time of 3-month surveillance biopsy to identify transcripts associated with ACR-3, developed a novel sequencing-based targeted expression assay, and validated this gene signature in an independent cohort. RESULTS Study participants with ACR-3 had significantly higher risk than those without ACR-3 of subsequent clinical acute rejection at 12 and 24 months, faster decline in graft function, and decreased graft survival in adjusted Cox analysis. We identified a 17-gene signature in peripheral blood that accurately diagnosed ACR-3, and validated it using microarray expression profiles of blood samples from 65 transplant recipients in the GoCAR cohort and three public microarray datasets. In an independent cohort of 110 transplant recipients, tests of the targeted expression assay on the basis of the 17-gene set showed that it identified individuals at higher risk of ongoing acute rejection and future graft loss. CONCLUSIONS Our targeted expression assay enabled noninvasive diagnosis of subclinical acute rejection and inflammation in the graft and may represent a useful tool to risk-stratify kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijia Zhang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Zhengzi Yi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Karen L Keung
- Department of Medicine, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Huimin Shang
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Chengguo Wei
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Zeguo Sun
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Caixia Xi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Christopher Woytovich
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Samira Farouk
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Weiqing Huang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Khadija Banu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Lorenzo Gallon
- Department of Medicine-Nephrology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ciara N Magee
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nader Najafian
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Milagros Samaniego
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Stephen I Alexander
- Department of Medicine, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ivy A Rosales
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rex Neal Smith
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jenny Xiang
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and
| | - Philip J O'Connell
- Department of Medicine, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Madhav C Menon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Barbara Murphy
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York;
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Clinical Significance of Renal Allograft Protocol Biopsies: A Single Tertiary Center Experience in Malaysia. J Transplant 2019; 2019:9153875. [PMID: 31186948 PMCID: PMC6521333 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9153875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of protocol renal allograft biopsy in kidney transplantation is controversial due to the concern with procedural-related complications; however, its role is slowly evolving. Recent evidence suggests that protocol biopsy is useful in detecting subclinical renal pathology. Early recognition and treatment of renal pathologies can improve long-term outcomes of renal allografts. Methodology A total of 362 renal allograft protocol biopsies were performed in adult recipients of kidney transplantation between 2012 and 2017. After excluding those with poor quality or those performed with a baseline serum creatinine level >200 umol/L, we analyzed 334 (92.3%) biopsies. Histology reports were reviewed and categorized into histoimmunological and nonimmunological changes. The immunological changes were subcategorized into the following: (1) no acute rejection (NR), (2) borderline changes (BC), and (3) subclinical rejection (SCR). Nonimmunological changes were subcategorized into the following: (1) chronicity including interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA), chronic T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), unspecified chronic lesions, and arterionephrosclerosis, (2) de novo glomerulopathy/recurrence of primary disease (RP), and (3) other clinically unsuspected lesions (acute pyelonephritis, calcineurin inhibitors toxicity, postinfective glomerulonephritis, and BK virus nephropathy). Risk factors associated with SCR were assessed. Results For the histoimmunological changes, 161 (48.2%) showed NR, 145 (43.4%) were BC, and 28 (8.4%) were SCR. These clinical events were more pronounced for the first 5 years; our data showed BC accounted for 59 (36.4%), 64 (54.2%), and 22 (40.7%) biopsies within <1 year, 1-5 years, and > 5 years, respectively (p = 0.011). Meanwhile, the incidence for SCR was 6 (3.7%) biopsies in <1 year, 18 (15.3%) in 1-5 years, and 4 (7.4%) in >5 years after transplantation (p=0.003). For the nonimmunological changes, chronicity, de novo glomerulopathy/RP, and other clinically unsuspected lesions were seen in 40 (12%), 10 (3%), and 12 (3.6%) biopsies, respectively. Living-related donor recipients were associated with decreased SCR (p=0.007). Conclusions Despite having a stable renal function, our transplant recipients had a significant number of subclinical rejection on renal allograft biopsies.
Collapse
|
42
|
Nankivell BJ, Agrawal N, Sharma A, Taverniti A, P'Ng CH, Shingde M, Wong G, Chapman JR. The clinical and pathological significance of borderline T cell-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:1452-1463. [PMID: 30501008 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2018] [Revised: 10/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The pathological diagnosis of borderline rejection (BL-R) denotes possible T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), but its clinical significance is uncertain. This single-center, cross-sectional cohort study compared the functional and histological outcomes of consecutive BL-R diagnoses (n = 146) against normal controls (n = 826) and acute TCMR (n = 55) from 551 renal transplant recipients. BL-R was associated with the following: contemporaneous renal dysfunction, acute tubular necrosis, and chronic tubular atrophy (P < .001); progressive tubular injury with fibrosis by longitudinal sequential histology (45.3% at 1 year); increased subsequent acute rejection (39.4%), allograft failure (P < .001), and patient mortality (P = .007). BL-R detected by biopsy indicated for impaired function was followed by suboptimal functional recovery (46.3%), persistent inflammation (27.2%), and acute rejection episodes (50.0%) despite antirejection treatment in 83.3%. By 1 year after BL-R, the incidence of new-onset microvascular inflammation (9.3%), C4d staining (22.3%), transplant glomerulopathy (13.3%), and de novo donor-specific antibodies (31.5%) exceeded normal controls (P < .05-.001). BL-R inflammation in protocol biopsy persisted in 28.0% and progressed to acute rejection in 32.6%; however, it resolved in 61.6% of the untreated cases. In summary, BL-R is a heterogeneous diagnostic grouping, ranging from mild inconsequential inflammation to clinically significant TCMR, which is capable of immune-mediated tubular injury resulting in inferior functional, immunological, and histological consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nidhi Agrawal
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ankit Sharma
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anne Taverniti
- Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chow H P'Ng
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, ICPMR, Sydney, Australia
| | - Meena Shingde
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, ICPMR, Sydney, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeremy R Chapman
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gordillo R, Munshi R, Monroe EJ, Shivaram GM, Smith JM. Benefits and risks of protocol biopsies in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 2019; 34:593-598. [PMID: 29725772 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-018-3959-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Protocol biopsies are defined as sampling of allograft tissue at predetermined times regardless of function. This procedure can be justified due to the lack of non-invasive methods to reliably diagnose rejection (acute or subclinical). Changes in creatinine are not seen with subclinical rejection or early acute rejection and do not always correlate with efficacy of treatment. Parents and providers are still hesitant to pursue protocol biopsy due to the potential complications and lack of definitive evidence of a benefit from doing this procedure. Importantly, the rate of transplant renal biopsy complications requiring additional intervention is low. It is unclear if detection and treatment of subclinical rejection detected on protocol biopsy will lead to improved graft survival. Our goal is to review the literature on this topic and share some of the experience in our center. Definition, indications, and complications of diagnostic transplant renal biopsies are not included in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Gordillo
- Division of Nephrology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Raj Munshi
- Division of Nephrology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eric J Monroe
- Division of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Giridhar M Shivaram
- Division of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jodi M Smith
- Division of Nephrology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Schinstock CA, Gandhi MJ. Maintaining the Health of the Renal Allograft: Laboratory and Histologic Monitoring After Kidney Transplantation. Clin Lab Med 2018; 38:607-621. [PMID: 30420056 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Advances in posttransplant care, including new immunosuppressive medications have led to excellent short-term renal allograft survival. However, there is a small therapeutic window within which the patient and the clinician must balance the risk of rejection, with side effects such as infection, malignancy, and toxicity. Laboratory testing plays a key role in this ongoing monitoring, which includes relatively simple tests, such as serum creatinine, to complex tests, such as solid-phase assays, used to monitor for donor-specific antibody and surveillance allograft biopsies. This article reviews the role of the laboratory tests and surveillance biopsies in posttransplant monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie A Schinstock
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Manish J Gandhi
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shrestha M, Singh D, Sigdel MR, Kafle MP. Abnormalities in Protocol Graft Kidney Biopsy 6 Months Posttransplantation in a Tertiary Care Center Hospital of Nepal. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:2377-2381. [PMID: 30316361 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing graft survival is the prime focus of every transplantation program. Detection of subclinical abnormalities with the help of protocol renal graft biopsies performed at predetermined intervals after transplantation has been one of the approaches. The objective was to study the abnormalities in protocol renal graft biopsy specimens at 6 months posttransplantation. METHODS This was a hospital-based observational descriptive study. It included the recipients who underwent kidney transplantation between October 2014 and September 2015. The recipients were followed up postoperatively on an outpatient basis, as per the institution protocol. At 6 months posttransplantation, protocol graft biopsy was performed in all patients with normal functioning allograft without proteinuria after obtaining informed written consent. RESULTS A total of 57 patients with chronic kidney disease underwent renal transplantation during the study period. Protocol biopsy was performed in 47 recipients. Subclinical rejection was found in 4 (8.5%) recipients. Two recipients had significant tubulitis and interstitial inflammation. One of them showed features of Banff Type IA cellular rejection (t2, i2) and another showed Banff Type IB cellular rejection (t3, i2). Biopsy specimen of 1 recipient showed significant glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis (g3, ptc1). Another recipient showed significant peritubular capillaritis (ptc2) with C4d positivity. IgA nephropathy was present in 6 (12.8%) recipients. BK virus nephropathy was found in 2 (4.3%) recipients. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that abnormal histologic findings occur in protocol graft biopsy specimens at 6 months post renal transplantation in patients without any clinical or laboratory abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Shrestha
- Department of Nephrology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
| | - D Singh
- Department of Nephrology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - M R Sigdel
- Department of Nephrology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - M P Kafle
- Department of Nephrology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Shakoor E, Salesi M, Jahromi MK, Sadeghi H, Karimi MH, Yusof A. THE EFFECT OF EXERCISE ON INTERFERON GAMMA, BODY FAT AND BMI OF KIDNEY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS. REV BRAS MED ESPORTE 2018. [DOI: 10.1590/1517-869220182405187030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction: Poor physical function and obesity are well documented in kidney transplant patients. Significant health benefits result from regular physical activity, many of which are important for kidney transplant patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 10-week combined exercises on Interferon Gamma (IFNγ), body fat percentage (BF%) and body mass index (BMI) in kidney transplant patients. Method: In a randomized controlled experimental design, 44 kidney transplant patients aged 20-50 years were randomly divided into two groups of exercise (n=23) and control (n=21). The exercise group participated in a cumulative training program for 10 weeks, three days a week, 60–90 minutes per day at 40-65% of predicted maximal heart rate reserve. A 5 ml venous blood sample and anthropometric parameters were taken from the subjects at baseline and after 10 weeks. Results: The exercise group showed an improvement in BF% (from 31.80±5.64 to 28.86 ± 5.82, p =0.001) and BMI (from 26.23 ± 1.81 to 25.45 ± 2.11, p = 0.001), but there was no significant change in the IFNγ level (from 0.06 ± 0.02 to 0.06 ± 0.02, p = 0.829). There was a significant difference between the control and exercise groups for BF% (p = 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.001). Conclusion: As a take-home message, it should be mentioned that combined exercise intervention is inexpensive and portable and can be performed at home or health centers for kidney transplant patients to reduce their weight and BF%. Evidence Level I; High quality randomized trial with or without statistically significant difference, but with narrow confidence intervals.
Collapse
|
47
|
Mincham CM, Gibson IW, Sharma A, Wiebe C, Mandal R, Rush D, Nickerson P, Ho J, Wishart DS, Blydt-Hansen TD. Evolution of renal function and urinary biomarker indicators of inflammation on serial kidney biopsies in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with and without rejection. Pediatr Transplant 2018; 22:e13202. [PMID: 29696778 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Urinary CXCL10 and metabolites are biomarkers independently associated with TCMR. We sought to test whether these biomarkers fluctuate in association with histological severity of TCMR over short time frames. Forty-nine pairs of renal biopsies obtained 1-3 months apart from 40 pediatric renal transplant recipients were each scored for TCMR acuity score (i + t; Banff criteria). Urinary CXCL10:Cr and TCMR MDS were obtained at each biopsy and were tested for association with changes between biopsies in acuity, estimated GFR (ΔeGFR), and 12-month ΔeGFR. Sequential biopsies were obtained 1.8 ± 0.8 months apart. Biopsy 1 was usually obtained under protocol (75%), and 62% percent had evidence of TCMR. Using each biopsy pair for comparison, ΔeGFR did not predict change in acuity. By contrast, change in acuity was significantly correlated with change in urinary CXCL10:Cr (ρ 0.45, P = .003) and MDS (ρ 0.29, P = .04) between biopsies. The 12-month ΔeGFR was not predicted by TCMR acuity or CXCL10:Cr at Biopsy 2; however, an inverse correlation was seen with urinary MDS (ρ -0.35; P = .02). Changes in eGFR correlate poorly with evolving TCMR acuity on histology. Urinary biomarkers may be superior for non-invasive monitoring of rejection, including histological response to therapy, and may be prognostic for medium-term function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M Mincham
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ian W Gibson
- Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Health Sciences Center, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Atul Sharma
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Children's Hospital at Health Sciences Center, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Health Sciences Center, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Rupasri Mandal
- Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - David Rush
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Health Sciences Center, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Health Sciences Center, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Julie Ho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Health Sciences Center, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - David S Wishart
- The Metabolomics Innovation Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Tom D Blydt-Hansen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Couvrat-Desvergnes G, Foucher Y, Le Borgne F, Dion A, Mourad G, Garrigue V, Legendre C, Rostaing L, Kamar N, Kessler M, Ladrière M, Morelon E, Buron F, Giral M, Dantan E. Comparison of graft and patient survival according to the transplantation centre policy for 1-year screening biopsy among stable kidney recipients: a propensity score-based study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 34:703-711. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Grégoire Couvrat-Desvergnes
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Departmental Hospital of Vendée, La Roche-sur-Yon, France
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie INSERM UMR1064, Université de Nantes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, RTRS “Centaure”, Nantes, France
| | - Yohann Foucher
- INSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Florent Le Borgne
- INSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
- IDBC/A2com, Pacé, France
| | - Angelina Dion
- INSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
| | - Georges Mourad
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Valérie Garrigue
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Kidney Transplant Center, Necker University Hospital, APHP, RTRS “Centaure”, Paris Descartes and Sorbonne Paris Cité Universities, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Organ Transplantation, Rangueil University Hospital and University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Organ Transplantation, Rangueil University Hospital and University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Michèle Kessler
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Brabois University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Marc Ladrière
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Brabois University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Emmanuel Morelon
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Clinic Immunology, RTRS “Centaure”, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Hospices Civils, Lyon, France
| | - Fanny Buron
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Clinic Immunology, RTRS “Centaure”, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Hospices Civils, Lyon, France
| | - Magali Giral
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie INSERM UMR1064, Université de Nantes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, RTRS “Centaure”, Nantes, France
- Centre d’Investigation Clinique en Biothérapie, Labex Transplantex, Nantes, France
| | - Etienne Dantan
- INSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jamshaid F, Froghi S, Di Cocco P, Dor FJ. Novel non-invasive biomarkers diagnostic of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review. Int J Clin Pract 2018; 72:e13220. [PMID: 30011113 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Acute rejection is a significant complication detrimental to kidney transplant function. Current accepted means of diagnosis is percutaneous renal biopsy, a costly and invasive procedure. There is an urgent need to detect and validate non-invasive biomarkers capable of replacing the biopsy. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS Comprehensive literature searches of Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were performed. Eligible studies were included as per inclusion criteria and assessed for quality using the GRADE quality of evidence tool. Outcomes evaluated included biomarker diagnostic performance, number of patients/samples, mean age and gender ratio, immunosuppression regime, in addition to clinical applications of the biomarker(s) tested. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Where possible, statistical analysis of comparative performance data was performed. RESULTS 23 studies were included in this review, including 19 adult, 3 paediatric and 1 mixed studies. A total of 2858 participants and 50 candidate non-invasive tests were identified. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve performance values ranged 36%-100%, 30%-100% and 0.55-0.98, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although larger, more robust multi-centre validation studies are needed before non-invasive biomarkers can replace the biopsy, numerous candidate tests have demonstrated significant promise for various facets of postoperative management. Suggested uses include: ruling out patients with a low risk of acute rejection to avoid the need for biopsy, non-invasive testing where the biopsy is contraindicated and a prompt diagnosis is needed, and integration into a serial blood monitoring protocol in conjunction with serum creatinine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Jamshaid
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Campus, Kings College London School of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Saied Froghi
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Campus, Kings College London School of Medicine, London, UK
- Imperial College London, Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Pierpaolo Di Cocco
- Imperial College London, Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Frank Jmf Dor
- Imperial College London, Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mehta R, Bhusal S, Randhawa P, Sood P, Cherukuri A, Wu C, Puttarajappa C, Hoffman W, Shah N, Mangiola M, Zeevi A, Tevar AD, Hariharan S. Short-term adverse effects of early subclinical allograft inflammation in kidney transplant recipients with a rapid steroid withdrawal protocol. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:1710-1717. [PMID: 29247472 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2017] [Revised: 12/03/2017] [Accepted: 12/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The impact of subclinical inflammation (SCI) noted on early kidney allograft biopsies remains unclear. This study evaluated the outcome of SCI noted on 3-month biopsy. A total of 273/363 (75%) kidney transplant recipients with a functioning kidney underwent allograft biopsies 3-months posttransplant. Among those with stable allograft function at 3 months, 200 biopsies that did not meet the Banff criteria for acute rejection were identified. These were Group I: No Inflammation (NI, n = 71) and Group II: Subclinical Inflammation (SCI, n = 129). We evaluated differences in kidney function at 24-months and allograft histology score at 12-month biopsy. SCI patients had a higher serum creatinine (1.6 ± 0.7 vs 1.38 ± 0.45; P = .02) at 24-months posttransplant, and at last follow-up at a mean of 42.5 months (1.69 ± 0.9 vs 1.46 ± 0.5 mg/dL; P = .027). The allograft chronicity score (ci + ct + cg + cv) at 12-months posttransplant was higher in the SCI group (2.4 ± 1.35 vs 1.9 ± 1.2; P = .02). The incidence of subsequent rejections within the first year in SCI and NI groups was 24% vs 10%, respectively (P = .015). De novo donor-specific antibody within 12 months was more prevalent in the SCI group (12/129 vs 1/71, P = .03). SCI is likely not a benign finding and may have long-term implications for kidney allograft function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajil Mehta
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sushma Bhusal
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Puneet Sood
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aravind Cherukuri
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Christine Wu
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Chethan Puttarajappa
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - William Hoffman
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nirav Shah
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Massimo Mangiola
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amit D Tevar
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|