Effect of blood transfusion post kidney transplantation on de novo human leukocytes antigen donor-specific antibody development and clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The relationship between blood transfusion following kidney transplantation (KT) and the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) is controversial. This was investigated by conducting a meta-analysis of studies on patients who underwent KT with or without blood transfusion, and by evaluating the effect of post-KT blood transfusion on clinical outcomes of kidney transplant recipients. Relevant studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were identified from inception to July 1, 2022. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the selected articles and estimated study quality. A fixed effects or random effects model was used to pool data according to the heterogeneity among studies. Data included in the meta-analysis were derived from 11 studies with a total of 19,543 patients including 6191 with and 13,352 without blood transfusion post-KT. We assessed the pooled associations between blood transfusion and occurrence of dnDSA and clinical outcomes of transplant recipients. Blood transfusion was strongly correlated with the development of dnDSA (relative risk [RR] = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.67; P < 0.05). Patients with blood transfusion had a higher risk of developing anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I dnDSA than non-transfused patients (RR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.14-2.69; P < 0.05) as well as significantly higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.21-2.35; P < 0.05) and graft loss (RR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.30-2.35; P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the development of anti-HLA antibodies, anti-HLA class II dnDSA, and anti-HLA class I and II dnDSA; delayed graft function; T cell-mediated rejection; acute rejection; borderline rejection; or patient death. Our results suggest that blood transfusion was associated with dnDSA development in KT recipients. The findings of this systematic review also suggest that post-KT blood transfusion recipients have a higher risk of AMR, and graft loss compared with non-transfused patients. Evidence from this meta-analysis indicates that the use of blood transfusion post-KT is associated with a significantly higher risk of immunological sensitization. More and higher quality results from large randomized controlled trials are still needed to inform clinical practice.

Maintaining the Health of the Renal Allograft: Laboratory and Histologic Monitoring After Kidney Transplantation

Advances in posttransplant care, including new immunosuppressive medications have led to excellent short-term renal allograft survival. However, there is a small therapeutic window within which the patient and the clinician must balance the risk of rejection, with side effects such as infection, malignancy, and toxicity. Laboratory testing plays a key role in this ongoing monitoring, which includes relatively simple tests, such as serum creatinine, to complex tests, such as solid-phase assays, used to monitor for donor-specific antibody and surveillance allograft biopsies. This article reviews the role of the laboratory tests and surveillance biopsies in posttransplant monitoring.

Peripheral blood immune response-related gene analysis for evaluating the potential risk of chronic antibody-mediated rejection

Noninvasive methods for the early diagnosis of chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) are desired for patients with de novo (dn) donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA). This study aimed to elucidate the clinical relevance of immune-related gene expression in peripheral blood of kidney transplant recipients. The expression levels of fourteen key molecules (Foxp3, CTLA-4, CCR7, TGF-β, IGLL-1, IL-10, ITCH, CBLB, Bcl-6, CXCR5, granzyme B, CIITA, Baff, TOAG-1/TCAIM) related to regulatory/cytotoxic function of immune cells were compared in 93 patients, which were divided into Groups A (clinical cAMR with dn DSA, n = 16), B (subclinical cAMR with dn DSA, n = 17), C (negative cAMR with dn DSA, n = 21) and D (stable function without dn DSA, n = 39). CIITA mRNA expression levels in groups B and C were significantly lower than those in group D (p < 0.01). Moreover, the CTLA-4 mRNA expression in group A was significantly higher than that in groups B and C (p < 0.01). ROC curve analysis suggested that CIITA (AUC = 0.902) and CTLA-4 (AUC = 0.785) may serve as valuable biomarkers of the stage of dn DSA production and clinical cAMR, respectively. In addition to dn DSA screening, monitoring of CIITA and CTLA-4 in peripheral blood could offer useful information on the time course of the development of cAMR.