Pediatric liver and kidney transplantation with allografts from DCD donors: A review of UNOS data

Use of DCD organs: Expanding the donor pool to increase pediatric transplantation

The number of children being listed for transplant continues to be greater than the number of available organs. In fact, over the past decade, rates of liver and kidney transplants in pediatric transplantation are essentially unchanged (Am J Transplant. 2020;20:193 and Am J Transplant. 2020;20:20). The use of DCD donors offers a potential solution to organ scarcity; however, the use of DCD organs in pediatric transplantation remains a rare event. Pediatric transplants done using carefully chosen DCD donor organs have shown to have outcomes similar to those seen with the use of donation after brain death (DBD) donors. Herein, we review the literature to examine the utilization of DCD livers and kidneys, outcomes of these allografts, and assess if DCD organs are a viable method to increase organ availability in pediatric transplantation.

Long-term outcomes of pediatric liver transplantation using organ donation after circulatory death: Comparison between full and reduced grafts

BACKGROUND

The shortage of donors' livers for pediatric recipients inspired the search for alternatives including donation after cardiac death (DCD).

METHODS

Retrospective review of pediatric liver transplant (PLT) using DCD grafts. Patients were divided into either FLG or RLG recipients. Pre-transplant recipient parameters, donor parameters, operative parameters, post-transplant recipient parameters, and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 14 PLTs from DCD donors between 2005 and 2018 were identified; 9 FLG and 5 RLG. All donors were Maastricht category III. Cold ischemia time was significantly longer in RLG (8.2 h vs. 6.2 h; p = .038). Recipients of FLG were significantly older (180 months vs. 7 months; p = .012) and waited significantly longer (168 days vs. 22 days; p = .012). Recipients of RLG tended to be sicker in the immediate pre-transplant period and this was reflected by the need for respiratory or renal support. There was no significant difference between groups regarding long-term complications. Three patients in each group survived more than 5 year post-transplant. One child was re-transplanted in the RLG due to portal vein thrombosis but failed to survive after re-transplant. One child from FLG also died from a non-graft-related cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Selected DCD grafts are an untapped source to widen the donor pool, especially for sick recipients. In absence of agreed criteria, graft and recipient selection for DCD grafts should be undertaken with caution.

Donation After Cardiac Death in Children

The wait list for organ transplant exceeds the rate of organ donation, especially in children. The solid-organ transplant rate has remained stable over time, despite increased demand. Although donation after cardiac death has helped to expand the donor organ pool for the adult population, this option remains scarce for children in need of transplant. Because long-term graft survival is more important in the pediatric group than in adults, we should reconsider the common notion that donation after cardiac death is inferior to donation after brain death. Herein, we review the literature to extract and analyze data regarding donation after cardiac death for solid-organ transplant in children.

Donation after Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation in Paediatric Recipients

Waiting list mortality together, with limited availability of organs, are one of the major challenges in liver transplantation (LT). Especially in the paediatric population, another limiting factor is the scarcity of transplantable liver grafts due to additional concerns regarding graft size matching. In adults, donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver grafts have been used to expand the donor pool with satisfactory results. Although several studies suggest that DCD livers could also be used in paediatric recipients with good outcomes, their utilisation in children is still limited to a small number of reports. Novel organ perfusion strategies could be used to improve organ quality and help to increase the number of DCD grafts utilised for children. With the current manuscript, we present the available literature of LT using DCD grafts in paediatric recipients, discussing current challenges with the use of these livers in children and how machine perfusion technologies could be of impact in the future.

Survival Benefit of Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplantation in Children Compared With Remaining on the Waiting List for a Kidney Donated After Brain Death

BACKGROUND

Kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) are increasingly being used for transplantation in adults to alleviate organ shortage. Pediatric data on survival benefits of DCD transplantation compared with remaining on the waitlist for a kidney donated after brain death (DBD) offer are lacking.

METHODS

We used Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to identify 285 pediatric (<18 y) DCD kidney transplants performed between 1987 and 2017. Propensity score matching was used to create a comparison group of 1132 DBD transplants. We used sequential Cox analysis to evaluate survival benefit of DCD transplantation versus remaining on the waitlist and Cox regression to evaluate patient and graft survival.

RESULTS

DCD transplantation was associated with a higher incidence of delayed graft function (adjusted odds ratio: 3.0; P < 0.001). The risks of graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.89; P = 0.46) and death (aHR, 1.2; P = 0.67) were similar between DCD and DBD recipients. We found a significant survival benefit of DCD transplantation compared with remaining on the waitlist awaiting a DBD kidney (aHR, 0.44; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher incidence of delayed graft function, long-term patient and graft survival are similar between pediatric DCD and DBD kidney transplant recipients. DCD transplantation in children is associated with a survival benefit, despite pediatric priority for organ allocation, compared with remaining on the waitlist.

Should We Be Utilizing More Liver Grafts From Pediatric Donation After Circulatory Death Donors? A National Analysis of the SRTR from 2002 to 2017

BACKGROUND

Rates of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment are higher among critically ill pediatric patients compared to adults. Therefore, livers from pediatric donation after circulatory death (pDCD) could improve graft organ shortage and waiting time for listed patients. As knowledge on the utilization of pDCD is limited, this study used US national registry data (2002-2017) to estimate the prognostic impact of pDCD in both adult and pediatric liver transplant (LT).

METHODS

In adult LT, the short-term (1-year) and long-term (overall) graft survival (GS) between pDCD and adult donation after circulatory death (aDCD) grafts was compared. In pediatric LT, the short- and long-term prognostic outcomes of pDCD were compared with other type of grafts (brain dead, split, and living donor).

RESULTS

Of 80 843 LTs in the study, 8967 (11.1%) were from pediatric donors. Among these, only 443 were pDCD, which were utilized mainly in adult recipients (91.9%). In adult recipients, short- and long-term GS did not differ significantly between pDCD and aDCD grafts (hazard ratio = 0.82 in short term and 0.73 in long term, both P > 0.05, respectively). Even "very young" (≤12 y) pDCD grafts had similar GS to aDCD grafts, although the rate of graft loss from vascular complications was higher in the former (14.0% versus 3.6%, P < 0.01). In pediatric recipients, pDCD grafts showed similar GS with other graft types whereas waiting time for DCD livers was significantly shorter (36.5 d versus 53.0 d, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the comparable survival seen to aDCDs, this data show that there is still much scope to improve the utilization of pDCD liver grafts.

Livers From Pediatric Donation After Circulatory Death Donors Represent a Viable and Underutilized Source of Allograft

Despite increased numbers of donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors, pediatric DCD livers are underused. To investigate possible reasons for this discrepancy, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using 2 data sets from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for all deceased liver donors and for all recipients of DCD liver transplants from March 8, 1993, to June 30, 2018. Pediatric (0-12 years) and adolescent (13-17 years) DCD donors were compared with those aged 18-40 years. We found that pediatric DCD allografts are recovered at a significantly lower rate than from 18-to-40-year-old donors (27.3% versus 56.3%; P < 0.001). However, once recovered, these organs are transplanted at a similar rate to those from the 18-to-40-year-old donor cohort (74.7% versus 74.2%). Significantly more pediatric DCD livers (odds ratio [OR], 3.75; confidence interval [CI], 3.14-4.47) were not recovered compared with adult organs, which were most commonly not recovered due to organ quality (10.2% versus 7.1%; P < 0.001). The 10-year relative risks (RRs) for graft failure and patient death were similar between pediatric and adult DCD donors, with adolescent DCD livers demonstrating improved outcomes. DCD livers transplanted into pediatric donors were protective against graft failure (RR, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.99) and patient death (RR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.69). In conclusion, despite lower rates of recovery, pediatric DCD livers represent a viable organ source for certain adults and children.

Donation after circulatory death liver transplantation: What are the limits for an acceptable DCD graft?

The utilization of donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers has been growing over the last decade. In large-volume centers, survival outcomes have improved and are comparable to outcomes with brain death donor (DBD) liver transplantation (LT). The relatively concentrated success with DCD LT demonstrated by high-volume transplant centers has rekindled international enthusiasm. The combination of increasing expertise in DCD LT and ongoing shortage in transplantable organs has promoted expansion of the DCD donor pool with regards to donor age, body mass index and donor warm ischemia time. In this review, we focused on the practice patterns in DCD liver graft utilization in the last decade, along with the possibilities for further expansion of DCD liver graft utilization and new technologies, such as machine perfusion.

Donation after cardiac death kidneys are suitable for pediatric recipients

Despite the high number of children listed for kidney transplantation and shortage of deceased organ donors, there is reluctance to utilize DCD kidneys in pediatric recipients. We examined outcomes in pediatric kidney transplant patients who received a DCD kidney allograft. UNOS database was queried to examine outcomes in all pediatric kidney transplant recipients from 1994 to 2017. Pediatric status was defined as <18 years at the time of transplantation. Recipients were divided by DBD or DCD allograft status. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined. Patient and allograft survival was calculated, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to be significant. A total of 286 pediatric kidney transplant recipients received a DCD allograft. The donors in the DCD group were significantly younger than those in the DBD group (21.7 vs 23.3 years), with a higher KDPI (26.5% vs 22.9%). In the DCD group, the average age at transplant was younger (11.6 vs 12.9 years), with no difference in cold ischemia time or length of stay between the two groups. Rates of delayed graft function were higher in the DCD group, but despite this, there were no significant differences in allograft or patient survival between the groups. There is no difference in allograft survival in pediatric kidney transplant recipients who receive a DCD kidney allograft. DCD kidney allografts are suitable for transplantation in pediatric patients and can greatly expand the donor pool.

Non-standard criteria donors in pediatric kidney transplantation

KT remains the treatment of choice for ESRD in children. However, the demand for kidney transplants continues to outstrip supply, even in the pediatric scenario. We reviewed the applicability of nonSCDs for pediatric KT. There is a lack of studies analyzing this modality among pediatric donors and recipients, where most conclusions are based on predictions from adult data. Nevertheless, marginal donors might be a reasonable option in selected cases. For example, the use of older LDs is an acceptable option, with outcomes comparable to SCDs. Organs donated after cardiac death represent another possibility, albeit with logistic, ethical, and legal limitations in some countries. AKI donors also constitute an option in special situations, although there are no pediatric data on these transplants. Likewise, there are no data on the use of expanded criteria donors in pediatric patients, but this appears not to be a good option, considering the compromised long-term survival.

Living or deceased donor kidney transplantation in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment modality for children with end-stage renal disease. In this review, we discuss the factors affecting the selection of the appropriate donor to ensure the best possible short and long-term outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Outcomes of pediatric renal transplantation from living donors are superior to those obtained from deceased donors. Despite this, the rate of living donor kidney transplantation has declined over the last decade. Living donation is considered to be safe but long-term outcomes, especially for parents who are often young donors, are not well understood. Living donation can also cause a financial impact to the donor and family. Barriers to living donation must be sought and defeated. Deceased donor organs are now the primary source of kidneys. How the risk of extended time on dialysis must be weighed against the improved outcomes that may accrue from better matching is controversial. Increasing the donor pool may be accomplished by reassessing sources that are currently avoided, such as donation after cardiac death and infant kidneys transplanted en bloc.

SUMMARY

The pediatric nephrologist must balance waiting for the highest quality kidney against the need for the shortest possible waiting time.

Should more donation after cardiac death livers be used in pediatric transplantation?

INTRODUCTION

There is a mismatch that exists in donor liver organ supply and demand. DCD livers represents a potential source to increase the number of liver grafts available for use in pediatric recipients; however, there has been hesitancy to use such organs. We evaluated patient and allograft outcomes in pediatric liver transplant recipients of DCD livers.

METHODS

The UNOS database was queried to examine outcomes in all liver transplant recipients from 1993 to 2017. Patients were then divided according to adult and pediatric status, DBD or DCD allograft status, and era of transplant. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined, and patient and allograft survival were calculated. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

A total of 57 pediatric recipients received a DCD liver allograft. DCD recipients were older than DBD recipients. There was no difference in the final PELD score between the groups. There were no differences in causes of allograft failure between the DCD and DBD groups. Importantly, the overall allograft survival in the DCD and DBD groups was similar, as was allograft survival based on era.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric liver transplant recipients of DCD allografts have comparable patient and allograft survival when compared to DBD allograft recipients. Use of DCD allografts in the pediatric liver transplant population should be strongly considered to increase the donor organ pool.

Utilisation of small paediatric donor kidneys for transplantation

With the increasing need for kidney transplantation in the paediatric population and changing donor demographics, children without a living donor option will potentially be offered an adult deceased donor transplant of marginal quality. Given the importance of long-term graft survival for paediatric recipients, consideration is now being given to kidneys from small paediatric donors (SPDs). There exist a lack of consensus and a reluctance amongst some centres in transplanting SPDs due to high surgical complication rates, graft loss and concerns regarding low nephron mass and long-term function. The aim of this review is to examine and present the evidence base regarding the transplantation of these organs. The literature in both the paediatric and adult renal transplant fields, as well as recent relevant conference proceedings, is reviewed. We discuss the surgical techniques, long-term graft function and rates of complications following transplantation of SPDs. We compare graft survival of SPDs to adult deceased donors and consider the use of small paediatric donors after circulatory death (DCD) organs. In conclusion, evidence is presented that may refute historically held paradigms regarding the transplantation of SPDs in paediatric recipients, thereby potentially allowing significant expansion of the donor pool.

Renal allograft survival rates in kidneys initially declined for paediatric transplantation

BACKGROUND

The outcome of organs which have been declined for paediatric recipients is not known. This study aimed to determine the outcome of kidneys initially declined for paediatric recipients and establish renal allograft survival in kidneys that were eventually transplanted.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the UK Transplant Registry for all donation after brain death (DBD) kidneys offered and declined to paediatric recipients (< 18 years) in the UK from 2009 to 2014.

RESULTS

Eighty-two percent (503/615) of kidneys initially declined for paediatric transplantation were eventually transplanted, 7% (46/615) of kidneys went to paediatric recipients and 62% (384/615) of kidneys went to adult (kidney only) recipients. The remainder were used for multiple organ transplants. In the 46 kidneys that went to paediatric recipients, 1 and 3-year renal allograft survivals were 89% (95% CI 75.8-95.3%) and 82% (95% CI 67.1-90.6%), respectively. In the 384 kidneys given to adult kidney-only recipients, 1 and 3-year renal allograft survivals were 96% (95% CI 93.5-97.6%) and 94% (95% CI 90.7-96.1%), respectively. Eighty-four percent of the 204 children who initially had an offer declined on their behalf were eventually transplanted and have a functioning graft at a median 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports acceptable short-term renal allograft survival in kidneys that were initially declined for paediatric recipients and subsequently transplanted. Evidence-based guidelines are required to ensure that the most appropriate kidneys are selected for paediatric recipients.

Donation after Circulatory Death in Paediatric Liver Transplantation: Current Status and Future Perspectives in the Machine Perfusion Era

Efforts have been made by the transplant community to expand the deceased donor pool in paediatric liver transplantation (LT). The growing experience on donation after circulatory death (DCD) for adult LT has encouraged its use also in children, albeit in selective cases, opening new perspectives for paediatric patients. Even though there has recently been a slight increase in the number of DCD livers transplanted in children, with satisfactory graft and patient outcomes, the use of DCD grafts in paediatric recipients is still controversial due to morbid outcomes associated with DCD grafts. In this context, recent advances in the optimization of donor support by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and in the graft preservation by liver machine perfusion could find application in order to expand the donor pool in paediatric LT. In the present study we review the current literature on DCD liver grafts transplanted in children and on the use of extracorporeal donor support and liver perfusion machines in paediatrics, with the aim of defining the current status and future perspectives of paediatric LT.

UK National Registry Study of Kidney Donation After Circulatory Death for Pediatric Recipients

BACKGROUND

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidney transplantation has acceptable renal allograft survival in adults but there are few data in pediatric recipients. The aim of this study was to determine renal allograft outcomes for pediatric recipients of a DCD kidney.

METHODS

Data were collected from the UK Transplant Registry held by National Health Service Blood and Transplant. Kidney transplants performed for pediatric recipients (age, <18 years) in the United Kingdom from 2000 to 2014 were separated into DCD, donation after brain death (DBD), and living donor (LD) transplants, analyzing 3-year patient and renal allograft survival.

RESULTS

One thousand seven hundred seventy-two kidney only transplants were analyzed. Twenty-one (1.2%) of these were from DCD donors, 955 (53.9%) from DBD donors, and 796 (44.9%) from LDs. Patient survival is 100% in the DCD group, 98.7% in the DBD group, and 98.9% in the LD group. Three-year renal allograft survival was 95.2% in the DCD group, 87.1% in the DBD group, and 92.9% in the LD group. There was no significant difference in 3-year renal allograft survival between the DCD and DBD groups (P = 0.42) or DCD and LD groups (P = 0.84). For DCD, the primary nonfunction rate was 5% and delayed graft function was 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

Children receiving a DCD kidney transplant have good renal allograft survival at 3-year follow-up, comparable to those receiving a kidney from a DBD donor or a LD. This limited evidence encourages the use of selected DCD kidneys in pediatric transplantation, and DCD allocation algorithms may need to be reviewed in view of this.

Long-term results after transplantation of pediatric liver grafts from donation after circulatory death donors

Background

Liver grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are increasingly accepted as an extension of the organ pool for transplantation. There is little data on the outcome of liver transplantation with DCD grafts from a pediatric donor. The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of liver transplantation with pediatric DCD grafts and to compare this with the outcome after transplantation of livers from pediatric donation after brain death (DBD) donors.

Method

All transplantations performed with a liver from a pediatric donor (≤16 years) in the Netherlands between 2002 and 2015 were included. Patient survival, graft survival, and complication rates were compared between DCD and DBD liver transplantation.

Results

In total, 74 liver transplantations with pediatric grafts were performed; twenty (27%) DCD and 54 (73%) DBD. The median donor warm ischemia time (DWIT) was 24 min (range 15–43 min). Patient survival rate at 10 years was 78% for recipients of DCD grafts and 89% for DBD grafts (p = 0.32). Graft survival rate at 10 years was 65% in recipients of DCD versus 76% in DBD grafts (p = 0.20). If donor livers in this study would have been rejected for transplantation when the DWIT ≥30 min (n = 4), the 10-year graft survival rate would have been 81% after DCD transplantation. The rate of non-anastomotic biliary strictures was 5% in DCD and 4% in DBD grafts (p = 1.00). Other complication rates were also similar between both groups.

Conclusions

Transplantation of livers from pediatric DCD donors results in good long-term outcome especially when the DWIT is kept ≤30 min. Patient and graft survival rates are not significantly different between recipients of a pediatric DCD or DBD liver. Moreover, the incidence of non-anastomotic biliary strictures after transplantation of pediatric DCD livers is remarkably low.

Donations After Circulatory Death in Liver Transplant

The supply of liver grafts for treatment of end-stage liver disease continues to fall short of ongoing demands. Currently, most liver transplants originate from donations after brain death. Enhanced utilization of the present resources is prudent to address the needs of the population. Donation after circulatory or cardiac death is a mechanism whereby the availability of organs can be expanded. Donations after circulatory death pose unique challenges given their exposure to warm ischemia. Technical principles of donations after circulatory death procurement and pertinent studies investigating patient outcomes, graft outcomes, and complications are highlighted in this review. We also review associated risk factors to suggest potential avenues to achieve improved outcomes and reduced complications. Future considerations and alternative techniques of organ preservation are discussed, which may suggest novel strategies to enhance preservation and donor expansion through the use of marginal donors. Ultimately, without effective measures to bolster organ supply, donations after circulatory death should remain a consideration; however, an understanding of inherent risks and limitations is necessary.

Outcomes of liver transplantation with liver grafts from pediatric donors used in adult recipients

Although there is an agreement that liver grafts from pediatric donors (PDs) should ideally be used for pediatric patients, there remain situations when these grafts are turned down for pediatric recipients and are then offered to adult recipients. The present study aimed to investigate the outcomes of using these grafts for liver transplantation (LT) in adult patients. Data from all patients undergoing LT between 2002 and 2014 were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Analysis and Research file. Adult recipients undergoing LT were divided into 2 groups: those receiving a pediatric liver graft (pediatric-to-adult group) and those receiving a liver graft from adult donors (adult-to-adult group). A separate subgroup analysis comparing the PDs used for adult recipients and those used for pediatric recipients was also performed. Patient and graft survival were not significantly different between pediatric-to-adult and adult-to-adult groups (P = 0.08 and P = 0.21, respectively). Hepatic artery thrombosis as the cause for graft loss was higher in the pediatric-to-adult group (3.6%) than the adult-to-adult group (1.9%; P < 0.001). A subanalysis looking at the pediatric-to-adult group found that patients with a predicted graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) < 0.8 had a higher 90-day graft loss rate than those with a GRWR ≥ 0.8 (39% versus 9%; P < 0.001). PDs used for adult recipients had a higher proportion of donors with elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (20% vs. 12%; P < 0.001), elevated creatinine (11% vs. 4%; P < 0.001), donation after cardiac death donors (12% vs. 0.9%; P < 0.001), and were hepatitis B virus core positive (1% vs. 0.3%; P = 0.002) than PDs used for pediatric recipients. In conclusion, acceptable patient and graft survival can be achieved with the use of pediatric liver grafts in adult recipients, when these grafts have been determined to be inappropriate for usage in the pediatric population. Liver Transplantation 22 1099-1106 2016 AASLD.

Kidney donation after circulatory death: current evidence and opportunities for pediatric recipients

Organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) has experienced a revival worldwide over the past 20 years, and is now widely practiced for kidney transplantation. Some previous concerns about these organs such as the high incidence of delayed graft function have been alleviated through evidence from adult studies. There are now a number of large adult cohorts reporting favorable 5-year outcomes for DCD kidney transplants, comparable to kidneys donated after brain death (DBD). This has resulted in a marked increase in the use of DCD kidneys for adult recipients in some countries and an increase in the overall number of kidney transplants. In contrast, the uptake of DCD kidneys for pediatric recipients is still low and concerns still exist over the longer-term outcomes of DCD organs. In view of the data from adult practice and the poor outcomes for children who stay on dialysis, DCD kidney transplantation should be offered as an option for children on the kidney transplant waiting list.

Chinese Pediatric Organ Donation With Scheduled Cardiac Arrest After Brain Death: A Novel China Classification Beyond Maastricht

OBJECTIVE

Organ donation with scheduled cardiac arrest after brain death (s-DBCD) is a special category in China. This study was to evaluate the procedure of pediatric s-DBCD, graft quality, and clinical outcomes of single kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 8 Chinese pediatric donors.

RESULTS

The death causes of the donors (age 4-12 years) were cerebral hypoxia after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 1), intracranial vascular malformation (n = 1), severe traumatic brain injury (n = 3), and brain malignancy (n = 3). The functional warm ischemia time of the grafts was 18 (13-26) minutes. Sixteen kidneys were recovered using liver-kidney en bloc procurement after in situ perfusion. All kidneys had a length >7 cm and were transplanted to 3 adolescent and 13 adult recipients. Two cases of delayed graft function occurred. The patients had a median serum creatinine level of 97 (55-123) μmol/L by the last visit. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate level was 85.4 (58-136) mL/min. Five episodes of biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 4 patients, which were reversed by methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Renal arterial stenosis was observed in 1 patient, which was cured by interventional balloon dilatation and stent implantation.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric s-DBCD is feasible with acceptable graft quality. Single kidney transplantation with pediatric graft size >7 cm has good clinical outcomes.

Reduced ATG-F dosage for induction in pediatric renal transplantation: a single-center experience

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG-F) is an extensively used induction agent. To our knowledge, no study to date has assessed reduced ATG-F dosage in children undergoing renal transplantation. This was a retrospective analysis of pediatric renal recipients in the Department of Kidney Transplantation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, from May 2007 to February 2013. Thirty-nine children underwent renal transplantation including 25 living related and 14 cardiac deceased donor transplantation. Each recipient received ATG-F 1.5 mg/kg/d once daily for 4 days. Of the 39 recipients, five (12.8%) showed delayed graft function, including one of 25 recipients (4%) of living donor and four of 14 recipients (28.6%) of deceased donor transplantation (p < 0.05). Six of the 39 recipients (15.4%) showed acute rejection on renal biopsy. Follow-up in these children ranged from 6 to 87 months. The one-, three-, and five-yr recipients and grafts survival rates postoperation were each 94.9% and 97.3%, 97.3%, and 94.6%, respectively. The incidence of postoperative infection was 35.9% (14/39), and did not differ significantly in the living related and deceased donor groups (p > 0.05). Low-dose ATG-F can be safely used as an immune induction agent in pediatric renal transplantation.

Pediatric organ donation and transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is increasing unmet need for solid organ donation. Alternative donor sources, such as donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD), are needed. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of DCDD on trends in pediatric organ donation and transplantation.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for US organ recipients and donors from 2001 to 2010 stratified according to age, organ, and deceased donor type (DCDD or donation after neurologic determination of death). Additional data included transplant wait-list removals due to death.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2010, pediatric organ transplant recipients increased from 1170 to 1475. Organs from DCDD donors were transplanted into children infrequently but increased from 1 to 31. Pediatric donation after neurologic determination of death decreased by 13% whereas DCDD increased by 174% (50 to 137). Recipients of pediatric grafts decreased from 3042 to 2751. Adults receiving grafts from pediatric donors decreased from 2243 to 1780; children receiving pediatric grafts increased from 799 to 971. Transplant recipients receiving pediatric DCDD grafts were few but increased annually from 50 to 128 adults and 0 to 9 children. Pediatric candidates dying waiting for an organ decreased from 262 to 110.

CONCLUSIONS

From 2001 to 2010, children received more solid organ transplants and fewer children died waiting. Organ recovery from pediatric and adult DCDD donors increased. The number of pediatric recipients of DCDD grafts remains small. Adults primarily receive the direct benefit from pediatric DCDD but other changes in organ allocation have directly benefited children.

Ethical controversies in organ donation after circulatory death

The persistent mismatch between the supply of and need for transplantable organs has led to efforts to increase the supply, including controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD). Controlled DCD involves organ recovery after the planned withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and the declaration of death according to the cardiorespiratory criteria. Two central ethical issues in DCD are when organ recovery can begin and how to manage conflicts of interests. The "dead donor rule" should be maintained, and donors in cases of DCD should only be declared dead after the permanent cessation of circulatory function. Permanence is generally established by a 2- to 5-minute waiting period. Given ongoing controversy over whether the cessation must also be irreversible, physicians should not be required to participate in DCD. Because the preparation for organ recovery in DCD begins before the declaration of death, there are potential conflicts between the donor's and recipient's interests. These conflicts can be managed in a variety of ways, including informed consent and separating the various participants' roles. For example, informed consent should be sought for premortem interventions to improve organ viability, and organ procurement organization personnel and members of the transplant team should not be involved in the discontinuation of life-sustaining treatment or the declaration of death. It is also important to emphasize that potential donors in cases of DCD should receive integrated interdisciplinary palliative care, including sedation and analgesia.

Kidney donation after cardiac death

There is continuing disparity between demand for and supply of kidneys for transplantation. This review describes the current state of kidney donation after cardiac death (DCD) and provides recommendations for a way forward. The conversion rate for potential DCD donors varies from 40%-80%. Compared to controlled DCD, uncontrolled DCD is more labour intensive, has a lower conversion rate and a higher discard rate. The super-rapid laparotomy technique involving direct aortic cannulation is preferred over in situ perfusion in controlled DCD donation and is associated with lower kidney discard rates, shorter warm ischaemia times and higher graft survival rates. DCD kidneys showed a 5.73-fold increase in the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and a higher primary non function rate compared to donation after brain death kidneys, but the long term graft function is equivalent between the two. The cold ischaemia time is a controllable factor that significantly influences the outcome of allografts, for example, limiting it to < 12 h markedly reduces DGF. DCD kidneys from donors < 50 function like standard criteria kidneys and should be viewed as such. As the majority of DCD kidneys are from controlled donation, incorporation of uncontrolled donation will expand the donor pool. Efforts to maximise the supply of kidneys from DCD include: implementing organ recovery from emergency department setting; improving family consent rate; utilising technological developments to optimise organs either prior to recovery from donors or during storage; improving organ allocation to ensure best utility; and improving viability testing to reduce primary non function.

Liver transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors: a comprehensive update

BACKGROUND

Use of donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors has been proposed as an effective way to expand the availability of hepatic allografts used in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT); yet, there remains no consensus in the medical literature as to how to choose optimal recipients and donors based on available information.

METHODS

We queried the United Network of Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database for hepatic DCD allografts used in OLT. As of March 31, 2011, 85,148 patients received hepatic allografts from donation-after-brain-death (DBD) donors, and 2351 patients received hepatic allografts from DCD donors. We performed survival analysis using log-rank and Kaplan-Meier tests. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model. All statistics were performed with SPSS 15.0.

RESULTS

Patients receiving hepatic DCD allografts had significantly worse survival compared with patients receiving hepatic DBD allografts. Pediatric patients who received a hepatic DCD allograft had similar survival to those who received a hepatic DBD allograft. The optimal recipient-related characteristics were age <50 y, International Normalized Ratio <2.0, albumin >3.5 gm/dL, and cold ischemia time <8 h; optimal donor-related characteristics included age <50 y and donor warm ischemia time <20 min.

CONCLUSIONS

By identifying certain characteristics, the transplant clinician's decision-making process can be assisted so that similar survival outcomes after OLT can be achieved with the use of hepatic DCD allografts.

Segmental ABO-incompatible liver graft from a donor after cardiac death in neonatal acute liver failure

Segmental liver grafts from DCD in pediatric LT have been safely used even in acute liver failure situations. Furthermore, despite the risk of antibody-mediated acute rejection, some studies have also demonstrated the safety of ABO incompatible LT in infants. The use of such grafts can be beneficial by reducing the time on the transplant waiting list but they are more susceptible to initial dysfunction and there is a lack of enthusiasm to consider their use especially for an emergency LT as a life-saving procedure. In this short article, we describe the use and successful outcome in a neonate with fulminant acute liver failure secondary to neonatal hemochromatosis who received an ABO-incompatible reduced-size DCD graft.

Late graft loss among pediatric recipients of DCD kidneys

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death (DCD) provides similar graft survival to donors after brain death (DBD) in adult recipients. However, outcomes of DCD kidneys in pediatric recipients remain unclear, primarily because of limited sample sizes.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We identified 137 pediatric (<18 years old) recipients of DCD kidneys between 1994 and 2010 using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data and compared outcomes with 6059 pediatric recipients of DBD kidneys during the same time period, accounting for donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics using time-varying Cox regression and matched controls. Long-term follow-up (4 years or beyond) was available for 31 DCD recipients.

RESULTS

Pediatric recipients of DCD kidneys experienced a significantly higher rate of delayed graft function (22.0% versus 12.3%; P = 0.001), although lower than reported delayed graft function rates of DCD grafts in adults. Although DCD and DBD graft survival was equal in the early postoperative period, graft loss among pediatric recipients of DCD kidneys exceeded their DBD counterparts starting 4 years after transplantation. This effect was statistically significant in a multivariate Cox model (hazard ratio = 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 3.39; P = 0.007) and matched-controls analysis (hazard ratio = 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 5.03; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant increase in DCD graft loss starting 4 years after transplantation motivates a cautious approach to the use of DCD kidneys in children, in whom long-term graft survival is of utmost importance.

Influence of physical activity on cardiorespiratory fitness in children after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cardiorespiratory fitness is significantly reduced in children with end-stage renal disease. The role of renal transplantation in improving cardiorespiratory fitness has not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

In this work, we wanted to assess whether, in children after a successful renal transplant, the amount of weekly physical exercise affects cardiorespiratory fitness and left ventricular mass (LVM). The study was conducted on 16 children after renal transplantation and 36 matching healthy controls. Four groups were formed according to the weekly amount of physical exercise; all children received an echocardiogram and underwent a treadmill exercise test according to the Bruce protocol.

RESULTS

Cardiorespiratory fitness is worst in renal transplant children with a weekly physical exercise<3 h; renal transplant children with a physical exercise of 3-5 h per week attain a cardiorespiratory fitness comparable to controls with a sedentary lifestyle (<3-h exercise per week); healthy controls with a weekly physical exercise of 3-5 h per week show the highest levels of cardiorespiratory fitness; the LVM assessed via echocardiography follows the same pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with a successful renal transplant, a weekly physical exercise of 3-5 h significantly improves the cardiorespiratory fitness and the LVM, up to the level of matching healthy controls with a sedentary lifestyle (<3 h exercise per week).

Similar liver transplantation survival with selected cardiac death donors and brain death donors

BACKGROUND

The outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with controlled graft donation after cardiac death (DCD) is usually inferior to that with graft donation after brain death (DBD). This study compared outcomes from OLT with DBD versus controlled DCD donors with predefined restrictive acceptance criteria.

METHODS

All adult recipients in the Netherlands in 2001-2006 with full-size OLT from DCD (n = 55) and DBD (n = 471) donors were included. Kaplan-Meier, log rank and Cox regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

One- and 3-year patient survival rates were similar for DCD (85 and 80 per cent) and DBD (86.3 and 80.8 per cent) transplants (P = 0.763), as were graft survival rates (74 and 68 per cent versus 80.4 and 74.5 per cent; P = 0.212). The 3-year cumulative percentage of surviving grafts developing non-anastomotic biliary strictures was 31 per cent after DCD and 9.7 per cent after DBD transplantation (P < 0.001). The retransplantation rate was similar overall (P = 0.081), but that for biliary stricture was higher in the DCD group (P < 0.001). Risk factors for 1-year graft loss after DBD OLT were transplant centre, recipient warm ischaemia time and donor with severe head trauma. After DCD OLT they were transplant centre, donor warm ischaemia time and cold ischaemia time. DCD graft was a risk factor for non-anastomotic biliary stricture.

CONCLUSION

OLT using controlled DCD grafts and restrictive criteria can result in patient and graft survival rates similar to those of DBD OLT, despite a higher risk of biliary stricture.

Reduced size liver transplantation from a donor supported by a Berlin Heart

Patients on cardiac assist devices are often considered to be high-risk solid organ donors. We report the first case of a reduced size liver transplant performed using the left lateral segment of a pediatric donor whose cardiac function was supported by a Berlin Heart. The recipient was a 22-day-old boy with neonatal hemochromatosis who developed fulminant liver failure shortly after birth. The transplant was complicated by mild delayed graft function, which required delayed biliary reconstruction and abdominal wall closure, as well as a bile leak. However, the graft function improved quickly over the first week and the patient was discharged home with normal liver function 8 weeks after transplant. The presence of a cardiac assist device should not be considered an absolute contraindication for abdominal organ donation. Normal organ procurement procedures may require alteration due to the unusual technical obstacles that are encountered when the donor has a cardiac assist device.

Impact of a pediatric donation after cardiac death program

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of a pediatric donation after cardiac death (DCD) program on organ donation.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

A free-standing children's hospital.

PATIENTS

All ventilated pediatric intensive care unit patients who died between September 1, 2005 and April 30, 2007.

INTERVENTIONS

Institution of a DCD program.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data collected included clinical features, medical eligibility and consent for organ donation, as well as outcome for donation among eligible patients. One hundred ten patients who died in the pediatric intensive care unit and were treated with mechanical ventilation immediately before death were identified. Thirty-one patients met exclusion criteria, 26 patients were not referred, and 53 patients were evaluated for potential DCD by the organ procurement agency. The majority of patients had anoxia or trauma as their primary diagnosis. Family members initiated discussions regarding donation in 17% of evaluations. Sixty-eight percent of patients were deemed medically ineligible by the organ procurement agency. Of the 17 medically eligible patients, consent for donation was given in 9 cases (53%). Of these, 7 patients (41%) successfully donated; accounting for 37% of organ donors during the study period. Two families gave consent for donation which did not occur; one child did not die within the required time period and one could not be matched with any recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a small percentage of dying patients are eligible for and will undergo DCD, such a program can markedly increase the number of organ donors at a children's hospital.

Preventable death: children on the transplant waiting list

Children, especially those under 5 years of age, have the highest death rate on the transplant waiting list compared to any other age range. This article discusses the concept, supported by OPTN data, that there is an age range of small pediatric donors, which are almost exclusively transplanted into small pediatric transplant candidates. Allocation policies that allow broader sharing of small pediatric donors into small pediatric candidates are likely to decrease death rates of children on the waiting list. As well, although the number of pediatric deceased donors continues to decline, improving consent rates for eligible pediatric donors, and judicious use of pediatric donors after cardiac death, can enhance the pediatric deceased donor supply.

Reduced glutathione in the liver as a potential viability marker in non-heart-beating donors

Although the use of non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) is the oldest type of organ transplantation, the results were and still are disappointing. To consider using a liver from NHBD, it is of importance to assess the graft viability. Our aim was to assess the role of reduced liver glutathione (rGSHL) as a potential predictive marker of liver function before transplantation. Autotransplanted livers were subjected to 0, 60, and 90 minutes of ischemia in 20 pigs. We analyzed systemic cardiocirculatory parameters, bowel ischemia by endotoxin, endotoxin-neutralizing capacity, oxidative stress, hepatic perfusion parameters, liver enzymes, local bowel ischemia, and liver oxidative stress (rGSHL and oxidized glutathione in the liver). Autotransplantation was comparable to donor explantation/recipient transplantation with respect to systemic and hepatic parameters. Liver ischemia for 0, 60, and 90 minutes resulted in survival in 100% (NHBD-0), 71% (NHBD-60), and 57% (NHBD-90) of animals. Of all parameters, only hepatic microperfusion, pHi of the sigmoid colon, and bowel ischemia by endotoxin in the NHBD-90 group showed significant changes compared to NHBD-60 and control animals. Although systemic endotoxin-neutralizing capacity and total glutathione in erythrocytes levels were mainly influenced by cold perfusion, hepatic oxidative stress increased with ischemia time. The cut-off value of 11.5 ng/mmol of rGSHL could distinguish survivors from nonsurvivors, independent of the ischemia time. In conclusion, rGSHL has the potential of becoming an important viability marker, as it could predict survival in autotransplantation NHBD model regardless of the ischemia time. Further investigation to declare reasons for differing rGSHL levels within the liver is required.