Alemtuzumab

Updates in induction immunosuppression regimens for intestinal transplantation

Intestinal allografts are the most immunologically complex and carry the highest risk of rejection among solid organ transplantation, necessitating complex immunosuppressive management. We evaluated the latest information regarding induction immunosuppression, with an emphasis on established, novel, and emergent therapies. We also reviewed classic and novel induction immunosuppression strategies for highly sensitized recipients. Comparable progress has been made in intestinal transplantation clinical outcomes since the implementation of induction strategies. This review shows a clear diversity of induction protocols can be observed across different centers. The field of intestinal transplantation is still in its early stages, which is further complicated by the limited number of institutions capable of intestinal transplantation and their geographical variation, which further hinders the development of adequately powered studies in comparison to other organs. As the implementation of institution-specific induction protocols becomes more refined and results are disseminated, future research efforts should be directed towards the development of efficacious induction strategies.

Allogeneic CAR-T Therapy Technologies: Has the Promise Been Met?

This last decade, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become a real treatment option for patients with B-cell malignancies, while multiple efforts are being made to extend this therapy to other malignancies and broader patient populations. However, several limitations remain, including those associated with the time-consuming and highly personalized manufacturing of autologous CAR-Ts. Technologies to establish "off-the-shelf" allogeneic CAR-Ts with low alloreactivity are currently being developed, with a strong focus on gene-editing technologies. Although these technologies have many advantages, they have also strong limitations, including double-strand breaks in the DNA with multiple associated safety risks as well as the lack of modulation. As an alternative, non-gene-editing technologies provide an interesting approach to support the development of allogeneic CAR-Ts in the future, with possibilities of fine-tuning gene expression and easy development. Here, we will review the different ways allogeneic CAR-Ts can be manufactured and discuss which technologies are currently used. The biggest hurdles for successful therapy of allogeneic CAR-Ts will be summarized, and finally, an overview of the current clinical evidence for allogeneic CAR-Ts in comparison to its autologous counterpart will be given.

Pancreatic islet transplantation: toward definitive treatment for diabetes mellitus

Since the late 20th century, advances in pancreatic islet transplantation have targeted improved glycemic control and fewer hypoglycemic events in patients with type 1 diabetes, and some important milestones have been reached. Following the Edmonton group's success in achieving insulin independence in all transplanted patients with type 1 diabetes, clinical islet transplantation is now performed worldwide. β cell replacement therapy for type 1 diabetes was established based on the favorable outcomes of a phase 3, prospective, open-label, single-arm, clinical study conducted at 8 centers in North America, in which 42 of 48 patients who underwent islet transplantation from 2008 to 2011 achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at day 365, which was maintained at 2 years in 34 patients. In Japan, a phase 2 multicenter clinical trial of islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes patients is currently ongoing and will end soon, but the interim results have already led to positive changes, with allogeneic islet transplantation being covered by the national health insurance system since April 2020. Current efforts are being made to solve the problem of donor shortage by studying alternative donor sources, such as porcine islets and pancreatic progenitor cells derived from pluripotent stem cells. The results of clinical trials in this area are eagerly awaited. It is hoped that they will contribute to establishing alternative sources for insulin-producing β cells in the near future.

Comparative efficacy and safety of antibody induction therapy for the treatment of kidney: a network meta-analysis

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibody induction therapies in kidney transplantation. Systematic literature searches were undertaken using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from 1980 to 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing three antibody induction therapies (alemtuzumab, interleukin-2 receptor antibodies and antithymocyte globulin) between each other were identified. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine both the direct and indirect evidence on treatment efficacy and its safety. Antibody induction therapy studies, comprising of 18 RCTs (3444 kidney transplant recipients), were included. Overall, alemtuzumab treatment was superior to the ATG group (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.71) and IL-2RAs group (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.52) for reducing the 1-year acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Although alemtuzumab treatment was nearly same with ATG group and IL-2RAs group in improving patient survival and renal function, it can reduce the adverse effects of cytomegalovirus infection more efficiently than ATG group (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.95) and IL-2RAs group (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.73). Alemtuzumab was not associated with increased other adverse effects. Alemtuzumab treatment is safe and effective for kidney transplant recipients. No serious adverse effects were observed in trials or in general populations.

Advances in pharmacotherapy to treat kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Current immunosuppressive combination therapy provides excellent prevention of T-cell-mediated rejection following renal transplantation; however, antibody-mediated rejection remains of high concern and accounts for a large number of long-term allograft losses. The recent development of protocol biopsies resulted in the definition of subclinical rejection (SCR), showing histologic evidence for rejection but unremarkable clinical course.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the current knowledge and evidence of pharmacotherapy to treat kidney allograft rejections and covers SCR treatment options. Each substance is analyzed with regard to its classical indication and further discussed for the treatment of other forms of rejection.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite a lack of randomized trials, early acute T-cell-mediated rejection can be treated effectively in most cases without graft loss. The necessity to treat SCR is currently unclear. Due to a lack of effective therapies, new treatment approaches for antibody-mediated rejection are an urgent medical need to improve long-term outcomes. Future research should aim to better define pathophysiology and histology, stratify risk, and develop rational treatment strategies from randomized controlled trials, in order to establish the value of novel therapies in the arsenal of rejection pharmacotherapy. However, the effective prevention of rejection with minimal side effects still remains the goal in immunosuppression.

Monoclonal antibody therapy and renal transplantation: focus on adverse effects

A series of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are commonly utilized in renal transplantation as induction therapy (a period of intense immunosuppression immediately before and following the implant of the allograft), to treat steroid-resistant acute rejections, to decrease the incidence and mitigate effects of delayed graft function, and to allow immunosuppressive minimization. Additionally, in the last few years, their use has been proposed for the treatment of chronic antibody-mediated rejection, a major cause of late renal allograft loss. Although the exact mechanism of immunosuppression and allograft tolerance with any of the currently used induction agents is not completely defined, the majority of these medications are targeted against specific CD proteins on the T or B cells surface (e.g., CD3, CD25, CD52). Moreover, some of them have different mechanisms of action. In particular, eculizumab, interrupting the complement pathway, is a new promising treatment tool for acute graft complications and for post-transplant hemolytic uremic syndrome. While it is clear their utility in renal transplantation, it is also unquestionable that by using these highly potent immunosuppressive agents, the body loses much of its innate ability to mount an adequate immune response, thereby increasing the risk of severe adverse effects (e.g., infections, malignancies, haematological complications). Therefore, it is extremely important for clinicians involved in renal transplantation to know the potential side effects of monoclonal antibodies in order to plan a correct therapeutic strategy minimizing/avoiding the onset and development of severe clinical complications.

A surgeons' guide to renal transplant immunopathology, immunology, and immunosuppression

The response to allografting involves adaptive and innate immune mechanisms. In the adaptive system, activated T cells differentiate to cytotoxic effectors that attack the graft and trigger B cells to differentiation to plasma cells that produce anti-HLA antibodies. The innate immune system recognizes antigens in a non-specific manner and recruits immune cells to the graft through the productions of chemotactic factors, and activation of cytokines and the complement cascade. In the kidney the tubules and the endothelium are the targets of the rejection response. Immune suppression is effective in modulating the adaptive immune system effect on graft histology.

Th17 mediated alloreactivity is facilitated by the pre-transplant microbial burden of the recipient

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and severity of aGvHD is associated with biological and genetic factors related to donors and recipients. Studies on inflammatory pathways involved in aGvHD have shown a significant impact of the gut microflora on aGvHD development giving increasing evidence in the understanding of the response of innate and adaptive immunity to microbial products. Cytokine deregulation may increase or reduce the risk of aGvHD. Damage of tissues affected by aGvHD reflects the immunological cascade of events in this disease.

Alemtuzumab induction in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis and systemic review

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab versus traditional antibodies for induction therapy in renal transplantation.

METHODS

Literature searches for all randomized controlled trials comparing alemtuzumab with traditional antibodies for post renal transplant induction therapy were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Quality assessment was performed in each trial. Meta-analyses were performed to demonstrate the pooled effects of relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 808 participants from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Alemtuzumab was associated with lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection over traditional antibodies (RR 0.63, CI 0.45-0.87, p=0.005). This difference remained when only studies comparing alemtuzumab with rabbit antithymocyte globulin were included (RR 0.32, CI 0.11-0.91, p=0.03), but lost significance when only patients at high-risk were included (RR 0.86, CI 0.48-1.55, p=0.62). No significant differences were detected between alemtuzumab and traditional antibodies in terms of delayed graft function, patient death, graft loss, and safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab induction is superior to traditional antibodies in preventing AR in renal transplantation, but this benefit may not extend to recipients at high immunologic risk. The lower rejection rates do not translate into a uniform increase in graft or patient survival.

Lymphocyte depletion in experimental hemorrhagic shock in Swine

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhagic shock results in systemic activation of the immune system and leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Lymphocytes have been identified as critical mediators of the early innate immune response to ischemia-reperfusion injury, and immunomodulation of lymphocytes may prevent secondary immunologic injury in surgical and trauma patients.

METHODS

Yorkshire swine were anesthetized and underwent a grade III liver injury with uncontrolled hemorrhage to induce hemorrhagic shock. Experimental groups were treated with a lymphocyte depletional agent, porcine polyclonal anti-thymocyte globulin (PATG) (n = 8) and compared to a vehicle control group (n = 9). Animals were observed over a 3 day survival period. Circulating lymphocytes were examined with FACS analysis for CD3/CD4/CD8, and central lymphocytes with mesenteric lymph node and spleen staining for CD3. Circulating and lung tissue16 infiltrating neutrophils were measured. Circulating CD3 lymphocytes in the blood and in central lymphoid organs (spleen/lymph node) were stained and evaluated using FACS analysis. Immune-related gene expression from liver tissue was quantified using RT-PCR.

RESULTS

The overall survival was 22% (2/9) in the control and 75% (6/8) in the PATG groups, p = 0.09; during the reperfusion period (following hemorrhage) survival was 25% (2/8) in the control and 100% (6/6) in the PATG groups, p = 0.008. Mean blood loss and hemodynamic profiles were not significantly different between the experimental and control groups. Circulating CD3+CD4+ lymphocytes were significantly depleted in the PATG group compared to control. Lymphocyte depletion in the setting of hemorrhagic shock also significantly decreased circulating and lung tissue infiltrating neutrophils, and decreased expression of liver ischemia gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphocyte manipulation with a depletional (PATG) strategy improves reperfusion survival in experimental hemorrhagic shock using a porcine liver injury model. This proof of principle study paves the way for further development of immunomodulation approaches to ameliorate secondary immune injury following hemorrhagic shock.

Lymphocyte modulation with FTY720 improves hemorrhagic shock survival in swine

The inflammatory response to severe traumatic injury results in significant morbidity and mortality. Lymphocytes have recently been identified as critical mediators of the early innate immune response to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Experimental manipulation of lymphocytes following hemorrhagic shock may prevent secondary immunologic injury in surgical and trauma patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the lymphocyte sequestration agent FTY720 as an immunomodulator following experimental hemorrhagic shock in a swine liver injury model. Yorkshire swine were anesthetized and underwent a grade III liver injury with uncontrolled hemorrhage to induce hemorrhagic shock. Experimental groups were treated with a lymphocyte sequestration agent, FTY720, (n = 9) and compared to a vehicle control group (n = 9). Animals were observed over a 3 day survival period after hemorrhage. Circulating total leukocyte and neutrophil counts were measured. Central lymphocytes were evaluated with mesenteric lymph node and spleen immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for CD3. Lung tissue infiltrating neutrophils were analyzed with myeloperoxidase (MPO) IHC staining. Relevant immune-related gene expression from liver tissue was quantified using RT-PCR. The overall survival was 22.2% in the vehicle control and 66.7% in the FTY720 groups (p = 0.081), and reperfusion survival (period after hemorrhage) was 25% in the vehicle control and 75% in the FTY720 groups (p = 0.047). CD3⁺ lymphocytes were significantly increased in mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen in the FTY720 group compared to vehicle control, indicating central lymphocyte sequestration. Lymphocyte disruption significantly decreased circulating and lung tissue infiltrating neutrophils, and decreased expression of liver immune-related gene expression in the FTY720 treated group. There were no observed infectious or wound healing complications. Lymphocyte sequestration with FTY720 improves survival in experimental hemorrhagic shock using a porcine liver injury model. These results support a novel and clinically relevant lymphocyte immunomodulation strategy to ameliorate secondary immune injury in hemorrhagic shock.

An analysis of lymphocyte phenotype after steroid avoidance with either alemtuzumab or basiliximab induction in renal transplantation

Several studies have analyzed the phenotype of repopulated T-lymphocytes following alemtuzumab induction; however there has been less scrutiny of the reconstituted B-cell compartment. In the context of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus monotherapy against basiliximab induction with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy in renal transplantation, we analyzed the peripheral B- and T-lymphocyte phenotypes of patients at a mean of 25 +/- 2 months after transplantation. We examined the relationship between peripheral lymphocyte phenotype and graft function. Patients who received alemtuzumab had significantly higher numbers of B cells including naïve, transitional and regulatory subsets. In contrast, the CD4(+) T-cell compartment was dominated by a memory cell phenotype. Following either basiliximab or alemtuzumab induction patients with lower numbers of B cells or B subsets had significantly worse graft function. For alemtuzumab there was also a correlation between these subsets the stability of graft function and the presence of HLA-specific antibodies. These results demonstrate that a significant expansion of regulatory type B cells is associated with superior graft function and that this pattern is more common after alemtuzumab induction. This phenomenon requires further prospective study to see whether this phenotype could be used to customize immunotherapy.

Skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients: advances in therapy and management: part II. Management of skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients

The management of skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients is a challenge to both the dermatologist and transplant physician. Part II of this continuing medical education review offers an approach to the management of this increasing problem. The importance of specialty dermatology clinics providing access to transplant patients, frequent skin cancer screening, patient education, and multidisciplinary care is discussed. The management of low risk squamous cell carcinoma with topical therapies, photodynamic therapy, systemic retinoids, and capecitabine is reviewed. Revision of immunosuppression in the management of high-risk patients is discussed in association with the potential role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for aggressive disease. Finally, management of in-transit and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma is reviewed, with a discussion of the role of more recent innovative therapies, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in advanced squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients.

Disease-specific hematopoietic cell transplantation: nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen for dyskeratosis congenita

Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is characterized by reticular skin pigmentation, oral leukoplakia and abnormal nails. Patients with DC have very short telomeres and approximately one-half have mutations in telomere biology genes. A majority of patients with DC develop BM failure (BMF). Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) represents the only known cure for BMF in DC, but poses significant toxicities. We report six patients who underwent allogeneic HCT with a novel nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen specifically designed for DC patients. Graft sources included related PBSCs (1), unrelated BM (2) and unrelated double umbilical cord blood (3). Complete donor engraftment was achieved in five of six patients. One patient had initial autologous hematopoietic recovery, which was followed by a second transplant that resulted in 88% donor chimerism. With a median follow-up of 26.5 months, four patients are alive, three of whom were recipients of unrelated grafts. We conclude with this small study that encouraging short-term survival can be achieved with HCT in patients with DC using a preparative regimen designed to promote donor engraftment and minimize life-threatening disease-specific complications such as pulmonary fibrosis. Long-term follow-up will be crucial with respect to individualized patient care with each of the transplanted individuals.

Alemtuzumab versus interleukin-2 receptor antibodies induction in living donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab use has been increasing in kidney transplantation. We aimed to compare posttransplantation outcomes between alemtuzumab and interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (IL-2RA) in living donor kidney transplant recipients in the United States.

METHODS

Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing data, as of August 2007, were used to identify all living donor kidney transplants performed in adults in the United States from 2003 to 2006 where induction therapy with alemtuzumab or IL-2RA (daclizumab or basiliximab) was used. Primary outcomes included incidence of acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival.

RESULTS

One thousand nine hundred thirteen recipients received alemtuzumab and 7011 received IL-2RA. There were few significant differences in baseline characteristics. The incidence of acute rejection at discharge was lower in the alemtuzumab group, when compared with that in the IL-2RA group (0.8% vs. 4.4%, respectively, P<0.001), but it was similar by 1 year posttransplant (9.8% vs. 11%, respectively). After adjusting for confounding factors, those in alemtuzumab group had a higher adjusted relative risk of graft loss (hazard ratios 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.48) in 4 years. Patient survival was comparable between the study groups. A higher rate of acute rejection and graft failure was seen in the recipients who used triple regimen (calcineurin-mycophenolate-steroid) in association with alemtuzumab.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of acute rejection at discharge was lower with alemtuzumab but was comparable with IL-2RA up to 1 year posttransplant. There was no difference in patient survival, but the risk of graft loss among patients who received alemtuzumab was higher compared with those who received IL-2RA induction.

Successes and disappointments with clinical islet transplantation

Transplantation of pancreatic islets is considered a therapeutic option for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who have life-threatening hypoglycaemic episodes. After the procedure, a decrease in the frequency and severity of hypoglycaemic episodes and sustained graft function as indicated by detectable levels of C-peptide can be seen in the majority of patients. However, true insulin independence, if achieved, usually lasts for at most a few years. Apart from the low insulin independence rates, reasons for concern regarding this procedure are the side effects of the immunosuppressive therapy, allo-immunization, and the high costs. Moreover, whether islet transplantation prevents the progression of diabetic micro- and macrovascular complications is largely unknown. Areas of current research include the development of less toxic immunosuppressive regimens, the control of the inflammatory reaction immediately after transplantation, the identification of the optimal anatomical site for islet infusion, and the possibility to encapsulate transplanted islets to protect them from the allo-immune response. At present, pancreatic islet transplantation is still an experimental procedure, which is only indicated for a highly selected group of type 1 diabetic patients with life-threatening hypoglycaemic episodes.

New directions for induction immunosuppression strategy in solid organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant centers are increasingly using induction immunosuppression strategies. Induction immunosuppression involves the use of intense therapy at the time of transplantation with the goal of preventing acute rejection and ultimately inducing a tolerogenic state. The objective of this review is to examine specialized induction agents currently in clinical use and highlight novel therapeutics on the horizon for induction immunosuppression.

METHODS

A literature search using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases identified salient basic science and clinical research articles on induction immunosuppression for solid organ transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

While current induction immunosuppression agents have reduced the incidence of acute rejection, the goal of transplant tolerance has not been realized. Furthermore, the long-term allograft survival rate is not clearly influenced by the practice of induction immunosuppression. New approaches to tolerance induction, such as costimulatory-based therapy, mixed chimerism, and adoptive cellular transfer, hold promise for more effective induction immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation.

Islet transplantation with alemtuzumab induction and calcineurin-free maintenance immunosuppression results in improved short- and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Only a minority of islet transplant recipients maintain insulin independence at 5 years under the Edmonton protocol of immunosuppression. New immunosuppressive strategies are required to improve long-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three subjects with unstable type 1 diabetes mellitus underwent islet transplantation with alemtuzumab induction and sirolimus-tacrolimus maintenance for 3 months and then sirolimus-mycophenolic acid maintenance thereafter. Follow-up was more than 2 years. Comparison was with 16 historical subjects transplanted under the Miami version of the Edmonton protocol.

RESULTS

Insulin independence was achieved in 2 of 3 alemtuzumab and 14 of 16 historical subjects. Those who did not achieve insulin independence only received a single islet infusion. Insulin-independence rates remained unchanged in the alemtuzumab group, but decreased from 14 of 16 (88%) to 6 of 16 (38%) in the historical group over 2 years. Insulin requirements increased in the historical group while remaining stable in the alemtuzumab group. Comparison of functional measures at 3 months suggested better engraftment with alemtuzumab (P=NS). Further comparison of alemtuzumab versus historical groups, up to 24 months, demonstrated significantly better: Mixed meal stimulation index (24 months, 1.0+/-0.08 [n=3] vs. 0.5+/-0.06 pmol/mL [n=6], P<0.01), mixed meal peak C-peptide (24 months, 5.0+/-0.5 [n=3] vs. 3.1+/-0.3 nmol/mL [n=6], P<0.05), HbA1c (24 months, 5.4+/-0.15 [n=3] vs. 6.3+/-0.12 pmol/mL [n=10], P<0.01). Administration of alemtuzumab was well tolerated. There was no increased incidence of infections in alemtuzumab subjects despite profound, prolonged lymphocyte depletion.

CONCLUSIONS

Islet transplantation with alemtuzumab induction was well tolerated and resulted in improved short- and long-term outcomes. Further investigation is underway for validation.