Chronic activation of spinal adenosine A1 receptors results in hypersensitivity

Current and Future Issues in the Development of Spinal Agents for the Management of Pain

Targeting analgesic drugs for spinal delivery reflects the fact that while the conscious experience of pain is mediated supraspinally, input initiated by high intensity stimuli, tissue injury and/or nerve injury is encoded at the level of the spinal dorsal horn and this output informs the brain as to the peripheral environment. This encoding process is subject to strong upregulation resulting in hyperesthetic states and downregulation reducing the ongoing processing of nociceptive stimuli reversing the hyperesthesia and pain processing. The present review addresses the biology of spinal nociceptive processing as relevant to the effects of intrathecally-delivered drugs in altering pain processing following acute stimulation, tissue inflammation/injury and nerve injury. The review covers i) the major classes of spinal agents currently employed as intrathecal analgesics (opioid agonists, alpha 2 agonists; sodium channel blockers; calcium channel blockers; NMDA blockers; GABA A/B agonists; COX inhibitors; ii) ongoing developments in the pharmacology of spinal therapeutics focusing on less studied agents/targets (cholinesterase inhibition; Adenosine agonists; iii) novel intrathecal targeting methodologies including gene-based approaches (viral vectors, plasmids, interfering RNAs); antisense, and toxins (botulinum toxins; resniferatoxin, substance P Saporin); and iv) issues relevant to intrathecal drug delivery (neuraxial drug distribution), infusate delivery profile, drug dosing, formulation and principals involved in the preclinical evaluation of intrathecal drug safety.

Spinal inhibitory neurotransmission in neuropathic pain

Nerve injury increases the spinal cord expression and/or activity of voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels, peptide receptors, and neuroimmune factors, which then drive dorsal horn neuron hyperexcitability. The intensity and duration of this central sensitization is determined by the net activity of local excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitter systems, together with ongoing/evoked primary afferent activity and descending supraspinal control. Spinal endogenous inhibitory systems serve as opposing compensatory influences and are gaining recognition for their powerful capacity to restrain allodynia and hyperalgesia. These include numerous G protein-coupled receptors (mu- and delta-opioid, alpha(2)-adrenergic, purinergic A1, neuropeptide Y1 and Y2, cannabinoid CB1 and CB2, muscarinic M2, gamma-amino-butyric acid type B, metabotropic glutamate type II-III, somatostatin) and perhaps nuclear receptors (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma). Excessive downregulation or defective compensatory upregulation of these systems may contribute to the maintenance of neuropathic pain. An increasing number of pharmacotherapeutic strategies for neuropathic pain are emerging that mimic and enhance inhibitory neurotransmission in the dorsal horn.

Persistent changes in spinal cord gene expression after recovery from inflammatory hyperalgesia: a preliminary study on pain memory

BACKGROUND

Previous studies found that rats subjected to carrageenan injection develop hyperalgesia, and despite complete recovery in several days, they continue to have an enhanced hyperalgesic response to a new noxious challenge for more than 28d. The study's aim was to identify candidate genes that have a role in the formation of the long-term hyperalgesia-related imprint in the spinal cord. This objective was undertaken with the understanding that the long-lasting imprint of acute pain in the central nervous system may contribute to the transition of acute pain to chronicity.

RESULTS

To analyze changes in gene expression when carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia has disappeared but propensity for the enhanced hyperalgesic response is still present, we determined the gene expression profile using oligo microarray in the lumbar part of the spinal cord in three groups of rats: 28d after carrageenan injection, 24h after injection (the peak of inflammation), and with no injection (control group). Out of 17,000 annotated genes, 356 were found to be differentially expressed compared with the control group at 28d, and 329 at 24h after carrageenan injection (both groups at p < 0.01). Among differentially expressed genes, 67 (39 in 28d group) were identified as being part of pain-related pathways, altered in different models of pain, or interacting with proteins involved in pain-related pathways. Using gene ontology (GO) classification, we have identified 3 functional classes deserving attention for possible association with pain memory: They are related to cell-to-cell interaction, synaptogenesis, and neurogenesis.

CONCLUSION

Despite recovery from inflammatory hyperalgesia, persistent changes in spinal cord gene expression may underlie the propensity for the enhanced hyperalgesic response. We suggest that lasting changes in expression of genes involved in the formation of new synapses and neurogenesis may contribute to the transition of acute pain to chronicity.