1
|
Weiler CR, Schrijvers R, Golden DBK. Anaphylaxis: Advances in the Past 10 Years. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:51-62. [PMID: 36162799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
In the past 10 years, anaphylaxis has grown into its own special area of study within Allergy-Immunology, both at the bench and at the bedside. This review focuses on some of the most clinically relevant advances over the past decade. These include simplified and more inclusive diagnostic criteria for adults and children, uniform definition of biphasic anaphylaxis, and improved systems for objective severity grading. Studies reported in the past decade have led to improved understanding of normal and abnormal regulation of mast cell function, translating into better diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to patients with anaphylaxis. Research has provided improved recognition and treatment of mast cell disorders and has identified a new condition, hereditary α-tryptasemia, that may impact anaphylactic syndromes. We have learned to recognize new causes (α-gal), new pathways (Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor-X2), and many risk factors for severe anaphylaxis. The stability of epinephrine in autoinjectors was reported to be very good for several years after the labeled expiry date, and it can tolerate freezing and thawing. Repeated and prolonged exposure to excessive heat leads to degradation of epinephrine activity. New treatments to prevent severe anaphylaxis have been described, using new ways to block the IgE receptor or modulate intracellular signaling pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rik Schrijvers
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David B K Golden
- Division of Allergy/Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Keshavarz B, Platts-Mills TAE, Wilson JM. The use of microarray and other multiplex technologies in the diagnosis of allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021; 127:10-18. [PMID: 33450398 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To give an overview and describe the strengths and weaknesses of immunoglobulin E (IgE) microarray and other multiplex assays that have been developed and are being used for allergy diagnostics. DATA SOURCES Queries for IgE microarray and multiplex assays were conducted with PubMed and Google Scholar, searching for primary articles and review papers. STUDY SELECTIONS We focused on articles written in English on commercially available IgE multiplex assays that were reported in the allergy and immunology literature. RESULTS Several commercial IgE assays that use microarray or other multiplex technology have been developed, and some have been implemented into clinical practice in Europe and Asia, with the Immuno Solid-Phase Allergen Chip being the most widely studied. Results of these assays generally correlate with results using "singleplex" IgE assays (eg, ImmunoCAP), though there can be variability among products and among allergens. A strength of the microarray technology is that IgE to a large number of allergens can be detected simultaneously in a single test, and only a small amount of patient serum is required. Cost, inadequate sensitivity under some scenarios, and difficulties with data interpretation, in some cases of 100 or more allergens, can be limitations. CONCLUSION IgE microarray assays are already a valuable tool in research applications. These assays, and also other forms of IgE multiplex assays, are likely to play an important role in the clinical practice of allergy in the future. Additional studies focused on clinical outcomes, and the development of more targeted allergen panels could facilitate increased clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behnam Keshavarz
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Thomas A E Platts-Mills
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jeffrey M Wilson
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Poziomkowska-Gęsicka I, Kostrzewska M, Kurek M. Comorbidities and Cofactors of Anaphylaxis in Patients with Moderate to Severe Anaphylaxis. Analysis of Data from the Anaphylaxis Registry for West Pomerania Province, Poland. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18010333. [PMID: 33466336 PMCID: PMC7794698 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is a severe, potentially life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction that is still rarely diagnosed. For safety reasons, patients should visit an allergologist to identify potential causes and cofactors of this reaction. This paper presents the analysis of data from the Anaphylaxis Registry gathered over ten years at the Allergy Clinic, Pomeranian Medical University (PMU). A questionnaire-based survey was used for patients visiting the Allergy Clinic to identify potential augmentation factors/comorbidities and/or cofactors of anaphylaxis in patients with a history of moderate to severe anaphylaxis. The registry comprised patients with grade II or higher anaphylaxis. The gathered data concerned chronic comorbidities (cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, and others), recurrence of anaphylaxis, and potential cofactors in anaphylaxis. In the analyzed group, the incidence rate of anaphylaxis was the highest for women aged 19–60 years. Most common comorbidities in patients with moderate to severe anaphylaxis included: cardiovascular diseases, respiratory tract diseases, features of atopy, and thyroid diseases. More than 30% of drug-induced reactions were anaphylactic reactions due to the re-exposure to the same drug, which points to the need for educational initiatives in this area. The incidence rate of anaphylaxis induced by Hymenoptera stings was comparable in patients who had a previous generalized reaction and those who had good tolerance to the previous sting. It is important to take these cofactors into consideration when evaluating patients with anaphylaxis as they may play a role in future anaphylactic reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iwona Poziomkowska-Gęsicka
- Clinical Allergology Department, Pomeranian Medical University (PMU) in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland;
- Correspondence:
| | - Magdalena Kostrzewska
- Department of Pulmonology, Allergology and Respiratory Oncology, University of Medical Sciences, 60-569 Poznan, Poland;
| | - Michał Kurek
- Clinical Allergology Department, Pomeranian Medical University (PMU) in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cardona V, Ansotegui IJ, Ebisawa M, El-Gamal Y, Fernandez Rivas M, Fineman S, Geller M, Gonzalez-Estrada A, Greenberger PA, Sanchez Borges M, Senna G, Sheikh A, Tanno LK, Thong BY, Turner PJ, Worm M. World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020. World Allergy Organ J 2020; 13:100472. [PMID: 33204386 PMCID: PMC7607509 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 435] [Impact Index Per Article: 108.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is the most severe clinical presentation of acute systemic allergic reactions. The occurrence of anaphylaxis has increased in recent years, and subsequently, there is a need to continue disseminating knowledge on the diagnosis and management, so every healthcare professional is prepared to deal with such emergencies. The rationale of this updated position document is the need to keep guidance aligned with the current state of the art of knowledge in anaphylaxis management. The World Allergy Organization (WAO) anaphylaxis guidelines were published in 2011, and the current guidance adopts their major indications, incorporating some novel changes. Intramuscular epinephrine (adrenaline) continues to be the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis. Nevertheless, its use remains suboptimal. After an anaphylaxis occurrence, patients should be referred to a specialist to assess the potential cause and to be educated on prevention of recurrences and self-management. The limited availability of epinephrine auto-injectors remains a major problem in many countries, as well as their affordability for some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, and ARADyAL research network, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio J. Ansotegui
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Hospital Quironsalud Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yehia El-Gamal
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Unit, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Stanley Fineman
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mario Geller
- Division of Medicine, Academy of Medicine of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Paul A. Greenberger
- Division of Allergy-Immunology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mario Sanchez Borges
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad and Clinica El Ávila, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Gianenrico Senna
- Asthma Center and Allergy Unit, Verona University and General Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Luciana Kase Tanno
- Hospital Sírio Libanês, Brazil andUniversity Hospital of Montpellier, São Paulo, Montpellier, and Sorbonne Université, INSERM Paris, France, and WHO Collaborating Centre on Scientific Classification Support Montpellier, and WHO ICD-11 Medical and Scientific Advisory Committee Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bernard Y. Thong
- Department of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Paul J. Turner
- National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Charite-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|