1
|
Li M, Kurahashi AM, Kawaguchi S, Siemens I, Sirianni G, Myers J. When words are your scalpel, what and how information is exchanged may be differently salient to assessors. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024. [PMID: 38850193 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Variable assessments of learner performances can occur when different assessors determine different elements to be differently important or salient. How assessors determine the importance of performance elements has historically been thought to occur idiosyncratically and thus be amenable to assessor training interventions. More recently, a main source of variation found among assessors was two underlying factors that were differently emphasised: medical expertise and interpersonal skills. This gave legitimacy to the theory that different interpretations of the same performance may represent multiple truths. A faculty development activity introducing assessors to entrustable professional activities in which they estimated a learner's level of readiness for entrustment provided an opportunity to qualitatively explore assessor variation in the context of an interaction and in a setting in which interpersonal skills are highly valued. METHODS Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we explored variation in assessment processes among a group of palliative medicine assessors who completed a simulated direct observation and assessment of the same learner interaction. RESULTS Despite identifying similar learner strengths and areas for improvement, the estimated level of readiness for entrustment varied substantially among assessors. Those who estimated the learner as not yet ready for entrustment seemed to prioritise what information was exchanged and viewed missed information as performance gaps. Those who estimated the learner as ready for entrustment seemed to prioritise how information was exchanged and viewed the same missed information as personal style differences or appropriate clinical judgement. When presented with a summary, assessors expressed surprise and concern about the variation. CONCLUSION A main source of variation among our assessors was the differential salience of performance elements that align with medical expertise and interpersonal skills. These data support the theory that when assessing an interaction, differential salience for these two factors may be an important and perhaps inevitable source of assessor variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Li
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Sarah Kawaguchi
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Isaac Siemens
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Giovanna Sirianni
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeff Myers
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holmboe ES, Osman NY, Murphy CM, Kogan JR. The Urgency of Now: Rethinking and Improving Assessment Practices in Medical Education Programs. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2023; 98:S37-S49. [PMID: 37071705 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Assessment is essential to professional development. Assessment provides the information needed to give feedback, support coaching and the creation of individualized learning plans, inform progress decisions, determine appropriate supervision levels, and, most importantly, help ensure patients and families receive high-quality, safe care in the training environment. While the introduction of competency-based medical education has catalyzed advances in assessment, much work remains to be done. First, becoming a physician (or other health professional) is primarily a developmental process, and assessment programs must be designed using a developmental and growth mindset. Second, medical education programs must have integrated programs of assessment that address the interconnected domains of implicit, explicit and structural bias. Third, improving programs of assessment will require a systems-thinking approach. In this paper, the authors first address these overarching issues as key principles that must be embraced so that training programs may optimize assessment to ensure all learners achieve desired medical education outcomes. The authors then explore specific needs in assessment and provide suggestions to improve assessment practices. This paper is by no means inclusive of all medical education assessment challenges or possible solutions. However, there is a wealth of current assessment research and practice that medical education programs can use to improve educational outcomes and help reduce the harmful effects of bias. The authors' goal is to help improve and guide innovation in assessment by catalyzing further conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S Holmboe
- E.S. Holmboe is chief, Research, Milestones Development and Evaluation, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0108-6021
| | - Nora Y Osman
- N.Y. Osman is associate professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, and director of undergraduate medical education, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3542-1262
| | - Christina M Murphy
- C.M. Murphy is a fourth-year medical student and president, Medical Student Government at Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3966-5264
| | - Jennifer R Kogan
- J.R. Kogan is associate dean, Student Success and Professional Development, and professor of medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8426-9506
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smirnova A, Chahine S, Milani C, Schuh A, Sebok-Syer SS, Swartz JL, Wilhite JA, Kalet A, Durning SJ, Lombarts KM, van der Vleuten CP, Schumacher DJ. Using Resident-Sensitive Quality Measures Derived From Electronic Health Record Data to Assess Residents' Performance in Pediatric Emergency Medicine. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2023; 98:367-375. [PMID: 36351056 PMCID: PMC9944759 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Traditional quality metrics do not adequately represent the clinical work done by residents and, thus, cannot be used to link residency training to health care quality. This study aimed to determine whether electronic health record (EHR) data can be used to meaningfully assess residents' clinical performance in pediatric emergency medicine using resident-sensitive quality measures (RSQMs). METHOD EHR data for asthma and bronchiolitis RSQMs from Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, a quaternary children's hospital, between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2019, were analyzed by ranking residents based on composite scores calculated using raw, unadjusted, and case-mix adjusted latent score models, with lower percentiles indicating a lower quality of care and performance. Reliability and associations between the scores produced by the 3 scoring models were compared. Resident and patient characteristics associated with performance in the highest and lowest tertiles and changes in residents' rank after case-mix adjustments were also identified. RESULTS 274 residents and 1,891 individual encounters of bronchiolitis patients aged 0-1 as well as 270 residents and 1,752 individual encounters of asthmatic patients aged 2-21 were included in the analysis. The minimum reliability requirement to create a composite score was met for asthma data (α = 0.77), but not bronchiolitis (α = 0.17). The asthma composite scores showed high correlations ( r = 0.90-0.99) between raw, latent, and adjusted composite scores. After case-mix adjustments, residents' absolute percentile rank shifted on average 10 percentiles. Residents who dropped by 10 or more percentiles were likely to be more junior, saw fewer patients, cared for less acute and younger patients, or had patients with a longer emergency department stay. CONCLUSIONS For some clinical areas, it is possible to use EHR data, adjusted for patient complexity, to meaningfully assess residents' clinical performance and identify opportunities for quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Smirnova
- A. Smirnova is clinical assistant professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and adjunct assistant professor, Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4491-3007
| | - Saad Chahine
- S. Chahine is associate professor of measurement and assessment, Faculty of Education, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-773X
| | - Christina Milani
- C. Milani is clinical research assistant, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abigail Schuh
- A. Schuh is associate professor of pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6422-2361
| | - Stefanie S. Sebok-Syer
- S.S. Sebok-Syer is assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3572-5971
| | - Jordan L. Swartz
- J.L. Swartz is clinical associate professor, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, and director of clinical informatics, Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey A. Wilhite
- J.A. Wilhite is senior research coordinator, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4096-8473
| | - Adina Kalet
- A. Kalet is professor and Steven and Shelagh Roell Chair, Robert D. and Patricia P. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-0223
| | - Steven J. Durning
- S.J. Durning is professor and vice chair, Department of Medicine, and director, Center for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5223-1597
| | - Kiki M.J.M.H. Lombarts
- K.M.J.M.H. Lombarts is professor of professional performance, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6167-0620
| | - Cees P.M. van der Vleuten
- C.P.M. van der Vleuten is professor of education, Department of Educational Development and Research. Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-3119
| | - Daniel J. Schumacher
- D.J. Schumacher is professor of pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center/University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5507-8452
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kou M, Baghdassarian A, Khanna K, Jamal N, Carney M, Fein DM, Kim I, Langhan ML, Rose JA, Zuckerbraun NS, Roskind CG. Guiding Fellows to Independent Practice: Current Trends in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow Supervision. Pediatr Emerg Care 2022; 38:517-520. [PMID: 35353795 DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000002676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies highlight the importance of physician readiness to practice beyond graduate training. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandates that pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows be prepared for independent practice by allowing "progressive responsibility for patient care." Prior unpublished surveys of program directors (PDs) indicate variability in approaches to provide opportunities for more independent practice during fellowship training. OBJECTIVES The aims of the study were to describe practices within PEM fellowship programs allowing fellows to work without direct supervision and to identify any barriers to independent practice in training. DESIGN/METHODS An anonymous electronic survey of PEM fellowship PDs was performed. Survey items were developed using an iterative modified Delphi process and pilot tested. Close-ended survey responses and demographic variables were summarized with descriptive statistics. Responses to open-ended survey items were reviewed and categorized by theme. RESULTS Seventy two of 84 PDs (88%) responded to the survey; however, not all surveys were completed. Of the 68 responses to whether fellows could work without direct supervision (as defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) during some part of their training, 31 (45.6%) reported that fellows did have this opportunity. In most programs, clinical independence was conditional on specific measures including the number of clinical hours completed, milestone achievement, and approval by the clinical competency committee. Reported barriers to fellow practice without direct oversight included both regulatory and economic constraints. CONCLUSIONS Current training practices that provide PEM fellows with conditional clinical independence are variable. Future work should aim to determine best practices of entrustment, identify ideal transition points, and mitigate barriers to graduated responsibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kajal Khanna
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Nazreen Jamal
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Daniel M Fein
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Children's Hospital at Montefiore, New York City, NY
| | - In Kim
- University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | | | - Jerri A Rose
- UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lam AC, Tang B, Lalwani A, Verma AA, Wong BM, Razak F, Ginsburg S. Methodology paper for the General Medicine Inpatient Initiative Medical Education Database (GEMINI MedED): a retrospective cohort study of internal medicine resident case-mix, clinical care and patient outcomes. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062264. [PMID: 36153026 PMCID: PMC9511606 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unwarranted variation in patient care among physicians is associated with negative patient outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Care variation likely also exists for resident physicians. Despite the global movement towards outcomes-based and competency-based medical education, current assessment strategies in residency do not routinely incorporate clinical outcomes. The widespread use of electronic health records (EHRs) may enable the implementation of in-training assessments that incorporate clinical care and patient outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The General Medicine Inpatient Initiative Medical Education Database (GEMINI MedED) is a retrospective cohort study of senior residents (postgraduate year 2/3) enrolled in the University of Toronto Internal Medicine (IM) programme between 1 April 2010 and 31 December 2020. This study focuses on senior IM residents and patients they admit overnight to four academic hospitals. Senior IM residents are responsible for overseeing all overnight admissions; thus, care processes and outcomes for these clinical encounters can be at least partially attributed to the care they provide. Call schedules from each hospital, which list the date, location and senior resident on-call, will be used to link senior residents to EHR data of patients admitted during their on-call shifts. Patient data will be derived from the GEMINI database, which contains administrative (eg, demographic and disposition) and clinical data (eg, laboratory and radiological investigation results) for patients admitted to IM at the four academic hospitals. Overall, this study will examine three domains of resident practice: (1) case-mix variation across residents, hospitals and academic year, (2) resident-sensitive quality measures (EHR-derived metrics that are partially attributable to resident care) and (3) variations in patient outcomes across residents and factors that contribute to such variation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION GEMINI MedED was approved by the University of Toronto Ethics Board (RIS#39339). Results from this study will be presented in academic conferences and peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Cl Lam
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brandon Tang
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anushka Lalwani
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amol A Verma
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian M Wong
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fahad Razak
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shiphra Ginsburg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Respirology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Holmboe ES, Kogan JR. Will Any Road Get You There? Examining Warranted and Unwarranted Variation in Medical Education. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2022; 97:1128-1136. [PMID: 35294414 PMCID: PMC9311475 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Undergraduate and graduate medical education have long embraced uniqueness and variability in curricular and assessment approaches. Some of this variability is justified (warranted or necessary variation), but a substantial portion represents unwarranted variation. A primary tenet of outcomes-based medical education is ensuring that all learners acquire essential competencies to be publicly accountable to meet societal needs. Unwarranted variation in curricular and assessment practices contributes to suboptimal and variable educational outcomes and, by extension, risks graduates delivering suboptimal health care quality. Medical education can use lessons from the decades of study on unwarranted variation in health care as part of efforts to continuously improve the quality of training programs. To accomplish this, medical educators will first need to recognize the difference between warranted and unwarranted variation in both clinical care and educational practices. Addressing unwarranted variation will require cooperation and collaboration between multiple levels of the health care and educational systems using a quality improvement mindset. These efforts at improvement should acknowledge that some aspects of variability are not scientifically informed and do not support desired outcomes or societal needs. This perspective examines the correlates of unwarranted variation of clinical care in medical education and the need to address the interdependency of unwarranted variation occurring between clinical and educational practices. The authors explore the challenges of variation across multiple levels: community, institution, program, and individual faculty members. The article concludes with recommendations to improve medical education by embracing the principles of continuous quality improvement to reduce the harmful effect of unwarranted variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S. Holmboe
- E.S. Holmboe is chief, research, milestones development, and evaluation, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0108-6021
| | - Jennifer R. Kogan
- J.R. Kogan is associate dean, Student Success and Professional Development, and professor of medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8426-9506
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chan TM, Dowling S, Tastad K, Chin A, Thoma B. Integrating training, practice, and reflection within a new model for Canadian medical licensure: a concept paper prepared for the Medical Council of Canada. CANADIAN MEDICAL EDUCATION JOURNAL 2022; 13:68-81. [PMID: 36091730 PMCID: PMC9441128 DOI: 10.36834/cmej.73717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
In 2020 the Medical Council of Canada created a task force to make recommendations on the modernization of its practices for granting licensure to medical trainees. This task force solicited papers on this topic from subject matter experts. As outlined within this Concept Paper, our proposal would shift licensure away from the traditional focus on high-stakes summative exams in a way that integrates training, clinical practice, and reflection. Specifically, we propose a model of graduated licensure that would have three stages including: a trainee license for trainees that have demonstrated adequate medical knowledge to begin training as a closely supervised resident, a transition to practice license for trainees that have compiled a reflective educational portfolio demonstrating the clinical competence required to begin independent practice with limitations and support, and a fully independent license for unsupervised practice for attendings that have demonstrated competence through a reflective portfolio of clinical analytics. This proposal was reviewed by a diverse group of 30 trainees, practitioners, and administrators in medical education. Their feedback was analyzed and summarized to provide an overview of the likely reception that this proposal would receive from the medical education community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa M Chan
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University
- Division of Education & Innovation, Department of Medicine
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University; McMaster Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERIT) program
- Office of Continuing Professional Development; Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University
| | - Shawn Dowling
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
| | - Kara Tastad
- Royal College Emergency Medicine Training Program, University of Toronto
| | - Alvin Chin
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University
| | - Brent Thoma
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kerth JL, van Treel L, Bosse HM. The Use of Entrustable Professional Activities in Pediatric Postgraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Acad Pediatr 2022; 22:21-28. [PMID: 34256178 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) provide a framework to make judgments of trainees' abilities in several settings including postgraduate medical education. No systematic review of the role of EPAs in pediatrics has yet been performed. OBJECTIVES In our systematic review, we sought to determine the use of EPAs in pediatrics to identify research gaps, summarize and discuss evidence relating to the development, implementation, and assessment. DATA SOURCES Medline, Scopus, PsycINFO, MedEdPortal, and Web of Science. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Two independent reviewers used a structured screening protocol in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and Association for Medical Education in Europe's guide for systematic reviews to include all articles reporting on EPAs in postgraduate medical education and pediatrics in particular. There were no restrictions due to language, study design, or participants. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS Data on development, implementation, feasibility, acceptance, and assessment of EPAs were extracted and analyzed by the 2 independent researchers. RESULTS Twenty-eight articles published between 2014 and 2020 were included in the review. We found an increase in publications and a notable shift from descriptions of development processes toward aspects beyond development, ie, implementation, feasibility, acceptance/perception, and assessment. LIMITATIONS Studies from non-English-speaking countries are scarce which might lead to an inaccurate representation of actual international practice. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS We provide a comprehensive overview of EPAs in pediatrics to guide future curriculum developers in collaborative development, implementation and assessment of EPAs in pediatric postgraduate medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janna-Lina Kerth
- Department of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology, and Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Lena van Treel
- Department of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology, and Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hans Martin Bosse
- Department of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology, and Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ten Cate O, Balmer DF, Caretta-Weyer H, Hatala R, Hennus MP, West DC. Entrustable Professional Activities and Entrustment Decision Making: A Development and Research Agenda for the Next Decade. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2021; 96:S96-S104. [PMID: 34183610 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
To establish a research and development agenda for Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for the coming decade, the authors, all active in this area of investigation, reviewed recent research papers, seeking recommendations for future research. They pooled their knowledge and experience to identify 3 levels of potential research and development: the micro level of learning and teaching; the meso level of institutions, programs, and specialty domains; and the macro level of regional, national, and international dynamics. Within these levels, the authors categorized their recommendations for research and development. The authors identified 14 discrete themes, each including multiple questions or issues for potential exploration, that range from foundational and conceptual to practical. Much research to date has focused on a variety of issues regarding development and early implementation of EPAs. Future research should focus on large-scale implementation of EPAs to support competency-based medical education (CBME) and on its consequences at the 3 levels. In addition, emerging from the implementation phase, the authors call for rigorous studies focusing on conceptual issues. These issues include the nature of entrustment decisions and their relationship with education and learner progress and the use of EPAs across boundaries of training phases, disciplines and professions, including continuing professional development. International studies evaluating the value of EPAs across countries are another important consideration. Future studies should also remain alert for unintended consequences of the use of EPAs. EPAs were conceptualized to support CBME in its endeavor to improve outcomes of education and patient care, prompting creation of this agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olle Ten Cate
- O. ten Cate is professor of medical education and senior scientist, Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6379-8780
| | - Dorene F Balmer
- D.F. Balmer is associate professor, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6805-4062
| | - Holly Caretta-Weyer
- H. Caretta-Weyer is assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9783-5797
| | - Rose Hatala
- R. Hatala is professor, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-2590
| | - Marije P Hennus
- M.P. Hennus is a pediatric intensivist and program director, pediatric intensive care fellowship, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1508-0456
| | - Daniel C West
- D.C. West is professor and senior director of medical education, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0909-4213
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thoma B, Caretta-Weyer H, Schumacher DJ, Warm E, Hall AK, Hamstra SJ, Cavalcanti R, Chan TM. Becoming a deliberately developmental organization: Using competency based assessment data for organizational development. MEDICAL TEACHER 2021; 43:801-809. [PMID: 34033512 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2021.1925100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Medical education is situated within health care and educational organizations that frequently lag in their use of data to learn, develop, and improve performance. How might we leverage competency-based medical education (CBME) assessment data at the individual, program, and system levels, with the goal of redefining CBME from an initiative that supports the development of physicians to one that also fosters the development of the faculty, administrators, and programs within our organizations? In this paper we review the Deliberately Developmental Organization (DDO) framework proposed by Robert Kegan and Lisa Lahey, a theoretical framework that explains how organizations can foster the development of their people. We then describe the DDO's conceptual alignment with CBME and outline how CBME assessment data could be used to spur the transformation of health care and educational organizations into digitally integrated DDOs. A DDO-oriented use of CBME assessment data will require intentional investment into both the digitalization of assessment data and the development of the people within our organizations. By reframing CBME in this light, we hope that educational and health care leaders will see their investments in CBME as an opportunity to spur the evolution of a developmental culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent Thoma
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Holly Caretta-Weyer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Daniel J Schumacher
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center/University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Eric Warm
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Andrew K Hall
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Stanley J Hamstra
- Milestones Research and Evaluation, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, IL, USA
- Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Medical Education, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rodrigo Cavalcanti
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- HoPingKong Centre for Excellence in Education and Practice, UHN, Toronto, Canada
| | - Teresa M Chan
- Program for Faculty Development, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- McMaster program for Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERIT), Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Touchie C, Kinnear B, Schumacher D, Caretta-Weyer H, Hamstra SJ, Hart D, Gruppen L, Ross S, Warm E, Ten Cate O. On the validity of summative entrustment decisions. MEDICAL TEACHER 2021; 43:780-787. [PMID: 34020576 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2021.1925642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Health care revolves around trust. Patients are often in a position that gives them no other choice than to trust the people taking care of them. Educational programs thus have the responsibility to develop physicians who can be trusted to deliver safe and effective care, ultimately making a final decision to entrust trainees to graduate to unsupervised practice. Such entrustment decisions deserve to be scrutinized for their validity. This end-of-training entrustment decision is arguably the most important one, although earlier entrustment decisions, for smaller units of professional practice, should also be scrutinized for their validity. Validity of entrustment decisions implies a defensible argument that can be analyzed in components that together support the decision. According to Kane, building a validity argument is a process designed to support inferences of scoring, generalization across observations, extrapolation to new instances, and implications of the decision. A lack of validity can be caused by inadequate evidence in terms of, according to Messick, content, response process, internal structure (coherence) and relationship to other variables, and in misinterpreted consequences. These two leading frameworks (Kane and Messick) in educational and psychological testing can be well applied to summative entrustment decision-making. The authors elaborate the types of questions that need to be answered to arrive at defensible, well-argued summative decisions regarding performance to provide a grounding for high-quality safe patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Touchie
- Medical Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada
- The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Benjamin Kinnear
- Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine/Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Daniel Schumacher
- Pediatrics, Hospital Medical Center/University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Holly Caretta-Weyer
- Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Stanley J Hamstra
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Danielle Hart
- Emergency Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare and the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Larry Gruppen
- Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Shelley Ross
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Eric Warm
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Olle Ten Cate
- Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Young JQ, Frank JR, Holmboe ES. Advancing Workplace-Based Assessment in Psychiatric Education: Key Design and Implementation Issues. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2021; 44:317-332. [PMID: 34049652 DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
With the adoption of competency-based medical education, assessment has shifted from traditional classroom domains of knows and knows how to the workplace domain of doing. This workplace-based assessment has 2 purposes; assessment of learning (summative feedback) and the assessment for learning (formative feedback). What the trainee does becomes the basis for identifying growth edges and determining readiness for advancement and ultimately independent practice. High-quality workplace-based assessment programs require thoughtful choices about the framework of assessment, the tools themselves, the platforms used, and the contexts in which the assessments take place, with an emphasis on direct observation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Q Young
- Department of Psychiatry, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell and, Zucker Hillside Hospital at Northwell Health, 75-59 263rd Street, Kaufman Building, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA.
| | - Jason R Frank
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 774 Echo Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K15 5NB, Canada
| | - Eric S Holmboe
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, ACGME, 401 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kinnear B, Kelleher M, Sall D, Schauer DP, Warm EJ, Kachelmeyer A, Martini A, Schumacher DJ. Development of Resident-Sensitive Quality Measures for Inpatient General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:1271-1278. [PMID: 33105001 PMCID: PMC8131459 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06320-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graduate medical education (GME) training has long-lasting effects on patient care quality. Despite this, few GME programs use clinical care measures as part of resident assessment. Furthermore, there is no gold standard to identify clinical care measures that are reflective of resident care. Resident-sensitive quality measures (RSQMs), defined as "measures that are meaningful in patient care and are most likely attributable to resident care," have been developed using consensus methodology and piloted in pediatric emergency medicine. However, this approach has not been tested in internal medicine (IM). OBJECTIVE To develop RSQMs for a general internal medicine (GIM) inpatient residency rotation using previously described consensus methods. DESIGN The authors used two consensus methods, nominal group technique (NGT) and a subsequent Delphi method, to generate RSQMs for a GIM inpatient rotation. RSQMs were generated for specific clinical conditions found on a GIM inpatient rotation, as well as for general care on a GIM ward. PARTICIPANTS NGT participants included nine IM and medicine-pediatrics (MP) residents and six IM and MP faculty members. The Delphi group included seven IM and MP residents and seven IM and MP faculty members. MAIN MEASURES The number and description of RSQMs generated during this process. KEY RESULTS Consensus methods resulted in 89 RSQMs with the following breakdown by condition: GIM general care-21, diabetes mellitus-16, hyperkalemia-14, COPD-13, hypertension-11, pneumonia-10, and hypokalemia-4. All RSQMs were process measures, with 48% relating to documentation and 51% relating to orders. Fifty-eight percent of RSQMs were related to the primary admitting diagnosis, while 42% could also be related to chronic comorbidities that require management during an admission. CONCLUSIONS Consensus methods resulted in 89 RSQMs for a GIM inpatient service. While all RSQMs were process measures, they may still hold value in learner assessment, formative feedback, and program evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Kinnear
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, , Cincinnati, OH, USA. .,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| | - Matthew Kelleher
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, , Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Dana Sall
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Daniel P Schauer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Eric J Warm
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Andrea Kachelmeyer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, , Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Abigail Martini
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, , Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Daniel J Schumacher
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, , Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ten Cate O, Carraccio C, Damodaran A, Gofton W, Hamstra SJ, Hart DE, Richardson D, Ross S, Schultz K, Warm EJ, Whelan AJ, Schumacher DJ. Entrustment Decision Making: Extending Miller's Pyramid. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2021; 96:199-204. [PMID: 33060399 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000003800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The iconic Miller's pyramid, proposed in 1989, characterizes 4 levels of assessment in medical education ("knows," "knows how," "shows how," "does"). The frame work has created a worldwide awareness of the need to have different assessment approaches for different expected outcomes of education and training. At the time, Miller stressed the innovative use of simulation techniques, geared at the third level ("shows how"); however, the "does" level, assessment in the workplace, remained a largely uncharted area. In the 30 years since Miller's conference address and seminal paper, much attention has been devoted to procedures and instrument development for workplace-based assessment. With the rise of competency-based medical education (CBME), the need for approaches to determine the competence of learners in the clinical workplace has intensified. The proposal to use entrustable professional activities as a framework of assessment and the related entrustment decision making for clinical responsibilities at designated levels of supervision of learners (e.g., direct, indirect, and no supervision) has become a recent critical innovation of CBME at the "does" level. Analysis of the entrustment concept reveals that trust in a learner to work without assistance or supervision encompasses more than the observation of "doing" in practice (the "does" level). It implies the readiness of educators to accept the inherent risks involved in health care tasks and the judgment that the learner has enough experience to act appropriately when facing unexpected challenges. Earning this qualification requires qualities beyond observed proficiency, which led the authors to propose adding the level "trusted" to the apex of Miller's pyramid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olle Ten Cate
- O. ten Cate is professor of medical education and senior scientist, Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6379-8780
| | - Carol Carraccio
- C. Carraccio was vice president of competency-based assessment, American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, at the time of writing; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5473-8914
| | - Arvin Damodaran
- A. Damodaran is rheumatologist and director of medical education, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5067-9483
| | - Wade Gofton
- W. Gofton is professor of surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0438-1659
| | - Stanley J Hamstra
- S.J. Hamstra is research consultant, milestone research and evaluation, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois, professor, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and adjunct professor, Department of Medical Education, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-366X
| | - Danielle E Hart
- D.E. Hart is program director, Emergency Medicine, and director of simulation, Interdisciplinary Simulation and Education Center, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Denyse Richardson
- D. Richardson is associate professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Physiatry, and a faculty member, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6113-158X
| | - Shelley Ross
- S. Ross is associate professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9581-3191
| | - Karen Schultz
- K. Schultz is professor and assessment director, Department of Family Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and chair, Certification Process and Assessment Committee, College of Family Physicians of Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-1700
| | - Eric J Warm
- E.J. Warm is Richard W. Vilter Professor of Medicine, director, Internal Medicine Residency Program, and medical director, Resident Ambulatory Practice, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6088-2434
| | - Alison J Whelan
- A.J. Whelan is chief medical education officer, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7661-148X
| | - Daniel J Schumacher
- D.J. Schumacher is associate professor of pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3747-2410
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schumacher DJ, Martini A, Sobolewski B, Carraccio C, Holmboe E, Busari J, Poynter S, van der Vleuten C, Lingard L. Use of Resident-Sensitive Quality Measure Data in Entrustment Decision Making: A Qualitative Study of Clinical Competency Committee Members at One Pediatric Residency. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2020; 95:1726-1735. [PMID: 32324637 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000003435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Resident-sensitive quality measures (RSQMs) are quality measures that are likely performed by an individual resident and are important to care quality for a given illness of interest. This study sought to explore how individual clinical competency committee (CCC) members interpret, use, and prioritize RSQMs alongside traditional assessment data when making a summative entrustment decision. METHOD In this constructivist grounded theory study, 19 members of the pediatric residency CCC at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center were purposively and theoretically sampled between February and July 2019. Participants were provided a deidentified resident assessment portfolio with traditional assessment data (milestone and/or entrustable professional activity ratings as well as narrative comments from 5 rotations) and RSQM performance data for 3 acute, common diagnoses in the pediatric emergency department (asthma, bronchiolitis, and closed head injury) from the emergency medicine rotation. Data collection consisted of 2 phases: (1) observation and think out loud while participants reviewed the portfolio and (2) semistructured interviews to probe participants' reviews. Analysis moved from close readings to coding and theme development, followed by the creation of a model illustrating theme interaction. Data collection and analysis were iterative. RESULTS Five dimensions for how participants interpret, use, and prioritize RSQMs were identified: (1) ability to orient to RSQMs: confusing to self-explanatory, (2) propensity to use RSQMs: reluctant to enthusiastic, (3) RSQM interpretation: requires contextualization to self-evident, (4) RSQMs for assessment decisions: not sticky to sticky, and (5) expectations for residents: potentially unfair to fair to use RSQMs. The interactions among these dimensions generated 3 RSQM data user profiles: eager incorporation, willing incorporation, and disinclined incorporation. CONCLUSIONS Participants used RSQMs to varying extents in their review of resident data and found such data helpful to varying degrees, supporting the inclusion of RSQMs as resident assessment data for CCC review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Schumacher
- D.J. Schumacher is associate professor of pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Abigail Martini
- A. Martini is a clinical research coordinator, Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Brad Sobolewski
- B. Sobolewski is associate professor of pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Carol Carraccio
- C. Carraccio is vice president of competency-based assessment, American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Eric Holmboe
- E. Holmboe is senior vice president for milestones development and evaluation, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jamiu Busari
- J. Busari is associate professor of medical education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sue Poynter
- S. Poynter is professor of pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Cees van der Vleuten
- C. van der Vleuten is professor of education, Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, and scientific director, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lorelei Lingard
- L. Lingard is professor and scientist, Department of Medicine, and director, Center for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|