Craniotomy in sitting position: anesthesiology management

Dynamic Lateral Semisitting Position for Supracerebellar Approaches: Technical Note and Case Series

BACKGROUND

It has always been a matter of debate which position is ideal for the supracerebellar approach. The risk of venous air embolism (VAE) is the major deterrent for surgeons and anesthesiologists, despite the fact that sitting and semisitting positions are commonly used in these operations.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate a reduction on the risk of VAE and tension pneumocephalus throughout the operation period while taking advantages of the semisitting position.

METHODS

In this study, 11 patients with various diagnoses were operated in our department using the supracerebellar approach in the dynamic lateral semisitting position. We used end-tidal carbon dioxide and arterial blood pressure monitoring to detect venous air embolism.

RESULTS

None of the patients had clinically significant VAE in this study. No tension pneumocephalus or major complications were observed. All the patients were extubated safely after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The ideal position, with which to apply the supracerebellar approach, is still a challenge. In our study, we presented an alternative position that has advantages of the sitting and semisitting positions with a lower risk of venous air embolism.

Before the Knife: A Detailed Step-by-Step Description of an Optimized Semi-Sitting Position in Posterior Fossa Surgery

BACKGROUND

In an ample armamentarium in neurosurgery, the semi-sitting position has produced debate regarding its benefits and risks. Although the position is apparently intuitive, many have abandoned its use since its initial inception, because of reported complexity and potential complications, leading to impracticality. However, through standardization, it has been shown not only to be safe but to carry with it many advantages, including less risk of secondary neurovascular injuries and better visualization of the surgical field. As with any surgical technical nuance, the semi-sitting position has advantages and disadvantages that must be weighed before the decision is made to adopt it or not, not only in a case-by-case scenario but also from a departmental standpoint. As we attempt to show, the advantages from a standardized approach for the semi-sitting position in experienced institutions may be more than sufficient to significantly outweigh the disadvantages, making it the preferable option for most, although not all, posterior fossa surgical interventions.

METHODS

In the present study, we aim to elaborate a straightforward narrative of the steps before incision, in an attempt to simplify the complexity of the position, alleviating its disadvantages and exponentially concentrating on its benefits. In nearly 100 steps, we carefully describe the points that culminate with the skin incision, initiating the intraoperative part of the procedure. Each step, therefore, is detailed in full, not in an effort to create a strict manual of the semi-sitting position but rather to facilitate understanding and put the technique into effect in a real-life scenario, thus simplifying what some depict as complex and time consuming.

CONCLUSIONS

Although several of the steps described are also relevant and integral parts of other surgical positioning, we intend to create a protocol, in a stepwise fashion, to allow facilitated following, to be easily implemented in departments with different levels of experience. The steps comprise nursing care through to electrophysiologic and anesthesiologic approaches, along with neurosurgical cooperation, making it a team approach, not only to avoid position-related complications but also to optimize preoperative standardization, constructing a safe, efficient, and patient-centered scenario, to set the best possible stage for the next step: the intraoperative part of the intervention.

A Brief Explanation on Surgical Approaches for Treatment of Different Brain Tumors

The main goal of brain tumor surgery is to achieve gross total tumor resection without postoperative complications and permanent new deficits. However, when the lesion is located close or within eloquent brain areas, cranial nerves, and/or major brain vessels, it is imperative to balance the extent of resection with the risk of harming the patient, by following a so-called maximal safe resection philosophy. This view implies a shift from an approach-guided attitude, in which few standard surgical approaches are used to treat almost all intracranial tumors, to a pathology-guided one, with surgical approaches actually tailored to the specific tumor that has to be treated with specific dedicated pre- and intraoperative tools and techniques. In this chapter, the basic principles of the most commonly used neurosurgical approaches in brain tumors surgery are presented and discussed along with an overview on all available modern tools able to improve intraoperative visualization, extent of resection, and postoperative clinical outcome.

[Sitting position in neurosurgery: realizing the risks]

The author discusses potential intraoperative complications following neurosurgical interventions in sitting position: venous air embolism and paradoxical air embolism, postural hypotension, pneumocephalus, cervical flexion neuropathy, positional damage to peripheral nerves and others. Naturally, prevention of these complications is also considered, and the most effective approach is surgery in lying position.

A practical guide to patient position and complication management in neurosurgery: a systematic qualitative review

PURPOSE

Adequate patient positioning is of paramount importance in neurosurgery. Complications related to the position are common and make up for more than 16% of the claims towards anaesthesiologists and neurosurgeons. This paper aims to provide the anaesthesiologist with a practical guide to avoid common pitfalls related to the patient positioning process.

METHOD

We performed a systematic review of the medical literature for the identification, screening, and inclusion of articles. The bibliographic search was conducted on June 1st, 2021 by two of the authors. In this review, we included articles indexed by MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, or Google Scholar.

RESULTS

We retrieved a total of 5706 unique papers from our initial search. However, after the initial screening, 5363 papers were removed is not related to our research leaving a total of 343 papers. We examined the full text of all the 343 articles including 68 of them in the final qualitative analysis.

DISCUSSION

In this review we examine the most common neurosurgical positions: supine, sitting, lateral, park-bench, prone, jack-knife, and knee-chest. For each of them, the proper positioning and related complications are described. Particular attention is given to the prevention and management of these complications, providing a practical guide for clinicians.

Air-embolism in the semi-sitting position for craniotomy: A narrative review with emphasis on a single centers experience

Albeit the semi-sitting position in neurosurgery has been in use for several decades, its application remains controversial in the neurosurgical and neuro-anaesthesia communities. The imminent and most feared risk of the sitting position is air entry into the vascular system due to the negative intravascular pressure leading to potentially life-threatening air embolism with its consequences. Recent advents in neurosurgical (improvement of the operating microscope, employment of intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring) and neuro-anaesthesia care (new anaesthetics, advanced monitoring modalities) have significantly impacted the approach to these surgeries. Vigilant intra-operative observation by an experienced team and peri-operative patient management guided by institutional protocols improves the safety profile of these surgeries. This review outlines the workflow and protocols used in our institution for all cases of semi-sitting position for skull base neurosurgery.

[Intraoperative vascular air embolism : Evidence for risks, diagnostics and treatment]

The entry of gases into the vascular system is called vascular air embolism (VAE). The blocking of the pulmonary circulation by VAE can lead to fulminant right-sided heart failure and cardiocirculatory arrest. A VAE can occur at any time if there is an open connection between the environment and a venous vessel with subatmospheric pressure. This situation occurs during ear nose throat surgery, hip surgery, surgery of the lesser pelvis or breast surgery, if the surgical field is above the level of the heart; however, a VAE can also occur during routine tasks, such as insertion or removal of a central venous catheter or during endoscopic procedures with the insufflation of gas.Because during these procedures VAE is not the main focus of the anesthesia or surgery personnel, in such situations its sudden unexpected occurrence can have severe consequences. In contrast, in cardiac surgery or neurosurgery the risk of intraoperative VAE is much better known. In procedures with a higher risk of a clinically relevant VAE, a patent foramen ovale should be ruled out by preoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Intraoperatively TEE is the most sensitive procedure not only to detect a VAE but also to visualize the clinical expression, e.g. acute right heart overload.The avoidance of an initial and repeated air embolism is the primary measure to minimize the incidence and severity of VAE.Intraoperatively the following measures should be undertaken: excellent communication between anesthesia and surgery personnel with predetermined actions, maintenance of normal volume, patient positioning with minimal difference in height between heart and head, state of the art surgical technique with closure of potential air entry sites, sufficient detection of air by TEE, repeated jugular vein compression during neurosurgery, intraoperative Trendelenburg positioning of the patient during persisting or clinically evident VAE, differentiated adjustment of ventilatory settings and catecholamine treatment, aspiration of the blood-air mixture (air lock) at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium through a large bore central venous line and keeping check of the coagulation status.

Estimation of the head elevation angle that causes clinically important venous air embolism in a semi-sitting position for neurosurgery: a retrospective observational study

Introduction:

The benefits of a sitting position for neurosurgery involving the posterior fossa remain controversial. The main concern is the risk of venous air embolism (VAE). A recent study showed that the rate of VAE was higher when the head was elevated to 45° than when it was elevated to 30°. However, the degree of head elevation that causes clinically important VAE is unclear. The purpose of this study was to estimate the head elevation angle at which the probability of VAE is 50% by using EtCO₂ monitoring to detect of VAE.

Methods:

The anesthesia records of 23 patients who underwent neurosurgery in a sitting position were reviewed retrospectively. Intraoperative ventilation was set to maintain EtCO₂ at approximately 38-42 mmHg. The head elevation angle in each case was determined from a photograph taken by the anesthesiologist or brain surgeon. Nineteen of the 23 cases had photographs available that contained a horizontal reference in the background. Seven cases were treated as VAE during the operation. Six of these cases met the criteria for VAE in this study. Data analysis was performed on a total of 18 patients. The angle between the line connecting the hip joint and the shoulder joint and the horizontal reference was obtained by ImageJ software. Logistic regression was performed using the Python programming language to determine the head elevation angle at which the probability of air embolism was 50%.

Results:

The decision boundary in the logistic regression was 35.7°. This head elevation angle was the boundary where the probability of VAE was 50%.

Conclusion:

The angle of head elevation that caused clinically important VAE was estimated to be 35.7°.

The impact of transesophageal echocardiography based protocol for management of adults in the sitting position on the incidence of clinically significant venous air embolism

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) – based protocol for management of adults in the sitting position during elective neurosurgical interventions on the incidence of clinically significant venous air embolism (VAE). Material and Methods ― The study involved 155 adult neurosurgery patients (70 in prospective group and 85 in retrospective group). Surgery in both groups was done in the sitting position. In the prospective group TEE-based protocol was used. Retrospective group served as control. The primary endpoint was considered to be a decrease in the frequency of clinically significant VAE in the prospective group in comparison with the retrospective one. In the prospective group, VAE with Tuebingen grade 3-5 was considered clinically significant. The PFO incidence and severity and the effect of the number of episodes of VAE per case on its maximum severity during surgery were also analyzed. Any complication in the postoperative period believed to be associated with the position of the patient on the table during the surgery was recorded. Results ― The incidence of the clinically significant VAE in the retrospective group was 23.5% (95% CI 15-34) and was 16.4% higher than the frequency in the prospective group (chi-square=7.6197, df=1, p=0.005). 50% (95% CI 38-62) of patients in prospective group developed VAE during surgery. In 16 cases, the number of episodes was more than one. The number of episodes of VAE in the observation was reliably associated with the maximum severity of VAE during the observation (Z=4.11; p<0.001). A moderate strength relationship was determined between them (SomersDelta=0.43; 95% CI 0.17-0.7). Not a single case of paradoxical air embolism was detected in a series of observations. None of the patients has got a neurological deficit or cardiopulmonary complications associated with the position on the surgical table in the postoperative period. Pneumocephalus was found in 100% of cases on head computed tomography, which, however, did not need surgical treatment. PFO in the prospective group was detected in 62% (95% CI 52-73) of patients. In 25% (95% CI 16-35), shunting was significant. A large PFO without Valsalva maneuver was detected in 12.5% (95% CI 6-21) of cases. Conclusion ― The use of the TEE-based protocol for the management of adult patients in a sitting position during elective neurosurgical interventions can reduce the incidence of clinically significant VAE.

The Effects of Patient Positioning on the Outcome During Posterior Cranial Fossa and Pineal Region Surgery

Background: Surgery on posterior cranial fossa (PCF) and pineal region (PR) carries the risks of intraoperative trauma to the brainstem structures, blood loss, venous air embolism (VAE), cardiovascular instability, and other complications. Success in surgery, among other factors, depends on selecting the optimal patient position. Our objective was to find associations between patient positioning, incidence of intraoperative complications, neurological recovery, and the extent of surgery.

Methods: This observational study was conducted in two medical centers: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (USA) and The Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute (Russian Federation). Patients were distributed in two groups based on the surgical position: sitting position (SP) or horizontal position (HP). The inclusion criteria were adult patients with space-occupying or vascular lesions requiring an open PCF or PR surgery. Perioperative variables were recorded and summarized using descriptive statistics. The post-treatment survival, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction were assessed at 3 months.

Results: A total of 109 patients were included in the study: 53 in SP and 56 in HP. A higher proportion of patients in the HP patients had >300 mL intraoperative blood loss compared to the SP group (32 vs. 13%; p = 0.0250). Intraoperative VAE was diagnosed in 40% of SP patients vs. 0% in the HP group (p < 0.0001). However, trans-esophageal echocardiographic (TEE) monitoring was more common in the SP group. Intraoperative hypotension was documented in 28% of SP patients compared to 9% in HP group (p = 0.0126). A higher proportion of SP patients experienced a new neurological symptom compared to the HP group (49 vs. 29%; p = 0.0281). The extent of tumor resection, postoperative 3-months survival, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction were not different in the groups.

Conclusions: The SP was associated with, less intraoperative bleeding, increased intraoperative hypotension, VAE, and postoperative neurological deficit. More HP patients experienced macroglossia and increased blood loss. At 3 months, there was no difference of parameters between the two groups.

Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: registration number NCT03364283.

[Surgery of posterior cranial fossa tumors in children in the prone position. The surgical technique features]

Posterior cranial fossa tumors are the most common neuro-oncological pathology of childhood. More than half of them are located along the midline, occupying the cerebellar vermis and 4th ventricle cavity. Historically, most of these tumors were operated on with the patient in sitting position. This tendency has significantly changed in the last 30 years. For example, 95% of all operations in Japan are now performed with the patient in lying position; for the US and Europe, these figures are 80 and 60%, respectively. This global tendency of switching to the lying position is mainly associated with a high risk of venous air embolism in the sitting position. In the period between 1999 and 2013, the first author used only the sitting position for resection of PCF tumors. During this period, he performed 606 operations. In patients with large/giant tumors (usually, these were piloid astrocytomas with cysts), the surgeon often faced the problem of excessive retraction of the cerebellum and rupture of the bridging veins, sometimes outside the surgical approach area. This situation led either to massive blood loss or to venous air embolism.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Therefore, beginning at 2013, we started to selectively use the prone position in cases of hemispheric piloid astrocytomas of the cerebellum. This initial experience allowed us to assess the surgical features of the procedure and use the experience in more complex interventions. Since the middle of 2016, given the tendency of using key-hole approaches, we have increasingly used the prone position in surgery of PCF tumors, sometimes removing tumors even through the burr hole. Since the end of 2016, we have routinely used the prone position for various tumors of the 4th ventricle. Between November 2016 and September 2017, the first author performed 113 surgeries for PCF tumors in children; of these, only 4 operations were performed in the sitting position. Thus, in less than a year, the prone position has become the main one in surgery for all PCF tumors in our practice. In this article, we would like to share our practical suggestions both about using the prone position and about its advantages and disadvantages that should be considered by a doctor who does not have experience of PCF surgery with the patient in prone position.

The semisitting position: analysis of the risks and surgical outcomes in a contemporary series of 425 adult patients undergoing cranial surgery

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the incidence of the primary complications related to positioning or surgery and their impact on neurological outcome in a consecutive series of patients undergoing elective surgery in the semisitting position.

METHODS

The authors prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data from adult patients undergoing elective surgery in the semisitting position for a cranial disease. Patients were managed perioperatively according to a standard institutional protocol, a standardized stepwise positioning, and surgical maneuvers to decrease the risk of venous air embolism (VAE) and other complications. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Neurointensive care unit (NICU) length of stay (LOS) and hospital LOS were the intermediate endpoints. Neurological outcome was the primary endpoint as determined by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-five patients were included in the analysis. VAE occurred in 90 cases (21%) and it made no significant statistical difference in NICU LOS, hospital LOS, and neurological outcome. No complication was directly related to the semisitting position, although 46 patients (11%) experienced at least 1 surgery-related complication and NICU LOS and hospital LOS were significantly prolonged in this group. Neurological outcome was significantly worse for patients with complications (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the presence of intraoperative VAE, the semisitting position was not related to an increased risk of postoperative deficits and can represent a safe additional option for the benefit of specific surgical and patient needs.

Vascular air embolism: A silent hazard to patient safety

PURPOSE

To narratively review published information on prevention, detection, pathophysiology, and appropriate treatment of vascular air embolism (VAE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register and Google Scholar databases were searched for data published through October 2016. The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for "air embolism" reports (years 2011-2016).

RESULTS

VAE may be introduced through disruption in the integrity of the venous circulation that occurs during insertion, maintenance, or removal of intravenous or central venous catheters. VAE impacts pulmonary circulation, respiratory and cardiac function, systemic inflammation and coagulation, often with serious or fatal consequences. When VAE enters arterial circulation, air emboli affect cerebral blood flow and the central nervous system. New medical devices remove air from intravenous infusions. Early recognition and treatment reduce the clinical sequelae of VAE. An organized team approach to treatment including clinical simulation can facilitate preparedness for VAE. The MAUDE database included 416 injuries and 95 fatalities from VAE. Data from the American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project showed 100% of claims for VAE resulted in a median payment of $325,000.

CONCLUSIONS

VAE is an important and underappreciated complication of surgery, anesthesia and medical procedures.

[Neuroanesthesia]

Anesthesiological challenges during craniotomy result from the anatomically related low compensatory capacity of the intracranial space in response to increased volume and the low ischemic tolerance of brain tissue. The anesthetic agents used should therefore not increase the intracranial volume and improve the ischemic tolerance. An acute life-threatening increase of intracranial pressure can be temporarily treated by hyperventilation until measures, such as osmotherapy and infusion of intravenous anesthetics become effective. During an operation the homeostatic parameters including blood volume, blood pressure, partial pressure of carbon dioxide and oxygen in blood, plasma glucose concentration and core body temperature have to be closely monitored and kept normal (6 Ns). Optimal implementation of anesthesia necessitates a detailed knowledge of the surgical approach and potential complications. Postoperatively, patients should be extubated as soon as possible to closely monitor cognitive function so that potential deterioration can be detected.

Venous air embolus during prone cervical spine fusion: case report

Venous air embolism (VAE) is a known neurosurgical complication classically and most frequently occurring in patients undergoing posterior cranial fossa or cervical spine surgery in a sitting or semi-sitting position. The authors present a case of VAE that occurred during posterior cervical spine surgery in a patient in the prone position, a rare intraoperative complication. The patient was a 65-year-old man who was undergoing a C1-2 fusion for a nonunion of a Type II dens fracture and developed a VAE. While VAE in the prone position is uncommon, it is a neurosurgical complication that may have significant clinical implications both intraoperatively and postoperatively. The aim of this review is 2-fold: 1) to improve the general knowledge of this complication among surgeons and anesthesiologists who may not otherwise suspect air embolism in patients positioned prone for posterior cervical spine operations, and 2) to formulate preventive measures as well as a plan for prompt diagnosis and treatment should this complication occur.

Principles of Neuro-anesthesia in Neurosurgery for Intensive Care Unit Nurses

As neurosurgical interventions and procedures are advancing, so is the specialty of neuro-anesthesia. The neurosurgeon and the neuro-anesthetist are focused on providing each patient with the best possible outcome. Throughout the surgery, the main priorities of the neuro-anesthetist are patient safety, patient well-being, surgical field exposure, and patient positioning. Potential postoperative complications include nausea and vomiting. Postoperative visual loss is a complication of neurosurgery, most specifically spine surgery, whose origins are unknown. Postoperative considerations for the intensive care unit nurse should include receiving a thorough clinical handoff from the anesthesia provider to ensure care continuity and patient safety.