Essential elements of an outpatient total joint replacement programme

Ambulatory total hip and knee arthroplasty: a literature review and perioperative considerations

PURPOSE

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA), particularly for the hip and knee, is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. The advancement/evolution of surgical and anesthesia techniques have allowed TJA to be performed on an ambulatory/same-day discharge basis. In this Continuing Professional Development module, we synthesize the perioperative evidence that may aid the development of successful ambulatory TJA pathways.

SOURCE

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for ambulatory or fast-track TJA articles. In the absence of direct evidence for the ambulatory setting, we extrapolated the evidence from the in-patient TJA literature.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Patient selection encompassing patient, medical, and social factors is fundamental for successful same-day discharge of patients following TJA. Evidence for the type of intraoperative anesthesia favours neuraxial technique for achieving same day discharge criteria and reduced perioperative complications. Availability of short-acting local anesthetic for neuraxial anesthesia would affect the anesthetic choice. Nonetheless, modern general anesthesia with multimodal analgesia and antithrombotics in a well selected population can be considered. Regional analgesia forms an integral part of the multimodal analgesia regime to reduce opioid consumption and facilitate same-day hospital discharge, reducing hospital readmission. For ambulatory total knee arthroplasty, a combination of adductor canal block with local anesthetic periarticular infiltration provided is a suitable regional analgesic regimen.

CONCLUSION

Anesthesia for TJA has evolved as such that same-day discharge will become the norm for selected patients. It is essential to establish pathways for early discharge to prevent adverse effects and readmission in this population. As more data are generated from an increased volume of ambulatory TJA, more robust evidence will emerge for the ideal anesthetic components to optimize outcomes.

Half of all hip and knee arthroplasty patients may be potential day-case candidates: a nationwide register study of 166,730 procedures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The overall potential pool of day-case candidates on a national level in hip and knee arthroplasty is unknown. We aimed to estimate the proportion of hip and knee arthroplasty patients eligible for day-case surgery based on contemporary widely used criteria and determine whether there has been a change in the proportion of eligible patients over time and, secondarily, to investigate the proportion of eligible patients discharged on the day of surgery.

METHODS

Based on data from the Danish National Patient Register, we identified all patients undergoing primary unilateral hip or knee arthroplasty from January 2010 to March 2020. Using a modification of day-case eligibility criteria proposed by a national multicenter collaboration, we sorted patients into either day-case eligible or ineligible. A day-case procedure was defined as discharge on the day of surgery.

RESULTS

We included patients comprising a total of 166,730 primary total hip (THA), total knee (TKA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). 48% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48-49) were eligible for day-case surgery, with a decline from 50% (CI 49-51) in 2010 to 46% (CI 46-47) eligible in 2019. More UKA patients were day-case eligible (55%, CI 54-56) than THA (47%, CI 47-48) and TKA patients (49%, CI 48-49). A maximum of 8.0% (CI 7.4-8.5) of eligible patients were discharged on the day of surgery in 2019.

CONCLUSION

48% of the Danish hip and knee arthroplasty patients were potential day-case candidates, with a small decline in eligibility from 50% in 2010 to 46% in 2019. Day of surgery discharge among day-case eligible patients peaked at 8% in 2019. Thus, the potential for more day-case surgery seems large.

Does Participation in Virtual or In-Person Preoperative Education Relate to Reduced Length of Stay After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Background

Advancements in surgical procedures for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have resulted in more effective procedures with more rapid recovery. To prepare patients for surgery, many organizations offer a preoperative "joint class," which has been associated with reduced length of stay (LOS). Virtual modes of education are increasingly favored for those having TJA.

Purpose

To determine whether participation in an individually administered preoperative educational session ("Prehab") relates to reduced LOS or increased likelihood of same-day discharge (SDD) for those undergoing TJA. Additionally, to establish whether and the virtual mode of education provision is superior or inferior to the in-person mode with regards to LOS benefits.

Methods

The author conducted a case-control study of 2532 patients who had a primary or revision TJA between January 2022 and August 2022 at a single institution. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record. A total of 1118 patients attended Prehab; 1414 patients did not. Patients were included if they were over the age of 18 and had a total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during the study period. T-tests, chi-square χ2 tests, and binomial logistic regression were used to evaluate the LOS and SDD outcomes for those who participated in Prehab compared with those who did not.

Results

Those receiving Prehab in any form had shorter LOS than those who had not. Those receiving virtual Prehab had the shortest LOS. There was no difference in the rate of SDD for outpatient-class patients.

Conclusion

Preoperative education is associated with LOS benefits to patients undergoing TJA. The virtual mode of education provision is at minimum non-inferior, and may be superior, to the in-person mode. The lack of statistically significant between-group differences for SDD outcomes may be explained by a lack of SDD-specific educational content provided during Prehab.

Synthesis of 'joint class' curricula at high volume joint replacement centres and a preliminary model for development and evaluation

RATIONALE

Preoperative patient education through 'joint class' has potential to improve quality of care for total joint replacement (TJR). However, no formal guidance exists regarding curriculum content, potentially resulting in inter-institutional variation.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to (a) synthesize curriculum components of 'joint classes' across high-volume institutions and (b) develop a preliminary theory of change model for development and evaluation guided by the existing curricula and related literature.

METHODS

We reviewed 'joint class' curricula from the websites of the 10 highest-volume TJR centres (by average annual 2017-2019 volume) that publicly disclosed this information. Two reviewers qualitatively compared available content and noted common categories, which were synthesized into key domains across institutions. We then reviewed the PubMed database for literature on pre-TJR patient education and education needs in the past 10 years. Drawing on our curriculum synthesis and related literature, we proposed a theory of change model: hypothesized mechanisms through which 'joint class' confers benefits to patients and health systems.

RESULTS

We identified 30 categories in our review of existing class content, which we synthesized into seven key domains: (I) Practical Elements, (II) Logistics, (III) Medical Information, (IV) Modifiable Risk Factors, (V) Expected Outcomes, (VI) Patient Role in Recovery and (VII) Enhanced Education. Variation across institutions was noted. Our preliminary model based on the curriculum synthesis and related literature on the impact of 'joint class' includes three levels: (1) Practical Elements ('joint class' accessibility and information quality), (2) Class Goals (increased health literacy, increased adherence, risk mitigation, realistic expectations, and reduced anxiety) and (3) Target Outcomes (improved clinical outcomes, positive patient experience and increased patient satisfaction).

CONCLUSION

Our synthesis identified core common topics included in pre-TJR education but also highlighted variation across institutions, supporting opportunities for standardization. Clinicians and researchers can use our preliminary model to systematically develop and evaluate 'joint classes,' with the goal of establishing a standard of care for TJR preoperative education.

Neuraxial and general anesthesia for outpatient total joint arthroplasty result in similarly low rates of major perioperative complications: a multicentered cohort study

Background

Neuraxial anesthesia when compared with general anesthesia has shown to improve outcomes following lower extremity total joint arthroplasty. It is unclear whether these benefits are present in outpatient surgery given the selection of healthier patients.

Objective

To compare the effects of neuraxial versus general anesthesia on outcomes following ambulatory hip and knee arthroplasty.

Methods

Multicentered retrospective cohort study in ambulatory hip or knee arthroplasty patients between January 2017 and December 2019. Primary endpoint examined 30-day major postoperative complications (mortality, myocardial infarction, deep venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, stroke, and acute renal failure).

Results

Of 11 523 eligible patients identified, 10 003 received neuraxial anesthesia, while 1520 received general anesthesia. 30-day major complications did not differ between neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia groups (1.8% vs 2.3%; aOR=0.85, CI: 0.56 to 1.27, p=0.39). There was no difference in 30-day minor complications (surgical site infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection; 3.3% vs 4.1%; aOR=0.83, CI: 0.62 to 1.14, p=0.23). The neuraxial group demonstrated reduced pain and analgesia requirements and had less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Median recovery room length of stay was shorter by 52 min in the general anesthesia group, but these patients were more likely to fail same day discharge (33% vs 23.4%; p<0.01).

Conclusion

Anesthesia type was not associated with an increased risk for complications. However, neuraxial anesthesia improved outcomes that predict readiness for discharge: patients had less pain, required less opioids, and had a lower incidence of PONV, thus improving the rate of same day discharge.

Trial registration number

NCT04203732.

A Simple Tool for Recommending Postoperative Status After Lower Extremity Total Joint Replacement

There is an increasing impetus to perform primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty on an outpatient basis and in the outpatient setting. However, with recent federal regulatory changes, orthopedic surgeons must now evaluate patients on a case-by-case basis to determine whether an inpatient admission will be medically necessary and appropriate. We thus created our prototype Lower Extremity Inpatient-Outpatient (LET-IN-OUT) total joint replacement tool as a simple, consistent way for other clinicians to identify specific major preoperative patient comorbidities and thus to recommend independently and objectively to the orthopedic surgeon postoperative inpatient or outpatient status for a given patient.

Same-Day vs One-Day Discharge: Rates and Reasons for Emergency Department Return After Hospital-Based Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

As short stay and outpatient total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) are more widely adopted, it is important to assess whether reducing length of stay leads to increased emergency department (ED) visits or readmissions.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 1743 primary TJA patients with same-day discharge (SDD) or 1-day length of stay between January and December 2019. Patients who returned to the ED or were readmitted within 30 days of TJA were identified, and chart review was performed to identify their primary reason for revisit.

RESULTS

Patients discharged on the day of surgery (n = 203, 11.6%) were more likely to be younger (P < .001) and have a lower body mass index (total hip arthroplasty, P = .018; total knee arthroplasty, P < .001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P < .001). The overall rate of return was 6.3%, and 1.3% of patients were readmitted. Controlling for age, gender, body mass index, surgery type, and American Society of Anesthesiologists, patients selected for SDD were not found to be at higher risk of return to the ED compared to 1-day length of stay patients (4.9% vs 6.4%, odds ratio 0.980, 95% confidence interval 0.484-1.984, P = .956).

CONCLUSION

SDD of eligible patients does not increase the risk of 30-day return to the ED. Continued analysis of risk factors for return and readmission will improve prospective identification of patients who can safely be discharged on the day of surgery, and future quality improvement initiatives should target the most common reasons for ED return.

Motor-sparing nerve blocks for total knee replacement: A scoping review

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This scoping review investigates the optimal combination of motor-sparing analgesic interventions for patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).

DESIGN

Scoping review.

INTERVENTION

MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched (inception-last week of May 2020). Only trials including motor-sparing interventions were included. Randomized controlled trials lacking prospective registration and blinded assessment were excluded.

MAIN RESULTS

The cumulative evidence suggests that femoral triangle blocks outperform placebo and periarticular infiltration. When combined with the latter, femoral triangle blocks are associated with improved pain control, higher patient satisfaction and decreased opioid consumption. Continuous femoral triangle blocks provide superior postoperative analgesia compared with their single-injection counterparts. However, these benefits seem less pronounced when perineural adjuvants are used. Combined femoral triangle-obturator blocks result in improved analgesia and swifter discharge compared with femoral triangle blocks alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal analgesic strategy for TKR may include a combination of different analgesic modalities (periarticular infiltration, femoral triangle blocks, obturator nerve block). Future trials are required to investigate the incremental benefits provided by local anesthetic infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK), popliteal plexus block and genicular nerve block.

First Reported Series of Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Middle East

Background

Outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming more commonplace in the United States. Alternatively, the current practice in the Middle East involves an inpatient stay of 7-10 days in the hospital after TKA. This study reports the early results of the first reported series of outpatient TKA performed on patients in the Middle East and compares the clinical and functional outcomes with those of patients who underwent inpatient TKA.

Methods

Eighty-eight patients underwent TKA (inpatient: 44 and outpatient: 44) using the modified intervastus approach in 2 hospitals in the Middle East from 2017 to 2019. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed by recording the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and knee range of motion (ROM) preoperatively, on the day of surgery, and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.

Results

Two patients undergoing outpatient TKA had complications: one patient suffered a periprosthetic fracture on postoperative day 10 after a fall, and the other patient had drainage on postoperative day 5. No complications occurred in the inpatient TKA cohort. There were no significant differences observed in the VAS scores or knee ROM numbers recorded for inpatient and outpatient TKA groups at any of the follow-up periods. Overall, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, VAS, and ROM significantly improved 6 months after surgery compared with preoperative values for both inpatient and outpatient TKA groups.

Conclusions

Outpatient TKA was safely implemented when compared with inpatient TKA, with satisfactory results. A total of 2 complications were seen in this study, which we believe are unrelated to the patient’s discharge status. The concept of outpatient TKA using the modified intervastus approach was very well accepted by the patients in this study and can potentially be applied safely elsewhere in the region.