1
|
Wiles MD, El-Boghdadly K, Mariano ER. How to conduct and report guidelines and position, best practice and consensus statements. Anaesthesia 2024; 79:542-547. [PMID: 38369594 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- M D Wiles
- Academic Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, UK
| | - E R Mariano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peri-operative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Anesthesiology and Peri-operative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Carroll JE, Zucco L, Warwick E, Radcliffe G, Moonesinghe SR, El-Boghdadly K, Guo N, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Ethnicity, socio-economic deprivation and postpartum outcomes following caesarean delivery: a multicentre cohort study. Anaesthesia 2024; 79:486-497. [PMID: 38359531 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Disparities relating to postpartum recovery outcomes in different socio-economic and racial ethnic groups are underexplored. We conducted a planned analysis of a large prospective caesarean delivery cohort to explore the relationship between ethnicity, socio-economic status and postpartum recovery. Eligible patients were enrolled and baseline demographic, obstetric and medical history data were collected 18 h and 30 h following delivery. Patients completed postpartum quality of life and recovery measures in person on day 1 (EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L, including global health visual analogue scale; Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score; and pain scores) and by telephone between day 28 and day 32 postpartum (EQ-5D-5L and pain scores). Socio-economic group was determined according to the Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile of each patient's usual place of residence. Data from 1000 patients who underwent caesarean delivery were included. There were more patients of Asian, Black and mixed ethnicity in the more deprived quintiles. Patients of White ethnicities had shorter postpartum duration of hospital stay compared with patients of Asian and Black ethnicities (35 (28-56 [18-513]) h vs. 44 (31-71 [19-465]) h vs. 49 (33-75 [23-189]) h, respectively. In adjusted models at day 30, patients of Asian ethnicity had a significantly greater risk of moderate to severe pain (numerical rating scale ≥ 4) at rest and on movement (odds ratio (95%CI) 2.42 (1.24-4.74) and 2.32 (1.40-3.87)), respectively). There were no differences in readmission rates or incidence of complications between groups. Patients from White ethnic backgrounds experience shorter postpartum duration of stay compared with patients from Asian and Black ethnic groups. Ethnic background impacts pain scores and recovery at day 1 postpartum and following hospital discharge, even after adjusting for socio-economic group. Further work is required to understand the underlying factors driving differences in pain and recovery and to develop strategies to reduce disparities in obstetric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E O'Carroll
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peri-operative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London
| | - L Zucco
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E Warwick
- Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - G Radcliffe
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S R Moonesinghe
- University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peri-operative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - B Carvalho
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peri-operative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - P Sultan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peri-operative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ahmad I, El-Boghdadly K. Time for confidential enquiries into airway complications? Anaesthesia 2024; 79:349-352. [PMID: 38114266 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- I Ahmad
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fechner J, El-Boghdadly K, Spahn DR, Motsch J, Struys MMRF, Duranteau O, Ganter MT, Richter T, Hollmann MW, Rossaint R, Bercker S, Rex S, Drexler B, Schippers F, Morley A, Ihmsen H, Kochs E. Anaesthetic efficacy and postinduction hypotension with remimazolam compared with propofol: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2024; 79:410-422. [PMID: 38221513 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Remimazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, may be used for induction and maintenance of total intravenous anaesthesia, but its role in the management of patients with multiple comorbidities remains unclear. In this phase 3 randomised controlled trial, we compared the anaesthetic efficacy and the incidence of postinduction hypotension during total intravenous anaesthesia with remimazolam vs. propofol. A total of 365 patients (ASA physical status 3 or 4) scheduled for elective surgery were assigned randomly to receive total intravenous anaesthesia with remimazolam (n = 270) or propofol (n = 95). Primary outcome was anaesthetic effect, quantified as the percentage of time with Narcotrend® Index values ≤ 60, during surgery (skin incision to last skin suture), with a non-inferiority margin of -10%. Secondary outcome was the incidence of postinduction hypotensive events. Mean (SD) percentage of time with Narcotrend Index values ≤ 60 during surgery across all patients receiving remimazolam (93% (20.7)) was non-inferior to propofol (99% (4.2)), mean difference (97.5%CI) -6.28% (-8.89-infinite); p = 0.003. Mean (SD) number of postinduction hypotension events was 62 (38.1) and 71 (41.1) for patients allocated to the remimazolam and propofol groups, respectively; p = 0.015. Noradrenaline administration events (requirement for a bolus and/or infusion) were also lower in patients allocated to remimazolam compared with propofol (14 (13.5) vs. 20 (14.6), respectively; p < 0.001). In conclusion, in patients who were ASA physical status 3 or 4, the anaesthetic effect of remimazolam was non-inferior to propofol.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lyons C, El-Boghdadly K. Point-of-care gastric ultrasound: food for thought. Anaesthesia 2024; 79:123-127. [PMID: 38017691 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C Lyons
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kua J, Potter T, Wong DJN, Nurmi E, El-Boghdadly K, Cronin JN. UK-wide rates of videolaryngoscopy use and barriers to universal uptake: a retrospective analysis of a multicentre observational study. Anaesthesia 2024; 79:100-101. [PMID: 37712109 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J Kua
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Potter
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D J N Wong
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E Nurmi
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - J N Cronin
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
El-Boghdadly K, Cook TM, Goodacre T, Kua J, Denmark S, Mercer N, Moonesinghe SR, Summerton DJ. Timing of elective surgery and risk assessment after SARS-CoV-2 infection: 2023 update: A multidisciplinary consensus statement on behalf of the Association of Anaesthetists, Federation of Surgical Specialty Associations, Royal College of Anaesthetists and Royal College of Surgeons of England: A multidisciplinary consensus statement on behalf of the Association of Anaesthetists, Federation of Surgical Specialty Associations, Royal College of Anaesthetists and Royal College of Surgeons of England. Anaesthesia 2023. [PMID: 37337416 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
Guidance for the timing of surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection needed reassessment given widespread vaccination, less virulent variants, contemporary evidence and a need to increase access to safe surgery. We, therefore, updated previous recommendations to assist policymakers, administrative staff, clinicians and, most importantly, patients. Patients who develop symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 7 weeks of planned surgery, including on the day of surgery, should be screened for SARS-CoV-2. Elective surgery should not usually be undertaken within 2 weeks of diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. For patients who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection and who are low risk or having low-risk surgery, most elective surgery can proceed 2 weeks following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. For patients who are not low risk or having anything other than low-risk surgery between 2 and 7 weeks following infection, an individual risk assessment must be performed. This should consider: patient factors (age; comorbid and functional status); infection factors (severity; ongoing symptoms; vaccination); and surgical factors (clinical priority; risk of disease progression; grade of surgery). This assessment should include the use of an objective and validated risk prediction tool and shared decision-making, taking into account the patient's own attitude to risk. In most circumstances, surgery should proceed unless risk assessment indicates that the risk of proceeding exceeds the risk of delay. There is currently no evidence to support delaying surgery beyond 7 weeks for patients who have fully recovered from or have had mild SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - T M Cook
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
- University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - T Goodacre
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Manor Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - J Kua
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Peri-operative Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - S Denmark
- Patient Lay Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - N Mercer
- Cleft Unit of the South West of England, Bristol Dental School, Bristol, UK
| | - S R Moonesinghe
- Centre for Peri-operative Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - D J Summerton
- Department of Urology, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
- University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hansel J, El-Boghdadly K. Are we there yet? The long journey of videolaryngoscopy into the mainstream. Anaesthesia 2023. [PMID: 37329149 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J Hansel
- Acute Intensive Care Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O'Carroll JE, Zucco L, Warwick E, Arbane G, Moonesinghe SR, El-Boghdadly K, Guo N, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Quality of recovery following childbirth: a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Anaesthesia 2023. [PMID: 37226593 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
To better understand outcomes in postpartum patients who receive peripartum anaesthetic interventions, we aimed to assess quality of recovery metrics following childbirth in a UK-based multicentre cohort study. This study was performed during a 2-week period in October 2021 to assess in- and outpatient post-delivery recovery at 1 and 30 days postpartum. The following outcomes were reported: obstetric quality of recovery 10-item measure (ObsQoR-10); EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L) survey; global health visual analogue scale; postpartum pain scores at rest and movement; length of hospital stay; readmission rates; and self-reported complications. In total, 1638 patients were recruited and responses analysed from 1631 (99.6%) and 1282 patients (80%) at one and 30 days postpartum, respectively. Median (IQR [range]) length of stay postpartum was 39.3 (28.5-61.0 [17.7-513.4]), 40.3 (28.5-59.1 [17.8-220.9]), and 35.9 (27.1-54.1 [17.9-188.4]) h following caesarean, instrumental and vaginal deliveries, respectively. Median (IQR [range]) ObsQoR-10 score was 75 ([62-86] 4-100) on day 1, with the lowest ObsQoR-10 scores (worst recovery) reported by patients undergoing caesarean delivery. Of the 1282 patients, complications within the first 30 days postpartum were reported by 252 (19.7%) of all patients. Readmission to hospital within 30 days of discharge occurred in 69 patients (5.4%), with 49 (3%) for maternal reasons. These data can be used to inform patients regarding expected recovery trajectories; facilitate optimal discharge planning; and identify populations that may benefit most from targeted interventions to improve postpartum recovery experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E O'Carroll
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - L Zucco
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E Warwick
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Arbane
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S R Moonesinghe
- Centre for Peri-operative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - B Carvalho
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - P Sultan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bailey CR, El-Boghdadly K. How to write a Science Letter for Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:385-387. [PMID: 35944281 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C R Bailey
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kua J, Nurmi E, Wong DJN, Potter T, Cronin JN, El-Boghdadly K. Clinical evidence needed for risks of PPE. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:393-394. [PMID: 36261154 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Kua
- University College London, London, UK
| | - E Nurmi
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D J N Wong
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Potter
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J N Cronin
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hughes C, El-Boghdadly K. How to conduct collaborative research studies. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:251-255. [PMID: 35858602 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C Hughes
- Unit of Academic Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Peri-operative Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- A Dos Santos Rocha
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - E Albrecht
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Potter T, Cronin JN, Kua J, Nurmi E, Wong DJN, Ahmad I, Cook TM, El-Boghdadly K. Aerosol precautions and airway complications: a national prospective multicentre cohort study. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:23-35. [PMID: 36070622 PMCID: PMC10087829 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The perceived risk of transmission of aerosolised viral particles from patients to airway practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic led to the widespread use of aerosol precautions, including personal protective equipment and modifications to anaesthetic technique. The risk of these aerosol precautions on peri-operative airway complications has not been assessed outside of simulation studies. This prospective, national, multicentre cohort study aimed to quantify this risk. Adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia for elective or emergency procedures over a 96-hour period were included. Data collected included use of aerosol precautions by the airway practitioner, airway complications and potential confounding variables. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the risk of individual aerosol precautions on overall and specific airway complications. Data from 5905 patients from 70 hospital sites were included. The rate of airway complications was 10.0% (95%CI 9.2-10.8%). Use of filtering facepiece class 2 or class 3 respirators was associated with an increased risk of airway complications (odds ratio 1.38, 95%CI 1.04-1.83), predominantly due to an association with difficult facemask ventilation (odds ratio 1.68, 95%CI 1.09-2.61) and desaturation on pulse oximetry (odds ratio 2.39, 95%CI 1.26-4.54). Use of goggles, powered air-purifying respirators, long-sleeved gowns, double gloves and videolaryngoscopy were not associated with any alteration in the risk of airway complications. Overall, the use of filtering facepiece class 2 or class 3 respirators was associated with an increased risk of airway complications, but most aerosol precautions used during the COVID-19 pandemic were not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Potter
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J N Cronin
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Kua
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, University College London, UK
| | - E Nurmi
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D J N Wong
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I Ahmad
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| | - T M Cook
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.,School of Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chau A, El-Boghdadly K. Analysis of paralysis: understanding the role of vocal cords in facemask ventilation. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:949-952. [PMID: 35727639 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Chau
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia, BC Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-Operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
El-Boghdadly K, Patel A. High flow is better than low flow, which is better than no flow. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:717. [PMID: 35373852 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - A Patel
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Iliff HA, El-Boghdadly K, Finlay I. General anaesthesia and euthanasia: difficulties defining the difference in end-of-life care. Anaesthesia 2021; 77:232-233. [PMID: 34658012 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H A Iliff
- Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Merthyr, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- A Patel
- Department of Anaesthesia, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Iliff HA, El-Boghdadly K, Ahmad I, Davis J, Harris A, Khan S, Lan-Pak-Kee V, O'Connor J, Powell L, Rees G, Tatla TS. Management of haematoma after thyroid surgery: systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons and the British Association of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. Anaesthesia 2021; 77:82-95. [PMID: 34545943 PMCID: PMC9291554 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Haematoma after thyroid surgery can lead to airway obstruction and death. We therefore developed guidelines to improve the safety of peri‐operative care of patients undergoing thyroid surgery. We conducted a systematic review to inform recommendations, with expert consensus used in the absence of high‐quality evidence, and a Delphi study was used to ratify recommendations. We highlight the importance of multidisciplinary team management and make recommendations in key areas including: monitoring; recognition; post‐thyroid surgery emergency box; management of suspected haematoma following thyroid surgery; cognitive aids; post‐haematoma evacuation care; day‐case thyroid surgery; training; consent and pre‐operative communication; postoperative communication; and institutional policies. The guidelines support a multidisciplinary approach to the management of suspected haematoma following thyroid surgery through oxygenation and evaluation; haematoma evacuation; and tracheal intubation. They have been produced with materials to support implementation. While these guidelines are specific to thyroid surgery, the principles may apply to other forms of neck surgery. These guidelines and recommendations provided are the first in this area and it is hoped they will support multidisciplinary team working, improving care and outcomes for patients having thyroid surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H A Iliff
- Department of Anaesthesia, Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Merthyr, UK.,Health Education and Improvement Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| | - I Ahmad
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Davis
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, UK
| | - A Harris
- Patient Representative, London, UK
| | - S Khan
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - V Lan-Pak-Kee
- Department of Anaesthesia, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - J O'Connor
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - L Powell
- Department of Anaesthesia, Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Merthyr, UK.,Health Education and Improvement Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - G Rees
- Department of Anaesthesia, Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Merthyr, UK
| | - T S Tatla
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gonvers E, El-Boghdadly K, Grape S, Albrecht E. Efficacy and safety of intrathecal morphine for analgesia after lower joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:1648-1658. [PMID: 34448492 PMCID: PMC9292760 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Widespread adoption of intrathecal morphine into clinical practice is hampered by concerns about its potential side‐effects. We undertook a systematic review, meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis with the primary objective of determining the efficacy and safety of intrathecal morphine. Our secondary objective was to determine the dose associated with greatest efficacy and safety. We also assessed the impact of intrathecal morphine on respiratory depression. We systematically searched the literature for trials comparing intrathecal morphine with a control group in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia. Our primary efficacy outcome was rest pain score (0–10) at 8–12 hours; our primary safety outcome was the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours. Twenty‐nine trials including 1814 patients were identified. Rest pain score at 8–12 hours was significantly reduced in the intrathecal morphine group, with a mean difference (95%CI) of −1.7 (−2.0 to −1.3), p < 0.0001 (19 trials; 1420 patients; high‐quality evidence), without sub‐group differences between doses (p = 0.35). Intrathecal morphine increased postoperative nausea and vomiting, with a risk ratio (95%CI) of 1.4 (1.3–1.6), p < 0.0001 (24 trials; 1603 patients; high‐quality evidence). However, a sub‐group analysis by dose revealed that rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours were similar between groups at a dose of 100 µg, while the risk significantly increased with larger doses (p value for sub‐group difference = 0.02). Patients receiving intrathecal morphine were no more likely to have respiratory depression, the risk ratio (95%CI) being 0.9 (0.5–1.7), p = 0.78 (16 trials; 1173 patients; high‐quality evidence). In conclusion, there is good evidence that intrathecal morphine provides effective analgesia after lower limb arthroplasty, without an increased risk of respiratory depression, but at the expense of an increased rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting. A dose of 100 µg is a ‘ceiling’ dose for analgesia and a threshold dose for increased rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Gonvers
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| | - S Grape
- Department of Anaesthesia, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland
| | - E Albrecht
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- D J N Wong
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C R Bailey
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Duggan LV, El-Boghdadly K. The importance of prospective observational studies in airway management: yet only the first step. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:1555-1558. [PMID: 34189730 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L V Duggan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pearce AC, Duggan LV, El-Boghdadly K. Making the grade: has Cormack and Lehane grading stood the test of time? Anaesthesia 2021; 76:705-709. [PMID: 33799315 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A C Pearce
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - L V Duggan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Levy N, Quinlan J, El-Boghdadly K, Fawcett WJ, Agarwal V, Bastable RB, Cox FJ, de Boer HD, Dowdy SC, Hattingh K, Knaggs RD, Mariano ER, Pelosi P, Scott MJ, Lobo DN, Macintyre PE. An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on the prevention of opioid-related harm in adult surgical patients. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:520-536. [PMID: 33027841 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
This international multidisciplinary consensus statement was developed to provide balanced guidance on the safe peri-operative use of opioids in adults. An international panel of healthcare professionals evaluated the literature relating to postoperative opioid-related harm, including persistent postoperative opioid use; opioid-induced ventilatory impairment; non-medical opioid use; opioid diversion and dependence; and driving under the influence of prescription opioids. Recommended strategies to reduce harm include pre-operative assessment of the risk of persistent postoperative opioid use; use of an assessment of patient function rather than unidimensional pain scores alone to guide adequacy of analgesia; avoidance of long-acting (modified-release and transdermal patches) opioid formulations and combination analgesics; limiting the number of tablets prescribed at discharge; providing deprescribing advice; avoidance of automatic prescription refills; safe disposal of unused medicines; reducing the risk of opioid diversion; and better education of healthcare professionals, patients and carers. This consensus statement provides a framework for better prescribing practices that could help reduce the risk of postoperative opioid-related harm in adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Levy
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St. Edmunds, UK
| | - J Quinlan
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - W J Fawcett
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - V Agarwal
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - F J Cox
- Pain Management Service, Critical Care and Anaesthesia, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H D de Boer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, Martini General Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S C Dowdy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - K Hattingh
- Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - R D Knaggs
- School of Pharmacy, Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - E R Mariano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peri-operative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Anesthesiology and Peri-operative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - P Pelosi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - M J Scott
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - D N Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- David Greenfield Metabolic Physiology Unit, MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - P E Macintyre
- Department of Anaesthesia, Pain Medicine and Hyperbaric Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
El-Boghdadly K, Cook TM, Goodacre T, Kua J, Blake L, Denmark S, McNally S, Mercer N, Moonesinghe SR, Summerton DJ. SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 and timing of elective surgery: A multidisciplinary consensus statement on behalf of the Association of Anaesthetists, the Centre for Peri-operative Care, the Federation of Surgical Specialty Associations, the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:940-946. [PMID: 33735942 PMCID: PMC8250763 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The scale of the COVID‐19 pandemic means that a significant number of patients who have previously been infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 will require surgery. Given the potential for multisystem involvement, timing of surgery needs to be carefully considered to plan for safe surgery. This consensus statement uses evidence from a systematic review and expert opinion to highlight key principles in the timing of surgery. Shared decision‐making regarding timing of surgery after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection must account for severity of the initial infection; ongoing symptoms of COVID‐19; comorbid and functional status; clinical priority and risk of disease progression; and complexity of surgery. For the protection of staff, other patients and the public, planned surgery should not be considered during the period that a patient may be infectious. Precautions should be undertaken to prevent pre‐ and peri‐operative infection, especially in higher risk patients. Elective surgery should not be scheduled within 7 weeks of a diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection unless the risks of deferring surgery outweigh the risk of postoperative morbidity or mortality associated with COVID‐19. SARS‐CoV‐2 causes either transient or asymptomatic disease for most patients, who require no additional precautions beyond a 7‐week delay, but those who have persistent symptoms or have been hospitalised require special attention. Patients with persistent symptoms of COVID‐19 are at increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality even after 7 weeks. The time before surgery should be used for functional assessment, prehabilitation and multidisciplinary optimisation. Vaccination several weeks before surgery will reduce risk to patients and might lessen the risk of nosocomial SARS‐CoV‐2 infection of other patients and staff. National vaccine committees should consider whether such patients can be prioritised for vaccination. As further data emerge, these recommendations may need to be revised, but the principles presented should be considered to ensure safety of patients, the public and staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| | - T M Cook
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.,University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - T Goodacre
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Manor Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - J Kua
- Health Services Research Centre, London, UK
| | - L Blake
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Library, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - S Denmark
- Patient Lay Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - S McNally
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastbourne Hospital, Eastbourne, UK
| | - N Mercer
- Cleft Unit of the South West of England, Bristol Dental School, Bristol, UK
| | - S R Moonesinghe
- Centre for Peri-operative Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - D J Summerton
- Department of Urology, Leicester General Hospital and Honorary Professor, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chin KJ, Mariano ER, El-Boghdadly K. Advancing towards the next frontier in regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2021; 76 Suppl 1:3-7. [PMID: 33426654 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K J Chin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E R Mariano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peri-operative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Anesthesiology and Peri-operative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Macfarlane AJR, Gitman M, Bornstein KJ, El-Boghdadly K, Weinberg G. Updates in our understanding of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity: a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2021; 76 Suppl 1:27-39. [PMID: 33426662 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Despite advances in clinical practice, local anaesthetic systemic toxicity continues to occur with the therapeutic use of local anaesthesia. Patterns of presentation have evolved over recent years due in part to the increasing use of ultrasound which has been demonstrated to reduce risk. Onset of toxicity is increasingly delayed, a greater proportion of clinical reports are secondary to fascial plane blocks, and cases are increasing where non-anaesthetist providers are involved. The evolving clinical context presents a challenge for diagnosis and requires education of all physicians, nurses and allied health professionals about these changing patterns and risks. This review discusses: mechanisms; prevention; diagnosis; and treatment of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity. The local anaesthetic and dose used, site of injection and block conduct and technique are all important determinants of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity, as are various patient factors. Risk mitigation is discussed including the care of at-risk groups, such as: those at the extremes of age; patients with cardiac, hepatic and specific metabolic diseases; and those who are pregnant. Advances in the changing clinical landscape with novel applications and settings for the use of local anaesthesia are also described. Finally, we signpost future directions to potentially improve the management of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity. The utility of local anaesthetics remains unquestionable in clinical practice, and thus maximising the safe and appropriate use of these drugs should translate to improvements in patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J R Macfarlane
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.,2University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Gitman
- Department of Anaesthesia, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - K J Bornstein
- Department of Medical Education, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| | - G Weinberg
- Department of Anaesthesia, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Jesse Brown VA Medical Centre, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shelton CL, Klein AA, Bailey CR, El-Boghdadly K. The Anaesthesia Case Report (ACRE) checklist: a tool to promote high-quality reporting of cases in peri-operative practice. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:1077-1081. [PMID: 33440026 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Case reports have fulfilled an important role in the development of anaesthesia and continue to be highly relevant to modern practice. Despite this, they are sometimes criticised for being insufficiently rigorous to meaningfully inform clinical practice or research design. Reporting checklists are a useful tool to improve rigour in research and, although case report checklists have previously been developed, no existing checklist focuses on the peri-operative setting. In order to address the need for a case reports checklist that better accommodates peri-operative care, we used an established tool as the basis for developing the 12-item Anaesthesia Case Report checklist. This was refined using an iterative approach through feedback from journal editors with experience of handling case reports, patient and public involvement, and trialling its use on Anaesthesia Reports submissions. The Anaesthesia Case Report checklist differs from existing checklists by aligning with peri-operative practice; it places less emphasis on making diagnoses and focuses on the way in which clinical challenges, for example, related to the patient's comorbidities or operative interventions, are addressed. Adopting a standardised approach to the content of case reports presents clear benefits to authors, editors and peer reviewers through streamlining the processes involved in writing and publication. The Anaesthesia Case Report checklist provides a pragmatic framework for comprehensive and transparent reporting. We hope it will facilitate the authorship of high-quality case reports with the potential to further improve the quality and safety of peri-operative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L Shelton
- Department of Anaesthesia, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - A A Klein
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - C R Bailey
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Kings College London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Kings College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ratnayake G, El-Boghdadly K, Pandit JJ. Research priorities and the methods used to address them. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:858-859. [PMID: 33615434 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G Ratnayake
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - J J Pandit
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Smith TG, Ahmad I, Takhar A, Surda P, El-Boghdadly K. Unconventional multidisciplinary team strategy for tracheostomy in COVID-19. Anaesth Rep 2020; 8:178-182. [PMID: 33241228 PMCID: PMC7671090 DOI: 10.1002/anr3.12074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- T G Smith
- Department of Anaesthesia Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK.,Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences King's College London London UK
| | - I Ahmad
- Department of Anaesthesia Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK.,King's College London London UK
| | - A Takhar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - P Surda
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK.,King's College London London UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pandit JJ, El-Boghdadly K, Ratnayake G. Emerging consensus on need to measure national academic capacity in anaesthesia: a reply. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:575-576. [PMID: 33095449 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J J Pandit
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - G Ratnayake
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ratnayake G, El-Boghdadly K, Pandit JJ. An analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic units. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:500-513. [PMID: 32888196 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Over a decade ago, bibliometric analysis predicted the disappearance of UK publishing in anaesthesia by 2020. We repeated this analysis to assess if this had turned out to be the case, searching PubMed for papers associated with UK consultant anaesthetists for 2017-2019 across 15 journals. Although the rate of decline has flattened using the same search filter, including a wider range of publication types shows that outputs still remain at half 1990s levels (381 papers for all 3 years combined), authored by 769 anaesthetists, 274 of whom are associated with an academic centre. There are now 11 identifiable academic units, and a further 15 places where anaesthetists have affiliations with academic centres as individuals. The majority of papers (71%) are in secondary analysis (observational, database and association studies, surveys and meta-analyses), rather than in primary research (clinical trials or laboratory studies). These data reflect the current academic capacity in terms of publications, academic units and staffing. We discuss how this information can be used to inform a new strategy for UK academic anaesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ratnayake
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London
| | - J J Pandit
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bowness J, El-Boghdadly K, Burckett-St Laurent D. Artificial intelligence for image interpretation in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:602-607. [PMID: 32726498 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Bowness
- Institute of Academic Anaesthesia, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.,Department of Anaesthesia, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
El-Boghdadly K, Wong DJN, Johnstone C, Ahmad I. Tracheal intubation of patients with COVID-19: global risks. Anaesthesia 2020; 76 Suppl 3:4-5. [PMID: 32654131 PMCID: PMC7405115 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - D J N Wong
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Johnstone
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I Ahmad
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
El-Boghdadly K, Wong DJN, Owen R, Neuman MD, Pocock S, Carlisle JB, Johnstone C, Andruszkiewicz P, Baker PA, Biccard BM, Bryson GL, Chan MTV, Cheng MH, Chin KJ, Coburn M, Jonsson Fagerlund M, Myatra SN, Myles PS, O'Sullivan E, Pasin L, Shamim F, van Klei WA, Ahmad I. Risks to healthcare workers following tracheal intubation of patients with COVID-19: a prospective international multicentre cohort study. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1437-1447. [PMID: 32516833 PMCID: PMC7300828 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Healthcare workers involved in aerosol‐generating procedures, such as tracheal intubation, may be at elevated risk of acquiring COVID‐19. However, the magnitude of this risk is unknown. We conducted a prospective international multicentre cohort study recruiting healthcare workers participating in tracheal intubation of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19. Information on tracheal intubation episodes, personal protective equipment use and subsequent provider health status was collected via self‐reporting. The primary endpoint was the incidence of laboratory‐confirmed COVID‐19 diagnosis or new symptoms requiring self‐isolation or hospitalisation after a tracheal intubation episode. Cox regression analysis examined associations between the primary endpoint and healthcare worker characteristics, procedure‐related factors and personal protective equipment use. Between 23 March and 2 June 2020, 1718 healthcare workers from 503 hospitals in 17 countries reported 5148 tracheal intubation episodes. The overall incidence of the primary endpoint was 10.7% over a median (IQR [range]) follow‐up of 32 (18–48 [0–116]) days. The cumulative incidence within 7, 14 and 21 days of the first tracheal intubation episode was 3.6%, 6.1% and 8.5%, respectively. The risk of the primary endpoint varied by country and was higher in women, but was not associated with other factors. Around 1 in 10 healthcare workers involved in tracheal intubation of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19 subsequently reported a COVID‐19 outcome. This has human resource implications for institutional capacity to deliver essential healthcare services, and wider societal implications for COVID‐19 transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| | - D J N Wong
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Owen
- Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - M D Neuman
- Penn Centre for Peri-operative Outcomes Research and Transformation, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - S Pocock
- Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - J B Carlisle
- Department of Anaesthesia, Peri-operative Medicine and Intensive Care, Torbay Hospital, UK
| | - C Johnstone
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Andruszkiewicz
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Poland
| | | | - B M Biccard
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - G L Bryson
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | - M T V Chan
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - M H Cheng
- Division of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - K J Chin
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - M Coburn
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | - M Jonsson Fagerlund
- Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden
| | - S N Myatra
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, India
| | - P S Myles
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | | | - L Pasin
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, Italy
| | - F Shamim
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan
| | - W A van Klei
- Division Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - I Ahmad
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wong DJN, El-Boghdadly K, Johnstone C, Ahmad I. Can gendered personal protective equipment design account for high infection rates in female healthcare workers following intubation? A reply. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:133. [PMID: 32638356 PMCID: PMC7361567 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D J N Wong
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - C Johnstone
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I Ahmad
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
El-Boghdadly K, Desai N, Halpern S, Blake L, Odor PM, Bampoe S, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Quadratus lumborum block vs. transversus abdominis plane block for caesarean delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis . Anaesthesia 2020; 76:393-403. [PMID: 32621529 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Caesarean delivery is the most commonly performed inpatient surgical procedure globally. Pain after caesarean delivery is moderate to severe if not adequately treated, and is a primary anaesthetic concern for patients. Transversus abdominis plane and quadratus lumborum blocks are fascial plane blocks that have the potential to improve analgesia following caesarean delivery. Although proponents of the quadratus lumborum block suggest that this technique may provide better analgesia compared with transversus abdominis plane block, there are limited data directly comparing these two techniques. We, therefore, performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare transversus abdominis plane and quadratus lumborum block approaches, seeking randomised controlled trials comparing both techniques to each other, or to control, with or without intrathecal morphine. In all, 31 trials with 2188 patients were included and our primary outcome, the cumulative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h, was reported in 12 trials. In the absence of intrathecal morphine, transversus abdominis plane and quadratus lumborum blocks were equivalent, and both were superior to control (moderate-quality evidence). In the presence of intrathecal morphine, no differences were found between control, transversus abdominis plane and quadratus lumborum blocks (moderate-quality evidence). Similar results were found for resting and active pain scores at 4-6 h, 8-12 h, 24 h and 36 h, although quadratus lumborum block was associated with lower pain scores at 36 h when compared with transversus abdominis plane block (very low-quality evidence). However, transversus abdominis plane block was associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (moderate-quality evidence) and sedation when compared with inactive control following intrathecal morphine administration (low-quality evidence). There are insufficient data to draw definitive conclusions, but transversus abdominis plane and quadratus lumborum block appear to be superior to control in the absence of intrathecal morphine, but provide limited additional benefit over inactive control when intrathecal morphine is also used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| | - N Desai
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| | - S Halpern
- Department of Anesthesiology, and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Blake
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Library, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - P M Odor
- Department of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Bampoe
- Department of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - B Carvalho
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - P Sultan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - I Ahmad
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
El-Boghdadly K, Mouritsen JM, Ehlers L, Kovaleva J, Ahmad I. Cost analysis of reusable vs. single-use flexible bronchoscopes: a reply. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:696-697. [PMID: 32557534 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - L Ehlers
- Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - J Kovaleva
- Sint-Jozefkliniek Bornem and Willebroek, Bornem, Belgium
| | - I Ahmad
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - I Ahmad
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Uppal V, Sondekoppam RV, Landau R, El-Boghdadly K, Narouze S, Kalagara HKP. Neuraxial anaesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks during the COVID-19 pandemic: a literature review and practice recommendations. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1350-1363. [PMID: 32344456 PMCID: PMC7267450 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has had a significant impact on global healthcare services. In an attempt to limit the spread of infection and to preserve healthcare resources, one commonly used strategy has been to postpone elective surgery, whilst maintaining the provision of anaesthetic care for urgent and emergency surgery. General anaesthesia with airway intervention leads to aerosol generation, which increases the risk of COVID‐19 contamination in operating rooms and significantly exposes the healthcare teams to COVID‐19 infection during both tracheal intubation and extubation. Therefore, the provision of regional anaesthesia may be key during this pandemic, as it may reduce the need for general anaesthesia and the associated risk from aerosol‐generating procedures. However, guidelines on the safe performance of regional anaesthesia in light of the COVID‐19 pandemic are limited. The goal of this review is to provide up‐to‐date, evidence‐based recommendations or expert opinion when evidence is limited, for performing regional anaesthesia procedures in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19 infection. These recommendations focus on seven specific domains including: planning of resources and staffing; modifying the clinical environment; preparing equipment, supplies and drugs; selecting appropriate personal protective equipment; providing adequate oxygen therapy; assessing for and safely performing regional anaesthesia procedures; and monitoring during the conduct of anaesthesia and post‐anaesthetic care. Implicit in these recommendations is preserving patient safety whilst protecting healthcare providers from possible exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Uppal
- Department of Anesthesia, Peri-operative Medicine and Pain Management, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia Health Authority and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - R V Sondekoppam
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - R Landau
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, UK
| | - S Narouze
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Rootstown, OH, USA
| | - H K P Kalagara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Peri-operative Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Desai N, El-Boghdadly K, Albrecht E. Epidural vs. transversus abdominis plane block for abdominal surgery - a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:101-117. [PMID: 32385856 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Traditionally, pain relief for abdominal surgery has centred on epidural analgesia, but transversus abdominis plane block is increasingly being used. Our aim was to compare the analgesic efficacy and the side-effect profile of transversus abdominis plane block with epidural analgesia in a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. After a systematic search of the electronic databases, we identified 18 randomised controlled trials with 1220 patients. Confirmed by trial sequential analysis, our first co-primary outcome, postoperative pain score at rest at 12 h, was decreased by a mean difference (95%CI) of 0.69 (0.12-1.27; p = 0.02) with epidural analgesia compared with transversus abdominis plane block, with the quality of evidence graded as low. No difference was found for the second co-primary outcome, postoperative pain score at rest at 24 h, with the quality of evidence rated as very low. Relative to transversus abdominis plane block, epidural analgesia further reduced the need for intravenous morphine-equivalent consumption during the 0-24 h interval by a mean difference (95%CI) of 5.91 mg (2.34-9.49; p = 0.001) at the expense of an increased incidence of hypotension at 72 h, with a risk ratio (95%CI) of 5.88 (2.08-16.67; p < 0.001). Our meta-analysis was limited by detection and performance bias, significant statistical heterogeneity and publication bias. In view of the minimal clinically important difference in postoperative pain scores, epidural analgesia was interpreted to not be clinically different to transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery. With transversus abdominis plane block, the increase in intravenous morphine-equivalent consumption at 24 h should be balanced against the decreased risk of hypotension at 72 h. In choosing between epidural analgesia and transversus abdominis plane block, potential benefits should be balanced against the reported risk of harm, although the confidence in the evidence varied, underlining the uncertainty in our estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Desai
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| | - E Albrecht
- Department of Anaesthesia, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mariano ER, El-Boghdadly K, Ilfeld BM. Using postoperative pain trajectories to define the role of regional analgesia in personalised pain medicine. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:165-169. [PMID: 32368794 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E R Mariano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peri-operative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Anesthesiology and Peri-operative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| | - B M Ilfeld
- In Residence, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.,Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Affiliation(s)
- A Patel
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Anaesthesia and Airway Management, London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Greig PR, Carvalho C, El-Boghdadly K, Ramessur S. Safety testing improvised COVID-19 personal protective equipment based on a modified full-face snorkel mask. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:970-971. [PMID: 32275770 PMCID: PMC7262274 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P R Greig
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Carvalho
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - S Ramessur
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sorbello M, El-Boghdadly K, Di Giacinto I, Cataldo R, Esposito C, Falcetta S, Merli G, Cortese G, Corso RM, Bressan F, Pintaudi S, Greif R, Donati A, Petrini F. The Italian coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: recommendations from clinical practice. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:724-732. [PMID: 32221973 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 228] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Novel coronavirus 2019 is a single-stranded, ribonucleic acid virus that has led to an international pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019. Clinical data from the Chinese outbreak have been reported, but experiences and recommendations from clinical practice during the Italian outbreak have not. We report the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak on regional and national healthcare infrastructure. We also report on recommendations based on clinical experiences of managing patients throughout Italy. In particular, we describe key elements of clinical management, including: safe oxygen therapy; airway management; personal protective equipment; and non-technical aspects of caring for patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019. Only through planning, training and team working will clinicians and healthcare systems be best placed to deal with the many complex implications of this new pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Sorbello
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AOU Policlinico San Marco University Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I Di Giacinto
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Anestesia e Terapia Intensiva Polivalente, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sant'Orsola-Malpighi - Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Cataldo
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Anestesia, Terapia Intensiva e Terapia del Dolore, Università Campus, Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - C Esposito
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Dipartimento di Area Critica Ospedale Monaldi, Ospedali dei Colli, Napoli, Italy
| | - S Falcetta
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Clinica di Anestesia e Rianimazione Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - G Merli
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Dipartimento di Anestesia e Terapia Intensiva, Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Milano, Italy
| | - G Cortese
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Dipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione ed Emergenze AOU Città della salute e della scienza Torino, Italy
| | - R M Corso
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Dipartimento di Chirurgia, Anestesia e Rianimazione, Ospedale GB Morgagni-L. Pierantoni, Forlì, Italy
| | - F Bressan
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Anestesia e Rianimazione Ospedale Santo Stefano di Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - S Pintaudi
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Past Head of Dipartimento di Emergenza, ARNAS Garibaldi Catania, Past Bio-containment coordinator for Sicily, Italian Military Navy scientific consultant, Italy
| | - R Greif
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - A Donati
- Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - F Petrini
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Dipartimento di Medicina Perioperatoria, Dolore, Terapia Intensiva e Rapid Response System, Ospedale di Chieti, Università di Chieti Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
This article reviews the key considerations when managing a patient with a difficult airway. The difficult airway may be anticipated from preassessment allowing time for investigations and preparation. Alternatively, the unanticipated difficult airway can present in an emergency situation, or unexpectedly during a routine anaesthetic. The main airway management techniques are discussed with a description of their advantages and limitations. Current guidelines are included that demonstrate how the techniques are incorporated into an overall strategy with a plan A-D when failure occurs. It is critical to progress through such an algorithm in a timely manner to prevent the onset of hypoxia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Hews
- Specialist Registrar, Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Consultant Anaesthetist, Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - I Ahmad
- Consultant Anaesthetist, Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ahmad I, El-Boghdadly K, Bhagrath R, Hodzovic I, McNarry AF, Mir F, O'Sullivan EP, Patel A, Stacey M, Vaughan D. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for awake tracheal intubation (ATI) in adults. Anaesthesia 2019; 75:509-528. [PMID: 31729018 PMCID: PMC7078877 DOI: 10.1111/anae.14904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Awake tracheal intubation has a high success rate and a favourable safety profile but is underused in cases of anticipated difficult airway management. These guidelines are a comprehensive document to support decision making, preparation and practical performance of awake tracheal intubation. We performed a systematic review of the literature seeking all of the available evidence for each element of awake tracheal intubation in order to make recommendations. In the absence of high‐quality evidence, expert consensus and a Delphi study were used to formulate recommendations. We highlight key areas of awake tracheal intubation in which specific recommendations were made, which included: indications; procedural setup; checklists; oxygenation; airway topicalisation; sedation; verification of tracheal tube position; complications; management of unsuccessful awake tracheal intubation; post‐tracheal intubation management; consent; and training. We recognise that there are a range of techniques and regimens that may be effective and one such example technique is included. Breaking down the key practical elements of awake tracheal intubation into sedation, topicalisation, oxygenation and performance might help practitioners to plan, perform and address complications. These guidelines aim to support clinical practice and help lower the threshold for performing awake tracheal intubation when indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Ahmad
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| | - R Bhagrath
- Department of Anaesthesia, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - I Hodzovic
- Department of Anaesthesia, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.,Department of Anaesthesia, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK
| | - A F McNarry
- Department of Anaesthesia, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - F Mir
- Department of Anaesthesia, St. George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E P O'Sullivan
- Department of Anaesthesia, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Patel
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Stacey
- Department of Anaesthesia, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust (HEIW), Cardiff, UK
| | - D Vaughan
- Department of Anaesthesia, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mouritsen JM, Ehlers L, Kovaleva J, Ahmad I, El-Boghdadly K. A systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis of reusable vs. single-use flexible bronchoscopes. Anaesthesia 2019; 75:529-540. [PMID: 31701521 PMCID: PMC7079200 DOI: 10.1111/anae.14891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The cost effectiveness of reusable vs. single‐use flexible bronchoscopy in the peri‐operative setting has yet to be determined. We therefore aimed to determine this and hypothesised that single‐use flexible bronchoscopes are cost effective compared with reusable flexible bronchoscopes. We conducted a systematic review of the literature, seeking all reports of cross‐contamination or infection following reusable bronchoscope use in any clinical setting. We calculated the incidence of these outcomes and then determined the cost per patient of treating clinical consequences of bronchoscope‐induced infection. We also performed a micro‐costing analysis to quantify the economics of reusable flexible bronchoscopes in the peri‐operative setting from a high‐throughput tertiary centre. This produced an accurate estimate of the cost per use of reusable flexible bronchoscopes. We then performed a cost effectiveness analysis, combining the data obtained from the systematic review and micro‐costing analysis. We included 16 studies, with a reported incidence of cross‐contamination or infection of 2.8%. In the micro‐costing analysis, the total cost per use of a reusable flexible bronchoscope was calculated to be £249 sterling. The cost per use of a single‐use flexible bronchoscope was £220 sterling. The cost effectiveness analysis demonstrated that reusable flexible bronchoscopes have a cost per patient use of £511 sterling due to the costs of treatment of infection. The findings from this study suggest benefits from the use of single‐use flexible bronchoscopes in terms of cost effectiveness, cross‐contamination and resource utilisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Mouritsen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - L Ehlers
- Danish Center of Healthcare Improvements, Institute of Business and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - J Kovaleva
- Sint-Jozefkliniek Bornem and Willebroek, Bornem, Belgium
| | - I Ahmad
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| | - K El-Boghdadly
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
El-Boghdadly K, Wiles MD. Erector spinae block or paravertebral block or thoracic epidural for analgesia after rib fracture? A reply. Anaesthesia 2019; 74:1067. [PMID: 31282580 DOI: 10.1111/anae.14760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M D Wiles
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|