Strategies for Transfer From Methadone to Buprenorphine for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorders and Associated Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Successful Initiation of Buprenorphine for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in an Opioid-Experienced Patient: A Case Report

Buprenorphine can be an effective and safe option for patients with chronic pain. We describe a case in which a patient on long-term full opioid agonists for chronic non-cancer pain was safely transitioned from methadone to buprenorphine in the outpatient setting using a low dose buprenorphine initiation protocol. One month after the opioid rotation, the patient reported adequate analgesic effect from the buprenorphine regimen. Further studies are warranted to better guide prescribing of buprenorphine for chronic nonmalignant pain.

Methadone-Buprenorphine Transfers Using Low Dosing of Buprenorphine: An Open-label, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

AIMS

To compare a low-dosing protocol to standard practice for methadone-buprenorphine transfers.

METHODS

We undertook a nonrandomized open-label clinical trial across 8 sites from NSW, Australia. Participants prescribed methadone wishing to transfer to buprenorphine could either choose or be randomized to a low-dose transfer or standard care transfer as per NSW health guidelines. The low-dose protocol started at 0.2 mg BD and increased to 16 mg on day 6, with flexible dosing thereafter. The primary outcome was continuation of buprenorphine 1 week post-transfer. Binary logistic regression was used to access the primary outcome with demographic differences between the groups included as covariates.

RESULTS

There were 117 participants who commenced the study, 101 in the low-dose arm and 16 in standard care. Mean methadone dose was 82 mg in the low-dose arm and 46 mg in standard care. The primary outcome was met by 81 participants in the low-dose arm (80%) and 13 participants in standard care (81%). There was no significant between-arm difference in the odds of the primary outcome (OR = 2.22; 95% CI: 0.45-10.91; P = 0.327). Four participants (4%) in the low-dose arm experienced precipitated withdrawal against 1 (6%) in standard care. Higher methadone dose decreased the odds of successful transfer by 20% (OR = 0.8 per 10 mg methadone; 95% CI: 0.7-0.99; P = 0.04). Withdrawal scores between the 2 arms were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to detect a difference between low dosing and standard care for methadone to buprenorphine transfers. Increasing methadone dose was a predictor of success; setting (ambulatory or inpatient) was not.

Buprenorphine 'microdosing' method for switching patients with opioid dependence from methadone to buprenorphine

Various factors limit the acceptability of methadone as an opioid agonist treatment (OAT), in which case, buprenorphine becomes the preferred alternative. The classical approach is to gradually taper methadone to a low dose and buprenorphine is initiated after some opioid-free period, which generally takes weeks. A novel approach known as 'microdosing' or the 'Bernese method' might serve as a valuable alternative. We describe two cases where the patients were successfully transitioned from methadone to buprenorphine using this method.

Rotation from methadone to buprenorphine using a micro-dosing regime in patients with opioid use disorder and serious mental illness: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Inducting buprenorphine from methadone has traditionally involved initial opioid withdrawal, with risk of mental state deterioration in patients with serious mental illness (SMI). Micro-dosing of buprenorphine, with small incremental doses, is a novel off-label approach to transitioning from methadone and does not require a period of methadone abstinence. Given the limited literature about buprenorphine microdosing, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of inducting buprenorphine in a series of patients on methadone with SMI.

METHODS

For this retrospective case series, we reviewed the records of 16 patients with SMI at a Melbourne addiction treatment centre, from January 2021 to July 2022, who transitioned via micro-dosing, from high-dose methadone (>30 mg) to buprenorphine and depot-buprenorphine. Psychiatric diagnoses, mental state, other substance withdrawal, transfer success, transition time, opioid withdrawal symptoms and overall patient experience were collected via objective and subjective reporting.

RESULTS

Methadone to buprenorphine transfer was completed by 88% of patients. Mental health measures remained stable with the exception of mildly increased anxiety. Median transfer time was 6.5 days for inpatients, 9 days for mixed setting and 10 days for outpatients. Most patients (93%) rated their experience 'manageable' reporting mild withdrawal symptoms. One patient met study criteria for precipitated withdrawal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective case series provides evidence that the use of a micro-dosing buprenorphine induction for methadone to buprenorphine transitions, including to depot-buprenorphine, has negligible risk, is tolerated by patients with SMI and is unlikely to precipitate an exacerbation of their mental illness.

Low-dose buprenorphine initiation and treatment continuation among hospitalized patients with opioid dependence: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is an effective treatment for both opioid use disorder (OUD) and chronic pain, but buprenorphine's pharmacology complicates treatment initiation for some patients. Low-dose buprenorphine initiation is a novel strategy that may reduce precipitated withdrawal. Few studies describe what patient populations benefit most from low-dose initiations and the clinical parameters that impact treatment continuation. This study aimed to 1) describe experiences with low-dose buprenorphine initiation, including both successes and failures among hospitalized patients in an urban underserved community; 2) identify patient- and treatment-related characteristics associated with unsuccessful initiation and treatment discontinuation; and 3) assess buprenorphine treatment continuation after discharge.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study with opioid-dependent (meaning OUD or receiving long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain) patients who underwent low-dose buprenorphine initiation during hospital admission from October 2021 through April 2022. The primary outcome was successful completion of low-dose initiation. Bivariate analysis identified patient- and treatment-related factors associated with unsuccessful initiation. Secondary outcomes were buprenorphine treatment discontinuation at post-discharge follow-up, 30- and 90-days.

RESULTS

Of 28 patients who underwent low-dose buprenorphine initiation, 68 % successfully completed initiation. Unsuccessful initiation was associated with receipt of methadone during admission and higher morphine milligram equivalents (MME) of supplemental opioids. Of 22 patients with OUD, the percent receiving a buprenorphine prescription at a follow-up visit, 30 days, and 90 days, respectively, was 46 %, 36 %, and 36 %. Of 6 patients with chronic pain, the percent receiving a buprenorphine prescription at a follow-up visit, 30 days, and 90 days, respectively, was 100 %, 100 %, and 83 %.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose buprenorphine initiation can be successful in opioid-dependent hospitalized patients. Patients taking methadone or requiring higher MME of supplemental opioids may have more difficulty with the low-dose buprenorphine initiation approach, but these findings should be replicated in larger studies. This study suggests patient- and treatment-related factors that clinicians could consider when determining the optimal treatment strategy for patients wishing to transition to buprenorphine.

Predictors of concurrent heroin use among patients on opioid maintenance treatment in France: a multilevel study over 11 years

BACKGROUND

Consistent reports from health professionals suggest that heroin is commonly used by patients undergoing opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) in France, potentially jeopardizing their recovery process. However, there has been no formal epidemiological assessment on the matter.

METHODS

We use a yearly updated compendium retrieving information on patients admitted in treatment centres in France between 2010 and 2020. Given the hierarchical nature of the data collection, we conduct 2-level modified Poisson regressions to estimate the risks of past month heroin use among patients on OMT.

RESULTS

Despite an overall decreasing trend over time, heroin use among patients on OMT is indeed common, with half of patients declaring concurrent use. Our study unveils differentiated risks of heroin use vary according to the type of OMT, with patients on methadone more likely to use heroin compared to those on buprenorphine. The use of multilevel-related measures also uncovers high heterogeneity among patients' profiles, reflecting different stages in the treatment process, as well as differentiated practices across treatment centres.

CONCLUSION

Opioid maintenance treatment is associated with heroin use, in particular when methadone is involved. The heterogeneity among patients on OMT should be given particular attention, as it underscores the need for tailored interventions.

Does opioid agonist treatment reduce overdose mortality risk in people who are older or have physical comorbidities? Cohort study using linked administrative health data in New South Wales, Australia, 2002-17

AIMS

To quantify the association between opioid agonist treatment (OAT) and overdose death by age group; test the hypothesis that across different age groups, opioid overdose mortality is lowest during OAT with buprenorphine compared with time out of treatment or OAT with methadone; and test associations between OAT and opioid overdose mortality in the presence of chronic circulatory, respiratory, liver and kidney diseases.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study using linked administrative data.

SETTING

New South Wales, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 37 764 people prescribed OAT, 1 August 2002 and 31 December 2017.

MEASUREMENTS

OAT exposure, opioid overdose mortality and key confounders were measured using linked population data sets on OAT entry and exit, hospitalization, mental health care, incarceration and mortality. ICD-10 codes were used to define opioid overdose mortality and chronic disease groups of interest.

FINDINGS

Relative to time out of treatment, time in OAT was associated with a lower risk of opioid overdose death across all age groups and chronic diseases. Among people aged 50 years and older, there was weak evidence that buprenorphine may be associated with greater protection against opioid overdose death than methadone [generalized estimating equation (GEE) adjusted incident rate ratio (aIRR) = 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.21, 1.02; marginal structural models (MSM) aIRR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.17, 1.41]. Buprenorphine was associated with greater protection against overdose death than methadone for clients with circulatory (MSM aIRR = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.11, 0.67) or respiratory (MSM aIRR = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.94) diseases, but not liver (MSM aIRR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.14, 2.43) or kidney (MSM aIRR = 1.16; 95% CI = 0.31, 4.36) diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) appears to reduce mortality risk in people with opioid use disorder who are older or who have physical comorbidities. Opioid overdose mortality during OAT with buprenorphine appears to be lower and reduced in clients with circulatory and respiratory diseases compared with OAT with methadone.

Transitioning From High-dose Methadone to Buprenorphine Using a Microdosing Approach: Unique Considerations at ASAM Level 3 Facilities

Transitions from high-dose methadone to buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) present risk of precipitated withdrawal related to the introduction of a high-affinity partial agonist at the mu-opioid receptor after occupancy by a lower-affinity full agonist. Various strategies have been explored to maintain patient stability during this process, including microdosing buprenorphine. Current literature lacks consensus on an optimal setting and strategy for initiating a buprenorphine microdosing protocol and gives little detail on patients' conditions after the acute transition period. We report a 6-day microdosing transition from methadone 100 mg directly to sublingual buprenorphine, followed by a 20-day period of monitoring and additional treatment. This patient tolerated a sublingual buprenorphine microdosing protocol while using supportive medications with a peak Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale score of 6. The patient's most significant withdrawal symptoms occurred several days after completion of the microdosing process. This case demonstrates the feasibility of using a transmucosal buprenorphine formulation in microdosing transitions from high-dose methadone directly to buprenorphine, and highlights the utility of a medically monitored intensive inpatient setting (American Society of Addiction Medicine level 3.7) in providing appropriate monitoring and treatment during and after a microdosing transition.

Clinical Case Conference: Strategies for Transferring From Methadone to Buprenorphine

The mainstay of treatment for opioid use disorder are medications, methadone (a full opioid agonist), or buprenorphine (a partial opioid agonist), in conjunction with psychosocial interventions. Both treatments are effective but safety, efficacy, and patient preference can lead to a decision to change from one treatment to the other. Transfer from buprenorphine to methadone is not clinically challenging; however, changing from methadone to buprenorphine is more complex. Published reports describe varied approaches to manage this transfer to both minimize patient symptoms associated with withdrawal from methadone and reduce risk of precipitating withdrawal symptoms with introduction of the partial agonist buprenorphine [Lintzeris et al. J Addict Med. 2020; in press]. There is no single approach for methadone to buprenorphine that is superior to others and no approach that is suitable for all case presentations. This case conference describes three different approaches to achieve a successful methadone to buprenorphine transfer and provides commentary on how the case may be managed based on published transfer "strategies."

Transition From Full Mu Opioid Agonists to Buprenorphine in Opioid Dependent Patients-A Critical Review

Methadone, a full opioid agonist at the mu-, kappa-, and delta-receptor, and buprenorphine, a partial agonist at the mu receptor, are first-line medications in opioid maintenance treatment. Transition from methadone to buprenorphine may precipitate withdrawal, and no accepted algorithm for this procedure has been developed. Current treatment strategies recommend transfer from methadone to buprenorphine predominantly in patients at low doses of methadone (30-40 mg/day). There are some reports indicating that transition from higher doses of methadone may be possible. A number of dosing strategies have been proposed to soften withdrawal symptoms and facilitate transfer including use of other opioids or medications and especially microdosing techniques for buprenorphine. The case series and studies available thus far are reviewed.