The impact of chemical dependency on health care professionals involved with the delivery of anesthesia

Workplace access, burnout, and prescription drug misuse among Korean hospital nurses: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Prescription drug misuse has been identified as a global issue of concern. Nurses' prescription drug misuse is linked to personal health problems and impaired nursing care. This study explored the level of South Korean hospital nurses' prescription drug misuse and examined associations with workplace access and burnout.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from 1142 nurses working in South Korean hospital settings. Nurses completed the online survey anonymously. Descriptive analysis, logistic regression, and Shapley value assessment were conducted.

RESULTS

Pain relievers (44.2%), IV drips (26.8%), and antibiotics (13.5%) were the most commonly misused drugs among hospital nurses. Accessibility in the workplace was high, with nurses reporting frequent administration of IV drips, pain relievers, and antibiotics and perceiving these drugs as easily accessible. Logistic regression demonstrated that perceived availability was significantly related to misuse across all drug types. Burnout was associated with IV drips, sleeping pills, and steroids, increasing the likelihood of misuse. Shapley feature importance analysis highlighted perceived availability as the most influential factor for IV drips, pain relievers, and steroids, while burnout emerged as crucial for antibiotics and sleeping pills. Notably, age played a significant role in appetite suppressant misuse, distinguishing it from other drugs.

CONCLUSION

Our results revealed that workplace access and burnout are associated with nurses' prescription drug misuse. Effective educational strategies are essential for enhancing nurses' willingness to seek help for personal health issues. Hospital organizations play a crucial role in facilitating access to healthcare and fostering a supportive environment for nurses to seek treatment when necessary. Additionally, governmental policies should prioritize the implementation of active surveillance systems to monitor medication usage in healthcare settings, thereby mitigating drug misuse among healthcare professionals. By addressing these issues, we can ensure the well-being of nurses and promote a safer healthcare environment.

Burnout und Abhängigkeit bei ärztlichem Personal zeitlos und während der COVID-19-Pandemie am Beispiel der Chirurgie und Anästhesie

Hintergrund

Die COVID-19(„coronavirus disease 2019“)-Pandemie wirkt sich auf die psychische Gesundheit und das berufliche Verhalten von Chirurgen und Chirurginnen und Anästhesisten und Anästhesistinnen aus und scheint einen Einfluss auf die Substanzabhängigkeit zu haben.

Fragestellung

Welche Gründe gibt es für das Auftreten einer Substanzabhängigkeit und einem Burnout bei Chirurgen und Chirurginnen und Anästhesisten und Anästhesistinnen zeitlos und während der COVID-19-Pandemie und welche Verbesserungsmaßnahmen könnten im klinischen Alltag helfen?

Material und Methoden

Es wurde eine Literaturrecherche in Form einer systematischen Übersicht („systematic review“) zu Studien und Übersichtsarbeiten durchgeführt, die für das Thema relevant sind.

Ergebnisse

Im Laufe der Jahre hat sich gezeigt, dass Chirurgen bzw. Chirurginnen und Anästhesisten bzw. Anästhesistinnen aufgrund ihres direkten Zugangs zu Medikamenten in der Klinik und der arbeitsbezogenen Stressbelastung zur Drogenabhängigkeit neigen. Insbesondere Chirurgen und Chirurginnen und Anästhesisten und Anästhesistinnen schienen eine erhöhte Neigung zur Suchterkrankungen und ein erhöhtes Burnout-Risiko in der Pandemie vorzuweisen.

Schlussfolgerungen

Präventive Maßnahmen zugunsten besserer Arbeitsbedingungen in der Chirurgie und Anästhesie und eine bessere Drogenkontrolle (nicht nur wegen der Ausgabe, sondern auch wegen der richtigen Drogentests) sowie mehr Therapie- und Wiedereingliederungsprogramme unter psychiatrischer Begleitung und in Zusammenarbeit mit einem multidisziplinären Team sind sinnvoll.

Substance use among vocational trainees in Australia: differences between medical specialties

BACKGROUND

There have been few large-scale nationally representative studies on the prevalence of substance use among doctors. Additionally, the association of different medical specialties with the use of different substances requires further research.

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate how the use of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs varied between junior doctors enrolled in different specialty training programmes.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted on a national survey of 12,252 Australian doctors. The population of interest was junior doctors currently enrolled in a specialty training programme, termed Vocational Trainees (VTs) (n=1890, 15.4% overall sample). Self-report prevalence of current alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use were assessed, and hazardous alcohol use was assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Logistic regression was used to examine the association between specialty and substance use, adjusting for demographic characteristics when required.

RESULTS

One in six VTs reported hazardous levels of alcohol use (n=268, 17.3%). After adjusting for confounders, the association between the prevalence of alcohol use and the specialties of emergency medicine/ICU (OR=2.15, 95% CI:1.40-3.32, p<0.001), anaesthetics (OR=2.53, 95% CI:1.35-4.76, p=0.004) and obstetrics/gynaecology (OR=1.89, 95% CI:1.19-3.02, p=0.007) remained significant. No significant associations were found between tobacco use/illicit drug use/hazardous alcohol use and medical specialty.

CONCLUSIONS

While rates of substance use and hazardous alcohol use in VTs are similar, if not lower, to the general population, it poses a concern that there are higher rates of alcohol use in certain medical specialties. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Postmortem qualitative analysis of psychological, occupational, and environmental factors associated with lethal anesthetic and/or opioid abuse among anesthesiologists: case series

BACKGROUND

Anesthetic and/or opioid abuse is more prevalent among anesthesiologists than in other medical specialties and it has been associated with high mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with lethal anesthetic and/or opioid abuse among anesthesiologists.

METHODS

We evaluated psychological factors, and occupational history and circumstances of death of anesthesiologists who died from anesthetic abuse. Data were obtained post-mortem from colleagues, and relatives. After finding eligible cases, we identified the key informants, who were interviewed personally or via email, through the qualitative method known as "Psychological Autopsy".

RESULTS

Eighteen cases of death were identified, but we were able to interview 44% of them (n = 8), most of whom were young males. They died at home or at the hospital and were found "at the scene". Being an introspective person who did not share personal issues at workplace was the most prevalent personal characteristic. At work, they seemed to perform very well their functions, but some presented subtle changes such as to staying more than usual at the workplace and/or neglecting some of their responsibilities. The main reported factors to explain their substance abuse were emotional problems including psychiatric, excessive hours of work, and other health factors.

CONCLUSION

This study identified that emotional disturbances, compulsive work, and general health problems were the more prominent factors involved with those deaths. Further, larger studies are needed to better understand how these factors could be early identified in order to timely prevent anesthetic and/or opioid abuse and several deaths among anesthesiologists.

Workplace well-being in pediatric anesthesia: How to design and implement a bespoke evidence-based framework in your department

BACKGROUND

All anesthetists are at risk of mental ill health and pediatric anesthetists face additional stressors that may impact upon well-being, particularly after an adverse outcome. The SARS COV-2 pandemic has resulted in a plethora of resources to support the well-being of frontline workers. Developing a well-being system for an anesthesia department using these resources may be complex to implement.

AIMS

In this article we outline how an anesthesia department can design and implement a framework for wellbeing, regardless of resources and financial constraints. We use the example of a free online toolkit developed in Australia for anesthetists.

METHODS

The "Long lives, Healthy Workplaces toolkit" is a framework which has been specifically developed by mental health experts for anesthetists, and does not require departments to pay for external experts.1 Departments can design a long-term model of evidence-based mental health strategies to meet their unique needs using five steps outlined in the toolkit and detailed in this article. The framework uses cycles of assessment and review to create an adaptable approach to incorporate emerging evidence. We explain how culture can impact the implementation of a well-being framework and we outline how departments can set goals and priorities.

CONCLUSION

Departments have different constraints which will alter how they approach supporting anaesthetists' wellbeing. Regardless of location or funding all departments should explicitly address anesthetists well-being. Long term sustainable well-being programs require a strategic and coordinated approach.