The Analgesic and Emotional Response to Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-controlled Study. Clin J Pain. 2018;34:1025-1031. [PMID: 29698250 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000623]

Integrating mechanistic-based and classification-based concepts into perioperative pain management: an educational guide for acute pain physicians

Chronic pain begins with acute pain. Physicians tend to classify pain by duration (acute vs chronic) and mechanism (nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic). Although this taxonomy may facilitate diagnosis and documentation, such categories are to some degree arbitrary constructs, with significant overlap in terms of mechanisms and treatments. In clinical practice, there are myriad different definitions for chronic pain and a substantial portion of chronic pain involves mixed phenotypes. Classification of pain based on acuity and mechanisms informs management at all levels and constitutes a critical part of guidelines and treatment for chronic pain care. Yet specialty care is often siloed, with advances in understanding lagging years behind in some areas in which these developments should be at the forefront of clinical practice. For example, in perioperative pain management, enhanced recovery protocols are not standardized and tend to drive treatment without consideration of mechanisms, which in many cases may be incongruent with personalized medicine and mechanism-based treatment. In this educational document, we discuss mechanisms and classification of pain as it pertains to commonly performed surgical procedures. Our goal is to provide a clinical reference for the acute pain physician to facilitate pain management decision-making (both diagnosis and therapy) in the perioperative period.

Case report: safety and efficacy of lidocaine infusion for the treatment of intractable zoster-associated neuralgia in solid organ transplant recipients

Introduction

Solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk for developing severe zoster-associated neuralgia, and the pharmaceutic therapies of pain management for these patients with limited organ function are challenging. Intravenous lidocaine infusion showed positive analgesic effects and is used for the management of neuropathic pain. This case series reports the safety and effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine infusion in the treatment of intractable zoster-associated neuralgia in solid organ transplant recipients.

Case series presentation

Five solid organ transplant recipients suffering from refractory zoster-associated neuralgia (numeric rating scale 8-10, despite using high doses of antiepileptic drugs or combined with opioids) were enrolled. Intravenous lidocaine (5 mg/kg ideal bodyweight) was administered over 1.5 h with the monitoring of vital signs. Pain intensity, patient satisfaction, adverse events, typical liver, and kidney function were evaluated. All subjects reported high satisfaction with their treatment and effective pain relief at the 6-month follow-up. One patient experienced short and mild numbness in the mouth and dizziness after the therapy, but no major adverse reactions were reported.

Conclusion

This case series provides evidence that intravenous lidocaine infusion provided effective pain relief as an analgesic treatment option for transplant patients with intractable zoster-associated neuralgia.

Long-term pain outcomes after serial lidocaine infusion in participants with recent onset of peripheral neuropathic pain: A pilot double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the outcomes up to 12 weeks after serial lidocaine infusion for early-onset peripheral neuropathic pain.

METHODS

This pilot double-blind, randomized, 2-arm placebo-controlled trial recruited 50 participants with onset of peripheral neuropathic pain within the past 6 months and randomized them to either receive lidocaine (3 mg/kg) in normal saline (50 mL) intravenous infusion over 1 hour (lidocaine group) once a week for 4 weeks or 50 mL of normal saline infusion (placebo group) once a week for 4 weeks. Twenty-nine participants completed the protocol; 15 participants were assigned to the lidocaine group and 14 to the placebo group. The outcomes were pain intensity assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), quality of life assessed using EuroQol-Five Dimensions-Five Levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), psychological function using the Thai version of the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), pain medication use, and adverse effects, all assessed at baseline (BL) and again at 4, 8, and 12 weeks following randomization.

RESULTS

The reported tramadol use at 8 and 12 weeks following the first infusion was significantly lower in the lidocaine group (P = .023). No other significant between-group differences were observed at any time point or for any other outcome, and no serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Multiple lidocaine infusions of 3 mg/kg once a week for 4 weeks in participants with recent onset of peripheral neuropathic pain demonstrated no significant benefits in pain intensity, quality of life, or psychological outcomes. At most, this treatment may result in less tramadol use.

Effects of intravenous single-bolus lidocaine infusion versus intravenous single-bolus magnesium sulfate infusion on postoperative pain, emotional status, and quality of life in patients undergoing spine fusion surgery: a randomized study

BACKGROUND

We assessed the efficiency of intravenous adjuvants in decreasing opioid intake and pain scores after spine fusion surgery.

METHODS

This study included 120 patients aged 18-60 listed for spine fusion surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to four groups: Group (Lidocaine): received IV lidocaine 4 mg/kg in 50 mL volume over 30 min. Group (Magnesium): received IV magnesium sulfate 30mg/kg in 50 mL volume over 30 min. Group (combined Lidocaine and Magnesium): received IV lidocaine 4 mg/kg in 50 mL volume over 30 min.+IV magnesium sulfate 30mg/kg in 50 mL volume over 30 min. Group (Control): received IV saline 50 mL. The time to the first request analgesia, the postoperative pain score, total analgesic use, patient satisfaction, anxiety, depression, mental state, quality of life, and side effects were measured.

RESULTS

The combined group had more extended time for the first analgesic request and fewer rescue analgesia doses than the other groups. NRS scores at rest or movement were statistically significantly lower in the lidocaine group and the combined group compared to the control group (P1, P3<0.05) at almost all times. This combination reduces anxiety and depression and improves overall health up to three months after a single infusion. The combined group had higher patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

A synergistic effect of a combination of lidocaine and magnesium sulfate on perioperative pain was found. It reduces analgesic consumption, depression, and anxiety and improves overall health up to three months after a single infusion dose.

Treating neuropathic pain and comorbid affective disorders: Preclinical and clinical evidence

INTRODUCTION

Neuropathic pain (NP) significantly impacts quality of life and often coexists with affective disorders such as anxiety and depression. Addressing both NP and its psychiatric manifestations requires a comprehensive understanding of therapeutic options. This study aimed to review the main pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for NP and comorbid affective disorders to describe their mechanisms of action and how they are commonly used in clinical practice.

METHODS

A review was conducted across five electronic databases, focusing on pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for NP and its associated affective disorders. The following combination of MeSH and title/abstract keywords were used: "neuropathic pain," "affective disorders," "depression," "anxiety," "treatment," and "therapy." Both animal and human studies were included to discuss the underlying therapeutic mechanisms of these interventions.

RESULTS

Pharmacological interventions, including antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and opioids, modulate neural synaptic transmission to alleviate NP. Topical agents, such as capsaicin, lidocaine patches, and botulinum toxin A, offer localized relief by desensitizing pain pathways. Some of these drugs, especially antidepressants, also treat comorbid affective disorders. Non-pharmacological techniques, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and photobiomodulation therapy, modulate cortical activity and have shown promise for NP and mood disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The interconnection between NP and comorbid affective disorders necessitates holistic therapeutic strategies. Some pharmacological treatments can be used for both conditions, and non-pharmacological interventions have emerged as promising complementary approaches. Future research should explore novel molecular pathways to enhance treatment options for these interrelated conditions.

Effects of perioperative intravenous lidocaine and esketamine on the quality of recovery and emotional state of patients after thyroidectomy: A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial

Background and Aims

Perioperative intravenous (IV) infusions of lidocaine and esketamine reduce postoperative pain, but there are few studies on the quality of recovery and patients' emotional states postoperatively. We aimed to explore the effects of perioperative IV lidocaine and esketamine on the quality of recovery and emotional state after thyroidectomy.

Methods

In this randomised trial, 137 patients undergoing thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to three groups: a lidocaine group (Group L), an esketamine group (Group E) and a normal saline placebo group (Group C). The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 2. The secondary outcomes included Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores on days 1 and 2 after surgery, pain scores, opioid consumption and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Statistical analysis was performed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests.

Results

The global QoR-40 scores in groups L and E on POD 1 and POD 2 were significantly higher than in group C (P < 0.001). The SAS and SDS scores on POD 1 and POD 2 in groups L and E were significantly lower than in group C (P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores among the three groups at 1 h, 2 h, 6 h and 12 h (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Perioperative IV lidocaine and esketamine improve the quality of postoperative recovery and the emotional state of patients undergoing thyroidectomy.

Investigational Drugs for the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

The pharmacological treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is unsatisfactory, and there is a clinical need for new approaches. Several drugs under advanced clinical development are addressed in this review. A systematic literature search was conducted in three electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus) and in the ClinicalTrials.gov register from 1 January 2016 to 1 June 2023 to identify Phase II, III and IV clinical trials evaluating drugs for the treatment of PHN. A total of 18 clinical trials were selected evaluating 15 molecules with pharmacological actions on nine different molecular targets: Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor (AT2R) antagonism (olodanrigan), Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel (VGCC) α2δ subunit inhibition (crisugabalin, mirogabalin and pregabalin), Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel (VGSC) blockade (funapide and lidocaine), Cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibition (TRK-700), Adaptor-Associated Kinase 1 (AAK1) inhibition (LX9211), Lanthionine Synthetase C-Like Protein (LANCL) activation (LAT8881), N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism (esketamine), mu opioid receptor agonism (tramadol, oxycodone and hydromorphone) and Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) inhibition (fulranumab). In brief, there are several drugs in advanced clinical development for treating PHN with some of them reporting promising results. AT2R antagonism, AAK1 inhibition, LANCL activation and NGF inhibition are considered first-in-class analgesics. Hopefully, these trials will result in a better clinical management of PHN.

Association between perioperative intravenous lidocaine and subjective quality of recovery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on the quality of recovery (QoR) following surgery.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

SETTING

Postoperative care.

INTERVENTION

Intravenous lidocaine during perioperative period.

PATIENTS

Adults undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was postoperative QoR measured with QoR-40 questionnaire, while the secondary outcomes included five individual dimensions (i.e., emotional, state, physical comfort, psychological support, physical independence, and pain) of QoR-40, intraoperative opioid consumption, and risk of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP).

MAIN RESULTS

Medline, Cochrane Library, Google scholar, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to June 2021. Fourteen RCTs involving 1148 patients in total undergoing elective surgery published from 2012 to 2021 were included. QoR-40 scores were evaluated at postoperative 24 h (12 trials), 72 h (one trial), and Day 5 (one trial), respectively. Pooled results revealed significantly higher global [mean difference (MD) = 9.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.33 to 12.97; I² = 97%; 13 RCTs; n = 1085] and individual dimension QoR-40 scores in the lidocaine group than those in placebo group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant impact of the type of surgery, age, gender, surgical time, anesthetic technique, lidocaine dosage, and time of assessment on global QoR-40 scores. The use of intravenous lidocaine was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative remifentanil consumption compared with that in the placebo group (standardized MD = -0.91, 95%CI: -1.32 to -0.51; I² = 86%; 10 RCTs; n = 799). There was no difference in risk of CPSP between the two groups [relative risk (RR) = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.33 to 1.25; I² = 58%; 4 RCTs; n = 309].

CONCLUSION

Our results verified the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine for enhancing postoperative quality of recovery by using a validated subjective tool and reducing intraoperative remifentanil consumption in patients receiving elective surgery under general anesthesia. Further studies are warranted to verify its efficacy in the acute care setting.

Role of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding intravenous lidocaine infusion to treat peripheral neuropathy. The clinical symptoms of peripheral neuropathy occur on a broad spectrum and stem from many etiologies resulting in complex treatment approaches. This review presents the background, evidence, and indications for the use of intravenous lidocaine infusions as a treatment option for this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

The clinical range of peripheral neuropathy symptoms includes pain, numbness, muscle weakness, paresthesia, balance difficulty, and autonomic dysfunction. However, severe neuropathic pain remains one of the most debilitating symptoms that significantly affects the quality of life. Current treatment options include antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and, in some cases, opiates, but these are often ineffective, creating the need for other therapeutic approaches.The pathophysiology of neuropathic pain involves sodium channels which create abnormal pain responses. Intravenous lidocaine primarily functions by inhibiting membrane sodium channels which desensitize peripheral nociceptors, thus creating an analgesic effect. The research in using intravenous lidocaine for neuropathic pain is not fully complete and requires further evaluation.

SUMMARY

Peripheral neuropathy is a manifestation commonly resulting from diabetes, alcohol abuse, vitamin deficiencies, and chemotherapy, among other causes. One of the most significant complications is neuropathic pain which is often resistant to multi-modal therapeutic regimens. Intravenous lidocaine infusions are a newer treatment option for neuropathic pain, which have additional anti-inflammatory effects with a minimal side effect profile. Studies have concluded it effectively treats neuropathic pain for weeks after administration, but results are variable depending on specific procedures. Further research, including additional direct comparison studies, should be conducted to fully evaluate this drug's usefulness.

Pharmacotherapeutic Options for Managing Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite an increasing number of available therapies, the treatment of neuropathic pain remains a major issue. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate that only a minority of patients with neuropathic pain have an adequate response to pharmacological treatment and that most drugs have dose-limiting side effects. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials published in the last five years. We searched for relevant papers within PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Clinical Trials database (ClinicalTrials.gov). Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, data extraction, and bias assessment. We identified 39 randomised controlled trials and included 16 in the meta-analysis. Trial outcomes were generally modest even for first-line drugs such as tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and gabapentinoids. Many drugs acting on new pain targets are currently under development. Clinical data are currently available for sodium channel isoform-specific antagonists, anti-nerve growth factor molecules, and fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitors.

Neural therapy for fibromyalgia: Myth or improving quality of life?

BACKGROUND

Fibromyalgia is a common rheumatic disease, which is thought to be a neuroendocrine dysregulation disorder. Patients' quality of life (QOL) is severely affected by this disease. Though neural therapy, as a treatment option, attempts to correct the underlying neuroendocrine dysfunction, yet there is no proven evidence of its effect on this disease. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of neural therapy on pain and functionality in patients with fibromyalgia.

METHODS

The study was a 1-year retrospective cohort study and held in physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics. A total of 60 female patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia were included. Sixty female patients with fibromyalgia were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups; the first group (n = 30) received neural therapy, the second group (n = 30) received conventional physical therapy and each of the two groups received the same home exercise (stretching, strengthening and aerobic exercises) programme for four weeks. The primer outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) scores after the treatment.

RESULTS

The social functioning score exhibited a significant improvement only in the intra-group comparison of the neural therapy group (P < .001). However, after treatment, the VAS, FIQ and all the SF-36 parameters, except role limitations because of physical health, were detected to be significantly improved in the neural therapy group compared with the exercise group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neural therapy may be an effective alternative treatment for improving the QOL in patients with fibromyalgia.

Expert consensus of the Chinese Association for the Study of Pain on ion channel drugs for neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain (NPP) is a kind of pain caused by disease or damage impacting the somatosensory system. Ion channel drugs are the main treatment for NPP; however, their irregular usage leads to unsatisfactory pain relief. To regulate the treatment of NPP with ion channel drugs in clinical practice, the Chinese Association for the Study of Pain organized first-line pain management experts from China to write an expert consensus as the reference for the use of ion channels drugs . Here, we reviewed the mechanism and characteristics of sodium and calcium channel drugs, and developed recommendations for the therapeutic principles and clinical practice for carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lidocaine, bulleyaconitine A, pregabalin, and gabapentin. We hope this guideline provides guidance to clinicians and patients on the use of ion channel drugs for the management of NPP.

Intravenous lidocaine alleviates postherpetic neuralgia in rats via regulation of neuroinflammation of microglia and astrocytes

This study aimed to explore the effects and possible mechanisms of intravenous lidocaine in postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) rats. Mechanical withdrawal thresholds and thermal withdrawal latencies were measured. Open field test, elevated plus maze test, and tail suspension test were used to assess anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors. Microglia and astrocytes in spinal dorsal horn (SDH), prefrontal cortex (PFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and hippocampus were analyzed. The expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-4 in SDH and serum were evaluated. Intravenous lidocaine alleviated mechanical allodynia and thermal hypoalgesia, downregulated the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β, and inhibited the activation of microglia and astrocytes in SDH. In addition, it reduced the activation of astrocyte but not microglia in PFC, ACC, and hippocampus. Intravenous lidocaine may relieve PHN by inhibiting the activation of microglia and astrocyte in SDH or by reducing the neuroinflammation and astrocyte activation in PFC, ACC, and hippocampus.

•

Intravenous lidocaine alleviates PHN in rats

•

Intravenous lidocaine inhibits microglia and astrocyte activation

•

Intravenous lidocaine cannot relieve anxiety and depression in PHN rats

Impact of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pain and rapid recovery of patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery: a randomized, double-blind trial

Background

To explore the effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pain and the rapid recovery of patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery.

Methods

The patients who underwent gastrointestinal tumor surgery from May to July 2020 were selected. The patients were randomly divided into the lidocaine group (group L) and control group (group C) by the random number table method, with 60 patients in each group. Both groups of patients received an intravenous drug infusion immediately after induction of tracheal intubation under general anesthesia. In group L, 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine was slowly injected intravenously at a rate of 1.5 mg·kg^-1·h^-1 to the surgical suture, and intravenous inhalation was used to maintain the depth of anesthesia. Group C patients were given the same volume of normal saline. The 2-, 4-, 7-, 14-, 30-, and 90-day numerical rating scale (NRS) and the proportion of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) after 3 months for both groups after surgery were recorded. Each patient's postoperative comfort score, requiring analgesia, return of flatus, bowl movement, hospitalization days, hospitalization expenses, and adverse events were also recorded.

Results

One hundred and twenty patients were enrolled but 5 of them failed to complete the treatment process. Therefore, 58 and 57 patients in group L and C were included into the final analysis. The NRS of patients in group L was significantly lower than that of group C at all time points after surgery (P<0.05), and the proportion of CPSP in group L was significantly lower than that of group C (P<0.05). The percentage of patients requiring analgesia and postoperative comfort score of group L was significantly higher than that of group C (P<0.01), patient's return of flatus, bowl movement, hospitalization days, and hospitalization expenses in group L were significantly lower than those in group C (P<0.05). There were no difference of adverse events between the 2 groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

During the perioperative period of radical gastrointestinal tumor surgery, intravenous lidocaine infusion can reduce acute postoperative pain, promote postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, and improve postoperative comfort.

Predicting Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients with Herpes Zoster by Machine Learning: A Retrospective Study

Introduction

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a neuropathic pain secondary to shingles. Studies have shown that early pain intervention can reduce the incidence or intensity of PHN. The aim of this study was to predict whether a patient with acute herpetic neuralgia will develop PHN and to help clinicians make better decisions.

Method

Five hundred two patients with shingles were reviewed and classified according to whether they had PHN. The risk factors associated with PHN were determined by univariate analysis. Logistic regression and random forest algorithms were used to do machine learning, and then the prediction accuracies of the two algorithms were compared, choosing the superior one to predict the next 60 new cases.

Results

Age, NRS score, rash site, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score, antiviral therapy and immunosuppression were found related to the occurrence of PHN. The NRS score was the most closely related factor with an importance of 0.31. As for accuracy, the random forest was 96.24%, better than that of logistic regression in which the accuracy was 92.83%. Then, the random forest model was used to predict 60 newly diagnosed patients with herpes zoster, and the accuracy rate was 88.33% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 77.43–95.18%.

Conclusions

This study provides an idea and a method in which, by analyzing the data of previous cases, we can develop a predictive model to predict whether patients with shingles will develop PHN.

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: Systematic review and French recommendations

Neuropathic pain remains a significant unmet medical need. Several recommendations have recently been proposed concerning pharmacotherapy, neurostimulation techniques and interventional management, but no comprehensive guideline encompassing all these treatments has yet been issued. We performed a systematic review of pharmacotherapy, neurostimulation, surgery, psychotherapies and other types of therapy for peripheral or central neuropathic pain, based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals before January 2018. The main inclusion criteria were chronic neuropathic pain for at least three months, a randomized controlled methodology, at least three weeks of follow-up, at least 10 patients per group, and a double-blind design for drug therapy. Based on the GRADE system, we provide weak-to-strong recommendations for use and proposal as a first-line treatment for SNRIs (duloxetine and venlafaxine), gabapentin and tricyclic antidepressants and, for topical lidocaine and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation specifically for peripheral neuropathic pain; a weak recommendation for use and proposal as a second-line treatment for pregabalin, tramadol, combination therapy (antidepressant combined with gabapentinoids), and for high-concentration capsaicin patches and botulinum toxin A specifically for peripheral neuropathic pain; a weak recommendation for use and proposal as a third-line treatment for high-frequency rTMS of the motor cortex, spinal cord stimulation (failed back surgery syndrome and painful diabetic polyneuropathy) and strong opioids (in the absence of an alternative). Psychotherapy (cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness) is recommended as a second-line therapy, as an add-on to other therapies. An algorithm encompassing all the recommended treatments is proposed.

Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The prevalence of neuropathic pain is estimated to be between 7 and 10% in the general population. The efficacy of intravenous (IV) lidocaine has been studied by numerous clinical trials on patients with neuropathic pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of IV lidocaine compared with a placebo for neuropathic pain and secondly to assess the safety of its administration. Methods: A literature search on PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google scholar databases was performed for relevant studies published up to February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating IV lidocaine treatment for pain relief in patients with neuropathic pain were included. Results: 26 articles met the inclusion criteria. Patients with varied etiology of neuropathic pain were among the patient samples of these studies. Fifteen articles were included for quantitative analysis. Lidocaine was superior to a placebo in relieving neuropathic pain in the early post-infusion period [Mean Difference (MD) = -11.9; 95% Confidence interval (CI): -16.8 to -7; p < 0.00001]. Multiple infusions of lidocaine over a period of 4 weeks, however, had no significant effect on reliving neuropathic pain (MD = -0.96; 95% CI: -2.02 to 0.11; p = 0.08). IV lidocaine was also associated with a significant number of adverse events compared to a placebo [Odds Ratio (OR) = 7.75; 95% CI: 3.18-18.92; p < 0.00001]. Conclusion: Our study indicates that while IV lidocaine is effective in pain control among patients with neuropathic pain in the immediate post-infusion period, it does not have a long-lasting, persistent effect. IV infusions of the drug are associated with an increased risk of side effects compared to a placebo. However, the risk of serious adverse events is negligible. Further, well-designed RCTs evaluating the effects of various dosages and infusion periods of IV lidocaine are required to provide clear guidelines on its clinical use.

American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Perioperative Opioid Minimization in Opioid-Naïve Patients

Surgical care episodes place opioid-naïve patients at risk for transitioning to new persistent postoperative opioid use. With one of the central principles being the application of multimodal pain interventions to reduce the reliance on opioid-based medications, enhanced recovery pathways provide a framework that decreases perioperative opioid use. The fourth Perioperative Quality Initiative brought together a group of international experts representing anesthesiology, surgery, and nursing with the objective of providing consensus recommendations on this important topic. Fourth Perioperative Quality Initiative was a consensus-building conference designed around a modified Delphi process in which the group alternately convened for plenary discussion sessions in between small group discussions. The process included several iterative steps including a literature review of the topics, building consensus around the important questions related to the topic, and sequential steps of content building and refinement until agreement was achieved and a consensus document was produced. During the fourth Perioperative Quality Initiative conference and thereafter as a writing group, reference applicability to the topic was discussed in any area where there was disagreement. For this manuscript, the questions answered included (1) What are the potential strategies for preventing persistent postoperative opioid use? (2) Is opioid-free anesthesia and analgesia feasible and appropriate for routine operations? and (3) Is opioid-free (intraoperative) anesthesia associated with equivalent or superior outcomes compared to an opioid minimization in the perioperative period? We will discuss the relevant literature for each questions, emphasize what we do not know, and prioritize the areas for future research.

Depression as a mediator of quality of life in patients with neuropathic pain: A cross-sectional study

AIMS

To explore whether pain intensity has an indirect effect on quality of life through mediation of depression in patients with neuropathic pain (NeP).

DESIGN

An observational, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

A convenience sample of patients suffering from NeP were enrolled from June 2015 - May 2016. Three questionnaires were used to collect data of pain intensity, Quality of life and depression. Andrew Hayes' PROCESS macro modelling tool for the SPSS software, based on the mediation Bootstrap confidence interval method, was used to analyse the mediation effect.

RESULTS

Both pain intensity and depression correlated negatively with the quality of life of patients. The indirect effect of pain intensity on the quality of life through depression was negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased pain intensity and depression were associated with a decreased quality of life in patients suffering from NeP and pain intensity had an indirect effect on the quality of life of patients through depression.

IMPACT

A low quality of life and depression are commonly seen in patients with NeP. However, little is known about the relationship between pain, quality of life and depression. Both pain intensity and depression had some negative effect on quality of life in patients with NeP. Pain intensity had an indirect effect on quality of life through a mediation effect of depression in patients with NeP. When caring for patients with NeP, nurses should assess depression routinely and try to alleviate it.

Short-Term Effects of 10% Lidocaine Ointment on Allodynia in Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study

Background: There is currently no established therapy for allodynia, which is a type of neuropathic pain. However, high concentrations of topical anesthetics can anesthetize the skin and increase the sensory threshold to tactile stimulation. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the short-term effects and safety of 10% lidocaine ointment for treating allodynia in cancer pain. Design: This was a randomized double-blind crossover study comparing the efficacies of 10% lidocaine ointment and placebo ointment for the treatment of static allodynia and spontaneous pain within 24 hours after ointment application, using a numerical rating scale (NRS). Setting/Subjects: The subjects were 25 cancer patients with current pain rating of ≥4 on NRS of static allodynia in cancer pain. Results: The NRS scores for static allodynia were significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the placebo group at two to eight hours after initial ointment application. A total of 56% of patients (95% confidence interval 35%-77%) had NRS improvements of ≥50% at eight hours after lidocaine ointment application compared with 20% (3%-37%) after placebo ointment application. There was no interaction between time and group in terms of NRS values for spontaneous pain (p = 0.835), but a significant main effect of group was found, with NRS scores being significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the placebo group (p = 0.027). There were no adverse events associated with lidocaine use. Conclusions: Lidocaine ointment 10% can alleviate allodynia for two to eight hours after application.

The efficiency and safety of steroid addition to multimodal cocktail periarticular injection in knee joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Steroids are frequently used for postoperative pain relief without definite evidence. This study was conducted to assess the pain management effect of the addition of steroids to a multimodal cocktail periarticular injection (MCPI) in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty and evaluate their safety. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through April, 2018. A total of 918 patients from ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were ultimately included. Compared with placebo groups, steroids application could effectively relieve pain on postoperative day (POD)1; decrease C-Reactive protein (CRP) level on POD3; improve range of motion (ROM) in postoperative 5 days; reduce morphine consumption, achieve earlier straight leg raising (SLR), and shorten the length of stay (LOS) in hospital. With regards to adverse effects, it did not increase the risk of postoperative infection, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), or other complications. However, no significant difference in pain relief, ROM, or increased Knee Society Knee Function Scores were found during long-term follow up. Overall, this meta-analysis ensured the efficiency and safety of steroids with MCPI in knee arthroplasty patients during the early postoperative period.