1
|
Diep C, Ladha KS. Reply to: 'Co-use of opioids with cannabis - evaluating risks and benefits'. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2023; 48:626-627. [PMID: 37263745 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Calvin Diep
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karim S Ladha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O’Neill V, Karanikas N, Sav A, Murphy P. Medicinal Cannabis and Implications for Workplace Health and Safety: Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews. Workplace Health Saf 2023; 71:400-410. [PMID: 37077169 PMCID: PMC10467002 DOI: 10.1177/21650799231157086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although medicinal cannabis is prescribed for conditions such as pain, epilepsy, nausea and vomiting during cancer treatment, evidence about associated adverse side effects is still evolving. Because adverse events (AEs) might impact the performance of workers, it is important to consider their implications on workplace health and safety (WHS). This study aimed to map the types and prevalence of the AEs associated with medical cannabis and articulate how those events could impact WHS. METHODS A scoping review of systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses published between 2015 and March 2021 was performed to identify the AEs of medicinal cannabis in adults. Publications in English and full text available online were collected from Embase, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. RESULTS Of 1,326 papers identified from the initial search, 31 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The studies reported various AEs with the most predominant being sedation, nausea/vomiting, dizziness, and euphoria. Acute and chronic pain was the most prevalent disorder under review. CONCLUSIONS Adverse events associated with the use of medicinal cannabis could increase workplace risks, including decreased alertness and reaction times, increased absenteeism, reduced ability to safely drive or operate machinery and an increased probability of falling. Focused research into the risk to workers and workplaces from the use of medical cannabis and related human performance impairment is urgently warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Adem Sav
- Queensland University of Technology
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cannabinoid Formulations and Delivery Systems: Current and Future Options to Treat Pain. Drugs 2021; 81:1513-1557. [PMID: 34480749 PMCID: PMC8417625 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-021-01579-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The field of Cannabis sativa L. research for medical purposes has been rapidly advancing in recent decades and a growing body of evidence suggests that phytocannabinoids are beneficial for a range of conditions. At the same time impressing development has been observed for formulations and delivery systems expanding the potential use of cannabinoids as an effective medical therapy. The objective of this review is to present the most recent results from pharmaceutical companies and research groups investigating methods to improve cannabinoid bioavailability and to clearly establish its therapeutic efficacy, dose ranges, safety and also improve the patient compliance. Particular focus is the application of cannabinoids in pain treatment, describing the principal cannabinoids employed, the most promising delivery systems for each administration routes and updating the clinical evaluations. To offer the reader a wider view, this review discusses the formulation starting from galenic preparation up to nanotechnology approaches, showing advantages, limits, requirements needed. Furthermore, the most recent clinical data and meta-analysis for cannabinoids used in different pain management are summarized, evaluating their real effectiveness, in order also to spare opioids and improve patients' quality of life. Promising evidence for pain treatments and for other important pathologies are also reviewed as likely future directions for cannabinoids formulations.
Collapse
|
4
|
Butler TW, Hande K, Ryan M, Raman R, McDowell MR, Cones B, Jackson HJ, Cortez M, Murphy BA. Cannabidiol: Knowledge, Beliefs, and Experiences of Patients With Cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2021; 25:405-412. [PMID: 34269337 DOI: 10.1188/21.cjon.405-412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabidiol (CBD) is purported to work for a variety of therapeutic indications. Interest in CBD products has significantly increased as patients with cancer seek ways to improve symptom control and quality of life. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to explore patients' knowledge of and experience with CBD. METHODS A panel of oncology nurse practitioners, an oncologist, and oncology pharmacy specialists developed a survey to capture information about patient knowledge and use of CBD. The initial survey was pilot tested and further refined, resulting in the final item survey. The final survey was administered to 100 participants undergoing or having completed cancer treatment and being followed in a supportive oncology care clinic at a large academic medical center. FINDINGS Most patients learned about CBD through a family member or friend. The majority of patients had never tried CBD. The most common reported indications were pain, anxiety, and nausea. Of those who had not tried CBD, the most common reasons included lack of knowledge about CBD and providers not recommending CBD.
Collapse
|
5
|
Moore RA, Fisher E, Finn DP, Finnerup NB, Gilron I, Haroutounian S, Krane E, Rice ASC, Rowbotham M, Wallace M, Eccleston C. Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicines for pain management: an overview of systematic reviews. Pain 2021; 162:S67-S79. [PMID: 32804833 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicines (CBM) are increasingly used to manage pain, with limited understanding of their efficacy and safety. We assessed methodological quality, scope, and results of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials of these treatments. Several search strategies sought self-declared systematic reviews. Methodological quality was assessed using both AMSTAR-2 and techniques important for bias reduction in pain studies. Of the 106 articles read, 57 were self-declared systematic reviews, most published since 2010. They included any type of cannabinoid, cannabis, or CBM, at any dose, however administered, in a broad range of pain conditions. No review examined the effects of a particular cannabinoid, at a particular dose, using a particular route of administration, for a particular pain condition, reporting a particular analgesic outcome. Confidence in the results in the systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 definitions was critically low (41), low (8), moderate (6), or high (2). Few used criteria important for bias reduction in pain. Cochrane reviews typically provided higher confidence; all industry-conflicted reviews provided critically low confidence. Meta-analyses typically pooled widely disparate studies, and, where assessable, were subject to potential publication bias. Systematic reviews with positive or negative recommendation for use of cannabinoids, cannabis, or CBM in pain typically rated critically low or low (24/25 [96%] positive; 10/12 [83%] negative). Current reviews are mostly lacking in quality and cannot provide a basis for decision-making. A new high-quality systematic review of randomised controlled trials is needed to critically assess the clinical evidence for cannabinoids, cannabis, or CBM in pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative, and Supportive Care Review Groups, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David P Finn
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Galway Neuroscience Centre and Centre for Pain Research, NCBES, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Nanna B Finnerup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ian Gilron
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Simon Haroutounian
- Division of Clinical and Translational Research, Washington University Pain Center, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Elliot Krane
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, and Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Andrew S C Rice
- Pain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Rowbotham
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United Kingdom
- Sutter Health, CPMC Research Institute, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Mark Wallace
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Christopher Eccleston
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative, and Supportive Care Review Groups, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haroutounian S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Belton J, Blyth FM, Degenhardt L, Forti MD, Eccleston C, Finn DP, Finnerup NB, Fisher E, Fogarty AE, Gilron I, Hohmann AG, Kalso E, Krane E, Mohiuddin M, Moore RA, Rowbotham M, Soliman N, Wallace M, Zinboonyahgoon N, Rice ASC. International Association for the Study of Pain Presidential Task Force on Cannabis and Cannabinoid Analgesia: research agenda on the use of cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicines for pain management. Pain 2021; 162:S117-S124. [PMID: 34138827 PMCID: PMC8855877 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The President of the International Association for the Study of Pain established a task force on cannabis and cannabinoid analgesia to systematically examine the evidence on (1) analgesic pharmacology of cannabinoids and preclinical evidence on their efficacy in animal models of injury-related or pathological persistent pain; (2) the clinical efficacy of cannabis, cannabinoids, and cannabis-based medicines for pain; (3) harms related to long-term use of cannabinoids; as well as (4) societal issues and policy implications related to the use of these compounds for pain management. Here, we summarize key knowledge gaps identified in the task force outputs and propose a research agenda for generating high-quality evidence on the topic. The systematic assessment of preclinical and clinical literature identified gaps in rigor of study design and reporting across the translational spectrum. We provide recommendations to improve the quality, rigor, transparency, and reproducibility of preclinical and clinical research on cannabis and cannabinoids for pain, as well as for the conduct of systematic reviews on the topic. Gaps related to comprehensive understanding of the endocannabinoid system and cannabinoid pharmacology, including pharmacokinetics and drug formulation aspects, are discussed. We outline key areas where high-quality clinical trials with cannabinoids are needed. Remaining important questions about long-term and short-term safety of cannabis and cannabinoids are emphasized. Finally, regulatory, societal, and policy challenges associated with medicinal and nonmedicinal use of cannabis are highlighted, with recommendations for improving patient safety and reducing societal harms in the context of pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Haroutounian
- Division of Clinical and Translational Research and Washington University Pain Center. Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine. St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lars Arendt-Nielsen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) and Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Joletta Belton
- Endless Possibilities Initiative, Fraser, CO, USA; Global Alliance of Pain Patient Advocates (GAPPA) Presidential Task Force
| | - Fiona M. Blyth
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Louisa Degenhardt
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Marta Di Forti
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, UK. South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Christopher Eccleston
- Centre for Pain Research. The University of Bath, Bath, UK, & Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, The University of Ghent, Belgium
| | - David P. Finn
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Galway Neuroscience Centre and Centre for Pain Research, Human Biology Building, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - Nanna B Finnerup
- Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research. The University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Alexandra E. Fogarty
- Department of Neurology, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Washington University School of Medicine. St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ian Gilron
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine and Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen’s University; Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University; School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Andrea G. Hohmann
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Program in Neuroscience, Gill Center for Biomolecular Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Eija Kalso
- Department of Pharmacology and SleepWell Research Programme, University of Helsinki; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital
| | - Elliot Krane
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, & Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Mohammed Mohiuddin
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine and, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
| | | | - Michael Rowbotham
- Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nadia Soliman
- Pain Research, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Mark Wallace
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego
| | | | - Andrew SC Rice
- Pain Research, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu ZY, Azuara-Blanco A, Kadonosono K, Murray T, Natarajan S, Sii S, Smiddy W, Steel DH, Wolfensberger TJ, Lois N. Reporting of Complications in Retinal Detachment Surgical Trials: A Systematic Review Using the CONSORT Extension for Harms. JAMA Ophthalmol 2021; 139:2781201. [PMID: 34137800 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Knowledge on the frequency and severity of complications in surgical trials for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is essential to determine whether surgical procedures are developed and compared adequately, taking into account not only efficacy but also harms. OBJECTIVE To review standards of reporting of complications in recent randomized clinical trials of RRD surgery. EVIDENCE REVIEW This systematic review included randomized clinical trials on RRD surgery published between January 2008 and January 2021 in Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles retrieved were reviewed for eligibility by 2 independent authors. Eligible studies were evaluated against checklist items from the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Extension for Harms criteria by 2 independent authors, and discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third author. FINDINGS Fifty studies were included. The median number of checklist items fulfilled was 8 (range, 0-15), of a possible total of 18. Frequently reported items were discussions balanced with regard to efficacy and adverse events (42 studies [84%]) and inclusions of harm-associated timing of data collection (41 studies [82%]). The least frequently reported items were distinctions between expected and unexpected adverse events (1 study [2%]) and mentions of the use of a validated instrument to report adverse event severity (4 studies [8%]). Frequency of complications was commonly reported (29 studies [58%]) in contrast with complication severity (10 studies [20%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This review suggests that severity of complications of RRD surgery has been infrequently quantified and reported in randomized clinical trials and potentially represents an important area of improvement in future RRD surgical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Yang Xu
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kazuaki Kadonosono
- Department of Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | | | | | - Samantha Sii
- Department of Ophthalmology, Lincoln County Hospital, United Kingdom
| | | | - David H Steel
- Sunderland Eye Infirmary, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | - Noemi Lois
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute For Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Medicinal applications of cannabis/cannabinoids. Curr Opin Psychol 2021; 38:1-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
9
|
Nutt DJ, Phillips LD, Barnes MP, Brander B, Curran HV, Fayaz A, Finn DP, Horsted T, Moltke J, Sakal C, Sharon H, O'Sullivan SE, Williams T, Zorn G, Schlag AK. A Multicriteria Decision Analysis Comparing Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Neuropathic Pain, Including Cannabinoids and Cannabis-Based Medical Products. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2021; 7:482-500. [PMID: 33998895 PMCID: PMC9418467 DOI: 10.1089/can.2020.0129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) still represents a major clinical challenge. Collective harnessing of both the scientific evidence base and clinical experience (of clinicians and patients) can play a key role in informing treatment pathways and contribute to the debate on specific treatments (e.g., cannabinoids). A group of expert clinicians (pain specialists and psychiatrists), scientists, and patient representatives convened to assess the relative benefit–safety balance of 12 pharmacological treatments, including orally administered cannabinoids/cannabis-based medicinal products, for the treatment of CNP in adults. Methods: A decision conference provided the process of creating a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) model, in which the group collectively scored the drugs on 17 effect criteria relevant to benefits and safety and then weighted the criteria for their clinical relevance. Findings: Cannabis-based medicinal products consisting of tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol (THC/CBD), in a 1:1 ratio, achieved the highest overall score, 79 (out of 100), followed by CBD dominant at 75, then THC dominant at 72. Duloxetine and the gabapentinoids scored in the 60s, amitriptyline, tramadol, and ibuprofen in the 50s, methadone and oxycodone in the 40s, and morphine and fentanyl in the 30s. Sensitivity analyses showed that even if the pain reduction and quality-of-life scores for THC/CBD and THC are halved, their benefit–safety balances remain better than those of the noncannabinoid drugs. Interpretation: The benefit–safety profiles for cannabinoids were higher than for other commonly used medications for CNP largely because they contribute more to quality of life and have a more favorable side effect profile. The results also reflect the shortcomings of alternative pharmacological treatments with respect to safety and mitigation of neuropathic pain symptoms. Further high-quality clinical trials and systematic comprehensive capture of clinical experience with cannabinoids is warranted. These results demonstrate once again the complexity and multimodal mechanisms underlying the clinical experience and impact of chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Nutt
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lawrence D Phillips
- Department of Management, Emeritus Professor of Decision Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Alan Fayaz
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tim Williams
- AWP Mental Health NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Gregor Zorn
- European Cannabinoid Therapy Association, Worcester, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singh S, Singh TG, Mahajan K, Dhiman S. Medicinal plants used against various inflammatory biomarkers for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. J Pharm Pharmacol 2020; 72:1306-1327. [PMID: 32812250 DOI: 10.1111/jphp.13326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disease manifested clinically by polyarthralgia associated with joint dysfunction triggering the antibodies targeting against the self-neoepitopes determined by autoimmune responses associated with chronic arthritic attacks. The activation of macrophages and other defence cells in response to self-epitopes as biomarkers in RA provides a better understanding of pathogenesis of disease and has led to the development of novel therapeutic approaches acting as potent inhibitors of these cells. KEY FINDINGS The current review retrieved the various medicinal plants possessing an active phytoconstituents with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, which tends to be effective alternative approach over the synthetic drugs concerned with high toxic effects. The current available literature provided an evident data concluding that the active constituents like fatty acids, flavonoids, terpenes and sesquiterpene lactones attenuate the RA symptoms by targeting the inflammatory biomarkers involved in the pathogenesis of RA. SUMMARY Despite the various synthetic treatment approaches targeting immune cells, cytokines improved the quality of life but still the drug management is challenging due to toxic and chronic teratogenic effects with anti-arthritic drugs. The current review has elaborated the selected traditionally used herbal medicinal plants with phytoconstituents possessing anti-inflammatory activity by suppressing the inflammatory biomarkers with lesser side effects and providing the future exploration of natural drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shareen Singh
- Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
| | | | - Kriti Mahajan
- Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
| | - Sonia Dhiman
- Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
| |
Collapse
|