Perioperative pharmacokinetics of methadone in adolescents

The Effects of Intraoperative Methadone on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review

Inadequate perioperative pain control has deleterious effects on children's development and can lead to heightened pain experiences and the avoidance of future medical procedures. Reports of perioperative use of methadone in children are increasing, as it has a favorable pharmacodynamic profile; however, the effectiveness of methadone in reducing postoperative pain has not been established. We, therefore, aimed to provide a scoping review of the literature comparing the effect of intraoperative methadone versus other opioids on postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and adverse events in pediatric patients. We identified studies in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases from inception to January 2023. Postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and adverse events were extracted for analysis. We screened 1864 studies, of which 83 studies were selected for full-text review. Five studies were included in the final analysis. Postoperative opioid consumption was decreased overall in children who received methadone compared to those who did not. The majority of studies indicated that methadone was superior to other opioids in reported pain scores, while the frequency of adverse events was similar between the groups. Although the data reviewed highlight a potential benefit of intraoperative methadone in pediatric patients, 4 of the 5 studies had serious methodological concerns. Thus, we cannot make strong recommendations for the regular use of methadone in the perioperative setting at this time. Our results highlight the need for large, well-designed randomized trials to fully evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraoperative methadone in diverse pediatric surgical populations.

Perioperative methadone for posterior spinal fusion in adolescents: Results from a double-blind randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Posterior spinal fusion is the most common surgical procedure performed for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the United States. Intraoperative methadone has been shown to improve pain control in adult patients undergoing complex spine surgery, and current pediatric studies show encouraging results; however, prospective randomized-controlled trials are lacking in the pediatric literature.

AIMS

We conducted a single-center double-blind randomized-controlled trial to compare intraoperative use of methadone to morphine in pediatric patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

METHODS

A total of 47 adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion were randomized (stratified by sex) to either a methadone (n = 25) or morphine (n = 22) group. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain severity, opioid-related side effects, and ratio of patient-controlled analgesia injections: attempts as a behavioral index of uncontrolled pain.

RESULTS

Patients in the methadone group consumed less total opioid postoperatively (median [interquartile range], 0.3 mg/kg [0.1, 0.5]) than patients in the morphine group (0.3 mg/kg [0.2, 0.6]), median difference [95% confidence interval] -0.07 [-0.2 to 0.02]; (p = .026). Despite the lower amount of opioid used postoperatively, pain scores for the methadone group (3.5 [3.0, 4.3]) were not significantly different from those in the morphine group (4.0 [3.2, 5.0]; p = .250). Groups did not differ on opioid-related side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

A two-dose intraoperative methadone regimen resulted in decreased opioid consumption compared to morphine. Although the clinical significance of these results may be limited, the analgesic equipoise without increased opioid-related side effects and potential for a lower incidence of chronic pain may tip the balance in favor of routine methadone use for adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

Opioid use disorder in pediatric populations: considerations for perioperative pain management and precision opioid analgesia

INTRODUCTION

Opioids are commonly used for perioperative analgesia, yet children still suffer high rates of severe post-surgical pain and opioid-related adverse effects. Persistent and severe acute surgical pain greatly increases the child's chances of chronic surgical pain, long-term opioid use, and opioid use disorder.

AREAS COVERED

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are often inadequate in treating a child's severe surgical pain. Research suggests that 'older' and longer-acting opioids such as methadone are providing better methods to treat acute post-surgical pain. Studies indicate that lower repetitive methadone doses can decrease the incidence of chronic persistent surgical pain (CPSP). Ongoing research explores genetic components influencing severe surgical pain, inadequate opioid analgesia, and opioid use disorder. This new genetic research coupled with better utilization of opioids in the perioperative setting provides hope in personalizing surgical pain management, reducing pain, opioid use, adverse effects, and helping the fight against the opioid pandemic.

EXPERT OPINION

The opioid and analgesic pharmacogenomics approach can proactively 'tailor' a perioperative analgesic plan to each patient based on underlying polygenic risks. This transition from population-based knowledge of pain medicine to individual patient knowledge can transform acute pain medicine and greatly reduce the opioid epidemic's socioeconomic, personal, and psychological strains globally.

Intraoperative Methadone in Next-day Discharge Outpatient Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Dose-finding Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Contemporary perioperative practice seeks to use less intraoperative opioid, diminish postoperative pain and opioid use, and enable less postdischarge opioid prescribing. For inpatient surgery, anesthesia with intraoperative methadone, compared with short-duration opioids, results in less pain, less postoperative opioid use, and greater patient satisfaction. This pilot investigation aimed to determine single-dose intraoperative methadone feasibility for next-day discharge outpatient surgery, determine an optimally analgesic and well-tolerated dose, and explore whether methadone would result in less postoperative opioid use compared with conventional short-duration opioids.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, dose-escalation feasibility and pilot study in next-day discharge surgery compared intraoperative single-dose IV methadone (0.1 then 0.2, 0.25 and 0.3 mg/kg ideal body weight) versus as-needed short-duration opioid (fentanyl, hydromorphone) controls. Perioperative opioid use, pain, and side effects were assessed before discharge. Patients recorded pain, opioid use, and side effects for 30 days postoperatively using take-home diaries. Primary clinical outcome was in-hospital (intraoperative and postoperative) opioid use. Secondary outcomes were 30-day opioid consumption, pain, opioid side effects, and leftover opioid counts.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) intraoperative methadone doses were 6 (5 to 7), 11 (10 to 12), 14 (13 to 16), and 18 (15 to 19) mg in 0.1, 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 mg/kg ideal body weight groups, respectively. Anesthesia with single-dose methadone and propofol or volatile anesthetic was effective. Total in-hospital opioid use (IV milligram morphine equivalents [MME]) was 25 (20 to 37), 20 (13 to 30), 27 (18 to 32), and 25 (20 to 36) mg, respectively, in patients receiving 0.1, 0.2, 0.25 and 0.3 mg/kg methadone, compared to 46 (33 to 59) mg in short-duration opioid controls. Opioid-related side effects were not numerically different. Home pain and opioid use were numerically lower in patients receiving methadone.

CONCLUSIONS

The most effective and well-tolerated single intraoperative induction dose of methadone for next-day discharge surgery was 0.25 mg/kg ideal body weight (median, 14 mg). Single-dose intraoperative methadone was analgesic and opioid-sparing in next-day discharge outpatient surgery.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Pro-Con Debate: Role of Methadone in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols-Superior Analgesic or Harmful Drug?

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are standardized and designed to provide superior analgesia, reduce opioid consumption, improve patient recovery, and reduce hospital length of stay. Yet, moderate-to-severe postsurgical pain continues to afflict over 40% of patients and remains a major priority for anesthesia research. Methadone administration in the perioperative setting may reduce postoperative pain scores and have opioid-sparing effects, which may be beneficial for enhanced recovery. Methadone possesses a multimodal profile consisting of µ-opioid agonism, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism, and reuptake inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine. Furthermore, it may attenuate the development of chronic postsurgical pain. However, caution is advised with perioperative use of methadone in specific high-risk patient populations and surgical settings. Methadone's wide pharmacokinetic variability, opioid-related adverse effects, and potential negative impact on cost-effectiveness may also limit its use in the perioperative setting. In this PRO-CON commentary article, the authors debate whether methadone should be incorporated in ERAS protocols to provide superior analgesia with no increased risks.

Short-acting versus long-acting opioids for pediatric postoperative pain management

INTRODUCTION

Opioids are potent analgesics commonly used to manage children's moderate to severe perioperative pain in children. A wide range of short and long-acting opioids are used to treat surgical pain and will be reviewed in this article.

AREAS COVERED

Both short- and long-acting opioids contain unique therapeutic benefits and adverse effects; however, due to the side effect profile and safety concerns, lack of familiarity, and evidence with long-acting opioids to treat surgical pain, shorter-acting opioids have traditionally been used in children. Almost all opioids work by binding to the mu receptor. Methadone, a long-acting opioid, is an exception because it also has beneficial N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist properties. Clinically methadone's properties could translate to improved analgesic outcomes, reduced risk of adverse events, less risk for acute hyperalgesia, tolerance and abuse potential, faster recovery, and reduced risk for chronic persistent surgical pain. This review article summarizes and compares the evidence of commonly used short and long-acting opioids for perioperative pain control in the pediatric population.

EXPERT OPINION

Individualized methadone therapy using pharmacogenomics has the potential to transform opioid use in pain management by improving patient safety and analgesic outcomes, thereby addressing the gaps in current standardized ERAS protocols.

What we know and what we don't know about the perioperative use of methadone in children and adolescents

Postoperative pain control is essential to optimizing patient outcomes, improving satisfaction, and allowing patients to resume their baseline functional activities. Methadone, a synthetic mu-opioid agonist, has multiple pharmacologic properties that may be optimal for perioperative use. Compared to other opioids, methadone has a longer duration of action, rapid onset, extended dosing intervals, high oral bioavailability, low cost, lack of active metabolites, and action on multiple receptors. The current literature examining the use of methadone in the perioperative care of children and adolescents is limited and most often reported within the context of spine or cardiothoracic surgery. Overall, these studies support the hypothesis that perioperative methadone in pediatric patients may decrease postoperative pain, opioid consumption, length-of-stay, and the incidence of some opioid-related side effects, like constipation and urinary retention. A variety of protocols for the perioperative use of methadone have been described, including a single intraoperative dose as well as multiple small doses within multimodal pain protocols. The superiority of these protocols has not been established. Like all opioids, methadone has a side effect profile which includes nausea, vomiting, reduced GI motility, sedation, and respiratory depression at high doses. There is also a concern that it can cause QTc prolongation in patients. The primary aim of this educational review is to examine the pharmacologic data, published perioperative protocols, dosing considerations, and risks and benefits associated with inclusion of methadone in analgesic regimens for surgical patients. A secondary aim is to introduce opportunities for research around the perioperative use of methadone in children and adolescents. Based on our review, we would prioritize establishing optimal procedure-specific methadone protocols, determining generalizability for use in routine pediatric surgeries, and investigating methadone safety and efficacy prospectively as the primary opioid for pain management in the postanesthesia care unit or postsurgical floors.

Error traps in the perioperative care of children with chronic pain

Pediatric patients with a history of chronic pain frequently have complex health needs that are challenging to meet in the perioperative period. Error traps are consequences or errors that are known to occur due to either gaps in knowledge or cognitive errors. Avoiding common error traps in these children can contribute to improved patient care and patient outcomes and overall better patient and family satisfaction. In patients with chronic pain, common errors during their perioperative care included as follows: failure to adequately prepare the patient and family; failure to incorporate past pain history and therapy into current treatment plans; failure to provide adequate multimodal analgesia; and failure to provide multidisciplinary and multimodal analgesia by incorporating other services such as mental health services and physical therapy. Cognitive errors may play a role in these error traps. Recognizing and avoiding them may improve and optimize pain care and outcome.

Methadone pharmacogenetics in vitro and in vivo: Metabolism by CYP2B6 polymorphic variants and genetic variability in paediatric disposition

AIMS

Methadone metabolism and clearance are determined principally by polymorphic cytochrome P4502B6 (CYP2B6). Some CYP2B6 allelic variants affect methadone metabolism in vitro and disposition in vivo. We assessed methadone metabolism by CYP2B6 minor variants in vitro. We also assessed the influence of CYP2B6 variants, and P450 oxidoreductase (POR) and CYP2C19 variants, on methadone clearance in surgical patients in vivo.

METHODS

CYP2B6 and P450 oxidoreductase variants were coexpressed with cytochrome b5 . The metabolism of methadone racemate and enantiomers was measured at therapeutic concentrations and intrinsic clearances were determined. Adolescents receiving methadone for surgery were genotyped for CYP2B6, CYP2C19 and POR, and methadone clearance and metabolite formation clearance were determined.

RESULTS

In vitro, CYP2B6.4 was more active than wild-type CYP2B6.1. CYPs 2B6.5, 2B6.6, 2B6.7, 2B6.9, 2B6.17, 2B6.19 and 2B6.26 were less active. CYPs 2B6.16 and 2B6.18 were inactive. CYP2B6.1 expressed with POR variants POR.28, POR.5 and P228L had lower rates of methadone metabolism than wild-type reductase. In vivo, methadone clinical clearance decreased linearly with the number of CYP2B6 slow metabolizer alleles, but was not different in CYP2C19 slow or rapid metabolizer phenotypes, or in carriers of the POR*28 allele.

CONCLUSIONS

Several CYP2B6 and POR variants were slow metabolizers of methadone in vitro. Polymorphisms in CYP2B6, but not CYP2C19 or P450 reductase, affected methadone clearance in vivo. CYP2B6 polymorphisms 516G>T and 983T>C code for canonical loss of function variants and should be assessed when considering genetic influences on clinical methadone disposition. These complementary translational in vitro and in vivo results inform on pharmacogenetic variability affecting methadone disposition in patients.

Scheduled methadone reduces overall opioid requirements after pediatric posterior spinal fusion: A single center retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Posterior spinal fusion to correct adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is associated with significant postoperative pain. Different modalities have been reported as part of a multimodal analgesic plan. Intravenous methadone acts as a mu-opioid agonist and N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist and has been shown to have opioid-sparing effects. Our multimodal approach has included hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with and without preincisional methadone, and recently postoperative methadone without a PCA.

AIMS

We hypothesized that a protocol including scheduled postoperative methadone doses would reduce opioid usage compared to PCA-based strategy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis between 2015 and 2020 was performed. There were three patient groups: Group PCA received a hydromorphone PCA without methadone; Group PCA + Methadone received preincisional methadone and a hydromorphone PCA; Group Methadone received preincisional methadone, scheduled postoperative methadone, and no PCA. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid use over 72 h. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, sedation scores, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Group PCA (n = 26) consumed 0.33 mg/kg (95% CI [0.28, 0.38]) total hydromorphone equivalents, Group PCA + methadone (n = 39) 0.30 mg/kg (95% CI [0.25, 0.36]) total hydromorphone equivalents, and Group methadone (n = 22) 0.18 mg/kg (95% CI [0.15, 0.21]) total hydromorphone equivalents (p = .00096). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

A protocol with intraoperative and scheduled postoperative methadone doses resulted in a 45% reduction in opioid usage compared to a PCA-based protocol with similar analgesia after pediatric posterior spinal fusion.

The effect of intraoperative lidocaine administration in a disrupted erector spinae fascial plane on intercostal transcranial motor evoked potentials

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks have been recently described for postoperative pain management following spine surgery but their effects on intraoperative neuromonitoring are unknown.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Pediatric patients at a tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

26 pediatric patients who received bilateral surgically-placed ESP catheters for single-stage posterior spine fusion (PSF) from August 2020 to June 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients in this study did not receive any special interventions as part of this observational retrospective study.

MEASUREMENTS

This retrospective study investigated the effects of local anesthesia administration through bilateral surgically-placed ESP catheters on intraoperative intercostal transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs) in the setting of a disrupted erector spinae fascial plane in pediatric patients undergoing single-stage posterior spine fusion.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 26 patients that received bilateral surgically-placed ESP catheters for pediatric posterior spine fusion surgery, none exhibited any changes in intercostal tcMEPs attributable to intraoperative lidocaine administration through the ESP catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of a local anesthetic into a disrupted erector spinae fascial plane does not appear to interfere with intraoperative neuromonitoring of posterior spine fusion surgeries.

Use of physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic modeling to inform dosing of the opioid analgesics fentanyl and methadone in children with obesity

Obesity is an increasingly alarming public health threat, with nearly 20% of children classified as obese in the United States today. Children with obesity are commonly prescribed the opioids fentanyl and methadone, and accurate dosing is critical to reducing the risk of serious adverse events associated with overexposure. However, pharmacokinetic studies in children with obesity are challenging to conduct, so there is limited information to guide fentanyl and methadone dosing in these children. To address this clinical knowledge gap, physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic models of fentanyl and methadone were developed in adults and scaled to children with and without obesity to explore the interplay of obesity, age, and pharmacogenomics. These models included key obesity‐induced changes in physiology and pharmacogenomic effects. Model predictions captured observed concentrations in children with obesity well, with an overall average fold error of 0.72 and 1.08 for fentanyl and methadone, respectively. Model simulations support a reduced fentanyl dose (1 vs. 2 μg/kg/h) starting at an earlier age (6 years) in virtual children with obesity, highlighting the importance of considering both age and obesity status when selecting an infusion rate most likely to achieve steady‐state concentrations within the target range. Methadone dosing simulations highlight the importance of considering genotype in addition to obesity status when possible, as cytochrome P450 (CYP)2B6*6/*6 virtual children with obesity required half the dose to match the exposure of wildtype children without obesity. This physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic modeling approach can be applied to explore dosing of other critical drugs in children with obesity.

Rediscovery of Methadone to Improve Outcomes in Pain Management

Clinically, methadone is most known for its use in the treatment of opioid maintenance therapy. However, methadone's pharmacological profile makes it an excellent analgesic that can enhance acute and chronic pain management. It is a potent μ-receptor agonist with a longer elimination half-life than most clinically used opioids. In addition, methadone inhibits serotonin and norepinephrine uptake, and it is an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist. These distinct analgesic pathways mediate hyperalgesic, allodynic, and neuropathic pain. Its unique analgesic properties provide several essential benefits in perioperative use, neuropathic pain, cancer, and noncancer pain. Despite these proven clinical utilities, methadone has not been used widely to treat acute and chronic pain in opioid naïve patients. This article describes the unique pharmacology of methadone and provides emerging evidence to support its application in acute and chronic pain management. Pain management options and guidelines for surgical patients on methadone are discussed as well.

Novel use of methadone intraoperatively in pediatric burn patients

Burn injury in children can cause severe and chronic physical and mental sequelae. Opioids are a mainstay in burn pain management but increasing utilization in this country has led to concern for their continued use and potential for dependence. Methadone is a long-acting analgesic that targets the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in addition to the mu opioid receptor and has benefit in adult burn patients. However, its use in the pediatric burn population has been less robustly studied. This is a retrospective cohort study at a single Level 1 Burn Center whose primary aim is to compare opioid utilization 36 hours postoperatively between pediatric burn patients who received intraoperative, intravenous methadone and those who did not. Secondary aim was to describe differences in methadone-related complications between the cohorts. There was decreased opioid utilization measured by median morphine equivalents per kilogram (ME/kg) postoperatively in the methadone cohort compared to the control cohort (0.54mg/kg v. 0.77mg/kg, p = 0.18). No adverse events were noted upon chart review. The data suggests methadone use is beneficial in pediatric burn patients, but further prospective studies are warranted on a larger population.

Perioperative Methadone and Ketamine for Postoperative Pain Control in Spinal Surgical Patients: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite application of multimodal pain management strategies, patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery frequently report severe postoperative pain. Methadone and ketamine, which are N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists, have been documented to facilitate postoperative pain control. This study therefore tested the primary hypothesis that patients recovering from spinal fusion surgery who are given ketamine and methadone use less hydromorphone on the first postoperative day than those give methadone alone.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 130 spinal surgery patients were randomized to receive either methadone at 0.2 mg/kg (ideal body weight) intraoperatively and a 5% dextrose in water infusion for 48 h postoperatively (methadone group) or 0.2 mg/kg methadone intraoperatively and a ketamine infusion (0.3 mg · kg-1 · h-1 infusion [no bolus] intraoperatively and then 0.1 mg · kg-1 · h-1 for next 48 h [both medications dosed at ideal body weight]; methadone/ketamine group). Anesthetic care was standardized in all patients. Intravenous hydromorphone use on postoperative day 1 was the primary outcome. Pain scores, intravenous and oral opioid requirements, and patient satisfaction with pain management were assessed for the first 3 postoperative days.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) intravenous hydromorphone requirements were lower in the methadone/ketamine group on postoperative day 1 (2.0 [1.0 to 3.0] vs. 4.6 [3.2 to 6.6] mg in the methadone group, median difference [95% CI] 2.5 [1.8 to 3.3] mg; P < 0.0001) and postoperative day 2. In addition, fewer oral opioid tablets were needed in the methadone/ketamine group on postoperative day 1 (2 [0 to 3] vs. 4 [0 to 8] in the methadone group; P = 0.001) and postoperative day 3. Pain scores at rest, with coughing, and with movement were lower in the methadone/ketamine group at 23 of the 24 assessment times. Patient-reported satisfaction scores were high in both study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative analgesia was enhanced by the combination of methadone and ketamine, which act on both N-methyl-d-aspartate and μ-opioid receptors. The combination could be considered in patients having spine surgery.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Stereoselective methadone disposition after administration of racemic methadone to anesthetized Shetland ponies assessed by capillary electrophoresis

The enantioselectivity of the pharmacokinetics of methadone was investigated in anesthetized Shetland ponies after a single intravenous (0.5 mg/kg methadone hydrochloride; n = 6) or constant rate infusion (0.25 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.25 mg/kg/h methadone hydrochloride; n = 3) administration of racemic methadone. Plasma concentrations of l‐methadone and d‐methadone and their major metabolites, l‐ and d‐2‐ethylidene‐1,5‐dimethyl‐3,3‐diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP), respectively, were analyzed by CE with highly sulfated γ‐cyclodextrin as chiral selector and electrokinetic analyte injection from liquid/liquid extracts prepared at alkaline pH. In both trials, the d‐methadone concentrations were lower than those of l‐methadone and the d‐EDDP levels were lower than those of L‐EDDP. For the case of a single intravenous bolus injection, the plasma concentration versus time profile of methadone enantiomers was analyzed with a two‐compartment pharmacokinetic model. l‐methadone showed a slower elimination rate constant, a lower body clearance, and a smaller steady‐state volume of distribution than d‐methadone. d‐methadone and d‐EDDP were eliminated faster than their respective l‐enantiomers. This is the first study that outlines that the disposition of racemic methadone administered to anesthetized equines is enantioselective.

A Novel Perioperative Multidose Methadone-Based Multimodal Analgesic Strategy in Children Achieved Safe and Low Analgesic Blood Methadone Levels Enabling Opioid-Sparing Sustained Analgesia With Minimal Adverse Effects

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative methadone, a long-acting opioid, is increasingly used for postoperative analgesia, although the optimal methadone dosing strategy in children is still unknown. The use of a single large dose of intraoperative methadone is controversial due to inconsistent reductions in total opioid use in children and adverse effects. We recently demonstrated that small, repeated doses of methadone intraoperatively and postoperatively provided sustained analgesia and reduced opioid use without respiratory depression. The aim of this study was to characterize pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of a multiple small-dose methadone strategy.

METHODS

Adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for idiopathic scoliosis or pectus excavatum (PE) repair received methadone intraoperatively (0.1 mg/kg, maximum 5 mg) and postoperatively every 12 hours for 3-5 doses in a multimodal analgesic protocol. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours postoperatively and analyzed for R-methadone and S-methadone, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidene (EDDP) metabolites, and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AAG), the primary methadone-binding protein. Peak and trough concentrations of enantiomers, total methadone, and AAG levels were correlated with clinical outcomes including pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), respiratory depression, and QT interval prolongation.

RESULTS

The study population included 38 children (10.8-17.9 years): 25 PSF and 13 PE patients. Median total methadone peak plasma concentration was 24.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 19.2-40.8) ng/mL and the median trough was 4.09 (IQR, 2.74-6.4) ng/mL. AAG concentration almost doubled at 48 hours after surgery (median = 193.9, IQR = 86.3-279.5 µg/mL) from intraoperative levels (median = 87.4, IQR = 70.6-115.8 µg/mL; P < .001), and change of AAG from intraoperative period to 48 hours postoperatively correlated with R-EDDP (P < .001) levels, S-EDDP (P < .001) levels, and pain scores (P = .008). Median opioid usage was minimal, 0.66 (IQR, 0.59-0.75) mg/kg morphine equivalents/d. No respiratory depression (95% Wilson binomial confidence, 0-0.09) or clinically significant QT prolongation (median = 9, IQR = -10 to 28 milliseconds) occurred. PONV occurred in 12 patients and was correlated with morphine equivalent dose (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Novel multiple small perioperative methadone doses resulted in safe and lower blood methadone levels, <100 ng/mL, a threshold previously associated with respiratory depression. This methadone dosing in a multimodal regimen resulted in lower blood methadone analgesia concentrations than the historically described minimum analgesic concentrations of methadone from an era before multimodal postoperative analgesia without postoperative respiratory depression and prolonged corrected QT (QTc). Larger studies are needed to further study the safety and efficacy of this methadone dosing strategy.

Methadone: applications in pediatric anesthesiology and critical care medicine

Like morphine, methadone is a pure agonist at the µ opioid receptor. However, in distinction to morphine which has an elimination half-life of 2-3 h, methadone has an elimination half-life of 24-36 h. In addition to its effects at the µ opioid receptor, methadone is an antagonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and also inhibits the reuptake of the neurotransmitters, serotonin and norepinephrine, in the central nervous system. Given its long half-life and high oral bioavailability, methadone has had a primary role in the outpatient treatment of patients with a history of opioid abuse or addiction. However, its unique pharmacology and cellular effects make it a valuable agent in the treatment of both acute and chronic pain of various etiologies. The following manuscript reviews the pharmacologic properties of methadone and discusses its clinical applications in the practice of pediatric anesthesiology and pediatric critical care medicine.

Postoperative Pain Management in Pediatric Spinal Fusion Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis

This article reviews and summarizes current evidence and knowledge gaps regarding postoperative analgesia after pediatric posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, a common procedure that results in severe acute postoperative pain. Inadequate analgesia may delay recovery, cause patient dissatisfaction, and increase chronic pain risk. Despite significant adverse effects, opioids are the analgesic mainstay after scoliosis surgery. However, growing emphasis on opioid minimization and enhanced recovery has increased adoption of multimodal analgesia (MMA) regimens. While opioid adverse effects remain a concern, MMA protocols must also consider risks and benefits of adjunct medications. We discuss use of opioids via different administration routes and elaborate on the effect of MMA components on opioid/pain and recovery outcomes including upcoming regional analgesia. We also discuss risk for prolonged opioid use after surgery and chronic post-surgical pain risk in this population. Evidence supports use of neuraxial opioids at safe doses, low-dose ketorolac, and methadone for postoperative analgesia. There may be a role for low-dose ketamine in those who are opioid-tolerant or have chronic pain, but the evidence for preoperative gabapentinoids and intravenous lidocaine is currently insufficient. There is a need for further studies to evaluate pediatric-specific optimal MMA dosing regimens after scoliosis surgery. Questions remain regarding how best to prevent acute opioid tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and chronic postsurgical pain. We anticipate that this timely update will enable clinicians to develop efficient pain regimens and provide impetus for future research to optimize recovery outcomes after spine fusion.

Methadone and a Clinical Pathway in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Historically Controlled Study

STUDY DESIGN

Historically controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES

Patients presenting for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by posterior spinal fusion may benefit from structured clinical pathways. We studied the effects of implementing a published clinical pathway for the perioperative care of patients with AIS that required intraoperative use of methadone at our institution.

METHODS

We performed a historically controlled clinical trial of patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS by comparing a retrospectively collected control group of 25 patients with a prospective experimental group of 14 patients receiving methadone, gabapentin, propofol, and remifentanil as part of a new clinical pathway.

RESULTS

Use of the pathway decreased average pain scores evaluated by the Numeric Rating Scale in the 24 hours following surgery (4.8 [4-6] to 3.4 [2-4], P = .03 [-2.6 to -0.2; t = -2.3]) and postoperative opioid consumption by 76% (41 [29-51] mg to 10 [4-17] mg, P < .001 [-45 to -15; Welch's t = 4.9]) during the same period. Improved analgesia and reduced reliance on opioids facilitated other postoperative elements of the clinical pathway and shortened the average hospital length of stay by 1 day (4 [3-6] days to 3 [3-5] days, P = .001 [-2 to -1; U = 67, Z = -3.3]).

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal analgesia and a clinical pathway add value in the perioperative care of patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS by improving analgesia and shortening hospitalization. The prospective arm of the trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT02481570.

Opioids in the Management of Acute Pediatric Pain: An Update in a Time of Crisis

Management of acute pain in children is fundamental to our practice. Its myriad benefits include reduced suffering, improved patient satisfaction, more rapid recovery, and a reduced risk of developing postsurgical chronic pain. Although a multimodal analgesic approach is now routinely used, informed and judicious use of opioid receptor agonists remains crucial in this treatment paradigm, as long as the benefits and risks are fully understood. Further, an ongoing public health response to the current opioid crisis is required to help prevent new cases of opioid addiction, identify opioid-addicted individuals, and ensure access to effective opioid addiction treatment, while at the same time continuing to safely meet the needs of patients experiencing pain.

Methadone-based Multimodal Analgesia Provides the Best-in-class Acute Surgical Pain Control and Functional Outcomes With Lower Opioid Use Following Major Posterior Fusion Surgery in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis

Introduction:

Posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis is extremely painful, with no superior single analgesic modality. We introduced a methadone-based multimodal analgesia protocol, aiming to decrease the length of hospital stay (LOS), improve pain control, and decrease the need for additional opioids.

Methods:

We analyzed 122 idiopathic scoliosis patients with posterior instrumented spinal fusion. They were matched by age, sex, surgeon, and the number of levels fused before and after the implementation of the new protocol. This analysis included 61 controls (intrathecal morphine, gabapentin, intravenous opioids, and adjuncts) and 61 patients on the new protocol (scheduled methadone, methocarbamol, ketorolac/ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and oxycodone with intravenous opioids as needed). The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, total opioid use (morphine milligram equivalents), time to a first bowel movement, and postdischarge phone calls.

Results:

New protocol patients were discharged earlier (median LOS, 2 days) compared with control patients (3 days; P < 0.001). Total inpatient morphine consumption was lower in the protocol group (P < 0.001). Pain scores were higher in the protocol group on the day of surgery, similar on postoperative day (POD) 1, and lower by POD 2 (P = 0.01). The new protocol also reduced the median time to first bowel movement (P < 0.001), and the number of postdischarge pain-related phone calls (P < 0.006).

Conclusion:

Methadone-based multimodal analgesia resulted in significantly lower LOS compared with the conventional regimen. It also provided improved pain control, reduced total opioid consumption, and early bowel movement compared with the control group.

Pharmacogenomics of methadone: a narrative review of the literature

Background: Methadone, a synthetic opioid with longer duration of action and lower abuse potential compared with morphine, is used to prevent opioid withdrawal, as well as to manage chronic and acute surgical pain. The variability in response to methadone has been widely recognized. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the pharmacogenetic factors underlying this variability. Materials & methods: This is a narrative overview of the literature on the genetic variants affecting pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of methadone, retrieved from searches of databases such as PubMed and google scholar. Discussion: Clinical responses to methadone may be affected by genetic variants in the opioidergic, dopaminergic and neurotrophic pathways. Polymorphisms in genes related to disposition and elimination of methadone alter the pharmacokinetics, and possibly pharmacodynamics of methadone. Cytochrome P450 enzymes and P-glycoprotein variants contribute to the interindividual variability in methadone pharmacokinetics. Evidence for single gene variants affecting methadone response remains weak. Multiple genetic variants must be considered in conjunction to improve predictive ability. Conclusion: Evidence remains scarce at this time, to recommend pharmacogenetic testing before methadone administration. Well-powered clinical studies are needed with population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and multigenetic signature-based predictions to enable tailored use of methadone in clinical practice.

Opioids: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Neonates, Infants, and Children

Pain management in the pediatric population is complex for many reasons. Mild pain is usually managed quite well with oral acetaminophen or ibuprofen. Situations involving more severe pain often require the use of an opioid, which may be administered by many different routes, depending on clinical necessity. Acute and chronic disease states, as well as the constantly changing maturational process, produce unique challenges at every level of pediatrics in dosing and management of all medications, especially with regard to high-risk opioids. Although there has been significant progress in the understanding of opioid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in neonates, infants, children, and adolescents, somewhat limited data exist from which necessary information, concerning the safe and effective use of these agents, may be drawn. The evidence here provided is intended to be helpful in directing the practitioner to patient-specific reasons for preferring one opioid over another. As our knowledge of opioids and their effects has grown, it has become clear that older medications like codeine and meperidine (pethidine) have very limited use in pediatrics. This review provides pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evidence on the currently available opioids: morphine, fentanyl (and derivatives), codeine, meperidine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, methadone, buprenorphine, butorphanol, nalbuphine, pentazocin, ketobemidone, tramadol, piritramide, naloxone and naltrexone. Morphine, being the most studied opioid analgesic, is the standard against which all others are compared. Pharmacokinetic parameters of morphine that have been found in neonates, i.e., higher volume of distribution, immature metabolic processes that develop at various rates, elimination that is variable based on age and weight, as well as treated and untreated disease processes, are an example of all opioids in the population discussed in this review. Outside the premature and neonatal population, the use of opioids in infants, children, and adolescents quickly begins to resemble the established values found in adults. As such, the concerns (risks) of these medications become comparable to those seen in adults.

Intraoperative Methadone in Same-Day Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Dose-Finding Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50 million US patients undergo ambulatory surgery annually. Postoperative opioid overprescribing is problematic, yet many patients report inadequate pain relief. In major inpatient surgery, intraoperative single-dose methadone produces better analgesia and reduces opioid use compared with conventional repeated dosing of short-duration opioids. This investigation tested the hypothesis that in same-day ambulatory surgery, intraoperative methadone, compared with short-duration opioids, reduces opioid consumption and pain, and determined an effective intraoperative induction dose of methadone for same-day ambulatory surgery.

METHODS

A double-blind, dose-escalation protocol randomized 60 patients (2:1) to intraoperative single-dose intravenous methadone (initially 0.1 then 0.15 mg/kg ideal body weight) or conventional as-needed dosing of short-duration opioids (eg, fentanyl, hydromorphone; controls). Intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, pain, and opioid side effects were assessed before discharge. Patient home diaries recorded pain, opioid use, and opioid side effects daily for 30 days postoperatively. Primary outcome was in-hospital (intraoperative and postoperative) opioid use. Secondary outcomes were 30 days opioid consumption, pain intensity, and opioid side effects.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) methadone doses were 6 (5-6) and 9 (8-9) mg in the 0.1 and 0.15 mg/kg methadone groups, respectively. Total opioid consumption (morphine equivalents) in the postanesthesia care unit was significantly less compared with controls (9.3 mg, 1.3-11.0) in subjects receiving 0.15 mg/kg methadone (0.1 mg, 0.1-3.3; P < .001) but not 0.1 mg/kg methadone (5.0 mg, 3.3-8.1; P = .60). Dose-escalation ended at 0.15 mg/kg methadone. Total in-hospital nonmethadone opioid use after short-duration opioid, 0.1 mg/kg methadone, and 0.15 mg/kg methadone was 35.3 (25.0-44.0), 7.1 (3.7-10.0), and 3.3 (0.1-5.8) mg morphine equivalents, respectively (P < .001 for both versus control). In-hospital pain scores and side effects were not different between groups. In the 30 days after discharge, patients who received methadone 0.15 mg/kg had less pain at rest (P = .02) and used fewer opioid pills than controls (P < .0001), whereas patients who received 0.1 mg/kg had no difference in pain at rest (P = .69) and opioid use compared to controls (P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

In same-day discharge surgery, this pilot study identified a single intraoperative dose of methadone (0.15 mg/kg ideal body weight), which decreased intraoperative and postoperative opioid requirements and postoperative pain, compared with conventional intermittent short-duration opioids, with similar side effects.

A Sensitive LC-MS/MS Assay for the Quantification of Methadone and its Metabolites in Dried Blood Spots: Comparison With Plasma

INTRODUCTION

Methadone, a synthetic narcotic, is widely used both in adults and children for pain control and as a replacement drug in opioid use disorder to prevent craving and withdrawal. To support clinical pharmacokinetic trials in neonates, infants, and children, the authors developed and validated a novel, automated, highly sensitive liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry ionization (LC-ESI-MS/MS) method for the quantification of methadone and its metabolites, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) and 2-ethyl-5-methyl-3,3-diphenylpyraline (EMDP), in samples collected as dried blood spots.

METHODS

Blood was spiked with different concentrations of methadone, EDDP, and EMDP, and blood drops were applied to filter paper cards. Punches of 6.4 mm were removed from the cards, and 600 µL of protein precipitation solution (methanol/0.2M ZnSO4, 7:3, vol/vol) containing the internal standards (methadone-d9 and EDDP-d5) at a concentration of 1 mcg/L was added. The extracts were analyzed using LC-ESI-MS/MS in combination with online extraction. The mass spectrometer was run in the positive multiple reaction monitoring mode, and the total run time was 3.2 minutes.

RESULTS

For the dried blood spots, the assay has a lower limit of quantification of 0.1 mcg/L for methadone, EDDP, and EMDP. The range of reliable response for methadone for the ion transition m/z = 310.2→265.1 was 0.1-100 mcg/L and for the ion transition m/z = 310.2→223.1 5-1000 mcg/L. For EDDP, on the range of reliable response for the ion transition, m/z = 278.2→234.3 was 0.1-100 mcg/L and for the ion transition m/z = 278.2→186.1 5-1000 mcg/L. The calibration range for EMDP was 0.1-100 mcg/L. Accuracy (85%-115%) and imprecision (<15%) met predefined acceptance criteria.

DISCUSSION

This assay allows for the measurement of small volume blood samples without the need for an intravenous blood draw, and thus, it is suitable for pharmacokinetics studies and therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric patients.

The Society for Pediatric Anesthesia recommendations for the use of opioids in children during the perioperative period

Opioids have long held a prominent role in the management of perioperative pain in adults and children. Published reports concerning the appropriate, and inappropriate, use of these medications in pediatric patients have appeared in various publications over the last 50 years. For this document, the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia appointed a taskforce to evaluate the available literature and formulate recommendations with respect to the most salient aspects of perioperative opioid administration in children. The recommendations are graded based on the strength of the available evidence, with consensus of the experts applied for those issues where evidence is not available. The goal of the recommendations was to address the most important issues concerning opioid administration to children after surgery, including appropriate assessment of pain, monitoring of patients on opioid therapy, opioid dosing considerations, side effects of opioid treatment, strategies for opioid delivery, and assessment of analgesic efficacy. Regular updates are planned with a re-release of guidelines every 2 years.

Methadone for Analgesia in Children with Life-Limiting Illness: Experience from a Tertiary Children's Health Service

Methadone has the potential to assist in the management of pain in children with life-limiting illness, but its use is limited by its complex pharmacokinetic profile and limited research on its use in children. This is a retrospective review of the use of methadone as an analgesic in 16 children with life-limiting illness. Efficacy, dosing and side effect profile were analysed. Fifteen (94%) patients had improvements in their analgesia with minimal observed adverse effects. Patients were either rapidly converted from a prior opioid in one change or received methadone as an adjunct medication. Conversions were calculated using ratios frequently in the range of 10:1 to 20:1 from the oral morphine equivalent total daily dose (MEDD). Adjunct initial dosing was a low dose trial, often beginning with 1 mg at night. Only two patients required a dose adjustment due to side effects attributed to methadone. This was despite the cohort having significant underlying illnesses, extensive concurrent medications, and high methadone dosing where needed. Analysis of dosing and ratios indicates that an individualised approach is required. Based on this and on the infrequency of methadone use in this population, specialist assistance with dosing is recommended. Further research, including prospective and pharmacokinetic studies, is recommended.

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Intraoperative Methadone in Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery

Background

Patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery often experience severe pain during the first three postoperative days. The aim of this parallel-group randomized trial was to assess the effect of the long-duration opioid methadone on postoperative analgesic requirements, pain scores, and patient satisfaction after complex spine surgery.

Methods

One hundred twenty patients were randomized to receive either methadone 0.2 mg/kg at the start of surgery or hydromorphone 2 mg at surgical closure. Anesthetic care was standardized, and clinicians were blinded to group assignment. The primary outcome was intravenous hydromorphone consumption on postoperative day 1. Pain scores and satisfaction with pain management were measured at postanesthesia care unit admission, 1 and 2 h postadmission, and on the mornings and afternoons of postoperative days 1 to 3.

Results

One hundred fifteen patients were included in the analysis. Median hydromorphone use was reduced in the methadone group not only on postoperative day 1 (4.56 vs. 9.90 mg) but also on postoperative days 2 (0.60 vs. 3.15 mg) and 3 (0 vs. 0.4 mg; all P&lt; 0.001). Pain scores at rest, with movement, and with coughing were less in the methadone group at 21 of 27 assessments (all P = 0.001 to &lt; 0.0001). Overall satisfaction with pain management was higher in the methadone group than in the hydromorphone group until the morning of postoperative day 3 (all P = 0.001 to &lt; 0.0001).

Conclusions

Intraoperative methadone administration reduced postoperative opioid requirements, decreased pain scores, and improved patient satisfaction with pain management.

Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects of methadone in children and adults with sickle cell disease

BACKGROUND

Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) are a significant source of morbidity among children and adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). There is little information on methadone use for SCD pain. This investigation evaluated methadone pharmacokinetics in children and adults with SCD, with a secondary aim to assess pain relief and opioid consumption.

PROCEDURE

Participants included children (<18 years) and adults with a VOE requiring hospitalization. Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard care (opioid patient-controlled analgesia; control group) or one dose of intravenous methadone (0.1-0.125 mg/kg) in addition to standard care (methadone group). Venous methadone and metabolite concentrations were measured. Pain scores, pain relief scores, and opioid consumption were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-four children (12 methadone, 12 controls) and 23 adults (11 methadone, 12 controls) were studied. In children, the half-life of R- and S-methadone enantiomers was 34 ± 16 and 24 ± 9 hr, respectively. In adults, R- and S-methadone half-lives were 52 ± 17 and 38 ± 12 hr, respectively. Pain scores were lower (P = 0.002) and pain relief scores were higher (P = 0.0396) in children receiving methadone versus controls. There was no difference in pain scores and pain relief in adults receiving methadone versus controls. There was no difference in opioid consumption between methadone and control groups, in both adults and children.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous methadone disposition in children and adults with SCD was comparable to that in subjects without SCD from prior studies. Methadone produced more pain relief than standard care in children with SCD. Higher methadone doses may be more effective and should be evaluated in both children and adults with SCD.

The hematological effects of nitrous oxide anesthesia in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Prolonged administration of nitrous oxide causes an increase in plasma homocysteine in children via vitamin B12 inactivation. However, it is unclear whether nitrous oxide doses used in clinical practice cause adverse hematological effects in pediatric patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 54 pediatric patients undergoing elective spinal surgery: 41 received nitrous oxide throughout anesthesia (maintenance group), 9 received nitrous oxide for induction and/or emergence (induction/emergence group), and 4 did not receive nitrous oxide (nitrous oxide-free group). Complete blood counts obtained before and up to 4 days after surgery were assessed for anemia, macrocytosis/microcytosis, anisocytosis, hyperchromatosis/hypochromatosis, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. The change (Δ) from preoperative to the highest postoperative value was calculated for mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and red cell distribution width (RDW).

RESULTS

No pancytopenia was present in any patient after surgery. All patients had postoperative anemia, and none had macrocytosis. Postoperative MCV (mean [99% confidence interval]) peaked at 86 fL (85-88 fL), 85 fL (81-89 fL), and 88 fL (80-96 fL) and postoperative RDW at 13.2% (12.8-13.5%), 13.3% (12.7-13.8%), and 13.0% (11.4-14.6%) for the maintenance group, the induction/emergence group, and the nitrous oxide-free group. Two patients in the maintenance group (5%) developed anisocytosis (RDW >14.6%), but none in the induction/emergence group or in the nitrous oxide-free group (P = 0.43). Both ΔMCV (P = 0.52) and ΔRDW (P = 0.16) were similar across all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Nitrous oxide exposure for up to 8 hours is not associated with megaloblastic anemia in pediatric patients undergoing major spinal surgery.

Intraoperative Methadone for the Prevention of Postoperative Pain

Background:

The intensity of pain after cardiac surgery is often underestimated, and inadequate pain control may be associated with poorer quality of recovery. The aim of this investigation was to examine the effect of intraoperative methadone on postoperative analgesic requirements, pain scores, patient satisfaction, and clinical recovery.

Methods:

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 156) were randomized to receive methadone (0.3 mg/kg) or fentanyl (12 μg/kg) intraoperatively. Postoperative analgesic requirements were recorded. Patients were assessed for pain at rest and with coughing 15 min and 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after tracheal extubation. Patients were also evaluated for level of sedation, nausea, vomiting, itching, hypoventilation, and hypoxia at these times.

Results:

Postoperative morphine requirements during the first 24 h were reduced from a median of 10 mg in the fentanyl group to 6 mg in the methadone group (median difference [99% CI], −4 [−8 to −2] mg; P &lt; 0.001). Reductions in pain scores with coughing were observed during the first 24 h after extubation; the level of pain with coughing at 12 h was reduced from a median of 6 in the fentanyl group to 4 in the methadone group (−2 [−3 to −1]; P &lt; 0.001). Improvements in patient-perceived quality of pain management were described in the methadone group. The incidence of opioid-related adverse events was not increased in patients administered methadone.

Conclusions:

Intraoperative methadone administration resulted in reduced postoperative morphine requirements, improved pain scores, and enhanced patient-perceived quality of pain management.

Immediate rescue designs in pediatric analgesic trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Designing analgesic clinical trials in pediatrics requires a balance between scientific, ethical, and practical concerns. A previous consensus group recommended immediate rescue designs using opioid sparing as a surrogate measure of analgesic efficacy. The authors summarize the performance of rescue analgesic designs in pediatric trials of four commonly used classes of analgesics: opioids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and local anesthetics.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and Web of science were searched in April 2013. The 85 studies selected were randomized or controlled clinical trials using immediate rescue paradigms in postoperative pain settings. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize predefined outcomes using Hedges' g. Difference between the means of the treatment arms were also expressed as a percentage of the corresponding value in the placebo group (placebo-treatment/placebo). Distributions of pain scores in study and control groups and relationships between opioid sparing and pain scores were examined.

RESULTS

For each of the four study drug classes, significant opioid sparing was demonstrated in a majority of studies by one or more of the following endpoints: (1) total dose (milligram per kilogram per hour), (2) percentage of children requiring rescue medication, and (3) time to first rescue medication (minutes). Pain scores averaged 2.4/10 in study groups, 3.4/10 in control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid sparing is a feasible pragmatic endpoint for pediatric pain analgesic trials. This review serves to guide future research in pediatric analgesia trials, which could test whether some specific design features may improve assay sensitivity while minimizing the risk of unrelieved pain.

The pharmacokinetics of methadone and its metabolites in neonates, infants, and children

BACKGROUND

The lack of methadone pharmacokinetic data in children and neonates restrains dosing to achieve the target concentration in these populations. A minimum effective analgesic concentration of methadone in opioid naïve adults is 0.058 mg·l(-1) , while no withdrawal symptoms were observed in neonates suffering opioid withdrawal if plasma concentrations of methadone were above 0.06 mg·l(-1) . The racemate of methadone which is commonly used in pediatric and anesthetic care is metabolized to 2-ethylidine-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) and 2-ethyl-5-methyl-3,3-diphenylpyrroline (EMDP).

METHODS

Data from four studies (age 33-week PMA-15 years) were pooled (n = 56) for compartment analysis using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Parameter estimates were standardized to a 70-kg person using an allometric model approach. Investigation was made of the racemate and metabolite (EDDP and EMDP) dispositions. In addition, neonatal data (n = 7) allowed further study of R- and S-enantiomer pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

A three-compartment linear disposition model best described the observed time-concentration profiles with additional compartments for metabolites. Population parameter estimates (between-subject variability) were central volume (V1) 21.5 (29%) l.70 kg(-1) , peripheral volumes of distribution V2 75.1 (23%) l.70 kg(-1) and V3 484 (8%) l.70 kg(-1) , clearance (CL) 9.45 (11%) l·h(-1) .70 kg(-1) , and intercompartment clearances Q2 325 (21%) l·h(-1) .70 kg(-1) and Q3 136 (14%) l·h(-1) .70 kg(-1) . EDDP formation clearance was 9.1 (11%) l·h(-1) .70 kg(-1) , formation clearance of EMDP from EDDP 7.4 (63%) l·h(-1) .70 kg(-1) , elimination clearance of EDDP was 40.9 (26%) l·h(-1) .70 kg(-1) and the rate constant for intermediate compartments 2.17 (43%) h(-1) .

CONCLUSIONS

Current pharmacokinetic parameter estimates in children and neonates are similar to those reported in adults. There was no clearance maturation with age. Neonatal enantiomer clearances were similar to those described in adults. A regimen of 0.2 mg·kg(-1) per 8 h in neonates achieves a target concentration of 0.06 mg·l(-1) within 36 h. Infusion, rather than intermittent dosing, should be considered if this target is to be achieved in older children after cardiac surgery.

Methadone N-demethylation by the common CYP2B6 allelic variant CYP2B6.6

The long-acting opioid methadone displays considerable unexplained interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Methadone metabolism clinically occurs primarily by N-demethylation to 2-ethyl-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP), catalyzed predominantly by CYP2B6. Retrospective studies suggest that the common allele variant CYP2B6*6 may influence methadone plasma concentrations. The catalytic activity of CYP2B6.6, encoded by CYP2B6*6, is highly substrate-dependent. This investigation compared methadone N-demethylation by CYP2B6.6 with that by wild-type CYP2B6.1. Methadone enantiomer and racemate N-demethylation by recombinant-expressed CYP2B6.6 and CYP2B6.1 was determined. At substrate concentrations (0.25-2 µM) approximating plasma concentrations occurring clinically, rates of methadone enantiomer N-demethylation by CYP2B6.6, incubated individually or as the racemate, were one-third to one-fourth those by CYP2B6.1. For methadone individual enantiomers and metabolism by CYP2B6.6 compared with CYP2B6.1, Vmax was diminished, Ks was greater and the in vitro intrinsic clearance was diminished 5- to 6-fold. The intrinsic clearance for R- and S-EDDP formation from racemic methadone was diminished approximately 6-fold and 3-fold for R- and S-methadone, respectively. Both CYP2B6.6 and CYP2B6.1 showed similar stereoselectivity (S>R-methadone). Human liver microsomes with diminished CYP2B6 content due to a CYP2B6*6 allele had lower rates of methadone N-demethylation. Results show that methadone N-demethylation catalyzed by CYP2B6.6, the CYP2B6 variant encoded by the CYP2B6*6 polymorphism, is catalytically deficient compared with wild-type CYP2B6.1. Diminished methadone N-demethylation by CYP2B6.6 may provide a mechanistic explanation for clinical observations of altered methadone disposition in individuals carrying the CYP2B6*6 polymorphism.

The pharmacokinetics of methadone in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion

BACKGROUND

The optimal methadone dosing regimen for children undergoing spinal surgery is uncertain because of sparse pediatric pharmacokinetic data and a paucity of analgesic effect data. The minimum effective analgesic concentration of methadone in opioid naïve adults is 58 mcg · L(-1).

METHODS

Adolescents aged 12-19 years undergoing idiopathic scoliosis correction were administered 0.25 mg · kg(-1) racemic methadone IV prior to surgical incision. Arterial blood samples for methadone assay were obtained at 0 min, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 20 min, 40 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h. Compartment analysis was undertaken using nonlinear mixed effects models. Parameter estimates were standardized to a 70-kg person using allometric models.

RESULTS

A three-compartment linear disposition model best described observed time-concentration profiles. Population parameter estimates (between-subjects variability) were central volume (V1) 19.1 (126%) L 70 kg(-1), peripheral volumes of distribution V2 65.5 (60%) L 70 kg(-1), V3 485 (23%) L 70 kg(-1), clearance (CL) 9.3 (11%) L · h(-1) · 70 kg(-1), and inter-compartment clearances Q2 282 (95%) L · h(-1) 70 kg(-1), Q3 139 (42%) L · h(-1) 70 kg(-1). The terminal elimination half-life was 44.4 h. The mean observed methadone concentration was <58 mcg · L(-1) by the first hour after administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Current pharmacokinetic parameter estimates in adolescents are similar to those reported in adults. Methadone undergoes rapid redistribution after bolus administration. This may result in plasma concentrations that provide inadequate analgesia postoperatively. We would suggest following the bolus (0.25 mg.kg(-1)) with an infusion (0.1-0.15 mg · kg(-1) · h(-1) for 4 h) during spinal surgery to ensure adequate plasma concentrations for 24 h.